Flexsteel Industries Earnings 2018-12-31

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☑ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018

or 

☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                     to

Commission file number 0-5151

FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

385 BELL STREET

 DUBUQUE, IOWA 52001-0877

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(563) 556-7730

 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).

Large accelerated filer ☐      Accelerated filer ☑      Non-accelerated filer ☐      Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No☑ 

FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in thousands)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 

(Amounts in thousands)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS – Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) incorporated in 1929 is celebrating its 125th anniversary of the Company’s founding in 1893. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is one of the oldest and largest manufacturers, importers and marketers of residential and contract upholstered and wooden furniture products in the United States. Over the generations the Company has built a committed retail and consumer following based on its patented, guaranteed-for-life Blue Steel Spring^TM – the all-riveted, high-carbon, steel-banded seating platform that gives upholstered and leather furniture the strength and comfort to last a lifetime. With offerings for use in home, hotel, healthcare, recreational vehicle, marine and office, the Company distributes its furniture throughout the United States and Canada through the Company’s sales force and various independent representatives.

ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides a framework for the recognition of revenue, with the objective that recognized revenues properly reflect amounts an entity is entitled to receive in exchange for goods and services. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, the Company’s fiscal year 2019. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). The Company adopted the modified retrospective method on July 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as revenue is recognized when product ownership and risk of loss is transferred to the customer, collectability is probable and the Company has no remaining performance obligations. Thus, the timing of revenue recognition is not impacted by the new standard.

The Company’s revenues result from the sale of goods and reflect the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled. The Company records revenue based on a five-step model in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). For its customer contracts, typically purchase orders, the Company identifies the performance obligations (goods), determines the transaction price, allocates the contract transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognizes the revenue when the performance obligation is transferred to the customer. A good is transferred when the customer obtains control of that good and risk of loss transfers at a point in time.

Provisions for customer volume rebates, product returns, discounts and allowances are variable consideration and are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period the related sales are recorded. Such provisions are calculated agreed upon percentages. Consideration given to customers for cooperative advertising is recognized as a reduction of revenue except to the extent there is a distinct good or service and evidence of the fair value of the advertising, in which case the expense is classified as selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A).

The Company has a limited lifetime warranty on all products. The Company does not offer the option to purchase warranties. The Company accounts for warranties under ASC 460, Guarantees, and not as variable consideration related to revenue.

Occasionally the Company receives deposits from customers before it has transferred control of the product to customers, resulting in contract liabilities. These contract liabilities are reported within “Accounts payable - trade” in the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had $2.2 million of customer deposits. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $1.9 million of customer deposits.

Upon adoption of ASC 606, the Company elected the following practical expedients and policy elections:

These accounting treatments are consistent with the Company’s policies prior to adoption of ASC 606. Therefore, there will be no impact to the consolidated financial statements.

Adoption of this standard did not result in significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies, business processes, systems or controls, or have a material impact on financial position, results from operations and cash flows or related disclosures. As such, prior period financial statements were not adjusted.

The following table disaggregates the Company’s net sales by product category for the quarter ended December 31, (in millions):

The following table disaggregates the Company’s net sales by product category for the six months ended December 31, (in millions):

UNADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS – In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which will require lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets related to the rights and obligations created by those leases and will expand disclosure requirements. The new guidance was issued to increase transparency and comparability among companies. In July 2018, the FASB approved an amendment to the new guidance that allows companies the option of using the effective date of the new standard as the initial application (at the beginning of the period in which is it adopted, rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period) and to recognize the effects of applying the new ASU as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance sheet or retained earnings. Based on the effective dates, the Company expects to adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the new transition election to not restate comparative periods. The Company is still evaluating the impact to its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

A comparison of inventories is as follows:

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, investments, trade receivables, other current assets, accounts payable – trade and certain accrued liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature. GAAP on fair value measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities require that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories: Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; or Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The Company has not changed its valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased available-for-sale securities, U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. Agencies, which were recorded at fair market value. These securities were classified as “Investments” in the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains or losses were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2018, the fair market value and book value of the investments were $8.0 million. As of June 30, 2018, the fair market value and book value of the investments were $16.0 million. These assets were classified as Level 1 in accordance with fair value measurements described above.

The Company maintains an unsecured credit agreement that provides short-term working capital financing up to $10.0 million with interest of LIBOR plus 1% (4.50% at December 31, 2018), including up to $4.0 million of letters of credit. Letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2018, totaled $1.3 million. Other than the outstanding letters of credit, the Company did not utilize borrowing availability under the credit facility, leaving borrowing availability of $8.7 million as of December 31, 2018. The credit agreement expires June 30, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants contained in the credit agreement.

The Company maintains an additional unsecured $10.0 million line of credit, with interest at prime minus 2% (3.50% at December 31, 2018). No amount was outstanding on the line of credit at December 31, 2018. This line of credit matures December 31, 2019.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) was enacted, which, among numerous provisions reduced the federal statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Based on the provisions of the Tax Reform, the Company remeasured its deferred tax assets and liabilities and adjusted its estimated annual federal income tax rate to incorporate the lower corporate tax rate into the tax provision.

During the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the effective tax rates were 27.5% and 21.1%, respectively. The prior year quarter was positively impacted by a one-time adjustment for the passage of the Tax Reform. During the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the effective tax rates were 27.3% and 30.2%, respectively.

The Company has two stock-based compensation methods available when determining employee compensation:

The long-term incentive compensation plan provides for shares of common stock to be awarded to officers and key employees based on performance targets set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Company’s shareholders previously approved 700,000 shares to be issued under the plan. As of December 31, 2018, 102,183 shares have been issued. The Committee selected fully-diluted earnings per share as the performance goal for the three-year performance periods July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2019 (2017-2019), July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2020 (2018-2020) and July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021 (2019-2021). The Committee also selected total shareholder return as a performance goal for the executive officers for the three-year performance periods 2017-2019, 2018-2020 and 2019-2021. Stock awards will be issued to participants as soon as practicable following the end of the performance periods subject to verification of results and Committee approval. The compensation cost related to the number of shares to be granted under each performance period is fixed on the grant date, which is the date the performance period begins.

During the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recorded no plan expense. If the target performance goals for 2017-2019, 2018-2020 and 2019-2021 plans would be achieved, the total amount of compensation cost recognized over the requisite performance periods would be $0.9 million, $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Omnibus Stock Plan

The Omnibus Stock Plan is for key employees, officers and directors and provides for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and performance units. The Company’s shareholders previously approved 700,000 shares to be issued under the plan.

Under the Omnibus Stock Plan, options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and exercisable for up to 10 years. It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares upon exercise of stock options. The Company accepts shares of the Company’s common stock as payment for the exercise price of options. Shares received as payment are retired upon receipt. During the quarter ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued options for 30,210 common shares and recorded expense of $0.1 million related to the stock option grants. The Company did not issue options or record expense for the quarter ended December 31, 2017.

During the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company issued options for 66,305 and 21,439 common shares and recorded expense of $0.4 million and $0.2 million related to stock option grants, respectively.

Under the Omnibus Stock Plan, the Company issued 3,675 and 1,701 shares to non-executive directors as compensation and recorded expense of $0.1 million during the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company issued 6,265 and 3,564 shares to non-executive directors as compensation and recorded expense of $0.2 million during the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

During the three and six months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.3 million compensation expense for grants of an aggregate 39,666 restricted stock units under the plan to four executive officers as per their notification of award letters dated July 1, 2018. In addition, the Company awarded 30,000 restricted stock units and 3,186 restricted stock shares to its Chief Executive Officer per notification of award letters dated December 28, 2018. The Company recorded no compensation expense related to these grants to the Chief Executive Officer for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2018. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million compensation expense for grants of an aggregate 6,280 restricted stock units under the plan to two executive officers as per their notification of award letters dated July 1, 2017.

At December 31, 2018, 406,152 shares were available for future grants under the plan.

2006 and 2009 Stock Option Plans

The 2006 and 2009 Stock Option Plans are for key employees, officers and directors and provide for granting incentive and nonqualified stock options. Under the plans, options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and exercisable for up to 10 years. All options were exercisable when granted. No additional options can be granted under the 2006 and 2009 Stock Option Plans.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2018, the Company awarded its Chief Executive Officer 55,000 options outside any Company stock plan. The Company recorded no compensation expense related to this grant during the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2018.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock plans as of December 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and 2017 and the changes during the periods then ended is presented below:

The following table summarizes information for options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018:

Basic earnings per share (EPS) of common stock are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share of common stock includes the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding. The Company’s potential common shares outstanding are stock options, shares associated with the long-term management incentive compensation plan and non-vested shares. The Company calculates the dilutive effect of outstanding options using the treasury stock method. Anti-dilutive shares are not included in the computation of diluted EPS when their exercise price is greater than the average closing market price of the common shares. The Company calculates the dilutive effect of shares related to the long-term management incentive compensation plan and non-vested shares based on the number of shares, if any, that would be issuable if the end of the fiscal period were the end of the contingency period.

In computing EPS for the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, net income as reported for each respective period is divided by the fully diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding:

Cash dividends declared per common share were $0.22 and $0.44 for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Environmental Matters – In March 2016, the Company received a General Notice Letter for the Lane Street Groundwater Superfund Site (the “Lane Street Site”) located in Elkhart, Indiana from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In April 2016, the EPA issued their proposed clean-up plan for groundwater pollution and request for public comment. The Company responded to the request for public comment in May 2016. The EPA issued a Record Decision selecting a remedy in August 2016 and estimated total costs to remediate of $3.6 million. In July 2017, the EPA issued a Special Notice Letter to the Company demanding that the Company perform the remedy selected and pay for the remediation cost and past response costs of $5.5 million. On October 12, 2017, the Company offered an amount, fully reimbursable by insurance coverage, to the EPA to resolve this matter. On November 6, 2017, the settlement offer extended on October 12, 2017 was rejected.

In April 2018, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order for Remedial Design and Remedial Action (the “Order”) against the Company. The Order was issued under Section 106(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §9606(a). The Order directs the Company to perform remedial design and remedial action for the Lane Street Site. The Order was to be effective May 29, 2018. To ensure completion of the remediation work, the EPA required the Company to secure financial assurance in the initial amount of $3.6 million, which as noted above, is the estimated cost of remedial work. The Company believes that financial assurance is not required because it meets the relevant financial test criteria as provided in the Order. In May 2018, the EPA agreed to suspend enforcement of the Order so that the Company could conduct environmental testing upgradient to its former manufacturing location pursuant to an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC). On July 5, 2018, the EPA proposed a draft AOC, to which the Company provided revisions. During the latter part of 2018, Flexsteel submitted to the EPA its proposed work plan for the upgradient testing to be conducted pursuant to the draft AOC. The EPA provided comments on that documentation on December 4, 2018. On January 23, 2019, Flexsteel submitted responses to the EPA’s comments and revised work plan documents. As of January 25, 2019, the Company has not finalized the AOC with the EPA. The Company reflected a $3.6 million liability in the consolidated financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Despite the Company’s position that it did not cause nor contribute to the contamination, the Company continues to reflect this liability in the consolidated financials for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2018 in accordance with FASB issued Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (ASC 410-30). The Company continues to evaluate the Order, its legal options and insurance coverages to assert its defense and recovery of current and future expenses related to this matter.

Other Proceedings – From time to time, the Company is subject to various other legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of the Company’s business. The Company does not consider any of such other proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, to be material to its business or likely to result in a material effect on its consolidated operating results, financial condition, or cash flows.

As of January 25, 2019, there were no subsequent events, other than the items mentioned in Note 8.

GENERAL:

The following analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our 2018 annual report on Form 10-K, with the exception of adopting the new revenue recognition standard (ASC 606) in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

The following table has been prepared as an aid in understanding the Company’s results of operations on a comparative basis for the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Amounts presented are percentages of the Company’s net sales.

Results of Operations for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017

The following table compares net sales for the quarter ended December 31, (in millions):

Net sales were $118.4 million for the quarter compared to record net sales of $129.4 million in the prior year quarter, a decrease of 8.5% from the prior year period. Lower residential net sales were primarily driven by decreased unit volume in residential ecommerce product, followed by lower volume in home furnishings products. Despite being lower than prior year quarter, the Company’s product sales volume through ecommerce distribution continued to rebound after channel disruption due to the partial implementation of the business information system in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. Overall, on a sequential quarter basis, residential product unit volume excluding products sold through ecommerce distribution, improved by a percentage in the low-single digits. Higher second quarter contract net sales were primarily driven by double-digit increased volume in recreational vehicle and healthcare products offset by the delivery timing of hospitality products and the previously disclosed plan to decrease sales to certain commercial office product customers.

Gross margin as a percent of net sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2018 was 18.2% compared to 21.2% for the prior year quarter. The quarter decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales was primarily driven by increased labor and raw material costs, partially offset by sell price increases. Labor costs moderated but remained higher than expected and accounted for approximately 130 basis point decrease for the second quarter. Raw material price increases, primarily in polyurethane and plywood, resulted in approximately 60 basis points of gross margin deterioration during the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter. Onetime costs associated with the relocation of equipment and inventory to the new Dubuque manufacturing facility in the second quarter resulted in an adverse impact to gross margin of 40 basis points. The move is expected to be completed during the third fiscal quarter of 2019. Consistent with ASC 606, the classification of certain rebates as a reduction of sales adversely impacted the quarter results by approximately 80 basis points.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were 16.4% of net sales in the second quarter, compared to 15.2% of net sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company’s SG&A expenses increased 50 basis points during the second quarter due to the transition of SAP consulting services from capitalizable development services to stabilization maintenance services.

The Company incurred $0.7 million pre-tax SG&A expense, or 60 basis points, during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 due to expenses associated with the appointment of Jerry Dittmer as President and Chief Executive Officer. On an after-tax basis, the expense represents $0.5 million or $0.07 per share.

The effective tax rate for the second quarter was 27.5% compared to 21.1% in the prior year quarter. The prior year quarter was positively impacted by a one-time adjustment for the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform).

The above factors resulted in net income of $1.6 million or $0.20 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2018, compared to $6.2 million or $0.78 per share in the prior year quarter.

All earnings per share amounts are on a diluted basis.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017

The following table compares net sales for the six months ended December 31, (in millions):

Net sales were $231.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2018, compared to $249.2 million in the prior year six-month period, a decrease of 7.0% from the prior year period. Lower residential net sales for the current six-month period were primarily driven by decreased unit volume in residential ecommerce product, followed by lower unit volume in home furnishings products. Despite being lower than prior year quarter, the Company’s product sales volume through ecommerce distribution continued to rebound after channel disruption due to the partial implementation of the business information system in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. Current year contract net sales were primarily driven by double-digit increased volume in recreational vehicle products offset by the previously disclosed plan to decrease sales to certain commercial office product customers.

For the six months ended December 31, 2018, gross margin as a percent of net sales was 18.7%, compared to 21.5% for the prior year period. The current fiscal year decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales was primarily driven by increased labor and raw material costs partially offset by sell-price increases. Labor costs moderated but remained higher than expected and accounted for approximately 160 basis point decrease for the fiscal year versus the comparable prior year period. Raw material price increases, primarily in polyurethane and plywood, resulted in approximately 100 basis points of gross margin deterioration during the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. Onetime costs associated with the relocation of equipment and inventory to the new Dubuque manufacturing facility in the second quarter resulted in an adverse impact to gross margin of 20 basis points for the six months ended December 31, 2018. The move is expected to be completed during the third fiscal quarter of 2019. Consistent with ASC 606, the classification of certain rebates as a reduction of sales adversely impacted the current fiscal year results by approximately 80 basis points.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were 17.1% of net sales in the current fiscal year, compared to 15.2% of net sales in the prior year period. The Company’s SG&A expenses increased 30 basis points during the current fiscal year due to the transition of SAP consulting services from capitalizable development services to stabilization maintenance services.

The Company incurred $0.7 million pre-tax SG&A expense, or 30 basis points, during the six-month period ended December 31, 2018 due to expenses associated with the appointment of Jerry Dittmer as President and Chief Executive Officer. On an after-tax basis, the expense represents $0.5 million or $0.07 per share. SG&A expenses for the six months also included $1.3 million pre-tax expense for one-time severance and ancillary costs related to the retirement of the former president and chief executive officer. On an after-tax basis, the expense represents $1.0 million or $0.13 per share.

During the prior fiscal year six-month period, the Company completed a $6.5 million sale of a facility and recognized a pre-tax gain of $1.8 million. On an after-tax basis, the gain represents $1.3 million or $0.16 per share.

The effective tax rate for the six months ended December 31, 2018 was 27.3% compared to 30.2% in the prior year period.

The above factors resulted in net income of $2.9 million or $0.36 per share for the six-months ended December 31, 2018 compared to $12.4 million or $1.56 per share for the prior year period.

All earnings per share amounts are on a diluted basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) at December 31, 2018 was $136.9 million compared to $148.7 million at June 30, 2018. Primary changes in working capital included increases of $1.9 million in other current assets and $1.8 million in accounts payable and decreases in investments of $8.0 million, inventory of $2.3 million and cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million.

For the six months ended December 31, 2018, capital expenditures were $17.5 million, including $13.3 million for the Company’s new manufacturing facility. During the six months ended December 31, 2018, dividend payments increased to $3.5 million from $3.3 million during the prior year period.

The Company maintains a credit agreement which provides unsecured short-term working capital financing up to $10.0 million with interest of LIBOR plus 1% (4.50% at December 31, 2018), including up to $4.0 million of letters of credit. Letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2018 totaled $1.3 million, leaving borrowing availability of $8.7 million. The credit agreement expires June 30, 2019.

The Company maintains an additional unsecured $10.0 million line of credit, with interest at prime minus 2% (3.50% at December 31, 2018). No amount was outstanding on the line of credit at December 31, 2018. This line of credit matures December 31, 2019.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $10.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2018 was comprised primarily of net income of $2.9 million, depreciation of $3.7 million, a decrease in inventory of $2.3 million, and increases in accounts payable of $3.6 million and accounts receivable of $1.3 million. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended December 31, 2017 was $1.3 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $9.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2018 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $8.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2017. Capital expenditures were $17.5 million and $12.9 million during the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Net proceeds from sales of investments were $7.9 million during the six months ended December 31, 2018.

Net cash used in financing activities was $3.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to dividends paid of $3.5 million. Net cash used in financing activities was $3.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to dividends paid of $3.3 million.

Capital expenditures are estimated to be $2 million for the remainder of fiscal 2019. Management believes that the Company has adequate cash and cash equivalents, investments, cash flows from operations and credit arrangements to meet its operating and capital requirements for fiscal year 2019. In the opinion of management, the Company’s liquidity and credit resources provide it with the ability to react to opportunities as they arise, to pay quarterly dividends to its shareholders, and to purchase productive capital assets that enhance safety and improve operations.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2018, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2018.

Outlook

In addition to delivering on sales growth opportunities, management is focused on making progress in three key areas to improve operating results:

1.       SAP stabilization and finalizing the future roll out plan; 

2.       Productivity improvement and operational execution; and 

3.       Current and future tariff mitigation.

SAP Stabilization and Future Planning Status

With the partial implementation of the new business information system in fiscal fourth quarter of 2018, the Company experienced higher than expected disruption to customers that resulted in service level penalties and volume impacts. These disruptions and higher costs extended into the first fiscal quarter of 2019. During the second fiscal quarter of 2019, the implementation team reorganized, including bringing in new leadership and implementing a long-term support structure. This team made significant progress in system stabilization and customer service level improvements back to near normal rates. Because of the large order volumes and quick ship requirements, the ecommerce channel requires time to rebuild credibility through consistent and flawless delivery execution after disappointing customers. Therefore, the rate of recovery is paced to the Company’s ability to sustain service levels consistent with historically normal and expected performance.

Upon further review and consideration of the first deployment of SAP S/4 HANA and poor execution due primarily to applicability of system design and solution, Company readiness and resourcing constraints, the Company is re-evaluating the solution, the business needs, resource capability, the timeline and cost of moving forward. This re-evaluation includes analyzing the total investment to date, the viability of the investment to fulfill the needs of the business and the probability of success of migrating the remaining portions of the business without significant rework of the system design and undergoing deeper business process transformation.

The Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2018 includes $26 million in net book value related to the SAP business information system. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company stated that it would complete the remaining deployment of SAP during fiscal 2020. The Company no longer believes this timeline is achievable. Instead, the Company will be completing the re-evaluation activities as described above with a thorough evaluation of the work completed to date including financial implications, its usefulness in the context of further implementation, the implications of that assessment mainly financial in nature, the provision of a revised scope, if applicable, and an outlook on timing and cost of project completion. The Company expects this re-evaluation and go forward plan to be completed by the end of this fiscal year.

Productivity and Operational Execution

Excluding labor inefficiencies attributable to the Dubuque manufacturing facility relocation, labor costs in the second quarter improved compared to first quarter results as the Company reduced excess labor capacity. While labor efficiency and utilization continued to be a challenge in the quarter, management is identifying and implementing additional initiatives to further mitigate increased labor costs, enhance service levels and reduce lead times.

Tariff Mitigation

The Company has worked to reduce Chinese sourced product costs in order to mitigate the size of sell price increases passed through to the marketplace during the first tariff implementation in September 2018. Although difficult to quantify, the Company believes there has been an adverse impact on order rates due to the current tariff level as some retailers have altered buying patterns and quantities since tariff implementation.

The Company anticipates additional volume declines if the tariff is escalated to 25% in March 2019. In preparation for the potential 25% tariff, the Company is aggressively working on supply chain realignment to provide cost reductions and mitigate price increases. Depending on the level of price increase at wholesale, which passes through to retail, there could be significant volume contraction in residential home furnishings. Inability to reduce Chinese sourced product costs or pass through pricing to mitigate the tariffs poses significant risk to current and future earnings.

General – Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of a financial instrument, derivative or non-derivative, caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. As discussed below, management of the Company does not believe that changes in these factors could cause material fluctuations in the Company’s results of operations or cash flows. The ability to import furniture products can be adversely affected by political issues in the countries where suppliers are located, disruptions associated with shipping distances and negotiations with port employees. Other risks related to furniture product importation include government imposition of regulations and/or quotas; duties and taxes on imports; and significant fluctuation in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. Any of these factors could interrupt supply, increase costs and decrease earnings.

Foreign Currency Risk – During the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not have sales, but has purchases and other expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The market risk associated with currency exchange rates and prices is not considered significant.

Interest Rate Risk – The Company’s primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any debt outstanding.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective as of December 31, 2018.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the quarter ended December 31, 2018, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Cautionary Statement Relevant to Forward-Looking Information for the Purpose of “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements with respect to long-term goals or anticipated results of the Company, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its reports to stockholders.

Statements, including those in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There are certain important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made herein. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty. Some of the factors that could affect results are the cyclical nature of the furniture industry, supply chain disruptions, litigation, the effectiveness of new product introductions and distribution channels, the product mix of sales, pricing pressures, the cost of raw materials and fuel, retention and recruitment of key employees, actions by governments including laws, regulations, taxes and tariffs, inflation, the amount of sales generated and the profit margins thereon, competition (both U.S. and foreign), credit exposure with customers, participation in multi-employer pension plans and general economic conditions. For further information regarding these risks and uncertainties, see the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Other than the item mentioned below, there has been no material change in the risk factors set forth under Part 1, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.

Effective September 24, 2018, the current U.S. administration imposed a 10% tariff on goods imported into the United States from China, including all furniture and furniture components manufactured in China, with the potential for the tariffs to increase to 25% on March 1, 2019. In fiscal 2018, approximately 44% of the Company’s sales were imported from China. Inability to reduce acquisition costs or pass through price increases may have an adverse impact on sales volume, earnings and liquidity.

The Company will be analyzing the SAP S/4 HANA solution designed and partially implemented to date. The analysis will include the total investment expended, the viability of the system design to fulfill the needs of the business, the probability and level of rework of the system design while also evaluating the potential need to undergo deeper business process transformation prior to further roll out and implementation of the solution. These activities and analyses may lead to the potential impairment of a significant portion of the capital expenditure invested to date. The net book value associated with the SAP business information system included in property, plant, and equipment in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 was $26 million.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.