Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund Earnings 2018-12-31
CSAF 10K Annual Report
| Balance Sheet | Income Statement | Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| ☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2018
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
or
Commission File number: 000-22260
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
| Delaware | 52-1823554 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
| 2850 Quarry Lake Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21209 | ||
| (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) |
| (410) 413-2600 | ||
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
| Units of Limited Partnership Interest | ||
| (Title of Class) |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Non-accelerated filer ☑ | Smaller reporting company ☐ |
| Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The Registrant has no voting stock. As of February 28, 2019, there were 85,911.455 Units of General and Limited Partnership Interest issued and outstanding.
| | Page | |
| PART I | ||
| Item 1. | 1–5 | |
| Item 1A. | 5–18 | |
| Item 1B. | 19 | |
| Item 2. | 19 | |
| Item 3. | 19 | |
| Item 4. | 19 | |
| PART II | ||
| Item 5. | 20 | |
| Item 6. | 20 | |
| Item 7. | 21-32 | |
| Item 7A. | 33–36 | |
| Item 8. | 37 | |
| Item 9. | 37 | |
| Item 9A. | 37 | |
| Item 9B. | 37 | |
| PART III | ||
| Item 10. | 38–39 | |
| Item 11. | 40 | |
| Item 12. | 40 | |
| Item 13. | 40 | |
| Item 14. | 40 | |
| PART IV | ||
| Item 15. | 41 | |
| Item 16. | 42 | |
| 43 | ||
PART I
General development of business
Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Registrant” or the “Fund”) is a limited partnership, which was organized on May 11, 1993 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. The Registrant operates as a commodity investment pool, whose purpose is to trade speculatively in the U.S. and international futures and forward markets. Specifically, the Fund trades in a diverse array of global markets, including global interest rates, stock indices, currencies and commodities.
The general partner and trading advisor of the Registrant is Campbell & Company, LP (“Campbell & Company”). Effective December 2, 2014, Campbell & Company, Inc. changed its name and form of entity to Campbell & Company, LP. Campbell & Company refers to either Campbell & Company, Inc. or Campbell & Company, LP depending on the applicable period discussed. In addition to making all trading decisions in its capacity as trading advisor, Campbell & Company conducts and manages all aspects of the business and administration of the Registrant in its role as general partner. Campbell & Company uses a systematic trading approach combined with quantitative portfolio management analysis and seeks to identify and profit from price movements in the futures and forward markets. Multiple trading models are utilized across most markets traded. Each model analyzes market movements and internal market and price configurations in order to generate signals to be executed through a variety of execution platforms.
During the continuous offering, the Fund was a registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and was subject to the regulatory requirements under the Securities Act of 1933. (Units in the Fund are no longer offered, as described below.) The Fund is a “reporting company” subject to the regulatory requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a commodity investment pool, the Fund is subject to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), an agency of the United States government which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry; rules of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”), an industry self-regulatory organization; and the requirements of the various commodity exchanges where the Fund executes transactions. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the requirements of futures commission merchants and interbank market makers through which the Fund trades.
Effective January 6, 2012, Units in the Fund were no longer offered for sale. For existing investors in the Fund, business has been and will be conducted as usual. There will be no change in trading, operations or monthly statements, etc., and redemptions will continue to be offered on a monthly basis.
A total of $6,078,611,354 was raised during the initial and continuing offering periods ending with the withdrawal of the Fund’s Registration Statement on January 6, 2012.
The Registrant will be terminated and dissolved promptly thereafter upon the happening of the earlier of: (a) the expiration of the Registrant’s stated term of December 31, 2023; (b) an election to dissolve the Registrant at any time by Limited Partners owning more than 50% of the Units then outstanding; (c) the withdrawal of Campbell & Company, unless one or more new general partners have been elected or appointed pursuant to the Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended; (d) Campbell & Company determines that the purpose of the Fund cannot be fulfilled; or (e) any event which shall make unlawful the continuing existence of the Registrant.
Financial information about segments
The Fund’s business constitutes only one segment for financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative “commodity pool.” The Fund does not engage in sales of goods or services.
Narrative description of business
General
The purpose of the Fund is to engage in the speculative trading, buying, selling, or otherwise acquiring, holding or disposing of commodities, including futures contracts, forward contracts and any other rights pertaining thereto, and for such other purposes as may be incidental or related thereto. The Fund has no employees.
The Fund trades pursuant to the Campbell Managed Futures Portfolio (the “CMF Portfolio”), formerly known as the Financial, Metals and Energy Large Portfolio. The CMF Portfolio seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns across a broad range of market conditions through systematic investments in a diversified portfolio of futures and forward contracts in a diverse array of global assets, including global interest rates, stock indices, currencies and commodities. The CMF Portfolio consists of underlying investment strategies, both trend following and non-trend following in nature, that aim for low correlation and are diversified by investment style, investment holding period and instrument. Trend following strategies apply traditional and alternative trend following methods to systematically exploit futures market moves through the use of price information. Some trend following strategies trade all markets while others are specific to certain sectors or factors. Non-trend following strategies develop relative value and fundamental themes to systematically exploit asset mispricings using carry, spread, and directional methods. Non-trend following strategies tend to be specific to certain sectors and employ global tactical asset allocation methodologies. Other technical strategies, based on statistical indicators, use varying lookback and holding periods to identify mispricings, complimentary to trend following. Additional models, markets and/or over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts may also be included or eliminated from time to time at Campbell & Company’s sole discretion without notice to unitholders.
The average sector allocation for each sector as of the previous six month ends through December 31, 2018 is as follows: 23% to interest rates, 35% to foreign exchange, 21% to commodities, and 21% to equity indices. Sector allocation for each sector is calculated using the dollar value of margin posted as collateral to support trading in each sector as a percentage of the total dollar value of margin posted to support trading in all sectors.
Use of Proceeds
Effective January 6, 2012, Units in the Fund were no longer offered for sale. For existing investors in the Fund, business has been and will be conducted as usual. The entire offering proceeds, without deductions, were credited to the Fund’s bank, brokerage and/or cash management accounts. The Fund meets margin requirements for its trading activities by depositing cash or U.S. government securities with the futures brokers and the over-the-counter counterparties. This does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures and forward contracts. The Fund typically receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Fund assets.
Approximately 10% to 30% of the Fund’s assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures brokers, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury Bills in segregated accounts with the futures brokers pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. Approximately 5% to 15% of the Fund’s assets are deposited with over-the-counter counterparties in order to initiate and maintain forward contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparties.
The Fund occasionally receives margin calls (requests to post more collateral) from its futures brokers or over-the-counter counterparties, which are met by moving the required portion of the assets held in the custody accounts at Northern Trust Company to the margin accounts. In the past three years, the Fund has not needed to liquidate any position as a result of a margin call.
The general partner deposits the majority of those assets of the Fund that are not required to be deposited as margin with the futures brokers and over-the-counter counterparties in a custodial account with Northern Trust Company. The assets deposited in the custodial account with Northern Trust Company are segregated. Such custodial account constitutes approximately 60% to 75% of the Fund’s assets and are invested directly by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC (“PNC”). PNC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. PNC does not guarantee any interest or profits will accrue on the Fund’s assets in the custodial account. PNC invests the assets according to agreed upon investment guidelines that first preserve capital, second allow for sufficient liquidity, and third provide a yield beyond the risk-free rate. Investments can include, but are not limited to, (i) U.S. government, agency, or municipal securities; (ii) banker acceptances or certificates of deposits; (iii) commercial paper or money market securities; (iv) short-term, investment-grade corporate debt securities; or (v) investment-grade, asset backed securities.
The Fund’s assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested in or loaned to Campbell & Company or any affiliated entities. Funds may be deposited and held in the Fund’s account at PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., prior to the transfer to the Fund’s trading accounts.
Cash Manager and Custodian
Prior to March 2014, Horizon Cash Management, LLC served as the cash manager under the Investment Advisory Agreement to manage and control the liquid assets of the Fund. In February 2014, the Fund signed an agreement with PNC to replace Horizon Cash Management, LLC as the cash manager for the Fund effective March 1, 2014. Horizon Cash Management, LLC was and PNC is registered as investment advisers with the SEC of the United States under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
The Fund opened a custodial account at the Northern Trust Company (the “Custodian”) and has granted the cash manager authority to make certain investments on behalf of the Fund provided such investments are consistent with the investment guidelines created by the general partner. All securities purchased by the cash manager on behalf of the Fund will be held in the Fund’s custody account at the custodian. The cash manager will have no beneficial or other interest in the securities and cash in such custody account.
Market Sectors
Campbell & Company’s CMF Portfolio trades in a fully diversified portfolio of futures and forward markets, including energy products, precious and base metals, stock market indices, interest rates and foreign currencies detailed out below.
| Commodities | Interest Rates | Equity Indices | Foreign Exchange (1) | |||||||
| Aluminum | London Brent Crude | Australian 90-Day Bill | Long Gilt | Amsterdam Exchange Index | OMX Stock Index | Australian Dollar (2) | Mexican Peso | |||
| Coffee | London Gas Oil | Australian 3-Year Bond | Short Sterling | CAC 40 Stock Index | Russell 2000 Index | Brazilian Real (3) | New Zealand Dollar | |||
| Copper | NY Gasoline RBOB | Australian 10-Year Bond | Treasury Notes/2-Year | DAX | S&P 400 Index | British Pound (2) | Norwegian Krone | |||
| Corn | Natural Gas | Canadian 10-Year Bond | Treasury Notes/5-Year | DJ Euro Stoxx 50 | S&P 500 Index | Canadian Dollar (2) | Philippine Peso (3) | |||
| Cocoa | Nickel | Canadian 90-Day Bill | Treasury Notes/10-Year | DJ Index | S&P 500 Volatility Index | Chilean Peso (3) | Polish Zloty | |||
| Cotton | Palladium | Euro-BTP Italian Gov Bond | Treasury Notes/30-Year | FTSE 100 Index | S&P Canada 60 Index | Chinese Yuan (3) | Russian Ruble (3) | |||
| Crude Oil | Platinum | Euro-BUND | Treasury Ultra Long Bond | FTSE China A50 | SPI 200 Index | Colombian Peso | Singapore Dollar | |||
| Feeder Cattle | Silver | Euro-BOBL | FTSE JSE Top 40 | SGX CNX Nifty | Czech Koruna | South African Rand | ||||
| Gold | Soybean Meal | Euro-Buxl 30-Year Bond | FTSE MIB | TOPIX | Euro (2) | South Korean Won (3) | ||||
| Heating Oil | Soybean Oil | Euro-OAT French 10-Year Bond | Hang Seng Index | Hungarian Forint | Swedish Krona | |||||
| High Grade Copper | Soybeans | Euro-Schatz | IBEX35 Stock Index | Indian Rupee (3) | Swiss Franc (2) | |||||
| KC Hard Red-Winter Wheat | Sugar #11 (World) | Eurodollar | MSCI Singapore | Indonesian Rupiah | Taiwan Dollar (3) | |||||
| Lead | Wheat | Euribor | MSCI Taiwan | Israeli Shekel | Turkish Lira | |||||
| Lean Hogs | Zinc | Japanese 10-Year Bond | NASDAQ 100 Index | Japanese Yen (2) | ||||||
| Live Cattle | Nikkei | | ||||||||
| (1) | Traded as forward contracts, not futures |
| (2) | Also may be traded as cross rates |
| (3) | Traded as non-deliverable forward |
Market Types
The Fund trades on a variety of United States and foreign futures exchanges, and in the off-exchange highly liquid, institutionally-based currency forward markets. As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Fund’s commitments to different types of markets — U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and non-regulated — differ substantially from time to time, as well as over time, and may change at any time if Campbell & Company determines such change to be in the best interests of the Fund.
Charges
The following is a description of current charges to the Fund.
| RECIPIENT | NATURE OF PAYMENT | AMOUNT OF PAYMENT | ||
| Campbell & Company | Brokerage Fee | The Fund pays Campbell & Company a brokerage fee of 7% of the Fund’s month-end net asset value per annum (prior to accruals for such brokerage fee or performance fees), irrespective of profitability, of which 4% is paid to the selling agents. Campbell & Company retains the remaining 3%. | ||
| Campbell & Company | Performance Fee | Campbell & Company is paid a quarterly performance fee equal to 20% of aggregate cumulative appreciation in the Fund’s net asset value per Unit, if any, excluding interest income and as adjusted for subscriptions and redemptions. | ||
| Campbell & Company | Offering Costs | Campbell & Company pays the Fund’s offering costs and is subsequently reimbursed by the Fund. Reimbursement of the Fund’s offering costs is limited to 2.5% of the aggregate subscriptions accepted by Campbell & Company. | ||
| Cash Manager and Custodian Fees | Cash Management and Custody Fees | The Fund pays a combined annualized fee of approximately 0.075% per annum of the funds managed by the Cash Manager for cash management services, custodian fee, and fees associated with monitoring the Fund’s cash management portfolio. | ||
| Goldman, Sachs & Co. and UBS Securities LLC | Brokerage Commissions | Brokerage commissions are paid at a rate of approximately $4 per round-turn contract executed for the Fund, or approximately 0.50% of the Fund’s net assets annually, up to 1% of the Fund’s net asset value per annum (which includes payments to the over-the-counter counterparty as referenced below). | ||
| NatWest Markets plc and UBS AG | Over-the-Counter Counterparty Execution and Clearing Costs | The over-the-counter counterparties’ execution costs are included in the price of each forward contract purchased or sold, and, accordingly, such costs cannot be determined but are charged. In addition, the over-the-counter counterparties charge between $3 and $4 per $1 million, plus any additional electronic platform charges, for forward contracts they facilitate on behalf of the Fund with third party banks. These prime brokerage fees, combined with the futures brokers’ charges, will equal approximately 0.55% of the Fund’s net assets and will not exceed 1% of the Fund’s net asset value per annum, as referenced above. | ||
| Other | Operating Expenses | The Fund may experience operating expenses such as legal, auditing, administration, printing and postage, as incurred, up to a maximum of 0.50% of the Fund’s net asset value per annum. |
Regulation
The U.S. futures markets are regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, which is administered by the CFTC, a federal agency created in 1974. The CFTC licenses and regulates commodity exchanges, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors and clearing firms which are referred to in the futures industry as “futures commission merchants.” Campbell & Company is licensed by the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor. Futures professionals are also regulated by the NFA, a self-regulatory organization for the futures industry that supervises the dealings between futures professionals and their customers. If Campbell & Company’s pertinent CFTC licenses or NFA memberships were to lapse, be suspended or be revoked, it would be unable to act as the Fund’s commodity pool operator and/or commodity trading advisor, as applicable.
Recent CFTC and NFA guidance has clarified that the foreign exchange forward contracts that Campbell & Company trades on behalf of its clients with the client’s OTC counterparty may be characterized as swap transactions. A swap transaction is an individually negotiated, non-standardized agreement between two parties to exchange cash flows measured by different interest rates, exchange rates or prices, with payments calculated by reference to a principal (“notional”) amount or quantity. The Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”) includes provisions that comprehensively regulate swap transactions for the first time, such as mandatory central clearing, and many foreign governmental authorities are in the process of contemplating similar regulatory intervention in the swap markets. With respect to swaps cleared through a central counterparty, the Fund will be subject to daily “variation” and “initial” margin requirements set by the central clearing counterparty and the Fund’s clearing member. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) that are members of a clearinghouse with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. The Fund posts initial and variation margin by posting collateral with its clearing member FCMs. Central clearing is expected to decrease counterparty risk and increase liquidity compared to bilateral swaps because central clearing interposes the central clearinghouse as the counterparty to each participant’s swap. However, central clearing does not eliminate counterparty risk or illiquidity risk entirely. In addition, depending on the size of the Fund and other factors, the margin required by a clearing member from the Fund may be in excess of the amounts required to be posted by the Fund pursuant to the rules of the central clearinghouse and in excess of the collateral required to be posted by the Fund to support its obligations under a similar non-cleared bilateral swap. However, in September 2014, regulators proposed new rules imposing certain margin requirements, including minimums, on uncleared swaps in the near future, which, if adopted, could affect this comparison.
The SEC and the CFTC under Dodd-Frank also have the authority to require most liquid swaps, under their respective jurisdiction, to be traded and executed on trading facilities. The CFTC has already subjected certain kinds of swaps to this platform execution requirement and it is expected that additional swaps will become subject to this requirement in the future. It is not yet clear when the parallel SEC requirements will go into effect. Moving trading to an exchange-type system may increase market transparency and liquidity but may require the Fund to incur increased expenses to access the same types of swaps. Rules adopted by the CFTC in 2012 also require centralized reporting of detailed information about many types of cleared and uncleared swaps. This information is available to regulators and, to a more limited extent and on an anonymous basis, to the public. Reporting of swap data may result in greater market transparency, which may be beneficial to funds that use swaps to implement trading strategies. However, these rules place potential additional administrative obligations on the Fund, and the safeguards established to protect anonymity may not function as expected.
Available Information
The Fund files quarterly, annual and current reports with the SEC. These reports are available to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Facilities in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC’s toll free number, 1-800-SEC-0330, for further information. The Fund does not maintain a website where these reports are posted. However, the Fund’s filings are posted on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
General Investment Related Risks
There are certain general market conditions in which any given investment strategy is unlikely to be profitable. Campbell & Company does not have any ability to control or predict such market conditions. The Fund is subject to certain general risks relating to its investment strategies, including, but not limited to, the following:
Short Sales May Lead to Potentially Unlimited Losses
The Fund may establish short positions in a number of investment instruments. A futures trader that is obligated to make delivery is “short” the contract or has “sold” the contract. A futures trader who establishes a short position in a futures contract would initially sell an interest at the current price and then would buy an interest at market price in order to offset such obligation. The short futures trader hopes to sell high and buy low. Short selling allows the short seller to profit from declines in market prices to the extent such declines exceed the transaction and any other related costs. A short sale creates the risk of an unlimited loss, in that the price of the underlying commodity could theoretically increase without limit, thus increasing the cost of buying those futures to offset the short position. There can be no assurance that the futures necessary to cover a short position will be available for “purchase”. Establishing a long position in futures contracts to close out the short position can itself cause the price of the futures to rise further, thereby exacerbating the loss. The use of leverage combined with short selling may increase the amount of losses that the Fund experiences.
Investing Globally Subjects the Fund to International Risks
Issuers are generally subject to different accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards in different countries throughout the world. The volume of trading, the volatility of prices and the liquidity of issuers may vary in the markets of different countries. Hours of business, customs and access to these markets by outside investors may also vary. In addition, the level of government supervision and regulation of the financial markets, securities and futures exchanges, securities dealers, futures commission merchants and listed and unlisted companies is different throughout the world. There may also be a lack of adequate legal recourse for the redress of disputes and, in some countries, the pursuit of such disputes may be subject to a highly prejudiced legal system.
Different markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures. Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of the Fund are uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of the Fund to make intended investments due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. The inability to dispose of portfolio instruments due to settlement problems could result either in losses due to subsequent declines in value of the portfolio instruments or, if the Fund has entered into a contract to sell the instrument, could result in possible liability to the purchaser.
The price of any foreign investment instrument and, therefore, the potential profit and loss thereon, may be affected by any variance in the foreign exchange rate between the time a position is established and the time it is liquidated, offset or exercised.
Certain foreign exchanges may also be in a more or less developmental stage so that prior price histories may not be indicative of current price dynamics. In addition, the Fund may not have the same access to certain financial investment instruments on foreign exchanges as do local traders, and the historical market data on which Campbell & Company bases its strategies may not be as reliable or accessible as it is in the United States. The rights of clients (such as the Fund) in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a non-U.S. market or broker are also likely to be more limited than in the case of U.S. markets or brokers.
With respect to different countries, there is a possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, imposition of withholding taxes on dividend or interest payments, limitations on the removal of funds or other assets, managed or manipulated exchange rates and other issues affecting currency conversion, political or social instability or diplomatic developments that could adversely affect investments in those countries. The Fund may invest in instruments that may be domiciled in a country other than the country in whose currency the instrument is denominated. The values and relative yields of such investments in the financial markets of different countries, and their associated risks, are expected to change independently of each other. These risks may be greater in emerging markets.
Exchange-Rate Risk
The Fund may invest in international financial instruments such as securities of non-U.S. issuers or non-U.S. futures contracts, which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Consequently, the Fund is subject to the exchange-rate risk of the dollar increasing or decreasing in value against the functional currency of such investments.
Changes in Financing Policies or the Imposition of Other Credit Limitations or Restrictions Could Compel the Fund to Liquidate Positions at Disadvantageous Prices
The Fund may utilize leverage and may depend on the availability of credit in order to finance its portfolio. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to maintain adequate financing arrangements under all market circumstances. As a general matter, the dealers that provide financing to the Fund can apply essentially discretionary margin, haircut, financing, security and collateral valuation policies. Changes by dealers in such financing policies, or the imposition of other credit limitations or restrictions, whether due to market circumstances disruptions or governmental, regulatory or judicial action, may result in large margin calls, loss of financing, forced liquidation of positions at disadvantageous prices, termination of swap and repurchase agreements and cross-defaults to agreements with other dealers. Any such adverse effects may be exacerbated in the event that such limitations or restrictions are imposed suddenly and/or by multiple market participants at or about the same time. The imposition of such limitations or restrictions could compel the Fund to liquidate all or part of its portfolio at disadvantageous prices. From time to time, banks and dealers have substantially curtailed financing activities and increased collateral requirements, forcing many hedge funds to liquidate.
The Fund’s Investments Could be Illiquid
Futures and forward positions cannot always be liquidated at the desired price; this can occur when the market is thinly traded (i.e., a relatively small volume of buy and sell orders) or in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events in which historical pricing relationships become materially distorted. The Fund may incur material losses and the risk of loss from pricing distortions is compounded by the fact that in disrupted markets many positions become illiquid making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving. The financing available to the Fund from banks, dealers and other counterparties is likely to be restricted in disrupted markets. For example, in 1994, 1998 and again from 2007-2009, there was a sudden restriction of credit by the dealer community that resulted in forced liquidations and major losses for a number of private investment funds. It is possible that in the future, in such situations, Campbell & Company may be unable for some time to liquidate certain unprofitable positions, thereby increasing the loss of the Fund from the trade. Additionally, foreign governments may take or be subject to political actions which disrupt the markets in their currency or major exports, such as energy products or metals. Market disruptions caused by unexpected political, military and terrorist events may from time to time cause dramatic losses for the Fund, and such events can result in otherwise historically low-risk strategies performing with unprecedented volatility and risk. Any of these actions could also result in losses to the Fund. Units should be owned only by persons financially able to maintain their investment and who can afford the loss of all or substantially all of such investment.
Your Investment in the Fund Could Be Illiquid; Suspension of Trading
There is no secondary market for the Units and none is expected to develop. While the Units have redemption rights, there are restrictions. For example, redemptions can occur only at the end of a month. If a large number of redemption requests were to be received at one time, the Fund might have to liquidate positions to satisfy the requests. Such a forced liquidation could adversely affect the Fund and consequently your investment.
Transfers of interest in the Units are subject to limitations, such as 30 days’ advance notice of any intent to transfer. Also, Campbell & Company may deny a request to transfer if it determines that the transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Fund.
Reduced Market Exposure in Times of High Volatility May Limit Profit Potential
During periods of high volatility in the markets, the Fund may reduce its market exposure. While the purpose of such reductions is to attempt to limit potential losses to the Fund, such reductions may also have the effect of limiting potential profits for such time as the Fund’s market exposure remains in a reduced state.
An Investment in the Fund May Not Diversify an Overall Portfolio
Historically, alternative investments such as managed futures funds have been generally lowly correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Low correlation means that there is no statistically valid relationship between the past performance of futures and forward contracts, on the one hand, and stocks or bonds, on the other hand. Low correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be exactly opposite.
Because of low correlation, the Fund cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market or vice versa. The futures and forward markets are fundamentally different from the securities markets in that for every gain made in futures and forward trading, there is an equal and offsetting loss.
Low correlation also does not mean that the Fund will not always move in the same direction as stocks and bonds. There may be times when the Fund gains during the same periods when stock and bonds gain and there also may be times when the Fund loses during periods when stock and bonds lose. If the Fund performs in a manner that is correlated with the general financial markets or does not perform successfully, you will obtain no diversification benefits by investing in the Units and the Fund may have no gains to offset your losses from other investments.
The Current Markets are Subject to Market Disruptions That May be Detrimental to Your Investment
The Fund may incur major losses in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events in which historical pricing relationships become materially distorted. The risk of loss from pricing distortions is potentially compounded by the fact that in disrupted markets many positions become illiquid, making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving. The financing available to the Fund from its banks, dealers and other counterparties is typically reduced in disrupted markets and may result in substantial losses to the Fund. Market disruptions may from time to time cause dramatic losses for the Fund, and such events can result in otherwise historically low-risk strategies performing with unprecedented volatility and risk.
Market disruptions during the past decade have led to increased govermental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the private fund and financial services industry in general. U.S. regulatory agencies are continuing to implement rulemaking as a result of the passage of Dodd-Frank in 2010. Further legislation proposing additional regulation of the industry is considered periodically by the U.S. Congress, as well as the governing bodies of non-U.S. jurisdictions. It is impossible to predict what, if any, changes in the regulations applicable to the Fund. Campbell & Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparties with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such laws or regulations could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Fund, as well as require increased transparency as to the identity of Unitholders.
Fixed-Income Investments Risks
The value of fixed-income securities in which the Fund may invest will change in response to fluctuations in interest rates. Except to the extent that values are independently affected by currency exchange rate fluctuations, when interest rates decline, the value of fixed-income securities generally can be expected to rise. Conversely, when interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities generally can be expected to decline.
In addition, the fixed-income securities in which the Fund may invest may be subject to income risk, call risk, prepayment risk, extension risk, and/or credit risk, each of which could affect the fixed-income securities’ value. Investments in lower rated or unrated fixed-income securities, while generally providing greater opportunity for gain and income than investments in higher rated securities, usually entail greater risk (including the possibility of default or bankruptcy of the issuers of such securities).
Trading Risks
There are Disadvantages to Making Trading Decisions Based Primarily on Technical Market Data
The trading systems used by Campbell & Company for the Fund are primarily technical. The profitability of trading under these systems depends on, among other things, the occurrence of significant price movements, up or down, in futures and forward prices. Such price movements may not develop; there have been periods in the past without such price movements.
The likelihood of the Units being profitable could be materially diminished during periods when events external to the markets themselves have an important impact on prices. During such periods, Campbell & Company’s historic price analysis could establish positions on the wrong side of the price movements caused by such events.
Increased Competition in Alternative Asset Investments
There has been a marked increase in the number of, and flow of capital into, investment vehicles established in order to implement alternative asset investment strategies, including the strategies to be implemented by the Fund. While the precise effect cannot be determined, such an increase may result in greater competition for investment opportunities, or may result under certain circumstances in increased price volatility or decreased liquidity with respect to certain positions. Prospective investors should understand that the Fund may compete with other investment vehicles, as well as investment and commercial banking firms, which may have substantially greater resources, in terms of financial resources and research staffs, than may be available to the Fund.
Increase in Assets Under Management May Make Profitable Trading More Difficult
Campbell & Company believes that it is virtually impossible to define or quantify the capacity of a portfolio with any degree of certainty. Campbell & Company has continued to introduce new strategies designed to deliver returns which have low correlation to returns from existing strategies. Campbell & Company and its affiliates have not agreed to limit the amount of additional assets they may manage, and are actively engaged in raising assets for existing and new accounts, including the Fund. However, Campbell & Company acknowledges that there may come a time when the combination of available markets and new strategies may not be sufficient for it to add new assets without detriment to diversification. If this were to occur, Campbell & Company would expect its risk-adjusted returns to begin to degrade. Should Campbell & Company ever conclude that its ability to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns has been unduly compromised by its growth in assets, it would not hesitate to restrict or halt the flow of new assets, and, if necessary, begin to repatriate market gains.
Should the amount of assets that Campbell & Company and its affiliates manage increase, it may be more difficult for them to trade profitably because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance. Accordingly, such increases in equity under management may require Campbell & Company to modify its trading decisions for the Fund, which could have a detrimental effect on your investment. Such considerations may also cause Campbell & Company to eliminate smaller markets from consideration for inclusion in certain trading programs, reducing the range of markets in which trading opportunities may be pursued. Campbell & Company reserves the right to make distributions of profits to Limited Partners in an effort to control asset growth. In addition, Campbell & Company may have an incentive to favor other accounts because the compensation received from some other accounts exceeds the compensation it receives from managing the Fund’s account. Because records with respect to other accounts are not accessible to Investors, the Investors will not be able to determine if Campbell & Company is favoring other accounts.
Investors Will Not be Able to Review the Fund’s Holdings on a Daily Basis
Campbell & Company makes the Fund’s trading decisions. While Campbell & Company receives daily trade confirmations from the futures brokers and over-the-counter counterparties, the Fund’s trading results are reported to Investors monthly. Accordingly, an investment in the Fund does not offer Investors the same transparency, i.e., an ability to review all investment positions daily, that a personal trading account offers.
Portfolio Turnover
The Fund may dispose of its investment instruments without regard to the length of time they have been held when such actions appear advisable based on the models included in its portfolio. Since Campbell & Company trades the Fund’s investment instruments based on the models included in the portfolio, it is impossible to predict, with any degree of certainty, the portfolio turnover rate for the Fund. A high portfolio turnover rate bears certain tax consequences and results in greater transaction costs, which are borne directly by the Fund.
Inadequate Models Could Negatively Affect the Fund’s Investment Portfolio
Campbell & Company’s trading is highly model driven, and is subject to possibly material flaws in the models. As market dynamics (for example, due to changed market conditions and participants) shift over time, a previously highly successful model may become outdated or inaccurate, possibly without Campbell & Company recognizing that fact before losses are incurred. In particular, the Fund may incur losses in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events that cause Campbell & Company’s pricing models to generate prices which deviate from the market. The risk of loss to the Fund in the case of disrupted markets is compounded by the number of different investment models of pricing, each of which may independently become wholly unpredictable during market disruptions. In addition, in disrupted derivatives markets, many positions may become illiquid, making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving.
Even if the basic concepts of our models are sound, Campbell & Company may make errors in developing algorithms for integrating the numerous factors and variables into them or in programming the algorithms. Those errors may cause the model to generate results different from those intended. They may be difficult to detect in many market conditions, possibly influencing outcomes only in periods of stress or change in market conditions.
Campbell & Company anticipates the continued modification, enhancement and development of models. Each new generation of models (including incremental improvements to current models) exposes the Fund to the possibility of unforeseen losses from a variety of factors, including conceptual failures and implementation failures. There can be no assurance that the models used by Campbell & Company will be effective or that they will be effectively utilized by Campbell & Company. Moreover, there can be no assurance that Campbell & Company will be able to continue to develop, maintain and update the models so as to effectively implement its trading strategy.
Reliance on the Campbell & Company’s Discretion and Trading Models
The Fund’s success depends on the ability of Campbell & Company to develop and employ proprietary models across debt instruments, futures-related interests and/or derivative instruments.
Campbell & Company can provide no assurance that its efforts or the proprietary trading models that it employs will be successful, that it will always recognize each situation in which the models’ signals should or should not be used, or that such use or non-use of such signals will increase the Fund’s profits or minimize its losses. The discretionary authority of Campbell & Company may have a significant actual effect on the Fund’s performance (positive or negative).
Use of the models is unlikely to be successful unless the algorithms underlying the models are correct and remain correct in the future. Because the algorithms are based on perceived relationships between changes in technical and quantitative variables and prices or other fundamental factors, they will likely be unsuccessful in generating profitable trading signals to the extent that such perceptions are inaccurate.
To the extent that the algorithms do not reflect certain factors that may influence prices of the underlying instruments, major losses may result. For example (one of many possible examples, a number of which are unknown), a pending political event not accounted for in the algorithms of the models may be very likely to cause a major and adverse price movement, but the Fund might well continue to maintain positions that would incur major losses as a result of such movement because the models failed to reflect the pending political event.
The models may be more effective with certain underlying instruments than with others, or may not work at all with respect to certain instruments. To the extent that the models generate signals for instruments for which it does not provide optimal analysis, diminished returns or increased losses may result.
The data used in developing the models may not reflect the changing dynamics of the markets. An influx of new market participants, changes in market regulation, international political developments, demographic changes and numerous other factors can contribute to once successful strategies becoming outdated. Not all of these factors can be identified, much less quantified.
In the past, there have been periods without discernible trends in the markets in which the Fund trades and, presumably, such periods will continue to occur in the future. Any factor which would lessen the prospect of major trends occurring in the future (such as increased governmental control of, or participation in, the markets) may reduce the prospect that certain models utilized by Campbell & Company will be profitable in the future.
Moreover, any factor which would make it more difficult to execute trades at desired prices in accordance with the signals of the models (such as a significant lessening of liquidity in a particular market) would also be detrimental to profitability. Further, many advisers’ trading methods utilize similar analyses in making trading decisions. Therefore, bunching of buy and sell orders can occur, which makes it more difficult for a position to be taken or liquidated. No assurance can be given that the strategies utilized by Campbell & Company will be successful under all or any market conditions.
Campbell & Company continues to test and evaluate the models, as a result of which the models may be modified from time to time. As a result of such periodic modifications, it is possible that the trading strategies used by Campbell & Company in the future may be different from the strategies presently in use, or that which were used in the past. Any modification of the models will not be subject to any requirement that Limited Partners receive notice of the change or consent to it. There can be no assurance as to the effects (positive or negative) of any modification on the Fund’s performance. No assurance can be given that the trading strategy used or to be used by Campbell & Company will be successful under all or any market conditions.
Market Factors May Adversely Influence the Models
Often, the most unprofitable market conditions for the Fund are those in which prices “whipsaw,” moving quickly upward, then reversing, then moving upward again, then reversing again. In such conditions, Campbell & Company may, on the basis of its models, establish positions based on incorrectly identifying both the brief upward or downward price movements as trends, whereas in fact no trends sufficient to generate profits develop. Overall market, industry or economic conditions, which neither the Fund nor Campbell & Company can predict or control, will have a material effect on performance.
Availability of Investment Opportunities
The business of identifying and structuring investments of the types contemplated by the Fund is specialized, and involves a high degree of uncertainty. The availability of investment opportunities generally is subject to market conditions as well as, in some cases, the prevailing regulatory or political climate. No assurance can be given that the Fund will be able to identify and complete attractive investments in the future or that it will be able to invest fully its subscriptions. Similarly, identification of attractive investment opportunities by Campbell & Company is difficult and involves a high degree of uncertainty. Even if attractive investment opportunities are identified by Campbell & Company, it may not be permitted to take advantage of the opportunity to the fullest extent desired. Investment funds sponsored, managed or advised by Campbell & Company or its affiliates may seek investment opportunities similar to those the Fund may be seeking, and none of these parties has an obligation to offer any opportunities it may identify to the Fund.
Holding Period of Investment Positions
Campbell & Company typically does not know the maximum - or, often, even the expected (as opposed to optimal) - duration of any particular position at the time of initiation (except in the case of certain options or derivatives positions, which have pre-established expiration dates). The length of time for which a position is maintained varies significantly, based on Campbell & Company's subjective judgment of the appropriate point at which to liquidate a position so as to augment gains or reduce losses. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to maintain any particular position, or group of related positions, for the duration required to realized the expected gains, or avoid losses, from such positions.
Futures, Forwards and Swaps
Futures, Forwards and Swaps Trading Can be Highly Volatile
Futures, forwards and other derivative prices are highly volatile and increase the amount of volatility in contrast to a direct investment in the underlying physical commodities or financial products. Price movements of futures, forwards and other derivative contracts are influenced by such factors as: changes in overall market movements due to fluctuating supply and demand relationships; weather; government agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies; and national and international political and economic events. In addition, governments from time to time intervene in certain markets, particularly the currency and interest-rate markets.
Futures and Forwards Trading is Highly Speculative and Volatile
Futures and forwards trading is speculative, and is not intended to be a complete investment program. Futures and forwards have a high degree of price variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes. Thus, significant amounts can be lost in a brief period of time. Futures and forwards trading is designed only for sophisticated investors who are able to bear the risk of capital loss. There can be no assurance that your account will achieve its investment objectives. Prospective investors are cautioned that they could lose all or substantially all of their investment. Prospective investors should understand that their account’s performance can be volatile.
Futures and Forwards Trading Involves Substantial Leverage
The low margin deposits normally required in futures and forward contracts trading permit an extremely high degree of leverage; margin requirements for futures and forward contracts trading being in some cases as little as 2% of the face value of the contracts traded. Accordingly, the Fund is able to hold positions with face values equal to several times its net assets; therefore, a relatively small price movement in a futures or forward contract may result in immediate and substantial losses to the investor. For example, if at the time of purchase, 10% of the price of the futures or forward contract is deposited as margin, a 10% decrease in the price of the futures or forward contract would, if the contract were then closed out, result in a total loss of the margin deposit before any deduction for brokerage commissions. The Fund’s ratio of margin to equity is typically 10% to 30%. As a result of this leveraging, even a small movement in the price of a contract can cause major losses.
Futures and Forwards Trading May Be Illiquid
Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contract prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single trading day no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has increased or decreased to the limit point, positions can be neither taken nor liquidated. Futures interest prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses. Also, the CFTC or exchanges may suspend or limit trading. While daily limits reduce liquidity, they do not reduce ultimate losses, and may in fact substantially increase losses because they may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading currency forward contracts.
In addition, the Fund may not be able to execute trades at favorable prices if little trading in the futures, forwards, swaps or other derivatives involved is taking place. It also is possible that an exchange or the CFTC might suspend trading in a particular contract, order immediate liquidation and settlement of a particular futures interest, or order that trading in a particular futures interest be conducted for liquidation only. During periods in October 1987, for example, trading in certain stock index futures was too illiquid for markets to function efficiently and was at one point actually suspended.
Forwards Trading and its Counterparty, Regulatory and Related Risks
The Fund may, but is not limited to, trade forward contracts in currencies. A forward contract is a contractual obligation to purchase or sell a specified quantity of a commodity or currency at a specified date in the future at a specified price and, therefore, is similar to a futures contract.
Forward contracts are not traded on exchanges; rather, banks (e.g., major money center investment banks) and dealers act as principals in these over-the-counter markets. Foreign exchange swaps and foreign exchange forwards, as well as bona fide spot foreign exchange transactions, are not subject to full regulation by the CFTC (including the clearing and platform execution mandates). Therefore, the Fund will not receive any benefit of CFTC regulation of its trading activities in excluded foreign exchange swaps and forward transactions. The Fund faces the risk of non-performance by its counterparties to forward contracts and such non-performance may cause some or all of its gains to remain unrealized.
Certain markets in which the Fund effects transactions may be in over-the-counter or "interdealer" markets, and also include unregulated private markets. Unlike futures contracts, the counterparty to forward contracts is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a clearing organization backed by a group of financial institutions. Furthermore, the participants in such markets are typically not subject to the same level of credit evaluation and regulatory oversight as are members of the “exchange based” markets. This exposes investors to the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions because of a dispute over the terms of the contract (whether or not bona fide) or because of a credit or liquidity problem, thus causing the Fund to suffer a loss. Such “counterparty risk” is accentuated for contracts with longer maturities where events may intervene to prevent settlement, or where Campbell & Company has concentrated the Fund’s transactions with a single or small group of counterparties. Campbell & Company is not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or from concentrating any or all transactions with one counterparty. However, Campbell & Company seeks to minimize credit risk primarily by dealing with counterparties that it believes are creditworthy. The ability of Campbell & Company and the Fund to transact business with any one or number of counterparties, the lack of any meaningful and independent evaluation of such counterparties’ financial capabilities and the absence of a regulated market to facilitate settlement may increase the potential for losses by the Fund.
The Fund may trade deliverable forward contracts in the inter-bank currency market. Such deliverable forward contracts are not currently traded on exchanges; rather, banks and dealers act as principals in these markets. As a result of Dodd-Frank, the CFTC now regulates non-deliverable forwards (including deliverable forwards where the parties do not intend to make or take delivery). Changes in the forward markets may entail increased costs and result in burdensome reporting requirements. There is currently no limitation on the daily price movements of forward contracts. Principals in the forward markets have no obligation to continue to make markets in the forward contracts traded. The imposition of credit controls by governmental authorities or the implementation of regulations pursuant to Dodd-Frank might limit such forward trading to less than that which Campbell & Company would otherwise recommend, to the possible detriment of the Fund.
In addition, there is no limitation on the daily price movements of forward contracts. Principals in the forward markets have no obligation to continue to make markets in the forward contracts traded. There have been periods during which certain banks or dealers have refused to quote prices for forward contracts or have quoted prices with an unusually wide spread between the price at which they are prepared to buy and that at which they are prepared to sell. The imposition of credit controls by governmental authorities might limit such forward trading to less than that which Campbell & Company and its affiliates would otherwise recommend, to the possible detriment of the Fund.
The Fund is a Party to Financial Instruments with Elements of Off-Balance Sheet Risk, Which May Cause the Fund to Lose All of Its Assets
The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures, forward, swaps and other derivatives and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Fund, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if the Fund’s trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Fund, the Fund could lose all of its assets and the limited partners would realize a 100% loss. Campbell & Company attempts to minimize potential market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio; however, these precautions may not be effective in limiting the risk of loss.
Forex/Cross Rates Trading
The Fund may trade currencies through Forex trading, which is the off-exchange trading of the exchange rate between two retail currency pairs. This may include cross rates trading, which is off-exchange trading of the exchange rate between two currency pairs other than the U.S. Dollar. The risk of loss in Forex trading can be substantial. Investors should be aware that Forex transactions are not traded on an exchange, and those funds deposited with the counterparty for Forex transactions may not receive the same protections as funds used to margin or guarantee exchange-traded futures contracts.
Swap Agreements
The Fund may enter into swap agreements. Swap agreements are privately negotiated over-the-counter derivative products in which two parties agree to exchange actual or contingent payment streams that may be calculated in relation to a rate, index, instrument, or certain securities, and a particular “notional amount.” Swaps may be subject to various types of risk, including market risk, liquidity risk, structuring risk, tax risk, and the risk of non-performance by the counterparty, including risks relating to the financial soundness and creditworthiness of the counterparty. Swaps can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Depending on their structure, swaps may increase or decrease the Fund’s exposure to commodity prices, equity or debt securities, long-term or short-term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), non-U.S. currency values, mortgage-backed securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices, baskets of securities, or inflation rates and may increase or decrease the overall volatility of the Fund’s portfolio. Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names. The Fund is not limited to any particular form of swap agreement if it determines that other forms are consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and policies. A significant factor in the performance of swaps is the change in individual commodity values, specific interest rates, currency values, or other factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from the counterparties. If a swap calls for payments by the Fund, then the Fund must have sufficient cash availability to make such payments when due. In addition, if a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap agreement would be likely to decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Dodd-Frank will mandate that a substantial portion of swap transactions must be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. While these provisions are intended in part to reduce counterparty credit risk related to swap transactions, Dodd-Frank’s success in this regard will depend on the implementation of many rules and regulations, a process that may take several years.
These hedging techniques using swaps involve one or more of the following risks: (i) imperfect correlation between the performance and value of the instrument and the value of the Fund securities or other objective of Campbell & Company; (ii) possible lack of a secondary market for closing out a position in such instrument; (iii) losses resulting from interest rate, spread or other market movements not anticipated by Campbell & Company; (iv) the possible obligation to meet additional margin or other payment requirements, all of which could worsen the Fund’s position; and (v) default or refusal to perform on the part of the counterparty with which the Fund trades. Furthermore, to the extent that any hedging strategy involves the use of over-the-counter swap transactions, such a strategy would be affected by implementation of the various regulations adopted pursuant to Dodd-Frank.
Credit Default Swaps
The Fund may invest in credit default swaps (“CDS”). CDS can be used to implement a trader’s view that a particular credit, or group of credits, will experience credit improvement or deterioration. The typical CDS requires the seller to pay to the buyer, in the event that a particular reference entity experiences specified credit events, the difference between the notional amount of the contract and the value of a portfolio of securities issued by the reference entity that the buyer delivers to the seller. In return, the buyer agrees to make periodic and/or upfront payments equal to a fixed percentage of the notional amount of the contract. The Fund may also purchase or sell CDS on a basket of reference entities or an index. In circumstances in which the Fund is the credit default swap buyer and does not own the debt securities that are deliverable under a credit default swap, the Fund is exposed to the risk that deliverable securities will not be available in the market, or will be available only at unfavorable prices, as would be the case in a so-called “short squeeze.” While the credit default swap market auction protocols reduce this risk, it is still possible that an auction will not be organized or will not be successful. In certain instances of issuer defaults or restructurings (for those CDS for which restructuring is specified as a credit event), it has been unclear under the standard industry documentation for CDS whether or not a “credit event” triggering the seller’s payment obligation had occurred. The creation of the CDS Determinations Committee in April 2009 was intended to reduce this uncertainty and create uniformity across the market, although it is possible that the efforts of the CDS Determinations Committee will not fully meet these goals. In either of these cases, the Fund would not be able to realize the full value of the credit default swap upon a default by the reference entity. As a seller of CDS, the Fund incurs leveraged exposure to the credit of the reference entity and is subject to many of the same risks it would incur if it were holding debt securities issued by the reference entity. However, the Fund will not have any legal recourse against the reference entity and will not benefit from any collateral securing the reference entity’s debt obligations. In addition, in the event the CDS Determinations Committee does not establish a cash settlement auction and identify the relevant deliverable securities, the credit default swap buyer will have broad discretion to select which of the reference entity’s debt obligations to deliver to the Fund following a credit event and will likely choose the obligations with the lowest market value in order to maximize the payment obligations of the Fund. Given the recent sharp increases in volume of CDS trading in the market, settlement of CDS may also be delayed beyond the time frame originally anticipated by counterparties. Such delays may adversely impact the Fund’s ability to otherwise productively deploy any capital that is committed with respect to such contracts.
Regulatory
The Current Markets are Subject to Governmental Intervention That May Be a Detriment to Your Investment; The Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”)
In response to the financial crises of 2008-2009, Dodd-Frank was enacted in July 2010. Dodd-Frank seeks to regulate markets, market participants and financial instruments that previously had been unregulated and substantially alters the regulation of many other markets, market participants and financial instruments. Because many provisions of Dodd-Frank require rulemaking by applicable regulators before becoming fully effective, not all of which have been finalized, and Dodd-Frank mandates multiple agency reports and studies (which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action), it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of Dodd-Frank on the Fund, Campbell & Company, and the markets in which they trade and invest. Dodd-Frank could result in certain investment strategies in which the Fund engages or may have otherwise engaged becoming non-viable or non-economic to implement. Dodd-Frank and regulations adopted pursuant to the Reform Act could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Fund.
The “Volcker Rule” component of Dodd-Frank materially restricts proprietary speculative trading by banks, “bank holding companies” and other regulated entities. As a result, there has been a significant influx of new portfolio managers into private investment funds who had previously traded institutional proprietary accounts. Such influx can only increase the competition for the Fund from other talented portfolio managers trading in the Fund’s investment sector.
Speculative Position Limits
The CFTC and certain exchanges have established position limits on the maximum net long or net short speculative positions that any person or group of persons acting in concert may hold or control in any particular futures contracts. Dodd-Frank significantly expands the CFTC’s authority to impose position limits with respect to futures contracts, swaps that are economically equivalent to futures, and certain swaps that perform a significant price discovery function. In response to this expansion of its authority, in 2013, the CFTC proposed (a) a series of new speculative position limits with respect to futures, options on futures and swaps on 28 so-called “exempt commodities” (which includes most energy and metals contracts) and (b) aggregation requirements with respect to positions across accounts with common ownership or control. The CFTC’s proposals are not yet finalized (or effective). If the CFTC is successful in these proposals, the counterparties with which the Fund deals may further limit the size or duration of positions available to the Fund. All accounts owned or managed by Campbell & Company are likely to be combined for speculative position limit purposes. The Fund could be required to liquidate positions it holds in order to comply with such limits, or may not be able to fully implement trading instructions generated by its trading models, in order to comply with such limits. Any such liquidation or limited implementation could result in substantial costs to the Fund.
Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets
Dodd-Frank includes provisions that comprehensively regulate the OTC derivatives markets for the first time. Dodd-Frank mandates that a substantial portion of OTC derivatives must be executed in regulated markets and be submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. The CFTC has now implemented mandatory clearing rules for 4 classes of interest rate swaps and 2 classes of index credit default swaps. The CFTC will also consider whether to propose mandatory clearing requirements for agricultural swaps, energy swaps, broad-based equity swaps, and foreign exchange non-deliverable forwards. OTC trades submitted for clearing will be subject to minimum initial and variation margin requirements set by the relevant clearinghouse, as well as possible SEC or CFTC mandated margin requirements. OTC derivatives dealers typically demand the unilateral ability to increase the Fund’s collateral requirements for cleared OTC trades beyond any regulatory and clearinghouse minimums. The bank regulators and the CFTC have imposed margin requirements on non-cleared OTC derivatives and new requirements that apply to the holding of customer collateral by OTC derivatives dealers. These requirements may increase the amount of collateral the Fund is required to provide and the costs associated with providing it. OTC derivative dealers also are required to post margin to the clearinghouses through which they clear their customers’ trades instead of using such margin in their operations, as was widely permitted before Dodd-Frank. This has and will continue to increase the OTC derivative dealers’ costs, and these increased costs are generally passed through to other market participants in the form of higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trade pricing, and the imposition of new or increased fees, including clearing account maintenance fees, and less favorable dealer marks.
With respect to cleared OTC derivatives, the Fund will not face a clearinghouse directly but rather through an OTC derivatives dealer that is registered with the CFTC or SEC to act as a clearing member. The Fund may face the indirect risk of the failure of another clearing member customer to meet its obligations to its clearing member. Such scenario could arise due to a default by the clearing member on its obligations to the clearinghouse, triggered by a customer’s failure to meet its obligations to the clearing member.
The CFTC now also requires certain derivative transactions that were previously executed on a bi-lateral basis in the OTC markets to be executed through a regulated futures or swap exchange or execution facility. The SEC is also expected to impose similar requirements on certain security-based derivatives in the near future, though it is not yet clear when the parallel SEC requirements will go into effect. Such requirements may make it more difficult and costly for investment funds, including the Fund, to enter into highly tailored or customized transactions. They may also render certain strategies in which the Fund might otherwise engage impossible or so costly that they will no longer be economical to implement. If the Fund decides to become a direct member of one or more of these exchanges or execution facilities, the Fund would be subject to all of the rules of the exchange or execution facility, which could bring additional risks and liabilities, and potential additional regulatory requirements.
OTC derivatives dealers are now required to register with the CFTC and will ultimately be required to register with the SEC. Dealers are subject to new minimum capital and margin requirements, business conduct standards, disclosure requirements, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, transparency requirements, position limits, limitations on conflicts of interest, and other regulatory burdens. These requirements further increase the overall costs for OTC derivative dealers, which costs may be passed along to market participants as market changes continue to be implemented. The overall impact of Dodd-Frank on the Fund remains highly uncertain and it is unclear how the OTC derivatives markets will adapt to this new regulatory regime, along with additional, sometimes overlapping, regulatory requirements imposed by non-U.S. regulators.
Major OTC derivatives market participants are now also required to register with the CFTC and will ultimately be required to register with the SEC. Campbell & Company is registered as a Forex Firm and Swap Firm with the National Futures Association and could be required to register as a major swap participant for trading in the OTC derivatives markets. Major Swap participants are also subject to new minimum capital and margin requirements, business conduct standards, disclosure requirements, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, transparency requirements, position limits, limitations on conflicts of interest, and other regulatory burdens. These requirements may further increase the overall costs for major swap participants. The overall impact of Dodd-Frank on Campbell & Company remains highly uncertain and it is unclear how the OTC derivatives markets will adapt to this new regulatory regime along with additional, sometimes overlapping, regulatory requirements imposed by non-U.S. regulators.
Although Dodd-Frank requires many OTC derivative transactions previously entered into on a principal-to-principal basis to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearinghouse, certain derivatives that may be traded by the Fund may remain principal-to-principal or OTC contracts between the Fund and third parties entered into privately. The risk of counterparty nonperformance can be significant in the case of these over-the-counter instruments, and “bid-ask” spreads may be unusually wide in these heretofore substantially unregulated markets. While Dodd-Frank is intended in part to reduce these risks, its success in this respect may not be evident for some time after Dodd-Frank is fully implemented, a process that may take several more years. To the extent not mitigated by implementation of Dodd-Frank, if at all, the risks posed by such instruments and techniques, which can be extremely complex, include: (1) credit risks (the exposure to the possibility of loss resulting from a counterparty’s failure to meet its financial obligations); (2) market risk (adverse movements in the price of a financial asset or commodity); (3) legal risks (the characterization of a transaction or a party’s legal capacity to enter into it could render the financial contract unenforceable, and the insolvency or bankruptcy of a counterparty could preempt otherwise enforceable contract rights); (4) operational risk (inadequate controls, deficient procedures, human error, system failure or fraud); (5) documentation risk (exposure to losses resulting from inadequate documentation); (6) liquidity risk (exposure to losses created by inability to prematurely terminate the derivative); (7) system risk (the risk that financial difficulties in one institution or a major market disruption will cause uncontrollable financial harm to the financial system); (8) concentration risk (exposure to losses from the concentration of closely related risks such as exposure to a particular industry or exposure linked to a particular entity); and (9) settlement risk (the risk faced when one party to a transaction has performed its obligations under a contract but has not yet received value from its counterparty).
Institutions, such as brokerage firms, banks and broker-dealers, generally have custody of the Fund’s portfolio assets and may hold such assets in “street name.” The Fund is subject to the risk that these firms and other brokers, counterparties, clearinghouses or exchanges with which the Fund deals may default on their obligations to the Fund. Any default by any of such parties could result in material losses to the Fund. Bankruptcy or fraud at one of these institutions could also impair the operational capabilities or the capital position of the Fund. In addition, securities and other assets deposited with custodians or brokers may not be clearly identified as being assets of the Fund, causing the Fund to be exposed to a credit risk with regard to such parties. The Fund generally will only be an unsecured creditor of its trading counterparties in the event of bankruptcy or administration of such counterparties. In some jurisdictions, the Fund may also only be an unsecured creditor of its brokers in the event of bankruptcy or administration of such brokers. The Fund attempts to limit its brokerage and custody transactions to well capitalized and established banks and brokerage firms in an effort to mitigate such risks, but the collapse in 2008 of the seemingly well capitalized and established Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers demonstrates the limits on the effectiveness of this approach in avoiding counterparty losses.
The Fund may effect transactions in “over-the-counter” or “interdealer” markets. The participants in such markets are typically not subject to the same level of credit evaluation and regulatory oversight as are members of “exchange-based” markets. This exposes the Fund to the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions because of a dispute over the terms of the contract (whether or not bona fide) or because of a credit or liquidity problem, thus causing the Fund to suffer a loss. Such “counterparty risk” is accentuated for contracts with longer maturities where events may intervene to prevent settlement, or where the Fund has concentrated its transactions with a single or small group of counterparties. The Fund is not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or in the size of the exposure which the Fund may provide to a given counterparty. The inability to make complete and “foolproof” evaluations of the financial capabilities of the Fund’s counterparties and the absence of a regulated market to facilitate settlement increases the risk to the Fund.
While Dodd-Frank is intended to bring more stability and lower counterparty risk to derivatives market by requiring exchange clearing of derivatives trades, not all of the Fund’s trades will be subject to the clearing requirements once they generally become effective, either because the trades are grandfathered or because they are bespoke. Furthermore, it is yet to be seen whether Dodd-Frank will be effective in reducing counterparty risk or if such risk may actually increase as a result of market uncertainty, mutuality of loss to clearinghouse members, or other reasons.
Regulatory Changes or Additional Government or Market Regulation or Actions May Alter the Operations and Profitability of the Fund
The global financial markets have in the past few years undergone pervasive and fundamental disruptions that have led to extensive and unprecedented governmental intervention. Such intervention has in certain cases been implemented on an “emergency” basis, suddenly and substantially eliminating market participants’ ability to continue to implement certain strategies or manage the risk of their outstanding positions. In addition, as one would expect given the complexities of the financial markets and the limited time frame within which governments have felt compelled to take action, these interventions have typically been unclear in scope and application, resulting in confusion and uncertainty which in itself has been materially detrimental to the efficient functioning of the markets as well as previously successful investment strategies.
Considerable regulatory attention has been focused on non-traditional investment pools. Market disruptions and the dramatic increase in the capital allocated to alternative investment strategies have led to increased governmental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the “hedge fund” industry in general. Certain legislation proposing greater regulation of the industry periodically is considered by Congress, the SEC, the CFTC and the governing bodies of non-U.S. jurisdictions. It is impossible to predict what, if any, changes in the regulations applicable to the Fund, Campbell & Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparties with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such regulation could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Fund or the ability of the Fund to continue to implement its investment strategies, as well as require increased transparency as to the identity of the Limited Partners.
The Fund, in particular, is dependent upon the use of leverage in implementing its investment strategy across the markets and instruments described herein. Any regulatory limitations may have a materially adverse impact on the Fund
The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. In addition, the CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. The regulation of swaps and futures transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. The effect of any future regulatory change on the Fund is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse.
Daily Price Fluctuation Limits Imposed by Futures Exchanges May Alter Trading Decisions for the Fund
Most U.S. futures exchanges have established “daily price fluctuation limits” which preclude the execution of trades at prices outside of the limit. Contract prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. If prices were to approach the level of the daily limits, these limits could cause a modification of Campbell & Company’s trading decisions for the Fund or force the liquidation of certain futures positions. Either of these actions may not be in the best interest of the investors. From time to time, the CFTC or the exchanges may suspend trading in market disruption circumstances. In these cases, it is possible that Campbell & Company, as trading manager, could be required to maintain a losing position that it otherwise would exit and incur significant losses or be unable to establish a position and miss a profit opportunity.
The Fund is Subject to Foreign Market Credit and Regulatory Risk
A substantial portion of Campbell & Company’s trades takes place on markets or exchanges outside the United States. From time to time, over 50% of the Fund’s overall market exposure could involve positions taken on foreign markets. The risk of loss in trading foreign futures contracts can be substantial. Participation in foreign futures contracts transactions involves the execution and clearing of trades on, or subject to the rules of, a foreign board of trade. Non-U.S. markets may not be subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts. None of the CFTC, NFA or any domestic exchange regulates activities of any foreign boards of trade, including the execution, delivery and clearing of transactions, nor do they have the power to compel enforcement of the rules of a foreign board of trade or any applicable foreign laws. Trading on foreign exchanges also presents the risks of exchange controls, expropriation, taxation and government disruptions.
Membership in a Swap Execution Facility
In an effort to facilitate the investment strategies employed by the Campbell & Company on behalf of the Fund, the Fund and/or Campbell & Company may become members of exchanges and/or swap execution facilities (“SEFs”). Such membership may subject the Fund and/or Campbell & Company to a wide range of regulation and other obligations, together with associated costs. Like any other self-regulatory organization, SEFs are expected to regularly revise and interpret their rules, and such revisions and interpretations could adversely impact the Fund. Even if the Fund opts not to trade on a SEF directly but instead through a broker, such trading may nevertheless require the Fund to consent to the SEF’s jurisdiction as a self-regulatory organization and to be subject to the SEF’s rulebook, which could adversely impact the Fund.
The Fund is Not a Regulated Investment Company and is Therefore Subject to Different Protections Than a Regulated Investment Company
Although the Fund and Campbell & Company are subject to regulation by the CFTC, the Fund is not an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Campbell & Company is not registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Accordingly, you do not have the protections afforded by those statutes which, for example, requires investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulates the relationship between the adviser and the investment company.
Tax Risks
Investors are Taxed Based on Their Share of Fund Income and Gain
Investors are taxed each year on their share of the Fund’s income and gain, if any, irrespective of whether they redeem any Units or receive any cash distribution from the Fund. Campbell & Company has the authority to make such distributions at any time in its sole discretion.
All performance information included in this Form 10K is presented on a pre-tax basis; the investors (other than tax-exempt investors) who experienced such performance had to pay the related taxes from other sources.
Tax Could be Due from Investors on Their Share of the Fund’s Ordinary Income Despite Overall Losses
Investors may be required to pay tax on their allocable share of the Fund’s ordinary income, which in the case of the Fund is the Fund’s interest income, gain on some foreign futures contracts, and certain other investment assets, even though the Fund incurs overall losses. Capital losses of individual taxpayers can be used only to offset capital gains and, in the case of non-corporate investors, $3,000 of ordinary income each year. Consequently, if an individual investor were allocated $5,000 of ordinary income and $10,000 of capital losses, the investor would owe tax on $2,000 of ordinary income even though the investor would have a $5,000 economic loss for the year. The remaining $7,000 capital loss could be used in subsequent years to offset capital gain and ordinary income, but subject to the same annual limitation on its deductibility against ordinary income.
There Could be a Limit on the Deductibility of Management and Performance Fees
Although the Fund treats the management and performance fees paid to Campbell & Company as ordinary and necessary business expenses, upon an IRS audit, the Fund may be required to treat such fees as “investment advisory fees” if the Fund’s trading activities did not constitute a trade or business for tax purposes. If the Investor’s share of expenses were deemed to be investment advisory fees, an Investor’s tax liability would likely increase because of statutory limitations applicable to miscellaneous itemized deductions, including investment advisory fees, of individual taxpayers. In addition, upon audit, a portion of the management fees might be treated as a non-deductible syndication cost or might be treated as a reduction in the Fund’s capital gain or as an increase in the Fund’s capital loss. If the management fees were so treated, an Investor’s tax liability would likely increase.
New Partnership Audit Rules
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changes the rules applicable to U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships. Under the new rules (which are generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017), among other changes and subject to certain exceptions, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and any partner’s distributive share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, or penalties attributable thereto are assessed and collected, at the partnership level. Consult with your tax advisor with respect to these changes and their potential impact on your investment in the Fund.
Other Risks
Fees and Commissions are Charged Regardless of Profitability and are Subject to Change
The Fund is subject to substantial charges payable irrespective of profitability, in addition to performance fees which are payable based on the Fund’s profitability. Included in these charges are brokerage fees and operating expenses. On the Fund’s forward trading, “bid-ask” spreads are incorporated into the pricing of forward contracts by the counterparties in addition to the brokerage fees paid by the Fund. It is not possible to quantify the “bid-ask” spreads paid by the Fund because the Fund cannot determine the profit its counterparty is making on the forward transactions. Such spreads can at times be significant.
The Fund’s Service Providers Could Fail
The institutions with which the Fund trades or invests may encounter financial difficulties that impair the operational capabilities or the capital position of the Fund. A futures broker is generally required by U.S. law to segregate all funds received from such broker’s customers from such broker’s proprietary assets. If the futures broker did not do so to the full extent required by law, the assets of the Fund might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the futures broker. Furthermore, in the event of the futures broker’s bankruptcies, the Fund could be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the futures broker’s combined customer accounts, even though certain property specifically traceable to the Fund (for example, Treasury bills deposited by the Fund with the futures brokers as margin) was held by the futures brokers. The futures broker has been the subject of regulatory and private causes of action, as described under “The Futures Broker” section of the Prospectus.
Although Campbell & Company regularly monitors the financial condition of the counterparties it uses, if the Fund’s counterparties were to become insolvent or the subject of liquidation proceedings in the United States (either under the Securities Investor Protection Act of the United States Bankruptcy Code), there exists the risk that the recovery of the Fund’s assets from such counterparty will be delayed or be a value less than the value of the assets originally entrusted to such counterparty.
Risks due to Redemption or Credit Restriction
The Fund is subject to the risk that its major institutional investors may be compelled to redeem or that the Fund’s counterparties or brokers will be required to restrict the amount of credit previously granted to the Fund due to their own financial difficulties, resulting in forced liquidation of substantial portions of the Fund’s trading program.
There are No Independent Experts Representing Investors
Campbell & Company has consulted with counsel, accountants and other experts regarding the formation and operation of the Fund. No counsel has been appointed to represent the Investors in connection with the offering of the Units. Accordingly, each prospective investor should consult his own legal, tax and financial advisers regarding the desirability of an investment in the Fund.
The Fund Places Significant Reliance on Campbell & Company and the Incapacity of its Principals Could Adversely Affect the Fund
Investors are not entitled to participate in the management of the Fund or the conduct of its business. Rather, the Fund is wholly dependent upon the services of the general partner. There can be no assurance that such services will be available for any length of time following the term of the Advisory Agreement. Furthermore, the incapacity of the general partner’s principals could have a material and adverse effect on the general partner’s ability to discharge its obligations under the Advisory Agreement. However, there is no individual principal at Campbell & Company whose absence would result in a material adverse effect on Campbell & Company’s ability to adequately carry out its advisory responsibilities.
The Fund Could Terminate Before You Achieve Your Investment Objective Causing Potential Loss of Your Investment or Disruption of Your Investment Portfolio
Campbell & Company may withdraw from the Fund upon 90 days’ notice, which would cause the Fund to terminate. Other events, such as a long-term substantial loss suffered by the Fund, could also cause the Fund to terminate before the expiration of its stated term. This could cause you to liquidate your investments and disrupt the overall maturity and timing of your investment portfolio. If the registrations with the CFTC or memberships in the National Futures Association of Campbell & Company or the futures broker were revoked or suspended, such entity would no longer be able to provide services to the Fund.
Transfers Could Be Restricted
Investors may transfer or assign Units only upon 30 days’ prior written notice to Campbell & Company and only if Campbell & Company is satisfied that the transfer complies with applicable laws and would not result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Fund. A transferee shall not become a substituted Investor without the written consent of the General Partner. See “Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership.”
Restrictions on Investment by ERISA Plans, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Campbell & Company anticipates that the underlying assets of the Fund may be considered for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (“ERISA”), and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to be assets of certain employee benefit plans and other Plans that purchase Units. Under such circumstances, the investments of the Fund and the activities of Campbell & Company will be subject to and, in certain cases, limited by, ERISA and the Code.
A Single-Advisor Fund May be More Volatile Than a Multi-Advisor Fund
The Fund is a single-advisor managed futures fund. Potential investors should understand that many managed futures funds are structured as multi-advisor funds in order to attempt to control risk and reduce volatility through combining advisors whose historical performance records have exhibited a significant degree of non-correlation with each other. As a single-advisor managed futures fund, the Fund may have increased performance volatility and a higher risk of loss than investment vehicles employing multiple advisors.
The Performance Fee Could Be an Incentive to Make Riskier Investments
Campbell & Company employs a speculative strategy for the Fund, and receives performance fees based on the trading profits earned by it for the Fund. Campbell & Company would not agree to manage the Fund’s account in the absence of such a performance fee arrangement. Accordingly, Campbell & Company may make investments that are riskier than might be made if the Fund’s assets were managed by Campbell & Company that did not require performance-based compensation.
The Fund May Distribute Profits to Investors at Inopportune Times
Campbell & Company reserves the right to make distributions of profits of the Fund to the Investors at any time in its sole discretion in order to control the growth of the assets under Campbell & Company’s management. Investors will have no choice in receiving these distributions as income, and may receive little notice that these distributions are being made. Distributions may be made at an inopportune time for the Investors.
Potential Inability to Trade or Report Due to Systems Failure Could Adversely Affect the Fund
Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the proper functioning of its internal computer systems. Accordingly, systems failures, whether due to third party failures upon which such systems are dependent or the failure of Campbell & Company’s hardware or software, could disrupt trading or make trading impossible until such failure is remedied. Any such failure, and consequential inability to trade (even for a short time), could, in certain market conditions, cause the Fund to experience significant trading losses or to miss opportunities for profitable trading. Additionally, any such failures could cause a temporary delay in reports to investors.
Failure to Receive Timely and Accurate Market Data from Third Party Vendors Could Cause Disruptions or the Inability to Trade
Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the receipt of timely and accurate market data from third party vendors. Accordingly, the failure to receive such data in a timely manner or the receipt of inaccurate data, whether due to the acts or omissions of such third party vendors or otherwise, could disrupt trading to the detriment of the Fund or make trading impossible until such failure or inaccuracy is remedied. Any such failure or inaccuracy could, in certain market conditions, cause the Fund to experience significant trading losses, effect trades in a manner which it otherwise would not have done, or miss opportunities for profitable trading. For example, the receipt of inaccurate market data may cause Campbell & Company to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would not have established (or exited), or fail to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would have established (or exited), and any subsequent correction of such inaccurate data may cause Campbell & Company to reverse such action or inaction, all of which may ultimately be to the detriment of the Fund.
Cyber Security Issues
With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, Campbell & Company is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through “hacking” or malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Cyber security failures or breaches by Campbell & Company, and other service providers (including, but not limited to custodians), and the issuers of securities in which Campbell & Company invests, have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with Campbell & Company ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. While Campbell & Company has established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such cyber attacks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. Furthermore, Campbell & Company cannot control the cyber security plans and systems put in place by service providers to Campbell & Company and issuers in which Campbell & Company invests. Campbell & Company and its clients could be negatively impacted as a result.
Conflicts of Interest Exist in the Structure and Operation of the Fund
Campbell & Company has not established any formal procedures to resolve the following conflicts of interest. Consequently, there is no independent control over how Campbell & Company resolves these conflicts which can be relied upon by investors as ensuring that the Fund is treated equitably with other Campbell & Company clients.
Campbell & Company has a conflict of interest because it acts as General Partner and sole trading advisor for the Fund. Since Campbell & Company acts as both trading advisor and General Partner for the Fund, it is very unlikely that its advisory contract will be terminated by the Fund. The fees payable to Campbell & Company were established by it and were not the subject of arm’s-length negotiation. These fees consist of a brokerage fee of up to 7% (of which 3% is retained) and a 20% performance fee. Campbell & Company, as General Partner, determines whether or not distributions are made and it receives increased fees to the extent distributions are not made. Campbell & Company has the authority to make such distributions at any time in its sole discretion.
Selling agents will be entitled to ongoing compensation as a result of their clients remaining in the Fund, so a conflict exists between the selling agent’s interest in maximizing compensation and in advising its clients to make investment decisions in the client’s best interests.
The Value Of The Shares Will Be Adversely Affected If The Fund is Required To Make Indemnification Payments
Under the Fund’s constituent document and pursuant to the service contracts, Campbell & Company and the service providers have the right to be indemnified for any liability or expense they incur, assuming that they have satisfied their standard of care and have not materially breached the applicable agreement(s). That means an indemnitee may require the assets of the Fund to be sold in order to cover losses or liability suffered by it with respect to the Fund. Any sale of that kind would reduce the value of the Shares of the Fund.
Reliance on Corporate Management and Financial Reporting
Certain of the strategies which may be implemented on behalf of the Fund rely on the financial information made available by the issuers in which the Fund invests. Campbell & Company has no ability to independently verify the financial information disseminated by the thousands of issuers in which the Fund may invest and is dependent upon the integrity of both the management of these issuers and the financial reporting process in general. Recent events have demonstrated the material losses which investors such as the Fund can incur as a result of corporate mismanagement, fraud and accounting irregularities.
The Fund’s Fees and Expenses
The Fund is required to make substantial profits in order to avoid depletion or exhaustion of its assets from fees and expenses. In addition, the performance fee paid to Campbell & Company by the Fund is based on both realized and unrealized gains and losses as of the end of the applicable period. Consequently, performance fees could be paid on unrealized gains that may never be realized by the Fund.
Compulsory Redemption of Units
Campbell & Company has the right to redeem all or any portion of the Units of any Investor, for any reason or no reason, upon not less than ten (10) days’ prior written notice to the Investor; provided, however, that the Fund may require a redemption of all or any portion of any Investor’s Units as of any date without providing any prior notice to avoid causing the assets of the Fund to be “plan assets” within the meaning of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. Amounts so redeemed will be calculated and paid as provided above for voluntary redemptions.
None.
The Registrant does not use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. Its assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash, short-term time deposits and other fixed income securities.
Campbell & Company is not aware of any material legal proceedings to which the Registrant or Campbell & Company is a party or to which any of their assets are subject.
Not Applicable.
PART II
| Item 5. |
Units of Limited Partnership Interest are not publicly traded. Units may be transferred or redeemed subject to the conditions imposed by the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. As of December 31, 2018, there were 4,001 Limited Partners in the Registrant and 89,103.635 Units of General and Limited Partnership Interest outstanding.
Campbell & Company has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Registrant will make to its Unitholders. Campbell & Company has not made any distributions as of the date hereof.
The Registrant has no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
Dollars in thousands, except per Unit amounts
The following summarized financial information is for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 192,827 | $ | 278,543 | $ | 397,752 | $ | 553,875 | $ | 690,656 | ||||||||||
| Total Partners’ Capital | 187,246 | 270,904 | 376,646 | 545,463 | 676,482 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions) | (16,517 | ) | 17,080 | (41,304 | ) | (503 | ) | 144,246 | ||||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | (28,728 | ) | (2,310 | ) | (72,322 | ) | (44,367 | ) | 100,452 | |||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) Per General and Limited Partner Unit * | (279.51 | ) | (17.18 | ) | (397.20 | ) | (208.71 | ) | 398.71 | |||||||||||
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per General and Limited Partner Unit | (279.60 | ) | (7.79 | ) | (410.88 | ) | (222.65 | ) | 461.28 | |||||||||||
| Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding | 102,781.101 | 134,438.733 | 182,079.450 | 212,574.520 | 251,943.822 | |||||||||||||||
The following summarized quarterly financial information (unaudited) presents the results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2018 and 2017.
| 1st Qtr. 2018 | 2nd Qtr. 2018 | 3rd Qtr. 2018 | 4th Qtr. 2018 | |||||||||||||
| Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions) | $ | (8,047 | ) | $ | (3,643 | ) | $ | (750 | ) | $ | (4,077 | ) | ||||
| Net Income (Loss) | (11,967 | ) | (6,653 | ) | (3,477 | ) | (6,631 | ) | ||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) per General and Limited Partner Unit * | (106.95 | ) | (62.75 | ) | (34.75 | ) | (71.19 | ) | ||||||||
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per General and Limited Partner Unit | (110.21 | ) | (63.44 | ) | (35.90 | ) | (70.05 | ) | ||||||||
| Net Asset Value per General and Limited Partner Unit at the End of the Period | 2,270.83 | 2,207.39 | 2,171.49 | 2,101.44 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Number of Units Per Period | 111,902.347 | 106,027.722 | 100,050.235 | 93,144.098 | ||||||||||||
| 1st Qtr. 2017 | 2nd Qtr. 2017 | 3rd Qtr. 2017 | 4th Qtr. 2017 | |||||||||||||
| Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions) | $ | 787 | $ | (11,377 | ) | $ | 6,447 | $ | 21,223 | |||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | (4,842 | ) | (16,328 | ) | 2,018 | 16,842 | ||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) per General and Limited Partner Unit * | (31.72 | ) | (118.72 | ) | 15.69 | 141.57 | ||||||||||
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per General and Limited Partner Unit | (32.23 | ) | (124.15 | ) | 11.63 | 136.96 | ||||||||||
| Net Asset Value per General and Limited Partner Unit at the End of the Period | 2,356.60 | 2,232.45 | 2,244.08 | 2,381.04 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Number of Units Per Period | 152,663.449 | 137,528.741 | 128,596.893 | 118,965.849 | ||||||||||||
| * | Based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period. |
Introduction
The offering of its Units of Limited Partnership Interest commenced on January 12, 1994. The initial offering terminated on April 15, 1994 and the Fund commenced operations on April 18, 1994. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and terminated on January 6, 2012.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Management believes that the estimates utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable and prudent; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The Fund’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 of the Financial Statements.
The Fund records all investments at fair value in its financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of realized and change in unrealized trading gains (losses) in the Statements of Operations. Generally, fair values are based on market prices; however, in certain circumstances, estimates are involved in determining fair value in the absence of an active market closing price (i.e., forward contracts which are traded in the inter-bank market).
Capital Resources
Effective January 6, 2012, units in the Fund were no longer offered for sale. For existing investors in the Fund, business has been and will be conducted as usual. There will be no change in trading, operations or monthly statements, etc., and redemptions will continue to be offered on a monthly basis.
The Fund does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Fund’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets, which are not operating capital or assets.
The Fund generally maintains 60 to 75% of its net asset value in cash, cash equivalents or other liquid positions in its cash management program over and above that needed to post as collateral for trading. These funds are available to meet redemptions each month. After redemptions are taken into account each month, the trade level of the Fund is adjusted and positions in the instruments the Fund trades are liquidated, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis to meet those increases or decreases in trade levels.
Liquidity
Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in the prices of futures contracts during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has reached the daily limit for that day, positions in that contract can neither be taken nor liquidated. Futures prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices, if little trading in such contracts is taking place. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund’s futures trading operations, the Fund’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.
The entire offering proceeds, without deductions, were credited to the Fund’s bank, custodial and/or cash management accounts. The Fund meets margin requirements for its trading activities by depositing cash or U.S. government securities with the futures brokers and the over-the-counter counterparties. This does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures and forward contracts. The Fund receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Fund assets.
Approximately 10% to 30% of the Fund’s assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures brokers, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury bills in segregated accounts with the futures brokers pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. Approximately 5% to 15% of the Fund’s assets are deposited with over-the-counter counterparties in order to initiate and maintain forward contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparties.
The general partner deposits the majority of those assets of the Fund that are not required to be deposited as margin with the futures brokers and over-the-counter counterparties in a custodial account with Northern Trust Company. The assets deposited in the custodial account with Northern Trust Company are segregated. Such custodial account constitutes approximately 60% to 75% of the Fund’s assets and are invested directly by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC (“PNC”). PNC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. PNC does not guarantee any interest or profits will accrue on the Fund’s assets in the custodial account. PNC invests the assets according to agreed upon investment guidelines that first preserve capital, second allow for sufficient liquidity, and third provide a yield beyond the risk-free rate. Investments can include, but are not limited to, (i) U.S. government, agency, or municipal securities; (ii) banker acceptances or certificates of deposits; (iii) commercial paper or money market securities; (iv) short-term, investment-grade corporate debt securities; or (v) investment-grade, asset backed securities.
The Fund occasionally receives margin calls (requests to post more collateral) from its futures brokers or over-the-counter counterparties, which are met by moving the required portion of the assets held in the custody accounts at Northern Trust Company to the margin accounts. In the past three years, the Fund has not needed to liquidate any position as a result of a margin call.
The Fund’s assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested in or loaned to Campbell & Company or any affiliated entities.
Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and forward contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Fund, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if the Fund’s trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Fund, the Fund could lose all of its assets and the Limited Partners would realize a 100% loss. Campbell & Company, the general partner (who also acts as trading advisor), minimizes market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 30% however, these precautions may not be effective in limiting the risk of loss.
In addition to market risk, in entering into futures and forward contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.
In the case of forward contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions; thus there may be a greater counterparty credit risk. Campbell & Company trades for the Fund only with those counterparties which it believes to be creditworthy. All positions of the Fund are valued each day at fair value. There can be no assurance that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Fund.
Disclosures About Certain Trading Activities that Include Non-Exchange Traded Contracts Accounted for at Fair Value
The Fund invests in futures and forward currency contracts. The fair value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is determined by the various futures exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) of the last business day of the reporting period.
Results of Operations
The returns for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were (11.74)%, (0.33)%, and (14.68)%, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Fund accrued brokerage fees in the amounts of $15,949,056, $22,077,027, and $33,665,203, respectively, and paid brokerage fees in the amounts of $16,448,864, $22,771,857, and $34,574,840, respectively. No performance fees were accrued or paid during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
2018 (For the Year Ended December 31)
Of the (11.74)% year to date return, approximately (5.54)% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately (8.18)% due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 1.98% due to investment income. An analysis of the (5.54)% trading losses by sector is as follows:
| Sector | % Gain (Loss) | |||
| Commodities | (1.96 | )% | ||
| Currencies | 3.56 | % | ||
| Interest Rates | 1.81 | % | ||
| Stock Indices | (8.95 | )% | ||
| (5.54 | )% | |||
The Fund showed a profit in January as gains came from foreign exchange, stock index, and interest rate holdings. Commodity positions showed some losses. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging FX markets, generated gains during January. The Fund was predominately positioned short the US dollar against other traded currencies and benefitted from a weaker greenback during the month. The weakness can be attributed to a few different themes, including expected hawkish central bank policy shifts outside the US as growth exceeds expectations, trade tensions, and US deficit concerns. The best gains came from long positioning on the British pound, Norwegian krone, and euro all versus short the US dollar. Long positioning on global stock indices also drove profits for the Fund. Most global stock indices welcomed 2018 with robust gains driven by a variety of factors. A synchronized upswing of global economic growth, stronger than expected corporate earnings results, and a major tailwind from the recently passed tax reform in the US all drove equities higher. The so-called “fear of missing out” dynamic only intensified the demand for equity exposure. The best profits were generated in the United States and across Asia, specifically in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Interest rate positions, from long-dated and short-dated bond markets, created additional gains for the Fund. Short positioning on US markets, specifically the 10-year and 5-year notes along with 90-day Eurodollar and 2-year notes, drove a bulk of the profits in the sector. US yields marched higher throughout the month as bond prices dropped amid expectations that the US Federal Reserve will continue its gradual interest rate policy tightening, as US inflation expectations continue to firm against a positive economic backdrop. Commodity holdings produced losses during the month. Profits from long positioning on precious and industrial metals and energy markets were overwhelmed by losses from short grain holdings. The weaker US dollar and stronger economic environment helped the metal and energy longs while strong export sales data hurt the grain shorts.
The Fund declined in February due to losses from stock index, commodity, and foreign exchange holdings. Fixed income positions showed partially offsetting gains. Long positioning on global stock indices drove losses for the Fund. After extending the long-term rally to start 2018, global equity markets spiked lower in the first half of the month. The sell-off was led by US stocks as markets experienced a sharp increase in volatility. While crowded equity positions sold off on profit-taking, the VIX (a measure of volatility on the S&P 500) had its largest ever daily climb on February 5th. The largest Fund loss came out of the US, specifically on the short VIX contract. Commodity holdings produced additional losses. The biggest commodity sub-sector losses were found within the energy markets as long positioning across the complex suffered on the back of increasing US supplies. Additionally, short grain positions generated losses as those markets rallied on strong export sales activity and weather concerns in key growing regions. Long precious metal positions also produced losses amid the stronger US dollar, firmer inflation, and quicker Fed tightening expectations. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging FX markets, generated losses during February. After the recent trend of a weakening US dollar, the Fund was positioned short the USD against all of our traded currencies and suffered from a broad correction in the greenback during the month. The reaction from the FX markets to the equity sell-off early in the month was relatively muted, and the market instead focused on higher US yields and heightened inflation expectations. Interest rate positions created some offsetting gains for the Fund. Short positioning on US markets drove the bulk of the profits in the sector. After global fixed income markets rallied on the risk-off trade early in February, Treasuries saw a greater correction than other government bond markets. US yields ultimately moved higher on the month amid expectations that the Federal Reserve will continue its path of tightening, while inflation expectations continue to firm against a positive economic backdrop.
March for the Fund was comprised of gains coming from commodity holdings while stock index and foreign exchange positions showed partially offsetting losses. Interest rate positions had little impact on the Fund during the month. Commodity holdings produced the best gains during March. Long positioning on the crude complex within the energy sub-sector generated profits. Geopolitical concerns around the US potentially pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal, bullish inventory data, and speculation that Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) might extend existing production cuts all combined to push energy prices higher during the month. Mixed positioning across the softs sub-sector proved profitable in March as well. A short sugar position gained amid ongoing global surplus concerns while a long cocoa holding also experienced profits as output worries from the Ivory Coast lifted prices. Long positioning on global stock indices produced some losses for the Fund. Holdings in Australia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, and the US contributed to some of the worst performance within the sector. Fear over a potential global trade war, tightening financial conditions after the US Federal Reserve raised interest rates, and concern over additional turnover among senior members of President Trump’s inner circle all put pressure on global equity markets during the month. Foreign exchange positioning on developed FX markets drove the sector’s losses during March. A late month rally in the US dollar produced losses from short dollar positions. The largest loss came from short US dollar versus a long euro holding. Dampening of concerns around a global trade war and quarter-end flows into the greenback both helped to boost the currency in the waning days of the month. Positioning on emerging market currencies produced almost no P&L effect for the Fund during March. Interest rate positions contributed a negligible P&L impact for the Fund. Gains from long-term markets were offset by losses in short-term markets leaving the sector nearly unchanged for the month.
Losses in April came from foreign exchange and commodity positions while fixed income and stock index holdings produced some partially offsetting gains for the Fund. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging FX markets, generated losses in April. After the recent trend of a weakening US dollar, the Fund was positioned short the US dollar against most of our traded currencies and suffered from a broad correction in the greenback. Early in the month, FX markets focused more on trade frictions and geopolitical tension but as those concerns eased, the market instead looked to higher US interest rates and heightened inflation expectations, causing a US dollar rally. Commodity holdings produced additional losses during April. The biggest sub-sector detractor was found within the industrial metals complex. Short positioning on aluminum suffered when the commodity pushed higher on supply worries following Russian sanctions by the White House. Energy and soft commodity holdings produced partially offsetting gains. Long positioning across the crude complex generated profits as the sub-sector rose to multi-year highs on supply disruptions. Interest rate positions, from long-dated and short-dated bond markets, created gains for the Fund. Short positioning on US markets, specifically the 10-year and 5-year notes along with Eurodollar and 2-year notes, drove profits in the sector. US bond prices fell and yields trended higher with the 10-year note yield piercing the widely scrutinized 3% level intra-month. Firming inflation expectations and the rebound in the US dollar provided support to yields. Long positioning on several stock indices produced additional gains as global stock markets rose in April. Reduced tariff tensions, strong US earnings, and eased geopolitical concerns on the Korean peninsula provided a tailwind for equities during the month. Additionally, European stocks were supported after the European Central Bank (“ECB”) steered away from any surprises during their April meeting.
The Fund showed a decline in May from all four asset classes traded – Interest Rates, FX, Commodities, and Stock Indices. Interest rate positions generated some of the largest losses for the Fund during May. Long positioning on the Italian 10-year note suffered amid a sharp sell-off due to political turmoil in the country which sparked speculation that Italy might leave the European Union. That same turmoil sent US interest rate markets higher due to safe-haven buying which hurt the Fund as it was positioned short across the entire US interest rate curve in anticipation of further FOMC rate hikes later this year. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging FX markets, also generated losses during the month. A long position on the British pound (versus short US dollar) declined in value as the ongoing BREXIT impasse, weaker UK economic data, and fading Bank of England rate-hike expectations all conspired to push the currency lower. A long position on the Turkish lira added to sector losses as economic and political woes in that country sent the EM currency to record lows against the dollar. Commodity holdings produced additional losses as well. A short sugar position suffered as the soft commodity advanced as Brazilian supply concerns boosted prices amid a trucker strike in the country. Other sub-sector losses were experienced in the grains, meats, and precious metals. The energy sub-sector, however, provided some partially offsetting gains. Long positioning across the crude complex benefitted as prices generally stayed in the uptrend that began almost one year ago. Long positioning on a variety of global stock indices produced some good profits for the Fund early in the month as most world indices experienced gains. Unfortunately, later in May, the political concerns that flared in Italy and renewed trade tensions between the US and China trigged a sharp reversal in prices, especially in Europe and Asia, which resulted in losses for some of the holdings. A long position on the Italian stock index was one of the worst performing markets for the sector.
Gains in June came from all four asset classes traded by the Fund – FX, Interest Rates, Commodities, and Stock Indices. Foreign exchange positioning generated some of the strongest gains during the month. While the positive returns were dominated by our short developed market positions (versus long the USD), we also saw gains across various emerging market currencies as well. The US dollar saw choppy trading early in June but ultimately continued the uptrend from the first two months of the second quarter. The DXY dollar index hit fresh 2018 highs and the greenback finished the month stronger versus the majority of our tradeable currencies. The back and forth headlines on a potential global trade war, coupled with dovish policies outside of the US, proved to be the major macro themes driving foreign exchange markets during the month. Interest rate positions generated additional gains for the Fund during June. Short positioning in US markets, specifically the 90-day Eurodollar and 2-year notes, created the bulk of fixed income gains as yields rose (prices fell) on the back of a 25 basis point FOMC rate hike, hawkish US Fed commentary, and a higher-than-expected projection for two additional US rate hikes this year. Policy divergence between the Fed and other central banks, such as the ECB and the Bank of Japan, benefitted our positioning. Commodity holdings produced small additional profits as well. A short corn position experienced strong profits as the grain fell to multi-month lows amid above-average crop progress and on concerns that trade tensions between the US and China could hurt US exports. Long energy positions produced profits after a larger-than-expected reduction in US oil inventories. Long positioning on a variety of global stock indices added slightly to the positive monthly result. Stock index returns ebbed and flowed on the numerous headlines surrounding trade tensions between the US and her trading partners. Some of the best monthly stock index gains were found in Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Losses in July came from commodities, FX and interest rates, while stock indices provided some partially offsetting gains. Commodity holdings produced some of the largest monthly losses for the Fund. Long energy positions declined as the complex fell from multi-year highs amid a myriad of bearish developments including global trade tensions and climbing output from OPEC. Short grain positions suffered as the agricultural complex rallied sharply sparking a short squeeze amid supply concerns. Long positioning on the industrial metals also created losses due to a sell-off created by fears over a global trade war and related concerns about future demand from China. Foreign exchange positioning generated additional losses during the month. Short commodity currency holdings (versus long US dollar) produced losses for the Fund as those markets rose as trade war fears dampened somewhat in the second half of the month. Short European foreign exchange positioning (versus long US dollar) also experienced losses, most notably from the Swedish krona which rallied after the Riksbank (Sweden’s central bank) turned more hawkish amid stronger economic data in that country during the month. Interest rate positions were also a drag on the Fund during July. Long positioning in Europe and the APAC region suffered as bond investors grew more concerned that global central banks are beginning to slowly withdraw stimulus with an eye towards higher interest rates in the future. Short positioning across much of the US interest rate curve provided some partially offsetting gains as US fixed income prices fell with other global bond markets. Long positioning on a variety of global stock indices added some partially offsetting gains to the Fund during the month. Most stock indices enjoyed a bullish tailwind from a stronger-than-expected second quarter earnings season which eclipsed the uncertainty caused by on-again, off-again international trade tensions.
Profits in August came from commodities and FX while interest rates and stock indices provided some partially offsetting losses during the month. Commodity holdings produced some of the largest monthly gains for the Fund. Short grain positions profited as the sub-sector sold off amid trade turmoil, beneficial weather, and higher yield estimates. Long energy holdings across the crude complex experienced gains as looming US sanctions on Iran, which are expected to cripple the nation’s oil exports, as well as larger than expected US inventory draws, fueled prices higher. The soft commodity sub-sector also added gains to the bottom-line, led by a short coffee holding. Coffee prices were pressured to a 12-year low amid a weaker Brazilian real and record harvest forecasts in Brazil. Foreign exchange positioning generated additional profits during the month. Long US dollar positions, against both developed and emerging market currencies, generated the gains. A short New Zealand dollar holding (versus long US dollar) experienced some of the greatest gains as weaker economic data and a dovish central bank caused the kiwi to sell-off. In emerging markets, a short holding on the South African rand (versus long US dollar) provided profits as expectations for further increases in US interest rates continued to put pressure on emerging market currencies. Interest rate positions were a drag on the Fund during August. Short positioning on US and United Kingdom fixed income markets suffered amid flight-to-safety buying and short-covering. Mounting concerns over the stability of emerging markets, especially in countries such as Argentina and Turkey, fueled demand for the relative safety of fixed income instruments as potential contagion fears spread. Long positioning on a variety of global stock indices also detracted from the monthly gains of the Fund. European and Asia long holdings generated most of the losses. Ongoing global trade tensions linked with uncertainty over BREXIT negotiations in the UK, and weaker than expected tech earnings, in Asia pressured those regions lower.
The Fund declined in September due to losses from FX and stock index positions, while commodity and fixed income holdings produced offsetting gains for the Fund. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging markets, generated losses in September. After the recent trend of a strengthening US dollar and emerging market weakness, the Fund was positioned long the US dollar against most of our traded currencies and suffered from a correction in the greenback. Early in the month, FX markets focused more on trade frictions and geopolitical tension but those concerns gradually eased and emerging market currencies saw their first monthly gain since March. Stock index holdings produced additional losses for the Fund. Long positioning on a variety of indices suffered from choppy markets that were whipsawed by global trade concerns between the US and her major economic partners. Balancing losses were gains seen from the Nikkei, which posted its best month in a year. Japanese shares were helped by a weaker yen which acted as a tailwind to exporters and a government which may be willing to make a trade deal. Interest rate positions from short US fixed income markets created gains for the Fund during the month. US bond markets fell and yields rose due to firming inflation data, a hike by the US Federal Reserve, and the decreasing risk of emerging market contagion. Providing smaller offsetting losses were our long positions on the long-dated European bond markets. Commodity holdings produced additional offsetting gains for the Fund during the month. The largest sub-sector gains were found in energies as long WTI and Brent oil positions profited. Oil prices rose on the potential for refinery disruptions from tropical storms and fears of a supply crunch from looming US-lead sanctions on Iran, outweighing the bearish effects of escalating disputes over global trade.
Losses in October came from stock index and commodity positions, while foreign exchange and fixed income holdings produced some partially offsetting gains for the Fund. Stock index holdings generated steep losses for the Fund during the month. Long positioning on a variety of global indices suffered as most world stocks sold-off sharply. A myriad of negative headwinds for global equities contributed to the sudden risk-off tone including peak earnings concerns, tighter financial conditions, trade-war fears, decelerating Chinese economic growth, the strong US dollar, waning benefits from US tax reform, geopolitical tensions on several fronts, a slowdown in corporate buyback activity ahead of Q3 earnings reports, and a weakening US housing market. Commodity holdings caused additional losses for the Fund during October. The energy and softs sub-sectors produced the worst results. Long positioning on the petroleum complex sold-off in sympathy with global stocks. In the softs, a short position on coffee produced losses as that commodity rose about 10% during the month, fueled by Brazilian real strength that triggered a bout of short covering. The grains sub-sector provided some offsetting gains as short holdings profited as the complex traded lower during the month amid the stronger US dollar. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging markets, generated some partially offsetting gains in October. Long positioning on the US dollar, the highest yielding G10 currency, profited as key European currencies stumbled following renewed BREXIT-related concerns and some disappointing economic data in the region. In the G10 basket of currencies, only the Japanese yen outperformed the US dollar as safe-haven buying benefitted the yen over the dollar. Interest rate positions from long German and Japanese markets created additional partially offsetting gains. Safe-haven demand pushed fixed income prices up (yields fell) which boosted the Fund’s long holdings, leading to a positive sector outcome during October.
In November losses came from foreign exchange, fixed income, and stock index positions, while commodity holdings produced some partially offsetting gains for the Fund. Foreign exchange positioning, in both developed and emerging markets, generated the largest losses in November. Long positioning on the US dollar against most of our traded currencies proved to be a headwind for the Fund. After having one of its best months in two years in October, the US dollar saw choppy trading throughout the month of November. A potential shift in US FOMC interest rate policy, trade war headlines, and a softening US inflation outlook helped prevent the dollar from a continuation of its broader move higher. Interest rate positions from short US 2-year notes and short US 90-day Eurodollars led to sector losses. Short-dated fixed income markets rallied in the US (yields fell) as several dovish speeches by US FOMC members, including Chairman Powell, indicated that the Fed might be closer to pausing US interest rate hikes than the market previously expected. Stock index positions also detracted during the month. The Fund held a mix of long and short positioning across the traded universe of global indexes. Most global indexes experienced a choppy month as traders weighed a mix of news related to trade wars, US Fed policy, global economic growth, and BREXIT. Some small gains were found in North America, but more than offsetting losses were realized in Europe and Asia. Commodity holdings produced some partially offsetting gains for the Fund during November, with the energy sub-sector realizing the best results. Long positioning on natural gas proved profitable as colder than expected temperatures in the US set-off a rally that led to a massive short-squeeze, sending prices higher by almost 40% during the month. A short on gasoline was also profitable as the petroleum complex continued its recent sell-off. Some partially offsetting losses were seen in a short soybean position as hopes for a truce in the US-Chinese trade war sent prices higher.
Profits in December were seen across all major asset classes traded - foreign exchange, commodities, interest rates, and stock indices. Foreign exchange positioning, mostly from developed markets, generated some robust gains in December. Short positioning on several of the so-called commodity currencies, primarily the Australian dollar and Canadian dollar (all versus long the US dollar), produced the best gains. The Canadian dollar sold off in sympathy with the meltdown in prices across the petroleum complex during the month. The Aussie dollar fell in value as China, a major export market for Australian commodities, reported weaker than expected economic data, generating concern about future demand. Commodity holdings also produced solid gains for the Fund during December, with the softs, grains, and industrial metals sub-sectors realizing the best results. Short positioning on cotton profited as prices fell due to concerns surrounding a recent slowdown in export sales activity. A short holding on soybeans proved profitable as prices fell amid a slowdown in US exports due to the ongoing US trade dispute with China. Short positioning on aluminum also produced profits from falling prices fueled by a barrage of weaker than expected economic data out of China. Interest rate positions from short-dated instruments provided additional profits during the month. Long positioning on short-term notes issued by the US, Europe, Canada, and the United Kingdom all generated gains. These positions benefitted from flight-to-safety flows seen during December as investors aggressively sold stocks and sought the relative safety that fixed income instruments provide. Stock index positions also added to gains during December. Short positioning on several global indices generated profits as most global stocks experienced a steep sell-off. A myriad of headwinds sent stocks reeling including higher US interest rates, signs of a global economic slowdown, ongoing tensions between the US and China over trade policies, and a partial US government shutdown fueled by bipartisan tensions.
2017 (For the Year Ended December 31)
Of the (0.33)% year to date return, approximately (8.15)% was due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 6.67% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.15% due to investment income. An analysis of the 6.67% trading gains by sector is as follows:
| Sector | % Gain (Loss) | |||
| Commodities | (5.08 | )% | ||
| Currencies | (5.06 | )% | ||
| Interest Rates | (4.29 | )% | ||
| Stock Indices | 21.10 | % | ||
| 6.67 | % | |||
FX and commodity losses offset gains in stock indices led to a down January as losses came from foreign exchange, commodity, and interest rate positions while stock index holdings produced some partially offsetting gains. Foreign exchange (FX) produced some of the largest losses during the month. Positioning within FX was broadly long the US dollar versus most other major currencies. Following the election of Donald Trump, the US dollar strengthened and our trading systems generally aligned positioning with that momentum. However, January saw a reversal of this trend as investors pared back their bullish bets on the greenback amid worries that President Trump was focusing more on protectionism than on pro-growth economic policies. Our FX holdings suffered as a result of this broad reversal in the US dollar. Commodity holdings added to the January losses. Within the energy sub-sector, long positioning on gasoline produced losses amid bearish inventory data. Short soybean holdings, part of the grains sub-sector, experienced losses due to a weakening US dollar and flood conditions in Argentina. In the softs sub-sector, a short on coffee saw losses due to a stronger Brazilian real and a downgrade to Brazil’s output forecast. Some partially offsetting gains came from the industrial metals sub-sector. Long positioning on zinc, copper, and aluminum all saw gains amid a combination of bullish fundamentals, especially from China, and some supply disruptions. Interest rate holdings also produced losses. Long holdings on the German 10-year note saw declines as bond prices fell amid rising inflation in the Eurozone. Inflation reached a 4-year high and approached the ECB’s stated 2% target. Stock index holdings contributed some offsetting gains. Long holdings across our universe of global stock indices benefited from a continuation of the rally that started with the election of Trump and his expected reflationary policies. Concerns over President Trump’s Executive Order limiting some immigration into the US capped gains late in the month as some investors became unnerved by the action.
Gains in stock indices, FX, and interest rates led to a profitable February as profits came from stock indices, foreign exchange, and interest rate positions while commodity holdings produced some partially offsetting losses for the Fund. Stock index holdings contributed some of the strongest gains to the Fund. Long holdings across the Fund’s universe of global stock indices benefited from generally better than expected economic data. The Bloomberg US indicator of economic surprises reached its strongest level since 2012. Solid fourth quarter 2016 corporate earnings reports also helped to fuel the rally, along with a steadily improving US labor market. Stock markets continued to look past the new Trump administration’s lack of policy implementation details and focused more on the potential benefits that tax reform, deregulation, and infrastructure spending might provide to global economies. Foreign exchange (FX) produced some additional gains as the Fund’s models took advantage of the mixed performance among the developed and emerging FX markets. Long positioning on higher-yielding currencies, such as the South African rand which rallied over 3% in February, proved profitable. A short position on the euro also showed a gain when it weakened on the back of French election concerns in the EU. Interest rate holdings also produced profits. Long positioning on longer-dated instruments within Germany provided some of the best gains. German 5-year and 10-year notes both rallied on a flight to quality move as investors grew more concerned about the spring French Presidential election. Marine Le Pen, the head of the far-right French Front National Party who has threatened to try to pull France out of the EU if elected, rose in the polls during the month. Commodity holdings modestly detracted from the February gains for the Fund. Profits from precious metals (mostly from silver) and industrial metals (mostly from aluminum) were more than offset by losses in the other sub-sectors. Grains were one of the worst performing sub-sectors as a short position on wheat suffered as the market rose to a 7-month high amid tight global ending stock projections.
Mixed performance across the asset classes traded led to a down March as losses came from interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity positions while stock index holdings produced some partially offsetting gains. Interest rate holdings produced some of the largest losses during the month. Long positioning on instruments within Germany sold off on higher EU inflation readings and as investors grew more comfortable that anti-EU political populism in France and the Netherlands was stalling. Short positioning within the US was hurt when fixed income instruments reversed the recent downtrend mid-month amid a less hawkish FOMC message communicated after their decision to hike interest rates on March 15th. Foreign exchange produced some additional losses as our models failed to successfully navigate a choppy month of price action for the US dollar. For example, long positioning on the New Zealand dollar (kiwi) suffered early in the month as that currency weakened against the US dollar leading up to the mid-month FOMC meeting which was widely expected to be hawkish. Our models then flipped to short the kiwi only to see the currency begin to strengthen when the US dollar sold off on the more dovish than expected message delivered by the Federal Reserve. Commodity holdings modestly detracted from the Fund during March. Some of the largest monthly losses came from the energy, precious metal, industrial metal, and meat sub-sectors. Partially offsetting gains were found in the soft commodity and grain sub-sectors, with some of the best profits coming from sugar and wheat. Stock index holdings contributed the strongest profits to the Fund during the month. Some of the best gains were found via long positions on European stock indices which benefited from the ongoing global reflation trade and dampening concerns around anti-EU political populism in the region. Our models also saw success in Asia as long positioning within Australia, Hong Kong, and Taiwan proved profitable as ongoing improvements in the Chinese economy, linked with enduring hopes for US tax reform and infrastructure spending, supported shares around the globe.
April gains came from stock index, foreign exchange, and interest rate holdings while commodities produced some partially offsetting losses for the Fund. Stock index holdings contributed the strongest profits to the Fund during the month. Global stock markets generally shook off new tensions with North Korea and a US cruise-missile strike on targets in Syria. A market-friendly French election outcome, above-trend US earnings growth, and movement on a number of policies by the White House all provided a positive offset to the worrisome news. Long positioning on global stock indices benefitted from the gains shown by equities during the month with some of the best profits coming from the United States and Hong Kong. Foreign exchange holdings added to the Fund gains during April. A short position on the Canadian dollar (versus the US dollar) benefitted as the loonie fell in value after President Trump announced a planned tariff on softwood lumber imports from Canada and also threatened to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Some partially offsetting losses were seen from a short on the euro (versus the US dollar) when currency markets cheered the French election outcome and sent the euro sharply higher late in the month. Interest rate positions produced some additional profits. Long positioning on 10-year notes in Canada and Japan saw some of the best monthly gains within the sector as yields fell in those countries which sent bond prices higher. Commodity holdings produced losses during the month. Long positioning on crude suffered when that market saw a price drop as record US crude stockpiles began to raise doubts about OPEC’s ability to curtail a global supply glut. Long holdings on the industrial metals showed losses when an unwind of the global reflation trade pushed commodity prices lower. Some gains were found in long positioning on live cattle which saw sharp price gains amid supply concerns following declines in slaughter estimates and a drop in cold storage inventories.
May shows losses caused by foreign exchange and commodity positions, while stock index and interest rate holdings produced partially offsetting gains for the Fund. Foreign exchange holdings produced some of the largest losses during May. Long positioning on the US dollar against most developed currencies drove the decline. An ongoing unwind of the Trump-induced reflation-trade, linked with some mixed US economic data and generally stronger European data, conspired to send the greenback lower during the month. The political turmoil that gripped Washington DC added to the US dollar angst while a soothing of political tensions in Europe, due to the election of Emmanuel Macron in France, helped support European currencies. Commodity holdings also produced losses during the month. Long positioning on natural gas suffered when that market saw a price drop as mild weather in the US reduced demand and as a new trade agreement with China is expected to encourage US drillers to produce more of the commodity. A short cocoa position suffered amid flood conditions and unrest in the Ivory Coast which sent prices higher. The grains produced some partially offsetting gains as a short soybean position profited from a sell-off in that market due to continued concerns surrounding increased South American planting expectations and steady US planting progress. Long holdings on global stock indices contributed some of the strongest profits to the Fund. Some of the best gains were seen in Hong Kong and the US as technology stocks performed particularly well. Improving global growth, linked with still-accommodative central banks and ongoing hope the Trump administration will ultimately get tax reform and infrastructure spending passed, kept the buy-the-dip mentality firmly in place. Interest rate positions produced additional profits. Long positioning on 10-year notes in Canada, Australia, and Germany produced gains as central banks in those regions indicated they planned to remain patient with their accommodative policies.
The Fund showed a loss in June led by down interest rate holdings as losses came from interest rate, commodities and foreign exchange positions, while stock index holdings had little impact on the Fund’s profit & loss (P&L) during the month. Interest rate positions produced the largest losses for the Fund during June. Long positioning on European, Australian, United Kingdom, and Canadian interest rate notes were some of the worst performing markets within the sector for the Fund. Late in the month, Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank (ECB), gave a speech at the opening of the ECB’s Forum on Central Banking which heightened expectations for monetary policy tapering in Europe. In subsequent days, several other major central banks, such as the Bank of England (BOE) and the Bank of Canada (BOC), also delivered more hawkish messages. The US has already embarked on a series of interest rate hikes and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has indicated that more hikes are likely to come. The specter of an end to ultra-loose monetary policy on both sides of the Atlantic triggered a widespread sell-off in global fixed income markets which sent global yields higher and had a detrimental impact on the Fund. Commodity holdings produced additional losses during June. Some of the worst losses came from short positioning on wheat which rose amid declines in crop conditions, strong export sales, and a weaker US dollar. Partially-offsetting gains were found in short energy positions as the crude complex saw a broad-based sell-off. Short soft commodity holdings benefitted from a decline fueled by ample supply expectations. Foreign exchange markets also contributed to losses this month. Long holdings on the US dollar against the Canadian dollar was one of the worst performing FX positions. The loonie appreciated about 4% versus the US dollar as the BOC kick-started the theme of policy normalization which led to losses. Long holdings on global stock indices ended the month showing little impact on the Fund. Early month gains were given back late in June as investors were unnerved by the global rise in rates which pushed many markets down from recent highs.
The Fund showed a gain in July led by foreign exchange and stock index positions, while commodity and interest rate holdings produced partially offsetting losses during the month. Foreign exchange positions produced some of the strongest monthly gains for the Fund. Broad-based US dollar weakness during July was the result of expectations that the US Federal Reserve would have to pause their recent path of higher interest rates due to weaker inflation readings for the US economy. In addition, the unpredictability of the Trump administration and the general inability of the US Congress to make progress on any substantive policy priorities weighed on the US currency. Some of the best gains were found in long positioning on the Australian dollar, euro, Canadian dollar, and Norwegian krone (all versus short US dollars). Long holdings on global stock indices also contributed to profits. Some of the best returns were found in Hong Kong, the United States, India, and the Netherlands. Second quarter earnings reports were generally stronger than expected and a less hawkish US Federal Reserve both provided a tailwind for stocks. Equities saw a period of unusually low volatility with the S&P VIX index touching an all-time low during July. Commodity holdings produced some of the largest losses during July. A short soybean holding drove losses in the grains sub-sector as the market rallied amid lowered crop conditions. A short position on silver was hurt amid higher demand and a weaker US dollar which conspired to send the price of the precious metal higher. In the softs sub-sector, a coffee short suffered as that market advanced to a 3-month high amid the weaker dollar and falling expectations for the Brazilian crop. Small offsetting gains were found in the energy sub-sector where a long on gasoline benefited from higher prices as crude inventories showed a contraction during the month. Interest rate positions produced some smaller losses for the Fund. Choppy price action was difficult for the trading systems to navigate as rate markets grappled with changing central bank messaging and a consolidation of the sharp sell-off seen in June.
The Fund showed a gain in August led by interest rate and commodity holdings, while foreign exchange and stock index positions produced some partially offsetting losses during the month. Interest rate positions produced the best gains for the Fund. Long positioning on German and Japanese long-term interest rate notes contributed some of the best sector gains. Early in the month, a spike in demand for safe-haven assets drove bond prices higher amid new threats by North Korea to launch missiles at the US territory of Guam. Later in the month, bonds benefitted again when North Korea launched a missile that flew over Japan, triggering a new round of safety-seeking trades. Commodity holdings produced some additional profits during August. Long positioning on copper and zinc experienced gains on the back of strengthening Chinese demand and improving macro conditions. Short wheat positions also produced profits as those markets sold-off amid steady harvest progress and improved crop ratings. The Fund experienced some partially offsetting losses in the energies, precious metals, and meats sub-sectors. Foreign exchange positions produced losses for the Fund. Long positioning on the New Zealand dollar (versus the US dollar) suffered when that country’s central bank took a more dovish tone in the monetary policy statement they issued early in August. The head of their central bank, Graeme Wheeler, then continued to jaw-bone down the currency in speeches later in the month. Long positioning on the British pound (versus the US dollar) also caused losses when that currency fell in value as UK economic data lagged Europe and prospects for higher UK interest rates diminished. Global stock indices also contributed to losses during the month. Short positioning on the S&P 500 Volatility Index (also known as the VIX) produced losses for the Fund as that index shot up more than 30% amid the North Korean missile threats early in August. Some partially offsetting gains were found in a long holding on the Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong which continued its strong year-to-date uptrend.
September losses came from foreign exchange, commodity, and interest rate holdings, while stock index positions produced some partially offsetting gains during the month. Foreign exchange positions produced losses for the Fund. Short US dollar positioning against a variety of developed market and emerging market currencies drove the Fund declines. The US dollar began to strengthen post the September 20th Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) interest rate meeting. On balance, the FOMC communication was more hawkish than expected. Later in the month, several FOMC members reinforced the hawkish rhetoric which cemented expectations for one more interest rate hike in 2017 which fueled the US dollar higher, hurting the Fund. Commodity holdings produced additional losses during September. The biggest sub-sector losses were found within the industrial metals complex. Long positioning on copper and nickel suffered due to the stronger US dollar and amid several bearish developments in China. Long positioning on gasoline also led to losses when that market sold-off as the impact from Hurricane Harvey on the Gulf Coast refinery infrastructure was less severe than originally expected. Interest rate positions created further losses for the Fund. Long positioning on German government notes produced some of the largest losses within the sector. German notes fell in tandem with US notes as a reflation trade fueled by President Trump’s tax overhaul plan generally pushed global yields higher. Global stock indices contributed some partially offsetting gains for the Fund. Long positioning in Japan, the United States, and continental Europe produced some of the best gains. A weaker yen helped boost shares in Japan. In the US, shares traded higher as prospects for tax reform trumped two major hurricanes and threats from North Korea. A still accommodative European central bank and the reelection of Chancellor Angela Merkel in Germany kept a strong tailwind behind stocks in that region.
October gains came from stock index, commodity, and interest rate holdings, while foreign exchange positions produced some partially offsetting losses during the month. Long positioning on global stock indices drove some of the strongest gains for the Fund during the month. A synchronized upswing in global growth, earnings recovery, and still-supportive global monetary policy have been the key tenets of a fundamental narrative that has boosted stocks this year. All three dynamics were on display during October. Global economic data was generally better-than-expected, as were third quarter corporate earnings reports. Most global central banks continued to maintain a dovish bias. The European Central Bank (ECB) announced a “dovish taper” to their quantitative easing program that was well received by global markets. Traction in Washington DC around US tax reform provided an added tailwind for equity prices. Commodity holdings produced some additional profits during October. A long position on Brent crude produced some of the best gains within the energy sub-sector. A combination of ongoing production cuts from OPEC and supply disruptions combined to push prices higher. Long positioning on copper, nickel, and zinc produced gains as industrial metal prices rose amid bullish dynamics emanating from China. Interest rate positions added to the gains for the Fund. Long holdings on sovereign European notes benefitted when the ECB monetary policy announcement was more dovish than expected which pushed the securities higher as yields fell. Tensions in Spain around Catalonia’s bid for independence also drove flight-to-safety buying in the instruments. Foreign exchange positions contributed some partially offsetting losses for the Fund. Short US dollar positioning (against a variety of currencies) suffered amid a broad-based rise in the greenback during the month. The possibility for tax reform in the US linked with expectations for yet another interest rate hike from the Federal Reserve in December helped to boost the US currency to three-month highs.
The Fund showed a gain in November from stock indices, interest rates, and foreign exchange, while commodity positions produced some partially offsetting losses. Long positioning on global stock indices drove the strongest gains for the Fund during the month with the US, Hong Kong, and Japan producing some of the best returns. Positive developments out of Washington DC regarding US tax reform proved to be a major tailwind for many indices, as was a stronger-than-expected third quarter corporate earnings season. European indices produced some partially offsetting losses during the month as a stronger euro and some regional political angst produced underperformance from those markets. Interest rate positions provided small gains to the Fund. Gains in Australia, France, Japan, and Italy were partially offset by losses in the US, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Trendless, range bound price action was seen across most of the global interest rate markets traded within the Fund, leading to subdued profits. Foreign exchange positions contributed some additional profits. A long holding on the euro (versus the US dollar) was one of the best performing positions. The euro rose in value against the US dollar amid steadily improving economic fundamentals in the euro-zone as evidenced by Germany’s economy, Europe’s largest, reporting its best Gross Domestic Product (GDP) number since 2011. Commodity holdings produced the largest offsetting losses during November. Precious metals were one of the worst performing sub-sectors. Both gold and silver experienced choppy intra-month price action caused by conflicting drivers which proved difficult for our quantitative trading systems to successfully navigate. Long positioning on the meat complex suffered as prices fell amid supply concerns. Falling industrial metal prices produced some losses as long positioning suffered from signs of a Chinese economic slowdown as that government looks to reign in growth.
Gains in December came from commodity and stock index holdings, while interest rate and foreign exchange positions produced some partially offsetting losses. Commodity holdings produced some of the largest Fund gains during the month. Long positioning within the crude complex, specifically on Brent, Gasoil, and WTI Crude, produced some of the best profits. The Brent holding profited as that product rose to two-and-a-half year highs due to supply concerns. Long holdings on the base metals complex, notably on zinc, aluminum, and copper, also showed gains as a slew of Chinese supply disruptions set a year-end rally into motion, benefitting the Fund. Long positioning on global stock indices drove additional profits for the Fund. Global stock indices showed some mixed returns during the month. Long positioning on indices within the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada produced some of the best results. Successful passage of US tax reform helped US indices, while bullish commodity price action was supportive of the other indices as they have more concentrated exposure to stocks tied to the oil and metals markets. Interest rate positions, primarily from long-dated bond markets, created some of the largest losses for the Fund. Long positioning on sovereign bond markets in Australia, Germany, Italy, and the United States experienced some of the worst losses amid a synchronized global sell-off which caused yields to rise. The sell-off was sparked by an amalgamation of bearish drivers including more hawkish central banks, higher expected issuance by governments, and growing concern that US tax reform, linked with persistently stronger global growth, will start to increase inflationary pressures. Foreign exchange positioning, specifically in developed FX markets, also generated losses during December. Short positioning across some of the commodity currencies, the New Zealand dollar, Australian dollar, and Canadian dollar (all versus the US dollar) suffered as those currencies appreciated in value. Intra-month strength in the energy and industrial metal complexes provided a tailwind for these currencies.
2016 (For the Year Ended December 31)
Of the (14.68)% return for the year, approximately (7.39)% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately (8.09)% due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 0.80% due to investment income. An analysis of the (7.39)% trading loss by sector is as follows:
| Sector | % Gain (Loss) | |||
| Commodities | (11.29 | )% | ||
| Currencies | (0.73 | )% | ||
| Interest Rates | 3.61 | % | ||
| Stock Indices | 1.02 | % | ||
| (7.39 | )% | |||
The Fund showed a gain during January as profits came from foreign exchange, interest rate, and commodity holdings while stock indices provided small offsetting losses during the month. Foreign exchange positions from both trend following and non-trend strategies produced some of the best gains. Long US dollar positioning versus short commodity currencies, such as the Mexican peso, Canadian dollar, and South African rand, showed gains as the commodity sell-off continued, especially within the energy complex. Short positioning on the British pound versus the US dollar also benefitted as global growth concerns reduced the likelihood of a Bank of England interest rate hike and on heightened speculation of a UK exit from the European Union (the so-called “BREXIT”). Interest rate positions provided additional gains to the Fund during January, particularly from the non-trend systems. Long positioning on both long-dated and short-dated instruments experienced profits. The sharp sell-off in global stock indices fueled safe-haven buying in interest rate products. In addition, ongoing dovish commentary from global central banks added to the upward price pressure. In fact, near month-end, the Bank of Japan adopted a new, and unexpected, negative interest rate policy that fueled additional buying of global interest rate markets. Some additional gains during the month came from commodity positions, with both trend and non-trend strategies contributing. Short positioning within the energy complex, namely on WTI and Brent, produced some of the best gains. Oil prices touched a 12-year low during the month as Iranian export sanctions were lifted which only added to the persistent oversupply within global markets as world demand continued to wane. Short positioning on copper returned profits as that metal saw lower prices amid ongoing economic weakness within China. A short position on gold produced some offsetting losses as risk-off sentiment produced safe-haven buying of the metal. Stock indices showed losses as long positioning from the trend systems suffered amid the steep sell-off in equities as global growth concerns persisted to start the New Year.
Gains in February came from interest rate, commodity, and stock index holdings while foreign exchange positions provided some offsetting losses during the month. Interest rate positions provided some of the best gains to the Fund during February, particularly from the non-trend systems. Long positioning on long-dated instruments experienced profits, while short-dated products saw small losses. The best sector gains were found within Germany and the UK. Concerns about European bank stocks were a major contributor to the risk-off sentiment during February which provided a tailwind to interest rate markets in the region. Anxieties over a possible UK exit from the European Union also drove safe-haven buying. Additional gains during the month came from commodity positions, with both trend and non-trend strategies contributing. Shorts within the energy complex, namely on natural gas, produced some of the best gains. Natural gas prices fell to a 17-year low amid milder temperatures and abundant production. Short positioning on the grains, especially corn and wheat, benefitted when prices dropped due to weaker export sales and healthy global supplies. Short positions on gold and silver produced some offsetting sector losses as the risk-off environment produced safe-haven buying of those metals. Stock index holdings showed a very small gain. A short position on the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong was one of the best performing trades as that index fell amid ongoing concerns over the health of the Chinese economy. Foreign exchange positions from both trend following and non-trend strategies produced losses for the Fund. February saw some very choppy price action within the various currency pairs making for a difficult trading environment. The Fund was short the Japanese yen versus the US dollar and experienced losses when the yen strengthened despite the Bank of Japan’s recent negative interest rate policy announcement. Trend following systems saw some offsetting gains from a short on the British pound as BREXIT concerns drove the currency to new multi-year lows.
March showed losses driven by commodity positioning, while foreign exchange, interest rate and stock index holdings had only a slightly negative impact during the month. Commodity positions from both the trend and non-trend systems provided some of the biggest losses during March. Short positioning across the petroleum complex suffered when those markets moved higher in response to an Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announcement that the organization had scheduled a mid-April meeting to discuss output levels. Natural gas shorts hurt the Fund as well as that product rallied amid larger than expected inventory draws. Short holdings on the grain markets also led to losses with soybeans being one of the worst performers. Strong exports, political tensions in Brazil, and lower inventory projections were all behind the move higher. Coffee shorts also suffered as the political tensions in Brazil drove prices up. Foreign exchange positions added small additional losses. Long positioning on the Australian dollar produced profits as a dovish U.S. Federal Reserve and ultra-loose policies in Japan and Europe collectively boosted the appeal of higher yielding currencies. A short on the British pound produced some offsetting losses as that currency experienced an oversold bounce fueled in part by a more dovish US Fed. Interest rate holdings had a slightly negative impact on the monthly P&L. Price action during March was very choppy making it difficult for some systems to find and hold profitable trades. The first half of the month saw fixed income prices chop lower as stock prices moved higher. The second half of the month saw a sharp reversal higher as the US Fed took a more dovish than expected stance on interest rate policy. Stock index holdings also had only a slightly negative monthly P&L impact. Global equity indices generally moved higher during March as commodity prices bounced and global central banks continued to provide an accommodative backdrop for stocks. The Fund held a mix of long and short holdings leading to offsetting gains and losses that left the sector nearly flat at month-end.
The Fund showed a steep decline in April as losses came from interest rate, commodity, stock index, and foreign exchange holdings. Interest rate holdings had the largest negative impact on the monthly P&L with both trend following and non-trend systems suffering. Fixed income prices saw a sharp reversal lower during the month which hurt long positioning within the Fund. Increasing inflation expectations amid a sharp bounce in crude oil prices, which have rallied over 60% from the decade-plus low seen in February, pushed interest rate yields higher and prices lower. Tentative signs that Chinese economic activity was beginning to stabilize only added to the downward pressure as money rotated to riskier assets, such as stocks and commodities. Commodity positions from both the trend and non-trend systems also provided losses to the Fund during April. Short positioning on the energies, industrial metals, soft commodities, and grain markets all contributed to the losses. Many markets in each of these sub-sectors saw sharp intra-month reversals to the upside fueled by short covering amid a revived “risk-on” environment. A weaker US dollar also contributed upward momentum to many of the dollar-denominated commodity markets. Some offsetting gains came from long positioning on silver which benefitted from the weaker US dollar and low inventory levels and short holdings on the cattle complex as those markets retreated on the back of slow seasonal demand and oversupply concerns. Stock index holdings showed a negative monthly P&L impact, especially from the trend models. Global equity indices generally moved higher during April as commodity prices bounced and global central banks continued to provide an accommodative backdrop for stocks. Foreign exchange positions added additional losses. Short positioning on the British pound versus the US dollar showed losses when the pound strengthened as fears began to subside that the United Kingdom might vote to exit the European Union at a planned referendum in June (BREXIT).
Losses in commodities and foreign exchange leave the Fund with a decline in May. Commodity positions from both the trend and non-trend models provided losses to the Fund. Long holdings on gold and silver both suffered as the US dollar strengthened during the month. Short positioning within the energy complex generated losses as the price of crude rallied on back of the supply and demand equilibrium showing tentative signs of rebalancing. In the meats, short cattle positions suffered as those markets rose amid signs of increased demand. Small offsetting profits were found within the grains sub-sector as a long soybean position profited due to strong US export sales and South American crop concerns. Foreign exchange positions from both the trend and non-trend systems also showed losses during May. After weakening for several months in a row, the US dollar steadily strengthened throughout most of the month hurting the Fund’s short dollar positions against a variety of currencies. Front-end US yields repriced higher as the Fed reminded markets through multiple channels that all FOMC meetings going forward are “live” with respect to potential policy change, fueling US dollar strength. Interest rate holdings had one of the largest positive impacts on the monthly P&L with both trend following and non-trend systems showing gains. Long positioning on long-dated markets in Europe, Australia, and the UK produced some of the best gains. A mix of weaker economic data, dovish central bank actions, and concern over the late June UK referendum to leave the Euro-zone (BREXIT) all helped to push prices higher in those regions during May. Stock index holdings showed a positive monthly P&L impact, especially from the non-trend models. The faster-reacting non-trend systems were able to successfully navigate the choppy price action seen in many of the global stock indices. A short position on the S&P 500 volatility index benefitted from the general risk-on environment in the second half of the month which pushed that index sharply lower.
The Fund showed a profit in June as gains came from interest rate and commodity markets, while stock index and foreign exchange holdings produced some losses. Interest rate holdings had the largest positive impact on the monthly P&L with both trend following and non-trend systems showing gains. Long positions across global interest rate markets showed strong profits, especially within Europe. United Kingdom voters surprised and shocked markets worldwide with their decision to leave the European Union. The BREXIT sparked a risk-off reaction globally, with government bond futures among the largest beneficiaries, as investors accepted record low bond yields in multiple markets in exchange for the safety of government paper. Commodity positions from the trend models provided some additional gains. Long positioning on the precious metals was one of the best performing sub-sectors. The flight to safety triggered by the UK BREXIT vote along with dampened expectations of additional US FOMC interest rate hikes this year pushed gold and silver prices sharply higher. The grains sub-sector contributed additional profits led by a long soybean holding which rose amid a bullish June crop report. Short positioning on natural gas produced some offsetting losses as lower average inventories, as calculated by the US EIA, helped contribute to a short squeeze in that market. Stock index holdings produced some of the largest monthly losses with both the trend following and non-trend systems contributing. Long global stock index exposure suffered from risk-off selling caused by the uncertainty that the UK BREXIT vote created. In addition, a short position on the CBOE volatility index future produced losses amid the sharp spike in volatility due to the UK referendum. Foreign exchange positions showed some small losses during June. Mixed FX positioning against the US dollar led to mostly offsetting gains and losses. Profits were seen on a long Japanese yen position which strengthened in a flight-to safety trade. Losses were produced by positioning on the Euro which saw choppy price action leading up to and after the surprising BREXIT decision.
The Fund showed a profit in July as gains came from stock index, commodity, and interest rate markets, while foreign exchange holdings produced some small losses. Stock index holdings produced some of the largest monthly gains with both the trend following and non-trend systems contributing. Global equity markets shook off the fear and uncertainty created by the UK’s decision to leave the European Union and produced strong gains during July. Long positioning within the Fund across global stock indices benefitted from the higher prices with holdings in Australia, the UK, Canada, Germany, and Taiwan producing some of the best performance. Generally better than expected Q2 earnings results, attractive dividend yields, and the expectation that global central banks will keep rates lower for longer all offset terror attacks, a coup attempt in Turkey, and uncertainty over the US presidential election. Commodity positions from both the trend and non-trend models provided some additional gains to the Fund. Short positioning across the energy complex was profitable with both gasoline and WTI crude producing some of the best returns. Inventory reports during the month showed that supply was plentiful leading to lower prices. Precious metals added to gains within the sector as long positioning benefitted from a slightly weaker US dollar and ongoing accommodation from the US Federal Reserve. Some offsetting losses were produced within the grain sub-sector. A long position on soybeans suffered from weaker demand amid robust crop expectations. Interest rate holdings had a positive impact on the monthly P&L with trend following systems showing gains. Long positioning on long-dated interest rate markets produced some of the best profits. Holdings in Australia benefitted from an accommodative central bank that is grappling with persistently low inflation readings and uncertainty around the newly elected Prime Minister’s effectiveness given his very narrow victory. Foreign exchange positioning produced small losses driven by non-trend following strategies. Choppy price action and a mix of long and short positioning versus the US dollar led to the muted P&L within the FX sector overall.
Losses primarily came from commodity, foreign exchange, and interest rate positions, while stock index positions closed flat for the month of August. Commodity holdings from the trend models provided some of the largest losses to the Fund. Positioning within the energy and precious metal sub-sectors caused a bulk of the damage. Short positioning within the energy complex suffered from concerns that OPEC might try to rein in production at an informal meeting scheduled for September which helped fuel a short squeeze. Long holdings on precious metals also caused losses as growing expectations for higher interest rates in the US led to a sell-off in both gold and silver. The Fund did receive some offsetting gains from a short position on wheat which saw its price decline to a 10-year low on abundant supply. Foreign exchange positions from both trend following and non-trend following strategies also showed losses during August. Some of the largest monthly losses were seen in the euro, Mexican peso, and Australian dollar (all versus the US dollar). Choppy price action in the euro and peso created a difficult environment for our systems to trade profitably. A multi-month uptrend in the Aussie dollar produced losses when that currency experienced a price reversal beginning in the middle of the month. Interest rate holdings had a negative impact on the monthly P&L with trend following and non-trend systems both showing losses. Long positioning, especially within the US, suffered from a better than expected July US employment report released early in the month. A growing stream of comments from US Federal Reserve members signaling their willingness to potentially raise interest rates at one of three remaining 2016 FOMC meetings also pressured interest rate markets lower, sending yields higher. Stock index P&L was relatively flat as a long position within Australia was hurt by a sell-off in the financial, mining, and telecommunication sectors. Some offsetting gains were found in a long position within Hong Kong which rose in value on better than expected earnings and amid the news that the long-planned stock-trading link between Hong Kong and China was officially approved.
September losses came from interest rate, commodity, stock index, and foreign exchange positions. Interest rate holdings had a negative impact on the monthly P&L with trend following and non-trend systems both showing losses. Uncertainty and nervousness over central bank interest rate decisions drove global fixed income prices lower in the first half of September as the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, and the European Central Bank all made intra-month policy announcements. On balance, all three major central banks leaned more hawkish than expected, with the US FOMC indicating that one interest rate hike was likely before year-end. The Fund was hurt by long positioning on long-dated markets, especially within Australia, the US, and the UK. Commodity holdings from both non-trend and trend models provided additional losses. A surprise announcement from OPEC that the cartel had agreed to some production cuts sent the crude complex sharply higher, hurting short positioning. Oversold price bounces in corn and wheat hurt short positioning within the grains. Some offsetting gains were seen in the softs and meats. A continued trend higher in the price of sugar benefitted long positioning, while a drop in both hog and cattle prices was profitable for short holdings, as prices fell about 23% and 7%, respectively. Stock index holdings added to the monthly losses as the non-trend systems struggled to successfully trade choppy global equity index markets. Global stocks sold off in the first half of the month following bond prices lower as yields rose. Stocks then bounced once markets digested major central bank announcements, only to see prices fall on financial health concerns surrounding Deutsche Bank (DB). Prices then rebounded when headlines turned more positive on the outlook for DB near month-end. Foreign exchange positions from the non-trend following strategies showed small losses. The non-trend systems failed to successfully navigate a very choppy environment for many major currencies. Among the biggest P&L contributors, the Mexican peso produced gains, while the Canadian dollar and euro produced losses.
The Fund showed a decline in October as losses from commodity and interest rate holdings were only partially offset by gains within foreign exchange positions. Stock index positioning had little impact on the Fund during the month. Commodity holdings from both trend and non-trend models produced losses. Short positions on corn and wheat suffered as prices rose due to stronger than expected export sales. The trading systems experienced losses in natural gas amid choppy price action as the market weighed warmer-than-normal weather and a structural tightening of the supply-and-demand balance. Long positioning on sugar saw losses as prices fell late in the month on improving growing conditions in Brazil. Long holdings on precious metals were hurt by the stronger US dollar. Interest rate holdings had a negative impact on the monthly P&L with trend following and non-trend systems both showing losses. Long positioning on long-dated interest rate markets within Europe experienced losses as prices fell during the month. The European Central Bank (ECB) failed to announce an extension to their existing quantitative easing (QE) program which pushed prices lower across continental Europe. Additional losses came from a long holding on the Australian 10-year note as that country’s central bank indicated that a rate cut was further away than the market had been expecting which caused futures to decline. Foreign exchange positions, especially from the non-trend following strategies, produced some partially offsetting gains during October. The US dollar was stronger across our universe of currencies. Some of the best gains came from short positioning on the British pound, Swedish krona, and the euro (all versus the US dollar). Expectations grew during the month that the US Federal Reserve was on-track to hike interest rates by the end of 2016 which helped lead to overall dollar strength. Stock index holdings had little impact on the Fund during the month. A mix of gains and losses across the global stock index market set produced mostly offsetting P&L which led to relatively flat performance from the asset class.
The Fund showed a decline in November as losses came primarily from commodity holdings while interest rate, foreign exchange, and stock index positions had a muted impact on the Fund during the month. Commodity holdings produced some of the largest losses to the Fund. Short positioning within the energy sub-sector was hurt in the second half of the month when OPEC confounded skeptics by securing its first production cut since 2008. This action sent prices sharply higher across the complex. Trend following strategies suffered in both coffee and sugar as long positions produced losses after prices for both commodities dropped due to higher supply expectations. A short live cattle position produced losses as that market rallied amid firmer wholesale prices and supportive inventory data. Some offsetting gains were found within the industrial metals sub-sector. A long zinc position profited as the metal’s price rose sharply, helped by tight supply and a pledge from US President-elect Trump to invest in infrastructure projects. Additional gains came from a short wheat holding which profited as prices dropped over 5% amid ample supply expectations. Foreign exchange positions produced some small losses during November. A long position on the Mexican peso (versus the US dollar) negatively impacted the Fund when Donald Trump’s unexpected presidential election victory sent that currency sharply lower amid fears over possible new protectionist policies. Interest rate holdings also produced small losses during the month. Trend following systems with long look-backs were most negatively impacted as the Trump victory pushed long-end prices sharply lower as yields rose. Bond markets began pricing in an expected Trump administration fiscal stimulus package, including increased infrastructure spending and tax cuts, which are viewed as inflationary. Stock index holdings produced flat results for the month. Long positioning in North American indices benefitted from the Trump victory as potential new infrastructure spending and a stronger US dollar helped shares rise in value. Offsetting losses were realized from long positioning in European indices.
The Fund advanced in December as gains came from stock index holdings while commodity positions produced partially offsetting losses, with five of the six sub-sectors traded showing declines. Foreign exchange and interest rate positions had little overall impact on the Fund during the month. Global stock index holdings contributed the best gains to the Fund during December. Long positioning on European indices produced some of the largest gains for the sector. During the month, the European Central Bank (ECB) gave a boost to equities when they extended their quantitative easing program. A calming of events within Italy around their political leadership and their ongoing banking crisis also helped markets. Additional gains came from the US, Canada, and Australia as those markets continued to benefit from expectations of reflationary policies from President-elect Trump and his incoming administration. Commodity holdings produced the largest offsetting losses to the Fund. Long positioning on copper and zinc incurred losses amid profit-taking after the recent run-up in prices driven by better Chinese economic growth and the Trump effect. A short lean hog holding suffered as that market rallied amid solid export activity and a lowered US production projection from the USDA. A short on natural gas produced losses when prices moved higher amid colder temperatures and below normal inventory stockpiles. Some small offsetting gains were found in a short cocoa position which fell amid higher production in Ivory Coast, driving prices to over 3-1/2 year lows. Interest rate holdings produced small profits for the Fund during December. Long positioning on the German 10-year note was one of the best performing markets, helped by the extension of stimulus from the ECB. Foreign exchange holdings had little impact on the Fund P&L during the month. Mixed positioning across the currencies traded led to mostly offsetting gains and losses leading to the muted impact overall.
Introduction
Past Results Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance
The Fund is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Fund’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Fund’s main line of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Fund’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Fund’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Fund’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.
The Fund rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Fund’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.
Standard of Materiality
Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage and multiplier features of the Fund’s market sensitive instruments.
Quantifying the Fund’s Trading Value at Risk
Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements
The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Fund’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact (such as the dollar amount of maintenance margin required for market risk sensitive instruments held at the end of the reporting period).
The Fund’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded is estimated in terms of Value at Risk (VaR). The Fund estimates VaR using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 97.5%) which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear exposures to risks, including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices or other market factors to which the portfolio is sensitive. The Fund’s VaR at a one day 97.5% confidence level corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 40 trading days or one day in 40. VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome.
The Fund uses approximately one quarter of daily market data and revalues its portfolio for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily “simulated profit and loss” outcomes. The VaR is the 2.5 percentile of this distribution.
The VaR for a sector represents the 2.5 percentile of outcomes for the aggregate exposures associated with that sector alone. The current methodology used to calculate the aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Fund’s open positions across all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes.
The Fund’s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and does not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. It is also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements.
VaR models, including the Fund’s, are continually evolving as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by the Fund in its daily risk management activities. Please further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities.
Because the business of the Fund is the speculative trading of futures and forwards, the composition of the Fund’s trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading day, which could positively or negatively materially impact market risk as measured by VaR.
The Fund’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors
The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Fund’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and the trading gains/losses by market category for the years then ended.
| December 31, 2018 | ||||||||
| Market Sector | Value at Risk* | Trading Gain/(Loss)** | ||||||
| Commodities | 0.87 | % | (1.96 | )% | ||||
| Currencies | 0.80 | % | 3.56 | % | ||||
| Interest Rates | 0.47 | % | 1.81 | % | ||||
| Stock Indices | 0.76 | % | (8.95 | )% | ||||
| Aggregate/Total | 2.11 | % | (5.54 | )% | ||||
| * | The VaR for a sector represents the 2.5 percentile of outcomes for the aggregate exposures associated with that sector alone. The aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Fund's open positions accross all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes. |
| ** | Of the (11.74)% year to date return, approximately (5.54)% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately (8.18)% due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 1.98% due to investment income. |
| December 31, 2017 | ||||||||
| Market Sector | Value at Risk* | Trading Gain/(Loss)** | ||||||
| Commodities | 0.53 | % | (5.08 | )% | ||||
| Currencies | 0.42 | % | (5.06 | )% | ||||
| Interest Rates | 0.52 | % | (4.29 | )% | ||||
| Stock Indices | 0.74 | % | 21.10 | % | ||||
| Aggregate/Total | 1.24 | % | 6.67 | % | ||||
| * | The VaR for a sector represents the 2.5 percentile of outcomes for the aggregate exposures associated with that sector alone. The aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Fund’s open positions across all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes. |
| ** | Of the (0.33)% year to date return, approximately (8.15)% was due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 6.67% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.15% due to investment income. |
| December 31, 2016 | ||||||||
| Market Sector | Value at Risk* | Trading Gain/(Loss)** | ||||||
| Commodities | 0.60 | % | (11.29 | )% | ||||
| Currencies | 0.58 | % | (0.73 | )% | ||||
| Interest Rates | 0.22 | % | 3.61 | % | ||||
| Stock Indices | 0.81 | % | 1.02 | % | ||||
| Aggregate/Total | 1.43 | % | (7.39 | )% | ||||
| * | The VaR for a sector represents the 2.5 percentile of outcomes for the aggregate exposures associated with that sector alone. The aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Fund’s open positions across all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes. |
| ** | Of the (14.68)% return for the year, approximately (7.39)% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately (8.09)% due to brokerage fees, operating expenses and offering costs borne by the Fund, offset by approximately 0.80% due to investment income. |
Material Limitations of Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk
The following limitations of VaR as an assessment of market risk should be noted:
| 1) | Past changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market movements; |
| 2) | Changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the VaR model; |
| 3) | VaR results reflect past trading positions while future risk depends on future positions; |
| 4) | VaR using a one day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and |
| 5) | The historical market risk factor data for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements. |
VaR is not necessarily representative of historic risk nor should it be used to predict the Fund’s future financial performance or its ability to manage and monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated or that such losses will not occur more than once in 40 trading days.
Non-Trading Risk
The Fund has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are immaterial. The Fund also has non-trading market risk as a result of investing a portion of its available assets in U.S. Treasury Bills held at the broker and over-the-counter counterparty. The market risk represented by these investments is minimal. Finally, the Fund has non-trading market risk on fixed income securities held as part of its cash management program. The cash manager will use its best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Fund but provide no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Fund as a result of such management.
Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures
The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Fund’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Fund manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Fund’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by Campbell & Company for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Fund’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Fund.
The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Fund as of December 31, 2018, by market sector.
Currencies
The Fund’s currency exposure is to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The Fund trades in a large number of currencies, including cross-rates — i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Campbell & Company does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Fund’s currency sector will change significantly in the future.
Interest Rates
Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond positions held by the Fund and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Fund’s profitability. The Fund’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and the other G-7 countries. Campbell & Company anticipates that G-7 interest rates will remain the primary rate exposure of the Fund for the foreseeable future. Changes in the interest rate environment will have the most impact on longer dated fixed income positions, at points of time throughout the year the majority of the speculative positions held by the Fund may be held in medium to long-term fixed income positions.
Stock Indices
The Fund’s primary equity exposure is to equity price risk in the G-7 countries as well as Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Netherlands, India, South Africa and Sweden. The stock index futures traded by the Fund are by law limited to futures on broadly based indices. The Fund is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. Markets that trade in a narrow range could result in the Fund’s positions being “whipsawed” into numerous small losses.
Energy
The Fund’s primary energy market exposure is to natural gas, crude oil and derivative product price movements, often resulting from international political developments and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the perceived outcome. Oil and gas prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.
Metals
The Fund’s metals market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of aluminum, copper, gold, lead, nickel, palladium, platinum, silver and zinc.
Agricultural
The Fund’s agricultural exposure is to the fluctuations of the price of cattle, cocoa, coffee, corn, cotton, hogs, soy, sugar, and wheat.
Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure
The following were the non-trading risk exposures of the Fund as of December 31, 2018.
Foreign Currency Balances
The Fund’s primary foreign currency balances are in Australian Dollar, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Euros, Hong Kong Dollar, Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollar, South African Rand and Swedish Krona. The Fund controls the non-trading risk of these balances by regularly converting these balances back into dollars (no less frequently than twice a month, and more frequently if a particular foreign currency balance becomes unusually large).
Fixed Income Securities and Short Term Investments
The Fund’s primary market exposure in instruments (other than treasury positions described in the subsequent section) held other than for trading is in its fixed income portfolio. The cash manager, PNC, has authority to make certain investments on behalf of the Fund. All securities purchased by the cash manager on behalf of the Fund will be held in the Fund’s custody account at the custodian. The cash manager will use its best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Fund but provide no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Fund as a result of such management.
U.S. Treasury Bill Positions for Margin Purposes
The Fund also has market exposure in its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio. The Fund holds U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities no longer than six months. Violent fluctuations in prevailing interest rates could cause minimal mark-to-market losses on the Fund’s U.S. Treasury Bills, although substantially all of these short-term investments are held to maturity.
Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure
The means by which the Fund and Campbell & Company, severally, attempt to manage the risk of the Fund’s open positions is essentially the same in all market categories traded. Campbell & Company applies risk management policies to its trading which generally limit the total exposure that may be taken per “risk unit” of assets under management. In addition, Campbell & Company follows diversification guidelines (often formulated in terms of the balanced volatility between markets and correlated groups), as well as reducing position sizes dynamically in response to trading losses.
General
The Fund is unaware of any (i) anticipated known demands, commitments or capital expenditures; (ii) material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources; or (iii) trends or uncertainties that will have a material effect on operations. From time to time, certain regulatory agencies have proposed increased margin requirements on futures contracts. Because the Fund generally will use a small percentage of assets as margin, the Fund does not believe that any increase in margin requirements, as proposed, will have a material effect on the Fund’s operations.
Financial statements meeting the requirements of Regulation S-X appear beginning on Page 44 of this report. The supplementary financial information specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is included in Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
None.
Campbell & Company, the general partner of the Fund, with the participation of the general partner’s chief executive officer and managing director, operations and finance, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) with respect to the Fund as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on their evaluation, the chief executive officer and managing director, operations and finance have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in the general partner’s internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Fund identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Fund.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Campbell & Company, LP (“Campbell & Company”), the general partner of the Fund is responsible for the management of the Fund. Management of Campbell & Company (“Management”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Fund’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| ● | Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Fund; |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Fund’s transactions are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and; |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Fund’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In making this assessment, Management used the framework established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
None.
PART III
The Registrant has no directors or executive officers. The Registrant has no employees. It is managed by Campbell & Company in its capacity as managing operator. Campbell & Company has been registered as a commodity pool operator (CPO) since September 1982. Its main business address is 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland, 21209, (410) 413-2600. Campbell & Company’s directors and executive officers are as follows:
G. William Andrews, born in 1972, joined Campbell & Company in April 1997 and, since November 2012, has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC registered investment adviser. Mr. Andrews is a member of the Board of Directors of various organizations, including Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company; Campbell Core Offshore Limited, an international business company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; The Campbell Offshore Fund Limited SPC (formerly known as The Campbell Global Assets Fund Limited SPC), a segregated portfolio company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; Campbell Managed Futures Offshore Fund – CAD, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; Campbell Equity Alpha Offshore Fund Limited, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; Campbell Equity Alpha Master Fund LP, an exempted limited partnership registered in the Cayman Islands; and Campbell Financial Services, LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer and FINRA member. Since August 2017, Mr. Andrews has served as an officer of Campbell & Company Delaware, LLC, the general partner of the Campbell Equity Alpha Onshore Fund, LP, a limited partnership formed in Delaware, the Campbell Equity Alpha Cayman, LP, an exempted limited partnership registered in the Cayman Islands, and the Campbell Equity Alpha Master Fund LP. Since November 2014, Mr. Andrews has also served as an officer of Campbell & Company, LLC. Since August 2018 Mr. Andrews has served on the firm’s Executive Committee. Since March 2010, Mr. Andrews has served on the firm’s Investment Committee. Mr. Andrews served as Co-Director of Research from November 2011 until October 2012; Chief Operating Officer from January 2010 to May 2012; Vice President, Director of Operations from April 2007 to January 2010; Vice President: Director of Research Operations from March 2006 to April 2007 and Research Assistant from March 2005 to February 2006. Mr. Andrews has also served as the Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC from March 2010 to June 2012. Mr. Andrews holds an M.B.A. in Finance from Loyola College in Maryland and a Bachelor of Social Science from Waikato University, New Zealand. Mr. Andrews became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective June 21, 2006 and March 29, 2010, respectively and registered as an NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company effective April 10, 2013 and April 11, 2013, respectively.
D. Keith Campbell, born in 1942, has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company since its inception in January 1972. Mr. Campbell currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company, LLC, which is the general partner of Campbell & Company. Since August 2018 Mr. Campbell has served on the firm’s Executive Committee. Mr. Campbell served as the President of Campbell & Company until January 1994, and was Chief Executive Officer until January 1998. Mr. Campbell has acted as a commodity trading advisor since January 1972 when, as general partner of the Campbell Fund Trust, a limited partnership engaged in commodity futures trading, he assumed sole responsibility for trading decisions made on its behalf. Since then, he has applied various technical trading models to numerous discretionary futures trading accounts. Mr. Campbell, as a sole proprietor, has been registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator since June 30, 1982 and a NFA Associate Member since July 1, 1984. Mr. Campbell became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company effective September 29, 1978 and as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person effective September 29, 1997 and October 29, 1997, respectively. Mr. Campbell became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective July 9, 2008. With respect to Mr. Campbell’s previously referenced commodity pool operator registration, Mr. Campbell became listed as a Principal effective March 10, 1975 and became registered as an Associated Person, a Swap Associated Person and a Forex Associated Person on February 28, 2013, March 1, 2013 and March 15, 2013, respectively.
Dr. Kevin Cole, born in 1972, joined Campbell & Company in October 2003 and has served as Chief Research Officer of both Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser, since June 2017. Since August 2018 Mr. Cole has served on the firm’s Executive Committee. In February 2017, Dr. Cole was appointed to serve Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser. Since he joined the firm Dr. Cole has had a significant role in the ongoing research and development of Campbell & Company’s trading systems. Dr. Cole formerly served as Deputy Chief Research Officer from January 2016 to June 2017, Director, Investment Strategies from October 2013 to December 2015, Research Manager from October 2006 to September 2013 and Senior Researcher from October 2003 to September 2006. He was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee in January 2016. As Chief Research Officer, Dr. Cole is responsible for the management of the research and investment process at the firm. Dr. Cole holds a B.A. in Economics from Georgetown University, and received a Ph.D. in Economics with a concentration in Finance from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Cole was listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective March 20, 2017.
Michael S. Harris, born in 1975, joined Campbell & Company in July 2000, and has served as President of both Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC registered investment adviser, since November 2012. Mr. Harris is a member of the Board of Directors for various organizations, including Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company; Campbell Core Offshore Limited, an international business company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; Campbell Managed Futures Offshore Fund – CAD, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; and Campbell Financial Services, LLC, an SEC- registered broker-dealer and FINRA member. Since August 2017, Mr. Harris has served as an officer of Campbell & Company Delaware, LLC, the general partner of the Campbell Equity Alpha Onshore Fund, LP, a limited partnership formed in Delaware, the Campbell Equity Alpha Cayman, LP, an exempted limited partnership registered in the Cayman Islands, and the Campbell Equity Alpha Master Fund LP. Since November 2014, Mr. Harris has served as an officer of Campbell & Company, LLC. Mr. Harris has served as the President of Campbell Financial Services, LLC, since April 2014. Since August 2018 Mr. Harris has served on the firm’s Executive Committee. Mr. Harris has been a member of the firm’s Investment Committee since March 2010. Mr. Harris served as Vice President and Director of Trading from June 2006 to October 2012 and as Deputy Manager of Trading from September 2004 to May 2012. Mr. Harris holds a B.A. in Economics and Japanese Studies from Gettysburg College. He also spent time studying abroad at Kansai Gaidai University in Osaka, Japan. Mr. Harris became registered as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company effective August 19, 2000 and September 21, 2000, respectively; and registered as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective February 25, 2013. Mr. Harris became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective June 15, 2006 and November 13, 2012, respectively. Mr. Harris became listed as a Swap Associated Person of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC on March 1, 2013. Mr. Harris became listed as a Forex Associated Person of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC on March 5, 2013. Mr. Harris became a member of the Board of Directors of the Foreign Exchange Professionals Association on February 10, 2015. Since October 2013, Mr. Harris has served on the Board of Directors of the Managed Funds Association, the leading advocate for sound business practices in the alternative investment industry. Mr. Harris has also been designated as a Branch Manager of Campbell & Company, LP since May 5, 2016.
Thomas P. Lloyd, born in 1959, joined Campbell & Company in September 2005 and, since December 2018, has served as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary of both Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor, and an SEC-registered investment adviser. In this capacity, Mr. Lloyd is currently involved in all aspects of legal affairs, compliance and regulatory oversight. Since joining the firm, Mr. Lloyd has also served as an officer of Campbell & Company and its affiliates in multiple capacities, including: Co-General Counsel; Chief Compliance Officer; President; Vice President; Secretary; and Assistant Treasurer. Since joining the firm, Mr. Lloyd has also served as an officer and/or a member of the Board of Directors of entities affiliated with Campbell & Company, including: Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC; Campbell Financial Services, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, an SEC-registered broker-dealer, and a FINRA member; Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company; Campbell & Company Delaware, LLC, the general partner of the Campbell Equity Alpha Onshore Fund, LP, a limited partnership formed in Delaware, and Campbell Equity Alpha Cayman, LP and the Campbell Equity Alpha Master Fund LP, both exempted limited partnerships registered in the Cayman Islands; and Campbell Core Offshore Limited and the Campbell Managed Futures Offshore Fund – CAD, both international business companies incorporated in the Cayman Islands. From July 1999 to September 2005, Mr. Lloyd was employed by DBSI, a broker/dealer subsidiary of a global investment bank, in several positions, including Managing Director and head of the legal group for Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the Private Client Division of DBSI. Mr. Lloyd holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Maryland, and a J.D. from the University of Baltimore School of Law. Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Bars of the State of Maryland and the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Lloyd initially became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective October 20, 2005 and December 12, 2005, respectively. Mr. Lloyd became registered as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company effective August 30, 2010.
There has never been a material administrative, civil or criminal action brought against Campbell & Company or any of its directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons.
No Forms 3, 4, or 5 have been furnished to the Registrant since inception. To the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, no such forms have been or are required to be filed.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
No individual is named as the “audit committee expert” because no member of the Audit Committee (“Committee”) individually meets all five qualifications in the SEC definition of an “audit committee financial expert”; however, management has determined that the members of the Committee collectively possess the attributes necessary to perform this function.
Code of Ethics
Campbell & Company has adopted a code of ethics for its Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director, Operations and Finance, Director of Fund Accounting, Accounting Managers and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to Campbell & Company’s corporate secretary, 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21209 or by calling 1-800-698-7235.
The Fund does not itself have any officers, directors or employees. The directors and managing officers of Campbell & Company are remunerated by Campbell & Company in their respective positions. The directors and managing officers receive no “other compensation” from the Fund. There are no compensation plans or arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Fund or Campbell & Company.
The Registrant is managed by its general partner, Campbell & Company. Campbell & Company receives from the Registrant a Brokerage Fee equal to 7% of the Registrant’s month-end Net Assets per year. From such 7% Brokerage Fee, Campbell & Company remits 4% to the broker-dealers which engaged in the distribution of the Units in return for ongoing services to the Limited Partners. Campbell & Company retains the remaining 3% as management fees (2% for providing advisory fees and 1% for acting as general partner). Campbell & Company also receives a performance fee of 20% of the aggregate cumulative appreciation (if any) in Net Asset Value per unit at the end of each calendar quarter, exclusive of the appreciation attributable to interest income. The performance fee is paid on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Net Asset Value per Unit over the highest previous cumulative Net Asset Value per Unit (commonly referred to as a “High Water Mark”). In determining the fees in this paragraph, adjustments shall be made for capital additions and withdrawals and Net Assets shall not be reduced by the fees being calculated for such current period. The performance fee is not subject to any clawback provisions. The brokerage fee and performance fee are typically paid in the month following the month in which they are earned. The brokerage fee and performance fee are paid from the available cash at the Fund’s bank, broker or cash management accounts.
| Item 12. |
| (a) | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners. As of December 31, 2018, there are no beneficial owners of the Limited Partnership. |
| (b) | Security Ownership of Management. As of December 31, 2018, Campbell & Company owned 0.000 Units of General Partnership Interest having a value of $0. Units of General Partnership will only be owned by Campbell & Company in its capacity as general partner. The amounts are summarized in the table below: |
| Title of Class | Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percentage of Class | |||
| Units of General Partnership Interest | Campbell & Company, L.P. | 0.000 Units | 0.00% of Units outstanding |
See Item 11. Executive Compensation and Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.
The principal accountant for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was Deloitte & Touche LLP.
| (a) | Audit Fees |
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Fund’s annual financial statements, for review of financial statements included in the Fund’s Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filing or engagements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $120,750 and $117,435, respectively.
| (b) | Audit Related Fees |
None.
| (c) | Tax Fees |
None.
| (d) | All Other Fees |
None.
| (e) | The Board of Directors of Campbell & Company approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors has determined that the payments made to its independent accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors’ independence. The Board of Directors explicitly pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms. |
PART IV
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
| (1) | See Financial Statements beginning on page 44 hereof. |
| (2) | Schedules: |
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not included in the financial statements or notes hereto applicable or because equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
| (3) | Exhibits |
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
| 3.01 | ||
| 3.02 | ||
| 4.01 | ||
| 10.01 | ||
| 10.02 | ||
| 10.03 | ||
| Certification of G. William Andrews, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
| Certification of Gabriel A. Morris, Managing Director, Operations and Finance, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
| Certification of G. William Andrews, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| Certification of Gabriel A. Morris, Managing Director, Operations and Finance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| 101.01 | Interactive data file pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Condensed Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, (ii) Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, (iii) Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) Statements of Changes in Unitholders’ Capital (Net Asset Value) For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (vi) Financial Highlights For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (vii) Notes to Financial Statements. |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 on April 27, 2010. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 on April 7, 2011. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on November 14, 2017. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014. |
None.
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Certification of G. William Andrews, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
| Certification of Gabriel A. Morris, Managing Director, Operations and Finance, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
| Certification of G. William Andrews, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| Certification of Gabriel A. Morris, Managing Director, Operations and Finance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| 101.01 | Interactive data file pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Condensed Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, (ii) Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, (iii) Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) Statements of Changes in Unitholders’ Capital (Net Asset Value) For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (vi) Financial Highlights For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (vii) Notes to Financial Statements. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 29, 2019.
| CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P. | |||
| By: | CAMPBELL & COMPANY, LP General Partner | ||
| By: | /s/ G. William Andrews | ||
| G. William Andrews | |||
| Chief Executive Officer | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities of Campbell & Company, LP, General Partner of the Registrant, indicated on March 29, 2019.
| Signature | Capacity | ||
| /s/ G. William Andrews | Chief Executive Officer | ||
| G. William Andrews | |||
| /s/ Michael S. Harris | President | ||
| Michael S. Harris | |||
| /s/ Thomas P. Lloyd | General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer | ||
| Thomas P. Lloyd | |||
| /s/ Gabriel A. Morris | Managing Director, Operations and Finance | ||
| Gabriel A. Morris |
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
ANNUAL REPORT
December 31, 2018
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P
INDEX
| PAGES | |
| 46 | |
| Financial Statements | |
| 47-50 | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | |
| 53 | |
| 54 | |
| 55 | |
| 56-66 |
To the Partners of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of operations, cash flows, changes in Partners’ capital (net asset value) and financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and schedules (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the results of its operations, its cash flows, changes in its Partners’ capital (net asset value) and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2019
We have served as the Fund’s auditor since 2005.
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
DECEMBER 31, 2018
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
| Maturity Face Value | Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | |||||||||
| Asset Backed Securities | ||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Auto Loans | $ | 7,569,517 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||
| Credit Cards | 3,931,654 | 2.10 | % | |||||||||
| Total Asset Backed Securities (cost $11,532,711) | 11,501,171 | 6.14 | % | |||||||||
| Bank Deposits | ||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Financials | 2,249,220 | 1.20 | % | |||||||||
| Total Bank Deposits (cost $2,250,068) | 2,249,220 | 1.20 | % | |||||||||
| Commercial Paper | ||||||||||||
| Switzerland | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $1,590,983) | 1,589,640 | 0.85 | % | |||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 1,504,169 | 0.80 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 5,190,962 | 2.77 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples | 8,848,532 | 4.73 | % | |||||||||
| Financials | 10,413,321 | 5.56 | % | |||||||||
| Industrials | 3,848,945 | 2.06 | % | |||||||||
| Utilities | 18,430,323 | 9.84 | % | |||||||||
| Total United States (cost $48,238,552) | 48,236,252 | 25.76 | % | |||||||||
| Total Commercial Paper (cost $49,829,535) | 49,825,892 | 26.61 | % | |||||||||
| Corporate Bonds | ||||||||||||
| Australia | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $364,957) | 365,276 | 0.19 | % | |||||||||
| Canada | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $6,289,499) | 6,261,609 | 3.34 | % | |||||||||
| Japan | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $2,043,076) | 2,033,119 | 1.09 | % | |||||||||
| United Kingdom | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 1,199,357 | 0.64 | % | |||||||||
| Financials | 2,819,871 | 1.51 | % | |||||||||
| Total United Kingdom (cost $4,041,771) | 4,019,228 | 2.15 | % | |||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 7,496,773 | 4.00 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 5,583,595 | 2.98 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples | 4,737,658 | 2.53 | % | |||||||||
| Energy | 1,317,702 | 0.70 | % | |||||||||
| Financials | 23,589,978 | 12.60 | % | |||||||||
| Industrials | 1,687,442 | 0.90 | % | |||||||||
| Materials | 323,148 | 0.17 | % | |||||||||
| Technology | 4,000,181 | 2.14 | % | |||||||||
| Utilities | 476,050 | 0.26 | % | |||||||||
| Total United States (cost $49,338,343) | 49,212,527 | 26.28 | % | |||||||||
| Total Corporate Bonds (cost $62,077,646) | 61,891,759 | 33.05 | % | |||||||||
| Government and Agency Obligations | ||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury Bills | ||||||||||||
| $ | 5,560,000 | U.S. Treasury Bills * Due 01/17/2019 | 5,554,640 | 2.97 | % | |||||||
| $ | 14,620,000 | U.S. Treasury Bills * Due 02/21/2019 | 14,571,303 | 7.78 | % | |||||||
| $ | 10,597,500 | U.S. Treasury Bills * Due 03/28/2019 | 10,537,129 | 5.63 | % | |||||||
| Total Government And Agency Obligations (cost $30,664,487) | 30,663,072 | 16.38 | % | |||||||||
| Total Fixed Income Securities ** (cost $156,354,447) | $ | 156,131,114 | 83.38 | % | ||||||||
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2018
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
| Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | ||||||
| Money Market Funds | ||||||||
| United States | ||||||||
| Money Market Funds (cost $2,208) | $ | 2,208 | 0.00 | % | ||||
| Total Short Term Investments (cost $2,208) | $ | 2,208 | 0.00 | % | ||||
LONG FUTURES CONTRACTS
| Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | ||||||
| Agriculture | $ | 124,980 | 0.07 | % | ||||
| Energy | (883,950 | ) | (0.47 | )% | ||||
| Metals | (1,694,502 | ) | (0.91 | )% | ||||
| Stock indices | (112,136 | ) | (0.06 | )% | ||||
| Short-term interest rates | 1,084,485 | 0.58 | % | |||||
| Long-term interest rates | 1,236,423 | 0.66 | % | |||||
| Net unrealized gain (loss) on long futures contracts | (244,700 | ) | (0.13 | )% | ||||
SHORT FUTURES CONTRACTS
| Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | ||||||
| Agriculture | 1,771,406 | 0.94 | % | |||||
| Energy | 559,274 | 0.30 | % | |||||
| Metals | 2,435,221 | 1.30 | % | |||||
| Stock indices | 107,927 | 0.06 | % | |||||
| Short-term interest rates | (5,783 | ) | 0.00 | % | ||||
| Long-term interest rates | (1,201,282 | ) | (0.64 | )% | ||||
| Net unrealized gain (loss) on short futures contracts | 3,666,763 | 1.96 | % | |||||
| Net unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts | $ | 3,422,063 | 1.83 | % | ||||
FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS
| Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | ||||||
| Various long forward currency contracts | $ | 3,835,197 | 2.05 | % | ||||
| Various short forward currency contracts | 841,205 | 0.45 | % | |||||
| Net unrealized gain (loss) on open forward currency contracts | $ | 4,676,402 | 2.50 | % | ||||
| * | Pledged as collateral for the trading of futures and forward positions. |
| ** | Included in fixed income securities are U.S. Treasury Bills with a fair value of $22,932,456 deposited with the futures brokers and $7,730,616 deposited with the interbank market makers. |
CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2017
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
| Maturity Face Value | Description | Fair Value ($) | % of Net Asset Value | |||||||||
| Asset Backed Securities | ||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Auto Loans | $ | 12,261,344 | 4.52 | % | ||||||||
| Credit Cards | 6,169,797 | 2.28 | % | |||||||||
| Equipment Loans | 150,539 | 0.06 | % | |||||||||
| Total Asset Backed Securities (cost $18,620,611) | 18,581,680 | 6.86 | % | |||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| Bank Deposits | ||||||||||||
| Canada | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $1,259,918) | 1,259,553 | 0.46 | % | |||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $3,571,839) | 3,571,811 | 1.32 | % | |||||||||
| Total Bank Deposits (cost $4,831,757) | 4,831,364 | 1.78 | % | |||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| Commercial Paper | ||||||||||||
| Japan | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $3,873,247) | 3,872,670 | 1.43 | % | |||||||||
| Switzerland | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $1,442,613) | 1,441,739 | 0.53 | % | |||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,462,175 | 1.28 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 9,188,026 | 3.39 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples | 7,466,892 | 2.76 | % | |||||||||
| Energy | 5,473,542 | 2.02 | % | |||||||||
| Financials | 19,389,778 | 7.16 | % | |||||||||
| Industrials | 14,765,234 | 5.45 | % | |||||||||
| Utilities | 24,115,891 | 8.90 | % | |||||||||
| Total United States (cost $83,874,489) | 83,861,538 | 30.96 | % | |||||||||
| Total Commercial Paper (cost $89,190,349) | 89,175,947 | 32.92 | % | |||||||||
| | ||||||||||||
| Corporate Bonds | ||||||||||||
| Canada | ||||||||||||
| Financials (cost $1,184,446) | 1,175,657 | 0.43 | % | |||||||||
| United Kingdom | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 2,254,371 | 0.83 | % | |||||||||
| Financials | 1,248,599 | 0.46 | % | |||||||||
| Total United Kingdom (cost $3,508,126) | 3,502,970 | 1.29 | % | |||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 16,668,168 | 6.15 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 12,486,862 | 4.61 | % | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples | 3,447,171 | 1.27 | % | |||||||||
| Energy | 1,324,944 | 0.49 | ||||||||||