Company Quick10K Filing
Quick10K
Connecticut Water Service
Closing Price ($) Shares Out (MM) Market Cap ($MM)
$68.13 12 $822
10-K 2018-12-31 Annual: 2018-12-31
10-Q 2018-09-30 Quarter: 2018-09-30
10-Q 2018-06-30 Quarter: 2018-06-30
10-Q 2018-03-31 Quarter: 2018-03-31
10-K 2017-12-31 Annual: 2017-12-31
10-Q 2017-09-30 Quarter: 2017-09-30
10-Q 2017-06-30 Quarter: 2017-06-30
10-Q 2017-03-31 Quarter: 2017-03-31
10-K 2016-12-31 Annual: 2016-12-31
10-Q 2016-09-30 Quarter: 2016-09-30
10-Q 2016-06-30 Quarter: 2016-06-30
10-Q 2016-03-31 Quarter: 2016-03-31
10-K 2015-12-31 Annual: 2015-12-31
10-Q 2015-09-30 Quarter: 2015-09-30
10-Q 2015-06-30 Quarter: 2015-06-30
10-Q 2015-03-31 Quarter: 2015-03-31
10-K 2014-12-31 Annual: 2014-12-31
10-Q 2014-09-30 Quarter: 2014-09-30
10-Q 2014-06-30 Quarter: 2014-06-30
10-Q 2014-03-31 Quarter: 2014-03-31
10-K 2013-12-31 Annual: 2013-12-31
8-K 2019-04-03 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2019-02-20 Regulation FD
8-K 2019-01-23 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2019-01-09 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-12-17 Enter Agreement, Off-BS Arrangement, Exhibits
8-K 2018-12-03 Other Events, Exhibits
8-K 2018-11-16 Shareholder Vote, Other Events, Exhibits
8-K 2018-11-09 Earnings, Exhibits
8-K 2018-11-08 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-11-06 Other Events
8-K 2018-11-05 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-10-24 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-10-17 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-10-15 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-10-02 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-08-09 Earnings, Exhibits
8-K 2018-08-05 Enter Agreement, Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-07-20 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-07-16 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-07-13 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-06-18 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-06-08 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-06-06 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-30 Enter Agreement, Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-21 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-11 Shareholder Vote, Other Events, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-10 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-07 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-05-03 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-04-28 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-04-19 Regulation FD, Other Events, Exhibits
8-K 2018-04-02 Officers
8-K 2018-03-23 Regulation FD, Exhibits
8-K 2018-03-07 Officers, Other Events, Exhibits
8-K 2018-02-07 Enter Agreement, Other Events, Exhibits
BK Bank of New York Mellon 51,030
LH Laboratory of America 15,060
NLSN Nielsen Holdings 9,290
SEDG Solaredge Technologies 2,010
ALX Alexanders 1,940
CEVA CEVA 608
CIO City Office REIT 442
ZOM Zomedica Pharmaceuticals 36
PRSI Portsmouth Square 0
HBIA Hills Bancorporation 0
CTWS 2018-12-31
Part I
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
Item 5. Market for The Registrants's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6. Selected Financial Information
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2: Income Tax Expense
Note 3: Common Stock
Note 4: Retained Earnings
Note 5: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Note 6: Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 7: Long-Term Debt
Note 8: Preferred Stock
Note 9: Bank Lines of Credit and Other Short-Term Debt
Note 10: Utility Plant
Note 11: Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Note 12: Long-Term Compensation Arrangements
Note 13: Stock Based Compensation Plans
Note 14: Revenues From Contracts with Customers
Note 15: Segment Reporting
Note 16: Acquisitions
Note 17: Commitments and Contingencies
Note 18: Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
EX-21 exhibit21-2018subsidiaryli.htm
EX-23 exhibit23-2018consentofind.htm
EX-24.1 exhibit241-powerofattorney.htm
EX-31.1 exhibit311-2018ceocertific.htm
EX-31.2 exhibit312-2018cfocertific.htm
EX-32.1 exhibit321-2018ceosoxcerti.htm
EX-32.2 exhibit322-2018cfosoxcerti.htm

Connecticut Water Service Earnings 2018-12-31

CTWS 10K Annual Report

Balance SheetIncome StatementCash Flow

10-K 1 ctws2018form10-k.htm CTWS 2018 FORM 10-K Document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-K
ý
Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 or

o
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period to from

Commission File Number 0-8084
cwclogocolor-sizeda02.jpg
Connecticut Water Service, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Connecticut
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
06-0739839
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
93 West Main Street, Clinton, CT
(Address of principal executive office)
06413
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (860) 669-8636
Registrant’s website:  www.ctwater.com

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Title of each Class
Common Stock, without par value
Name of each exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o  No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o  No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý






Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large Accelerated Filer x
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o
Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No ý

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $775,510,970 based on the closing sale price on such date as reported on the NASDAQ.

Number of shares of Common Stock, no par value, outstanding as of February 1, 2019 was 12,060,120, including 99,476 common stock equivalent shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document
 
Part of Form 10-K Into Which Document is Incorporated
 
 
 
Definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed on or about March 29, 2019, for Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 9, 2019.
 
Part III





 
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
Page Number
 
 
Part I
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
Item 1A.
 
Item 1B.
 
Item 2.
 
Item 3.
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
Part II
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
Item 6.
 
Item 7.
 
Item 7A.
 
Item 8.
 
Item 9.
 
Item 9A.
 
Item 9B.
 
 
 
 
 
Part III
 
 
 
Item 10.
 
Item 11.
 
Item 12.
 
Item 13.
 
Item 14.
 
 
 
 
 
Part IV
 
 
 
Item 15.
 
Item 16.
 
 
 

3



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“10-K”), or incorporated by reference into this 10-K, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that are made based upon, among other things, our current assumptions, expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (referred to as “the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”).  These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside our control, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements where statements are preceded by, followed by or include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “future,” “potential,” “probably,” “predictions,” “continue” or the negative of such terms or similar expressions.  Forward-looking statements included in this 10-K, or incorporated by reference into this 10-K, include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:

the proposed Merger between the Company and SJW Group, the anticipated timing of the Merger and our ability to successfully complete the Merger;
projected capital expenditures and related funding requirements;
the availability and cost of capital;
developments, trends and consolidation in the water and wastewater utility industries;
dividend payment projections;
our ability to successfully acquire and integrate regulated water and wastewater systems, as well as unregulated businesses, that are complementary to our operations and the growth of our business;
the capacity of our water supplies, water facilities and wastewater facilities;
the impact of limited geographic diversity on our exposure to unusual weather;
the impact of conservation awareness of customers and more efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances on water usage per customer;
our capability to pursue timely rate increase requests;
our authority to carry on our business without unduly burdensome restrictions;
our ability to maintain our operating costs at the lowest possible level, while providing good quality water service;
our ability to obtain fair market value for condemned assets;
the impact of fines and penalties;
changes in laws, governmental regulations and policies, including environmental, health and water quality and public utility regulations and policies;
the decisions of governmental and regulatory bodies, including decisions to raise or lower rates;
our ability to successfully extend and expand our service contract work within our Service and Rentals Segment in both Connecticut and Maine;
the development of new services and technologies by us or our competitors;
the availability of qualified personnel;
the condition of our assets;
the impact of legal proceedings;
general economic conditions;
the profitability of our Real Estate Segment, which is subject to the amount of land we have available for sale and/or donation, the demand for any available land, the continuation of the current state tax benefits relating to the donation of land for open space purposes and regulatory approval for land dispositions;
the amount of repair tax deductions and the Internal Revenue Service’s ultimate acceptance of the deduction methodology; and
acquisition-related costs and synergies.

Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to:

the risks associated with the proposed Merger between the Company and SJW Group, the anticipated timing of the Merger and our ability to successfully complete the Merger;
changes in public utility regulations and policies;
changes in general economic, business, credit and financial market conditions;
changes in environmental conditions, including those that result in water use restrictions;
the determination of what qualifies for a repair expense tax deduction;
abnormal weather conditions;
increases in energy and fuel costs;

4



unfavorable changes to the federal and/or state tax codes;
significant changes in, or unanticipated, capital requirements;
significant changes in our credit rating or the market price of our common stock;
our ability to integrate businesses, technologies or services which we may acquire;
our ability to manage the expansion of our business;
the continuous and reliable operation of our information technology systems, including the impact of cyber security attacks or other cyber-related events;
the extent to which we are able to develop and market new and improved services;
the continued demand by telecommunication companies for antenna site leases on our property;
the effect of the loss of major customers;
our ability to retain the services of key personnel and to hire qualified personnel as we expand;
labor disputes;
increasing difficulties in obtaining insurance and increased cost of insurance;
cost overruns relating to improvements or the expansion of our operations;
increases in the costs of goods and services;
civil disturbance or terroristic threats or acts; and
changes in accounting pronouncements.

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.  You should read this 10-K and the documents that we incorporate by reference into this 10-K completely and with the understanding that our actual future results, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect.  These forward-looking statements represent our assumptions, expectations and beliefs only as of the date of this 10-K.  Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose certain information under the federal securities laws, we are not obligated, and assume no obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future.  For further information or other factors which could affect our financial results and such forward-looking statements, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”  We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

5



PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

The Company

The Registrant, Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (referred to as “the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) was incorporated in 1974, with The Connecticut Water Company (“Connecticut Water”) as its largest subsidiary which was organized in 1956. Connecticut Water Service, Inc. is a non-operating holding company, whose income is derived from the earnings of its six wholly-owned subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2018.  In 2018, approximately 85% of the Company’s net income, which includes the impact of merger costs, was attributable to water operations carried out within its four regulated water companies, Connecticut Water, The Heritage Village Water Company (“HVWC”), The Avon Water Company (“Avon Water”) and The Maine Water Company (“Maine Water”), together the “Regulated Companies”.  As of December 31, 2018, the Regulated Companies supplied water to 139,574 customers, representing a population of approximately 450,000, in 80 municipalities throughout Connecticut and Maine and approximately 3,000 wastewater customers in Southbury, CT.  The Regulated Companies are subject to state regulation regarding financial issues, rates, and operating issues, and to various other state and federal regulatory agencies concerning water quality and environmental standards.

In addition to its Regulated Companies, the Company owns two active unregulated companies.  In 2018, these unregulated companies, together with real estate transactions and Maine Water’s unregulated operations, contributed the remaining 15% of the Company’s net income through real estate transactions as well as services and rentals.  The two active unregulated companies are Chester Realty, Inc., a real estate company in Connecticut; and New England Water Utility Services, Inc. (“NEWUS”), which provides contract water and sewer operations and other water related services.

Our mission centers on passionate employees delivering life sustaining, high quality water service to families and communities while providing a fair return to our shareholders.

Our corporate headquarters are located at 93 West Main Street, Clinton, Connecticut 06413.  Our telephone number is (860) 669-8636, and our Internet address is www.ctwater.com.  The references to our website and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) website are intended to be inactive textual references only, and the contents of those websites are not incorporated by reference herein and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.

The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to these documents will be made available free of charge through the “INVESTORS” section of the Company’s Internet website (www.ctwater.com) as soon as practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The following documents are also available through the “INVESTORS” section of our website, under the “Governance” tab:

Board of Directors Code of Conduct
Compensation Committee Charter
Corporate Finance and Investments Committee Charter
Corporate Governance Committee Charter
Bylaws of Connecticut Water Service, Inc.
Employee Code of Conduct
Audit Committee Charter

Additionally, information concerning the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting Materials (2018 Annual Report and 2019 Proxy Statement) can be found under the “INVESTORS” menu, under the “Investor Resources” tab when the Annual Meeting Materials are filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019.

The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. These materials may be obtained electronically by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of each of the Company’s SEC filings (without exhibits) and corporate governance documents mentioned above will also be mailed to investors, upon request, by contacting the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Kristen A. Johnson, at Connecticut Water, 93 West Main Street, Clinton, CT 06413.


6



Proposed Merger with SJW Group

On August 5, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Revised Merger Agreement”) with SJW Group, a Delaware corporation (“SJW”), and Hydro Sub, Inc., a Connecticut corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SJW (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SJW (the “Merger”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Revised Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of our common stock (other than certain cancelled shares) will be automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $70.00 per share, payable without interest. The Revised Merger Agreement amends and restates in its entirety the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “First Amended and Restated Merger Agreement”), dated as of May 30, 2018, by and among the Company, SJW and Merger Sub, which amended and restated in its entirety the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Original Merger Agreement”), dated as of March 14, 2018, by and among the Company, SJW and Merger Sub.

The Board of Directors approved, adopted and declared advisable the Revised Merger Agreement and the Merger and recommended that the Company’s shareholders approve the Revised Merger Agreement following a comprehensive review of the transaction. The Revised Merger Agreement was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 16, 2018.

The Merger is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including, among other things, approval of the Revised Merger Agreement by the Company’s shareholders (which was received on November 16, 2018) and regulatory approvals (including the approval of the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (“PURA”) and the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”)). The required waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “HSR Act”), was terminated early on April 27, 2018. The early termination will expire and the Company and SJW will need to re-file the necessary notifications under the HSR Act if the Merger is not consummated by April 27, 2019. On October 15, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) consented to the joint application for transfer of control filed by the Company and SJW on October 4, 2018 and amended on October 12, 2018, and no further clearance from the FCC is required.

On May 4, 2018, Maine Water filed with MPUC an application for approval of the Merger. On May 7, 2018, the Company and SJW filed with PURA a joint application for approval of the Merger. Following the start on May 31, 2018 of a 45-day go-shop process permitted by the First Amended and Restated Merger Agreement, the Company and SJW withdrew their joint PURA application on June 19, 2018, and filed a new joint application on July 18, 2018 following the end of the go-shop process. On January 9, 2019, the Company and SJW withdrew their current application before PURA and announced that they were continuing to evaluate their regulatory approach, including the possibility of submitting a new application to PURA in connection with the Merger. On January 23, 2019, Maine Water voluntarily requested to withdraw its application before MPUC, aligning the Maine regulatory process with the regulatory process in Connecticut. After a thorough review conducted by the management and boards of the Company and SJW, and with the support of their respective Connecticut regulatory counsel, the Company disclosed on February 21, 2019 that the companies decided to file new applications with PURA and MPUC which are intended to address PURA’s concerns. The Company and SJW expect that the new applications will be filed during the second quarter of 2019. PURA must make a ruling on the merger within 120 days after the filing of an application, unless the Company and SJW agree to an extension of the 120-day timeframe. MPUC must make a ruling on the merger within 60 days after the filing of an application, unless it determines that the necessary investigation cannot be concluded within 60 days, in which event it can extend the review period for up to an additional 120 days.

On July 20, 2018, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) formally issued an Order Instituting Investigation (the “Order”) providing that CPUC will investigate whether the Merger is subject to CPUC approval and the Merger’s anticipated impacts within California. CPUC held a public participation hearing on January 31, 2019 in connection with the Order.

Our Regulated Companies

Our Regulated Companies are subject to seasonal fluctuations and weather variations.  The demand for water is generally greater during the warmer months than the cooler months due to customers’ incremental water consumption related to cooling systems and various outdoor uses such as private and public swimming pools and lawn sprinklers.  Demand will vary with rainfall and temperature levels from year to year and season to season, particularly during the warmer months. The financial risk associated with changes in demand was mitigated in the State of Connecticut due to the adoption of the Water Revenue Adjustment (“WRA”) by Connecticut Water in 2013 and by HVWC in 2015. Currently, Avon Water does not utilize the WRA.

In general, the profitability of the water utility industry is largely dependent on the timeliness and adequacy of rates allowed by utility regulatory commissions. In addition, profitability is affected by numerous factors over which we have little or no control,

7



such as costs to comply with security, environmental, and water quality regulations. Inflation and other factors also impact costs for construction, materials and personnel related expenses.

The Company believes that we are presently in compliance with current environmental and water quality regulations, but the regulations are subject to change at any time.  The costs to comply with future changes in state or federal regulations, which could require us to modify existing filtration facilities and/or construct new ones, or to replace any reduction of the safe yield from any of our current sources of supply, could be substantial.

Regulatory Matters

The rates we charge our water and wastewater customers in Connecticut and Maine are established under the jurisdiction of and are approved by PURA and MPUC, respectively.  It is our policy to seek rate relief as necessary to enable us to achieve an adequate rate of return.  The Regulated Companies’ allowed returns on equity and allowed returns on rate base are as follows:

As of December 31, 2018
 
Allowed Return on Equity
 
Allowed Return on Rate Base
Connecticut Water
 
9.75
%
 
7.32
%
HVWC (blended water and wastewater rates)
 
10.10
%
 
7.19
%
Avon Water
 
10.00
%
 
7.79
%
Maine Water
 
9.50
%
 
7.96
%

The PURA establishes rates in Connecticut on a company-wide basis while the MPUC approves Maine Water’s rates on a division-by-division basis. Each of Connecticut Water, HVWC, Avon Water and Maine Water are allowed to add surcharges to customers’ bills in order to recover certain costs associated with approved capital projects in between full rate cases, as well as approved surcharges for the WRA, in Connecticut, as discussed in more detail below. HVWC has not added surcharges to customers’ bills in order to recover certain approved capital projects as of December 31, 2018, however, HVWC, as authorized by PURA, began to utilize the WRA as of May 1, 2015.

On January 3, 2018, PURA reopened the most recent rate case decisions for the Company’s Connecticut Regulated Companies to determine what, if any, adjustments to rates are appropriate to account for revisions to tax laws, including corporate tax rates, contained in the Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). On January 23, 2019, PURA issued a decision that determined the appropriate accounting and rate treatments for the reduction in the Federal Corporate Income Tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. The reduction in the Federal Corporate Income Tax impacts two specific areas of corporate income tax that the regulated water utilities must account for: a) the income tax expense included in rates charged to customers; and b), the Excess Accumulated Deferred Income Tax (“EADIT”) liability accrued on the regulated utilities books.

PURA has directed regulated water companies, including Avon and HVWC, to create a regulatory liability as of January 1, 2018 to account for the reduced Federal Corporate Income Tax expense and defer treatment until the companies file their next general rate cases, at which point the companies will propose a method to return the regulatory liability to customers. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Avon and HVWC recorded regulatory liabilities in the amounts of $154,000 and $89,000, respectively, in anticipation of the final decision. Additionally, PURA directed Avon and HVWC, to establish a liability account for the EADIT from January 1, 2018, going forward, which will also be returned to customers commencing with the companies’ next rate cases. As discussed below, Connecticut Water has entered into a settlement agreement with the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel (“OCC”), which was approved by PURA, which covers treatment of the Tax Act.

On January 11, 2018, the MPUC issued a notice of investigation to determine the impact of the Tax Act on Maine Water. The investigation will allow the MPUC to determine what, if any, adjustments to rates are appropriate to account for revisions to tax laws, including corporate tax rates contained in the Tax Act. In addition to determining the impact of the Tax Act, the MPUC will consider whether to issue an accounting order to establish a regulatory liability as of January 1, 2018 to account for the reduced Federal Corporate Income Tax expense and defer treatment until the divisions file their next general rate case, at which point each division will propose a method to return the regulatory liability to customers. Following discovery, technical conferences were held on April 19, 2018, July 17, 2018, and October 15, 2018. A settlement conference was held on December 6, 2018. The Company expects to reach a settlement with the MPUC in the first quarter of 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Maine Water recorded a regulatory liability in the amount of $167,000, in anticipation of a settlement.


8



The Heritage Village Water Company Acquisition
As previously reported, on May 10, 2016, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire HVWC, pending a vote of HVWC shareholders, approval by PURA and MPUC and the satisfaction of other various closing conditions, pursuant to the terms of Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 10, 2016 between and among HVWC, the Company, and HAC, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned Connecticut subsidiary (the “Merger Agreement”). HVWC serves approximately 4,700 water customers in the Towns of Southbury, Middlebury, and Oxford, Connecticut and approximately 3,000 wastewater customers in the Town of Southbury, Connecticut.

The acquisition was executed through a stock-for-stock merger transaction valued at approximately $16.9 million. Holders of HVWC common stock received shares of the Company’s common stock in a tax-free exchange. In addition, the transaction reflected a total enterprise value of HVWC of approximately $21.5 million, with the $16.9 million paid to shareholders in a stock exchange and the assumption by the Company of approximately $4.6 million of debt held by HVWC at the time of the acquisition.

The Company received regulatory approval from MPUC on September 28, 2016 and from PURA on December 5, 2016, to proceed with the transaction. The shareholders of HVWC voted to approve the acquisition at a special meeting of HVWC’s shareholders held on February 27, 2017.

On February 27, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of HVWC by completing the merger of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary HAC, Inc. with and into HVWC, with HVWC as the surviving corporation, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Connecticut corporate law. Upon the effective time of the Merger, the holders of HVWC’s 1,620 issued and outstanding shares of common stock became entitled to receive an aggregate of 300,445 shares of the Company’s common stock in a tax-free exchange, which exchange was commenced promptly by the issuance of a letter of transmittal and related materials by Connecticut Water’s exchange agent.

The Avon Water Company Acquisition
As previously reported, on October 12, 2016, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire Avon Water, pending a vote of Avon Water shareholders, approval by PURA and the MPUC and the satisfaction of other various closing conditions, pursuant to the terms of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 11, 2016 as amended on March 29, 2017 between and among Avon Water, the Company, and WC-A I, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned Connecticut subsidiary (the “Merger Agreement”). Avon Water serves approximately 4,800 customers in the Farmington Valley communities of Avon, Farmington, and Simsbury, Connecticut.

On February 10, 2017, Connecticut Water received regulatory approval from MPUC and on April 12, 2017, Connecticut Water received regulatory approval from PURA to proceed with the transaction. The shareholders of Avon Water voted to approve the acquisition at a special meeting of Avon Water’s shareholders held on June 16, 2017.

Effective July 1, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Avon Water by completing the merger of Connecticut Water’s wholly-owned subsidiary WC-A I, Inc. with and into Avon Water, with Avon Water as the surviving corporation, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Connecticut corporate law. Upon the effective time of the Merger, the holders of Avon Water’s 122,289 issued and outstanding shares of common stock became entitled to receive the following merger consideration for each share of Avon Water common stock held: (i) a cash payment of $50.11; and (ii) a stock consideration component, consisting of 3.97 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The transaction was completed through a stock-for-stock exchange where Avon Water shareholders received the Company’s common stock valued at approximately $26.9 million, in a tax-free exchange, and a cash payment of $6.1 million for a total payment to shareholders of $33.0 million. The transaction reflects a total enterprise value of approximately $39.1 million, with the $33.0 million paid to shareholders and the assumption by the Company of approximately $6.1 million of debt held by Avon Water at the time of acquisition.

Connecticut Rates
Connecticut Water’s Water Infrastructure Conservation Adjustment (“WICA”) was 0.00%, 9.81% and 7.13% above base rates at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Avon Water’s WICA surcharge was 9.31% and 8.09%. As of December 31, 2018, HVWC has not filed for a WICA surcharge. On December 27, 2018, PURA issued a final decision authorizing Connecticut Water to implement a 2.15% WICA surcharge on customers’ bills effective January 1, 2019, representing approximately $19.5 million in WICA related projects.

On February 6, 2018, Connecticut Water filed a petition with PURA to reopen Connecticut Water’s 2010 rate case (previously reopened in 2013) proceeding for the limited purpose of approving a Settlement Agreement entered into by Connecticut Water

9



and the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel (“OCC”) (the “Agreement”). The Agreement contemplates a change in Connecticut Water’s customer rates effective for bills rendered on and after April 1, 2018 made up of the following two components: (1) the revenue requirements associated with a $36.3 million addition to rate base to reflect necessary upgrades to Connecticut Water’s Rockville Water Treatment Plant; and (2) the folding in to base rates of the Company’s present WICA surcharges. In addition, the Agreement provides that:
1.
Upon implementation of new rates under the Agreement, until such time as new rates are adopted in a general rate case, through a temporary modification of the earnings sharing mechanism, Connecticut Water customers will receive one hundred percent of any earnings in excess of levels allowed by law rather than limiting such customer credits to 50% as contemplated by applicable law;
2.
Connecticut Water agrees it will not file for a general increase of Connecticut Water’s base rates unless those rates are to be effective on or after January 1, 2020;
3.
The pending proceeding initiated by PURA in Docket No. 09-12-11RE03, Application of The Connecticut Water Company for Amended Rates – Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act shall be closed; and
4.
Connecticut Water shall continue to make investments in infrastructure replacement consistent with its approved WICA plan. Connecticut Water shall be allowed to continue to pursue recovery of eligible projects through WICA.

On August 15, 2018, PURA issued a final decision that accepted the conditions of a revised settlement agreement. The primary facets of the revised settlement agreement were the revenue requirements associated with the Rockville Water Treatment Plant, discussed above, and the folding of previously approved WICA surcharges into base rates, which reset Connecticut Water’s WICA to zero and resolution of the Company’s obligations related to the Tax Act. New rates were effective as of April 1, 2018.

Since 2013, Connecticut law has authorized a Water Revenue Adjustment (“WRA”) to reconcile actual water demands with the demands projected in the last general rate case and allows companies to adjust rates as necessary to recover the revenues approved by PURA in the last general rate case. The WRA removes the financial disincentive for water utilities to develop and implement effective water conservation programs. The WRA allows water companies to defer on the balance sheet, as a regulatory asset or liability, for later collection from or crediting to customers the amount by which actual revenues deviate from the revenues allowed in the most recent general rate proceedings. A similar WICA reconciliation adjustment mechanism allows the Connecticut water utilities that have WICA to be made whole, and not more than whole for their allowed WICA revenues during a calendar year. Additionally, projects eligible for WICA surcharges were expanded to include energy conservation projects, improvements required to comply with streamflow regulations, and improvements to acquired systems.

Connecticut Water and HVWC’s allowed revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, as approved by PURA during each company’s last general rate case and including subsequently approved WICA surcharges, were approximately $88.9 million. Through normal billing for the year ended December 31, 2018 operating revenue for Connecticut Water and HVWC would have been approximately $80.7 million had the WRA not been implemented. As a result of the implementation of the WRA, Connecticut Water and HVWC recorded $8.2 million in additional revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, which reflects increased allowed revenues, effective April 1, 2018, resulting from the application of the rate settlement approved by PURA during 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, Connecticut Water recorded $4.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in additional revenue related to the WRA. Avon Water does not currently use the WRA mechanism.

Maine Rates
In Maine, the overall, approved cumulative Water Infrastructure Charge (“WISC”) for all of Maine Water’s divisions was 6.8%, 5.6% and 4.7% above base rates as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The WISC rates for the Biddeford and Saco division were reset to zero with the approval of the general rate increase discussed below. In January 2019, Maine Water filed six additional WISC applications which have been approved by the MPUC. These six new filings will add approximately $369,000 in annualized revenues.

On June 29, 2017, Maine Water filed for a rate increase in its Biddeford and Saco division. The rate request was for an approximate $1.6 million, or 25.1%, increase in revenues. The rate request was designed to recover higher operating expenses, depreciation and property taxes since Biddeford and Saco’s last rate increase in 2015. Maine Water and the Maine Office of the Public Advocate reached an agreement that increases annual revenue by $1.56 million. The agreement was approved by the MPUC on December 5, 2017, with new rates effective December 1, 2017.

A water revenue adjustment mechanism law in Maine became available to regulated water utilities in Maine on October 15, 2015.  Maine Water is currently precluded from seeking new rates in the Biddeford and Saco division due to provisions in the settlement agreement with the MPUC.  Maine’s rate-adjustment mechanism could provide revenue stabilization in divisions with declining water consumption and Maine Water expects to request usage of this mechanism in future rate filings when consumption trends support its use.


10



Maine Water Land Sale
On March 11, 2016, Maine Water entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the Coastal Mountains Land Trust, a Maine nonprofit corporation (the “Land Trust”) pursuant to which Maine Water agreed to sell two conservation easements to the Land Trust on approximately 1,400 acres of land located in the towns of Rockport, Camden and Hope, in Knox County, Maine valued in the aggregate at $3.1 million. The land had a book value of approximately $600,000 at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and is included in “Other Property and Investments” and “Utility Plant”, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The easements and purchase prices are as follows:

1. Ragged Mountain Mirror Lake Conservation Easement: $1,875,000; and
2. Grassy Pond Conservation Easement: $600,000.

The first transaction regarding Mirror Lake was completed on September 27, 2018. As a result of the transaction, Maine Water has recognized $435,000 in net income in the period and has recorded a regulatory liability of $435,000 that will be refunded to customers over a one-year period, beginning January, 2019. In addition to the net income recorded as a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a $100,000 deferred income tax benefit due to the timing difference related to the cash refund to customers. The total net income benefit recorded by the Company for this transaction was $535,000 presented as $625,000 in gain on real estate transactions offset by $90,000 of donation deduction in the Other line item. Maine Water also made a $250,000 contribution to the Land Trust at the closing.

The second transaction regarding Grassy pond is scheduled to close on or before December 31, 2019. The second transaction is structured such that Maine Water will sell a conservation easement valued at $1,200,000 for $600,000. Accordingly, Maine Water expects to claim a $600,000 charitable deduction on the bargain sale. Similarly to the first transaction, net proceeds from the second transaction will be shared equally between the customers of the Camden Rockland division and Maine Water.

Our Water Systems

As of December 31, 2018, our water infrastructure consisted of 77 noncontiguous water systems in the States of Connecticut and Maine.  Our system, in total, consists of approximately 2,300 miles of water main and reservoir storage capacity of 9.4 billion gallons.  The safe, dependable yield from our 249 active wells and 25 surface water supplies is approximately 185 million gallons per day.  Water sources vary among the individual systems, but overall approximately 80% of the total dependable yield comes from surface water supplies and 20% from wells.

For the year-ended December 31, 2018, our Regulated Companies’ 139,574 customers consumed approximately 10.1 billion gallons of water, generating $116,665,000 in operating revenues.  We supply water, and in most cases, fire protection to all or portions of 80 towns throughout Connecticut and Maine.


11



The following table breaks down the above total figures by customer class as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:

 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
Customers:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
119,390

 
118,493

 
111,494

Commercial
9,358

 
9,386

 
8,626

Industrial
530

 
536

 
479

Public Authority
1,070

 
1,072

 
948

Fire Protection
3,250

 
3,178

 
2,876

Other water customers (including non-metered accounts)
2,964

 
2,980

 
545

Wastewater
3,012

 
3,012

 

Total
139,574

 
138,657

 
124,968

Water Revenues (in thousands):
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
$
69,134

 
$
62,831

 
$
59,884

Commercial
15,123

 
13,676

 
12,250

Industrial
3,395

 
3,196

 
3,176

Public Authority
3,917

 
3,845

 
3,510

Fire Protection
21,731

 
20,235

 
18,486

Other (including non-metered accounts)
3,365

 
3,271

 
1,361

Total
$
116,665

 
$
107,054

 
$
98,667

Customer Water Consumption (millions of gallons):
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
6,678

 
6,408

 
6,583

Commercial
2,126

 
2,026

 
1,954

Industrial
729

 
711

 
724

Public Authority
536

 
575

 
539

Total
10,069

 
9,720

 
9,800


The Regulated Companies own various small, discrete parcels of land that are no longer required for water supply purposes.  At December 31, 2018, this land totaled over 600 acres.  Over the past several years, we have been disposing of these land parcels through sales and/or donations, primarily to towns and municipalities. For more information, please refer to Segments of Our Business below.

Additional information on land dispositions can be found in Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Commitments and Contingencies”.

Competition

Our Regulated Companies face competition from a few small privately-owned water systems operating within, or adjacent to, our franchise areas and from municipal and public authority systems whose service areas in some cases overlap portions of our franchise areas.

Employees

As of December 31, 2018, we employed a total of 297 people.  Our employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements.


12



Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following is a list of the executive officers of the Company as of February 28, 2019:

Name
 
Age in 2019*
 
Offices
 
Period Held or Prior Position
 
Term of Office Expires
D. C. Benoit
 
61
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Held current position or other executive position with the Company since April 1996
 
2019 Annual Meeting
R. J. Doffek
 
56
 
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller
 
Held current position or other finance position with the Company since November 2015
 
2019 Annual Meeting
C. J. Patla
 
51
 
Vice President – Service Delivery
 
 
Held current position or other engineering position with the Company since June 1990
 
2019 Annual Meeting
M. P. Westbrook
 
60
 
Vice President – Customer and Regulatory Affairs
 
Held current position or other management position with the Company since September 1988
 
2019 Annual Meeting
K. A. Johnson
 
52
 
Vice President –  Human Resources and Corporate Secretary
 
Held current position or other human resources position with the Company since May 2007
 
2019 Annual Meeting
R. L. Knowlton
 
60
 
Division President – The Maine Water Company
 
Vice President of Operations of The Maine Water Company (and its predecessor companies) since 1993
 
2019 Annual Meeting

* - Age shown is as of filing date of February 28, 2019.

For further information regarding the executive officers see the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 29, 2019.

Segments of Our Business

For management and financial reporting purposes we divide our business into three segments: Water Operations (our Regulated Companies), Real Estate Transactions (through either our regulated or unregulated companies), and Services and Rentals (our unregulated companies and certain unregulated transactions within Maine Water).

Water Operations – The Water Operations segment is comprised of our core regulated water operations to supply public drinking water and provide wastewater services to our customers.  This segment encompasses all transactions of our Regulated Companies with the exception of certain real estate transactions, including costs associated with acquisitions of Regulated Companies. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Real Estate Transactions – Our Real Estate Transactions segment involves the sale or donation for income tax benefits of our real estate holdings.  These transactions can be effected by any of our subsidiary companies.  Through land donations and sales in previous years, the Company earned tax credits to use in future years.  The Company is limited by time and the amount of taxable income when using these credits.  For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold a small parcel of land and adjusted previously adjusted tax reserves related to previously completed land sales/donations resulting in a loss of $54,000. During 2017, the Company sold small parcels of land in Connecticut and Maine. These transactions generated $33,000 in net income in the Real Estate segment. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company completed the first phase of the previously discussed sale of conservation easement in Maine. Net income from the Real Estate Transactions segment is shown net in the “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” portion of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.


13



A breakdown of the net income of this segment between our regulated and unregulated companies for the past three years is as follows:

 
Income (Loss) from Real Estate Transactions
 
Regulated
 
Unregulated
 
Total
2018
$
629,000

 
$

 
$
629,000

2017
$
33,000

 
$

 
$
33,000

2016
$
(54,000
)
 
$

 
$
(54,000
)

Services and Rentals – Our Services and Rentals segment provides contracted services to water utilities and other clients and also leases certain of our properties to third parties through our unregulated companies in the State of Connecticut and through Maine Water in the State of Maine.  The types of services provided include contract operations of water facilities and Linebacker®, our service line protection plan for public drinking water customers.  Our lease and rental income comes primarily from the renting of residential and commercial property. Net income from the Services and Rentals segment is shown net in the “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” portion of the Company’s “Consolidated Statements of Income”. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Linebacker is an optional service line protection program offered by the Company to eligible residential customers through NEWUS in Connecticut and Maine Water in Maine covering the cost of repairs for leaking or broken water service lines which provide drinking water to a customer’s home.  For customers who enroll in this program, the Company will repair or replace a leaking or broken water service line, curb box, curb box cover, meter pit, meter pit cover, meter pit valve plus in-home water main shut off valve before the meter.  This was the sixth year that NEWUS has successfully offered expanded coverage to Connecticut Water customers for failure of in-home plumbing, sewer and septic drainage lines and implemented modified terms and conditions with limitations on certain coverages. As of December 31, 2018, NEWUS had approximately 20,000 customers enrolled in its Linebacker protection program and over 35% were enrolled in one of our expanded coverage plans. Depending on the coverage selected, Linebacker prices range between $88 to $190, effective March 1, 2018. Maine Water offers basic service line protection under Linebacker to its customers at a rate of $85. As of December 31, 2018, Maine Water had approximately 2,500 customers enrolled in Linebacker.

Some of the services listed above have limited competition. However, the Company has seen competitors in the service line protection business begin to market to Connecticut Water and Maine Water customers. Additionally, there can be considerable competition for contract operations of large water facilities and systems. The Company sought to develop a niche market by attaching our name to service line protection plans and by seeking to serve smaller facilities and systems in our service areas where there is less competition.  The Services and Rentals segment has provided between 5-11% of our overall net income in 2018, 2017, and 2016.  Net income generated by this segment of our business was $1,807,000, $1,167,000 and $1,219,000 for the years 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.


14



ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or anticipated future results. For a discussion identifying additional risk factors and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, see the discussion in “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information”, in Item 7 below – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

We may fail to consummate the Merger, and uncertainties related to the consummation of the Merger may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and negatively impact the price of our common stock.

As previously discussed, on August 5, 2018, the Company entered into the Revised Merger Agreement with SJW and Merger Sub, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SJW. Pursuant to the Revised Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SJW. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Revised Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of our common stock (other than certain cancelled shares) will be automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $70.00 per share, payable without interest. The Revised Merger Agreement was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 16, 2018. The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of a number of additional conditions beyond our control, including regulatory approvals (including, without limitation, the approval of PURA and MPUC) and other customary closing conditions. The conditions to the Merger could prevent or delay the completion of the Merger. Further, regulators may impose conditions, obligations or restrictions on the Merger that may have the effect of delaying or preventing its completion.

On December 3, 2018, PURA issued a proposed decision that would deny approval of the Merger. On January 4, 2019, PURA denied the Company and SJW’s joint motion, filed on December 14, 2018, requesting that PURA reopen the record and grant an extension to admit substantial new evidence. On January 9, 2019, the Company and SJW withdrew their current application before PURA and announced that they were continuing to evaluate their regulatory approach, including the possibility of submitting a new application to PURA in connection with the Merger. On January 23, 2019, Maine Water voluntarily requested to withdraw its application before MPUC, aligning the Maine regulatory process with the regulatory process in Connecticut. After a thorough review conducted by the management and boards of the Company and SJW, and with the support of their respective Connecticut regulatory counsel, the Company disclosed on February 21, 2019 that the companies decided to file new applications with PURA and MPUC which are intended to address PURA’s concerns. The Company and SJW expect that the new applications will be filed during the second quarter of 2019. There can be no assurance that PURA and MPUC will approve any new applications submitted in connection with the Merger in Connecticut and Maine, respectively, on a timely basis or at all. In addition, CPUC previously instituted an investigation into whether the Merger is subject to its approval and the Merger’s anticipated impacts in California. There can be no assurance that CPUC will determine that its prior authorization is not required for the Merger.

The efforts and costs to satisfy the closing conditions of the Merger, including the regulatory approval process, may place a significant burden on management and internal resources, and the Merger and related transactions, whether or not consummated, may result in a diversion of management’s attention from day-to-day operations. Any significant diversion of management’s attention away from ongoing business and difficulties encountered in the Merger process could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There also is no assurance that the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Revised Merger Agreement will occur on the terms and timeline currently contemplated or at all. When the parties entered into the Revised Merger Agreement on August 5, 2018, they expected the closing of the Merger to occur during the first quarter of 2019. In light of recent regulatory developments, including the decision of the Company and SJW to withdraw their prior joint PURA application and Maine Water’s MPUC application in January 2019 and the subsequent decision of the Company and SJW to file new applications with PURA and MPUC during the second quarter of 2019, the closing of the Merger will be delayed. PURA must make a ruling on the merger within 120 days after the filing of an application, unless the Company and SJW agree to an extension of the 120-day timeframe. MPUC must make a ruling on the merger within 60 days after the filing of an application, unless it determines that the necessary investigation cannot be concluded within 60 days, in which event it can extend the review period for up to an additional 120 days.

The Revised Merger Agreement also contains certain customary termination rights, including the right of each of the Company and SJW to terminate the Revised Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated by May 5, 2019, subject to two

15



automatic three-month extensions up to November 5, 2019 if needed to satisfy the regulatory approvals. In addition, SJW may fail to obtain the necessary funds to complete the Merger. If the proposed Merger is not completed or the Revised Merger Agreement is terminated, the price of our common stock may decline, including to the extent that the current market price of our common stock reflects an assumption that the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Revised Merger Agreement will be consummated without further delays, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If the Revised Merger Agreement is terminated and the Company determines to seek another business combination, it may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of the Merger.

We are subject to various uncertainties and restrictions on the conduct of our business while the Merger is pending, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Uncertainty about the pendency of the Merger and the effect of the Merger on employees, customers, vendors, communities and other third parties who deal with us may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel pending the consummation of the Merger, as such personnel may experience uncertainty about their future roles following the consummation of the Merger. Additionally, these uncertainties could cause customers, vendors and other third parties who deal with us to seek to change existing business relationships with us or fail to extend an existing relationship with us, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and market price of our common stock. In addition, the Revised Merger Agreement restricts us from taking certain actions without SJW’s consent while the Merger is pending, and these restrictions have been in place since the Original Merger Agreement was executed on March 14, 2018. These restrictions may, among other matters, prevent us from pursuing otherwise attractive business opportunities, buying or selling assets, making certain capital expenditures, refinancing or incurring additional indebtedness, entering into transactions, or making other changes to our business prior to consummation of the Merger or termination of the Revised Merger Agreement. These restrictions and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to lawsuits relating to the Merger, which may impact the timing of the closing of the Merger and adversely impact our business.

On June 14, 2018, two nearly identical putative class action complaints were filed against the members of the Board of Directors, SJW and Mr. Eric W. Thornburg (the chief executive officer and president of SJW) on behalf of the Company’s shareholders in the Connecticut Superior Court in the Judicial District of Middlesex under the captions Dunn v. Benoit, et al., Case No. MMX-CV18-6021536-S (Conn. Super. Ct.) and Tillotson v. Benoit, et al., Case No. MMX-CV18-6021537-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), respectively. The complaints, as amended on September 18, 2018 and September 20 2018, respectively, allege, among other things, that (i) the members of the Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties owed to the Company’s shareholders in connection with negotiating the Merger, (ii) the Company’s preliminary proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 20, 2018 in respect of the special meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on November 16, 2018 in connection with the Merger, omits certain material information and (iii) SJW and Mr. Thornburg aided and abetted the alleged breaches by the Board of Directors. Among other remedies, the action seeks to recover rescissory and other damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties to these actions entered into an agreement in principle to settle and release all claims that were or could have been alleged by the plaintiffs in those actions. On November 20, 2018, the plaintiffs in these two actions filed motions seeking an award of attorneys’ fees of $1.5 million, which the Company intends to oppose.

On October 5, 2018, a putative class action complaint and a direct action complaint were filed against the Company and the members of the Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut under the captions Paskowitz v. Connecticut Water Service, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01663 (D. Conn.) and Assad v. Connecticut Water Service, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01664 (D. Conn.), respectively. The nearly identical complaints allege that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by causing certain supposed misstatements or omissions to be included in the October 2, 2018 definitive proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect of the special meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on November 16, 2018 in connection with the Merger. Among other remedies, the actions seek to recover rescissory and other damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties to these actions entered into an agreement in principle to settle and release all claims that were or could have been alleged by the plaintiffs in those actions.

The Company and our directors and officers may be subject to further lawsuits relating to the Merger, including, among other things, in relation to the change from stock consideration in the Original Merger Agreement and First Amended and Restated

16



Merger Agreement to cash consideration in the Revised Merger Agreement. Litigation is very common in connection with the sale of public companies, regardless of whether the claims have any merit. One of the conditions to consummating the Merger is that no order preventing or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger shall have been issued by any court. Consequently, if any lawsuit challenging the Merger is successful in obtaining an order preventing the consummation of the Merger, that order may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed. While we will evaluate and defend against any lawsuits, the time and costs of defending against litigation relating to the Merger may adversely affect our business.

Actions taken by parties who oppose the Merger could negatively impact the completion and timing of the proposed transaction and cause disruption and expense for the Company.

On April 5, 2018, the Company received an unsolicited proposal from Eversource Energy regarding the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of our common stock, which the Company determined was neither a superior proposal nor reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal. Additionally, Eversource Energy filed a preliminary proxy statement to solicit proxies in opposition to the Merger, issued multiple press releases in support of its proposal and in opposition to the Merger, and has intervened in the PURA and MPUC proceedings related to the Merger. It is unclear what additional actions Eversource Energy may take to further express its opposition to the Merger. Even if ultimately unsuccessful, actions taken by Eversource Energy or other third parties, including intervention in our regulatory proceedings, could disrupt the Company’s business, cause the Company to incur substantial additional expense, and negatively impact the ability of the Company to consummate the Merger and the expected timing of the consummation of the Merger.

Because we incur significant capital expenditures annually, we depend on the rates we charge our customers, which are subject to regulation.

The water utility business is capital intensive. On an annual basis, we spend significant amounts of capital for additions to or replacement of property, plant and equipment. Our ability to maintain and meet our financial objectives is dependent upon the rates we charge our customers. These rates are subject to approval by PURA in Connecticut and the MPUC in Maine.  Our Regulated Companies are entitled to file rate increase requests, from time to time, to recover our investments in utility plant and expenses. Once a rate increase petition is filed with the respective agency, the ensuing administrative and hearing process may be lengthy and costly.  We can provide no assurances that any future rate increase requests will be approved by each agency; and, if approved, we cannot guarantee that any such rate increase requests will be granted in a timely or sufficient manner to cover the investments and expenses for which we initially sought the rate increase.  Additionally, a regulatory agency may rule that a company must reduce its rates.

Under a 2007 Connecticut law, PURA authorizes regulated water companies to use a rate adjustment mechanism, known as WICA, for eligible projects completed and in service for the benefit of the customers.  During 2013, the Maine Legislature enacted a law that allows Maine Water for expedited recovery of investments in water systems infrastructure replacement, both treatment and distribution, through WISC, similar to WICA in Connecticut. Maine Water began to use the WISC during 2014.

If we are unable to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness as it comes due, or we default under certain other provisions of our loan documents, our indebtedness could be accelerated and our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $257.5 million in long-term debt outstanding.  Our ability to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness as it comes due will depend upon our current and future performance.  Our performance is affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control.  We believe that our cash generated from operations, and, if necessary, borrowing under our existing and planned credit facilities, will be sufficient to enable us to make our debt payments as they become due.  If, however, we do not generate sufficient cash, we may be required to refinance our obligations or sell additional equity, which may be on terms that are not as favorable to the Company as current terms.

No assurance can be given that any debt refinancing or sale of equity will be possible when needed or that we will be able to negotiate acceptable terms.  In addition, our failure to comply with certain provisions contained in our trust indentures and loan agreements relating to our outstanding indebtedness could lead to a default on these documents, which could result in an acceleration of our indebtedness.


17



Credit market volatility may affect our ability to refinance our existing debt, borrow funds under our existing lines of credit or incur additional debt.

During certain periods of the United States credit and liquidity crisis of 2008-2009, the volatility and disruption in the credit and banking markets reached unprecedented levels.  In many cases, the markets contained limited credit capacity for certain issuers, and lenders had requested shorter terms.  The market for new debt financing was limited and in some cases not available at all.  In addition, the markets had increased the uncertainty that lenders will be able to comply with their previous commitments.  The Company noted improvements that continued through 2018.  If significant market disruption and volatility return, the Company may not be able to refinance our existing debt when it comes due, draw upon our existing lines of credit or incur additional debt, which may require us to seek other funding sources to meet our liquidity needs or to fund our capital expenditures budget.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain debt or other financing on reasonable terms, or at all.

Failure to maintain our existing credit ratings could affect our cost of funds and related margins and liquidity position.

Since 2003, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) has rated our outstanding debt and has given credit ratings to us and our largest subsidiary The Connecticut Water Company.  Their evaluations are based on a number of factors, which include financial strength as well as transparency with rating agencies and timeliness of financial reporting.  In January 2019, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) reduced its ‘A’ corporate credit rating on the Company to ‘A-’ based on S&P’s uncertainty surrounding the Company's potential merger with SJW, including the increased likelihood that the pending transaction may not close as expected. Also, contributing to the revised rating was the Company’s elevated capital spending, regulatory lag and temporarily increased merger costs and the impact these factors are expected to have on certain financial measures. Additionally, S&P revised the Company’s ratings outlook to stable from negative due to their view that the Company will continue to effectively manage regulatory risk in key jurisdictions, including in Connecticut and in Maine.

We may sustain losses that exceed or are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are not insured.

We maintain insurance coverage as part of our overall legal and risk management strategy to minimize our potential liabilities. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits, exclusions and maximums, and insurance companies may seek to deny claims we might make. Generally, our insurance policies cover property damage, worker’s compensation, employer’s liability, general liability and automobile liability. Each policy includes deductibles or self-insured retentions and policy limits for covered claims. As a result, we may sustain losses that exceed or that are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are not insured.

Although in the past we have been generally able to cover our insurance needs, there can be no assurances that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance in the future, or that such insurance can be economically secured. For example, catastrophic events can result in decreased coverage limits, more limited coverage, increased premium costs or deductibles.

We are subject to adverse publicity and reputational risks, which make us vulnerable to negative customer perception and could lead to increased regulatory oversight or other sanctions.

Water utilities, including our Regulated Companies, have a large consumer customer base and as a result are exposed to public criticism regarding, among other things, the reliability of their water services, the quality of water provided, and the timeliness and accuracy of bills that are provided for such services. Adverse publicity and negative consumer sentiment may render legislatures and other governing bodies, the MPUC, PURA and other regulatory authorities, and government officials less likely to view companies such the Company and its Regulated Companies in a favorable light, and may cause the Company and its Regulated Companies to be susceptible to less favorable legislative and regulatory outcomes, as well as increased regulatory oversight and more stringent regulatory requirements. Unfavorable regulatory outcomes may include the enactment of more stringent laws and regulations governing our operations, as well as fines, penalties or other sanctions or requirements. The imposition of any of the foregoing could have a material negative impact on the Company and each of our regulated companies’ business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our inability to comply with debt covenants under our credit facilities could result in prepayment obligations.

We are obligated to comply with debt covenants under our loan and debt agreements.  Failure to comply with covenants under our credit facilities could result in an event of default, which if not timely cured or waived, could result in us being required to repay or finance these borrowings before their due date, could limit future borrowings, and result in cross default issues and increase our borrowing costs.  The covenants are normal and customary in bank and loan agreements.  The Company and its subsidiaries were in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2018.


18



Market conditions, interest rate changes or changes in demographics may unfavorably impact the value of our benefit plan assets and liabilities which then could require significant additional funding.

The performance of the capital markets affects the values of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy future obligations under the Company’s pension and post-retirement benefit plans and could significantly impact our results of operations and financial position.  As detailed in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, the Company has significant obligations in these areas and the Company holds significant assets in these trusts.  The market value of these assets are subject to market fluctuations, which may affect investment returns, which may fall below the Company’s projected return rates.  A decline in the market value of the pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets will increase the funding requirements under the Company’s pension and post-retirement benefit plans if the actual asset returns do not recover these declines in value.  Additionally, the Company’s pension and post-retirement benefit plan liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates.  As interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, potentially increasing benefit expense and funding requirements.  Further, changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of the obligations related to the pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.  Also, future increases in pension and other post-retirement costs as a result of reduced plan assets may not be fully recoverable from our customers, and the results of operations and financial position of the Company could be negatively affected.

Our operating costs could be significantly increased because of state and federal environmental and health and safety laws and regulations.

Our water operations are governed by extensive federal and state environmental protection and health and safety laws and regulations, including the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act and similar state laws, and federal and state regulations issued under these laws by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state environmental regulatory agencies.  These laws and regulations establish, among other things, criteria and standards for drinking water and for discharges into the waters of the United States, the State of Connecticut or the State of Maine. Pursuant to these laws, we are required to obtain various environmental permits from environmental regulatory agencies for our operations.  We cannot assure that we have been or will be at all times in full compliance with these laws, regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators.

Environmental laws and regulations are complex and change frequently.  These laws, and the enforcement thereof, have tended to become more stringent over time.  For example, the State of Connecticut recently revised its Water Diversion Regulations.  The revision modified the prior exemptions from Water Diversion permitting and permits are now required for certain expansions of service beyond Exclusive Service Areas identified as of October 2016.  While we have budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to maintain compliance with these laws and our permits, it is possible that new or stricter standards could be imposed that will raise our operating costs.  Although these costs may be recovered in the form of higher rates, there can be no assurance that either the PURA or the MPUC would approve rate increases to enable us to fully recover such costs.  In summary, we cannot be assured that our costs of complying with, or discharging liabilities under, current and future environmental and health and safety laws will not adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our business has inherently dangerous workplaces. If we fail to maintain safe work sites, we can be exposed to not only people impacts but also to financial losses such as penalties and other liabilities.

Our safety record is critical to our reputation. We maintain health and safety standards to protect our employees, customers, vendors and the public. Although we intend to adhere to such health and safety standards and aim for zero injuries, it is extremely difficult to avoid accidents at all times.

Our business sites, including construction and maintenance sites, often put our employees and others in close proximity with large pieces of equipment, moving vehicles, pressurized water, underground trenches and vaults, chemicals and other regulated materials. On many sites we are responsible for safety and, accordingly, must implement safety procedures. If we fail to implement such procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective or are not followed by our employees or others, our employees and others may be injured or die. Unsafe work sites also have the potential to increase employee turnover and raise our operating costs. Any of the foregoing could result in financial losses, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, our operations can involve the handling and storage of hazardous chemicals, which, if improperly handled, stored or disposed of, could subject us to penalties or other liabilities. We are also subject to regulations dealing with occupational health and safety. Although we maintain functional employee groups whose primary purpose is to ensure we implement

19



effective health, safety, and environmental work procedures throughout our organization, including construction sites and maintenance sites, the failure to comply with such regulations or procedures could subject us to liability.

New and more stringent climate change laws and regulations may be adopted that could require compliance with greenhouse gas emissions standards and other climate change initiatives. Additional capital expenditures could be required and our operating costs could be increased in order to comply with new regulatory standards imposed by federal and state environmental agencies.

Climate change has been receiving ever increasing attention worldwide in the past decade.  Many scientists, legislators, and others attribute global warming to increased levels of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, which has led to significant legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions.  Possible new climate change laws and regulations, if enacted, may require us to monitor and/or change our utility operations.  It is possible that new standards could be imposed that will require additional capital expenditures or raise our operating costs.  Because it is uncertain what laws will be enacted, we cannot predict the potential impact of such laws on our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.  Although these expenditures and costs may be recovered in the form of higher rates, there can be no assurance that either PURA or the MPUC or other regulatory bodies that govern our business would permit us to recover such expenditures and costs.  We cannot assure you that our costs of complying with new standards or laws will not adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Streamflow Regulations in Connecticut could potentially impact our ability to serve our customers.

In December 2011, regulations concerning the flow of water in Connecticut’s rivers and streams were adopted.  As promulgated, the regulations require that certain downstream releases be made from seven of Connecticut Water’s eighteen active reservoirs no later than ten years following the adoption of stream classifications by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (“DEEP”).  Currently, downstream releases are made at two locations.  No groundwater supply wells are affected by the regulations.

DEEP has finalized stream classifications in three areas of the state where Connecticut Water maintains and operates sources of supply.  Other areas of the state, including areas where Connecticut Water operates, remain to be classified.  The Company remains engaged in the process in order to minimize impact to our available water supply.  Although modified from prior versions, the regulations still have the potential to lower our safe yield, raise our capital and operating expenses and adversely affect our revenues and earnings.  Because they affect only a subset of the Company’s supplies and allow for releases to be scaled back in response to drought events, the overall impact is anticipated to be manageable.  Costs associated with the regulations may be recovered in the form of higher rates.  Although there can be no assurance PURA would approve rate increases to enable us to recover all such costs, legislation passed in 2013 allows for a WICA surcharge to recover capital improvement costs necessary to achieve compliance with the regulations.

The State of Maine also has regulations that govern the flow of water in rivers and streams and also govern lake levels on great ponds.  Code of Maine Rules Chapter 587 (“Chapter 587”) regulates any activity that alters the flow or level of classified state waters after August 2007.  Maine Water operates five water systems that use surface waters governed by this chapter.  Maine Water has operated in full compliance with the chapter since its effective date and fully expects continued compliance.  For public water systems, Chapter 587 allows the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (“MDEP”) to impose site specific conditions in locations where Maine’s water quality classifications are not being met.  Any conditions proposed on a water withdrawal by a public water system must consider the provisions of any legislative charter, the watershed protection benefits provided by the utility and the financial viability of the utility.  Further, any conditions imposed must be accommodated by the existing MPUC approved rate schedule for the utility and may not, in and of themselves, cause a utility to request a rate increase from their customers.  To date, the MDEP has not imposed any withdrawal conditions on any public water system in Maine.

Maine Water’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations which could adversely affect demand for its water services and its revenues.

Demand for our water during the warmer months is generally greater than during cooler months due primarily to additional requirements for water in connection with irrigation systems, swimming pools, cooling systems and other outside water use. Throughout the year, and particularly during typically warmer months, demand will vary with temperature and rainfall levels. In the event that temperatures during the typically warmer months are cooler than normal, or if there is more rainfall than normal, the demand for our water may decrease and adversely affect our revenues. As Maine Water becomes eligible to use the recently passed water revenue adjustment mechanism upon the expiration of the agreed upon stay out period, this risk will be mitigated.

20




Declining per customer residential water usage in the State of Maine and at Avon Water may reduce our revenues, financial condition and results of operations in future years.

A trend of declining per customer residential water usage has been observed for the last several years, which we attribute to increased water conservation, including the use of more efficient household fixtures and appliances among residential users.  While Connecticut Water and HVWC utilize the water revenue adjustment mechanism, our regulated businesses in Maine and at Avon Water are heavily dependent on revenue generated from rates we charge to our residential customers for the volume of water they use.  The rate we charge for our water is regulated by the MPUC in Maine and PURA in Connecticut and we may not unilaterally adjust our rates to reflect changes in demand.  Declining volume of residential water usage may have a negative impact on our operating revenues in the future if regulators do not reflect any usage declines in the rate setting design process. While Maine Water and Avon Water have legislative authorization to utilize the water revenue adjustment mechanism to mitigate this risk, these companies continue to evaluate the proper timing to seek the required approval of regulatory agencies to implement the mechanism.

Potential regulatory changes, drought conditions or other climate change related impacts may impede our ability to serve our current and future customers’ demand for water and our financial results.

We depend on an adequate water supply to meet the present and future demands of our customers.  Changes in regulatory requirements could affect our ability to utilize existing supplies and/or secure new sources, as required.  Insufficient supplies or an interruption in our water supply could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  Drought conditions or other climate change related impacts could interfere with our sources of water supply and could adversely affect our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our existing and future customers. An interruption in our water supply could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  Moreover, governmental restrictions on water usage during drought conditions may result in a decreased demand for our water, even if our water reserves are sufficient to serve our customers during these drought conditions, which may adversely affect our revenues and earnings at Maine Water. Persistent dry weather and continued drought conditions in 2016 in the State of Connecticut prompted Connecticut Water to join other major water utilities in the state and request that all customers voluntarily reduce their water usage by 10% in July 2016 in an effort to extend the availability of existing supplies and to support the rivers and streams in the state. While supplies in our reservoirs were lower than normal, Connecticut Water also has groundwater sources in nearly all of its water systems that provide operational flexibility so we are not solely dependent on our reservoirs for water supply. Connecticut Water encouraged all customers to reduce their water usage by 10% and, in October 2016, began asking customers in the shoreline communities of Guilford, Madison, Clinton, Westbrook and Old Saybrook to reduce their water usage by 15%. On April 21, 2017, the Company announced that all of our reservoirs in the State of Connecticut had returned to full capacity and that the previously announced water supply advisory has been lifted.

Wastewater operations entail significant risks and may impose significant costs.

Wastewater collection and treatment and septage pumping and sludge hauling involve various unique risks.  If collection or treatment systems operated by HVWC fail or do not operate properly, or if there is a spill, untreated or partially treated wastewater could discharge onto property or into nearby streams and rivers, causing various damages and injuries, including environmental damage.  These risks are most acute during periods of substantial rainfall or flooding, which are the main causes of wastewater overflow and system failure.  Liabilities resulting from such damages and injuries could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


21



We are increasingly dependent on the continuous and reliable operation of our information technology systems, and a disruption of these systems, resulting from cyber security attacks or other events, could adversely affect our business.

We rely on our information technology systems in connection with the operation of our business, especially with respect to customer service and billing, accounting and, in some cases, the monitoring and operation of our treatment, storage and pumping facilities. In addition, we rely on our systems to track our utility assets and to manage maintenance and construction projects, materials and supplies, and our human resource functions. A loss of these systems, or major problems with the operation of these systems, could adversely affect our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from the following types of cyber security attacks or other events:
power loss, computer systems failures, and internet, telecommunications or data network failures;
operator negligence or improper operation by, or supervision of, employees;
physical and electronic loss of data;
computer viruses, cyber security attacks, intentional security breaches, hacking, denial of service actions, misappropriation of data and similar events;
difficulties in the implementation of upgrades or modification to our information technology systems; and
hurricanes, fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters.

Recognizing the increasing importance of managing and protecting electronic data, the Company, beginning in 2014, partnered with a consulting firm to evaluate the Company's cyber security strengths and vulnerabilities and to help in creating an evaluation of the Company's current information technology (“IT”) structure within the organization.  In April 2014, a cyber security assessment analysis identified and prioritized steps that the Company should take to enhance its security surrounding cyber security.  In September 2014, the consultant delivered a report related to the IT structure which contained recommendations aimed at strengthening the IT organization.  The Company has implemented the recommendations contained in the cyber security assessment.

Since the implementation of those recommendations, the Company has continued to evaluate its cyber security strengths and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis. As a result, the Company has focused on the following initiatives:
Cyber security architecture;
Disaster recovery automation;
Data loss prevention;
Web security;
Systems controls;
Program awareness;
Mobile security;
Cyber training for employees;
Phishing campaigns;
Systems patch management; and
Supporting cyber policy for all projects or ongoing practices.

Although we do not believe that our systems are at a materially greater risk of cyber security attacks than other similar organizations, our information technology systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from the types of cyber security attacks or other events listed above or other similar actions, and such incidents or other events may go undetected for a period of time. Such cyber security attacks or other events may result in: the loss or compromise of customer, financial or operational data; disruption of billing, collections or normal field service activities; disruption of electronic monitoring and control of operational systems; and delays in financial reporting and other normal management functions. Possible impacts associated with a cyber security attack or other events may include remediation costs related to lost, stolen, or compromised data, repairs to data processing systems, increased cyber security protection costs, adverse effects on our compliance with regulatory and environmental laws and regulation, including standards for drinking water, litigation and reputational damage.


22



The failure of, or the requirement to repair, upgrade or dismantle, any of our dams may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We own and operate numerous dams throughout the States of Connecticut and Maine.  While the Company maintains robust dam maintenance and inspection programs, a failure of any of those dams could result in injuries and damage to residential and/or commercial property downstream for which we may be responsible, in whole or in part.  The failure of a dam could also adversely affect our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our customers and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  Any losses or liabilities incurred due to the failure of one of our dams might not be covered by insurance policies or be recoverable in rates, and such losses may make it difficult for us to secure insurance in the future at acceptable rates.

Any failure of our reservoirs, storage tanks, mains or distribution networks could result in losses and damages that may affect our financial condition and reputation.

Our Regulated Companies distribute water through an extensive network of mains and store water in reservoirs and storage tanks located across Connecticut and Maine.  A failure of major mains, reservoirs, or tanks could result in injuries and damage to residential and/or commercial property for which we may be responsible, in whole or in part.  The failure of major mains, reservoirs or tanks may also result in the need to shut down some facilities or parts of our water distribution network in order to conduct repairs.  Such failures and shutdowns may limit our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our customers and to meet the water delivery requirements prescribed by governmental regulators, including PURA and the MPUC, and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity and reputation.  Any business interruption or other losses might not be covered by insurance policies or be recoverable in rates, and such losses may make it difficult for us to secure insurance in the future at acceptable rates.

Any future acquisitions we may undertake may involve risks and uncertainties.

An important element of our growth strategy is the acquisition and integration of water systems in order to move into new service areas and to broaden our current service areas.  As of December 31, 2018, our Regulated Companies serve 139,574 customers, or a population of approximately 450,000 people, in 80 municipalities throughout Connecticut and Maine.  We will be unable to acquire other businesses if we cannot identify suitable acquisition opportunities or reach mutually agreeable terms with acquisition candidates.  It is our intent, when practical, to integrate any businesses we acquire with our existing operations.  The negotiation of potential acquisitions as well as the integration of acquired businesses could require us to incur significant costs and cause diversion of our management’s time and resources.  Future acquisitions by us could result in:
dilutive issuances of our equity securities;
incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities;
failure to have effective internal control over financial reporting;
fluctuations in quarterly results; and
other acquisition-related expenses.

Some or all of these items could have a material adverse effect on our business as well as our ability to finance our business and comply with regulatory requirements.  The businesses we acquire, including HVWC and Avon Water acquired in 2017, may not achieve sales and profitability that would justify our investment and any difficulties we encounter in the integration process, including the integration of controls necessary for internal control and financial reporting, could interfere with our operations, reduce our operating margins and adversely affect our internal controls.  In addition, as consolidation becomes more prevalent in the water and wastewater industries, the prices for suitable acquisition candidates may increase to unacceptable levels and limit our ability to grow through acquisitions.


23



Water supply contamination may adversely affect our business.

Our water supplies are subject to possible contamination, including contamination from the development of naturally-occurring compounds, chemicals in groundwater systems, pollution resulting from man-made sources, and possible terrorist attacks. In the event that our water supply is contaminated, we may have to interrupt the use of that water supply until we are able to substitute the flow of water from an uncontaminated water source or provide additional treatment.  We may incur significant costs in order to treat the contaminated source through expansion of our current treatment facilities, or development of new treatment methods.  If we are unable to substitute water supply from an uncontaminated water source, or to adequately treat the contaminated water source in a cost-effective manner, there may be an adverse effect on our revenues, operating results and financial condition.  The costs we incur to decontaminate a water source or an underground water system could be significant and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition and may not be recoverable in rates.  We could also be held liable for consequences arising out of human exposure to hazardous substances in our water supplies or other environmental damage.  For example, private plaintiffs have the right to bring personal injury or other toxic tort claims arising from the presence of hazardous substances in our drinking water supplies.  Our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover the costs of these claims.

Attention is being given to emerging contaminants, including, without limitation, chemicals and other substances that currently do not have any regulatory standard in drinking water or have been recently created or discovered (including by means of scientific achievements in the analysis and detection of trace amounts of substances). Examples of sources of emerging contaminants include, but are not limited to, newly created chemical compounds (including, for example, perfluorinated compounds and manufactured nanomaterials); human and veterinary products; microbes, viruses, amoebae and other pathogens; and residual by-products of disinfection. We rely upon governmental agencies to set appropriate regulatory standards to protect the public from these and other contaminants. Our role is to meet or surpass those standards, when established. PURA and/or MPUC may disapprove of cost recovery, in whole or in part, for implementation of treatment infrastructure for an emerging contaminant in the absence of a regulatory standard. Furthermore, depending on the regulatory standards and implementation schedules that might be established for any emerging contaminants, we may not be able to detect and/or mitigate all such substances in our drinking water system or supplies in a timely manner, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and reputation. In addition, we believe emerging contaminants may form the basis for additional or increased federal or state regulatory initiatives and requirements in the future, which could significantly increase the cost of our operations.

We operate a number of water and wastewater systems under Operation and Maintenance (“O&M”) contracts and face the risk that the owners of those systems may fail to provide capital to properly maintain those systems, which may negatively affect us as the operators of the systems.

We operate a number of water systems under O&M contracts. Pursuant to these contracts, we operate the system according to the standards set forth in the applicable contract, and it is generally the responsibility of the owner of the system to undertake capital improvements. In some cases, we may not be able to convince the owner to make needed improvements in order to maintain compliance with applicable regulations. Although violations and fines incurred by water and wastewater systems may be the responsibility of the owner of the system under these contracts, those non-compliance events may reflect poorly on us as the operator of the system and damage our reputation, and in some cases, may result in liability to the same extent as if we were the owner.

Increased security measures may continue to increase our operating costs.

In addition to the potential pollution of our water supply as described above, we have taken steps to increase security measures at our facilities and heighten employee awareness of threats to our water supply.  We have also tightened our security measures regarding the delivery and handling of certain chemicals used in our business.  We have and will continue to bear increased costs for security precautions to protect our facilities, operations and supplies. These costs may be significant.  We are currently not aware of any specific threats to our facilities, operations or supplies; however, it is possible that we would not be in a position to control the outcome of terrorist events should they occur.


24



The accuracy of our judgments and estimates about financial and accounting matters will impact our operating results and financial condition.

We make certain estimates and judgments in preparing our financial statements regarding, among others:
the number of years to depreciate certain assets;
amounts to set aside for uncollectible accounts receivable and uninsured losses;
our legal exposure and the appropriate accrual for claims, including medical and workers’ compensation claims;
future costs for pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations; and
possible tax allowances.

The quality and accuracy of those estimates and judgments will have an impact on our operating results and financial condition.

In addition, we must estimate unbilled revenues and costs at the end of each accounting period.  If our estimates are not accurate, we will be required to make an adjustment in a future period.

The final determination of our income tax liability may be materially different from our income tax provision.

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Our calculation of the provision for income taxes is subject to our interpretation of applicable business tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file. In addition, our income tax returns are subject to periodic examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. During 2013 and 2014, Connecticut Water and Maine Water, respectively, changed their tax method of accounting to permit the expensing of qualifying utility asset costs that were previously being capitalized and depreciated for tax purposes. Our determination of what qualifies as a capital cost versus a repair expense tax deduction is subject to subsequent adjustment and may impact the income tax benefits that have been recognized. Although we believe our income tax estimates, including any tax reserves or valuation allowances we have recorded or may record, are appropriate, there is no assurance that the final determination of our income tax liability will not be materially different; either higher or lower, from what is reflected in our income tax provision. In the event we are assessed additional income taxes, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

In addition, new Federal, state and local laws, changes in existing laws, rules or regulations, or administrative interpretations thereof, could impact us. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018, and certain other provisions related specifically to the public utility industry, including continuation of interest expense deductibility, the exclusion from utilizing bonus depreciation and the normalization of deferred income taxes. The enactment of the Tax Act required a re-measurement of our deferred income taxes that impacted our 2017 results of operations and financial position. We have assumed that the predominant majority of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at our utility subsidiaries will remain subject to a normalization method of accounting pursuant to the U.S. tax code or applicable regulations and that we will be able to deduct for U.S. federal corporate income tax purposes substantially all of our interest expense, based upon our interpretation of U.S. tax law debt allocation methodologies, at the Tax Act’s 21% corporate tax rate. The adoption or issuance of any related interpretations that impact these assumptions or with respect to provisions related specifically to the public utility industry or to corporate taxpayers in general may also impact our future financial performance, including our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity, which impacts will largely be determined through future regulatory proceedings. Moreover, we are unable to determine or predict the potential impacts, if any, of any other new or amended laws, rules or regulations, or interpretations thereof, to the extent they may be ultimately enacted, adopted or issued, on us or our businesses, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.

Key employee turnover may adversely affect our operating results.

Our success depends significantly on the continued individual and collective contributions of our management team. The loss of the services of any member or our senior management team or the inability to hire and retain experienced management personnel could harm our operating results.


25



We must continue to attract and retain qualified technical and managerial personnel in order to succeed.

Our future success will also depend largely upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, operational and financial managers. There is significant competition for such personnel in our industry. We try to ensure that we offer competitive compensation and benefits as well as opportunities for continued development, and we continually strive to recruit and train qualified personnel and retain key employees. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to be successful in attracting and retaining the personnel we require to grow and operate profitably.

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2018, the properties of our Regulated Companies consisted of land, easements, rights (including water rights), buildings, reservoirs, standpipes, dams, wells, supply lines, treatment plants, pumping plants, transmission and distribution mains and conduits, mains and other facilities and equipment used for the collection, purification, storage and distribution of water.  In certain cases, Connecticut Water and Maine Water are or may be a party to limited contractual arrangements for the provision of water supply from neighboring utilities.  Water mains are located, for the most part, in public streets and, in a few instances, are located on land that we own in fee simple and/or land utilized pursuant to easement right, most of which are perpetual and adequate for the purpose for which they are held. Substantially all of our treatment, storage, and distribution properties are owned by our subsidiaries, Connecticut Water, HVWC, Avon Water and Maine Water. A substantial portion of such properties owned by Maine Water are subject to liens of mortgage or indentures that secure bonds, notes and other evidences of long-term indebtedness.

The net utility plant of the Company at December 31, 2018 was solely owned by the Regulated Companies.  The “Net Utility Plant” balance as of December 31, 2018 was $739,793,000, approximately $42.1 million more than the balance of “Net Utility Plant” as of December 31, 2017, due primarily to normal plant additions and construction spending related to infrastructure improvements, including WICA and WISC projects.

Sources of water supply owned, maintained, and operated by our Regulated Companies include 25 surface water supplies and 108 well fields, as of December 31, 2018.  In addition, Connecticut Water, HVWC, Avon Water and Maine Water have agreements with various neighboring water utilities to provide water, at negotiated rates, to our water systems.  Collectively, these sources have the capacity to deliver approximately 84 million gallons of potable water daily to the 27 major operating systems. The Regulated Companies own, maintain, and operate 50 small, non-interconnected satellite and consecutive water systems that, combined, have the ability to deliver about 3.5 million gallons of additional water per day to their respective systems. For some small consecutive water systems, purchased water may comprise substantially all of the total available supply of the system.

As of December 31, 2018, the Regulated Companies own and operate 30 water filtration facilities, having a combined treatment capacity of approximately 52 million gallons per day.

As of December 31, 2018, the transmission and distribution systems of the Regulated Companies consisted of approximately 2,300 miles of main.  On that date, approximately 74% of our mains were 8 inch diameter or larger.  Substantially all new main installations are cement-lined ductile iron pipe of 8 inch diameter or larger.

We believe that our properties are maintained in good condition and in accordance with current regulations and standards of good waterworks industry practice.


26



ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On June 14, 2018, two nearly identical putative class action complaints were filed against the members of the Board of Directors, SJW and Mr. Eric W. Thornburg (the chief executive officer and president of SJW) on behalf of the Company’s shareholders in the Connecticut Superior Court in the Judicial District of Middlesex under the captions Dunn v. Benoit, et al., Case No. MMX-CV18-6021536-S (Conn. Super. Ct.) and Tillotson v. Benoit, et al., Case No. MMX-CV18-6021537-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), respectively. The complaints, as amended on September 18, 2018 and September 20 2018, respectively, allege, among other things, that (i) the members of the Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties owed to the Company’s shareholders in connection with negotiating the Merger, (ii) the Company’s preliminary proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 20, 2018 in respect of the special meeting of its shareholders held on November 16, 2018 in connection with the Merger, omits certain material information and (iii) SJW and Mr. Thornburg aided and abetted the alleged breaches by the Board of Directors. Among other remedies, the actions seek to recover rescissory and other damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties to these actions entered into an agreement in principle to settle and release all claims that were or could have been alleged by the plaintiffs in those actions. On November 20, 2018, the plaintiffs in these two actions filed motions seeking an award of attorneys’ fees of $1.5 million, which the Company intends to oppose.

On October 5, 2018, a putative class action complaint and a direct action complaint were filed against the Company and the members of the Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut under the captions Paskowitz v. Connecticut Water Service, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01663 (D. Conn.) and Assad v. Connecticut Water Service, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01664 (D. Conn.), respectively. The nearly identical complaints allege that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by causing certain supposed misstatements or omissions to be included in the October 2, 2018 definitive proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect of the special meeting of its shareholders held on November 16, 2018 in connection with the Merger. Among other remedies, the actions seek to recover rescissory and other damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties to these actions entered into an agreement in principle to settle and release all claims that were or could have been alleged by the plaintiffs in those actions.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings from time to time. Although the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, there are no pending legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries are a party or to which any of our properties is the subject that presents a reasonable likelihood of a material adverse impact on the Company.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

27



PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CTWS”.  

As of February 1, 2019, there were approximately 2,900 holders of record of our common stock.

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for May 9, 2019 in Madison, Connecticut.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company – In May 2005, the Company adopted a common stock repurchase program (“Share Repurchase Program”).  The Share Repurchase Program allows the Company to repurchase up to 10% of its outstanding common stock, at a price or prices that are deemed appropriate.  As of December 31, 2018, no shares have been repurchased. Currently, the Company has no plans to repurchase shares under the Share Repurchase Program.

Performance Graph – Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return for each of the years 20142018 on the Company’s Common Stock, based on the market price of the Common Stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the cumulative total shareholder return of companies in the S&P’s 500 Index and the S&P’s 500 Utility Index.

chart-bf1711a3e4b95848803.jpg


28



ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31, (thousands of dollars except per share amounts and where otherwise indicated)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues
$
116,665

 
$
107,054

 
$
98,667

 
$
96,041

 
$
94,020

Operating Expenses
$
80,564

 
$
73,649

 
$
70,462

 
$
69,399

 
$
68,856

Other Utility Income, Net of Taxes
$
1,078

 
$
824

 
$
744

 
$
797

 
$
833

Total Utility Operating Income
$
37,179

 
$
34,229

 
$
28,949

 
$
27,439

 
$
25,997

Interest and Debt Expense
$
11,124

 
$
8,841

 
$
6,916

 
$
6,737

 
$
6,515

Net Income
$
16,695

 
$
25,054

 
$
23,387

 
$
22,761

 
$
21,319

Cash Common Stock Dividends Paid
$
14,899

 
$
13,882

 
$
12,514

 
$
11,715

 
$
11,188

Dividend Payout Ratio
89
%
 
55
%
 
54
%
 
51
%
 
52
%
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
11,913,727

 
11,539,520

 
11,008,565

 
10,958,499

 
10,892,986

Basic Earnings Per Common Share from Continuing Operations
$
1.40

 
$
2.17

 
$
2.12

 
$
2.07

 
$
1.95

Number of Shares Outstanding at Year End
12,054,712

 
12,065,016

 
11,248,458

 
11,192,882

 
11,124,630

ROE on Year End Common Equity
5.7
%
 
8.5
%
 
9.9
%
 
10.2
%
 
10.2
%
Declared Common Dividends Per Share
$
1.235

 
$
1.175

 
$
1.115

 
$
1.05

 
$
1.01

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stockholders’ Equity
$
294,136

 
$
293,630

 
$
236,028

 
$
223,977

 
$
209,451

Long-Term Debt (Consolidated, Excluding Current Maturities)
257,511

 
253,367

 
197,047

 
171,868

 
170,309

Preferred Stock

 
772

 
772

 
772

 
772

Total Capitalization
$
551,647

 
$
547,769

 
$
433,847

 
$
396,617

 
$
380,532

Stockholders’ Equity (Includes Preferred Stock)
53
%
 
54
%
 
55
%
 
57
%
 
55
%
Long-Term Debt
47
%
 
46
%
 
45
%
 
43
%
 
45
%
Net Utility Plant
$
739,793

 
$
697,723

 
$
601,396

 
$
546,284

 
$
506,939

Total Assets
$
951,869

 
$
898,783

 
$
784,502

 
$
710,715

 
$
664,897

Book Value - Per Common Share
$
24.40

 
$
24.34

 
$
20.98

 
$
20.01

 
$
18.83

OPERATING REVENUES BY REVENUE CLASS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
$
69,134

 
$
62,831

 
$
59,884

 
$
58,439

 
$
57,095

Commercial
15,123

 
13,676

 
12,250

 
11,816

 
11,473

Industrial
3,395

 
3,196

 
3,176

 
3,229

 
2,984

Public Authority
3,917

 
3,845

 
3,510

 
3,193

 
3,215

Fire Protection
21,731

 
20,235

 
18,486

 
18,016

 
17,757

Other (Including Non-Metered Accounts)
3,365

 
3,271

 
1,361

 
1,348

 
1,496

Total Operating Revenues
$
116,665

 
$
107,054

 
$
98,667

 
$
96,041

 
$
94,020

Number of Customers (End of Year)
139,574

 
135,657

 
124,968

 
123,633

 
123,071

Billed Consumption (Millions of Gallons)
10,069

 
9,720

 
9,800

 
9,772

 
9,428

Number of Employees
297

 
294

 
266

 
266

 
265



29



ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Executive Overview

Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (the “Company”) is a non-operating holding company, whose income is derived from the earnings of its six wholly-owned subsidiary companies, as of December 31, 2018: The Connecticut Water Company (“Connecticut Water”), The Heritage Village Water Company (“HVWC”), The Avon Water Company (“Avon Water”), The Maine Water Company (“Maine Water”), New England Water Utility Services, Inc. (“NEWUS”), and Chester Realty Company (“Chester Realty”). Connecticut Water, HVWC, Avon Water and Maine Water are our regulated water companies (together, the “Regulated Companies”).

In 2018, approximately 85% of the Company’s net income was attributable to the water operations, which includes the impact of merger costs, of the Regulated Companies, which combined had 139,574 customers throughout 80 municipalities in Connecticut and Maine, as of December 31, 2018.  The rates charged for service by Connecticut Water, HVWC and Avon Water are subject to review and approval by the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (“PURA”). The rates charged for service by Maine Water are subject to review and approval by the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”).

Proposed Merger with SJW
On August 5, 2018, the Company entered into the Revised Merger Agreement with SJW and Merger Sub, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SJW. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Revised Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of our common stock (other than certain cancelled shares) will be automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $70.00 per share, payable without interest. The Revised Merger Agreement amends and restates in its entirety the First Amended and Restated Merger Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2018, which amended and restated in its entirety the Original Merger Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2018.

The Board of Directors approved, adopted and declared advisable the Revised Merger Agreement and the Merger and recommended that the Company’s shareholders approve the Revised Merger Agreement following a comprehensive review of the transaction. The Revised Merger Agreement was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 16, 2018.

The Merger is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including, among other things, approval of the Revised Merger Agreement by the Company’s shareholders (which was received on November 16, 2018) and regulatory approvals (including the approval of PURA and MPUC). The required waiting period under the HSR Act, was terminated early on April 27, 2018. The early termination will expire and the Company and SJW will need to re-file the necessary notifications under the HSR Act if the Merger is not consummated by April 27, 2019. On October 15, 2018, the FCC consented to the joint application for transfer of control filed by the Company and SJW on October 4, 2018 and amended on October 12, 2018, and no further clearance from the FCC is required.

On May 4, 2018, Maine Water filed with MPUC an application for approval of the Merger. On May 7, 2018, the Company and SJW filed with PURA a joint application for approval of the Merger. Following the start on May 31, 2018 of a 45-day go-shop process permitted by the First Amended and Restated Merger Agreement, the Company and SJW withdrew their joint PURA application on June 19, 2018, and filed a new joint application on July 18, 2018 following the end of the go-shop process. On January 9, 2019, the Company and SJW withdrew their current application before PURA and announced that they were continuing to evaluate their regulatory approach, including the possibility of submitting a new application to PURA in connection with the Merger. On January 23, 2019, Maine Water voluntarily requested to withdraw its application before MPUC, aligning the Maine regulatory process with the regulatory process in Connecticut. After a thorough review conducted by the management and boards of the Company and SJW, and with the support of their respective Connecticut regulatory counsel, the Company disclosed on February 21, 2019 that the companies decided to file new applications with PURA and MPUC which are intended to address PURA’s concerns. The Company and SJW expect that the new applications will be filed during the second quarter of 2019. PURA must make a ruling on the merger within 120 days after the filing of an application, unless the Company and SJW agree to an extension of the 120-day timeframe. MPUC must make a ruling on the merger within 60 days after the filing of an application, unless it determines that the necessary investigation cannot be concluded within 60 days, in which event it can extend the review period for up to an additional 120 days.

On July 20, 2018, CPUC formally issued the Order providing that CPUC will investigate whether the Merger is subject to CPUC approval and the Merger’s anticipated impacts within California. CPUC held a public participation hearing on January 31, 2019 in connection with the Order.

30




The Heritage Village Water Company Acquisition
As previously reported, on May 10, 2016, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire HVWC, pending a vote of HVWC shareholders, approval by PURA and MPUC and the satisfaction of other various closing conditions, pursuant to the terms of Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 10, 2016 between and among HVWC, the Company, and HAC, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned Connecticut subsidiary (the “Merger Agreement”). HVWC serves approximately 4,700 water customers in the Towns of Southbury, Middlebury, and Oxford, Connecticut and approximately 3,000 wastewater customers in the Town of Southbury, Connecticut.

The acquisition was executed through a stock-for-stock merger transaction valued at approximately $16.9 million. Holders of HVWC common stock received shares of the Company’s common stock in a tax-free exchange. In addition, the transaction reflected a total enterprise value of HVWC of approximately $21.5 million, with the $16.9 million paid to shareholders in a stock exchange and the assumption by the Company of approximately $4.6 million of debt held by HVWC at the time of the acquisition.

The Company received regulatory approval from MPUC on September 28, 2016 and from PURA on December 5, 2016, to proceed with the transaction. The shareholders of HVWC voted to approve the acquisition at a special meeting of HVWC’s shareholders held on February 27, 2017.

On February 27, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of HVWC by completing the merger of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary HAC, Inc. with and into HVWC, with HVWC as the surviving corporation, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Connecticut corporate law. Upon the effective time of the Merger, the holders of HVWC’s 1,620 issued and outstanding shares of common stock became entitled to receive an aggregate of 300,445 shares of the Company’s common stock in a tax-free exchange, which exchange was commenced promptly by the issuance of a letter of transmittal and related materials by Connecticut Water’s exchange agent.

The Avon Water Company Acquisition
As previously reported, on October 12, 2016, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement to acquire Avon Water, pending a vote of Avon Water shareholders, approval by PURA and the MPUC and the satisfaction of other various closing conditions, pursuant to the terms of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 11, 2016 as amended on March 29, 2017 between and among Avon Water, the Company, and WC-A I, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned Connecticut subsidiary (the “Merger Agreement”). Avon Water serves approximately 4,800 customers in the Farmington Valley communities of Avon, Farmington, and Simsbury, Connecticut.

On February 10, 2017, Connecticut Water received regulatory approval from MPUC and on April 12, 2017, Connecticut Water received regulatory approval from PURA to proceed with the transaction. The shareholders of Avon Water voted to approve the acquisition at a special meeting of Avon Water’s shareholders held on June 16, 2017.

Effective July 1, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Avon Water by completing the merger of Connecticut Water’s wholly-owned subsidiary WC-A I, Inc. with and into Avon Water, with Avon Water as the surviving corporation, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Connecticut corporate law. Upon the effective time of the Merger, the holders of Avon Water’s 122,289 issued and outstanding shares of common stock became entitled to receive the following merger consideration for each share of Avon Water common stock held: (i) a cash payment of $50.11; and (ii) a stock consideration component, consisting of 3.97 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The transaction was completed through a stock-for-stock exchange where Avon Water shareholders received the Company’s common stock valued at approximately $26.9 million, in a tax-free exchange, and a cash payment of $6.1 million for a total payment to shareholders of $33.0 million. The transaction reflects a total enterprise value of approximately $39.1 million, with the $33.0 million paid to shareholders and the assumption by the Company of approximately $6.1 million of debt held by Avon Water at the time of acquisition.
Regulatory Matters and Inflation

In 2007, the Connecticut General Assembly passed the Water Infrastructure and Conservation Adjustment (“WICA”) Act.  WICA allows Connecticut Water to add a surcharge to customers’ bills, subject to an expedited review and approval by PURA and no more than twice a year, to reflect the replacement of certain types of aging utility plant; principally water mains, meters, service lines and water conservation related investments. Connecticut Water has been using the WICA surcharge since 2009. Similarly, beginning in June 2013, a Water Infrastructure Charge (“WISC”) became available in Maine that allows for expedited recovery of investment in water system infrastructure replacement, both treatment and distribution. Maine Water implemented the WISC mechanism in all of their systems in 2014.

31




Since 2013, Connecticut law has authorized a Water Revenue Adjustment (“WRA”) to reconcile actual water demands with the demands projected in the last general rate case and allows companies to adjust rates as necessary to recover the revenues approved by PURA in the last general rate case. The WRA removes the financial disincentive for water utilities to develop and implement effective water conservation programs. The WRA allows water companies to defer on the balance sheet, as a regulatory asset or liability, for later collection from or crediting to customers the amount by which actual revenues deviate from the revenues allowed in the most recent general rate proceedings. A similar WICA reconciliation adjustment mechanism allows the Connecticut water utilities that have WICA to be made whole, and not more than whole for their allowed WICA revenues during a calendar year. Additionally, projects eligible for WICA surcharges were expanded to include energy conservation projects, improvements required to comply with streamflow regulations, and improvements to acquired systems.

Connecticut Water and HVWC’s allowed revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, as approved by PURA during each company’s last general rate case and including subsequently approved WICA surcharges, were approximately $88.9 million. Through normal billing for the year ended December 31, 2018 operating revenue for Connecticut Water and HVWC would have been approximately $80.7 million had the WRA not been implemented. As a result of the implementation of the WRA, Connecticut Water and HVWC recorded $8.2 million in additional revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, which reflects increased allowed revenues, effective April 1, 2018, resulting from the application of the rate settlement approved by PURA during 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, Connecticut Water recorded $4.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in additional revenue related to the WRA. Currently, Avon Water does not utilize the WRA.

On February 6, 2018, Connecticut Water filed a petition with PURA to reopen Connecticut Water’s 2010 rate case (previously reopened in 2013) proceeding for the limited purpose of approving a Settlement Agreement entered into by Connecticut Water and the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel (“OCC”) (the “Agreement”). The Agreement contemplates a change in Connecticut Water’s customer rates effective for bills rendered on and after April 1, 2018 made up of the following two components: (1) the revenue requirements associated with a $36.3 million addition to rate base to reflect necessary upgrades to Connecticut Water’s Rockville Water Treatment Plant; and (2) the folding in to base rates of the Company’s present WICA surcharges. In addition, the Agreement provides that:
1.
Upon implementation of new rates under the Agreement, until such time as new rates are adopted in a general rate case, through a temporary modification of the earnings sharing mechanism, Connecticut Water customers will receive one hundred percent of any earnings in excess of levels allowed by law rather than limiting such customer credits to 50% as contemplated by applicable law;
2.
Connecticut Water agrees it will not file for a general increase of Connecticut Water’s base rates unless those rates are to be effective on or after January 1, 2020;
3.
The pending proceeding initiated by PURA in Docket No. 09-12-11RE03, Application of The Connecticut Water Company for Amended Rates – Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act shall be closed; and
4.
Connecticut Water shall continue to make investments in infrastructure replacement consistent with its approved WICA plan. Connecticut Water shall be allowed to continue to pursue recovery of eligible projects through WICA.

On August 15, 2018, PURA issued a final decision that accepted the conditions of a revised settlement agreement. The primary facets of the revised settlement agreement were the revenue requirements associated with the Rockville Water Treatment Plant, discussed above, and the folding of previously approved WICA surcharges into base rates, which reset Connecticut Water’s WICA to zero and resolution of the Company’s obligations related to the Tax Act. New rates were effective as of April 1, 2018.

The Company has and will continue to focus on minimizing operating costs that are passed along to its customers without sacrificing the quality service it values and the customers demand.  At the same time, the Company will continue to employ its current strategy of timely collection of appropriate costs and a fair rate of return for its shareholders through appropriate rates for its regulated water service while looking to expand through targeted acquisitions.

While the Company plans to file timely rate cases, continue to make acquisitions, similar to the completed HVWC and Avon Water acquisitions, and, in the future, utilize the WICA and WISC adjustments to allow for more timely recovery of investment in utility plant, it will also look to NEWUS and Maine Water to increase its earnings in unregulated businesses.  The Company will continue to seek out maintenance and service contracts with new customers and renew existing contracts that have proven to be beneficial to the Company, as well as to continue the expansion of the Linebacker® program.

The Company, like all other businesses, is affected by inflation, most notably by the continually increasing costs required to maintain, improve, and expand its service capabilities.  The cumulative effect of inflation over time results in significantly higher operating costs and facility replacement costs, which must be recovered from future cash flows.


32



Our regulated water companies’ ability to recover its increased expenses and/or investment in utility plant is dependent on the rates we charge our customers.  Changes to these rates must be approved by PURA and MPUC through formal rate proceedings.  Due to the subjectivity of certain items involved in the process of establishing rates such as customer usage, future customer growth, inflation, and allowed return on investment, we have no assurance that we will be able to raise our rates to a level we consider appropriate, or to raise rates at all, through any future rate proceeding.

Our regulated water utilities are also subject to environmental and water quality regulations, which are continually modified and refined to ensure the safety of the Company’s water sources and, ultimately, the public’s health.  Costs to comply with environmental and water quality regulations are substantial.  The costs to comply with future changes in state or federal regulations, which could require us to modify current filtration facilities and/or construct new ones, or to replace any reduction of the safe yield from any of our current sources of supply, could be substantial.  While there can be no guarantee that all expenditures related to increased regulation will be recoverable in rate proceedings, the Company believes that the regulatory environment in Connecticut and Maine would allow prudent expenditures to be recovered in rates.  To date, the Company has never had any costs associated with water quality and environmental spending refused in a general rate proceeding.  The Company believes that it is in compliance with current regulations, but the regulations are subject to change at any time.

Recognizing the increasing importance of managing and protecting electronic data, the Company, beginning in 2014, partnered with a consulting firm to evaluate the Company's cyber security strengths and vulnerabilities and to help in creating an evaluation of the Company's current information technology (“IT”) structure within the organization.  In April 2014, a cyber security assessment analysis identified and prioritized steps that the Company should take to enhance its security surrounding cyber security.  In September 2014, the consultant delivered a report related to the IT structure which contained recommendations aimed at strengthening the IT organization.  The Company has implemented the recommendations contained in the cyber security assessment.

Since the implementation of those recommendations, the Company has continued to evaluate its cyber security strengths and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis. As a result, the Company has focused on the following initiatives:
Cyber security architecture;
Disaster recovery automation;
Data loss prevention;
Web security;
Systems controls;
Program awareness;
Mobile security;
Cyber training for employees;
Phishing campaigns;
Systems patch management; and
Supporting cyber policy for all projects or ongoing practices.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and as directed by the regulatory commissions to which the Company’s Regulated Companies are subject.  (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our significant accounting policies).  The Company believes the following policies and estimates are critical to the presentation of its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Public Utility Regulation – Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 980 “Regulated Operations” (“FASB ASC 980”), requires cost-based, rate-regulated enterprises such as the Regulated Companies to reflect the impact of regulatory decisions in their financial statements.  The state regulators, through the rate regulation process, can create regulatory assets that result when costs are allowed for ratemaking purposes in a period after the period in which costs would be charged to expense by an unregulated enterprise.  The balance sheet includes regulatory assets and liabilities as appropriate, primarily related to income taxes, post-retirement benefit costs and deferred revenues associated with the WRA.  The Company believes, based on current regulatory circumstances, that the regulatory assets recorded are probable to be recovered and that its use of regulatory accounting is appropriate and in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 980.


33



Revenue Recognition – The Company’s accounting policies regarding revenue recognition by segment are as follows:

Our revenues are primarily from tariff-based sales. We provide water and wastewater services to customers under these tariffs without a defined contractual term (at-will). As the revenue from these arrangements is based upon the amount of the water and wastewater services supplied and billed in that period (including estimated billings), there was not a shift in the timing or pattern of revenue recognition for such sales when compared to our revenue recognition prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-09. We have also completed the evaluation of our other revenue streams, including those tied to longer term contractual commitments and the Company’s Linebacker program.

Customers are primarily billed quarterly on a cycle basis and bills are due upon receipt. To match revenues with associated expenses, we accrue unbilled revenues for water and wastewater services delivered to customers, but not yet billed at month end, creating a contract asset.

Water Operations – Most of our water customers are billed quarterly, with the exception of larger commercial and industrial customers, as well as certain public and private fire protection customers who are billed monthly.  Most customers, except fire protection customers, are metered.  Revenues from metered customers are based on their water usage multiplied by approved, regulated rates and are earned when water is delivered.  Public fire protection revenues are based on the length of the water main, and number of hydrants in service and are earned on a monthly basis.  Private fire protection charges are based on the diameter of the connection to the water main.  Our Regulated Companies accrue an estimate for metered customers for the amount of revenues earned relating to water delivered but unbilled at the end of each quarter, which is reflected as “Accrued Unbilled Revenues” in the accompanying balance sheets. Beginning in 2013, Connecticut Water began to record deferred revenue to represent under collection from customers based upon allowed revenues as approved by PURA. On March 31, 2017, HVWC calculated its actual revenues compared to allowed revenues dating back to May 1, 2015, for collection from customers, as allowed by a PURA order. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Real Estate Transactions – Revenues are recorded when a sale or other transaction has been completed and title to the real estate has been transferred. Net income from the Real Estate Transactions segment is shown net in the “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” portion of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Net Income. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Services and Rentals – Revenues are recorded when the Company has delivered the services called for by contractual obligation. Net income from the Services and Rentals segment is shown net in the “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” portion of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. More detailed information, including revenues, costs and income taxes associated with the segment can be found in Note 15, “Segment Reporting” in the Company’s “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Income Taxes – The Company provides income tax expense for its utility operations in accordance with the regulatory accounting policies of the applicable jurisdictions. The Company’s income tax provision is calculated on a separate return basis. For Connecticut Water, PURA requires the flow-through method of accounting for most state tax temporary differences as well as for certain federal temporary differences. For Avon Water, PURA requires the flow-through method of accounting for most state temporary differences and normalized accounting for most federal temporary differences. PURA has allowed the flow-through method of accounting stemming from Avon Water’s adoption of the IRS’ Repair Regulations. For HVWC, PURA requires normalized accounting for federal and state temporary differences. The MPUC requires the flow-through method of accounting for most state temporary differences and normalized accounting for most federal temporary differences. In its approvals of the stipulation agreements between Maine Water and the Office of the Public Advocate, issued in 2015, the MPUC has allowed the flow-through method of accounting stemming from Maine Water’s adoption of the IRS’ Repair Regulations in all of its divisions.

The Company computes deferred tax liabilities for all temporary book-tax differences using the liability method prescribed in FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (“FASB ASC 740”). Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized at currently enacted income tax rates to reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Such temporary differences are the result of provisions in the income tax law that either require or permit certain items to be reported on the income tax return in a different period than they are reported in the financial statements. Deferred tax liabilities that have not been reflected in tax expense due to regulatory treatment are reflected as Unfunded Future Income Taxes, and are expected to be included in future years’ rates. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded provisional impacts of the Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). During the year ended

34



December 31, 2018 the Company, as allowed by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), finalized its analysis and accounting for the Tax Act. As a result, the Company re-measured Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities to reflect the enacted legislation and recorded a Regulatory Liability of $27.4 million to capture the excess accumulated deferred income taxes for items included in rates that follow the normalized method of accounting. Unrecovered Income Taxes and Unfunded Future Income Taxes were written down by $32.3 million to reflect the reduced tax rate for items that follow the flow-through method of accounting. Pursuant to ASU 2018-02, the Company has elected to reclassify the stranded tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act from AOCI to Retained Earnings in the amount of approximately $70,000. These stranded taxes relate to post-retirement obligations of the Company. For more information on the Tax Act, please see Note 2.

The Company believes that deferred income tax assets, net of provisions, will be realized in the future. The majority of Unfunded Future Income Taxes, prior to 2013, relate to deferred state income taxes regarding book to tax depreciation differences. Beginning in 2013, basis differences resulting from the repair tax deduction contributed to the change in unfunded income taxes.

Deferred Federal and State Income Taxes include amounts that have been provided for accelerated depreciation subsequent to 1981, as required by federal income tax regulations, as well as the basis differences associated with expenditures qualifying for repair tax deductions as clarified by the IRS in regulations issued in 2013. Deferred taxes have also been provided for temporary differences in the recognition of certain expenses for tax and financial statement purposes as allowed by regulatory ratemaking policies.

Employee Benefit Plan Accounting – Management evaluates the appropriateness of the discount rate through the modeling of a bond portfolio which approximates the pension and post-retirement plan liabilities.  Management further considers rates of high quality corporate bonds of approximate maturities as published by nationally recognized rating agencies consistent with the duration of the Company’s pension and post-retirement plans.

The discount rate assumption we use to value our pension and post-retirement benefit obligations has a material impact on the amount of expense we record in a given period.  Our 2018 and 2017 pension expense was calculated using assumed discount rates of 3.60% and 4.10%, respectively. Our 2018 and 2017 post-retirement welfare expense was calculated using assumed discount rates of 3.50% and 3.95%, respectively.  In 2019, our pension and post-retirement welfare expense will be calculated using assumed discount rates of 4.25% and 4.15%, respectively.  The following table shows how much a one percent change in our assumed discount rate would have changed our reported 2018 pension and post-retirement expense:

 
Increase (Decrease) in Pension Expense
 
Increase (Decrease) in Post-retirement Expense
1% Increase in the discount rate
$
(1,618,000
)
 
$
(181,000
)
1% Decrease in the discount rate
$
1,949,000

 
$
212,000


Other assumptions that affect the costs associated with our benefit plans include the assumed rate of return on plan assets and the expected rate of compensation increase.  The Company has assumed an 7.25% return on plan investments for 2018 and 2017, and a 4.00% rate of compensation increase for our pension and post-retirement welfare plans, in 2018 and 2017.  The assumed health care trend rate was 8.00% and 8.25% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. RP 2018, a mortality table issued by the Society of Actuaries in 2018, was used in determination of our pension and post-retirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 2018 and projected costs for 2019.

Goodwill – As part of the purchase of regulated water companies, the Company recorded goodwill of $66.4 million and $67.0 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, representing the amount of the purchase price over net book value of the assets acquired.  The decrease during 2018 is related to adjustments made to deferred taxes based on the Company’s ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards that had valuation allowances at the acquired companies. The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 350 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“FASB ASC 350”).

As part of FASB ASC 350, the Company is required to perform an annual review of goodwill for any potential impairment, which we perform as of December 31 each year. We update the assessment between the annual testing if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. As allowed under FASB ASC 350, the Company performed a qualitative analysis of its goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2018. A qualitative analysis includes a review of internal and external factors that could have an impact on a reporting unit’s fair value when compared to its carrying amount. These factors included a review of macroeconomic conditions, industry and

35



market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, company specific events, changes in reporting units and a review of the Company’s stock price. Based on these factors and other factors considered in its quantitative analysis performed in 2017, discussed below, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the fair market value is more than the carrying value of the Water Operation Segment and therefore, no goodwill impairment was recognized in 2018 and 2017.

The Company performed a quantitative analysis of impairment as of December 31, 2017, which concluded that the estimated fair value of the Water Operations reporting unit, which has goodwill recorded, exceeded the reporting unit’s carrying amount by at least 122% as of December 31, 2017.  Additionally, the Company believes that no event has occurred which would trigger impairment.

We may be required to recognize an impairment of goodwill in the future due to market conditions or other factors that are beyond our control and unrelated to our performance. Those market events could include a decline in the forecasted results in our business plan, significant adverse rate case results, changes in capital investment budgets or changes in interest rates that could permanently impair the fair value of a reporting unit. Recognition of impairments of a significant portion of goodwill would negatively impact our reported results of operation and total capitalization, the effects of which could be material and could make it more difficult to maintain our credit ratings, secure financing on favorable terms, maintain compliance with debt covenants and meet expectations of our regulators.

Outlook

The Company’s earnings and profitability are primarily dependent upon the sale and distribution of water. In the State of Maine and at Avon Water, the amount of water sold and distributed is dependent on seasonal weather fluctuations, particularly during the summer months when water demand will vary with rainfall and temperature levels.  The Company’s earnings and profitability in future years will also depend upon a number of other factors, such as the ability to maintain our operating costs at current or lower levels, customer growth in the Company’s core regulated water utility businesses, growth in revenues attributable to non-water sales operations, availability and desirability of land no longer needed for water delivery for land sales, and the timing and adequacy of rate relief when requested, from time to time, by our Regulated Companies.

The Company believes that the factors described above and those described in detail below under the heading “Commitments and Contingencies” may have significant impact, either alone or in the aggregate, on the Company’s earnings and profitability in fiscal years 2019 and beyond.  Please also review carefully the risks and uncertainties described in Item 1A – Risk Factors and those described above under the heading “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements”.

The Company expects Net Income from its Water Operations segment, excluding merger costs, to increase in 2019 over 2018 levels, primarily due to the settlement agreement between Connecticut Water and Connecticut’s OCC approved by PURA during 2018, revenue increases due to the utilization of WISC in Maine and WICA in Connecticut, continued cost containment efforts, and modest growth in its Services and Rentals segment. During 2019 and subsequent years, the ability of the Company to maintain and increase its Net Income will principally depend upon the effect on the Company of the factors described above in this “Outlook” section, those factors described in the section entitled “Commitments and Contingencies” and the risks and uncertainties described in the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A “Risk Factors”.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company is not aware of any demands, events, or uncertainties that will result in a decrease of liquidity or a material change in the mix or relative cost of its capital resources, other than those outlined below.


36



Borrowing Facilities

The Company maintains a $15.0 million line of credit agreement with CoBank, ACB, which is currently scheduled to expire on July 1, 2020.  The Company maintains an additional line of credit of $45.0 million with RBS Citizens, N.A. (“Citizens”), with an expiration date of April 25, 2021.  On December 14, 2018, the Company and Citizens agreed to increase the amount of the line of credit from $45.0 million to $75.0 million and to extend the maturity date of the Line of Credit until December 14, 2023. The Company has delivered to Citizens an Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated December 14, 2018, evidencing the debt payable pursuant to the Line of Credit. Additionally, Avon Water maintained a $3.0 million line of credit with Northwest Community Bank, which expired on September 30, 2018, at which point it converted to other short-term debt. As of December 31, 2018 the total lines of credit available to the Company were $90.0 million.  As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had $52.6 million and $19.3 million outstanding under its lines of credit, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $37.4 million in unused lines of credit.  Interest expense charged on interim bank loans will fluctuate based on market interest rates.  As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $1.7 million in other short-term debt outstanding.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the weighted average interest rates on these short-term borrowings outstanding was 4.6% and 3.4%, respectively.

On January 10, 2017, Maine Water executed and delivered to CoBank a new Promissory Note and Single Advance Term Loan Supplement, dated January 10, 2017 (the “Third Promissory Note”). On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Third Promissory Note issued pursuant to the Agreement, CoBank agreed to make an unsecured loan (the “Loan”) to Maine Water in the principal amount of $5,000,000 at 4.18%, due December 30, 2026. The proceeds of the Loan are being used to finance new capital expenditures and refinance existing debt owed to the Company, incurred in connection with general water system improvements.

On August 28, 2017, the Company executed and delivered to CoBank a new Promissory Note and Supplement (2017 Single Advance Term Loan) (the “2017 Promissory Note”). On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the 2017 Promissory Note issued pursuant to the Company’s Master Loan Agreement, CoBank agreed to make a term loan (the “Loan”) to the Company in the principal amount of $15,000,000. Under the 2017 Promissory Note, the Company will pay interest on the Loan at a fixed rate of 4.15% per year through August 20, 2037, the maturity date of the Loan.

On September 28, 2017, Connecticut Water completed the issuance of $35,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 3.53% unsecured Senior Notes due September 25, 2037 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of September 28, 2017 (the “Purchase Agreement”) between and among Connecticut Water, NYL Investors, LLC (“NY Life”), as agent, and the Purchasers listed in the Purchaser Schedule attached to the Purchase Agreement, in a private placement financing exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes were used by Connecticut Water to repay loans from the Company the proceeds of which were used for capital expenditure projects by Connecticut Water. The Senior Notes bear interest at the rate of 3.53% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 27 and September 27 of each year commencing on March 27, 2018. The principal amount of the Senior Notes, if not previously paid, shall be due on September 25, 2037. The Senior Notes are callable in whole or in part, subject to a make-whole amount.

On December 13, 2018, Maine Water executed and delivered to CoBank a new Promissory Note and Single Advance Term Loan Supplement, dated October 30, 2018 (the “Fourth Promissory Note”). On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Fourth Promissory Note issued pursuant to the Agreement, CoBank agreed to make an unsecured loan (the “Loan”) to Maine Water in the principal amount of $8,000,000 at 5.51%, due December 30, 2043. The proceeds of the above described Loan from CoBank were used to refinance existing debt and to finance certain capital expenditures.

During the year ending December 31, 2018, the Company paid the following amounts related to Long-Term Debt: approximately $495,000 related to CTWS’s 2017 CoBank issuance; $1,123,000 related to CTWS’s Term Loan Note issued as part of the 2012 acquisition of Maine Water; approximately $1,970,000 in sinking funds related to Maine Water’s outstanding bonds; an additional $2,250,000 related to a CoBank loan to Maine Water that matured in 2018; approximately $164,000 related to HVWC’s mortgage loan; and $168,000 related to Avon Water’s mortgage loan.

Capital Budget

In 2018, the Company spent $54.5 million on capital projects.  The Company used a combination of its internally generated funds, borrowings under its lines of credit, including the increased line finalized in December 2018, and the December 2017 and December 2018 long term debt issuances by Maine Water to fund this construction budget.


37



The following table shows the total construction expenditures excluding non-cash contributed utility plant for each of the last three years and what we expect to invest on construction projects in 2019.

 
Gross Construction Expenditures
 
Construction Funded by Developers & Others
 
Construction Funded by Company
2018
$
57,495,000

 
$
2,991,000

 
$
54,504,000

2017
$
53,796,000

 
$
2,253,000

 
$
51,543,000

2016
$
67,887,000

 
$
1,548,000

 
$
66,339,000

2019 (Projected)
$
85,700,000

 
**

 
$
85,700,000


** – The Company cannot predict the amount of construction funded by others.

Credit Rating

In January 2019, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) reduced its ‘A’ corporate credit rating on the Company to ‘A-’ based on S&P’s uncertainty surrounding the Company's potential merger with SJW, including the increased likelihood that the pending transaction may not close as expected. Also, contributing to the revised rating was the Company’s elevated capital spending, regulatory lag and temporarily increased merger costs and the impact these factors are expected to have on certain financial measures. Additionally, S&P revised the Company’s ratings outlook to stable from negative due to their view that the Company will continue to effectively manage regulatory risk in key jurisdictions, including in Connecticut and in Maine.

Stock Plans

The Company offers a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (“DRIP”) to all registered shareholders, and to the customers and employees of our regulated water companies, whereby participants can opt to have cash dividends directly reinvested into additional shares of the Company. In August 2011, the Board of Directors approved amendments to the DRIP (effective as of January 1, 2012) that permit the Company to add, at the Company’s discretion, an “up to 5.00% purchase price discount” feature to the DRIP which is intended to encourage greater shareholder, customer and employee participation in the DRIP. In August 2014, the Board of Directors approved further amendments to the DRIP to reflect the Company's appointment of a new common stock transfer agent. In August 2017, the Board of Directors approved amendments to the DRIP to permit persons who are not registered shareholders of the Company to participate in the plan with a minimum purchase of $500 and to modify the monthly minimum and quarterly maximum cash purchases permitted under the plan. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, participants reinvested $1,410,000 and $1,404,000, respectively, as part of the DRIP.

Construction Expenditures

During 2018, the Company incurred approximately $57.5 million of construction expenditures, including approximately $2,991,000 funded by developers and others.  The Company financed the expenditures through internally generated funds, long-term debt issuances, proceeds from its dividend reinvestment plan, customers’ advances, contributions in aid of construction and short-term borrowings.

Our Board of Directors has approved an $85.7 million construction budget for 2019, net of amounts to be financed by customer advances and contributions in aid of construction.  The Company will fund the capital budget through a combination of its internally generated funds, borrowing under its available lines of credit and the January 2019 new debt issuance by Maine Water and other potential debt issuances in 2019.

As the Company looks forward to 2019 and 2020, it anticipates continued reinvestment to replace aging infrastructure and to seek recovery of these costs through periodic WICA and WISC applications.  The total cost of that investment may exceed the amount of internally generated funds.  The Company expects to rely upon its internally generated funds and short-term borrowing facilities and new debt issuances over the next 12-24 months.


38



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We do not use off-balance sheet arrangements such as securitization of receivables with any unconsolidated entities or other parties. The Company does not engage in trading or risk management activities and does not have material transactions involving related persons.

The following table summarizes the Company’s future contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2018:

Payments due by Periods
(in thousands)
 
 
Contractual Obligations
 
 
Total
 
Less
than 1
year
 
Years
2 and 3
 
Years
4 and 5
 
More
than 5
years
Long-Term Debt (LTD)
 
$
265,450

 
$
4,059

 
$
38,313

 
$
23,443

 
$
199,635

Interest on LTD
 
127,165

 
10,753

 
20,937

 
17,023

 
78,452

Operating Lease Obligations
 
103

 
72

 
14

 
14

 
3

Purchase Obligations (1) (2) (3) (4)
 
99,182

 
1,867

 
3,640

 
3,766

 
89,909

Long-Term Compensation Agreements (5)
 
44,695

 
2,914

 
4,505

 
4,188

 
33,088

Total (6) (7)
 
$
536,595

 
$
19,665

 
$
67,409

 
$
48,434

 
$
401,087


1.
Connecticut Water has an agreement with the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority (“RWA”) to purchase water from RWA. The agreement was signed in April 2006 and became effective upon the receipt of all regulatory approvals in 2008 and will remain in effect for a minimum of fifty years upon becoming effective. Connecticut Water will pay RWA $75,000 per year as part of a capacity agreement, for a total of 14 years, starting on the effective date of the agreement. In addition, Connecticut Water is able, but under no obligation, to purchase up to one million gallons of water per day at the then current wholesale rates per the agreement.
2.
Connecticut Water has an agreement with The Metropolitan District (“MDC”) to purchase water from MDC to serve the Unionville system. The agreement became effective on October 6, 2000 and has a term of fifty years beginning May 19, 2003, the date the water supply facilities related to the agreement were placed in service. Connecticut Water agrees to purchase 283 million gallons of water annually from MDC.
3.
Connecticut Water has a 99 year lease with 19 Perry Street to obtain well water for its public water supply system. The agreement became effective in 1975 and is based on current water rates in effect each year. There is no limitation on the amount of water that can be withdrawn from the leased property.
4.
Maine Water has an agreement with the Kennebec Water District for potable water service. The agreement was extended and became effective on November 7, 2015 for a new term of 5 years. Maine Water guarantees a minimum consumption of 63.5 million gallons of water annually. Water sales to Maine Water are billed at a flat rate per gallon plus the monthly minimum tariff rate for a 4-inch metered service.
5.
Pension and post retirement contributions cannot be reasonably estimated beyond 2023 and may be impacted by such factors as return on pension assets, changes in the number of plan participants and future salary increases.
6.
We pay refunds on Advances for Construction over a specific period of time based on operating revenues related to developer-installed water mains or as new customers are connected to and take service from such mains. After all refunds are paid, any remaining balance is transferred to Contributions in Aid of Construction. The refund amounts are not included in the above table because the refund amounts and timing are dependent upon several variables, including new customer connections, customer consumption levels and future rate increases, which cannot be accurately estimated. Portions of these refund amounts are payable annually through 2028 and amounts not paid by the contract expiration dates become non-refundable.
7.
We intend to fund these contractual obligations with cash flows from operations and liquidity sources held by or available to us.

In addition to the obligations disclosed in the contractual obligations table above, we have uncertain tax positions of $3.3 million.  Although we believe our tax positions comply with applicable law, we have made judgments as to the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits.  Due to the uncertainty of future cash outflows, if any, associated with our uncertain tax positions, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the timing or amounts that may be paid.


39



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider Adjusted Net Income as a key business metric, which is a Non-GAAP financial measure.

We define Adjusted Net Income as Net Income excluding certain material items outside of normal business operations. For this Non-GAAP financial measure, we consider these items to be income or expenses that have not been recorded within the prior two years and are not expected to recur within the next two years. Such items include costs incurred in 2018 for the proposed merger with SJW and the completed acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water during 2017.

Adjusted Net Income is a supplemental financial measure used by us and by external users of our financial statements and is considered to be an indicator of the operational strength and performance of our business. Adjusted Net Income allows us to assess our performance without regard to the impact of matters that we do not consider indicative of the operating performance of our business.

We use Adjusted Net Income to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period that, when viewed in combination with our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. We believe Adjusted Net Income assists our Board of Directors, management and investors in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period because they remove the impact of certain material items outside of normal business operations (such as the costs incurred for the proposed merger with SJW) from our operating results.

Despite the importance of this Non-GAAP financial measure in analyzing our business, measuring and determining incentive compensation and otherwise evaluating our operating performance, Adjusted Net Income is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, may have limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative to, Net Income or any other measure of our performance derived in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted Net Income is not a measure of profitability under GAAP.

We also urge you to review the reconciliation of this Non-GAAP financial measure included in the Results of Operations section of this Annual Report. To properly and prudently evaluate our business, we encourage you to review the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report and to not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. In addition, because the Adjusted Net Income measure is susceptible to varying calculations, such Non-GAAP financial measures may differ from, and may therefore not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Overview of 2018 Results from Operations

Net Income
Net Income for 2018 was $16,695,000, or $1.40 basic earnings per share, a decrease of $8,359,000, or $0.77 basic earnings per share, compared to 2017.  The decrease in earnings was due to lower net income in our Water Operations segment due to costs associated with the proposed merger with SJW. Changes in net income for our segments were as follows (in thousands):

Business Segment
 
2018 Net Income
 
2017 Net Income
 
Increase (Decrease)
Water Operations
 
$
14,259

 
$
23,854

 
$
(9,595
)
Real Estate
 
629

 
33

 
596

Services and Rentals
 
1,807

 
1,167

 
640

Total
 
$
16,695

 
$
25,054

 
$
(8,359
)


40



Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted Net Income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows (in follows):

 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Increase (Decrease)
Net Income
 
$
16,695

 
$
25,054

 
$
(8,359
)
Merger and Acquisition Costs
 
10,819

 
392

 
10,427

Financing Costs
 
177

 

 
177

Adjusted Net Income
 
$
27,691

 
$
25,446

 
$
2,245


Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased from the same period in the prior year by $2,245,000.

See “Our Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of our use of Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income.

Water Operations

A breakdown of the components of the decrease in net income from Water Operations is as follows (in thousands):

 
2018
 
2017
 
Increase (Decrease)
Operating Revenues
$
116,665

 
$
107,054

 
$
9,611

Operation and Maintenance
52,006

 
47,130

 
4,876

Depreciation
18,692

 
16,684

 
2,008

Income Taxes
(2,008
)
 
(1,993
)
 
(15
)
Taxes Other than Income Taxes
11,874

 
10,941

 
933

Other Utility Income
1,078

 
824

 
254

Merger and Acquisition Costs
(10,819
)
 
(392
)
 
(10,427
)
Other (Deductions)
(1,442
)
 
(2,803
)
 
1,361

Interest and Debt Expense (net of AFUDC)
10,659

 
8,067

 
2,592

Total Net Income from Water Operations
$
14,259

 
$
23,854

 
$
(9,595
)

The decrease in net income from Water Operations for 2018 compared to 2017 was $9,595,000, or 40.2%.  As discussed above, the results in each of these periods have been negatively impacted by merger and acquisition costs and the related interest costs due to increased borrowings on our lines of credit in order to finance these costs.

Revenue from our water customers increased by $9,611,000, or 9.0%, to $116,665,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the same period in 2017.  The primary drivers of higher revenues were the settlement agreement reached between PURA and Connecticut Water, which increased rates effective as of April 1, 2018, and increased WISC charges in Maine. Additionally, the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water during 2017 contributed approximately $2,814,000 in additional revenues in 2018.


41



Operation and Maintenance (“O&M”) expense increased by $4,876,000, or 10.3%, during the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the 2017 period, primarily due to the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water on February 27 and July 1, respectively. HVWC and Avon Water added approximately $2,457,000 of additional O&M expense during 2018. The following table presents the components of O&M expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, both including and excluding the impact of the HVWC and Avon Water acquisitions (in thousands):

Expense Components
 
2018
 
2017
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
HVWC and Avon Water O&M Impact
 
Adjusted Increase/(Decrease)
Medical
 
$
3,939

 
$
2,629

 
$
1,310

 
$
23

 
$
1,287

Payroll
 
18,254

 
16,941

 
1,313

 
765

 
548

Vehicles
 
2,192

 
1,748

 
444

 
120

 
324

Utility costs
 
4,979

 
4,354

 
625

 
323

 
302

Purchased water
 
1,900

 
1,559

 
341

 
60

 
281

Maintenance
 
4,503

 
3,976

 
527

 
247

 
280

Water treatment (including chemicals)
 
2,852

 
2,695

 
157

 
116

 
41

Property and liability insurance
 
1,831

 
1,661

 
170

 
143

 
27

Pension
 
1,955

 
1,935

 
20

 
(2
)
 
22

Customer
 
1,703

 
1,734

 
(31
)
 
28

 
(59
)
Investor relations
 
638

 
809

 
(171
)
 

 
(171
)
Post-retirement medical
 
325

 
507

 
(182
)
 

 
(182
)
Outside services
 
3,763

 
3,793

 
(30
)
 
175

 
(205
)
Other benefits
 
831

 
1,123

 
(292
)
 
63

 
(355
)
Other
 
2,341

 
1,666

 
675

 
396

 
279

Total
 
$
52,006

 
$
47,130

 
$
4,876

 
$
2,457

 
$
2,419


The changes in individual items are described below:
Medical costs increased in the year ending December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 primarily due to an increase in costs associated with claims filed by employees and their families and the costs associated with the administration of the Company’s medical plans;
Payroll costs increased primarily due to more employee time spent on capital projects in 2017 than in 2018, and therefore less time to O&M expense, and higher wages in the year ending December 31, 2018 compared to the year ending December 31, 2017;
Utility costs increased in the period primarily due to an increase in electrical, heating and communications costs;
Purchased water costs increased primarily due to an increase in the rates charged to the Company by neighboring utilities in the Unionville division of Connecticut Water during the year ending December 31, 2018;
Water treatment costs increased primarily due to an increase in costs associated with laboratory testing and samples collection; and
Property and liability insurance costs increased in 2018 over 2017 due to higher premiums on the Company’s insurance coverage stemming from growth of insurable assets.

The O&M increases detailed above were offset by the following decreases to O&M expense:
Investor relations decreased primarily due to a reduction costs associated with investor outreach during the year ending December 31, 2018 when compared to 2017 and costs associated with Board of Directors meetings. These decreases were partially off-set by increases in costs associated with the Company’s annual stockholder report and meeting;
Post-retirement medical costs decreased due to a regulatory asset established by the PURA that was fully amortized during 2017;
Outside services decreased primarily due a reduction in non-acquisition related legal costs during the year ending December 31, 2018; and
Other benefits decreased primarily due to an increase in capitalized benefits, which reduces O&M expense, partially offset by higher costs associated with certain awards granted to non-officer management employees.

The Company’s Depreciation expense increased $2,008,000, or 12.0%, when comparing 2018 to 2017, of which, approximately $528,000 is associated with depreciation at HVWC and Avon Water. The primary driver of the increase in

42



Depreciation expense was a higher Utility Plant balance in 2018 than in 2017 due to normal plant additions, including the upgrades to Connecticut Water’s Rockville Water Treatment Plant that was completed in 2017. The Company takes one half-year of depreciation the year plant goes into service, therefore, 2018 was the first full-year of depreciation for the Rockville Water Treatment Plant.

Total Interest and Debt Expense, net of Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (“AFUDC”) increased by $2,592,000 in the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to 2017. Approximately $161,000 of this increase was attributable to the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water. The primary reason for the remainder of the increase was the higher interest costs related to new debt issued by Maine Water in 2018, increased borrowing under our lines of credit to finance merger and acquisition costs, and a full year’s worth of interest on debt issued by the Company, Connecticut Water and Maine Water throughout 2017.

Real Estate

Income from the Real Estate segment is largely dependent on the tax deductions received on donations and, or, sales of available land.  This typically occurs when utility-owned land is deemed to be unnecessary to protect water sources.  During 2018, Maine Water completed the first phase of the previously announced easement sale to the Coastal Mountains Land Trust. This transaction, in addition to minor tax transactions in Connecticut generated approximately $629,000 in net income in the Real Estate segment.

During 2017, Maine Water sold a small parcel of land and Connecticut Water sold a small property and together these transactions generated approximately $33,000 in net income.

Other

The decrease in net loss seen in the year ended December 31, 2018 in “Other” under “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” was primarily due to the impacts of the implementation of the Tax Act and the resulting treatment of previously deferred federal income taxes during 2017.

Overview of 2017 Results from Operations

Net Income for 2017 was $25,054,000, or $2.17 basic earnings per share, an increase of $1,667,000, or $0.05 basic earnings per share, compared to 2016.  The increase in earnings was principally due to higher net income in our Water Operations segment due to ongoing investment in water infrastructure and the recovery of that investment through WICA and WISC, the incremental impact the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water added in 2017, and the reduction in federal tax reserves no longer deemed necessary. Changes in net income for our segments were as follows (in thousands):

Business Segment
 
2017 Net Income
 
2016 Net Income
 
Increase (Decrease)
Water Operations
 
$
23,854

 
$
22,222

 
$
1,632

Real Estate
 
33

 
(54
)
 
87

Services and Rentals
 
1,167

 
1,219

 
(52
)
Total
 
$
25,054

 
$
23,387

 
$
1,667


Water Operations

The increase in net income from Water Operations for 2017 compared to 2016 was $1,632,000, or 7.3%.  The Net Income from Water Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were each impacted by non-recurring items. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded the impact of the Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other provisions, the Tax Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from the existing maximum rate of 35%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result, the Company remeasured deferred tax assets and liabilities and incurred expense for the remeasurement of the deferred tax assets of $1.5 million on our income tax expense related to long-term deferred tax assets during the quarter ended December 31, 2017, which impacted the Other line on the Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes portion of the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The Net Income from Water Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 was impacted positively by a partial reversal of previously established tax provisions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, new information caused the Company to

43



undertake a review of its provision recorded associated with the repair deduction. While the Company maintains the belief that the deduction taken on its tax return is appropriate, the methodology for determining the deduction has not been agreed to by the taxing authorities. During the Company’s review of the position through the quarter ended March 31, 2017, new information caused management to reassess the previously recorded provision. This reassessment resulted in the reversal of a portion of the provision related to the Maine subsidiary, in the amount of $1,164,000. During the Company’s review of the position through the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the impact of new information on Connecticut Water caused management to reassess the previously recorded provision. The reassessment resulted in the reversal of a portion of the provision in the amount of $2,445,000. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017 an additional $810,000 was reversed due to statute expiration. In the quarter ended December 31, 2017, continued analysis resulted in the reversal of a portion of the provision in the amount of $1,620,000 for a total reversal of $6,039,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017. In future years, the Company expects to add to this provision based on capital spending and also decrease the provision based on statute expirations.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company reversed incorrectly recorded mark-to-market expense as an out-of-period adjustment resulting in a one-time benefit (reduction) of approximately $1.6 million in Operation and Maintenance expense.

A breakdown of the components of the increase in net income from Water Operations was as follows (in thousands):

 
2017
 
2016
 
Increase (Decrease)
Operating Revenues
$
107,054

 
$
98,667

 
$
8,387

Operation and Maintenance
47,130

 
43,155

 
$
3,975

Depreciation
16,684

 
13,905

 
$
2,779

Income Taxes
(1,993
)
 
2,570

 
$
(4,563
)
Taxes Other than Income Taxes
10,941

 
9,796

 
$
1,145

Other Utility Income
824

 
744

 
$
80

Other (Deductions) Income (including Merger and Acquisition Costs)
(3,195
)
 
(2,045
)
 
$
(1,150
)
Interest and Debt Expense (net of AFUDC)
8,067

 
5,718

 
$
2,349

Total Net Income from Water Operations
$
23,854

 
$
22,222

 
$
1,632


Revenue from our water customers increased by $8,387,000, or 8.5%, to $107,054,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the same period in 2016.  The primary drivers of higher revenues were the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water on February 27 and July 1, respectively. These acquisitions added approximately $5,802,000 in new revenues during 2017. The remaining $2,585,000 increase was primarily attributable to increased rates in 2017 associated with recurring WICA charges in Connecticut and WISC charges in Maine.


44



Operation and Maintenance (“O&M”) expense increased by $3,975,000, or 9.2%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the 2016 period, primarily due to the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water on February 27 and July 1, respectively. HVWC and Avon Water added approximately $2,711,000 of additional O&M expense during 2017. The following table presents the components of O&M expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, both including and excluding the impact of the HVWC and Avon Water acquisitions (in thousands):

Expense Components
 
2017
 
2016
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
HVWC and Avon Water O&M
 
Adjusted Increase/(Decrease)
Mark-to-market
 
$
13

 
$
(1,401
)
 
$
1,414

 
$

 
$
1,414

Outside services
 
3,793

 
3,284

 
509

 
127

 
382

Maintenance
 
3,976

 
3,312

 
664

 
389

 
275

Payroll
 
16,941

 
15,812

 
1,129

 
948

 
181

Subscriptions and dues
 
393

 
247

 
146

 
3

 
143

Property and liability insurance
 
1,661

 
1,542

 
119

 
68

 
51

Investor relations
 
809

 
775

 
34

 

 
34

Medical
 
2,629

 
2,597

 
32

 
39

 
(7
)
Utility costs
 
4,354

 
3,899

 
455

 
489

 
(34
)
Vehicles
 
1,748

 
1,793

 
(45
)
 
34

 
(79
)
Purchased water
 
1,559

 
1,675

 
(116
)
 
35

 
(151
)
Customer
 
1,734

 
1,829

 
(95
)
 
96

 
(191
)
Water treatment (including chemicals)
 
2,695

 
2,702

 
(7
)
 
201

 
(208
)
Other benefits
 
1,123

 
1,947

 
(824
)
 
79

 
(903
)
Other
 
3,702

 
3,142

 
560

 
203

 
357

Total
 
$
47,130

 
$
43,155

 
$
3,975

 
$
2,711

 
$
1,264


The changes in individual items are described below:
The increase in mark-to-market expense was related to an out-of-period adjustment made during the second quarter of 2016 related to stock-based performance awards previously granted to officers of the Company. The Company had mistakenly marked certain stock-based performance awards classified as equity awards to the market price of the Company’s common stock price at the end of each reporting period. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company reversed all of the incorrectly recorded mark-to-market expense resulting in a one-time benefit of $2.6 million, including a reversal of approximately $1.0 million in expense related to the first quarter of 2016 for a net out-of-period adjustment of $1.6 million;
The increase in Outside services was primarily due to higher auditing fees, higher outside labor costs and an increase in the use of consultants during the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ending December 31, 2016. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in legal fees during 2017;
Payroll costs increased primarily due to higher wages in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016;
Subscriptions and dues increased primarily due to a new training module in use by the Company in 2017 that was not fully in use in 2016; and
Property and liability insurance costs increased in 2017 over 2016 due to higher premiums on the Company’s insurance coverage stemming from growth of insurable assets.

The O&M increases detailed above were offset by the following decreases to O&M expense:
The decrease in the Other benefits was primarily due to the resignation of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer. As a result of his departure, the executive forfeited previously awarded performance stock awards that had not vested and, in the third quarter of 2017, the Company reversed the expense recognized in previous periods associated with those unvested awards;
Water treatment costs decreased due to a decrease in the cost of chemicals used in the treatment process;
Customer costs decreased due to a reduction in costs associated with a voluntary water conservation program that rewards customers for reducing their consumption by 10% that was in effect during 2016, lower uncollectible accounts charges, reduced costs associated with customer communications, and a decrease in outside collection efforts during the year ended December 31, 2017; and

45



Purchased water decreased in 2017 primarily due to the end of drought like conditions that persisted through much of 2016, causing the Company to purchase water from neighboring utilities to meet customer demand. As the drought conditions improved during 2017, the need to purchase water lessened.

The Company’s Depreciation expense increased $2,779,000, or 20.0%, when comparing 2017 to 2016, of which, approximately $1,137,000 is associated with depreciation at HVWC and Avon Water. The primary driver of the increase in Depreciation expense was a higher Utility Plant balance in 2017 than in 2016 due to normal plant additions, including the upgrades to Connecticut Water’s Rockville Water Treatment Plant that was completed in 2017.

Income Tax expense associated with “above the line” Water Operations decreased by $4,563,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the same period in 2016 due to the reversal of previously established provisions, as discussed above.

Total Interest and Debt Expense, net of Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (“AFUDC”) increased by $2,349,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the same period in 2016. Approximately $307,000 of this increase is attributable to the acquisitions of HVWC and Avon Water. The primary reason for the remainder of the increase was the higher interest costs related to new debt issued by the Company, Connecticut Water and Maine Water in 2017 and a full year’s worth of interest on Connecticut Water’s 2016 issuance.

Real Estate

Income from the Real Estate segment is largely dependent on the tax deductions received on donations and, or, sales of available land.  This typically occurs when utility-owned land is deemed to be unnecessary to protect water sources.  During 2017, Maine Water sold a small parcel of land and Connecticut Water sold a small property, together these transactions generated approximately $33,000 in net income in the Real Estate segment.

During 2016, the Company recorded a valuation allowance on a previously completed land donation and the sale of a small parcel of land in Connecticut. These transactions generated $54,000 in net loss in the Real Estate segment.

Other

The increase in net loss seen in the year ended December 31, 2017 in “Other” under “Other Income (Deductions), Net of Taxes” was primarily due to the impacts of the implementation of the Tax Act and the resulting treatment of previously deferred federal income taxes, as discussed above.


46



COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Water Supply – Connecticut Water has an agreement with the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority (“RWA”) to purchase water from RWA. The agreement was signed in April 2006 and became effective upon the receipt of all regulatory approvals in 2008 and remains in effect for a minimum of fifty years upon the effective date. Connecticut Water will pay RWA $75,000 per year, for a total of 14 years, starting on the effective date of the agreement. In addition, Connecticut Water is able, but under no obligation, to purchase up to one million gallons of water per day at the then current wholesale rates per the agreement. Connecticut Water has an agreement with The Metropolitan District (“MDC”) to purchase water from MDC to serve the Unionville system. The agreement became effective on October 6, 2000 and has a term of fifty years beginning May 19, 2003, the date the water supply facilities related to the agreement were placed in service. Connecticut Water agrees to purchase 283 million gallons of water annually from MDC. Connecticut Water has a 99 year lease with 19 Perry Street to obtain well water for its public water supply system. The agreement became effective in 1975 and is based on current water rates in effect each year. There is no limitation on the amount of water that can be withdrawn from the leased property. Maine Water has an agreement with the Kennebec Water District for potable water service. The agreement was extended and became effective on November 7, 2015 for a new term of 5 years. Water sales to Maine Water are billed at a flat rate per gallon plus the monthly minimum tariff rate for a 4-inch metered service. During 2018, 2017, and 2016, the Company spent $1,823,000, $1,532,000 and $1,556,000, respectively, on water purchased under these agreements. The Company’s expected payments related to these agreements for the years 2019 through 2023 will be as follows:

(in thousands)
 
 
2019
 
$
1,867

2020
 
$
1,846

2021
 
$
1,794

2022
 
$
1,853

2023
 
$
1,913


Reviews by Taxing Authorities – On its 2012 Federal tax return, filed in September 2013, Connecticut Water filed a change in accounting method to adopt the IRS temporary tangible property regulations. On its 2013 Federal tax return, filed in September 2014, Maine Water filed the same change in accounting method. This method change allowed the Company to take a current year deduction for expenses that were previously capitalized for tax purposes. Since the filing of the 2012 tax return, the IRS has issued final regulations. While the Company maintains the belief that the deduction taken on its tax return is appropriate, the methodology for determining the deduction has not been agreed to by the taxing authorities. Provisions for uncertain tax positions were recorded to reflect the possible challenge of the Company’s methodology for determining its repair deduction as required by FASB ASC 740. During the quarter ended September 30, 2018, $1.3 million was reversed due to statute expiration. During the year ended December 31, 2018, in conjunction with its review of the impacts of the Tax Act, the Company reviewed its provision associated with the repair deduction. Should the IRS challenge the Company’s tax treatment, and ultimately disallow a portion of the repair deduction, the Company expects the net operating loss carryforwards to offset any resulting liability. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a portion of the provision in the amount of $980,000 was reversed to reflect the offset by the remeasured net operating loss deferred tax asset. In addition, as required by FASB ASC 740, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a provision of $1.0 million for a portion of the benefit that is not being returned to customers resulting from any possible tax authority challenge. The Company had previously recorded a provision of $4.6 million in the prior year for a cumulative total of $3.3 million.

The Company remains subject to examination by federal and state tax authorities for the 2015 through 2017 tax years. On April 26, 2017, Avon Water was notified by the IRS that its stand-alone Federal tax filing for 2015 was selected to be reviewed beginning in the second quarter of 2017. On March 20, 2018, Avon Water received a notice of adjustment from the IRS related to the Federal tax audit for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016. As a result, a reduction in net operating loss carryover of $56,000 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company – In May 2005, the Company adopted a common stock repurchase program (“Share Repurchase Program”).  The Share Repurchase Program allows the Company to repurchase up to 10% of its outstanding common stock, at a price or prices that are deemed appropriate.  As of December 31, 2018, no shares have been repurchased. Currently, the Company has no plans to repurchase shares under the Share Repurchase Program.

Environmental and Water Quality Regulation – The Company is subject to environmental and water quality regulations.  Costs to comply with environmental and water quality regulations are substantial.  We are presently in compliance

47



with current regulations, but the regulations are subject to change at any time.  The costs to comply with future changes in state or federal regulations, which could require us to modify current filtration facilities and/or construct new ones, or to replace any reduction of the safe yield from any of our current sources of supply, could be substantial.

Legal Proceedings – We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time. Although the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, there are no pending legal proceedings to which we, or any of our subsidiaries are a party, or to which any of our properties is subject, that presents a reasonable likelihood of a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Rate Relief – The rates we charge our water and waste water customers in Connecticut and Maine are established under the jurisdiction of and are approved by PURA and MPUC, respectively.  Connecticut Water’s allowed return on equity and return on rate base, effective as of December 31, 2018 were 9.75% and 7.32%, respectively. HVWC’s blended water and wastewater allowed return on equity and return on rate base, effective December 31, 2018, were 10.10% and 7.19%, respectively. Avon Water’s allowed return on equity and return on rate base, effective December 31, 2018, were 10.00% and 7.79%, respectively. Maine Water’s average allowed return on equity and return on rate base, as of December 31, 2018 were 9.50% and 7.96%, respectively.

Land Dispositions – The Company and its subsidiaries own additional parcels of land in Connecticut and Maine, which may be suitable in the future for disposition or for further protection through conservation easements, through sale or by donation to municipalities, other local governments or private charitable entities such as local land trusts.  In Connecticut, these additional parcels would include certain Class I and II parcels previously identified for long term conservation by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (“DEEP”), which have restrictions on development and resale based on provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes.  In Maine, these parcels include primarily company-owned land used for water supply protection, and a permanent conservation easement may be appropriate for some parcels to ensure the permanent protection of the watersheds, while balancing the appropriate community and recreational use of the land.

Capital Expenditures – The Company has received approval from its Board of Directors to spend $85.7 million on capital expenditures in 2019, in part to fund improvements to water treatment plants and increased spending related to infrastructure improvements.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

The primary market risk faced by the Company is interest rate risk.  As of December 31, 2018, the Company had no exposure to derivative financial instruments or financial instruments with significant credit risk or off-balance-sheet risks.  In addition, the Company is not subject in any material respect to any currency or other commodity risk.

The Company maintains a $15.0 million line of credit agreement with CoBank, ACB, which is currently scheduled to expire on July 1, 2020.  The Company maintains an additional line of credit of $45.0 million with RBS Citizens, N.A. (“Citizens”), with an expiration date of April 25, 2021.  On December 14, 2018, the Company and Citizens agreed to increase the amount of the line of credit from $45.0 million to $75.0 million and to extend the maturity date of the Line of Credit until December 14, 2023. The Company has delivered to Citizens an Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated December 14, 2018, evidencing the debt payable pursuant to the Line of Credit. Additionally, Avon Water maintained a $3.0 million line of credit with Northwest Community Bank, which expired on September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2018 the total lines of credit available to the Company were $90.0 million.  As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had $52.6 million and $19.3 million of “Interim Bank Loans Payable”, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $37.4 million in unused lines of credit.  Interest expense charged on interim bank loans will fluctuate based on market interest rates.

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The “Consolidated Financial Statements” of Connecticut Water Service, Inc., and the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, together with the reports of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP independent registered public accounting firm, are included herein on pages 50 through 95.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None


48



ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures – As of December 31, 2018, management, including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).  Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. We have used the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) in conducting our evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. Based on our evaluation, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.  The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 has been audited by Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None
PART III

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3), the information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is hereby incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed in EDGAR on or about March 29, 2019 in connection with the annual meeting to be held on May 9, 2019.  Certain information concerning the executive officers of the Company is included in Item 1 of this report.

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES


49



PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)
 
1

 
Financial Statements:
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Page
 
 
 

 
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
 
51
 
 
 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
52
 
 
 

 
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
54
 
 
 

 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
54
 
 
 

 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017
 
55
 
 
 

 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
56
 
 
 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
57
 
 
2

 
Financial Statement Schedule:
 
 
 
 
 

 
The following schedule of the Company is included on the attached page as indicated
 
 
 

 
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
102
 
 
 

 
All other schedules provided for in the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is set forth in the financial statements or notes thereto.
 
 
(b)
 
 

 
Exhibits
 
 
 
 
 

 
Exhibits for Connecticut Water Service Inc., are in the Index to Exhibits
 
96
 
 
 

 
Exhibits heretofore filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as indicated below are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof as if filed herewith.  Exhibits marked by asterisk (* or **) are being filed or furnished herewith.
 
 

50



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

 
 
Page
 
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
 
44
 
 
 
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
52
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
54
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
54
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017
 
55
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
56
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
57
 
 
 
 
 
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
 
102
 


51



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the board of directors of Connecticut Water Service Inc.:

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Connecticut Water Service Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, and cash flows, for each of the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and consolidated financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)2 (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control
over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


52



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013.

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2019


53



CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the Years Ended December 31, (in thousands, except per share data)
 
2018

 
2017

 
2016

Operating Revenues
 
$
116,665

 
$
107,054