|
ii
|
|
iii
|
|
1
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
1
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
1
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
1
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
43
|
|
ITEM 4.A.
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
|
105
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
|
110
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
|
119
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
|
122
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
|
122
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
|
139
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
|
142
|
|
|
143
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
|
143
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
|
143
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
|
143
|
|
ITEM 16.A.
|
|
144
|
|
ITEM 16.B.
|
|
144
|
|
ITEM 16.C.
|
|
144
|
|
ITEM 16.D.
|
|
145
|
|
ITEM 16.E.
|
|
145
|
|
ITEM 16.F.
|
|
146
|
|
ITEM 16.G.
|
|
146
|
|
ITEM 16.H.
|
|
147
|
|
ITEM 16.I.
|
|
147
|
|
ITEM 16.K.
|
|
147
|
|
149
|
|
ITEM 17.
|
|
149
|
|
ITEM 18.
|
|
149
|
|
ITEM 19.
|
|
149
|
|
152
|
In this annual report, unless otherwise indicated:
|
• |
“Costamare”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or similar terms are used for convenience to refer to Costamare Inc., or any one or more of its subsidiaries or their predecessors, or to such
entities collectively, except that when such terms are used in this annual report in reference to the common stock, the 7.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), the 8.50% Series C
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), the 8.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), the 8.875% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual
Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock” and, together with the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”) or the context otherwise indicates, they refer
specifically to Costamare Inc.;
|
|
• |
currency amounts in this annual report are in U.S. dollars; and
|
|
• |
all data regarding our fleet and the terms of our charters is as of March 19, 2024.
|
We use the term “twenty foot equivalent unit” (“TEU”), the international standard measure of containers, in describing the
capacity of our containerships. We use the term deadweight ton (“dwt”) in describing the size of dry bulk vessels. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies
that a vessel can carry.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements in this annual report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) that are not statements of
historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The disclosure and analysis set forth in this annual report includes assumptions, expectations,
projections, intentions and beliefs about future events in a number of places, particularly in relation to our operations, cash flows, financial position, plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets
in which we operate. These statements are intended as “forward-looking statements”. In some cases, predictive, future-tense or forward-looking words such as “believe”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “forecast”, “plan”,
“potential”, “may”, “should”, “could” and “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time
to time make other oral or written statements which are forward-looking statements, including in our periodic reports that we file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), other information sent to our security holders,
and other written materials. We caution that these and other forward-looking statements included in this annual report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of this annual
report (and in the documents incorporated by reference herein) or the date on which such oral or written statements are made, as applicable, about factors that are beyond our ability to control or predict, and are not intended to give any
assurance as to future results.
Factors that might cause future results to differ include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
• |
general market conditions and shipping industry trends, including charter rates, vessel values and the future supply of, and demand for, ocean-going containership and dry bulk shipping services;
|
|
• |
our continued ability to enter into time charters with existing and new customers, and to re-charter on favorable terms our vessels upon the expiry of existing charters;
|
|
• |
our future financial condition and liquidity, including our ability to make required payments under our credit facilities, and comply with our loan covenants;
|
|
• |
our ability to finance our capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate activities;
|
|
• |
risks related to our dry bulk operating platform, including uncertainty related to the introduction of a new line of business for the Company, the fact that the chartering-in and chartering-out
of dry bulk vessels is inherently more volatile than traditional vessel ownership and risks associated with derivative instruments such as forward freight agreements and bunker hedging;
|
|
• |
risks related to our leasing business, including uncertainty related to the introduction of a new line of business for the Company, as well as exposure to new financial, counterparty and legal
risks;
|
|
• |
the effects of a possible worldwide economic slowdown;
|
|
• |
disruption of world trade due to rising protectionism or the breakdown of multilateral trade agreements;
|
|
• |
environmental and regulatory conditions, including changes in laws and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities;
|
|
• |
business disruptions and economic uncertainty resulting from epidemics or pandemics, including any new outbreaks or variants of COVID-19 that may emerge;
|
|
• |
business disruptions due to natural disasters or other disasters outside our control;
|
|
• |
fluctuations in interest rates and currencies, including the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies;
|
|
• |
technological advancements in the design, construction and operations of containerships and dry bulk vessels and opportunities for the profitable operations of our vessels;
|
|
• |
the financial health of our customers, our lenders and other counterparties, and their ability to perform their obligations;
|
|
• |
potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events, sanctions, piracy or acts by terrorists and armed conflicts;
|
|
• |
future, pending or recent acquisitions of vessels or other assets, the recent commencement of operations of our dry bulk platform, our business strategy, areas of possible expansion and expected
capital spending or operating expenses, including the recent investment in a leasing business;
|
|
• |
expectations relating to dividend payments and our ability to make such payments;
|
|
• |
the availability of existing secondhand vessels or newbuild vessels to purchase, the time that it may take to construct and take delivery of new vessels or the useful lives of our vessels;
|
|
• |
the availability of key employees and crew, the length and number of off-hire days, dry-docking requirements, fuel and insurance costs;
|
|
• |
our anticipated general and administrative expenses, including our fees and expenses payable under our management and services agreements, as may be amended from time to time;
|
|
• |
our ability to leverage to our advantage our managers’ relationships and reputation within the international shipping industry;
|
|
• |
our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major liner companies;
|
|
• |
expected cost of, and our ability to comply with, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as requirements imposed by classification societies and
standards demanded by our charterers;
|
|
• |
any malfunction or disruption of information technology systems and networks that our operations rely on or any impact of a possible cybersecurity breach;
|
|
• |
risks inherent in vessel operation, including perils of the sea, terrorism, piracy and discharge of pollutants;
|
|
• |
potential liability from current or future litigation;
|
|
• |
our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations; and
|
|
• |
other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report.
|
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this annual report, whether as a
result of new information, future events, a change in our views or expectations or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such
factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
ITEM 1. |
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. |
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
A. Reserved.
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors
Risk Factor Summary
Industry Risks
|
• |
Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter rates in the international shipping industry which are based on macroeconomic factors outside of our control;
|
|
• |
The market value of our vessels can fluctuate substantially over time, and if these values are low at a time when we are attempting to dispose of a vessel, we could incur a loss;
|
|
• |
The international dry bulk industry is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully for charters on favorable terms with established companies or new entrants that may have
greater resources and access to capital;
|
|
• |
The operation of dry bulk vessels entails certain unique operational risks, which could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends;
|
|
• |
Disruptions in global markets from terrorist attacks, regional armed conflicts, general political unrest and the resulting governmental action could have a material adverse impact on our results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows; and
|
|
• |
A decrease in the level of China’s export of goods and import of raw materials could have a material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and in turn, could cause a material adverse impact
on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
|
Risks Inherent in Our Business
|
• |
Delay in the delivery or cancelation of any secondhand vessels we may agree to acquire, or any future newbuild vessel orders, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition
and earnings;
|
|
• |
We are dependent on our charterers and other counterparties fulfilling their obligations under agreements with us;
|
|
• |
We may have difficulty properly managing our growth through acquisitions of new or secondhand vessels and we may not realize expected benefits from these acquisitions;
|
|
• |
The increased volatility of our new dry bulk operating platform may have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow;
|
|
• |
Declines in the value of our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial
position;
|
|
• |
Our investment in the leasing business exposes us to financial and counterparty risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flow;
|
|
• |
Our managers may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled crews on our behalf necessary to operate our business or may pay rising crew wages and other vessel operating costs;
|
|
• |
Fuel, or bunker, price fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders;
|
|
• |
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which may reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders;
|
|
• |
The derivative contracts we have entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currencies, bunker prices and freight rates can result in reductions in our
stockholders’ equity as well as reductions in our income;
|
|
• |
We are subject to regulation and liability under environmental and operational safety laws that could require significant expenditures and affect our cash flows and net income;
|
|
• |
Our business depends upon certain members of our senior management who may not necessarily continue to work for us;
|
|
• |
Our chairman and chief executive officer has affiliations with our managers and others that could create conflicts of interest between us and our managers or other entities in which he has an
interest;
|
|
• |
Our managers are privately held companies and there is little or no publicly available information about them; and
|
|
• |
Being active in multiple lines of business, including managing multiple fleets, requires management to allocate significant attention and resources, and failure to successfully or efficiently
manage each line of business may harm our business and operating results.
|
Risks Relating to Our Securities
|
• |
The price of our securities may be volatile and future sales of our equity securities could cause the market price of our securities to decline;
|
|
• |
Investors may view our having multiple lines of business, including ownership of multiple fleets, negatively, which may decrease the trading price of our securities;
|
|
• |
Holders of Preferred Stock have extremely limited voting rights; and
|
|
• |
Members of the Konstantakopoulos family are our principal existing stockholders and will effectively be able to control the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote;
their interests may be different from yours.
|
Industry Risks
Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter rates in the international shipping industry
which are based on macroeconomic factors outside of our control. The cyclical nature of the shipping industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates, which may reduce our revenues and negatively affect our results of operations.
The ocean-going shipping industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability. Our profitability
is dependent upon the charter rates we are able to charge for our ships. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply of and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply of and demand for the consumer goods and major
commodities carried by water internationally. We are exposed to changes in charter rates in both the containership and dry bulk markets through both traditional vessel ownership as well as our dry bulk operating platform.
Since the factors affecting the supply of and demand for containership and dry bulk vessels are outside of our control and are
unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable. A significant decrease in charter rates would adversely affect our profitability and cash flows and could decrease the value of our
fleet.
The demand for containerships and dry bulk vessels has generally been influenced by, among other factors:
|
• |
supply of and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
|
|
• |
changes in the exploration or production of energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
|
|
• |
the location of regional and global exploration, production and manufacturing facilities;
|
|
• |
the location of consuming regions for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
|
|
• |
the globalization of production and manufacturing;
|
|
• |
global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts, terrorist activities, sanctions, embargoes, strikes, tariffs and “trade wars”;
|
|
• |
economic slowdowns caused by public health events such as the initial outbreak and resurgences of COVID-19;
|
|
• |
natural disasters and other disruptions in international trade;
|
|
• |
disruptions and developments in international trade;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including the distance cargo products are transported by sea, competition with other modes of cargo transportation and trade patterns;
|
|
• |
environmental and other regulatory developments;
|
|
• |
currency exchange rates; and
|
Factors that influence the supply of containership and dry bulk vessel capacity include:
|
• |
the availability of financing;
|
|
• |
the price of steel and other raw materials;
|
|
• |
the number of newbuilding orders and deliveries, including slippage in deliveries;
|
|
• |
the cost of newbuildings and the time it takes to construct a newbuild;
|
|
• |
the number of shipyards and ability of shipyards to deliver vessels;
|
|
• |
port and canal congestion;
|
|
• |
scrap prices and the time it takes to scrap a vessel;
|
|
• |
speed of vessel operation;
|
|
• |
costs of bunkers and other operating costs;
|
|
• |
the efficiency and age profile of the existing containership and dry bulk fleet in the market;
|
|
• |
the number of vessels that are out of service, namely those that are laid-up, dry-docked, awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire;
|
|
• |
the economics of slow steaming;
|
|
• |
government and industry regulation of maritime transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations; and
|
|
• |
sanctions (in particular, sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela, amongst others).
|
These factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to
correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions.
Our ability to re-charter our vessels upon the expiration or termination of their current charters and to charter our vessels
for which we have not yet secured charters and the charter rates payable under any renewal options or replacement or new charters will depend upon, among other things, the prevailing states of the containership and dry bulk charter markets. If
the charter markets are depressed when our vessels’ charters expire or when we are otherwise seeking new charters, we may be forced to charter our vessels at reduced or even unprofitable rates, or we may not be able to charter them at all and/or
we may be forced to scrap them, which may reduce or eliminate our earnings or make our earnings volatile.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Containership Timecharter Rate Index (a per TEU weighted average of six to twelve
month time charter rates of 1,000 to 5,000 TEU vessels, and three year time charter rates of 6,800 TEU to 9,000 TEU vessels that is published in the Container Intelligence Monthly, calculated on a monthly basis by Clarkson Research Services
Limited (“Clarkson Research”) (based on $/TEU for 1993=100)) decreased by 36%, from 105.76 points in December 2022 to 67.36 points in December 2023. The decrease in charter rates is mainly attributable to the newbuild containerships delivered
during 2023 (2.3 million TEU capacity), the further normalization in supply chains and a stagnant demand in seaborne container transportation. Weak or volatile conditions in the containership sector may affect our ability to generate cash flows
and maintain liquidity, as well as adversely affect our ability to obtain financing.
According to Clarkson Research, seaborne container trade (in terms of million TEU transported) grew by a compound annual growth
rate of 2.2% per annum between 2014 and 2023. During this period, there have been two years, 2020 and 2022, at which seaborne container trade exhibited negative growth rates. More specifically, during 2020, volumes decreased by 1.5% due to the
outbreak of COVID-19 and the respective supply chain inefficiencies it caused, whereas in 2022, volumes decreased by 3.7% following an increase of 6.6% in the previous year. Clarkson Research estimates an increase in seaborne container trade from
200.3 million TEU in 2022 to 200.9 million TEU in 2023. Furthermore, according to Clarkson Research, future supply as represented by the containership order-book as of December 2023 amounted to 24.5% of the existing fleet capacity, lower than the
respective percentage of 29.4% a year ago but still one of the highest such percentages since 2011. Delivery of the vessels currently under construction may negatively affect time charter rates for both short- and long-term periods unless it
coincides with an increase in the demand for seaborne transportation of container boxes.
We charter our dry bulk vessels primarily on short-term time charters, and therefore, we are exposed to changes in spot market
rates, namely to short-term time charter rates and voyage charter rates, for dry bulk vessels; such changes may affect our earnings and the value of our dry bulk vessels at any given time. Conditions in the international dry bulk shipping market
can be volatile and cyclical and have varied significantly over the last decade. During 2022, mainly due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the COVID-19 lockdown policies in China and the emergence of inflationary pressures, demand for
seaborne dry bulk trade softened and time charter rates for Capesize, Panamax, Supramax and Handysize vessels (as measured by the BCI, BPI-82, BSI-58 and BHSI-38 Indexes, respectively) dropped on average by 50% compared to 2021 levels. During
2023, the full removal of COVID-19 lockdown policies in China, the increased demand for thermal coal and the reduction of transit flows in the Panama Canal, among other factors resulted in an increase of 57% in time charter rates for the
aforementioned categories. Weak or volatile conditions in the dry bulk shipping sector may affect our ability to generate cash flows and maintain liquidity, as well as adversely affect our ability to obtain financing.
An oversupply of containership or dry bulk vessel capacity may reduce charter rates and adversely affect our
ability to charter our vessels at profitable rates or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
An oversupply of large newbuild vessels and/or re-chartered containership capacity entering the market, combined with any
decline in the demand for containerships, may reduce available charter rates and may decrease our ability to charter our containerships when we are seeking new or replacement charters other than for unprofitable or reduced rates, or we may not be
able to charter our containerships at all. According to Clarkson Research, as of December 2023, the containership order-book represented 24.5% of the existing fleet capacity, 66% of which was for vessels with carrying capacity in excess of 12,000
TEU.
An oversupply of large newbuild vessels and/or re-chartered containership capacity entering the market, combined with any
decline in the demand for containerships, may reduce available charter rates and may decrease our ability to charter our containerships when we are seeking new or replacement charters other than for unprofitable or reduced rates, or we may not be
able to charter our containerships at all.
Although the number of dry bulk vessels on order as a percentage of the dry bulk fleet in the water was at a moderate level of
9% as of December 2023, such number can quickly increase if multiple orders by industry participants and outside investors are placed. While the orderbook has consistently remained below 10% since the beginning of 2020, dry bulk vessels older
than 15 years represent 20% of all dry bulk vessels, which, coupled with stricter environmental regulations relating to fuel oil emissions, could lead to increased activity in newbuild orders for more fuel efficient vessels. If, due to an
oversupply of dry bulk vessels, charter rates decline upon the expiration or termination of our current charters, we may only be able to re-charter those vessels at reduced rates or we may not be able to charter these vessels at all.
Risks inherent in the operation of ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation, which could
adversely affect our expenses, net income, cash flow and stock price.
The operation of ocean-going vessels carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:
|
• |
piracy or terrorist attacks including the recent Houthi seizures and attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea;
|
|
• |
environmental accidents;
|
|
• |
grounding, fire, explosions and collisions;
|
|
• |
cargo and property loss or damage;
|
|
• |
business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war, terrorism, disease and quarantine, political action in various countries or adverse weather conditions; and
|
|
• |
work stoppages or other labor problems with crew members serving on our vessels, some of whom are unionized and covered by collective bargaining agreements.
|
Such occurrences could result in death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental damage, delays in the delivery of
cargo, loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts, governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business, litigation with our employees, customers or third parties, higher insurance rates, and damage to our
reputation and customer relationships generally. Although we maintain hull and machinery and war risks insurance, as well as protection and indemnity insurance, which may cover certain risks of loss resulting from such occurrences, our insurance
coverage may be subject to caps or not cover such losses, and any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs and lower our revenues. The involvement of our vessels in an environmental disaster may harm our reputation as a safe and
reliable vessel owner and operator. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The market value of our vessels can fluctuate substantially over time, and if these values are low at a time
when we are attempting to dispose of a vessel, we could incur a loss, which would adversely affect our financial condition and could impair our ability to pay dividends.
Containership and dry bulk vessel values can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:
|
• |
prevailing economic conditions in the markets in which our vessels operate;
|
|
• |
reduced demand for containerships or dry bulk vessels, including as a result of a substantial or extended decline in world trade;
|
|
• |
increases in the supply of vessel capacity;
|
|
• |
changes in prevailing charter hire rates;
|
|
• |
the physical condition, size, age and technical specification of the ships;
|
|
• |
the costs of building new vessels;
|
|
• |
changes in technology which can render older vessels obsolete;
|
|
• |
the relative environmental efficiency of the vessel, as compared to others in the markets in which our vessels operate;
|
|
• |
whether the vessel is equipped with an exhaust gas scrubber or not; and
|
|
• |
the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships to respond to technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards,
customer requirements or otherwise.
|
The risk of realizing a loss on the sale of a vessel is greater during periods when vessel values are low compared to their
historical levels. In the future, we may sell vessels under unfavorable conditions resulting in losses in order to maintain sufficient liquidity and to allow us to cover our operating costs. If the market values of our vessels deteriorate, we may
be required to record an impairment charge in our financial statements, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, any such deterioration in the market values of our vessels could trigger a breach of certain covenants under our
credit facilities, which could adversely affect our operations. If a charter expires or is terminated, we may be unable to re-charter the vessel at an acceptable rate and, rather than continue to incur costs to maintain the vessel, may seek to
dispose of it. Our inability to dispose of the vessel at a reasonable price could result in a loss on its sale and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows,
including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The international dry bulk industry is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully for
charters on favorable terms with established companies or new entrants that may have greater resources and access to capital, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity and results of
operations.
The international dry bulk shipping industry is highly competitive, capital intensive and highly fragmented with virtually no
barriers to entry. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom may have greater resources and access to capital than we have. In addition, we are a new entrant in the dry bulk industry and some of our competitors may have
more experience and more established customer relationships. Competition among vessel owners for the seaborne transportation of dry bulk cargo can be intense and depends on the charter rate, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of
the vessel and its operators to the charterers. Many of our competitors have greater resources and access to capital than we have and operate larger fleets than we may operate, and thus they could be able to offer lower charter rates or higher
quality vessels than we are able to offer. If this were to occur, we may be unable to retain or attract new charterers on attractive terms, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity and
results of operations.
Our operating results are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which could affect our operating results and the
amount of available cash with which we service our debt or could pay dividends.
We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter
rates. This is particularly true for our dry bulk fleet. To the extent we operate vessels on short-term time charters, index-linked time charters and voyage charters obtained in the spot market, this seasonality may result in the future and has
in the past resulted in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results which could affect our ability to pay dividends to our common stockholders. The dry bulk market is typically stronger in the fall and spring months in anticipation of
increased consumption of coal and other raw materials in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and increased South American grain shipments during spring. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt
vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. As a result, our revenues may be weaker during the fiscal quarters ended March 31 and September 30, and, conversely, our revenues may be stronger in fiscal quarters ended June 30 and December
31.
The operation of dry bulk vessels entails certain unique operational risks, which could affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
The operation of certain ship types, such as dry bulk vessels, has certain unique risks. With a dry bulk vessel, the cargo
itself and its interaction with the ship can be a risk factor. By their nature, dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and may react badly to water exposure. In addition, dry bulk vessels are often subjected to battering
treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold), and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be
more susceptible to breach at sea. Furthermore, any defects or flaws in the design of a dry bulk vessel may contribute to vessel damage. Hull breaches in dry bulk vessels may lead to the flooding of the vessels’ holds. If a dry bulk vessel
suffers flooding in its holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the vessel’s bulkheads, leading to the loss of the vessel. If we are unable to adequately maintain our vessels, we may be unable to
prevent these events.
Any of these circumstances or events may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows,
financial condition and ability to pay dividends. In addition, the loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.
Downside risks to the world economy, ongoing conflicts, renewed terrorist activity, the outbreak of a
pandemic crisis, international hostilities, the refugee crisis and protectionist policies which could affect advanced economies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Global growth is subject to downside economic risks stemming from factors such as energy costs, fiscal fragility in advanced
economies, monetary tightening in certain advanced and emerging economies, high sovereign, corporate and private debt levels, highly accommodative macroeconomic policies and increased volatility in debt and equity markets as well as in the price
of fuel and other commodities. The current macroeconomic environment is also characterized by significant inflation, causing the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks to increase interest rates. Inflation and rising interest rates may
raise the cost of capital, increase our operating costs and generally reduce economic growth, disrupting global trade and shipping. Political events such as the continued global trade war between the U.S. and China, the economic impact of and
global response to the emergence of a pandemic crisis such as COVID-19 (and new variants that may emerge), the continuing war in Syria, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, the recent
Houthi seizures and attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, renewed terrorist attacks around the world and the refugee crisis may disrupt global supply chains and negatively impact
globalization and global economic growth, which could disrupt financial markets, and may lead to weaker consumer demand in the European Union, the United States and other parts of the world which could have a material adverse effect on our
business. The recent Houthi seizures and attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea have impacted the global economy as some companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez
Canal and Red Sea. This has caused concerns of supply disruption as well as the risk of one of our vessels being attacked or seized.
The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine may lead to further regional and international conflicts or armed action. It is
possible that such conflict could disrupt supply chains and cause instability in the global economy. Additionally, the ongoing conflict could result in the imposition of further economic sanctions by the United States and the European Union
against Russia. While much uncertainty remains regarding the global impact of the conflict in Ukraine, it is possible that such tensions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. Furthermore,
it is possible that third parties with whom we have charter contracts may be impacted by events in Russia and Ukraine, which could adversely affect our operations.
In addition, we anticipate that a significant number of port calls made by our vessels will continue to involve the loading or
unloading of cargoes in ports in the Asia Pacific region. In recent years, China has been one of the world’s fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product, which has had a significant impact on shipping demand. However, if China’s
growth in gross domestic product and especially in industrial production continues to slow and other countries in the Asia Pacific region experience slower or negative economic growth in the future, this may negatively affect the economies of the
United States and the European Union, and thus, may negatively impact shipping demand. In addition, the continued global trade war between the U.S. and China, including the introduction by the U.S. of tariffs on selected imported goods, mainly
from China, may provoke further retaliation measures from the affected countries which has the potential to create new impediments to trade. Furthermore, trade friction could increase the volatility in the foreign exchange markets which could
also negatively affect global trade. Such volatile economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our
stockholders.
Disruptions in global markets from terrorist attacks, regional armed conflicts, general political unrest and
the resulting governmental action could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Terrorist attacks in certain parts of the world and the continuing response of the United States and other countries to these
attacks, armed conflicts as well as the threat of future attacks or the spreading of armed conflicts, continue to cause uncertainty and volatility in the world markets and may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, the recent seizures and attacks on vessels travelling through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea by the Houthi and
Iran, advances of ISIS and other terrorist organizations in the Middle East and Africa and political tension or conflicts in the Asia Pacific Region such as in the South China Sea and North Korea may negatively impact global credit and equity
markets, cause uncertainty and volatility in the global financial markets and may accordingly affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The recent Houthi seizures and attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea, the
Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea have impacted the global economy as some companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez Canal and the Red Sea. This has caused concerns of supply disruption as well as the risk of
one of our vessels being attacked or seized. In addition, recent events in the Israel-Hamas conflict have created additional concerns of disruption as the conflict may broaden or escalate. These uncertainties, as well as future hostilities or
other political instability in regions where our vessels trade, could trigger a new refugee crisis, affect trade volumes and patterns and adversely affect our operations, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
In addition, global financial markets and economic conditions which remain subject to significant vulnerabilities, such as the
deterioration of fiscal balances and the rapid accumulation of public debt, may be negatively impacted by the aforementioned conflicts and risks. Furthermore, certain banks that have historically been significant lenders to the shipping industry
have reduced or ceased lending activities in the shipping industry. Any future tightening of capital requirements could further reduce lending activities. If this were to occur, we may experience difficulties obtaining financing commitments or be
unable to fully draw on the capacity under our committed term loans in the future if our lenders are unwilling to extend financing to us or unable to meet their funding obligations due to their own liquidity, capital or solvency issues. We cannot
be certain that financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all in the future. If financing becomes unavailable when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our future obligations as they come due.
Our failure to obtain such funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. In the absence of
available financing, we also may be unable to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
Geopolitical risks may affect the ability of certain of our managers and service providers, which have
offices in Greece to operate efficiently.
The location of the offices of our managers and service providers, as well as certain of our sub-managers’ offices in Greece
exposes them to geopolitical risks related to Greece, such as a resurgence of influx of refugees. Although to date, these risks have not affected our managers’ operations, a serious regional crisis may have a material adverse effect on our
operations in the future and may limit the ability of our managers and service providers with offices in Greece to operate. These limitations may include the ability of our Greek suppliers to fully perform their contracts, the ability of our
Greek-based seafarers or shore employees to travel to and from our vessels and delays or other disruptions in the operation of our fleet.
An increase in trade protectionism and the unravelling of multilateral trade agreements could have a
material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism will adversely affect our business. Recently, government
leaders have declared that their countries may turn to trade barriers to protect or revive their domestic industries in the face of foreign imports, thereby depressing the demand for shipping.
The U.S. government has recently made statements and taken actions that may impact U.S. and international trade policies,
including tariffs affecting certain Chinese industries. It is unknown whether and to what extent new tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. If any new
tariffs, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or, in particular, if the U.S. government takes retaliatory trade actions due to the ongoing U.S.-China trade tension, such changes could
have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In 2022, in response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the U.S. and several European countries imposed various economic
sanctions against Russia, prohibitions on imports of Russian energy products, including crude oil, petroleum, petroleum fuels, oils, liquefied natural gas and coal, and prohibitions on investments in the Russian energy sector by US persons, among
other restrictions. The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine may lead to further regional and international conflicts or armed action. It is possible that such conflict could disrupt supply chains and cause instability in the global
economy. Additionally, the ongoing conflict could result in the imposition of further economic sanctions by the United States and the European Union against Russia. While much uncertainty remains regarding the global impact of the conflict in
Ukraine, it is possible that such tensions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. Furthermore, it is possible that third parties with whom we have charter contracts may be impacted by events
in Russia and Ukraine, which could adversely affect our operations.
Restrictions on imports, including in the form of tariffs, could have a major impact on global trade and demand for shipping.
Specifically, increasing trade protectionism in the markets that our charterers serve may cause an increase in (i) the cost of goods exported from exporting countries, (ii) the length of time required to deliver goods from exporting countries,
(iii) the costs of such delivery and (iv) the risks associated with exporting goods. These factors may result in a decrease in the quantity of goods to be shipped. Protectionist developments, or the perception they may occur, may have a material
adverse effect on global economic conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade, including trade between the United States and China. These developments would have an adverse impact on our charterers’ business, operating results and
financial condition. This could, in turn, affect our charterers’ ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and impair our ability to renew charters and grow our business. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
A decrease in the level of China’s export of goods and import of raw materials could have a material adverse
impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
China exports considerably more finished products than it imports. Our containerships are deployed on routes involving
containerized trade in and out of emerging markets, and our charterers’ container shipping and business revenue is derived among others from the shipment of goods from the Asia Pacific region, including China, to various overseas export markets
including the United States, Europe and Latin America. The ongoing global trade war between the U.S. and China may have contributed to the economic slowdown witnessed in China in recent years. Furthermore, the government of China has implemented
economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods. This may have the effect of reducing the supply of goods available for export and may, in turn, result in a decrease of demand for container shipping. Many of the
reforms, particularly some limited price reforms that result in the prices for certain commodities being principally determined by market forces, are unprecedented or experimental and may be subject to revision, change or abolition.
The employment of our dry bulk vessels and the respective revenues depend on the international shipment of raw materials and
commodities primarily to China, Japan, South Korea and Europe from North and South America, India, Indonesia, and Australia. Any reduction in or hindrance to the demand for such materials could negatively affect demand for our vessels and, in
turn, harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. For instance, the government of China has implemented economic policies aimed at reducing the consumption of coal which may, in turn, result in a decrease in shipping demand.
Similarly, the initial onset of COVID-19 resulted in reduced economic activity due to lockdowns and lower demand for movement of raw materials.
The level of imports to and exports from China could be adversely affected by changes to economic reforms by the Chinese
government, including China’s “zero-COVID” policy, which disrupted manufacturing, supply chains and consumer spending, as well as by changes in political, economic and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese government. A
reduction of exports from China or imports to China could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our financial and operating performance may be adversely affected by the continuation of COVID-19, the
spread of new variants or the occurrence of another epidemic and related governmental responses thereto.
Our business may be adversely affected by any new outbreaks or new variants of COVID-19 or occurrence of another epidemic that
may emerge. The initial onset of COVID-19 introduced uncertainty into our operational and financial activities, resulting in numerous actions taken by governments and governmental agencies in an attempt to mitigate the spread or any resurgence of
the virus, including travel bans, quarantines and other emergency public health measures such as lockdowns. While many of these measures have since been relaxed, we cannot predict whether and to what degree such measures will be reinstated in the
event of any resurgence of COVID-19, any new variants thereof or occurrence of another epidemic, which may adversely affect global economic activity and could have a material adverse effect on our future business, results of operations, cash
flows, financial condition, the carrying value of our assets, the fair values of our vessels and our ability to pay dividends. The occurrence or reoccurrence of any of the foregoing events or other epidemics, an increase in the severity or
duration of epidemics and pandemics, including COVID-19, or a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 or another virus could have a material adverse effect on our future financial and operating performance.
Risks Inherent in Our Business
Delay in the delivery or cancelation of any secondhand vessels we
may agree to acquire, or any future newbuild vessel orders, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and earnings.
As of March 19, 2024, we had no newbuild containerships under contract or any secondhand vessels that we had agreed to acquire,
and all vessels we have agreed to acquire had been delivered, but we may contract for additional newbuild or secondhand vessels in the future. In 2022, we served notices of termination for eight newbuild vessels on order at a Chinese shipyard due
to default by the shipyard and we are currently in arbitration with the shipyard in connection with the terminations. A delay by the seller or shipyard in the delivery date of any vessel we contract to purchase will reduce our expected income
from that vessel and, if the vessel is already chartered, may lead the charterer of such vessel to claim damages or to cancel the relevant charter. If the seller of any vessel we contract to purchase is not able to build and/or to deliver the
vessel to us as agreed, or if we cancel a purchase agreement because a seller has not met his obligations, it may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows,
including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The expected delivery dates under any shipbuilding contracts or purchase agreements we may enter into in the future, may be
delayed or the relevant contract may be cancelled for reasons not under our control, including, among other things:
|
• |
quality or engineering problems;
|
|
• |
breach of contract by, or disputes with, our counterparties;
|
|
• |
changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards;
|
|
• |
work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard;
|
|
• |
bankruptcy of or other financial crisis involving the shipyard or other seller;
|
|
• |
a backlog of orders at the shipyard;
|
|
• |
sanctions imposed on the seller, the shipyard, or the vessel;
|
|
• |
political, social or economic disturbances;
|
|
• |
weather interference or a catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake or fire, or other accident;
|
|
• |
disruptions due to COVID-19;
|
|
• |
requests for changes to the original vessel specifications;
|
|
• |
shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel;
|
|
• |
an inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals;
|
|
• |
financial instability of the lenders under our committed credit facilities, resulting in potential delay or inability to draw down on such facilities; and
|
|
• |
financial instability of the charterers under our agreed time charters for the newbuild vessels, resulting in potential delay or inability to charter the newbuild vessels.
|
We are dependent on our charterers and other counterparties fulfilling their obligations under agreements
with us, and their inability or unwillingness to honor these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and impair our ability to pay dividends.
Payments to us by our charterers under charter agreements are and will be our main source of operating cash flow. Such
agreements subject us to counterparty risks. The ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other
things, general economic conditions, the condition of the maritime and offshore industries, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for specific types of vessels, and various expenses.
These risks are heightened for our containership agreements, as we derive our revenues from the containership sector from a
limited number of customers in part through long-term time charters. Weakness in demand for container shipping services, increased operating costs due to changes in environmental or other regulations and the oversupply of large containerships as
well as the oversupply of smaller size vessels due to a cascading effect places our liner company customers under financial pressure. Declines in demand and increases in liner companies’ operating costs could result in financial challenges to our
liner company customers and may increase the likelihood of one or more of our customers being unable or unwilling to pay us contracted charter rates or going bankrupt.
If we lose a time charter because the charterer is unable to pay us or for any other reason, we may be unable to re-deploy the
related vessel on similarly favorable terms or at all. Also, we will not receive any revenues from such a vessel while it is not chartered, but we will be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain and insure the vessel and service any
indebtedness on it. The combination of any surplus of vessel capacity and the expected entry into service of new technologically advanced or more environmental friendly vessels may make it difficult to secure substitute employment for any of our
ships if our counterparties fail to perform their obligations under the currently arranged time charters, and any new charter arrangements that we may be able to secure could be at lower rates. Furthermore, the surplus of vessels available at
lower charter rates and lack of demand for our customers’ services could negatively affect our charterers’ willingness to perform their obligations under our time charters, particularly if the charter rates in such time charters are significantly
above the prevailing market rates. Accordingly, we may have to grant concessions to our charterers in the form of lower charter rates for the remaining duration of the relevant charter or part thereof, or to agree to re-charter vessels coming off
charter at reduced rates compared to the charter then ended. While we have agreed in certain cases to charter rate re-arrangements entailing reductions for specified periods, we have been compensated for these adjustments by, among other things,
subsequent rate increases and/or extended charter periods, so that the aggregate payments under the charters are not materially reduced, and in some cases we also have arranged for term extensions. However, there is no assurance that any future
charter re-arrangements will be on similarly favorable terms.
The loss of any of our charterers, time charters or vessels, or a decline in payments under our time charters, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
In addition to charter parties, we may, among other things, enter into shipbuilding contracts, contracts for the sale or
purchase of secondhand vessels, provide performance guarantees relating to shipbuilding contracts, to sale and purchase contracts or to charters, enter into credit facilities or other financing arrangements, accept commitment letters from banks,
or enter into insurance contracts or derivative contracts (including interest rate swaps, bunker swaps, exchange rate swaps, or forward freight agreements) or enter into joint ventures. Such agreements expose us to counterparty credit risk. The
ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend upon a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the state
of the capital markets, the condition of the ocean-going shipping industry and charter hire rates. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant losses, which in turn could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
A limited number of containership customers operating in a consolidating industry comprise the majority of
our revenues. The loss of these customers could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and competitive position and further consolidation among our customers will reduce our bargaining power.
Our customers in the containership sector consist of a limited number of liner companies. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S (“A.P.
Moller-Maersk”), Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A. (“MSC”), members of the Evergreen Group (“Evergreen”), Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft (“Hapag Lloyd”), Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (“ZIM”) and Cosco Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
(“COSCO”) together represented 86%, 85% and 83% of our containership revenue in 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively. The tough economic conditions faced by these liner companies historically and the intense competition among them has caused, and
may in the future cause, certain liner companies to default and is also leading to a consolidation among liner companies. We expect that the number of leading liner companies which are our client base may continue to shrink and we may depend on a
more limited number of customers to generate a substantial portion of our revenues. The cessation of business with these liner companies or their failure to fulfill their obligations under the time charters for our containerships could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. In addition to consolidations, alliances involving our customers could
further increase the concentration of our business and reduce our bargaining power. In 2014, three of our subsidiaries participated in a restructuring agreement with one of our charterers whereby they agreed to charter hire reductions in exchange
for equity and unsecured debentures which were eventually repaid in full and in certain cases charter period extensions.
We could lose a customer or the benefits of our time charter arrangements for many different reasons, including if the customer
is unable or unwilling to make charter hire or other payments to us because of a deterioration in its financial condition, disagreements with us or if the charterer exercises certain termination rights or otherwise. If any of these customers
terminate its charters, chooses not to re-charter our ships after charters expire or is unable to perform under its charters and we are not able to find replacement charters on similar terms or are unable to re-charter our ships at all, we will
suffer a loss of revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Our Fleet”.
We may have difficulty properly managing our growth through acquisitions of new or secondhand vessels and we
may not realize expected benefits from these acquisitions, which may negatively impact our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
We expect to grow our business by ordering newbuild vessels and through selective acquisitions of secondhand vessels to the
extent that they are available. Our future growth will primarily depend on:
|
• |
the operations of the shipyards that build any newbuild vessels we may order;
|
|
• |
the availability of employment for our vessels;
|
|
• |
locating and identifying suitable secondhand vessels;
|
|
• |
obtaining newbuild or secondhand contracts at acceptable prices;
|
|
• |
obtaining required financing on acceptable terms;
|
|
• |
consummating vessel acquisitions;
|
|
• |
enlarging our customer base;
|
|
• |
hiring additional shore-based employees and seafarers;
|
|
• |
continuing to meet technical and safety performance standards; and
|
|
• |
managing joint ventures or significant acquisitions and integrating the new ships into our fleet.
|
Ship values are correlated with charter rates. During periods in which charter rates are high, ship values are generally high as
well, and it may be difficult to consummate ship acquisitions or enter into shipbuilding contracts at favorable prices. During periods in which charter rates are low and employment is scarce, ship values are low; however, any vessel acquired
without an attached time charter will still incur expenses to operate, insure, maintain and finance, thereby significantly increasing the cash outlay. In addition, any vessel acquisition may not be profitable and may not generate cash flows
sufficient to justify the investment. We may not be successful in executing any future growth plans and we cannot give any assurance that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with such growth efforts. Other risks
associated with vessel acquisitions that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results include the risks that we may:
|
• |
fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer relationships, cost-savings or cash flow enhancements;
|
|
• |
be unable (through our managers) to hire, train or retain qualified shore-based and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;
|
|
• |
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
|
|
• |
significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
|
|
• |
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with any vessels or businesses acquired; or
|
|
• |
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges.
|
If we fail to properly manage our growth through acquisitions of newbuild or secondhand vessels we may not realize expected
benefits from these acquisitions, which may negatively impact our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Future acquisitions of secondhand vessels may result in increased operating and maintenance costs.
Many of our containerships and all of the dry bulk vessels we have acquired are secondhand vessels. Unlike newbuild vessels,
secondhand vessels typically do not carry warranties as to their condition. Depending on market conditions, we may purchase a secondhand vessel on an as-is basis based on the review of its records, but even when we do inspect secondhand vessels
prior to purchase, such an inspection would normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a vessel’s condition as we would possess if it had been built for us and operated by us during its life. In addition, if a secondhand vessel is not in
the condition promised or warranted by its seller and requires significant repairs, we may find it hard to be indemnified by the respective seller, which is typically a single-vessel shipowning company with no assets, other than their vessel
sold, and no continuing operations, and which may even no longer be in existence when the damage or other deficiency is discovered. Repairs and maintenance costs for secondhand vessels are difficult to predict and may be substantially higher than
for vessels which we had operated since they were built. In addition, variability in the age and type of secondhand vessels in our fleet may prevent us from attaining economies of scale in our operations and maintenance of our fleet, which may
result in higher costs. These costs could decrease our cash flows, liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
The increased volatility of our new dry bulk operating platform may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings and cash flow.
Our dry bulk operating platform that commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2022 represents a new line of business for
us. Uncertainties and risks related to our dry bulk operating platform include, but are not limited to, the fact that the chartering-in and chartering-out of dry bulk vessels is inherently more volatile than traditional vessel ownership and is
subject to greater fluctuations based on many factors beyond our control, including global economic conditions, the dry bulk charter market, availability of cargoes to be transported on board the dry bulk vessels we charter-in, off-hire periods
and timing delays in the performance of cargo transportation, bunker prices, marine disasters, environmental accidents, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. Any such factors could reduce the demand for the chartering-in and
chartering-out of dry bulk vessels and could therefore adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. In addition, our senior management team and managers have limited experience with the oversight of a dry bulk operating platform and may not
successfully or efficiently manage this new line of business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company-Business Overview-General”.
Declines in the value of our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an
adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
Through our dry bulk operating platform, we use derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements in order to establish
market positions on the freights market. We also use derivative instruments such as forward freight agreements, foreign exchange forwards and bunker swaps to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the charter market, foreign exchange rates and
bunker prices. Furthermore, we use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to European Union Allowances within the context of EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme. As a result of such trades, we may incur derivative exposure that could have a
material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We may incur losses on these derivative positions, and those losses could be material.
Our investment in the leasing business exposes us to financial and counterparty risks, which could adversely
affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
Since March 30, 2023, we are the controlling shareholder of Neptune Maritime Leasing Limited (“Neptune” or “NML”) which operates
a leasing business. Neptune acquires and charters out on a bareboat basis vessels to customers (lessees) through wholly-owned subsidiaries. The leasing business finances part of its vessels’ acquisition cost using bank debt. The terms for
obtaining finance may not match the terms for providing finance to its customers. For example, Neptune may pay a fixed interest rate to its lenders and receive a floating interest rate from its customers or vice versa. This may expose Neptune to
interest rate risk and as a result, our revenues and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Further, the ability and willingness of each of our lessees to perform their obligations under the bareboat charter with the
leasing business will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control. As a result, our revenues and results of operations may be adversely affected. These factors include:
|
• |
global and regional economic and political conditions;
|
|
• |
supply and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
|
|
• |
developments in international trade;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances that cargoes are transported;
|
|
• |
environmental concerns and regulations;
|
|
• |
the number of newbuilding deliveries;
|
|
• |
the improved fuel efficiency of newer vessels; and
|
|
• |
the recycling rate of older vessels.
|
In depressed market conditions, customers of the leasing business may no longer need a vessel that is chartered to them and may
default on their obligations or they may seek to renegotiate the terms of their bareboat charters with the leasing business. Should a lessee fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, the leasing business could sustain significant
losses which could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow.
In addition, our containerships and dry bulk vessels may be subject to “sister ship” arrest in certain jurisdictions from
creditors of the vessels that are bareboat chartered out.
Any failure of such lessees to meet their obligations to the leasing business or to third-parties, or any disputes with respect
to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the leasing business or its properties and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and
cash flow.
We may be unable to obtain additional debt financing for future acquisitions of newbuild and secondhand
vessels, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or may be unable to obtain such financing on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Our ability to borrow against the vessels in our existing fleet and any vessels we may acquire in the future largely depends on
the existence of continued employment of the vessel and on the value of the vessels, which in turn depends in part on charter hire rates, the creditworthiness of our charterers and the duration of the charter. The actual or perceived credit
quality of our charterers, any defaults by them, any decline in the market value of our fleet and the lack of long-term employment of our vessels may materially affect our ability to obtain the additional capital resources that we will require to
purchase additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing or committing to financing on unattractive terms could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Our managers may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled crews on our behalf necessary to operate
our business or may pay rising crew wages and other vessel operating costs, which may have the effect of increasing costs or reducing our fleet utilization which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Acquiring and renewing time charters depends on a number of factors, including our ability to man our vessels with suitably
experienced, high-quality masters, officers and crews. Our success will depend in large part on our managers’ ability to attract, hire, train and retain suitably skilled and qualified personnel. In recent years, the limited supply of and the
increased demand for well-qualified crew, due to the increase in the size of the global shipping fleet, has created upward pressure on crewing costs, which we bear under our time charters. Changing conditions in the home country of our seafarers,
such as increases in the local general living standards or changes in taxation, may make serving at sea less appealing and thus further reduce the supply of crew and/or increase the cost of hiring competent crew. Unless we are in a position to
increase our hire rates to compensate for increases in crew costs and other vessel operating costs such as insurance, repairs and maintenance, and lubricants, our business, results of operations, financial condition and our profitability may be
adversely affected. In addition, any inability we experience in the future to attract, hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could impair our ability to manage, maintain and grow our business. If we cannot attract and
retain sufficient numbers of quality onboard seafaring personnel, our fleet utilization will decrease, which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows,
including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Fuel, or bunker, price fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our cash flows, liquidity and our ability
to pay dividends to our stockholders.
The price and supply of vessel fuel, known as bunkers, is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control,
including geo-political developments, supply and demand for oil, actions by members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other oil and gas producers, economic or other sanctions levied against oil and gas producing
countries, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns and regulations.
The cost of fuel is a significant factor in negotiating charter rates and can affect us in both direct and indirect ways. This
cost will be borne by us when our vessels are not employed or are employed on voyage charters. As of March 19, 2024, the majority of the vessels that we charter-in under our dry bulk operating platform are expected to be employed under voyage
charters and we may enter into more such arrangements in the future, and to the extent we do so, an increase in the price of fuel beyond our expectations may adversely affect our profitability. Even where the cost of fuel is borne by the
charterer, which is the case with all of our existing time charters, that cost may affect the level of charter rates that charterers are willing to pay.
A decrease in the cost of fuel may lead our charterers to abandon slow steaming, thereby releasing additional capacity into the
market and exerting downward pressure on charter rates or may lead our charterers to employ older, less fuel efficient vessels which may drive down charter rates and make it more difficult for us to secure employment for our newer vessels.
In addition, the entry into force on January 1, 2020 of the 0.5% mass by mass (“m/m”) global sulphur cap in marine fuels under
the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”) Annex VI has led to a significant increase in the costs for low sulphur fuel used by vessels that are not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers. Because the cost of fuel
is born by our charterers for our vessels employed on a time charter basis or by ourselves when we charter-in vessels, which are generally not equipped with scrubbers, such vessels may be less competitive compared to vessels that are equipped
with scrubbers. As of March 19, 2024, we owned 15 containerships and two dry bulk vessels in the water that are equipped with scrubbers. As of March 19, 2024, we have chartered-in for a period, 50 dry bulk vessels through our dry bulk operating
platform, 18 of which are equipped with scrubbers. Ships that are not retrofitted with exhaust gas scrubbers to comply with the new emissions standard may become less competitive (compared with ships equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers that can
utilize the less expensive high sulphur fuel), have difficulty finding employment, command lower charter hire and/or need to be scrapped, which may negatively impact our revenues and cash flows as well as our future operations.
Reliance on suppliers may limit our ability to obtain supplies and services when needed and could result in
additional off-hire days or delays in the repair and maintenance of our fleet which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and cash flows.
We rely on a significant number of third party suppliers of consumables, spare parts and equipment to operate, maintain, repair
and upgrade our fleet of ships. Delays in delivery or unavailability or poor quality of supplies could result in off-hire days due to consequent delays in the repair and maintenance of our fleet or lead to our time charters being terminated. This
would negatively impact our revenues and cash flows. Cost increases could also negatively impact our future operations.
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which may
reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet and replace, over the long-term,
the operating capacity of our fleet and we generally expect to finance these capital expenditures with cash balances or credit facilities. In addition, we will need to make substantial capital expenditures to acquire vessels in accordance with
our growth strategy. These expenditures could increase as a result of, among other things: the cost of labor and materials; customer requirements; the size of our fleet; the cost of replacement vessels; the length of charters; governmental
regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards relating to safety, security or the environment; competitive standards; and the age of our ships. Significant capital expenditures, including expenditures to maintain and replace,
over the long-term, the operating capacity of our fleet, may reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
The aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect
our earnings.
In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with the age of the vessel. As our fleet
ages, we will incur increased costs. Older vessels may require longer and more expensive dry-dockings, resulting in more off- hire days and reduced revenue. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more
recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology or design. In addition, older vessels are often less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards related to the age of a vessel
may also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage.
As of March 19, 2024, our current fleet of 68 containerships in the water had an average age (weighted by TEU capacity) of 12.3
years, and our current fleet of 37 dry bulk vessels had an average age (weighted by dwt capacity) of 12.4 years. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”. We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market
conditions will justify such expenditures or will enable us to profitably operate our older vessels.
Unless we set aside reserves or are able to borrow funds for vessel replacement, at the end of the useful
lives of our vessels our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As noted above, as of March 19, 2024, our current fleet of 68 containerships in the water had an average age (weighted by TEU
capacity) of 12.3 years, and our current fleet of 37 dry bulk vessels (including one secondhand vessel that we have agreed to sell), had an average age (weighted by dwt capacity) of 12.4 years. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Our Fleet”. Unless we maintain reserves or are able to borrow or raise funds for vessel replacement, we will be unable to replace the older vessels in our fleet. Our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues earned by the
chartering of our containerships and dry bulk vessels. The inability to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing charterers, establish relationships
with new customers and obtain new time charters, for which we will face substantial competition from new entrants and established companies with significant resources.
One of our principal objectives is to acquire additional vessels in conjunction with entering into additional time charters for
these vessels. The process of obtaining new time charters is highly competitive and generally involves an intensive screening process and competitive bids, and often extends for several months especially for long-term charters. Generally, we
compete for charters based upon charter rate, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and vessel specifications, including size, age and condition.
In addition, as vessels age, it can be more difficult to employ them on profitable time charters, particularly during periods of
decreased demand in the charter market. Accordingly, we may find it difficult to continue to find profitable employment for our vessels as they age.
We face substantial competition from a number of experienced companies, including liner companies in the containership sector,
state-sponsored entities and financial organizations. Some of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we do, and can therefore operate larger fleets and may be able to offer better charter rates. In the future, we
may also face competition from reputable, experienced and well-capitalized marine transportation companies, including state-sponsored entities, that do not currently own containerships or dry bulk vessels, but may choose to do so. Any increased
competition may cause greater price competition for time charters, as well as for the acquisition of high-quality secondhand vessels and newbuild vessels. Furthermore, since the charter rate is generally considered to be one of the principal
factors in a charterer’s decision to charter a vessel, the rates offered by our competitors can place downward pressure on rates throughout the charter market. On the other hand, consolidation and the creation of alliances among liner companies
have increased their negotiation power when chartering our vessels. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to charter our vessels, expand our relationships with existing customers or establish relationships with new customers on a
profitable basis, if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
We conduct a substantial amount of business in China. The legal system in China has inherent uncertainties
that could limit the legal protections available to us and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We conduct a substantial amount of business in China, including through our managers V.Ships (Shanghai) Limited (“V.Ships
Shanghai”), Navilands (Shanghai) Containers Management Ltd. and Navilands (Shanghai) Bulkers Management Ltd. which, as of March 19, 2024, operated 14 vessels that were mostly manned by Chinese crews, which exposes us to potential litigation in
China. Additionally, many of our vessels regularly call to ports in China, and as of March 19, 2024, we have chartered eight of our containerships with Chinese charterers , while none of our dry bulk vessels was chartered with Chinese charterers.
As of the same date, we have entered into sale and leaseback transactions in respect of ten containerships with certain Chinese financial institutions. In 2023, we served notices of termination for eight newbuild vessels on order at a Chinese
shipyard due to default by the shipyard. See “Item 4. Information on the Company— B. Business Overview—Our Fleet—Our Containership Fleet”.
The Chinese legal system is based on written statutes and their legal interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National
People’s Congress. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, the Chinese government has been developing a comprehensive system of commercial laws, and considerable progress has been made in
introducing laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation and trade. However, because these laws and regulations are relatively new, there is a general
lack of internal guidelines or authoritative interpretive guidance, and because of the limited number of published cases and their non-binding nature, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Although
the related charters, shipbuilding agreements and sale and leaseback agreements are governed by English law, we may have difficulties enforcing a judgment rendered by an arbitration tribunal or by an English court (or other non-Chinese court) in
China. Such charters, shipbuilding agreements and sale and leaseback agreements, and any additional agreements that we enter into with Chinese counterparties, may be subject to new regulations in China that may require us to incur new or
additional compliance or other administrative costs and pay new taxes or other fees to the Chinese government. In addition, China enacted a tax for non-resident international transportation enterprises engaged in the provision of services to
passengers or cargo, among other items, in and out of China using their own, chartered or leased vessels, including any stevedore, warehousing and other services connected with the transportation. The law and relevant regulations broaden the
range of international transportation companies which may find themselves liable for Chinese enterprise income tax on profits generated from international transportation services passing through Chinese ports. This tax or similar regulations by
China may reduce our operating results and may also result in an increase in the cost of goods exported from China and the risks associated with exporting goods from China, as well as a decrease in the quantity of goods to be shipped from or
through China, which would have an adverse impact on our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition and could thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and increase the number of
their time charters with us.
Changes in laws and regulations, including with regards to tax matters, and their implementation by local authorities could
affect our vessels chartered to Chinese customers as well as our vessels calling to Chinese ports, our vessels built at Chinese shipyards and the financial institutions with whom we have entered into sale and leaseback transactions, and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Adverse developments in the international shipping business could reduce our ability to service our debt
obligations and pay dividends to our stockholders.
We rely, to a large extent, on the cash flow generated from charters for our vessels. An adverse development in the
international container and dry bulk shipping industry would have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations and could also impair our ability to service debt or pay dividends to our stockholders.
Regarding our containership transportation business, if market conditions do not offer opportunities for long-term, fixed-rate
charters, we may be forced to charter our vessels on shorter term charters at less predictable rates, adversely impacting our growth. As of March 19, 2024, the time charters of seven of our containerships will expire in 2024. While we generally
expect to be able to obtain time charters for our vessels within a reasonable period prior to their time charter expiry or delivery, as applicable, we cannot be assured that this will occur in any particular case, or at all. There is currently
less demand for long-term time charters compared to recent years. If conditions worsen, despite securing a short-term time charter, it may not be continuous, leaving the vessel idle for some days in between charters. If such a trend occurs, we
may then have to charter more of our containerships for shorter periods upon expiration or early termination of the current charters. As a result, our revenues, cash flows and profitability would then reflect fluctuations in the short-term
charter market and become more volatile. It may also become more difficult or expensive to finance or refinance vessels that do not have long-term employment at fixed rates. In addition, we may have to enter into charters based on changing market
prices, as opposed to contracts based on fixed rates, which would increase the volatility of our revenues, cash-flows and profitability and, during a period of depressed charter rates, could also result in a decrease in our revenues, cash flows
and profitability, including our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. If we are unable to re-charter these containerships or obtain new time charters at favorable rates or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Additionally, because we charter our dry bulk vessels primarily on short-term time charters and voyage charters, we are exposed
to changes in spot market rates, namely to short-term time charter rates and voyage charter rates, for dry bulk vessels; such changes may affect our earnings and the value of our dry bulk vessels at any given time. See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Our profitability will be dependent on the level of charter rates in the international shipping industry. The cyclical nature of the shipping industry may lead to
volatile changes in charter rates, which may reduce our revenues and negatively affect our results of operations.”
We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order
to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets, including our
ships. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay our obligations and to make dividend payments depends entirely on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to
us. The ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a creditor, or by the law of their respective jurisdiction of incorporation which regulates the payment of
dividends. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, our board of directors may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends.
Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of
consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or if there is no surplus, from the net profits for the current and prior fiscal year, or while a company is insolvent or if it would be rendered insolvent by the
payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus or net profits in the future to pay dividends, and our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds, surplus or net profits to make distributions to us. As a result of these and other
factors, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record net income. We can give no assurance that dividends will be paid in the future or the amounts of dividends which may be
paid.
Our credit facilities or other financing arrangements contain payment obligations and restrictive covenants
that may limit our liquidity and our ability to expand our fleet. A failure by us to meet our obligations under our credit facilities could result in an event of default under such credit facilities and foreclosure on our vessels.
Our credit facilities impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions in our existing credit
facilities generally limit Costamare Inc., and our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
|
• |
pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends;
|
|
• |
purchase or otherwise acquire for value any shares of our subsidiaries’ capital;
|
|
• |
make or repay loans or advances, other than repayment of the credit facilities;
|
|
• |
make investments in or provide guarantees to other persons;
|
|
• |
sell or transfer significant assets, including any vessel or vessels mortgaged under the credit facilities, to any person, including Costamare Inc. and our subsidiaries;
|
|
• |
create liens on assets; or
|
|
• |
allow the Konstantakopoulos family’s direct or indirect holding in Costamare Inc. to fall below 30% of the total issued and outstanding share capital.
|
Our credit facilities also require Costamare Inc. and certain of our subsidiaries to maintain the aggregate of (a) the market
value, (on a charter free or charter inclusive basis, as applicable), of the mortgaged vessel or vessels and (b) the market value of any additional security provided to the lenders, above a percentage ranging between 100% to 125% of the
then-outstanding amount of the credit facility and any related swap exposure (except one credit facility for which such percentage is 140%).
Costamare Inc. is required to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants to maintain minimum liquidity, minimum market
value adjusted net worth, interest coverage and leverage ratios, as defined.
|
• |
the ratio of our total liabilities (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) to market value adjusted total assets (after deducting all cash and cash equivalents) may not exceed 0.75:1;
|
|
• |
the ratio of EBITDA over net interest expense must be equal to or higher than 2.5:1, however such covenant should not be considered breached unless the Company’s liquidity is less than 5% of the
total debt or market value adjusted net worth is less than $600 million;
|
|
• |
the aggregate amount of all cash and cash equivalents may not be less than the greater of (i) $30 million or (ii) 3% of the total debt; and
|
|
• |
the market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $500 million.
|
A failure to meet our payment and other obligations could lead to defaults under our credit facilities. Our lenders could then
accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose on the vessels in our fleet securing those credit facilities, which could result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have at such time and the commencement of similar foreclosure
proceedings by other lenders. If any of these events occur, we cannot guarantee that our assets will be sufficient to repay in full all of our outstanding indebtedness and we may be unable to find alternative financing. Even if we could obtain
alternative financing, such financing may not be on terms that are favorable or acceptable. The loss of these vessels would have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition as well as on our cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our stockholders. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Substantial debt levels may limit our ability to obtain additional financing and pursue other business
opportunities or to pay dividends and may increase our cost of borrowing or cause us to issue additional equity securities which would be dilutive to existing shareholders.
As of December 31, 2023, we had outstanding indebtedness of approximately $2.4 billion, including the obligations under the
unsecured bond loan, finance leases and other financing arrangements, and we expect to incur additional indebtedness as we grow our fleet or in order to cover its operational needs. This level of debt could have important consequences to us,
including the following:
|
• |
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available on
favorable terms;
|
|
• |
we may need to use a substantial portion of our cash from operations to make principal and interest payments on our debt, thereby reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for
operations, future business opportunities and dividends to our stockholders;
|
|
• |
our debt level could make us more vulnerable than our competitors with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and
|
|
• |
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions.
|
Our ability to service our debt depends upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be
affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We may not be able to refinance all or part of our maturing debt on favorable terms, or at all, especially in
the current interest rate environment. If our operating income is not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or discontinuing dividend payments, reducing or delaying our
business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on
satisfactory terms, or at all.
In the future we may change our operational and financial model by replacing amortizing debt in favor of non-amortizing debt
with a higher fixed or floating rate without shareholder approval, which may increase our risk of defaulting on our indebtedness if market conditions become unfavorable.
The derivative contracts we have entered into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates,
foreign currencies, bunker prices and freight rates can result in reductions in our stockholders’ equity as well as reductions in our income. There can be no assurance that these hedges will be effective as they depend on the credit worthiness of
our counterparties.
We have entered into interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and cross currency swaps generally for purposes of managing our
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates applicable to indebtedness under our credit facilities which were advanced at floating rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currencies. The amount of interest we may be required to pay may end up being higher than the amount we would have to pay had we not entered in such derivative contracts, depending on market circumstances. As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate
notional amount of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps relating to our fleet as of such date was $1,137.8 million. As of December 31, 2023, our obligations under fixed rate loans, finance leases, other financing arrangements and our
unsecured bond loan, which were under fixed interest rates amounted to $886.2 million. Furthermore, with respect to our unsecured bond loan, we have entered into two cross currency swaps for a notional amount of $122.4 million to hedge the
related foreign exchange exposure.
We have also entered into forward freight agreements to establish market positions and to hedge our exposure to dry bulk freight
rates. We also entered into bunker swaps to hedge our exposure to bunker prices. The settlement amounts we may have to pay (or receive) at expiration of such derivative contracts (or whilst trading such derivative contracts) may be higher (or
lower) than the amount we would have to pay (or receive), had we not entered into such derivative contracts, depending on market circumstances.
From time to time, we also enter into certain currency hedges. As of December 31, 2023, the Company was engaged in 24 Euro/U.S.
dollar contracts totaling $78.6 million. There is no assurance that our derivative contracts or any that we enter into in the future will provide adequate protection (when traded for hedging purposes) against adverse changes in interest rates,
currency exchange rates, freight rates or bunker prices or that our counterparties will be able to perform their obligations. In addition, as a result of the implementation of new regulation of the swaps markets in the United States, the European
Union and elsewhere over the next few years, the cost of interest rate and currency hedges may increase or suitable hedges may not be available.
While we monitor the credit risks associated with our counterparties and many of our derivative contracts are cleared through
clearinghouses, there can be no assurance that these counterparties would be able to meet their commitments under our derivative contracts or any future derivative contract. The potential for our counterparties to default on their obligations
under our derivative contracts may be highest when we are most exposed to the fluctuations in interest and currency rates such contracts are designed to hedge, and several or all of our counterparties may simultaneously be unable to perform their
obligations due to the same events or occurrences in global financial markets.
To the extent our existing derivative contracts do not, and future derivative contracts may not, qualify for treatment as hedges
for accounting purposes we would recognize fluctuations in the fair value of such contracts in our statement of comprehensive income. In addition, changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts are recognized in “Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss” on our balance sheet, and can affect compliance with the net worth covenant requirements in our credit facilities. Changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts that do not qualify for treatment as hedges for
accounting and financial reporting purposes affect, among other things, our net income and our earnings per share. For additional information see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
In addition, through our dry bulk operating platform, we use the derivative markets and take positions in derivative
instruments, such as forward freight agreements. As a result of such trades, we may incur derivative exposure that could have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We may
incur losses on these derivative positions, and those losses could be material. For additional information see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Declines in the value of
our derivative instruments, such as forward freight agreements, could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.”
Fluctuations in interest rates could result in financial losses for us.
We are exposed to a market risk relating to fluctuations in
interest rates because the majority of our credit facilities bear interest costs at a floating rate based on SOFR. Significant increases in interest rates could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and our ability to
service our debt. From time to time, we take positions in interest rate derivative contracts in order to manage our exposure to and risk associated with such interest rates fluctuations, however no assurance can be given that the use of these
derivative instruments may effectively protect us from adverse interest rate movements. Between the start of 2022 to the end of 2023, SOFR increased from 0.05% to 5.38%. As of December 31, 2023, our obligations under our secured credit
facilities that bear interest at SOFR plus a margin amounted to $1,505.8 million. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects - B. Liquidity and Capital Resources - Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Because we generate all of our revenues in United States dollars but incur a significant portion of our
expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could hurt our results of operations.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a material impact on our financial performance. We generate all of our revenues
in United States dollars, but a substantial portion of our vessels’ operating expenses are incurred in currencies other than United States dollars. This difference could lead to fluctuations in net income due to changes in the value of the United
States dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the Euro. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the United States dollar falls in value could increase, thereby decreasing our net income. While we may hedge some of this
exposure from time to time, our U.S. dollar-denominated results of operations and financial condition and ability to pay dividends could suffer from adverse currency exchange rate movements. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities, Finance Leases and Other Financing Arrangements”.
Increased competition in technology and innovation could reduce our charter hire income and the value of our
vessels.
The charter rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors, including the vessel’s
efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed and fuel economy as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through
canals and straits. Physical life is related to the original design and construction, maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. If new vessels are built in the future that are more efficient or flexible or have longer physical lives
than our vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect our ability to re-charter, the amount of charter hire payments that we receive for our vessels once their current time charters expire and the
resale value of our vessels. This could adversely affect our revenues and cash flows, and our ability to service our debt or pay dividends to our stockholders.
We are subject to regulation and liability under environmental and operational safety laws that could
require significant expenditures and affect our cash flows and net income.
Our business and the operation of our vessels are materially affected by environmental regulations in the form of international,
national, state and local laws, regulations, conventions, treaties and standards in force in international waters and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration, including
regulations governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, water discharges, ballast water management and climate change. We may incur substantial costs
in complying with these requirements, including costs for ship modifications and changes in operating procedures. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, it is difficult to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with
such requirements or their impact on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels.
Environmental regulations may also require or cause a reduction in cargo capacity, vessel modifications or operational changes
or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of or increased costs for insurance coverage relating to environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports. Under local, national and foreign laws, as
well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities, including obligations to pay for emissions allowances, cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource damages, personal injury and/or property damages in
the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental requirements can also result in substantial penalties,
fines and other sanctions, including criminal sanctions, and, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels. Events of this nature or additional environmental conventions, laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flow, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
For example, the International Safety Management Code (the “ISM Code”) requires vessel managers to develop and maintain an
extensive “Safety Management System” (“SMS”) and to obtain a Safety Management Certificate (“SMC”) verifying compliance with its approved SMS and a document of compliance with the ISM Code from the government of each vessel’s flag state. Failure
to comply with the ISM Code may lead to withdrawal of the permit to operate or manage the vessels, subject us to increased liability, decrease or suspend available insurance coverage for the affected vessels, or result in a denial of access to,
or detention in, certain ports. Each of the vessels in our fleet, Costamare Shipping and each of our sub-managers is ISM Code-certified, although such certifications are subject to change or revocation.
Furthermore, on January 1, 2020, the emissions standard under MARPOL Annex VI for the reduction of sulphur oxides, initially
announced in 2016 by the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”), came into force. Compliance with this emissions standard requires either the installation of exhaust gas scrubbers, which allows the vessel to use the existing, less expensive,
high sulphur content fuel, or fuel system modification and tank cleaning, which allows the vessel to use more expensive, low sulphur fuel. It is unclear how the new emissions standard will affect the employment of vessels in the future, given
that the cost of fuel is borne by our charterers for vessels employed on a time charter basis or us when we charter-in vessels. Our owned and chartered-in vessels which are generally not equipped with scrubbers may be less competitive compared to
vessels that are equipped with scrubbers. As of March 19, 2024, we owned 15 containerships and two dry bulk vessels that are equipped with scrubbers. As of March 19, 2024, we have chartered-in for a period, 50 dry bulk vessels out of which 18 are
equipped with scrubbers. Ships not equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers may become less competitive (compared with ships equipped with exhaust gas scrubbers that can utilize the less expensive high sulphur fuel), may have difficulty finding
employment, may command lower charter hire and/or may need to be scrapped.
In addition, on December 31, 2018, our European Union Member State-flagged (“EU-flagged”) vessels became subject to Regulation
(EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on ship recycling (the “EU Ship Recycling Regulation” or “ESRR”) and exempt from the Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (the “European Waste Shipment Regulation” or “EWSR”) which had previously governed their disposal and recycling. The EWSR continues to be applicable to Non-European Union Member State-flagged (“non-EU-flagged”)
vessels. As of December 31, 2023, 31 of our 110 vessels in the water were EU-flagged.
Under the ESRR, commercial EU-flagged vessels of 500 gross tonnage and above may be recycled only at shipyards included on the
European List of Authorised Ship Recycling Facilities (the “European List”). As of December 31, 2023, all our EU-flagged vessels met this weight specification. The European List presently includes nine facilities in Turkey but no facilities in
the major ship recycling countries in Asia. The combined capacity of the European List facilities may prove insufficient to absorb the total recycling volume of EU-flagged vessels. This circumstance, in tandem with a possible decrease in cash
sales, may result in longer wait times for divestment of recyclable vessels as well as downward pressure on the purchase prices offered by European List shipyards. Furthermore, facilities located in the major ship recycling countries generally
offer significantly higher vessel purchase prices, and as such, the requirement that we utilize only European List shipyards may negatively impact revenue from the residual values of our vessels.
In addition, the EWSR requires that non-EU-flagged ships departing from European Union ports be recycled solely in Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries. In March 2018, the Rotterdam District Court ruled that the sales of four recyclable vessels by third-party Dutch ship owner Seatrade to cash buyers, who then reflagged and resold
the vessels to non-OECD country recycling yards, were effectively indirect sales to non-OECD country yards, in violation of the EWSR. If European Union Member State courts widely adopt this analysis, it may negatively impact revenue from the
residual values of our vessels and we may be subject to a heightened risk of non-compliance, due diligence obligations and costs in instances where we sell older ships to cash buyers.
Governmental regulation of the shipping industry, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, is
expected to become stricter in the future. We believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will lead to additional compliance obligations, including enhanced risk
assessment and security requirements and greater inspection and safety requirements for vessels. To comply with new environmental laws and regulations and other requirements that may be adopted, we may be required to incur significant capital and
operational expenditures to keep our vessels in compliance, or to scrap or sell certain vessels entirely. For additional information see “Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance—Environmental
and Other Regulations”.
Climate change and related legislation or regulations may adversely impact our business, including potential
financial, operational and physical impacts.
Growing concern about the sources and impacts of global climate
change has led to the proposal or enactment of a number of domestic and foreign legislative and administrative measures, as well as international agreements and frameworks, to monitor, regulate and limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas
(“GHG”) emissions. Although the Paris Agreement, which was adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2015, does not specifically require controls on GHG emissions from ships, it is possible that countries will seek to
impose such controls as they implement the Paris Agreement or any new treaty that may be adopted in the future. In the European Union, emissions are regulated under the EU Emissions Trading System (the “EU ETS”), an EU-wide trading scheme for
industrial GHG emissions. While the shipping industry has not been subject to the EU ETS in the past, in May 2023, EU ETS regulations were amended in order to include emissions from maritime transport
activities in the EU ETS and to require the monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions of additional greenhouse gases and emissions from additional ship types. In January 2024, the EU ETS was extended to cover CO2 emissions from all large ships (of 5,000 gross tonnage and above) entering EU ports, and will apply to methane and nitrous oxide emissions beginning in 2026. Shipping companies will need to buy allowances that correspond to the emissions covered by the system.
In addition, in June 2021, the IMO adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that entered into force on November 1, 2022 (with
certification requirements that entered into force on January 1, 2023), which require ships to reduce GHG emissions using technological and operational approaches to improve energy efficiency and that provide important building blocks for future
GHG emissions reduction measures. Under these regulations, vessels must calculate their Energy Efficiency Existing Ships Index (“EEXI”) and Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”), and vessels that receive poor ratings may incur additional regulatory
burdens. These and other emission requirements will present significant challenges for vessel owners and operators. To address the potential compliance challenges for some of our existing vessels, particularly the older ones, we may incur
significant capital expenditures to apply efficiency improvement measures and meet the required EEXI threshold, such as steps associated with shaft/engine power limitation (power optimization), fuel change, energy saving devices and ship
replacement. The introduction of the EEXI and CII regulatory framework may also accelerate the scrapping of older tonnage, while the adoption of a shaft/engine power limitation as a measure to comply with the latest amendments may lead to the
continuing prevalence of slow steaming to even lower speeds. This, in turn, could result in the contracting/building of new ships to replace any reduction in capacity.
In July 2023, the IMO adopted the 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships, a framework for Member States that provides new
mid-term emissions reduction goals and guidance. Implementation of the framework may require additional capital expenditures to achieve compliance with new emissions reduction targets across the shipping sector and increased use of zero or
near-zero GHG emission technologies, among other obligations.
These requirements and any passage of additional climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the
European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level, that restricts emissions of GHGs could require us to make significant financial expenditures, including the installation of
pollution controls and the purchase of emissions credits, as well as have other impacts on our business or operations that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Even in the absence of climate control legislation and regulations, our
business and operations may be materially affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or more intense weather events. For additional information see “Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss
and Liability Insurance—Environmental and Other Regulations”.
We rely on our information systems to conduct our business, and failure to protect these systems against
security breaches could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, if these systems fail or become unavailable for any significant period of time, our business could be harmed.
The safe and efficient operation of our business including, but
not limited to, accounting, billing, disbursement, booking and tracking, vessel scheduling, vessel operations and managing our financial exposure is dependent on computer hardware and software systems. Information systems are vulnerable to
security breaches by computer hackers and cyber terrorists. We rely on industry-accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems. However, these
measures and technology may not adequately prevent cybersecurity breaches, the access, capture or alteration of information by criminals, the exposure or exploitation of potential security vulnerabilities, the installation of malware or
ransomware, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced data or data loss. In addition, the unavailability of the information systems or the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason could disrupt our business and
could result in decreased performance and increased operating costs, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. Failure of critical systems on board a vessel such as failure of its propulsion system or its steering and navigation
control systems due to breaches on vessel’s information systems entails a major safety risk and could lead to dangerous situations for the safety of the seafarers on board the vessel, the vessel and potentially threaten the environment. Our
managers and service providers also rely on information systems to provide us with commercial, technical and other management services. Any significant interruption or failure of our, or one of our manager’s or service provider’s, information
systems or any significant breach of security could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders. Furthermore, any changes in the nature of cyber threats might require us to adopt additional procedures for monitoring cybersecurity, which could
require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures.
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us,
which could subject us to fines, penalties or subject us to litigation which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our vessels have called and we expect will continue to call in ports in South America and other areas where smugglers attempt to
hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any
of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims or penalties which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our
stockholders.
Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could
increase costs and cause disruption of our business.
International shipping is subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination
and certain trans-shipment points. These inspection procedures can result in cargo seizure, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery of containers, and the levying of customs duties, fines and other penalties against us.
Since the events of September 11, 2001, United States authorities have substantially increased container inspections. Government
investment in non-intrusive container scanning technology has grown and there is interest in electronic monitoring technology, including so-called “e-seals” and “smart” containers, that would enable remote, centralized monitoring of containers
during shipment to identify tampering with or opening of the containers, along with potentially measuring other characteristics such as temperature, air pressure, motion, chemicals, biological agents and radiation. Also, as a response to the
events of September 11, 2001, additional vessel security requirements have been imposed, including the installation of security alert and automatic identification systems on board vessels. Following a number of recent terrorist attacks in cities
across the globe, there has been a heightened level of security and new security procedures could be introduced.
It is unclear what additional changes, if any, to the existing inspection and security procedures may ultimately be proposed or
implemented in the future, or how any such changes will affect the industry. It is possible that such changes could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us. Furthermore, changes to inspection and security procedures could also
impose additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of goods in containers uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the International Ship and Port Facilities
Security Code (the “ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code requires vessels to develop and maintain a ship security plan that provides security measures to address potential threats to the security of ships or port facilities. Although each of our vessels is
ISPS Code-certified, any failure to comply with the ISPS Code or maintain such certifications may subject us to increased liability and may result in denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Furthermore, compliance with the ISPS Code
requires us to incur certain costs. Although such costs have not been material to date, if new or more stringent regulations relating to the ISPS Code are adopted by the IMO and the flag states, these requirements could require significant
additional capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of
earnings.
A government of the jurisdiction where one or more of our vessels are registered could requisition for title or seize our
vessels. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes its owner. Also, a government could requisition our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a ship and
effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would expect to be entitled
to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payment, if any, would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels may cause us to breach covenants in certain of our
credit facilities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Acts of piracy and attacks on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy and attacks have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in certain regions of the world, such as the
South China Sea, the Malacca Strait, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Piracy continues to occur in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia, West Africa, and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea. Furthermore,
the recent seizures and attacks by the Houthi and Iran on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea have impacted seaborne trade as many companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez Canal
and Red Sea. We consider potential acts of piracy to be a material risk to the international shipping industry, and protection against this risk requires vigilance. Our vessels regularly travel through regions where pirates are active. Crew costs
could also increase in such circumstances. In the event that a vessel is seized and remains in captivity for a period exceeding 180 days, the charterers will terminate the charter and the insurance cover will expire. We may not be adequately
insured to cover losses from acts of terrorism, piracy, regional conflicts and other armed actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our
operations.
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, fire, contact with floating objects, property
loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of a marine disaster, including oil spills and other
environmental mishaps. There are also liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. We procure insurance for our fleet of containerships and dry bulk vessels in relation to risks commonly insured against by vessel
owners and operators. Our current insurance includes (i) hull and machinery insurance covering damage to our and third-party vessels’ hulls and machinery, (ii) war risks insurance covering losses associated with the outbreak or escalation of
hostilities and (iii) protection and indemnity insurance (which includes environmental damage) covering, among other things, third-party and crew liabilities such as expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew members, passengers and
other third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, third-party claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property and pollution arising from oil or other substances.
We can give no assurance that we are adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. Even
if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to obtain a timely replacement vessel in the event of a loss of a vessel. Under the terms of our credit facilities, we are subject to restrictions on the use of any
proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance policies. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have
led to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim
records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage. There is no cap on our liability exposure for such calls or premiums payable to our
protection and indemnity association. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs. A catastrophic oil spill or
marine disaster could exceed our insurance coverage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Any uninsured or underinsured
loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, the insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain actions, such as vessels failing to maintain required certification.
We do not carry loss of hire insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire
periods, such as those that occur during an unscheduled dry-docking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Accordingly, any loss of a vessel or any extended period of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Our charterers may engage in legally permitted trading in locations which may still be subject to sanctions or boycott, such as
Iran. Our insurers may be contractually or by operation of law prohibited from honoring our insurance contract for such trading, which could result in reduced insurance coverage for losses incurred by the related vessels. Furthermore, our
insurers and we may be prohibited from posting or otherwise be unable to post security in respect of any incident in such locations, resulting in the loss of use of the relevant vessel and negative publicity for our Company which could negatively
impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and share price.
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flows.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers or receivers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a
maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages, including, in some jurisdictions, for debts incurred by previous owners. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien-holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel. The arrest
or attachment of one or more of our vessels, if such arrest or attachment is not timely discharged, could cause us to default on a charter or breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities, could interrupt our cash flows and could require
us to pay large sums of money to have the arrest or attachment lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s
maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels or to other
vessels privately owned or controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as
well as our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Compliance with safety and other requirements imposed by classification societies may be very costly and may
adversely affect our business.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society. The classification society
certifies that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the classification society. Every vessel must comply with all applicable international conventions and the regulations of the
vessel’s flag state as verified by a classification society and must successfully undergo periodic surveys, including annual, intermediate and special surveys. If any vessel does not maintain its class, it will lose its insurance coverage and
therefore will be unable to trade, and the vessel’s owner will be in breach of relevant covenants under its financing arrangements. Failure to maintain the class of one or more of our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows, including cash available to pay dividends to stockholders.
Our business depends upon certain members of our senior management who may not necessarily continue to work
for us.
Our future success depends to a significant extent upon our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos
Konstantakopoulos, certain members of our senior management and our managers and service providers. Mr. Konstantakopoulos has substantial experience in the container shipping industry and has worked with us and our managers for many years. He,
our managers and certain of our senior management team are crucial to the execution of our business strategies and to the growth and development of our business. If these individuals were no longer to be affiliated with us or our managers, or if
we were to otherwise cease to receive services from them, we may be unable to recruit other employees with equivalent talent and experience, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our arrangements with our chief executive officer restrict his ability to compete with us, and such
restrictive covenants generally may be unenforceable.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our chairman and chief executive officer, entered into a restrictive covenant agreement with us
on November 3, 2010, which was amended and restated on July 1, 2021, under which, during the period of Mr. Konstantakopoulos’ employment or service with us and for six months thereafter, Mr. Konstantakopoulos will agree to restrictions on his
ownership and acquisition of interests in any containership or dry bulk vessel, and any business involved in the ownership of containerships or dry bulk vessels, subject to certain exceptions, including (i) pursuant to his involvement with us,
(ii) with respect to certain acquisitions for which we are first given the opportunity to make and (iii) interests acquired prior to entering into the restrictive covenant agreement.
Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has also agreed that if one of our vessels and a vessel majority owned directly or indirectly by
him are both available and meet the criteria for an available charter, our vessel will be offered such charter. Such priority chartering obligation currently applies in respect of two containerships privately owned or controlled, and one dry bulk
vessel controlled by Mr. Konstantakopoulos, but does not apply to four containerships and two dry bulk vessels owned by companies in which Mr. Konstantakopoulos holds a passive interest. This could give rise to a conflict of interest, which could
adversely impact our results of operations.
We also cannot rule out the possibility that our board of directors will grant waivers to the restrictive covenant agreement.
These restrictions have been waived by the Board of Directors or do not apply with respect to six container vessels and three dry bulk vessels in which Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos has an interest, with no such waivers occurring in the year
ending December 31, 2023. For more information on the restrictive covenant agreement, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos Restrictive Covenant Agreement”.
In addition, the restrictive covenant agreement is governed by English law, and English law generally does not favor the
enforcement of such restrictions which are considered contrary to public policy and facially are void for being in restraint of trade. Our ability to enforce these restrictions, should it ever become necessary, will depend upon us establishing
that there is a legitimate proprietary interest that is appropriate to protect, and that the protection sought is no more than is reasonable, having regard to the interests of the parties and the public interest. We cannot give any assurance that
a court would enforce the restrictions as written by way of an injunction or that we could necessarily establish a case for damages as a result of a violation of the restrictive covenants agreement.
Our chairman and chief executive officer has affiliations with our managers and others that could create
conflicts of interest between us and our managers or other entities in which he has an interest.
Pursuant to the Framework Agreement between Costamare Shipping
Company S.A. (“Costamare Shipping”) and us dated November 2, 2015, as amended and restated on January 17, 2020 and as further amended and restated on June 28, 2021 (the “Framework Agreement”), the Services Agreement between Costamare Shipping
Services Ltd. (“Costamare Services”) and our vessel-owning subsidiaries dated November 2, 2015, as amended and restated on June 28, 2021 (the “Services Agreement”) and the separate ship-management agreements pertaining to each vessel, our
managers provide us with, among other things, commercial, technical and other management services. Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services are controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos alone or
together with members of his family. As of March 19, 2024, Costamare Shipping is also the manager of four vessels privately owned by our chairman and chief executive officer. Starting in February 2024, certain of our vessel-owning subsidiaries
appointed Navilands Container Management Ltd. and, Navilands Bulker Management Ltd., (together, “Navilands”) as managers to provide their vessels, together with Costamare Shipping, with technical, crewing, commercial, provisioning, bunkering,
sale and purchase, accounting and insurance services pursuant to separate ship-management agreements between each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries and Navilands. Navilands Container Management Ltd. and Navilands Bulker Management Ltd. may
subcontract certain services to and enter into a relevant sub-management agreement with Navilands (Shanghai) Containers Management Ltd. and Navilands (Shanghai) Bulkers Management Ltd. (together, “Navilands (Shanghai)”) respectively. Navilands
and Navilands (Shanghai) are indirectly controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. In addition, our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, indirectly owns 50% of Blue
Net Chartering GmbH & Co. KG (“Blue Net”) which provides charter brokerage services to our containerships under a brokerage agreement (the “Brokerage Agreement”) and of Blue Net Chartering Asia Pte. Ltd. (“Blue Net Asia”) which provides
charter brokerage services to our containerships on a case by case basis. Blue Net does not provide its services to the vessels for which charter brokerage services are being provided by Blue Net Asia. Pursuant
to agreements dated November 14, 2022 (the “2022 Agency Agreements”), Costamare Bulkers Services GmbH (“Local Agency A”), Costamare Bulkers Services APS (“Local Agency B”) and
Costamare Bulkers Services Pte. Ltd. (“Local Agency C”) and pursuant to the agreement dated November 20, 2023 (together with the 2022 Agency Agreements, the “Agency Agreements”), Costamare Bulkers Services Co., Ltd. (“Local Agency D” and together with Local Agency A, Local Agency B and Local Agency C, the “Agency Companies”) provide chartering and other services to Costamare Bulkers Inc.
(“Costamare Bulkers” or “CBI”). The Agency Companies are directly or indirectly controlled by our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. The
terms of the Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement, the separate ship management agreements, the Brokerage Agreement and the Agency Agreements were not negotiated at arm’s length by non-related third parties. Accordingly, the terms may
be less favorable to the Company than if such terms were obtained from a non-related third party. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements”.
Additionally, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, our chairman and chief executive officer, is the owner as at March 19, 2024 of
approximately 28.7% of our common stock, and this relationship could create conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand, and our affiliated managers or service providers, on the other hand. These conflicts, which are addressed in the
Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement, the separate ship management agreements, the Brokerage Agreement and the restrictive covenant agreement between us and our chairman and chief executive officer, may arise in connection with the
chartering, purchase, sale and operation of the vessels in our fleet versus vessels owned or chartered-in by other companies, including companies affiliated with our chairman and chief executive officer. These conflicts of interest may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Restrictive Covenant
Agreements”.
In addition, in connection with Costamare’s investment in the leasing business, Neptune entered into an Amended and Restated
Management Services Agreement (the “Neptune Management Agreement”) with Neptune Global Financing Limited (the “Neptune Manager”). Neptune Global Financing Limited is 51% owned by Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos. The terms of the Neptune Management
Agreement were not negotiated at arm’s length by non-related third parties. Accordingly, the terms may be less favorable to the Company than if such terms were obtained from a non-related third party. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions”.
Our chairman and chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, privately owns one container vessel (which is
comparable to two of our vessels), has a controlling interest in a company that owns one container vessel (which is comparable to four of our vessels) and holds a passive interest in certain companies that own four containerships (which are
comparable to 18 of our vessels). Mr. Konstantakopoulos also has a controlling interest in a company that owns one dry bulk vessel (which is comparable to eight of our vessels) and holds a passive interest, together with members of his family, in
a business involved in the ownership of two dry bulk vessels (which are comparable to 18 of our vessels). Mr. Konstantakopoulos may acquire additional vessels. Additionally, one of our non-independent board members holds a minority interest in a
company that owns a containership comparable to four of our vessels and may acquire additional vessels. These vessels may compete with the Company’s vessels for chartering opportunities. These investments were entered into following the review
and approval of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors. “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions”.
Certain of our managers are permitted to, and are actively seeking to, provide management services to
vessels owned by third parties that compete with us, which could result in conflicts of interest or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Costamare Shipping and Costamare Services have provided in the past and may provide in the future management services and other
services in respect of the Joint Venture vessels (as defined in “Item 4. Information on the Company––Business Overview––Our Fleet––Framework Deed”) as well as to containerships and dry bulk vessels owned by entities controlled by our chairman and
chief executive officer, Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos, or members of his family and their affiliates that are similar to and may compete with our vessels. V.Ships Greece, V.Ships Shanghai, Navilands, Navilands (Shanghai), HanseContor
Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG (“HanseContor”), FML Ship Management Ltd. (“FML”), F. A. Vinnen & Co. (GmbH & Co. KG) (“Vinnen”) and Synergy Marine Pte. Ltd. (“Synergy”) provide and/or may provide services to third parties. Blue Net and
Blue Net Asia provide brokerage services to third party vessels, including vessels that are similar to and compete with our vessels. These third-party vessels include vessels owned by Peter Döhle Schiffahrts-KG, a German integrated ship owner and
manager, which also controls 50% of Blue Net and Blue Net Asia. Our managers’ provision of management services to third parties, including related parties, that may compete with our vessels could give rise to conflicts of interest or adversely
affect the ability of these managers to provide the level of service that we require. Conflicts of interest with respect to certain services, including sale and purchase and chartering activities, among others, may have an adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Our managers are privately held companies and there is little or no publicly available information about
them.
The ability of our managers to continue providing services for our benefit will depend in part on their own financial strength.
Circumstances beyond our control could impair our managers’ financial strength, and because they are privately held companies, information about their financial strength is not publicly available. As a result, an investor in our stock might have
little advance warning of problems affecting any of our managers, even though these problems could have a material adverse effect on us. As part of our reporting obligations as a public company, we will disclose information regarding our managers
that has a material impact on us to the extent that we become aware of such information.
We depend on our managers to operate and expand our business and compete in our markets.
Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, the Services Agreement and the separate ship-management agreements pertaining to each
vessel, our managers provide us with, among other things, commercial, technical and other management services. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management of Our Fleet” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management and Services Agreements”. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy depends significantly upon our managers’ satisfactory performance of these services. Our business
will be harmed if such entities fail to perform these services satisfactorily or if they stop providing these services.
Costamare Shipping, one of our managers, also owns the Costamare trademarks, which consist of the name “COSTAMARE” and the
Costamare logo, and has agreed to license each trademark to us on a royalty free basis for the life of the Framework Agreement. If the Framework Agreement or the Services Agreement were to be terminated or if their terms were to be altered, our
business could be adversely affected, as we may not be able to immediately replace such services, and even if replacement services were immediately available, the terms offered could be less favorable than the ones offered by our managers.
Our ability to compete for and enter into new time charters or potential voyage charters and to expand our relationships with
our existing charterers depends largely on our relationship with our managers and their reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If our managers suffer material damage to their reputation or relationships, it may harm the ability of
us or our subsidiaries to:
|
• |
renew existing charters upon their expiration;
|
|
• |
successfully enter into sale and purchase transactions and interact with shipyards;
|
|
• |
obtain financing and other contractual arrangements with third parties on commercially acceptable terms (therefore potentially increasing operating expenditure for the fleet);
|
|
• |
maintain satisfactory relationships with our charterers and suppliers;
|
|
• |
operate our fleet efficiently; or
|
|
• |
successfully execute our business strategies.
|
If our ability to do any of the things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations, as well as our cash flows.
Being active in multiple lines of business, including managing multiple fleets, requires management to
allocate significant attention and resources, and failure to successfully or efficiently manage each line of business may harm our business and operating results.
Our dry bulk operating platform commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2022, and in the first quarter of 2023 we entered
into a leasing business. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—General.” In addition, our fleet consists of both containerships and dry bulk vessels following our entry into the dry bulk business in 2021. Containerships and
dry bulk vessels operate in different markets with different chartering characteristics and different customer bases. Our management team must devote significant attention and resources to different lines of business as well as to both our
containership and dry bulk fleets, and the time spent on each business will vary significantly from time to time depending on various circumstances and needs of each business. Each business requires significant attention from our management and
could divert resources away from the day-to-day management of the other business, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our vessels may call at ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the United
States government, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments, which could negatively affect the trading price of our shares of common stock.
The United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments and their agencies impose sanctions and
embargoes on certain countries and maintain lists of countries, individuals or entities they consider to be state sponsors of terrorism, involved in prohibited development of certain weapons or engaged in human rights violations. From time to
time on charterers’ instructions, our vessels have called and may again call at ports located in countries that have been subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other
governments and their agencies, including ports in Iran, Syria and Sudan.
The sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons
or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended, strengthened or lifted over time. The United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S.
Department of the Treasury principally apply, with limited exception, to U.S. persons (defined as any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United
States, or any person in the United States) only, not to non-U.S. companies. The United States can, however, extend sanctions liability to non-U.S. persons, including non-U.S. companies, such as our Company.
For example, in 2010, the United States enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act (“CISADA”),
which expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to non-U.S. companies, such as the Company, and introduces limits on the ability of companies and persons to do
business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleum or petroleum products. In 2012, President Obama signed Executive Order 13608 which prohibits foreign persons from violating or
attempting to violate or causing a violation of any sanctions in effect against Iran or facilitating any deceptive transactions for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions. The Secretary of the Treasury may prohibit any transactions
or dealings, including any U.S. capital markets financing, involving any person found to be in violation of Executive Order 13608. Also in 2012, the U.S. enacted the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”), which
created new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions. Among other things, the ITRA intensifies sanctions regarding the provision of goods, services, infrastructure or technology to Iran’s petroleum or petrochemical sector. The ITRA also
includes a provision requiring the President of the United States to impose five or more sanctions from Section 6(a) of the Iran Sanctions Act, as amended, on a person the President determines is a controlling beneficial owner of, or otherwise
owns, operates, or controls or insures a vessel that was used to transport crude oil from Iran to another country and (1) if the person is a controlling beneficial owner of the vessel, the person had actual knowledge the vessel was so used or (2)
if the person otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures the vessel, the person knew or should have known the vessel was so used. Such a person could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including exclusion from U.S. capital markets,
exclusion from financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and exclusion of that person’s vessels from U.S. ports for up to two years. The ITRA also includes a requirement that issuers of securities must disclose to the SEC in their
annual and quarterly reports filed after February 6, 2013 if the issuer or “any affiliate” has “knowingly” engaged in certain sanctioned activities involving Iran during the timeframe covered by the report. Finally, in January 2013, the U.S.
enacted the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (the “IFCA”), which expanded the scope of U.S. sanctions on any person that is part of Iran’s energy, shipping or shipbuilding sector and operators of ports in Iran, and imposes
penalties on any person who facilitates or otherwise knowingly provides significant financial, material or other support to these entities.
In 2022, in response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the United States and several European countries imposed various
economic sanctions against Russia, prohibitions on imports of Russian energy products, including crude oil, petroleum, petroleum fuels, oils, liquefied natural gas and coal, prohibitions on the maritime transport of Russian oil and petroleum
products that are purchased at or above a certain price, and prohibitions on investments in the Russian energy sector by US persons, among other restrictions.
The United States can also remove sanctions it has previously imposed. On January 16, 2016, the United States suspended certain
sanctions against Iran applicable to non-U.S. companies, such as the Company, pursuant to the nuclear agreement reached between Iran, China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union. To implement these
changes, beginning on January 16, 2016, the United States waived enforcement as to non-U.S. companies of many of the sanctions against Iran’s energy and petrochemical sectors described above, among other things, including certain provisions of
CISADA, ITRA, and IFCA. However, in May 2018, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and almost all of the U.S. sanctions waived and lifted in January 2016 were reinstated in August 2018 and
November 2018, respectively. In addition, in May 2019 and January 2020, additional sectors of the Iranian economy became subject to sanctions. The May 2019 sanctions targeted the iron, steel, aluminum and copper sectors of Iran, and the January
2020 sanctions targeted the construction, mining, manufacturing and textiles sectors of Iran. These sanctions also encompass significant transactions to sell, supply or transfer to Iran goods or services related to the aforementioned sanctioned
sectors.
From January 2011 through December 2023, vessels in our fleet made a total of 206 calls to ports in Iran, Syria and Sudan,
representing approximately 0.31% of our approximately 67,237 calls on worldwide ports, including calls made by vessels owned pursuant to the Framework Deed with York, and may again call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and
embargoes imposed by the United States government as state sponsors of terrorism. In addition, in 2023, 2022 and 2021, none of our vessels, including vessels owned pursuant to the Framework Deed with York, made any calls to ports in Cuba, Iran,
North Korea, Syria or Sudan. Although we believe that we were and are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations through the implementation of a Company-wide sanctions policy, and intend to continue to maintain
such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be expanded and subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or other
penalties, could limit our ability to trade to the United States and other countries or charter our vessels, could limit our ability to obtain financing and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or
not to invest, in the Company. In addition, if we have a casualty in sanctioned locations, including Iran, our underwriters may not provide required security, which could lead to the detention and subsequent loss of our vessel and the
imprisonment of our crew, and our insurance policies may not cover the costs and losses associated with the incident. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company simply because we do business
with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that may involve our vessels, and could result in fines or other penalties
against the Company for failing to prevent those violations, could limit our ability to trade to the United States and other countries or charter our vessels, could limit our ability to obtain financing and could, in turn, negatively affect our
reputation. Investor perception of the value of our common stock may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery legislation in other
jurisdictions could result in fines, criminal penalties, contract terminations and an adverse effect on our business.
We may operate in a number of countries through the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are
committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”). We are
subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such
violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition,
actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior
management.
We are a Marshall Islands corporation, and the Marshall Islands does not have a well-developed body of
corporate law or a bankruptcy act, and as a result, stockholders may have fewer rights and protections under Marshall Islands law than under the laws of a jurisdiction in the United States.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations
Act (the “BCA”). The provisions of the BCA are similar to provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States, most notably Delaware. The BCA also provides that it is to be applied and construed to make it uniform with
the laws of Delaware and other states of the United States that have substantially similar legislative provisions or statutory laws. In addition, so long as it does not conflict with the BCA or decisions of the Marshall Islands courts, the BCA is
to be interpreted according to the non-statutory law (or case law) of the State of Delaware and other states of the United States that have substantially similar legislative provisions or statutory laws. There have been, however, few court cases
in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA, in contrast to Delaware, which has a well-developed body of case law interpreting its corporate law statutes. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same
conclusions as the courts in Delaware or such other states of the United States. For example, the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary
responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the relevant U.S. jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. As a result, our public stockholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests
in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling stockholders than would stockholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction.
The Marshall Islands has no established bankruptcy act, and as a result, any bankruptcy action involving our company would have
to be initiated outside the Marshall Islands, and our public stockholders may find it difficult or impossible to pursue their claims in such other jurisdictions.
It may be difficult or impossible to enforce service of process and enforcement of judgments against us and
our officers and directors.
We are a Marshall Islands corporation and all of our subsidiaries are, and will likely be, incorporated in jurisdictions outside
the United States. In addition, our executive offices are located outside of the United States in Monaco. All of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of most
of our officers and directors are, and will likely be, located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for U.S. investors to serve legal process within the United States upon us or any of these persons or to
enforce a judgment against us for civil liabilities in U.S. courts. In addition, you should not assume that courts in the countries in which we or our subsidiaries are incorporated or where our or our subsidiaries’ assets are located (1) would
enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or our subsidiaries based upon the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (2) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us
or our subsidiaries based on those laws.
There is also substantial doubt that the courts of the Marshall Islands or Monaco would enter judgments in original actions
brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws.
Risks Relating to our Securities
The price of our securities may be volatile and future sales of our equity securities could cause the market
price of our securities to decline.
The price of our equity securities has been and may continue to be volatile and may fluctuate due to various factors including:
|
• |
actual or anticipated fluctuations in quarterly and annual results;
|
|
• |
fluctuations in the seaborne transportation industry, including fluctuations in the containership and dry bulk markets;
|
|
• |
our payment of dividends;
|
|
• |
mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry;
|
|
• |
changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards;
|
|
• |
shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecasted by securities analysts;
|
|
• |
announcements concerning us or our competitors;
|
|
• |
general economic conditions;
|
|
• |
future sales of our stock or other securities;
|
|
• |
investors’ perceptions of us and the international shipping industry;
|
|
• |
the general state of the securities markets; and
|
|
• |
other developments affecting us, our industry or our competitors.
|
The shipping industry and associated derivatives markets are highly unpredictable and volatile. Securities markets worldwide are
experiencing significant price and volume fluctuations. The market price for our securities may also be volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our securities
in spite of our operating performance. Consequently, you may not be able to sell our securities at prices equal to or greater than those at which you pay or paid.
Furthermore, sales of a substantial number of shares of our equity securities in the public market, or the perception that these
sales could occur, may depress the market price for our securities. These sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the future.
On July 6, 2016, we implemented a dividend reinvestment plan (the “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”) that offers holders of our
common stock the opportunity to purchase additional shares by having their cash dividends automatically reinvested in our common stock. Subject to the rules of the NYSE, in the future, we may issue, in addition to the shares to be issued under
our Dividend Reinvestment Plan and the shares to be issued under the Services Agreement, additional shares of common stock, and other equity securities of equal or senior rank, without stockholder approval, in a number of circumstances.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we have issued 1,742,320 new shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. In addition,
during the year ended December 31, 2023, we have issued 598,400 common shares to Costamare Services in payment of services rendered under the Services Agreement.
The issuance by us of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities of equal or senior rank would have the
following effects:
|
• |
our existing stockholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;
|
|
• |
the dividend amount payable per share on our securities may be lower;
|
|
• |
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding share may be diminished; and
|
|
• |
the market price of our securities may decline.
|
Our major stockholders also may elect to sell large numbers of shares held by them from time to time. The number of shares of
common stock and Preferred Stock available for sale in the public market will be limited by restrictions applicable under securities laws, and agreements that we and our executive officers, directors and existing stockholders may enter into with
the underwriters at the time of an offering. Subject to certain exceptions, these agreements generally restrict us and our executive officers, directors and existing stockholders from directly or indirectly offering, selling, pledging, hedging or
otherwise disposing of our equity securities or any security that is convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our equity securities and from engaging in certain other transactions relating to such securities for an agreed period after
the date of an offering prospectus without the prior written consent of the underwriters.
Our ability to pay dividends or to redeem our Preferred Stock may be limited by the amount of cash we
generate from operations following the payment of fees and expenses, by the establishment of any reserves, by restrictions in our debt instruments and by additional factors unrelated to our profitability.
The declaration and payment of dividends (including cumulative dividends payable to the holders of our Preferred Stock) is
subject to the discretion of our board of directors and the requirements of Marshall Islands law. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things (a) our earnings, financial condition, cash flow and cash
requirements, (b) our liquidity, including our ability to obtain debt and/or equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by our vessel acquisition strategy, (c) restrictive covenants in our existing and future debt instruments and (d)
provisions of Marshall Islands law governing the payment of dividends.
The international shipping industry and associated derivatives markets are highly volatile, and we cannot predict with certainty
the amount of cash, if any, that will be available for distribution as dividends or to redeem our Preferred Stock in any period. Also, there may be a high degree of variability from period to period in the amount of cash, if any, that is
available for the payment of dividends or the redemption of our Preferred Stock and our obligation to pay dividends to holders of our Preferred Stock will reduce the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends to holders of our common
stock. The amount of cash we generate from and use in our operations and the actual amount of cash we will have available for dividends and redemptions may fluctuate significantly based upon, among other things:
|
• |
the charter hire payments we obtain from our charters as well as our ability to charter or re-charter our vessels and the charter rates obtained;
|
|
• |
the due performance by our charterers and other counterparties of their obligations;
|
|
• |
our fleet expansion strategy and associated uses of our cash and our financing requirements;
|
|
• |
delays in the delivery of newbuild vessels and the beginning of payments under charters relating to those vessels;
|
|
• |
the level of our operating costs, such as the costs of crews, vessel maintenance, lubricants and insurance;
|
|
• |
the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet and the timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled dry-docking of our vessels;
|
|
• |
disruptions related to the continuation of COVID-19, new variants or future pandemics;
|
|
• |
prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and Hamas and the Red Sea crisis;
|
|
• |
changes in interest rates;
|
|
• |
currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
• |
dry bulk freight rates and bunker prices;
|