epwcf_20f
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
☐
|
|
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
☒
|
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020
OR
☐
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
OR
☐
|
|
SHELL
COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 000-30087
EMPOWER CLINICS INC. (formerly ADIRA ENERGY LTD.)
(Exact
name of Registrant specified in its charter)
CANADA
(Jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
Suite 505, 1771 Robson Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6G 1C9
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Contact Person: Steven McAuley
Address: Suite 505, 1771 Robson Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6G 1C9
Email: s.mcauley@empowerclinics.com
Telephone: (604) 789-2146
(Name,
Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company
Contact Person)
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Title
of Each Class
None
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
COMMON SHARES
(Title
of Class)
Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d)
of the Act: None
The
number of outstanding shares of the Company’s only class of
capital or common stock as at December 31, 2020
was 283,811,903 common
shares.
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
☐
No
☒
If this
is an annual report or a transition report, indicate by check mark
if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Yes
☐
No
☒
Indicate
by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes
☒
No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether Registrant has submitted electronically,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes
☒
No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging
growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
|
Large
accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer
☐
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ☒
|
Emerging growth
company ☐
|
|
If an
emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark which basis of accounting the Registrant has used to
prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S.
GAAP ☐
|
|
International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the
International Accounting Standards Board
☒
|
Other ☐
|
|
If
“other” has been checked in response to the previous
question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
Registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17
☐
Item
18 ☐
If this
is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
Yes
☐ No☒
(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST
FIVE YEARS)
Indicate
by checkmark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
YES
☐
NO
☐
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL
|
|
- 5
-
|
|
|
- 7
-
|
ITEM 1
-
|
|
- 7
-
|
ITEM 2
-
|
|
- 7
-
|
ITEM 3
-
|
|
- 7
-
|
A.
|
|
- 7
-
|
B.
|
|
- 8
-
|
C.
|
|
- 8
-
|
D.
|
|
- 8
-
|
ITEM
4
|
|
- 13
-
|
A.
|
|
- 13
-
|
B.
|
|
- 14
-
|
C.
|
|
- 16
-
|
D.
|
|
- 17
-
|
ITEM
5
|
|
- 17
-
|
A.
|
|
- 17
-
|
B.
|
|
- 19
-
|
C.
|
|
- 23
-
|
D.
|
|
- 23
-
|
E.
|
|
- 23
-
|
F.
|
|
- 24
-
|
G.
|
|
- 24
-
|
ITEM
6
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
- 24
-
|
A.
|
|
- 24
-
|
B.
|
|
- 27
-
|
C.
|
|
- 28
-
|
D.
|
|
-30
-
|
E.
|
|
-30
-
|
ITEM
7
|
|
- 32
-
|
A.
|
|
- 32
-
|
B.
|
|
- 33
-
|
C.
|
|
- 33
-
|
ITEM
8
|
|
- 33
-
|
A.
|
|
- 33
-
|
B.
|
|
- 34
-
|
ITEM
9
|
|
- 34
-
|
ITEM
10
|
|
- 34
-
|
A.
|
|
- 34
-
|
B.
|
|
- 34
-
|
C.
|
|
- 34
-
|
D.
|
|
- 35
-
|
E.
|
|
- 36
-
|
F.
|
|
- 41
-
|
G.
|
|
- 41
-
|
H.
|
|
- 41
-
|
I.
|
|
- 41
-
|
ITEM
11
|
|
- 41
-
|
A.
|
|
- 41
-
|
B.
|
|
- 41
-
|
C.
|
|
- 41
-
|
ITEM
12
|
|
- 42
-
|
Part II
|
|
- 43
-
|
ITEM
13
|
|
- 43
-
|
ITEM
14
|
|
- 43
-
|
ITEM
15
|
|
- 43
-
|
ITEM
16A
|
|
- 44
-
|
ITEM
16B
|
|
- 44
-
|
ITEM
16C
|
|
- 44
-
|
ITEM
16D
|
|
- 45
-
|
ITEM
16E
|
|
- 45
-
|
ITEM
16F
|
|
- 45
-
|
ITEM
16G
|
|
- 45
-
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM
17
|
|
- 46
-
|
ITEM
18
|
|
- 46
-
|
ITEM
19
|
|
- 97
-
|
GENERAL
This
Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange
Act.
In this
Form 20-F, references to:
“Adira”
means Adira Energy Ltd., a Canadian federal corporation (formerly
AMG Oil Ltd.);
“BCBCA” means the Business Corporations Act
(British Columbia);
“CBCA” means the Canadian Business Corporations
Act;
“CBD” means Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive
constituent of cannabis which contains less than 0.3% THC
content;
“Empower” means Empower Clinics Inc., a
corporation incorporated pursuant to the BCBCA;
“IFRS” means generally accepted accounting
principles approved by the IASB;
“IASB” means the International Accounting
Standards Board;
“EHC CA” means Empower Healthcare Corp.,
previously S.M.A.A.R.T Holdings Inc., a corporation incorporated
pursuant to the BCBCA;
“SMAART US” means S.M.A.A.R.T Holdings Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of EHC CA incorporated pursuant to the laws
of Nevada;
“EHC US” means Empower Healthcare Corp., a
wholly owned subsidiary of EHC CA incorporated pursuant to the laws
of Oregon;
“THC” means tetrahydrocannabinol, a chemical
responsible for most of marijuana's psychological
effects;
“Transaction” means EHC CA completing the
acquisition with Adira, pursuant to which EHC CA amalgamated with
1149770 B.C. Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Adira, to form
Empower Healthcare Corporation, resulting in the indirect
acquisition by EHC CA of all of the issued and outstanding
securities of Adira
“We”,
“us”, “our”, and the “Company” means Empower, a
Company currently listed for trading on the Canadian Securities
Exchange and Frankfurt Stock Exchange
Empower
and its subsidiaries have historically used U.S. dollar as their
reporting currency. All references in this document to
“dollars” or “$” are to United States
dollars and all references to “CDN$” are to Canadian
dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
Except
as noted, the information set forth in this Form 20-F is as of
December 31, 2020 and all information included in this document
should only be considered correct as of such date.
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Much of
the information included in this Form 20-F includes or is based
upon estimates, projections or other “forward looking
statements”. Such forward looking statements include any
projections or estimates made by us and our management in
connection with our business operations. These statements relate to
future events or our future financial performance. Generally, any
statements contained herein that are not statements of historical
facts may be forward–looking statements. In some cases you
can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as
“may”, “should”, “expects”,
“plans”, “anticipates”,
“believes”, “estimates”,
“predicts”, “potential” or “continue
or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology.
While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon
which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our
current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual
results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any
estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future
performance suggested herein. Such estimates, projections or other
forward looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties
and other factors, including the risks in the section titled
“Risk Factors”, below, that may cause our actual
results, levels of activities, performance or achievements to be
materially different from any future results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. We caution the reader that important
factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could
materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ
materially from the results expressed in any such estimates,
projections or other forward looking statements. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required
by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United
States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking
statements to conform those statements to actual
results.
In
particular, without limiting the generality of the foregoing
disclosure, the statements contained in Item 4.B. –
“Business Overview”, Item 5 – “Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects” and Item 11 –
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk” are inherently subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or
achievements to differ significantly.
PART I
|
IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
|
Not
applicable.
|
OFFER
STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not
applicable.
A.
Selected
Financial Data
The
selected historical information presented in the table below for
the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Empower for such
periods, and have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued
by the IASB. The selected financial information presented below
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto of Empower, and with the
information appearing under each of Item 4 –
“Information on the Company” and Item 5 –
“Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” of this
Form 20-F. All financial data presented in this Form 20-F are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the consolidated
financial statements and their notes.
U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share
data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
4,889,824
|
179,153
|
Total
Assets
|
9,230,219
|
1,555,719
|
Total
Liabilities
|
14,720,620
|
5,070,632
|
Total
Shareholders’ Deficit
|
(5,490,401)
|
(3,514,913)
|
|
|
|
Operating
Data
|
|
|
Revenues
|
3,209,196
|
2,031,581
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Direct clinics
expenses
|
1,193,560
|
826,276
|
Operating
expenses
|
3,947,408
|
2,933,619
|
Legal and
professional fees
|
1,394,571
|
1,015,743
|
Depreciation and
amortization expense
|
381,492
|
327,059
|
Share-based
payments
|
323,799
|
608,944
|
|
|
|
Loss from
operations
|
(4,031,634)
|
(3,680,060)
|
|
|
|
Other (gains)
expenses
|
13,034,677
|
621,603
|
|
|
|
Loss before income
taxes
|
(17,066,311)
|
(4,301,663)
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
recovery
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
Net loss and
comprehensive loss
|
(17,066,311)
|
(4,301,663)
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
net loss per share
|
(0.09)
|
(0.04)
|
Weighted average
number of common shares used in computing basic and diluted net
loss per share
|
182,331,616
|
117,289,366
|
Empower has never declared or paid any cash or other
dividends.
B. Capitalization
and Indebtedness
Not
applicable.
C. Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not
applicable.
An
investment in our securities is highly speculative and involves a
high degree of risk. Our Company may face a variety of risks that
may affect our operations or financial results and many of those
risks are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict.
Before investing in our company’s securities, investors
should carefully consider the following risks. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only risks and
uncertainties that we face or that an investment in our securities
entails. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our
business operations. Any of the following risks could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects
and results of operations. In that case, investors may lose all or
a part of their investment. The risks discussed below also include
forward-looking statements and the out actual results may differ
substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. See ‘‘Note Regarding Forward Looking
Statements” and “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects”.
Risks Associated with the Company
Our independent auditors have referred to circumstances which might
result in doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern,
which may hinder our ability to obtain future
financing.
At
December 31, 2020, the Company had a working capital deficiency of
$1,746,818 (December 31, 2019 - $4,185,359), has not yet achieved
profitable operations, has accumulated deficit of $30,078,630
(December 31, 2019 - $13,012,319). The Company has limited revenues
and the ability of the Company to ensure continuing operations is
dependent on the Company’s ability to raise sufficient funds
to finance development activities and expand sales. These
circumstances represent a material uncertainty that cast
substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern and ultimately the appropriateness of the use of
accounting principles applicable to a going concern.
Regulatory Risks.
The
Company operates in a new industry which is highly regulated and is
evolving rapidly. Sometimes new risks emerge and management may not
be able to predict all of them, or be able to predict how they may
cause actual results to be different from those contained in any
forward-looking statements. Failure to comply with the requirements
of the State licensing agencies within which the Company operates
would have a material adverse impact on the business, financial
condition and operating results of the Company.
The
Company will incur ongoing costs and obligations related to
regulatory compliance. Failure to comply with regulations may
result in additional costs for corrective measures, penalties or in
restrictions of our operations. In addition, changes in
regulations, more vigorous enforcement thereof or other
unanticipated events could require extensive changes to the
Company's operations, increased compliance costs or give rise to
material liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on
the business, results of operations and financial condition of the
Company.
The
industry is subject to extensive controls and regulations, which
may significantly affect the financial condition of market
participants. The marketability of any product may be affected by
numerous factors that are beyond the Company's control and which
cannot be predicted, such as changes to government regulations,
including those relating to taxes and other government levies which
may be imposed. Changes in government levies, including taxes,
could reduce the Company's earnings and could make future capital
investments or the Company's operations uneconomic. The industry is
also subject to numerous legal challenges, which may significantly
affect the financial condition of market participants and which
cannot be reliably predicted.
Change in Laws, Regulations and Guidelines.
The
Company operates in an industry that is not recognized as a legal
industry by the US Federal government.
The
Company operates a growing network of physician-staffed medical
cannabis clinics with a primary focus on enabling patients to
improve and protect their health. These clinics operate in those
states where the medicinal use of cannabis produces is
permitted.
The
Company’s operations are subject to a variety of laws,
regulations and guidelines relating to the manufacture, management,
transportation, storage and disposal of medical cannabis and also
including laws and regulations relating to health and safety,
privacy and the conduct of operations. While to the knowledge of
the Company's management, the Company is currently in compliance
with all such laws, changes to such laws, regulations and
guidelines due to matters beyond the control of the Company may
cause adverse effects to the Company's operations and the financial
condition of the Company.
The
industry is subject to extensive controls and regulations, which
may significantly affect the financial condition of market
participants. The marketability of any product may be affected by
numerous factors that are beyond the Company's control and which
cannot be predicted, such as changes to government regulations,
including those relating to taxes and other government levies which
may be imposed. Changes in government levies, including taxes,
could reduce the Company's earnings and could make future capital
investments or the Company's operations uneconomic.
Market Risks.
The
Company’s securities will trade on public markets and the
trading value thereof is determined by the evaluations, perceptions
and sentiments of both individual investors and the investment
community taken as a whole. Such evaluations, perceptions and
sentiments are subject to change, both in short term time horizons
and longer term time horizons. An adverse change in investor
evaluations, perceptions and sentiments could have a material
adverse outcome on the Company and its securities.
Price Risks.
Cannabis
is a developing market, likely subject to volatile and possibly
declining prices year over year, as a result of increased
competition. Because medical cannabis products are a newly
commercialized and regulated industry, historical price data is
either not available or not predictive of future price levels.
There may be downward pressure on the average prices for medical
cannabis products and that price volatility might not be favorable
to the Company. Pricing will depend on the number of patients who
gain physician approval to purchase medical cannabis. An adverse
change in the cannabis prices, or in investors’ beliefs about
trends in those prices, could have a material adverse outcome on
the Company and its securities.
Financing Risks.
The
Company will be dependent on raising capital through a combination
of debt and/or equity offerings. There can be no assurance that the
capital markets will remain favorable in the future, and/or that
the Company will be able to raise the financing needed to continue
its business at favorable terms, or at all. Restrictions on the
Company’s ability to finance could have a material adverse
outcome on the Company and its securities.
Key Personnel Risks.
The
Company’s efforts are dependent to a large degree on the
skills and experience of certain of its key personnel, including
the board of directors. The Company does not maintain “key
man” insurance policies on these individuals. Should the
availability of these persons’ skills and experience be in
any way reduced or curtailed, this could have a material adverse
outcome on the Company and its securities.
Competition.
There
is potential that the Company will face intense competition from
other companies, some of which can be expected to have more
financial resources, industry, manufacturing and marketing
experience than the Company. Additionally, there is potential that
the industry will undergo consolidation, creating larger companies
that may have increased geographic scope and other economies of
scale. Increased competition by larger, better-financed competitors
with geographic or other structural advantages could materially and
adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
To
remain competitive, the Company will require a continued level of
investment in research and development, marketing, sales and client
support. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain
research and development, marketing, sales and client support
efforts on a competitive basis which could materially and adversely
affect the business, financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
History of Net Losses; Accumulated Deficit; Lack of Revenue from
Operations.
The
Company has incurred net losses to date. The Company may continue
to incur losses. There is no certainty that the Company will
operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the
future.
Uninsurable risks.
The
Company may become subject to liability for events, against which
it cannot insure or against which it may elect not to insure. Such
events could result in substantial damage to property and personal
injury. The payment of any such liabilities may have a material,
adverse effect on the Company's financial position.
Financial Instruments & Other Instruments.
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities and due to related parties,
convertible debt and loans payable. Cash is classified as fair
value through profit or loss and recorded at fair value. Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, due to related parties and
shareholder’s loan are classified as other current
liabilities. The fair value of cash, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, and due to related parties are equal to their carrying
value due to their short-term maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it
is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to
significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these
financial instruments.
The
fair value of arms-length financial instruments approximates their
carrying value due to the relatively short-term to
maturity.
Risks Associated with Our Business
Our future success will be dependent on additional states
legalizing medical marijuana.
Our
future success will depend on the continued development of the
medical marijuana market, and on our ability to penetrate that
market. According to the Marijuana Policy Project, a
pro-legalization group, medical marijuana is legal in 29 states and
Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and Guam. However, continued
development of the medical marijuana market is dependent upon
continued legislative authorization of marijuana at the state level
for medical purposes and, in certain states, including Oregon,
based on the specifics of the legislation passed in that state, on
local governments authorizing a sufficient number of dispensaries.
Any number of factors could slow or halt the progress. Further,
progress, while encouraging, is not assured and the process
normally encounters set-backs before achieving success. While there
may be ample public support for legislative proposal, key support
must be created in the legislative committee or a bill may never
advance to a vote. Numerous factors impact the legislative process.
Any one of these factors could slow or halt the progress and
adoption of marijuana for medical purposes, which would limit the
market for our products and negatively impact our business and
revenues.
The alternative medicine industry faces strong
opposition.
It is
believed by many that well-funded, significant businesses may have
a strong economic opposition to the medical marijuana industry as
currently formed. We believe that the pharmaceutical industry
clearly does not want to cede control of any compound that could
become a strong selling drug. For example, medical marijuana will
likely adversely impact the existing market for Marinol, the
current “marijuana pill” sold by mainstream
pharmaceutical companies. Further, the medical marijuana industry
could face a material threat from the pharmaceutical industry
should marijuana displace other drugs or simply encroach upon the
pharmaceutical industry’s market share for compounds such as
marijuana and its component parts. The pharmaceutical industry is
well funded with a strong and experienced lobby that eclipses the
funding of the medical marijuana movement. Any inroads the
pharmaceutical industry makes in halting or rolling back the
medical marijuana movement could have a detrimental impact on the
market for our products and thus on our business, operations and
financial condition.
Marijuana remains illegal under U.S. federal law.
Marijuana
remains illegal under U.S. federal law. It is a Schedule-I
controlled substance. Even in those jurisdictions in which the use
of medical marijuana has been legalized at the state level, its
prescription is a violation of federal law. The United States
Supreme Court has ruled in United States v. Oakland Cannabis
Buyers’ Coop. and Gonzales v. Raich that it is the
federal government that has the right to regulate and criminalize
cannabis, even for medical purposes. Therefore, federal law
criminalizing the use of marijuana trumps state laws that legalize
its use for medicinal purposes.
According
to the Marijuana Policy Project, a pro-legalization group, medical
marijuana is legal in 29 states and Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico
and Guam. In addition, eight states and the District of Columbia
have legalized recreational cannabis use. In 2013, the U.S.
Department of Justice issued a memorandum (commonly referred to as
the “Cole
Memorandum”) to the U.S. Attorneys offices (federal
prosecutors) directing that federal prosecution of individuals and
businesses that rigorously comply with state regulatory provisions
in states that have strictly-regulated legalized medical or
recreational cannabis programs be given low priority. This federal
policy was reinforced by the passage of a federal omnibus spending
bill in 2014 (the “2014
Spending Bill”) that included the so-called
Rohrabacher–Farr amendment which prohibits the use of federal
funds to interfere in the implementation of state laws legalizing
cannabis and state medical marijuana laws. The Department of
Justice, which encompasses the Drug Enforcement Agency, was subject
to the 2014 Spending Bill.
The
Rohrabacher–Farr amendment remained in the federal omnibus
spending bill for the 2016 fiscal year that was signed into law by
President Obama on December 18, 2015. In September 2016, the
amendment was included in a short-term spending bill passed by
Congress and signed into law, which allowed it to remain in effect
through December 9, 2016 when it was again renewed pursuant to a
further short-term spending bill until April 28, 2017.
The
2014 Spending Bill has been cited as evidence of the development of
bi-partisan support in the U.S. Congress for legalizing the use of
cannabis. However, it remains unclear whether the federal
government will eventually repeal the federal prohibition on
cannabis, and there is no assurance that the Rohrabacher–Farr
amendment will be extended past April 28, 2017. Political and
regulatory risks also exist due to the recent election of Donald
Trump to the U.S. Presidency, and the appointment of Sen. Jeff
Sessions to the post of Attorney General with effect from February
9, 2017. Mr. Trump’s positions regarding marijuana are remain
unclear. However, Sen. Sessions has been a consistent opponent of
marijuana legalization efforts throughout his political career, and
has publicly commented that the Justice Department will commit to
enforcing federal laws on marijuana in an “appropriate
way”. It remains unclear what stance the Department of
Justice under the new administration might take toward legalization
efforts in U.S. states, but federal enforcement of the Controlled
Substances Act and other applicable laws is possible.
We may have difficulty accessing the service of U.S.
banks.
As
discussed above, the use of marijuana is illegal under federal law.
Therefore, there is a compelling argument that U.S. banks would not
be able to accept for deposit funds from the drug trade and
therefore would not be able to do business with our Company. On
February 14, 2014 the U.S. Department of the Treasury Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) released guidance to
banks “clarifying Bank Secrecy Act expectations for financial
institutions seeking to provide services to marijuana-related
businesses.” Under these guidelines, financial institutions
must submit a “suspicious activity report”
(“SAR”) as
required by federal money laundering laws. These marijuana related
SARs are divided into three categories: marijuana limited,
marijuana priority, and marijuana terminated, based on the
financial institution’s belief that the marijuana business
follows state law, is operating out of compliance with state law,
or where the banking relationship has been terminated. In the
United States, a bill has been tabled in Congress to grant banks
and other financial institutions immunity from federal criminal
prosecution for servicing marijuana-related businesses if the
underlying marijuana business follows state law. This bill has not
been passed and there can be no assurance with that it will be
passed in its current form or at all.
In
addition, U.S. Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) has recently re-introduced
proposed legislation in Congress that contemplates, among other
things, the removal of marijuana from the Controlled Substance Act
schedules and regulate it like alcohol.
While
these are positive developments in this regard, there can be no
assurance this legislation will be successful, that even with the
FinCEN guidance that banks will decide to do business with medical
marijuana retailers, or that in the absence of actual legislation
state and federal banking regulators will not strictly enforce
current prohibitions on banks handling funds generated from an
activity that is illegal under federal law. If, in the future, we
are unable to open accounts and otherwise use the service of U.S.
banks, our ability to carry on business in the United States may
become untenable.
Our Company is organized under the
laws of Canada.
Our
Company is a Canadian corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations
Act and as such, its corporate structure, the rights
and obligations of shareholders and its corporate bodies may be
different from those of the home countries of international
investors. Furthermore, non-Canadian residents may find it more
difficult and costly to exercise shareholder rights. International
investors may also find it costly and difficult to effect service
of process and enforce their civil liabilities against us or some
of our directors, controlling persons and officers.
Risks Associated with our Common Shares
The market price of the common shares of our corporation may be
volatile
The
market price of our common shares may experience significant
volatility. Numerous factors, including many over which we have no
control, may have a significant impact on the market price of our
common shares including, among other things: regulatory
developments in target markets affecting us, our customers or our
competitors; actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly
operating results; changes in financial estimates or other material
comments by securities analysts relating to us, our competitors or
the industry in general; announcements by other companies in the
industry relating to their operations, strategic initiatives,
financial condition or financial performance or to the industry in
general; announcements of acquisitions or consolidations involving
industry competitors or industry suppliers; addition or departure
of our executive officers; and sales or perceived sales of
additional common shares of Empower. In addition, the stock market
in recent years has experienced extreme price and trading volume
fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to
the operating performance of individual companies. These broad
market fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the common
shares of Empower regardless of our operating performance. There
can be no assurance that an active market for the common shares
will be established or persist and the share price may
decline.
The value of securities issued by us might be affected by matters
not related to our operating performance.
The
value of securities issued by us may be affected by matters not
related to our operating performance or underlying value for
reasons that include the following: general economic conditions in
Canada, the US and globally; industry conditions, including
fluctuations in the price of cannabis flower; governmental
regulation of the cannabis industry; fluctuation in foreign
exchange or interest rates; stock market volatility and market
valuations; competition for, among other things, capital,
acquisition of skilled personnel; the need to obtain required
approvals from regulatory authorities; worldwide supplies and
prices of and demand for cannabis flower and derivatives; political
conditions and developments in Canada, the US, and globally;
revenue and operating results failing to meet expectations in any
particular period; investor perception of the cannabis industry;
limited trading volume of our common shares; change in governmental
regulations; announcements relating to our business or the business
of our competitors; our liquidity; and our ability to raise
additional funds.
In the
past, companies that have experienced volatility in their value
have been the subject of securities class action litigation. We
might become involved in securities class action litigation in the
future. Such litigation often results in substantial costs and
diversion of management’s attention and resources and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operation.
An investment in our Company will likely be diluted.
We may
issue a substantial number of our common shares without investor
approval to raise additional financing and we may consolidate the
current outstanding common shares. Any such issuance or
consolidation of our securities in the future could reduce an
investor’s ownership percentage and voting rights in us and
further dilute the value of your investment.
We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We do
not intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future, as we
anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings in the
development and growth of our business. Therefore, investors will
not receive any funds unless they sell their common shares, and
shareholders may be unable to sell their common shares on favorable
terms or at all. We cannot assure you of a positive return on
investment or that you will not lose the entire amount of your
investment in our common shares. Prospective investors seeking or
needing dividend income or liquidity should not purchase our common
shares.
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
We are
a Canadian corporation existing under the CBCA which conducts
business as a medical cannabis clinic company with operations in
the United States of America, as more particularly described below
in Item 4B – “Business Overview”.
A. History
and Development of the Company
Name
Our
legal and commercial name is Empower Clinics Inc.
Principal Office
Our
principal office is located at Suite 505, 1771 Robson Street
Vancouver, BC V6G 1C9.
Incorporation
We are
a Canadian corporation existing under the CBCA.
Our
common shares are registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange
Act. Our current trading symbol on the OTC Bulletin Board (the
“OTCQB”) is
“EPWCF” and our current trading symbol on the Canadian
Securities Exchange (the “CSE”) is “CBDT”. Our
current trading symbol on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange is
“8EC.F 8EC.MU, 8EC.SG”.
Important Events in the Development of the Company’s
Business
Reverse Take-over
Empower
was originally incorporated as a Nevada corporation on February 20,
1997 under the name “Trans New Zealand Oil Company". Its name
was changed to “AMG Oil Ltd.” on July 27, 1998 and to
Adira on December 17, 2009. On November 25, 2008, the
Company’s shareholders approved the change of its
jurisdiction of incorporation from the State of Nevada to a
federally incorporated Canadian company pursuant to a continuation
under the Canada Business Corporations Act, which was completed on
November 27, 2008. On April 23, 2018, the Company completed the
acquisition of EHC CA, which represented a reverse takeover of the
Company by EHC CA, with EHC CA as the accounting acquirer and the
Company as the accounting acquiree. In connection with the reverse
takeover, the Company changed its name to Empower, and consolidated
its common shares on the basis of one new common share for each
6.726254 old common shares. Prior to the acquisition of EHC CA, the
Company was engaged in oil and gas exploration activities and
following such acquisition the Company became engaged in its
current business, being the operation of medical cannabis
certification clinics and developer of hemp-based CBD products in
the United States.
Acquisitions
Effective
April 30, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the membership
interest of Sun Valley Certification Clinics Holdings, LLC
(“Sun Valley”),
an Arizona Limited Liability Company (the “Sun Valley Acquisition”). Through
its subsidiaries, Sun Valley operates a network of
professional medical cannabis and pain management practices, with
five clinics in Arizona, one clinic in Las Vegas, a tele-medicine
platform serving California, and a fully developed franchise
business model for the domestic cannabis industry. Subsidiaries
include the following:
-
Sun Valley Alternative Health Centers, LLC;
-
Sun Valley Alternative Health Centers West, LLC;
-
Sun Valley Alternative Health Centers NV, LLC;
-
Sun Valley Alternative Health Centers Tucson, LLC;
-
Sun Valley Alternative Health Centers Mesa, LLC; and
-
Sun Valley Certification Clinics Franchising, LLC
(each,
a “Subsidiary” and, collectively the
“Subsidiaries”)
Effective
October 5, 2020, the Company acquired 100% of the membership
interest in Kai Medical Laboratories LLC. (“Kai Medical”). Kai Medical
operates a high-complexity CLIA and COLA accredited laboratory that
provides reliable and accurate testing solutions to hospitals,
medical clinics, pharmacies, and employer groups. KAI has taken an
active role in COVID-19 testing, battling the pandemic through
RT-PCR testing and serology testing with the capacity to process
4,000 RT-PCR test specimens per day. While the RT-PCR test
identifies if a patient has an active virus, the serology or
antibody test detects if a patient has previously been exposed to
the virus. Both of these test results are vital to managing
outbreaks and the potential spread of coronavirus.
On
December 31, 2020, the Company acquired Lawrence Park Health and
Wellness Clinic Inc., and 1100900 Canada Inc. dba Atkinson
(collectively "LP&A").
LP&A operate multidisciplinary health clinics in the Greater
Toronto Area, Ontario. As leading experts in musculoskeletal health
LP&A’s many practitioners provide a variety of
para-medical services that will form an integral component of the
development of the Company’s growth strategy by opening
healthcare centers in key markets comprised of primary care and
para-medical services further supported by virtual care and
telemedicine services.
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
During
the year ended December 31, 2020, cash used for capital
expenditures of property and equipment was $142,350 (2019 -
$3,828), and net cash used for capital expenditures in the
acquisition of Kai Medical and LP&A was $167,644 (2019 –
$787,318 for the acquisition of Sun Valley).
Takeover Offers
We are
not aware of any indication of any public takeover offers by third
parties in respect of our common shares during our last and current
financial years.
(a)
|
Summary of Operations
|
On June
12, 2015 EHC CA, through its wholly owned subsidiary EHC US,
purchased all of the assets of Presto Quality Care Corporation
(“Presto”), an
Oregon company that had owned and operated the business currently
carried on by EHC CA. The consideration for the purchase was the
assumption by EHC CA of a note payable by Presto to Bayview
Equities Ltd. in the amount of $550,000 plus accrued interest of
$35,893.
Summary
of clinics:
-
The
Portland clinic was opened in 2003
-
The
Grants Pass clinic was opened in 2009
-
The
Spokane, Washington clinic was opened in January 2010
-
The
Riverside California clinic was opened in 2009 and was recently
closed
-
The
Bend, Oregon clinic was opened in 2011 and was recently
closed
-
The
Chicago, Illinois clinic was opened in September 2018 and was
recently closed
-
In
addition, the travelling clinics started operating in various
locations from 2003 onwards and were designed to service the small
markets that could not sustain a full-time clinic. All the clinics
were start-ups and run by local advocates for the medicinal
benefits of Cannabis. Local offices were sourced and clinics were
held for between one to three days a week, eventually being held
for six days a week in Portland. The initial marketing was mainly
word of mouth. The clinics were staffed by doctors or registered
nurses.
-
The
Lawrence Park clinic operates in Toronto, Ontario (acquired on
December 31, 2020)
-
The
Atkinson clinic operates in Thornhill, Ontario (acquired on
December 31, 2021)
On
April 30, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the membership
interest of Sun Valley, an Arizona Limited Liability Company.
Through its Subsidiaries, Sun Valley operates a network of
professional medical cannabis and pain management practices, with
five clinics in Arizona, one clinic in Las Vegas, a tele-medicine
platform serving California, and a fully developed franchise
business model for the domestic cannabis industry.
Operations
at Sun Valley Health based in Phoenix, AZ saw a reduction in
patient volume in late Q3 2020 and Q4 2020 due to significant
regulatory changes in the state of Arizona that saw the state fully
legalize cannabis in November 2020. This resulted in the
elimination of the need to have medical cannabis certification card
to legally purchase cannabis products from dispensaries in the
state. As a result, the Company determined it was appropriate to
close two of the clinic locations in Q4 2020 and reduce headcount
and operating expenses. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the
Company closed one of the two remaining clinic locations, resulting
in one remaining clinic location.
On
October 5, 2020, the Company acquired 100% of the membership
interest in Kai Medical Laboratories LLC. (“Kai
Medical”). Kai Medical operates a high-complexity CLIA and
COLA accredited laboratory that provides reliable and accurate
testing solutions to hospitals, medical clinics, pharmacies, and
employer groups. KAI has taken an active role in COVID-19 testing,
battling the pandemic through RT-PCR testing and serology testing
with the capacity to process 4,000 RT-PCR test specimens per day.
While the RT-PCR test identifies if a patient has an active virus,
the serology or antibody test detects if a patient has previously
been exposed to the virus. Both of these test results are vital to
managing outbreaks and the potential spread of
coronavirus.
Empower
is creating a network of physicians and practitioners who integrate
to serve patient needs, in-clinic, through telemedicine, and with
decentralized mobile delivery. A simplified, streamlined care model
bringing key attributes of the healthcare supply chain together,
always focused on patient experience. The Company provides COVID-19
testing services to consumers and businesses as part of a
four-phased nationwide testing initiative in the United States.
Empower recently acquired Kai Medical Laboratory, LLC as a wholly
owned subsidiary with largescale testing capability.
(b)
|
Effects
of Government Regulations
|
See
Item 3D - “Risk Factors”.
Our
executive offices located at Suite 505, 1771 Robson Street
Vancouver, BC V6G 1C9.
(d)
|
Special
Skill and Knowledge
|
Steven
McAuley, our Chairman and CEO has significant experience in
managing and growing public companies.
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, all of our
operating activities were in the United States of America. On
December 31, 2020, we acquired LP&A, however, there are no
operating results included in the financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2020.
(f)
|
Competitive
Conditions
|
There
is potential that the Company will face intense competition from
other companies, some of which can be expected to have more
financial resources, industry, manufacturing and marketing
experience than the Company. Additionally, there is potential that
the industry will undergo consolidation, creating larger companies
that may have increased geographic scope and other economies of
scale. Increased competition by larger, better-financed competitors
with geographic or other structural advantages could materially and
adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
To
remain competitive, the Company will require a continued level of
investment in research and development, marketing, sales and client
support. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain
research and development, marketing, sales and client support
efforts on a competitive basis which could materially and adversely
affect the business, financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
(g)
|
Dependence
on Customers and Suppliers
|
The
Company has over 165,000 patients and as such, we are not dependent
upon a concentration of customers. The Company is not exposed to
concentration of suppliers.
The
following table sets out the current organizational structure of
the Company and its significant subsidiaries:
Name
of Subsidiary
|
Status
|
Jurisdiction
of Incorporation
|
Empower
Healthcare Corporation (previously S.M.A.A.R.T Holdings
Inc.)
|
Active
|
British
Columbia, Canada
|
S.M.A.A.R.T.
Holdings Inc.
|
Inactive
|
Oregon,
USA
|
Empower
Healthcare Corporation
|
Active
|
Oregon,
USA
|
SMAART
Inc.
|
Inactive
|
Oregon,
USA
|
The
Hemp & Cannabis Company
|
Inactive
|
Oregon,
USA
|
THCF
Access Points, Inc.
|
Inactive
|
Oregon,
USA
|
The
Hemp & Cannabis Company
|
Inactive
|
Washington,
USA
|
THCF
Access Points, Inc.
|
Inactive
|
Washington,
USA
|
CanMed
Solutions Inc.
|
Inactive
|
Oregon,
USA
|
Kai
Medical Laboratory LLC
|
Active
|
Dallas,
Texas
|
11000900 Canada
Inc.
|
Active
|
Ontario,
Canada
|
Lawrence Park
Health and Wellness Clinic Inc.
|
Active
|
Ontario,
Canada
|
Sun
Valley Certification Clinics Holdings, LLC
|
Inactive
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Alternative Health Centers, LLC
|
Active
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Alternative Health Centers West, LLC
|
Inactive
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Alternative Health Centers NV, LLC
|
Inactive
|
Nevada,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Alternative Health Centers Tucson, LLC
|
Inactive
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Alternative Health Centers Mesa, LLC
|
Active
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Sun
Valley Certification Clinics Franchising, LLC
|
Inactive
|
Arizona,
USA
|
Consideration in
the Sun Valley Acquisition on April 30, 2019 consisted of cash,
common shares of the Company and a promissory note having an
aggregate value of $3,054,593 as summarized
below:
1.
A cash
payment of $775,000, of which $150,000 was held back by the
Company, half of which is to be released six months from the date
of Closing and the other half of which is to be release twelve
months from the date of Closing;
2.
Issuance
of 22,058,823 common shares of the Company at a deemed price of
$0.135 (CDN$0.175) per Share, representing the average daily
closing price of the common shares on the CSE for the 10-day
trading period ended April 26, 2019. Pursuant to an escrow
agreement dated April 30, 2019, 14,705,882 of the common shares
will be held in escrow by Odyssey Trust Company, and will vest in
quarterly installments over 36 months from the date of the
Closing;
3.
A cash
payment of $12,318 and issuance of 350,602 common shares at a
deemed price of $0.13 (CDN$0.175) per Share, representing the
average daily closing price of the common shares on the CSE for the
10-day trading period ended April 26, 2019 to a minority
shareholder of one of the Subsidiaries in order to acquire their
minority interest therein; and
4.
A
promissory note of US$125,000 bearing interest at a rate of 4% per
annum and due July 31, 2019, to a minority shareholder of one of
the Subsidiaries in order to acquire their minority interest
therein.
Consideration in
the Kai Medical Acquisition on October 5, 2020 consisted of 500,000
stock options and 500,000 warrants with a fair value of $10,025 and
$10,025, respectively. The Company acquired cash of
$9,826.
Consideration in
the acquisition of 11000900 Canada Inc. and Lawrence Park Health
and Wellness Clinic Inc. on December 31, 2020 had aggregate fair
value of $1,766,933, consisting of cash of $215,991, cash payable
of $58,907, up to3,750,000 stock options with a fair value of
$344,110 and share consideration with a fair value of
$1,147,925.
Property
and equipment is comprised of furniture and fixtures and leasehold
improvements at the Company’s clinics as well as testing
instruments utilized by Kai Medical. The Company’s leases,
all of which support clinic operations, are summarized
below:
-
Portland,
Oregon – Shared space which is currently on a month-to-month
lease
-
Phoenix,
Arizona – 2,830 square feet which was on a five-year lease
term and expired on February 28, 2021. This clinic is now
closed.
-
Mesa,
Arizona – 1,325 square feet which is currently on a five-year
lease term set to expire on March 31, 2022. The Company terminated
this lease and closed the clinic in February 2021.
-
Surprise,
Arizona – 745 square feet which is currently on a five-year
lease term expiring September 30, 2022.
-
Tucson,
Arizona – 1,400 square feet which was on a five-year lease
term set to expire on August 31, 2022. The Company terminated this
lease and closed the clinic in February 2021.
-
Toronto,
Ontario – 1,274 square feet which is currently on a 13-month
lease expiring on January 31, 2022.
-
Dallas,
Texas – 15,750 square feet which is currently on a lease
expiring June 30, 2022.
-
Dallas,
Texas – 1,360 square feet which is currently on a
month-to-month lease.
We
currently do not have exposure to any environmental protection
requirements and policies.
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
The
following is a discussion and analysis of our activities,
consolidated results of operations and financial condition as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2020. It should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and
related notes for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by
the IASB.
Results of Operations
Consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.
Total Revenues
Clinic
services revenues were $3,154,301, compared to $1,949,549 during
fiscal 2019 as the Company pivoted its medical clinics to
performing COVID-19 testing from April 2020 through to the end of
the year, which offset decreased revenues from patient visits to
Sun Valley Health clinics. Revenues for fiscal 2018 were
$1,091,386 as the Company
received 7,607 patients spending on average $143, noting that
clinics revenues for 2018 were driven primarily by patients seeking
medical cannabis licenses.
Product
revenues were $54,895, compared to $82,032 during fiscal 2019 and
$nil during fiscal 2018 as the Company had expanded into CBD
product sales and the sale of premium wellness products in the
prior year. Product revenues declined as a direct result of the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Earnings from clinic operations
Cost of
clinic services were $1,157,428, compared to $793,374 during fiscal
2019 and $417,047 during fiscal 2018. These costs represent
physician and clinic support staff expenses that are required to
operate the clinics and provide patient consulting services. These
expenses increased due to the increase in revenues. The Company
continues to monitor and improve its operational controls to align
labor cost with direct patient consultations. The Company employs a
diverse mix of physicians and practitioners.
Cost of
product revenues (changes in finished goods inventory) was $36,132,
compared to $32,902 during fiscal 2019 and $nil during fiscal 2018,
as the Company had expanded into CBD product sales and the sale of
premium wellness products during fiscal 2019, and during fiscal
2020 expanded laboratory testing services with the acquisition of
Kai on October 5, 2020, which resulted in higher run rate cost of
goods sold.
Operating expenses
Operating
expenses were $3,947,408, compared to $2,933,619 during fiscal 2019
and $2,517,681 during fiscal 2018. The increase over the years is
primarily related to additional advertising and promotion expenses
of $1,031,297 due to the launching capital markets and investor
relations marketing programs in order to increase visibility and
awareness to the investment community and prospective shareholders
and to more effectively communicate developments of the Company,
partially offset by savings in salaries and benefits as well as
reductions in rent as the Company closed various offices as part of
its cost-cutting initiatives.
Legal and professional fees
Legal
and professional fees were $1,394,570, compared to $1,015,743 during fiscal 2019 and $
1,450,141 during fiscal 2018.
The increase is primarily related to the acquisitions of Kai and
LP&A in Q4 2020. The decrease from fiscal 2018 to fiscal 2019
was the result of the Company’s public listing transaction
occurring during fiscal 2018 which resulted in higher fees during
that year.
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation
and amortization expense were $381,492, compared to $374,210 during
fiscal 2019 and $123,473 during fiscal 2018. The balance increased
due to the acquisition of Sun Valley in May 2019 which carried
additional leases and the depreciation on the right-of-use
asset.
Share-based payments
Share-based
payments were $323,799, compared to $608,944 during fiscal 2019 and
$892,417 during fiscal 2018.
The share-based payments expense is the fair value of share options
recognized as an expense during the period based on the fair valued
determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model
valuation.
Change in fair value of warrant liability
The
Company recorded a loss on the change in the fair value of the
warrant liability of $11,886,796 compared to a gain of
$2,065,781 during fiscal 2019
and a gain of $1,598,425 during fiscal
2018.The share purchase warrants are required to be revalued
at every quarter end and the current year loss resulted from the
significant increase in the Company’s share price during
fiscal 2020, which is a key variable in determining the fair value
of the warrant liability per the Black-Scholes valuation
model.
Gain on change in fair value of conversion feature
During
fiscal 2019, the Company recorded a gain on the change in the fair
value of the conversion feature of $587,229, compared to $890,136
during fiscal 2018. The conversion feature relates to the
convertible debentures outstanding during the period and is
required to be revalued at every quarter end and the gain resulted
from the decrease in the Company’s share price during fiscal
2019, which is a key variable in determining the fair value of the
conversion feature. As all the convertible debentures were
converted to common shares during fiscal 2020, the revaluation of
the conversion option during fiscal 2020 was significantly
reduced.
Inflation
During
the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, inflation has not had a
material impact on our operations.
Foreign Exchange Risk
We have
limited exposure to financial risk related to the fluctuation of
foreign exchange rates. We operate in the U.S., most of our
monetary assets are held in U.S. dollars and most of our
expenditures are made in U.S. dollars. However, we also have
expenditures in CDN$. We have not hedged our exposure to currency
fluctuations.
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
Liquidity
Liquidity
risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulties in
meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities and
other contractual obligations. The Company’s strategy for
managing liquidity is based on achieving positive cash flows from
operations to internally fund operating and capital
requirements.
Factors
that may affect the Company’s liquidity are continuously
monitored. These factors include the number of patient visits,
average patient spend per visit, operating costs, capital costs,
income tax refunds, foreign currency fluctuations, seasonality,
market immaturity and a highly fluid environment related to state
and federal law passage and regulations.
In the
event that the Company is adversely affected by any of these
factors and, as a result, the operating cash flows are not
sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital requirements
there is no guarantee that the Company would be able to raise
additional capital on acceptable terms to fund a potential cash
shortfall. Consequently, the Company is subject to liquidity
risk.
The
Company will need to procure additional financing in order to fund
its ongoing operation. The Company intends to obtain such financing
through equity financing, and there can be no assurance that the
Company can raise the required capital it needs to build and expand
as expected, nor that the capital markets will fund the business of
the Company. Without this additional financing, the Company may be
unable to achieve positive cash flow and earnings as quickly as
anticipated, these uncertainties cast a significant doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
At
December 31, 2020, the Company had cash of $4,889,824 and working
capital of $1,746,818. Subsequent to year end, the Company received
cash of $5,864,336 from the exercise of warrants and stock
options.
Year ended December 31, 2020 compared to year ended
December 31, 2019:
-
Cash
used by operating activities was $1,749,818, compared to $2,273,188
during fiscal 2019 and $2,835,710 during fiscal 2018. Significant
drivers of the change over the prior year relate to additional
operating expenses incurred as a result of the growth of the
Company, partially offset by increased revenues generated from
COVID-19 testing.
-
Cash used in investing activities was
$309,994, compared to $791,146
during fiscal 2019 and $100,227 during fiscal 2018 as a result of
cash spend on the acquisition of Kai and LP&A as well as
intangible assets during fiscal 2020, compared to the cash spend
related to the acquisition of Sun Valley during fiscal
2019.
-
Cash provided by financing activities was
$6,770,483 compared to $3,085,819 during fiscal 2019 and $3,093,604 during
fiscal 2018. Cash provided by
financing activities during fiscal 2020 related to cash proceeds
from the issuance of common shares and cash proceeds from the
exercise of warrants, partially offset by cash spend on lease
payments and repayments of notes payable and loans payable, whereas
cash provided by financial activities during fiscal 2019 related to
cash proceeds from the issuance of common shares, advance of
convertible debentures, advance of notes payable and cash acquired
in the acquisition of Sun Valley which was partially offset by
lease payments and share issue costs. Cash provided by financing
activities during fiscal 2018 was primarily related to cash
proceeds from the issuance of common shares and advance of
convertible debentures.
Capital Resources
The
capital of the Company consists of consolidated equity, notes
payable, convertible debentures, secured loan payable, and
convertible note payable, net of cash.
As at December 31,
|
|
|
Equity
|
(5,490,401)
|
(3,514,913)
|
Notes
payable
|
708,361
|
969,891
|
Convertible
debentures
|
-
|
427,320
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
200,530
|
192,717
|
Current
portion of loans payable
|
992,070
|
761,711
|
Non-current
portion of loans payable
|
1,140,157
|
-
|
|
(2,449,283)
|
(1,163,274)
|
Less:
Cash
|
(4,889,824)
|
(179,153)
|
|
(7,339,107)
|
(1,342,427)
|
The
board of directors of the Company has overall responsibility for
the establishment and oversight of the Company’s risk
management policies on an annual basis. The Company’s board
of directors identifies and evaluates the Company’s financial
risks and is charged with the responsibility of establishing
controls and procedures to ensure financial risks are
mitigated.
The
Company’s objectives when managing capital are to pursue and
complete the identification and evaluation of assets, properties or
businesses with a view to acquisition. The Company does not have
any externally imposed capital requirements to which it is
subject.
The
Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it
in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk
characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the
capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new common
shares or adjust the amount of cash.
The
Company’s investment policy is to invest excess cash in
investment instruments at high credit, quality financial
institutions with terms to maturity selected with regards to the
expected time of expenditures from continuing
operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make
estimates based on assumptions about future events that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period.
The
estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical
experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The
estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing
basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized
prospectively in the period in which the estimate is revised.
Management has made the following critical judgements and
estimates:
Critical judgements in applying accounting policies
Critical
judgements made by management in applying the Company’s
accounting policies, apart from those involving estimations, that
have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements are as
follows:
Functional currency
The
functional currency for each of the Company’s subsidiaries is
the currency of the primary economic environment in which the
respective entity operates; such determination involves certain
judgements to identify the primary economic environment. The
Company reconsiders the functional currency of its subsidiaries if
there is a change in events and/or conditions which determine the
primary economic environment.
Assessment of Cash Generating Units
For
impairment assessment and testing, assets are grouped together into
the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from
continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of
other assets or cash generating units (“CGU”). The
Company applies judgement in assessing the smallest group of assets
that comprise a single CGU.
Assessment of useful lives of property and equipment and intangible
assets
Management
reviews its estimate of the useful lives of property and equipment
and intangible assets annually and accounts for any changes in
estimates prospectively. The Company applied judgment in
determining the useful lives of trademarks and patient records with
less than an indefinite life. In addition, the Company applied
judgment in determining the useful lives of the right-of-use assets
and leasehold improvements for purposes of assessing the shorter of
the useful life or lease term.
Assessment of indicators of impairment
At the
end of each reporting period, the Company assesses whether there
are any indicators, from external and internal sources of
information, that an asset or CGU may be impaired, thereby
requiring adjustment to the carrying value.
Revenue recognition
Determination of performance obligations
The
Company applied judgement to determine if a good or service that is
promised to a customer is distinct based on whether the customer
can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with
other readily available resources and whether the good or service
is separately identifiable. Based on these criteria, the Company
determined the primary performance obligation relating to its sales
contracts is the delivery of the medical services or sale of
product, each representing a single performance obligation with
consideration allocated accordingly.
Transfer of control
Judgement
is required to determine when transfer of control occurs relating
to the medical services to its customers. Management based its
assessment on a number of indicators of control, which include, but
are not limited to whether the Company has present right of
payment, whether delivery of medical services has occurred and
whether the physical possession of the goods, significant risks and
rewards and/or legal title have been transferred to the
customer.
Expected credit losses
In
calculating the expected credit loss on financial instruments,
management is required to make a number of judgments including the
probability of possible outcomes with regards to credit losses, the
discount rate to use for time value of money and whether the
financial instrument’s credit risk has increased
significantly since initial recognition.
Business combinations
Judgment
is used in determining whether an acquisition is a business
combination or an asset acquisition.
In a
business combination, all identifiable assets, liabilities and
contingent liabilities acquired are recorded at their fair values,
including the total consideration paid by the Company. One of the
most significant estimates relates to the determination of the fair
value of these assets and liabilities including assessing the fair
value of any favourable or unfavorable lease terms. For any
intangible asset identified or form of consideration paid by the
Company, depending on the type of intangible asset or consideration
paid and the complexity of determining its fair value, an
independent valuation expert or management may develop the fair
value, using appropriate valuation techniques, which are generally
based on a forecast of the total expected future net cash flows.
The evaluations are linked closely to the assumptions made by
management regarding the future performance of the assets concerned
and any changes in the discount rate applied.
Additionally,
as part of a business combination, all forms of consideration paid
(on the date of acquisition or contingent upon achieving certain
milestones) are recorded at their fair values, which is a
significant estimate. For any form of consideration paid by the
Company, depending on the type of consideration paid and the
complexity of determining its fair value, an independent valuation
expert or management may develop the fair value, using appropriate
valuation techniques, which are generally based on a forecast of
the total expected future net cash flows. The evaluations are
linked closely to the assumptions made by management regarding the
future performance of the asset concerned and any changes in the
discount rate applied. In the event that there is contingent
consideration in an acquisition management makes assumptions as to
the probability of the consideration being paid.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Significant
assumptions about the future and other major sources of estimation
uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that may result in a
material adjustment to the carrying amounts of the Company’s
assets and liabilities are as follows:
Current and deferred taxes
The
Company’s provision for income taxes is estimated based on
the expected annual effective tax rates (and tax laws) that have
been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting
period. The current and deferred components of income taxes are
estimated based on forecasted movements in temporary differences.
Changes to the expected annual effective tax rate and differences
between the actual and expected effective tax rate and between
actual and forecasted movements in temporary differences will
result in adjustments to the Company’s provision for income
taxes in the period changes are made and/or differences are
identified.
In
assessing the probability of realizing income tax assets
recognized, management makes estimates related to expectations of
future taxable income, applicable tax planning opportunities,
expected timing of reversals of existing temporary differences and
the likelihood that tax positions taken will be sustained upon
examination by applicable tax authorities. In making its
assessments, management gives additional weight to positive and
negative evidence that can be objectively verified. Estimates of
future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows from
operations and the application of existing tax laws in each
jurisdiction. Forecasted cash flows from operations are based on
patient visits, which are internally developed and reviewed by
management.
Weight
is attached to tax planning opportunities that are within the
Company’s control and are feasible and implementable without
significant obstacles.
The
likelihood that tax positions taken will be sustained upon
examination by applicable tax authorities is assessed based on
individual facts and circumstances of the relevant tax position
evaluated in light of all available evidence.
Equity-settled share-based payments
Share-based
payments are measured at fair value. Options and warrants are
measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on
estimated fair values of all share-based awards at the date of
grant and are expensed to earnings or loss from operations over
each award’s vesting period. The Black-Scholes option pricing
model utilizes subjective assumptions such as expected price
volatility and expected life of the option. Changes in these input
assumptions can significantly affect the fair value
estimate.
Contingencies
Due to
the nature of the Company’s operations, various legal and tax
matters can arise from time to time. In the event that
management’s estimate of the future resolution of these
matters’ changes, the Company will recognize the effects of
the changes in its consolidated financial statements for the period
in which such changes occur.
Warrant liability and conversion feature
Warrant
liability and conversion feature are measured at fair value using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on estimated fair
values at the date of grant and revalued at period end to the
consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss over the life
of the instruments. The Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizes
subjective assumptions such as expected price volatility and
expected life of the option. Changes in these input assumptions can
significantly affect the fair value estimate.
Leases as a result of adopting IFRS 16
Identifying whether a contract includes a lease
IFRS 16
applies a control model to the identification of leases,
distinguishing between a lease and a service contract on the basis
of whether the customer controls the asset. The Company had to
apply judgment on certain factors, including whether the supplier
has substantive substitution rights, does the Company obtain
substantially all of the economic benefits and who has the right to
direct the use of that asset.
Incremental borrowing rate
When
the Company recognizes a lease, the future lease payments are
discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.
This significant estimate impacts the carrying amount of the lease
liabilities and the interest expense recorded on the consolidated
statement of loss and comprehensive loss.
Estimate of lease term
When
the Company recognizes a lease, it assesses the lease term based on
the conditions of the lease and determines whether it will extend
the lease at the end of the lease contract or exercise an early
termination option. As it is not reasonably certain that the
extension or early termination options will be exercised, the
Company determined that the term of its leases are the lesser of
original lease term or the life of the leased asset. This
significant estimate could affect future results if the Company
extends the lease or exercises an early termination
option.
|
Research
and Development, Patents and Licenses
|
Not
applicable.
We are
not aware of any trends that have or are reasonably likely to have
a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to investors.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
|
The
Company has not entered into any material off-balance sheet
arrangements such as guarantee contracts, contingent interests in
assets transferred to unconsolidated entities, derivative financial
obligations or arrangements with respect to any obligations under a
variable interest equity arrangement.
|
Tabular
Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
A
summary of undiscounted liabilities and future operating
commitments at December 31, 2020, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
analysis of financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payables
and accrued liabilities
|
$3,442,725
|
$3,442,725
|
$-
|
$-
|
Loans
payable
|
2,132,227
|
992,070
|
143,624
|
996,533
|
Notes
payable
|
708,361
|
708,361
|
-
|
-
|
Convertible notes
payable
|
200,530
|
200,530
|
-
|
-
|
Lease
payments
|
496,386
|
241,138
|
255,248
|
-
|
Total
financial liabilities and commitments
|
$6,980,229
|
$5,584,824
|
$398,872
|
$996,533
|
Various
tax and legal matters are outstanding from time to time. In the
event that management’s estimate of the future resolution of
these matters’ changes, the Company will recognize the
effects of these changes in the consolidated financial statements
in the period such changes occur.
Not
applicable.
ITEM 6
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
|
Directors
and Senior Management
|
The
size of Empower’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently set at three.
All of Empower’s directors are elected annually by the
shareholders and hold office until the next annual general meeting
or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, unless
their office is earlier vacated in accordance with the CBCA and
Empower’s articles of incorporation.
The
following table sets forth information relating to the directors
and senior management of the Company as at the date of this Form
20-F:
Name(1)
|
Position
|
Steven
McAuley (2)
|
Director,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Andrejs
Bunkse (2)(3)
|
Director
|
Dustin
Klein (2)
|
Director,
Senior Vice President of Business Development
|
Kyle
Appleby
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Yoshi
Tyler
|
Director,
President of Kai Medical
|
Notes:
(1)
|
|
Neither
age nor date of birth of directors or senior managers is required
to be reported in our home country (Canada) nor otherwise publicly
disclosed.
|
(2)
|
|
Member
of Audit Committee.
|
(3)
|
|
“Independent”
for purposes of National Instrument 52-110– Audit Committees
(“NI
52-110”).
|
The
following is biographical information on our directors and officers
who are acting in the capacity of director or officer as of the
date hereof:
Steven McAuley – Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
Mr.
McAuley is our Chairman and CEO. He is also the Chairman
and CEO of Empower. in Vancouver, B.C. Canada, a position he has
held since January 4, 2019. From January 2013 through January 2019,
Mr. McAuley was the Founder & CEO of Privatis Technology
Corporation in Vancouver, B.C. Canada. He is the former SVP,
Financial Services for Penske Automotive Group NYSE: PAG, CEO of
Xpel Technologies TSXV: DAP and former CEO, United Kingdom, GE
Capital Fleet Services.
Kyle Appleby – Chief Financial Officer
Mr.
Appleby has been our Chief Financial Officer since October 2020.
Mr. Appleby is the owner of CFO Advantage Inc., a CFO service
provide for reporting issuers since 2009. Mr. Appleby has acted as
CFO for various reporting issuers.
Dustin Klein – Director and Senior Vice President of
Business Development
Mr.
Klein has been a member of the Board of Directors of Empower since
May 2019. Mr. Klein is currently the co-founder of Sun Valley
Science, LLC, a position he has held since its formation in May
2018. Between September 2013 and May 2019, Mr. Klein was a
co-founder of our Affiliates Sun Valley Health Centers, LLC, Sun
Valley Health Centers West, LLC, Sun Valley Health Centers Mesa,
LLC, Sun Valley Health Centers NV, LLC and Sun Valley Health
Centers Tucson, LLC which operate Sun Valley Health Businesses in
the metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, Tucson, Arizona and Las Vegas,
Nevada area until April 2019. From September 2012 through July
2013, Mr. Klein was the Manager of Johns 4x4 in Boulder, Colorado.
From January 2012 through August 2012, Mr. Klein was a Regional
Account Manager for Solar City in Denver Colorado. From January 1,
2011 through December 31, 2011, Mr. Klein was the owner of Gutshot
Entertainment in Denver, Colorado.
Andrejs Bunkse – Director
Mr.
Bunkse has been a member of the Board of Directors of Empower since
June 2019. Mr. Bunkse is currently Of Counsel to Nimbus Legal PLLC
in Scottsdale Arizona, a position he has held since May 2018. Mr.
Bunkse is the founder of Rain Legal (Law Offices of Andrejs K.
Bunkse), a position he has held since April 2018. Mr. Bunkse has
been the President of Endurance Strategies Group in Phoenix,
Arizona since May 2013.
Yoshi Tyler – Director
Ms.
Tyler has been a member of the Board of Directors since April 2021.
Ms. Tyler is the President of Kai Medical Laboratory, LLC, a
position she has held since January 2017. With a professional and
entrepreneurial background in healthcare, Ms. Tyler has more than
13 years of experience providing leadership at Pfizer, Inc., a
Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company. This experience has provided
her with in-depth knowledge and industry insights to found and lead
Kai Medical Laboratory towards unprecedented growth.
Cease trade orders, bankruptcies, penalties or
sanctions
For the
purposes of this section, “order” means a cease trade
order; an order similar to a cease trade order; or an order that
denied the relevant company access to any exemption under
securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than
30 consecutive days.
On May
3, 2021, the Company was granted a management cease trade order
(“MCTO”) by the
British Columbia Securities Commission. The MCTO does not affect
the ability of shareholders who are not insiders of the Company to
trade their securities.
The
MCTO restricted the following individuals from buying or selling
securities of Empower:
-
Steven McAuley
– Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-
Kyle Appleby
– Chief Financial Officer
-
Dustin Klein
– Director and Senior Vice President of Business
Development
-
Andrejs Bunkse
– Director
The
MCTO was issued in connection with the delay by the Company in
filing its annual financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2020, and the related management’s discussion and
analysis and certificates of its CEO and CFO (collectively, the
"Required Filings") with
Canadian securities regulators until after the April 30, 2021
filing deadline. The delay in filing was primarily due to the
impact of COVID-19 on the audit and associated required travel, of
the Company's recently acquired subsidiaries in both the US and
Canada. The Required Filings were filed on July 2, 2021 and the
MCTO was lifted on July 14, 2021
On May
7, 2019, the Company’s trading was suspended by Canadian
securities regulators due to a delay in filing the Required Filings
with Canadian securities regulators until after the April 30, 2019
filing deadline. The delay was the result of material deficiencies
in the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as
outlined Item 15 of this 20-F. The Required Filings were filed on
June 6, 2019, at which point the Company’s trading
resumed.
Other
than as disclosed above, to the best of our knowledge, no director
or executive officer of Empower is, as at the date hereof, or has
been, within the 10 years before the date hereof, a director, chief
executive officer or chief financial officer of any corporation
(including Empower) that:
(a)
was
subject to an order that was issued while the director or executive
officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive
officer or chief financial officer; or
(b)
was
subject to an order that was issued after the director or executive
officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief
financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred
while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief
executive officer or chief financial officer.
To the
best of our knowledge, no director or executive officer of Empower
or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of
Empower to affect materially the control of Empower:
(a)
is, as
at the date hereof, or has been within the 10 years before the date
hereof, a director or executive officer of any corporation
(including Empower) that, while that person was acting in that
capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that
capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation
relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or
instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with
creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed
to hold its assets; or
(b)
as,
within the 10 years before the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a
proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or
insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings,
arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver,
receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the
director, executive officer or shareholder.
To the
best of our knowledge, no director or executive officer of the
Company, or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of the
Company’s securities to affect materially the control the
Company, has been subject to:
(a)
any
penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities
legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered
into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority;
or
(b)
any
other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body
that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor
in making an investment decision.
Conflicts of Interest
Our
directors and officers are aware of the existence of laws governing
accountability of directors and officers for corporate opportunity
and requiring disclosures by directors of conflicts of interest and
we will rely upon such laws in respect of any directors and
officers’ conflicts of interest or in respect of any breaches
of duty by any of its directors or officers. All such conflicts
will be disclosed by such directors or officers in accordance with
the CBCA and they will govern themselves in respect thereof to the
best of their ability in accordance with the obligations imposed
upon them by law.
Promoters
None
noted.
During
the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid aggregate remuneration to
our directors and officers as a group who served in the capacity of
director or executive officer during such year $296,815 (2019 -
$1,301,945).
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In
assessing the compensation of our Company’s executive
officers, we do not have in place any formal objectives, criteria
or analysis; instead, we rely mainly on Board discussion.
Currently, any material commitments, inclusive of remuneration, are
required to be pre-approved by the Board.
Our
executive compensation program has three principal components: base
salary, incentive bonus plan and stock options. Base salaries for
all our employees are established for each position through
comparative salary surveys of similar type and size companies. Both
individual and corporate performances are also taken into account.
Incentive bonuses, in the form of cash payments, are designed to
add a variable component of compensation based on corporate and
individual performances for executive officers and employees. No
bonuses were paid to executive officers or employees during the
most recently completed financial year.
We have
no other forms of compensation, although payments may be made from
time to time to individuals or companies they control for the
provision of consulting services. Such consulting services are paid
for at competitive industry rates for work of a similar nature by
reputable arm’s length services providers.
As at
December 31, 2019 we had a compensatory plan, contract or
arrangement where Mr. Craig Snyder is entitled to receive up to two
years salary as a severance payment depending on the date of
termination. His final severance was paid in 2019.
We have
no additional compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements where
an executive officer is entitled to receive in excess of $100,000
in the event of termination, resignation or retirement, a change of
control of Empower or a change in responsibilities following a
change in control, other than as described in this Form
20-F.
Summary Compensation Table
The
following table provides a summary of compensation that we paid to
our senior management during the year ended December 31,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)
|
|
|
|
Names and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Share-Based Awards($)
|
Option-Based Awards($)
|
Annual incentive plans
|
Long-term incentive plans
|
Pension Value($)
|
All Other Compensation($)
|
Total Compensation($)
|
Steven
McAuley, President, CEO and Director (1)
|
2020
|
142,499
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
14,556
|
157,055
|
Kyle
Appleby, CFO(2)
|
2020
|
6,709
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
6,709
|
Dustin
Klein, SVP Business Development, Director (3)
|
2020
|
50,000
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
50,000
|
Andrejs
Bunkse, Director(4)
|
2020
|
7,500
|
Nil
|
11,353
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
7,500
|
(1)
Appointed CEO and Director on January 4, 2019.
(2)
Appointed on September 28, 2020
(3)
Appointed on April 30, 2019
(4)
Appointed on May 26, 2019
Option Based Awards
Stock
options are granted to provide an incentive to our directors,
officers, employees and consultants to achieve our longer-term
objectives; to give suitable recognition to the ability and
industry of such persons who contribute materially to our success;
and to attract and retain persons of experience and ability, by
providing them with the opportunity to acquire an increased
proprietary interest in Empower. We award stock options to our
executive officers based upon the recommendation of the Board,
which recommendation is based upon the Compensation
Committee’s review of a proposal from the President and CEO.
Previous grants of incentive stock options are taken into account
when considering new grants.
We have
a stock option plan for the granting of incentive stock options to
the officers, employees, consultants and directors. See Item 6E -
“Share Ownership – Equity Compensation Plans” for
more information.
Director Compensation
We have
no arrangements, standard or otherwise, pursuant to which Directors
are compensated by for their services in their capacity as
Directors, or for committee participation, involvement in special
assignments or for services as consultant or expert during the most
recently completed financial year or subsequently, up to and
including the date of this Form 20-F, except for the consulting
fees described in Item 7.B – “Related Party
Transactions” of this Form 20-F.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards
We did
not make any long-term incentive plan awards during the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefits
We do
not provide for pension, retirement, or similar
benefits.
Employment Agreements
As of
the date of this Annual Report, we have the following agreements
with officers of the Company:
Steven McAuley
Effective
January 4, 2019, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Steven McAuley which includes an annual base salary of
$225,000, a variable annual incentive program to be determine by
the Board of Directors, a bonus incentive program to be based on
the satisfaction of certain milestones, including the successful
completion of financing rounds following which the annual base
salary will be increased by an amount equal to 2% of the total
amount raised, the grant of 7,000,000 stock options with a five
year term and in lieu of a signing bonus, the issuance of 2,000,000
fully vested common shares and 5,000,000 common shares which will
be subject to a three year vesting period from the date of grant,
with 11.11% vesting each three months from the date of
grant.
In
2020, Mr. Steven McAuley deferred his salary in order to support
the working capital constraints that the Company was
facing.
Our
Directors have served in their respective capacities since their
election or appointment and will serve until our next annual
general meeting or until a successor is duly elected and qualified,
unless their office is earlier vacated in accordance with the CBCA
and our articles of incorporation. Our officers serve at the
discretion of the Board.
The
Board is responsible for, among other things, identifying suitable
candidates to be recommended for election to the Board by
shareholders or appointment by the Directors, subject to the limits
in Empower’s articles and the CBCA. One of the objectives of
the Board with respect to the nomination is to maintain the
composition of the Directors in a way that provides the best mix of
skills and experience to guide our long-term strategy and ongoing
business operations.
The
Board conducts an annual review and assessment of the performance
of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our other senior
executive officers.
The
Board also reviews and monitors our executive development programs
and the long-range plans and personnel policies for recruiting,
developing and motivating our executives. The Board has reviewed
and approved the qualifications of each of the Board nominees
standing for election.
The
Board’s review of the performance of our company and the
Chief Executive Officer as measured against objectives established
in the prior year by the Board and the CEO. The evaluation is to be
used by the Board in its deliberations concerning the CEO’s
annual compensation. The evaluation of performance against
objectives forms part of the determination of the entire
compensation of senior employees. The Board is also responsible for
reviewing the compensation of the Directors on an annual basis,
taking into account such matters as time commitment, responsibility
and compensation provided by comparable organizations. The
compensation committee will make an annual review of such matters
and make a recommendation to the Board.
The
Board is responsible for making an annual assessment of the overall
performance of the Directors as a group and to reporting its
findings to the full Board. The assessment examines the
effectiveness of the Directors as a whole and specifically reviews
areas that the Directors and/or management believe could be
improved to ensure the continued effectiveness of the Directors in
the execution of their responsibilities.
Term of Office
All
directors have a term of office expiring at our next annual general
meeting, unless a director’s office is earlier vacated in
accordance with our Articles or the provisions of the CBCA. All
officers serve at the discretion of the Board.
Audit Committee
We have
a standing Audit Committee that assists the directors of the
Company in overseeing all material aspects of reporting, control
and audit functions, except those specifically related to the
responsibilities of another standing committee of the Board. The
role of the Audit Committee includes a particular focus on the
qualitative aspects of financial reporting to shareholders and on
our processes for the management of business/financial risk and for
compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical, and
regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is responsible for,
among other things, the making recommendations to our Board with
respect to the appointment and remuneration of our independent
accountant.
As of
the date hereof, our Audit Committee is comprised of Steven
McAuley, Andrejs Bunkse, and Dustin Klein.
We have
procedures for the review and pre-approval of any services
performed by our auditors. The procedures require that all proposed
engagements of the auditors for audit and non-audit services be
submitted to the Audit Committee for approval prior to the
beginning of any such services. The Audit Committee considers such
requests, and, if acceptable to a majority of the Audit Committee
members, pre-approves such audit and non-audit services by a
resolution authorizing management to engage the auditors for such
audit and non-audit services. During such deliberations, the Audit
Committee assesses, among other factors, whether the services
requested would be considered “prohibited services” as
contemplated by the regulations of the SEC, and whether the
services requested and the fees related to such services could
impair the independence of the auditors.
Pursuant
to section 6.1 of NI 52-110, as adopted by the Canadian Securities
Administrators (the “CSA”), the Company is exempt from
the requirements of Parts 3 and 5 of NI 52-110 for the year ended
December 31, 2020, by virtue of the Company being a “venture
issuer” (as defined in NI 52-110).
Part 3
of NI 52-110 prescribes certain requirements for the composition of
audit committees of non-exempt companies that are reporting issuers
under Canadian provincial securities legislation. Part 3 of NI
52-110 requires, among other things that an audit committee be
comprised of at three directors, each of whom, is, subject to
certain exceptions, independent and financially literate in
accordance with the standards set forth in NI 52-110.
Part 5
of NI 52-110 requires an annual information form that is filed by a
non-exempt reporting issuer under National Instrument 51-102
– Continuous Disclosure
Obligations, as adopted the CSA, to include certain
disclosure about the issuer's audit committee, including, among
other things: the text of the audit committee's charter; the name
of each audit committee member and whether or not the member is
independent and financially literate; whether a recommendation of
the audit committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor
was not adopted by the issuer's board of directors, and the reasons
for the board's decision; a description of any policies and
procedures adopted by the audit committee for the engagement of
non-audit services; and disclosure of the fees billed by the
issuer's external auditor in each of the last two fiscal years for
audit, tax and other services.
As of
December 31, 2020 we employed 58 employees across the entire
operation.
Common Shares
The
shareholdings of our officers and directors are set forth below as
of July 16, 2021.
|
|
|
Percentage
of holding on a fully diluted basis(1)
|
Holder
name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
McAuley (2)
|
17,484,000
|
5.24%
|
5.24%
|
|
|
Andrejs
Bunkse (3)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Dustin
Klein (4)
|
6,740,196
|
2.02%
|
2.02%
|
-
|
-
|
Kyle Appleby
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Yoshi
Tyler(6)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Notes:
(1)
|
|
“Fully
diluted basis” means with the exercise of all warrants and
options.
|
(2)
|
|
Steven
McAuley is an interested party in the Company by virtue of him
serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors, a director and as
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
|
(3)
|
|
Andrejs
Bunkse is an interested party in the Company by virtue of him
serving as a director.
|
(4)
|
|
Dustin
Klein is an interested party in the Company by virtue of him
serving as a director and as the Company’s Senior Vice
President of business development.
|
(5)
|
|
Kyle
Appleby is an interested party in the Company by virtue of him
serving as the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer.
|
(6)
|
|
Yoshi
Tyler is an interested party in the Company by virtue of her
serving as a director and the President of Kai
Medical.
|
Options
Share
option transactions and the number of share options outstanding
during the three months ended March 31, 2021 and years ended
December 31, 2020, and 2019 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2018
|
7,600,000
|
CDN
$0.25
|
Granted
|
7,700,000
|
CDN
$0.14
|
Cancelled
|
(4,850,000)
|
CDN
$0.27
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2019
|
10,450,000
|
CDN
$0.16
|
Granted
|
6,967,761
|
CDN
$0.05
|
Exercised
|
(7,583,333)
|
CDN
$0.14
|
Outstanding,
December 31, 2020
|
9,834,428
|
CDN
$0.08
|
Granted
|
1,761,364
|
CDN
$0.40
|
Cancelled
|
(1,936,667)
|
CDN
$0.06
|
Exercised
|
(3,339,666)
|
CDN
$0.07
|
Outstanding,
March 31, 2021
|
6,319,459
|
CDN
$0.18
|
Of the
share options outstanding, 4,744,459 were exercisable as of March
31, 2021. Ms. Yoshi Tyler holds 775,000 share options and Mr.
Andrejs Bunkse holds 1,100,000 share options that are exercisable
into common shares. No other share options are held by interested
parties.
Warrants
There
were no share purchase warrants, exercisable into common shares of
Empower, held by our officers and directors as of March 31, 2021 or
the date of herein.
Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table summarizes our compensation plans under which
equity securities are authorized for issuance as at March 31,
2021:
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and
rights
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans(1) (excluding
securities reflected in the second column)
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by securityholders
|
19,804,364
|
|
26,845,794
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved by securityholders
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Total:
|
19,804,364
|
|
26,845,794
|
Notes:
(1)
|
|
The
number of securities remaining available for future issuance under
our 10% rolling stock option plan as at the end of our most
recently completed financial year is calculated on the basis of 10%
of our issued and outstanding common shares as at such date (being
10% of 333,402,526 = 33,340,253 less share options of 6,494,459 =
26,845,794). Note that the Company does not have a maximum number
of warrants that can be issued.
|
The
Company has an incentive share option plan (“the Stock Option
Plan”) in place under which it is authorized to grant share
options to executive officers, directors, employees and
consultants.
The
purpose of the Stock Option Plan continues to be to allow us grant
options to our directors, officers, employees and consultants, as
additional compensation, and as an opportunity to participate in
our success. The granting of such options is intended to align the
interests of such persons with that of the shareholders. Options
will be exercisable over periods of up to five years as determined
by the Board and are required to have an exercise price no less
than the fair market value of Empower’s common shares, at the
time of grant. Pursuant to the Stock Option Plan, the Board may,
from time to time, authorize the issue of stock options to our
directors, officers, employees and consultants or employees of
companies providing management or consulting services to
us.
The
maximum number of common shares which may be issued pursuant to
options previously granted and those granted under the Stock Option
Plan will be a maximum of 10% of the issued and outstanding common
shares at the time of the grant. In addition, the number of common
shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one individual may
not exceed 5% of the issued common shares on a yearly basis or 2%
if the optionee is engaged in investor relations activities or is a
consultant. The Stock Option Plan contains no vesting requirements,
but permits the Board to specify a vesting schedule in its
discretion.
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDER AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Major Shareholders
We are
a publicly-held corporation, with our common shares held by
residents of the United States, Canada and other countries. To the
best of our knowledge, as of the date of this 20-F, no person,
corporation or other entity beneficially owns, directly or
indirectly, or controls more than 5% of our common shares, except
as follows:
Name
|
Number of Common Shares Owned(1)(2)
|
Percentage(3)
|
Steven
McAuley
|
17,484,000
|
5.24%
|
Notes:
(1)
|
|
Under
Rule 13d–3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any
person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract,
arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or
shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to
direct the voting of common shares; and (ii) investment power,
which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of
common shares. Certain common shares may be deemed to be
beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example,
persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the
common shares). In addition, common shares are deemed to be
beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to
acquire the common shares (for example, upon exercise of an option)
within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided.
In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of
common shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of common
shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by
reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of
outstanding common shares of any person as shown in this table does
not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or
voting power with respect to the number of common shares actually
outstanding on the date hereof.
|
(2)
|
|
Each of
our common shares entitles the holder thereof to one
vote.
|
(3)
|
|
Based
on 291,520,720 common shares of Empower issued and outstanding as
of the date of this filing.
|
(4)
|
|
CDS
& Co. (the registration name for The Canadian Depositary of
Securities Limited, which acts as nominee for many Canadian
brokerage firms).
|
Geographic Breakdown of Shareholders
As of
July 21, 2021, our shareholder register indicates that our common
shares are held as follows:
Location
|
Number of Common Shares
|
Percentage of Total Common Shares
|
Number of Registered Shareholders of Record
|
United
States
|
9,563,777
|
2.87%
|
42
|
Canada
|
323,209,870
|
96.94%
|
26
|
Other
|
628,879
|
0.19%
|
5
|
Total
|
333,402,526
|
100.00%
|
68
|
Common
shares registered in intermediaries were assumed to be held by
residents of the same country in which the clearing house was
located.
Transfer Agent
Our
securities are recorded in registered form on the books of our
transfer agent, Olympia Trust Company Suite 1900, 925 West Georgia
Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2. However, the majority of such shares
are registered in the name of intermediaries such as brokerage
houses and clearing houses (on behalf of their respective brokerage
clients). We do not have knowledge or access to the identities of
the beneficial owners of such common shares registered through
intermediaries.
Control
To the
best of our knowledge, we are not directly or indirectly owned or
controlled by any other corporation, by any foreign government or
by any other natural or legal person, severally or
jointly.
Insider Reports under the British Columbia Securities
Act
Since
the Company is a reporting issuer under the Securities Acts of
British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario, certain
“insiders” of the Company (including its directors,
certain executive officers, and persons who directly or indirectly
beneficially own, control or direct more than 10% of its common
shares) are generally required to file insider reports of changes
in their ownership of Empower’s common shares five days
following the trade under National Instrument 55-104 –
Insider Reporting Requirements and Exemptions, as adopted by the
Canadian Securities Administrators. All insider reports must be
filed electronically five days following the date of the trade at
www.sedi.ca. The public is able to access these reports at
www.sedi.ca.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
None of
our directors or senior officers, no associate or affiliate of the
foregoing persons, and no insider has or had any material interest,
direct or indirect, in any transactions, or in any proposed
transaction, which in either such case has materially affected or
will materially affect us or our predecessors during the year ended
December 31, 2019.
|
(a)
|
Compensation
of key management personnel:
|
For the
purpose of related party disclosure in accordance with IASB 24,
directors, the CEO, CFO, COO and executive vice president are
considered key management personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in
thousands
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
benefits
|
$341,601
|
$734,655
|
Directors
fees
|
7,500
|
11,250
|
Share-based
compensation
|
12,159
|
556,040
|
|
|
|
|
$361,260
|
$1,301,945
|
|
Interests
of Experts and Counsel
|
Not
applicable.
|
Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information
|
Financial Statements
The
financial statements required as part of this Annual Report on Form
20-F are filed under Item 18 of this Annual Report.
Legal Proceedings
As at
the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, Empower is not
involved in any legal, arbitration or governmental proceedings and,
to Empower’s knowledge, no material legal, arbitration or
governmental proceedings involving Empower are pending or
contemplated against Empower.
Dividends
We have
not paid any dividends on our common shares since incorporation.
Our management anticipates that we will retain all future earnings
and other cash resources for the future operation and development
of our business. We do not intend to declare or pay any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future
dividends will be at the Board’s discretion, subject to
applicable law, after taking into account many factors including
our operating results, financial condition and current and
anticipated cash needs.
We have
not experienced any significant changes since the date of the
financial statements included with this Form 20-F except as
disclosed in this Form 20-F.
Cease Trades
On May
3, 2021, the Company was granted a management cease trade order
(“MCTO”) by the
British Columbia Securities Commission. The MCTO does not affect
the ability of shareholders who are not insiders of the Company to
trade their securities. The MCTO was issued in connection with the
delay by the Company in filing its annual financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related
management’s discussion and analysis and certificates of its
CEO and CFO (collectively, the "Required Filings") with Canadian
securities regulators until after the April 30, 2021 filing
deadline. The delay in filing was primarily due to the impact of
COVID-19 on the audit and associated required travel, of the
Company's recently acquired subsidiaries in both the US and Canada.
The Required Filings were filed on July 2, 2021 and the MCTO was
lifted on July 14, 2021.
Common Shares
Our
authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares
without par value, of which 283,811,903 common shares were issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2020. All common shares are
initially issued in registered form. There are no restrictions on
the transferability of our common shares imposed by our
constituting documents.
The
common shares entitle their holders to: (i) vote at all meetings of
our shareholders except meetings at which only holders of specified
classes of shares are entitled to vote, having one vote per common
share, (ii) receive dividends at the discretion of the Board; and
(iii) receive our remaining property on liquidation, dissolution or
winding up.
Trading Markets
Our
current trading symbol on the CSE is “CBDT”. We also
trade on the OTCQB with the trading symbol “EPWCF” and
on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with the trading symbol
“8EC”.
As
disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, on April 23, 2018, the
Company completed its previously disclosed reverse takeover
transaction of Adira. As a result, the Company has limited history
of high and low share price progression.
Escrowed Securities
As at
December 31, 2020 10,986,306 common shares were subject to
escrow.
Not
applicable.
|
Memorandum
and Articles of Incorporation
|
We were
incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on
April 28, 2015. We changed our name from S.M.A.A.R.T. Holdings
Inc., to Empower concurrent with the Transaction.
We
currently are not party to any material contracts.
There
are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada relating
to restrictions on the export or import of capital, or affecting
remittance of interest, dividends or other payments to non-resident
holders of our common shares. However, the Investment Canada
Act (Canada) will prohibit implementation, or if necessary, require
divestiture of an investment deemed “reviewable” under
the Investment Canada Act by an investor that is not a
“Canadian” as defined in the Investment Canada Act,
unless after review the Minister responsible for the Investment
Canada Act is satisfied that the “reviewable”
investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.
The
following discussion summarizes the principal features of the
Investment Canada Act for a non-Canadian who proposes to acquire
common shares of the Company. The discussion is general only; it is
not a substitute for independent legal advice from an investor's
own adviser; and, except where expressly noted, it does not
anticipate statutory or regulatory amendments.
The
Investment Canada Act is a federal statute of broad application
regulating the establishment and acquisition of Canadian businesses
by non-Canadians, including individuals, governments or agencies
thereof, corporations, partnerships, trusts or joint ventures,
Investments by non-Canadians to acquire control over existing
Canadian businesses or to establish new ones are either reviewable
or notifiable under the Investment Canada Act. If an investment by
a non-Canadian to acquire control over an existing Canadian
business is reviewable under the Investment Canada Act, the
Investment Canada Act generally prohibits implementation of the
investment unless, after review, the Minister of Industry is
satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to
Canada.
An
investment in the Company’s common shares by a non-Canadian,
who is not a resident of a World Trade Organization
(“WTO”) member, would be reviewable under the
Investment Canada Act (Canada) if it was an investment to acquire
control of the Company and the value of the assets of the Company
was CAN $5 million or more. An investment in common shares of the
Company by a resident of a WTO member would be reviewable only if
it was an investment to acquire control of the Company and the
enterprise value of the assets of the Company was equal to or
greater than a specified amount, which is published by the Minister
after its determination for any particular year. This amount is
currently CAN $1 billion (unless the WTO member is party to one of
a list of certain free trade agreements, in which case the amount
is currently CAN $1.5 billion); beginning January 1, 2019, both
thresholds will be adjusted annually by a GDP (Gross Domestic
Product) based index.
A
non-Canadian would be deemed to acquire control of the Company for
the purposes of the Investment Canada Act if the non-Canadian
acquired a majority of the outstanding common shares (or less than
a majority but controlled the Company in fact through the ownership
of one-third or more of the outstanding common shares) unless it
could be established that, on the acquisition, the Company is not
controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of such
common shares. Certain transactions in relation to the
Company’s common shares would be exempt from review under the
Investment Canada Act, including, among others, the
following:
(a) the
acquisition of voting shares or other voting interests by any
person in the ordinary course of that person’s business as a
trader or dealer in securities;
(b)
the acquisition of
control of the Company in connection with the realization of
security granted for a loan or other financial assistance and not
for any purpose related to the provisions of the Investment Canada
Act (Canada), if the acquisition is subject to approval under the
Bank Act (Canada), the Cooperative Credit Associations Act
(Canada), the Insurance Companies Act (Canada) or the Trust and
Loan Companies Act (Canada); and
(c)
the acquisition of
control of the Company by reason of an amalgamation, merger,
consolidation or corporate reorganization following which the
ultimate direct or indirect control of the Company, through the
ownership of voting interests, remains unchanged.
Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences for United States
Residents
The
following summarizes the material Canadian federal income tax
considerations generally applicable to the holding and disposition
of our shares by a holder (in this summary, a “U.S. Holder”) who, (a) for the
purposes of the Income Tax
Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”) and at all relevant
times, (i) is not resident in Canada, (ii) deals at arm’s
length with, and is not affiliated with, us, (iii) holds our shares
as capital property and does not use or hold, and is not deemed to
use or hold, our shares in the course of carrying on, or otherwise
in connection with, a business in Canada, and (b) for the purposes
of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the
“Treaty”) and at
all relevant times, is a resident solely of the United States, has
never been a resident of Canada, is a “qualifying
person” who is fully entitled to the benefit of the Treaty
and has not held or used (and does not hold or use) our shares in
connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada.
This summary does not apply to traders or dealers in securities,
limited liability companies, tax-exempt entities, insurers,
authorized foreign bank, financial institutions (including those to
which the mark-to-market provisions of the Tax Act apply), special
financial institutions, or any other holder to which special
circumstances may apply.
This
summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, all
regulations thereunder, the Treaty, all proposed amendments to the
Tax Act, the regulations and the Treaty publicly announced by the
Government of Canada prior to the date hereof, and our
understanding of the current published administrative practices of
the Canada Revenue Agency. It has been assumed that all currently
proposed amendments will be enacted as proposed and that there will
be no other relevant change in any governing law or administrative
practice, although no assurances can be given in this
respect.
The
summary does not take into account Canadian provincial, U.S.
federal (which follows further below), state or other foreign
income tax law or practice. The tax consequences to any particular U.S.
Holder will vary according to the status of that holder as an
individual, trust, corporation, partnership or other entity, the
jurisdictions in which that holder is subject to taxation, and
generally according to that holder’s particular
circumstances. Accordingly, this summary is not, and is not to be
construed as, Canadian tax advice to any particular U.S. Holder.
All U.S. Holders are advised to consult with their own tax advisors
regarding their particular circumstances. The discussion below is
qualified accordingly.
Dividends
Dividends
paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited to a U.S. Holder
by us will be subject to Canadian withholding tax. The Tax Act
requires a 25% withholding unless reduced under an applicable tax
treaty. Under the Treaty, provided that a holder can demonstrate
that it is a qualifying U.S. Holder, the rate of withholding tax on
dividends paid to a U.S. Holder is generally limited to 15% of the
gross amount of the dividend (or 5% if the U.S. Holder is a
qualified company and beneficially owns at least 10% of our voting
shares). We will be required to withhold the applicable withholding
tax from any dividend and remit it to the Canadian government for
the U.S. Holder’s account.
Disposition
For
purposes of the following discussion, we have assumed that our
shares will remain listed on the TSXV. A U.S. Holder is not subject
to tax under the Tax Act in respect of a capital gain realized on
the disposition of our shares in the open market unless the shares
are “taxable Canadian property” to the holder thereof
and the U.S. Holder is not entitled to relief under the Treaty. Our
shares will be taxable Canadian property to a U.S. Holder (a) if,
at any time during the 60-month period preceding the disposition:
(i) the U.S. Holder, alone or together with persons with whom the
U.S. Holder did not deal at arm’s length, owned 25% or more
of our issued shares of any class or series, and (ii) more
than 50% of the fair market value of the shares was derived,
directly or indirectly, from one or any combination of real
property situated in Canada, timber resource properties, Canadian
resource properties, or an option in respect of, or an interest in,
or for civil law a right in, any of the foregoing, or (b) in other
specific circumstances, including where shares were acquired for
other securities in a tax-deferred transaction for Canadian tax
purposes. If our shares constitute taxable Canadian property to the
holder, the holder will (unless relieved under the Treaty) be
subject to Canadian income tax on any gain. The taxpayer’s
capital gain or loss from a disposition of the share is the amount,
if any, by which the proceeds of disposition exceed (or are
exceeded by) the aggregate of the adjusted cost base of the share
and reasonable expenses of disposition. One-half of a capital gain
(“taxable capital
gain”) from the disposition of taxable Canadian
property (other than treaty protected properties) is included in
computing the income of a U.S. Holder and one-half of a capital
loss (“allowable capital
loss”) is deductible from taxable capital gains from
dispositions of taxable Canadian property realized in the same
year. Unused allowable capital losses from previous taxation years
generally may be carried back three taxation years or forward
indefinitely and applied to reduce net taxable capital gains
realized in those years by a U.S. Holder from the disposition of a
taxable Canadian property.
A U.S.
Holder whose shares constitute taxable Canadian property should
consult with the holder’s own tax advisors regarding any
possible relief (if any) from Canadian tax under the Treaty based
on applicable circumstances at the relevant time.
United States Tax Consequences
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The
following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal
income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined
below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and
disposition of our common shares.
This
summary is for general information purposes only and does not
purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S.
federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder
arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and
disposition of our common shares. In addition, this summary does
not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any
particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to such U.S. Holder, including without limitation
specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under an applicable tax
treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should
not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with
respect to any U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S.
federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S.
state and local, and foreign tax consequences to U.S. Holders of
the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.
Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not
discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. Each U.S. Holder
should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S.
federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S.
state and local, and foreign tax consequences relating to the
acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common
shares.
No
legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has been requested, or will
be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.
This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not
precluded from taking a position that is different from, and
contrary to, the positions taken in this summary. In addition,
because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject
to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could
disagree with one or more of the conclusions described in this
summary.
Scope of this Summary
Authorities
This
summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final,
temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published
administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada
and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income
and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the
“Canada-U.S. Tax Convention”), and U.S. court decisions
that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available,
as of the date of this document. Any of the authorities on which
this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse
manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a
retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S.
federal income tax considerations described in this summary. This
summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or
beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be
applied on a retroactive or prospective basis.
U.S. Holders
For
purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. Holder” means
a beneficial owner of our common shares that is for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
●
an individual who
is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
●
a corporation (or
other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof
or the District of Columbia;
●
an estate whose
income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its
source; or
●
a trust that (1) is
subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and
the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial
decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable
Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
Non-U.S. Holders
For
purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S. Holder” is a
beneficial owner of our common shares that is not a U.S. Holder.
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to non-U.S. Holders arising from and relating to the
acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.
Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor
regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S.
federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax
consequences (including the potential application of and operation
of any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership,
and disposition of our common shares.
U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not
Addressed
This
summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations
applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions
under the Code, including, but not limited to, the following: (a)
U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified
retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other
tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial
institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate
investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) U.S.
Holders that are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities
or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting
method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a “functional
currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that
own our common shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction,
conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement
involving more than one position; (f) U.S. Holders that acquired
our common shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock
options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) U.S. Holders
that hold our common shares other than as a capital asset within
the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held
for investment purposes); or (h) U.S. Holders that own or have
owned (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the
total combined voting power of the outstanding shares of the
Company. This summary also does not address the U.S. federal income
tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders who are: (a) U.S.
expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; (b) persons
that have been, are, or will be a resident or deemed to be a
resident in Canada for purposes of the Tax Act; (c) persons that
use or hold, will use or hold, or that are or will be deemed to use
or hold our common shares in connection with carrying on a business
in Canada; (d) persons whose our common shares constitute
“taxable Canadian property” under the Tax Act; or (e)
persons that have a permanent establishment in Canada for the
purposes of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention. U.S. Holders that are
subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not
limited to, U.S. Holders described immediately above, should
consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S.
federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S.
state and local, and foreign tax consequences relating to the
acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common
shares.
If an
entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other
“pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax
purposes holds our common shares, the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to such entity and the partners (or other owners) of
such entity generally will depend on the activities of the entity
and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not
address the tax consequences to any such owner. Partners (or other
owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as
partnerships or as “pass-through” entities for U.S.
federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and
relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our
common shares.
Ownership and Disposition of our common shares
The
following discussion is subject to the rules described below under
the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company
Rules.”
Taxation of Distributions
A U.S.
Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive
distribution, with respect to our common share will be required to
include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a
dividend (without reduction for any foreign income tax withheld
from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated
“earnings and profits” of we, as computed for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. To the extent that a distribution
exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and
profits” of we, such distribution will be treated first as a
tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder's tax
basis in our common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or
exchange of such our common shares (see “Sale or Other
Taxable Disposition of Common Shares” below). However, we may
not maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance
with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder
should therefore assume that any distribution by us with respect to
our common shares will constitute ordinary dividend income.
Dividends received on our common shares generally will not
constitute qualified dividend income eligible for the
“dividends received deduction”. Subject to applicable
limitations and provided that we are eligible for the benefits of
the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, dividends paid by us to
non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will
be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term
capital gains for dividends, provided certain holding period and
other conditions are satisfied, including that we are not
classified as a PFIC (as defined below) in the tax year of
distribution or in the preceding tax year. The dividend rules are
complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor
regarding the application of such rules.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares
A U.S.
Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable
disposition of our common shares in an amount equal to the
difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair
market value of any property received and (b) such U.S.
Holder’s tax basis in such our common shares sold or
otherwise disposed of. Any such gain or loss generally will be
capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss
if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, such our common
shares are held for more than one year.
Preferential
tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is
an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no
preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder
that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to
significant limitations under the Code.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
If we
were to constitute a PFIC for any year during a U.S. Holder’s
holding period, then certain potentially adverse rules would affect
the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder resulting
from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common
shares. We do not believe that we were a PFIC during our tax year
ended December 31, 2018. PFIC classification is fundamentally
factual in nature, generally cannot be determined until the close
of the tax year in question, and is determined annually.
Additionally, the analysis depends, in part, on the application of
complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to
differing interpretations. Consequently, there can be no assurances
regarding our PFIC status for any tax year during which U.S.
Holders hold our common shares.
In
addition, in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC, such
holder may be required to file an annual report with the IRS
containing such information as Treasury Regulations and/or other
IRS guidance may require. In addition to penalties, a failure to
satisfy such reporting requirements may result in an extension of
the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax. U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of
filing such information returns under these rules, including the
requirement to file a revised IRS Form 8621.
We
generally will be a PFIC under Section 1297 of the Code if, for a
tax year, (a) 75% or more of our gross income for such tax year is
passive income (the “income test”) or (b) 50% or more
of the value of our assets either produce passive income or are
held for the production of passive income (the “asset
test”), based on the quarterly average of the fair market
value of such assets. “Gross income” generally includes
all sales revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from
investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources,
and “passive income” generally includes, for example,
dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains
from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from
commodities transactions. Active business gains arising from the
sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if
substantially all (85% or more) of a foreign corporation’s
commodities are stock in trade or inventory, depreciable property
used in a trade or business or supplies regularly used or consumed
in a trade or business and certain other requirements are
satisfied.
In
addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test
described above, if we own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of
the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation,
we will be treated as if we (a) held a proportionate share of the
assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a
proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. In
addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test
described above, “passive income” does not include any
interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or
accrued by us from a “related person” (as defined in
Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are
properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not
passive income.
Under
certain attribution rules, if we are a PFIC, U.S. Holders will be
deemed to own their proportionate share of any subsidiary of ours
which is also a PFIC (a ‘‘Subsidiary
PFIC’’), and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax
on (i) a distribution on the shares of a Subsidiary PFIC or (ii) a
disposition of shares of a Subsidiary PFIC, both as if the holder
directly held the shares of such Subsidiary PFIC.
If we
are a PFIC in any tax year in which a U.S. Holder held our common
shares, such holder generally would be subject to special rules
with respect to “excess distributions” made by us on
our common shares and with respect to gain from the disposition of
our common shares. An “excess distribution” generally
is defined as the excess of distributions with respect to our
common shares received by a U.S Holder in any tax year over 125% of
the average annual distributions such U.S. Holder has received from
us during the shorter of the three preceding tax years, or such
U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common shares.
Generally, a U.S. Holder would be required to allocate any excess
distribution or gain from the disposition of our common shares
ratably over its holding period for our common shares. Such amounts
allocated to the year of the disposition or excess distribution
would be taxed as ordinary income, and amounts allocated to prior
tax years would be taxed as ordinary income at the highest tax rate
in effect for each such year and an interest charge at a rate
applicable to underpayments of tax would apply.
While
there are U.S. federal income tax elections that sometimes can be
made to mitigate these adverse tax consequences (including, without
limitation, the “QEF Election” under Section 1295 of
the Code and the “Mark-to-Market Election” under
Section 1296 of the Code), such elections are available in limited
circumstances and must be made in a timely manner.
U.S.
Holders should be aware that, for each tax year, if any, that we
are a PFIC, we can provide no assurances that we will satisfy the
record keeping requirements of a PFIC, or that we will make
available to U.S. Holders the information such U.S. Holders require
to make a QEF Election with respect to us or any Subsidiary PFIC.
U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding
the potential application of the PFIC rules to the ownership and
disposition of our common shares, and the availability of certain
U.S. tax elections under the PFIC rules.
Additional Considerations
Additional Tax on Passive Income
Individuals,
estates and certain trusts whose income exceeds certain thresholds
will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare surtax on “net
investment income” including, among other things, dividends
and net gain from disposition of property (other than property held
in certain trades or businesses). U.S. Holders should consult with
their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on
their ownership and disposition of our common shares.
Receipt of Foreign Currency
The
amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign
currency, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of
our common shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value
of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on
the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is
converted into U.S. dollars at that time). A U.S. Holder will have
a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on
the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise
disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have
a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as
ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income
or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Each U.S. Holder should
consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign
currency.
Foreign Tax Credit
Subject
to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that pays (whether
directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect
to dividends paid on our common shares generally will be entitled,
at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction
or a credit for such Canadian income tax. Generally, a credit will
reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S.
Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This
election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign
taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S.
Holder during a year.
Complex
limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general
limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of
a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such
U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income
bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In
applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of
income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as
either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.”
Generally, dividends paid by a foreign corporation should be
treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on
the sale of stock of a foreign corporation by a U.S. Holder should
be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as otherwise
provided in an applicable income tax treaty, and if an election is
properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a distribution
with respect to our common shares that is treated as a
“dividend” may be lower for U.S. federal income tax
purposes than it is for Canadian federal income tax purposes,
resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S.
Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with
respect to specific categories of income. The foreign tax credit
rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S.
tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Under
U.S. federal income tax law and Treasury Regulations, certain
categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with
respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign
corporation. For example, U.S. return disclosure obligations (and
related penalties) are imposed on individuals who are U.S. Holders
that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess
certain threshold amounts. The definition of specified foreign
financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in
foreign financial institutions, but also, unless held in accounts
maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued
by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument or contract held for
investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S.
person and any interest in a foreign entity. U. S. Holders may be
subject to these reporting requirements unless our common shares
are held in an account at certain financial institutions. Penalties
for failure to file certain of these information returns are
substantial. U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax
advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns,
including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.
Payments
made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of
dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable
disposition of, our common shares will generally be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of
28%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s
correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form
W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification
number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has
previously failed to properly report items subject to backup
withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury,
that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer
identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S.
Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However,
certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these
information reporting and backup withholding rules. Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under
the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit
against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if
any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required
information to the IRS in a timely manner. Each U.S. Holder should
consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and
backup withholding rules.
|
Dividends
and Paying Agents
|
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
Exhibits
attached to this Form 20-F are also available for viewing at our
offices, Suite 505, 1771 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6G 1C9; or
you may request them by calling our office at 1-888-367-6937.
Copies of our financial statements and other continuous disclosure
documents required under securities rules are available for viewing
on the internet at www.sedar.com.
See
Item 4.C – “Organizational Structure” of this
Annual Report on Form 20-F.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
We are
not subject to any material market risks.
|
Transaction
Risk and Currency Risk Management
|
Our
operations do not employ complex financial instruments or
derivatives, and given that we keep our excess funds in high-grade
short-term instruments, we do not have significant or unusual
financial market risks. In the event we experience substantial
growth in the future, our business and results of operations may be
materially affected by changes in interest rates on new debt
financings, the granting of credit options to our customers, and
certain other credit risks associated with our
operations.
|
Interest
Rate Risk and Equity Price Risk
|
We are
equity financed and do not have material amounts of debt which
could be subject to significant interest rate change risks. We have
raised equity funding through the sale of securities denominated in
CDN$, and will likely raise additional equity funding denominated
in CDN$ in the future.
|
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
|
We are
exposed to financial risk related to the fluctuation of foreign
exchange rates. Most of our monetary assets are held in US dollars
and most of our expenditures are made in US dollars. However, we
also have some monetary assets and expenditures in CDN$. A
significant change in the currency rates between the CDN$ relative
to the US dollar could have an effect on our future results of
operations, financial position or cash flows, depending on our
currency management techniques. We have not hedged our exposure to
currency fluctuations.
The
table below summarizes the net monetary assets and liabilities held
in foreign currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN$ net monetary
liabilities
|
$4,195,664
|
$2,434,448
|
|
$4,195,664
|
$2,434,448
|
The
effect on loss before income tax for the year ended December 31,
2020, of a 10.0% change in the foreign currencies against the US
dollar on the above-mentioned net monetary assets and liabilities
of the Company is estimated to be an increase/decrease of $534,108
(2018 - $316,186) assuming that all other variables remained
constant.
|
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not
applicable.
PART II
|
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
None.
|
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
None.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(“Exchange Act”)
to mean controls and other procedures of an issuer that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and
includes, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the
issuer’s management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
As
required under the Exchange Act, we have carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F, being
December 31, 2020. This evaluation was carried out by our Mr.
Steven McAuley, our Chief Executive Officer, and Kyle Appleby, our
Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our executives
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as at December 31, 2020.
Material
weaknesses identified include:
-
No
formal server network to maintain Company documents
-
Reconciliations
for material accounts were not completed in a timely
manner
-
Monthly
and quarterly consolidation were not maintained
-
No
segregation of duties in performing reconciliations and financial
reporting
-
Limited
access to the accounting system for key management
personnel
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Exchange Act in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) defines this as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive
and principal financial officers and effected by the Board,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
includes those policies and procedures that:
-
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company;
-
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and
-
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s
assets that may have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Under
the supervision and with the participation of Mr. Steven McAuley,
who serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Kyle Appleby who
serves as our Chief Financial Officer, our management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
at December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, our management
used the criteria, established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based upon this assessment, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was ineffective as at December 31, 2020.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting to future periods are subject to risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
This
Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the
Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Management's report is not
subject to attestation by the Company's registered public
accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's
report in this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During
the period ended December 31, 2020, there were changes which
created ineffective internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERTS
|
As
disclosed above, as of the date hereof, our Audit Committee is
comprised of Steven McAuley (chair), Andrejs Bunkse and Dustin
Klein.
We have
adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our
employees and officers, including our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of
Business Conduct meets the requirements for a “code of
ethics” within the meaning of that term in Item 16B of Form
20-F. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct will be provided to
any person without charge, upon request. All requests for a copy of
our code of ethics should be directed in writing to the attention
of Steven McAuley, c/o Empower Clinics Inc., Suite 505, 1771 Robson
Street Vancouver, BC V6G 1C9, or by email at:
s.mcauley@empowerclinics.com.
During
the most recently completed fiscal year, the Company has neither:
(a) amended its Code of Ethics; nor (b) granted any waiver
(including any implicit waiver) form any provision of its Code of
Ethics.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
following table sets forth information regarding the amount billed
to us by our principal independent auditors, MNP LLP for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees:
|
$305,000
|
$90,900
|
Audit Related
Fees:
|
113,500
|
57,770
|
Tax
Fees:
|
|
|
Total:
|
$418,500
|
$148,670
|
Audit Fees
This
category includes the aggregate fees billed by our independent
auditor for the audit of our consolidated annual financial
statements, reviews of interim financial statements and attestation
services that are provided in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit Related Fees
This
category includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two
fiscal years for assurance and related services by the independent
auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audits or reviews of the financial statements and are not reported
above under “Audit Fees,” and generally consist of fees
for other engagements under professional auditing standards,
accounting and reporting consultations.
Tax Fees
This
category includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two
fiscal years for professional services rendered by the independent
auditors for tax compliance, tax planning and tax
advice.
Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by
Independent Auditors
The
policy of our Audit Committee is to pre-approve all audit and
permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent
auditors during the fiscal year.
|
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT
COMMITTEES
|
Not
applicable.
|
PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
|
In the
year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did not purchase any of
its issued and outstanding common shares pursuant to any repurchase
program or otherwise.
|
CHANGES TO REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
|
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
PART III
Not
applicable.
Financial Statements Filed as Part of this Annual
Report
●
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated June 30,
2021;
●
Consolidated
statement of financial position for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2020 and 2019;
●
Consolidated
statements of comprehensive profit and loss for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019;
●
Consolidated
statements of changes in (deficit) equity for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019;
●
Consolidated
statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2020 and 2019; and
●
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
EMPOWER CLINICS INC.
(formerly ADIRA ENERGY LTD.)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019, 2018
INDEX
|
Page
|
Independent Auditors’ Report
|
49
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
52
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
|
53
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
|
55
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
54
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
57 - 96
|
Empower
Clinics Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For
the years ended
December
31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Empower Clinics
Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
position of Empower Clinics Inc. (the Company) as of December 31,
2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of loss and
comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2020, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated
financial statements).
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its
consolidated operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2020,
in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board.
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
This
matter is also described in the “Critical Audit
Matters” section of our report.
Basis for Opinion
These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The
critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from
the current period audit of the financial statements that were
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee
and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially
challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of
critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate
opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or
disclosures to which they relate.
Critical Audit Matter Description
|
Audit Response
|
Going Concern
Refer
to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company has a history of losses and negative cash flows from
operating activities, and as at December 31, 2020, the Company had
a working capital deficiency of $1,746,818 (December 31, 2019 -
$4,185,359) and an accumulated deficit of $30,078,630 (December 31,
2019 - $13,012,319). This matter is also described in the
“Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern” section
of our report.
We
identified managements judgments and assumptions used to assess the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a
critical audit matter due to inherent complexities and
uncertainties related to the Company’s cash flow forecasts.
Auditing these judgments and assumptions involved especially
challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit
evidence and effort required to address these matters.
|
We
responded to this matter by performing procedures over going
concern. Our audit work in relation to this included, but was not
restricted to, the following:
● We obtained and
tested the Company’s forecast cash flows by testing the
completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by
benchmarking it to externally derived industry data and evaluating
the Company’s historical results.
● We evaluated the
estimates and assumptions by developing an understanding of the
nature of each critical assumption and estimate and then assessed
their sensitivity to reasonably possible changes, including
notably, the probability that management will be able to access
funding by assessing the terms of current year agreements and the
company’s history in obtaining financing.
● We assessed the
adequacy of the disclosures related to the application of the going
concern assumption.
|
Acquisitions of Kai Medical Laboratory, LLC and Lawrence Park and
Atkinson
Refer
to Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial
statements.
On
October 5, 2020, the Company entered into a membership interest
purchase agreement to acquire 100% interest in the business of Kai
Medical Laboratory, LLC for total consideration of
$20,050.
On
December 31, 2020, the Company entered into a share purchase
agreement to acquire 100% interest in the businesses of Lawrence
Park Health and Wellness Clinic Inc., 1100900 Canada Inc dba
Atkinson, and Momentum Health Inc. collectively (“Lawrence
Park & Atkinson’”) for total consideration of
$1,771,409.
These
transactions have been accounted for by the Company as business
combinations under IFRS 3 - Business Combinations.
Due to
the complexities involved in the assessment of business combination
versus asset acquisition as well as the significant judgments,
assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows,
volatility, risk free rate and discount rates, within the
methodology utilized to measure the fair value of the related
assets and liabilities acquired and consideration paid, we have
identified this area as a critical audit matter.
|
We
responded to this matter by performing procedures over the
estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. Our audit work in relation to each of these acquisitions
included, but was not restricted to, the following:
● We obtained a copy
of the amended and restated purchase and sale agreement from
management and read the terms in detail to ensure that the
transaction has been appropriately assessed as a business
combination;
● We obtained
management’s analysis and a memo detailing how the fair value
of assets and liabilities acquired have been determined, the
purchase consideration paid, and the resulting goodwill recognized
on the transaction;
● We involved
internal valuation specialists to test the appropriateness of the
methodology used in the valuation of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. We also verified the appropriateness of the
key inputs and assumptions used in the above model including
revenue growth rates, operating margins and discount rates by
comparing such items to the industry projections and conditions
found in industry reports as well as historical operating results
of the entity acquired;
● We also involved
external appraisal experts to assess the appropriateness of the
depreciated replacement cost of the property and equipment
acquired, by performing an independent calculation and inspecting
the estimated remaining years of service for the underlying assets
based on the original acquisition dates and condition of
assets;
● We assessed the
qualifications of the valuators engaged by the Company based on
their credentials and experience; and
● We performed
sensitivity analysis of the significant assumptions relating to
forecasted revenue, expenses and discount rates within the
valuation models by varying key assumptions within an observable
range.
|
Measurement of Purchase Consideration Payable
Refer to Note 7 in the consolidated financial
statements.
On
December 16, 2020, the Company acquired 100% interest in the
businesses of Lawrence Park & Atkinson for consideration of
$1,771,409.
Pursuant to the Amended and restated share purchase agreement, part
of the consideration comprising 3,750,000 stock options is payable
subject to completion of certain milestones relating to the opening
of new clinics and is required to be measured at fair value.
Therefore, estimating the fair value of the purchase consideration
payable is subject to significant management estimates and
judgment, including the model used, probability of opening of
clinics, risk free rate and volatility. This matter required
significant audit attention during the engagement and accordingly
we have identified this as a critical audit matter.
|
We responded to this matter by performing procedures in relation to
the measurement of purchase consideration payable. Our audit work
in relation to this included, but was not restricted to, the
following:
● We obtained
forecasts prepared by management and assessed reasonableness of
management’s estimated probability of opening clinics over
the milestone period stipulated in the agreement;
● We involved our
internal valuations specialists to evaluate whether the valuation
model used by management is reasonable and to assist in verifying
the reasonability of the volatility input used; and
● We also performed
sensitivity analyses on probability assumptions within the
valuation model.
|
Impairment of goodwill and Intangible assets
Refer
to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
During
2019, the Company had recognized goodwill of $2,500,000 on
acquisition of Sun Valley Certification Clinics Holdings, LLC.
Additionally, on October 5, 2020, the Company acquired 100%
interest in Kai Medical Laboratory, LLC and on December 31, 2020,
the Company acquired 100% interest in Lawrence Park Health and
Wellness Clinic Inc., 1100900 Canada Inc dba Atkinson, and Momentum
Health Inc. collectively (“Lawrence Park &
Atkinson”)
Any
goodwill recognized from these acquisitions is subject to
impairment assessments annually, or more frequently to the extent
events or conditions indicate a risk of possible
impairment.
Significant
judgments are made in determining the cash-generating unit to which
such assets belong for purposes of the impairment tests. There
exists high estimation uncertainty due to the significant judgments
used to estimate the future revenues and cash flows, including
growth rates, operating expenses, and cash outflows,
weighted-average cost of capital, future market conditions and the
valuation methodology.
For
these reasons we determined goodwill and intangible asset
impairment assessments to be a critical audit matter.
|
We
responded to this matter by performing procedures over the
impairment of goodwill and intangibles. Our audit work in relation
to this included, but was not restricted to, the
following:
● We obtained cash
flow forecasts prepared by management and assessed critical
management estimates included in the forecast, such as revenue
growth, terminal growth rates, gross margin and discount rates. The
net present value of the forecast cash flows was compared to the
carrying value of the related cash generating unit;
● We validated
management’s assessment of indicators of impairment for
intangibles, including reference to historical performance,
external market data, and assessment of the Company’s future
strategy and budgets;
● We assessed the
accuracy of management’s historical forecasts and, where
there were discrepancies, we evaluated the impact of these on the
current year forecasts;
● We involved our
internal valuations specialists to estimate an appropriate discount
rate with reference to market data and compared that to the rate
used by management;
● We evaluated the
cash flow forecasts in detail, tracing to supporting documentation
for the revenue figures, focusing on market assumptions, including
discussions with the directors and the business unit head as well
as assessment of supporting internal analysis; and
● We
applied sensitivities to calculations prepared by management to
assess the impact on the impairment assessment of reasonable
possible changes to assumptions.
|
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
Ottawa,
Canada
June
30, 2021
EMPOWER CLINICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(in
United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
4,889,824
|
179,153
|
Accounts
receivable
|
8
|
264,866
|
24,482
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
81,748
|
38,382
|
Inventory
|
|
17,681
|
21,848
|
Total current
assets
|
|
5,254,119
|
263,865
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory
note
|
10
|
-
|
122,573
|
Property and
equipment
|
11
|
1,590,047
|
797,423
|
Intangible
assets
|
12
|
303,907
|
254,640
|
Goodwill
|
12
|
2,082,146
|
117,218
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
9,230,219
|
1,555,719
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
13,25
|
3,442,725
|
1,874,990
|
Current
portion of loans payable
|
16
|
992,070
|
761,711
|
Current
portion of notes payable
|
14
|
708,361
|
969,891
|
Convertible
debentures payable
|
17
|
-
|
427,320
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
15
|
200,530
|
192,717
|
Current
portion of lease liability
|
18
|
241,138
|
219,800
|
Current
portion of warrant liability
|
19
|
1,416,113
|
-
|
Conversion
feature
|
17
|
-
|
2,795
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
7,000,937
|
4,449,224
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
payable
|
16
|
1,140,157
|
-
|
Lease
Liability
|
18
|
255,248
|
515,096
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
26,694
|
-
|
Warrant
liability
|
19
|
6,297,584
|
106,312
|
Total liabilities
|
|
14,720,620
|
5,070,632
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
DEFICIENCY
|
|
|
|
Issued
capital
|
20(b)
|
22,969,566
|
7,827,310
|
Share subscriptions
receivable
|
20(b)
|
(745,531)
|
-
|
Shares to be
issued
|
14(d)
|
60,287
|
22,050
|
Contributed
surplus
|
|
2,223,269
|
1,501,361
|
Warrant
reserve
|
|
80,638
|
146,685
|
Deficit
|
|
(30,078,630)
|
(13,012,319)
|
Total
shareholders’ deficiency
|
|
(5,490,401)
|
(3,514,913)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ deficiency
|
|
9,230,219
|
1,555,719
|
Nature
of operations and going concern (note 1)
Commitments
and contingencies (note 28)
Events
after the reporting period (note 29)
Approved
and authorized by the Board of Directors on June 30,
2021:
“Steven
McAuley”
|
Director
|
“Yoshi
Tyler”
|
Director
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
EMPOWER CLINICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
For the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
(in
United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
Clinic
services
|
|
3,154,301
|
1,949,549
|
1,091,386
|
Product
revenues
|
|
54,895
|
82,032
|
-
|
Total
revenues
|
|
3,209,196
|
2,031,581
|
1,091,386
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
clinic expenses excluding depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of clinic services
|
|
1,157,428
|
793,374
|
417,047
|
Cost
of product revenues
|
|
36,132
|
32,902
|
-
|
Total direct clinic
expenses
|
|
1,193,560
|
826,276
|
417,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,015,636
|
1,205,305
|
674,339
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
21,26
|
3,947,408
|
2,933,619
|
2,517,681
|
Legal and
professional fees
|
|
1,394,571
|
1,015,743
|
1,450,141
|
Depreciation and
amortization expense
|
11,12
|
381,492
|
327,059
|
123,473
|
Impairment of
intangible assets
|
12
|
340,575
|
93,757
|
64,200
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
12
|
117,218
|
2,377,397
|
-
|
Share-based
payments
|
20(c),26
|
323,799
|
608,944
|
892,417
|
Loss from
operations
|
|
(4,489,427)
|
(6,151,214)
|
(4,373,573)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
expenses (income)
|
|
|
|
|
Listing
fee
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
1,308,808
|
Accretion
expense
|
14,16,17
|
327,301
|
114,515
|
241,521
|
Interest
expense
|
14-18
|
212,110
|
240,539
|
126,375
|
Issuance costs
allocated to warrants accounted for as liabilities
|
20(b)
|
44,947
|
129,965
|
-
|
Interest
income
|
10
|
(7,573)
|
(4,977)
|
-
|
Gain on debt
settlement of accounts payable
|
13,20(b)
|
-
|
(15,130)
|
-
|
Gain on termination
of leases
|
11
|
(14,049)
|
(76,717)
|
-
|
Impairment loss on
write-off of property and equipment
|
|
-
|
196,352
|
-
|
Loss (gain) on
change in fair value of warrant liability
|
19
|
11,886,796
|
(2,065,781)
|
(1,598,425)
|
Gain on change in
fair value of conversion feature
|
17
|
(2,795)
|
(587,229)
|
(890,136)
|
Impairment of
promissory note
|
10
|
130,147
|
-
|
-
|
Impairment of
assets held for sale
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
57,072
|
Restructuring
expense, net
|
22
|
-
|
88,808
|
110,424
|
Other expense
(income), net
|
|
-
|
130,104
|
60,706
|
|
|
12,576,884
|
(1,849,551)
|
(583,655)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss and comprehensive loss for the year
|
|
(17,066,311)
|
(4,301,663)
|
(3,789,918)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
(0.09)
|
(0.04)
|
(0.06)
|
Diluted
|
|
(0.09)
|
(0.04)
|
(0.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
182,331,616
|
117,289,366
|
66,670,041
|
Diluted
|
|
182,331,616
|
117,289,366
|
66,670,041
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
EMPOWER CLINICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
(in
United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss and comprehensive loss for the year
|
|
(17,066,311)
|
(4,301,663)
|
(3,789,918)
|
Items
not involving cash:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
11,12
|
|