Bright Scholar Education Holdings Ltd [BEDU] Filings

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

OR

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

OR

☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-38077

Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

No. 1, Country Garden Road
Beijiao Town, Shunde District, Foshan, Guangdong 528300
The People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Mr. Ruolei Niu, Chief Financial Officer
Suites 6-7 The Turvill Building Old Swiss, 149 Cherry Hinton Road

Cambridge, England, CB1 7BX, United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 12-2334-1303

E-mail: robertniu@brightscholar.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered, pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None

(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒ No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

†The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Except where the context otherwise requires and for purposes of this annual report on Form 20-F only:

Effective on August 19, 2022, we changed the ratio of the ADSs to Class A ordinary shares from the then ADS ratio of one ADS to one Class A ordinary share to a new ADS ratio of one ADS representing four Class A ordinary shares.

Names of certain companies provided in this annual report are translated or transliterated from their original Chinese legal names.

Discrepancies in any table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated financial statements for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.

This annual report contains translations of certain Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates. Unless otherwise stated, the translation of Renminbi into U.S. dollars has been made at RMB7.2582 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate in effect on August 31, 2023 as set forth in the H.10 Statistical Release of the Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. The PRC government imposes controls over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign trade. On December 22, 2023, the noon buying rate was RMB7.1315 to US$1.00.

Bright Scholar Holdings, our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company, does not have any substantive operations other than indirectly controlling the VIEs, which controls and holds our domestic kindergartens and complementary services, through certain contractual arrangements, and indirectly holding Bright Scholar (UK) Holdings Limited, through which we operate our overseas schools. Investors in the ADSs are purchasing equity securities of our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company rather than purchasing equity securities of the VIEs. We conduct our business operations through both our consolidated subsidiaries and the VIEs based on certain contractual arrangements. We, together with the VIEs, are subject to PRC laws relating to, among others, restrictions over foreign investments in education services set out in the Negative List (2021 Version) promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), and the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”). Our VIE structure is used to replicate foreign investment in China-based companies and provide investors with exposure to foreign investment in China-based companies where the PRC law prohibits direct foreign investment in the operating companies. Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any share in the VIEs, and investors may never hold equity interests in the Chinese operating companies. Instead, as a result of our direct ownership in Zhuhai Bright Scholar and the contractual agreements with the VIEs, we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. Because of our corporate structure, we are subject to risks due to uncertainty of the interpretation and the application of the PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to limitation on control of domestic kindergarten and complementary services through variable interest vehicle, and foreign ownership of internet technology companies, and regulatory review of oversea listing of PRC companies through a special purpose vehicle, and the validity and enforcement of the contractual agreements. We are also subject to the risks of uncertainty about any future actions of the PRC government in this regard. Our contractual agreements may not be effective in providing control over the VIEs. We may also subject to sanctions imposed by PRC regulatory agencies including Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission if we fail to comply with their rules and regulations. Investors in the ADSs are not purchasing equity securities of the VIEs, but instead, are purchasing equity securities of our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company. Because of our corporate structure, we are subject to risks due to uncertainty of the interpretation and the application of the PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to limitation on foreign ownership of private education entities, and regulatory review of oversea listing and offering of securities of PRC companies through a special purpose vehicle, and the validity and enforcement of the contractual agreements. We are also subject to the risks of uncertainty about any future actions of the PRC government in this regard. Our contractual agreements may not be effective in providing control over the VIEs. We may also subject to sanctions imposed by PRC regulatory agencies including Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission if we fail to comply with their rules and regulations.

We and the VIEs face various legal and operational risks and uncertainties related to being based in and having significant operations in China. The PRC government has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of a China-based company, such as us and the VIEs, to conduct its business, accept foreign investments or list on U.S. or other foreign exchanges. For example, we and the VIEs face risks associated with regulatory approvals of offshore offerings, oversight on cybersecurity and data privacy, as well as the uncertainty of PCAOB inspection on our auditors. Such risks could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the ADSs or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer ADSs and/or other securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. The PRC government also has significant discretion over the conduct of the business of us and the VIEs and may intervene with or influence our operations or the development of the private education industry as it deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals. Furthermore, the PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over overseas securities offerings and foreign investment in China-based companies like us. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or in extreme cases, become worthless. For further details, see “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

We are subject to a number of prohibitions, restrictions and potential delisting risk under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (the “HFCAA”). Pursuant to the HFCAA and related regulations, if we have filed an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) has determined that it is unable to inspect and investigate completely, the SEC will identify us as a “Commission-identified Issuer,” and the trading of our securities on any U.S. national securities exchange, as well as any over-the-counter trading in the United States, will be prohibited if we are identified as a Commission-identified Issuer for two consecutive years. In August 2022, the PCAOB, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC signed a Statement of Protocol (the “Statement of Protocol”), which establishes a specific and accountable framework for the PCAOB to conduct inspections and investigations of PCAOB-governed accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate PCAOB registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong completely in 2022. The PCAOB Board vacated its previous 2021 determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to be able to satisfactorily conduct inspections of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainties and depends on a number of factors out of our and our auditor’s control. The PCAOB continues to demand complete access in mainland China and Hong Kong moving forward and is making plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and beyond, as well as to continue pursuing ongoing investigations and initiate new investigations as needed. The PCAOB has also indicated that it will act immediately to consider the need to issue new determinations with the HFCAA if needed. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect and investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in China and we fail to retain another registered public accounting firm that the PCAOB is able to inspect and investigate completely in 2023 and beyond, or if we otherwise fail to meet the PCAOB’s requirements, the ADSs will be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, and our shares and ADSs will not be permitted for trading over the counter in the United States under the HFCAA and related regulations. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Our ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the over-the-counter market under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in China for two consecutive years. The delisting of the ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.”

We listed the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BEDU” on May 18, 2017 and completed an initial public offering of 17,250,000 ADSs on June 7, 2017. We issued an additional 10,000,000 ADSs on March 2, 2018. In July 2019, we issued senior notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$300.0 million, with interests of 7.45% per annum and maturing on July 31, 2022, and listed such senior notes on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. As of the date of this annual report, we have redeemed all outstanding senior notes matured on July 31, 2022. Upon the completion of such redemption, all senior notes have been cancelled and delisted from the official list of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.

Permissions and Licenses Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations and Overseas Securities Offerings

The operations of the businesses that we own and operate in China are subject to PRC laws and regulations. The laws and regulations governing the private education industry in China are relatively new and quickly evolving, hence bringing uncertainties to their interpretation and enforcement. For example, our operations in China are subject to regulatory approvals and permit requirements, oversight on cybersecurity and data privacy, and anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition laws, with respect to which the applicable laws and regulations have evolved substantially in recent years. For details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations” in this annual report.

We, through our WFOE and the affiliated entities, conduct certain of our operations in China. We and the affiliated entities are required to obtain certain licenses, permits from or filing with relevant governmental authorities in China in order to operate our business and conduct overseas securities offerings and listings.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress amended the Law on the Promotion of Private Education on November 7, 2016, which became effective on September 1, 2017 and were further amended on December 29, 2018 (the “Amended Law”). According to the Amended Law, which became effective on September 1, 2017, private schools for after-school tutoring can be established as for-profit private schools at the election of the school sponsors. The Amended Law also deleted the provision stipulating that measures for administration of profit-making non-state training institutions registered with the administrative department for industry and commerce shall be separately formulated by the State Council. According to the Rules for the Implementation of Supervision and Management of For-profit Private Schools, jointly issued by the PRC Ministry of Education (the “MOE”), the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, and came into force on December 30, 2016, for-profit private tutoring institutions shall be in compliance with the regulations applicable to private schools. On February 13, 2018, the General Offices of the MOE and three other ministries in China jointly issued the Notice to Launch Special Campaign towards After-school Tutoring Institutions on Practically Reducing Burdens for Primary and Middle School Students, which requires after-school tutoring institutions with satisfactory conditions to obtain school operation licenses and other permits. Further, on August 22, 2018, the State Council issued the Opinion on Supervising After-School Tutoring Institutions (the “Circular 80”), which provides detailed guidance for these after-school tutoring institutions. Pursuant to the Alleviating Burden Opinion, which was promulgated on July 24, 2021 and the Circular 80, institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in relation to the compulsory education are required to be registered as non-profit organization and institutions providing after-school tutoring services shall obtain the private school operating permit. Council Circular 80 and the Implementation Rules further require the learning centers of a training school providing after-school tutoring services to make filings with the relevant education authorities. On September 7, 2021, to implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion, the MOE published on its website that the MOE, together with two other government authorities, issued a circular requiring all institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in relation to the compulsory education to complete registration as non-profit by the end of 2021, and all those institutions shall, before completing such registration, suspend enrollment of students and charging fees. For the non-academic tutoring services, the Alleviating Burden Opinion requires that local governmental authorities shall administer the non-academic after-school tutoring institutions by classifying sports, culture and art, science and technology and other non-academic subjects, formulating standards among different classification of non-academic tutoring and conducting strict examination before granting permission.

Therefore, we expect that the Amended Law, accompanied with its relevant implementation rules and regulations as well as other administrative actions, will bring significant changes to our compliance environment. A certain number of our entities, through which we operate our existing learning centers, may be required to obtain new licenses and permits or update their existing ones.

As of the date of this annual report, all of our learning centers in China currently in operation need to obtain and update their operating permits, business licenses required by the regulatory changes discussed above. If we fail to obtain and update such permits or licenses in any event as required by relevant laws or regulations, we may be subject to fines, confiscation of profits derived from non-compliant operations or suspension of admitting students, and we may be unable to continue the operations or suspension of admitting students, at our non-complying learning centers, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business—Our learning centers may not be able to obtain or update the required educational permits and business licenses, which may subject us to fines and other penalties, including the suspension of operations in noncompliant learning centers and confiscation of profits derived from non-compliant operations.”

On December 28, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China (the “CAC”) and other twelve PRC regulatory authorities jointly revised and promulgated the Measures for Cybersecurity Review (the “Cybersecurity Review Measures”), which became effective on February 15, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any notice that we are a critical information infrastructure operator from any government authority, nor have we received any request from the CAC, to undergo a cybersecurity review pursuant to any PRC laws or regulations. Moreover, none of us, our subsidiaries or the affiliated entities have received any notice from any PRC authority requiring us to obtain any permissions, in each case in connection with our previous issuance of securities to foreign investors.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC, as approved by the State Council, released the Trial Measures for Administration of Overseas Securities Offerings and Listings by Domestic Enterprises and five interpretive guidelines (collectively, the “CSRC Filing Rules”), which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Under the CSRC Filing Rules, a filing-based regulatory system shall be applied to “indirect overseas offerings and listings” of PRC domestic enterprises, which refers to securities offerings and listings in an overseas market made under the name of an offshore entity but based on the underlying equity, assets, earnings or other similar rights of a domestic enterprise that operates its main business domestically. The CSRC Filing Rules state that, any post-listing follow-on offering by an issuer in the same overseas market where it has previously offered and listed securities, including issuance of shares, convertible notes and other similar securities, shall be subject to filing requirement within three business days after the completion of the offering, and if the subsequent offering is conducted in other overseas markets, it shall be filed with the CSRC within three working days after the applications for such offerings are submitted. Therefore, any of our future offering and listing of our securities in an overseas market shall be subject to the filing requirements under the CSRC Filing Rules. In addition, as advised by our PRC legal counsel, we are required to submit a report to CSRC after the occurrence and public disclosure of the following material events: (1) change of control; (2) investigations or sanctions imposed by overseas securities regulatory agencies or other relevant competent authorities; (3) change of listing status or transfer of listing segment and (4) voluntary or mandatory delisting. If we fail to complete the filing or reporting procedures, under the CSRC Filing Rules or otherwise, for any future overseas securities offering or listing, we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities, which may include orders for correction, warnings and fines. Any adverse regulatory actions or sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The filing with and reporting to the CSRC will be required in connection with our capital raising activities and occurrences of other specific events, and we cannot assure you that we or the affiliated entities will be able to make such filing or reporting in a timely manner or at all, in which case we may face regulatory sanctions for failure to make such filing or reporting.”

Cash Flows Through Our Organization

We are a holding company with no business operations of our own. We conduct certain of our operations through our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs in China. As a result, our ability to pay dividends and to service any debt we may incur and pay our operating expenses may depend on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries.

Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, our PRC subsidiaries are required to allocate at least 10% of their accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund statutory reserves of up to 50% of the registered capital of the enterprise. Statutory reserves are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation.

If we intend to distribute dividends, we will transfer the dividends to Time Education China Holdings Limited, or Time Education, our Hong Kong subsidiary, in accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, and then Time Education will transfer the dividends to Impetus Investment Limited, our Cayman Islands subsidiary, and further to Bright Scholar Holdings, the Cayman Islands holding company, and the dividends will be distributed from the Bright Scholar Holdings to all shareholders respectively in proportion to the shares they hold, regardless of whether the shareholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions. For the fiscal years of 2021, 2022 and 2023, no dividends were declared and paid by our PRC subsidiaries to our Cayman holding company or Cayman subsidiaries.

For the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings provided interest-free loans of nil, nil and RMB82.9 million (US$11.4 million) to Bright Scholar Holdings, respectively. For the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings borrowed loans of RMB49.6 million, nil and RMB375.9 million (US$51.8 million) from Bright Scholar Holdings, respectively.

For the 2020 fiscal year, the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings borrowed interest-free loans of RMB278.3 million from the VIEs. The VIEs repaid RMB447.6 million to the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings in the 2021 fiscal year. The VIEs borrowed interest free loans of RMB50.6 million (US$7.0 million) from the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings in the 2023 fiscal year. For the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings provided interest-free loans of RMB107.5 million, 79.2 million and RMB8.6 million (US$1.2 million) to the VIEs, respectively. For the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, no assets other than the above cash transactions were transferred between the subsidiaries of Bright Scholar Holdings and the VIEs.

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

Market data and certain industry forecasts used in this annual report were obtained from internal surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Industry publications generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Similarly, internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, while believed to be reliable, have not been independently verified, and we make no representation as to the accuracy of such information.

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. [Reserved]

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

An investment in the ADSs involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report, before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The market or trading price of the ADSs could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In addition, the risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Please note that additional risks not presently known to us, that we currently deem immaterial or that we have not anticipated may also impair our business and operations.

Risk Factor Summary

Risks Related to Our Business

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares and ADSs

Risks Related to Our Business

Our compliance with the Implementation Rules has materially and adversely affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect in the future, and we have been subject to significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private for-profit education business and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress amended the Law on the Promotion of Private Education on November 7, 2016, which became effective on September 1, 2017 and were further amended on December 29, 2018 (the “Amended Law”). Pursuant to the Amended Law, sponsors of private schools may choose to establish schools in China either as non-profit or for-profit schools. Sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and the operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. On the other hand, sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenue must be used for the operation of the schools. As a holding company, our ability to generate profits, pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders under the existing and the Amended Law is affected by many factors, including but not limited to the characterizations of our schools as for-profit or non-profit schools, the profitability of our schools and other affiliated entities, and our ability to receive dividends and other distributions from our PRC subsidiaries. If our schools are unable to be registered as for-profit private education entities, the approval of which is subject to the discretion of government authorities, our contractual arrangements with such schools may be subject to more stringent scrutiny. Furthermore, pursuant to the Amended Law, sponsors are not permitted to establish for-profit schools if such schools provide compulsory education (including primary school education of six years and middle school education of three years) services, which cover grades one to nine. Nevertheless, prior to the deconsolidation of BGY Education Investment, income from compulsory education services accounted for a significant portion of revenue. For further details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview— Regulations—Regulations on Private Education in the PRC—The Law for Promoting Private Education and the Implementation Rules.”

On May 14, 2021, the PRC State Council announced the Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Implementation Rules, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education, (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of merger, acquisition, contractual arrangements, etc., and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party.

The Implementation Rules have significantly impacted our business operations and our results of operations. After consultation with its PRC legal counsel and external advisors, we reached the conclusion that, as a result of the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have lost control over the Affected Entities, which primarily include our private schools providing compulsory education, not-for-profit kindergartens and other enterprises within China that are affected by the Implementation Rules. We have determined that, in substance, we ceased to recognize revenues for all activities related to the Affected Entities with compulsory education and discontinued all business activities with such entities, by August 31, 2021 while continuing to provide essential services to keep these schools open. As of the date of this annual report, the related staff had transferred out from the services center in our headquarters. As a result, our ability to engage in the private not-for-profit education in China has been materially and adversely affected, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to restore such ability, which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. 

We may not be able to execute our growth strategies or continue to grow as rapidly as we have in the past several years.

As of the date of this annual report, the domestic school network under our continuing operations in China includes nine kindergartens in China, all of which are registered as for-profit kindergartens. The discontinuation has caused our domestic school network to shrink drastically due to the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively expand our domestic school network, which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. For our continuing operations, we intend to enroll students, recruit teachers and educational staff, increase the utilization rates of our existing and new schools and invest in overseas and complementary businesses. However, we may not be able to continue to grow as rapidly as we did previously due to uncertainties involved in the process, for example:

These risks may increase significantly when we expand into new cities or countries. Managing the growth of a geographically diverse business also involves significant risks and challenges. We may find it difficult to manage financial resources, implement uniform education standards and operational policies and maintain our operational, management and technology systems across our network. If we are unable to manage our expanding operations or successfully achieve future growth, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to achieve profitability in the future.

We may not be able to achieve profitability. In particular, some of our schools, especially those at the ramp-up stage and with comparatively low utilization rates, are currently operating at loss and we may not be able to achieve profitability for these schools. Newly launched schools may negatively impact our overall financial condition.

Our ability to achieve profitability and maintain positive cash flow will depend in large part on our ability to control our costs and expenses, which are expected to increase as we further develop and expand our business network, as well as our ability to attract and retain educational talents to promote our business success. We may incur significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the other risks described in this annual report. We may also further encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. If we fail to increase revenue at the rate we anticipate or if our costs and expenses increase at a faster rate than the increase in our revenue, we may not be able to achieve profitability.

Our corporate structure is built upon a series of contractual arrangements which has caused us to lose control of the Affected Entities.

On August 17, 2020, the MOE, and other four ministries and commissions promulgated the Opinions on Further Standardization of Education Fee, which further strengthens the regulation of private education fees. The Opinions on Further Standardization of Education Fee stipulates that private schools must publicize the itemized fees and standards at a prominent location in the school and indicate the itemized fees and standards in the admissions brochure and admission notice. If fees that should be publicized are not publicized, or the content of the publicity is not in compliance with the relevant policies, students are entitled to refuse the payment of the fees. In addition, the Opinions on Further Standardization of Education Fee emphasizes that sponsors of non-profit schools shall not transfer proceeds generated from operating such schools by way of related party transactions that fail to meet the requirements of being open, fair or just, and other service fees charged to our students must be charged based on a reasonable basis and voluntary and non-profit principles. If the regulatory authority deems otherwise, our operations may be adversely affected.

On September 7, 2020, the MOE published the draft Pre-school Education Law for public comments which was then submitted for review to the State Council on April 12, 2021 (the “First Draft of PEL”). The draft Preschool Education Law, among other things, tightens restrictions over kindergartens in pursuing profits and prohibits social capital from controlling state-run kindergartens and non-profit kindergartens through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, franchising, through variable interest entities or via contractual control, prohibits (a) kindergartens from being directly or indirectly involved as assets of a company aiming at a listing, and (b) a listed company or its controlling shareholders to invest for-profit kindergartens through capital market financing or purchase the assets of for-profit kindergartens by issuing shares or paying cash.

On July 24, 2021, the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of State Council jointly promulgated the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education (the “Alleviating Burden Opinion”). The Alleviating Burden Opinion prohibits foreign investors from controlling or holding interest (including through contractual arrangements) in institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in relation to the compulsory education.

On September 1, 2023, the MOE published another draft of the Preschool Education Law for public comments, which, if compared with the First Draft of PEL, repeats those restrictions over, among other things, social capital seeking to control state-run kindergartens and non-profit kindergartens through mergers and acquisitions, or via contractual control, and prohibitions of (a) kindergartens from being directly or indirectly involved as assets of a company aiming at a listing either domestically or abroad, and (b) a listed company to invest for-profit private kindergartens through stock market financing or purchase the assets of for-profit private kindergartens by issuing shares or paying cash.

In addition, pursuant to the Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021, social organizations and individuals are prohibited from controlling a private school that provides compulsory education or a non-for-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of merger, acquisition, contractual arrangements, among others, and private school providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party, and any other private school conducting any transaction with any related party shall follow the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality, fix the price reasonably and regulate the decision-making, and shall not damage the interests of the state and the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, which may impose restrictions on the above-mentioned related party transactions. Such prohibition has significantly affected the enforceability of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with affiliated entities providing compulsory education. Therefore, we concluded that we lost control of the schools providing compulsory education, not-for-profit kindergartens, and the sponsor entities (i.e., the Affected Entities) as from August 31, 2021 and such VIE contractual arrangements with them have become invalid since then and classified them as discontinued operations. Such discontinuation has had a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our schools in China that are involved in related party transactions may also be subject to strict supervision by relevant government authorities, and we may need to establish corresponding information disclosure systems and incur greater compliance costs. Our contractual arrangements, which may be deemed as related-party transactions, may be subject to scrutiny against the stipulated benchmarks by relevant government authorities.

If our existing group structure or contractual arrangements are deemed to violate any rules, laws or regulations, we may be required to terminate or amend our contractual arrangement. Our license to operate private schools may be revoked, cancelled or not be renewed. We may be subject to penalties as determined by the relevant authorities. We may also be restricted from further expanding our schools or school network. For example, we may not be able to acquire non-profit private schools. If any of the foregoing occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to maintain the operation of our kindergartens and to expand our kindergarten network may be limited due to our listing status as well as the PRC laws and regulations, which may in turn affect our results of operations.

On November 7, 2018, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council promulgated the Opinions on Regulating the Development and Deepening of the Reform of the Pre-School Education (the “Opinions”), which limits the ability by kindergartens to obtain financing through equity financing. It is unclear whether the Opinions will be applied retrospectively. In addition, we have not been notified of or been subject to any material fines or other penalties under any PRC laws or regulations due to any alleged violation of the Opinions. However, we cannot assure you that the Opinions will not be applied retrospectively, and that we will not be subject to adverse impact under the Opinions or any laws or regulations promulgated pursuant to the Opinions in the future. Moreover, the Opinions prohibit private kindergartens from listing as public companies by themselves or through packaging with other assets and restrict public companies from acquiring for-profit kindergartens with funds raised in the capital markets. Even though the Opinions do not clearly provide whether companies listed in capital markets outside the PRC fall under such restriction, we may be subject to this restriction, which would limit our ability to carry out further expansion plans with regard to our kindergarten business.

In addition, on January 22, 2019, the General Office of the State Council issued the Circular on Initiating the Rectification of Kindergartens Affiliated to Residential Communities in Urban Areas (the “Circular on Initiating the Rectification”), which requires existing community-affiliated kindergartens to be handed over to local education authorities and shall be held by local education authorities as public kindergartens or turn into inclusive kindergartens operated by authorized social entities. It also provides that community-affiliated kindergartens shall be not-for-profit. As of the date of this annual report, the domestic school network under our continuing operations in China includes nine kindergartens in China, all of which are registered as for-profit kindergartens, as the discontinuation has caused our domestic school network to shrink drastically due to the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules. See “—Our compliance with the Implementation Rules has materially and adversely affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect in the future, and we have been subject to significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private for-profit education business and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.” As of the date of this annual report, we do not own any not-for-profit community-affiliated kindergartens, and we do not plan to sponsor any not-for-profit community-affiliated kindergartens in the future, as the Circular on Initiating the Rectification has significantly restricted our ability to sponsor community-affiliated kindergartens. We cannot assure you that the domestic kindergartens we currently operate will not be classified as community-affiliated kindergartens and thus become not-for-profit. If any of the kindergartens we operate is classified as a community-affiliated kindergarten, we may become unable to continue to operate such kindergarten, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Private Education in the PRC—Opinions on Regulating the Development and Deepening of the Reform of Pre-school Education.”

Our learning centers may not be able to obtain or update the required educational permits and business licenses, which may subject us to fines and other penalties, including the suspension of operations in noncompliant learning centers and confiscation of profits derived from non-compliant operations.

According to the Amended Law, which became effective on September 1, 2017, private schools for after-school tutoring can be established as for-profit private schools at the election of the school sponsors. The Amended Law also deleted the provision stipulating that measures for administration of profit-making non-state training institutions registered with the administrative department for industry and commerce shall be separately formulated by the State Council. According to the Rules for the Implementation of Supervision and Management of For-profit Private Schools, jointly issued by the MOE, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, and came into force on December 30, 2016, for-profit private tutoring institutions shall be in compliance with the regulations applicable to private schools. On February 13, 2018, the General Offices of the MOE and three other ministries in China jointly issued the Notice to Launch Special Campaign towards After-school Tutoring Institutions on Practically Reducing Burdens for Primary and Middle School Students, which requires after-school tutoring institutions with satisfactory conditions to obtain school operation licenses and other permits. Further, on August 22, 2018, the State Council issued the Opinion on Supervising After-School Tutoring Institutions (the “Circular 80”), which provides detailed guidance for these after-school tutoring institutions. Pursuant to the Alleviating Burden Opinion, which was promulgated on July 24, 2021 and the Circular 80, institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in relation to the compulsory education are required to be registered as non-profit organization and institutions providing after-school tutoring services shall obtain the private school operating permit. Council Circular 80 and the Implementation Rules further require the learning centers of a training school providing after-school tutoring services to make filings with the relevant education authorities. On August 23, 2023, the MOE promulgated the Provisional Measures on Administrative Penalties for After-school Tutoring, which provides regulatory guidelines and a legal basis of the enforcement for the local authorities overseeing service providers of after-school tutoring. On September 7, 2021, to implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion, the MOE published on its website that the MOE, together with two other government authorities, issued a circular requiring all institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in relation to the compulsory education to complete registration as non-profit by the end of 2021, and all those institutions shall, before completing such registration, suspend enrollment of students and charging fees. For the non-academic tutoring services, the Alleviating Burden Opinion requires that local governmental authorities shall administer the non-academic after-school tutoring institutions by classifying sports, culture and art, science and technology and other non-academic subjects, formulating standards among different classification of non-academic tutoring and conducting strict examination before granting permission.

Therefore, we expect that the Amended Law, accompanied with its relevant implementation rules and regulations as well as other administrative actions, will bring significant changes to our compliance environment. A certain number of our entities, through which we operate our existing learning centers, may be required to obtain new licenses and permits or update their existing ones.

As of the date of this annual report, all of our learning centers in China currently in operation need to obtain and update their operating permits or business licenses required by the regulatory changes discussed above. If we fail to obtain and update such permits or licenses in any event as required by relevant laws or regulations, we may be subject to fines, confiscation of profits derived from non-compliant operations or suspension of admitting students, and we may be unable to continue the operations at our non-complying learning centers, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We have in the past acquired several businesses and intend to remain acquisitive while continuing our organic growth, which may expose us to acquisition related risks.

We are at all times pursuing acquisition opportunities and these processes are, at any time, in various stages of completion. For example, we have completed several acquisitions in the United Kingdom and will continue to seek opportunities in overseas markets and in complementary education services. Our targets may cover a wide range of education, including independent schools, boarding schools, art institutes, pre-university education service providers, language training centers and other education-related service providers. Our acquisition strategy exposes us to significant acquisition-related risks. If we successfully complete several of these ongoing opportunities, the overall scope of our operations could grow substantially in the near to mid-term future and would have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. While there is no certainty as to whether any of the opportunities that we are currently pursuing, or any future opportunity, will be completed, some of these opportunities may be completed in the near- or mid-term future, if current challenges to the processes can be overcome. Our acquisition-related risks include:

We may not be able to effectively manage our business expansion and successfully integrate businesses we acquire.

In recent years, we have expanded rapidly through acquisitions in China and overseas. As part of our global expansion plan, we have been exploring merger and acquisition opportunities abroad to expand our global school network, targeting quality private education providers and reputable schools in our targeted overseas countries and jurisdictions. For further details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Expansions and Investments.”

Our rapid expansion has resulted, and will continue to result, in substantial demands on our management, personnel, operational, technological and other resources. The sustainable post-acquisition organic growth is largely dependent on our ability to integrate operations, system infrastructure, existing partnerships and management philosophies of acquired schools and businesses. The integration of acquired schools is complicated and time-consuming and requires significant resource commitment, standardized integration process, and adequate planning and implementation. We cannot assure you that the acquisitions will be as successful as intended, or at all. The main challenges involved in integrating acquired schools and businesses include the following:

Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate the acquired schools and businesses with our existing operations in accordance with the expected timetables, and we may incur significant financial expenses and commit significant resources to streamline the operation of the acquired schools and businesses under our internal control requirements, and our pricing and profitability targets may not prove accurate or feasible, which may result in adverse impact to our financial performance. Any difficulties or delays encountered in connection with the integration of our and the acquired businesses’ operations could divert substantial management attention to the transition of the acquired schools and businesses before achieving full integration and may result in delay or deferral by our management of important strategic decisions for our existing businesses, which may adversely affect our business growth. In addition, the businesses and schools we acquire may be loss-making or have existing liabilities or other risks that we may not be able to effectively manage or may not be aware of at the time we acquire them, which may impact our ability to realize the expected benefits from the acquisition or our financial performance.

In addition, we plan to acquire additional overseas schools to expand our global network. We have announced a number of international acquisitions and may undertake future acquisitions or other corporate transactions in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively and efficiently identify new overseas school projects, manage acquired overseas schools and our overseas operations, or integrate the acquired overseas schools with our existing operations. In addition, political and economic instabilities, tariffs, trade barriers and other restrictive actions taken by the governments of our targeted markets, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, our insufficient experience and knowledge of the local markets as well as the relevant local laws and regulations may all affect our ability to operate our overseas schools and manage our overseas operations, which in turn may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to the acquired businesses, which may adversely affect our financial performance.

The businesses and schools we acquired or plan to acquire may be operating at a loss or have existing liabilities or other risks that we may not be able to effectively manage or may not be aware of at the time that we acquire them. Although consistent with industry practice, we always conduct a review of assets prior to each acquisition, such reviews are inherently incomplete as it is generally not feasible to review in depth every individual asset involved in each acquisition. Ordinarily, our due diligence focuses on higher-value businesses or assets and will only conduct a sample due diligence on the remainder. Nonetheless, even an in-depth review of all assets and records may not necessarily reveal an exhaustive list of existing and potential problems, nor will it permit us to become sufficiently familiar with the assets to assess fully their deficiencies and capabilities. As we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers for these unknown liabilities and risks, this may in turn affect our ability to realize the expected benefits from the acquisition or our financial performance. Furthermore, even though the sellers may be required to indemnify us with respect to breaches of the representations and warranties pursuant to the respective sell and purchase agreements, such indemnification is limited and subject to various materiality thresholds and an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to recover any amount with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with the acquired business may exceed our expectations, along with other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not generate sufficient profit to guarantee our ability to meet financial obligations due to the net current liabilities as of August 31, 2023.

As of August 31, 2023, we had net current liabilities of RMB553.0 million (US$76.2 million) for our continuing operations. Although we had net cash generated from operating activities of RMB22.3 million (US$3.1 million) for the 2023 fiscal year, we cannot assure you that we will not experience periods of net current liabilities in the future. We may record net current liabilities in future periods as we expand. A net current liabilities position could expose us to liquidity risks, constrain our operational flexibility and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing and expand our business. We cannot assure you that we will always be able to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or obtain necessary funding to meet our future financial needs, including repaying liabilities upon maturity and financing our capital commitments. If we fail to meet our financial obligations, our business, liquidity, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

As of the date of this annual report, our management has concluded that we will have sufficient financial resources to support our operations and meet our financial obligations and commitments as they become due. Therefore, our financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue on a going concern basis. However, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient profits and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to generate such profits or obtain such funding. Failure to continue as a going concern would require that our assets and liabilities be restated on a liquidation basis, which could differ significantly from the going concern basis.

We may need additional capital for our future expansion and our leverage profile may change significantly.

To the extent our existing sources of capital are not sufficient to satisfy our existing and future needs, we may have to seek external financing sources. Our ability to obtain additional capital from external sources in the future is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, regulatory considerations, general market conditions for capital raising activities and economic, political and other conditions in jurisdictions where we operate. In particular, future debt financing, if can be obtained, could include terms that may restrict our financial flexibility or our ability to manage our business freely, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, we have completed several overseas acquisitions in the past, such as the acquisitions of Bournemouth Collegiate School (“BCS”), St. Michael’s School, Bosworth Independent School (“BIC”) and CATS Colleges Holdings Limited (“CATS”) and may in the future enter into agreements in relation to future overseas acquisitions, some of which may be funded by debt financing. In the event that the amount of debt drawn to fund such acquisitions is significant, this could result in a significant change to our leverage profile and financing costs, which could impact our financial position and results of operations in the future. Additional debt financing may also increase our interest expense, leverage and gearing, as well as potentially require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt servicing. If we fail to repay our debt in a timely manner, we may face risks of default which may also cause our other debt to be accelerated.

If we fail to ramp up our existing schools or successfully launch new schools, our business growth and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

As of the date of this annual report, we have a network of nine kindergartens in China, among which five kindergartens are in the ramp-up period. As the discontinuation has caused our domestic school network to shrink drastically, due to the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules. See “—Our compliance with the Implementation Rules has materially and adversely affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect in the future, and we have been subject to significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private for-profit education business and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.” Four of the five domestic kindergartens currently in the ramp-up period are operating at a loss. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to attract a sufficient number of students to enroll in these schools, recruit additional qualified teachers and educational staff to meet the demands of the increased student enrollment or otherwise expand our operations at schools in a manner that ensures a consistently high quality of education service. We or our partners may encounter difficulty in procuring the land and obtaining the permits for construction. We cannot assure you that we will be able to apply our experience from the operation of our existing schools to new schools or that we will be able to obtain the requisite permits, licenses or accreditations or recruit a sufficient number of qualified teachers. If we fail to attract students to our existing schools or start new schools with the requisite permits, licenses and accreditations and teachers, our business growth and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be unable to engage with the Affected Entities to provide education services as we expected.

Following the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have been engaging with the relevant government authorities and external advisors to seek full compliance with the Implementation Rules and other applicable PRC laws and regulations. However, we are exploring the possibility of continuing to engage with the Affected Entities in future cooperation on mutually acceptable terms and in full compliance with the Implementation Rules and other applicable PRC laws and regulations.  The future cooperation may involve our provision of services to some of the Affected Entities, such as consultation for school operation, property management and maintenance, administrative management and school branding.

However, the future cooperation with the Affected Entities, if any, will be arm’s length transactions on mutually acceptable terms. We cannot assure you that the cooperation under contemplation will be specifically permitted by competent government authorities or that we will be able to agree on commercial terms satisfactory to us, and as such, we may be unable to effectuate the cooperation with the Affected Entities as we expect.

We had ceased to recognize revenues for all activities related to the Affected Entities with compulsory education and discontinued all business activities with such entities by August 31, 2021, while continuing to provide essential services to keep these schools open.

Services provided to these schools primarily include marketing and consulting, procurement support, human resources, finance and legal support, and information technology support, all of which were conducted through our centralized management system. Our centralized management system provided services to the Affected Entities without charges together with other kindergartens that we charged services fee for. As we did not track the costs incurred by the centralized management system separately among different service recipients, and majority of the costs are staff costs incurred by the centralized management system, there are significant limitations for us to accurately determine the costs attributable to providing services to the Affected Entities. As of the date of this annual report, the related staff had transferred out from the services center in our headquarters.

It is not clear under the Implementation Rule whether the provision of such services to the Affected Entities will be considered transactions with any related parties in spite of the fact that it is free of charge. If the provision of such services to the Affected Entities is considered transactions with related parties, we may be subject to penalty for our past provision of services to these entities, and we may be prohibited from providing such services to the Affected Entities.

If we fail to enroll and retain a sufficient number of students, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to continue to enroll and retain students for our schools is critical to the continued success and growth of our business. The success of our efforts to enroll and retain students will depend on several factors, including our ability to:

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if we cannot maintain or increase our student base as we expand our school network.

Moreover, our ability to enroll and retain a sufficient number of students may be adversely affected the declining birth rate in China and worldwide. Continued decline in birth rate may cause the demand for private education to decline and the competition among education service providers to intensify, leading to reduced revenue and profitability of our operations.

Changes in international regulations and travel restrictions have materially and adversely affected and together with changes in sanctions could continue to materially adversely affect international student enrollments.  

We are subject to a wide range of laws and regulations relating to our international operations. These include laws and regulatory regimes of the countries in which we operate, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act. These laws and regulations change frequently. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant penalties or the revocation of our authority to operate in the applicable jurisdiction, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Further changes to the regulatory environment, including changes to government policy or practice in oversight and enforcement, or other factors, including geopolitical instability, imposition or extension of international sanctions, a natural disaster or pandemic in either the students’ countries of origin or countries in which they desire to study, could continue to negatively affect our ability to attract and retain students and negatively affect our operating results. Any significant changes to availability of government funding for education, visa policies for students and their dependents, or other administrative immigration requirements, or the tax environment, including changes to tax laws, policies and practices, in any one or more countries in which we operate our business available could negatively affect our operating results.

A substantial portion of our revenue comes from oversea schools.  Our ability to enroll students in oversea schools is directly dependent on our ability to comply with complex regulatory environments. For example, the impact of Brexit on us over time will depend on the agreed terms of the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU. Uncertainty over the impact and terms of Brexit trade deals may materially diminish interest in traveling to the U.K. for study. If the U.K. is no longer viewed as a favorable study destination, our ability to recruit international students would be adversely impacted, which would materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, the outcome of general elections in the U.K. may affect investors’ ability to access the U.K. market and impair our ability to expand our service offering in the U.K.

Changes to levels of direct and indirect government funding for international education programs would also materially affect the success of our operations. For example, if access to student loans or other funding were to be lost for our operations that admit students who are entitled to receive the benefit of this funding, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

In January 2021, U.S. President Biden reversed a previously enacted ban on travel from certain countries to the U.S. and directed the State Department to restart visa processing for individuals from the affected countries. There have since been new, unrelated travel restrictions into the U.S. due to COVID-19, and those restrictions can be expected to continue changing. On September 25, 2020, the previous U.S. presidential administration proposed significant changes to the visa rules governing entry of non-immigrant academic students and exchange visitors. In July 2021, the Biden administration formally withdrew the notice of proposed rulemaking regarding these changes. Nevertheless, negative perceptions regarding travel to the U.S. could continue to have a negative impact on our ability to recruit international students, and our business could be materially adversely affected.

Accidents, injuries or other harm may occur at our schools, learning centers or the events we organize, which could negatively affect our reputation and our ability to attract and retain students.

There are inherent risks of accidents or injuries in our business. We could be held liable if any student, employee or other person is injured in any accident or incident at any of our schools, learning centers or the events we organize. Though we believe we have taken appropriate measures to limit these risks, in the event of personal injuries, food poisoning, fires or other accidents or incidents suffered by students or other people, we could nonetheless face claims alleging that we were negligent, that we provided inadequate supervision or that we were otherwise liable for the injuries. In addition, if any of our students, teachers or instructors commits acts of violence or otherwise behaves inappropriately, we could face claims alleging our failure to provide adequate security measures or precautions to prevent such actions. Similar events and allegations may also arise with respect to events we organize, including off-campus gatherings and overseas camp programs. Parents of our students may perceive our facilities or programs to be unsafe, which may discourage them from sending their children to our schools, learning centers or programs. We have historically encountered isolated student-related accidents on our school premises and compensated the injured students. Although we maintain liability insurance, the insurance coverage may not be adequate to fully protect us from claims of all kinds and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain sufficient liability insurance in the future on commercially reasonable terms or at all. A liability claim against us or any of our employees could adversely affect our reputation and ability to attract and retain students. Even if unsuccessful, such a claim could create unfavorable publicity, cause us to incur substantial expenses and divert the time and attention of our management.

We may be unable to charge tuition at sufficient levels to be profitable or raise tuition or other fees as planned.

Our results of operations are affected in large part by the pricing of our education services. We charge tuition or other fees based on each student’s grade level and the programs in which the student is enrolled. Subject to the applicable regulatory requirements, we generally determine tuition or other fees based on the demand for our education services, the cost of our services, and the tuition and the fees charged by our competitors. Although we have been able to increase the tuition or other fees in the past, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase our tuition or other fees in the future without adversely affecting the demand for our education services.

The tuition or other fees we charge for some of our education programs is subject to regulatory restrictions. The regulatory authorities in China have huge power to regulate the private education industry, including the tuition, room and boarding fees and other fees charged by schools. We have occasionally encountered difficulty in persuading the local regulatory authorities to approve our tuition or other fees increase proposals in the past. In light of the significant increase in tuition and other education related fees in China in recent years, regulatory authorities may impose stricter price controls on education charges generally in the future. For example, in accordance with the relevant local regulations, if we increase the tuition or other fees of our schools in Guangdong province in a certain school year, such increase will generally not affect the existing students until they complete their current section of education at the same schools. If the tuition or other fees we charge are required to be reduced or are not allowed to increase in line with increases in our costs, or if there are any changes in the regulations which may otherwise negatively affect or restrict our ability to adjust our tuition or other fees, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. For example, the local government authorities in implementing the Amended Law may impose additional limits on the tuition and other fees our schools charge, restrict proposed increase in fees as charged by any of our kindergartens if deemed community-affiliated kindergartens, or prevent us from raising the tuition and other fees to our desired levels or at all. For our complementary education services, we have more discretion in determining the tuition or other fees, but we cannot assure you that the current regulatory regime will not change in a manner that may restrict our ability to increase tuition or other fees for our complementary education services.

In addition, if we add new kindergartens to our domestic school network in the future, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the for-profit school designation for such schools. As a result, we may not be able to maintain the level of our current tuition or other fees and may not be able to raise any of such fees for our kindergartens at our desired rates, times and places or at all in the future under the framework of the Amended Law.

Furthermore, the tuition or other fees we are able to charge is subject to a number of other factors, such as the perception of our brand, the academic results achieved by our students, our ability to hire qualified teachers, and general local economic conditions. Any significant deterioration in these factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to charge tuition or other fees at levels sufficient for us to remain profitable.

We may not be able to renew kindergarten operation agreements or maintain favorable fee rates at our existing domestic kindergartens or enter into kindergarten operation agreements for new domestic kindergartens on commercially reasonable terms.  

We may launch new kindergartens in China in collaboration with school development partners and on our own. We cannot assure you that we will obtain leases for kindergarten premises, renew our kindergarten operation agreements or enter into new kindergarten operation agreements on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

If we fail to help our students achieve their academic goals, students’ and parents’ satisfaction with our education services may decline.

The success of our business depends on our ability to deliver quality school experiences and help our students achieve their academic goals. Our schools may not be able to meet the expectations of our students and their parents in terms of students’ academic performance. A student may not be able to attain the level of academic improvement that he or she seeks and his or her performance may otherwise not progress or decline due to reasons beyond our control. We may not be able to provide education that is satisfactory to all of our students and their parents. Their satisfaction with our services may decline. In addition, we cannot assure you that our students will be admitted to the higher-level education institutions of their choice. Any of the foregoing could result in a student’s withdrawal from our schools, and dissatisfied students or their parents may attempt to persuade other students or prospective students not to attend our schools. If our ability to retain students decreases significantly or if we otherwise fail to continue to enroll and retain new students, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business is subject to the risks of international operations.

We have entered into the global market, such as United Kingdom and the United States, through acquisition of established overseas schools, and we may expand our operations in additional markets and regions in the future. We may have to adapt our business models to the local markets due to various legal requirements and market conditions. Our international operations and expansion efforts have resulted and may continue to result in increased costs and expenses and are subject to a variety of risks, including increased competition, uncertain enforcement of our intellectual property rights, changes and evolutions in overseas market conditions, and the complexity of compliance with the local laws and regulations.

In addition, compliance with applicable laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, such as education laws, anti-corruption laws, tax laws, foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, data privacy requirements, labor laws, restrictions on foreign investment, and anti-competition regulations, increases the costs and risk exposure of doing business in foreign jurisdictions. Although we have implemented policies and procedures to comply with these laws and regulations, a violation by us or our employees, contractors or agents could nevertheless occur. In some cases, compliance with the laws and regulations of one country could violate the laws and regulations of another country. Violations of these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our brand, international growth efforts and business.

We may not be able to recruit, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified and experienced teachers and principals.

Teachers are critical to maintaining the quality of our education and services and our brand and reputation. Our principals are also instrumental to the successful operation of our schools. Our ability to continue to attract teachers and principals with the necessary experience and qualifications is therefore a critical contributing factor to the success of our operations. There are a limited number of teachers and principals in China with the necessary experience, expertise and qualifications that meet our requirements. In addition, we strive to provide an immersive bilingual learning environment in our domestic schools, which requires a sizable pool of foreign teachers. As the Chinese market for qualified foreign teachers is extremely competitive and the attrition rate of foreign teacher is generally higher than that of Chinese teachers, we cannot assure you that we can increase the number of our foreign teachers to meet the growing demand from our domestic schools when our student enrollment increases. In addition, as Chinese government process for obtaining the work and residence permits for foreign teachers may be time-consuming, we may fail to apply for such permits for our foreign teachers before they join us. We also face similar risks of shortage in supply of teachers and principals in the U.K. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified teachers and principals, we may experience a decrease in the quality of our education programs and services in one or more of our schools or incur increase in hiring and labor costs, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

If we lose the permits or licenses required to provide our education or complementary education services or operate our schools or if we fail to obtain the accreditations, permits or licenses for our new schools or complementary education services, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We must apply periodically to the local education bureaus and civil affairs bureaus to obtain or renew the permits or licenses to operate our schools and ancillary services. While we believe that we will be able to obtain or renew such permits or licenses, we cannot assure you that such permits and licenses will be obtained or renewed in a timely manner, or at all, or that new conditions will not be imposed. Any failure to obtain or renew the required permits or licenses to operate our schools could give rise to administrative penalties including rectification or suspension of operations in non-complying schools or confiscation of profits derived from noncompliant operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Severe competition in the private education market may cause the enrollment at our schools to fall, bring up cost for recruiting and retaining teachers and limit our tuition cap, and thus, reduce profitability.

We may face competition from other existing or new schools targeting the children of affluent local families in the locations in which we operate. Some of our existing and potential competitors may be able to devote greater resources than we can to the development and construction of private schools and respond more quickly to changes in demands of students and their parents, admissions standards, market needs or new technologies. Moreover, our competitors may increase capacity in any of the local markets to an extent that leads to an over-supply of placement positions at private schools and downward pressure on tuition prices. Our existing or potential competitors may also provide higher compensation to teachers in the same region, making it more difficult for us to recruit and retain competent and qualified teachers. Our existing or potential competitors may also strategically price their tuition lower than ours to attract students and parents. Among other legislations and national policies that encourage social forces to provide diversified education services (such as childcare services), the Amended Law may attract more private school operators to offer non-compulsory education and further increase competition in this market.

Our complementary businesses, including English proficiency training and extracurricular programs, may also face competition from other providers of comparable services that may have stronger financial resources, technology, service performance or brand recognition.

If we are unable to differentiate our services from those of our competitors and successfully market our services to students and their parents, we could face competitive pressures that reduce our student enrollment. If our student enrollment falls, we may be required to reduce our tuition or increase spending in order to attract and retain students, which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business and financial performance may suffer if we fail to successfully develop and launch new education services.

The future success of our business depends partly on our ability to develop new education services. The planned timing or launch of new education services is subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual timing may differ materially from originally proposed timeframes. Unexpected operational, technical or other issues could delay or prevent the launch of one or more of our new education services or programs. In addition, significant investment of human capital, financial resources and management time and attention may be required to successfully launch features of our new education programs. For further details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Expansions and Investments.” However, we cannot assure you that our students will choose us over third-party service providers or that we will be able to successfully integrate such services with our schools and other complementary businesses without expending significant financial resources on marketing and operational optimization. If we fail to manage the expansion of our portfolio of education services cost-effectively, our business could be negatively affected.

We cannot assure you that any of our new services will achieve market acceptance or generate incremental revenue. If our efforts to develop, market and sell our new education services and programs to the market are not successful, our business, financial position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Any deterioration in our relationships with providers of overseas education services may adversely affect our business.

We have business collaborations with various overseas schools and institutions. We derive direct benefits from these relationships such as the ability to offer more diverse programs and classes, including summer and winter camps, and the ability to charge a premium for the programs we offer with other overseas education service providers. We also derive indirect benefits from these relationships, including enhancement of our brand and reputation and exposure to international education methods and experiences.

If our relationships with any of these overseas education service providers deteriorate or are otherwise damaged or terminated, or if the benefits we derive from these relationships diminishes, whether as a result of our own actions, actions of our partners, actions of any third party, including our competitors, or of regulatory authorities or other entities beyond our control, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Any damage to the reputation of any of our business may adversely affect our overall business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our reputation could be adversely affected under many circumstances, including the following:

The likelihood that any of the foregoing may occur increases as we expand our school network. These events could influence the perception of our schools not only by our students and their parents, but also by other constituencies in the education sector and the general public. Moreover, an event that directly damages the reputation of one of our schools could adversely affect the reputation and operations of our other schools. If our reputation deteriorates, our overall business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate from quarter to quarter, and in turn result in volatility in and adversely affect the price of the ADSs.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations as our costs and expenses vary significantly throughout the fiscal year and do not necessarily correspond with the timing of recognition of our revenues. Our students enrolled in our domestic kindergartens and overseas schools and their parents typically pay the tuition and other fees prior to the commencement of a semester, and we recognize revenues from the delivery of education services on a straight-line basis over a semester. We typically incur higher upfront operating expenses in the first fiscal quarter at the start of each school year, and also typically recognize more revenue in the second half of fiscal years due to higher revenues from complementary education services during the summer and, to a lesser extent, students who transfer into our schools for the second semester. As a result of the combination of the foregoing, we have historically incurred net loss or significantly lower net income in the second and fourth fiscal quarters, primarily due to our schools being closed during winter and summer holidays, when no revenue from our school operations is recognized. We expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our results of operations. These fluctuations could result in volatility in and adversely affect the price of the ADSs.

Our business could be disrupted if we lose the services of members of our senior management team, key principals and teaching staff.

Our success depends in part on the continued application of skills, efforts and motivation of our officers and senior management team. In 2023, we experienced changes in our senior management team. We may in the future experience such changes for reasons beyond our control. In addition, key personnel could leave us to join our competitors. Losing the services of key members of senior management or experienced personnel may be disruptive to and cause uncertainty for our business. We depend upon the services of our senior management team, who collectively has significant experience with our company and within the education industry. If one or more members of our senior management team are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions for health, family or other reasons, we may not be able to replace them easily or at all. If we cannot attract and retain qualified senior management members, key principals and teaching staff in a timely manner, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could materially and adversely affect our business.

We have historically relied upon the brand name of “Country Garden” to market our schools. As we expand our schools beyond the network of Country Garden’s residential communities, we have created and begun to promote our own brands, including “Bright Scholar.” Since our inception, we have also created other intellectual property, including education materials developed by our teaching staff. Unauthorized use of any of our intellectual property may adversely affect our business and reputation. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secrets laws to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, despite our efforts, third parties may obtain and use our intellectual property without proper authorization. The practice of intellectual property rights enforcement by the PRC regulatory authorities is in its early stages and is subject to significant uncertainty. We may also need to resort to litigation and other legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any such action, litigation or other legal proceedings could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources and could disrupt our business. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to exercise our intellectual property rights effectively or otherwise prevent others from the unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of our operations.

We operate our business under several brands, which may have a dilutive effect on brand recognition among our students and their parents.

We operate our business under several brands including “Country Garden,” our English proficiency training under “élan,” overseas study counseling business under “Can-Achieve”, overseas career counseling business under “Dream Big Career,” and overseas schools under “CATS,” “Worthgate,” “Guildhouse,” “Bosworth,” “St Michael’s” and “Bounemouth Collegiate Schools.” We intend to otherwise promote a unified brand “Bright Scholar” as our corporate image, which represents the full range of education services we offer in China. Maintaining multiple brands could dilute our brand recognition among students and their parents and increase our overall marketing expenses as we allocate resources among different brands. We may transition our individual brands to “Bright Scholar” in the future if the market responds positively to our new corporate image. We cannot assure you, however, that our prospective students will embrace our new brand given its limited market exposure and recognition. We may incur significant financial resources for, and divert considerable management attention to, the integration of our existing brands with our new corporate image and the enhancement of brand recognition, which may adversely affect our business, results of operation and financial condition.

We may be exposed to infringement claims by third parties, which, if successful, could cause us to pay significant damages.

We cannot assure you that education materials and content used in our schools and programs do not or will not infringe on intellectual property rights of third parties. While we are not aware of any claims for intellectual property infringement with regard to the above-mentioned education materials and content as of the date of this annual report, we cannot assure you that third parties will not claim that we have infringed on their proprietary rights in the future.

We may also use education materials designed in conjunction with our overseas associates and we cannot assure you that disputes will not arise over the intellectual property rights associated with these materials.

Although we plan to vigorously defend ourselves in any such litigation or legal proceedings, we cannot assure you that we will prevail in such matters. Participation in such litigation and legal proceedings may also cause us to incur substantial expenses and divert our management’s time and attention. If we are required to pay damages or incur settlement expenses, it could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we are required to pay any royalties or enter into any licensing agreements with the owners of intellectual property rights, we may find that the terms are not commercially acceptable, and lose the ability to use the related materials or content, which in turn could adversely affect our education programs. Any similar claim against us, even ungrounded, could also damage our reputation and brand image. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Unauthorized disclosure of personal data that we collect and retain, whether due to a system failure or otherwise, could damage our business.

We maintain records that include personal data, including academic and medical records, address and family information. Our online services may store and process certain personal and other sensitive data provided by students or their parents. There are numerous laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information and data. Specifically, personally identifiable and other confidential information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in PRC and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The PRC government has enacted a series of laws and regulations relating to the protection of privacy and personal information, which require internet service providers and other network operators to clearly indicate the purposes, methods and scope of any information collection and usage, obtain appropriate user consent and establish user information protection systems with appropriate remedial measures.

Internationally, many jurisdictions have established data privacy and cybersecurity legal frameworks with which we may need to comply. For example, the EU has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which requires covered businesses to comply with rules regarding the processing of personal data, including its use, protection and the ability of persons whose personal data is processed to access, to correct or delete personal data about themselves. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 20 million (whichever is the greater). Additionally, the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation (“U.K. GDPR”) (i.e., a version of the GDPR as implemented into U.K. law) went into effect following Brexit. While the GDPR and the U.K. GDPR are substantially the same, going forward there is an increasing risk for divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of the data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations as between the EU and the United Kingdom, which may result in greater operational burdens, costs and compliance risks. Additionally, the GDPR and the U.K. GDPR include certain limitations and stringent obligations with respect to the transfer of personal data from the EU and the United Kingdom to third countries, and the mechanisms to comply with such obligations are also in considerable flux and may lead to greater operational burdens, costs and compliance risks.

However, these regulatory frameworks for privacy issues in China and worldwide are currently evolving and are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. We cannot assure you that our existing privacy and personal protection system and technical measures will be considered sufficient under applicable laws and regulations. We could be adversely affected if legislation or regulations in China or worldwide are expanded to require changes in business practices or privacy policies, or if the PRC or foreign governmental authorities interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition to laws, regulations and other applicable rules regarding privacy and privacy advocacy, industry groups or other private parties may propose new privacy standards that we must comply with. The interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws and privacy standards are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws or privacy standards may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and privacy standards, could result in additional cost and liability for us, damage our reputation, inhibit the use of our services and harm our business.

If we were found to be in breach of any international privacy and data protection laws and regulations, we could incur significant expenses in connection with rectifying any security breaches, settling any resulting claims, payment of possible fines and providing enhanced protection to prevent additional breaches. In addition, any failure to protect personal information may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain students, harm our reputation and materially adversely affect our business, prospects and results of our operations.

Failures or interruptions in our centralized data management system may adversely affect our operations.

We have established a centralized data management system, the Oracle ERP system, which collects and analyzes group-wide financial, procurement and student admission information and data. We are in the process of gradually refining the features and functionalities of such enterprise resource planning system (“ERP system”) to enhance efficiency. We are also expanding the application of such ERP system into entities we newly acquired in order to streamline our data and information management system. However, we cannot assure you that such ERP system will not encounter technical failures and interruptions, leading to our management’s failure to timely access accurate key operating data, which may adversely affect our operation. We may encounter compatibility issues when incorporating newly acquired schools into our ERP system, which may compromise the overall accuracy and value of the operating information generated from such ERP system and adversely affect the implementation of our growth strategies as we expand our business and integrate new businesses. 

We may fail to maintain the proper functioning of or improve our technology infrastructure.

Our online teaching facilities and internal systems rely on software that is highly technical and complex and depend on the ability of such software to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of data. Our systems are vulnerable to disruptions from design errors, execution errors, employee misconduct, external fraud, security breaches, capacity constraints, software flaws, computer viruses, cyberattacks, power outages and similar events. We cannot assure you that our information technology systems will always operate without interruptions. Some errors may only be discovered after the code has been released for external or internal use. Any errors, bugs or defects discovered in the software on which we rely could cause failures in our systems’ performance and result in disruptions in operations, slower response time and delays in information processing, thereby compromising our ability to support our online teaching activities. If any of the above were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, some of our subsidiaries and affiliates have historically been targeted in cyberattacks. Although we have stepped up the protection of our information systems, we cannot assure you that we will not become a target in cyberattacks again. Any such attacks could result in significant financial losses, damage to our reputation, disruption to our operations, and loss of confidential information.

We will also continue to upgrade and improve our information technology systems, software, mobile application and big data analytics in order to support our business growth and optimize our operating efficiency. Adopting new technologies and maintaining and upgrading our technology infrastructure require significant investment of time and resources, including adding new hardware, updating software and recruiting and training new engineering personnel. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in implementing these upgrades and improvement plans. New technologies may not be fully integrated with our existing systems on a timely basis, or at all. Our systems may experience slower response time and interruptions during upgrades, which could impair the experience of our students and business partners, delay the reporting of accurate operating and financial information, and result in material and adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, the reliability and availability of our platform depends on telecommunications carriers and other third-party providers for communications and storage capacity, including bandwidth and server storage, among other things. If we are unable to enter into and renew agreements with these providers on acceptable terms, if any of our existing agreements with such providers are terminated as a result of our breach or otherwise, or if these service providers themselves experience service disruptions or cessations, the proper functioning of our platform could be adversely affected.

We have limited insurance coverage with respect to our business and operations.

We are exposed to various risks associated with our business and operations, and we have limited insurance coverage. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Insurance” for more information. We are exposed to risks including, among other things, accidents or injuries in our schools, loss of key management and personnel, business interruption, natural disasters, terrorist attacks and social instability or any other events beyond our control. The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage. As a result, insurance companies in China offer limited business-related insurance products. We do not have any business disruption insurance, product liability insurance or key-man life insurance. Any business disruption, legal proceeding or natural disaster or other events beyond our control could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 

We face risks related to natural disasters, health epidemics or terrorist attacks in regions where we operate.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, landslides, tornados and tsunamis, outbreaks of health epidemics such as avian influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, COVID-19 virus, and Influenza A virus, such as H5N1 subtype and H5N2 subtype flu viruses, as well as terrorist attacks, other acts of violence or war or social instability in the regions in which we operate or those generally affecting China and regions where we operate. If any of these occur, our schools and facilities may be required to temporarily or permanently close and our business operations may be suspended or terminated. Our students, teachers and staff may also be negatively affected by such event. In addition, any of these could adversely affect the economy and demographics of the regions where we operate, which could cause significant declines in the number of our students in those regions and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

COVID-19 has significantly affected China and many other countries. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, various nations imposed various measures to keep COVID-19 in check, including travel restrictions from time to time. Such measures have adversely affected our operation, as it has caused inconvenience to our day-to-day operating activities. Following the phase-out of COVID-19 prevention measures globally, we have resumed our operations. If the outbreak persists or escalates, we may be subject to further negative impact on our business operations and financial condition.

Our business, financial performance and results of operations could be adversely affected by deterioration of the relation between China and the United States.

Recent international trade disputes, including those between China and the United States, and the uncertainties created by such disputes may disrupt the transnational flow of goods and significantly undermine the stability of the global and Chinese economy, thereby harming our business. International trade disputes could result in tariffs and other protectionist measures that could adversely affect our business. Any escalation in existing trade tensions or the advent of a trade war, or news and rumors of the escalation of a potential trade war, could affect consumer confidence and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and, ultimately, the trading price of the ADSs.

Political tensions between the United States and China have escalated due to various reasons. Rising political tensions could reduce levels of trades, investments, technological exchanges and other economic activities between the two major economies, which would have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, there have been media reports on deliberations within the U.S. government regarding potentially limiting or restricting China-based companies from accessing U.S. capital markets. If any such deliberations were to materialize, resulting legislation may have a material and adverse impact on the stock performance of China-based issuers listed in the United States. It is currently unclear whether the proposed or additional legislations would be enacted that would have the effect of potentially limiting or restricting China-based companies from accessing U.S. capital markets.

We will continue to monitor developments related to these political tensions and their potential impact on our business. Nonetheless, we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected by any future legislative or regulatory changes or other developments related to these tensions.

Fluctuation in the exchange rate of the British pound may affect international students’ affordability of our private education services.

Fluctuation in the exchange rate of British pound may affect international students’ affordability of our private education services in the United Kingdom. International students need to pay more in their local currency in exchange for British pounds when the British pound strengthens, and this increases the cost of studying and living in the United Kingdom for them. Exchange rate fluctuations also impact the daily living expenses of international students in the United Kingdom. The exchange rate movements of the British pound are complex and influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, political factors, and market expectations. If the exchange rate of the British pound rises drastically or fluctuates in an unpredictable way, international students’ demand for our services in the United Kingdom may decrease, and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we grant additional employees share options or other equity incentives in the future, our net income could be adversely affected.

We granted share options to purchase a total of 3,509,242 Class A ordinary shares to certain school principals and management team members pursuant to our 2017 Share Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) from 2017 to 2023. We may grant additional share options under the 2017 Plan in the future. We are required to account for share-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which generally requires a company to recognize, as an expense, the fair value of share options and other equity incentives to employees based on the fair value of equity awards on the date of the grant, with the compensation expense recognized over the period in which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the equity award. If we grant options or other equity incentives in the future, we could incur significant compensation charges and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately or timely report our results of operations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of the ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, every public company is required to include a management report on the company’s internal controls over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting. As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules as promulgated by the SEC, our management assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2023 using criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management is not permitted to conclude that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective if there are one or more material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financing reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In the 2022 fiscal year, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified two material weaknesses and two significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2022. In the 2023 fiscal year, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified no material weakness and two significant deficiencies. The significant deficiencies identified related to control environment in our overseas schools component and Information Technology General Controls (“ITGCs”) in the areas of access security, change management, and data backup in certain financially relevant systems within our business.

As further described in “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, we have implemented and are continuing to implement a number of measures to address our historical material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and other control deficiencies not identified as significant, as well as the current significant deficiencies and other control deficiencies not identified as significant in our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure you, however, that these measures will fully address the significant deficiencies, together with other control deficiencies identified in our internal control over financial reporting. Our failure to correct these control deficiencies or our failure to discover and address any other control deficiencies could result in inaccuracies in our financial statements and could also impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs, may be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, ineffective internal control over financial reporting significantly hinders our ability to prevent fraud.

As a public company in the United States, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F. Our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2023. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures.” If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our management and our independent registered public accounting firm may also conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. This could adversely impact the market price of the ADSs due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our reporting processes. We will need to incur additional costs and use management and other resources in order to comply with Section 404. In addition, once we cease to be a non-accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us.

During the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, and we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of the ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

The continuing impact of “Brexit” may have a negative effect on our business operated in the United Kingdom. 

Following a national referendum and enactment of legislation by the government of the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom formally withdrew from the European Union (“Brexit”) and ratified a trade and cooperation agreement governing its future relationship with the European Union. The agreement, which became effective in 2021, addresses economic arrangements, law enforcement, judicial cooperation and a governance framework including procedures for dispute resolution, among other things. Because the agreement merely sets forth a framework in many respects and will require complex additional bilateral negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union as both parties continue to work on the rules for implementation, significant political and economic uncertainty remains about how the precise terms of the relationship between the parties will differ from the terms before withdrawal. As a result, we face risks associated with the potential uncertainty and disruptions that may follow Brexit and the implementation and application of the trade and cooperation agreement, including with respect to disruptions to the free movement of people, data and capital between the United Kingdom and the European Union and potential material changes to the regulatory regime applicable to our operations in the United Kingdom. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the United Kingdom determines which laws of the European Union to replace or replicate. These developments have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets and could significantly reduce global market liquidity and limit the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets.

The ongoing instability and uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the implementation and application of the trade and cooperation agreement, could require us to restructure our business operations in the United Kingdom, may increase our regulatory costs, and could have an adverse impact on our business and staff in the United Kingdom.

Changes in U.K. tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from our operations in the United Kingdom, and our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have filed returns for U.K. corporation tax on the basis that they are resident in the United Kingdom. Such subsidiaries are subject to U.K. tax in respect of their worldwide income and gains (subject to any applicable exemptions). Any change in such subsidiaries’ status or any change in U.K. tax laws could materially affect our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

Fluctuations in the value of the Renminbi and British pound sterling, among others, may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

As we operate globally, our business and share price may be affected by fluctuations between Renminbi and British pound sterling, among others, against the U.S. dollar and other currencies. For example, on July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the Renminbi was permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. Later on, the People’s Bank of China has decided to further implement the reform of the RMB exchange regime and to enhance the flexibility of RMB exchange rates. Such changes in policy have resulted in a significant appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar since 2005. There is still significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt a more flexible currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant adjustment of the rate for Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.

Any significant appreciation or depreciation of the Renminbi and British pound sterling, among others, may have a material adverse effect on the value of, and any dividends payable on, the ADSs in foreign currency terms. More specifically, if we decide to convert our Renminbi or British pound sterling into U.S. dollars, the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi or British pound sterling would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us. To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from our initial public offering into Renminbi or British pound sterling for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi or British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi or British pound sterling amount we receive from the conversion. In addition, appreciation or depreciation in the exchange rate of the Renminbi or British pound sterling to the U.S. dollar could materially and adversely affect the price of the ADSs in U.S. dollars without giving effect to any underlying change in our business or results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Our private education service business is subject to extensive regulation in China. If the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangement that establishes our corporate structure for operating our business does not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties.

Our domestic private education service business is subject to extensive regulations in China. The PRC government regulates various aspects of our business and operations, such as curriculum content, education materials, standards of school operations, student recruitment activities, tuition and other fees. The laws and regulations applicable to the private education sector are subject to frequent change, and new laws and regulations may be adopted, some of which may have a negative effect on our business, either retrospectively or prospectively.

Foreign ownership in education services is subject to strict regulations in China. The PRC government regulates the provision of education services through strict licensing requirements. In particular, PRC laws and regulations currently prohibit foreign ownership of companies and institutions providing compulsory education services at primary and middle school levels, and restrict foreign investment in education services businesses at the high school and kindergarten level. We are a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Our PRC subsidiary, Zhuhai Bright Scholar, is a foreign-owned enterprise and is currently ineligible to apply for and hold licenses to operate, or otherwise own equity interests in, our schools. Due to these restrictions, we conduct our private education business in China primarily through contractual arrangements among (1) Zhuhai Bright Scholar, (2) the VIEs, and (3) the ultimate shareholders of the VIEs, including Ms. Meirong Yang. We hold the required licenses and permits necessary to conduct our private education business in China through the schools controlled and held by the VIEs. We have been and expect to continue to be dependent on the VIEs to operate our private education business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure” for more information.

If our ownership structure and contractual arrangements are found to violate any PRC laws or regulations, including the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Educational Teaching and Thoroughly Enhancing the Quality of Compulsory Education and any legislations to be enacted (such as the Preschool Education Law), or if we are found to require but failed to obtain any of the permits or approvals for our private education business, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities include the MOE, which regulates the education industry, the PRC Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, which regulates foreign investments, the Civil Affairs Bureau, which regulates the registration of schools, and SAIC, which regulates the registration of for-profit schools. The authorities would have broad discretion in imposing fines or punishments upon us for such violations, including:

As of August 31, 2023, similar ownership structure and contractual arrangements have been used by many China-based companies listed overseas, including a number of education companies listed in the United States. To our knowledge, none of the fines or punishments listed above has been imposed on any of these public companies, including companies in the education industry. However, we cannot assure you that such fines or punishments will not be imposed on us or any other companies in the future. If any of the above fines or punishments is imposed on us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If any of these penalties results in our inability to direct the activities of the VIEs and their respective subsidiaries that most significantly impact their economic performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from the VIEs and their respective subsidiaries, we may not be able to consolidate the VIEs and their respective subsidiaries in our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we do not believe that such actions would result in the liquidation or dissolution of our company, our wholly-owned subsidiaries in China or the VIEs or their respective subsidiaries.

In addition, pursuant to the Implementation Rules, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education, (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of merger, acquisition, contractual arrangements, etc., and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party. Any private school conducting transactions with related parties must adhere to the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality. Tuition and fees shall be set reasonable. And the decision-making process shall not damage the state interests, the interests of the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students. Failure to comply with these principles may result in an order to make corrections within a specified time limit. Illegal gains obtained, if any must be confiscated, and collected fees returned. If the circumstances are serious, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller or member of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school within one to five years. In cases where the violations have an especially severe adverse social impact, such individuals may be permanently prohibited from becoming sponsors, actual controllers, or members of decision-making or supervisory bodies of other private schools. If a violation constitutes a public security administration offense, the public security organ will impose a punishment according to law. If a violation constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility will be investigated in accordance with the law.

These regulations may challenge the validity of our contractual arrangements that establish our corporate structure for operating our business. For example, the clause or provision of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement in relation to related party transactions between Zhuhai Bright Scholar and the VIE, namely BGY Education Investment, to the extent concerning private schools offering compulsory education are not legally enforceable since September 1, 2021. Furthermore, our contractual arrangements may not be enforceable in the PRC if the PRC government authorities view such contracts as contravening any mandatory provision of PRC laws and administrative regulations or are otherwise not enforceable due to offending public order or good morals. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, for our continuing operations, we may not be able to exert effective control over those VIEs and their respective shareholders, and our ability to conduct our business may be materially and adversely affected. We are continuously assessing the impact of relevant regulations on our business and making necessary measures and efforts to comply with the requirements under these regulations and implementations, including restructuring corporate structure or unwinding contractual arrangements, etc. However, the relevant authorities have yet to promulgate any detailed implementation rules and regulations under the Implementation Rules. It is still unclear whether the above provisions have any retrospective effect for contractual arrangements over private compulsory education schools existing before September 1, 2021. Therefore, uncertainty remains as to when and how the Implementation Rules will specifically be applied to our business.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress approved the Foreign Investment Law (“Foreign Investment Law”), which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the Law on Chinese-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures, the Law on Chinese-Foreign Contractual Joint Ventures, and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. On December 26, 2019, the State Council issued the Implementation Rules of the Foreign Investment Law to clarify and elaborate relevant provisions of the Foreign Investment Law, and the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC promulgated a judicial interpretation to address several issues concerning the application of the Foreign Investment Law. The above Implementation Rules and the judicial interpretation became effective as of January 1, 2020.

The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to China’s foreign investment regulatory regime to align with international standards and unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign investment” refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, we cannot assure you that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition contains a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under PRC Laws. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribe further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial position.

We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders for our operations in China, which may not be as effective in providing control as direct ownership.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on the contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders, including Ms. Meirong Yang, one of our largest shareholders, to operate our private education business in China. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” The revenue contribution of the VIEs from continuing operations accounted for 21.5% of the total revenues for our continuing operations in the 2023 fiscal year. However, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct equity ownership in providing us with control over the VIEs. The VIEs and their shareholders may fail to take certain actions required for our business, or to procure that newly established or acquired schools enter into the contractual arrangements in a timely manner, or to follow our instructions despite their contractual obligations to do so. If they fail to perform their obligations under their respective agreements with us, we may have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, which may not be effective. Any failure by the VIEs and the shareholders of the VIEs to perform their obligations under the contractual arrangements would have a material adverse effect on the financial position and performance of our company. For example, the contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in China. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with arbitral procedures as contractually stipulated. The commercial arbitration system in China is not as developed as some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the commercial arbitration system or legal system in China could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. In addition, if the legal structure and the contractual arrangements were found to violate any existing or future PRC laws and regulations, we may be subject to fines or other legal or administrative sanctions.

If the imposition of government actions causes us to lose our right to direct the activities of the VIEs or our right to receive substantially all the economic benefits and residual returns from the VIEs and we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a satisfactory manner, we would no longer be able to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs.

As a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with no material operations, we conduct a substantial majority of our operations through our subsidiaries, the VIEs, and their subsidiaries in China. We control and receive the economic benefits of our VIEs and its subsidiaries’ business operations through certain contractual arrangements. Our ADSs listed on the New York Stock Exchange represents shares of our offshore holding company instead of shares of the VIEs or their subsidiaries in China. We may not be able to continue to satisfy the applicable requirements and rules with respect to this structure. If we are unable to satisfy the New York Stock Exchange criteria for maintaining our listing, our securities could be subject to delisting.

If the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of our VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we may be unable to exercise our contractual rights over the assets of the VIEs, and the ADSs or ordinary shares may decline in value or become worthless.

Investors in the ADSs are not purchasing equity securities of our subsidiaries that have substantive business operations in China but instead are purchasing equity securities of a Cayman Islands holding company. We are a Cayman Islands holding company that conducts a portion of its operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs based on certain contractual agreements. Such structure involves unique risks to investors in the ADSs.

The PRC government has adopted a series of regulatory actions and issued statements to regulate business operations in China, including those related to VIEs and private schools, which may challenge the validity of our contractual arrangements. In the event that the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of our VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if these regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we may be unable to assert our contractual rights over the assets of the VIEs, and the ADSs or ordinary shares may decline in value or become worthless.

On May 14, 2021, the PRC State Council announced the Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Under the Implementation Rules, social organizations and individuals are prohibited from controlling a private school that provides compulsory education or a non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of, among others, merger, acquisition, and contractual arrangements, and a private school providing compulsory education is prohibited from conducting transactions with its related party. In particular, the prohibition over related party transactions has significantly affected the enforceability of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with affiliated entities providing compulsory education. Therefore, we re-assessed our control over the Affected Entities. Based on the relevant accounting standard in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have concluded that we have lost control of the Affected Entities since August 31, 2021, in view of the significant uncertainties and restrictions the Implementation Rules impose on our ability to direct the range of ongoing activities that would most significantly impact the returns of those entities and to be exposed to returns that are commensurate with a controlling interest, and that such uncertainties and restrictions already had a significant impact on our ability to direct and its economic exposure from involvement with such entities.

Except for the Affected Entities, the contractual arrangements enable us to: (1) exercise effective control over the VIEs; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs in consideration for the services provided by us; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all of the equity interests in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted under PRC law. Therefore, we are able to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs in our consolidated financial statements. However, our PRC legal counsel has advised us that as there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations, and we cannot assure you that the PRC government would agree that our corporate structure or any of the above contractual arrangements comply with current or future PRC laws or regulations. PRC laws and regulations governing the validity of these contractual arrangements are uncertain and the relevant government authorities may have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations. For a detailed description of the risks associated with our corporate structure, see “—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” and “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

Our largest shareholder may have potential conflict of interest with us and not act in the best interests of our company.

Ms. Meirong Yang is a director of the VIEs. We cannot assure you that Ms. Meirong Yang will always act in the best interests of our company. In addition, Ms. Meirong Yang owes duties of loyalty and diligence to the VIEs as its director pursuant to PRC law. However, she does not owe a fiduciary duty to our company as she is not an officer or director of our company. We provide no incentives to encourage Ms. Meirong Yang to act in our best interest in her capacity as the shareholder of the VIEs. We rely on Ms. Meirong Yang to comply with the terms and conditions of the contractual arrangements. Although Ms. Meirong Yang is obligated to honor her contractual obligations with respect to the VIEs, she may nonetheless breach or cause our the VIEs to breach or refuse to renew the existing contractual arrangements which allow us to effectively exercise control over the VIEs and to receive economic benefits from them. If Ms. Meirong Yang does not honor her contractual obligations with respect to the VIEs, we may exercise our exclusive option to purchase, or cause our designee to purchase, all or part of the equity interest in the VIEs to the extent permitted by PRC law. If we cannot resolve any disputes between us and the shareholders of the VIEs, we would have to rely on arbitration or legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Contractual arrangements between the VIEs and us may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and a finding that we or the VIEs owe additional taxes could materially reduce our net income and the value of your investment.

Under PRC laws and regulations, transactions between related parties should be conducted on an arm’s-length basis and may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We could face material adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements among our subsidiary in China, the VIEs and the shareholders of the VIEs are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis and adjust the income of the VIEs through the transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in, for PRC tax purposes, increased tax liabilities of the VIEs. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to disgorge our prior tax benefits, and require us to pay additional taxes for prior tax years and impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIEs for underpayment of prior taxes. To date, similar contractual arrangements have been used by many public companies, including companies listed in the United States, and, to the best of our knowledge, no publicly available information has indicated that the PRC tax authorities have imposed any material penalties on those companies. However, we cannot assure you that such penalties will not be imposed on any other companies or us in the future. Our net income may be reduced if the tax liabilities of the VIEs materially increase or if they are found to be subject to additional tax obligations, late payment fees or other penalties.

If any of the VIEs becomes bankrupt or enter into liquidation proceeding, we may lose the ability to use and dispose assets held by such entity, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently conduct certain of our operations in China through contractual arrangements with the VIEs and the shareholders of the VIEs. As part of these arrangements, certain of our education-related assets that are critical to the operation of our business are held by the VIEs. If any of these entities goes bankrupt and all or part of their assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of our business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of the VIEs undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, its equity owner or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights relating to some or all of these assets, which would hinder our ability to operate our business and could materially and adversely affect our business, our ability to generate revenue and the market price of the ADSs.

If the custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets, including chops and seals, fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts that our business relies on, are executed with validity when using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant PRC industry and commerce authorities.

In order to maintain the physical security of our chops, we generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to authorized employees. Although we monitor such authorized employees, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. There is a risk that our employees could abuse their authority, for example, by entering into a contract not approved by us or seeking to gain control of one of our subsidiaries or affiliated entities. If any employee obtains, misuses or misappropriates our chops and seals or other controlling intangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruption to our normal business operations.

We may have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve and divert management from our operations.

PRC regulation of loans and direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our public offerings and other financing activities to make loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, which could harm our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

As an offshore holding company of our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, in utilizing the proceeds of our initial public offerings and other financing activities, we may (1) make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, (2) make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, (3) establish new PRC subsidiaries and make capital contributions to these new PRC subsidiaries, and (4) acquire offshore entities with business operations in China in an offshore transaction. For details on our use of offering proceeds, see “Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds—Use of Proceeds.”

However, most of these uses are subject to PRC regulations and approvals. For example:

As a result of the requirements and limitations outlined above, the amount of funds that we can directly contribute to our operations in China through Zhuhai Bright Scholar, a foreign-invested enterprise indirectly held by us, is limited.

In addition, on March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach regarding the Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises (“Circular 19”), which came into effect from June 1, 2015. The notice requires that the capital of a foreign-invested company settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies shall be used only for purposes within the business scope as approved by the applicable government authorities and may not be used for equity investments in China unless such activity is set forth in the business scope or is otherwise permissible under PRC laws or regulations. Furthermore, SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of such capital of a foreign-invested company settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be changed without SAFE’s approval, and may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not otherwise been used. On October 23, 2019, the SAFE issued the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Facilitating Cross-border Trade and Investment, which, among other things, expanded the use of foreign exchange capital in domestic equity investment. Non-investment foreign-funded enterprises are allowed to lawfully make domestic equity investments by using their capital on the premise without violation of prevailing special administrative measures for access of foreign investments (negative list) and the authenticity and compliance with the regulations of domestic investment projects. If our affiliated entity requires financial support from us or our wholly owned subsidiary in the future, and we find it necessary to use foreign currency-denominated capital to provide such financial support, our ability to fund our variable interest entity’s operations will be subject to statutory limits and restrictions, including those described above.

On February 13, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Simplifying and Improving the Direct Investment-related Foreign Exchange Administration Policies (“Circular 13”), which was implemented on June 1, 2015. Pursuant to Circular 13, the registration of existing equity is required in lieu of annual foreign exchange inspection of direct investment. Circular 13 also grants the authority to examine and process foreign exchange registration with respect to both domestic and overseas direct investments.

We expect that PRC laws and regulations may continue to limit our use of proceeds from our initial public offerings and other financing activities or from other financing sources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain these government registrations or approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans or capital contributions by us to our entities in China. If we fail to receive such registrations or approvals, our ability to use the proceeds of our initial public offerings and other financing activities and to capitalize our PRC operations may be hindered, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

PRC economic, political and social conditions, as well as changes in any government policies, laws and regulations, could adversely affect the overall economy in China or the education services market, which could harm our business.

The majority of our operations are conducted in China, and a significant portion of our revenues are derived from China. Accordingly, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations are subject, to a significant extent, to economic, political and legal developments in China.

The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects. Although the PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy since the late 1970s, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating the industry. The PRC government has significant control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling the incurrence and oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene with or influence our operations to further regulatory, political and societal goals. The PRC government has recently published new policies that significantly affected industries such as the education and internet industries, and we cannot rule out the possibility that more regulations or policies would be released, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, under the former Law on the Promotion of Private Education, as amended on June 29, 2013 and on December 29, 2018, and its implementation rules, a private school should elect to be either a school that does not require “reasonable returns” or a school that requires “reasonable returns.” A private school must consider factors such as the school’s tuition, ratio of the funds used for education-related activities to the course fees collected, admission standards and educational quality when determining the percentage of the school’s net income that would be distributed to the investors as reasonable returns. On September 1, 2017, the Amended Law came into effect, under which the concept “reasonable returns” is no longer applicable and a private school should opt to be either for-profit or non-profit. Sponsors of for-profit schools may obtain operating profits, while sponsors of non-profit schools may not. However, pursuant to the Implementation Rules, sponsors are not permitted to register for-profit schools that provide compulsory education services from grades one to nine. Such rules apply to a significant portion of our domestic K-12 schools. Furthermore, the PRC government has recently indicated the intent to exert more oversight and control over overseas securities offerings and other capital markets activities and foreign investment in China-based companies like us. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors. This could result in a substantial decline in the value of such securities or, in the most extreme cases, render them completely worthless.

While the PRC economy has grown significantly in the past two to three decades, such growth has been uneven among various regions and among various sectors of the economy. Demand for our education services depends, in large part, on economic conditions in China and especially the regions where we operate, including Guangdong province. Any significant slowdown in China’s economic growth may adversely affect the disposable income of the families of prospective students and cause them to delay or cancel their plans to participate in our schools, which in turn could reduce our revenues. In addition, any sudden changes to China’s political system or the occurrence of social unrest could also have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, our company, the VIEs and their subsidiaries, and our investors may face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the VIEs and their subsidiaries’ financial performance and operations, including the enforceability of the contractual arrangements. As of the date of this annual report, neither our company nor the VIEs have received or have been denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges. However, we cannot assure you that our company or the VIEs will receive or not be denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges in the future.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions in a civil law system may be cited as reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, newly introduced PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections of interests related to foreign investments in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system evolves rapidly, the interpretations of such laws and regulations may not always be consistent, and enforcement of these laws and regulations involves significant uncertainties. Any of these could limit the available legal protections.

In addition, the PRC administrative and judicial authorities have broad discretion in interpreting, implementing or enforcing statutory rules and contractual terms. As a result, it may be more challenging to predict the outcome of administrative and judicial proceedings and the level of legal protection we may receive in the PRC than under some more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may affect our decisions on the policies and actions to be taken to comply with PRC laws and regulations, and may affect our ability to enforce our contractual or tort rights. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited legal actions or threats to extract payments or benefits from us. Such uncertainties may therefore increase our operating expenses and costs, and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene with or influence our operations as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals.

The PRC government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. The ability of our subsidiaries and the VIEs to operate in China may be impaired by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to education, taxation, land use rights, foreign investment limitations, and other matters. We cannot assure you that government authorities in China will not introduce enhanced regulation over the education industry that may lead to our inability to operate in China at all. Furthermore, the PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over overseas securities offerings and other capital markets activities and foreign investment in China-based companies like us. For example, on July 6, 2021, the relevant PRC government authorities promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Scrutinizing Illegal Securities Activities in accordance with the Law, or the Opinions. The Opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies. On February 17, 2023, with the approval of the State Council, the CSRC released the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. According to the Trial Measures, among other requirements, (1) domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC; if a domestic company fails to complete the filing procedures, such domestic company may be subject to administrative penalties; (2) where a domestic company seeks to indirectly offer and list securities in an overseas market, the issuer shall designate a major domestic operating entity responsible for all filing procedures with the CSRC, and such filings shall be submitted to the CSRC within three business days after the submission of the overseas offering and listing application; and (3) where a listed issuer seeks to indirectly offer and list securities in the same overseas market, such filings shall be submitted to the CSRC within three business days after the completion of the overseas offering and listing. On the same day, the CSRC also held a press conference for the release of the Trial Measures and issued the Notice on Administration for the Filing of Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, which clarifies that (1) on or prior to the effective date of the Trial Measures, domestic companies that have already submitted valid applications for overseas offering and listing but have not obtained approval from overseas regulatory authorities or stock exchanges may reasonably arrange the timing for submitting their filing applications with the CSRC, and must complete the filing before the completion of their overseas offering and listing; (2) a six-month transition period will be granted to domestic companies which, prior to the effective date of the Trial Measures, have already obtained the approval from overseas regulatory authorities or stock exchanges, but have not completed the indirect overseas listing; if domestic companies fail to complete the overseas listing within such six-month transition period, they shall file with the CSRC according to the requirements; and (3) the CSRC will solicit opinions from relevant regulatory authorities and complete the filing of the overseas listing of companies with contractual arrangements which duly meet the compliance requirements, and support the development and growth of these companies. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or, in extreme cases, become worthless. We did not have to complete such filings with the CSRC for our initial public offering on May 19, 2017 and the follow-on offering on February 28, 2018 because the offerings had taken place before the enactment of the Trial Measures; however, we will be required to complete such filings with the CSRC for our future offerings. If we cannot complete such filings with the CSRC, we may not continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or, in extreme cases, become worthless.

Any increase in applicable enterprise income tax rates or the discontinuation of any preferential tax treatments currently available to us may result in significantly higher tax burden or the disgorgement of any benefits we enjoyed in the past, which could in turn materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Under the former Law on the Promotion of Private Education, as amended on June 29, 2013 and on December 29, 2018, and its implementing rules as promulgated on September 1, 2021, private schools, whether for-profit or non-profit, may enjoy national preferential tax treatment. The implementing rules provide that non-profit private schools are eligible to enjoy the same preferential tax treatment as public schools. To date, however, no separate policies, regulations or rules have been introduced by the authorities in this regard. Moreover, prior to April 1, 2023, our subsidiaries operating in the United Kingdom had been subject to income tax rate at 19%. Form April 1, 2023, the income tax rate for our subsidiaries operating in the United Kingdom increased to 25%.

In addition, preferential tax treatments granted to us by local government authorities are subject to review and may be adjusted or revoked at any time in the future. For example, three of our affiliate entities in Sichuan province enjoy preferential enterprise income tax treatments. The discontinuation of any preferential tax treatments currently available to us will cause our effective tax rate to increase, which will increase our income tax expenses and in turn decrease our net income. In addition, we may not be granted preferential tax treatment by the local governments of additional regions into which we may expand. The Amended Law, which became effective on September 1, 2017, no longer uses the term “reasonable return.” Instead, under the Amended Law, sponsors of private schools may elect to register their schools as either non-profit or for-profit, with the exception that private schools in compulsory education must be registered as non-profit private schools. Pursuant to such Amended Law, non-profit private schools will be entitled to the same tax benefits as public schools, but taxation policies for for-profit private schools are still unclear. However, it is unclear how the Amended Law and its potential implementation rules would impact the tax treatment applicable to our schools and whether our schools would enjoy any preferential tax treatment in the future. Any negative development could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Under the PRC enterprise income tax law, we may be classified as a PRC “resident enterprise,” which could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.

The PRC enterprise income tax law and its implementing rules provide that enterprises established outside of China whose “de facto management bodies” are located in China are considered “resident enterprises” under PRC tax laws. The implementing rules define the term “de facto management bodies” as a management body which substantially manages, or has control over the business, personnel, finance and assets of an enterprise. On April 22, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation issued Circular 82, which provides that a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a group of PRC companies will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management body” located within China if all of the following requirements are satisfied: (1) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function are mainly in China; (2) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in China; (3) its major assets, accounting books, company seals, and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in China; and (4) at least half of the enterprise’s directors with voting right or senior management reside in China. The State Administration of Taxation issued a bulletin on August 3, 2011 to provide more guidance on the implementation of Circular 82. The bulletin clarifies certain matters relating to resident status determination, post-determination administration and competent tax authorities. Although both the circular and the bulletin only apply to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises and not those by PRC individuals, the determination criteria set forth in the circular and administration clarification made in the bulletin may reflect the general position of the State Administration of Taxation on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises and the administration measures should be implemented, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC individuals.

In addition, the State Administration of Taxation issued a bulletin on January 29, 2014 to provide more guidance on the implementation of Circular 82. This bulletin further provides that, among other things, an entity that is classified as a “resident enterprise” in accordance with the circular shall file the application for classifying its status of resident enterprise with the local tax authorities where its main domestic investors are registered.

As the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to the determination by the PRC tax authorities, if we are deemed as a PRC “resident enterprise,” we will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our worldwide income at a uniform tax rate of 25.0%, although dividends distributed to us from our existing PRC subsidiaries and any other PRC subsidiaries which we may establish from time to time could be exempt from the PRC dividend withholding tax due to our PRC “resident recipient” status. This could have a material adverse effect on our overall effective tax rate, our income tax expenses and our net income. Furthermore, dividends, if any, paid to our shareholders and ADS holders may be decreased as a result of the decrease in distributable profits. In addition, if we were to be considered a PRC “resident enterprise,” dividends we pay with respect to the ADSs or ordinary shares and the gains realized from the transfer of the ADSs or ordinary shares may be considered income derived from sources within China and be subject to PRC withholding tax, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of your investment in us and the price of the ADSs.

There are significant uncertainties under the PRC enterprise income tax law relating to the withholding tax liabilities of our PRC subsidiaries, and dividends payable by our PRC subsidiaries to our offshore subsidiaries may not qualify to enjoy certain preferential treatments.

Under the PRC enterprise income tax and its implementation rules, the profits of a foreign-invested enterprise generated through operations, which are distributed to its immediate holding company outside China, will be subject to a withholding tax rate of 10.0%. Pursuant to a special arrangement between Hong Kong and China, such rate may be reduced to 5.0% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns more than 25.0% of the equity interest in the PRC company. Our current PRC subsidiaries are wholly owned by our Hong Kong subsidiary. Moreover, under the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues regarding the Administration of the Dividend Provision in Tax Treaties promulgated on February 20, 2009, the taxpayer needs to satisfy certain conditions to enjoy the benefits under a tax treaty. These conditions include: (1) the taxpayer must be the beneficial owner of the relevant dividends, and (2) the corporate shareholder to receive dividends from the PRC subsidiaries must have continuously met the direct ownership thresholds during the 12 consecutive months preceding the receipt of the dividends. Further, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Notice on Issues Relating to “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties, or Circular 9, defines the “beneficial owner” as a party who holds ownership of and control over the income of the entity, or the rights or assets from which such income are derived. Circular 9 sets forth certain detailed factors in determining the “beneficial owner” status. Further, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Notice on How to Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties on June 29, 2012, which replaced the Notice on How to Understand and Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties. Furthermore, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Relating to “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties (“Circular 9”) in February 3, 2018, which took effect on April 1, 2018, replaced the Notice on How to Understand and Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties and provides guidance for determining whether a resident of a contracting state is the “beneficial owner” of an item of income under China’s tax treaties and tax arrangements.

Entitlement to a lower tax rate on dividends according to tax treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions is subject to inspection or approval of the relevant tax authorities. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be entitled to any preferential withholding tax rate under tax treaties for dividends received from our PRC subsidiaries.

Based on the recent development of PRC law, there is significant uncertainty about the application and interpretation of the Law on the Promotion of Private Education, the Implementation Rules and their detailed implementation rules and regulations. We may face significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private education business, acquire private schools, or receive payments from the VIEs and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.

Pursuant to the Law on the Promotion of Private Education, sponsors of private schools may choose to establish schools as either non-profit or for-profit schools. Sponsors are not permitted to establish for-profit schools that provide compulsory education services, which covers grades one to nine and which accounts for a significant portion of our students as well as revenue during the reporting period. Sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and any operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenue must be used for the operation of the schools.

Given the Law on the Promotion of Private Education, the Implementation Rules and other relevant laws and regulations, as a holding company, our ability to generate profits, pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders are subject to many factors, including whether our schools are characterized as for-profit or non-profit, the profitability of our schools, and our ability to receive dividends and other distributions from our PRC subsidiary, Zhuhai Bright Scholar, which in turn depends on the service fees paid to Zhuhai Bright Scholar from the VIEs. Zhuhai Bright Scholar has exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with each of the VIEs, Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang, the shareholders of the VIEs. Pursuant to these agreements, Zhuhai Bright Scholar has the exclusive right to provide comprehensive technical and business support services to the VIEs. As advised by our PRC counsel, as of August 2021, our right to receive the service fees from our schools and other affiliated entities did not, to our knowledge, contravene any PRC laws or regulations then in force. Likewise, the payment of service fees under our contractual arrangements should not be regarded as the distribution of returns, dividends or profits to the sponsors of our schools under the PRC laws and regulations then in force.

However, according to the Implementation Rules, which came into force on September 1, 2021, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in, or actually control private schools providing compulsory education; (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school providing compulsory education or any non-profit private school providing pre-school education by means of merger, acquisition, contractual arrangements, etc.; and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party. Where a private school conducts any transaction with any related party, it shall adhere to the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality, fix reasonable tuition and fees and regulate the decision-making, and shall not damage the state and the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, otherwise, there is a risk of being ordered to make corrections within a time limit. The illegal gains, if any, shall be confiscated after the fees collected are returned; if the circumstances are serious, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller or member of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school within one to five years; if the circumstances are especially serious with adverse social impact, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller and members of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school permanently; if a violation of public security administration is committed, the public security organ shall impose a public security administration punishment according to law; if a crime is committed, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the law.

Therefore, a private school providing compulsory education is prohibited from conducting transactions with its related party. As a result, the clause or provision in the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements that pertains to related party transactions between a private school providing compulsory education and Zhuhai Bright Scholar was not legally enforceable since September 1, 2021. Since then, we have stopped transacting with the Affected Entities. However, to keep these private schools providing compulsory education in operations, we continued to provide essential services without recognizing any revenues relating to such activities to schools providing compulsory education in our discontinued operations, which are key to the normal daily operation of these schools. However, in May and June 2023, the related staff had transferred out from the services center in our headquarters, and we ceased to provide such free services. The possibility and impact of illegal risks are still unable to be assessed clearly. We are continuously assessing the impact of relevant regulations on our business and making necessary measures and efforts to comply with the requirements under these regulations and implementations, including restructuring corporate structure or unwinding contractual arrangements, etc.

In particular, the validity of our contractual arrangements may be challenged, and our corporate structure may need to be restructured to comply with the new regulations, which may be time-consuming and expensive and impose additional restrictions on our business expansion and may further adversely affect our business operations and results of operations. See “—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—Our private education service business is subject to extensive regulation in China. If the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangement that establishes our corporate structure for operating our business does not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties.”

On July 24, 2021, the Alleviating Burden Opinion was promulgated. The Alleviating Burden Opinion proposes certain measures intended to ease the workload of students in compulsory education and regulate the relevant after-school tutoring services for the compulsory education stage in the PRC, including (1) institutions providing after-school education service on academic subjects in China’s compulsory education system, or academic training institutions, need to be registered as non-profit, no approval will be granted to new academic training institutions, and an approval mechanism will be adopted for online academic training institutions; (2) foreign ownership in academic training institutions is prohibited, including through contractual arrangements, and companies with existing foreign ownership need to rectify such status; (3) listed companies are prohibited from raising capital to invest in businesses that teach academic subjects in compulsory education; (4) academic training institutions are prohibited from providing tutoring services on academic subjects in compulsory education during public holidays, weekends and school breaks; and (5) academic training institutions must follow the fee standards to be established by relevant authorities. The Alleviating Burden Opinion also provides that institutions providing after-school tutoring services on academic subjects in high schools (which do not fall within China’s compulsory education system) shall take into consideration the Alleviating Burden Opinion when conducting activities. If the corporate structure and the business of our complementary education services are deemed to be in violation of the Alleviating Burden Opinion by relevant authorities, our corporate structure and business operations may be adversely affected and may need to be restructured to comply with the Alleviating Burden Opinion.

We face uncertainties with respect to indirect transfers of the equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

The State Administration of Taxation issued Bulletin on Several Issues concerning the Enterprise Income Tax on the Indirect Transfers of Properties by Non-Resident Enterprises (“Bulletin 7”), on February 3, 2015. Under Bulletin 7, an “indirect transfer” of assets, including equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise, by non-PRC resident enterprises may be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable assets if the arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding payment of PRC enterprise income tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax. According to Bulletin 7, “PRC taxable assets” include assets attributed to an establishment in China, immoveable properties in China, and equity investments in PRC resident enterprises. In respect of an indirect offshore transfer of assets of a PRC establishment, the relevant gain is to be regarded as effectively connected with the PRC establishment and therefore included in its enterprise income tax filing, and would consequently be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25.0%. If the underlying transfer relates to the immoveable properties in China or to equity investments in a PRC resident enterprise that is not effectively connected to a PRC establishment of a non-resident enterprise, a PRC enterprise income tax at 10.0% would apply, subject to available preferential tax treatment under applicable tax treaties or similar arrangements. The party obligated to make the transfer payments has the withholding obligation. There is uncertainty as to the implementation details of Bulletin 7. If Bulletin 7 was determined by the tax authorities to be applicable to some of our transactions involving PRC taxable assets, our offshore subsidiaries conducting the relevant transactions might be required to spend valuable resources to comply with Bulletin 7 or to establish that the relevant transactions should not be taxed under Bulletin 7.

On October 17, 2017, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Bulletin on Issues Concerning the Source-based Withholding of Enterprise Income Tax on Non-resident Enterprises (“Bulletin 37”), which became effective on December 1, 2017. According to Bulletin 37, non-resident enterprises who voluntarily declare their enterprise income tax shall at the same time confirm when they would make payments for the declared amount of tax. If the withholding agent fails to or is unable to withhold the income tax in accordance with the law, the non-resident enterprise will be deemed to have cleared its tax payment on time if it voluntarily declares and pays the tax before or within the time limit the tax authority orders it to do so. If the taxable income before withholding on a source-basis falls within the form of dividends or any equity investment gains, the obligation to settle such tax payments is triggered on the date of actual payment of the dividends or other equity investment gains. In addition, on December 1, 2017, Bulletin 37 repealed the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Strengthening the Administration over Enterprise Income Tax on Income of Non-resident Enterprises from Equity Transfer and Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Issuing the Interim Measures for the Administration of Source-based Withholding of the Enterprise Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises issued by the State Administration of Taxation on December 10, 2009 and January 1, 2009, respectively.

As a result, we and our non-PRC shareholders may have the risk of being taxed for the disposition of our ordinary shares or ADS and may be required to spend valuable resources to comply with Bulletin 7 and Bulletin 37 or to establish that we or our non-PRC shareholders should not be taxed as an indirect transfer, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or the investment by non-PRC investors in us.

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenue effectively.

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to use revenue generated in Renminbi to fund any business activities we may have outside China in the future or to make dividend payments to our shareholders and ADS holders in U.S. dollars. Under current PRC laws and regulations, Renminbi is freely convertible for current account items, such as trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions and dividend distributions. However, Renminbi is not freely convertible for direct investment or loans or investments in securities outside China, unless such use is approved by SAFE. For example, foreign exchange transactions under our subsidiary’s capital account, including principal payments in respect of foreign currency-denominated obligations, remain subject to significant foreign exchange controls and the approval requirement of SAFE. These limitations could affect our ability to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures.

Our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to declare dividends to our offshore subsidiary holding their equity interest, convert the dividends into a foreign currency and remit to its shareholder outside China. In addition, in the event that any of our PRC subsidiaries liquidates, proceeds from the liquidation may be converted into foreign currency and distributed outside China to our overseas subsidiary holding its equity interest. Furthermore, in the event that any of the VIEs liquidates, our PRC subsidiary, Zhuhai Bright Scholar, may, pursuant to the power of attorneys respectively executed by Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang, require such VIE to pay and remit the proceeds from such liquidation to Zhuhai Bright Scholar. Zhuhai Bright Scholar then may distribute such proceeds to us after converting them into foreign currency and remit them outside China in the form of dividends or other distributions. Once remitted outside of China, dividends, distributions or other proceeds from liquidation paid to us will not be subject to restrictions under PRC regulations on its further transfer or use.

Other than the above distributions by and through our PRC subsidiaries, which are permitted without further approvals, any conversion of the Renminbi-denominated revenue generated by the VIEs for direct investment, loans or investment in securities outside China will be subject to the limitations discussed above. To the extent we need to convert and use any Renminbi-denominated revenue generated by the VIEs not paid to our PRC subsidiaries and revenue generated by our PRC subsidiaries not declared and paid as dividends, the limitations discussed above will restrict the convertibility of, and our ability to directly receive and use such revenue. As a result, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that the PRC regulatory authorities will not impose more stringent restrictions on the convertibility of Renminbi in the future, especially with respect to foreign exchange transactions.

Our subsidiaries and affiliated entities in China are subject to restrictions on making dividends and other payments to us.

As a holding company, we primarily rely on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China for our cash needs, including paying dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders to the extent we choose to do so, servicing any debt we may incur and paying our operating expenses. The income for our PRC subsidiaries, especially Zhuhai Bright Scholar, in turn depends on the service fees paid by the VIEs. Current PRC regulations permit our subsidiaries in China to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under the applicable requirements of PRC law, our PRC subsidiaries may only distribute dividends after they have made allowances to fund certain statutory reserves. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Pursuant to the Law on the Promotion of Private Education, sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools, and the operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools. All revenue must be used for the operation of the schools. According to Implementation Rules, a non-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual non-restricted net asset increase, or a for-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual net income, to its development, respectively. In addition, prior to the promulgation of specific Implementation Rules and other relevant regulations, at the end of each fiscal year, each of our private schools in China is required to allocate a certain amount to its development fund for the construction or maintenance of the school properties or purchase or upgrade of school facilities. In particular, our for-profit schools must allocate no less than 10% of their annual net income, and our non-profit schools must allocate no less than 10% of their annual increase in the unrestricted net assets of the school. However, the relevant authorities have yet to promulgate any detailed implementation rules and regulations under the Implementation Rules. We remain uncertain as to the timing and substance of the rules under the Law on the Promotion of Private Education and Implementation Rules to be promulgated, and how such rules will impact our operation. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries or the VIEs in China incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any such restrictions may materially affect such entities’ ability to make dividends or make payments, in service fees or otherwise, to us, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain PRC regulations, including the M&A Rules and national security regulations, may require a complicated review and approval process which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The Provisions on the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (Revised in 2009), or the M&A Rules, established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities in China by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. For example, MOFCOM must be notified if a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. In addition, certain acquisitions of domestic companies by offshore companies that are related to or affiliated with the same entities or individuals of the domestic companies, are subject to MOFCOM approval. In addition, the Implementing Rules Concerning Security Review on Mergers and Acquisitions by Foreign Investors of Domestic Enterprises, issued by MOFCOM in August 2011, require that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors in “any industry with national security concerns” be subject to national security review by MOFCOM. In addition, any activities attempting to circumvent such review process, including structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement, are strictly prohibited.

There is significant uncertainty regarding the interpretation and implementation of these regulations relating to merger and acquisition activities in China. Therefore, complying with these requirements could be time-consuming. The required notification, review or approval process may materially delay or affect our ability to complete merger and acquisition transactions in China. As a result, our ability to seek growth through acquisitions may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, if MOFCOM determines that we should have obtained its approval for our entry into contractual arrangements with the VIEs and the shareholders of the VIEs, we may be required to file for remedial approvals. We cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain such approval from MOFCOM. We may also be subject to administrative fines or penalties by MOFCOM that may require us to limit our business operations in China, delay or restrict the conversion and remittance of our funds in foreign currencies into China or take other actions that could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure by the beneficial owners of our shares who are PRC residents to comply with certain PRC foreign exchange regulations could restrict our ability to distribute profits, restrict our cross-border investment activities and subject us to liability under PRC law.

SAFE has promulgated regulations, including the Notice on Relevant Issues Relating to Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Investment and Financing and Round-Trip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles (“Circular 37”), effective on July 4, 2014, and its appendices. Circular 37 requires PRC residents, including PRC institutions and individuals, to register with local branches of SAFE if they direct establish or indirect control an offshore entity for the purpose of overseas investment and financing. Such domestic or offshore entities with PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests are referred to in Circular 37 as a “special purpose vehicle.” The term “control” under Circular 37 is broadly defined as the operation rights, beneficiary rights or decision-making rights acquired by the PRC residents in the offshore special purpose vehicles by means as acquisition, trust, proxy, voting rights, repurchase, convertible bonds or other arrangements. Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. If a PRC shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiaries. Further, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for foreign exchange evasion.

These regulations apply to our direct and indirect shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions or share transfers that we make in the future if our shares are issued to PRC residents. Additionally, in practice, different local SAFE branches may have different views and procedures on the application and implementation of SAFE regulations, and there remains uncertainty with respect to its implementation. As of the date of this annual report, all PRC residents known to us that currently hold direct or indirect interests in our company either have completed the necessary registrations or are in the process of updating their necessary registration with SAFE as required by Circular 37. However, we cannot assure you that these individuals or any other direct or indirect shareholders or beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents will be able to successfully complete the registration or update the registration of their direct and indirect equity interest as required in the future. If they fail to make or update the registration, our PRC subsidiaries could be subject to fines and legal penalties, and SAFE could restrict our cross-border investment activities and our foreign exchange activities, including restricting our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to, or obtain loans denominated in foreign currencies from, our company, or prevent us from contributing additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries. As a result, our business operations and our ability to pay dividends could be materially and adversely affected.

The filing with and reporting to the CSRC will be required in connection with our capital raising activities and occurrences of other specific events, and we cannot assure you that we or the Affiliated Entities will be able to make such filing or reporting in a timely manner or at all, in which case we may face regulatory sanctions for failure to make such filing or reporting.

Under the current Regulations on Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rules”), as jointly adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, an offshore special purpose vehicle that is controlled by PRC domestic companies or individuals and that has been formed for the purpose of an overseas listing of securities through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies or assets is required to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. However, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the scope and applicability of the M&A Rules to offshore special purpose vehicles. It remains uncertain as to how the M&A Rules will be interpreted or implemented in the context of an overseas offering and its opinions summarized above are subject to any new laws, regulations and rules or detailed implementations and interpretations in any form relating to the M&A Rules. We cannot assure you that relevant PRC government agencies, including the CSRC, might, from time to time, further clarify or interpret the M&A Rules in writing or orally and require their approvals to be obtained for an offering. If we fail to obtain required CSRC approval under the M&A Rules in a timely manner, we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies, which may include fines and penalties on the operations in China, delays in or restrictions on the repatriation of the proceeds from the relevant offering into China, restrictions on or prohibition of the payments or remittance of dividends by our WFOE or the VIE in China, or other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs.

On July 6, 2021, the General Office of the State Council of the PRC, together with another regulatory authority, jointly promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down Illegal Securities Activities in Accordance with the Law, which calls for enhanced administration and supervision of overseas-listed China-based companies, proposes to revise the relevant regulation governing the overseas issuance and listing of shares by such companies, and clarifies the responsibilities of competent domestic industry regulators and government authorities.

Moreover, on February 17, 2023, the CSRC, as approved by the State Council, released a new filing-based regime to regulate overseas offerings and listings by domestic companies. The new filing rules consist of the Trial Measures for Administration of Overseas Securities Offerings and Listings by Domestic Companies (the “Trial Measures”) and five interpretive guidelines (collectively, the “CSRC Filing Rules”), which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Under the CSRC Filing Rules, a filing-based regulatory system shall be applied to “indirect overseas offerings and listings” of PRC domestic companies. Pursuant to the CSRC Filing Rules, if the issuer meets either of the following conditions, its securities offerings and listing will be deemed as an “indirect overseas offering and listing by a PRC domestic company” and is therefore subject to the filing requirements: (1) any of the revenues, profits, total assets or net assets of the issuer’s Chinese operating entities in the most recent financial year accounts for more than 50% of the corresponding data in the issuer’s audited consolidated financial statements for the same period; and (2) the key link of its business operations are conducted in mainland China or its principal place of business is located in the mainland China, or the majority of senior management in charge of business operations are Chinese citizens or have domicile in the PRC. The CSRC Filing Rules state that, any post-listing follow-on offering by an issuer in an the same overseas market where it has previously offered and listed securities, including issuance of shares, convertible notes and other similar securities, shall be subject to filing requirement within three business days after the completion of the offering, and if the subsequent offering is conducted in other overseas markets, it shall be filed with the CSRC within three working days after the applications for such offerings are submitted. Therefore, any of our future offering and listing of our securities in an overseas market will be subject to the filing requirements under the CSRC Filing Rules. In addition, we are required to submit a report to CSRC after the occurrence and public disclosure of the following material events: (1) change of control; (2) investigations or sanctions imposed by overseas securities regulatory agencies or other relevant competent authorities; (3) change of listing status or transfer of listing segment and (4) voluntary or mandatory delisting. If we fail to complete the filing or reporting procedures with the CSRC as required, we may face sanctions by the CSRC, which may include orders for correction, warnings and fines. Any adverse regulatory actions or sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs.

Failure to comply with governmental regulations and other legal obligations concerning data protection and cybersecurity may materially and adversely affect our business, as we routinely collect, store and use data during the conduct of our business.

We routinely collect, store and use data during our operations. We are subject to PRC laws and regulations governing the collecting, storing, sharing, using, processing, disclosure and protection of data on the Internet and mobile platforms as well as cybersecurity. On April 13, 2020, the Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission and 10 other government authorities jointly promulgated the Measures for Cybersecurity Review. On August 17, 2021, the PRC State Council promulgated the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, critical information infrastructure shall mean any important network facilities or information systems of an important industry or field, such as public communication and information service, energy, communications, water conservation, finance, public services, e-government affairs and national defense science, which may endanger national security, peoples’ livelihood and public interest in the event of damage, function loss or data leakage. In addition, relevant administration departments of each critical industry and sector (the “Protection Departments”), shall be responsible to formulate eligibility criteria and determine the critical information infrastructure operator in the respective industry or sector. The operators shall be informed about the final determination as to whether they are categorized as critical information infrastructure operators. On January 4, 2022, the CAC announced the adoption of the Cybersecurity Review Measures, and effective February 15, 2022, online platforms and network providers possessing personal information of more than one million individual user must undergo a cybersecurity review by the CAC when they seek listing in foreign markets. Furthermore, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress passed the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC, which became effective from November 1, 2021 and requires personal information processing operators, among other regulatory requirements, to obtain a personal information protection certification issued by recognized institutions in accordance with the CAC regulation before such personal information can be transferred out of China. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been informed that we are identified as a critical information infrastructure operator by any governmental authorities.

On August 20, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law, which became effective on November 1, 2021. The Personal Information Protection Law aims to protect personal information rights and interests, regulate the processing of personal information, ensure the orderly and free flow of personal information in accordance with the law, and promote the reasonable use of personal information. According to the Personal Information Protection Law, personal information includes all kinds of identified or identifiable information related to natural persons recorded by electronic or other means, but excludes de-identified information. The Personal Information Protection Law also specifies the rules for handling sensitive personal information, which includes biometrics, religious beliefs, specific identities, medical health, financial accounts, trails and locations, and personal information of teenagers under fourteen years old and other personal information, which may easily infringe the personal dignity or harm safety of livelihood and property upon leakage or illegal usage. Personal information handlers are responsible for their personal information handling activities, and must adopt necessary measures to safeguard the security of the personal information they handle. Otherwise, the personal information handlers will be ordered for rectification or suspension or termination of provision of services, confiscation of illegal income, subject to fines or other penalties.

We face regulatory uncertainties in China that could restrict our ability to grant share incentive awards to our employees or consultants who are PRC citizens.

Pursuant to the Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in a Stock Incentive Plan of an Overseas Publicly-Listed Company issued by SAFE on February 15, 2012 (“Circular 7”), a qualified PRC agent (which could be the PRC subsidiary of the overseas-listed company) is required to file an application with SAFE on behalf of “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) who are granted shares or share options by the overseas-listed company according to its share incentive plan. The application is for conducting SAFE registration with respect to such share incentive plan and obtaining approval for an annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with the share purchase or share option exercise. The foreign exchange income received from the sale of shares and dividends distributed by the overseas listed company and any other income by such PRC individuals shall be fully remitted into a collective foreign currency account in China, which is opened and managed by the PRC domestic agent before distribution to such individuals. In addition, such domestic individuals must also retain an overseas entrusted institution to handle matters in connection with their exercise of share options and their purchase and sale of shares. The PRC domestic agent also needs to update registration with SAFE within three months after the overseas-listed company materially changes its share incentive plan or make any new share incentive plans.

We have granted shares options under the 2017 Plan in the past and may continue to grant additional share options in the future. When we do, we need to apply for or update our registration with SAFE or its local branches on behalf of our employees or consultants who receive options or other equity-based incentive grants under our share incentive plan or material changes in our share incentive plan. However, we may not always be able to make applications or update our registration on behalf of our employees or consultants who hold any type of share incentive awards in compliance with Circular 7. We cannot assure you that such applications or update of registration will be successful. If we or the participants of our share incentive plan who are PRC citizens fail to comply with Circular 7, we and/or such participants of our share incentive plan may be subject to fines and legal sanctions. There may be additional restrictions on the ability of such participants to exercise their share options or remit proceeds gained from sale of their shares into China, and we may be prevented from further granting share incentive awards under our share incentive plan to our employees or consultants who are PRC citizens.

Labor contract laws in China may adversely affect our results of operations.

The current PRC Labor Contract Law imposes greater liabilities on employers and significantly increases the cost of an employer’s decision to reduce its workforce. Moreover, it stipulates that the employment contract of an employee must be automatically terminated upon reaching the mandatory retirement age. If we decide to significantly change or decrease our workforce, the Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our ability to enact such changes in a manner that is most advantageous to our business or in a timely and cost-effective manner, thus materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in labor costs and employee benefits in China may adversely affect our business and our profitability.

The PRC economy has been experiencing significant growth, leading to inflation and increased labor costs. China’s overall economy and the average wage in China are expected to continue to grow. In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. The determination of the relevant government agencies whether an employer has made adequate payments of the requisite statutory employee benefits is within their discretion. Employers that fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. Future increases in China’s inflation and material increases in labor costs and employee benefits may materially and adversely affect our profitability and results of operations unless we are able to pass on these costs to our students by increasing tuition.

Litigation and negative publicity surrounding China-based companies listed in the United States may negatively impact the trading price of the ADSs.

Litigation and negative publicity surrounding companies with operations in China listed in the United States have negatively impacted stock prices of these companies. Certain politicians in the United States have publicly warned investors to shun China-based companies listed in the United States. The SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or the PCAOB, also issued a joint statement on April 21, 2020, reiterating the disclosure, financial reporting and other risks involved in the investments in companies that are based in emerging markets, and the limited remedies thereof. Furthermore, various equity-based research organizations have recently published reports on China-based companies after examining their corporate governance practices, related party transactions, sales practices and financial statements. These reports have led to special investigations and listing suspensions on U.S. national exchanges. Any similar scrutiny on us, regardless of its merit, could cause the market price of the ADSs to fall, divert management resources and energy, cause us to incur expenses in defending ourselves against rumors, and increase the premiums we pay for director and officer insurance.

If the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in China for two consecutive years, our ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the over-the-counter market under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCAA”). The delisting of the ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

Pursuant to the HFCAA, if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years, the SEC will prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong and our auditor was subject to that determination. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. For this reason, we do not expect to be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA after we file this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023.

Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years under such circumstances. If our shares and the ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no assurance that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our shares will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase the ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of the ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares and ADSs

The trading price of the ADSs may experience rapid and substantial volatility, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. In addition, factors specific to our operations can contribute to the volatility of the ADSs. These factors may include, but are not limited to:

Any of these factors may result in significant and sudden changes in the volume and price of the trading of the ADSs. The securities of some China-based companies that have listed their securities in the United States have experienced significant volatility since their initial public offerings in recent years, including, in some cases, substantial declines in the trading prices of their securities. The trading performances of these companies’ securities after their offerings may affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies listed in the United States in general, which consequently may impact the trading performance of the ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, any negative news or perceptions about inadequate corporate governance practices or fraudulent accounting, corporate structure or other matters of other Chinese companies may also negatively affect the perceptions of investors towards Chinese companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have engaged in any inappropriate activities. In particular, the global financial crisis, the ensuing economic recessions and deterioration in the credit market in many countries have contributed and may continue to contribute to extreme volatility in the global stock markets.

Moreover, recent instances of extreme stock price fluctuations, especially among companies with smaller public floats, have led to increased volatility in the market. As we have a relatively small public float, we may experience greater stock price volatility, including aggressive price run-ups and declines, lower trading volume and less liquidity, compared with companies with larger public floats. In particular, the ADSs may be subject to rapid and substantial price volatility, low volumes of trades and large spreads in bid and ask prices. Such volatility, including any stock run-up, may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance, financial condition or prospects, and industry, market or economic factors, which makes it difficult for prospective investors to assess such rapidly changing value of the ADSs. In addition, due to the potential low trading volumes, even small quantities of buying or selling can have a disproportionate impact on the price of the ADSs. This low volume of trades could also cause the price of the ADSs to fluctuate significantly, with large percentage changes occurring within a single trading day. Holders of the ADSs may also not be able to readily liquidate their investment or may be forced to sell at depressed prices due to such low-volume trading. As a result of such volatility, investors may experience losses on their investment in the ADSs. Such volatility also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional ADSs or other securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future, as well as our ability to retain key employees, many of whom have been granted equity incentives. Furthermore, the potential extreme volatility may confuse the public investors of the value of the ADSs, distort the market’s perception of the price of the ADSs, and our financial performance and public image, and negatively affect the long-term liquidity of the ADSs, regardless of our actual or expected operating performance.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and cost us significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, successful or not, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Substantial future sales or perceived potential sales of the ADSs in the public market could cause the price of the ADSs to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of the ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs. All of our outstanding ADSs are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act. If any existing shareholder or shareholders sell a substantial amount of ADSs, the prevailing market price for the ADSs could be adversely affected. Such sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the market price of the ADSs.

Short selling is a trading strategy where an investor sells securities that they have borrowed from a third party, with the intention of buying back the same securities at a later time to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decrease in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

Public companies listed in the United States with a significant portion of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. They may also be subject to external investigations by regulatory bodies such as the SEC. Additionally, shareholders have initiated lawsuits against some of these companies.

We may be the subject of unfavorable allegations made by short sellers in the future. Any such allegations may be followed by periods of instability in the market price of our common shares and ADSs and negative publicity. Once we become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether true or not, we would have to expend significant amount of resource to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed given the principles of freedom of speech, the availability of injunctive reliefs, applicable federal or state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly and time-consuming and could distract our management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could severely impact our business operations and shareholders’ equity, and the value of any investment in the ADSs could be greatly reduced or even rendered worthless.

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

As of November 30, 2023, Excellence Education Investment Limited, Ultimate Wise Group Limited and Sure Brilliant Global Limited collectively hold over 90% of the aggregate voting power of our company. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management And Employees—E. Share Ownership.” As a result of the dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, Excellence Education Investment Limited, Ultimate Wise Group Limited and Sure Brilliant Global Limited have considerable influence over matters such as decisions regarding mergers, consolidations, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. Their interests may not always align with the best interests of the company or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of the ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ADSs will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If research analysts do not establish and maintain adequate research coverage or if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades the ADSs or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more research analysts discontinue their coverage of our company or reduce the frequency of publishing reports on us, it may lead to a reduced visibility of our company in the financial markets. This lack of visibility could adversely impact the market price and trading volume of the ADSs.

Because our board has the complete discretion as to dividend distribution, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs.

We declared a cash dividend of US$0.10, US$0.12 and US$0.12 per ordinary share on September 18, 2019, July 23, 2020 and July 21, 2021, respectively.

Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to applicable laws. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. We cannot assure you that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in the ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.

U.S. holders that own 10% or more of the vote or value of our ordinary shares or ADSs may suffer adverse tax consequences if any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are characterized as a “controlled foreign corporation,” or a CFC, under Section 957(a) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code.

A non-U.S. corporation is considered a CFC if more than 50% of (1) the total combined voting power of all classes of shares of such corporation entitled to vote or (2) the total value of the shares of such corporation, is owned, or is considered as owned by applying certain constructive ownership rules, by U.S. shareholders (within the meaning of the Code) on any day during the taxable year of such non-U.S. corporation. Certain U.S. shareholders of a CFC generally are required to include currently in gross income such shareholders’ share of the CFC’s “Subpart F income,” a portion of the CFC’s earnings to the extent the CFC holds certain U.S. property and a portion of the CFC’s “global intangible low-taxed income” (as defined under Section 951A of the Code). Such U.S. shareholders are subject to current U.S. federal income tax with respect to such items, even if the CFC has not made an actual distribution to such shareholders.

We believe that certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries may be classified as CFCs. In the event that any of our subsidiaries are a CFC, U.S. holders who hold 10% or more of the vote or value of our ordinary shares or ADSs may realize adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences. If you are a U.S. holder who holds 10% or more of the vote or value of our ordinary shares or ADSs, you should consult your own tax advisors regarding the U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, owning or disposing our ordinary shares or our ADSs and the impact of the legislation commonly known as Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, especially the changes to the rules relating to CFCs.

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to United States investors in the ADSs or ordinary shares.

We will be classified as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, if, in any particular taxable year, either (1) 75.0% or more of our gross income for such year consists of certain types of passive income, or (2) 50.0% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income. Although the law in this regard is unclear, we treat the New VIEs as being owned by us for United States federal income tax purposes, not only because we exercise effective control over the operation of such entities but also because we are entitled to substantially all of their economic benefits, and, as a result, we consolidate their results of operation in our financial statements. Assuming that we are the owner of the New VIEs for United States federal income tax purposes, and based upon our historical and current income and assets, we do not believe that we were classified as a PFIC for the taxable year ended August 31, 2023.

The determination of whether we are or will become a PFIC will depend upon the composition of our income (which may differ from our historical results and current projections) and assets and the value of our assets from time to time, including, in particular, the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles (which may depend upon the market value of the ADSs or ordinary shares from time-to-time and may be volatile). In estimating the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles, we have taken into account our market capitalization, which may fluctuate. Among other matters, if our market capitalization declines further, we may be classified as a PFIC for the current or future taxable years. It is also possible that the IRS may challenge our classification or valuation of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles, which may result in our company being, or becoming classified as, a PFIC for the current or future taxable years.

Finally, in determining our PFIC status, we have relied on our unaudited and audited financials. If we are required to restate or amend our financials further, it is possible that our company may have been, or we may determine that it is, a PFIC.

The determination of whether we are or will be a PFIC may also depend, in part, on how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets. Under circumstances where we retain significant amounts of liquid assets, or if the New VIEs were not treated as owned by us for United States federal income tax purposes, our risk of being classified as a PFIC may substantially increase. Because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules and PFIC status is a factual determination made annually after the close of each taxable year, we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year.

If we are classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”) may incur significantly increased United States federal income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares and on the receipt of distributions on the ADSs or ordinary shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the United States federal income tax rules, and such holders may be subject to burdensome reporting requirements. Further, if we are classified as a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds the ADSs or ordinary shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years for which such U.S. Holder holds the ADSs or ordinary shares. For more information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

Our memorandum and articles of association contains anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or prompt us to engage in change-of-control transactions. While these provisions exist with the intention of safeguarding our interests, they may inadvertently limit our shareholders’ opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. For example, our board of directors has the authority subject to any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our Class A ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. The issuance of preferred shares can be expedited and structured in a manner that delays or prevents a change in control of our company or complicates the removal of management. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

However, under Cayman Islands law, our board of directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them by our memorandum and articles of association for a proper purpose and for what they believe in good faith to be in the best interest of the Company.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Cayman Islands Company Act (As Revised) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England. English courts’ decisions are of persuasive authority but not binding upon a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

The Cayman Islands courts are also unlikely (1) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws, or (2) to impose liabilities against us, in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws.

Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States (and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments), the courts of the Cayman Islands would generally recognize as a valid, final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in the United States. This recognition would apply to judgments that require the payment of a sum of money is payable (excluding multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain circumstances, in personam judgments for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (1) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties involved in the judgment, (2) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands, (3) such judgment was not obtained by fraud, (4) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands, (5) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands, and (6) the correct procedures under Cayman Islands laws are duly followed.

However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce a punitive judgment of a United States court predicated upon the liabilities provision of the federal securities laws in the United States without retrial on the merits if such judgment gives rise to obligations to make payments that may be regarded as fines, penalties or similar charges.

As a result of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or large shareholders than compared to public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

As a Cayman Islands company, substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. The majority of our current operations are conducted in the United Kingdom and China. In addition, a majority of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. Most of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice, or the DOJ, and other authorities often have substantial difficulties in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons, including company directors and officers, in certain emerging markets, including China. Additionally, our public shareholders may have limited rights and few practical remedies in emerging markets where we operate. Although shareholder claims are common in the United States, such as class action, claims under securities law and fraud, it’s generally more difficult or impossible to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many emerging markets, including China. In China, there are significant legal and other obstacles for the SEC, the DOJ and other U.S. authorities to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation. Although the competent authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, the regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States has not been efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law which became effective in March 2020, no foreign securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to foreign securities regulators. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if an action is successfully brought, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render it difficult to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

We will be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC may be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, investors may not have access to the same level of protection or information that would be available were the investors to invest in a U.S. domestic issuer.

As a “controlled company” under the rules of the NYSE, we are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements, which could adversely affect our public shareholders.  

Under the rules of the NYSE, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a controlled company and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of our directors be independent, as defined in the NYSE rules, and the requirement that our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees consist entirely of independent directors. Excellence Education Investment Limited, Ultimate Wise Group Limited and Sure Brilliant Global Limited collectively hold over 90% of the aggregate voting power of our company. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership” for details. Therefore, we are a “controlled company” under the rules of the NYSE. We have elected to rely on certain exemptions under the NYSE rules available to controlled companies, including the exemption from having a majority of our directors be independent, and may continue to elect to do so as long as we remain a controlled company. As a result, you may not have the same protections enjoyed by shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with from New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards.

As a Cayman Islands company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we are subject to New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. However, the New York Stock Exchange rules allow a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under the articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. We have followed and intend to continue to follow Cayman Islands corporate governance practices in lieu of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE that, for example, listed companies must have a majority of independent directors and that the audit committee consists of at least three members. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters, our shareholders may have less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to vote.

As a holder of the ADSs, you will only be able to exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares in accordance with these instructions. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying shares unless you withdraw the shares. Under our memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required for convening a general meeting is ten days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive notice sufficiently in advance to withdraw the shares underlying your ADSs to allow you to vote with respect to any specific matter. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote your shares. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may have no legal remedy if the shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

The depositary for the ADSs will give us a discretionary proxy to vote our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, except in limited circumstances, which could adversely affect your interests.

Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if you do not vote, the depositary will give us a discretionary proxy to vote our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs at shareholders’ meetings unless:

The effect of this discretionary proxy is that if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, you cannot prevent our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs from being voted, except in the circumstances described above. This may make it more difficult for shareholders to influence the management of our company. Holders of our ordinary shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy.

You may not receive dividends or other distributions on our Class A ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.

The depositary of the ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares or other deposited securities underlying the ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of Class A ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make a distribution to a holder of ADSs if such distribution consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act but that are not properly registered or under exemption. The depositary may also determine that it is not feasible to distribute certain property through the mail. Additionally, the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing them. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property. We have no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such distributions. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline in the value of the ADSs.

You may experience dilution of your holdings due to inability to participate in rights offerings.

We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings.

You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient when performing its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events such as a right offering, during which the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of the ADSs generally when the share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and development of the company

We are an exempted company with limited liability incorporated in the Cayman Islands. We conduct our business primarily through our subsidiaries and affiliated entities in China, the United Kingdom and the United States. As of the date of this annual report, we have a network of nine kindergartens in China and a number of learning centers for after-school programs through certain contractual arrangements with the VIEs, which in turn controls and holds these kindergartens and learning centers. As of the date of this annual report, we operate eight overseas schools and three language training institutions, which we may also refer to as international language schools, through Bright Scholar (UK) Holdings Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. We trace our history back to the founding of Guangdong Country Garden School, our first private school, in 1994. Over the past two decades, we have launched and acquired a number of schools and complementary education services in China, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada.

Beginning in 2016, we underwent a series of restructurings. In particular:

In August 2021, shareholder of BGY Education Investment, i.e., Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang, established a few new entities, including Foshan Meiliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Shangtai Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Renliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Yongliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Zhiliang Education Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Boteng Consulting Co., Ltd. On August 13, 2021, a set of agreements supplementary to the 2017 contractual arrangements were entered into among Zhuhai Bright Scholar, BGY Education Investment, Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang, and these new entities to enable them, as well as their subsidiaries, to join the 2017 contractual arrangements and share the same rights and obligations, if applicable, of BGY Education Investment.

We have been advised by our PRC legal counsel that the contractual arrangements among Zhuhai Bright Scholar, BGY Education Investment and the subsidiaries and schools it held, and Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang as the shareholders of BGY Education Investment were valid, binding and enforceable under PRC laws and regulations before August 31, 2021, and were not in violation of PRC laws or regulations in effect as of August 31, 2021; and the respective contractual arrangements with Foshan Meiliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Shangtai Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Renliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Yongliang Education Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Zhiliang Education Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Boteng Consulting Co., Ltd. are valid, binding and enforceable under PRC laws and regulations, and are not in violation of PRC laws or regulations currently in effect. If the VIEs, Ms. Meirong Yang and Mr. Wenjie Yang fail to perform their obligations under the contractual arrangements, we could be limited in our ability to enforce the contractual arrangements that give us the effective control over the VIEs. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders for our operations in China, which may not be as effective in providing control as director ownership.”

We have been advised by our PRC legal counsel, however, that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws and regulations. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may in the future take a view that is contrary to the above opinion of our PRC legal counsel. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that if the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangements that establish the structure for operating our education services business in China do not comply with relevant PRC government restrictions on foreign investment in the education services industry, we could be subject to severe penalties, including being prohibited from continuing operations. For a detailed description of the risks associated with our corporate structure, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

If we are unable to maintain effective control over the VIEs, we will not be able to continue to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs into our financial results. We concluded that we have lost control over the private schools among the Affected Entities since August 31, 2021 based on the relevant accounting standard in accordance with U.S. GAAP due to the Implementation Rules that became effective on September 1, 2021. However, in June 2023, the related staff had transferred out from the services center in our headquarters, and we ceased to provide such free services. The revenue contribution of our continuing operations accounted for 43.9% of our total revenues in the 2020 fiscal year and 37.8% in the 2021 fiscal year. Further, as a holding company, our ability to generate profits, pay dividend and other cash distributions to our shareholders depends principally on our ability to receive dividends and other distributions from our PRC subsidiaries. We, through our PRC subsidiary, Zhuhai Bright Scholar, have entered into an exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement with each of the VIEs, pursuant to which we provide service to our VIEs in exchange for the payment of service fees. The services fees we are entitled to collect under the agreement are calculated as the balance of general income less any costs, taxes and other reserved fees stipulated by laws and regulations. In practice, we evaluate on a case-by-case basis the performance and future plans of individual entities before determining the amount we collect from each entity. We do not have unfettered access to the revenues from our PRC subsidiaries or affiliated entities due to the significant PRC legal restrictions on the payment of dividends by PRC companies, foreign exchange control restrictions, and the restrictions on foreign investment, among others. For example, under the applicable requirements of PRC law, our PRC subsidiaries may only distribute dividends after they have made allowances to fund certain statutory reserves. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Our subsidiaries and affiliated entities in China are subject to restrictions on making dividends and other payments to us.”

We listed the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BEDU” on May 18, 2017 and completed an initial public offering of 17,250,000 ADSs on June 7, 2017, raising approximately US$174.7 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting commissions and the offering expenses payable by us. On March 2, 2018, we completed a follow-on public offering of 10,000,000 ADSs, raising approximately US$181.4 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting commissions and the offering expenses payable by us.

In April 2018, our board approved a share repurchase program (the “2018 Share Repurchase Program”) to repurchase up to US$100.0 million worth of our outstanding ADSs within 12 months. The 2018 Share Repurchase Program has expired on April 30, 2019 and as of such date, we had repurchased 6,679,183 of our outstanding ADSs for an aggregate purchase price of approximately US$77 million, pursuant to the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. In September 2019, our board approved a share repurchase program (the “2019 Share Repurchase Program”) to repurchase up to US$30.0 million worth of our outstanding ADSs within 12 months. The 2019 Share Repurchase Program expired on November 19, 2020 and as of such date we had repurchased 1,200,000 of our outstanding ADSs for an aggregate purchase price of approximately US$9.4 million pursuant to the program. In November 2020, our board approved a share repurchase program (the “2020 Share Repurchase Program”) to repurchase up to US$50.0 million worth of our outstanding ADSs within 12 months.

In July 2019, we issued senior notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$300.0 million, with interests of 7.45% per annum and maturing on July 31, 2022 at an issue price of 100.0% in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. We listed such senior notes on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited by way of debt issues to professional investors (as defined in Chapter 37 of the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong) only. As of the date of this annual report, we have redeemed all outstanding senior notes matured on July 31, 2022. Upon the completion of such redemption, all senior notes have been cancelled and delisted from the official list of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.

On April 29, 2022, our board of directors received a preliminary non-binding proposal letter (the “Proposal”) dated the same date from Ms. Huiyan Yang, our ex-chairlady, and Ms. Meirong Yang (collectively, the “Buyer Group”) proposing to acquire all of our outstanding Class A ordinary shares, including Class A Shares represented by ADSs, and Class B ordinary shares that are not already beneficially owned by the Buyer Group for a purchase price of US$0.83 per share in cash in a going private transaction (the “Proposed Transaction”), subject to certain conditions. Our board of directors formed a special committee consisting of three then independent directors, Mr. Peter Andrew Schloss, Mr. Jun Zhao and Mr. Ronald J. Packard, to evaluate and consider the Proposed Transaction. On December 29, 2022, our board of directors received a letter dated the same date from the Buyer Group, informing us the decision of the Buyer Group to withdraw the Proposal dated April 29, 2022 and forego the Proposal to privatize our company.

Effective on August 19, 2022, we changed the ratio of the ADSs to Class A ordinary shares from the then ADS ratio of one ADS to one Class A ordinary share to a new ADS ratio of one ADS representing four Class A ordinary shares.

Our principal executive office is located at No.1, Country Garden Road, Beijiao Town, Shunde District, Foshan, Guangdong, zip code 528300, China. Our principal phone number is (86)-757-2991-6814. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the offices of Conyers Trust Company (Cayman) Limited, Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive, PO Box 2681, Grand Cayman, KY1-1111, Cayman Islands. Investors should submit any inquiries to the address and telephone number of our principal executive offices. Our website is www.brightscholar.com. The information contained on our website is not a part of this annual report. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Law Debenture Corporate Services Inc., located at 801 2nd Avenue, Suite 403, New York, New York 10017.

For information regarding our principal capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures.”

B. Business Overview

We are a global premier education service company, which primarily provides quality international education service to global students and equip them with the critical academic foundation and skillsets necessary to succeed in the pursuit of higher education. As part of our global expansion plan, we have been actively exploring mergers and acquisition opportunities abroad to expand our global school network, targeting quality private education providers and reputable schools in our targeted overseas countries and jurisdictions. As of the date of this annual report, we have eight overseas school located in the United Kingdom and the United States. During the 2023 school year, we had an average of 3,827 students enrolled at our schools for our continuing operations. Bright Scholar Holdings, our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company, does not have any substantive operations other than indirectly controlling the VIEs through certain contractual arrangements, and indirectly holding Bright Scholar (UK) Holdings Limited, through which we operate our overseas schools.

Our continued business includes domestic kindergartens and K-12 operation services, overseas schools and complementary education services. As a global premier education service provider, we have built our global presence primarily through acquiring established overseas schools and language training institutions in countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States. Leveraging our experience and insights into learning needs at different stages, our kindergartens seek to lay the necessary foundation for our students’ future studies. We also offer a range of complementary education services, primarily including camp programs, after-school programs, through our network of learning centers in China, as well as international education consulting services.

For our continuing operations, our revenue was RMB1,401.8 million, RMB1,714.0 million and RMB2,123.8 (US$292.6 million) for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, respectively; our net loss was RMB535.1 million, RMB703.5 million and RMB386.8 (US$53.3 million) for the same periods, respectively. We use adjusted net loss, which excludes share-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, tax effect of amortization of intangible assets, impairment loss on operating lease right-of-use assets, impairment loss on goodwill, impairment loss on intangible assets, impairment loss on property and equipment, impairment loss on the long-term investment, and income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in evaluating our ongoing results of operations. Our adjusted net loss was RMB420.2 million, RMB141.7 million and RMB149.4 million (US$20.6 million) for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, respectively. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospectus—A. Operating Results—Results of Operations—Non-GAAP measures” for details.

Our Overseas Schools

As of the date of this annual report, we have an overseas school network of eight schools, including seven schools in the United Kingdom and one in the United States, with an average of 2,584 enrolled students for the 2023 school year. As a global premier education provider, we have built our global presence primarily through overseas acquisition of schools and education services in countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States.

In December 2018, we acquired BCS, an established independent school located in the United Kingdom. BCS offers day and boarding education from two to 18 years of age, and has a strong global inclusive philosophy based on a traditional UK education.

In July 2019, we acquired CATS, which operates five overseas schools and three language training institutions across the United Kingdom and the United States as of the date of this annual report. In addition, we granted a third party the right to use the brands “CATS” and “Cambridge School of Visual & Performing Arts” for the operation of two campuses in Shanghai, China.

In September 2019, we acquired St. Michael’s School and BIC located in the United Kingdom. St. Michael’s School offers day and boarding education from three to 18 years of age, comprising predominantly day students and boarders from more than 15 countries. BIC provides independent boarding education to pupils from the United Kingdom and other countries from 13 to 19 years of age.

The following table sets forth certain information about each of our overseas schools.

Bournemouth Collegiate School (BCS)

Bournemouth Collegiate School is an established independent school located in Bournemouth, Dorset, England. It offers day and boarding education from age 2—18 on two campuses. It has a strong global inclusive philosophy based on a traditional UK education. Bournemouth Collegiate School has an average of 669 students enrolled for the 2023 school year, including local students and international boarders from 15 countries.

CATS Colleges

CATS Colleges is an international school network focused primarily on the provision of quality education services to international students with a globally integrated platform of campuses located across the United Kingdom and the United States. As of the date of this annual report, CATS Colleges comprised five schools in Cambridge, London, Canterbury and Boston as well as three language training institutions in the United Kingdom. It has a diverse mix of over 1,291 students from around 90 nationalities in the 2023 school year.

In July 2020, we decided to permanently cease the operation of the four language training institutions in the United States as a resource conserving measure in response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In December 2021, we sold one language training institutions in the United Kingdom and two institutions in Canada to focus on the operation of the remaining three language training institutions in the United Kingdom.

St. Michael’s School

St. Michael’s School is an established independent school in the United Kingdom. Located in Llanelli, Wales. It offers day and boarding education from age three to 18. Established in 1923, the school has an inclusive philosophy for all its students based on a traditional UK education, and was named Welsh Independent Secondary School of the Year 2019 in The Sunday Times Parent Power rankings and regularly ranking in the United Kingdom’s top 30 Independent Schools for A level results. The school has an average of 415 students enrolled for the 2023 school year, comprised predominantly of day students as well as boarding students from more than six countries.

Bosworth Independent College (BIC)

BIC is a leading independent boarding college in the United Kingdom. Located in Northampton, England, it provides independent boarding education to pupils from the United Kingdom and abroad from 13 to 19 years of age. Established in 1977, it was ranked in the UK’s Top 100 Coeducational Boarding Schools by A Level results in 2018. The school has an average of 209 students enrolled for the 2023 school year, including boarding students from 27 countries.

Our Complementary Education Services

We provide complementary education services to students from our schools and others. These complementary education services further enhance students’ overall learning experience and generate synergies with our school operations.

Camp programs

We have organized summer and winter camp programs in certain countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. We also offer summer school programs, which are more rigorous and allow our participants to study for specific courses or prepare for standardized tests.

As of the date of this annual report, we have developed business collaborations with a number of overseas universities and high schools as the local hosts of our camps or summer school programs. We work together with our partners to design programs and activities to improve the participants’ English communication skills, expand their knowledge and develop a familiarity with college environments and international cultures.

Our overseas camp programs typically take place on university campuses and include various activities, such as classes and excursions. For high school students, we offer tours to different universities during our programs. These visits allow participants to become familiar with the overseas campuses, talk with admissions officers and spend time with our alumni currently studying at each university. Some of our camp programs include a homestay, which allows the participants to get an inside look at Western family dynamics and form supportive friendships in an immersive English-speaking environment. We send our teachers to escort the students during their tours. By participating in the summer and winter camps, we believe our students not only broaden their horizons and improve their English proficiency, but also clarify their academic goals and enhance their motivation to pursue overseas studies after graduating from our schools.

In addition to overseas camps, we have launched our domestic camp programs by opening our first campground, Lake Forest Camp, in Huizhou, Guangdong province at the beginning of 2019. Taking full advantage of its outdoor adventure facilities, we provide different kinds of activities on the land and in the water, which encourage personal growth, team cooperation and leadership. Lake Forest Camp targets students from both our own schools and schools outside our network. In June 2019, we acquired a 25% equity interest in Start Camp Education (“Start Camp”). Start Camp provides one-stop solution in camp layout and program design for education department of local governments, education groups and real estate developers. In September 2020, we entered into an agreement to acquire 60% equity interests in Jiangxi Leti Camp Education Technology Co., Ltd. (“Leti Camp”), which specializes in providing summer and winter camp activities for teenagers and owns a comprehensive product offering in Hands-on Inquiry Based Learning (HIBL) and camp business.

Our overseas camp programs were adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic due to the global travel freeze resulted therefrom. In response, we developed domestic travel study programs, which are complementary to our students’ classroom education and allow students to study and explore humanities, history, technology, nature, etc., depending on the theme of each program. As of the date of this annual report, we provide options for 26 domestic camp programs and 10 overseas camp programs. As of the same date, our domestic camp programs include 13 summer school programs and 13 domestic travel study programs. In the 2023 fiscal year, approximately 80,000 students participated in our domestic and overseas camp programs as well as domestic travel study programs.

After-school programs

English proficiency training

We offer English proficiency development courses to children aged from five to 15 through a network of 18 learning centers located in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong province under the brand of “élan.” Our goal is to help children improve their general English proficiency. To this end, we have adopted a holistic language learning approach, which immerses children in an English-speaking environment and requires them to think, learn and communicate with the mindset of native speakers. Our learning centers are staffed only by native English speakers as instructors and are equipped with libraries containing age-appropriate English-language books and audio materials suited to English learners of different proficiency levels. In the 2023 school year, we had an average of 56 instructors in our learning centers. In the 2023 fiscal year, we had an average student enrollment of 2,745 for English proficiency training.

Extracurricular programs

We offer a wide range of extracurricular programs primarily to children. Our programs encompass popular subjects, such as art, soccer and programmable robotics. Our programs supplement in-classroom learning and promote the well-balanced development of children. Our programs also help children tap into their interests and potential that benefit their study or career goals. We work with our partners on these programs.

We have also strategically invested in the acquisition of equity interest in Hangzhou Impression Arts Training Co., Ltd. (“Hangzhou Impression”), a Zhejiang-based art training institution, to supplement the extracurricular programs we offer. See “—Our Expansions and Investments.”

Overseas Study Consulting Services

We offer overseas study education consulting services to better serve our students in and outside of our network of schools. As of the date of this annual report, we have strategically invested in the acquisitions of equity interests in several providers of education consulting services, including Can-achieve (Beijing) Education Consulting Co., Ltd. (“Can-achieve”) and FGE Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (“FGE”). See “—Our Expansions and Investments.” Through these strategic acquisitions, we are able to provide a comprehensive range of services covering K-12 education as well as consulting services from application to overseas universities, which we believe will drive our future growth.

Career counselling and International Contest Training Services

We also offer career counselling and international contest training services to students. We have strategically invested in the acquisitions of equity interests in services provider for career counselling and international contest training, such as Chengdu Yinzhe Education and Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chengdu Yinzhe”) and Shanghai Huodai Business Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (“Linstitute”) to provide students around the globe with access to high quality education.

Our Domestic Kindergartens

As of the date of this annual report, we have nine kindergartens in China, all of which are registered as for-profit kindergartens. In the 2023 school year, our kindergartens had an average of 1,243 students.

Our kindergartens provide an active and healthy learning environment to help students develop their potential and personality, appreciate diverse cultures and lay the foundation to drive future success. In our kindergartens, we integrate elements of traditional Chinese culture with international cultural awareness through language classes and cultural activities.

The following table sets forth certain information about each of our domestic kindergartens.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Domestic Kindergartens

Due to the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have concluded that we have lost control of 68 domestic kindergartens since August 31, 2021 and that such VIE contractual arrangements with them has become invalid since then and, we have thus classified them as discontinued operations.

Discontinued Bilingual and International Schools

Due to the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have concluded that we have lost control of the international schools and bilingual schools previously in our school network as well as the sponsor entities of such schools since August 31, 2021 and that such VIE contractual arrangements with them has become invalid since then and, we have thus classified them as discontinued operations.

Centralized Management

We have provided services of a centralized management system for our school network, through which we manage and oversee certain aspects of our kindergartens across our network, including school administration, supply procurement and sharing and development of teaching resources, to support and facilitate management of our schools as well as to ensure consistency in the quality of our education. For our overseas operations, we have established a center of excellence to centralize certain functions of management, including finance, IT, human resources, procurement, marketing and admissions.

Sharing and development of teaching resources

In order to maintain and improve our teaching quality, some of our schools share their teaching resources with each other and jointly hold teacher development workshops. We also operate a centralized teaching staff recruitment program through which we hire and deploy teachers and educational staff within our school network based on each school’s needs and teacher preferences. We intend to continue to leverage the availability of our teaching resources at different schools within our network to ensure consistency in teaching quality.

Education material and equipment procurement

We make procurement decisions regarding teaching materials and equipment and other education supplies for our schools in the same geographical areas to improve our operating efficiency, maximize economies of scale and enhance our overall bargaining power with suppliers. Such procurement choices include those for catering, textbooks, school uniforms, classroom furniture, computers, kitchen equipment, tableware and office appliances.

School administration

To improve our service efficiency, we have centralized our finance, marketing, human resources, legal and information technology functions. We have adopted a series of policies and procedures relating to general corporate governance matters, which are aimed at strengthening the management and government of our company and our schools. For example, in the 2018 fiscal year, we implemented an ERP system where we centralize the collection and analysis of budgeting, procurement and financial information and data, which enhanced the efficiency of our data management processes, adding value to the overall operation of our business.

Our Expansions and Investments

In January 2016, we acquired élan, an English proficiency training business. In March 2018, we acquired an additional 49% equity interest in Can-achieve to supplement our test preparation and college counseling business to improve our students’ university admission results. As of the date of this annual report, we hold a total of 70% equity interest in Can-achieve. In June 2018, we acquired a 75% equity interest in FGE, which is primarily engaged in providing overseas study consulting services. In December 2018, we acquired a 75% equity interest in Chengdu Yinzhe, which is primarily engaged in offering online career and education mentoring services to overseas Chinese students under the brand of “DreambigCareer.” As of the date of this annual report, we hold a total of 90% equity interest in Chengdu Yinzhe. In December 2018, we acquired BCS in the United Kingdom, which offers day and boarding education from ages two to 18. In March 2019, we purchased a 70% equity interest in Hangzhou Impression, a Zhejiang-based art training institution. In June 2019, we acquired a 25% equity interest in Start Camp, which provides one-stop solution in camp layout and program design for education department of local governments, education groups and real estate developers in China. In July 2019, we acquired CATS, which operates five overseas schools and three language training institutions across the United Kingdom and the United States as of the date of this annual report. In September 2019, we acquired St. Michael’s School and BIC located in the United Kingdom. In July 2020, we acquired a 51% equity interest in Shanghai Huodai Business Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (“Linstitute”), which offers high-quality and outcomes-focused online training services including Academic Olympiad and other world-wide recognized international courses. As of the date of this annual report, we hold a total of 60% equity interest in Linstitute. In September 2020, we entered into an agreement to acquire a 60% equity interest in Leti Camp, which specializes in providing summer and winter camp activities for teenagers and owns a comprehensive product offering in Hands-on Inquiry Based Learning (HIBL) and camp business. We plan to continue to make strategic investments into and acquisitions of overseas schools and complementary businesses to better serve our students and drive our future growth.

Our Students

Student admission

Our students enrolled in our kindergartens are primarily Chinese nationals from relatively affluent families. Our overseas schools recruit students from around the world, with a student body comprising around 90 different nationalities for the 2023 school year. The majority of the students in our overseas schools are from 14 to 18 years old.

Student and parent support services

We generally have small class sizes across our domestic school network in order to provide each student with close and frequent teacher interactions and individual attention and support. Our teachers assist students through academic difficulties with personalized remedial measures, including additional practice materials and instructive sessions.

We also maintain regular communication with the parents of our students and provide them with complementary seminars and training on education programs, university applications and parenting.

Our Teachers

Teacher qualifications

We have assembled a team of teachers with extensive experience in education. Our schools are staffed with different levels of teachers and educational staff. Certain senior teachers have managerial responsibilities in addition to their responsibilities as instructors. Educational staff include teaching assistants, librarians and medical staff. We seek to employ teachers that have a passion for teaching, mastery of their subject areas, strong communication skills and proficiency in employing innovative and effective teaching methods. In the 2023 fiscal year, we had an average of 938 teachers and instructors globally.

Teacher recruitment

Our teachers are critical to maintaining the quality of our programs and services and in promoting our brand and reputation. We place particular importance on recruiting teachers who are appropriately qualified and experienced. For our overseas schools, we also expect teachers to have a wealth of international experience across the world of academia. We implement a centralized recruitment program that seeks to hire teachers and educational staff and deploy them across our school network based on each kindergarten’s needs and teacher preferences. We screen candidates for strong academic credentials, dedication and knowledge in the relevant teaching subjects, and commitment to serving students’ needs. We require our teachers to possess the appropriate qualifications required by PRC regulatory authorities, including the foreign expert certificate in the case of foreign teachers. We believe that teacher candidates are attracted to our schools because of our reputation, commitment to quality education, financial strength and competitive compensation package. To enhance our retention rate, we also allow our teachers to laterally transfer within our school network.

Teacher training

We are committed to providing ongoing professional development for our teachers and principals, in the form of online, on-campus or one-on-one training and support sessions. From time to time, we organize seminars on professional training in cooperation with prestigious institutions. We also invite veteran teachers to participate in school administration by offering them management training with the possibility of promotion to principal positions. The opportunity for ongoing professional training and career advancement is not always available at private schools in China and is a key differentiator in our ability to attract, develop and retain talented teachers.

Teachers in our overseas schools are continuously assessed under Continues Development, a program that measure the effectiveness and quality of their teaching and provide them with the right learning environment that enables them to adapt teaching methods and use innovative tools to delivery academic excellence. 

Our Tuition

We charge our students tuition, boarding and other applicable fees generally prior to the beginning of each semester. Tuition and fees being paid in arrears is subject to special approval. We also accept monthly payment of fees at certain kindergartens we operate. We offer a partial refund if a student withdraws in the predetermined period. We may also offer tuition discounts to certain of Country Garden’s homeowners, our employees and employees of Country Garden. Tuition refund or discounts did not materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial position. We have limited discretion in determining the types and amounts of fees we charge under the current PRC regulatory regime. For example, in accordance with the relevant local regulations, if we increase the tuition at our schools in Guangdong province in a certain school year, such increase will generally not affect the existing students until they complete their current section of education at the same schools. In determining the amount of tuition we charge, we consider factors including the demand for our education programs, the cost of our operations, the geographic markets where our kindergartens are located and general economic conditions in China. Our tuition and fees charged for internationally accredited programs are typically higher than that for government-mandated curricula, which reflects the additional educational and operational resources associated with administering the former. For the 2023 school year, we charged average tuition and fees of RMB23,314 for domestic kindergartens and RMB249,729 for overseas schools.

Research and Curriculum Development

We believe we have devoted significant resources to our research and curriculum development efforts which are reflected in the course materials and effective teaching methods. We work with school teachers to develop, update and improve school curricula and course materials based upon students’ needs and the latest official government curricula or course outlines issued by the relevant international programs. As students’ academic ability levels vary, our curricula are designed with the flexibility to address a particular student’s strengths and weaknesses. Our teaching and research department works with school teachers to prepare or update such course curricula, and revises the curricula based on feedback from the classroom. To ensure our education quality can be upheld across schools, we have dedicated a professional team to designing curricula for the programs implemented in our schools and to keep our teaching materials updated with reference to the latest educational trends. Our overseas schools are continuously developing curriculum and academic extension activities to prepare students for admission to top universities. For example, preparation for students applying to Oxbridge has included preparation for admissions tests, workshops with a drama specialist to prepare students for interview, and mock interviews with academics from the University of Cambridge. Additionally, our overseas schools develop curricula in specific subject areas, which focus on the skills needed for interested students’ success at university.

In August 2019, we entered into an agreement with National Center for School Curriculum and Textbook Development (“NCCT”) and National Institute for Curriculum and Textbook Research (“NICTR”), to jointly establish a research base for fundamental education curriculum reform. Through this agreement, NCCT and NICTR will assist us in the development of a forward-looking and systematic five-year curriculum plan and annual curriculum reform guidance. In addition, they will also assist in the optimization of our current curriculum to advocate our core values in education.

Marketing 

We historically marketed our schools in China primarily to students from families that purchased residential units developed by Country Garden. We distributed marketing brochures and offer site tours of our school to prospective home buyers visiting the sales centers for residential properties developed by Country Garden. Our relationship with Country Garden is synergistic because our schools enable Country Garden to meet the requisite local governmental requirements or market needs for schools in its residential communities and we may offer preferential student placements and tuition discounts as an incentive to prospective home buyers. We believe that the availability of and convenient access to quality education is a significant factor that drives home buying decisions.

As we have gradually forged a reputation for quality education through a proven track record of success over the years, we began to attract students from families other than Country Garden’s homeowners. We have also implemented a variety of marketing methods to enhance the brand recognition of our schools. By doing so, we intend to continue creating and implementing a standard corporate identity across all our schools. We take measures to increase word-of-mouth referrals which have been instrumental to attracting new students and building our brand. We have also strengthened our marketing strategy to drive student recruitment, and built up our marketing teams at both headquarters and regional levels to assist student’s recruitment, while allocating more marketing and promotional budgets for schools in the ramp-up stage.

Our overseas schools depend on advertisements on related websites such as university targeted websites, generic campaigns on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, and educational agencies to market themselves and recruit students. We have also assembled a team of specialists to offer support, training and guidance to the educational agencies and assist them in student recruitment.

Competition

The education service market in China is rapidly evolving, highly fragmented and competitive. We compete with a number of private kindergarten operators. We may also compete with local private kindergartens and quality education service providers in each region we have a presence. Similarly, our overseas schools compete against large operators such as Nord Anglia and Alpha Plus in the United Kingdom, as well as standalone private schools in each region. We believe we are well-positioned to replicate our success and compete effectively based on the following factors:

Properties and Facilities

We currently occupy a total combined gross floor area of approximately 31,087 square meters of facilities developed by Country Garden, all of which is leased. By utilizing the properties developed by Country Garden we avoid significant capital expenditures in connection with land procurement and facilities construction. We may also provide preferential student placements and tuition discounts to homeowners of the Country Garden properties. In recognition of our synergistic relationship, Country Garden adopted an internal policy that designates us as a preferred school operator partner, under which we are entitled to the right of first refusal on school development projects in connection with its new residential properties.

As of the date of this annual report, we also own 60 properties and lease 35 facilities in the United Kingdom and the United States for school campuses and office use.

Intellectual Property

We have obtained a license to use certain trademarks, including “Country Garden” from Country Garden free of charge for a term expiring in 2028 and 2030. We have applied for or registered trademarks relating to our logos and names, including “Bright Scholar” and “Bo Shi Le” in China. As of the date of this annual report, we have registered 165 trademarks including “élan,” with the PRC Trademark Office and major domain names used for our operation with the China Internet Network Information Center, including www.brightscholar.com, brightscholar.net, www.bgyedu.cn, 博实乐.cn and 博实乐.com. From time to time, we are required to obtain licenses with respect to course materials owned by third parties for our education services, in particular for our international program which requires foreign-language education materials. We own copyrights to the course content we developed in-house.

Our trademarks and other intellectual property rights distinguish our services and products from those of our competitors and contribute to our ability to compete in our target markets. To protect our intellectual properties, we rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws. We have confidentiality clauses in our employment agreements with our employees to protect our intellectual property rights, and also monitor any infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property rights.

Insurance

We maintain various insurance policies to safeguard against risks and unexpected events. We maintain insurance to cover students and teachers’ medical expenses for injuries they might sustain at our schools. We also maintain insurance to cover our liability should any injuries occur at our schools. In addition, we maintain property insurance for our vehicles. We do not maintain business interruption insurance, product liability insurance or key-man life insurance. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We have limited insurance coverage with respect to our business and operations.” We consider our insurance coverage to be in line with that of other private education providers of a similar scale in China.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings, investigations and claims during the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceeding or investigation which, in the opinion of our management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulations

We operate our business in China under a legal regime consisting of the National People’s Congress, which is the country’s highest legislative body, the State Council, which is the highest authority of the executive branch of the PRC central government, and several ministries and agencies under its authority, including the MOE, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the Ministry of Civil Affairs and their respective local offices. The section summarizes the principal PRC regulations related to our business.

PRC Laws and Regulations Relating to Foreign Investment in Education

Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2021 Version)

Pursuant to the Foreign Investment Industries Guidance Catalog (Amended in 2015), or the Foreign Investment Catalog, which was amended and promulgated by National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, and the MOFCOM on March 10, 2015 and became effective on April 10, 2015, kindergarten education, high school education and higher education are restricted industries for foreign investors, and foreign investments are only allowed to invest in kindergarten education, high school education and higher education in cooperative ways and the domestic party shall play a dominant role in the cooperation. In addition, according to the Foreign Investment Catalog, foreign investors are prohibited from investing in compulsory education, i.e., primary school to middle school.

Sino-foreign cooperation in operating schools is specifically governed by the Regulation on Operating Sino-foreign Schools of the PRC, which was promulgated by the State Council on March 1, 2003 and became effective on September 1, 2003 and amended on July 18, 2013, the Law for Promoting Private Education of the PRC, and the Implementing Rules for the Regulations on Operating Sino-foreign Schools or the Implementing Rules, which were issued by the MOE on June 2, 2004 and became effective on July 1, 2004.

On June 18, 2012, the MOE issued the Implementation Opinions of the MOE on Encouraging and Guiding the Entry of Private Capital in the Fields of Education and Promoting the Healthy Development of Private Education to encourage private investment and foreign investment in the field of education. According to these opinions, the proportion of foreign capital in a PRC-foreign education institute shall be less than 50%.

The Foreign Investment Industries Guidance Catalog (2017 Revision), or the 2017 Catalog, which was promulgated on June 28, 2017 and took effect on July 28, 2017 replacing the abovementioned Foreign Investment Industries Guidance Catalog (2015 Revision), contains the same types of industry categories.

The Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Foreign Investment Access Negative List) set forth in the 2017 Catalog was replaced by the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2018 Version), or the 2018 Negative List, promulgated on June 28, 2018 with effect on July 28, 2018, which imposes the same restriction and prohibition on foreign investors in the education sector besides one additional ban on religious education institutes. On June 30, 2019, the MOFCOM and the NDRC jointly released the Catalog of Industries Encouraging Foreign Investment (2019 Version), or the 2019 Encouraged Catalog, which became effective on July 30, 2019 and replaced the previous list of the industries in which foreign investment is encouraged to invest under the 2017 Catalog, and the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2019 Version), or the 2019 Negative List, which became effective on July 30, 2019 and replaced the 2018 Negative List. On June 23, 2020, the MOFCOM and the NDRC jointly released the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2020 Version), or the 2020 Negative List, which superseded the 2019 Negative List on July 23, 2020. On December 27, 2021, the NDRC and the MOFCOM jointly released the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2021 Version), or the 2021 Negative List which came into effect on January 1, 2022 and replaced the 2020 Negative List. The 2021 Negative List remains unchanged with respect to the education industry, while it further provides that any domestic enterprise, which is engaged in the field of business that foreign investment is prohibited from investing as set forth in the 2021 Negative List, shall be examined and approved by the relevant state authorities before issuing shares and listing and trading abroad. Besides, any foreign investor shall not participate in the management of such domestic enterprise, and its shareholding ratio shall follow the relevant provisions regulating foreign investors’ investment in domestic securities.

As of the date of this annual report, our domestic kindergartens fall within restricted industries for foreign investors.

Regulations on Private Education in the PRC

Education Law of the PRC

On March 18, 1995, the National People’s Congress of the PRC, or the NPC, enacted the Education Law of the PRC, or the Education Law, which was amended on August 27, 2009. The Education Law sets forth provisions relating to the fundamental education systems of the PRC, including a school education system comprising kindergarten education, primary education, secondary education and higher education, a system of nine-year compulsory education, a national education examination system, and a system of education certificates. The Education Law stipulates that the government formulates plans for the development of education, establishes and operates schools and other education institution. Furthermore, it provides that in principle, enterprises, social organizations and individuals are encouraged to establish and operate schools and other types of education institutions in accordance with PRC laws and regulations. Meanwhile, no organization or individual may establish or operate a school or any other education institution for profit-making purposes. The Education Law was amended on December 27, 2015, and further amended on April 29, 2021. The amended Education Law repudiates a specific paragraph of the old law, which prohibits any organization or individual from establishing or operating a school or any other education institution for profit-making purposes. Nevertheless, schools and other education institutions sponsored wholly or partially by government financial funds and donated assets remain prohibited from being established as for-profit organizations.

The Law for Promoting Private Education and the Implementation Rules

The Law for Promoting Private Education of the PRC became effective on September 1, 2003 and was amended on June 29, 2013 and on December 29, 2018, and the Implementation Rules became effective on April 1, 2004 and was amended on April 7, 2021 and the amended version became effective on September 1, 2021. Under these regulations, “private schools” are defined as schools established by social organizations or individuals using non-government funds. Private schools providing academic qualifications education, kindergarten education, education for self-study examination and other education shall be subject to approval by the education authorities at or above the county level, while private schools engaging in occupational qualification training and occupational skill training shall be subject to approvals from the authorities in charge of labor and social welfare at or above the county level. A duly approved private school will be granted a Permit for Operating a Private School, and shall be registered with the Ministry of Civil Affairs of the PRC, or the MCA, or its local counterparts as a privately run non-enterprise institution. Each of our schools has obtained the Permit for Operating a Private School and has been registered with the relevant local counterpart of the MCA.

Under the above regulations, the operations of a private school are highly regulated. For example, the types and amounts of fees charged by a private school providing academic qualifications education shall be approved by relevant government authorities and publicly disclosed, and a private school that provides non-academic qualifications education shall file its pricing information with the relevant government authorities and publicly discloses such information.

According to PRC laws and regulations, entities and individuals who establish private schools are commonly referred to as “sponsors” rather than “owners” or “shareholders.” The economic substance of “sponsorship” with respect to private schools is substantially similar to that of shareholder’s ownership with respect to companies in terms of legal, regulatory and tax matters. For example, the name of the sponsor shall be entered into the private schools’ articles of association and Permit for Operating a Private School, similar to that of shareholders where their names shall be entered into the company’s articles of associations and corporate records filed with relevant authority. From the perspective of control, the sponsor of a private school also has the right to exercise ultimate control over the school by means such as adopting the private school’s constitutional documents, electing the school’s decision-making bodies, including the school’s board of directors and principals. The sponsor can also profit from the private schools by receiving “reasonable returns,” as explained in detail below, or disposing its sponsorship interests in the schools for economic gains. However, the rights of sponsors vis-à-vis private schools also differ from the rights of shareholders vis-à-vis companies. For example, under the PRC laws, a company’s ultimate decision-making body is its shareholders meeting, while for private schools, it is the board of directors, though the members of which are substantially appointed by the sponsor. The sponsorship interest also differs from the ownership interests with regard to the right to the distribution of residual properties upon liquidation of a private school, mainly because private education is treated as a public welfare undertaking under the current regulations. While private education is treated as a public welfare undertaking under the current regulations, sponsors of a private school may choose to require “reasonable returns” from the annual net balance of the school after deduction of costs for school operations, donations received, government subsidies (if any), the reserved development fund and other expenses as required by the regulations. Private schools, whether for-profit or non-profit, may enjoy national preferential tax treatments, while non-profit private schools shall be entitled to the same preferential tax treatment as public schools. To date, however, no regulations have been promulgated by such authorities in this regard.

The Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Amending the Law for Promoting Private Education of the PRC, or the Amendment, was promulgated by Order No. 55 of the President of the PRC on November 7, 2016 and came into force on September 1, 2017.

Under the Amendment, the term “reasonable return” is no longer used and sponsors of private school may choose to establish non-profit or for-profit private schools at their own discretion, while before the Amendment, all private schools shall not be established for for-profit purposes. Nonetheless, school sponsors are not allowed to establish for-profit private schools that are engaged in compulsory education. In other words, the schools engaged in compulsory education should retain their non-profit status after the Amendment comes into force.

The Amendment further establishes a new classification system for private schools to be classified by whether they are established and operated for profit-making purposes.

According to the Amendment, the key features of the aforesaid new classification system for private schools include the following:

On December 29, 2016, the State Council issued the Several Opinions of the State Council on Encouraging the Operation of Education by Social Forces and Promoting the Healthy Development of Private Education, or the State Council Opinions, which requires to ease the access to the operation of private schools and encourages social forces to enter into the education industry. The State Council Opinions also provides that each level of the people’s governments shall increase their support to the private schools in terms of financial investment, financial support, autonomy policies, preferential tax treatments, land policies, fee policies, autonomy operation, protecting the rights of teachers and students etc. Further, the State Council Opinions require each level of the people’s governments to improve its local policies on government support to for-profit and non-profit private schools by ways of preferential tax treatments etc. In addition, under the State Council Opinions, private schools shall strengthen its construction of the Chinese Communist Party, or the CCP, and further the theoretical system of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics by introducing such system into textbooks and teaching programs. The construction of the CCP’s organizations by the private schools as well as the CCP’s leadership to private schools shall constitute an important part of such school’s annual inspection.

On December 30, 2016, the MOE, MCA, SAIC, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Welfare and the State Commission Office of Public Sectors Reform jointly issued the Implementation Rules on the Classification Registration of Private Schools to reflect the new classification system for private schools as set out in the Amendment. Generally, if a private school established before promulgation of the Amendment chooses to register as a non-profit school, it shall amend its articles of association, continue its operation and complete the new registration process. If such private school chooses to register as a for-profit school, it shall conduct financial liquidation process, have the property rights of its assets such as lands, school buildings and net balance being authenticated by relevant government authorities, pay up relevant taxes, apply for a new Permit for Operating a Private School, re-register as for-profit schools and continue its operation. As of the date of this annual report, the majority of provincial governments in the PRC have promulgated their local rules which detail but for the most part repeat the provisions contained in the abovementioned state rules.

On December 30, 2016, the MOE, SAIC and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Welfare jointly issued the Implementation Rules on the Supervision and Administration of For-profit Private Schools, pursuant to which the establishment, division, merger and other material changes of a for-profit private school shall first be approved by the education authorities or the authorities in charge of labor and social welfare, and then be registered with the competent branch of SAIC.

On September 1, 2017, SAIC and MOE jointly issued the Notice of Relevant Work on the Registration and Management of the Name of For-Profit Private Schools, which specifies the requirements on the names of for-profit private schools.

On December 29, 2018, the Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Amending the Seven Laws of the Labor Law of the People’s Republic of China was promulgated by Order No.24 of the President of the PRC and took effect on the same date, which made two minor adjustments to Article 26 and Article 64 of the Law for Promoting Private Education of the PRC. These minor adjustments do not materially affect our business and operations.

On May 14, 2021, the State Council announced the amended version of the Implementation Rules of the Law for Promoting Private Education, the other details of the operation requirement of non-profit schools and for-profit schools will further of the PRC, or the Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Amended Regulations, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education, (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of merger, acquisition, contractual arrangements, etc., and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party. Where a private school other than private schools providing compulsory education conducts transactions with any related party, it shall follow the principles of openness, fairness and equality, determine the reasonable fees and regulate the decision-making, and shall not do detriment to the state interests, the interests of the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, otherwise, there is a risk of being ordered to make corrections within a time limit, and the illegal gains, if any, shall be confiscated after the fees collected are returned; if the circumstances are serious, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller or member of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school within one to five years; if the circumstances are especially serious with adverse social impact, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller and members of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school permanently; if a violation of public security administration is constituted, the public security organ shall impose a public security administration punishment according to law; if a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the law.

For a detailed discussion on how the Amendment and the above regulations will affect our schools, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our compliance with the Implementation Rules has materially and adversely affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect in the future, and we have been subject to significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private for-profit education business and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.”

Besides the Amendment and the above regulations, the other details of the operation requirement of non-profit schools and for-profit schools will further be provided in implementation regulations that are yet to be introduced:

As of the date of this annual report, certain local governments, such as Jiangsu province and Hebei province, have promulgated their local regulations relating to legal person registration and administration for private schools and certain local governments, such as Guangdong province, Jiangsu province, Hubei province, Hebei province, Gansu province, and Anhui province, have promulgated general guidance to encourage the development of private schools. Among these local regulations and guidance, some local governments, such as Hubei province, Hebei province, and Anhui province, require the existing private schools to register either as for-profit or non-profit schools within a specific time period.

Regulations on compulsory education

According to the Law for Compulsory Education of the PRC, which was promulgated by the NPC on April 12, 1986 and was amended by the tenth Standing Committee of the NPC on June 29, 2006 and by the twelfth Standing Committee of the NPC on April 24, 2015, and by the thirteenth Standing Committee of the NPC on December 29, 2018, a nine-year system of compulsory education, including six years of primary school and three years of middle school, was adopted.

Further, the MOE issued the Reform Guideline on the Curriculum System of Compulsory Education (Trial) on June 8, 2001, which became effective on the same date, pursuant to which schools providing compulsory education shall follow a “state-local-school” three-tier curriculum system. In other words, schools must follow the state curriculum standard for state courses, while the local education authorities have the power to determine the curriculum standard for other courses, and schools may also develop curriculum that are suitable for their specific needs provided that the state curriculum shall be completely maintained.

On June 23, 2019, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council promulgated the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Educational Teaching and Thoroughly Enhancing the Quality of Compulsory Education, which lays out more stringent requirements for textbooks that are permitted to be used in compulsory education.

On December 16, 2019, the MOE issued the Administrative Measures on Primary and Secondary School Textbooks, which details the regulations on the authoring, vetting, publication and schools’ selection of primary and secondary school textbooks.

On May 6, 2020, the General Office of the MOE issued the Notice on Negative List of Excessive and Advanced Training in Six Subjects of Compulsory Education (Trial). According to the Notice, extracurricular training institutions are prohibited from providing for students in primary schools and middle schools excessive and advanced training relating to six subjects, namely, Chinese, Math, English, Physics, Chemistry and Biology. For example, the difficulties of education contents provided by extracurricular training institutions shall not exceed the difficulties of contents in textbooks used in corresponding compulsory education classes, and the extracurricular education targeting students in primary schools shall not include contents expected to be taught in middle schools, and the extracurricular education targeting students in middle schools shall not include contents expected to be taught in high schools.

Regulations on the operation of high schools

The MOE has promulgated several regulations on the operation of high schools, which mainly concern the choice of textbooks, the curriculum system and the graduation exam system.

According to the Circular of the Central Office of the MOE on the Selection of the Trial Textbooks for the Curriculum of High Schools promulgated on April 26, 2005 and the Interim Measures for the Management of the Selection of the Primary and Middle School Textbooks promulgated and came into effect on September 30, 2014, the textbooks used by the primary and middle schools can only be selected from the catalog issued by the MOE; and the provincial education authority is in charge of textbook selection within its relevant administrative jurisdiction and has the power to approve the curriculum system applied in the primary and middle schools within the province.

Further, the MOE issued the Notice on Developing Trial Curriculum System in High Schools, the Guidance on Strengthening Instruction on Developing Trial Curriculum System in High Schools, the Notice on Propelling 2006 Trial Curriculum System in High Schools and the Notice on Propelling 2007 Trial Curriculum System in High Schools from 2003 through 2007, pursuant to which the MOE developed a new curriculum system in high schools nationwide, and the implementation of such curriculum system is carried on mainly by the provincial education authorities while the MOE mainly provides guidance to its local counterparts. Under the guidelines of the MOE and subject to approval by the respective provincial education authorities, the high schools may adopt their own unique curriculum system.

Regulations on After-School Tutoring

The State Council issued an Opinion on Supervising After-School Tutoring Institutions (“Circular 80”) on August 22, 2018, which provides various guidance on regulating after-school tutoring institutions that target primary and secondary school students. Circular 80 requires that after-school tutoring institutions obtain school operating permits and other legally required licenses and permits, and instructs relevant governmental authorities to strengthen their supervisions and regulations on after-school tutoring institutions. Circular 80 also standardizes the approval and registration processes of after-school tutoring institutions.

Measures for Punishment for Violation of Professional Ethics of Primary and Secondary School Teachers

The Measures for Punishment for Violation of Professional Ethics of Primary and Secondary School Teachers as promulgated by MOE on January 11, 2014 and amended on November 8, 2018 prohibits teachers of primary and secondary schools from providing paid tutoring in schools or in out-of-school learning centers. Some provinces and cities where our schools are located have adopted more stringent regulations which prohibit public school teachers from teaching, on a part-time basis, at private schools or learning centers. For a detailed description of the risk associated with these matters, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We may be unable to recruit, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified and experienced teachers and principals.”

Opinions on Regulating the Development and Deepening of the Reform of Pre-school Education

On November 7, 2018, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council promulgated the Opinions on Regulating the Development and Deepening of the Reform of the Pre-School Education, which provides, among others, that (1) private kindergartens forming part or all of the assets of a listing vehicle are prohibited from listing on stock markets; (2) non-governmental capital is prohibited from controlling state-owned or collectively-owned kindergartens and non-profit kindergartens by ways of mergers and acquisitions, entrusted management, franchising, variable interest entities arrangements, or other forms of control agreements; (3) for-profit kindergartens which participate in acquisitions, franchising or chain operation shall file with education departments of the county level or above and make available to the public agreements entered into with relevant interested enterprises; (4) listed companies are prohibited from investing in for-profit kindergartens through financing through stock markets, and should not purchase assets of for-profit kindergartens by cash, issuance of shares or other similar means; and (5) provincial legislative bodies should promulgate implementing measures by June 2019 with regard to the election of private kindergartens to be registered as non-profit or for-profit schools and specify time-frame requirements for such registration. For a detailed description of the associated risks, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risks Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our ability to maintain the operation of our kindergartens and to expand our kindergarten network may be limited due to our listing status as well as the PRC laws and regulations, which may in turn affect our results of operations.” On September 7, 2020, the MOE published the draft Preschool Education Law, which was followed by another draft of the Preschool Education Law on September 1, 2023, both for public comments. The drafts of the Preschool Education Law are expected to tighten restrictions over kindergartens in pursuing profits and specify legal liabilities for the violation of such restrictions.

PRC Laws and Regulations Relating to Trademark and Domain Name

Trademark

Pursuant to the Trademark Law of the PRC, or the Trademark Law, which was revised on April 23, 2019 and with effect from November 1, 2019, registered trademarks refer to trademarks that have been approved and registered by the Trademark Office of the National Intellectual Property Administration, which include commodity trademarks, service trademarks, collective marks and certification marks. The trademark registrant shall enjoy an exclusive right to use the trademark, which shall be protected by law.

Domain name

Pursuant to the Measures for the Administration of Internet Domain Names of China, which was promulgated by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the PRC on August 24, 2017 and with effect from November 1, 2017, “domain name” shall refer to the character mark of hierarchical structure, which identifies and locates a computer on the internet and corresponds to the Internet protocol (IP) address of that computer and the principle of “first come, first serve” is followed for the domain name registration service. Domain name applicants shall provide true, accurate and complete identification of the domain name holder as requested by the domain name registration service provider.

PRC Laws and Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange

The principal regulation governing foreign currency exchange in China is the Foreign Exchange Administration Rules of the PRC. These were promulgated by the State Council of the PRC on January 29, 1996 and with effect from April 1, 1996 and were amended on January 14, 1997 and August 5, 2008. Under these rules, Renminbi is generally freely convertible for payments of current account items, such as trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions and dividend payments, but not freely convertible for capital account items, such as direct investment, loan or investment in securities outside China, unless the prior approval of the SAFE or its local counterparts is obtained.

Under the Foreign Exchange Administration Rules, foreign-invested enterprises in the PRC may, without the approval of SAFE, make a payment from their foreign exchange accounts at designated foreign exchange banks for paying dividends with certain evidencing documents (such as board resolutions, tax certificates), or for trade and services-related foreign exchange transactions by providing commercial documents evidencing such transactions. They are also allowed to retain foreign currency (subject to a cap approval by SAFE) to satisfy foreign exchange liabilities. In addition, foreign exchange transactions involving overseas direct investment or investment and trading in securities, derivative products abroad are subject to registration with SAFE or its local counterparts and approval form or filling with the relevant PRC government authorities (if necessary).

According to the Circular on the Management of Offshore Investment and Financing and Round Trip Investment By Domestic Residents through Special Purpose Vehicles, or Circular 37, which was promulgated on July 14, 2014 and with effect from the same day, before a domestic resident contributes its legally owned onshore or offshore assets and equity into a Special Purpose Vehicle, or SPV, the domestic resident shall be required to register with the local branch of SAFE for foreign exchange registration of overseas investments before contributing the domestic and overseas lawful assets or interests to a SPV, and to update such registration in the event of any change of basic information of the registered SPV or major change in the SPV’s capital, including increases and decreases of capital, share transfers, share swaps, mergers or divisions. The SPV is defined as an “offshore enterprise directly established or indirectly controlled by the domestic resident (including domestic institution and individual resident) with their legally owned assets and equity of the domestic enterprise, or legally owned offshore assets or equity, for the purpose of investment and financing”; “Round Trip Investments” refer to “the direct investment activities carried out by a domestic resident directly or indirectly via an SPV, that is, establishing a foreign-invested enterprise or project within the PRC through a new entity, merger or acquisition and other ways, while obtaining ownership, control, operation and management and other rights and interests”. In addition, according to the procedural guidelines as attached to the Circular 37, the principle of review has been changed to “the domestic individual resident is only required to register the SPV directly established or controlled (first level)”.

Pursuant to Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Simplifying and Improving the Direct Investment-related Foreign Exchange Administration Policies, or Circular 13, which was promulgated on February 13, 2015 and implemented June 1, 2015, the initial foreign exchange registration for establishing or taking control of a SPV by domestic residents can be conducted with a qualified bank, instead of the local foreign exchange bureau, and the Circular 13 also simplifies some procedures relating to foreign exchange for direct investments.

On March 30, 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach regarding the Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or Circular 19, which came into effect from June 1, 2015. According to Circular 19, the foreign exchange capital of foreign-invested enterprises shall be subject to the Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement. The Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement refers to the foreign exchange capital in the capital account of a foreign-invested enterprise for which the rights and interests of monetary contribution has been confirmed by the local foreign exchange bureau (or the book-entry registration of monetary contribution by the banks) can be settled at the banks based on the actual operational needs of the foreign-invested enterprise. The proportion of Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement of the foreign exchange capital of a foreign-invested enterprise is temporarily determined to be 100%. The Renminbi converted from the foreign exchange capital will be kept in a designated account and if a foreign-invested enterprise needs to make further payment from such account, it still needs to provide supporting documents and go through the review process with the banks.

SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming and Regulating Policies on the Control over Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital Accounts, or Circular 16, on June 9, 2016, which became effective simultaneously. Pursuant to Circular 16, enterprises registered in the PRC may also convert their foreign debts from foreign currency to Renminbi on a self-discretionary basis. Circular 16 provides an integrated standard for conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on self-discretionary basis which applies to all enterprises registered in the PRC. Circular 16 reiterates the principle that Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital of a company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope or prohibited by PRC laws or regulations, while such converted Renminbi shall not be provided as loans to its non-affiliated entities.

On January 26, 2017, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Improving Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Optimizing Authenticity and Compliance Verification, or Circular 3, which took effect on the same date. Circular 3 sets out various measures to tighten authenticity and compliance verification of cross-border transactions and cross-border capital flow, which include without limitation requiring banks to verify board resolutions, tax filing form, and audited financial statements before wiring foreign invested enterprises’ foreign exchange distribution above US$50,000, and strengthening genuineness and compliance verification of foreign direct investments.

On October 23, 2019, SAFE issued the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Promoting the Facilitation of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or the Circular 28, which took effect on the same date. Circular 28 allows non-investment foreign-invested enterprises to use their capital funds to make equity investments in China, with genuine investment projects and in compliance with effective foreign investment restrictions (negative list) and other applicable laws. However, as the Circular 28 was newly issued, there are still substantial uncertainties as to its interpretation and implementations in practice.

As of the date of this annual report, all PRC residents known to us that currently have direct or indirect interests in our company have completed or in the course of updating the necessary registrations, as required by Circular 37. For a detailed description of the risk associated with the non-completion of such process, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—A failure by the beneficial owners of our shares who are PRC residents to comply with certain PRC foreign exchange regulations could restrict our ability to distribute profits, restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activities and subject us to liability under PRC law.”

Regulations on loans to and direct investment in the PRC entities by offshore holding companies

According to the Implementation Rules for the Provisional Regulations on Statistics and Supervision of Foreign Debt promulgated by SAFE on September 24, 1997 and the Interim Provisions on the Management of Foreign Debts promulgated by SAFE, the NDRC and the MOF and effective from March 1, 2003, loans by foreign companies to their subsidiaries in China, which accordingly are foreign-invested enterprises, are considered foreign debt, and such loans must be registered with the local branches of the SAFE. Under the provisions, the total amount of accumulated medium-term and long-term foreign debt and the balance of short-term debt borrowed by a foreign-invested enterprise is limited to the difference between the total investment and the registered capital of the foreign-invested enterprise.

According to the Provisional Regulations for the Proportion of Registered Capital to Total Amount of Investment of Joint Ventures Using Chinese and Foreign Investment issued by SAIC on February 17, 1987 and Decision on Amending the Provisions on the Merger or Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors issued by MOFCOM on August 8, 2006, if the registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise is less than US$2.1 million, its total investment amount may not exceed 1.4 times the registered capital; if the registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise is more than US$2.1 million but less than US$5 million, its total investment amount may not exceed two times the registered capital; if the registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise is more than US$5 million but less than US$12 million, its total investment amount may not exceed 2.5 times the registered capital; and if the registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise is more than US$12 million, its total investment amount may not exceed three times the registered capital.

According to the Measures for the Administration of Foreign Debt Registration issued by SAFE on April 28, 2013, the statutory limit on the amount of loans from an overseas shareholder to a foreign-invested enterprise is the difference between the total investment amount and the registered capital of the foreign-invested enterprise.

On January 12, 2017, the People’s Bank of China promulgated Notice of the People’s Bank of China on Issues Concerning Macro Prudential Management of Full Scale Cross-border Financing, or PBOC Circular 9. According to PBOC Circular 9, the People’s Bank of China establishes a cross-border financing regulation system and the legal entities and financial institutions established in PRC excluding government financing vehicles and real estate enterprise, may carry out cross-border financing of foreign currency in accordance with relevant regulations. PBOC Circular 9 provides that, among other things, the outstanding amount of the foreign currency for the entities in cross-border financing, shall be limited to the upper limit of the risk-weighted balance of such entity.

The enterprise shall, after signing the cross-border financing contract, but not later than three business days before the withdrawal of the borrowing funds, file with the local branches of SAFE for the cross-border financing through SAFE’s capital project information system. PBOC Circular 9 also provides that during the one-year period starting from January 11, 2017, foreign-invested enterprises may choose one method to carry out cross-border financing in foreign currency either according to PBOC Circular 9 or according to the Interim Provisions on the Management of Foreign Debts. After the end of such one-year period, the method of foreign-invested enterprises to carry out cross-border financing in foreign currency will be determined by the People’s Bank of China and SAFE.

On September 14, 2015, the National Development and Reform Commission promulgated Notice on Promoting the Administrative Reform of the Filing and Registration System for Enterprises’ Issuance of Foreign Debts, or NDRC Circular 2044. According to NDRC Circular 2044, an enterprise that plans to issue foreign debts shall apply to the National Development and Reform Commission in advance for filing, registration, and report issuance information to the National Development and Reform Commission within 10 business days after the completion of such issuance. The National Development and Reform Commission shall determine whether to accept the application within five business days from the date of receipt of the application, and issue the Certificate on the Filing and Registration of Foreign Debts Issued by Enterprises within seven business days from the date of accepting the application.

Zhuhai Bright Scholar, a foreign-invested enterprise indirectly held by us, currently has a total investment amount of RMB14.0 million (approximately US$2.0 million) and an initially subscribed registered capital RMB10.0 million (approximately US$1.5 million). We may provide shareholder loans of up to the U.S. dollar equivalent of RMB4.0 million (approximately US$0.6 million) to Zhuhai Bright Scholar, which is the difference between its total investment amount and registered capital. According to the Measures for the Reporting of Foreign Investment Information issued by MOFCOM and SAIC on December 30, 2019, which supersedes the Interim Measures for the Administration of the Establishment and Alteration of Archival Filing of Foreign Invested Enterprises, the increase of total investment amount and registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise must be reported to commerce departments through the enterprise registration system and the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and market regulatory departments shall forward such investment information reported by foreign investors or foreign-invested enterprises to commerce departments in a timely manner.

According to applicable PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises, capital contributions from a foreign holding company to its PRC subsidiaries, which are considered foreign-invested enterprises, may only be made when approval by or registration with the MOFCOM or its local counterpart is obtained.

Provisions on the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (Revised in 2009)

Under the M&A Rules, a foreign investor is required to obtain necessary approvals when (1) a foreign investor acquires equity in a domestic non-foreign invested enterprise thereby converting it into a foreign-invested enterprise, or subscribes for new equity in a domestic enterprise via an increase of registered capital thereby converting it into a foreign-invested enterprise; or (2) a foreign investor establishes a foreign-invested enterprise which purchases and operates the assets of a domestic enterprise, or which purchases the assets of a domestic enterprise and injects those assets to establish a foreign-invested enterprise. According to Article 11 of the M&A Rules, where a domestic company or enterprise, or a domestic natural person, through an overseas company established or controlled by it/him/her, acquires a domestic company which is related to or connected with it/him/her, approval from the MOFCOM is required.

For a detailed description of the risk associated with the M&A Rules, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Certain PRC regulations, including the M&A Rules and national security regulations, may require a complicated review and approval process which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.”

C. Organizational Structure

The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure, including our principal subsidiaries and affiliated entities, as of the date of this annual report.

The following table sets forth the details of our significant subsidiaries, VIEs and schools/subsidiaries held by the VIEs from our continuing operations.

The following table sets forth the details of the significant subsidiaries, the VIE, i.e., BGY Education Investment, and schools/subsidiaries held by the VIE from our discontinued operations, as of August 31, 2021, collectively referred to as the Affected Entities throughout this annual report.