20-F 1 ea0201663-20f_ellomay.htm ANNUAL REPORT

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

FORM 20-F

 

(Mark One)

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of event requiring this shell company report……

 

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

 

Commission File Number 001-35284

 

ELLOMAY CAPITAL LTD.

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

ISRAEL

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

18 Rothschild Boulevard, 1st floor

Tel Aviv 6688121, Israel

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Kalia Rubenbach, Chief Financial Officer

Tel: +972-3-797-1111; Facsimile: +972-77-344-6856

18 Rothschild Boulevard, 1st floor

Tel Aviv 6688121, Israel
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class   Trading Symbol   Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 10.00 per share   ELLO   NYSE American LLC

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

None

 

Title of Class

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

 

None

 

Title of Class

 

 

 

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 12,852,5851 ordinary shares, NIS 10.00 par value per share.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Yes ☐ No

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Yes ☐ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Yes  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer ☐ Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  

 

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). 

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP ☐ International Financial Reporting Standards as issued Other ☐
  by the International Accounting Standards Board  

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

 

Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

 

Yes ☐ No

 

 

1Does not include a total of 258,046 ordinary shares held at that date as treasury shares under Israeli law, all of which were repurchased by Ellomay. For so long as such treasury shares are owned by Ellomay they have no rights and, accordingly, are neither eligible to participate in or receive any future dividends which may be paid to Ellomay’s shareholders nor are they entitled to participate in, be voted at or be counted as part of the quorum for, any meetings of Ellomay’s shareholders.

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

In the financial statements included in this Report, comparative amounts of other comprehensive income were retrospectively classified in order to present the change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit or loss, which resulted in approximately €37.3 million and €21.8 million being reclassified for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, from Effective portion of change in fair value of cash flow hedges to Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit or loss.

 

This retrospective classification did not have any effect on our profit (loss) and on our total other comprehensive income (loss) for these years.

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

  Page
Introduction iii
   
Forward-Looking Statements iv
   
Summary of Risk Factors v
   
Part I
     
Item 1: Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 1
     
Item 2: Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 1
     
Item 3: Key Information 1
     
Item 4: Information on Ellomay 19
     
Item 4A: Unresolved Staff Comments 103
     
Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 103
     
Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees 129
     
Item 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 147
     
Item 8: Financial Information 154
     
Item 9: The Offer and Listing 155
     
Item 10: Additional Information 155
     
Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 172
     
Item 12: Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities 172
     
Part II
     
Item 13: Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 174
     
Item 14: Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds 174
     
Item 15: Controls and Procedures 174
     
Item 16: [Reserved] 175
     
Item 16A: Audit Committee Financial Expert 175
     
Item 16B: Code of Ethics 175

 

i

 

 

Item 16C: Principal Accountant Fees and Services 175
     
Item 16D: Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 176
     
Item 16E: Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company and Affiliated Purchasers 176
     
Item 16F: Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountants 176
     
Item 16G: Corporate Governance 176
     
Item 16H: Mine Safety Disclosure 177
     
Item 16I: Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 177
     
Item 16J: Insider Trading Policies 177
     
Item 16K: Cybersecurity 177
     
Part III
     
Item 17: Financial Statements 179
     
Item 18: Financial Statements 179
     
Item 19: Exhibits 179

 

ii

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The following is the Report on Form 20-F of Ellomay Capital Ltd., or the Report. Unless the context in which such terms are used would require a different meaning, all references to “Ellomay,” “us,” “we,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Ellomay Capital Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

All references to “€,” “euro” or “EUR” are to the legal currency of the European Union, or EU, all references to “NIS” or “New Israeli Shekel” are to the legal currency of Israel and all references to “$,” “dollar,” “US$,” “USD” or “U.S. dollar” are to the legal currency of the United States of America. Other than as specifically noted, all amounts translated into a different currency were translated based on the relevant exchange rate as of December 31, 2023.

 

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB.

 

All trademarks, service marks, trade names and registered marks used in this Report are trademarks, trade names or registered marks of their respective owners.

 

Statements made in this Report concerning the contents of any agreement, contract or other document are summaries of such agreements, contracts or documents and are not complete description of all of their terms. If we filed any of these agreements, contracts or documents as exhibits to this report or to any previous filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, you may read the document itself for a complete understanding of its terms.

 

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

 

This Report contains and incorporates by reference market data, industry statistics, and other data that have been obtained from, or compiled from, information made available by third parties. Although we believe these third-party sources are reliable, we have not independently verified the information. Except as may otherwise be noted, none of the sources cited in this report has consented to the inclusion of any data from its reports, nor have we sought their consent. In addition, some data are based on our good faith estimates. Such estimates are derived from publicly available information released by independent industry analysts and third-party sources, as well as our own management’s experience in the industry, and are based on assumptions made by us based on such data and our knowledge of such industry and markets, which we believe to be reasonable. However, none of our estimates have been verified by any independent source. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

 

iii

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

In addition to historical information, this report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Some of the statements under “Item 3.D: Risk Factors,” “Item 4: Information on Ellomay,” “Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere in this Report, constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current view about future plans, intentions or expectations. These statements relate to future events or other future financial performance, plans strategies and prospects, and are identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “scheduled,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “aim,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

 

The forward-looking statements contained in this Report are based on current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and the potential effects on our business. There can be no assurance that future developments actually affecting us will be those anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

 

Assumptions included in this Report involve judgment with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations or projections include the risks and uncertainties relating to our business described in this Report under “Item 3.D: Risk Factors,” “Item 4: Information on Ellomay,” “Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere in this Report. In addition, new factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors, nor assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof, except as required by applicable law. In addition to the disclosure contained herein, readers should carefully review any disclosure of risks and uncertainties contained in other documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.

 

To the extent that this Report contains forward-looking statements (as distinct from historical information), we desire to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we are therefore including this statement for the express purpose of availing ourselves of the protections of the safe harbor with respect to all forward-looking statements.

 

iv

 

 

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

 

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Item 3.D “Risk Factors.” You should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties when investing in our ordinary shares. Principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:

 

risks related to projects that are in the development stage, among other issues due to the inability to obtain or maintain licenses or project finance;

 

regulatory changes and government interventions impacting electricity prices and other changes in electricity prices, including their impact on the fair value of financial instruments and assets;

 

weather conditions and various meteorological and geographic factors;

 

our EPC contractors’ and our other contractors’, suppliers’ and service providers’ technical, professional and financial ability to construct, install, test and commission a renewable energy plant and to provide us with the required services and support, including operation and maintenance, or O&M, undertakings in connection with the development, construction and operation of our renewable energy plants;

 

the availability of financial incentives, government subsidies and governmental regulations on our operating renewable energy projects and projects under development and the potential reduction or elimination, including retroactive amendments, of the government subsidies and economic incentives applicable to, or amendments to regulations governing the, renewable energy markets in which we operate or to which we may in the future enter;

 

defects in the components of the renewable energy plants we operate or theft of various components;

 

our ability to meet our obligations, undertakings and financial covenants under various financing agreements, including to our debenture holders, our ability to raise additional equity, debt or other types of financing in the future and the limitations imposed on us in the deeds of trust governing our debentures;

 

risks due to our current debt, which has increased in recent years, and future debt;

 

our inability to generate a positive cashflow from our operations;

 

risks relating to operations in foreign countries, including cross currency movements, payment cycles and existing and changing tax arrangements, rules, requirements and international initiatives;

 

our inability to locate land suitable or sufficient for the needs of the projects that we develop and potential disagreements with landowners;

 

potential effects of the war and hostilities in Israel on our Israeli operations, projects under development and headquarters;

 

natural disasters, terrorist attacks, other catastrophic events, cyber attacks and information technology or telecommunication system disruptions;

 

changes in the prices of the components or raw materials required for the production of renewable energy;

 

v

 

 

our dependency on revenues and cash flows from the Talasol PV Plant;

 

risks in connection with our Waste-to-Energy, or WtE, plants in the Netherlands, including shortages, insufficient quality or changes in prices of raw materials, increase in delivery prices and environmental and other regulatory changes;

 

risks relating to our Israeli operations, including the centralized electricity market and exposure to damages due to hostile attacks;

 

the risks we are exposed to due to our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd. (f/k/a U. Dori Energy Infrastructures Ltd.), or Ellomay Luzon Energy and Dorad Energy Ltd., or Dorad, including risk factors generally applicable to electricity manufacturers and our joint control of Ellomay Luzon Energy and lack of control of Dorad, restrictions on our right to transfer our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy, regulatory changes applicable to Dorad, shortages of gas, exposure to changes in the Israeli consumer price index and exchange rates and involvement in legal proceedings;

 

the market, economic and political factors in the countries in which we operate;

 

our ability to maintain expertise in the energy market, and to track, monitor and manage the projects which we have undertaken, including the impact of competition and changes in the renewable energy markets;

 

future disagreements with our partners who own a portion of our renewable energy plants;

 

fluctuations in the value of currency and interest rates;

 

risks related to our incorporation and location in Israel, including security risks and political risks;

 

risks related to economic uncertainty and exposure to the impact of the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine;

 

our plans with respect to the management of our financial and other assets and our ability to identify, evaluate and consummate additional suitable business opportunities and strategic alternatives;

 

we are controlled by a small group of shareholders and, as a foreign private issuer, may rely on home country practices with respect to certain matters;

 

the price, market liquidity and volatility of our ordinary shares, potential future dilutions and listing on two markets;

 

dependency on key management and personnel;

 

our inability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;

 

impact of provisions of Israeli law on our shareholders’ ability to enforce US judgements on us, on the ability to acquire us or a controlling position in our company, on rights and obligations of shareholders; and

 

exposure to legal and administrative proceedings and tax audits.

 

vi

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1: Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 2: Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 3: Key Information

 

A. [Reserved]

 

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

 

Not Applicable.

 

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

 

Not Applicable.

 

D. Risk Factors

 

Investing in our securities involves significant risk and uncertainty. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below as well as the other information contained in this Report before making an investment decision with respect to our securities. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, prospects, results of operations and cash flows could be harmed and could therefore have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.

 

The risks described below are the material risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations in the future.

 

Risks Related to our Business

 

Risks Related to our Renewable Energy Operations

 

In recent years, we entered the development and entrepreneurship renewable energy market. These operations are exposed to regulatory and other development risks that may cause such projects not to enter the construction phase and other risks that may cause damages, delays and interruptions during the construction phase, and thereby cause the total or partial loss of the project development funds invested in the project. We are currently active in several projects in various development and construction stages, including the construction of a 156 Mega Watt, or MW, pumped storage project in the Manara Cliff in Israel, or the Manara PSP, and the development of various PV projects in Italy, Spain, Israel and the United States. Projects in the development stages are exposed to various risks, including the inability to obtain or maintain regulatory permits and approvals and the inability to obtain financing (whether from lending institutions or tax equity partners, as applicable), upon terms economically beneficial or at all. Projects in the construction stage are exposed to various risks, including delays in the construction, interferences from third parties such as adjacent plot owners, residents living in the vicinity, governmental, municipal, environmental and other authorities, malfunctions in construction equipment, shortage in equipment or personnel required for the construction and damage caused by weather conditions and other factors that we cannot control. All projects in the development and construction stages are subject to additional risks, including changes to existing regulation that could reduce the potential profitability of such projects, potential disagreements and conflicts with partners, dependency on technical consultants, and risks associated with operations in foreign countries, as applicable. If any of these risks materialize, the entire project may be delayed or cancelled altogether, causing the loss of all part of the funds invested in the project development efforts and the impairment of some or all of the capitalized investments we made in connection with the project. Such impairment would have an adverse impact on our financial position. Even if we succeed in selling our rights in a project to third parties, the return of our project development expenses will likely be conditioned upon the continued development of the project by such third parties.

 

1

 

 

Existing regulations, and changes to such regulations, may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers and restrictions to the construction and operation of renewable energy plants, which may adversely affect our operations. The installation and operation of renewable energy plants is subject to oversight and regulation in accordance with international, European (to the extent applicable), national and local ordinances, building codes, zoning (or permitting), environmental protection regulation, including waste disposal regulations, utility interconnection requirements, security requirements and other rules and regulations. Any changes in applicable regulations that increase the burdens or restrictions on the operation of our renewable energy plants could increase our costs of operation and, as a result, adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, various governmental, municipal and other regulatory entities require the issuance and continued effectiveness of relevant permits, licenses and authorizations for the construction and operation of renewable energy plants. If such permits, licenses and authorizations are not timely issued, it could result in the interruption, cessation or abandonment of a newly constructed renewable energy plant or may require significant changes to such renewable energy plant, any of which may cause severe losses. In addition, if issued, these licenses and permits may be revoked by the authorities following their issuance in the event the authorities discover irregularities or deviations from the scope of the license or permit. Any revocation of existing licenses may obligate us to cease constructing or operating the relevant renewable energy plant for the period required to renew the relevant license or indefinitely and therefore will adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

Government interventions in response to high energy prices may negatively impact revenues or increase our tax burden. European countries responded, during 2021 and 2022, to the increased energy prices experienced by adopting several measures aimed at reducing or limiting the profits of renewable energy manufacturers through taxes or other regulatory arrangements. For example, Spain introduced a reduction mechanism for excess remuneration resulting from the high price of natural gas during 2021-2022 and Italy introduced a set of laws aimed at reducing excess remuneration. This Spanish regulation mainly impacted our operating profit from the 300 MW photovoltaic plant in the municipality of Talaván, Cáceres, Spain, which was connected to the Spanish national grid in December 2020, or the Talasol PV Plant (with respect to the portion of revenues not subject to the financial power swap executed in connection with the Talasol PV Plant, or the Talasol PPA), and from our Spanish 28 MW photovoltaic plant, or the Ellomay Solar PV Plant. Although the electricity prices in Spain and Italy decreased during 2023, future changes and increases in electricity prices in Spain, Italy and other countries or areas in which our plants are located could cause local regulators to adopt new measures aimed at limiting the profitability of renewable energy manufacturers. These measures may include caps on energy prices, changes to price formulations and the proposal of windfall taxes on energy companies, including companies that generate renewable energy. It is possible these measures may intensify and be adopted by other countries in which we operate will operate in the future in which case it could materially affect our financial results.

 

A drop in the price of energy may negatively impact our results of operations. The revenue from the sale of energy produced by renewable energy plants is based on proceeds from the sale of electricity and gas produced in the electricity and gas market at market price and sometimes also includes incentives in the form of governmental subsidies or fixed tariffs. Previous revisions to the governmental subsidies’ regime in several countries, including Spain, Italy and Israel, which reduced or eliminated the scope of the incentives paid by governments, increased the dependency of renewable energy plants on market prices or on tariffs determined in a public bid process. Many factors impact the prices of electricity, including demand, the cost of alternative energy, such as natural gas and fuel, introduction of competing manufacturers and technologies and regulatory changes imposing caps on prices or otherwise impacting the profitability of energy manufacturers. A decrease in the price of electricity and gas, particularly in the countries in which we operate and in which some of our revenues are based on the market price of electricity and gas, may negatively impact our profitability and our ability or interest to expand our renewable energy operations.

 

2

 

 

The success of our renewable energy plants, from their construction through their commissioning and ongoing commercial operation, depends to a large extent on the cooperation, reliability, solvency, and proper performance of the contractors we engage for the construction, operation and maintenance of our renewable energy plants, or the Contractors, and of the other third parties involved in the construction and operation of the plants, including technical consultants, subcontractors, local advisors, financing entities, land owners, suppliers of feedstock, suppliers of solar panels and other components of a PV system, the energy grid regulator, governmental agencies and potential purchasers of electricity. The construction and operation of a renewable energy plant requires timely input, often of a highly specialized technical nature, and cooperation from several parties, including the suppliers of the various system components (such as solar panels or CHP engine) and plant operators, other suppliers of relevant parts and materials (including replacement parts), feedstock suppliers, suppliers of solar panels and other components of a PV system, land owners, subcontractors, electricity brokers, financing entities (including tax equity partners) and governmental and related agencies (as subsidizers and as regulators). If we fail to obtain such input or cooperation, or fail to locate suitable suppliers, equipment, land or other components required in order to efficiently and timely construct or operation a renewable energy plant, the specific project and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In addition, as we use Contractors to construct and thereafter operate and maintain our renewable energy plants, we depend on the Contractors’ expertise and experience, representations, warranties and undertakings regarding, inter alia: the construction quality, schedule of construction, operation, maintenance and performance of each of the plants, the use of high-quality materials, strict compliance with applicable legal requirements and the Contractors’ financial stability. If the Contractors’ representations, warranties or undertakings are inaccurate or untrue, or if any of the Contractors or other entities fail to perform their obligations properly, this could result in the interruption or cessation of construction or operations or abandonment of the relevant plant, or may require significant expenses to mitigate the damages or repair them, any of which may cause us severe losses.

 

Our business is affected by the availability of financial incentives and supporting regulation. The reduction or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives could reduce our profitability and our revenues. Many countries, such as Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel and the United States, previously introduced substantial incentives to offset the cost of renewable energy production, including photovoltaic power systems and WtE technologies, in the form of Feed-in-Tariff, or FiT, green certificates, tax credits or other incentives aimed at promoting the use of clean energy (including solar energy and biogas) and reducing dependence on other forms of energy. In addition, several countries encourage manufacturers and farmers to choose waste management methods that are more environmentally-friendly, either by establishing fines on non-environmentally friendly waste management methods or by payment of incentives. Certain of these government incentives were reduced or eliminated in the past years (for example with respect to photovoltaic installations in Italy and Spain) and the remaining incentives could potentially be reduced or eliminated in the future. If the governments in the countries in which we operate facilities that are entitled to incentives elect to revise the existing incentive schemes to reduce incentives, or in case of future deterioration in the financial position of the local governments resulting in partial or no payment or in regulatory changes, it may adversely affect our profitability from projects that receive incentives.

 

The performance of our renewable energy plants depends on the quality of the equipment installed in such plants and on the reliability of the suppliers of spare and replacement parts. The performance of our renewable energy plants depends on the quality of the components of the plants and the equipment installed in the plants. Any defects or deterioration in the quality of such components and equipment could harm our results of operations, and if we will not be able to quickly locate quality replacement parts or perform repairs, our results of operations could be adversely affected for a long period of time. For example, the performance of our photovoltaic plants, or the PV Plants, depends on the quality of the solar panels installed. Degradation in the performance of the solar panels above a certain level is guaranteed by the panel suppliers and we generally receive undertakings from the Contractors with respect to minimum performances. Therefore, a critical factor in the success of our PV Plants is the existence of reliable solar panel suppliers, who guarantee the performance and quality of the solar panels supplied and their ability to provide us with replacement and spare parts that are of sufficient quality. If the suppliers of solar panels do not meet their undertakings under the guarantees and no replacement panels are available at a reasonable price, it could result in the interruption, cessation or abandonment of the relevant PV Plant, or may require significant expenses to mitigate the damages or repair them, any of which may cause us severe losses.

 

3

 

 

In the event we are unable to comply with the obligations and undertakings, including with respect to financial covenants, which we undertook in connection with the project financing of our renewable energy plants, our results of operations may be adversely affected. In connection with the financing of some of our PV Plants, our WtE plants, and the Manara PSP, we entered into long-term agreements with various financing entities and may in the future enter into additional project finance agreements, for example, the projects currently under development in Italy. The financing agreements include, and future project finance agreements are expected to include, inter alia, undertakings and financial covenants, the majority of which are based on the ongoing income derived from the relevant plant, which may be adversely affected by the various risks detailed herein. If we fail to comply with any of these undertakings and covenants, we may be subject to penalties, future financing requirements, and the acceleration of the repayment of debt. These occurrences would adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and our ability to obtain outside financing for other projects.

 

As a substantial part of our business is currently located in Europe, we are subject to additional risks that may negatively impact our operations. We currently have substantial PV operations in Spain and in Italy and WtE operations in the Netherlands, all of which are held by our wholly-owned Luxembourg subsidiary, Ellomay Luxembourg Holdings S.àr.l, or Ellomay Luxembourg, and may make additional investments in projects located in Europe, such as the development and construction of additional PV plants in Spain and Italy. Due to these existing operations and any additional future investments, we are subject to special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in other jurisdictions, including rules and regulations, cross currency movements, different payment cycles, tax issues, such as variations in tax laws as compared to Israel, cultural and language differences, crime, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, terrorist attacks and wars and deterioration of political and economic relations with Israel. Our European operations subject us to a number of these risks, as well as the requirement to comply with the local laws, such as the Spanish, Italian, Dutch and EU laws, which could be burdensome to our operations. We cannot assure you that we would be able to adequately address some or all of these risks. If we were unable to do so, our operations might suffer.

 

We may not be able to source land sufficient or suitable for the development of our projects. We do not own the land on which a substantial portion of the projects in our portfolio are located. The successful development of a renewable energy project requires obtaining rights, whether ownership or lease rights, to land suitable for the project, including among other features, its location, size, geological status and the ability to build, or proximity to, interconnection facilities and transmissions systems. Such land may not always be available to us at all or under acceptable terms and, if available, may require the execution of long-term leases or other long-term arrangements. The construction of our facilities requires substantial investments and efforts and as the majority of our projects are located on land owned by third parties, we are subject to risks in connection with such ownership, including disputes with landowners and with other third parties, such as creditors of the landowners. Any loss of rights to the land on which our projects are located or constructed could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or other catastrophic events could harm our operations. Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters, terrorist attacks, public health events and other business disruptions, which could harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. Among others, floods, storms, seismic turbulence and earth movements may damage our projects in operation or under construction. The insurance coverage we have for a portion of such risks may not cover the damage in full because these circumstances are sometimes deemed “acts of god.” In the event that an earthquake, fire, tsunami, typhoon, terrorist attack, or other natural, manmade or technical catastrophe were to damage or destroy any part of our plants or those of manufacturers on which we rely, destroy or disrupt vital infrastructure systems or interrupt our operations or services for any extended period of time, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

 

4

 

 

An increase in the prices of components of a renewable energy plant may adversely affect our projects under development, our future growth and our business. Installations of renewable energy plants have substantially increased over the past few years. The increased demand led to fluctuations in the prices of the components of the plants resulting from oversupply and undersupply. For example, the increased demand for solar panels resulted in substantial investments in solar panels production facilities, creating oversupply and a sharp continuing decrease in the prices of solar panels. However, the Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on global supply chains, since 2020, halted years of solar panel price cost reductions. The Covid-19 pandemic has put pressure on global supply chains with factory closures, import tariffs, shortages of raw materials and components, and shipping bottlenecks creating supply chain shortages and delays. It may take several years until solar module prices stabilize. Increased costs of replacing components in our existing plants and of constructing new plants, could potentially delay the commencement or completion of construction of new projects and may impact the profitability of constructing plants and our ability to expand our business. Also, shortage or delays to deliveries of vital components can result in construction and installations delays.

 

The market for renewable energy is intensely competitive and rapidly evolving. The market for renewable energy attracts many initiatives and therefore is intensely competitive. The changes in the renewable energy field, such as the adoption of additional supporting legislation, combined with the impact of shortage of natural gas and other sources of energy, raised additional awareness and interest in the filed by many market participants, including private and public companies, investment funds, institutional investors and others. For example, in recent years the Israeli Electricity Authority commenced issuing licenses to photovoltaic installations in tender processes resulting in a substantial decrease in prices per KWh in the newly issued licenses and our competitors, who strive to construct new renewable energy plants and acquire existing plants, may offer lower prices per KWh in future tender processes. Existing and future competition may also impact our ability to obtain project finance for our facilities. Our competitors may have established more prominent market positions, may have greater resources and may have more experience in this field than us. Extensive competition may adversely affect our ability to continue to acquire and develop new plants.

 

Our success depends in part on our senior management team and other key employees and our ability to attract, integrate and retain key personnel and qualified individuals. We depend on the expertise of our senior management team and other key employees to help us meet our strategic objectives. The inability to maintain our senior management team and other key employees or to attract highly skilled personnel, may materially adversely affect the implementation of our development business plan and could ultimately adversely impact our business.

 

We do not wholly-own a few of our operating projects and projects under development. Although we currently control these projects, disagreements with our partners could cause delays in the construction or development of the projects or affect decisions made in connection with operating plants. We wholly-own all of our operating PV plants and the Netherlands’ WtE plants, except the Talasol PV Plant, of which we hold 51%. We also own 83.333% of the Manara PSP and may in the future enter into projects that we do not wholly-own or introduce additional partners to the Manara PSP or other projects under development or to our operating plants. Although we control both the Talasol PV Plant and the Manara PSP, any disagreement with our partners could affect decisions made in connection with the Manara PSP and the Talasol PV Plant and may require management resources and attention. Any damages caused due to such disagreements could adversely affect our business plans and results of operations.

 

We may be subject to disruptions or failures in information technology, telecommunication systems and network infrastructures that could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Our renewable energy business relies, among other things, on information technology and on telecommunication services as we remotely monitor and control our assets and interface with regulatory agencies and wholesale power markets. Disruptions or failures in such systems may result due to various causes, including internal malfunctions in our systems or in the systems of third parties such as suppliers, governmental authorities, from employee error, theft or misuse, malfeasance, power disruptions, natural disasters or accidents and may also result from cyber-attacks or other breaches of information technology security. As a result of Israel’s war with Hamas and recent hostilities with the Iranian regime, we also face increased cybersecurity risks associated with the ongoing conflict and the fact that our headquarters are located in Israel. Such disruptions and failures could have an adverse effect on our business operations, financial reporting, financial condition and results of operations.

 

5

 

 

Fluctuations in energy prices and the resulting changes in the fair value of financial instruments and assets may impact our financial results. Renewable energy manufacturers, such as our company, may execute financial power swaps or other offtake arrangements that fix the price of the all or part of the electricity manufactured by a plant. These instruments and the related assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value in our financial statements. Increases in market prices of electricity generally cause a significant change in the fair value of assets or liabilities recorded in connection with these instruments and result in decreases in our shareholders equity. For example, as of December 31, 2022, we recorded current maturities of derivatives in the amount of approximately €33.2 million as a result of the increase in the fair value of the liability resulting from the Talasol PPA and a similar reduction in our shareholders’ equity. Although these changes do not impact our cash flow (as the revenues of Talasol Solar S.L.U, or Talasol, from the sale of electricity during the same period are expected to exceed its liability and payments to the PPA provider), there is an impact on our balance sheet and on the other comprehensive income (loss). Future material fluctuations in the market price of electricity could have a material adverse impact on our financial results and could further decrease our shareholders’ equity.

 

Risks Related to our PV Plants

 

Our ability to produce solar power depends upon the magnitude and duration of sunlight as well as other meteorological and geographic factors. Solar power production has a seasonal cycle and requires prolonged and strong exposure to sunlight in order to meet the maximum production capacity. Adverse meteorological conditions, including sever weather conditions such as storms, extensive rain and winds, can damage our photovoltaic plants or materially impact the output of photovoltaic plants and result in production of electricity below expected output, which in turn could adversely affect our profitability. Lower electricity output due to changes in meteorological conditions and other geographic factors may adversely affect our profitability.

 

The use of tax equity arrangements to finance projects will limit certain management rights and operational flexibility with respect to those projects, as well as our rights to tax credits generated by those projects. We expect that our U.S. projects will have tax equity financing arrangements in place, which will require us to transfer all or some of the investment tax credits generated by each project to a tax equity investor. To the extent we want to incur project-level debt at a project in which we transferred the investment tax credits to a tax equity investor, we may be required to obtain the tax equity investor’s consent prior to such incurrence. In addition, to avoid the recapture of investment tax credits, we are required to keep the project in an operational status for at least the first five years of operations and we cannot reduce our ownership of the project below a certain percentage during this period. As a result, compliance with our obligations to our tax equity investors may prevent us from making certain business decisions that would have improved our financial position and results of operations.

 

We are exposed to the possibility of damages to, or theft of, the various components of our PV Plants. Such occurrences may cause disruptions in the production of electricity and additional costs. Our PV Plants may suffer damages and disruption in the production of electricity due to theft of panels and other components, or due to bad weather and land conditions. Although such damages are generally covered by the PV Plants’ insurance policies, under certain circumstances such occurrences may not be covered or may only be partially covered by the insurance and, if covered, utilization of the insurance may cause an increase in the premiums paid to our insurance companies, all of which may adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

 

6

 

 

Risks Related to our WtE (Biogas) Plants

 

In addition to the risks involved in the construction and operation of, and the regulatory risks applicable to, renewable energy plants in general, WtE plants are exposed to risks specific to this industry. In addition to the risks detailed above under “Risks Related to our Renewable Energy Operations,” WtE plants are exposed to additional risks specific to this industry, including:

 

As the raw materials used to produce energy in the WtE market are not freely available (as is the case with wind and solar energies), the success of a WtE plant depends, among other things, on the prices of feedstock required in order to maintain the optimal mix of feedstock necessary to maximize performance of the plants and meet a certain of range of energy (gas, electricity or heat) production levels. To ensure a continuous supply of raw materials, both in terms of the quantity and the quality and composition of the raw materials, a WtE plant is required to enter into supply relationships with several feedstock suppliers, such as farmers, food manufacturers and other specialized feedstock suppliers and to continuously monitor the proposed transactions to locate the most efficient and beneficial offers. Any increase in the price of feedstock or shortage in the type or quality of feedstock required to produce the desired energy levels with the technology used by the plant could slow down or halt operations, causing a material adverse effect on the results of operations. The price and quality of the feedstock mix might also increase the plant’s operating costs, either due to the need to purchase a more expensive feedstock mix to meet the desired energy production levels, or due to an increase in residues and the resulting increase of surplus quantities that require removal. In addition to the impact of the quality of the feedstock on the production levels, maintaining and monitoring the feedstock quality is crucial for preventing malfunctions in the process, for example due to high levels of certain chemicals that might harm the CHP engines. Additionally, a wrong feedstock mix and/or low feedstock quality might create biology problems such as lower bacteria population, which directly adversely impacts biogas production. Therefore, any shortage of quality feedstock and changes in the feedstock mix available for use could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of our WtE plants. As a result of the Russia-Ukraine military conflict, our WtE plants experienced a shortage of raw materials and feedstock, which impacted the composition of the materials used by the facilities and their production.

 

The operation of WtE plants is highly complex and requires ongoing supervision and maintenance. Several factors may impact the efficiency of the facilities, including the availability and cost of feedstock, the composition of feedstock, malfunctions and damages. In addition, following a correction of malfunctions that disables the system, the plant does not generally return to maximum capacity immediately and the startup is implemented gradually. Although we have insurance policies that cover damages and loss of revenue upon certain events, these insurance policies may not cover all damages or be available to us in the future, on acceptable terms or at all.

 

The expense level and profitability of WtE plants depends on many factors, many of which are not within our control. For example, the recent increase in fuel prices increased transportation costs and operating expenses of our WtE plants. Any future increase in expenses could materially impact the results of operations and financial condition of our WtE plants.

 

The WtE industry is subject to many laws and regulations which govern the protection of the environment, quality control standards, health and safety requirements, and the management, transportation and disposal of different types of waste. Environmental laws and regulations may require removal or remediation of pollutants and may impose civil and criminal penalties for violations. The costs arising from compliance with environmental laws and regulations may increase operating costs for our WtE plants and we may be exposed to penalties for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. In addition, existing regulation governing waste management and waste disposal provide incentives to feedstock suppliers to use waste management solutions such as the provision of feedstock to WtE plants. Any regulatory changes that impose additional environmental restrictions on the WtE industry or that relieve feedstock suppliers from the stringent regulation concerning waste management and disposal could increase our operating costs, limit or change the cost of the feedstock available to us, and adversely affect our results of operations.

 

7

 

 

Risks Related to our Israeli Operations

 

The Talmei Yosef PV Plant and the Dorad Power Plant are located in the southern part of Israel, in proximity to the Gaza Strip and within range of missile and mortar bombs launched from the Gaza Strip. The Manara PSP is located the northern part of Israel, in proximity to the border with Lebanon. The war and hostilities in Israel, commencing October 7, 2023, may pose a risk to such operations. The Talmei Yosef PV Project is located near the Gaza Strip border and the Dorad Power Plant is located in Ashkelon, a town in the southern part of Israel, in proximity to the Gaza Strip. In recent years, there has been an escalation in violence and missile attacks from the Gaza Strip to Southern and Central Israel. The Manara PSP is constructed in close proximity to Israel’s border with Lebanon, in an area that has also been attacked by missiles in the past. Due to the location of the Dorad Power Plant, Dorad has implemented various security measures to enable continued operations of the Dorad Power Plant during attacks on its premises. However, any such further attacks to the area surrounding the Gaza Strip or the northern border of Israel or any direct damage to the location of the Dorad Power Plant or the Manara PSP may damage it and disrupt their operations, and may cause losses and delays. On October 7, 2023, the “Iron Swords” war broke out in Israel following an attack in Southern Israel by Hamas. The war and hostilities, including missile attacks, mainly on southern and northern Israel, have continued since then, further escalating with a drone and missile attack by the Iranian regime in early April 2024. As a result of the attacks in northern Israel, the construction works on the Manara PSP site were halted and have not yet been resumed. Although we expect to receive compensation for certain damages, there is no assurance that the compensation will be fully or timely received and, even if received, that it will cover all of our direct and indirect damages as a result of the delays. The continuation or future escalation of the war and hostilities in southern and northern Israel, including potential direct damage due to missile attacks, temporary or permanents cessation of operations and potential inability to access the sites, could materially adversely impact the Company’s Israeli operations and projects under development and the Company’s results of operations. In addition, any operations in Israel are impacted by the general security and economic conditions in Israel, any deterioration in the security or economic condition in Israel, including, but not limited to, due to war, terrorist attacks, recession or any other events that may cause a decrease in electricity consumption or electricity prices, may damage the facilities or the transmission of gas to the Dorad Power Plant or may adversely impact customers and may cause losses or delays. Although we executed an agreement to sell our holdings in the Talmei Yosef PV Plant on December 31, 2023, until the sale is consummated, we continue to be exposed to risks in connection with the Talmei Yosef PV Plant, including the risk that the conditions to closing will not be timely fulfilled and the transaction will not be consummated.

 

The electricity sector in Israel is highly regulated. Any changes in the tariffs, system charges or applicable regulations may adversely affect our operations and results of operations. In addition, failure to obtain and maintain electricity production and supply licenses from the regulator could materially adversely affect our operations and results of operations. The Israeli electricity sector is subject to various laws and regulations, such as the tariffs charged and paid by Noga – Electricity System Management Ltd., which is a newly-formed Israeli government company managing the national electricity system, or the System Manager, and the IEC, and the licensing requirement that apply to private manufacturers, such as Dorad, in which we indirectly hold 9.375%. The tariffs paid by Dorad in connection with the Dorad Power Plant to the System Manager for system operation services provided to Dorad and the fees received by Dorad from the System Manager for electricity sold to the IEC and for providing the IEC with energy availability, are all based on tariffs determined by the Israeli regulator. The updates and changes to the regulation and tariffs required to be paid to the IEC and to the System Manager by Dorad, or from the System Manager to Dorad, may not necessarily involve negotiations or consultations with Dorad and may be unilaterally imposed on it. Any changes in the tariffs, system charges or applicable regulations may adversely affect our operations and results of operations. In addition, a manufacturer of electricity in Israel, such as Dorad, the Manara PSP, the Talmei Yosef PV Plant and any other plant we may wish to develop, promote, construct, operate or acquire, is required to hold permanent licenses for production and supply, issued by the Israeli Electricity Authority, which include terms and conditions that could be revised in the future by the Israeli Electricity Authority, and which could be revoked under certain circumstances. In the event any manufacturer does not meet its obligations set forth in the licenses or in the event the Israeli Electricity Authority decides to impose additional restrictions or materially change the terms of the licenses, then, subject to its right to a hearing, such manufacturer may lose one or all of its licenses (production and supply) or their terms may be materially revised. Failure to maintain such licenses or a material revision to the terms of the licenses could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The electricity sector in Israel is highly centralized. The IEC controls and operates the electricity system and all stages of the transmission of electricity. The electricity sector in Israel is dominated by the IEC, which controls and operates the supply, distribution and transmission of electricity, and also produces the majority of electricity in Israel. The System Manager, entered into an agreement with Dorad for the purchase of availability and electricity The System Manager is also the only customer of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant and is subject to the requirement to pay a fixed tariff for the electricity manufactured by such plant. Similarly, it is currently expected that the sole customer of the Manara PSP will be the System Manager, who will be required to pay the Manara PSP for availability and electricity produced. The ability of the System Manager to pay the renewable energy manufacturers could be affected by financial instability of the System Manager. The inability of the System Manager to pay Dorad, Talmei Yosef, the Manara PSP or any energy project we may be involved in in Israel, may adversely affect our plan of operations and could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

 

8

 

 

Risks Related to our Investment in Ellomay Luzon Energy

 

We have joint control in Ellomay Luzon Energy, who, in turn, holds a minority stake in Dorad.  Therefore, we do not control the operations and actions of Dorad. We currently hold 50% of the equity of Ellomay Luzon Energy (f/k/a U. Dori Energy Infrastructures Ltd.), who, in turn, holds 18.75% of Dorad and accordingly our indirect interest in Dorad is 9.375%. Although we entered into a shareholders’ agreement, or the Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement, with Ellomay Luzon Energy and the other shareholder of Ellomay Luzon Energy, Amos Luzon Entrepreneurship and Energy Group Ltd. (f/k/a U. Dori Group Ltd.), or the Luzon Group, providing us with joint control of Ellomay Luzon Energy, should differences of opinion as to the management, prospects and operations of Ellomay Luzon Energy arise, such differences may limit our ability to direct the operations of Ellomay Luzon Energy. Moreover, Ellomay Luzon Energy holds a minority stake in Dorad and as of the date hereof is entitled to nominate only one director in Dorad, which, according to the Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement, we are entitled to nominate. As we have one representative on the Dorad board of directors, which has a total of seven directors, we do not control Dorad’s operations. Therefore, as we have joint control over Ellomay Luzon Energy and limited control over Dorad, we may be unable to prevent certain developments that may adversely affect their business and results of operations. Since July 2015, several of Dorad’s direct and indirect shareholders, including Ellomay Clean Energy Limited Partnership, or Ellomay Energy LP, a limited partnership directly and indirectly wholly-owned by us that holds Ellomay Luzon Energy’s shares, are involved in various legal proceedings, all as more fully described in “Item 4.B: Business Overview” below. In addition, to the extent our interest in Ellomay Luzon Energy is deemed an investment security, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the Investment Company Act, we could be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, depending on the value of our other assets. Please see “We may be deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which could subject us to material adverse consequences” below.

 

The Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement contains restrictions on our right to transfer our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy, which may make it difficult for us to terminate our involvement with Ellomay Luzon Energy. The Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement contains several restrictions on our ability to transfer our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy, including a right of first refusal. The aforesaid restrictions may make it difficult for us to terminate our involvement with Ellomay Luzon Energy should we elect to do so and may adversely affect the return on our investment in Ellomay Luzon Energy.

 

Our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy are pledged to the holders of our Series E Secured Debentures, which may limit our ability to sell such holdings or perform other actions that may be beneficial to us. On February 1, 2023, we issued a new series of secured nonconvertible debentures due March 31, 2029, or the Series E Secured Debentures. The Series E Debentures are secured by pledges on the shares of Ellomay Luzon Energy held by Ellomay Energy LP and on Ellomay Energy LP’s rights and agreements in connection with shareholder’s loans (and capital notes) provided by Ellomay Energy LP to Ellomay Luzon Energy. The Deed of Trust governing the Series E Secured Debentures includes several limitations and requirements applicable to our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy and additional provisions that may limit our ability to sell our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy or to revise arrangements with Ellomay Luzon Energy. For further information concerning the Deed of Trust governing our Series E Secured Debentures, issued on February 1, 2023, see “Item 5.B: Liquidity and Capital Resources” under “Series E Secured Debentures” and “Item 10.C: Material Contracts.”

 

9

 

 

Dorad, which is the only substantial asset held by Ellomay Luzon Energy, operates the Dorad Power Plant, whose successful operations and profitability depends on a variety of factors, some of which are not within Dorad’s control.  Dorad’s only substantial asset is the Dorad Power Plant, situated on the premises of the Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline Company, or EAPC, located south of Ashkelon, Israel. The Dorad Power Plant is subject to various complex agreements with third parties (the IEC, the operations and maintenance contractor, suppliers, private customers, etc.) and to regulatory restrictions and guidelines in connection with, among other issues, the tariffs to be paid by the IEC to Dorad for the energy it produces. Various factors and events may materially adversely affect Dorad’s results of operations and profitability and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on Ellomay Luzon Energy’s and on our results of operations and profitability. These factors and events include:

 

Electricity tariffs, which are determined and updated solely by the Israeli Electricity Authority, have a material impact on the results of operations of Dorad.

 

The operation of the Dorad Power Plant is highly complex and depends upon the continued ability: (i) to operate the various turbines, and (ii) to turn the turbines on and shut them down quickly based on demand. The profitability of Dorad also depends on the accuracy of the proprietary forecasting system used by Dorad. Any defects or disruptions, or inaccuracies in forecasts, may result in an inability to provide the amount of electricity required by Dorad’s customers or in over-production, both of which could have a material adverse effect on Dorad’s operations and profitability.

 

Dorad’s operations depend upon the expertise and success of its operations and maintenance contractor, who is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Dorad Power Plant. If the services provided by such contractor will cause delays in the production of energy or any other damage to the Dorad Power Plant or to Dorad’s customers, Dorad may be subject to claims for damages and to additional expenses and losses and therefore Dorad’s profitability could be adversely affected. Dorad also depends on certain sole suppliers for services, including the IEC, which distributes the electricity manufactured by Dorad to Dorad’s customers and Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd., who delivers the gas required for Dorad’s operations. Any disagreement or disruption of these services could adversely impact Dorad’s operations.

 

Significant equipment failures may limit Dorad’s production of energy. Although damages from equipment failures generally covered by insurance policies, any such failures may cause disruption in the production, may not all be covered by the insurance and the correction of such failures may involve a considerable amount of resources and investment and could therefore adversely affect Dorad’s profitability.

 

Dorad’s operations depend on the availability and accurate function of its information technology, communications and data retrieval and analysis systems. As such, Dorad is exposed to risks of cyber-attacks, either directed specifically at Dorad or at infrastructure or Israeli sites in general. The occurrence of a cyber-attack may halt Dorad’s operations and result in damages to Dorad’s financial results and reputation.

 

The construction of the Dorad Power Plant was mainly financed by a consortium of financing entities pursuant to a long-term credit facility and such credit facility provides for pre-approval by the consortium of certain of Dorad’s actions and contracts with third parties and further includes a list of events that may enable the lenders to demand immediate repayment of the credit facility. Changes in the credit ratings of Dorad and its shareholders, non-compliance with financing and other covenants, delays in provision of required pre-approvals or disagreements with the financial entities, material changes in Dorad’s licenses or a loss of license by Dorad and additional factors may trigger certain rights granted to the lenders under the financing documents and may adversely affect Dorad’s operations and profitability.

 

10

 

 

Dorad entered into a long-term natural gas supply agreement, or the Tamar Agreement, with the partners in the “Tamar” license located in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Israel, or Tamar. This agreement includes a “take or pay” mechanism, subject to certain restrictions and conditions that may result in Dorad paying for natural gas not actually required for its operations. In addition, in November 2022, Dorad started purchasing natural gas from Energean Israel Ltd., or Energean. Dorad’s operations depend on the timely, continuous and uninterrupted supply of natural gas from Tamar and Energean and on the existence of sufficient reserves throughout the term of the agreements with Tamar and Energean. Any disruptions in the gas supply, could adversely impact Dorad’s operations and results of operations. In addition, the price of natural gas under the supply agreements with Tamar and Energean is linked to production tariffs determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority but cannot be lower than the “final floor price” included in the agreements. In the event of future reductions in the production tariff, the price of gas may reach the “floor price” and thereafter will not be further reduced. Any delays, disruptions, increases in the price of natural gas under the agreement, or shortages in the gas supply from Tamar or Energean will adversely affect Dorad’s results of operations.

 

The Dorad power plant is subject to environmental regulations, aimed at increasing the protection of the environment and reducing environmental hazards, including by way of imposing restrictions regarding noise, harmful emissions to the environment and handling of hazardous materials. Currently the costs of compliance with the foregoing requirements are not material. Any breach or other noncompliance with the applicable laws may cause Dorad to incur additional costs due to penalties and fines and expenses incurred in order to regain compliance with the applicable laws, all of which may have an adverse effect on Dorad’s profitability and results of operations.

 

Due to the agreements with contractors of the Dorad Power Plant and the indexation included in the gas supply agreement, Dorad is exposed to changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar against the NIS. In addition, due to the indexing to the Israeli consumer price index under Dorad’s credit facility, Dorad is exposed to fluctuations in the Israeli CPI, which may adversely affect its results of operations and profitability. Dorad from time to time executes forward transactions to purchase U.S. dollars against the NIS and other hedging transactions to minimize these risks.

 

Dorad is involved in several arbitration and court proceedings initiated by Dorad’s shareholders, including Ellomay Luzon Energy. Disagreements and disputes among shareholders may interfere with Dorad’s operations and specifically with Dorad’s business plan and potential growth.

 

The electricity production sector in Israel has expanded and evolved during recent years, with the introduction of privately held electricity production facilities. Dorad is subject to competition from existing or new electricity producers, who will attempt to sell electricity directly to private customers, including Dorad’s customers or potential customers. The added competition may reduce the rates received by Dorad and therefore decrease its revenues and profitability.

 

Dorad is required to make payments to various third parties, including the financing consortium, the gas suppliers, the O&M contractor and the gas transmission service provider. In the event Dorad will not have sufficient liquidity to comply with its payment obligations, its operations and financial results may be materially adversely impacted.

 

11

 

 

Risks Related to the Manara PSP

 

The Manara PSP currently holds a conditional license. Such conditional license may be revoked for various reasons, such as non-compliance with milestones stipulated in the conditional license. The Manara PSP currently holds a conditional license for the construction of a 156 MW pumped storage project, or the Manara PSP Conditional License, issued to it on June 17, 2020. Conditional licenses issued by the Israeli Electricity Authority include several milestones, and deadlines for completing such milestones, including the completion of the construction works of the pumped storage power plant. The Israeli Electricity Authority could revoke the Manara PSP Conditional License if Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., the project company of the Manara PSP, or Ellomay PS, does not timely meet the milestones included in it. Any such attempted revocation is subject to a written notice from the Israeli Electricity Authority, which is required to include the reasons for the proposed revocation, and to a hearing of Ellomay PS before the Israeli Electricity Authority. If the Manara PSP Conditional License will be revoked in the future, that could prevent the completion of the Manara PSP, resulting in a loss of some or all the funds invested in the Manara PSP.

 

The construction of the Manara PSP is a complex and unique engineering challenge. The construction process of the Manara PSP includes planning and conducting of a comprehensive investigation to characterize the variety of soils and rocks at the construction sites. In accordance with the infrastructure characteristics and the seismic risks that exist on site, stability calculations need to be performed on the basis of which instructions are given for the planning and execution of the reservoirs. Any complications during the construction period of the Manara PSP could cause delays in the construction and could expose the Manara PSP to non-compliance with the terms of the Manara PSP Conditional License issued to it by the Israeli Electricity Authority and could otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations in connection with the Manara PSP.

 

Risks Related to our Operations and our Structure

 

We depend on the Talasol PV Plant for a substantial portion of our revenues and cash flows. We depend on the Talasol PV Plant, and expect to continue to depend on the Talasol PV Plant and other relatively large projects, for a substantial portion of our revenues and cash flows. The Talasol PV Plant accounted for approximately 51.1% and 61.4% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As new projects reach commercial operation, our dependency on the Talasol PV Plant is expected to reduce. However, this project, as well as other large projects such as the Manara PSP, are still expected to account for a substantial portion of our revenues and cash flows in the future. Consequently, any damage or loss in connection with the Talasol PV Plant could materially reduce our revenues and cash flows and, as a result, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our ability to leverage our operations and increase our operations depends, inter alia, on our ability to obtain attractive project and corporate financing from financial entities or to enter into other financing arrangements, including tax equity arrangements.  Our ability to obtain attractive financing and the terms of such financing, including interest rates, equity to debt ratio requirement and timing of debt availability will significantly impact our ability to leverage our investments and enhance our operations and to fulfill our development plans. Although we have financing agreements with respect to several of our PV Plants, WtE plants and the Manara PSP and although we raised significant funds in Israel through the issuance of debentures, there is no assurance we will be able to procure additional project financing or financing from tax equity partners, as applicable, for projects under development or any operations we will acquire or projects we wish to advance in the future, or to obtain additional corporate financing, on terms favorable to us or at all. In recent years, the global markets as well as the market in Israel have experienced significant increases in interest rates, which impact the interest rates applicable to public and private debt financings. In addition, adverse developments that affect financial institutions, such as events involving liquidity that are rumored or actual, have in the past and may in the future lead to bank failures and market-wide liquidity problems. The results of events or concerns that involve one or more of these factors could include a variety of material and adverse impacts on our ability to obtain financing, and on our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations. Any instability in the banking and financing markets could limit the availability of funds for financing activities or result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. An increase in interest rates may also adversely impact the profitability and return on projects we consider, and may cause us to decide not to pursue certain business opportunities. In addition, we recently entered into the US solar PV market. We expect that our US PV projects will rely on third-party tax equity funding, obtained through the sale of available tax incentives. No assurance can be given that tax equity investors will be available or willing to provide financing on acceptable terms, that we will be able to sell the tax incentives through other markets or that the tax incentives and benefits that are needed to make tax equity financing available will remain in place. Even if we locate a tax equity partner, we may be required to provide them with certain rights with respect to the relevant project, which include rights to a portion of the projects’ cash flows. Our inability to obtain additional financing, through financing entities, tax equity funding or otherwise, on favorable terms, or at all, may adversely affect our ability to leverage our investments and to procure the equity required in order to execute one or more projects or increase and further develop our operations and execute our business plan.

 

12

 

 

Our ability to freely operate our business is limited due to certain restrictive covenants contained in the deeds of trust of our Debentures. The deeds of trust governing our Series C Debentures, Series D Convertible Debentures, Series E Secured Debentures and Series F Debentures, or, together, the Deeds of Trust and the Debentures, respectively, contain restrictive covenants that limit our operating and financial flexibility. These covenants include, among other things, a “negative pledge” with respect to a floating pledge on all of our assets. The Deeds of Trust also contain covenants regarding maintaining certain levels of financial ratios and criteria, including as a condition to the distribution of dividends, as a trigger for an obligation to pay additional interest and as a cause for immediate repayment, and other customary immediate repayment conditions, including, under certain circumstances, in the event of a change of control, a default under the deed of trust of the other debentures issued by us, a change in our field of operations or a disposition of a substantial amount of assets. Our ability to continue to comply with these and other obligations depends in part on the future performance of our business. Such obligations may hinder our ability to finance our future operations or the manner in which we operate our business. In particular, any non-compliance with performance-related covenants and other undertakings of the Debentures could result in increased interest payments for some or all of the Debentures or a demand for immediate repayment of the outstanding amount under the Debentures and restrict our ability to obtain additional funds, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Our debt increases our exposure to market risks, may limit our ability to incur additional debt that may be necessary to fund our operations and could adversely affect our financial stability. As of December 31, 2023, our total indebtedness in connection with corporate and project financing (including the Talasol PV Plant, of which we hold 51% and the Manara PSPs, of which we hold approximately 83.33%) was approximately €442 million, including principal and interest expected repayments, financing related swap transactions and excluding any related capitalized costs. The Deeds of Trust permit us to incur additional indebtedness, including by issuing additional debentures of the existing series of Debentures and issuing additional series of debentures, subject to maintaining certain financial ratios and covenants. Our debt, including the Debentures, and any additional debt we may incur, could adversely affect our financial condition by, among other things:

 

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or business conditions and cross currency movements and limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our industry and the economy in general;

 

requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our debt, thus reducing the funds available for operations and future business development; and

 

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to operate, develop and expand our business.

 

We may incur significant additional amounts of debt, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness. We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness, including additional issuances of debentures and secured indebtedness, in the future. Although the Deeds of Trust governing our Debentures contain conditions that may affect our ability to incur additional debt, mainly through the issuance of additional debentures of the existing series of the Debentures, these conditions are limited and we will be able to incur additional debt and enter into leveraged transactions, so long as we do not breach the financial covenants and meet these conditions. If new debt is added to our existing debt levels, the related risks that we face would intensify and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations, including the obligations in connection with repayment of the Debentures.

 

We cannot assure you that our business will generate cash flow from operations or future borrowings from other sources in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness, including the Debentures, or to fund our other liquidity needs. To service our indebtedness, we require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to make payments on, and to refinance our indebtedness, including the Debentures, to fund planned capital expenditures and to maintain sufficient working capital depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. As such, we may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service the Debentures or our other indebtedness, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, such as reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the Debentures, on or before the maturity thereof. These efforts may not be successful and such failure could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the Debentures, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that the terms of that indebtedness will allow any of the above alternative measures or that these measures would satisfy our scheduled debt service obligations. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to repay or refinance our debt on favorable terms, it could significantly adversely affect our financial condition, the value of our outstanding debt, including the Debentures, and our ability to make any required cash payments under our indebtedness, including the Debentures. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at that time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations.

 

13

 

 

Our business results may be affected by currency and interest rate fluctuations and the hedging transactions we enter into from time to time in order to manage currency and interest rate related risks. We hold cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities mainly in euro and NIS. Our holdings in our PV Plants located in Spain and Italy and in the WtE plants located in the Netherlands are denominated in euro and our holdings in the Talmei Yosef PV Plant and in Ellomay Luzon Energy are denominated in NIS. Our Debentures and the project finance obtained in connection with the Talmei Yosef PV Plant and the Manara PSP are denominated in NIS and the interest and principal payments are to be made in NIS. The financing for several of our PV Plants bears interest based on EURIBOR rate. Therefore, our repayment obligations and undertakings may be affected by adverse movements in the exchange and interest rates. Although we attempt to manage these risks by executing various swap interest and currency transactions as more fully explained in “Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below, we cannot ensure we will succeed in eliminating these risks in their entirety. These swap transactions may also impact the results of our operations due to fluctuations in their value based on changes in the relevant exchange or interest rate.

 

We are incorporated and headquartered in Israel, and some of our operations and projects under development are located in Israel, and therefore we are subject to potential adverse impact of political, economic and military instability in Israel and its region.

 

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, our principal offices are located in central Israel and our headquarters and management, and most of our employees are located in Israel. In addition, all of the funding raised by us through equity or debt issuances was raised in the Israeli market and from Israeli investors and several of our projects under development, as well as the Talmei Yosef PV Plant, are located in Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business and prospects. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations.

 

In recent years, Israel has been engaged in sporadic armed conflicts with Hamas, an Islamist terrorist group that controls the Gaza Strip, with Hezbollah, an Islamist terrorist group that controls large portions of southern Lebanon, and with Iranian-backed military forces in Syria. In addition, Iran attacked Israel and may be developing nuclear weapons. Some of these hostilities were accompanied by missiles being fired from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon and Syria against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, including areas in which our headquarters, operations and projects under development are located. Any hostilities involving Israel, regional political instability or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. On October 7, 2023, the “Iron Swords” war broke out in Israel following an attack in Southern Israel by Hamas. The war and hostilities, including missile attacks, mainly on southern and northern Israel, have continued since then, further escalating with a drone and missile attack by the Iranian regime in early April 2024. In addition to the impact of the war on our operating facilities and projects under development as set forth above under “Risks Related to our Israeli Operations,” we may be exposed to other risks related to the war due to the location of our headquarters in Israel, including the impact of the war on currency exchange rates, interest rates, the Israeli economy and consumer price index and potential trade curtailments, reputational damage, the labor market in Israel and adverse impact on our business relationship with foreign contractors, suppliers, partners, financing entities and other third-parties.

 

In addition, prior to the commencement of the hostilities and war in Israel, the Israeli government was pursuing extensive changes to Israel’s judicial system. In response to the foregoing developments, individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have voiced concerns that the proposed judicial changes, if adopted, may negatively impact the business environment in Israel, including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest or conduct business in Israel, as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates, increased volatility in securities markets, and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. In addition, since the announcement of the proposed changes, large protests have taken place and continue to take place in many cities in Israel. The proposed judicial changes may also adversely affect the labor market in Israel or lead to political instability or civil unrest. At this stage, where the proposed legislation has not become effective, and its scope is not fully determined, we cannot assess the possible impacts of these changes and their likelihood, however, to the extent that any of these negative developments do occur, they may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and the market price of our shares, as well as on our ability to raise additional capital.

 

14

 

 

We are currently operating in a period of economic uncertainty and capital markets disruption, which has been significantly impacted by geopolitical instability. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by any negative impact on the global economy and capital markets resulting from the conflict in Ukraine or any other geopolitical tensions. U.S. and global markets are experiencing volatility and disruption following the escalation of geopolitical tensions. On February 24, 2022, a full-scale military invasion of Ukraine by Russian troops was reported. This invasion led to global sanctions that have impacted the international economy, to a shortage and ensuing increase in price of natural gas and other forms of energy and electricity, shortages in raw materials, including in the materials comprising the feedstock used by our WtE plants, supply chain delays and an increase in the cost of transportation, impacting the cost of operations of our WtE plants, which depend on transportation of feedstock and residues. We cannot anticipate the length and continued impact of the ongoing military conflict. We are continuing to monitor the situation globally and assessing its potential impact on our business.

 

Additionally, Russia’s prior annexation of Crimea, recent recognition of two separatist republics in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and subsequent military interventions in Ukraine have led to sanctions and other penalties being levied by the United States, European Union and other countries against Russia, Belarus, the Crimea Region of Ukraine, the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic, and the so-called Luhansk People’s Republic, including agreements to remove certain Russian financial institutions from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication payment system. Additional potential sanctions and penalties have also been proposed and/or threatened. Russian military actions and the resulting sanctions could adversely affect the global economy and financial markets and lead to instability and lack of liquidity in capital markets, potentially making it more difficult for us to obtain additional funds.

 

The continued military conflict between Russian and the Ukraine may adversely impact our operations in the future, including through the implementation of new regulation in the countries in which we operate, changes in the financial markets and availability of funds in Europe, shortages in raw materials and continued increase in delivery prices.

 

Our inability to effectively hedge interest rate, currency and other market-related risks may adversely affect our profitability. We use hedging instruments from time to time to manage interest rate, currency and other market-related risks. If any of the variety of instruments we use to hedge our exposure to these various types of risk is not effective, we may incur losses, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition. The majority of our derivative contracts are OTC derivatives, i.e., derivative contracts that are not transacted on an exchange. These derivatives are entered into under ISDA Master Agreements. If a counterparty defaults on these contracts, the underlying exposure would no longer be effectively hedged, which could result in losses. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will continue to be able to hedge risks related to current or future assets or liabilities in an efficient manner or at all. Disruptions such as market crises and economic recessions may put a strain on the availability and effectiveness of hedging instruments. For example, the expected transition away from LIBOR and similar benchmark rates may have a different impact on the hedged item and the hedging instrument, which could cause some of our hedge to become ineffective, resulting in potential losses.

 

Our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements are subject to increasingly complex tax laws of various jurisdictions and expose us to the enactment of legislation implementing changes in taxation of international business activities, or other changes in tax legislation or policies, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We are an Israeli company and therefore subject to Israeli corporate income tax. Our operating subsidiaries are mostly registered outside of Israel. Therefore, we are also subject to taxation in several other jurisdictions around the world.

 

Tax laws in Israel and these other jurisdictions have grown increasingly complex, and the application thereof can be uncertain. In addition, we are subject to a variety of bilateral and multilateral tax treaties, which can change at any time, eliminating or reducing the tax treatment we currently enjoy. We utilize a variety of tax planning services to address this complexity, but there can be no assurance that we will remain in compliance in the jurisdictions in which we operate, which could subject us to the risk of tax enforcement actions.

 

The amount of taxes we pay in these jurisdictions could also increase substantially as a result of changes in the applicable tax principles, including increased tax rates, new tax laws or revised interpretations of existing tax laws and precedents. For example, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), has put forth two proposals - Pillar One and Pillar Two, which revise the existing profit allocation and nexus rules (profit allocation based on location of sales versus physical presence) and ensure a minimal level of taxation, respectively. As of the date of this Report, more than 140 countries, including Israel and other countries in which we operate, have agreed to enact legislation on Pillar Two and to enforce a minimum global tax rate of 15%. Many countries are expected to implement such legislation in 2024, but it is currently unclear when Israel will do so. These changes, when enacted by various countries in which we do business, may increase our taxes in these countries. As the Pillar Two solution is subject to implementation by each member country, the timing and ultimate impact of any such changes on our tax obligations is uncertain.

 

Such legislative initiatives may materially and adversely affect our plans to expand and further develop our operations and may increase our tax liability and administrative expenses and may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we do not conduct an adequate due diligence investigation of a target project or if certain events beyond our control occur, we may be required to subsequently take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring, and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our stock price. We must conduct a due diligence investigation of target projects that we intend to acquire or purchase an interest in. Intensive due diligence is time consuming and expensive due to the cost of the technical, accounting, finance and legal professionals involved in the due diligence process. Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business, we cannot assure you that this due diligence will reveal all material issues that may affect a particular target project, or that factors outside the control of the target project and outside of our control will not later arise. If our due diligence review fails to identify issues specific to a target project, industry or the environment in which the target project operates, or if certain events or circumstances occur that are beyond our control, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and may not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our ordinary shares.

 

15

 

 

Tax audits may result in an obligation to make material payments to tax authorities at the conclusion of these audits. We conduct our business globally (currently in Israel, Luxembourg, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and the USA). Our domestic and international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenues and expenses in different jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenues and expenses. Additionally, the amount of income taxes paid is subject to our interpretation of applicable laws in the jurisdictions in which we file. Not all of the tax returns of our operations in other countries and in Israel are final and we may be subject to further audit and assessment by the applicable tax authorities. Such audits often result in proposed assessments and any estimation of the potential outcome of an uncertain tax issue is a matter for judgment, which can be subjective and highly complex. While we believe we comply with applicable tax laws and that we provided adequately for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to the tax audit, there can be no assurance that a governing tax authority will not have a different interpretation of the law and assess us with additional taxes, as a result of which our future results may be adversely affected. Although we believe our estimates to be reasonable, the ultimate outcome of such audits, and of any related litigation, could differ materially from our provisions for taxes, which may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Our failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could materially adversely affect our reported financial information and the market price of our ordinary shares. We are characterized as an “accelerated filer” under the US Securities Law. Among other things, this characterization imposes a requirement that our registered public accounting firm issue an attestation report as to our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for each fiscal year. Our efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have resulted in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention, and we expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of resources. We cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure that we or our registered public accounting firm can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial information, and the market price of our ordinary shares.

 

We are subject to risks associated with legal or administrative proceedings that could materially affect us. We are subject to risks and costs associated with lawsuits, claims or administrative proceedings. The result and costs of defending any such proceedings or claims, regardless of the merits and eventual outcome, may be material. Any such proceedings or claims could also materially delay our ability to complete construction of a project in a timely manner or at all or could otherwise materially adversely affect a completed project’s operations. Further, we have little control over whether third-party claims will be brought by one or more third parties, including public and private landowners, purchasers of electricity or green certificates, equipment suppliers, construction firms, labor unions, and O&M and other service providers or their employees or contractors. Defending litigation, delays caused by litigation, and the costs of settling or other unfavorable outcomes, including judgments for monetary damages, injunctions, or denial or revocation of permits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We may be deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which could subject us to material adverse consequences. We could be deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act if we invest more than 40% of our assets in “investment securities,” as defined in the Investment Company Act. Investments in securities of majority owned subsidiaries (defined for these purposes as companies in which we control 50% or more of the voting securities) are not “investment securities” for purposes of this definition. As our interest in Ellomay Luzon Energy is not considered an investment in majority owned securities, unless we maintain the required portion of our assets under our control, limit the nature of the requisite portion of our investments of our cash assets to cash and cash equivalents (which are generally not “investment securities”), succeed in making additional strategic “controlling” investments and continue to monitor our investment in Ellomay Luzon Energy, we may be deemed to be an “investment company.” We do not believe that our holdings in our PV Plants or WtE plants would be considered “investment securities,” as we control our PV Plants (other than the Talasol PV Plant) and our WtE plants via wholly-owned subsidiaries. In addition, despite minority holder protective rights granted to the minority shareholders of the Talasol PV Plant and the Manara PSP, including several rights which effectively require the unanimous consent of all shareholders, we believe that our interests in the Talasol PV Plant and the Manara PSP do not constitute “investment securities” given, among other things, our majority shareholder and board membership status in the project companies. We do not believe that the current fair value of our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy (all as more fully set forth under “Business” below) and other relevant assets, all of which may be deemed to be “investment securities,” would result in our being deemed to be an “investment company.” If we were deemed to be an “investment company,” we would not be permitted to register under the Investment Company Act without an order from the SEC permitting us to register because we are incorporated outside of the United States and, prior to being permitted to register, we would not be permitted to publicly offer or promote our securities in the United States. Even if we were permitted to register, it would subject us to additional commitments and regulatory compliance. Investments in cash and cash equivalents might not be as favorable to us as other investments we might make if we were not potentially subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. We seek to conduct our operations, including by way of investing our cash and cash equivalents, to the extent possible, so as not to become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. In addition, because we are actively engaged in exploring and considering strategic investments and business opportunities, and in fact the majority of our investments to date (mainly in the Italian, Spanish and Israeli photovoltaic power plants markets and in the Netherlands’ WtE market) were made through a controlling investment, we do not believe that we are currently engaged in “investment company” activities or business. These strategies may force us to pursue less than optimal business strategies or forego business arrangements and to forgo certain cash management strategies that could have been financially advantageous to us and to our financial situation and business prospect.

 

16

 

 

We may be characterized as a passive foreign investment company. Our U.S. Holders may suffer adverse tax consequences. Under the passive foreign investment company or “PFIC” rules, for any taxable year that our passive income or our assets that produce passive income exceeds specified levels, we will be characterized as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This characterization could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences for our U.S. Holders (as defined below), which may include having certain distributions on our ordinary shares and gains realized on the sale of our ordinary shares treated as ordinary income, rather than as capital gains income, and having potentially punitive interest charges apply to the proceeds of sales of our ordinary shares and certain distributions.

 

Certain elections may be made to reduce or eliminate the adverse impact of the PFIC rules for our U.S. Holders, but these elections may be detrimental to such U.S. Holders under certain circumstances. The PFIC rules are extremely complex and U.S. Holders are urged to consult independent tax advisers regarding the potential consequences to them of our classification as a PFIC.

 

Based on our income and/or assets, we believe that we were a PFIC with respect to any U.S. Holder that held our shares in 2008 through 2012. We also believe, based on our income and assets, that it is likely that we were not a PFIC with respect to U.S. Holders that initially acquired our ordinary shares in 2013-2023. However, the Internal Revenue Service may disagree with our determinations regarding our prior or present PFIC status and, depending on future events, we could become a PFIC in future years.

 

For a more detailed discussion of the consequences of our being classified as a PFIC, see “Item 10.E: Taxation” below under the caption “U.S. Tax Considerations Regarding Ordinary Shares.”

 

Risks Relating to our Ordinary Shares and Ownership Structure

 

We are controlled by a small number of shareholders, who may make decisions with which you may disagree and which may also prevent a change of control via purchases in the market. Currently, a group of investors comprised of Kanir Joint Investments (2005) Limited Partnership, or Kanir, and S. Nechama Investments (2008) Ltd., or Nechama Investments, hold an aggregate of approximately 44.6% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Shlomo Nehama, our Chairman of the Board who controls Nechama Investments holds directly an additional approximately 3.6% of our outstanding ordinary shares and Ms. Anat Raphael, which holds a majority of the outstanding shares of Kanir Investments Ltd., or Kanir Ltd., the general partner of Kanir, holds an additional approximately 2% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Therefore, acting together, these shareholders could exercise significant influence over our business, including with respect to the election of our directors and the approval of a change in control and other material transactions. This concentration of control may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in management, or limiting the ability of our other shareholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interest. In addition, due to this concentration of control, we are deemed a “controlled company” for purposes of NYSE American LLC rules and as such we are not subject to certain NYSE American LLC corporate governance rules. Moreover, our Second Amended and Restated Articles includes the casting vote provided to our Chairman of the Board under certain circumstances and the ability of members of our Board to demand that certain issues be approved by our shareholders, requiring a special majority, all as more fully described in “Memorandum of Association and Second Amended and Restated Articles” below may have the effect of delaying or preventing certain changes and corporate actions that would otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

You may have difficulty enforcing U.S. judgments against us in Israel. We are organized under the laws of Israel and our headquarters are in Israel. All of our officers and directors reside outside of the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult to effect service of process upon us or any of these persons within the United States. In addition, you may not be able to enforce any judgment obtained in the U.S. against us or any of such persons in Israel and in any event will be required to file a request with an Israeli court for recognition or enforcement of any non-Israeli judgment. Subject to certain time limitations, executory judgments of a United States court for liquidated damages in civil matters may be enforced by an Israeli court, provided that: (i) the judgment was obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, that recognizes and enforces similar judgments of Israeli courts and according to the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel, (ii) adequate service of process was effected and the defendant had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (iii) the judgment and its enforcement are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the State of Israel, (iv) the judgment was not obtained by fraud and does not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties, (v) the judgment is no longer appealable, and (vi) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign court. If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court, it will be payable in Israeli currency. You may not be able to enforce civil actions under U.S. securities laws if you file a lawsuit in Israel.

 

17

 

 

We may rely on certain Israeli “home country” corporate governance practices which may not afford shareholders the same protection afforded to stockholders of U.S. companies. As a foreign private issuer for purposes of U.S. securities laws, NYSE American LLC rules allow us to follow certain Israeli “home country” corporate governance practices in lieu of the corresponding NYSE American LLC corporate governance rules. Such home country practices may not afford shareholders the same level of rights or protections in certain matters as those of stockholders of U.S. domestic companies. To the extent we are entitled to elect to follow Israeli law and practice rather than corresponding U.S. law or practice, such as with regard to the requirement for shareholder approval of changes to option plans, our shareholders may not be afforded the same level of rights they would have under U.S. practice.

 

The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law. We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, each shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters. Israeli law provides that these duties are applicable in shareholder votes on, among other things, amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or who has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. However, Israeli law does not define the substance of this duty of fairness. Because Israeli corporate law has undergone extensive revisions in recent years, there is little case law available to assist in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholder behavior.

 

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional ordinary shares, among other reasons, for purposes of carrying out future acquisitions, financing needs, and also as a result of our incentive and compensation plans. We have two series of options (Series 1 and 2) and one series of convertible debentures (Series D) listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, to purchase an aggregate of 1,780,757 ordinary shares. In the event some or all of our Series 1 Options or Series 2 Options are exercised, or some or all of our Series D Convertible Debentures are converted, you may experience dilution of your percentage of holdings in our ordinary shares. We may also choose to raise additional equity capital in the future for various reasons and purposes. The issuance of any additional ordinary shares in the future, or any securities that are exercisable for or convertible into our ordinary shares, will have a dilutive effect on our shareholders as a consequence of the reduction in percentage ownership.

 

Our ordinary shares are listed on two markets, and this may result in price variations that could affect the trading price of our ordinary shares. Our ordinary shares are listed on the NYSE American LLC and on the TASE, both under the symbol “ELLO.” Trading in our ordinary shares on these markets is made in different currencies (U.S. dollars on the NYSE American LLC and New Israeli Shekels on the TASE), and at different times (due to the different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of our ordinary shares on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on the other market.

 

We have not paid a cash dividend or executed a buyback of a substantial number of shares since 2016 and there is no assurance we will do so in the future. We have not paid any cash dividends or announced a share buyback plan since 2016. Future dividends or future share buyback plans will depend on our earnings, if any, capital requirements, general financial condition and applicable legal and contractual constraints in connection with distribution of profits, and will be within the discretion of our then-board of directors. There can be no assurance that any additional dividends will be paid or share buyback programs adopted, as to the timing or the amount of the dividends or share buyback programs, or as to whether our Board of Directors will elect to distribute our profits by means of share repurchases or a distribution of a cash or other dividend. In addition, the terms of the deeds of trust governing our Debentures restrict our ability to made “distributions” (as such term is defined in the Israeli Companies Law, 1999, as amended, or the Companies Law, which includes cash dividends and repurchase of shares). For more information see “Item 5.B: Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Item 8.A: Financial Information; Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information; Dividends” below.

 

18

 

 

Our stock price has been very volatile in the past and may in the future be volatile, which could adversely affect the market liquidity of our ordinary shares and our ability to raise additional funds. The market liquidity and analyst coverage of our ordinary shares is limited. Our ordinary shares have experienced substantial price volatility in the past, particularly during periods of very limited volume of trading in our ordinary shares resulting in every transaction performed significantly influencing the market price. Although our ordinary shares are listed both on the NYSE American LLC and on the TASE, there is still limited liquidity, and combined with the general economic and political conditions, these circumstances cause the market price for our ordinary shares to continue to be volatile. The continuance of such factors and other factors relating to our business may materially adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares in the future and could result in lower prices for our ordinary shares than might otherwise prevail and in larger spreads between the bid and asked prices for our ordinary shares. These issues could materially impair our ability to raise funds through the issuance of our ordinary shares in the securities markets.

 

Provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of Ellomay or a controlling position in Ellomay, which could prevent a change of control and, therefore, depress the price of our shares. Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders. These provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of Ellomay, which could prevent a change of control and therefore depress the price of our shares.

 

ITEM 4: Information on Ellomay

 

A. History and Development of Ellomay

 

Our legal and commercial name is Ellomay Capital Ltd. Our office is located at 18 Rothschild Boulevard, 1st floor, Tel-Aviv 6688121, Israel, and our telephone number is +972-3-7971111. Our registered agent in the United States is CT Corporation System, 111 Eight Avenue, New York, New York 10011.

 

We were incorporated as an Israeli corporation under the name Nur Advertisement Industries 1987 Ltd. on July 29, 1987. On August 1, 1993, we changed our name to NUR Advanced Technologies Ltd., on November 16, 1997 we again changed our name to NUR Macroprinters Ltd. and on April 7, 2008, in connection with the closing of the sale of our business to HP, we again changed our name to Ellomay Capital Ltd. Our corporate governance is controlled by the Companies Law.

 

Our ordinary shares are currently listed on the NYSE American LLC and are also listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ELLO” pursuant to the Israeli regulatory “dual listing” regime that provides companies whose securities are listed both in the NYSE American LLC and the TASE certain reporting leniencies.

 

Recent Developments

 

The ”Iron Swords” War in Israel

 

On October 7, 2023, the “Iron Swords” war broke out in Israel following an attack in Southern Israel by Hamas. The war and hostilities, including missile attacks, mainly on southern and northern Israel, have continued since then, further escalating with a drone and missile attack by the Iranian regime in early April 2024. The substantial majority of the Company’s operating facilities, which serve as the Company’s main sources of liquidity, are located outside of Israel, in Spain, Italy and the Netherlands. The substantial majority of the projects under development of the Company are also located outside of Israel, in Italy and in the USA. These facilities and projects have not been impacted by the war and hostilities in Israel. The Company’s headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, which is in central Israel, and the Company’s headquarter work continued uninterrupted throughout the initial war and hostilities.

 

The Company has three assets that are currently operating or under construction in Israel: (i) the Talmei Yosef PV Plant (100% owned by the Company, in southern Israel), (ii) the Pumped Storage Project in the Manara Cliff (83.34% owned by the Company, in northern Israel), and (iii) the Dorad power plant (9.375% owned by the Company, in southern Israel). The Talmei Yosef PV Plant and the Dorad power plant have not been materially impacted by the war and are currently fully operational. For a discussion of the impact on the Manara PSP, see below under “Projects under Development or Construction; The Manara PSP.” The continuation or future escalation of the war and hostilities in southern and northern Israel, including potential direct damage due to missile attacks, temporary or permanents cessation of operations and potential inability to access the sites, could materially adversely impact the Company’s Israeli operations and projects under development and the Company’s results of operations.

 

19

 

 

Projects under Development or Construction

 

The Manara PSP

 

The construction of the Manara PSP commenced in April 2021. We and Ampa Ltd., the Manara PSP’s other shareholder invested the equity required for the Manara PSP (not including indexation), with the remainder of the funding received from a consortium of lenders led by Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd., at a scope of approximately NIS 1.27 billion. This aggregate amount is linked to a synthetic composite index comprising a weighted average of the indices and currencies applicable to the Manara PSP’s construction costs.

 

Due to the “Iron Swords” war situation, which also affects the northern area of Israel in proximity to the Lebanon border, works on the Manara PSP site were suspended in early October 2023. Efforts are currently being focused on accelerating design activities to mitigate potential delays, while manufacturing of the main equipment, including electro-mechanical equipment, is proceeding as planned. The State of Israel protects the project in situations that may be considered force majeure, such as the current war. This protection is provided under the framework of the tariff regulation (financing support standards). The project is expected to receive remedies for schedule or budget overruns caused by such situations. Originally, the project was planned to become commercially operational in the first half of 2027. However, due to the ongoing war, the operation date will be delayed. Currently, it is impossible to estimate when construction will end and when commercial operation will commence. As a result of the delays due to the war, the Israeli Electricity Authority has approved a 10-month extension to the project schedule, and the Company anticipates receiving additional extensions as needed, considering the ongoing situation.

 

For more information, see “Item 4.B: Business Overview” under the heading “Pumped Storage Project in the Manara Cliff in Israel.”

 

The construction of the Manara PSP and the connection of this project to the grid are subject to risks and uncertainties. For more information concerning these and other risks see under “Item 3.D: Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Business.”

 

PV Projects under Development

 

Italian PV Portfolio

 

Our Italian PV Portfolio includes our wholly-owned Italian subsidiaries: (i) Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL, which owns a fully constructed PV Plant with installed capacity of 4.95 MW, which was connected to the grid in February 2024, (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy One SRL, which owns a fully constructed PV Plant with installed capacity of 14.8 MW that is expected to be connected to the grid within a few weeks, and (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy Four SRL (15.06 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Five SRL (87.2 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Seven SRL (54.77 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Nine SRL (8 MW) and Ellomay Solar Italy Ten SRL (18 MW), which are developing PV plants that have reached Ready to Build. All of these projects are located in the Lazio Region, Italy. The cost of construction of the Italian PV Portfolio, including related expenses, is currently estimated at €150 million - €200 million and the expected average construction period of each facility is approximately 18 months.

 

We also have additional approximately 302 MW PV projects in Italy under advanced development stages.

 

Israeli PV Portfolio

 

We are advancing the following PV projects in Israel:

 

(i)the Klahim and Komemiyut projects, each intended for 21 MW PV and 50 MW / hour batteries. The projects obtained approvals for connection to the grid and are in the process of receiving a building permit. Construction is planned to commence during 2024. These projects were initially planned to receive a tariff based on a tender we previously won for PV plus storage in Israel, however, we waived our rights in connection with the tender and elected to transition to the regulation that enables direct sale to end customers through private suppliers;

 

(ii)the Talmei Yosef project, intended for 10 MW PV and 22 MW / hour batteries. The request for zoning approval was approved in the fourth quarter of 2023;

 

(iii)the Talmei Yosef storage project in batteries, which obtained zoning intended for approximately 400 MW / hour. The project is designed for the regulation of high voltage storage; and

 

(iv)there are additional 46 MW PV that are under preliminary planning stages.

 

20

 

 

Texas, USA, PV Portfolio

 

During 2023, we commenced development of PV projects in the vicinity of Dallas, Texas. Each PV project under development is expected to have a capacity of approximately 10-14 MW. There are currently two projects under construction with an aggregate capacity of approximately 27.36 MW (the Fairfield and Malakoff projects), and two projects ready for construction with an aggregate capacity of approximately 21.5 MW (the Mexia and Talco projects). All four projects are expected to be connected to the grid during 2024. The aggregate cost of development and construction of these projects is expected to be approximately €58 million, and the projects are expected to be funded partially through a tax equity arrangement covering approximately 36% of the expenses.

 

Additional PV Projects under Early Development

 

In addition to the Italian PV Portfolio and the portfolio of Israeli and US PV projects, we have PV projects under early development stages – approximately 800 MW in Italy, USA, Spain and Israel.

 

The advancement and development of these and other projects is subject to the projects reaching several milestones, including receipt of regulatory approvals and authorizations, procurement of land rights, obtaining financing, commencement and completion of construction and connection to the grid, and to various risks and uncertainties applicable to projects under development and construction as more fully set forth under “Item 3.D: Risk Factors” above. There can be no assurance as to how many projects, if any, will reach the final stage of connection to the grid and operational status and, even if projects reach certain milestones, there is no assurance that we will decide to advance the projects. We may advance some or all of the projects with partners and therefore we may not wholly-own such projects in the future.

 

Agreement to Sell the Talmei Yosef PV Plant

 

On December 31, 2023, we executed an agreement, or the Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement, to sell our holdings in the 9 MW PV plant located in Talmei Yosef, Israel, or the Talmei Yosef PV Plant.

 

The Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement provides for the sale of our holdings in the Talmei Yosef PV Plant to Greenlight Fund Limited Partnership and Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd., in equal parts, in consideration for NIS 44.75 million (approximately €11.2 million), with an additional potential payment of up to NIS 4 million (approximately €1 million) in the event the Talmei Yosef PV Plant will produce more than 18 million Kwh during 2024. The Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement provides for a cutoff date of June 30, 2023 and at closing the parties will determine whether an adjustment to the purchase price is required to reflect our entitlement to revenues (net of expenses) up to such date, taking into account the results and the cash held by the project company. We do not expect a material adjustment to the purchase price.

 

The Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement includes customary representations and indemnification undertakings in connection with breaches of representations, which, other than with respect to customary exceptions, are subject to a cap of NIS 9 million and limited to a period of 18 months from the closing date.

 

The consummation of the sale is subject to various customary conditions to closing, including receipt of regulatory approvals and the consent of the financing entity of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant. All conditions to closing were originally required to be fulfilled within an initial period of 90 days from execution of the Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement, which can be extended to up to 150 days under certain circumstances. On April 2, 2024, an addendum to the Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement was executed, providing for a 45-day extension of the deadline until May 15, 2024 for fulfillment of the closing conditions.

 

The Talmei Yosef PV Plant is located in southern Israel. One of the conditions to closing is the end of the “war” status in southern Israel for a pre-determined period (based on the official definitions published by the Israeli Authorities) and that the Talmei Yosef PV Plant is physically accessible. Based on the circumstances as of the date hereof, this condition is currently fulfilled but there can be no assurance that it will continue to be fulfilled on the expected closing date. The closing of the sale is currently expected during the second quarter of 2024. The Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement further provides that in the event that due to the current war and hostilities in Israel the facility will be damaged or its output will decrease, the buyers are not required to consummate the acquisition.

  

Following consummation of the sale, we will maintain the rights to the two projects under development located in the vicinity of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant as noted under “Israeli PV Portfolio” above.

 

As noted above, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Talmei Yosef Sale Agreement is subject to the fulfilment of the conditions to closing as of the date of the closing. These conditions to closing are mostly not within our control or the buyers’ control. There can be no assurance as to whether or when the conditions to closing will be satisfied and as to the impact of the war and hostilities in Israel on the ability to consummate the sale and on the final purchase price.

 

21

 

 

Series F Debentures and Series 2 Options Public Offering in Israel

 

On January 16, 2024, we issued in an Israeli public offering units consisting of an aggregate principal amount of NIS 170 million of our newly issued Series F Debentures, due March 31, 2030 and the Series 2 Options to purchase an aggregate of 1,020,000 ordinary shares at a price per share of NIS 80 (subject to customary adjustments), which expire on January 5, 2028. The net proceeds of the offering, net of related expenses such as consultancy fee and commissions, were approximately NIS 165 million (approximately €40 million as of the issuance date). In the event all of the Series 2 Options are exercised prior to their expiration date, we will receive additional gross proceeds of NIS 81.6 million.

 

The Series F Debentures are not secured by any collaterals. The Series F Debentures and the Series 2 Options are traded on the TASE.

 

The principal amount of Series F Debentures is repayable in four non-equal installment on March 31 in each of the years 2027 to 2030 (inclusive) as follows: in each of the principal payments in the years 2027 and 2028 a rate of 30% of the principal will be paid, in the principal payment in the year 2029 a rate of 25% of the principal will be paid and in the principal payment in the year 2030 a rate of 15% of the principal will be paid. The Series F Debentures bear a fixed interest at the rate of 5.5% per year (that is not linked to the Israeli CPI or otherwise), payable semi-annually on March 31 and September 30, commencing March 31, 2024 through March 31, 2030 (inclusive).

 

The Series F Deed of Trust includes customary provisions, including (i) a negative pledge such that we may not place a floating charge on all of our assets, subject to certain exceptions and (ii) an obligation to pay additional interest for failure to maintain certain financial covenants, with an increase of 0.25% in the annual interest rate for the period in which we do not meet each standard and up to an increase of 0.75% in the annual interest rate. The Series F Deed of Trust does not restrict our ability to issue any new series of debt instruments, other than in certain specific circumstances, and enables us to expand the Series F Debentures provided that: (i) we are not in default of any of the immediate repayment provisions included in the Series F Deed of Trust or in breach of any of our material obligations to the holders of the Series F Debentures pursuant to the terms of the Series F Deed of Trust, (ii) the expansion will not harm our compliance with the financial covenants for purposes of the immediate repayment provision included in the Series F Deed of Trust and (iii) to the extent the Series F Debentures are rated at the time of the expansion, the expansion will not harm the rating of the existing Series F Debentures.

 

The Series F Deed of Trust includes a number of customary causes for immediate repayment, including a default with certain financial covenants for the applicable period, and as noted above a mechanism for the update of the annual interest rate in the event we do not meet certain financial covenants. The financial covenants are as follows:

 

a.Our Series F Adjusted Balance Sheet Equity (as such term is defined in the Series F Deed of Trust, which, among other exclusions, excludes changes in the fair value of hedging transactions of electricity prices, such as the PPA executed in connection with the Talasol PV Plant, and interest rates), on a consolidated basis, shall not be less than €77 million for two consecutive quarters for purposes of the immediate repayment provision and shall not be less than €82 for purposes of the update of the annual interest provision;

 

b.The ratio of (a) the short-term and long-term debt from banks, in addition to the debt to holders of debentures issued by us and any other interest-bearing financial obligations provided by entities who are in the business of lending money (excluding financing of projects and other exclusions as set forth in the Series F Deed of Trust), net of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, deposits, financial funds and negotiable securities, to the extent that these are not restricted (with the exception of a restriction for the purpose of securing any financial debt according to this definition), or, together, the Series F Net Financial Debt, to (b) our Adjusted Balance Sheet Equity, on a consolidated basis, plus the Series F Net Financial Debt, or our Series F CAP, Net, to which we refer herein as the Series F Ratio of Net Financial Debt to Series F CAP, Net, shall not exceed the rate of 65% for three consecutive quarters for purposes of the immediate repayment provision and shall not exceed a rate of 60% for purposes of the update of the annual interest provision; and

 

c.The ratio of (a) our Series F Net Financial Debt, to (b) our earnings before financial expenses, net, taxes, depreciation and amortization, where the revenues from our operations, such as the Talmei Yosef PV Plant, are calculated based on the fixed asset model and not based on the financial asset model (IFRIC 12), and before share-based payments, when the data of assets or projects whose Commercial Operation Date occurred in the four quarters that preceded the test date will be calculated based on Annual Gross Up (as such terms are defined in the Series F Deed of Trust), based on the aggregate four preceding quarters, or our Series F Adjusted EBITDA, to which we refer to herein as the Series F Ratio of Net Financial Debt to Series F Adjusted EBITDA, shall not be higher than 12 for three consecutive quarters for purposes of the immediate repayment provision and shall not be higher than 11 for purposes of the update of the annual interest provision.

 

22

 

 

The Series F Deed of Trust further provides that we may make distributions (as such term is defined in the Companies Law, e.g. dividends), to our shareholders, provided that: (a) we will not distribute more than 60% of the distributable profit, (b) we will not distribute dividends based on profit due to revaluation (for the removal of doubt, negative goodwill will not be considered a revaluation profit), (c) we are in compliance with all of our material undertakings to the holders of the Series F Debentures, (d) on the date of distribution and after the distribution no cause for immediate repayment exists and (e) we will not make a distribution for as long as a “warning sign” (as such term is defined in the Israeli Securities Regulations) exists. We are also required to maintain the following financial ratios (which are calculated based on the same definitions applicable to the financial covenants set forth above) after the distribution: (i) Series F Adjusted Balance Sheet Equity not lower than €94 million, (ii) Series F Ratio of Net Financial Debt to Series F CAP, Net not to exceed 58%, and (iii) Series F Ratio of Net Financial Debt to Series F Adjusted EBITDA, shall not be higher than 9, and not to make distributions if we do not meet all of our material obligations to the holders of the Series F Debentures and if on the date of distribution and after the distribution a cause for immediate repayment exists.

 

For further information concerning the Series F Deed of Trust, see “Item 10.C: Material Contracts” and the Series F Deed of Trust included as Exhibit 4.24 under “Item 19: Exhibits.”

 

Series F Debentures Private Placement in Israel

 

On April 17, 2024, we issued NIS 40 million par value of our unsecured non-convertible Series F Debentures, in a private placement to Israeli classified investors for an aggregate gross consideration of approximately NIS 37.8 million, reflecting a price of NIS 0.946 per NIS 1 principal amount of the Series F Debentures. Following completion of the private placement, the aggregate outstanding par value of the Company’s Series F Debentures is NIS 210 million.

 

Principal Capital Expenditures and Divestitures

 

In the last three fiscal years, our principal capital expenditures were mainly the development and construction of the Manara PSP and of various PV projects in Italy, Spain, Israel and the United States. For information regarding our projects under development and construction, please see above under “Recent Developments,” below under “Business Overview,” “Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and Note 6 to our to our annual financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

 

The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that we file electronically with the SEC. These SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services. Our website is http://www.ellomay.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.

 

B. Business Overview

 

We are involved in the initiation, development, construction and production of renewable and clean energy projects in Europe, USA and Israel. We indirectly own eight PV plants that are operating and connected to their respective national grids as follows: (i) five PV plants in Spain with an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 35.9 MWp, (ii) 51% of Talasol, which owns a PV plant with an installed capacity of 300 MW in the municipality of Talaván, Cáceres, Spain, (iii) one PV plant in Israel with an installed capacity of approximately 9 MWp and (iv) Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL, that owns a PV Plant with installed capacity of 4.95 MW in the Lazio Region, Italy. In addition, we indirectly own: (i) 9.375% of Dorad, which owns an approximate 850MWp dual-fuel operated power plant in the vicinity of Ashkelon, Israel, (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy One SRL, that owns a PV plant with installed capacity of 14.8 MW in the Lazio Region, Italy, which is ready for connection to the grid, (iii) Ellomay Solar Italy Four SRL (15.06 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Five SRL (87.2 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Seven SRL (54.77 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Nine SRL (8 MW) and Ellomay Solar Italy Ten SRL (18 MW) that are developing PV projects in the Lazio Region, Italy that have reached “ready to build” status, (iv) Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Normal Cubic Meter, or Nm3, per year, respectively, (v) 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is constructing the Manara PSP, a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant In the Manara Cliff, (vi) Fairfield Solar Project, LLC, Malakoff Solar I LLC and Malakoff Solar II, LLC that are constructing PV projects with installed capacity of 13.44 MW, 6.96 MW and 6.96 MW, respectively, in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, and (v) Mexia Solar I, LLC, Mexia Solar II, LLC and Talco Solar, LLC that are developing PV projects with installed capacity of 5.6 MW, 5.6 MW and 10.3 MW, respectively, in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, and have reached “ready to build” status. We also initiate and develop additional PV projects in Italy, Spain, USA and Israel.

 

23

 

 

PV Plants

 

Photovoltaic Industry Background

 

Clean electricity generation accounts for a growing share of electric power. While a majority of the world’s current electricity supply is still generated from fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, these traditional energy sources face a number of challenges including fluctuating prices, security concerns over dependence on imports from a limited number of countries, and growing environmental concerns over the climate change risks associated with power generation using fossil fuels. As a result of these and other challenges facing traditional energy sources, governments, businesses and consumers are increasingly supporting the development of alternative energy sources, including solar energy, the fastest-growing source of renewable energy.

 

By extracting energy directly from the sun and converting it into an immediately usable form, either as heat or electricity, intermediate steps are eliminated.

 

Global Trends in the Industry

 

Europe

 

European Climate Goals

 

In June 2021 the EU established the European Climate Law based on the RED II Directive, in which the previously adopted CO2 reduction goals are made legally binding for the EU member states. The European Climate Law includes the obligation for Europe’s economy and society to become climate-neutral by 2050 and also provides the intermediate target for a 55% cut in greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 compared to 1990 levels (also known as the “Fit for 55” package). On February 4, 2024, the EU published its recommendation for a 90% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 intermediate as a new intermediate goal. On October 9, 2023, the EU Counsil adopted the amended Renewable Energy Directive (“RED III”), which forms part of the “Fit for 55” package. The RED III increases the renewable energy target share out of overall EU energy consumption from the initial 32% under the RED II Directive, which was increased to 40% in July 2021 to 42.5% by 2030, with an indicative target of an additional 2.5%. RED III also includes specific targets for EU Member States in certain sectors as follows: (i) industry – including a 1.6% annual increase in renewable energy usage, (ii) transport – including a requirement that each EU Member State choose between reaching at least 29% renewables in the energy consumption of the sector by 2030 or reducing greenhouse gas intensity in the sector by 14.5% by 2030 , and (iii) building (district heating and cooling) – setting an indicative target of at least 49% share of renewable energy in buildings by 2030 and gradually increasing renewable targets for heating and cooling systems. The RED III Directive also requires EU Member States to further streamline the administrative permit-granting procedures to eliminate unnecessary administrative burden for the purpose of establishing renewable energy projects and related grid infrastructure projects and determine the maximum timeframe for the permit-granting procedures in renewable acceleration areas and in other areas. The RED III Directive became effective on November 20, 2023, and EU members states were granted 18 months to amend their national laws accordingly, with a shorter deadline of July 2024 for some provisions related to permitting for renewables. In this regard, the European Commission has established, as part of the REPowerEU program, measures to increase the target to 45% by 2030. This program furthermore focuses on saving energy, producing clean energy and diversifying the EU’s energy supplies.

 

European Installed Capacity

 

Overcoming severe supply chain bottlenecks and Covid-19 related restrictions, 41.4 GW of new solar PV capacity was connected to the grid in 2022 throughout EU Member States, a 47% increase compared to 2021. This follows the substantial addition of 41% in 2021. The total solar capacity of EU Member States reached 208.9 GW in 2022, an increase of 25% from 2021. 2023 marked another record year for solar PV in the EU, with approximately 56 GW installed, showing a 40% growth from 2022. 

 

According to “SolarPower Europe’s” base case scenario, additional annual PV installations between 2023-2027 are forecasted to be 56 GW, 62 GW, 74 GW and 85 GW, respectively. Furthermore, “SolarPower Europe” expects the total solar capacity of the EU to reach 920 GW by 2030 in their base case scenario, surpassing the 750 GW target set by the REPowerEU by 24%.

 

24

 

 

Israel

 

In October 2020, the Israeli government approved a plan to increase its solar capacity by 15 GW and raise its target proportion of national electricity drawn from renewables from 17% to 30% by 2030. The 2025 target was set at 20%. According to the Israeli Electricity Authority’s 2023 Annual Conference, the total installed renewable energy capacity is expected to be 9.6 GW by the end of 2025, of which 4.5 GW will be in dual-use photovoltaic systems and 2.6 GW will be from land photovoltaic systems. This is expected to constitute 35% of the total capacity expected in Israel at that time. Furthermore, the Israeli Electricity Authority forecasts that the total installed renewable energy capacity will be 16 GW by the end of 2030.

 

According to the 2022 Annual Renewable Energy Report of the Israeli Electricity Authority, Israel’s total installed renewable energy capacity reached approximately 4.8 GW by the end of 2022, representing 21% of the total capacity in the Israeli electricity market and reflecting an average increase of 37% per annum during the years 2018-20. The report shows that solar energy contributed 3.3 GW out of the total 4.8 GW, with 2 GW from dual-use photovoltaic systems and 1.3 GW from land photovoltaic systems. This report also reveals an increase in the installations during recent years with a monthly average of 43 MW, 78 MW and 96 MW during 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. In addition, the report highlights that the actual consumption rate of renewable energy in Israel crossed the 10% threshold for the first time in 2022, with renewable energy representing 10.1% of the actual electricity consumed during the year.

 

For more information, see below under “Material Effects of Government Regulations on the Israeli PV Plant”.

 

United States

 

Commencing January 2021, the United States has actively committed to addressing climate change through a series of ambitious goals, actions and legislations. These acts include rejoining the Paris Agreement, a global initiative aimed at limiting temperature increases to below 2 degrees Celsius, and forming the US National Climate Task Force which included the US Secretary of Treasury and the US Secretary of Defense. The Climate Task Force outlined nation-wide climate goals that include reducing the US greenhouse emissions by 50%-52% compared to 2005 levels by 2030, achieving 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035 and achieving a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.

 

Anatomy of a Solar Power Plant

 

Solar power systems convert the energy in sunlight directly into electrical energy within solar cells based on the photovoltaic effect. Multiple solar cells, which produce DC power, are electrically interconnected into solar panels. A typical solar panel may have several dozens of individual solar cells. Multiple solar panels are electrically wired together and are electrically wired to an inverter, which converts the power from DC to AC and interconnects with the utility grid.

 

Solar electric cells convert light energy into electricity at the atomic level. The conversion efficiency of a solar electric cell is defined as the ratio of the sunlight energy that hits the cell divided by the electrical energy that is produced by the cell. In recent years, effort in the industry has been directed towards the development of solar cell technology that reduces per watt costs and increases conversion efficiency. Solar electric cells today are getting better at converting sunlight to electricity, but commercial panels still harvest only part of the radiation they are exposed to. Scientists are working to improve solar panels’ efficiency using various methods.

 

25

 

 

Solar electric panels are composed of multiple solar cells, along with the necessary internal wiring, aluminum and glass framework, and external electrical connections.

 

Inverters convert the DC power from solar panels to the AC power distributed by the electricity grid. Grid-tie inverters synchronize to utility voltage and frequency and only operate when utility power is stable (in the case of a power failure these grid-tie inverters shut down to safeguard utility personnel from possible harm during repairs). Inverters also operate to maximize the power extracted from the solar panels, regulating the voltage and current output of the solar array based on sun intensity.

 

Monitoring. There are two basic approaches to access information on the performance of a solar power system. The most accurate and reliable approach is to collect the solar power performance data locally from the counters and the inverter with a hard-wired connection and then transmit that data via the internet to a centralized database. Data on the performance of a system can then be accessed from any device with a web browser, including personal computers and cell phones. As an alternative to web-based remote monitoring, most commercial inverters have a digital display on the inverter itself that shows performance data and can also display this data on a nearby personal computer with a hard-wired or wireless connection.

 

Tracker Technology vs. Fixed Technology

 

Some of our PV Plants use fixed solar panels while others use panels equipped with single or dual axis tracking technology. Tracking technology is used to minimize the angle of incidence between the incoming light and a photovoltaic panel. As photovoltaic panels accept direct and diffuse light energy and panels using tracking technology always gather the available direct light, the amount of energy produced by such panels, compared to panels with a fixed amount of installed power generating capacity, is higher. As the double axis trackers allow the photovoltaic production to stay closer to maximum capacity for many additional hours, an increase of approximately 20% (single) - 30% (dual) of the photovoltaic modules plane irradiation can be estimated. On the other hand, tracker technology requires more complex and expensive operations and maintenance and, as this is a more sophisticated technology, it is exposed to more defects.

 

Energy Storage Solutions

 

According to a study published by the European Commission in 2020, innovative energy storage solutions will play an important role in ensuring the integration of renewable energy sources into the grid in the EU at the lowest cost. This will help the EU reach its 2050 de-carbonization objectives under the European Green Deal while ensuring Europe’s security of energy supply. This independent study, titled “Energy Storage Study - Contribution to the security of electricity supply in Europe”, analyzes the different flexibility energy storage options that will be needed to reap the full potential of the large share of variable energy sources in the power system. This study notes that the main energy storage reservoir in the EU at the moment is pumped hydro storage. However, as prices fall, new battery technology projects are emerging - such as lithium-ion batteries and behind-the-meter storage.

 

Looking ahead in 2024, TrendForce anticipates the global energy storage installed capacity to reach 71GW/167GWh, marking a 36% and 43% year-on-year increase, respectively, and maintaining a robust growth trajectory.

 

26

 

 

Solar Power Benefits

 

The direct conversion of light into energy offers the following benefits compared to conventional energy sources:

 

Reliability - Solar energy production does not require fossil fuels and is therefore less dependent on this limited natural resource with volatile prices. Although there is variability in the amount and timing of sunlight over the day, season and year, a properly sized and configured system can be designed to be highly reliable while providing long-term, fixed price electricity supply.

 

Convenience - Solar power systems can be installed on a wide range of sites, including small residential roofs, the ground, covered parking structures and large industrial buildings. Most solar power systems also have few, if any, moving parts and are generally guaranteed to operate for 20-25 years, resulting in low maintenance and operating costs and reliability compared to other forms of power generation.

 

Cost-effectiveness - While solar power has historically been more expensive than fossil fuels, there are continual advancements in solar panel technology which increase the efficiency and lower the cost of production, thus making the production of solar energy even more cost effective.

 

Environmental - Solar power is one of the cleanest electric generation sources, capable of generating electricity without air or water emissions, noise, vibration, habitat impact or waste generation. In particular, solar power does not generate greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change or other air pollutants, as power generation based on fossil fuel combustion does, and does not generate radioactive or other wastes as nuclear power and coal combustion do. It is anticipated that environmental protection agencies will limit the use of fossil fuel based electric generation and increase the attractiveness of solar power as a renewable electricity source.

 

Security - Producing solar power improves energy security both on an international level (by reducing fossil energy purchases from hostile countries) and a local level (by reducing power strains on local electrical transmission and distribution systems).

 

These benefits impacted our decision to enter into the solar photovoltaic market. We believe the fluctuations in fuel costs, environmental concerns and energy security make it likely that the demand for solar power production will continue to grow. Many countries, including Italy and Spain, have put incentive programs in place to spur the installation of grid-tied solar power systems. For further information please see “Material Effects of Government Regulations on the PV Plants.”

 

Measuring the Performance of Solar Power Plants

 

One of the main factors for measuring the efficiency and quality of a power plant is the performance ratio (PR). The performance ratio is stated as percent and describes the relationship between the actual and theoretical energy outputs of the PV plant. This calculation provides the proportion of the energy that is actually available for export to the electricity grid after deduction of any energy losses and of energy consumption for the operation of the PV plant. The performance ratio can be used to compare PV plants at different locations as the calculation is independent of the location of a PV plant. The closer the performance ratio is to 100%, the more efficient the relevant PV plant is operating, however a PV plant cannot reach a performance ratio of 100% as there are inevitable losses and use of energy of the PV plant. High-performance PV plants can however reach a performance ratio higher than 80%.

 

There are several risk factors associated with the photovoltaic market. See “Item 3.D: Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Business.”

 

27

 

 

Our Operating Photovoltaic Plants

 

 

The following table includes information concerning our operating PV Plants:

 

Name  Installed Production / Capacity1  Location  Type of Plant  Connection to Grid  Fixed Tariff  Revenue in
the year ended
December 31,
2022
(in thousands)2
   Revenue in
the year ended
December 31,
2023
(in thousands)2
 
“Rinconada II”  2,275 kWp  Municipality of Córdoba, Andalusia, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  July 2010  N/A  946   835 
“Rodríguez I”  1,675 kWp  Province of Murcia, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  November 2011  N/A  684   576 
“Rodríguez II”  2,691 kWp  Province of Murcia, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  November 2011  N/A  1,109   951 
“Fuente Librilla”  1,248 kWp  Province of Murcia, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  June 2011  N/A  525   429 
“Talasol”4  300,000 kWp  Talaván, Cáceres, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  December 2020  N/A  32,740   24,971 
“Ellomay Solar”  28,000 kWp  Talaván, Cáceres, Spain  PV – Fixed Panels  June 2022  N/A  3,5975   4,051 

 

 

1.The actual capacity of a photovoltaic plant is generally subject to a degradation of approximately 0.5%-0.7% per year, depending on climate conditions and quality of the solar panels.

 

28

 

 

2.These results are not indicative of future results due to various factors, including changes in the regulation and in the climate and the degradation of the solar panels.

 

3.The Talasol PV Plant is 51% owned by us and the revenues included in the table reflect 100% ownership.

 

4.As the Ellomay Solar PV Plant was connected to the Spanish national grid during June 2022, no revenues were recorded in connection with this PV Plant during the year ended December 31, 2022 until connection to the national grid.

 

The table does not include information about the Talmei Yosef PV Plant, which we have treated as a discontinued operation in connection with its expected sale. The total proceeds from the sale of electricity of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant were approximately €0.7 million and €1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As a result of the accounting treatment of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant as a financial asset, if the results of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant would have been recorded as continuing operations, we would have recorded revenues in the amount of approximately €49.5 million and €53.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The initial tariff for the Talmei Yosef PV Plant was NIS 0.9631/kWh, fixed for a period of 20 years and updated once a year based on changes to the Israeli CPI of October 2011. The tariff was NIS 0.9946/kWh in 2021, NIS 1.0185/kWh in 2022 and NIS 1.0722/kWh in 2023.

 

Photovoltaic Plants

 

The construction and operation of photovoltaic plants entail the engagement of Contractors, in order to build, assemble, install, test, commission, operate and maintain the photovoltaic power plants, for the benefit of our wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

Each of the PV Plants is constructed and operates on the basis of the following main agreements:

 

Development Agreement with a local experienced developer for the provision of development services with respect to photovoltaic greenfield projects from initial processing, obtaining of approvals and clearances with the aim of reaching “ready to build” status;

 

An Engineering, Procurement & Construction projects Contract, or an EPC Contract, which governs the installation, testing and commissioning of a photovoltaic plant by the respective Contractor;

 

An Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement, which governs the operation and maintenance of the photovoltaic plant by the respective Contractor; and

 

A number of ancillary agreements, including:

 

oone or more “surface rights agreements” or “lease agreements” with the land owners, which provide the terms and conditions for the lease of land on which the photovoltaic plants are constructed and operated;

 

ooptionally, one or more “project financing agreements” with financing entities, as were already executed with respect to several of the PV Plants and as more fully described below, and as may be executed in the future with respect to one or more of the remaining PV Plants; and

 

oa stock purchase agreement in the event we acquire an existing company that owns a photovoltaic plant that is under construction or is already constructed.

 

29

 

 

With respect to our Spanish PV Plants:

 

Standard “power distribution agreements” with the applicable Spanish power distribution grid company such as Endesa Distribución Eléctrica, S.L.U., or Endesa, or Iberdrola Distribución Eléctrica, S.A.U., or Iberdrola, regarding the rights and obligations of each party, concerning, inter alia, the evacuation of the power generated in the plant to the grid;

 

Standard “representation agreements” with an entity that will act as the energy sales agent of the PV Plant in the energy market, in accordance with Spanish Royal Decree 436/2004; and

 

Assignment Contract (“contrato de encargo de proyecto”) and the Technical Access Contract (“Contracto técnico de acceso a la red de transporte”) with Red Eléctrica de España (the Spanish grid operator, or REE).

 

With respect to our Israeli PV Plant:

 

A power purchase agreement with the IEC for the purchase of electricity by the IEC with a term of 20 years commencing on the date of connection to the grid.

 

With respect to Italian PV Plants to be developed or held in the future:

 

One or more “power purchase agreements” with GSE, specifying the power output to be purchased by GSE for resale and the consideration in respect thereof or, alternatively, a “power purchase agreements” with a private energy broker, specifying the power output to be purchased for resale and the consideration in respect thereof;

 

One or more “interconnection agreements” with the Enel Distribuzione S.p.A, or ENEL, the Italian national electricity grid operator, which provide the terms and conditions for the connection to the Italian national grid; and

 

To the extent the FiT or any other incentive will be applicable – standard “incentive agreements” with GSE, Italy’s energy regulation agency responsible, inter alia, for incentivizing and developing renewable energy sources in Italy and purchasing energy and re-selling it on the electricity market. Under such agreements, it is anticipated that GSE will grant the applicable FiT governing the purchase of electricity (FiTs are further detailed in “Material Effects of Government Regulations on the Italian PV Plants”).

 

With respect to the US PV Plants developed in the vicinity of Dallas, Texas:

 

One or more agreements to acquire the solar modules from the manufacturers;

 

One or more “interconnection agreements” with Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC or Texas-New Mexico Power Co., the local electricity grid operator;

 

One or more service agreements with a Qualified Scheduling Entity, or QSE, registered with the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc., or ERCOT, which enables the participation in the ERCOT real-time and day-ahead markets; and

 

Potentially, one or more agreements with tax equity partners in connection with investment tax credits purchase.

 

The summaries below describe the material terms of the O&M Agreements executed in connection with our operating PV Plants.

 

30

 

 

Operation and Maintenance Agreements

 

General

 

As mentioned above, each of the PV Plants is operated and maintained by a local contractor pursuant to an O&M Agreement executed between such Contractor and our subsidiary that owns the PV Plant, or the PV Principal. Each O&M Agreement sets out the terms under which each of the Contractors is to operate and maintain the PV Plant.

 

In our Talmei Yosef PV Plant and Talasol PV Plant, a technical adviser, or the Technical Advisor, was appointed by the Financing Entity, to monitor the performance of the services. Our current Technical Advisers in Spain and Israel is a leading technical firm which appears in the banks’ whitelist.

 

We expect that, if required, we could replace some or all of our current O&M Contractors with other contractors and service providers. However, we cannot ensure that if such replacement shall take place we will receive the same terms and warranties from the new contractor. In addition, to the extent the relevant PV Plant received financing from a bank or other financing institution, the applicable financing agreement generally requires that we obtain the financing institution’s approval for the replacement of an O&M contractor.

 

The Services

 

Each O&M Agreement governs the provision of the following services: (i) Subscription Services, which include Preventive Maintenance Services (maintenance services such as cleaning of panels and taking care of vegetation, surveillance, remote supervision of operation and full operational status of the PV Plant) and Corrective Maintenance Services (services to correct incidents arising at the PV Plant or to remedy any anomaly in the operation of the PV Plant), and (ii) Non-Subscription Services, which are all services outside the scope of the Subscription Services. In some cases, certain engagement agreements are executed by us directly with service providers (such as internet, security services, etc.).

 

The Consideration

 

Based on the range of services offered by the Contractor, the annual consideration for the Subscription Services in our operating PV Plants in Spain, other than Ellomay Solar and Talasol, varies from €12,800 to €20,700 per MWp (linked to the local Consumer Price Index) for each of the PV Plants, paid on a quarterly basis. The annual consideration for the Talasol O&M services amounts to approximately €2 million, paid on a monthly basis. The annual consideration for the Ellomay Solar O&M services amounts to approximately €0.2 million, paid on a monthly basis. The annual consideration for the Talmei Yosef O&M services amounts to approximately NIS 0.5 million (approximately €0.12 million based on the average exchange rate for converting the NIS to euro during the year ended December 31, 2023), paid on a quarterly basis. The Subscription Services fee is fixed, and the Contractor is not entitled to request an increase in the price due to the occurrence of unforeseen circumstances. This annual consideration does not include the price of the insurance policies to be obtained by the PV Principal, including all risk insurance policies.

 

O&M Contractor’s Obligations, Representations and Warranties

 

The Contractor’s obligations under the O&M Agreement include, inter alia, the duty to diligently perform the operation and maintenance services in compliance with the applicable law and permits in a workmanlike manner and using the most advanced technologies, to manage the spare parts and replenish the inventory as needed, and to assist the PV Principal and the Financing Entity in dealing with the authorities by providing the necessary information required by such authorities. The Contractor represents and warrants, inter alia, that it holds the necessary permits and authorizations, and that it has the necessary skills and experience to perform the services contemplated by the O&M Agreement.

 

31

 

 

Termination

 

Each party may terminate the O&M Agreement (to the extent applicable, after obtaining the approval of the financing entity) if the other is in breach of any of its obligations that remain uncured for 30 days following written notice thereof.

 

The O&M Agreement is terminated if the Contractor is liquidated or becomes bankrupt or insolvent, and on other similar grounds, unless the PV Principal is willing to continue the O&M Agreement.

 

The O&M Agreement also provides the parties the option to withdraw from the agreement other than in the event of a breach by the other party, subject to certain circumstances and advance notice requirements.

 

The Talasol PV Plant

 

The Talasol PV Plant is a 300 MW photovoltaic plant in the municipality of Talaván, Cáceres, Spain, which was connected to the Spanish national grid in December 2020 and of which we indirectly own 51%.

 

In June 2018, Talasol executed the Talasol PPA in respect of approximately 80% (75% based on P-50) of the output of a prospective photovoltaic plant for a period of 10 years. The Talasol PPA was executed with a leading international energy company with a solid investment grade credit rating and a pan-European asset base, which is active in more than forty countries and has a proven track record in financial hedges. The power produced by the Talasol PV Plant is sold in the open market for the then current market power price. The Talasol PPA is expected to hedge the risks associated with fluctuating electricity market prices by allowing Talasol to secure a certain level of income for the power production included under the Talasol PPA. The hedging provides that if the market price goes below a price underpinned by the Talasol PPA, the Hedging Provider will pay Talasol the difference between the market price and the underpinned price, and if the market price is above the underpinned price, Talasol will pay the Hedging Provider the difference between the market price and the underpinned price. The hedge transaction became effective in March 2019.

 

In April 2019, we sold 49% of our holdings in Talasol to two entities and therefore our current ownership interest in the Talasol PV Plant is 51%.

 

The Talasol PV Plant reached mechanical completion in September 2020 and was connected to the electricity grid and electricity production commenced at the end of December 2020.

 

Agreements with Partners in Talasol

 

On April 17, 2019, Ellomay Luxembourg executed a Credit Facilities Assignment and Sale and Purchase of Shares Agreement, or the Talasol SPA, with GSE 3 UK Limited and Fond-ICO Infraestructuras II, FICC, or, together, the Talasol Partners, pursuant to which it agreed to sell to each of the Talasol Partners 24.5% of its holdings in Talasol.

 

The transactions contemplated under the Talasol SPA were consummated in April 2019. The aggregate purchase price paid by the Talasol Partners, in the amount of approximately €16.1 million, represented 49% of the amounts withdrawn and interests accrued from and by Talasol under its shareholder development costs credit facility in connection with the Talasol PV Plant’s financing as of the closing date of the Talasol SPA (approximately €4.9 million), plus a payment for 49% of Talasol’s shares (approximately €4.9 million) plus a premium of approximately €6.1 million. Of such aggregate purchase price, the payment of €1.4 million was deferred until the achievement of a preliminary acceptance certificate, or PAC, under the EPC agreement of the Talasol PV Plant. Following the achievement of PAC on January 27, 2021, the deferred payment amount of €1.4 million was received by Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

32

 

 

On the closing date of the Talasol SPA, Ellomay Luxembourg and the Talasol Partners entered into a Partners’ Agreement, or the Talasol PA, setting forth the relationship between the prospective shareholders of Talasol, the governance and management of Talasol, the funding and financing of Talasol and the mechanism for future transfers of Talasol’s shares. The Talasol PA provides that all matters brought for a vote at a partners’ meeting, other than specific reserved matters, will be adopted by the majorities set forth in the Spanish Companies Act. The Talasol PA includes minority rights for the Talasol Partners and provides that we will appoint the majority of the board members and that all matters brought for a vote at a board of directors meeting will be adopted by a simple majority of the directors, other than specific matters.

 

The Talasol PA further provides that Ellomay Luxembourg will be entitled to receive a management fee from Talasol in consideration for the administrative, support and management services to be provided to Talasol by Ellomay Luxembourg. The Talasol PA includes restrictions on transfer of the shares of Talasol by Ellomay Luxembourg and any of the Talasol Partners, which is prohibited for a certain period (other than in connection with certain customary permitted transfers) and thereafter is subject to a right of first offer, tag along rights granted to the Talasol Partners on sales by Ellomay Luxembourg and a drag along right granted to Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

Talasol PV Plant Project Finance

 

The Talasol PV Plant obtained project financing in connection with the commencement of its construction. During January 2022, Talasol refinanced its previous financing. For more information concerning the refinancing and the new financing of Talasol, see “Item 5.B: Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

The Talasol PV Plant and the Ellomay Solar PV Plant are in their operational stage, which entails several risks and uncertainties. For more information concerning these and other risks see under “Risk Factors – Risks Related to our Business.”

 

Ellomay Solar

 

On February 26, 2021, Ellomay Solar entered into an engineering, procurement & construction agreement in connection with the Ellomay Solar PV Plant with METKA EGN Spain S.L.U., a 100% indirect subsidiary of MYTILINEOS S.A., under the Renewables & Storage Development Business Unit.

 

The Ellomay Solar EPC Agreement provided for a fixed and lump-sum amount of €15.82 million for the complete execution and performance of the works defined in the EPC Agreement. The works included the engineering, procurement and construction of the Ellomay Solar PV Plant and the ancillary facilities for injecting power into the grid and performance of two years of O&M services. The EPC Agreement contained additional standard provisions, including liquidated damages in connection with delays and performance, performance guarantees, suspension and termination.

 

In June 2022, the Ellomay Solar PV Plant was connected to the electricity grid and commenced production of electricity.

 

33

 

 

Israeli PV Projects under Development

 

For information concerning PV projects under development in Israel see “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay” under “Recent Developments.” On July 19, 2020, we were notified that we were one of the winners of a first-in-kind quota tender process published by the Israeli Electricity Authority for combined photovoltaic and electricity storage facilities in Israel. The tariff per kWh determined in the tender process is NIS 0.199 for a quota of 20 MW. This tariff is linked to the Israeli CPI and is valid for a period of 23 years commencing on the commercial operation of each relevant plant. In connection with such tender, we commenced development of the Klahim and Komemiyut projects, each intended for 21 MW PV and 50 MW / hour batteries. The projects obtained approvals for connection to the grid and are in the process of receiving a building permit. Construction is planned to commence during 2024. However, we thereafter waived our rights in connection with the tender and elected to transition to the regulation that enables direct sale to end customers through private suppliers.

 

We have additional projects under development in Israel is set forth under “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay” under “Recent Developments.”

 

The continued development and construction of the facilities depends upon various factors, including, but not limited to, the Company’s ability to locate sites for construction, enter into EPC agreements and obtain project finance and all other required approvals, all upon terms acceptable to us. Therefore, there is no assurance as to whether and when such process will be completed.

 

Framework Agreement for the Development of PV Projects in Italy

 

In December 2019, Ellomay Luxembourg executed a Framework Agreement, or the Framework Agreement, with an established and experienced European developer. Pursuant to the Second Framework Agreement, the developer will provide Ellomay Luxembourg with development services with respect to photovoltaic greenfield projects in Italy in the scope of 350 MW with the aim of reaching an aggregate “ready to build” authorized capacity of at least 265 MW over a period of forty-one months.

 

The Framework Agreement provides that the developer will offer all projects identified during the term of the Framework Agreement exclusively to Ellomay Luxembourg and that, with respect to each project acquired by Ellomay Luxembourg, the developer will be entitled to provide development services until it reaches “ready to build” status. The parties agreed on a development budget including a monthly development service consideration, to be paid to the developer and all other payments for the tasks required to bring the projects to a ready to build. In addition, Ellomay Luxembourg undertook to pay a success fee to the developer with respect to each project that achieves a “ready to build” status. Currently development is progressing as planned.

 

In April 2021, the Framework Agreement was amended and the target of reaching an aggregate “ready to build” authorized capacity of at least 265 MW was increased to 365 MW.

 

Our Italian PV Portfolio (as more fully described under “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay,” under “Recent Developments”) was developed under the Framework Agreement.

 

The advancement and development of projects that will become part of the Framework Agreement is subject to various conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals and authorizations and procurement of land rights. There can be no assurance as to the aggregate capacity of projects that will by identified by the developer and that will thereafter reach the “ready to build” status, and as to our decision and success in completing construction of any of such projects. Any future decision of the Company with respect to the continued development of projects will be subject to the relevant circumstances existing at the time such decision will be made. In addition, projects in the construction stage are exposed to several risks, including delays in supply of equipment and defaults by contractors as noted under “Item 3.D: Risk Factors” above.

 

In November 2019, Ellomay Luxembourg executed a Framework Agreement with the aim of reaching an aggregate authorized capacity of at least 250 MW over a three-year period. In connection with the execution of this agreement, Ellomay Luxembourg paid the developer an advance payment of approximately €1.6 million, based on the target aggregate project capacity of 250 MW, and undertook to pay an additional advance payment per each project when the project submits its environmental impact assessment application. As the target aggregate capacity was not achieved, the advance payment including interest in the aggregate amount of approximately €1.9 million was refunded in August 2023.

 

34

 

 

US PV Market Joint Development Agreement

 

On March 14, 2023, we entered into a Joint Development Agreement, or the JDA, for the development of solar photovoltaic projects in the State of Texas. The JDA was executed with a project development company experienced in the development of energy projects, site acquisition, capital markets and commercial management. Construction on the first two PV projects under the JDA, with an aggregate capacity of approximately 27.36 MW, commenced in March 2024. Construction on two additional projects with an aggregate capacity of approximately 21.5 MW is expected to commence during the third quarter of 2024. All four projects are expected to be connected to the grid by the end of 2024.

 

The projects to be developed under the JDA will be subject to the ERCOT Distributed Generation, or DG, Scheme for projects of up to 10 MW AC capacity. Under the DG Scheme, ERCOT (the electricity regulator of the State of Texas), allows owners of generation assets to sell electricity through Qualified Scheduling Entities (QSE’s) at market rates under Real Time or Day Ahead prices at the local nodes where the projects are located and/or to designated “Behind the Meter” clients under Power Purchase Agreements.

 

Competition

 

Our competitors are mostly other entities that seek land and contractors to construct new power plants on their behalf or seek to purchase existing photovoltaic power plants. The competition in the Israeli photovoltaic sector concentrates on the ability to receive licenses from the Israeli Electricity Authority for the construction of new photovoltaic plants, which is subject to a quota as more fully described below and the ability to acquire existing plants that were already granted an electricity production license. The market for solar energy is intensely competitive and rapidly evolving, and many of our competitors who strive to construct new solar power plants have established more prominent market positions and are more experienced in this field. Our competitors in this market include Etrion Corporation (TSX, TO:ETX), Sunflower Sustainable Investments Ltd. (TASE:SNFL), Nofar Energy Ltd, (TASE:NOFR), Doral Group Renewable Energy Resurcs Ltd. (TASE:DORL), Meshek Energy-Renewable Energies Ltd. (TASE:MSKE), Shikun & Binui Energy Ltd. (TASE:SBEN), Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (NASD, TASE:ENLT), Energixs Renewable Energies Ltd. (TASE:ENRG), Allerion Clean Power S.p.A. (ARN.MI), NextEra Energy Partners (NYSE:NEP), NRG Yield (NASD:NYLD), TransAlta Renewables (TSX:RNW), Pattern Energy Group (NASD:PEGI), Abengoa Yield PLC (NASD:ABY), NextEnergy Solar Fund Limited (LSE:NESF), Bluefield Solar Income Fund Limited (LSE:BSIF), Infinis Energy PLC (LSE:INFI), The Renewables Infrastructure Group Limited (LSE:TRIG) and TerraForm Power, Inc. (NASD:TERP). If we fail to attract and retain ongoing relationships with solar plants developers, we will be unable to reach additional agreements for the development and operation of additional solar plants, should we wish to do so.

 

Customers

 

The customers of our PV Plants are generally the local operators of the national grid and our PV Plants do not provide electricity or enter into power purchase agreements with private customers. The agreements with the customers include customary termination provisions, including in connection with breaches of the electricity producer and in the event the plant causes disruptions with the grid.

 

Seasonality

 

Solar power production has a seasonal cycle due to its dependency on the direct and indirect sunlight and the effect the amount of sunlight has on the output of energy produced. We produce a substantial amount of our PV Plants’ energy during the summer months when sunlight conditions tend to be most favorable. Although we received the technical calculation of the average production recorded in the area of each of our PV Plants from our technical advisors and incorporated such data into our financial models, adverse meteorological conditions, including climate change and extreme weather conditions, can have a material impact on the PV Plants’ output and could result in production of electricity below expected output.

 

35

 

 

Sources and Availability of Components of the Solar Power Plant

 

As noted above, the construction of our PV Plants entails the assembly of solar panels and inverters purchased from third party suppliers. A critical factor in the success of our PV Plants is the existence of reliable panel suppliers, who guarantee the performance and quality of the panels supplied. Degradation in such performance above a certain minimum level, generally 90% during the initial ten-year period and 80% during the following ten-fifteen years period, is guaranteed by the panel suppliers. However, if any supplier is unreliable or becomes insolvent, it may default on warranty obligations.

 

There are currently sufficient numbers of solar panel manufacturers at sufficient quality and we are not currently dependent on one or more specific suppliers. Silicon is a dominant component of the solar panels and inverters are also a material component of the photovoltaic systems, and although manufacturing abilities of silicon have increased over-time, any shortage of silicon, or any other material component necessary for the manufacture of the solar panels, or any shortage of other components, including inverters, may adversely affect our business. Shortages in materials may also impact the ability to construct batteries designated for energy storage.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on the PV Plants and Projects

 

The development, construction and operation of a photovoltaic plant is subject to complex legislation covering, inter alia, building permits, licenses, the governmental long-term incentive scheme and security considerations. The following is a brief summary of the regulations applicable to our PV Plants.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on Italian PV Plants

 

The regulatory framework surrounding photovoltaic plants located in Italy consists of legislation at the Italian national and local level. Relevant European legislation has been incorporated into Italian legislation, as described below.

 

Authorization Procedure

 

Environmental Impact Assessment (Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale – VIA)

 

According to Legislative Decree no. 152 of 3 April 2006, or Legislative Decree no. 152/2006, regulating environmental matters:

 

(i)PV projects with an overall power capacity exceeding 1 MW are subject to the Environmental Impact Assessment screening procedure, or EIA Screening, performed by the relevant region. At the end of the EIA Screening procedure, the competent authority determines whether or not the PV project should be subject to the ordinary Environmental Impact Assessment procedure, or EIA; and

 

(ii)PV projects with an overall power capacity exceeding 10 MW are subject to the EIA performed by the state.

 

The authorization procedure follows different procedures depending on whether the project falls under the EIA procedure of the state or of the relevant region, namely:

 

(i)PV projects falling within EIA procedure of the regions (i.e., PV projects with a power capacity between 1 MW and 10 MW) are authorized by means of Provvedimento Autorizzatorio Unico Regionale, or PAUR, pursuant to Article 27-bis of the Legislative Decree no. 152/2006, which includes the EIA and the Autorizzazione Unica (“Single Authorization”), or AU, pursuant to Article 12 of Legislative Decree no. 387 of December 29, 2003, or Legislative Decree no. 387/2003, and all other permits / nihil obstat / opinions necessary for the implementation of the PV project; and

 

(ii)PV projects falling within EIA procedure of the state (i.e., PV projects with a power capacity exceeding 10 MW) are authorized by means of the AU which includes the EIA decree.

 

36

 

 

Authorizations for the construction and operation of PV Plants

 

a.Authorization for the construction and operation of PV Plants (Autorizzazione Unica)

 

The construction and operation of a PV plant is subject to receipt of the AU pursuant to Article 12 of Legislative Decree no. 387/2003.

 

The AU is an authorization issued by the relevant region (or, as the case may be, the province delegated by the region) which contains all permits, authorizations and opinions that would otherwise be necessary to start the construction works (such as, building licenses, landscape authorizations, permits for the interconnection facilities, etc.).

 

The AU is issued following a procedure called Conferenza di Servizi (“Steering Committee”) in which all relevant entities and authorities participate. Such procedure is to be completed within 90 days of the filing of the relevant application. With Decree-Law no. 13/2023 (Dcreto Semplificazioni PNRR) converted into Law no. 4 of April 21, 2023, the AU procedure was partially amended by providing that, when required, the VIA shall also be included in the AU procedure. The timeline remained 90 days when no environmental assessment is required, while, in other cases, it is reduced to 60 days, plus the time required for the relevant environmental assessment procedure.

 

b.PAUR

 

According to Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree no. 152/2006, in case of PV projects falling within EIA procedure of the region, the interested party shall submit to the region (or, as the case may be, the province delegated by the region) the PAUR application.

 

Under the PAUR procedure, all authorizations, understandings, concessions, licenses, opinions, concerts, nihil obstat and consents, however denominated, necessary for the implementation and operation of the same project are issued, including the EIA and AU.

 

c.PAS

 

Article 6 of Legislative Decree no. 28 of March 3, 2011, or Legislative Decree no. 28/2011, introduced a simplified authorization procedure, or PAS, and aimed at authorizing certain typologies of renewable energy power plants. According to the PAS procedure, an applicant can start the construction works of the PV project after 30 days of the filing of the application with the competent municipality provided that the latter has in that time not raised objections and/or requested integrations.

 

In connection with the PAS procedure, Decree-Law no. 13/2023 has provided that after the elapse of the 30 day period without any objection and/or requested integrations by the competent Municipality, the applicant can request publication of the PAS application in the regional official bulletin (BUR). Such publication entails the benefit to provide certainty to the PAS and also sets the date from which the term for appeals before the administrative Court shall run.

 

With Law No. 34/2022 (which has converted Decree no. 17/2022, so-called “Decreto Energia”) the application of the PAS procedure has been further expanded and now also applies to:

 

(i)the construction of PV plants of up to 10 MW located in so called “suitable areas” (aree idonee) (which are to be identified on the basis of the criteria set out in Legislative Decree no. 199 of November 8, 2021, as detailed below); and

 

(ii)agri-photovoltaic plants located less than 3 km away from industrial, productive or commercial areas (with no power limitation).

 

Under the circumstances described in (i) and (ii) above, the threshold for the subjection of in the applicable guidelines, including, for example, areas of significant cultural interest or protected areas pursuant to applicable legislation, certain agricultural areas, areas of tourist attraction and areas that perform functions for the conservation of biodiversity.

 

37

 

 

Decree-Law no. 13/2023 has provided that also ground based PV plants located in industrial or commercial areas, dismissed dumbs and quarries, not subject to landscape restrictions (vincoli paesaggistici) shall be qualified as ordinary maintenance and not be subject to any permit or authorizations. Furthermore, in connection with agro-photovoltaic plants the Decree has provided that plants located in agricultural areas not placed in protected areas shall be considered “items instrumental to agricultural activity” (manufatti strumentali all’attività agricola) and therefore freely installable if: (i) they are made by farmers or companies jointly owned by farmers and electricity producers; (ii) the panels are at least 2 meters from the ground; (iii) the panels are not supported by concrete foundations or hardly removable; (iv) the intervention is carried out in such a way as to ensure integration with agricultural activities.

 

d.DILA

 

Furthermore, in relation to PV plants, non-substantial modifications can be authorized through the so called Dichiarazione di Inizio Lavori Asseverata, or DILA, i.e., a self-declaration confirmed by a qualified surveyor based on which the relevant works can start immediately. Specifically, pursuant to Article 6-bis of Legislative Decree no. 28/2011, interventions on existing plants and changes to authorized projects that do not entail an increase in the surface area occupied by the plants and the related connection works, and regardless of the resulting electric power following the intervention, may be carried out with DILA without the need to submit such changes to environmental and landscape assessments or to obtain any act of consent from the competent administrations.

 

In particular, works on ground-mounted PV plants may be carried out with DILA if, also as a result of the modification of the technological solution used, through the replacement of modules and other components and the modification of the layout of the system, they entail a variation of the maximum height from the ground not exceeding 50%.

 

e.Free building activity (Attività di edilizia libera)

 

According to Law Decree no. 13/2023 (still to be converted into law) the construction and operation of PV plants:

 

(i)in areas for industrial, productive or commercial use;

 

(ii)in closed and restored landfills or landfill lots; or

 

(iii)in quarries or lots of quarries that cannot be exploited further, for which the competent authority for the issue of the authorization has certified the completion of the recovery and environmental restoration activities envisaged in the authorization title in compliance with the regional regulations in force;

 

is considered an ordinary maintenance activity and is not subject to the acquisition of permits, authorizations or acts of consent, however denominated.

 

Furthermore, the installation of PV plants on buildings is qualified as ordinary maintenance and is not subject to any permit or authorizations (edilizia libera), with the exception of buildings considered of public interest.

 

Suitable areas

 

On November 8, 2021, Legislative Decree no. 199, or Legislative Decree no. 199/2021 or Red II Decree, has been issued, implementing the EU RED II (Renewable Energy Directive, no. 2018/2001) on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.

 

38

 

 

Article 20 of the Legislative Decree no. 199/2021 provides for the regulations for the identification of surfaces and areas suitable for the installation of renewable energy plants. In particular, the aforementioned provision provided that ministerial decrees to be adopted by Ministry of the Environment and Energy Safety, or the MASE, in consultation with the Ministry of Culture, or MC, and after agreement in the Unified Conference must establish uniform principles and criteria for the identification of areas suitable and unsuitable for the installation of renewable source plants having a total capacity at least equal to that identified as necessary by the National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan, or the PNIEC.

 

Subsequently, each region (within a further 180 days of the adoption of the ministerial decrees) has to identify by specific regional laws the suitable areas, in compliance with the principles and criteria established in the ministerial decrees. The decrees have not yet been issued, however, Legislative Decree no. 199/2021:

 

(i)provided that pending the identification of suitable areas by the regions no moratoria or suspensions of the terms of authorization procedures may be ordered; and

 

(ii)identified some suitable areas.

 

Pursuant to Article 20 of the Legislative Decree no. 199/2021, as recently modified and supplemented, the following areas are to be considered as suitable areas:

 

(i)the sites where plants of the same source are already installed and where non-substantial modification works are carried out, as well as, for PV plants only, the sites where, on the date of entry into force of the provision, there are photovoltaic plants on which, without change in the occupied area or otherwise with changes in the occupied area within the limits referred to in (vi)(a) below, substantial modification work is carried out for refurbishment, repowering or complete reconstruction, including with the addition of storage systems with a capacity not exceeding 8 MWh for each MW of power of the photovoltaic plant;

 

(ii)the areas of sites undergoing reclamation;

 

(iii)quarries and mines that have ceased, not reclaimed or abandoned or are in an environmentally degraded condition;

 

(iv)sites and facilities at the disposal of Italian State Railways Group companies and rail infrastructure managers as well as highway concession companies;

 

(v)sites and facilities in the availability of the airport management companies within the perimeter of relevance of the airports of the smaller islands subject to the necessary technical verifications by the National Civil Aviation Authority;

 

(vi)exclusively for photovoltaic plants, including those with ground-mounted modules, in the absence of constraints under Part Two of the Legislative Decree no. 42 of January 22, 2004, or the Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code:

 

a)areas classified as agricultural, enclosed within a perimeter whose points are not more than 500 meters from areas of industrial, artisanal and commercial use, including sites of national interest, as well as quarries and mines;

 

b)areas within industrial plants and establishments, as defined in Legislative Decree no. 152/2006, as well as classified agricultural areas enclosed within a perimeter whose points are no more than 500 meters from the same plant or establishment; and

 

c)the areas adjacent to the highway network within a distance not exceeding 300 meters; and

 

(vii)without prejudice to the provisions of points above, areas that are not included in the perimeter of property subject to protection under the Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code, nor fall within the buffer zone of property subject to protection under Part Two or Article 136 of the same Legislative Decree. The buffer strip shall be determined by considering a distance from the perimeter of protected property of 500 metres for photovoltaic plants.

 

39

 

 

In order to further facilitate authorization procedures in suitable areas, Article 22 of the Legislative Decree no. 199/2021 provided that:

 

(i)in procedures for the authorization of power production facilities powered by renewable sources on suitable areas, including those for the adoption of the environmental impact assessment resolution, the competent authority for landscape matters shall express a mandatory non-binding opinion. After the time limit for the expression of the non-binding opinion has expired, the competent authority shall in any case take action on the permit application; and

 

(ii)the time limits for permit procedures for plants in suitable areas shall be reduced by one-third.

 

Such rules shall also apply, where they fall on suitable areas, to the electrical infrastructure for the connection of plants for the production of energy from renewable sources and those necessary for the development of the national electricity transmission grid, if strictly functional to the increase of energy that can be produced from renewable sources.

 

Connection to the National Grid

 

The procedures for the connection to the national grid are provided by the Regulatory Authority for Energy, Networks and Environment (Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente, or ARERA. Currently, the procedure to be followed for the connection is regulated by ARERA Resolution no. 99 of 2008 (Testo Integrato delle Connessioni Attive, or TICA), as subsequently integrated and amended.

 

According to TICA, an application for connection must be filed, depending on the power capacity of the PV plant, with the competent local / national grid operator, after which the latter issues in favor of the applicant the connection estimate for the connection costs of the PV project, including the Soluzione Tecnica Minima Generale, or STMG. Depending on the grid operator, the STMG shall be accepted within 45 or 120 days of its issuance. However, for the authorization to the connection to become definitive, all relevant authorization procedures (such as easements, ministerial nulla osta, etc.) must be successfully completed.

 

There are three alternative modalities to sell electricity:

 

(i)by way of sale on the electricity market (Italian Power Exchange - IPEX), the so called “Borsa Elettrica”;

 

(ii)through bilateral contracts with wholesale dealers; and

 

(iii)via the so-called “Dedicated Withdrawal” introduced by ARERA Resolution no. 280/07 and subsequent amendments. This is the most common way of selling electricity, as it affords direct and quick negotiations with the national energy handler (GSE), which will in turn deal with energy buyers on the market.

 

The Incentive Tariff System for PV Plants

 

a.FER1 Incentives

 

The Italian government promotes renewable energies by providing certain incentives. In the past, these incentives were provided mainly through granting of a fixed Feed-in Tariff, or FiT, for a period of 20 years from the entry into operation of a PV plant. The FiT was determined with reference to the nominal power of the PV plant, the characteristics of the plant (plants were divided into non-integrated, partially integrated and architecturally integrated) and the year on which the plant has been connected to the grid.

 

40

 

 

On July 4, 2019, the Italian Ministry for Economic Development issued a decree setting out a new incentive scheme for renewable energy plants including PV plants (Decree 4 July 2019, or the FER1 Decree). With reference to PV plants, the FER1 Decree divides the PV plants eligible for incentives into two groups according to type, renewable energy source and category of intervention:

 

Group A Includes PV plants of new construction.
Group A-2 includes PV plants of new construction whose modules are installed to replace roofs of buildings and farm buildings on which asbestos or fibre cement is completely removed.

 

With respect to PV plants, the FER1 Decree provides incentives that are determined mainly based on the PV plant capacity. Additional bonuses are granted to plants below 1 MWp installed as replacement of asbestos rooftops (included in group called “A-2” as set forth above) and to plants with power below 100 kW installed on buildings provided that the amount of self-consumed energy is equal at least to 40% of the total net production (€10/MWh). Below is a table summarizing the amount of the applicable reference tariff:

 

Plant Type  Power level
(kW)
  Reference
Tariff
(€/MWh)
   A-2 plants
Bonus
(€/MWh)
   Bonus for self-
consumption
(€/MWh)
 
Group A  20 <P ≤100   99.75    -    10 
   100 <P ≤1000   85.50    -    - 
   P ≥1000   66.50    -    - 
Group A-2  20 <P ≤100   105.00    12    10 
   100 <P ≤1000   90.00    12    - 

 

There are two different ways of accessing the incentives depending on the power of the PV plant and the group to which it belongs:

 

(i)Enrolment in Registers – PV plants with a power capacity of more than 20 kW and less than 1 MW that belong to Groups A and A-2 must be enrolled in the Registers, through which the available power quota is allocated on the basis of specific priority criteria. With respect to plants below 1 MW, the first criterion is the installation of the plant in areas such as closed dumps or mines, or (for A-2 plants) on public buildings such as schools or hospitals. This is aimed at giving preference to environment-friendly plants and therefore, for the avoidance of doubt, such plants will be preferred to other plants even if the tariff reduction set out in the application is lower.

 

(ii)Participation to Auction Procedures – PV plants with a power capacity greater than or equal to 1 MW that belong to Groups A must participate in the Auction Procedures, through which the available power quota is allocated, according to the highest discount offered on the incentive level and, at equal discount, applying further priority criteria. Incentives are awarded for a period of 20 years at the outcome of seven tenders held between September 2019 and September 2021, whereby the effective granted tariff will be equal to the reference tariff as reduced by the percentage reduction offered by the applicant. With respect to plants above 1 MW, the first criterion is instead the tariff percentage reduction.

 

There are two different incentive mechanisms, depending on the power of the plant:

 

(i)the All-in Tariff (Tariffa Onnicomprensiva, or TO) consisting of a single tariff, corresponding to the incumbent tariff, which also remunerates the electricity withdrawn by the GSE; and

 

(ii)an incentive calculated as the difference between the incumbent tariff and the hourly zonal energy price, since the energy produced remains at the operator’s disposal.

 

For plants above 250 KW, the incentive is paid by GSE as positive balance between the tariff and the energy price (i.e. the zonal hourly price); if the balance is negative, GSE is entitled to receive the relevant amount from the producer. For plants below 250KW, the producer can also request that GSE pay the incentive as All-in Tariff (Tariffa Onnicomprensiva). The incentives provided by the FER1 Decree cannot be cumulated with the ones provided under the various Conto Energia (the laws governing the previous incentive regime in Italy) and are in any case subject to achievement of an overall cap equal to an annual medium cost for incentives of €5.8 billion per year.

 

41

 

 

b.Red II Decree Incentives

 

The Red II Decree has set-up the framework for new incentives in the PV industry that will have to be implemented through detailed legislation, which is still to be adopted. In particular, it has been provided that different incentives will be granted depending on the type of plant, and the main distinction is implemented between “small plants” (with capacity up to 1 MW) and “big plants” (with capacity higher than 1MW):

 

(i)as to small plants with a power capacity equal to or less than 1 MW, incentives will be awarded:

 

a)as to plants with market competitive generation costs and plants belonging to energy communities or self-consumption configuration, through direct access to incentives; and

 

b)as to innovative plants and plants with higher generation costs, through tender procedures.

 

(ii)as to big plants, with power capacity above a threshold of at least 1 MW, incentives will be awarded through downward auction procedures.

 

According to the RED II Decree, procedural simplifications and priority for the access to incentives are contemplated for PV plants, including inter alia:

 

(i)the combination of renewables with storage systems is promoted, so as to enable greater programmability of sources, also in coordination with mechanisms for the development of centralized storage capacity;

 

(ii)priority access is established for PV plants to be built on suitable areas (aree idonee), with the same economic offers; and

 

(iii)participation in incentives is facilitated for those who install PV plants following asbestos removal, with bonus facilities and the widest possible participation modalities.

 

In respect of the procedural simplifications required under the RED II Decree, after issuance of Law 34/2022, for suitable areas the applicable procedure will be: (i) DILA procedure for plants with power up to 1 MW, (ii) PAS procedure for plants with power higher than 1 MW and up to 10 MW and (iii) AU procedure for plants with power higher than 10 MW. In addition, Decree-Law no. 13/2023 has identified some new criteria as well as reduced the minimum distance from protected areas required for the installation of the plants.

 

Furthermore, with specific regard to PV plants located in suitable areas and included in programs already approved by local authorities in the field of the so-called VAS procedure (Valutazione strategica ambientale) Decree-Law no. 13/2023 has excluded, until June 30, 2024, the VIA procedure in relation to (i) projects of PV plants with total power up to 30 MW and, (ii) projects for the reconstruction, upgrading or integral reconstruction of existing PV plants, which do not involve variation of the occupied area with total power up to 50 MW.

 

The amount of the incentives, as well as the financial commitment allocated thereto, shall be defined by future implementing decrees.

 

Decree-Law no. 181/2023 (Nuovo Decreto Energia) has introduced a fund aimed at promoting the construction of PV plants in suitable areas and new provisions aimed at supporting energy-intensive businesses (imprese energivore) to install renewable energy source systems.

 

42

 

 

The Red II Decree has also set up an ad hoc definition of long-term power purchase agreements, defined as the contract by which a person or entity undertakes to purchase renewable sources electricity directly from an electricity producer. In that respect, the aim of the Red II Decree is to promote the utilization of power purchase agreements, and in this respect, within 180 days of entry into force thereof, the following actions have been planned:

 

(i)the creation of an online information board with the aim to facilitate the alignment of demand and offer;

 

(ii)the setting-up of a platform for the conclusion of power purchase agreements (as already provided in previous legislation);

 

(iii)the definition of tender schemes for the supply of renewable source energy to public administration through power purchase agreements; and

 

(iv)issuance of an ad hoc regulation in order to inform final customers as to power purchase agreements, also in order to facilitate use thereof by consumers in aggregate shape.

 

In this respect, in November 2023 the European Commission approved, under EU State aid rules, a €1.7 billion Italian scheme to support agrivoltaic installations proposed by the Italian Minister of the Environment and Energy Security with Decree dated April 14, 2023. Under such scheme, effective until December 31, 2024, the aid will be granted to agricultural producers, cumulatively, in the form of (i) grants up to 40% of the eligible investment costs, and (ii) incentive tariffs, to be paid during the project operations for a 20-year period. The projects will be selected through transparent and non-discriminatory bidding procedures, where beneficiaries will compete on the basis of reverse auctions for the incentive tariff. In order to benefit from the scheme, beneficiaries must start operations before June 30, 2026.

 

In November 2023, the European Commission also approved another €5.7 billion Italian scheme to support renewable electricity self-production and self-consumption (including through energy communities) proposed by the Minister of the Environment with Decree dated February 23, 2023. Part of the scheme will be effective until December 31, 2025, while the remaining part will be effective until December 31, 2027. The scheme supports the construction of renewable power generation installations, as well as the expansion of existing ones. Beneficiaries are projects up to 1 MW and can access the scheme on first come first served basis. The aid is composed of two measures: an incentive on the electricity consumed by self-consumers and renewable energy communities and, for projects located in municipalities with less than 5,000 inhabitants, a grant of up to 40% of the eligible costs.

 

Retention from Incentives for Panel Disposal

 

As part of the implementation of legislative decree 49/2014, in December 2015, GSE published the guidelines regarding disposal of PV panels that benefit from incentives. In particular, the decree had established that GSE was entitled to retain a certain amount from payment of incentives as a guarantee for the cost of disposal of the panels installed on PV plants and GSE set out the determination of such retention.

 

The guidelines provide that the retention shall start from the 11th year of incentive and shall be calculated, for plants with nominal capacity higher than 10 kWp, on the basis of the following formula:

 

[2 * (n – i + 1) / n * (n + 1)] * total quota

 

where “n” is equal to 10, “i” is the year in which the retention is applied, and “total quota” is n*number of panels (GSE has however reserved to amend the value of “n” after further assessment of disposal costs).

 

For example, for a plant with 100 panels, based on the above formula the retention is equal to €181.82 for the first year and an aggregate amount of €1,000 for a ten-year period (assuming a duration of the incentive of 20 years).

 

The retention will be held by GSE in an interest-bearing escrow account and is to be returned to producers after evidence is provided to GSE that the panels have been disposed correctly. If such evidence is not provided, GSE will proceed by itself to the disposal of the panels and not return the retention to the producer.

 

43

 

 

The guidelines clarify that the retention shall apply also in the case that the incentive-related receivables have been the object of assignment (as is applicable to our financed projects). PV pkants subject to the Fourth and Fifth Conto Energia (except for certain specific type of plants) are exempt from the retention provided that the relevant panel producers are enrolled with consortia/institutions listed in an ad hoc register held by GSE.

 

Furthermore, in 2021 GSE provided that as an alternative to the retention, PV plant owners can provide a financial guarantee for the dismantling by joining an ad hoc set-up collective system. In this respect, with Decree n. 54/2022 the Ministry of Ecological Transition (now, MASE) has approved new operating instructions defined by GSE. The new guidelines provide clarifications on operational issues and set out the timeframe (within ten years of commencement of operations) to join collective systems as an alternative to retention.

 

New provisions regarding determination of cadastral value and so called “super-depreciation”

 

Art. 21 of Law 208/2015 (2016 Italian Budget Law) set out new criteria concerning the determination of the cadastral value of immovable assets with so called special and particular destination (i.e., those belonging to cadastral categories “D” and “E”). PV plants fall within the scope of such provision. Following issuance of the law, on February 1, 2016, the Italian Tax Office (Agenzia delle Entrate) published official clarifications to the scope of said provision. In connection with ground PV plants, the Italian Tax Office pointed out that, on the basis of the new provision, modules and inverters shall not be accounted in the determination of the associated cadastral value, which should entail a significant reduction in the calculation of the related tax burden.

 

With circular dated March 30, 2017, the Italian Tax Office further clarified that PV plants can be characterized as movable assets and particularly, as a result, will be subject to the so called “super-depreciation”, which allows them to increase the actual cost of the investment in PV plants by 40%, with associated significant fiscal benefits. During subsequent years such fiscal benefit has been partially amended; for 2022 a tax credit equal to 6% of the capital expenditure (up to a maximum of 2 million euros) has been provided.

 

Renewables energy cap

 

“Extra-profits” Measure (Law No. 25 of 28 March 2022)

 

By means of Article 15-bis, Law Decree no. 4 of January 27, 2022, or Law Decree no. 4/2022 (converted into Law no. 25/2022 “Extra-profits Measure”), the Italian Government introduced a two-ways offset mechanism aimed at annulling the extra revenues that incentivized PV plants and in general plants for the production of energy from renewable sources, to deal with the ongoing increase in energy prices.

 

From February 1, 2022 and originally until December 31, 2022, a rebalancing mechanism in the form of a “cap” was applied by the GSE on the price of electricity injected into the grid by:

 

(i)PV plants with an output exceeding 20 kW that benefit from fixed feed-in tariffs under the Conto Energia scheme, which do not dependent on market prices (i.e., First, Second, Third and Fourth Conto Energia); and

 

(ii)plants powered by solar, hydroelectric, geothermal and wind power sources with an output exceeding 20 kW that do not benefit from incentive mechanisms, entered into operation before January 1, 2010 (any grid parity plant commissioned before December 31 , 2009).

 

In particular, GSE shall calculate the difference between: (a) a benchmark price (“Benchmark Price” or “Cap”) indicated under Chart 1 of the Decree with reference to each market zone (Center-North: Eur 58/MWh; Center-South: Eur 57/MWh; North: Eur 58/MWh; Sardinia: Eur 61/MWh; Sicila: Eur 75/MWh; Eur 56/MWh) and (b) a market price equal to: for plants mentioned above under point (i) and for plants mentioned above under point (ii) from solar, wind, geothermal and hydro sources, the hourly zonal market price of electricity or, with regard to fixed price power purchase agreements entered into before January 27, 2022, the price indicated in such power purchase agreements, or, for plants mentioned under point (ii) above, different from those indicated under point (i) above, the monthly arithmetic average of the hourly zonal electricity market prices or, with regard to fixed price power purchase agreements entered into before January 27, 2022, the price indicated in such power purchase agreements.

 

44

 

 

If the difference is positive, GSE shall pay the relevant amount to the producers. Conversely, should the difference be negative, the GSE shall set-off, or request payment of the corresponding amount from the producer.

 

The above does not apply to electricity sold under power purchase agreements executed before January 27, 2022, unless they are linked to the price resulting from the electricity spot markets and do not provide an average price exceeding 10% of the hourly zonal Benchmark Price. ARERA, by means of Resolution. 266/2022/R/EEL dated June 21, 2022 has issued implementing provisions.

 

Article 11 of law decree no. 115/2022 extended this mechanism to June 30, 2023, in relation to power purchase agreements executed before August 5, 2022.

 

Several energy operators have challenged the Extra-profits Measure before the Regional Administrative Court of Milan requesting the Court to raise (i) before the Constitutional Court a question of compatibility of this law with the Italian Constitution and/or (ii) before the EU Court of Justice a question of compatibility with the EU laws. The Regional Administrative Court of Lombardia – Milan, after the hearing of November 23, 2022, annulled the ARERA resolution implementing the Extra-profits Measure. Based on the ruling of the Court, dated February 9, 2023, the ARERA Resolution is flawed on the preparatory and motivational level, because it has unreasonably failed to identify on the technical level and to enhance on the regulatory level all the factors that lead to the definition of the economic matches functional to the emergence of the inframarginal profit actually realized by the operators affected by the measure. The Court pointed out that it is up to ARERA to identify the relevant economic items for the purpose of surfacing the actual inframarginal profit received by the relevant producers. Thus, a complex set of elements affecting the accrual of actual profit was submitted to ARERA, starting with costs that are necessarily incurred by producers, such as environmental compensation measures, concession fees, imbalance fees, energy purchase costs for auxiliary plants, regional water derivation fees, and any tax levies that already affect the inframarginal profit earned. In addition, it was pointed out that it is necessary to consider the different sizes, spatial locations, and operating times of plants of the same type, which, because of these differences, are called upon to incur different operating costs. However, the Court has not raised questions before the Constitutional Court / EU Court of Justice. ARERA filed appeals against such ruling, which are still pending.

 

New price cap (Italian Budget Law of December 29, 2022, no. 197)

 

a.Price cap on revenues

 

The Italian Budget Law of December 29, 2022, no. 197, also taking into account the Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 of October 6, 2022, provided that as of December 1, 2022 and until June 30, 2023, a cap is applied on market revenues obtained from the production of electricity, through a one-way compensation mechanism, with reference to electricity fed into the grid by:

 

(i)renewable source plants not covered by Article 15-bis of Decree-Law No. 4 of January 27, 2022, converted, with amendments, by Law No. 25 of March 28, 2022 (i.e., renewable source plants not subject to the “Extra-profits” Measure discussed above);

 

(ii)plants powered by non-renewable sources.

 

The cap on revenues shall apply to any market revenues of producers of electricity generated by the above-mentioned plants and, if any, of intermediaries participating in wholesale electricity markets on behalf of such producers, regardless of the time horizon of the market in which the transaction generating the revenue takes place and whether the electricity is traded bilaterally or in a centralized market.

 

b.Calculation method

 

For this purpose, the GSE calculates the difference between the following values:

 

(i)a reference price equal to 180 euros per MWh or, for sources with generation costs higher than the aforementioned price, to a value per technology established in accordance with criteria defined by ARERA, taking into account investment and operating costs and a fair return on investment. To this end, in the case of plants incentivized with one-way mechanisms other than those substituting green certificates, the reference price is equal to the maximum value between the amount of 180 euros per MWh and the tariff payable;

 

45

 

 

(ii)a market price equal to the monthly average of the hourly zonal market price, calculated as a weighted average for non-programmable plants, based on the production profile of the individual plant, and as an arithmetic average for programmable plants, or, for supply contracts entered into before the date of this law that do not fall in the exclusion cases, at the price indicated in the contracts themselves.

 

If this difference is negative, the GSE shall equalize or request from the producer the corresponding amount. The producers concerned, upon request by the GSE, shall transmit to the GSE, within thirty days of such request, a statement attesting to the information necessary for the calculation.

ARERA shall regulate the implementation modalities of the aforementioned provisions also in continuity with the operational modalities defined in relation to the Extra-profits Measures. ARERA has not issued the implementing regulations yet.

 

c.Exclusions

 

Thus price cap does not apply:

 

(i)to plants with a capacity of up to 20 kW;

 

(ii)to electricity falling under the scope of Article 5-bis of Decree-Law No. 14 of February 25, 2022 (i.e., coal- and oil-fired thermoelectric plants);

 

(iii)to energy subject to supply contracts concluded before December 1, 2022, provided that they are not linked to the price trend of the energy spot markets and that, in any case, they are not entered into at an average price higher than the value as calculated according to the calculation method described above, limited to the period of duration of such contracts;

 

(iv)to electricity subject to withdrawal contracts concluded by the GSE pursuant to Article 16-bis of Decree-Law No. 17 of March 1, 2022, and that, in any case, are not stipulated at an average price higher than the value as calculated according to the calculation method described above, limited to the period of duration of the aforesaid contracts; and

 

(v)to renewable source plants with active incentive contracts that are regulated with a two-way mechanism, renewable source plants with contracts that provide for the withdrawal at an all-inclusive fixed tariff of electricity by the GSE as well as electricity shared within energy communities and self-consumption configurations.

 

No similar provisions have been introduced so far for the period beyond June 30, 2023.

 

Capacity Market

 

At the beginning of February 2018, the EU Commission approved the scheme presented by the Italian government for the setting up of the so-called “capacity market”. This has been approved for a period of ten years and will allow producers of electric energy (including from PV sources) to participate in auctions whereby they will obtain additional remuneration for providing availability to produce electric energy.

 

After consultation with the EU institutions and green light by the latter, the capacity market has been implemented through Decree issued by the Ministry of Economic Development on June 28, 2019. However, the remuneration provided therein is not compatible with GSE incentives. Therefore, if a photovoltaic plant benefits from GSE incentives it cannot also benefit from incentives under the capacity market remuneration.

 

46

 

 

On September 3, 2019, ARERA by means of Resolution 363/2019/R/EEL, set the technical and economic parameters for the capacity auctions:

 

(i)price cap for new capacity at €75k/MW;

 

(ii)price cap for existing capacity at €33k/MW;

 

(iii)formula for the calculation of the strike price to be applied to the de-rated capacity production in the Ancillary Services Markets, or ASM.

 

On September 6, 2019, Terna announced the procedure and the requirements of the tenders for 2022 and 2023. Subsequently, with Decree issued by the Ministry of Ecologic Transition of October 28, 2021, the regulatory framework of the Capacity Market formulated by Terna for the delivery year 2024 (according to ARERA guidelines) has been approved. Thereafter, Terna formally issued the approved regulatory framework. ARERA, by means of Resolution no. 498/2021/R/eel of November 16, 2021, approved the Capacity Market procedure and technical rules proposed by Terna.

 

On November 23, 2021, Terna announced the procedure and requirements of the tenders for the 2024 auction and on February 21, 2022 Terna published the results of the 2024 auction. On September 7, 2022, the EU Court of Justice confirmed the compliance of the Capacity Market scheme with the EU state aid rules.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on Spanish PV Plants

 

The Spanish general legal framework applicable to renewable energies

 

Law 24/2013, of December 27, 2013, of the Power Sector

 

The Spanish general legal framework applicable to renewable energies is contained in Law 24/2013, of December 27, 2013, of the Power Sector, or Law 24/2013, which sets forth the regulatory framework of the power sector with the objective of guaranteeing the electricity supply with an adequate level of quality, at the least possible cost, while ensuring the economic and financial sustainability of the system and pursuing effective competition in the power sector. At the same time, the principle of environmental sustainability is considered.

 

The economic and financial sustainability is the guiding principle for both the Spanish Public Administration and the agents acting under the scope of Law 24/2013, with a view to avoid the accumulation of new tariff deficits. According to Law 24/2013, incomes must be enough to cover expenses and, on the other hand, tariffs and charges must be automatically reviewed in case of overcoming certain established thresholds.

 

In accordance with Royal Decree-law 9/2013, dated July 12, 2013, which adopts several urgent measures in order to ensure the financial stability of the power system, or RDL 9/3013, Law 24/2013 regulates the new remuneration scheme of those renewable energy installations entitled to a regulated income, or the so called “Specific Remuneration,” in addition to the market price. Law 24/2013 sets forth the principle of reasonable profit for the sake of which the parameters to determine the regulated income are reviewed every six years.

 

In addition, Law 24/2013 establishes the priority access and dispatching of RES and high efficiency Combined Heat and Power in line with the EU Directives, and further develops the general criteria for access and dispatching by reinforcing the principles of objectivity and non- discrimination. Thereby, the reasons to refuse access are based on technical criteria exclusively.

 

Moreover, Law 24/2013 develops a specific regulatory framework for self-consumption. Law 24/2013 defines three different categories of self-consumption and obliges those installations connected to the grid to contribute to the costs and services of the system in the same conditions of the other customers. It also defines the activity of “recharging managers” (for electric vehicles).

 

47

 

 

Royal Decree Law 15/2018

 

The Spanish general legal framework applicable to renewable energies includes Royal Decree Law 15/2018, of October 5, 2018, or RDL 15/2018, of urgent measures for energy transition and consumer protection. RDL 15/2018 includes, among others, the following:

 

(i)It introduces three principles in the activity of self-consumption: (i) the right to self-consume electricity without charges; (ii) the right to shared self-consumption by one or more consumers to take advantage of economies of scale; and (iii) administrative and technical simplification.

 

(ii)Any consumer – whether or not a direct consumer of the market – may acquire energy through bilateral contracting with a producer.

 

(iii)Regarding access and connection permits: (i) the validity of the access and connection permissions granted prior to the entry into force of Law 24/2013 is extended and the aforementioned permits will expire if they have not obtained the authorization of exploitation, on the later of: (a) before March 31, 2020, or (b) five years from the obtaining of the right of access and connection; (ii) the guarantees to be placed for the access and connection permits are increased from €10/kW to €40/kW; (iii) with regards to the actions carried out in the transport or distribution networks by the owners of the access and connection permits which must be developed by the grid operator or distributor, the promoter must advance 10% of the total investment value to be undertaken within a period not exceeding 12 months. Once the aforementioned amount has been paid and the administrative authorization for the generation plant has been obtained, its holder shall, within four months, enter into an Assignment Contract with the transportation grid operator or distributor, otherwise, the validity of the access and connection permits will expire.

 

Royal Decree-law 17/2019

 

On November 24, 2019, Royal Decree-law 17/2019, of November 22, or RDL 17/2019, enacted urgent measures for the necessary adaptation of remuneration parameters affecting the electricity system and responding to the process of cessation of activity of thermal generation plants. Among others, this new regulation updates the remuneration parameters of generation plants entitled to a specific remuneration for the regulatory period starting January 1, 2020, as further explained below.

 

Royal Decree-law 23/2020

 

On June 25, 2020, Royal Decree-Law 23/2020 of June 23, 2020, or RD-law 23/2020, came into force, approving measures in the energy sector and other sectors for the reactivation of the economy and introducing a series of new provisions focused on overcoming the obstacles identified in the energy transition process and established an attractive framework for renewable energy investments in Spain.

 

As a novelty, and in connection with the expiry of access and connection to the grid permits, RD-law 23/2020 established certain permitting milestones to be achieved by the promoters. Failure to do so, will result in expiration of the permits (except when the environmental permit was not granted for reasons not attributable to the promoter). The milestones set up in RD-law 23/2020 were modified by Royal Decree-Law 29/2021, of December 21, 2021, or RD-law 29/2021, Royal Decree-Law 5/2023, of June 28, 2023, or RD-Law 5/2023, and Royal Decree-Law 8/2023 of December 27, 2023, or RD-law 8/2023, as further explained below.

 

Royal Decree-law 29/2021

 

On December 23, 2021, RD-law 29/2021 came into force, approving urgent measures in the energy field for the promotion of electric mobility, self-consumption, and the deployment of renewable energies.

 

As a novelty, and in connection with self-consumption, RD-law 29/2021 establishes that installations associated with a self-consumption modality with a surplus installed power not exceeding 100 kW are exempt from presenting the guarantee unless they are part of a group whose power exceeds 1 MW. Likewise, RD-Law 29/2021 adopts measures to facilitate collective or shared self-consumption–- in which several self-consumers benefit from a single installation–- and extends this possibility to high voltage.

 

48

 

 

Finally, the RD-law 29/2021 modifies the milestones established in RD-law 23/2020. In this sense, the dates foreseen in RDL 23/2020 for the intermediate milestones related to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the prior administrative authorization (PAA) and the construction authorization (CAA) have been extended for an additional nine months. All this, without extending the total period of five years for the final milestone of obtaining the administrative exploitation authorization. As noted below, RD-law 8/2023 extends the deadlines for the achievement of the CCA and AEA for projects that have obtained the access and connection permits between January 1, 2018 and December 28, 2023.

 

Impact on the Talasol PV Plant

 

The exploitation authorization is required to be granted within five years from the entry into force of RD-law 23/2020 (i.e., by June 25, 2025) as modified by RD-law 29/2021 and was already granted.

 

Impact on the Ellomay Solar 28 MW Project

 

The exploitation authorization is required to be granted within five years from the entry into force of RD-law 23/2020 (i.e., by June 25, 2025) as modified by RD-law 29/2021 and was granted on January 23, 2022.

 

Impact on future PV projects in Spain

 

Once the access permit is granted to a project, the below milestones will apply (the starting date is the date the permit access was granted):

 

Request of connection permit required in 6 months.

 

Valid request of Prior Administrative Authorization required in 6 months.

 

Obtention of environmental permit required in 31 months.

 

Obtention of Prior Administrative Authorization required in 34 months.

 

Obtention of Construction Administrative Authorization required in 37 months.

 

Obtention of Exploitation Authorization required in 5 years.

 

As noted below, RD-law 8/2023 revised these deadlines for certain projects.

 

Impact on operating facilities

 

The above regulation does not affect our existing and operating facilities.

 

Royal Decree 1183/2020

 

Royal Decree-law 1183/2020, or RD 1183/2020, entered into force on December 31, 2020. RD 1183/2020 regulates in detail the procedure for obtaining access and connection permits. RDL 23/2020 established a moratorium by virtue of which it was not possible to request new access and connection permits until the regulation establishing the procedure for obtaining these was approved, and was then further extended until the available capacities in accordance with the new criteria established by the Spanish National Commission on Markets and Competition (CNMC) in Circular 1/2021 (as defined below) are published. The moratorium was released on July 1, 2022. In addition, the approval of RD 1183/2020 determines the entry into force of art. 33.8 of Law 24/2013, which sets a validity of five (5) years of the access and connection permits.

 

RD 1183/2020 also regulates the access capacity tenders in certain nodes of the transmission grid for the integration of renewable energies.

 

49

 

 

CNMC Circular 1/2021

 

The CNMC Circular 1/2021, or Circular 1/2021, establishing the methodology and conditions for access and connection to the electricity transmission and distribution networks, was published on January 22, 2021. Circular 1/2021 completes the regulation process related to access and connection to the electricity transmission and distribution networks. The regulation has been developed through the Resolution of May 20, 2021, explained further below.

 

Resolution of May 20, 2021, of the CNMC, which establishes the detailed specifications for the determination of the generation access capacity to the transmission network and distribution networks

 

Resolution of May 20, 2021, contains the detailed specifications for the determination of the access capacity of generation to the transmission grid and distribution networks.

 

The purpose of the detailed specifications for the determination of the access capacity to the transmission grid for generation is to establish the particular aspects of criteria and methodology for the calculation of the access capacity to the transmission grid for generation or storage facilities, new or existing, which change their declared conditions, with direct connection to the transmission grid or with connection in distribution with influence on the transmission grid.

 

The detailed specifications for the determination of the generation access capacity to the distribution networks determine the criteria and methodology for the calculation of the access capacity to the distribution networks, the calculation of the access capacity to the distribution network in the processing of requests for access of generation or transmission requests for access of generation or storage facilities, whether new or existing that change their technical characteristics or existing facilities that change their significant technical characteristics.

 

Law 7/2021 of climate change and energy transition

 

Law 7/2021 of May 20, 2021 on climate change and energy transition, or Law 7/2021, establishes objectives for 2030 which include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of the Spanish economy by at least 23% compared to 1990; the penetration of renewable energies in final energy consumption of at least 42%; achieving an electricity system with at least 74% of generation from renewable energies and reduction of primary energy consumption by at least 39.5%. It also establishes that Spain must achieve climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest. The energy transition promoted by Law 7/2021 enables the mobilization of more than 200 billion euros of investment over the decade 2021-2030.

 

Royal Decree-Law 17/2021, of September 14

 

Royal Decree-Law 17/2021, of September 14, or RDL 17/2021, entered into force on September 16, 2021. From the entry into force of RDL 17/2021, a temporary adjustment in the remuneration of certain generation facilities is foreseen, in proportion to the higher income obtained by such facilities due to the internalization in the price of electricity in the wholesale market of the increase in the price of natural gas in international markets by the marginal emitting technologies. The adjustment does not apply to certain, mainly smaller, plants and to the part of the energy produced by generation facilities which is subject to a fixed price (physical or financial) PPA under certain conditions (which included the Talasol PPA). Such adjustment was initially foreseen until March 31, 2022, but has been amended and extended until December 31, 2023 and is now no longer in effect.

 

Royal Decree-law 6/2022

 

Royal Decree-law 6/2022, of March 29, 2022, or RDL 6/2022, establishes a range of urgent measures within the framework of the National Plan for Response to the Economic and Social Consequences of the War in Ukraine. In particular, in the renewable energy field it adopts several measures, among others: (i) the mechanism for reducing excess electricity market remuneration due to the high quotation price of natural gas in international markets, which was introduced under RDL 17/2021 and which is no longer in effect as explained above; (ii) it foresees the exceptional update of the specific remuneration parameters for 2022, as will be further detailed below; (iii) it establishes certain particularities in the environmental assessment to accelerate the permitting process; and (iv) it extends the suspension of the generation tax (a 7% tax imposed on certain electricity generating facilities, including the Company’s PV Plants in Spain) until December 31, 2023. Please see below for a description of the relevant modifications introduced by RD-law 8/2023.

 

50

 

 

Royal Decree-law 11/2022

 

Royal Decree-law 11/2022, dated June 25, 2022, adopts certain measures to respond to the economic and social consequences of the war in Ukraine and to address situations of social and economic vulnerability. In particular, it extends the mechanism for reducing excess electricity market remuneration due to the high quotation price of natural gas in international markets, until December 31, 2022.

 

Royal Decree-law 17/2022

 

Royal Decree-law 17/2022, dated September 22, 2022, modifies Article 115 of the Royal Decree 1955/2000 and adopts measures to allow cogeneration installations to recover their operating costs - due to the price situation in the energy markets - through a new type of voluntary waiver of the specific remuneration scheme so that they can apply for inclusion in the adjustment mechanism. It also introduces measures to promote the processing, commissioning and evacuation of renewable energy. Firstly, one of the requirements to obtain administrative authorization for construction, or AAC, without the need for a new prior administrative authorization, or AAP, in case of modifications to generation facilities that have already obtained AAP, is modified. Therefore, the requirement that the installed power, after the modifications, does not exceed by more than 10% the power defined in the original project, is amended so that the resulting installed power does not exceed the original one by more than 15%. This is without prejudice to the implications that this excess power may have for the purposes of access and connection permits. One of the requirements established regarding the consideration of non-substantial modifications is also revised to provide that a substantial modification in basic technical characteristics will be measured at more than 10% of the capacity and not 5%. Deadlines for the approval of the execution project are also reduced under certain circumstances. RD-law 17/2022 also modifies RD 413/2014 in relation to the prior registration of electricity production facilities and creates an active demand response service.

 

Royal Decree-law 18/2022

 

Royal Decree-Law 18/2022, of October 18, 2022, or RDL 18/2022, establishes a wide range of measures aimed at: (i) the protection of gas and electricity consumers, (ii) the promotion of renewable gases and digitalization, (iii) the promotion of self-consumption, (iv) the rapid injection of energy into the network, and (v) administrative simplification for electricity production facilities, among others. This RDL 18/2022 further extended the mechanism for reducing excess electricity market remuneration due to the high quotation price of natural gas in international markets until December 31, 2023.

 

In addition, regarding the procedure for holding capacity tenders, the nodes reserved for contest by Resolution of the Secretary of State for Energy will remain reserved regardless of whether the capacity reserved for competition has been reduced below the limit of 100 MW for nodes of the peninsular electricity system or 50 MW for those located in non-peninsular territory, and that the conditions contained in Article 18.2 of Royal Decree 1183/2020, of December 29, 2020 are no longer met after the resolution.

 

51

 

 

Royal Decree-law 20/2022

 

This Royal Decree-law introduces several measures in the energy field, among others, (i) an exceptional and transitory procedure for the determination of the environmental affection of generation projects from renewable energy sources and the specific authorization procedures for those projects that have obtained a favorable opinion; and (ii) with regard to grid capacity, the suspension of certain permitting procedures related to knots in which there is capacity that has been reserved for grid capacity tenders (in any case, this does not affect those projects for which access and connection has already been requested).

 

Remuneration of Renewable Energy Plants

 

The remuneration of electricity generation activity includes the following concepts: (i) the electric energy negotiated through the daily and intraday markets, remunerated on the basis of the price resulting from the balance between the supply and the demand of electric energy offered in them (i.e., spot price), (ii) adjustment services, including non-frequency services and system balance services, necessary to ensure adequate supply to the consumer, (iii) where appropriate, the remuneration for capacity mechanism, (iv) where appropriate, the additional remuneration for the production of electric energy in the electrical systems of non-peninsular territories, which the government may apply to cover the difference between the investment and operational costs and the incomes of these plants, and (v) where appropriate, the specific remuneration for the production of electric energy from renewable energy sources, high efficiency cogeneration and waste.

 

The legal and regulatory framework applicable to the production of electricity from renewable energy sources in Spain was modified by RDL 9/2013, due to the adoption of several urgent measures in order to ensure the financial stability of the power system, eliminating the former “Special Regime” and feed-in-tariff established by Royal Decree 661/2007 and Royal Decree 1578/2008 and establishing the basis of the current remuneration scheme applicable to renewable energies called the “Specific Remuneration” regime.

 

Specific Remuneration includes two components to be paid in addition to the electricity market price: (i) an “investment retribution” sufficient to cover the investment costs of a so-called “standard facility” – provided that such costs are not fully recoverable through the sale of energy in the market, and (ii) an “operational retribution” sufficient to cover the difference, if any, between the operational income and costs of a standard plant that participates in the market.

 

The Specific Remuneration provides that commencing July 13, 2013 all PV plants currently in operation, including our Spanish PV Plants, were no longer entitled to receive the applicable feed-in-tariff for renewable installations but rather became entitled to receive the Specific Remuneration.

 

The basic concept of the Specific Remuneration contained in RDL 9/2013 was confirmed by the current Power Act (Law 24/2013) and further developed by the following regulations:

 

1.Royal Decree 413/2014 which regulates electricity generation activity using renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste, or RD 413/2014.

 

52

 

 

2.Order IET/1045/2014 approving the retribution parameters for certain types of generation facilities of electricity from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste facilities, or Order 1045/2014.

 

3.Order ETU/130/2017 updating the retribution parameters for certain types of generation facilities of electricity from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste facilities, for the purposes of their application to the Regulatory Semi-period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2019, or Order 130/2017.

 

4.RDL 17/2019, adopting urgent measures for the necessary adaptation of remuneration parameters affecting the electricity system and responding to the process of cessation of activity of thermal generation plants.

 

5.Order TED/171/2020, updating the retribution parameters for certain types of generation facilities of electricity from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste facilities, for the purposes of their application to the Regulatory Period beginning on January 1, 2020, or Order 171/2020.

 

6.RDL 6/2022, of March 29, 2022, adopting urgent measures within the framework of the National Plan for the response to the economic and social consequences of the war in Ukraine.

 

7.Order TED/1232/2022, of December 2, 2022, which updates the remuneration parameters for its application to the year 2022, or Order 1232/2022.

 

8.Royal Decree-Law 5/2023 of June 28, 2023, adopting and extending certain measures in response to the economic and social consequences of the war in Ukraine, support for the reconstruction of the island of La Palma and other situations of vulnerability; transposing European Union Directives on structural modifications of commercial companies and reconciliation of family and professional life for parents and carers; and on the implementation and enforcement of European Union law.

 

9.Order TED/741/2023, of June 30, 2023, updating the remuneration parameters of the applicable type installations to determinate installations of production of electrical energy from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste, that applies to the regulatory semi-period that begins on January 1, 2023 and ends December 31, 2025.

 

Pursuant to the above regulations, the calculation of the Specific Remuneration is performed as follows:

 

a)The Specific Remuneration is calculated by reference to a “standard facility” during its “useful regulatory life”. Order 1045/2014 characterized the existing renewable installations into different categories (referred to as IT-category). These categories were created taking into account the type of technology, the date of the operating license and the geographical location of renewable installations.

 

The Specific Remuneration is not calculated independently for each power installation. It is calculated based on the inclusion of each existing installations in one of the formulated IT-categories and, as a result of such inclusion, is based on the retribution parameters assigned to that particular IT-category.

 

53

 

 

b)According to RD 413/2014, the calculation of the Specific Remuneration of each IT-category shall be performed taking into account the following parameters:

 

(i)the standard revenues for the sale of energy production, valued at the production market prices (currently set at €54.42/MWh, €52.12/MWh and €48.82/MWh for 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively);

 

(ii)the standard exploitation costs; and

 

(iii)the standard value of the initial investment. For this calculation, only those costs and investments that correspond exclusively to the electricity production activity will be taken into account. Furthermore, costs or investments determined by administrative rules or acts that do not apply throughout Spanish territory will not be taken into account.

 

c)Order 1045/2014 established the relevant parameters applicable to each IT-category. Therefore, to ascertain the total amount of the Specific Remuneration applicable to a particular installation it is necessary to (i) identify the applicable IT-category and (ii) integrate in the Specific Remuneration formula set forth in RD 413/2014 the economic parameters established by Order 1045/2014 for the relevant IT-category and the relevant update regulation (i.e., Order 171/2020).

 

d)The Specific Remuneration is calculated for regulatory periods of six years, each divided into two regulatory semi-periods of three years. The first Regulatory Period commenced July 14, 2013 and terminated on December 31, 2019. The second Regulatory Period commenced January 1, 2020 and terminates December 31, 2025 (the corresponding first Regulatory Semi-Period ends December 31, 2022).

 

e)The Specific Remuneration is designed to ensure a “reasonable rate of return” or profitability that during the first regulatory period (i.e., until December 2019) shall be equivalent to a Spanish 10-year sovereign bond calculated as the average of stock price in the stock markets during the months of April, May and June 2013, increased by 300 basis points (7.398% for plants prior to RDL 9/2013). RDL 17/2019 has fixed the reasonable rate of return for the second Regulatory Period at 7.09%. However, for plants prior to RDL the reasonable rate of return will remain at 7.398% if the conditions set forth in RDL 17/2019 are met (mainly to withdraw from any arbitration procedure, or to renounce any compensation, in connection with the regulatory changes in Spain that modified the remuneration regime).

 

f)Pursuant to RD 413/2014, the revenues from the Specific Remuneration are set based on the number of operating hours reached by the installation in a given year and adjusted to electricity market price deviations. Furthermore, the economic parameters of the Specific Remuneration might be reviewed by the Spanish government at the end of a regulatory period or semi-period, however the standard value of the initial investment and the useful regulatory life will remain unchanged for the entire Regulatory Useful Life of the installation, as determined by Order 1045/2014.

 

54

 

 

The update of the Specific Remuneration is carried out by reference to the IT-categories with the sole exception of the adjustment of annual revenues from the Specific Remuneration as a result of the number of Equivalent Operating Hours. This update is made installation by installation by the National Markets and Competition Commission.

 

The Talasol PV Plant is a “merchant” facility, i.e., will not be entitled to feed-in-tariff, “specific remuneration” or other similar regulatory incentives.

 

Special considerations for January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025

 

Royal Decree-Law 5/2023 of June 28, 2023 updates the remuneration parameters of the standard installations for the regulatory half-period between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025 and provides that it will be carried out considering the following in relation to the estimate of the electricity market price:

 

The estimate for the year 2023 is 109.31 €/MWh.

 

The estimate for the year 2024 is 108.86 €/MWh and for the year 2025 is 89.37 €/MWh. For the years 2026 and beyond, the value obtained for the year 2025 will be used.

 

For the calculation of the adjustment value for deviations in the market price for the year 2023 that will be applied in the updating of the remuneration parameters for the regulatory half-period starting on January 1, 2026, the weighted average value of the basket of electricity market prices for the year 2023 will be the minimum value between this value and the average annual price of the daily and intraday market in the year 2023.

 

Order TED/741/2023 establishes the same estimated values for 2023, 2024 and 2025.

 

The obligation to finance the tariff deficit

 

Pursuant to Law 24/2013, renewable installations are required to finance future tariff deficits whereas pursuant to the former Power Act, the tariff deficit was only financed by five vertically integrated companies (Iberdrola, Endesa, E.On, Gas Natural Fenosa and Hidrocantábrico). Therefore, in the event there is a temporary deviation between revenues and costs of the electricity system on any given monthly settlement, this deviation shall be borne by all the companies participating in the settlement system (including renewable facilities).

 

Taxation of the income from generation of electricity

 

In December 2012, the Spanish Parliament enacted the 15/2012 on fiscal measures for the sustainability of the energy sector, which entered into force on January 1, 2013. Law 15/2012 sets forth a tax on energy generation of 7% from the total amount received for the production of electricity. RDL 15/2018 suspended this tax with respect to the electricity produced and injected to the grid during a period of six months commencing October 6, 2018 through March 31, 2019. The suspension has been extended several times, the last one by Royal Decree-law 20/2022, dated December 27, 2022, until December 31, 2023. RD-law 8/2023 regulates the determination of the taxable base and the amount of the instalments of the tax on the value of electricity production for the year 2024.

 

55

 

 

Removal of the Generation Access Toll

 

The CNMC approved Circular 3/2020, which was published in the Official State Gazette on January 24, 2020, by which the electricity generators are exempted from paying the toll to access the grid. This means the removal of the €0.5/MWh access toll that was established for electricity generators under Royal Decree – Law 14/2010 of December 23, 2010.

 

Royal Decree-Law 3/2023

 

Royal Decree-Law 3/2023, of March 28, 2023, extended the production cost adjustment mechanism to reduce the price of electricity in the wholesale market regulated in Royal Decree-Law 10/2022, of May 13, 2022 under the so-called “Iberian mechanism” until December 31, 2023.

 

With respect to the reference value for gas, which was set in RD-l 10/2022 at 40 €/MWh for six months, after which this value would be increased by 5 €/MWh for each calendar month until the end of the mechanism. RD-L 3/2023 has established a lineal path starting at 55 €/MWh and up to 65 €/MWh in December 2023, thus ending with the same level of natural gas price that would have been reached in May 2023 if the extension of the Iberian mechanism had it not been carried out.

 

In addition, and taking into account that RD-l 10/2022 envisaged a scheme for exemption from payment of the adjustment for those energy volumes which, through forward contracting instruments, had been hedged against the volatility of daily and intraday market prices (e.g., PPAs) and that this regulation was conceived as a single declaration scheme, a new period of fifteen working days from the entry into force of RD-l 3/2023, which takes place the day after its publication in the BOE, was established for the declaration of those forward contracting instruments which, subscribed prior to March 7, 2023, extend their effects from June to December 2023.

 

Royal Decree-Law 5/2023

 

Royal Decree-Law 5/2023 of June 28, 2023, which adopted multiple measures and regulatory modifications in various areas and affected multiple sectors, included certain provisions affecting PV projects in Spain, mainly:

 

Adaptation of administrative milestones to the supply chain situation for installations that have obtained access permits since January 1, 2018: RDL 5/2023 extends by 6 months the deadline for accreditation of the fourth milestone corresponding to obtaining the Construction Administrative Authorization for holders of access permits obtained after December 31, 2017 and prior to the entry into force of RDL 5/2023 as follows:

 

oIf the access permit was obtained after December 31, 2017 and before the entry into force of RDL 23/2020: 43 months from June 25, 2020 (i.e., January 24, 2024); and

 

oIf the access permit was obtained after June 25, 2020 and before the entry into force of RDL 5/2023: 43 months from the date of obtaining the access permit.

 

56

 

 

Updating of the remuneration parameters of installations under the specific remuneration regime. In relation to the specific remuneration regime, it is established for the regulatory half-period starting on January 1, 2023 and ending on December 31, 2025. The estimate of the electricity market price for the year 2023 was made considering the values of the daily market between January 1 and May 31, 2023 and the values of futures traded in said period for the energy delivered between June 1 and December 31, 2023. The estimate of the electricity market price for the year 2024 and subsequent years will be made based on the futures markets. Based on these guidelines, the estimate of the electricity market price for the year 2023 is €109.31/MWh and the estimated electricity market price for the year 2024 is 108.86 €/MWh and for the year 2025 is 89.37 €/MWh. For the years 2026 and thereafter, the value obtained for 2025 will be used. These estimated prices replace the prices estimated in application of article 22 of RD 413/2014.

 

For the calculation of the adjustment value for deviations in the market price for the year 2023, provided for in article 22 of RD 413/2014, which will be applicable in the update of the remuneration parameters of the regulatory half-period that has its beginning on January 1, 2026, the weighted average value of the basket of electricity market prices for the year 2023 will be the minimum value between said value, as defined in article 22 of RD 413/2014, and the average annual price of the daily and intraday market in the year 2023.

 

Royal Decree-Law 8/2023

 

RD-law 8/2023, of December 27, 2023 adopted measures to face the economic and social consequences derived from the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as to alleviate the effects of the drought in Spain contains many provisions affecting the energy sector in general.

 

For example, for those new projects that have obtained the access and connection permits between January 1, 2018 and December 28, 2023, certain administrative milestones may be extended as follows:

 

the Construction Administrative Authorization shall be obtained by (i) July 25, 2024 if the access and connection permits were granted after December 31, 2017 and prior to June 25, 2020, or (ii) within 49 months as from the date of the access and connection permits (if they were granted on or after June 25, 2020).

 

the deadline for the obtention of the Exploitation Authorization may be extended up to 8 years, if certain requirements are met. The 8 years’ deadline shall be calculated in the same way as the deadline for the Construction Administrative Authorization.

 

Other special rules are included to address the issue of unavailability of grid connection infrastructure for the permitting process of renewable energy projects.

 

Additionally, RD-law 8/2023 contains new rules for access and connection tenders, such as (i) release of capacity which was reserved for self-consumption, (ii) new criterion to evaluate tenders and (iii) incorporation of capacity auctions on the demand side and provides that from January 1, 2024 until March 31, 2024, Electricity Special Tax will be levied at the rate of 2.5%, and from April 1, 2024 until June 30, 2024, at the rate of 3.8%.

 

57

 

 

Finally, RD-law 8/2023 extends certain measures adopted at the time to counteract the economic and social consequences of the war in Ukraine and also introduces certain measures on provisional and definitive operational notifications.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on Texas, USA, PV Plants

 

Texas PV Market and Regulation

 

Inflation Reduction Act

 

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, was enacted. The IRA is widely recognized as the most significant climate legislation in the history of the United States, and signifies a monumental step toward fostering a sustainable future. This groundbreaking legislation allocates substantial funding, introduces impactful programs, and provides incentives aimed at accelerating the transition to a clean energy economy. The multifaceted approach of the IRA underscores the US government’s unwavering commitment to combating climate change and underscores the importance of collaborative efforts in addressing this global challenge.

 

The “IRA” ushered in a transformative era by extending and modifying the Investment Tax Credits, or “ITC”, outlined in section 48 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended). This landmark legislation introduces a comprehensive framework that grants taxpayers a tax credit for a significant portion of the expenditures incurred when placing energy properties in service. The ITC for a taxable year equals the product of multiplying the energy percentage established by the IRA by the basis of the energy property placed in service during that year (i.e., for renewable energy facilities, the eligible construction costs during the relevant year).

 

The IRA establishes a base ITC rate of 30% for projects commencing construction before January 1, 2025. This rate is contingent upon satisfying the Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship requirements stipulated within the IRA, commonly referred to as the “IRA Wage Requirements.” Assuming compliance with these requirements, renewable energy projects gain the potential to qualify for additional incentives such as the Domestic Content Adder, which accounts to a 10% ITC bonus, the Energy Community Adder, which offers a similar bonus for those meeting its specified criteria and the Low-Income Community Adder, which offers an even more substantial bonus ranging from 10% to 20%. A project can be rewarded each adder directly and the receipt of a particular adder is not contingent on the receipt of another adder.

 

The IRA introduced a new way of monetizing the tax credits by allowing eligible taxpayers, excluding tax-exempt entities, to transfer either the entirety or a portion of certain tax credits to an unrelated party. This flexibility not only encourages collaboration but also serves as a strategic mechanism for maximizing the utilization of available tax benefits and is expected to increase the availability of third-party tax equity financing arrangements.

 

58

 

 

Texas Renewable Energy Regulations and Permitting

 

In 2023, pursuant to Section 46 of House Bill 1500, Texas repealed the Public Utility Regulatory Act, or PURA § 39.904, Goal for Renewable Energy, which was the statutory basis for the renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, mandate in the state. However, Section 53 of HB 1500 required the Public Utility Commission of Texas, or PUCT, to adopt rules to implement a new RPS only for PV resources and phase it out so that it terminates on September 1, 2025. HB 1500 also added PURA § 39.9113, which requires ERCOT to maintain a voluntary renewable energy credits, or RECs, trading program to maintain accreditation and a banking system to award and track RECs to facilitate voluntary contractual obligations and verify claims regarding environmental attributes of renewable energy production in Texas.

 

Unlike many states across the USA, Texas does not have a Power Siting Board and does not require project developers to obtain approval for the siting or construction of a new PV plant. The PUCT has the authority to oversee power generation companies; however, it lacks the capability to grant permits or certificates for the construction of new electric generating plants or to directly regulate the building process of individual electric generating plants. At the local level, Texas counties have restricted control over specific elements of the construction process, such as the utilization of county roads, but they do not have the authority to regulate the development and construction of PV projects. While the authorization of electric generating facilities in Texas does not necessitate state or county permits, these projects still require general construction permits such as the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities required under the Clean Water Act and the Texas Water Code. Other permits may be required for specific components of a project, such as access driveways and utility line crossings, or when new water wells, septic systems or concrete batch plants will be installed, but such permits are generally ministerial and can be obtained in the ordinary course of business.

 

According to the ERCOT protocols, a PV facility generating 10 MWac or less is considered a Distributed Generation facility. The owner of a Distributed Generation facility that generates electricity intended to be sold at the ERCOT wholesale market must register with the PUCT as a Power Generation Company and submit an Emergency Operations Plan to the PUCT and ERCOT. Furthermore, the Distributed Generation facility must interconnect with the local distribution utility through executing the standard Distributed Generation Interconnection Agreement. All of the Company’s US PV projects are considered Distributed Generation facilities.

 

In addition to the registrations required by the PUCT, the owner of the Distributed Generation facility must register with ERCOT as a Resource Entity. Additionally, the owner of the Distributed Generation can choose to be registered as a Settlement Only Distributed Generator which enables the facility to be settled for exported energy only without participating in the ERCOT Ancillary Services market, Reliability Unit Commitment, and Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch. A Settlement Only Distributed Generator must engage and designate a Qualified Scheduling Entity who will be responsible for financial settlements on its behalf.

 

Lastly, in order for a Distributed Generation facility to sell the Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SREC) that are generated from the operations of the facility, the facility must register with ERCOT for a Texas Renewable Energy Certificates account and with the PUCT as a Renewable Energy Credit Generator.

 

59

 

 

Texas Market Structure

 

Utility-scale projects, particularly wind and solar farms, stand as the backbone of the renewable energy capacity of Texas. These projects generate electricity and interface with the ERCOT grid, which operates independently, overseeing the majority of the state’s electric power flow. The integration of utility-scale renewable energy projects into ERCOT has significantly reshaped the state’s energy landscape.

 

Within the ERCOT market, utility-scale renewable energy generators engage in the competitive wholesale electricity market through participating in the Real-Time energy market or in the Day-Ahead energy market. Real-time transactions driven by supply and demand dynamics set the market-clearing price, establishing a dynamic framework for electricity trading. As utility-scale projects contribute substantial capacity to the grid, they play a vital role in influencing these market dynamics.

 

Retail customers may purchase power from retail electricity providers, or REPs, that may procure renewable electricity in the ERCOT wholesale electric market. Renewable energy plans offered by REPs enable consumers to make choices aligned with their sustainability goals.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on Israeli PV Plants

 

The Israeli Electricity Market

 

The Israeli electricity market is dominated by the IEC, which manufactures and sells most of the electricity consumed in Israel and by the Palestinian Authority and had an installed capacity of approximately 10.5 GW as of the end of 2022. According to such report, in 2022 the installed capacity of the IEC represented 48% of the total installed capacity in the Israeli market, the actual electricity production of the IEC represented 51% of the actual electricity production in the Israeli market and the IEC’s market share in the supply segment represented 69% of the supply segment of the Israeli market, with the remainder represented by the independent power producers. The IEC controls both the transmission network (for long-distance transmittal of electricity) and the distribution network (for transmittal of electricity to the end users). Unless otherwise noted, the information concerning the Israeli electricity market included in this Report is derived from the Israeli Electricity Sector Annual Report for 2022, published by the Israeli Electricity Authority in September 2023.

 

Israeli Regulation

 

The regulatory framework applicable to the production of electricity by the private sector in Israel is provided under the Israeli Electricity Law, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, including the Electricity Market Regulations (Terms and procedures for the granting of a license and the duties of the Licensee), 1997, the Electricity Market Principles (Transactions with the supplier of an essential service), 2000, and the Electricity Market Regulations (Conventional Private Electricity Manufacturer), 2005, or the Electricity Market Regulations. In addition, standards, guidelines and other instructions published by the Israeli Electricity Authority (established pursuant to Section 21 of the Electricity Law) and\or by the Israeli Electric Company also apply to the production of electricity by the private sector in Israel. The operations of photovoltaic plants in Israel are also subject to various licensing, permitting and other regulations and requirements, issued and supervised by the relevant municipality, the Israeli Land Authority and various governmental entities including the Ministry of Energy, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Defense.

 

60

 

 

In June 2018, the Israeli Government issued resolution no. 3859 for the reform of the electricity market and a structural change in the IEC. In July 2018, Amendment No. 16 to the Electricity Law was adopted. This amendment implements the reform of the Israeli electricity market and the reduction of the IEC’s monopolistic power by providing arrangements for the removal of the system management authorities from the IEC, maintaining the transmission and part of the distribution facilities with the IEC, increasing the competition in the production segment by forcing the IEC to sell some of the power plants it owns and opening up the supply segment to competition.

 

The Israeli Electricity Authority operates in accordance with the Israeli Electricity Law and the policies of the Israeli government and the Minister of Energy and Infrastructures, or the Minister of Energy. As part of its authorities, the Israeli Electricity Authority, among other roles, grants licenses and supervises the compliance with the provisions of the Israeli Electricity Law and the licenses issued thereunder, sets the tariffs and the methods for updating them and determining standards for the quality, nature and level of the services provided by the holders of essential service supplier licenses in relation to their customers and other electricity manufacturers, including in connection with electricity consumption, grid connections, supply reliability, infrastructure services and the purchase of electricity from licensees.

 

As part of the 2018 reform referred to above, the Israeli government separated the system management unit from the IEC and transitioned it to a separate government company (the System Manager). The System Manager is responsible for planning and development of the electricity market and maintaining the balance between the supply and demand for electricity and ensuring survivability of the electricity production and transmission systems, managing the transmission of the energy from the power plants through the grid to substations with the requisite reliability and quality, timing of maintenance works in the production units and transmission system, managing the trade in electricity under competitive, equal and beneficial terms, including entering into agreements to purchase energy availability from manufacturers and the design of development of the transmission and transformation system.

 

During 2020, the Minister of Energy instructed that the coal-based production units of the IEC gradually transition to manufacturing electricity using natural gas, commencing in 2022 and through 2025. On the basis of this decision, in 2019 the IEC sold its production units in Alon Tavor, in 2020 its production units in Ramat Hovav, and in 2022 its production units in Hagit Mizrach (effective June 2022). In addition, the IEC published a procedure (PQ) for the sale of its production units in Eshkol in order to sell them to private parties in 2023 and announced the buyer in November 2023. The sale process is currently expected to be completed during 2024. Upon completion of the sale of said production units, the IEC’s market share in the electricity production segment in Israel will be below 50%. In November 2023, the IEC published a tender for the BOT construction and operation (for a 25 year period) of a new power plant to be fueled by natural gas with installed capacity of 600-900 MW in Sorek (in central Israel).

 

As noted above, the System Manager was established in connection with the implementation of the 2018 reform in the electricity sector. The System Manager began operating at the end of 2020 and the planning, development and technology unit, as well as the statistics unit, were transferred to it. In November 2021, the system management unit was also transferred to the System Manager as described above, and it began to operate fully. Commencing its full operation, the System Manager manages the planning and development of the electricity system and the operation of the electricity production units in Israel. Based on the Israeli Electricity Sector Report, published by the Israeli Electricity Authority in September 2023, as of the end of 2022, the IEC owned approximately 48% of the production capacity and the remainder is owned by the private electricity producers. In addition, the System Manager is responsible for managing the electricity market in Israel.

 

61

 

 

Renewable Energy in Israel

 

On August 6, 1998, the Israeli government approved the resolution of the Committee of Ministers for Environment and Hazardous Materials “to act to advance the development of technologies for efficient use of renewable energies in order to reduce the dependency on imported fuel and reduce the contamination of the environment.” Commencing in 2009, the Israeli government adopted a number of decisions intended to achieve the integration of renewable energies into the local electricity market, including the adoption of a roadmap for the market in July 2011 and setting targets for renewable energy manufacturing.

 

The current targets for manufacturing electricity from renewable sources were set by the Israeli government in September 2015, as follows: 10% in 2020, 13% in 2025 and 30% in 2030. These targets were set as part of the Israeli government’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Israel. During 2022, the actual consumption of electricity from renewable energy represented 10.4% of the consumption and the installed capacity (DC) of renewable energy as of the end of 2022 was 4.8 GW, compared to 3.65 GW as of the end of 2021.

 

In August 2017, Amendment no. 14 to the Electricity Sector Law, or Amendment no. 14, was published. Amendment no. 14 is in effect until December 31, 2030. Amendment no. 14 requires that the Israeli Minister of Energy formulate a perennial work plan in connection with production of electricity from renewable energy, which will include action items per year in order to meet the targets for renewable energy manufacturing determined by the Israeli government. Amendment no. 14 further provides that an inter-ministerial committee will be established, which will be required to submit its recommendations to the Israeli Minister of Energy regarding the advancement of electricity manufacturing from renewable energy, including recommendation with respect to: (i) methods for minimizing or eliminating obstructions for manufacturing of electricity from renewable energy, including in connection with planning and financing and (ii) methods for minimizing or eliminating obstructions for the construction of facilities for manufacturing electricity from renewable energy. Amendment no. 14 also requires the general manager of the Ministry of Energy to provide an annual report to the Economic Committee of the Israeli parliament on meeting the targets for manufacturing electricity from renewable energy and with respect to the implementation of Amendment no. 14 and the perennial work plan.

 

Photovoltaic Plants

 

The Israeli Electricity Authority determines the quotas for various traditional and renewable energy manufacturers in Israel. In the past, the Israeli Electricity Authority determined quotas for photovoltaic installations. The previous quota of 300 MWp for medium installations, connected to the distribution grid, and 200 MWp for large installations, connected to the transmission grid, have been fully utilized.

 

62

 

 

Israeli government resolution no. 2117, approved in October 2014, provides for a shift of thermo-solar, wind and bio-gas quotas in aggregate of 340 megawatt to solar quotas to be equally divided between plants connected to the transmission network and plants connected to the distribution network and further providing that the total quotas will not exceed 114 megawatt per year.

 

On October 10, 2016, The Israeli Electricity Authority published a hearing concerning the development of new photovoltaic plants with a total capacity ranging between 800-1700 megawatts as will be determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority, or the Publication. According to the Publication, the licenses to construct new photovoltaic plants under the new quotas shall be granted on the basis of a competitive bidding process, in which the bidders shall propose the applicable tariffs they expect to be paid for each KW/h supplied to the electric grid. The Publication provides that bidders who submit the lowest proposals that collectively fall within the quota limits will be entitled to develop a photovoltaic plant and sell electricity to the grid at a price equal to the lowest tariff proposal amongst the unsuccessful bids. Consequently, all successful bidders shall eventually sell electricity at the same tariff.

 

The final tariff will be valid for a period of 23 years for plants connected to the distribution grid, and 22 years for plants connected to the transmission grid, starting from the date of commercial operation or upon receiving a permanent license to produce electricity and the commencement of commercial operation, as shall be determined in accordance with the then applicable licensing regulation.

 

In November 2017, the Minister of Energy approved an additional quota of 1,600 MWp for photovoltaic installations that will be allocated between small rooftop installations and medium installations.

 

During the years 2017-2019, several tenders were conducted. The results of the fourth tender related to land-mounted medium installations that were published in November 2019, set a price per KWh of NIS 0.1798 for an aggregate production capacity of 236 MWp to be constructed by the end of 2020. The results of the second tender related to rooftop and water reservoir mounted installations, also published in November 2019, set a price per KWh of NIS 0.2307 for an aggregate production capacity of 68 MWp. During 2020, the Israel Electricity Authority conducted additional tenders and on December 28, 2020 the results of the most recent tender were published, with an aggregate installed capacity allocated of 609 MW and price per KWh set at NIS 0.1745, which is 12% lower than the price set in the previous tender. In a tender held at the end of 2021 in connection with a 300 MW plant in Dimona, Israel, with 210 MW storage, the price determined was 0.0857 per KWh.

 

In addition, the Israeli Electricity Authority approved a quota of 200 MWp for tenders to be published in conjunction with the Israel Land Authority for the construction of photovoltaic installations, of which winners were announced in connection with 136 MWp.

 

Licensing

 

The Israeli Electricity Authority regulated the establishment of photovoltaic plants, in several categories as noted above. Medium photovoltaic plants, such as the Israeli PV Plant, are governed by the Israeli Electricity Authority’s decision no. 284, or Decision 284. Decision 284 provides that it will apply until the earlier of reaching a quota of 300 megawatt in Israel or until the end of 2017.

 

63

 

 

An entity wishing to construct and operate a photovoltaic plant in Israel is required to obtain a conditional license, subject to the fulfillment of several threshold conditions set forth in Decision 284. A conditional license is generally valid for 42 months and the licensee, after meeting the milestones included in the conditional license, may be granted a conditional tariff approval based on the prevailing tariff, which is valid until the earlier of: (i) 90 days following its issuance and (ii) receipt of financing for the construction of the photovoltaic plant. In the event the licensee obtains financing during the 90 day period, it is issued the conditional tariff becomes permanent and is linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index for a period of 20 years commencing upon commercial operation of the plant. Thereafter, subject to fulfilment of certain conditions, a permanent production license is granted.

 

National Outline Plan and Permits

 

In December 2010, the Israeli National Committee for Planning and Construction approved National Outline Plan 10/d/10, or the Outline Plan, for regulating photovoltaic plants from small rooftop mounted installations through photovoltaic plants on land plots up to a size of 0.29 square miles. The Outline Plan provides for the construction of photovoltaic plants in two routes: permit and plan. Permits are available for rooftop mounted installations and for land installations on specific lands, depending on their designation in the National Outline Plan and a plan route requires the licensee to file a plan with the relevant planning authority and such a plan cannot be filed with respect to certain lands that are designated as forests, national parks or reservations. The Outline Plan provides that preference will be given to the construction of photovoltaic plants in areas designated for construction and development. The Outline Plan permits planning authorities to approve the construction of photovoltaic plants in certain areas in northern and southern Israel in larger scopes than other areas.

 

Transfer of Rights in a Photovoltaic Plant

 

Any change of control in a photovoltaic plant that received a production license from the Israeli Electricity Authority requires amending the license and the approval of the Israeli Electricity Authority. Therefore, in the event we execute an agreement to acquire or sell and Israeli PV plant, such acquisition or sale, among other things, will be conditioned upon receipt of these approvals and the amendment of the relevant license.

 

Ellomay Luzon Energy and the Dorad Power Plant

 

General

 

Ellomay Luzon Energy is an Israeli private company in which we currently hold 50%. The remaining 50% is currently held by the Luzon Group (f/k/a the Dori Group). The Luzon Group is an Israeli publicly traded company, whose shares and debentures are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Ellomay Luzon Energy’s main asset is its holdings of 18.75% of Dorad.

 

Ellomay Luzon Energy

 

On November 25, 2010, Ellomay Energy Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an Investment Agreement, or the Dori Investment Agreement, with the Dori Group and Ellomay Luzon Energy, with respect to an investment by Ellomay Energy Ltd. in Ellomay Luzon Energy. Pursuant to the terms of the Dori Investment Agreement, Ellomay Energy Ltd. invested a total amount of NIS 50 million (approximately €10 million) in Ellomay Luzon Energy, and received a 40% stake in Ellomay Luzon Energy’s share capital. The transaction contemplated by the Dori Investment Agreement, or the Dori Investment, was consummated in January 2011, or the Dori Closing Date.

 

Ellomay Energy Ltd. was also granted an option to acquire additional shares of Ellomay Luzon Energy, or the Dori Option, which, if exercised, will increase Ellomay Energy Ltd.’s percentage holding in Ellomay Luzon Energy to 49% and, subject to the obtainment of certain regulatory approvals – to 50%. The exercise price of the options was NIS 2.4 million for each 1% of Ellomay Luzon Energy’s issued and outstanding share capital (on a fully diluted basis). In May 2015, we exercised the first option and in May 2016, we exercised the second option, accordingly, we currently hold 50% of Ellomay Luzon Energy and our indirect ownership of Dorad is 9.375%. The aggregate amount paid in connection with the exercise of such options amounted to approximately NIS 2.8 million (approximately €0.7 million), including approximately NIS 0.4 million (approximately €0.1 million) required in order to realign the shareholders loans provided to Ellomay Luzon Energy by its shareholders with the new ownership structure.

 

64

 

 

Concurrently with the execution of the Dori Investment Agreement, Ellomay Energy Ltd., Ellomay Luzon Energy and Dori Group also entered into the Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement that became effective upon the Dori Closing Date. The Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement provides that each of Dori Group and Ellomay Energy Ltd. is entitled to nominate two directors (out of a total of four directors) in Ellomay Luzon Energy for as long as the ratio of holdings between the two shareholders is in the range of 1:1 to 1:1.5 and thereafter such number of directors based on the ratio of holdings of the parties. The Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement also grants each of Dori Group and Ellomay Energy Ltd. with equal rights to nominate directors in Dorad, provided that in the event Ellomay Luzon Energy is entitled to nominate only one director in Dorad, such director shall be nominated by Ellomay Energy Ltd. for so long as Ellomay Energy Ltd. holds at least 30% of Ellomay Luzon Energy. The Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement further includes customary provisions with respect to restrictions on transfer of shares, a reciprocal right of first refusal, tag along, limitations on pledging of Ellomay Luzon Energy’s shares, principles for the implementation of a BMBY separation mechanism, special majority rights, etc.

 

Following the Dori Closing Date, the holdings of Ellomay Energy Ltd. in Ellomay Luzon Energy were transferred to Ellomay Energy LP, an Israeli limited partnership whose general partner is Ellomay Energy Ltd. and whose sole limited partner is us. Ellomay Energy LP replaced Ellomay Energy Ltd. with respect to the Dori Investment Agreement and the Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement.

 

Ellomay Luzon Energy’s representative on Dorad’s board of directors is currently Mr. Ran Fridrich, who is also our CEO and a member of our Board of Directors.

 

Ellomay Energy LP and Ellomay Luzon Energy entered into a loan agreement and capital notes agreements, effective December 31, 2022, which provide for the conversion of approximately NIS 23.5 million of the then outstanding shareholders’ loans to capital notes, payable not less than 60 months after the date of their execution, at the sole discretion of Ellomay Luzon Energy, with the remaining balance of shareholders’ loans (NIS 10 million), linked to the Israeli CPI and bearing an annual interest equal to the interest payable on Dorad’s senior debt plus 3%, with a repayment date of December 31, 2023. The Luzon Group entered into a similar loan agreement and capital notes with respect to its portion of the shareholders’ loans. During the year ended December 31, 2023, Ellomay Luzon Energy repaid all outstanding shareholders’ loans.

 

To the best of our knowledge, since February 2018, the holdings and rights of the Luzon Group in Ellomay Luzon Energy (including the shares of Ellomay Luzon Energy held by the Luzon Group and the shareholders’ loans provided by the Luzon Group to Ellomay Luzon Energy) are pledged to the holders of debentures issued by the Luzon Group to the public in Israel. We provided pledges on our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy and the shareholder’s loans provided to Ellomay Luzon Energy in connection with the issuance of our Series E Secured Debentures. For more information see Item 5.B: Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Item 10.C: Material Contracts.”

 

The Dorad Power Plant

 

Other than information relating to Ellomay Luzon Energy, the disclosures contained herein concerning the Dorad Power Plant are based on information received from Dorad and other publicly available information.

 

Dorad currently operates a combined cycle power plant based on natural gas, with a license to produce approximately 860 MW, located south of Ashkelon, or the Dorad Power Plant. The Dorad Power Plant was constructed as a turnkey project, with the consideration denominated in US dollars, and commenced commercial operations in May 2014. The electricity produced by the Dorad Power Plant is sold to end-users throughout Israel and to the Israeli National Electrical Grid. The transmission of electricity to the end-users is done via the existing transmission and distribution grid, in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Electricity Market Law, 1996, or the Electricity Law, and its regulations, and the standards and the tariffs determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority. The existing transmission and the majority of the existing distribution lines are operated by the Israeli Electric Company, or IEC, which is the only entity that holds a transmission license in Israel.

 

65

 

 

The Dorad Power Plant is a combined cycle power plant based on natural gas, with a license to produce approximately 860 MW. The production capacity of the Dorad Power Plant is subject to degradation and is currently approximately 850 MW.

 

The Dorad Power Plant is based on combined cycle technology using natural gas. The combined cycle configuration is a modern technology to produce electricity, where gas turbines serve as the prime mover. After combustion in the gas turbine to produce electricity, the hot gases from the gas turbine exhaust are directed through an additional heat exchanger to produce steam. The steam powers a steam turbine connected to a generator, which produces additional electric energy. The Dorad Power Plant is comprised of twelve natural gas turbines, each with an installed capacity of 50 MWp and two steam turbines, each with an installed capacity of 100 MWp. These turbines can be turned on and off quickly, with no material losses in energy efficiency, which provides operational flexibility in accordance with the expected needs of customers and the IEC, calculated based on a proprietary forecasting system implemented by Dorad.

 

The other shareholders in Dorad are Eilat Ashkelon Infrastructure Services Ltd., or EAIS (37.5%), an Israeli private company owned by Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline Company Ltd., or EAPC, Edelcom Ltd., or Edelcom, (18.75%), an Israeli private company indirectly owned by Mr. Ori Edelsburg, and Zorlu Enerji Elektrik Uretim A.S., or Zorlu, (25%), a publicly traded Turkish company. Dorad’s shareholders, including Ellomay Luzon Energy, are parties to a shareholders agreement dated November 2010 that includes customary provisions including provisions in connection with the holdings of Dorad’s shares, the investments in Dorad, its financing and management, restrictions of transfer of shares, including a right of first refusal, pre-emption rights, arrangements in connection with the financing of Dorad’s operations and mechanisms that will be implemented in the event any of Dorad’s shareholders does not meet its financing obligations, including dilution mechanisms, certain special shareholder or board, as applicable, majority requirements (either a 66% majority or for certain resolutions a unanimous vote requirement) and the right of each shareholder holding 10% of Dorad’s shares to nominate, replace or terminate the service of one member to Dorad’s Board of Directors, providing that shareholders may aggregate holdings for purposes of appointment of a director and that each director will be entitled to the voting rights determined based on a division of the holdings of the shareholder that appointed such director by the number of directors appointed by such director. As noted below, pursuant to the shareholders’ agreement among Ellomay Luzon Energy’s shareholders and Ellomay Luzon Energy, or the Ellomay Luzon Energy Shareholders Agreement, we are currently entitled to recommend the nomination of the Dorad board member on behalf of Ellomay Luzon Energy.

 

“Iron Swords” War

 

Due to the location of the Dorad Power Plant, Dorad has implemented various security measures in order to enable continued operations of the Dorad Power Plant during attacks on its premises.

 

During the “Iron Swords” war, which commenced on October 7, 2023, thousands of rockets were launched towards the State of Israel, and shrapnel landed several times in the area of the Dorad Power Plant and caused immaterial damage to property and equipment, but did not impact the ongoing operation of the power plant.

 

The security situation resulted in a decrease in the scope of economic and business activity in Israel and caused, among other things, a disruption in the supply and production chain, a decrease in the scope of national transportation, a shortage of personnel, a decrease in the value of financial assets and an increase in the exchange rate of foreign currencies relative to the NIS.

 

Due to the war and in accordance with notifications provided by the Israeli Ministry of Energy to the operator of the “Tamar” natural gas field, the natural gas extraction from the reservoir was temporarily halted and thereafter renewed. This did not have a material impact on Dorad’s operations, which continued operating the power plant based on natural gas purchased from Energean.

 

66

 

 

Dorad estimated, based on the information it had as of February 29, 2024 (the date of approval of Dorad’s financial statements as of December 31, 2023), that the current events and the security escalation in Israel have an impact on its results but that the impact on its short-term business results will be immaterial. Dorad further notes that as this event is not under the control of Dorad, and factors such as the continuation of the war and hostilities or their cessation may affect Dorad’s assessments, as of the date of the financial statements, Dorad had no ability to assess the extent of the impact of the war on its business activity and its medium and long-term results. Dorad continues to regularly monitor the developments and examine the effects on its operations and the value of its assets.

 

Dorad Credit Facility

 

Dorad entered into a credit facility agreement with a consortium led by Bank Hapoalim Ltd. as the arranger of the debt and Clal Credit and Financing Ltd. of the Clal Insurance Company Ltd. group as the organizer of the institutional lenders’ consortium, or the Dorad Credit Facility, and financial closing of the Dorad Power Plant was reached in November 2010, with the first drawdown received in January 2011. The Dorad Credit Facility provides that the consortium will fund up to NIS 3.85 billion, indexed to the Israeli CPI, which in any event will not be more than 80% of the cost of the project, with the remainder to be funded by Dorad’s shareholders and that guarantees will be provided to third parties in accordance with the project’s documents.

 

The funding is linked to the Israeli consumer price index and bears interest at a rate that is subject to updates every three years based on Dorad’s credit rating. As of December 31, 2023, the effective interest rate is approximately 5.1%. Dorad received an “investment grade” rating (AA-), on a local scale, from S&P Ma’alot. On April 4, 2023, Dorad received an update of its debt rating forecast to ilAA-/Negative and on April 9, 2024, Dorad received a ratification of its debt rating of ilAA- with a “Stable” forecast. In the event Dorad’s rating will be lowered, the interest rate will increase to approximately 5.5%.

 

The funding is repaid (interest and principal) in semi-annual payments (on May 26 and November 26 of each year), commencing six months of the commencement of operations of the Dorad Power Plant and for a period of 17 years thereafter. Dorad is also required to pay annual commissions in the aggregate amount of approximately $0.17 million. The Dorad Credit Facility further includes customary provisions, representations and warranties, including early repayment under certain circumstances and floating and fixed charges on Dorad’s assets and rights in connection with the Dorad Power Plant, whereby a breach of representations and warranties is likely to lead, among others, to a demand for immediate repayment, a breach of Dorad’s undertakings under its licenses and potentially the termination of the licenses.

 

The Dorad Credit Facility requires Dorad to comply with the following financial standards: (i) a debt coverage ratio of 1.10:1 over two consecutive calculation periods, and a debt coverage ratio of 1.05:1 over the entire calculation period, and (ii) a minimal loan life coverage ratio of 1.10:1. Dorad is required to examine compliance with these standards as of May 27 and November 27 of each year. Dorad is in compliance with these financial standards as of December 31, 2023 (based on the compliance examination conducted as of November 27, 2023).

 

67

 

 

As noted above, Dorad’s senior loan facility is linked to the Israeli CPI. As the production tariff is partially linked to the Israeli CPI, the exposure is minimized. However, as the production tariff is published in delay with respect to the actual changes in the CPI, Dorad executed derivative transactions on the Israeli CPI. In connection with the Dorad Credit Facility, Dorad’s shareholders (including Ellomay Luzon Energy) undertook to provide guarantees to the IEC and to various suppliers and service provides of Dorad and also undertook to indemnify Dorad and the consortium in connection with certain expenses, including certain environmental hazards. During 2023, the Israeli CPI increased by approximately 3.3%.

 

The aggregate investment of Dorad in the construction of the Dorad Power Plant was approximately NIS 4.7 billion (equivalent to approximately €1.1 billion). The Dorad Credit Facility provides for the establishment of the project’s accounts and determines the distribution of the cash flows among the accounts. In addition, the Dorad Credit Facility includes terms and procedures for executing deposits and withdrawals from each account and determines the minimum balances in each of the capital reserves. In connection with the Dorad Credit Facility, Dorad also provided pledges on its properties, including fixed, floating and real property pledges.

 

As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding balance of the Dorad Credit Facility was approximately NIS 2.29 billion. As of December 31, 2023, no additional withdrawals are permitted under the Dorad Credit Facility.

 

In connection with the Dorad Credit Facility, Dorad executed an accounts agreement that regulates the opening of the project accounts and the distribution of cash flows between the accounts. In addition, the agreement provides conditions and procedures for making deposits and withdrawals from each account, determines the total minimum balances in each of the reserve funds, regulates the order of priorities for payments between the accounts and other conditions in connection with the management of the accounts, including regarding transfers between accounts. The reserve funds include a fund for debt service, a fund for heavy maintenance, a fund for distribution and a fund for regulatory fines. As of December 31, 2023, the remaining deposits in respect of the aforementioned reserve funds are in the aggregate amount of approximately NIS 522 million.

 

The Dorad Credit Facility includes limitations on distributions by Dorad based on compliance with financial covenants and certain undertakings. For the purposes of the Dorad Credit Facility, a “distribution” includes also the repayment of shareholders’ loans. A distribution that is not in compliance with the Dorad Credit Facility is a cause for immediate repayment of the financing obtained by Dorad.

 

In connection with the Dorad Credit Facility, Dorad’s shareholders executed an equity injection agreement and subordinated loan agreement with Dorad and the financing entities. These agreements include undertakings by Dorad’s shareholders to inject, separately and each according to their relative share, from time to time and simultaneously with each withdrawal request from the Dorad Credit Facility, a total of up to 20% cash, whether as equity or by way of shareholders’ loans, which in any case will be subordinated and pledged to Dorad’s obligations towards the financing entities, in accordance with the terms of the agreements. In accordance with the capital injection agreement and to guarantee the shareholders’ obligations to provide their relative share of funding, the shareholders provided at that time cash and bank guarantees in the amount of their commitment net of any amounts transferred to Dorad prior to such date. The capital injection agreement includes representations and undertakings in relation to Dorad’s shareholders and the project, the violation of which may, among other things, cause a demand for immediate repayment of the Dorad Credit Facility, a breach of Dorad’s undertakings under its licenses and potentially the termination of the licenses. In accordance with the subordinated loan agreement, commencing on the financial closing date, any amount that will be designated as a loan will be linked to the Israeli CPI and will bear an annual interest rate of 10%, and it is also determined that any distribution to Dorad’s shareholders, including loan repayment, will be possible subject to compliance with financial standards as detailed in the financing agreements (see above). As part of the Dorad Credit Facility, all of Dorad’s issued share capital is pledged in favor of Poalim Trust Services Ltd., as trustee for the financing entities.

 

68

 

 

As of December 31, 2023, we (through Ellomay Luzon Energy) provided guarantees to the Israeli Electricity Authority, to the System Manager, to the Israeli Electricity Authority and to Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd. in the aggregate amount of approximately NIS 15 million. The guarantees were provided pursuant to a Guarantee Provision Agreement between Ellomay Luzon Energy and an Israeli bank, which includes customary provisions and also undertakings of the Company to comply with certain financial standards and an agreement of the shareholders of Ellomay Luzon Energy that upon the occurrence of certain events, including non-compliance with the financial standards, an event of default under the Dorad Credit Facility, a breach by the Luzon Group, the Company, Ellomay Energy, Ellomay Energy LP or Ellomay Luzon Energy of undertakings to the bank and a change of control of the Luzon Group, the Company, Ellomay Energy and/or Ellomay Energy LP, the shareholders’ loans provided to Ellomay Luzon Energy will be subordinated to amounts due from Ellomay Luzon Energy to the bank under this agreement and Ellomay Luzon Energy will not be permitted to distribute any dividends or make any payments to its shareholders. Ellomay Luzon Energy is in compliance with the financial covenants included in the Guarantee Provision Agreement.

 

The Dorad Power Plant commenced operations in May 2014, following the receipt of the permanent production and supply licenses discussed under “Material Effects of Government Regulations on Dorad’s Operations” below.

 

Dorad previously entered into an operation and maintenance agreement with Eilat-Ashkelon Power Plant Services Ltd., or EAPPS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EAIS, which holds 37.5% of Dorad. Certain of the obligations under such agreement were subcontracted to Zorlu, which holds 25% of Dorad. During 2013, EAPPS entered into an agreement with Edeltech O&M Ltd. (f/k/a Ezom Ltd.), or Edeltech O&M, which, to our knowledge, is 75% owned by the controlling shareholder of Edelcom (which holds 18.75% of Dorad) with the remainder held by a company controlled by Zorlu, for the provision of sub-contracting services to EAPPS. Despite the assignment and subcontracting agreement, EAPPS remained liable to Dorad for all obligations under the agreement. In December 2017, Dorad and Edeltech O&M executed an operation and maintenance agreement for the Dorad Power Plant, or the Dorad O&M Agreement, replacing EAPPS by Edeltech O&M as the O&M contractor of the Dorad Power Plant under the same terms. On November 29, 2022, the agreement between Dorad and EAPPS was assigned to EAIS. On August 22, 2022, the operating contractor informed Dorad that 25% of the ordinary shares and voting rights in the maintenance contractor were transferred to Edeltech Holdings 2006 Ltd., or Edeltech Holdings, which from that date owns 100% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the maintenance contractor.

 

The Dorad O&M Agreement is for a period of 24 years and 11 months commencing upon receipt of a permanent license by Dorad, and in no event for a period that is longer than the period of the lease of the Dorad Power Plant premises. Pursuant to the O&M agreement, Dorad receives operation and maintenance services, including purchase of spare parts and repairs in consideration for a fixed and variable (depending on production during the period) monthly payment.

 

In 2008, Dorad executed a lease with respect to the land on which the Dorad Power Plant is located (approximately 18.5 acres) with EAIS (one of Dorad’s shareholders who leases the land from the Israel Land Authority) for the construction period and for a period of 24 years and 11 months following the commencement of commercial operations of the Dorad Power Plant. The lease agreement was executed by the Israel Land Authority in April 2015 and expires on May 20, 2039. The annual payment under the lease agreement is approximately NIS 3.7 million, linked to the Israeli CPI. Dorad undertook to indemnify EAPC and EAIS for payments and expenses paid or to be paid by EAIS, including the improvement, tax payments, fines for expenses and other payments, in respect of the land due to the construction of the power plant. In addition, Dorad’s shareholders signed a guarantee in favor of EAPC (which transferred its lease right to EAIS) to fulfill Dorad’s obligations as stated above to indemnify EAIS. The liability of Dorad’s shareholders according to the guarantee will be up to their holdings in Dorad’s share capital (pro rata).

 

69

 

 

Dividends

 

On May 6, 2021, Dorad’s Board of Directors approved the distribution of a dividend in the amount of NIS 100 million (approximately €25.4 million) and such dividend was distributed during May 2021. In connection with such dividend distribution, Ellomay Luzon Energy received an amount of approximately NIS 18.8 million (approximately €4.5 million) and repaid an amount of approximately NIS 9 million (approximately €2.3 million) loan to us. In August 2023, Dorad’s board of directors approved the distribution of a dividend in the amount of NIS 70 million (approximately €17 million) and such dividend was distributed during August and September 2023. In connection with such dividend distribution, Ellomay Luzon Energy received an amount of approximately NIS 13 million (approximately €3.2 million) and repaid an amount of NIS 6.5 million to us. On December 28, 2023, Dorad’s board of directors approved the distribution of an additional dividend in the amount of NIS 70 million (approximately €17.4 million) and such dividend was distributed during December 2023 and January 2024. In connection with such dividend distribution, Ellomay Luzon Energy received an amount of approximately NIS 13 million (approximately €3.3 million) and repaid an amount of approximately NIS 5 million to us, thereby repaying the shareholders’ loans in full. In addition, in December 2023 Ellomay Luzon Energy declared and paid its shareholders a dividend in the amount of NIS 3 million, of which we received NIS 1.5 million.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

We and Ellomay Luzon Energy, and several of the other shareholders of Dorad and their representatives and Dorad, are involved in various litigations as follows:

 

Petition to Approve a Derivative Claim filed by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Hemi Raphael

 

During April 2015, Ellomay Luzon Energy approached Dorad in writing, requesting that Dorad take legal steps to demand that Zorlu, Wood Group Gas Turbines Ltd., the engineering, procurement & construction contractor of the Dorad Power Plant, or Wood Group, and the representatives of Zorlu on the Dorad Board of Directors disclose details concerning the contractual relationship between Zorlu and Wood Group. In its letters, Ellomay Luzon Energy notes that if Dorad will not act as requested, Ellomay Luzon Energy intends to file a derivative suit in the matter.

 

Following this demand, in July 2015, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Ellomay Luzon Energy’s representative on Dorad’s Board of Directors, who is also a member of our Board of Directors, filed a petition, or the Petition, for approval of a derivative action on behalf of Dorad with the Economic Department of the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court. The Petition was filed against Zorlu, Zorlu’s current and past representatives on Dorad’s Board of Directors and Wood Group and several of its affiliates, all together, the Defendants. The petition requested, inter alia, that the court instruct the Defendants to disclose and provide to Dorad documents and information relating to the contractual relationship between Zorlu and Wood Group, which included the transfer of funds from Wood Group to Zorlu in connection with the EPC agreement of the Dorad Power Plant. For the sake of caution, Plaintiffs further requested to reserve their rights to demand, on behalf of Dorad, monetary damages in a separate complaint after Dorad receives the aforementioned information and documents.

 

At a hearing held in April 2016, Ori Edelsburg (a director in Dorad) and affiliated companies were added as additional respondents.

 

In December 2016, an arbitration agreement was executed pursuant to which this proceeding, as well as the petition to approve a derivative claim filed by Edelcom mentioned below will be arbitrated before Judge (retired) Hila Gerstel. A statement of claim, or the Claim, was filed by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Mr. Raphael on behalf of Dorad against Zorlu, Mr. Edelsburg, Edelcom and Edeltech Holdings, which owns Edelcom, or Edeltech, and, together with Mr. Edelsburg and Edelcom, the Edelsburg Group, on February 23, 2017 in which they repeated their claims included in the amended Petition and in which they required the arbitrator to obligate the defendants, jointly and severally, to pay an amount of $183,367,953 plus interest and linkage to Dorad. During March 2017, the respondents filed two motions with the arbitrator as follows: (i) to instruct the plaintiffs to resubmit the statement of claim filed in connection with the arbitration proceedings in a form that will be identical to the form of the statement of claim submitted to the court, with the addition of the monetary demand only or, alternatively, to instruct that several sections and exhibits will be deleted from the statement of claim and (ii) to postpone the date for filing their responses by 45 days from the date the motion set forth under (i) is decided upon. The plaintiffs filed their objection to both motions and some of the respondents filed their responses to the objection. In April 2017, the Defendants filed their statements of defense. Within the said statements of defense, Zorlu attached a third party notice against Dorad, Ellomay Luzon Energy and the Luzon Group, in the framework of which it repeated the claims on which its defense statement was based and claimed, among other claims, that if the plaintiffs’ claim against Zorlu was accepted and would negate Zorlu’s right receive compensation and profit from its agreement with Dorad and therefore Zorlu should be compensated in the amount of approximately NIS 906.4 million (approximately €218.3 million). Similarly, also within their statement of defense, Edelcom, Mr. Edelsburg and Edeltech filed a third-party notice against Ellomay Luzon Energy claiming for breaches by Ellomay Luzon Energy of the duty to act in good faith in contract negotiations and that any amount ruled will constitute unlawful enrichment.

 

70

 

 

In October 2017, EAIS, which holds 37.5% of Dorad’s shares, filed a statement of claim in this arbitration proceeding. In its statement of claim, EAIS joins Ellomay Luzon Energy’s and Mr. Raphael’s request as set forth in the Claim and raises claims that are similar to the claims raised by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Mr. Raphael in the Claim.

 

In December 2017, Zorlu filed a request in connection with the Ellomay Luzon Energy statement of claim to the extent it is directed at board members serving on behalf of Zorlu and in January 2018 the arbitrator provided its ruling that the legal validity of the actions or inactions of board members of Dorad will be attributed to the entities that are shareholders of Dorad on whose behalf the relevant board member acted and the legal determinations, if any, will be directed only towards the shareholders of Dorad. During January 2018, Mr. Edelsburg, Edelcom and Zorlu filed their statement of defense in connection with the claim filed by EAIS and also filed third party notices against EAIS, Ellomay Luzon Energy and the Luzon Group claiming that EAIS and the Luzon Group enriched themselves at Dorad’s account without providing disclosure to the other shareholders and requesting that, should the position of Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS be accepted in the main proceeding, the arbitrator, among other things, obligate EAIS to refund to Dorad all of the rent paid to date and determine that Dorad is not required to pay any rent in the future or determine that the rent fees be reduced to their market value and refund Dorad the excess amounts paid by it to EAIS, to determine that the board members that represent EAIS and Ellomay Luzon Energy breached their fiduciary duties towards Dorad and obligate EAIS and Ellomay Luzon Energy to pay the amount of $140 million, plus interest in the amount of $43 million, which is the amount Zorlu received for the sale of its rights under the Dorad EPC agreement, and to rule that in connection with the engineering and construction works performed by the Luzon Group, the Luzon Group and Ellomay Luzon Energy are required to refund to Dorad or compensate the defendants in an amount of $24 million, plus interest and linkage and, alternatively, to determine that Mr. Edelsburg, Edelcom and Zorlu are entitled to indemnification from the third parties for the entire amount they will be required to pay.

 

In May 2019, a new arbitrator was appointed, and dates were set for the discovery process. On February 15, 2021, the arbitrator approved replacing the late Mr. Hemi Raphael as the claimant with Mr. Ran Fridrich.

 

On June 28, 2023, an arbitration award was issued in connection with the arbitration proceeding described in Section 1.16 as follows:

 

Petition to Approve a Derivative Claim filed by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Hemi Raphael - The arbitration award accepts the majority of the claims made by the Plaintiffs and the arbitrator ruled that the defendants, severally and jointly, are required to: (i) pay Dorad an amount of $100 million, bearing interest pursuant to applicable law from January 1, 2013 until the payment date, (ii) bear the expenses of the plaintiffs, including Ellomay Luzon Energy, in an aggregate amount of NIS 20 million, plus VAT, and (iii) bear 80% of the expenses of Dorad in the proceeding (while the Plaintiffs will bear the remaining 20%).

 

Third-Party Notices and Counterclaims submitted by Zorlu and Edelcom - The arbitration award provides that due to the ruling accepting the derivative petition as detailed above, the third-party notices and counterclaim are rejected.

 

Petition to Approve a Derivative Claim filed by Edelcom - The arbitration award provides, inter alia, that the entrepreneurship agreement was not breached and therefore there is no basis for approving a derivative claim.

 

On July 4, 2023 and July 5, 2023, the parties to the arbitration (other than Dorad) approached the retired judge named in the arbitration agreement as the agreed appeal arbitrator asking him to agree to rule on the appeal concerning the arbitration award. On July 6, 2023, the judge notified the parties that he agrees to rule on the appeal.

 

71

 

 

In November 2023, appeals were submitted by the plaintiffs and the respondents against the arbitration award. In their appeal, the plaintiffs claimed, inter alia, that the arbitrator was mistaken in his arbitration award decisions and requested alternative rulings either accepting the appeal and cancelling the entire financial payment decision included in the arbitration award or a partial cancellation of the financial payment decision included in the arbitration award and a relative decrease of the interest and expenses obligation imposed on the plaintiffs. In their appeal, the defendants appealed the financial payment decision and claimed that the amount ruled should have been higher and also appealed the interest rate determined with respect to the financial payment and the scope of expenses reimbursement. The parties filed responses to the appeals in February 2024 and the last date for submission of answers to the responses was scheduled for May 2024. A preliminary hearing was scheduled for May 30, 2024.

 

As Edelcom did not appeal the arbitrator’s decision with respect to the petition to approve a derivative claim filed by Edelcom in connection with the entrepreneurship fees, the arbitration award remains unchanged with respect to this petition and claim.

 

As of the date hereof, in light of the preliminary stage of the appeals and based on the advice of legal counsel of Ellomay Luzon Energy, it is too early to estimate the outcome of the appeals. Based on advice from its legal counsel, Dorad did not include the impact of the arbitration award in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023.

 

For more information see Note 6 to our annual financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

 

Petition to Approve a Derivative Claim filed by Edelcom

 

In February 2016 the representatives of Edelcom, which holds 18.75% of Dorad, and Ori Edelsburg sent a letter to Dorad requesting that Dorad file a claim against Ellomay Energy, our wholly-owned subsidiary that holds Ellomay Luzon Energy’s shares, the Luzon Group and Ellomay Luzon Energy referring to an entrepreneurship agreement that was signed in November 2010 between Dorad and the Luzon Group, pursuant to which the Luzon Group received payment in the amount of approximately NIS 49.4 million (approximately €11.9 million) in consideration for management and entrepreneurship services. Pursuant to this agreement, the Luzon Group undertook to continue holding, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of Dorad’s share capital for a period of 12 months from the date the Dorad Power Plant is handed over to Dorad by the construction contractor. The Edelcom Letter claims that as a consequence of the management rights and the options to acquire additional shares of Ellomay Luzon Energy granted to us pursuant to the Dori Investment Agreement, the holdings of the Dori Group in Dorad have fallen below 10% upon execution of the Dori Investment Agreement. The Edelcom Letter therefore claims that Dori Group breached its commitment according to entrepreneurship agreement. The Edelcom Letter requests that Dorad take all legal actions possible against the Dori Group, Ellomay Luzon Energy, Ellomay Energy and Mr. Hemi Raphael to recover the amounts it paid in accordance with the entrepreneurship agreement and also notify Ellomay Luzon Energy that, until recovery of the entrepreneurship fee, Dorad shall withhold the relevant amount from any amount Ellomay Luzon Energy is entitled to receive from Dorad, including repayments of shareholders’ loans and dividend distributions. In July 2016, Edelcom filed a petition for approval of a derivative action against Ellomay Energy, the Luzon Group, Ellomay Luzon Energy and Dorad. In November 2016, Ellomay Energy and Ellomay Luzon Energy filed a joint petition requesting that this application be transferred to the same judges who will be adjudicating the petition filed by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Hemi Raphael mentioned above and in November 2016, Edelcom filed an objection to this request. As noted above, in December 2016, an arbitration agreement was executed pursuant to which this proceeding, as well as the proceeding mentioned above will be arbitrated before Judge (retired) Hila Gerstel and the proceeding before the court was deleted. On February 23, 2017, Edelcom submitted the petition to approve the derivative claim to the arbitrator. On April 30, 2017, Ellomay Energy filed its response to the petition and on May 1, 2017 the Luzon Group filed its response to the petition. For more information see above under “Petition to Approve a Derivative Claim filed by Ellomay Luzon Energy and Hemi Raphael”.

 

72

 

 

Opening Motion filed by Zorlu

 

On April 8, 2019, Zorlu filed an opening motion with the District Court in Tel Aviv against Dorad and the directors serving on Dorad’s board on behalf of Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS. In the opening motion, Zorlu asked the court to instruct Dorad to convene a shareholders meeting and to include on the agenda of this meeting a discussion and a vote on the planning and construction of an additional power plant adjacent to the existing power plant, or the Dorad 2 Project. Zorlu claimed that although the articles of association of Dorad provides that the planning and construction of an additional power plant requires a unanimous consent of the Dorad shareholders, and while Zorlu and Edelcom are opposed to this project, including due to the current disagreements among Dorad’s shareholders, Dorad continued taking actions to advance the project, which include spending substantial amounts of Dorad’s funds. Zorlu further claims that the representatives of Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS on the Dorad board have acted to prevent the convening of a shareholders meeting as requested by Zorlu. Edelcom thereafter joined the opening motion as an additional respondent that opposes the advancement of the project at this stage. In addition, Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS were joined as additional respondents. On June 28, 2021, a ruling was handed in which the court ordered Dorad to convene a special shareholders meeting, on whose agenda will be the planning and construction of the “Dorad 2 Project”. Following the said ruling, Dorad’s board resolved that Dorad’s management will continue to examine the feasibility of the “Dorad 2 Project” and its implications, and bring its decisions to Dorad’s board approval. Dorad’s Board of Directors further resolved that to the extent it will approve the Dorad 2 Project, the decision will be presented to Dorad’s shareholders for approval. On July 27, 2021, a shareholders meeting of Dorad was held. In accordance with the court ruling, the agenda for such meeting included two resolutions (1) the planning and construction of the Dorad 2 Project – a resolution that Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS supported and Edelcom and Zorlu rejected; and (2) approval of the aforementioned resolution of the Dorad Board of Directors – a resolution which Ellomay Luzon Energy and EAIS supported and with respect to which Edelcom and Zorlu abstained. Following such shareholders meeting, correspondence was exchanged between Dorad and Edelcom concerning, among other issues, the implications of the aforementioned resolutions. Dorad estimates (after consulting with legal counsel) that by convening the aforementioned shareholders meeting Dorad complied with the court ruling and therefore the opening motion process ended.

 

Potential Expansion of the Dorad Power Plant

 

As noted above, Dorad is examining the possibility of constructing an additional power plant within the area of the existing Dorad Power Plant, that will become part of the existing plant. On July 13, 2020, Dorad submitted to the National Infrastructure Committee, or NIC, plans for public objections, on January 11, 2021, the NIC decided to postpone the final decision and on December 27, 2021, the NIC decided to raise the construction of another power plant to a government decision. The NIC’s decision includes conditions to the issuance of the building permit.

 

On May 28, 2023, the Israeli Government approved the national infrastructures plan (NIP 11/b) which governs, among other issues, the expansion of the power plant owned by Doard by approximately 650 MW.

 

On July 12, 2023, Dorad received a copy of a petition submitted by O.P.C Hadera Expansion Ltd., or OPC, concerning the approval of the Israeli Government. On July 19, 2023, the Israeli Supreme Court rejected the petition submitted by OPC due to non-exhaustion of proceedings. On July 24, 2023, Dorad received a copy of OPC’s letter to the Israeli Government, through the Secretary of the Government, requesting an urgent response to OPC’s letter dated July 3, 2023 and noting that to the extent the Government does not act accordingly, OPC will have no other recourse and will file a new petition with the court. Furthermore, on July 17, 2023, Dorad received a copy of a petition submitted by Reindeer Energy Ltd., or Reindeer, concerning the same approval of the Israeli Government. On July 19, 2023, the Israeli court resolved that Reindeer is required to notify the court by July 24, 2023 why its petition should not be deleted as it is premature, without an order to pay legal expenses and while reserving its claims until a final resolution is adopted in the matter. On July 25, 2023, Dorad received a copy of Reindeer’s response, claiming that the petition is not premature and that without the court’s interference at this stage, the possibility to compete over building a power plant in Central Israel will be eliminated until 2035, therefore, Reindeer claims that the court’s suggestion does not maintain its rights but eliminates them and harms the public interest, which requires a discussion of the petition. On July 27, 2023, the court rejected Reindeer’s petition resolving that it is premature and that under the circumstances there is no justification to discuss it at this time because it is unclear what the recommendation of the National Infrastructure Committee will be after another discussion and what will be the final resolution of the Israeli Government and the basis of the resolution.

 

73

 

 

On January 16, 2024, Dorad received a letter from Edelcom stating that Edelcom, as a shareholder of Dorad, objects to the proposal to expand the power plant.

 

Following the approval of NIP 11/b, Dorad approached the NIC for a building permit, however, on January 11, 2024, Dorad was informed in an e-mail message from the NIC that its position is that as long as NIP 20/B or NIP 91 are not definitively rejected, it is not possible to issue a building permit for the new power plant, based on a legal opinion of legal advisers in the NIC and in the planning administration, which were sent to Dorad on January 15, 2024. On February 7, 2024, Dorad, through its legal counsel, sent a letter, among other addressees to the legal advisers of the NIC and the planning administration that prepared the aforesaid legal opinion, arguing that the NIC’s refusal to grant Dorad a building permit is illegal and contrary to the proper interpretation of NIP 11/B. On February 26, 2024, Dorad received a response from the NIC, which stands by its position that the issuance of building permits for the expansion of the power plant should not be promoted. In Dorad’s opinion, the NIC’s opposition and conduct in refusing to issue building permits is illegal. In March 2024, Doard filed a petition with the Israeli Supreme Court requesting the issuance of a conditional order to the NIC instructing it to provide the reasons for its refusal to attend to the request for issuance of building permits for the construction of the “Dorad 2” power plant, which was approved by the Israeli government as aforementioned. Dorad also requested that following the issuance of this order, the order will become a permanent order instructing the NIC to attend to the issuance of the building permits. A response to the petition is due to be filed in May 2024.

 

On February 19, 2024, Dorad received a planning survey to receive the expansion of the power plant from the System Manager, which allows electricity to be taken out commencing October 2028.

 

The expansion of the Dorad Power Plant by building the Dorad 2 facility in a combined cycle technology, will result in an aggregate capacity of the Dorad Power Plant of approximately 1,500 MW and the approved plan also enables adding batteries with a capacity of approximately 80 MW. The Company expects that if the Dorad 2 plan will materialize and the expansion will be completed, the expansion of the power plant will increase the revenues and income of Dorad. The expansion has not yet been approved by Dorad and its approval and construction are subject to various conditions, including, among others, receipt of corporate and other approvals and permits, obtaining financing, receipt of licenses from the Israeli Electricity Authority, regulatory changes and market terms and condition, all of which are not within the control of Dorad or the Company. As of the date of this report, Dorad has not yet reached a final decision with respect to Dorad 2 and there can be no assurance as to if, when and under what terms it will be advanced or promoted by Dorad. As of the date of this report, Dorad has not yet reached a final decision with respect to Dorad 2 and there can be no assurance as to if, when and under what terms it will be advanced or promoted by Dorad.

 

Competition

 

Dorad competes with the IEC and other private electricity manufacturers with respect to sales to potential customers directly.

 

As long as the regulation remains unchanged, as the IEC controls the transmission and the majority of the delivery lines and the connection of the private power plants to the Israeli national grid, Dorad and the other private manufacturers are dependent on the IEC for their operations and may also be subject to unilateral actions on the part of IEC’s employees.

 

As of December 31, 2023, there are several private power plants operating in Israel for the production and supply of electricity. To the best of the Company’s knowledge and according to public information, in addition to those stations sold by the IEC to private parties as mentioned below, in 2012 the OPC Rotem Ltd. Power plant, which is a private plant located in the Rotem Plain that produces electricity using turbines that consume natural gas in the combined cycle technology, with a capacity of about 440 MW began operating. In September 2015, Dalia Energy Power Ltd. began operating a private power plant operated by natural gas with a production capacity of approximately 900 MW, at the Tzafit site, located adjacent to the “Tzafit” power plant of the IEC and in the jurisdiction of the Yoav Regional Council. At the beginning of 2021, the IPM company began operating a private power plant with a production capacity of approximately 450 MW, in the industrial area of Be’er Tuvia. In addition, commencing the end of 2015, a number of additional private plants operate through cogeneration (which is the use of steam as part of industrial processes) with an aggregate capacity of approximately 1,000 MW. Based on the Israeli Electricity Sector Report, published by the Israeli Electricity Authority in September 2023, the private power producers owned a market share in the production segment of approximately 43% of the installed electricity capacity in Israel.

 

74

 

 

Customers

 

Dorad entered into electricity supply agreements with various commercial consumers for the entire production capacity of the Dorad Power Plant (assuming maximal consumption by all customers in the summer season, characterized by peaks of demand from customers). The majority of the agreements are for ten years terms and may be extended for an additional five years, and the agreements do not obligate the customers to purchase a minimum quantity of electricity. The end-users include the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Mekorot (Israel’s water utility and supply company), Israeli food manufacturers (Ossem and Strauss), Israeli hotel chain (Isrotel), and others. The electricity supply agreements are, mainly, based on a reduced rate compared to the rate applicable to electricity consumers in the general market, as determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority. There is no regulatory or contractual limit on the discount rate at which electricity can be sold by Dorad. Dorad’s supply agreements, with the exception of agreements executed prior to the extension of the supply license) are required to include an exit right for the customer no later than five years from the date of the start of electricity supply.

 

The Covid-19 crisis affects Dorad’s customers (which, as noted above, include hotels and other industrial customers), and during 2020 Dorad reported a certain decrease in consumption of electricity by its customers and by the IEC due to the Covid-19 crisis and its implications on the tourism industry, the industrial entities and electricity consumption in general. During the first quarter of 2022, Dorad reported an increase in the use of electricity of several of its customers compared to the same period in 2021.

 

In addition to the provision of electricity to specific commercial consumers, in August 2010, Dorad entered into an agreement with the IEC, which governs the provision of infrastructure services and electricity from the IEC to Dorad, provides that Dorad will supply availability and energy to the IEC based on a production plan determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority, on IEC’s requirements and on the tariffs determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority. According to the aforementioned agreement, the IEC connected Dorad’s power plant to the electricity grid, and also provides Dorad with infrastructure, backup and ancillary services that are required to enable the supply of electricity by Dorad to the private consumers at the time and in consideration for the prices that will be determined according to the standards applicable to Dorad, as determined from time to time by the Israeli Electricity Authority. In the agreement, provisions were established, among other things, regarding the equipment, materials and assets used and intended for use to connect the Dorad Power Plant to the electricity grid, their operation by the IEC, their inspection and the provision of maintenance services for them.

 

According to the agreement of Dorad with the System Manager, Dorad undertook to provide the System Manager with variable availability at the level of power that is not intended for Dorad’s end customers, in accordance with a production plan whose format is determined by the Israeli Electricity Authority, and to sell to the System Manager the electricity that it will seek to purchase out of the variable availability provided to it. The System Manager committed to purchase availability and energy capacity from Dorad in accordance with the Electricity Market Regulations (Conventional Private Electricity Manufacturer), 2005, for a period of twenty years commencing on the date of commercial operation. In the event that Dorad does not sell any electricity to private customers, Dorad will be entitled for payments from the System Manager for all its free availability capacity. It was also determined that in exchange for the sale of energy, the System Manager will pay Dorad the price at which Dorad offered to sell to the System Manager, but no more than the maximum price set by the Israeli Electricity Authority in accordance with the standards applicable to Dorad and in accordance with Dorad’s tariff approval.

 

In connection with the establishment of Noga, the new System Manager, Dorad’s agreement with the IEC was assigned by the IEC to the System Manger during 2021.

 

75

 

 

Seasonality

 

The demand for electricity by Dorad’s customers is seasonal and is affected by, among other factors, the climate prevailing in that season. Until December 31, 2022, the months of the year were split into three seasons as follows: the summer season – the months of July and August; the winter season – the months of December, January and February; and intermediate seasons – (spring and autumn), the months from March to June and from September to November. There is a higher hourly demand for electricity during the winter and summer seasons, and the average electricity consumption per hour is higher in these seasons than in the intermediate seasons and is even characterized by peak demands due to extreme climate conditions of heat or cold. In addition, Dorad’s revenues are affected by the Taoz Tariff (an electricity tariff that varies across seasons and across the day in accordance with demand hour clusters), as, on average, the Taoz Tariff is higher in the summer season than in the intermediate and winter seasons. Commencing January 1, 2023, changes in the Taoz Tariff and the composition of the summer season became effective. For more information concerning the changes, see “Material Effects of Government Regulations on Dorad’s Operations – Tariffs” below.

 

Changes in the climate have an effect on electricity consumption of Dorad’s customers, which is increased and/or more prolonged during periods of heat or cold that are more extreme than in previous years (in the summer and winter seasons) and could have a material impact on Dorad and its financial results.

 

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials for the Operations of the Dorad Power Plant

 

As described above, the Dorad Power Plant is a dual-fuel plant. However, the cost of running on diesel oil is expensive and the use of diesel oil increases the level of emissions into the air (compared to gas-based operation). In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, Dorad maintains a stock of diesel oil intended for use as backup for operating the plant for 100 hours at full load, in the event of inability to operate the plant with gas. In accordance with the standards published by the Israeli Electricity Authority, the tariff approval granted to Dorad, the agreement between Dorad and the IEC and the existing agreements between Dorad and its customers, in the event of a gas shortage (either due to a lack of supply or the ability to transport the gas, as described above) Dorad will purchase the energy it requires in order to meet its obligations towards its customers from the IEC and will sell it to its customers at the retail price (that is, without the discount included in these agreements). During 2023 Dorad did not have a significant diesel oil use.

 

Pursuant to the Israeli Electricity Sector Report, published by the Israeli Electricity Authority in September 2023, natural gas is currently being used for the production of approximately 68% of the electricity produced in Israel.

 

Agreement with Tamar

 

On October 15, 2012, Dorad entered into the Tamar Agreement with Tamar, which is one of the suppliers of natural gas for the Israeli electricity market. Pursuant to information received from Dorad, Dorad purchases natural gas from Tamar for purposes of operating the Dorad Power Plant and the main terms of the Tamar Agreement are as follows:

 

a.Tamar has committed to supply natural gas to Dorad in an aggregate quantity of up to approximately 11.2 billion cubic meters (BCM), or the Total Contract Quantity, in accordance with the conditions set forth in the Tamar Agreement.

 

b.The Tamar Agreement will terminate on the earlier to occur of: (i) sixteen (16) years following the commencement of delivery of natural gas to the Dorad power plant or (ii) the date on which Dorad will consume the Total Contract Quantity in its entirety. Each of the parties to the Tamar Agreement has the right to extend the Tamar Agreement until the earlier of: (i) an additional year provided certain conditions set forth in the Tamar Agreement were met, or (ii) the date upon which Dorad consumes the Total Contract Quantity in its entirety.

 

c.Dorad has committed to purchase or pay for (“take or pay”) a minimum annual quantity of natural gas in a scope and in accordance with a mechanism set forth in the Tamar Agreement. The Tamar Agreement provides that if Dorad did not use the minimum quantity of gas as committed, it shall be entitled to consume this quantity every year during the three following years and this is in addition to the minimum quantity of gas Dorad is committed to.

 

d.The Tamar Agreement grants Dorad the option to reduce the minimum annual quantity so that it will not exceed 50% of the average annual gas quantity that Dorad will actually consume in the three years preceding the notice of exercise of the option, subject to adjustments set forth in the Tamar Agreement. The reduction of the minimum annual quantity will be followed by a reduction of the other contractual quantities set forth in the Tamar Agreement. The option described herein is exercisable during the period commencing as of the later of: (i) the end of the fifth year after the commencement of delivery of natural gas to Dorad in accordance with the Tamar Agreement or (ii) January 1, 2020, and ending on the later of: (i) the end of the seventh year after the commencement of delivery of natural gas to Dorad in accordance with the Tamar Agreement or (ii) December 31, 2022. In the event Dorad exercises this option, the quantity will be reduced at the end of a one year period from the date of the notice and until the termination of the Tamar Agreement. This option was exercised by Dorad (see below for additional details).

 

76

 

 

e.The natural gas price set forth in the Tamar Agreement is linked to the production tariff as determined from time to time by the Israeli Electricity Authority, which includes a “final floor price.” Any delays, disruptions, increases in the price of natural gas under the agreement, or shortages in the gas supply from Tamar will adversely affect Dorad’s results of operations. In addition, as future reductions in the production tariff will not affect the price of natural gas under the agreement with Tamar, Dorad’s profitability may be adversely affected.

 

f.Dorad may be required to provide Tamar with guarantees or securities in the amounts and subject to the conditions set forth in the Tamar Agreement.

 

g.The Tamar Agreement includes additional provisions and undertakings as customary in agreements of this type such as compensation mechanisms in the event of shortage in supply, the quality of the natural gas, limitation of liability, etc.

 

As a result of the indexation included in the gas supply agreement, Dorad is exposed to changes in exchange rates of the U.S. dollar against the NIS. To minimize this exposure Dorad executed forward transactions to purchase U.S. dollars against the NIS.

 

On April 2, 2019, Dorad entered into an addendum to the Tamar Agreement according to which the gas quantities specified in the addendum to the Tamar Agreement that Dorad purchases from Tamar will not be included for the purpose of calculating the quantities of gas at the time of the reduction of the purchases from Tamar, in accordance with the instructions of the Tamar Agreement and in accordance with the layout instructions for increasing the quantity of natural gas produced from the Tamar natural gas field and rapid development of natural gas fields Leviathan, Karish and Tanin and additional fields, dated August 16, 2015.

 

On March 22, 2021, Dorad entered into an addendum to the Tamar Agreement according to which the parties agreed on the amount of gas that Dorad will purchase from Tamar commencing January 1, 2022, and Dorad exercised the option set forth in section (d) above, resulting in an update to the amounts and prices of gas purchased by Dorad from Tamar, which is beneficial to Dorad. This addendum also provides that Dorad will be entitled to compensation in the amount specified in the addendum, which was received in the third quarter of 2021.

 

On April 5, 2021, Dorad entered into an additional gas purchase agreement with Tamar, or the Additional Tamar Agreement, pursuant to which Dorad is entitled to purchase additional quantities of gas from Tamar during a period of four years ending on April 5, 2025. As part of the Additional Tamar Agreement, Dorad will receive a grant that depends, among other things, on the amount of gas consumption quantities determined in the Additional Tamar Agreement. Dorad received 50% of the grant in the first quarter of 2022 and expects to receive the remainder on the date of termination of the Additional Dorad Agreement pursuant to the conditions set forth therein.

 

The addendums to the Tamar Agreement and the Additional Tamar Agreement were subject to certain conditions precedent that were met on July 14, 2021.

 

77

 

 

Natural Gas Purchase Agreement with Energean

 

In October 2017, Dorad executed an agreement with Energean regarding the acquisition of natural gas, in a cumulative volume of approximately 6 BCM over a period of 14 years, from the Karish and Tanin reserves held by them and whose completion was initially expected to be by the second half of 2021. Based on the agreement, Dorad will purchase about half of the gas required to operate the Dorad Power Plant and the rest of the demand will continue to be supplied by Tamar. According to the agreement with Energean, if Dorad does not actually consume the minimum quantity it has undertaken, it will be forced to consume this quantity. In November 2018, all the suspending conditions included in the agreement with Energean were fulfilled. During 2020-2022, Energean updated the forecast date for the initial gas flow several times due to the impact of the Covid-19 crisis on the Energean production facilities. Due to these delays, Dorad continued to purchase gas from Tamar at a higher price than the price set in the agreement with Energean. In February 2022, Dorad approached Energean demanding that it meet the timeline set forth in the agreement and compensate Dorad for the delays. Energean began to flow gas to Dorad at the beginning of November 2022.

 

Agreement with Alon Gat

 

On March 6, 2019, Dorad signed a memorandum of understanding with Alon Energy Centers LP, or Alon Gat, which currently operates a private power plant for the production of electricity in Kiryat Gat, Israel, with a capacity of approximately 73 MW. This memorandum provides that Alon Gat will provide Dorad with the full availability of the aforementioned power plant and will sell the electricity produced at the power plant to Dorad, which will serve as supplier in consideration for payment for availability and electricity, for an initial term of six years. On November 12, 2019, commercial operation of the Alon Gat power plant began and the implementation of the memorandum of understanding became effective. The memorandum contained termination provisions, including in the event of regulatory changes that materially impair the implementation of the understandings between the parties. On January 8, 2023, Alon Gat informed Dorad of the termination of the agreement, effective March 31, 2023, due to certain regulatory changes that enabled Alon Gat to terminate the agreement with Dorad, including the change in production tariff and demand hours cluster.

 

Delivery of Natural Gas

 

The natural gas is supplied through Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd., currently the sole operator of a natural gas transportation system in Israel. The ability to deliver natural gas depends on the extent of the capacity of gas that can be transported in the pipeline.

 

In November 2010, Dorad executed a standard agreement with Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd., a governmental company, which was approved by the Israeli Gas Authority, according to which the Dorad Power Plant was connected to the natural gas pipeline. Dorad paid connection fees in the amount of NIS 47 million and is obligated to pay Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd. a fixed monthly payment for the capacity in the pipeline and a variable payment for gas flowing through the pipeline.

 

Tamar carried out a project to add compressors aimed at increasing the amount of gas passing through the transmission pipeline. The agreements between Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd. and its customers (including Dorad), include, among other things, the maximum capacity that the customer may purchase. As of December 31, 2023, the maximum capacity established in the agreement between Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd. and Dorad is sufficient for the full production capacity of the Dorad Power Plant. In extreme conditions, there may be a shortage in the supply of natural gas. However, Dorad estimates that even if such a shortage occurs, for example due to extreme weather conditions, it is expected to last only a few hours. In Dorad’s estimation, no material financial impact is expected on Dorad if such a shortage arises.

 

78

 

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on Dorad’s Operations

 

As noted above under “Material Effects of Government Regulations on the Israeli PV Plant,” the regulatory framework applicable to the production of electricity by the private sector in Israel is provided under the Electricity Law, regulations promulgated thereunder, and other standards, guidelines and instructions published by the Israeli Electricity Authority and the IEC. In addition, the gas transportation system in Israel is regulated by the Israeli Gas Authority, and by the regulation and decisions of the Ministry of Energy and the Israeli Gas Authority on these issues.

 

Licenses

 

The Israeli Electricity Market Law provides that certain actions in the electricity market, including generation of electricity and supply of electricity, require a license. In May 2014, the Israeli Electricity Authority resolved to grant Dorad production licenses for a period of twenty years (which can be extended for an additional ten year period under certain conditions) and a supply license for a period of one year. In August 2014, Dorad filed a request to extend the supply license for an additional period of nineteen years and the long-term supply license was executed in July 2015.

 

In accordance with the terms of Dorad’s production licenses, the sale to the System Manager is conducted using the method of available capacity and energy. The production licenses impose on Dorad an obligation to comply with a minimum level of availability, regularity and efficiency in the operation of the license, an obligation to carry out inspections of the power plant and maintenance work therein, and an obligation to report to the Israeli Electricity Authority, including in connection with malfunctions and inspections carried out at the power plant. In accordance with the terms of the supply license, Dorad may sell electricity to consumers who have a continuous electricity meter installed that stores consumption data (only). In addition, in accordance with the terms of the supply license, it is required that Dorad’s equity not be less than a certain percentage of the normative cost of the power plant (according to the definition of the relevant term therein).

 

The licenses cannot be transferred, encumbered or seized, directly or indirectly, and the production licenses also provide that it is not possible to sell or pledge any property used for the execution of the licenses, all except with the prior approval of the Minister. In addition, the licenses state, among other things, that the approval of the Minister of Energy is required for the transfer or encumbrance of control of Dorad. In the event that the transfer of control also includes a change in the terms of the license, the approval of the Israeli Electricity Authority is also required. In addition, the licenses include restrictions and requirements in connection with transfers of rights, directly or indirectly, in Dorad.

 

Subject to the right of hearing and the rules applicable to it, the Israeli Electricity Authority may, with the approval of the Minister, change the conditions of the licenses granted to Dorad, add to them or subtract from them, if there have been changes in the suitability of Dorad, in the general environment of the electricity market (or in the technology relevant to the license, in relation to the production license), or if the changes are required to ensure competition in the electricity market (in relation to the production license) or the level of services to be provided. The Israeli Electricity Authority is also entitled to terminate the licenses or suspend them before the end of their term, subject to the right of the license holder for a hearing, for example in the event of a violation of the terms of the license or non-compliance with the eligibility conditions for receiving the licenses, all in accordance with the conditions specified in the licenses and according to the provisions of applicable law. The Israeli Electricity Law provides that in addition to revocation or suspension of a license due to non-compliance, the Israeli Electricity Authority may also revoke, suspend or modify a license based on other considerations, including the contribution of the license to the level of services to the public, the benefit of the consumers and the contribution of the license to the competition in the electricity market. The Israeli Electricity Law further provides that other than due to non-compliance or loss of eligibility, the revocation, suspension or modification of certain licenses, which licenses of the scope held by Dorad, requires the approval of the Minister.

 

79

 

 

As a condition for receiving the licenses, Dorad provided guarantees to ensure compliance with the conditions of the licenses as well as to compensate and indemnify the State of Israel for damages caused to it as a result of breach of these conditions or as a result of termination, limiting or suspension of the licenses. In addition, Dorad must provide a guarantee in favor of the System Manager in the amount of 70% of the average monthly bill payment of its customers in the summer season according to their consumption in the corresponding period of the previous year. In accordance with the terms of the licenses granted to Dorad, Dorad is not allowed to carry out actions that may cause a reduction in competition in the electricity market or harm it. These licenses also include provisions regarding the insurance that Dorad must maintain during the licenses period.

 

As of December 31, 2023, Dorad is in compliance with the terms of the licenses granted to it.

 

Tariffs and Payments

 

As noted above, the Israeli Electricity Authority determines the tariffs in the electricity sector, including the Taoz Tariff, which is the tariff for electricity consumers above a certain size, based on the costs of production, infrastructure, transmission, distribution and system costs, which changes according to the seasons and according to clusters of demand hours during the day, or the Taoz Tariff. The Taoz Tariff creates a direct link between the costs of electricity production and its supply at different times and the price paid by the customer. In each season, three clusters of hours were determined: peak (hours with the highest demand), high (hours with an average demand) and low (hours with low demand). The price of electricity at peak is the highest, at high is at an intermediate level, and at low is the lowest. These rates have a material effect on the results of Dorad’s operations.

 

On August 28, 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority issued a decision in which, among other things, a change in the clusters of demand hours was established, according to the decision the “high” cluster was eliminated, peak hours will be shifted in some seasons from noon to evening hours and the number of months in the summer season will be expanded to 4 months (June – September instead of July and August). The decision became effective on January 1, 2023.

 

The Israeli Electricity Authority determined the method and tariffs for the provision of availability and electricity by private electricity producers to the System Manager in the event not all of the capacity of such manufacturers was sold directly to customers. The Israeli Electricity Authority’s decision provides that the System Manager will pay for the availability even in the event electricity was not actually used by end customers depending on the amount of electricity made available to the System Manager. This decision further provides that in the event the System Manager purchases electricity from the private manufacturer, the tariff paid for the electricity will not be higher than the tariff determined in the tariff approval issued to the private manufacturer.

 

For the purpose of guaranteeing the tariffs that electricity producers are entitled to receive from the Israeli Electricity Authority, they are granted a “tariff approval” by the Israeli Electricity Authority, which includes, among other things, tariffs arising from the tariff arrangements in the standards in connection with force majeure and insurance, warranty, replacement fuel and tariffs for the manufacturer in connection with the purchase of electricity, purchase of availability and energy or the purchase of related services. In September 2010, Dorad received a tariff approval from the Israeli Electricity Authority that sets forth the tariffs applicable to the Dorad Power Plant throughout the period of its operation, valid for a period of 20 years from the date of receipt of the production license (i.e., until May 2034), which is updated according to mechanisms set forth therein and includes, among other things as described above, tariffs for the sale of availability and energy to the System Manager, and in October 2013, Dorad received a revised tariff approval pursuant to the Tamar Agreement.

 

80

 

 

On December 27, 2020, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “2021 Annual Update to the Electricity Rate,” which, among other things, provided for a decrease of approximately 5.7% in the average production component commencing January 1, 2021 and effective throughout 2021.

 

On January 31, 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “Electricity Rates for Customers of IEC in 2022” which provided for an increase in the average production component of approximately 13.6% commencing from February 1, 2022.

 

On April 12, 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision, which became effective May 1, 2022, regarding an annual update to the 2022 electricity tariff pursuant to which, among other things, the production component increased by approximately 9.4% compared to the 2021 tariff.

 

On July 28, 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision titled “Annual Electricity Rate Update 2022,” which, among other things, provided for an increase in the average production component of approximately 24.3% compared to the 2021 tariff, applicable from August 1, 2022, that will remain in effect through the end of 2022.

 

On December 26, 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “Annual Update of 2023 Electricity Rates for Customers of the IEC” which provided for a decrease in the average production component of approximately 0.7% from January 1, 2023 through the end of 2023. On January 26, 2023, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “Annual Update of 2023 Electricity Rates for Customers of the IEC” which provided for a decrease in the average production component of approximately 1.2% from February 1, 2023 through the end of 2023. On March 27, 2023, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “Ongoing Update to Electricity Rates for Customers of IEC,” which provided for a decrease in the average production component of approximately 1.4% from April 1, 2023, which was in effect through the end of January 2024.

 

On January 29, 2024, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding “Annual Update of 2024 Electricity Rates for Customers of the IEC,” which provided for a decrease in the average production component of approximately 1% from February 1, 2024.

 

In October 2021, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a decision regarding the dates of payment and invoices, which regulates the payment dates so that all suppliers in the market will pay the System Manager on one fixed date, followed by all service providers (manufacturers and network providers) receiving the payment from the System Manager for their services at another fixed date. The purpose of the said resolution was to assist the System Manager with minimizing the cash flow required for its operations as well as to regulate the conduct of all parties in the electricity sector with respect to the dates of payments and receivables. In connection with the initial implementation of the aforementioned decision, Dorad had to advance a payment to the System Manager in the amount of approximately NIS 40 million, after which the continuation of payments will be made according to the updated payment dates.

 

81

 

 

Consumption Plans and Deviations

 

In August 2019, the Israeli Electricity Authority published a proposed resolution that is subject to a public hearing concerning an amendment to the standards governing deviations from consumption plans. These standards regulate the accounting mechanism in the event the actual consumer consumption is different than the consumption plan submitted by the electricity manufacturers (such as Dorad) and include a mechanism protecting the manufacturers from random deviations in actual consumption volumes. Based on the Israeli Electricity Authority’s publication, which includes a call for public comments (the hearing process), the Israeli Electricity Authority proposed revoking the protections included in the aforementioned standards, claiming that the manufacturers are misusing the protections and regularly submit plans and forecasts that deviate from the actual expected consumption, and also seeks to impose financial sanctions on the manufacturers, which may be in material amounts upon the occurrence of certain deviation events. On January 27, 2020, the Israeli Electricity Authority issued a resolution amending the standards and imposing financial sanctions in cases of certain extraordinary events that may add up to significant sums. The resolution entered into effect commencing September 1, 2020. Dorad is preparing to reduce the implications of the resolution and the implementation of the resolution does not have a material effect on the financial results of Dorad.

 

On November 22, 2020, the IEC filed a third-party notice against Dorad in connection with a class action submitted against the IEC claiming that the IEC was negligent in overseeing the private electricity manufacturers thereby damaging the electricity consumers. The claim against the IEC alleges that the private electricity manufacturers provided false reports in the consumption plans they submitted to the System Manager, based on the standards set by the Israeli Electricity Authority. On October 31, 2021, a hearing was held on the request to send notices to third parties, but no decision has yet been given on the request. Dorad and other third parties submitted their responses (and objections) to the class action and the claimant notified the court that he does not object to the third-party notices. On April 10, 2023, the court decided to reject the request submitted by the IEC to send the third-party notice to Dorad. On June 11, 2023, the IEC submitted an appeal on the court’s decision. The respondents submitted written responses to the appeal and a hearing date is scheduled for May 6, 2024. At this point, based on the advice of legal counsel, Dorad cannot estimate the outcome of this legal proceeding.

 

Permits and Environmental Laws

 

The Dorad Power Plant is subject to a variety of Israeli environmental laws and regulations, including limitations concerning noise, emissions of pollutants, handling hazardous materials, including storage, transport and disposal, electromagnetic field radiation, and water pumping. In the event of non-compliance with environmental laws, Dorad could be subject to financial and criminal sanctions, denial of permits or licenses, suspension of activity and/or an increase in Dorad’s expenses due to damages, to the extent that they are caused as a result of non-compliance with environmental laws.

 

Dorad is required to obtain and maintain various licenses and permits from local and municipal authorities for its operations. Dorad holds a business license, a discharge permit into the sea, a toxic permit and an emission permit according to the Israeli Clean Air Law, 2008.

 

In connection with Dorad’s financing, Dorad’s shareholders undertook to indemnify Dorad and/or the financing entities in connection with environmental hazards in the event that Dorad bears any cost or expense or liability, among other events in connection with environmental hazards or pollution and deviations from the business plan related to seawater absorption. To the extent that indemnification is provided as stated above, the indemnification amounts will not be considered part of the equity that Dorad’s shareholders have committed to provide to Dorad as part of the financing of the project.

 

82

 

 

Market Model for Private Manufacturers on the Transmission Grid

 

In March 2022, the Israeli Electricity Authority published its resolution providing for a market model for private manufacturers and renewable energy on the transmission grid. The purpose of the resolution is to create a uniform set of rules and a possibility for better control of the System Manager over the loads on the network, especially in view of the massive entry of renewable energies into the market. This resolution preserves the ability of manufacturers operating under a different regulation, including Dorad, to continue operating in a format of physical loading (production according to the predicted customer consumption and selling excess electricity to the System Manager), and also allows those manufacturers to decide, every month, at their discretion, to switch to a central loading format that will entitle them to energy payments in accordance with the mechanisms established in the resolution and in parallel to purchase the electricity required by their customers from the System Manager at market price (SMP). This arrangement became effective commencing January 1, 2024. Dorad is examining the impact of the resolution on its operations and may, at any time and from time to time, elect to switch to the proposed central loading mechanism in the event it resolves that the change will have a positive impact on its financial results.

 

Waste-to-Energy (Biogas) Projects

 

 

Plant Title  Installed/
production
Capacity
  Location  Connection
to Grid
  Revenue in the
year ended December 31,
2022
(in thousands)
   Revenue in the
year ended
December 31,
2023
(in thousands)
 
“Groen Gas Goor”  3 million Nm3 per year  Goor, the Netherlands  November 2017  3,207   4,345 
“Groen Gas Oude-Tonge”  3.8 million Nm3 per year,  Oude-Tonge, the Netherlands  June 2018  3,100   5,269 
“Groen Gas Gelderland”  7.5 million Nm3 per year1  Gelderland, the Netherlands  April 2017  6,333   7,407 

 

 

1.This plant’s permit provides for a subsidy in connection with production of approximately 7.5 million Nm3 per year, however the actual production capacity of the plant is approximately 9.5 million Nm3 per year.

 

The Goor Plant

 

General

 

We indirectly wholly-own Groen Gas Goor B.V., or Groen Goor, a project company operating an anaerobic digestion plant, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 375 Nm3/h, in Goor, the Netherlands, or the Goor Plant and the land on which the Goor Plant is located.

 

The Goor Plant commenced operations in December 2017. The overall capital expenditure in connection with the Goor Plant was approximately €10.8 million, including bank financing. We provided approximately €2.1 million in shareholder’s loans to Groen Goor. The Goor Plant is currently operated by Groen Goor, who recruited experienced employees for this purpose. During 2019 we added a centrifuge decanter and a dry silo system for the Goor Plant. In October 2016, Groen Goor executed offtake agreements for selling its produced gas, electricity, green gas certificates and green electricity certificates.

 

83

 

 

The Oude Tonge Plant

 

We indirectly wholly-own Groen Gas Oude–Tonge B.V., or Oude Tonge, which owns an anaerobic digestion plant, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 475 Nm3/h, in Oude Tonge, the Netherlands, or the Oude-Tonge Plant. The Oude Tonge Plant commenced operations in June 2018. We provided approximately €1.7 million in shareholder’s loans to Oude Tonge.

 

The Oude Tonge Plant is currently operated by Oude Tonge, who recruited experienced employees for this purpose and the senior management provides services both to the Oude Tonge Plant and to the Goor Plant. During 2019, we added a centrifuge decanter for the Oude Tonge Plant. In May 2017, Oude Tonge executed offtake agreements for selling its produced gas and green gas certificates.

 

The Gelderland Plant

 

On December 1, 2020, we acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., or GG Gelderland, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ellomay Luxembourg. We paid €1.567 million for the shares and the repayment of shareholder loans. An additional shareholder loan of approximately €5.9 million was granted to GG Gelderland by Ellomay Luxembourg on December 1, 2020. GG Gelderland owns an operating anaerobic digestion plant in Gelderland, the Netherlands, with a permit that provides for a subsidy in connection with production of approximately 7.5 million Nm3 per year. The actual production capacity of the plant is approximately 9.5 million Nm3 per year.

 

During 2023, we assessed the recoverable amount of its Biogas plants in the Netherlands in light of operating losses suffered by these projects in recent years and lower results than forecasted for 2023. The examination was conducted based on the net consideration (net of expected estimated indemnification) included in a binding offer received for the sale of the Biogas plants. The examination concluded that the fair value (net of transaction costs) of each of the plants is higher than the carrying value of such plant and therefore there is no need for an impairment provision.

 

Waste-to-Energy Technologies

 

The process of energy recovery from non-recyclable waste is often referred to as waste-to-energy or energy-from-waste. The waste-to-energy market includes various treatment processes and technologies used to generate a usable form of energy while reducing the volume of waste, including combustion, gasification, pyrolization, anaerobic digestion and landfill gas recovery. The resulting energy can be in the form of electricity, gas, heating and/or cooling, or conversion of the waste into a fuel for future use.

 

Gasification in the waste-to-energy market is the process of converting organic carbonaceous materials into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2) by reacting the material at high temperatures (>700 °C), without combustion, with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam. This process produces a gas mixture called synthetic gas or syngas or producer gas and is itself a fuel. The organic materials used in the gasification process are a variety of biomass and waste-derived feedstocks, including wood pellets and chips and waste wood.

 

Anaerobic digestion is a biological process that produces a gas (also known as biogas) principally composed of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). These gases are produced from organic waste such as livestock manure and food processing waste and from agro-residues. Depending on the type of feedstock used and the system design, biogas is typically 55%-75% pure methane. The biogas is emitted during the digestion process of the substrates by specific combinations of bacteria. As there is a relatively wide range of feedstock mix that can be used in the process, the plants in the Netherlands are designed to allow flexibility that is expected to reduce dependency on certain feedstock mix or the feedstock supplier. Biogas is used to produce green gas, or bio-methane, with properties close to natural gas that is injected into the natural gas grid.

 

84

 

 

The anaerobic digestion process leaves an organic residue, the digestate. The digestate can be used as a fertilizer and soil improver and the WtE plant is required to find solutions for the proper disposal of the digestate. The ability to dispose of digestate is subject to the relevant regulation in the target countries with respect to the amounts and timing of disposal of digestate as a fertilizer in such country. In the event restrictions and regulation does not permit disposal in a certain country, the WtE plant is required to dispose of the digestate in more distant locations or to store the digestate, which increases the costs of the disposal of digestate.

 

Benefits of Waste-to-Energy

 

Waste-to-energy generates clean, reliable energy from a renewable fuel source, thus expected to reduce dependency on “traditional” energy production methods, such as fossil fuels, oil and other similar raw materials that are less friendly to the environment. The use of waste assists in the on-going management of waste in a manner that is more environmentally-friendly than other waste management solutions, such as landfilling. We believe that by processing waste in waste-to-energy facilities, greenhouse gas emissions and the risk of contamination of ground water will be reduced.

 

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials for the Operations of the WtE Plants

 

As noted above, the anaerobic digestion process requires continuous input of raw materials such as: manure, glycerin, mix grain and corn, all of which are not freely available (as is the case with wind, solar and hydro energies).

 

The success of a WtE plant depends on its ability to procure and maintain sufficient levels of the waste applicable and suitable to the WtE technology the plant uses, to meet a certain of range of energy (gas, electricity or heat) production levels. Both Groen Goor and Oude Tonge initially executed long term feedstock agreements with feedstock suppliers. These agreements were terminated due to disagreements with the suppliers. To ensure continuous supply of raw materials, both in terms of the quantity and the quality and composition of the raw materials, our WtE plants started working with a large number of waste suppliers, such as farmers, food manufacturers and other specialized waste suppliers in order to continuously monitor the proposed sales and try to locate the most efficient and beneficial offers.

 

The Netherlands Waste-to-Energy Market and Regulation

 

Dutch Climate Goals

 

According to EU law, the production rate of energy from renewable sources for the Netherlands by the year 2030 must be 39%. In addition, the Dutch government’s goal is to have at least 16% renewable energy by 2023 and an almost fully sustainable energy supply in 2050.

 

85

 

 

In July 2019, the national Climate Act (“Klimaatwet”) was adopted. The Climate Act contains several national climate goals. As a result of the European Climate Law, the CO2 emission reduction in the Climate Act targets were amended in July 2023 to 55% by 2030 and climate-neutral by 2050, aiming for negative emissions after 2050. In addition, pursuant to the Coalition Agreement (“Coalitieakkoord") of December 2021, the Dutch government is aiming for a CO2 reduction of 60% by 2030, 70% by 2035 and 80% by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. Furthermore, the Dutch government mentions investments in research and innovation of climate neutral technology and emphasizes the importance of a sustainable energy supply.

 

The Climate Act does not contain any direct obligations for citizens and businesses; it provides the national government with a framework to establish further legislation in order to reach the national climate goals and renewable energy goals. In this regard the Climate Act requires the Dutch government to draft a so-called National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP). The Climate Plan covers a period of ten years, is adjusted every five years based on actual insights and contains the most important decisions and measures in the field of climate policy and energy saving management for the next five years. The first NECP (“Integraal Nationaal Energie en Klimaatplan 2021-2030”) was presented on November 1, 2019 and mainly refers to the headlines and various goals set – in broad outline – in the aforementioned Climate Act. It also provides an overview of the current and upcoming Dutch legislation in the field of climate policy. In June 2022, the Dutch government presented the draft NECP (“Ontwerp Beleidsprogramma Klimaat en Energie”). This program complements the Climate Plan and elaborates on the climate policy from the Coalition Agreement. In December 2023, in connection with the RED III Decree, the European Commission issued recommendations under the European Climate Law to the Netherlands on their submitted draft NECP. The recommendations reflected that, based on projections, the contribution of the Netherlands to (amongst other) renewable energy, energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is significantly below the EU target. These recommendations have to be taken into account in the final NECP, which is due by June 30, 2024.

 

Another mechanism introduced in the Climate Act is the Climate and Energy Outlook (“Klimaaten Energieverkenning”), which is regarded as one of the accountability instruments of the Dutch climate and energy policy. Based on the Climate and Energy Outlook published in 2023, the Dutch greenhouse gas emissions are expected to decrease by 46%-57% in 2030 compared to 1992. The Climate and Energy Outlook mentions that the main reason for the delay in reaching the 55% reduction target is the need for more rapid implementation of existing plans and formulation of additional policies. In addition, parts of the abovementioned NECP are not yet sufficiently detailed and several policy programs, such as the REPowerEU, are still being negotiated by the European Commission. The Climate and Energy Outlook is accompanied with a Climate Memorandum (“Klimaatnota”). The 2023 Climate Memorandum contains, amongst others, an updated climate and energy legislative and policy program regarding emission reduction, energy infrastructure, energy efficiency, the implementation of EU legislation, etc.

 

86

 

 

In order to have a fully sustainable energy supply or circular economy in 2050, the Dutch government established the National Circular Economy Program 2023-2030 (“Nationaal Programma Circulaire Economie 2023-2030”) in February 2023. The intermediate target for 2030 is 50% less use of raw materials compared to 2016 levels, but with the reservation that a final decision on the intermediate target will be made in 2024. The National Circular Economy Program 2023-2030 introduces four general measures: reducing raw material usage, substituting raw materials (by, for example bio-based materials), extending product lifetime and high-grade processing, which focuses on recycling (raw) materials. For the most impactful product groups, within the five supply chains with the most harmful environmental impact, concrete targets have been formulated and specific policy has been developed. This is, for instance, the case for companies producing/manufacturing wind farms, solar PV systems and climate control systems. The other categories are consumer goods, plastics, construction and biomass & foodstuffs (which latter category fall under the transition agenda for circular agriculture). The National Circular Economy Program 2023-2030 sums up several measures of government intervention (mostly of voluntary nature) to reach the targets, such as pricing measures (for instance levies), regulatory measures and stimulating measures (e.g., subsidies), encouraging companies to take possible and/or necessary measures in order to reach the targets set out in the Program.

 

The Dutch government also introduced a policy program concerning “green gas” (biomethane) in December 2022 (“Programma Groen Gas”). Green gas is gas from renewable energy sources, such as biomethane. Through this program, the government aims for a significant scale-up of the production of green gas in the Netherlands, particularly within the chemical industry sector. The program entails (amongst others) the introduction of targets and regulations for a so-called blending obligation regarding green gas and for “gasification” (vergassing) of biogenic residual streams. The Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate published draft legislation in July 2023 in this regard.

 

The legislation regarding the blending obligation is expected to introduce an administrative obligation for energy suppliers of gas to provide a certain amount of green gas to the end users concerned (all part of ETS2: urban environment, agriculture and any industry not regulated by the ETS1) as part of the total gas supply. Compliance with this obligation can (exclusively) be proven by the existing ‘green gas certificates’, so-called Guarantees of Origin (Garanties van Oorsprong, GvO’s), which can be traded through the VertiCer register (the organization responsible for issuing and managing the Guarantees of Origin). The GvOs are valid for a year after receiving them. The blending obligation will therefore also introduce tradable green gas units (“groengaseenheden”, GGE), issued originally by the Dutch Emission Authority (Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit, Nea). The GGEs can be traded on the market between producers and suppliers (also between themselves) and do not have a determined validity period.

 

By imposing the obligation on the gas suppliers, the government hopes to create a sufficiently high market price, thereby stimulating new (necessary) investments in the production capacity of green gas (such as the manufacturing of production installations, but also cooperation within the chain). The blending obligation does not follow directly from European regulations, but will be incorporated in Dutch law, in the Environmental Protection Act (which already contains several obligations regarding renewable energy). The obligation is however in line with EU ambitions and policies, such as the ambition in the REPowerEU-plan to produce 35 bcm of green gas (biomethane) in 2030.

 

A consultation round was open until September 2023. The results of the consultations and further developments are currently reviewed and processed in order to establish the definite proposals for further legislation. In February 2024, the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate informed Parliament that the entry-into-force of the blending obligation will be postponed to January 2026.

 

In addition to the blending obligation, the Dutch government aims to increase the use of non-biogenic gas streams for gasification (vergassing), in particular for waste streams that are unsuitable for recycling. In this regard, the government opened a subsidy scheme in mid-February 2024 for “demonstration projects” regarding installations (partially) meant for gasification of biogenic or mixed (with non-biogenic) residual streams into renewable energy carriers (such as green gas and biofuels). The subsidy scheme is open until August 29, 2024 and has a total possible budget of €30 million per demonstration project.

 

87

 

 

The Dutch Ministry of Finance and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate are currently exploring whether new climate legislation or other measures can stimulate the contribution of financial companies to the climate transition. The Dutch government has therefore opened a consultation round for the draft version of the Act on Climate Measures Financial Sector (“Consultatie klimaatmaatregelen financiële sector”), aiming to capture all the possible advantages and disadvantages of new legislation, also with respect to other possible (legal and non-legal) measures, European developments, the possible impact of the legislation for the financial sector on financing Dutch businesses and on the international competitiveness of the Netherlands and its businesses. The consultation round was open until February 15, 2024. As the Dutch Cabinet that executed the Coalition Agreement is expected to be replaced during the coming months, it is more difficult to predict if and to what extent the current targets and established (national) policies regarding climate and energy goals will be continued, however the EU climate and energy directives are binding on the Netherlands therefore provisions and policies implementing EU climate and energy legislation are likely to remain in effect.

 

Permits

 

As of January 1, 2024, various regulations on environment and spatial planning are implemented in the Dutch Environmental and Planning Act (“Omgevingswet”) and underlying legislation. This includes the former Dutch Environmental Permitting Act (“Wet algemene bepalingen omgevingsrecht”), the Dutch Water Act (“Waterwet”), the Dutch Spatial Planning Act (“Wet ruimtelijke ordening”), the Activities Decree on Environmental Management (“Activiteitenbesluit”) and several parts of the Dutch Environmental Protection Act (“Wet milieubeheer”).

 

The legislator of the Environmental and Planning Act has stated that the Act has a policy neutral character and the Environmental and Planning Act and underlying regulations are not materially different than the prior regulation. One difference is that under the new legal system, it is not the operator of a certain facility/business but the performer of any environmentally impactful activity that has to comply with the applicable regulations.

 

In practice, permits obtained under former legislation are and will stay valid. Any permit applications that have been submitted before the Dutch Environment and Planning Act entered into force, are assessed in accordance with the former legislation.

 

Under former legislation, a permit is required to operate a waste treatment plant in the Netherlands for its (now-called) environmentally impactful activities. In addition to this permit, a permit might be required for discharging waste (water) into sewage systems or surface water as well as permits for activities regulated under the local zoning plan (“omgevingsplan”) or local ordinances (“Algemene Plaatselijke Verordening”). The need for these permits depends on the (physical) scale of the waste treatment plant and its impact on the nearby environment. A permit is, in principal, issued without a time limit, but the competent authorities are allowed to include provisions regarding limitations or conditions under which the activities performed by the waste treatment plant need to be carried out. To ensure compliance, the authorities may withdraw a permit in case of significant violations of restrictions and/or applicable environmental regulations. Moreover, changing circumstances, as a consequence of new operational activities on-site, new developments nearby or new (EU) legislation, may require the permit to be revised.

 

88

 

 

Furthermore, the operation of a waste treatment plant must be in line with the designated use in the applicable zoning plan as established by the municipality. In case the plant/operation is not in line with the provisions in the zoning plan, either the zoning plan has to be adapted or a permit has to be obtained under the aforementioned Environmental Planning Act (thereby allowing deviation from the applicable designated use). New zoning plans may amend or prohibit the designated use that allows the operation of an existing plant.

 

For the operation of a waste treatment plant in the Netherlands, a permit under the Dutch Environment and Planning Act is required as well for any environmentally impactful activities that might negatively affect designated Natura 2000-areas (“Natura 2000-gebieden”), in particular by causing deposition of nitrogen. Furthermore, as of July 1, 2021, the Dutch Nitrogen and Nature Improvement Act (“Wet stikstofreductie en natuurverbetering”) establishes provisions targeting a more structural solution in regard to the (both ecological and political) nitrogen issue in the Netherlands due to the annulment of the so-called ‘Integrated Approach to Nitrogen’ (“Programma Aanpak Stikstof”) by the highest Dutch Administrative Court in May 2019. This approach, which provided exemptions to the permit obligation and entailed the idea that through nature restoration measures and source-directed measures, a general autonomous reduction of nitrogen depositions/emissions could be created (only) in favor of (more) economic developments, was ruled to be unlawful in regard to EU law. As a result, permits regarding nitrogen deposition are only issued if the nitrogen deposition is practically nil. Hence, in general it is rather difficult to obtain a permit under the Dutch Nature Protection Act, for both the construction and the operation of a (modified/new) waste treatment plant. Under the Dutch Nitrogen and Nature Improvement Act, the (outgoing) Dutch government published the Program for Nitrogen Reduction 2022-2035. The main goal of this Program is to determine which measures are necessary to achieve the reduction of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen-sensitive Natura 2000-areas (40% in 2025, 50% in 2030 and 74% in 2035). Furthermore, the Act obliges the Dutch government to legalize nitrogen reports and calculations, based on the abovementioned Integrated Approach to Nitrogen, via a ‘legalization program’. However, due to the same issues mentioned above, this program is still under negotiation and not in place yet.

 

Energy saving/supply

 

The Netherlands waste treatment sector is subject to strict regulatory obligations, requiring that approximately 10% of the market is processed. As a result, facilities that produce waste (such as the industry sector farms) are expected and encouraged to seek more appropriate solutions for waste management. As part of the Climate Act, the (outgoing) Dutch government has intensified the enforcement of the legal obligation for operators of facilities to take energy saving measures under the Decree on Environmental Activities (“Besluit activiteiten leefomgeving”) (and earlier under the Activities Decree). In short, the obligations require operators of facilities that consume > 50,000 kWh of electricity and/or 25,000 m³ of natural gas per year to implement all (statutory designated) possible energy saving measures with a payback period of five (5) years or less. In order to support this effort, the (outgoing) Dutch government has drafted and updated in April 2020 a so called ‘recognized measures’ list, intended to simplify compliance with the energy saving obligation. This list is available as an annex to the Environmental Activities Decree. Since 2023, these facilities are obliged to also take energy saving measures whenever the measures do not save energy but do reduce CO2 emissions. These energy saving measures include generating renewable energy and switching to an energy carrier with lower CO2 emissions. In order to monitor these obligations, the operator of the plant has an obligation to inform and report to the competent authorities which energy saving measures are taken/implemented on site. This information report was required to be submitted to the State Department for Entrepreneurship by December 1, 2023 at the latest and, subsequently, this has to be repeated every 4 years. This information duty does not apply if a permit for the operation of a plant already stipulates certain energy saving obligations or when it has already an audit obligation under the European Energy Efficiency Directive (EED).

 

89

 

 

In January 2022, the amended Chapter 9.7 of the Dutch Environmental Protection Act (“Wet milieubeheer”) entered into force (along with the underlying amended Dutch Energy Transport Decree (“Besluit energie vervoer”) and Dutch Energy Transport Regulation (“Regeling energie Vervoer”)). These amendments are part of the implementation of the national Climate Act and the RED II. In July 2021 the European Commission proposed an amendment of the RED II, as part of the package to deliver on the European Green Deal. In short, the regulation in Chapter 9.7 of the Dutch Environmental Protection Act (“Wet milieubeheer”) holds the obligation for a fuel supplier to meet a certain reduction of non-sustainable fuels, by for example compensating their oil supply with sustainable biofuels (or electricity produced from renewable sources). In May 2023, the new Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) entered into force, which contains stricter obligations to become climate neutral in 2050. In September 2023, the (outgoing) Dutch government published draft legislation regarding the implementation of RED III and further draft legislation, such as additional amendments regarding the Dutch Environmental Protection Act and the Dutch Energy Transport Decree and enactment of the amendments is expected in Q2-Q4 of 2024. All the adjustments will mainly, in brief, focus on the encouragement of renewable hydrogen, both in the industry as the transport sector. All (upcoming) draft legislation still needs to be discussed and approved by the Dutch Parliament and Senate.

 

To accelerate the energy transition (from fossil to sustainable energy) in the Netherlands, the Dutch Electricity Act (“Elektriciteitswet”) obliges network operators to provide priority to facilities that produce renewable energy in the connection to the electricity grid. This Act also sets rules and requirements regarding the connection point’s allocation, the method of connection and the distribution of ‘connection costs’ between network operator and the plant’s operator. Due to a considerable growth of renewable energy developments (e.g., the rise of wind and solar power projects onshore), congestion on the electricity grid is an issue of increasing size and legal complexity in several parts of the Netherlands. In January 2021, the revised version of the Dutch investment plan and quality of electricity and gas Decree (“Besluit investeringsplan en kwaliteit elektriciteit en gas”) entered into force. This Decree determines among others that the reserve capacity of the high-voltage grid will be dedicated to energy generated by renewable energy sources. The (outgoing) Dutch government has submitted a draft for the so-called Dutch Energy Act (“Energiewet”), which aims to substitute the current Dutch Electricity Act (“Elektriciteitswet”) and the Dutch Gas Act (“Gaswet”). The Dutch Energy Act offers a modern and updated regulatory framework that supports and stimulates the energy transition in the Netherlands and contributes to the goal of a clean energy supply that is safe, reliable, affordable and takes into account spatial planning. The Dutch Energy Act will retain the current ordering of the gas and electricity market, but at the same time contains adjustments to support the transition to a climate neutral energy supply. It also implements the European ‘Clean Energy Package’ (being the latest update in the European energy policy framework) as well.

 

90

 

 

Subsidies/funds

 

The current subsidy scheme for renewable energy in the Netherlands is called SDE++ (“Stimulering Duurzame Energieproductie en Klimaattransitie” or Stimulating Renewable Energy Production and Climate Transition). The SDE++ program stimulates the further rollout of renewable energy and focuses on stimulating CO2 emissions reduction techniques, by compensating the so-called unprofitable top margin of these techniques. The SDE++ program provides for various categories of biomass technologies for which subsidy can be requested, for example heat generation and gas extraction from biomass. Under the SDE++ program, subsidies are granted on the basis of the quantity of renewable energy that has been produced or CO2 emissions that have been prevented. The subsidy is equal to the difference between the cost price of reduction of CO2 emissions or renewable energy, and the profits that have been/will be made (defined as the ‘unprofitable top margin’). Subsidy applications under the SDE++ program are handled on the basis of increasing maximum subsidy need per phase. Consequently, projects with a lower subsidy need shall be given priority when granting subsidies. The subsidy is granted for a period of 12 to 15 years. Throughout the term part of the subsidy is provided via an advance payment based on the expected market prices established by November 1 of the previous year. After the end of the calendar year, from April onwards, an adjustment of the advance payment based on the actual market prices and production is made.

 

In November 2022, the (outgoing) Dutch government notified the Parliament that the advance payments were considerably too high and that, currently, the Dutch government should not pay subsidies for as many categories and projects, thereby also taking into account the high energy prices (and high profits). The waste-to-energy plants may keep these profits and will, during the subsidy term, receive subsidy again when energy prices drop (which may create the unprofitable top margin again). The (outgoing) Dutch government furthermore stated that it wants to prevent subsidized projects from realizing excess profits over the entire duration of the subsidized project as the aim of the SDE++ is to compensate the unprofitable top margin and not to facilitate excess profits. In that regard the (outgoing) Dutch government noted that it is investigating the possibility of adapting the SDE ++ program, for example into a system where subsidies are only paid after any previous excess profits are taken into account. The outcome of this investigation is not known yet, but as no exclusions to these adaptions are contemplated, it is expected that these changes will have an impact on waste-to-energy plants.

 

In most cases the SDE++ program allows ‘banking’. This means that in case less sustainable energy is produced than predicted, one can make up for this difference in the following years (forward banking). When, on the other hand, the production exceeds the subsidized annual production, one can counterbalance this in the following years (backward banking), though with a maximum of 25% of the subsidized annual energy production, except for the wind category.

 

The SDE++ program is determined annually. The round of application for the SDE++ program in 2023 closed on October 6. The total requested amount of subsidy was €8.3 billion. The majority of the budget has been requested for renewable heat. The applications are currently being assessed and the final results of the 2023 SDE++ program are not presented yet.

 

The SDE++ program will continue in 2024 and 2025 and will be open for subsidy applications from September 102024 until October 7, 2024. The budget amounts to €11.5 billion. Some modifications in the subsidy allocation system have been made since 2023, in order to stimulate certain techniques that are currently insufficiently addressed but essentially to the energy transition. A budget of €1 billion is reserved per specific field and when the budget within the relevant field is not fully used (because too few applications were made), the remaining budget will be transferred to another field. The determined fields are: (a) low-temperature heat, (b) high-temperature heat and (c) molecules (including green gas, advanced renewable fuels and hydrogen production). The category ‘air-to-water heat pump’ was added to the SDE++ program. Finally, some categories will not fall under the SDE++ program in 2023, such as green gas from residual waste and hydrogen from bio-based raw materials, because these techniques are not yet deemed profitable by the (outgoing) Dutch government.

 

91

 

 

In the abovementioned Coalition Agreement, the (outgoing) Dutch government announced the introduction of a new climate and transition fund of €35 billion for the upcoming ten years, in addition to the SDE++ program. This fund has taken shape in the Temporary Climate Fund Act (“Tijdelijke wet Klimaatfonds”), which was approved by the Dutch parliament in December 2023 and published in February 2024. The Act is yet to enter into force and the date is currently unknown. The objectives of the Climate Fund are: (a) greenhouse gas-neutral energy supply by 2050; (b) encouraging the implementation of energy efficiency techniques and promoting the use of renewable energy and other greenhouse gas-reducing techniques and measures in the industry; (c) stimulating the implementation of energy efficiency techniques and renewable energy in the built environment. Measures in all economic sectors, including the circular economy, are eligible for funding, provided that these measures meet the abovementioned objectives. The Climate Fund is a budgetary fund and intended to reserve available resources that can be used for specific purposes in the future. Commencing 2023, a multiannual climate funding program (“Meerjarenprogramma Klimaatfonds”) will be published on an annual basis, which provides information on achieving the financial obligations and purposes of the Climate Fund.

 

One of the expected concrete spending targets of the Climate Fund is the National Investment Scheme for Climate Projects Industry (“Nationale Investeringsregeling Klimaatprojecten Industrie”, in short: “NIKI”). The NIKI subsidy scheme is intended to appy in addition to the SDE++ program, and will subsidize larger-scale sustainable investments relating to green chemistry and electrification. The NIKI subsidy scheme is currently expected to open during 2024.

 

Taxes

 

In January 2021, the Industry CO2 Tax (“Wet CO2-heffing industrie”) entered into force. The rationale behind this tax is that the big polluters, in general the larger industrial facilities such as industry falling under the Industrial Emissions Directive and European Emissions Trading System (“EU ETS”) and waste incineration plants, have to pay their fair share in reducing CO2 emissions in the Netherlands. Furthermore, the Industry CO2 Tax aims at ensuring that the reduction target for industry as agreed in the Climate Agreement is achieved, while the level playing field with neighboring countries is affected as little as possible. This tax is connected with the EU ETS system as provided for in the European Directive 2003/87/EC; if emission prices within that system rise, the Industry CO2 Tax falls and vice versa. Facilities are granted an exemption for part of the CO2 emissions, on which they do not have to pay any tax (dispensation rights). The exemption is determined by comparing the plant’s CO2 emissions with the most efficient facilities in the same industry in Europe. The more efficient the plant produces, the less Industry CO2 Tax it is required to pay on balance, because that tax is levied on the emitted CO2 that is in excess of the dispensation rights. The levy will increase in the coming years to encourage facilities to produce more efficiently, from €30 per ton CO2 in 2021 up to €125 in 2030 (though in 2023 the levy has not increased). At the same time, the dispensation rights will be decreasing throughout the years. In addition, since January 1, 2023, a second tariff has been in place due to the Minimum CO2-price Industry Act (“Wet minimum CO2-prijs industrie”). This tariff ensures that a minimum CO2 price applies as well to emissions for which a company has dispensation rights under the Industry CO2 Tax. The tariff for 2024 is €74.17 per ton CO2, and will gradually increase to €128 in 2030.

 

92

 

 

Furthermore, in March 2022 the Dutch Minimum CO2-price Electricity Generation Act (“Wet minimum CO2-prijs elektriciteitsopwekking”) entered into force. The minimum price covers greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation at companies covered by the EU ETS. More specifically, this Act introduces an annually modified CO2 tax, because the tax is based on the difference between the annual national CO2 price and the EU ETS price. The tax is based on the number of tons of carbon dioxide released into the air in accordance with the plant’s electricity emission report. This means that, for instance, no tax will be levied on companies that generate electricity with windmills or solar panels. This tax can impact the biogas facilities, if they fall under the EU ETS system and emit CO2 while generating electricity.

 

Dutch tax laws also provide for an Energy Investment Allowance (“EIA”), a tax advantage for companies in the Netherlands that invest in energy-efficient technology allowing a deduction of 40% (in 2024) of the investment costs from the corporate income, on top of the usual depreciation. The right to the EIA is declared with the tax return, provided the investment is timely reported to the Dutch Enterprise Agency (“RVO”). The net EIA benefit is about 11% of the investment costs. The EIA can be claimed for all assets included in the annual Energy List (as published by RVO). The 2024 Energy List was published in January 2024. The EIA can also be claimed for customized investments that result in substantial energy savings, as far as these investments meet the saving standards of the EIA. The EIA budget used to be around €150 million, but is increased up to €249 million for 2023. It has been agreed that the EIA program will primarily be focused on energy efficiency investments. A renewable energy project that is eligible for an SDE++ subsidy is not eligible for the EIA tax advantage (the latter only relates to new projects and projects that have already obtained rights to tax advantages).

 

In January 2023, the (outgoing) Dutch government published a draft for the ‘Temporary Inframarginal Electricity Tax Act’ (“Tijdelijke wet Inframarginale Elektriciteitsheffing”). This Act implements the recently established EU regulation containing ‘an emergency intervention to address high energy prices.’ In short, the Act introduces a retroactive levy for market revenues in the period December 2022 – June 2023, insofar the market revenues rise above an exempt amount per megawatts. The tax/levy is levied on the sum of the taxable market revenues per calendar month. A producer is obliged to keep records of its generated electricity per month in the abovementioned period. The market revenues can follow from three types of revenues, namely: (i) income from electricity sales agreements regarding the Dutch electricity markets, (ii) negative income from agreements to purchase electricity on this market, to comply with selling obligations under the agreements referred to under (i), and (iii) negative and positive income from contracts such as power purchase agreements. The levy will be imposed on electricity producers in the Netherlands with a production installation of an installed capacity of 1 MW or more (e.g., +/- 3.000 solar panels or more). The producer will receive an invitation from the Tax Administration (Belastingdienst) to file a tax return. If the tax period is not extended by the European Union, the latest date of filing the tax return is June 30, 2024. The draft Act was approved by the Dutch Parliament on February 15, 2024 and is yet to be discussed and voted on by the Dutch Senate.

 

93

 

 

Electricity and Green Certificates

 

There are generally two types of electricity on the Dutch electricity market: (i) grey electricity, which is less environmentally friendly because it is made from sources such as gas and coal, and (ii) green electricity, which is made from renewable energy sources, such as sun, wind water and certain forms of biomass. Both types of electricity eventually end up on the same energy grid, but only electricity with a ‘green power certificate’ (in the Netherlands also known as a Guarantee of Origin) is treated as sustainable. In the Netherlands, the organization CertiQ is responsible for issuing and managing these certificates. A producer can register an electricity production installation, for example a waste-to-energy plant, with CertiQ – and is obliged to register the plant if a subsidy for SDE ++ has been issued by the government. One certificate covers 1 MWh and is valid for one year after the month in which the energy has been generated. A green certificate can also be obtained if the plant generates sustainable heat. If an installation generates both heat and electricity, it must be registered twice. If electricity is generated with sun, water or wind, the grid operator sends the production data to CertiQ. If electricity is generated with a biomass installation or the installation generates heat, simultaneously with the registration a measurement protocol, which must be approved by a recognized measurement company, is submitted to CertiQ.

 

The green certificates are booked by CertiQ on the account of a trader, which has been chosen by the producer. This trader does not have to be the (contracted) energy supplier of the plant. The issuance of green power certificates happens across Europe and the trader can sell the certificates on the European market through the platform of the Association of Issuing Bodies (“AIB”). The Netherlands may only import and export Guarantees of Origin made by an AIB member, which country must also belong to the European Economic Area. This means that, for example, exporting certificates to the United Kingdom is not allowed. Green certificates give consumers and companies more insight into what exactly takes place in energy generation and therefore they can choose more consciously what type of energy they want to consume. The increase in demand for energy and the government polices to offset the GHG emission is also major factor for the growth of the green certificates market. For more information see “Dutch Climate Goals” above.

 

Pumped Storage Project in the Manara Cliff in Israel

 

The current ownership structure of Ellomay PS is as follows: (i) 75% is owned by Ellomay Water Plants Holdings (2014) Ltd., or Ellomay Water, which we wholly-own, and (ii) 25% is owned by Sheva Mizrakot Ltd., an Israeli private company, or Sheva Mizrakot. 66.667% of Sheva Mizrakot is owned by Ampa Investments Ltd., or Ampa, and the remaining 33.333% are owned by Ellomay Water. Accordingly, we hold (through our direct holdings in Ellomay PS and through our holdings in Sheva Mizrakot) 83.333% of the Manara PSP, and the remaining 16.667% of the Manara PSP are held by Ampa through its holdings in Sheva Mizrakot.

 

The Manara PSP is projected to cost approximately NIS 1.64 billion (excluding future indexation) (approximately €410 million). This amount includes a reevaluation of the project CAPEX according to actual basket of indices applicable to such CAPEX for the period since financial close and until December 2023 when an updated financial model was submitted. On March 7, 2021, the Manara PSP received the approval of the Israeli Electricity Authority that the conditions for Financial Close under the applicable regulations were met. In April 2021, a notice to commence the construction works (NTC) was issued to Electra Infrastructures Ltd., the EPC contractor of the Manara PSP, and construction of the Manara PSP commenced. The construction period of the Manara PSP was initially expected to be 62.5 months from such date. Due to the “Iron Swords” war situation, which also affects the northern area of Israel in proximity to the Lebanon border, works on the Manara PSP site were suspended in early October 2023. Efforts are currently being focused on accelerating design activities to mitigate potential delays, while manufacturing of the main equipment, including electro-mechanical equipment, is proceeding as planned. The State of Israel fully protects the project in situations that may be considered force majeure, such as the current war. This protection is provided under the framework of the tariff regulation (financing support standards). The project is expected to receive full remedies for schedule or budget overruns caused by such situations. Originally, the project was planned to become commercially operational in the first half of 2027. However, due to the ongoing war, the operation date will be delayed. Currently, it is impossible to estimate when construction will end and when commercial operation will commence. As a result of the delays due to the war, the Israeli Electricity Authority has approved a 10-month extension to the project schedule, and the Company anticipates receiving additional extensions as needed, considering the ongoing situation.

 

94

 

 

Manara PSP Project Finance

 

On February 11, 2021, we announced the financial closing of the project finance of the Manara PSP, or the Manara PSP Project Finance. The Manara PSP Project Finance is provided by a consortium of Israeli banks and institutional investors, arranged and led by Mizrahi-Tefahot Bank Ltd. As of the date of the financial closing, the Manara PSP Project Finance was in the aggregate amount of NIS 1.27 billion (excluding future indexation) (approximately €338 million based on the euro/NIS exchange rate as of December 31, 2022). This amount is subject to reevaluation to an actual basket of indices similar to the CAPEX as described above.

 

For more information see “Item 5.B: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Notes 6 and 11.A to our annual financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

 

Manara PSP EPC Agreement

 

On February 14, 2021, we also announced the execution of the EPC agreement for the construction of the Manara PSP, or the Manara PSP EPC Agreement, under a “turnkey” contract with Electra Infrastructure Ltd., or Electra Infrastructure, one of Israel’s largest construction companies. The aggregate consideration payable to Electra Infrastructure under the Manara PSP EPC Agreement is expected to be approximately NIS 1.13 billion (excluding future indexation) (approximately €301 million based on the exchange rate as at December 31, 2022). The majority of this amount is linked to the actual change in the Israel Residential Construction Index. In accordance with the Manara PSP EPC Agreement Voith Hydro, the world’s leading manufacturer of hydroelectric turbines, or Voith Hydro, was nominated as the subcontractor that will be providing the electro-mechanical equipment to the Manara PSP.

 

Manara PSP O&M Agreement

 

In parallel to the execution of the Manara PSP EPC Agreement, Ellomay PS also executed an O&M agreement, or the Manara PSP O&M Agreement, with Mekorot Israel National Water Co., the Israeli national water company, or Mekorot (which is fully owned by the Israeli Government), Voith Hydro and Verbund Hydro, one of the largest hydroelectric companies in Europe with extensive expertise in the operation of hydroelectric power plants, or, together, the Manara PSP O&M Contractors. The Manara PSP O&M Agreement provides that the Manara PSP O&M Contractors will be involved in the construction process through a mobilization period and that O&M services will be provided for a twenty year period, during which Mekorot, Voith Hydro and Verbund will provide O&M services for the initial three years, with Mekorot providing O&M services exclusively for the remaining 17 years.

 

Background

 

The development of the Manara PSP began in 2007, and the Manara PSP, which was under different ownership at the time, was granted a conditional license in 2009 for a capacity of 200 MW, or the First Conditional License. The First Conditional License expired in 2011 and thereafter the previous owner applied for a new conditional license, but before the application was approved, the Israeli Electricity Authority rendered a decision, in 2012, prohibiting cross ownership in pumped storage projects (at the time, the then-owner of Manara PSP was also a shareholder in the Gilboa PSP), thus forcing the sale of Manara PSP to a new owner.     

 

In January 2014, we entered into an agreement with Ortam Sahar Engineering Ltd., or Ortam, an Israeli publicly traded company, pursuant to which we acquired (a) Ortam’s holdings (24.75%) in Agira Sheuva Electra, L.P., or the Partnership, an Israeli limited partnership that had been promoting the Manara PSP; and (b) Ortam’s holdings: (i) in Chashgal Elyon Ltd., or the GP, an Israeli private company, which is the general partner in the Partnership (holding 25% in the Partnership), and (ii) in the engineering, procurement and construction contractor of the aforementioned project (50%). On May 20, 2014, our indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, Ellomay Manara (2014) Ltd., or Ellomay Manara, entered into an agreement, or the Electra Agreement, with Electra Ltd., or Electra, an Israeli publicly traded company. Pursuant to the Electra Agreement, Ellomay Manara acquired Electra’s holdings (24.75%) in the Partnership, as well as Electra’s holdings in the GP (25%).

 

95

 

 

In addition, we, Ellomay Manara and Electra agreed that: (i) on the closing date of the transactions contemplated under the Electra Agreement, Ellomay Manara shall transfer to subsidiaries of Electra all of its then holdings in the engineering, procurement and construction contractor of the aforementioned project, or the EPC, (50%), which will be acquired at closing by us from another partner in the Partnership pursuant to a conditional agreement we entered into, resulting in Electra’s subsidiaries holding 100% of the EPC; and (ii) each of Electra (through its subsidiaries) and us (together with Ellomay Manara) was granted an eighteen-month put option and call option, respectively, with respect to the entire holdings in the EPC.

 

In addition to the aforementioned agreements, in January 2014 we entered into an agreement with Galilee Development Cooperative Ltd., an Israeli cooperative, or the Cooperative, pursuant to which, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, we shall acquire the Cooperative’s holdings (24.75%) in the Partnership as well as its holdings in: (i) the GP (25%), and (ii) the EPC (50%).

 

In November 2014, Ellomay Manara consummated the acquisition of 75% of the limited partnership rights in the Partnership, as well as 75% of the holdings in the GP, from Electra, Ortam and the Cooperative. The remaining 25% of the holdings in the Partnership and in the GP are held by Sheva Mizrakot. We and Ellomay Manara did not pay any consideration upon the acquisition. On the same date, Ellomay Manara acquired Ortam’s holdings (50%) in the EPC and, as set forth above, immediately transferred such holdings to a subsidiary of Electra, which, following such transfer now holds 100% of the EPC. According to the various agreements executed in connection with the Manara PSP, we and Ellomay Manara are liable, jointly and severally, to all the monetary obligations set forth in said agreements.

 

In February 2023, the trustees of the entity that sold the rights in the Manara PSP to us filed a petition with the Israeli court requesting the following: (1) payment of NIS 1.5 million (approximately €0.374 million based on the Euro/NIS exchange rate at that time) in connection with a claimed debt of a third party, and (2) payment of linkage and interest differences in an amount of approximately NIS 0.672 million (approximately €0.168 million based on the Euro/NIS exchange rate at that time) with respect to an amount that was already paid to the seller and to Electra, claiming that the payment was delayed due to disagreements between the seller and Electra and missing approvals. Based on the parties’ agreement, a mediation process is ongoing. In light of the preliminary stage of the proceedings and based on the advice of our legal counsel, it is too early to estimate the outcome of the mediation process and the legal proceedings.

 

In December 2018, we executed a settlement agreement, or the A.R.Z. Settlement Agreement, with A.R.Z. Electricity Ltd., or A.R.Z Electricity, an Israeli private company that at the time held 33.33% of Sheva Mizrakot Ltd. The A.R.Z. Settlement Agreement resolves a claim made by A.R.Z. Electricity and Mr. Raanan Aloni against us and our affiliates, in connection with the Manara PSP, and other disputes between such parties concerning the Manara PSP. In connection with the Manara PSP Project Finance and based on the A.R.Z. Settlement Agreement, A.R.Z. Electricity was required to provide its indirect share of equity investment and financing to the Manara PSP. Due to the failure to provide the required funds, Ellomay Water Plants Holdings (2014) Ltd., the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary that holds 75% of Ellomay PS, overtook A.R.Z. Electricity’s holdings in Sheva Mizrakot (33%) and, as a result, the Company’s indirect holdings in the Manara PSP increased from 75% to 83.333%.

 

As of December 31, 2023, we paid an amount of approximately NIS 24 million (approximately €6 million) on account of the consideration upon the acquisition and will be required to pay certain parties additional amounts (including interest) in certain installments, which in the aggregate are not expected to exceed an amount of NIS 6.4 million (approximately €1.6 million).

 

96

 

 

Tariff Approval

 

On December 31, 2020, Ellomay PS received the tariff approval for the Manara PSP from the Israeli Electricity Authority that regulates the tariffs and formulas for purchasing energy from a pumped storage manufacturer connected to the transmission network for a period of 20 years beginning on the date of receipt of the permanent production license. The tariff approval became effective following the financial closing of the Manara PSP in February 2021.

 

On February 11, 2021, the Manara PSP complied with the conditions precedent under the Manara PSP Conditional License following the financial closing of the Manara PSP Project Finance and the execution of the Manara PSP EPC and O&M Agreements. For more information see “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay; Recent Developments.” The construction process of the Manara PSP is expected to be highly complex and includes various engineering and other challenges, includes planning and conducting of a comprehensive investigation to characterize the variety of soils and rocks at the construction sites. In accordance with the infrastructure characteristics and the seismic risks that exist on site, stability calculations need to be performed on the basis of which instructions are given for the planning and execution of the reservoirs.

 

Pumped Storage Power Plants

 

Pumped storage is a form of renewable energy based on hydropower. A pumped storage power plant is capable of generating electric energy on demand and is one of the most veteran and widely applied technologies used worldwide for energy storage. The technology has been in use for more than 100 years, providing over 100,000 MW around the world.

 

The technology allows storing available energy for later use. Pumped storage plants store electricity during low demand periods and release it back to the grid during peak demand periods, thereby utilizing the gap in production costs to stabilize the grid’s voltage and regulation.

 

The plant is a hydro-storage system comprised of upper and lower water reservoirs, connected by an underground water pressure pipe: during low demand – pumping water from the lower reservoir for energy storage, and during peak demand – releasing water from the upper reservoir for energy production. The technology utilizes excess electricity production capacity during low demand hours to increase supply during peak demand hours, thus providing available reserves to be used by the grid dispatcher during peak and low demand periods. 

 

Pumped storage also allows optimal grid stability functionality by providing a combination of low latency, high power and high energy response (~90 sec).

 

The need for electricity storage solutions in the Israeli electricity market

 

The purpose of pumped storage systems is to stabilize the grid’s voltage and to create optimization in the management of the electricity grid. The demand for electricity, in the Israeli market as well as in other electricity markets, is influenced by many factors, including the weather, time of day and day of the week, and the rise in the standard of living in Israel.

 

97

 

 

In order to meet the growing electricity needs in Israel, and being able to provide electricity to consumers, the IEC constantly over-generates energy. The over-generation of energy is the result of using low flexibility energy sources (coal and gas). The demand curve is generally characterized by peak demand, usually in summer afternoons or winter evenings, and low demand during night times. During low demand periods, the majority of energy is produced by base-load plants at relatively cheap production costs, while at peak demand times, more expensive energy sources are added.

 

In recent years, the use of renewable, volatile energy sources has increased, thus increasing the grid’s volatility and the need for storing energy during low-demand hours as a way to create demand when renewable energy is produced and releasing it during peak-consumer demand hours.

 

The Manara PSP

 

The Manara Cliff is in Northern Israel, just south of the city of Kiryat Shmona. According to the construction plans of the Manara PSP, the plant will deploy water reservoirs built on agricultural land. The upper water reservoir will be located near Kibbutz Manara and the lower water reservoir will be based on an existing reservoir near Kiryat Shmona belonging to a local water cooperative.

 

Ellomay PS entered into land lease option agreements with the site holders, in order to secure land use rights for the duration of the construction phase and the commercial operation of the Manara PSP, and a water supply agreement with the Galil Elyon Water Association, in order to secure water supply for the project for the duration of the commercial operation.

 

Ellomay PS also holds detailed geological and hydrological surveys, and an environmental impact assessment.

 

Competition

 

According to the current applicable regulation, the Manara PSP cannot enter into electricity sale agreements with private customers, and will therefor provide 100% of its available capacity and energy to the System Manager (Noga, formerly a business unit of IEC that was spun off from IEC according to government decision), pursuant to a power purchase agreement. The System Manager is obligated to purchase availability and energy from any power plant whose commercial operation was approved by the applicable regulation.

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations on the Manara PSP

 

The Manara PSP is subject to regulations applicable to energy producers and power plants in general, including the Electricity Market Regulations, and to pumped storage producers in particular. For more information concerning the Israeli electricity market and regulation see “The Israeli Electricity Market; Competition” and “Material Effects of Government Regulations on Dorad’s Operations” under “Ellomay Luzon Energy and the Dorad Power Plant” above.

 

The Manara PSP was announced by the Israeli Government as a national infrastructure project. National Infrastructure Plan 41A (which updated National Infrastructure Plan 41), which establishes the planning principles for the Manara PSP.

 

98

 

 

Licenses

 

The Manara PSP was initially granted a conditional license by the Israeli Electricity Authority for the construction of a pumped storage power plant with a capacity of 340 MW, or the Prior Conditional License. On December 4, 2017, the Israeli Electricity Authority announced the reduction of the capacity stipulated in the Prior Conditional License from 340 MW to 156 MW. The reduced capacity was based on the remaining portion of the quota for pumped storage projects in Israel as determined by the Israeli Government and implemented by the Israeli Electricity Authority, which is currently 800 MW, after deducting the capacity already allocated to two projects that were at the time in more advanced stages than the Manara PSP. On February 26, 2020, Ellomay PS retracted the Prior Conditional License issued to it, which was due to expire on February 28, 2020 because Ellomay PS did not reach financial closing by such date as was required under the milestones included in the Prior Conditional License. On the same date, Ellomay PS filed an application for a new similar conditional license for a pumped storage plant with a capacity of 156 MW.

 

On June 17, 2020, the Israeli Minister of Energy executed the Manara PSP Conditional License, following the retraction of the previous conditional license, which permits Ellomay PS to construct the Manara PSP. The Manara PSP Conditional License includes several conditions precedent to the entitlement of Ellomay PS to receive an electricity production license. The Manara PSP Conditional License is valid for a period of seventy-two (72) months commencing from the date of its approval by the Minister of Energy, subject to compliance by Ellomay PS with the milestones set forth therein and subject to the other provisions set forth therein (including achieving financial closing, the provision of guarantees and the construction of the pumped storage hydro power plant). As noted above, on February 11, 2021, Ellomay PS complied with the project finance milestone under the Manara PSP Conditional License. According to applicable law, the 72 months validity period may be extended for additional periods of 12 months each if required and subject to the Minister’s approval at such time. Such extension may result in forfeiture of the license guarantee which value currently amounts to approximately NIS 4.1 million (approximately €1 million). The guarantee amount is linked to the USD and is reduced over time upon fulfillment of certain interim project milestones.

 

The licenses issued by the Israeli Electricity Authority include several milestones, which the license holder must meet in a timely manner in order to be eligible for a permanent license to produce electricity. In the event the license holder does not meet the milestones within certain timeframes set out under applicable electricity regulations, the Israeli Electricity Authority has the authority to revoke the license.    

 

The Israeli Water Authority granted to Ellomay PS a water plant license, and approved the water rationing needed for the preliminary filling of the reservoirs prior to commencement of commercial operation, and for the continued operation of the power plant. The water plant license was granted to Ellomay PS in August 2015 and was since renewed from time to time.

 

Tariffs

 

In November 2009, the Israeli Electricity Authority published the regulatory framework for pumped storage power plants, or the PS Regulatory Framework, which has since been amended a few times. The PS Regulatory Framework establishes the following principles:

 

a.Purchase of availability from a licensed private producer;

 

b.Payment for availability, start-ups and dynamic benefits;

 

c.The plant is required to be under the full control of the system manager (currently the IEC);

 

d.Capital and operational tariff for availability – including exchange rate linkage, indexes and interests;

 

e.During the first twenty years of its operation, the plant shall be entitled to capital and operational tariff set out in the tariff approval; and

 

f.Bonuses and fines mechanism, based on standard technical operational parameters.

 

On December 31, 2020, the Manara PSP received a tariff approval from the Israeli Electricity Authority that regulates the tariffs and formulas for purchasing energy from a pumped storage manufacturer connected to the transmission network for a period of 20 years beginning on the date of receipt of the permanent production license. The tariff approval became effective following the financial closing of the Manara PSP in February 2021.

 

99

 

 

Material Effects of Government Regulations – General

 

Investment Company Act of 1940

 

Regulation under the Investment Company Act governs almost every aspect of a registered investment company’s operations and can be very onerous. The Investment Company Act, among other things, limits an investment company’s capital structure, borrowing practices and transactions between an investment company and its affiliates, and restricts the issuance of traditional options, warrants and incentive compensation arrangements, imposes requirements concerning the composition of an investment company’s board of directors and requires shareholder approval of certain policy changes. In addition, contracts made in violation of the Investment Company Act are void.

 

An investment company organized outside of the United States is not permitted to register under the Investment Company Act without an order from the SEC permitting it to register and, prior to being permitted to register, it is not permitted to publicly offer or promote its securities in the United States.

 

We do not believe that our current asset structure results in our being deemed to be an “investment company.” Specifically, we do not believe that our holdings in our PV Plants or our WtE plants would be considered “investment securities,” as we control our PV Plants (other than the Talasol PV Plant) and our WtE plants via wholly-owned subsidiaries. In addition, despite minority holder protective rights granted to the minority shareholders of the Talasol PV Plant and the Manara PSP, including several rights which effectively require the unanimous consent of all shareholders, we believe that our interests in the Talasol PV Plant and the Manara PSP do not constitute “investment securities” given, among other things, our majority shareholder and board membership status. The current fair value of our holdings in Ellomay Luzon Energy and other relevant assets do not in our judgment exceed 40% of our aggregate assets, excluding our assets held in cash and cash equivalents. If we were deemed to be an “investment company,” we would not be permitted to register under the Investment Company Act without an order from the SEC permitting us to register because we are incorporated outside of the United States and, prior to being permitted to register, we would not be permitted to publicly offer or promote our securities in the United States. Even if we were permitted to register, it would subject us to additional commitments and regulatory compliance. Investments in cash and cash equivalents or in other assets that are not deemed to be “investment securities” might not be as favorable to us as other investments we might make if we were not potentially subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. We seek to conduct our operations, including by way of investing our cash and cash equivalents, to the extent possible, so as not to become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. In addition, because we are actively engaged in exploring and considering strategic investments and business opportunities, and in fact have entered the Italian and Spanish photovoltaic power plants markets through controlling investments, we do not believe that we are currently engaged in “investment company” activities or business.

 

Shell Company Status

 

Following the consummation of sale of our previous wide format printers business in 2008 and until we commenced our renewable energy business in 2010, we ceased conducting any operating activity and substantially all of our assets consisted of cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly, we may have been deemed to be a “shell company,” defined by Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during such period as (1) a company that has no or nominal operations; and (2) either: (i) no or nominal assets; (ii) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (iii) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets.

 

100

 

 

Our characterization as a former “Shell Company” subjects us to various restrictions and requirements under the U.S. Securities Laws. For example, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 144(i) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shares issued by us at the time we were deemed to be a “shell company” and thereafter can only be resold pursuant to the general provisions of Rule 144 subject to the additional conditions in Rule 144(i), including that we have filed all reports and other materials required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, during the twelve month period preceding the use of Rule 144 for resale of such shares. This continuing restriction may limit our ability to, among other things, raise capital via the private placement of our shares.

 

C. Organizational Structure

 

Our Spanish PV Plants are held by: (i) Rodríguez I Parque Solar, S.L., (ii) Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L., (iii) Seguisolar S.L., (iv) Ellomay Spain S.L. and (v) Ellomay Solar S.L.U., all wholly-owned by Ellomay Luxembourg. The Talasol PV Plant is held by Talasol Solar S.L.U, of which 51% is owned by Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

Our Israeli PV Plant is held by Ellomay Talmei Yosef Ltd. (formerly Sun Team Talmei Yosef Ltd.), which is wholly-owned by Ellomay Sun Team Ltd. (formerly Sun Team Ltd.), which, in turn, is wholly-owned by Ellomay Holdings Talmei Yosef Ltd. (formerly Sun Team Group Ltd.), which is wholly-owned by us. For more information concerning an agreement to sell our holdings in our Israeli PV Plant see above under “Recent Developments.”

 

We hold our Ellomay Luzon Energy shares through Ellomay Clean Energy Limited Partnership, an Israeli limited partnership whose general partner is Ellomay Clean Energy Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel and wholly-owned by us.

 

Our WtE plants located in the Netherlands are held by: (i) Groen Gas Goor B.V., (ii) Groen Gas Oude–Tonge B.V. and (iii) Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., all wholly-owned by Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

We hold the rights in connection with the Manara PSP through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ellomay Water Plants Holdings (2014) Ltd., which indirectly owns 75% of the rights in Ellomay PS and through our 33.333% holdings in Sheva Mizrakot, which owns 25% of Ellomay PS.

 

Our rights in connection with PV Plants that have finished construction in Italy are held by: (i) Ellomay Solar Italy One SRL (expected to be connected to the grid during the second quarter of 2024) and (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL (connected to the grid during in February 2024), all wholly-owned by Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

Our rights in connection with PV Plants that have reached “Ready to Build” status in Italy are held by: (i) Ellomay Solar Italy Four SRL, (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy Five SRL, (iii) Ellomay Solar Italy Seven SRL, (iv) Ellomay Solar Italy Nine SRL and (v) Ellomay Solar Italy Ten SRL, all wholly-owned by Ellomay Luxembourg.

 

Our rights in connection with PV Plants that have reached “Ready to Build” status in the USA are held by our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries: (i) Fairfield Solar Project, LLC, (ii) Malakoff Solar I LLC, (iii) Malakoff Solar II, LLC, (iv) Mexia Solar I, LLC, (v) Mexia Solar II, LLC and (vi) Talco Solar, LLC.

 

101

 

 

D. Property, Plants and Equipment

 

Our office space of approximately 360 square meters is located in Tel Aviv, Israel. This lease currently expires in February 2025. We sub-lease a small part of our office space to a company controlled by Mr. Shlomo Nehama, at a price per square meter based on the price that we pay under our leases. This sub-lease agreement was approved by our Board of Directors.

 

Our PV Plants are located in Spain and Israel. Pursuant to the building right agreements executed by the majority of our subsidiaries that hold our PV Plants, our subsidiaries own the PV Plants and received the right to maintain the PV Plants on the land on which they are located, or the Lands. The ownership of the Lands under the leasing agreements remains with the relevant owners of the Lands who are the grantors of the building rights under the respective building right agreements. The following table provides information with respect to the Lands of our operational PV Plants:

 

PV Plant   Size of Property   Location   Owners of the PV Plants/Lands
“Rinconada II”   81,103 m²   Municipality of Córdoba, Andalusia, Spain   PV Plant owned by Ellomay Spain S.L. Land held by owners and leased to Ellomay Spain S.L.
“Rodríguez I”   65,600 m2   Lorca Municipality, Murcia Region, Spain  

PV Plant owned by Rodríguez I Parque Solar, S.L. Lease Agreement executed between the owners and Rodríguez I Parque Solar, S.L.

 

 

“Rodríguez II”   50,300 m2   Lorca Municipality, Murcia Region, Spain  

PV Plant owned by Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L. Lease Agreement executed between the owners and Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L.

 

“Fuente Librilla”  

64,000 m2

 

  Fuente Librilla Municipality, Murcia Region, Spain  

PV Plant owned by Seguisolar S.L. Lease Agreement executed between owners and Seguisolar S.L.

 

“Talasol”   6,040,000 m2   Talavan (Cáceres) – Extremadura Region, Spain   PV Plant owned by Talasol. Lease Agreements executed with the Talavan Municipality, which owns the land
“Talmei Yosef”   164,000 m2   Talmei Yosef, Israel  

Lease Agreement executed with the entity that leased the property from the ILA.

 

“Ellomay Solar”   706,400 m2   Talavan (Cáceres) – Extremadura Region, Spain   PV Plant owned by Ellomay Solar S.L.U. Lease Agreement executed between owners and Ellomay Solar S.L.U.
“Ellomay Solar Two”   96,319 m2   Lazio Region, Italy   PV Plant owned by Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL. Lease Agreement executed between owners and Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL.

 

Our Italian subsidiaries that are developing and constructing PV projects executed long-term lease agreements in connection with the land on which the PV plants developed and constructed by such subsidiaries will be located. For further information concerning the lease agreements of our PV Plants and of the Italian subsidiaries, see the summaries of the lease agreements included as Exhibits 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.16 and 4.21 under “Item 19: Exhibits.”

 

102

 

 

The land on which our WtE plants are located is owned by the relevant project companies. The land on which the Manara PSP is being constructed is leased from various Israeli cooperatives. Manara PS also entered into a development agreement with the ILA in connection with the land. A summary of the lease agreement and development agreement is included as Exhibit 4.19 under “Item 19: Exhibits.”

 

Our subsidiaries in the United States that are developing and constructing PV projects executed long-term lease agreements in connection with the land on which the PV plants is or will be constructed by such subsidiaries. The lease agreements are included as Exhibits 4.22 and 4.23 under “Item 19: Exhibits.”

 

For more information concerning the use of the properties in connection with the PV Plants, the WtE plants and the Manara PSP, see “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay” and “Item 4.B: Business Overview” above.

 

ITEM 4A: Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

 

The following discussion and analysis is based on and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, and the other financial information included in this Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current plans, estimates and beliefs and involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Report. For discussion related to cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 2023.

 

General

 

We are involved in the initiation, development, construction and production of renewable and clean energy projects in Europe, USA and Israel. We indirectly own eight PV plants that are operating and connected to their respective national grids as follows: (i) five PV plants in Spain with an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 35.9 MWp, (ii) 51% of Talasol, which owns a PV plant with an installed capacity of 300 MW in the municipality of Talaván, Cáceres, Spain, (iii) one PV plant in Israel with an installed capacity of approximately 9 MWp and (iv) Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL, that owns a PV plant with installed capacity of 4.95 MW in the Lazio Region, Italy. In addition, we indirectly own: (i) 9.375% of Dorad, which owns an approximate 850MWp dual-fuel operated power plant in the vicinity of Ashkelon, Israel, (ii) Ellomay Solar Italy One SRL that owns a PV plant with installed capacity of 14.8 MW in the Lazio Region, Italy, which is ready for connection to the grid, (iii) Ellomay Solar Italy Four SRL (15.06 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Five SRL (87.2 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Seven SRL (54.77 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Nine SRL (8 MW) and Ellomay Solar Italy Ten SRL (18 MW) that are developing PV projects in the Lazio Region, Italy that have reached “ready to build” status, (iv) Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Nm3 per year, respectively, (v) 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is constructing the Manara PSP, a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant In the Manara Cliff, (vi) Fairfield Solar Project, LLC, Malakoff Solar I LLC and Malakoff Solar II, LLC that are constructing PV projects with installed capacity of 13.44 MW, 6.96 MW and 6.96 MW, respectively, in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, and (v) Mexia Solar I, LLC, Mexia Solar II, LLC and Talco Solar, LLC that are developing PV projects with installed capacity of 5.6 MW, 5.6 MW and 10.3 MW, respectively, in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas, and have reached “ready to build” status. We also initiate and develop additional PV projects in Italy, USA, Spain and Israel. See “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay” and “Item 4.B: Business Overview” for more information.

 

103

 

 

We generate revenue from the sale of electricity produced by our renewable energy plants and from the sale of green certificates to third parties in Spain and the Netherlands (of which prices significantly increased during 2022, mainly due to supporting regulation attempting to reduce the impact of carbon emissions). During the year ended December 31, 2023, we generated revenues from our PV operations in Spain and Israel and from our WtE operations in the Netherlands. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we had several projects under construction, including PV projects in Italy and Texas, USA, and the Manara PSP in northern Israel. We mainly finance our operations and development efforts from our ongoing operations and by the issuance of corporate debt in the Israeli market, with the remainder being funded by project finance obtained on a per-project or per-portfolio basis and expect to finance our PV development efforts in the USA by raising funds from tax equity investors.

 

Changes in the Fair Value of the Talasol PPA

 

The Talasol PPA experienced a high volatility due to the substantial increase in electricity prices in Europe since the commencement of the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. In accordance with hedge accounting standards, the changes in the Talasol PPA’s fair value are recorded in our shareholders’ equity through a hedging reserve and not through the accumulated deficit/retained earnings. The changes do not impact our consolidated net profit/loss or our consolidated cash flows. As we control Talasol, the total impact of the changes in fair value of the Talasol PPA (including the minority share) is consolidated into our financial statements and total equity. Alongside the increase in fair value of the liability in connection with the Talasol PPA, the increase in the electricity prices had, and is expected to continue to have for as long as the prices remain relatively high, a positive impact on Talasol’s revenues from the sale of the capacity that is not subject to the Talasol PPA, resulting in an expected increase in Talasol’s net income and cash flows.

 

Potential Sale of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant

 

On December 31, 2023, we executed an agreement to sell our holdings in the Talmei Yosef PV Plant. For more information, see “Item 4.A: History and Development of Ellomay; Recent Developments.”

 

In connection with the expected sale of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant, we present the results of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant as a discontinued operation and the results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 are adjusted accordingly. The Talmei Yosef PV Plant was presented in our financial results as a financial asset, in accordance with IFRIC 12 under IFRS, and since its acquisition, we recognized relatively high profits through its ownership. Accordingly, although the consideration expected to be received for the Talmei Yosef PV Plant reflects a market value higher than the price invested by us in its acquisition, due to the accounting treatment under IFRIC 12, we recognized a net loss of approximately €1.8 million in connection with the expected sale.

 

A. Operating Results

 

Segments

 

Our reportable segments, which form our strategic business units, are as follows: (i) PV Plants presented per plant or geographical areas (Italy, Spain, Ellomay Solar, Talasol, USA and Israel), (ii) 9.375% indirect interest in Dorad, (iii) anaerobic digestion plants (Biogas) in the Netherlands, and (iv) pumped storage hydro power plant in Manara, Israel. For more information see Note 22 to our annual financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

 

104

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

The results of operations included in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 only partially include the results of the Ellomay Solar PV Plant (since June 24, 2022). In addition, the results for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 do not include the results of the PV Plant owned by Ellomay Solar Italy Two SRL, which was connected to the grid in February 2024. Therefore, our past results are not indicative of our results in the future.

 

   For the year ended
December 31,
 
   2023   2022* 
   Unaudited   Audited 
   € in thousands
(except per share data)
 
Revenues   48,834    52,241 
Operating expenses   (22,861)   (23,671)
Depreciation and amortization expenses   (16,012)   (15,580)
Gross profit   9,961    12,990 
Project development costs   (4,465)   (3,784)
General and administrative expenses   (5,283)   (5,855)
Share of profits of equity accounted investee   4,320    1,206 
Operating profit   4,533    4,557 
Financing income   8,747    6,443 
Financing income in connection with derivatives and warrants, net   251    605 
Financing expenses in connection with projects finance   (6,077)   (6,008)
Financing expenses in connection with debentures   (3,876)   (2,130)
Interest expenses on minority shareholder loan   (2,014)   (1,529)
Other financing expenses   (588)   (857)
Financing expenses, net   (3,557)   (3,476)
Profit before taxes on income   976    1,081 
Tax benefit (taxes on income)   1,436    (1,652)
Profit (loss) from continuing operations   2,412    (571)
Profit (loss) from discontinued operation (net of tax)   (1,787)   711 
Profit for the period   625    140 
Profit (loss) attributable to:          
Owners of the Company   2,219    (357)
Non-controlling interests   (1,594)   497 
Profit for the period   625    140 
Other comprehensive income (loss) items that after initial recognition in comprehensive income (loss) were or will be transferred to profit or loss:          
Foreign currency translation differences for foreign operations   (7,949)   (7,829)
Effective portion of change in fair value of cash flow hedges   39,431    (65,542)**
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit or loss   9,794    38,080**
Total other comprehensive income (loss)   41,276    (35,291)
           
Total other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:          
Owners of the Company   16,931    (19,920)
Non-controlling interests   24,345    (15,371)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)   41,276    (35,291)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year   41,901    (35,151)
           
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year attributable to:          
Owners of the Company   19,150    (20,277)
Non-controlling interests   22,751    (14,874)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year   41,901    (35,151)
           
Basic net earning (loss) per share   0.17    (0.03)
Diluted net earning (loss) per share   0.17    (0.03)
Basic profit (loss) per share from continuing operations   0.31    (0.08)
Diluted profit (loss) per share from continuing operations   0.31    (0.08)
Basic profit (loss) per share from discontinued operation   (0.14)   0.05 
Diluted profit (loss) per share from discontinued operation   (0.14)   0.05 

 

 

*The results of the Talmei Yosef PV Plant have been reclassified as a discontinued operation and the results for the year ended December 31, 2022 have been adjusted accordingly.

**Reclassified.

 

105

 

 

Revenues

 

Revenues were approximately €48.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, down by 7% compared to approximately €52.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease mainly results from the decrease in electricity prices in Spain and from a curtailment of the electricity supply from our plants to the grid during June 2023 due to maintenance and upgrade work on the main transmission line between Spain and Portugal, which caused a decrease in revenues of approximately €1 million. We subsequently implemented a solution aimed at minimizing the impact of future similar curtailments. The decrease in revenues was partially offset by an increase in revenues from our biogas plants in the Netherlands, resulting mainly from increased production and an increase in the 2023 gas price, and from the connection to the grid of Ellomay Solar on June 24, 2022, upon which we commenced recognition of revenues.

 

Revenues by Segments

 

  Year ended December 31,   2023 vs. 2022 Change 
(Euro in thousands)  2023   2022      % 
Spanish PV segment   2,791    3,264    (473)   (14.49)
Ellomay Solar PV segment   4,051    3,597    454    12.62
Talasol PV Segment   24,971    32,740    (7,769)   (23.73)
Netherlands biogas segment   17,021    12,640    4,381    34.66

 

Spanish PV Segment. Revenues from our Spanish PV segment were approximately €2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease mainly resulted from the substantial decrease in electricity prices in Spain.

 

Ellomay Solar PV Segment. Revenues from our Ellomay Solar PV segment were approximately €4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase resulted from the connection to the Spanish grid of the Ellomay Solar PV Plant on June 24, 2022, upon which we commenced recognition of revenues, partially offset by the substantial decrease in electricity prices in Spain.

 

Talasol PV Segment. Revenues from our Talasol PV segment were approximately €25 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €32.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease mainly resulted from the substantial decrease in electricity prices in Spain.

 

Both the Talasol PV segment and the Ellomay Solar PV segment suffered from a curtailment of the electricity supply from their facilities to the grid during June 2023 due to maintenance and upgrade work on the main transmission line between Spain and Portugal, which caused a decrease in revenues of approximately €1 million. We subsequently implemented a solution aimed at minimizing the impact of future similar curtailments due to maintenance and upgrades to the national grid.

 

Netherlands Biogas Segment. Revenues from our Netherlands biogas segment were approximately €17 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in revenues is mainly due to increased production and an increase in the 2023 gas price.

 

106

 

 

Operating Expenses and Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

 

Operating expenses were approximately €22.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease mainly results from a decrease in payments under the Spanish RDL 17/2022, caused by a reduction in the electricity market price. RDL 17/2022 established the reduction of returns on the electricity generating activity of Spanish production facilities that do not emit greenhouse gases, accomplished through payments of a portion of the revenues by the production facilities to the Spanish government. As a result of the decrease in the electricity market price in Spain during the year ended December 31, 2023, the payments under RDL 17/2022 were lower compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease in operating expenses was partially offset by increased operating expenses in connection with our biogas operations in the Netherlands caused by higher production and the use of higher quality raw materials, and from the connection to the grid of Ellomay Solar PV Plant during June 2022, upon which we commenced recognition of expenses.

 

Depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately €16 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately €15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses is mainly attributable to the commencement of recognition of results of the Ellomay Solar PV Plant upon its connection to the Spanish grid in June 2022.

 

Operating Expenses by Segments

 

  Year ended December 31,   2023 vs. 2022 Change 
(Euro in thousands)