Ford Motor Credit Earnings 2018-12-31
FMCC 10K Annual Report
| Balance Sheet | Income Statement | Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
R | Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 | ||
or
£ | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________ | ||
Commission file number 1-6368 | ||
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 38-1612444 |
(State of organization) | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
One American Road, Dearborn, Michigan | 48126 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(313) 322-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each Exchange on which registered | |
3.700% Notes due March 11, 2019 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.588% Notes due June 2, 2020 | New York Stock Exchange | |
0.623% Notes due June 28, 2023* | New York Stock Exchange | |
1.355% Notes due February 7, 2025* | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.350% Notes due Nine Months or More from the Date of Issue due August 20, 2026 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due June 14, 2019* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due December 12, 2019* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due December 16, 2019* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due May 14, 2021* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due December 1, 2021* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due December 7, 2022* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due November 15, 2023* | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Notes due December 1, 2024* | New York Stock Exchange | |
*Issued under Euro Medium Term Notes due Nine Months or More from The Date of Issue Program | ||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Emerging growth company o | |||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
o Yes þ No
All of the limited liability company interests in the registrant (“Shares”) are held by an affiliate of the registrant. None of the Shares are publicly traded.
REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.
Exhibit Index begins on page 63 |
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Table of Contents | Page | ||
Part I | |||
Part II | |||
i
Table of Contents (Continued) | Page | ||
Part III | |||
Part IV | |||
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and Subsidiaries Financial Statements | |||
ii
PART I
ITEM 1. Business.
Overview
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC was incorporated in Delaware in 1959 and converted to a limited liability company in 2007. We are an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Our principal executive offices are located at One American Road, Dearborn, Michigan 48126, and our telephone number is (313) 322-3000.
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website located at www.fordcredit.com/investor-center. These reports can also be found on the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov.
Our website and its content are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (“2018 Form 10-K Report” or “Report”) nor filed with the SEC.
Products and Services. We offer a wide variety of automotive financing products to and through automotive dealers throughout the world. The predominant share of our business consists of financing Ford and Lincoln vehicles and supporting the dealers of those brands. We earn our revenue primarily from:
• | Payments made under retail installment sale and lease contracts that we originate and purchase; |
• | Interest rate supplements and other support payments from Ford and affiliated companies; and |
• | Payments made under dealer financing programs. |
As a result of our financing activities, we have a large portfolio of consumer and non-consumer finance receivables and operating leases.
Finance receivables and operating leases in the consumer portfolio include products offered to individuals and businesses that finance the acquisition of Ford and Lincoln vehicles from dealers for personal and commercial use. Retail financing includes retail installment sale contracts for new and used vehicles and direct financing leases for new vehicles to retail and commercial customers, including leasing companies, government entities, daily rental companies, and fleet customers.
Finance receivables in the non-consumer portfolio include products offered to automotive dealers and receivables related to Ford and its affiliates. We make wholesale loans to dealers to finance the purchase of vehicle inventory, also known as floorplan financing, as well as loans to dealers to finance working capital and improvements to dealership facilities, finance the purchase of dealership real estate, and finance other dealer vehicle programs. We also purchase receivables from Ford and its affiliates, primarily related to the sale of parts and accessories to dealers and certain used vehicles from daily rental fleet companies. In addition, we provide financing to Ford for vehicles that Ford leases to its employees.
We also service the finance receivables and leases we originate and purchase, make loans to Ford affiliates, and provide insurance services related to our financing programs.
Geographic Scope of Operations and Segment Information. We conduct our financing operations directly and indirectly through our subsidiaries and affiliates. We offer substantially similar products and services throughout many different regions, subject to local legal restrictions and market conditions. We segment our business based on geographic regions: the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Items excluded in assessing segment performance because they are managed at the corporate level, including market valuation adjustments to derivatives and exchange-rate fluctuations on foreign currency-denominated transactions, are reflected in Unallocated Other.
For additional financial information regarding our operations by business segment and operations by geographic region, see Note 17 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
1
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Americas Segment
Our Americas segment includes operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina. This segment represented 78% and 80% of total managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our United States operations accounted for 85% and 87% of Americas segment total managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively, and our Canadian operations accounted for 13% and 12% of Americas segment total managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. Managed receivables equal net finance receivables and net investment in operating leases, excluding unearned interest supplements and residual support, allowance for credit losses, and other (primarily accumulated supplemental depreciation). For additional information on how we review our business performance, including on a managed basis, refer to the “Overview” section of Item 7. Managed receivables are discussed further in the “Financial Condition” section of Item 7.
Under the Ford Credit and Lincoln Automotive Financial Services brand names, we provide financing services to and through dealers of Ford and Lincoln vehicles. Operations in some markets may also include joint ventures with local financial institutions and other third parties. In addition, other private label operations and alternative business arrangements exist in some markets.
Europe Segment
Our Europe segment includes operations in the European region and a joint venture in South Africa. This segment represented 17% of total managed receivables at both year-end 2017 and 2018. Our operations in the European region are managed primarily through a United Kingdom-based subsidiary, FCE Bank plc (“FCE”), which operates in the United Kingdom and has branches in 11 other European countries. On July 1, 2018, FCE established an operating subsidiary in Germany, Ford Bank GmbH (“Ford Bank”). FCE also has operating subsidiaries in Switzerland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary that provide a variety of retail and dealer financing. The United Kingdom and Germany are our largest markets in Europe, representing 59% and 58% of Europe segment managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. Customers and dealers in Italy, France, and Spain were 23% and 24% of Europe segment managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. FCE, through its Worldwide Trade Financing (“WWTF”) division, provides financing to distributors and importers in about 70 countries where Ford has no national sales company presence. Our operations include joint ventures with local financial institutions and other third parties in various locations. In addition, other private label operations and alternative business arrangements exist in some markets.
Asia Pacific Segment
Our Asia Pacific segment includes operations in China and India. This segment represented 5% and 3% of total managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. China operations accounted for 97% and 96% of Asia Pacific segment total managed receivables at year-end 2017 and 2018, respectively. In addition, other private label operations and alternative business arrangements exist in some markets.
Dependence on Ford
The predominant share of our business consists of financing Ford and Lincoln vehicles and supporting Ford and Lincoln dealers. Any extended reduction or suspension of Ford’s production or sale of vehicles due to a decline in consumer demand, work stoppage, governmental action, negative publicity or other event, or significant changes to marketing programs sponsored by Ford would have an adverse effect on our business. Additional information about Ford’s business, operations, production, sales, and risks can be found in Ford’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (“Ford’s 2018 Form 10-K Report”), filed separately with the SEC.
Ford has sponsored special financing programs available only through us. Under these programs, Ford makes interest supplements or other support payments to us. These programs increase our financing volume and share of financing sales and operating leases of Ford and Lincoln vehicles. Similar programs may be offered in the future. For additional information regarding interest supplements and other support costs received from affiliated companies, see Notes 4 and 5 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
2
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Competition
The automotive financing business is highly competitive, due in part to web-based credit aggregation systems that permit dealers to send, through standardized systems, retail credit applications to multiple finance sources to evaluate financing options offered by these finance sources. Our principal competitors are:
• | Banks; |
• | Independent finance companies; |
• | Credit unions; |
• | Leasing companies; and |
• | Other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies. |
We compete mainly on the basis of service and financing rate programs, including those sponsored by Ford. A key foundation of our service is providing broad and consistent purchasing policies for retail installment sale and lease contracts, and consistent support for dealer financing requirements across economic cycles. These policies have helped us build strong relationships with Ford’s dealer network that enhance our competitiveness. Our ability to provide competitive financing rates depends on effectively and efficiently originating, purchasing, and servicing our receivables, and efficiently accessing the capital markets. We routinely monitor the capital markets and develop funding plans to optimize our competitive position. Ford-sponsored special financing programs available only through us give us a competitive advantage in providing financing to Ford dealers and their customers.
Seasonal Variations
As a finance company, we own and manage a large portfolio of receivables that are generated throughout the year and are collected over a number of years, primarily in fixed monthly payments. As a result, our overall financing revenues do not exhibit seasonal variations.
Consumer Financing
Overview and Purchasing Process
We provide financing services to customers for personal and commercial use through automotive dealers that have established relationships with us. Our primary business consists of originating and purchasing retail installment sale and lease contracts for new and used vehicles from Ford and Lincoln dealers. We report in our financial statements the receivables from customers under installment sale contracts and certain leases with fleet customers as finance receivables. We report in our financial statements most of our retail leases as net investment in operating leases with the capitalized cost of the vehicles recorded as depreciable assets.
In general, we purchase from dealers retail installment sale contracts and lease contracts that meet our purchase standards. These contracts primarily relate to the purchase or lease of new vehicles, but some are for used vehicles. Dealers typically submit customer applications electronically. We automatically obtain information on the applicant including a credit bureau score, if available. We use a proprietary scoring system that measures credit quality using information in the credit application, proposed contract terms, credit bureau data, and other information. After a proprietary risk score is generated, we decide whether to purchase a contract using a decision process based on a judgmental evaluation of the applicant, the credit application, the proposed contract terms, credit bureau information (e.g., FICO score), proprietary risk score, and other information. Our evaluation emphasizes the applicant’s ability to pay and creditworthiness focusing on payment, affordability, applicant credit history, and stability as key considerations. Purchase decisions are made within a framework of Ford Credit’s purchase quality and risk factor guidelines. Credit applications are typically evaluated by our electronic decisioning process, which may approve or reject applications.
Retail Financing
The amount we pay for a retail installment sale contract is based on a negotiated vehicle purchase price agreed to between the dealer and the retail customer, less vehicle trade-in allowance or down payment from the customer and special marketing cash payments offered by Ford Credit and Ford, plus any additional products, such as insurance and extended service plans, that are included in the contract. The net purchase price owed by the customer typically is paid over a specified number of months with interest at a fixed rate negotiated between the dealer and the retail customer. The dealer may retain a limited portion of the finance charge.
3
Item 1. Business (Continued)
We offer a variety of retail installment sale financing products. The average original term of our retail installment sale contracts in the United States was 65 months for contracts purchased in both 2017 and 2018. A small portion of our retail installment sale contracts have non-uniform payment periods and payment amounts to accommodate special cash flow situations. We also offer a retail balloon product in Europe under which the retail customer may finance a vehicle with an installment sale contract with a series of monthly payments followed by paying the amount remaining in a single balloon payment. The customer can satisfy the balloon payment obligation by payment in full of the amount owed, by refinancing the amount owed, or by returning the vehicle to us and paying any contractually agreed additional charges for excess mileage or excess wear and use. Generally, we sell vehicles returned to us to Ford dealers and non-Ford dealers through auctions.
In most markets, we hold a security interest in the vehicles purchased through retail installment sale contracts. This security interest provides us certain rights and protections. As a result, if our collection efforts fail to bring a delinquent customer’s payments current, we generally can repossess the customer’s vehicle, after satisfying local legal requirements, and sell it at auction. The customer typically remains liable for any deficiency between net auction proceeds and the defaulted contract obligations, including any repossession-related expenses. We generally require retail customers to carry fire, theft, and collision insurance on financed vehicles.
We offer vehicle-financing programs to retail and commercial customers including leasing companies, government entities, daily rental companies, and fleet customers. These financings include primarily lease plans for terms of 24 to 60 months. We hold a security interest in financed vehicles in almost all instances. At the end of the finance term, a lease customer may be required to pay any shortfall between the fair market value and the specified end of term value of the vehicle. If the fair market value of the vehicle at the end of the finance term exceeds the specified end of term value, the lease customer may be paid the excess amount. These financings are included in our consumer segment and reported as retail financing.
Net Investment in Operating Leases
We offer leasing plans to retail customers through our dealers. Our highest volume retail-leasing plan is called Red Carpet Lease, which is offered in the United States and Canada through dealers of Ford and Lincoln brands. Under these plans, dealers originate the leases and offer them to us for purchase. Upon our purchase of a lease, we take ownership of the lease and title to the leased vehicle from the dealer. After we purchase a lease from a dealer, the dealer generally has no further obligation to us in connection with the lease. The customer is responsible for properly maintaining the vehicle and is obligated to pay for excess wear and use as well as excess mileage, if any. At the end of the lease, the customer has the option to purchase the vehicle for the price specified in the lease contract, or return the vehicle to the dealer. If the customer returns the vehicle to the dealer, the dealer may buy the vehicle from us or return it to us. We generally sell vehicles returned to us to Ford and non-Ford dealers through auctions.
The amount we pay to a dealer for a retail lease, also called the acquisition cost, is based on the negotiated vehicle price agreed to between the dealer and the retail customer, less any vehicle trade-in allowance or down payment from the customer and special marketing cash payments offered by Ford Credit and Ford, plus any additional products, such as insurance and extended service plans, that are included in the contract. The customer makes monthly lease payments based on the purchase price less the contractual residual value of the vehicle, plus lease charges. Some of our lease programs, such as our Red Carpet Lease Advance Payment Plan, provide certain pricing advantages to customers who make all or some monthly payments at lease inception or purchase refundable higher mileage allowances. We require lease customers to carry fire, theft, liability, and collision insurance on leased vehicles. In the case of a contract default and repossession, the customer typically remains liable for any deficiency between net auction proceeds and the defaulted contract obligations, including any repossession-related expenses.
In the United States, operating lease terms for new vehicles range primarily from 24 to 39 months. In both 2017 and 2018, the average original lease term for contracts purchased was 35 months.
4
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Non-Consumer Financing
Overview
We extend credit to franchised dealers selling Ford and Lincoln vehicles primarily in the form of approved lines of credit to purchase new and used vehicles. Each lending request is evaluated, taking into consideration the borrower’s financial condition, supporting security, and numerous other financial and qualitative factors. Generally, receivables are secured by the related vehicle or the related property and may also be secured by other dealer assets. Asset verification processes are in place and include physical audits of vehicle inventories with increased audit frequency for higher-risk dealers.
Dealer Financing
Wholesale Financing. We offer a wholesale financing program for qualifying dealers to finance new and used vehicles held in inventory (also known as floorplan financing). We generally finance the vehicle’s wholesale invoice price for new vehicles and up to 100% of the dealer’s purchase price for used vehicles. Dealers generally pay a floating interest rate on wholesale loans. In the United States, the average new wholesale receivable, excluding the time the vehicle was in transit from the assembly plant to the dealership, was outstanding for 71 days in 2017 compared with 68 days in 2018. Our wholesale financing program includes financing of large multi-brand dealer groups.
When a dealer uses our wholesale financing program to purchase vehicles, we obtain a security interest in the vehicles and, in many instances, other assets of the dealer. In the United States and Canada, our wholly owned subsidiary, The American Road Insurance Company (“TARIC”), generally provides insurance for vehicle damage and theft of vehicles held in dealer inventory that are financed by us.
Dealer Loans. We make loans to dealers to finance the purchase of dealership real estate, to make improvements to dealership facilities, and to provide working capital. These loans are typically secured by mortgages on dealership real estate and/or by security interests in other dealership assets. In addition, these loans are generally supported by personal guarantees from the individual owners of the dealership.
Other Dealer Financing. We also provide financing to qualified dealers for vehicles to be utilized for service replacement and retail rental use. In addition, we provide financing to qualified daily rental companies for new and used vehicles used in their operations.
Other Financing
We also purchase receivables from Ford and its affiliates, primarily related to the sale of parts and accessories to dealers and certain used vehicles from daily rental fleet companies. In addition, we provide financing to Ford for vehicles that Ford leases to its employees. These receivables are excluded from our credit quality reporting since the performance of this group of receivables is generally guaranteed by Ford.
Marketing and Special Programs
We actively market our financing products and services to automotive dealers and customers. We demonstrate to dealers the value of a business relationship with us through personal sales contacts, targeted advertisements in trade publications, and participation in dealer-focused conventions and organizations. Our marketing strategy is based on our belief that we can better assist dealers in achieving their sales, financial, and customer satisfaction goals by being a reliable finance source with knowledgeable automotive and financial professionals offering personal attention and interaction. We demonstrate our commitment to dealer relationships with a variety of materials, measurements, and analyses showing the advantages of a full range of automotive financing products that allows consistent and predictable single source financing. We promote increased dealer transactions through incentives, bonuses, contests, and selected program and rate adjustments.
5
Item 1. Business (Continued)
We promote our retail financing products primarily through pre-approved credit offers to prospective customers, point-of-sale information, and ongoing communications with existing customers. Our communications to these customers promote the advantages of our financing products, the availability of special plans and programs, and the benefits of affiliated products, such as extended warranties, service plans, insurance coverage, gap protection, and excess wear and use waivers. We also emphasize the quality of our customer service and the ease of making payments and transacting business with us. For example, through our web site located at www.fordcredit.com or via our mobile application a customer can make inquiries, review an account balance, examine current incentives, schedule an electronic payment, or qualify for a pre-approved credit offer.
We also market our non-consumer financing services with a specialized group of employees who make direct sales calls on dealers and, often at the request of such dealers, on potential high-volume commercial customers. This group also uses various materials to explain our flexible programs and services specifically directed at the needs of commercial and fleet vehicle customers.
Servicing
Consumer Financing
After we purchase retail installment sale contracts and leases from dealers and other customers, we manage the contracts during their contract terms. This management process is called servicing. We service the finance receivables and leases we originate and purchase. Our servicing duties include the following:
• | Applying monthly payments from customers; |
• | Maintaining a security interest in the financed vehicle; |
• | Providing billing statements to customers; |
• | Responding to customer inquiries; |
• | Releasing our security interest on paid-off finance contracts; |
• | Contacting delinquent customers for payment; |
• | Arranging for the repossession of vehicles; and |
• | Selling repossessed and returned vehicles. |
Customer Payment Operations. Customers may make payments by mailing checks to a bank for deposit in a lockbox account, through electronic payment services, a direct debit program, or a telephonic payment system.
Collections. We design our collection strategies and procedures to keep accounts current and to collect on delinquent accounts. We employ a combination of proprietary and non-proprietary tools to assess the probability and severity of default for all of our finance receivables and leases and implement our collection efforts based on our determination of the credit risk associated with each customer. As each customer develops a payment history, we use an internally developed behavioral scoring model to assist in determining the best collection strategies. Based on data from this scoring model, contracts are categorized by collection risk. Our centralized collection operations are supported by auto-dialing technology and proprietary collection and workflow operating systems. Through our auto-dialer program and our monitoring and call log systems, we target our efforts on contacting customers about missed payments and developing satisfactory solutions to bring accounts current.
Supplier Operations. We engage vendors to perform some of our servicing processes. These processes include depositing monthly payments from customers, monitoring the perfection of security interests in financed vehicles, imaging of contracts and electronic data file maintenance, generating retail and lease billing statements, providing telephonic payment systems for retail customers, handling of some inbound and outbound collections calls, and recovering deficiencies for selected accounts.
Payment Extensions. In our regular course of business we may offer payment extensions to customers. Each month 1% to 2% of our U.S. retail contracts outstanding are granted payment extensions. A payment extension allows the customer to extend the term of the contract, usually by paying a fee that is calculated in a manner specified by law. Before agreeing to a payment extension, the service representative reviews the customer’s payment history and current financial situation and assesses the customer’s desire and capacity to make future payments. The service representative decides whether the proposed payment extension complies with our policies and guidelines. Payment extensions are reviewed regularly by Ford Credit’s servicing managers.
6
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Repossessions and Off-lease Vehicles. We view repossession of a financed or leased vehicle as a final step that we undertake only after all other collection efforts have failed. Our United States and Canada systems also employ a web-based network of outside contractors who support the repossession process. In all of our markets we sell repossessed vehicles and apply the proceeds to the amount owed on the customer’s account. We continue to attempt collection of any deficient amounts until the account is paid in full, we obtain mutually satisfactory payment arrangements with the debtor, or we determine that the account is uncollectible. Repossessed vehicles are reported in Other assets on our balance sheet at values that approximate expected net auction proceeds.
We manage the sale of returned leased vehicles and repossessed vehicles. We inspect and recondition the vehicle to maximize the net auction value of the vehicle. Returned leased vehicles are predominantly sold through an on-line auction, closed auctions in which only Ford and Lincoln dealers may participate, or at open auctions in which any licensed dealer can participate. Typically, repossessed vehicles are sold at open auctions.
Non-Consumer Financing
In the United States and Canada, we require dealers to submit monthly financial statements that we monitor for potential credit deterioration. We assign an evaluation rating to each dealer, which, among other things, determines the frequency of physical audits of vehicle inventory. We electronically audit vehicle inventory utilizing integrated systems allowing us to access information from Ford reported sales. We monitor dealer inventory financing payoffs daily to detect deviations from typical repayment patterns and take appropriate actions. If a dealer fails to make principal or interest payments when due, we will classify the dealer as “status” and may take one or more of the following actions: demand payment of all or a portion of the related receivables; suspend the dealer’s credit lines; place Ford Credit employees or security personnel at the dealership; secure the dealer’s inventory; require certified funds for all vehicles sold by the dealer; initiate legal actions to exercise rights under the floorplan financing agreement; or increase the dealer’s floorplan interest rate. If a loss appears imminent, we will attempt to redistribute new vehicle inventory, liquidate all remaining collateral, enforce any third-party guarantees, and charge off any remaining amounts as uncollectible.
We also provide financing to fleet purchasers, leasing companies, daily rental companies, and other commercial customers. We generally review our exposure under these credit arrangements at least annually.
Outside of the United States and Canada, non-consumer financing is managed by the respective regional offices, executed within the local markets, and similar risk management principles are applied.
Insurance
We conduct insurance underwriting operations primarily through TARIC in the United States and Canada. TARIC offers a variety of products and services, including:
• | Physical damage insurance coverage for Ford Credit financed vehicles at dealer locations; |
• | Physical damage insurance coverage for Ford and Lincoln vehicles in transit between final assembly plants and dealer locations; |
• | Contractual liability insurance on extended service contracts for Ford and its affiliates; and |
• | Commercial automobile and general liability insurance and surety bonds for Ford in the United States. |
TARIC invests premiums and other revenue to fund future claims, and has established investment guidelines and strategies to reflect its risk tolerance, regulatory requirements, and rating agency considerations, among other factors. TARIC is rated by A.M. Best Company on its financial strength and issuer credit rating. Since 2012, TARIC’s rating has been A (Excellent) for its financial strength and “a” on its issuer credit rating.
We also offer various Ford-branded insurance products throughout the world underwritten by non-affiliated insurance companies from which we receive fee income but the underwriting risk remains with the non-affiliated insurance companies. Premiums from our insurance business generated 1% of our total revenues in both 2017 and 2018.
7
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Employee Relations
We employed approximately 7,600 full-time employees worldwide at both year-end 2017 and 2018. Most employees are salaried and are not represented by a union. We consider employee relations to be satisfactory.
Governmental Regulations
As a finance company, we are highly regulated by the governmental authorities in the locations where we operate.
United States
Within the United States, our operations are subject to regulation and supervision under various federal, state, and local laws.
Federal Regulation. We are subject to federal regulation, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Consumer Leasing Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. These laws require us to provide certain disclosures to prospective purchasers and lessees in consumer retail and lease financing transactions and prohibit discriminatory credit practices. The principal disclosures required under the Truth-in-Lending Act for retail financing transactions include the terms of repayment, the amount financed, the total finance charge, and the annual percentage rate. For retail lease transactions, under the Consumer Leasing Act, we are required to disclose the amount due at lease inception, the terms for payment, and information about lease charges, insurance, excess mileage, wear and use charges, and liability on early termination. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants and customers on a variety of factors, including race, color, sex, age, or marital status. Pursuant to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, creditors are required to make certain disclosures regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not approved of the reasons for being denied. In addition, any of the credit scoring systems we use during the application process or other processes must comply with the requirements for such systems under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires us to provide certain information to consumers whose credit applications are not approved on the basis of a consumer credit report obtained from a national credit bureau and sets forth requirements related to identity theft, privacy, and accuracy in credit reporting. In addition, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), it is unlawful for us to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice. We are also subject to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that provides additional protections for certain customers in the military such as prohibiting us from charging interest in excess of 6% on transactions with those customers, limiting our ability to collect future payments from those lease customers who terminate their lease early, and limiting our use of self-help repossession of the vehicle for those customers. We are subject to other federal regulation, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, that requires us to maintain confidentiality and safeguard certain consumer data in our possession and to communicate periodically with consumers on privacy matters. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has broad rule-making and enforcement authority for a wide range of consumer financial protection laws that regulate consumer finance businesses, such as Ford Credit’s financing business. For additional discussion of the CFPB, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors”
We are also subject to regulation in our funding and securitization activities, including requirements under federal securities laws and specific rules and requirements for asset-backed securities. Derivative activities are regulated under the Commodities Exchange Act and Dodd-Frank Act. These regulations also impose operational and reporting requirements for these funding transactions.
State Regulation - Licensing. In most states, a consumer credit regulatory agency regulates and enforces laws relating to finance companies. Rules and regulations generally provide for licensing of finance companies, limitations on the amount, duration, and charges, including interest rates, that can be included in finance contracts, requirements as to the form and content of finance contracts and other documentation, and restrictions on collection practices and creditors’ rights. We must renew these licenses periodically. In periods of high interest rates, rate limitations could have an adverse effect on our operations if we were unable to purchase retail installment sale contracts with finance charges that reflect our increased costs. In certain states, we are subject to periodic examination by state regulatory authorities.
8
Item 1. Business (Continued)
State Regulation - Repossessions. To mitigate our credit losses, sometimes we repossess a financed or leased vehicle. Repossessions are subject to prescribed legal procedures, including peaceful repossession, one or more customer notifications, a prescribed waiting period prior to disposition of the repossessed vehicle, and return of personal items to the customer. Some states provide the customer with reinstatement rights that require us to return a repossessed vehicle to the customer in certain circumstances. Our ability to repossess and sell a repossessed vehicle is restricted if a customer declares bankruptcy.
International
In some countries outside the United States, some of our subsidiaries, including FCE and Ford Bank, are regulated and/or licensed banking institutions and are required, among other things, to maintain minimum capital and liquidity. FCE is authorized by the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and regulated by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the PRA to carry on a range of regulated activities within the United Kingdom. Pursuant to the Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive, CRD IV, FCE operates through a branch and subsidiary network in 14 other European countries. Under FCE’s banking license, consumer credit and leasing activities are also passported to the European branches. In many other locations where we operate, governmental authorities require us to obtain equivalent banking licenses to conduct our business.
Regulatory Compliance Status
Based on our compliance management processes and procedures, we believe that we maintain all material licenses and permits required for our current operations and are in material compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to us and our operations. Failure to satisfy those legal and regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, reputation, and/or liquidity. Further, the adoption of new laws or regulations, or the revision of existing laws and regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, and/or liquidity.
We actively monitor proposed changes to relevant legal and regulatory requirements in order to maintain our compliance. Through our governmental relations efforts, we also attempt to participate in the legislative and administrative rule-making process on regulatory initiatives that impact finance companies. The cost of our ongoing compliance efforts has not had a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
For additional information on new or increased credit regulations, consumer or data protection regulations, or other regulations, refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
9
Item 1. Business (Continued)
Certain Agreements with Ford and Affiliates
We and Ford are parties to an Amended and Restated Relationship Agreement (the “Relationship Agreement”) relating to our long-standing business practices with Ford. A copy of the Relationship Agreement was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2015, and is incorporated by reference herein as an exhibit. Pursuant to the Relationship Agreement, if our managed leverage for a calendar quarter were to be higher than 11.5 to 1 (as reported in our most recent Form 10-Q Report or Form 10-K Report), we can require Ford to make or cause to be made a capital contribution to us in an amount sufficient to have caused such managed leverage to have been 11.5 to 1. No capital contributions have been made to us pursuant to the Relationship Agreement.
In addition to the foregoing, the other principal terms of the Relationship Agreement include the following:
• | Any extension of credit from us to Ford or any of Ford’s automotive affiliates will be on arm’s length terms and will be enforced by us in a commercially reasonable manner; |
• | We will not guarantee more than $500 million of the indebtedness of, make any investments in, or purchase any real property or manufacturing equipment classified as an automotive asset from Ford or any of Ford’s automotive affiliates; |
• | We will not be required by Ford or any of Ford’s automotive affiliates to accept credit or residual risk beyond what we would be willing to accept acting in a prudent and commercially reasonable manner (taking into consideration any interest rate supplements or residual value support payments, guarantees, or other subsidies that are provided to us by Ford or any of Ford’s automotive affiliates); |
• | We and Ford are separate, legally distinct companies, and we will continue to maintain separate books and accounts. We will prevent our assets from being commingled with Ford’s assets, and hold ourselves out as a separate and distinct company from Ford and Ford’s automotive affiliates; |
• | Allocates to us $3.0 billion of commitments, including commitments under a Chinese renminbi sub-facility as the amount we may borrow as a Subsidiary Borrower under Ford’s corporate credit facility and requires us to reimburse Ford for a proportionate amount of Ford’s costs under that credit facility; and |
• | Prohibits Ford from terminating Ford’s corporate credit facility prior to its maturity, or taking any other action that would impair our ability to borrow under that credit facility, without our prior written consent. |
We also have an agreement to maintain FCE’s net worth in excess of $500 million. No payments have been made to FCE pursuant to the agreement during the 2001 through 2018 periods.
More information about agreements between us and Ford and other affiliates is contained in our Notes to the Financial Statements, “Business - Overview,” “Business - Consumer Financing - Retail Financing,” “Business - Non-Consumer Financing - Other Financing,” and the description of Ford’s business in Ford’s 2018 Form 10-K Report.
10
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
We have listed below (not necessarily in order of importance or probability of occurrence) the most significant risk factors applicable to Ford or Ford Credit:
Ford’s long-term competitiveness depends on the successful execution of fitness actions. Ford has announced fitness redesign plans to transform the operational fitness of its business by becoming more customer centric and adopting processes that emphasize simplicity, speed and agility, efficiency, and accountability. Ford is working on 18 major initiatives as part of its fitness redesign efforts. In addition, to further improve its fitness and overall competitiveness, Ford is leveraging relationships with third parties, including the recently announced alliance with Volkswagen AG to develop commercial vans and medium-sized pickups for global markets beginning as early as 2022. The goal of the alliance is to drive scale and efficiencies and enable both companies to share investments in vehicle architectures. If Ford’s fitness actions are not successful or are delayed, Ford may not be able to materially lower costs in the near term or improve its competitiveness in the long term, which could have an adverse effect on its profitability.
Industry sales volume, particularly in the United States, Europe, or China, can be volatile and could decline if there is a financial crisis, recession, or significant geopolitical event. Because Ford, like other manufacturers, has a high proportion of relatively fixed structural costs, relatively small changes in industry sales volume can have a substantial effect on its cash flow and profitability. Industry vehicle sales are affected by overall economic and market conditions. If industry vehicle sales were to decline to levels significantly below Ford’s planning assumption, particularly in the United States, Europe, or China, the decline could have a substantial adverse effect on Ford’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Ford’s new and existing products and mobility services are subject to market acceptance. Although Ford conducts extensive market research before launching new or refreshed vehicles and introducing new services, many factors both within and outside Ford’s control affect the success of new or existing products and services in the marketplace. It takes years to design and develop a new vehicle or change an existing vehicle. Because customers’ preferences may change quickly, Ford’s new and existing products may not generate sales in sufficient quantities and at high enough prices to be profitable. Offering vehicles and services that customers want and value can mitigate the risks of increasing price competition and declining demand, but products and services that are perceived to be less desirable (whether in terms of price, quality, styling, safety, overall value, fuel efficiency, or other attributes) can exacerbate these risks. With increased consumer interconnectedness through the internet, social media, and other media, mere allegations relating to quality, safety, fuel efficiency, corporate social responsibility, or other key attributes can negatively impact Ford’s reputation or market acceptance of its products or services, even where such allegations prove to be inaccurate or unfounded. Further, Ford’s ability to successfully grow through investments in the area of mobility and electrification depends on many factors, including advancements in technology, regulatory changes, and other factors that are difficult to predict that may significantly affect the future of autonomous vehicles and mobility services. Rapid changes to Ford’s industry, including the introduction of new types of competitors who may possess technological innovations, increase the significance that Ford is able to anticipate, develop, and deliver products and services that customers desire.
Ford’s results are dependent on sales of larger, more profitable vehicles, particularly in the United States. A shift in consumer preferences away from larger, more profitable vehicles (including trucks and utilities) at levels beyond Ford’s current planning assumption—whether because of spiking fuel prices, a decline in the construction industry, government actions or incentives, or other reasons—could result in an immediate and substantial adverse effect on Ford’s results and financial condition.
Ford may face increased price competition resulting from industry excess capacity, currency fluctuations, or other factors. The global automotive industry is intensely competitive, with manufacturing capacity far exceeding current demand. According to the December 2018 report issued by IHS Automotive, the global automotive industry is estimated to have had excess capacity of about 42 million units in 2018, an increase of about 7 million units from the prior year. Industry overcapacity has resulted in many manufacturers offering marketing incentives on vehicles in an attempt to maintain and grow market share; these incentives historically have included a combination of subsidized financing or leasing programs, price rebates, and other incentives. As a result, Ford is not necessarily able to set its prices to offset higher costs of marketing incentives, commodity or other cost increases, or the impact of adverse currency fluctuations, including pricing advantages foreign competitors may have because of their weaker home market currencies. Continuation of or increased excess capacity, particularly for trucks and utilities, could have a substantial adverse effect on Ford’s financial condition and results of operations.
11
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates can have a significant effect on results. As a resource-intensive manufacturing operation, Ford and Ford Credit are exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. Ford and Ford Credit monitor and manage these exposures as an integral part of their overall risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability of markets and seeks to reduce potentially adverse effects on our business. Changes in commodity prices (from tariffs or otherwise), currency exchange rates, and interest rates cannot always be predicted, hedged, or offset with price increases to eliminate earnings volatility. As a result, significant changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, or interest rates could have a substantial adverse effect on Ford’s and/or Ford Credit’s financial condition and results of operations.
With a global footprint, Ford’s results could be adversely affected by economic, geopolitical, protectionist trade policies, or other events, including Brexit. With the increasing interconnectedness of global economic and financial systems, a financial crisis, natural disaster, geopolitical crisis, or other significant event in one area of the world can have an immediate and material adverse impact on markets around the world. Recent steps taken by the U.S. government to apply and consider applying tariffs on automobiles, parts, and other products and materials have the potential to disrupt existing supply chains and impose additional costs on Ford’s business. Further, other countries could attempt to retaliate by imposing tariffs that would increase the cost for Ford to import its vehicles into such countries.
Concerns persist regarding the overall stability of the European Union, given the diverse economic and political circumstances of individual European countries. These concerns have been exacerbated by Brexit. A hard Brexit, which would result in the United Kingdom losing access to free trade agreements for goods and services with the European Union and other countries, would likely result in a significant reduction in industry volumes in the United Kingdom, increased tariffs on U.K. imports and exports, and delays at the U.K. border. The total costs to Ford of a hard Brexit, not including currency exchange related effects, could be $500 million to $1 billion in 2019.
FCE is a bank authorized by the U.K. government to carry on a range of regulated activities within the United Kingdom and through a branch network in 11 other European countries through a passporting system, which allows it to establish or provide its services in those countries without further authorization requirements. If passporting arrangements cease to be effective as a result of Brexit, FCE’s ability to carry out regulated activities in those countries would be dependent upon various central banks, including the European Central Bank, granting licenses, where necessary, prior to the expiration of passporting rights.
Ford has operations in various markets with volatile economic or political environments and is pursuing growth opportunities in a number of newly developed and emerging markets. These investments may expose Ford to heightened risks of economic, geopolitical, or other events, including governmental takeover (i.e., nationalization) of Ford’s manufacturing facilities or intellectual property, restrictive exchange or import controls, disruption of operations as a result of systemic political or economic instability, outbreak of war or expansion of hostilities, and acts of terrorism, each of which could have a substantial adverse effect on Ford’s financial condition and results of operations. Further, the U.S. government, other governments, and international organizations could impose additional sanctions that could restrict Ford and Ford Credit from doing business directly or indirectly in or with certain countries or parties, which could include affiliates.
Ford’s production, as well as Ford’s suppliers’ production, could be disrupted by labor disputes, natural or man-made disasters, financial distress, production difficulties, or other factors. A work stoppage or other limitation on production could occur at Ford or its suppliers’ facilities for any number of reasons, including as a result of disputes under existing collective bargaining agreements with labor unions or in connection with negotiation of new collective bargaining agreements, as a result of labor disputes in response to potential restructuring actions (e.g., plant closures), as a result of supplier financial distress or other production constraints or difficulties, or for other reasons. Many components used in Ford’s vehicles are available only from a single supplier and therefore cannot be re-sourced quickly or inexpensively to another supplier (due to long lead times, new contractual commitments that may be required by another supplier before ramping up to provide the components or materials, etc.). Such single-source suppliers also could threaten to disrupt Ford’s production as leverage in negotiations. A significant disruption to Ford’s production schedule could have a substantial adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
12
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Ford’s ability to maintain a competitive cost structure could be affected by labor or other constraints. Substantially all of the hourly employees in Ford’s Automotive operations in the United States and Canada are represented by unions and covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements provide guaranteed wage and benefit levels throughout the contract term and some degree of income security, subject to certain conditions. As a practical matter, these agreements may restrict Ford’s ability to close plants and divest businesses. A substantial number of Ford’s employees in other regions are represented by unions or government councils, and legislation or custom promoting retention of manufacturing or other employment in the state, country, or region may constrain as a practical matter Ford’s ability to sell or close manufacturing or other facilities.
Pension and other postretirement liabilities could adversely affect Ford’s liquidity and financial condition. Ford has defined benefit retirement plans in the United States that cover many of its hourly and salaried employees. Ford also provides pension benefits to non-U.S. employees and retirees, primarily in Europe. In addition, Ford and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor plans to provide other postretirement benefits (“OPEB”) for retired employees (primarily health care and life insurance benefits). These benefit plans impose significant liabilities on Ford and could require Ford to make additional cash contributions, which could impair Ford’s liquidity. If Ford’s cash flows and capital resources were insufficient to meet any pension or OPEB obligations, Ford could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, suspend dividend payments, seek additional capital, or restructure or refinance its indebtedness.
Economic and demographic experience for pension and other postretirement benefit plans (e.g., discount rates or investment returns) could be worse than Ford has assumed. The measurement of Ford’s obligations, costs, and liabilities associated with benefits pursuant to its pension and other postretirement benefit plans requires that Ford estimate the present value of projected future payments to all participants. Ford uses many assumptions in calculating these estimates, including assumptions related to discount rates, investment returns on designated plan assets, and demographic experience (e.g., mortality and retirement rates). Ford generally remeasures these estimates at each year end, and recognizes any gains or losses associated with changes to its plan assets and liabilities in the year incurred. To the extent actual results are less favorable than Ford’s assumptions, Ford may recognize a substantial remeasurement loss in its results.
Ford’s vehicles could be affected by defects that result in delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, or increased warranty costs. Government safety standards require manufacturers to remedy defects related to vehicle safety through safety recall campaigns, and a manufacturer is obligated to recall vehicles if it determines that the vehicles do not comply with a safety standard. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (“NHTSA”) enforcement strategy has shifted to a significant increase in civil penalties levied and the use of consent orders requiring direct oversight by NHTSA of certain manufacturers’ safety processes, a trend that could continue. Should Ford or government safety regulators determine that a safety or other defect or a noncompliance exists with respect to certain of Ford’s vehicles prior to the start of production, the launch of such vehicle could be delayed until such defect is remedied. The cost of recall and customer satisfaction actions to remedy defects in vehicles that have been sold could be substantial, particularly if the actions relate to global platforms or involve defects that are identified years after production (e.g., Takata airbag inflators). Such recall and customer satisfaction actions may relate to defective components Ford receives from suppliers, and Ford’s ability to recover from the suppliers may be limited by the suppliers’ financial condition. Furthermore, launch delays, recall actions, and increased warranty costs could adversely affect Ford’s reputation or market acceptance of its products as discussed above under “Ford’s new and existing products and mobility services are subject to market acceptance.”
Ford may need to substantially modify its product plans to comply with safety, emissions, fuel economy, and other regulations that may change in the future. The worldwide automotive industry is governed by a substantial amount of government regulation, which often differs by state, region, and country. Government regulation has increased, and proposals for additional regulation are advanced, primarily out of concern for the environment (including concerns about global climate change and its impact), vehicle safety, and energy independence. For example, as discussed under “Item 1. Business - Governmental Standards” in Ford’s 2018 Form 10-K Report, in the United States the CAFE standards for light duty vehicles increase sharply to approximately 50 mpg by the 2025 model year; EPA’s parallel CO2 emission regulations impose similar standards. California’s zero-emission vehicles (“ZEV”) rules also mandate steep increases in the sale of electric vehicles and other advanced technology vehicles through the 2025 model year; the ZEV mandate is now being expanded to include medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, and even more burdensome regulations are likely to follow. In addition, many governments regulate local product content and/or impose import requirements as a means of creating jobs, protecting domestic producers, and influencing the balance of payments.
13
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Ford is continuing to make changes to its product cycle plan to improve the fuel economy of its petroleum-powered vehicles and to offer more electrified vehicles with lower GHG emissions. There are limits on Ford’s ability to achieve fuel economy improvements over a given time frame, however, primarily relating to the cost and effectiveness of available technologies, consumer acceptance of new technologies and changes in vehicle mix, willingness of consumers to absorb the additional costs of new technologies, the appropriateness (or lack thereof) of certain technologies for use in particular vehicles, the widespread availability (or lack thereof) of supporting infrastructure for new technologies, and the human, engineering, and financial resources necessary to deploy new technologies across a wide range of products and powertrains in a short time. The current fuel economy, CO2, and ZEV standards will be difficult to meet if fuel prices remain relatively low and market conditions do not drive consumers to purchase electric vehicles and other highly fuel-efficient vehicles in large numbers.
Increased scrutiny of automaker emission testing by regulators around the world has led to new regulations, more stringent enforcement programs, requests for field actions, and/or delays in regulatory approvals. The cost to comply with existing government regulations is substantial and additional regulations or changes in consumer preferences that affect vehicle mix could have a substantial adverse impact on Ford’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a number of governments, as well as non-governmental organizations, publicly assess vehicles to their own protocols. The protocols could change aggressively, and any negative perception regarding the performance of Ford’s vehicles subjected to such tests could reduce future sales. Court decisions arising out of consumer and investor litigation could give rise to de facto changes in the interpretation of existing emission laws and regulations, thereby imposing new burdens on manufacturers.
Ford could experience unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations, or adverse publicity arising out of alleged defects in products, perceived environmental impacts, or otherwise. Ford spends substantial resources ensuring that it complies with governmental safety regulations, mobile and stationary source emissions regulations, and other standards. Compliance with governmental standards, however, does not necessarily prevent individual or class actions, which can entail significant cost and risk. In certain circumstances, courts may permit tort claims even where Ford’s vehicles comply with federal and/or other applicable law. Furthermore, simply responding to actual or threatened litigation or government investigations of Ford’s compliance with regulatory standards, whether related to Ford’s products or business or commercial relationships, may require significant expenditures of time and other resources. Litigation also is inherently uncertain, and Ford could experience significant adverse results. In addition, adverse publicity surrounding an allegation may cause significant reputational harm that could have a significant adverse effect on Ford’s sales.
Ford’s receipt of government incentives could be subject to reduction, termination, or clawback. Ford receives economic benefits from national, state, and local governments in various regions of the world in the form of incentives designed to encourage manufacturers to establish, maintain, or increase investment, workforce, or production. These incentives may take various forms, including grants, loan subsidies, and tax abatements or credits. The impact of these incentives can be significant in a particular market during a reporting period. For example, most of Ford’s manufacturing facilities in South America are located in Brazil, where the state or federal governments have historically offered, and continue to offer, significant incentives to manufacturers to encourage capital investment, increase manufacturing production, and create jobs. As a result, the performance of Ford’s South American operations has been impacted favorably by government incentives to a substantial extent. In Brazil, however, the federal government has levied assessments against Ford concerning Ford’s calculation of federal incentives it received, and certain states have challenged the grant to Ford of tax incentives by the State of Bahia. A decrease in, expiration without renewal of, or other cessation or clawback of government incentives for any of Ford’s business units, as a result of administrative decision or otherwise, could have a substantial adverse impact on Ford’s financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in Ford’s 2018 Form 10-K Report for a discussion of tax proceedings in Brazil and the potential requirement for Ford to post collateral.
14
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Operational systems, security systems, and vehicles could be affected by cyber incidents. Ford and Ford Credit rely on information technology networks and systems, including in-vehicle systems and mobile devices, some of which are managed by suppliers, to process, transmit, and store electronic information that is important to the operation of their businesses and Ford’s vehicles. Despite security measures, Ford and Ford Credit are at risk for interruptions, outages, and breaches of: (i) operational systems (including business, financial, accounting, product development, consumer receivables, data processing, or manufacturing processes); (ii) facility security systems; and/or (iii) in-vehicle systems or mobile devices. Such cyber incidents could materially disrupt operational systems; result in loss of trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information; compromise the privacy of personal information of customers, employees, or others; jeopardize the security of their facilities; affect the performance of in-vehicle systems; and/or impact the safety of Ford’s vehicles. A cyber incident could be caused by malicious third parties using sophisticated, targeted methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption, and other security defenses, including hacking, fraud, trickery, or other forms of deception. Ford, Ford Credit, their suppliers, and dealers have been the target of these types of attacks in the past and such attacks are likely to occur in the future. The techniques used for attacks by third parties change frequently and may become more sophisticated, which may cause cyber incidents to be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Ford’s and Ford Credit’s networks and Ford’s in-vehicle systems may also be affected by computer viruses or breaches due to the negligence or misconduct of employees, contractors, and/or others who have access to Ford’s and Ford Credit’s networks and systems. A significant cyber incident could harm Ford’s or Ford Credit’s reputation and/or subject Ford or Ford Credit to regulatory actions or litigation, and a significant cyber incident involving Ford or one of its suppliers could impact Ford’s production capability.
Ford and Ford Credit are subject to laws, rules, and regulations in the United States and other countries relating to the collection, use, and security of personal information of customers, employees, or others, including laws that may require Ford and Ford Credit to notify regulators and affected individuals of a data security breach. Regulatory actions seeking to impose significant penalties and/or legal actions could be brought against Ford and Ford Credit in the event of a data breach or perceived or actual non-compliance with data protection or privacy requirements. Among these requirements is the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which came into effect on May 25, 2018.
Ford Credit’s access to debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts could be affected by credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors. Ford Credit’s ability to obtain unsecured funding at a reasonable cost is dependent on its credit ratings or its perceived creditworthiness. Ford Credit’s ability to obtain securitized funding under its committed asset-backed liquidity programs and certain other asset-backed securitization transactions is subject to having a sufficient amount of assets eligible for these programs, as well as Ford Credit’s ability to obtain appropriate credit ratings and, for certain committed programs, derivatives to manage the interest rate risk. Over time, and particularly in the event of any credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, or other factors, Ford Credit may reduce the amount of receivables it purchases or originates because of funding constraints. The potential phase out of LIBOR is one such risk that could cause market volatility or disruption. In July 2017 the chief executive of the FCA, which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is unknown whether any banks will continue to voluntarily submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021 or whether LIBOR will continue to be published by its administrator based on these submissions or on any other basis. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms, or the establishment of alternative reference rates, but the potential phase out of LIBOR could adversely affect Ford Credit’s access to the capital markets and cost of funding. In addition, Ford Credit may be limited in the amount of receivables it purchases or originates in certain countries or regions if the local capital markets, particularly in developing countries, do not exist or are not adequately developed. Similarly, Ford Credit may reduce the amount of receivables it purchases or originates if there is a significant decline in the demand for the types of securities it offers or Ford Credit is unable to obtain derivatives to manage the interest rate risk associated with its securitization transactions. A significant reduction in the amount of receivables Ford Credit purchases or originates would significantly reduce its ongoing profits and could adversely affect its ability to support the sale of Ford vehicles.
15
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Ford Credit could experience higher-than-expected credit losses, lower-than-anticipated residual values, or higher-than-expected return volumes for leased vehicles. Credit risk is the possibility of loss from a customer’s or dealer’s failure to make payments according to contract terms. Credit risk (which is heavily dependent upon economic factors including unemployment, consumer debt service burden, personal income growth, dealer profitability, and used car prices) has a significant impact on Ford Credit’s business. The level of credit losses Ford Credit may experience could exceed its expectations and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, Ford Credit projects expected residual values (including residual value support payments from Ford) and return volumes for the vehicles it leases. Actual proceeds realized by Ford Credit upon the sale of returned leased vehicles at lease termination may be lower than the amount projected, which would reduce the profitability of the lease transaction. Among the factors that can affect the value of returned lease vehicles are the volume of vehicles returned, economic conditions, marketing programs, and quality or perceived quality, safety, fuel efficiency, or reliability of the vehicles. Actual return volumes may be influenced by these factors as well as by contractual lease-end values relative to auction values. Each of these factors, alone or in combination, has the potential to adversely affect Ford Credit’s profitability if actual results were to differ significantly from Ford Credit’s projections.
Ford Credit could face increased competition from banks, financial institutions, or other third parties seeking to increase their share of financing Ford vehicles. No single company is a dominant force in the automotive finance industry. Most of Ford Credit’s competitors in the United States use credit aggregation systems that permit dealers to send, through standardized systems, retail credit applications to multiple finance sources to evaluate financing options offered by these sources. Also, direct on-line or large dealer group financing options provide consumers with alternative finance sources and/or increased pricing transparency. All of these financing alternatives drive greater competition based on financing rates and terms. Competition from such institutions and alternative finance sources could adversely affect Ford Credit’s profitability and the volume of its retail business. In addition, Ford Credit may face increased competition on wholesale financing for Ford dealers.
Ford Credit could be subject to new or increased credit regulations, consumer or data protection regulations, or other regulations. As a finance company, Ford Credit is highly regulated by governmental authorities in the locations in which it operates, which can impose significant additional costs and/or restrictions on its business. In the United States, for example, Ford Credit’s operations are subject to regulation and supervision under various federal, state, and local laws, including the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, Consumer Leasing Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The Dodd-Frank Act directs federal agencies to adopt rules to regulate the finance industry and the capital markets and gives the CFPB broad rule-making and enforcement authority for a wide range of consumer financial protection laws that regulate consumer finance businesses, such as Ford Credit’s automotive financing business. Exercise of these powers by the CFPB may increase the costs of, impose additional restrictions on, or otherwise adversely affect companies in the automotive finance business. The CFPB has authority to supervise and examine the largest nonbank automotive finance companies, such as Ford Credit, for compliance with consumer financial protection laws.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
16
ITEM 2. Properties.
We own our world headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan. Most of our automotive finance operations are located in leased properties. The continued use of any of these leased properties is not material to our operations. At December 31, 2018, our total future rental commitment under leases of real property was $95 million.
We operate through four business centers in the United States and two business centers in Canada.
United States: | Colorado Springs, Colorado | Greenville, South Carolina |
Tampa, Florida | Nashville, Tennessee | |
Canada: | Edmonton, Alberta | Oakville, Ontario |
Each of the U.S. business centers generally services dealers and customers located within its region. All of our U.S. business centers are electronically linked and workload can be allocated across these centers. In addition, our Canadian business centers share a similar electronic linkage and workload allocation capability.
We also have three specialty centers in North America that focus on specific activities:
• | Customer Service Center - Omaha, Nebraska; |
• | Loss Prevention Center - Irving, Texas; and |
• | National Recovery Center - Mesa, Arizona. |
In Europe, we have a service center in Manchester, England that services our U.K. dealers and customers and dealers from multiple European countries. We also have a service center in Cologne, Germany to service our German dealers and customers. We have other service centers around the world and provide servicing through our local branches and subsidiaries.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.
Various legal actions, proceedings, and claims (generally, “matters”) are pending or may be instituted or asserted against us. These include but are not limited to matters arising out of governmental regulations; tax matters; alleged illegal acts resulting in fines or penalties; financial services; employment-related matters; dealer and other contractual relationships; personal injury matters; investor matters; and financial reporting matters. Certain of the pending legal actions are, or purport to be, class actions. Some of the matters involve or may involve claims for compensatory, punitive, or antitrust or other treble damages in very large amounts, sanctions, assessments, or other relief, which, if granted, would require very large expenditures. Our significant pending matter is summarized below:
European Competition Law Matter. On October 5, 2018, FCE Bank plc received a notice from the Italian Competition Authority (the “ICA”) concerning an alleged violation of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The ICA alleges that FCE Bank plc and other parties engaged in anti-competitive practices in relation to the automotive finance market in Italy. On January 9, 2019, FCE Bank plc received a decision from the ICA, which included an assessment of a fine against FCE Bank plc in the amount of about $50 million. FCE Bank plc plans to appeal the decision and the fine, with the ultimate resolution of the matter potentially taking several years.
The litigation process is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable with assurance. It is reasonably possible that matters could be decided unfavorably to us. Although the amount of liability at December 31, 2018, with respect to litigation matters cannot be ascertained, we believe that any resulting liability would not materially affect our operations, financial condition, or liquidity.
In addition, any litigation, investigation, proceeding, or claim against Ford that results in Ford incurring significant liability, expenditures, or costs could also have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, or liquidity. For a discussion of pending significant cases against Ford, see Item 3 in Ford’s 2018 Form 10-K Report.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
17
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
At December 31, 2018, all of our Shares were owned by Ford Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford. We did not issue or sell any equity interests during 2018, and there is no market for our Shares. We paid cash distributions to our parent of $406 million and $2.7 billion in 2017 and 2018, respectively.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.
Not required.
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
Our primary focus is to profitably support the sale of Ford and Lincoln vehicles. We work with Ford to maximize customer and dealer satisfaction and loyalty, offering a wide variety of financing products and outstanding service. We strive to continually improve processes focusing on the customer and the dealer to manage costs and ensure the efficient use of capital. As a result, Ford Credit is uniquely positioned to drive incremental sales, improve customer satisfaction and owner loyalty to Ford, and direct profits and distributions back to Ford to support its overall business, including vehicle development.
We leverage three fundamental strategies in the management of our operations. The first is to employ prudent origination practices while maintaining a managed level of risk. The second is to have efficient and effective servicing and collection practices. The third is to fund the business efficiently while managing our balance sheet risk.
Generation of Revenue, Income, and Cash
The principal factors that influence our earnings are the amount and mix of finance receivables, operating leases, and financing margins. The performance of these receivables and leases over time, mainly through the impact of credit losses and variations in the residual value of leased vehicles, also affects our earnings.
The amount of our finance receivables and operating leases depends on many factors, including:
• | The volume of new and used vehicle sales and leases; |
• | The extent to which we purchase retail installment sale and lease contracts and the extent to which we provide wholesale financing; |
• | The sales price of the vehicles financed; |
• | The level of dealer inventories; |
• | Ford-sponsored special financing programs available exclusively through us; and |
• | The availability of cost-effective funding |
For finance receivables, financing margin equals the difference between revenue earned on finance receivables and the cost of borrowed funds. For operating leases, financing margin equals revenue earned on operating leases, less depreciation expense and the cost of borrowed funds. Interest rates earned on most receivables and rental charges on operating leases generally are fixed at the time the contracts are originated. On some receivables, primarily dealer wholesale financing, we charge interest at a floating rate that varies with changes in short-term interest rates.
18
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Business Performance
We review our business performance by segment (Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific) on a managed basis. Receivables are presented on a managed basis, as it closely approximates the customer’s outstanding balance on the receivables, which is the basis for earning revenue. Our managed receivables equal net finance receivables and net investment in operating leases, excluding unearned interest supplements and residual support, allowance for credit losses, and other (primarily accumulated supplemental depreciation). To evaluate our performance we monitor a number of measures, such as delinquencies, repossession statistics, losses on repossessions, and the number of bankruptcy filings.
We measure the performance of our segments primarily on an Income before income taxes, after excluding market valuation adjustments to derivatives and exchange-rate fluctuations on foreign currency-denominated transactions, which are reflected in Unallocated Other. These adjustments are excluded when assessing our segment performance because they are carried out at the corporate level. We also adjust segment performance to reallocate interest expense among the segments reflecting debt and equity levels proportionate to their product risk. For additional information regarding our segments, see Note 17 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
19
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations
Overview
In general, we measure period-to-period changes in earnings before taxes using the causal factors listed below:
• | Volume and Mix – Volume and Mix are primarily reflected within Net financing margin on the income statement. |
◦ | Volume primarily measures changes in net financing margin driven by changes in average managed receivables at prior period financing margin yield (defined below in financing margin) at prior period exchange rates. Volume changes are primarily driven by the volume of new and used vehicle sales and leases, the extent to which we purchase retail installment sale and lease contracts, the extent to which we provide wholesale financing, the sales price of the vehicles financed, the level of dealer inventories, Ford-sponsored special financing programs available exclusively through us, and the availability of cost-effective funding. |
◦ | Mix primarily measures changes in net financing margin driven by period over period changes in the composition of our average managed receivables by product and by country or region. |
• | Financing Margin – Financing Margin is reflected within Net financing margin on the income statement. |
◦ | Financing margin variance is the period-to-period change in financing margin yield multiplied by the present period average managed receivables at prior period exchange rates. This calculation is performed at the product and country level and then aggregated. Financing margin yield equals revenue, less interest expense and scheduled depreciation for the period, divided by average managed receivables for the same period. |
◦ | Financing margin changes are driven by changes in revenue and interest expense. Changes in revenue are primarily driven by the level of market interest rates, cost assumptions in pricing, mix of business, and competitive environment. Changes in interest expense are primarily driven by the level of market interest rates, borrowing spreads, and asset-liability management. |
• | Credit Loss – Credit Loss is reflected within the Provision for credit losses on the income statement. |
◦ | Credit loss is the change in the provision for credit losses at prior period exchange rates. For analysis purposes, management splits the provision for credit losses into net charge-offs and the change in the allowance for credit losses. |
◦ | Net charge-off changes are primarily driven by the number of repossessions, severity per repossession, and recoveries. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are primarily driven by changes in historical trends in credit losses and recoveries, changes in the composition and size of our present portfolio, changes in trends in historical used vehicle values, and changes in economic conditions. For additional information, refer to the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section. |
• | Lease Residual – Lease Residual is reflected within Depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases on the income statement. |
◦ | Lease residual measures changes to residual performance at prior period exchange rates. For analysis purposes, management splits residual performance primarily into residual gains and losses, and the change in accumulated supplemental depreciation. |
◦ | Residual gain and loss changes are primarily driven by the number of vehicles returned to us and sold, and the difference between the auction value and the depreciated value (which includes both base and accumulated supplemental depreciation) of the vehicles sold. Changes in accumulated supplemental depreciation are primarily driven by changes in our estimate of the expected auction value at the end of the lease term, and changes in our estimate of the number of vehicles that will be returned to us and sold. For additional information, refer to the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section. |
• | Exchange – Reflects changes in EBT results driven by the effects of converting functional currency income to U.S. dollars. |
• | Other – Primarily includes Operating expenses, Other revenue, Insurance expenses, and Other income on the income statement at prior period exchange rates. |
◦ | Changes in operating expenses are primarily driven by salaried personnel costs, facilities costs, and costs associated with the origination and servicing of customer contracts. |
◦ | In general, other income changes are primarily driven by changes in earnings related to market valuation adjustments to derivatives (primarily related to movements in interest rates), which are included in unallocated risk management, and other miscellaneous items. |
20
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
In addition, the following definitions and calculations apply to the charts contained in Item 7 of this Report:
• | Cash (as shown on the Funding Structure, Liquidity Sources, and Leverage charts) – Cash and cash equivalents and Marketable securities reported on Ford Credit’s balance sheet, excluding amounts related to insurance activities |
• | Earnings Before Taxes (EBT) – Reflects Income before income taxes as reported on Ford Credit’s income statement |
• | Return on Equity (ROE) (as shown on the Key Metrics chart) – Reflects return on equity calculated by annualizing net income for the period and dividing by monthly average equity for the period |
• | Securitizations (as shown on the Public Term Funding Plan chart) – Public securitization transactions, Rule 144A offerings sponsored by Ford Credit, and widely distributed offerings by Ford Credit Canada |
• | Term Asset-Backed Securities (as shown on the Funding Structure chart) – Obligations issued in securitization transactions that are payable only out of collections on the underlying securitized assets and related enhancements |
• | Total Debt (as shown on the Leverage chart) – Debt on Ford Credit’s balance sheet. Includes debt issued in securitizations and payable only out of collections on the underlying securitized assets and related enhancements. Ford Credit holds the right to receive the excess cash flows not needed to pay the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions |
• | Total Net Receivables (as shown on the Key Metrics and Receivables charts) – Includes finance receivables (retail and wholesale) sold for legal purposes and net investment in operating leases included in securitization transactions that do not satisfy the requirements for accounting sale treatment. These receivables and operating leases are reported on Ford Credit’s balance sheet and are available only for payment of the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions; they are not available to pay the other obligations of Ford Credit or the claims of Ford Credit’s other creditors |
• | Unallocated Other (as shown on the EBT by Segment chart) – Items excluded in assessing segment performance because they are managed at the corporate level, including market valuation adjustments to derivatives and exchange-rate fluctuations on foreign currency-denominated transactions |
21
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations - 2018
The following chart shows our full year 2018 key metrics compared with full year 2017:
In 2018, EBT was $2,627 million, $317 million higher compared with the prior year.
Net receivables and managed receivables were 3% higher compared with a year ago, led by growth in the United States. Consumer credit metrics were healthy in the United States, with the loss-to-receivables ratio at 0.46%, which improved seven basis points from a year ago. U.S. auction values were up 4% compared with 2017.
ROE was 14%, eight percentage points lower compared with a year ago, primarily reflecting the non-recurrence of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on our provision for income taxes.
Our balance sheet remains strong with managed leverage within our target range of 8:1 to 9:1.
22
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The following chart shows the factors that contributed to the strong full year 2018 EBT:
Our 2018 EBT was $317 million higher than a year ago, led by favorable lease residual performance and favorable volume and mix. This was offset in part by unfavorable derivatives market valuation.
23
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
We have three reportable segments in our consolidated financial statements that align with our management reporting structure and reflect the manner in which our Chief Operating Decision Maker manages our business, including resource allocation and performance assessment. These segments are: the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Items excluded in assessing segment performance, because they are managed at the corporate level, are reflected in Unallocated Other. Results of operations by segment and Unallocated Other for full year 2018 are shown below (in millions). For additional information, see Note 17 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
Our 2018 net income was $2.2 billion, a decrease of $0.8 billion compared with the prior year, primarily reflecting the non-recurrence of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Americas Segment
The Americas Segment EBT of $2.2 billion for full year 2018 was $413 million higher compared with 2017, more than explained by favorable lease residual performance, favorable volume and mix, and lower insurance losses. This was partially offset by increased operating costs.
Europe Segment
The Europe Segment EBT of $391 million for full year 2018 was $62 million higher compared with 2017, explained primarily by favorable volume and mix. Higher operating costs due to Brexit were a partial offset.
Asia Pacific Segment
The Asia Pacific Segment EBT of $102 million for full year 2018 was $17 million higher compared with 2017, explained primarily by favorable volume and mix and tax incentives. Lower financing margin was a partial offset.
Unallocated Other
Unallocated Other was a $74 million loss for full year 2018, a $175 million deterioration compared with 2017, reflecting unfavorable performance in market valuation adjustments to derivatives.
24
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations - 2017
The following chart shows our full year 2017 key metrics compared with full year 2016:
In 2017, EBT was $2,310 million, $431 million higher compared with 2016.
Net receivables and managed receivables were 10% higher compared with 2016, primarily reflecting global growth in retail receivables, an increase of about $4 billion due to foreign exchange, and the consolidation of our Forso joint venture. At December 31, 2017, Forso receivables were $1.4 billion.
ROE was 22%, 11 percentage points higher compared with 2016, primarily reflecting the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
U.S. consumer credit metrics were healthy, with the loss-to-receivables ratio at 0.53%, up 6 basis points from 2016 and within expectations.
25
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The following chart shows the increase in full year 2017 EBT compared with full year 2016 by causal factor:
Ford Credit’s full year 2017 EBT was $431 million higher than the prior year, reflecting favorable volume and mix, lease residual improvement, and financing margin.
26
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of operations by segment and Unallocated Other for full year 2017 are shown below (in millions). For additional information, see Note 17 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
Our 2017 net income was $3.0 billion, an increase of $1.6 billion compared with 2016, primarily reflecting the positive impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Americas Segment
The Americas Segment EBT of $1.8 billion for full year 2017 was $284 million higher compared with 2016, explained primarily by favorable volume and mix, financing margin, and lease residual performance driven by improved residual losses on the lease portfolio, partially offset by operating costs and other.
Europe Segment
The Europe Segment EBT of $329 million for full year 2017 was $91 million higher compared with 2016, explained primarily by the non-recurrence of a 2016 cost due to FCE Bank’s settlement of a pension deficit in a Ford-sponsored retirement plan (offset fully in Ford of Europe’s results), and favorable volume and mix.
Asia Pacific
The Asia Pacific Segment EBT of $85 million for full year 2017 was $24 million higher compared with 2016, explained primarily by favorable volume and mix, partially offset by lower financing margin driven by higher borrowing costs.
Unallocated Other
Unallocated Other EBT of $101 million for 2017 was $32 million higher compared with 2016, explained primarily by favorable performance in market valuation adjustments to derivatives.
27
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Financing Shares and Contract Placement Volume
Our focus is on supporting Ford and Lincoln dealers and customers. This includes going to market with Ford and our dealers to support vehicle sales with financing products and marketing programs. Ford’s marketing programs may encourage or require Ford Credit financing and influence the financing choices customers make. As a result, our financing share, volume, and contract characteristics vary from period to period as Ford’s marketing programs change.
The following chart shows our United States and Canada retail installment and lease share of new Ford and Lincoln brand vehicle retail sales and wholesale financing share of new Ford and Lincoln brand vehicles acquired by dealers. Also shown is the Americas segment consumer financing contract placement volume for new and used vehicles. All data is for the years ended December 31:
In 2018, U.S. retail and lease share and total contract placement volume were up compared to a year ago, primarily reflecting changes in Ford’s marketing programs.
28
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The following chart shows Europe’s retail installment and lease share of new Ford-brand vehicles sold and wholesale financing share of new Ford-brand vehicles acquired by dealers. Also shown is Europe’s consumer financing contract placement volume for new and used vehicles. All data is for the years ended December 31:
In 2018, Europe Segment financing share was about equal to a year ago and total contract placement volume was consistent with a year ago.
29
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The following chart shows Asia Pacific’s retail installment share of new Ford and Lincoln brand vehicles sold by dealers and wholesale financing share of new Ford and Lincoln brand vehicles acquired by dealers. Also shown is Asia Pacific’s consumer financing contract placement volume for new and used vehicles. All data is for the years ended December 31:
In 2018, Asia Pacific Segment total contract placement volume was down 33% compared with a year ago driven primarily by lower Ford sales volume in China.
30
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Financial Condition
Finance Receivables and Operating Leases
Our receivables, including finance receivables and operating leases, were as follows (in billions):
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
Net Receivables | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||
Americas Segment | |||||||||||
Consumer financing | $ | 51.2 | $ | 55.1 | $ | 56.5 | |||||
Non-Consumer financing | 28.9 | 29.8 | 32.1 | ||||||||
Net Investment In operating leases | 26.9 | 26.4 | 27.0 | ||||||||
Total Americas Segment | $ | 107.0 | $ | 111.3 | $ | 115.6 | |||||
Europe Segment | |||||||||||
Consumer financing | $ | 10.8 | $ | 15.0 | $ | 15.5 | |||||
Non-Consumer financing | 7.4 | 9.2 | 9.6 | ||||||||
Net Investment In operating leases | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||
Total Europe Segment | $ | 18.5 | $ | 24.5 | $ | 25.5 | |||||
Asia Pacific Segment | |||||||||||
Consumer financing | $ | 2.9 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 3.8 | |||||
Non-Consumer financing | 1.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | ||||||||
Net Investment In operating leases | — | — | — | ||||||||
Total Asia Pacific Segment | $ | 4.7 | $ | 6.9 | $ | 5.2 | |||||
Total net receivables | $ | 130.2 | $ | 142.7 | $ | 146.3 | |||||
Managed Receivables | |||||||||||
Total net receivables (GAAP) | $ | 130.2 | $ | 142.7 | $ | 146.3 | |||||
Unearned interest supplements and residual support | 5.3 | 6.1 | 6.8 | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||
Other, primarily accumulated supplemental depreciation | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | ||||||||
Total managed receivables (Non-GAAP) | $ | 136.9 | $ | 150.5 | $ | 154.9 | |||||
Our operating lease portfolio is prudently managed and was 19% of total net receivables at December 31, 2018. Leasing is an important product, and our leasing strategy balances sales, share, residuals, and long-term profitability. Operating leases in the U.S. and Canada represent 99% of our total operating lease portfolio.
At December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018, net receivables includes consumer receivables before allowance for credit losses of $32.5 billion, $38.9 billion, and $40.7 billion, respectively, and non-consumer receivables before allowance for credit losses of $26.0 billion, $24.5 billion, and $25.7 billion, respectively, that have been sold for legal purposes in securitization transactions but continue to be reported in our consolidated financial statements. In addition, at December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018, net receivables includes net investment in operating leases before allowance for credit losses of $11.8 billion, $11.5 billion, and $16.3 billion, respectively, that have been included in securitization transactions but continue to be reported in our consolidated financial statements. The receivables and net investment in operating leases are available only for payment of the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions; they are not available to pay the other obligations or the claims of Ford Credit’s other creditors. Ford Credit holds the right to receive the excess cash flows not needed to pay the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions. For additional information on our securitization transactions, refer to the “Securitization Transactions” and “On-Balance Sheet Arrangements” sections and Note 7 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
31
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the possibility of loss from a customer’s or dealer’s failure to make payments according to contract terms. Credit losses are a normal part of a lending business, and credit risk has a significant impact on our business. We actively manage the credit risk of our consumer (retail financing and operating lease) and non-consumer (dealer financing) receivables to balance our level of risk and return using our consistent underwriting standards, effective proprietary scoring system, and world-class servicing. The allowance for credit losses (also referred to as the credit loss reserve) represents our estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in our finance receivables and operating leases as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for credit losses is estimated using a combination of models and management judgment, and is based on such factors as historical loss performance, portfolio quality, and receivable levels. The adequacy of our allowance for credit losses is assessed quarterly and the assumptions and models used in establishing the allowance are evaluated regularly. A description of our allowance setting process is provided in the “Critical Accounting Estimates - Allowance for Credit Losses” section.
Most of our charge-offs are related to retail finance and operating lease contracts. Charge-offs are affected by the number of vehicle repossessions, the unpaid balance outstanding at the time of repossession, the auction price of repossessed vehicles, and other charge-offs. We also incur credit losses on our dealer financing, but default rates for these receivables historically have been substantially lower than those for retail finance and operating lease contracts. For additional information on severity, refer to the “Critical Accounting Estimates - Allowance for Credit Losses”
section.
In purchasing retail finance and operating lease contracts, we use a proprietary scoring system that measures credit quality using information in the credit application, proposed contract terms, credit bureau data, and other information. After a proprietary risk score is generated, we decide whether to purchase a contract using a decision process based on a judgmental evaluation of the applicant, the credit application, the proposed contract terms, credit bureau information (e.g., FICO score), proprietary risk score, and other information. Our evaluation emphasizes the applicant’s ability to pay and creditworthiness focusing on payment, affordability, applicant credit history, and stability as key considerations. While FICO is a part of our scoring system, our models enable us to more effectively determine the probability that a customer will pay than using credit scores alone. When we originate business, our models project expected losses and we price accordingly. We ensure the business fits our risk appetite. For additional information on the quality of our receivables, see Note 4 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
32
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
U.S. Origination Metrics
We support customers across the credit spectrum. Our higher risk business, as classified at contract inception, consistently represents 5-6% of our portfolio and has been stable for over 10 years.
The following charts show annual trends for FICO, higher risk mix, and retail contract terms:
The 2018 average placement FICO score remained strong.
In 2018, our average retail placement term was unchanged from a year ago, and retail contracts of 84 months and longer continued to be a relatively small part of our business. Ford Credit remains focused on managing the trade cycle – building customer relationships and loyalty while offering financing products and terms customers want.
Ford Credit’s origination and risk management processes deliver robust portfolio performance.
33
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
U.S. Credit Losses
The following charts show the primary drivers of credit losses in the U.S. retail and lease business, which comprised 69% of our worldwide consumer portfolio at December 31, 2018. Loss-to-Receivables (“LTR”) ratios are charge-offs divided by average managed receivables:
Compared with a year ago, both delinquencies and the repossession rate have improved. Severity has improved year-over-year reflecting longer average time to repossession and lower principal outstanding at repossession.
Our 2018 charge-offs and LTR ratio improved compared with the prior year.
Credit loss metrics remain strong reflecting a healthy business environment and consumer credit conditions.
34
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Worldwide Credit Losses
The following charts show annual trends of charge-offs (credit losses, net of recoveries), LTR ratios, credit loss reserve, and our credit loss reserve as a percentage of end-of-period (“EOP”) managed receivables:
Our worldwide credit loss metrics remain strong. The worldwide LTR ratio in 2018 was equal to a year ago.
Our credit loss reserve is based on such factors as historical loss performance, portfolio quality, and receivables level. The credit loss reserve as of December 31, 2018 was about the same as at December 31, 2017.
The reserve as a percent of managed receivables was slightly lower than a year ago.
35
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Residual Risk
Leasing is an important product that many customers want and value, and lease customers also are more likely to buy or lease another Ford or Lincoln vehicle. We manage our lease share with an enterprise view to support sales, protect residual values, and manage the trade cycle. Ford Credit and Ford work together under a leasing strategy that considers share, term, model mix, geography, and other factors.
We are exposed to residual risk on operating leases and similar balloon payment products where the customer may return the financed vehicle to us. Residual risk is the possibility that the amount we obtain from returned vehicles will be less than our estimate of the expected residual value for the vehicle. We estimate the expected residual value by evaluating recent auction values, return volumes for our leased vehicles, industrywide used vehicle prices, marketing incentive plans, and vehicle quality data. For operating leases, changes in expected residual values impact depreciation expense, which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.
For additional information on our residual risk on operating leases, refer to the “Critical Accounting Estimates - Accumulated Depreciation on Vehicles Subject to Operating Leases” section and Note 5 “Net Investment in Operating Leases”.
Americas Retail Operating Lease Experience
The United States and Canada markets within our Americas segment accounted for 99% of Ford Credit’s total operating leases at December 31, 2018. The following table shows operating lease placement, termination, and return volumes for this segment for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except for percentages):
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||
Placements (a) | 445 | 418 | 433 | |||||
Terminations (b) | 358 | 405 | 407 | |||||
Returns (c) | 255 | 301 | 295 | |||||
Memo: | ||||||||
Return rates | 71 | % | 74 | % | 72 | % | ||
__________
(a) | Placement volume measures the number of leases we purchase in a given period. |
(b) | Termination volume measures the number of vehicles for which the lease has ended in a given period. |
(c) | Return volume reflects the number of vehicles returned to us by customers at lease end. |
In 2018, placement volume was up about 15,000 units compared with 2017, primarily reflecting changes in Ford’s marketing programs. Termination volume increased by about 2,000 units compared with 2017, reflecting higher lease placements in prior years. Return volume decreased about 6,000 units compared with 2017, reflecting decreased return rates.
36
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
U.S. Ford and Lincoln Brand Operating Lease Experience
The following charts show lease placement volume and lease share of Ford and Lincoln brand retail sales for vehicles in the respective periods. The U.S. operating lease portfolio accounted for 87% of our total net investment in operating leases at December 31, 2018.
Our 2018 lease placement volume was up compared with a year ago, reflecting Ford’s marketing programs.
Industry lease share in 2018 was up compared with a year ago. Ford Credit’s lease share was up compared with a year ago and remains below the industry, reflecting the Ford sales mix.
37
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The following charts show lease return volumes and auction values at incurred vehicle mix for vehicles returned in the respective periods:
Lease return volume and the return rate in 2018 were down from the prior year. Our 2018 24-month and 36-month off-lease auction values were higher compared with a year ago.
We expect full-year 2019 off-lease 36-month auction values to be about 4% lower compared with 2018 at constant mix.
38
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Credit Ratings
Our short-term and long-term debt is rated by four credit rating agencies designated as nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (“NRSROs”) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: DBRS, Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P.
In several markets, locally recognized rating agencies also rate us. A credit rating reflects an assessment by the rating agency of the credit risk associated with a corporate entity or particular securities issued by that entity. Rating agencies’ ratings of us are based on information provided by us and other sources. Credit ratings assigned to us from all of the NRSROs are closely associated with their opinions on Ford. Credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities and are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating agency may have different criteria for evaluating company risk and, therefore, ratings should be evaluated independently for each rating agency.
There have been no rating actions taken by these NRSROs since the filing of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.
The following chart summarizes certain of the credit ratings and outlook presently assigned by these four NRSROs:
NRSRO RATINGS | |||||||||||||||
Ford Credit | NRSROs | ||||||||||||||
Long-Term Senior Unsecured | Short -Term Unsecured | Outlook/Trend | Minimum Long-Term Investment Grade Rating | ||||||||||||
DBRS | BBB | R-2M | Stable | BBB (low) | |||||||||||
Fitch | BBB | F2 | Stable | BBB- | |||||||||||
Moody’s | Baa3 | P-3 | Negative | Baa3 | |||||||||||
S&P | BBB | A-2 | Negative | BBB- | |||||||||||
39
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Funding and Liquidity
Our primary funding objective is to be well capitalized with a strong balance sheet and ample liquidity to support our financing activities and growth under a variety of market conditions, including short-term and long-term market disruptions.
Our funding strategy remains focused on diversification, and we plan to continue accessing a variety of markets, channels, and investors.
Our liquidity profile continues to be diverse, robust, and focused on maintaining liquidity levels that meet our business and funding requirements. We annually stress test our balance sheet and liquidity to ensure that we continue to meet our financial obligations through economic cycles.
Funding Sources
Our funding sources include primarily unsecured debt and securitization transactions (including other structured financings). We issue both short-term and long-term debt that is held by both institutional and retail investors, with long-term debt having an original maturity of more than 12 months.
We sponsor a number of securitization programs that can be structured to provide both short-term and long-term funding through institutional investors in the United States and international capital markets. For additional information on our securitization transactions, refer to the “Securitization Transactions” section.
We obtain short-term unsecured funding from the sale of demand notes under our Ford Interest Advantage program, through the Retail Deposit program at FCE Bank plc (“FCE”), and by issuing unsecured commercial paper in the United States and other international markets. At December 31, 2018, the principal amount outstanding of Ford Interest Advantage notes, which may be redeemed at any time at the option of the holders thereof without restriction, and FCE Deposits was $6 billion. At December 31, 2018, the principal amount outstanding of our unsecured commercial paper was $4 billion, which primarily represents issuance under our commercial paper program in the United States.
We maintain multiple sources of readily available liquidity to fund the payment of our unsecured short-term debt obligations.
Cost of Funding Sources
The cost of securitization transactions and unsecured debt funding is based on a margin or spread over a benchmark interest rate. Spreads are typically measured in basis points. Our asset-backed funding and unsecured long-term debt costs are based on spreads over U.S. Treasury securities of similar maturities, a comparable London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), or other comparable benchmark rates. The funding costs of our floating rate demand notes change depending on market conditions.
During 2018, the weighted average spread of the triple-A rated notes offered in our U.S. public retail securitization transactions ranged from 19 to 22 basis points over the relevant benchmark rates and our U.S. institutional unsecured long-term debt transaction spreads ranged from 81 to 169 basis points over the relevant benchmark rates.
40
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Funding Portfolio
The following chart shows the trends in funding for our managed receivables:
Managed receivables of $155 billion as of December 31, 2018, were funded primarily with term debt and term asset-backed securities. Securitized funding as a percent of managed receivables was 39%.
We target a mix of securitized funding between 35% and 40%. The calendarization of the funding plan will result in quarterly fluctuations of the securitized funding percentage.
41
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Public Term Funding Plan
The following chart shows our issuances for 2016, 2017, and 2018, and our planned issuances for 2019, excluding short-term funding programs:
Our total unsecured public term funding plan is categorized by currency of issuance.
In 2018, we completed $27 billion of public term funding. For 2019, we project full-year public term funding in the range of $27 - $33 billion. We plan to continue issuing our eurocurrency-denominated (e.g., euro and sterling) public unsecured debt from the United States.
Through February 15, 2019, we have completed $4 billion of public term issuances.
42
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Liquidity Sources
We define gross liquidity as cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (excluding amounts related to insurance activities) and committed capacity (which includes our credit and asset-backed facilities and bank lines), less utilization of liquidity. Utilization of liquidity is the amount funded under our liquidity sources and also includes the cash and cash equivalents required to support securitization transactions. Securitization cash is cash held for the benefit of the securitization investors (for example, a reserve fund). Net liquidity available for use is defined as gross liquidity less certain adjustments for asset-backed capacity in excess of eligible receivables and cash related to the Ford Credit Revolving Extended Variable-utilization program (“FordREV”), which can be accessed through future sales of receivables. While not included in available liquidity, these adjustments represent additional funding sources for future originations.
The following chart shows our liquidity sources and utilization:
Our liquidity available for use will fluctuate quarterly based on factors including near-term debt maturities, receivable growth, and timing of funding transactions. We target liquidity of about $25 billion.
At December 31, 2018, our liquidity available for use was $27.3 billion, $2.2 billion lower than year-end 2017. Our sources of liquidity include cash, committed asset-backed facilities, unsecured credit facilities, and the Ford corporate credit facility allocation. At December 31, 2018, our liquidity sources including cash totaled $51.6 billion, about the same as at year-end 2017.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities. At December 31, 2018, our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (excluding amounts related to insurance activities) totaled $10.2 billion, compared with $11.8 billion at year-end 2017. In the normal course of our funding activities, we may generate more proceeds than are required for our immediate funding needs. These excess amounts are held primarily in highly liquid investments, which provide liquidity for our anticipated and unanticipated cash needs and give us flexibility in the use of our other funding programs. Our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (excluding amounts related to insurance activities) primarily include U.S. Department of Treasury obligations, federal agency securities, bank time deposits with investment-grade institutions, investment-grade commercial paper, debt obligations of a select group of non-U.S. governments, non-U.S. governmental agencies, supranational institutions, non-U.S. central banks, and money market funds that carry the highest possible ratings.
43
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
The average maturity of these investments ranges from approximately three to six months and is adjusted based on market conditions and liquidity needs. We monitor our cash levels and average maturity on a daily basis. Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities included amounts to be used only to support our securitization transactions of $3.8 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
Committed Capacity. At December 31, 2018, our committed capacity totaled $41.4 billion, compared with $39.7 billion at December 31, 2017. Our committed capacity is primarily comprised of committed ABS facilities from bank-sponsored commercial paper conduits and other financial institutions, unsecured credit facilities with financial institutions, and allocated commitments under the Ford corporate credit facility.
Committed Asset-Backed Facilities. We and our subsidiaries have entered into agreements with a number of bank-sponsored asset-backed commercial paper conduits and other financial institutions. Such counterparties are contractually committed, at our option, to purchase from us eligible retail receivables or to purchase or make advances under asset-backed securities backed by retail or wholesale finance receivables or operating leases for proceeds of up to $35.4 billion ($17.4 billion of retail financing, $6.0 billion of wholesale financing, and $12.0 billion of operating leases) at December 31, 2018. In the United States, we are able to obtain funding within two days for our unutilized capacity in some of our committed asset-backed facilities. These committed facilities have varying maturity dates, with $17.9 billion having maturities within the next twelve months and the remaining balance having maturities through 2020. We plan capacity renewals to protect our global funding needs, optimize capacity utilization, and maintain sufficient liquidity.
Our ability to obtain funding under these facilities is subject to having a sufficient amount of eligible assets as well as our ability to obtain interest rate hedging arrangements for certain facilities. At December 31, 2018, $20.7 billion of these commitments were in use. These programs are free of material adverse change clauses, restrictive financial covenants (for example, debt-to-equity limitations and minimum net worth requirements), and generally, credit rating triggers that could limit our ability to obtain funding. However, the unused portion of these commitments may be terminated if the performance of the underlying assets deteriorates beyond specified levels. Based on our experience and knowledge as servicer of the related assets, we do not expect any of these programs to be terminated due to such events.
FCE has pre-positioned retail receivables with the Bank of England which supports access to the Discount Window Facility. Pre-positioned assets are neither pledged to nor held as collateral by the Bank of England unless the Discount Window Facility is accessed. FCE’s eligibility to access the Discount Window Facility is not reflected in the Liquidity Sources table above.
Unsecured Credit Facilities. At December 31, 2018, we and our majority-owned subsidiaries had $6.0 billion of contractually committed unsecured credit facilities with financial institutions, including the FCE Credit Agreement, the Ford Bank Credit Agreement, and the allocation under Ford’s corporate credit facility. At December 31, 2018, $5.3 billion was available for use.
FCE’s £745 million (equivalent to $954 million at December 31, 2018) syndicated credit facility (the “FCE Credit Agreement”) matures in 2021. At December 31, 2018, £505 million (equivalent to $646 million) was available for use. Ford Bank’s €240 million (equivalent to $275 million at December 31, 2018) syndicated credit facility (the “Ford Bank Credit Agreement”) matures in 2021. At December 31, 2018, all €240 million was available for use.
Both the FCE Credit Agreement and Ford Bank Credit Agreement contain certain covenants, including an obligation for FCE and Ford Bank to maintain their ratio of regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets at no less than the applicable regulatory minimum. The FCE Credit Agreement requires the support agreement between FCE and Ford Credit to remain in effect (and enforced by FCE to ensure that its net worth is maintained at no less than $500 million). The Ford Bank Credit Agreement requires a guarantee of Ford Bank’s obligations under the agreement, provided by Ford Credit, to remain in effect.
Lenders under the Ford corporate credit facility have commitments totaling $13.4 billion, with 75% of the commitments maturing on April 30, 2023 and 25% of the commitments maturing on April 30, 2021. Ford has allocated $3.0 billion of commitments, including commitments under a Chinese renminbi sub-facility, to us on an irrevocable and exclusive basis to support our liquidity. At December 31, 2018, all $3.0 billion was available for use.
44
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Funding and Liquidity Risks
Our funding plan is subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, including disruption in the capital markets that could impact both unsecured debt and asset-backed securities issuance and the effects of regulatory changes on the financial markets.
Despite our diverse sources of funding and liquidity, our ability to maintain liquidity may be affected by, among others, the following factors (not necessarily listed in order of importance or probability of occurrence):
• | Prolonged disruption of the debt and securitization markets; |
• | Global capital market volatility; |
• | Market capacity for Ford- and Ford Credit-sponsored investments; |
• | General demand for the type of securities we offer; |
• | Our ability to continue funding through asset-backed financing structures; |
• | Performance of the underlying assets within our asset-backed financing structures; |
• | Inability to obtain hedging instruments; |
• | Accounting and regulatory changes; |
• | Our ability to maintain credit facilities and committed asset-backed facilities; and |
• | Credit ratings assigned to us. |
Stress Tests
We annually conduct stress testing on our funding and liquidity sources to ensure we can continue to meet our financial obligations and support the sale of Ford vehicles during firm-specific and market-wide stress events. Stress tests are intended to quantify the potential impact of various adverse scenarios on the balance sheet and liquidity. These scenarios include assumptions on access to unsecured and secured debt markets, runoff of short-term funding, and ability to renew expiring liquidity commitments and are measured over various time periods, including 30 days, 90 days, and longer term. We target a sufficient amount and composition of liquidity to withstand such stresses. Our stress test does not assume any additional funding, liquidity, or capital support from Ford. We routinely develop contingency funding plans as part of our liquidity stress testing.
45
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Balance Sheet Liquidity Profile
We define our balance sheet liquidity profile as the cumulative maturities, including the impact of expected prepayments, of our finance receivables, investment in operating leases, and cash, less the cumulative debt maturities over upcoming annual periods. Our balance sheet is inherently liquid because of the short-term nature of our finance receivables, investment in operating leases, and cash. We ensure our cumulative debt maturities have a longer tenor than our cumulative asset maturities. This positive maturity profile is intended to provide additional liquidity after all of our assets have been funded and is in addition to our liquidity stress test.
The following chart shows our cumulative maturities for the periods presented:
Maturities of investment in operating leases consist primarily of the portion of rental payments attributable to depreciation over the remaining life of the lease and the expected residual value at lease termination. For additional information on maturities of finance receivables and debt, see Notes 4 and 11 of our Notes to the Financial Statements. Maturities of finance receivables and investment in operating leases in the chart above include expected prepayments for our retail installment sale contracts and investment in operating leases. The 2019 finance receivables maturities in the chart above also include all of the wholesale receivables maturities that are otherwise shown in Note 4 as extending beyond 2019. The chart above also reflects the following adjustments to debt maturities in Note 11 to match all of the asset-backed debt maturities with the underlying asset maturities:
• | The 2019 maturities include all of the wholesale securitization transactions, even if the maturities extend beyond 2019; and |
• | Retail securitization transactions under certain committed asset-backed facilities are assumed to amortize immediately rather than amortizing after the expiration of the commitment period. |
46
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Securitization Transactions
Overview
We securitize finance receivables and net investment in operating leases through a variety of programs using amortizing, variable funding, and revolving structures. We also engage in other structured financing transactions. Due to the similarities between securitization and structured financing, we refer to structured financings as securitization transactions. Our securitization programs are targeted to institutional investors in both public and private transactions. We completed our first securitization transaction in 1988, and participate in a number of securitization markets primarily in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, and China.
Securitization provides us with a lower cost source of funding compared with other alternatives, diversifies our funding among different markets and investors, and provides additional liquidity. In the United States, we are able to obtain funding within two days for our unutilized capacity in some of our committed asset-backed facilities.
Our securitization transactions involve sales to consolidated entities or we maintain control over the assets. As a result, the securitized assets and related debt remain on our balance sheet and affect our financial condition, operating results, and liquidity.
Use of Special Purpose Entities
In a securitization transaction, the securitized assets are generally held by a bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity (“SPE”) in order to isolate the securitized assets from the claims of our creditors and ensure that the cash flows on the securitized assets are available for the benefit of securitization investors. Payments to securitization investors are made from cash flows on the securitized assets and any enhancements in the SPE, and not by Ford Credit and are not based on our creditworthiness. Senior asset-backed securities issued by the SPEs generally receive the highest credit ratings from the rating agencies that rate them.
Securitization SPEs have limited purposes and generally are only permitted to purchase the securitized assets, issue asset-backed securities, and make payments on the securities. Some SPEs, such as certain trusts that issue securities backed by retail installment sale contracts, only issue a single series of securities and are dissolved when those securities have been paid in full. Other SPEs, such as the trust that issues securities backed by wholesale receivables, issue multiple series of securities from time to time and may not be dissolved until the last series of securities is paid in full.
Our use of SPEs in our securitization transactions is consistent with conventional practices in the consumer asset-backed securitization industry. We sponsor the SPEs used in all of our securitization programs with the exception of bank-sponsored conduits. None of our officers, directors, or employees holds any equity interests in our SPEs or receives any direct or indirect compensation from the SPEs. These SPEs do not own our Shares or shares of any of our affiliates.
Selection of Assets, Enhancements, and Retained Interests
In order to be eligible for inclusion in a securitization transaction, each asset must satisfy certain eligibility criteria designed for the specific transaction. For example, for securitization transactions of retail installment sale contracts, the selection criteria may be based on factors such as location of the obligor, contract term, payment schedule, interest rate, financing program, the type of financed vehicle, and whether the contracts are active and in good standing (e.g., when the obligor is not more than 30-days delinquent or bankrupt). Subject to regulatory or rating agency requirements, it is our preferred practice to satisfy the applicable eligibility criteria by randomly selecting the assets to be included in a particular securitization from our entire portfolio of assets.
We provide various forms of credit and payment enhancement to increase the likelihood of receipt by securitization investors of the full amount of interest and principal due on their asset-backed securities. Credit enhancement includes (i) over-collateralization (when the principal amount of the securitized assets exceeds the principal amount of related asset-backed securities), (ii) segregated cash reserve funds, (iii) subordinated securities, and (iv) excess spread (when interest collections on the securitized assets exceed the related fees and expenses, including interest payments on the related asset-backed securities). Payment enhancement includes interest rate swaps and other hedging arrangements, liquidity facilities, and certain cash deposits.
47
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
We retain interests in our securitization transactions, including in the form of subordinated securities issued by the SPE, rights to cash held for the benefit of the securitization investors, and residual interests. Residual interests represent the right to receive collections on the securitized assets in excess of amounts needed to pay securitization investors and to pay other transaction participants and expenses. We retain credit risk in securitization transactions, including the most subordinated interests in the securitized assets, which are structured to absorb expected credit losses on the securitized assets before any losses would be experienced by investors. Based on past experience, we expect that any losses in the pool of securitized assets would likely be limited to our retained interests. Our retention of credit risk is legally required in certain jurisdictions, including the United States, to be at least 5% of the credit risk of the securitized assets and is typically required to be retained for at least two years.
Our Continuing Obligations
We are engaged as servicer to service the securitized assets and securitization transactions. Our servicing duties include collecting payments on the securitized assets, preparing monthly investor reports on the performance of the securitized assets and the securitization transaction, and facilitating payments to securitization investors. While servicing securitized assets, we apply the same servicing policies and procedures that we apply to our owned assets and maintain our normal relationship with our financing customers.
We generally have no obligation to repurchase or replace any securitized asset that becomes delinquent in payment or otherwise is in default. As the seller and servicer of the securitized assets and as the administrator of the securitization SPE, we are obligated to provide certain kinds of support to our securitization transactions, which are customary in the securitization industry. These obligations include performing administrative duties for the SPE and some transaction parties, indemnifications, repurchase obligations on assets that do not meet representations or warranties on eligibility criteria or that have been materially modified, the mandatory sale of additional assets in some revolving transactions, the payment or reimbursement of transaction party expenses, and, in some cases, servicer advances of certain amounts. Securitization investors have no recourse to us or our other assets and have no right to require us to repurchase the asset-backed securities. We generally have no obligation to provide liquidity or contribute cash or additional assets to our SPEs either due to the performance of the securitized assets or the credit rating of our short-term or long-term debt. We do not guarantee any asset-backed securities. We may be required to support the performance of certain securitization transactions, however, by increasing cash reserves.
For certain public offerings of asset-backed securities, we have obligations to report certain information, including asset-level data on the securitized assets, ensure the engagement of an independent asset representations reviewer, cooperate and provide access to information necessary for an asset representations review, and participate in dispute resolution proceedings for unresolved asset repurchase requests.
Structural Features Under Certain Securitization Programs
The following securitization programs contain structural features that could prevent us from using these sources of funding in certain circumstances:
• | Revolving Retail Program. Asset-backed securities under the FordREV program may be supported by a combination of a revolving pool of U.S. retail installment sale contracts and cash collateral. Cash generated by the receivables during the revolving period in excess of what is needed to pay certain expenses of the trust and interest on the notes may be used to purchase additional receivables provided that certain tests are met after the purchase. The revolving period ends upon the occurrence of certain events that include if credit losses or delinquencies on the pool of assets supporting the securities exceed specified levels, if certain segregated account balances are below their required levels, and if interest is not paid on the securities. |
• | Retail Committed Facilities. If credit losses or delinquencies on a pool of assets held by a facility exceed specified levels, or if the level of over-collateralization or other credit enhancement for that pool decreases below a specified level, we will not have the right to sell additional pools of assets to that facility. |
• | Wholesale Program. If the payment rates on wholesale receivables in the securitization trust are lower than specified levels or if there are significant dealer defaults, we will be unable to obtain additional funding and any existing funding would begin to amortize. |
• | Lease Facility Program. If credit losses or delinquencies in our portfolio of retail lease contracts exceed specified levels, we will be unable to obtain additional funding from the securitization of retail lease contracts through our committed lease facilities. |
48
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
On-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our securitization transactions involve sales to consolidated entities or we maintain control over the assets and, therefore, the securitized assets and related debt remain on our balance sheet. The securitized assets are available only for payment of the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions. They are not available to pay our other obligations or the claims of our other creditors. We hold the right to receive the excess cash flows not needed to pay the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions. This debt is the obligation of our consolidated securitization entities and not the obligation of Ford Credit or our other subsidiaries. For additional information on our on-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 7 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
The following table shows worldwide cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and related debt by segment and product for our on-balance sheet securitization transactions at December 31 (in billions):
2017 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Finance Receivables and Net Investment in Operating Leases (a) | Related Debt (b) | Cash and Cash Equivalents | Finance Receivables and Net Investment in Operating Leases (a) | Related Debt (b) | |||||||||||||||||||
Finance Receivables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail financing | $ | 1.7 | $ | 31.4 | $ | 28.0 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 33.9 | $ | 29.8 | ||||||||||||
Wholesale financing | 1.1 | 21.2 | 11.5 | 0.3 | 22.7 | 13.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Americas Segment | 2.8 | 52.6 | 39.5 | 2.1 | 56.6 | 43.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail financing | 0.4 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 0.4 | 6.1 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale financing | 0.1 | 3.3 | 0.5 | — | 3.0 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Europe Segment | 0.5 | 9.9 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 9.1 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail financing | — | 0.9 | 0.7 | — | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale financing | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Asia Pacific Segment | — | 0.9 | 0.7 | — | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total finance receivables | 3.3 | 63.4 | 45.4 | 2.5 | 66.4 | 49.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in operating leases | 0.5 | 11.5 | 7.2 | 0.5 | 16.3 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total on-balance sheet arrangements | $ | 3.8 | $ | 74.9 | $ | 52.6 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 82.7 | $ | 59.8 | ||||||||||||
__________
(a) | Before allowances for credit losses. Unearned interest supplements and residual support are excluded from securitization transactions. |
(b) | Includes unamortized discount and debt issuance costs. |
49
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Leverage
We use leverage, or the debt-to-equity ratio, to make various business decisions, including evaluating and establishing pricing for finance receivable and operating lease financing, and assessing our capital structure. We refer to our shareholder’s interest as equity.
The following chart shows the calculation of our financial statement leverage and managed leverage:
We believe that managed leverage is useful to our investors because it reflects the way we manage our business. We deduct cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (excluding amounts related to insurance activities) because they generally correspond to excess debt beyond the amount required to support our operations and amounts to support on-balance sheet securitization transactions. We make derivative accounting adjustments to our assets, debt, and equity positions to reflect the impact of interest rate instruments we use in connection with our term-debt issuances and securitization transactions. The derivative accounting adjustments related to these instruments vary over the term of the underlying debt and securitized funding obligations based on changes in market interest rates. We generally repay our debt obligations as they mature. As a result, we exclude the impact of these derivative accounting adjustments on both the numerator and denominator in order to exclude the interim effects of changes in market interest rates. For additional information on our use of interest rate instruments and other derivatives, refer to Item 7A.
We plan our managed leverage by considering prevailing market conditions and the risk characteristics of our business. At December 31, 2018, our financial statement leverage was 9.4:1, and managed leverage was 8.8:1. We target managed leverage in the range of 8:1 to 9:1.
50
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
We are party to certain contractual obligations involving commitments to make payments to others. Most of these are debt obligations, which are recorded on our balance sheet and disclosed in our Notes to the Financial Statements. Long-term debt may have fixed or variable interest rates. For long-term debt with variable rate interest, we estimate the future interest payments based on projected market interest rates for various floating rate benchmarks received from third parties. In addition, we may enter into contracts with suppliers for purchases of certain services, including operating lease commitments. These arrangements may contain minimum levels of service requirements. Our aggregate contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 are shown below (in millions):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2020 - 2021 | 2022 - 2023 | 2024 and Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt (a) | $ | 36,503 | $ | 57,230 | $ | 21,320 | $ | 10,703 | $ | 125,756 | |||||||||
Interest payments relating to long-term debt | 3,189 | 3,775 | 1,438 | 814 | 9,216 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease | 19 | 25 | 19 | 34 | 97 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 33 | 44 | 29 | 3 | 109 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 39,744 | $ | 61,074 | $ | 22,806 | $ | 11,554 | $ | 135,178 | |||||||||
__________
(a) | Excludes unamortized discounts, unamortized issuance costs, and fair value adjustments. |
Liabilities recognized for unrecognized tax benefits of $115 million are excluded from the table above. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash flows associated with income tax liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period of payment. For additional information on income taxes, see Note 12 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
For additional information on our long-term debt and operating lease obligations, see Notes 11 and 19, respectively, of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if 1) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made; and 2) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, or use of different estimates that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
The accounting estimates that are most important to our business involve:
• | Allowance for credit losses; and |
• | Accumulated depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases. |
Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with Ford’s and our audit committees, and these audit committees have reviewed these estimates and disclosures.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses represents our estimate of the probable credit loss inherent in finance receivables and operating leases as of the balance sheet date. The adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is assessed quarterly and the assumptions and models used in establishing the allowance are evaluated regularly. Because credit losses can vary substantially over time, estimating credit losses requires a number of assumptions about matters that are uncertain. For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses, see Note 6 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
Nature of Estimates Required. We estimate the probable credit losses inherent in finance receivables and operating leases based on several factors.
51
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Consumer Portfolio. We estimate the allowance for credit losses on consumer receivables and on operating leases using a combination of measurement models and management judgment. The models consider factors such as historical trends in credit losses and recoveries (including key metrics such as delinquencies, repossessions, and bankruptcies), the composition of the present portfolio (including vehicle brand, term, risk evaluation, and new/used vehicles), trends in historical used vehicle values, and economic conditions. Estimates from these models rely on historical information and may not fully reflect losses inherent in the present portfolio. Therefore, we may adjust the estimate to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent economic trends and conditions, portfolio composition, and other relevant factors.
Assumptions Used. Our allowance for credit losses is based on our assumptions regarding:
• | Frequency. The number of finance receivables and operating lease contracts that are expected to default over the loss emergence period (“LEP”), measured as repossessions; repossession ratio reflects the number of finance receivables and operating lease contracts that we expect will default over a period of time divided by the average number of contracts outstanding; and |
• | Loss severity. The expected difference between the amount a customer owes when the finance contract is charged off and the amount received, net of expenses, from selling the repossessed vehicle. |
Collective Allowance for Credit Losses. The collective allowance is evaluated primarily using a collective LTR model that, based on historical experience, indicates credit losses have been incurred in the portfolio even though the particular accounts that are uncollectible cannot be specifically identified. The LTR model is based on the most recent years of history. An LTR for each product is calculated by dividing credit losses (i.e., charge-offs net of recoveries) by average net finance receivables or average net investment in operating leases, excluding unearned interest supplements and residual support, allowance for credit losses, and other (primarily accumulated supplemental depreciation). The average LTR that is calculated for each product is multiplied by the end-of-period balances for that given product.
Our largest markets also use a loss projection model to estimate losses inherent in the portfolio. The loss projection model applies recent monthly performance metrics, stratified by contract type (retail or lease), contract term (e.g., 60-month), and risk rating to our active portfolio to estimate the losses that have been incurred.
The LEP is an assumption within our models and represents the average amount of time between when a loss event first occurs to when it is charged off. This time period starts when the consumer begins to experience financial difficulty. It is evidenced, typically through delinquency, before eventually resulting in a charge-off. The LEP is a multiplier in the calculation of the collective consumer allowance for credit losses.
For accounts greater than 120 days past due, the uncollectible portion is charged off, such that the remaining recorded investment is equal to the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell.
Specific Allowance for Impaired Receivables. Consumer receivables involved in Troubled Debt Restructurings are specifically assessed for impairment. A specific allowance is estimated based on the present value of the expected future cash flows of the receivable discounted at the contract’s original effective interest rate or the fair value of any collateral adjusted for estimated costs to sell.
After establishing the collective and specific allowance for credit losses, if management believes the allowance does not reflect all losses inherent in the portfolio due to changes in recent economic trends and conditions, or other relevant factors, an adjustment is made based on management judgment.
Sensitivity Analysis. Changes in the assumptions used to derive frequency and severity would affect the allowance for credit losses. The effect of the indicated increase/decrease in the assumptions for our U.S. Ford and Lincoln brand retail financing and operating lease portfolio is as follows (in millions):
Assumption | Basis Point Change | Increase / (Decrease) | ||
Frequency - repossession ratio | + / - 10 bps | $36 / ($36) | ||
Loss severity per unit | + / - 100 | 4 / (4) | ||
52
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Non-Consumer Portfolio. We estimate the allowance for credit losses for non-consumer receivables based on historical LTR ratios, expected future cash flows, and the fair value of collateral.
Collective Allowance for Credit Losses. We estimate an allowance for non-consumer receivables that are not specifically identified as impaired using an LTR model for each financing product based on historical experience. This LTR is an average of the most recent historical experience and is calculated consistent with the consumer receivables LTR approach. All accounts that are specifically identified as impaired are excluded from the calculation of the non-specific or collective allowance.
Specific Allowance for Impaired Receivables. Dealer financing is evaluated by segmenting individual loans by the risk characteristics of the loan (such as the amount of the loan, the nature of the collateral, and the financial status of the debtor). The loans are analyzed to determine whether individual loans are impaired, and a specific allowance is estimated based on the present value of the expected future cash flows of the receivable discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral adjusted for estimated costs to sell.
After establishing the collective and specific allowance for credit losses, if management believes the allowance does not reflect all losses inherent in the portfolio due to changes in recent economic trends and conditions, or other relevant factors, an adjustment is made based on management judgment.
Changes in our assumptions affect the Provision for credit losses on our income statement and the allowance for credit losses contained within Finance receivables, net and Net investment in operating leases on our balance sheet.
Accumulated Depreciation on Vehicles Subject to Operating Leases
Accumulated depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases reduces the value of the leased vehicles in our operating lease portfolio from their original acquisition value to their expected residual value at the end of the lease term. For additional information on net investment in operating leases, including the amount of accumulated depreciation, see Note 5 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
We monitor residual values each month, and we review the adequacy of our accumulated depreciation on a quarterly basis. If we believe that the expected residual values for our vehicles have changed, we revise depreciation to ensure that our net investment in operating leases (equal to our acquisition value of the vehicles less accumulated depreciation) will be adjusted to reflect our revised estimate of the expected residual value at the end of the lease term. Such adjustments to depreciation expense would result in a change in the depreciation rates of the vehicles subject to operating leases and are recorded prospectively on a straight-line basis.
Each lease customer has the option to buy the leased vehicle at the end of the lease or to return the vehicle to the dealer. For additional information on our residual risk on operating leases, refer to the “Residual Risk” section.
Nature of Estimates Required. Each operating lease in our portfolio represents a vehicle we own that has been leased to a customer. At the time we purchase a lease, we establish an expected residual value for the vehicle. We estimate the expected residual value by evaluating recent auction values, return volumes for our leased vehicles, industrywide used vehicle prices, marketing incentive plans, and vehicle quality data.
Assumptions Used. Our accumulated depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases is based on our assumptions regarding:
•Auction value. Our projection of the market value of the vehicles when sold at the end of the lease; and
•Return volume. Our projection of the number of vehicles that will be returned at lease end.
53
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Sensitivity Analysis. For returned vehicles, we face a risk that the amount we obtain from the vehicle sold at auction will be less than our estimate of the expected residual value for the vehicle. The impact of the change in assumptions on future auction values and return volumes would increase or decrease accumulated supplemental depreciation and depreciation expense over the remaining terms of the operating leases. The effect of the indicated increase/decrease in the assumptions for our U.S. Ford and Lincoln brand operating lease portfolio is as follows (in millions):
Assumption | Basis Point Change | Increase / (Decrease) | ||
Future auction values | + / - 100 bps | $(128) / $128 | ||
Return volumes | + / - 100 | 18 / (18) | ||
Adjustments to the amount of accumulated supplemental depreciation on operating leases would be reflected on our balance sheet as Net investment in operating leases and on the income statement in Depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases.
Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the following Account Standards Updates (“ASU”), which are not expected to have a significant change in practice and / or have a significant financial impact (with the exception of those standards further discussed in Note 2) to our financial statements or financial statement disclosures.
Standard | Effective Date (a) | ||
2018-16 | Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes | January 1, 2019 | |
2018-08 | Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made | January 1, 2019 | |
2018-02 | Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | January 1, 2019 | |
2016-02 | Leases | January 1, 2019 (b) | |
2018-18 | Clarifying the interaction between Collaborative Arrangements and Revenue From Contracts With Customers | January 1, 2020 | |
2018-17 | Targeting Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities | January 1, 2020 | |
2018-15 | Customer’s Accounting for Implementation costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract | January 1, 2020 | |
2016-13 | Credit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments | January 1, 2020 | |
__________
(a) | Early adoption for each of the standards is permitted. |
(b) | The FASB has issued the following updates to the Leases standard: ASU 2018-01 (Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Leases) and ASU 2018-11 (Targeted Improvements to Leases), and ASU 2018-20 (Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors). which we will adopt with the new Leases standard effective January 1, 2019. |
Outlook
We expect full year 2019 EBT to be strong, but lower than 2018, reflecting lower volume and financing margin, and higher operating costs.
54
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
Statements included or incorporated by reference herein may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, forecasts, and assumptions by our management and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated, including, without limitation:
• | Ford’s long-term competitiveness depends on the successful execution of fitness actions; |
• | Industry sales volume, particularly in the United States, Europe, or China, can be volatile and could decline if there is a financial crisis, recession, or significant geopolitical event; |
• | Ford’s new and existing products and mobility services are subject to market acceptance; |
• | Ford’s results are dependent on sales of larger, more profitable vehicles, particularly in the United States; |
• | Ford may face increased price competition resulting from industry excess capacity, currency fluctuations, or other factors; |
• | Fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates can have a significant effect on results; |
• | With a global footprint, Ford’s results could be adversely affected by economic, geopolitical, protectionist trade policies, or other events, including Brexit; |
• | Ford’s production, as well as Ford’s suppliers’ production, could be disrupted by labor disputes, natural or man-made disasters, financial distress, production difficulties, or other factors; |
• | Ford’s ability to maintain a competitive cost structure could be affected by labor or other constraints; |
• | Pension and other postretirement liabilities could adversely affect Ford’s liquidity and financial condition; |
• | Economic and demographic experience for pension and other postretirement benefit plans (e.g., discount rates or investment returns) could be worse than Ford has assumed; |
• | Ford’s vehicles could be affected by defects that result in delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, or increased warranty costs; |
• | Ford may need to substantially modify its product plans to comply with safety, emissions, fuel economy, and other regulations that may change in the future; |
• | Ford could experience unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations, or adverse publicity arising out of alleged defects in products, perceived environmental impacts, or otherwise; |
• | Ford’s receipt of government incentives could be subject to reduction, termination, or clawback; |
• | Operational systems, security systems, and vehicles could be affected by cyber incidents; |
• | Ford Credit’s access to debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts could be affected by credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors; |
• | Ford Credit could experience higher-than-expected credit losses, lower-than-anticipated residual values, or higher-than-expected return volumes for leased vehicles; |
• | Ford Credit could face increased competition from banks, financial institutions, or other third parties seeking to increase their share of financing Ford vehicles; and |
• | Ford Credit could be subject to new or increased credit regulations, consumer or data protection regulations, or other regulations. |
We cannot be certain that any expectation, forecast, or assumption made in preparing forward-looking statements will prove accurate, or that any projection will be realized. It is to be expected that there may be differences between projected and actual results. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of their initial issuance, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. For additional discussion, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
55
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Overview
We are exposed to a variety of risks in the normal course of our business. Our financial condition depends on the extent to which we effectively identify, assess, monitor, and manage these risks. The principal types of risk to our business include:
• | Market risk - the possibility that changes in interest and currency exchange rates will adversely affect our cash flow and economic value; |
• | Counterparty risk - the possibility that a counterparty may default on a derivative contract or investment; |
• | Credit risk - the possibility of loss from a customer’s failure to make payments according to contract terms; |
• | Residual risk - the possibility that the actual proceeds we receive at lease termination will be lower than our projections or return volumes will be higher than our projections; |
• | Liquidity risk - the possibility that we may be unable to meet all of our current and future obligations in a timely manner; and |
• | Operating risk - the possibility of: errors relating to transaction processing and systems; actions that could result in compliance deficiencies with regulatory standards or contractual obligations; and fraud by our employees or third parties. |
We manage each of these types of risk in the context of its contribution to our overall global risk. We make business decisions on a risk-adjusted basis and price our services consistent with these risks.
Credit, residual, and liquidity risks are discussed in Items 1 and 7. A discussion of market risk (including currency and interest rate risk), counterparty risk, and operating risk follows.
Market Risk
Given the unpredictability of financial markets, we seek to reduce volatility in our cash flow and economic value from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. We use various financial instruments, commonly referred to as derivatives, to manage market risks. We do not engage in any trading, market-making, or other speculative activities in the derivative markets.
Our strategies to manage market risks are approved by our Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”) and the Ford Global Risk Management Committee (“GRMC”). The ALCO is co-chaired by our Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer of Ford. The GRMC is chaired by the Chief Financial Officer of Ford.
The Ford Treasurer’s Office is responsible for the execution of our market risk management strategies. These strategies are governed by written policies and procedures. Separation of duties is maintained between the strategy and approval of derivatives trades, the execution of derivatives trades, and the settlement of cash flows. Regular audits are conducted to ensure that appropriate controls are in place and that these controls are effective. In addition, the ALCO, GRMC, Ford’s Audit Committee, and Ford Credit’s Board of Directors review our market risk exposures and use of derivatives to manage these exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
Nature of Exposure. Generally, our assets and the related debt have different re-pricing periods, and consequently, respond differently to changes in interest rates.
Our assets consist primarily of fixed-rate retail installment sale and operating lease contracts and floating-rate wholesale receivables. Fixed-rate retail installment sale and operating lease contracts generally require customers to make equal monthly payments over the life of the contract. Wholesale receivables are originated to finance new and used vehicles held in dealers’ inventory and generally require dealers to pay a floating rate.
56
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (Continued)
Debt consists primarily of short-term and long-term unsecured debt and securitization debt. In the case of unsecured term debt, to support our positive maturity profile, we may borrow at terms longer than the terms of our assets, in most instances with maturities up to ten years. These debt instruments are principally fixed-rate and require fixed and equal interest payments over the life of the instrument and a single principal payment at maturity.
Risk Management. Our interest rate risk management objective is to reduce volatility in our cash flows and volatility in our economic value from changes in interest rates based on an established risk tolerance that may vary by market. We use economic value sensitivity analysis and re-pricing gap analysis to evaluate potential long-term effects of changes in interest rates. We then enter into interest rate swaps to convert portions of our floating-rate debt to fixed or our fixed-rate debt to floating to ensure that our exposure falls within the established tolerances. We also use pre-tax cash flow sensitivity analysis to monitor the level of near-term cash flow exposure. The pre-tax cash flow sensitivity analysis measures the changes in expected cash flows associated with our interest-rate-sensitive assets, liabilities, and derivative financial instruments from hypothetical changes in interest rates over a twelve-month horizon. The ALCO reviews the re-pricing mismatch and exposure every month and approves interest rate swaps required to maintain exposure within approved thresholds prior to execution.
Quantitative Disclosure. To provide a quantitative measure of the sensitivity of our pre-tax cash flow to changes in interest rates, we use interest rate scenarios that assume a hypothetical, instantaneous increase or decrease of one percentage point in all interest rates across all maturities (a “parallel shift”), as well as a base case that assumes that all interest rates remain constant at existing levels. In reality, interest rate changes are rarely instantaneous or parallel and rates could move more or less than the one percentage point assumed in our analysis. As a result, the actual impact to pre-tax cash flow could be higher or lower than the results detailed in the table below. These interest rate scenarios are purely hypothetical and do not represent our view of future interest rate movements.
Under these interest rate scenarios, we expect more assets than debt and liabilities to re-price in the next twelve months. Other things being equal, this means that during a period of rising interest rates, the interest earned on our assets will increase more than the interest paid on our debt, thereby initially increasing our pre-tax cash flow. During a period of falling interest rates, we would expect our pre-tax cash flow to initially decrease. Our pre-tax cash flow sensitivity to interest rate movement is highlighted in the table below.
Our pre-tax cash flow sensitivity at December 31 was as follows (in millions):
Pre-Tax Cash Flow Sensitivity | 2017 | 2018 | |||||
One percentage point instantaneous increase in interest rates | $ | 14 | $ | 51 | |||
One percentage point instantaneous decrease in interest rates (a) | (14 | ) | (51 | ) | |||
___________
(a) | Pre-tax cash flow sensitivity given a one percentage point decrease in interest rates requires an assumption of negative interest rates in markets where existing interest rates are below one percent. |
Additional Model Assumptions. While the sensitivity analysis presented is our best estimate of the impacts of the specified assumed interest rate scenarios, our actual results could differ from those projected. The model we use to conduct this analysis is heavily dependent on assumptions. Embedded in the model are assumptions regarding the reinvestment of maturing asset principal, refinancing of maturing debt, replacement of maturing derivatives, exercise of options embedded in debt and derivatives, and predicted repayment of retail installment sale and lease contracts ahead of contractual maturity. Our repayment projections ahead of contractual maturity are based on historical experience. If interest rates or other factors change, our actual prepayment experience could be different than projected.
57
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (Continued)
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our policy is to minimize exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. To meet funding objectives, we borrow in a variety of currencies, principally U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, euros, pound sterling, and renminbi. We face exposure to currency exchange rates if a mismatch exists between the currency of our receivables and the currency of the debt funding those receivables. When possible, we fund receivables with debt in the same currency, minimizing exposure to exchange rate movements. When a different currency is used, we may use foreign currency swaps and foreign currency forwards to convert substantially all of our foreign currency debt obligations to the local country currency of the receivables. As a result of this policy, we believe our market risk exposure relating to changes in currency exchange rates at December 31, 2018 is insignificant.
Derivative Notional Values. The outstanding notional value of our derivatives at December 31 was as follows (in billions):
2017 | 2018 | ||||||
Interest rate derivatives | |||||||
Pay-fixed, receive-floating, excluding securitization swaps | $ | 20 | $ | 28 | |||
Pay-floating, receive-fixed, excluding securitization swaps | 41 | 44 | |||||
Securitization swaps | 28 | 28 | |||||
Total interest rate derivatives | 89 | 100 | |||||
Other derivatives | |||||||
Cross-currency swaps | 4 | 5 | |||||
Foreign currency forwards | 2 | 4 | |||||
Total notional value | $ | 95 | $ | 109 | |||
Derivative Fair Values. The net fair value of our derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2017 was an asset of $625 million, compared to an asset of $7 million at December 31, 2018.
For additional information regarding our derivatives, see Note 9 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
Counterparty Risk
Counterparty risk relates to the loss we could incur if an obligor or counterparty defaulted on an investment or a derivative contract. We enter into master agreements with counterparties that allow netting of certain exposures in order to manage this risk. Exposures primarily relate to investments in fixed income instruments and derivative contracts used for managing interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risk. We, together with Ford, establish exposure limits for each counterparty to minimize risk and provide counterparty diversification.
Our approach to managing counterparty risk is forward-looking and proactive, allowing us to take risk mitigation actions before risks become losses. Exposure limits are established based on our overall risk tolerance, which is calculated from counterparty credit ratings and market-based credit default swap (“CDS”) spreads. The exposure limits are lower for smaller and lower-rated counterparties, counterparties that have relatively higher CDS spreads, and for longer-dated exposures. Our exposures are monitored on a regular basis and are included in periodic reports to Ford’s Treasurer and our Chief Financial Officer.
Substantially all of our counterparty exposures are with counterparties that have an investment grade rating. Investment grade is our guideline for minimum counterparty long-term ratings. For additional information on our derivatives, see Note 9 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
58
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (Continued)
Operating Risk
We operate in many locations and rely on the abilities of our employees and computer systems to process a large number of transactions. Improper employee actions, improper operation of systems, or unforeseen business interruptions could result in financial loss, regulatory action and damage to our reputation, and breach of contractual obligations. To address this risk, we maintain internal control processes that identify transaction authorization requirements, safeguard assets from misuse or theft, protect the reliability of financial and other data, and minimize the impact of a business interruption on our customers. We also maintain system controls to maintain the accuracy of information about our operations. These controls are designed to manage operating risk throughout our operation.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements, the accompanying Notes, and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm that are filed as part of this Report are listed under “Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” and are set forth beginning on page FC-1 immediately following the signature pages of this Report.
Selected quarterly financial data for 2017 and 2018 are provided in Note 18 of our Notes to the Financial Statements.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
59
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. David W. McClelland, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and Brian E. Schaaf, our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Treasurer, have performed an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2018, and each has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. The assessment was based on criteria established in the framework Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. Other Information.
None.
60
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Not required.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.
Not required.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.
Not required.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Not required.
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Our principal accounting fees and services for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in millions):
2017 | 2018 | ||||||
Nature of Services | |||||||
Audit fees - for audit of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, attestation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, preparation of statutory audit reports, and providing comfort letters in connection with our funding transactions | $ | 11.5 | $ | 12.1 | |||
Audit-related fees - for support of funding transactions, due diligence for mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, attestation services, internal control reviews, and assistance with interpretation of accounting standards | 2.4 | 2.2 | |||||
Tax fees - for tax compliance and the preparation of tax returns, tax consultation, planning and implementation services, assistance in connection with tax audits, and tax advice related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures | 0.6 | 0.5 | |||||
All other fees - for support in business and regulatory reviews and research analysis regarding new strategies | — | — | |||||
Total fees | $ | 14.5 | $ | 14.8 | |||
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Ford’s audit committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures that govern the engagement of PwC, and the services provided by PwC to Ford Credit are pre-approved in accordance with Ford’s policies and procedures. The policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular services and our audit committee is informed of the services provided to us by PwC, including the audit fee requests for these services that have been submitted to and approved by Ford’s audit committee. The pre-approval policies and procedures do not include delegation of the Ford or Ford Credit audit committees’ responsibilities under the Exchange Act to management.
61
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and Subsidiaries
•Consolidated Income Statement for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018
•Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018
•Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017 and 2018
•Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Interest for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018
•Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018
•Notes to the Financial Statements
The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Notes to the Financial Statements listed above are filed as part of this Report and are set forth beginning on page FC-1 immediately following the signature pages of this Report.
(a) 2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, the information required to be contained in them is disclosed elsewhere in the Financial Statements, or the amounts involved are not sufficient to require submission.
62
(a) 3. Exhibits
Designation | Description | Method of Filing | ||
Certificate of Formation of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. | Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC dated as of April 30, 2007. | Filed as Exhibit 99.4 to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Exhibit 4-A | Form of Indenture dated as of February 1, 1985 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company relating to Unsecured Debt Securities. | Filed as Exhibit 4-A to Ford Motor Credit Company Registration Statement No. 2-95568 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 4-A-1 | Form of First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1986 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-B to Ford Motor Credit Company Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 1986 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | ||
Exhibit 4-A-2 | Form of Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 1, 1986 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-B to Ford Motor Credit Company Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 28, 1986 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | ||
Exhibit 4-A-3 | Form of Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 15, 1987 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-E to Ford Motor Credit Company Registration Statement No. 33-12928 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 4-A-4 | Form of Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 1988 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-F to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Ford Motor Credit Company Registration Statement No. 33-20081 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Exhibit 4-A-5 | Form of Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 1, 1990 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-G to Ford Motor Credit Company Registration Statement No. 33-41060 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 1998 between Ford Motor Credit Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Ford Motor Credit Company Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 15, 2002 between Ford Motor Credit Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4-I to Amendment No. 1 to Ford Motor Credit Company Registration Statement No. 333-75234 and incorporated herein by reference. | |||
Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 5, 2006 between Ford Motor Credit Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4 to Ford Motor Credit Company Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 18, 2012 between Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon supplementing the Indenture designated as Exhibit 4-A. | Filed as Exhibit 4 to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Form of Indenture dated as of March 16, 2015 between Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon relating to Unsecured Debt Securities. | Filed as Exhibit 4-A to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Registration Statement No. 333-202789 and incorporated by reference herein. | |||
Copy of Amended and Restated Relationship Agreement dated as of April 30, 2015 between Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. | Filed as Exhibit 10 to Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Copy of Amended and Restated Support Agreement dated as of September 20, 2004 between Ford Motor Credit Company and FCE Bank plc. | Filed as Exhibit 10 to Ford Motor Credit Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
Copy of Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement dated as of December 12, 2006 between Ford Motor Credit Company and Ford Motor Company. | Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Ford Motor Credit Company Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 12, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. File No. 1-6368. | |||
63
Designation | Description | Method of Filing | ||
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Filed with this Report. | |||
Powers of Attorney. | Filed with this Report. | |||
Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of CEO. | Filed with this Report. | |||
Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of CFO. | Filed with this Report. | |||
Section 1350 Certification of CEO. | Furnished with this Report. | |||
Section 1350 Certification of CFO. | Furnished with this Report. | |||
Exhibit 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | * | ||
Exhibit 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | * | ||
Exhibit 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | * | ||
Exhibit 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | * | ||
Exhibit 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | * | ||
Exhibit 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | * | ||
__________
* | Submitted electronically with this Report in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S-T. |
Instruments defining the rights of holders of certain issues of long-term debt of Ford Credit have not been filed as exhibits to this Report because the authorized principal amount of any one of such issues does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Ford Credit. Ford Credit will furnish a copy of each such instrument to the SEC upon request.
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ford Motor Credit Company LLC has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC
By: | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf |
Brian E. Schaaf | |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
Date: | February 21, 2019 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
DAVID W. MCCLELLAND* | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | February 21, 2019 | ||
David W. McClelland | ||||
N. JOY FALOTICO* | Director, Chairman of the Board | February 21, 2019 | ||
N. Joy Falotico | ||||
JOHN T. LAWLER* | Director and Audit Committee Member | February 21, 2019 | ||
John T. Lawler | ||||
DAVID A. WEBB* | Director and Chair of the Audit Committee | February 21, 2019 | ||
David A. Webb | ||||
THOMAS C. SCHNEIDER* | Director and Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer | February 21, 2019 | ||
Thomas C. Schneider | ||||
BRIAN E. SCHAAF* | Director, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | February 21, 2019 | ||
Brian E. Schaaf | ||||
* By /s/ DAVID J. WITTEN | Attorney-in-Fact | February 21, 2019 | ||
David J. Witten | ||||
65
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholder's interest and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
FC-1
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 21, 2019
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1959.
FC-2
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
(in millions)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||
Financing revenue | |||||||||||
Operating leases | $ | 5,555 | $ | 5,552 | $ | 5,795 | |||||
Retail financing | 3,070 | 3,451 | 3,891 | ||||||||
Dealer financing | 1,760 | 1,903 | 2,207 | ||||||||
Other | 38 | 70 | 84 | ||||||||
Total financing revenue | 10,423 | 10,976 | 11,977 | ||||||||
Depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases | (4,329 | ) | (4,135 | ) | (3,867 | ) | |||||
Interest expense | (2,755 | ) | (3,175 | ) | (3,930 | ) | |||||
Net financing margin | 3,339 | 3,666 | 4,180 | ||||||||
Other revenue | |||||||||||
Insurance premiums earned (Note 14) | 156 | 158 | 167 | ||||||||
Fee based revenue and other | — | 243 | 238 | ||||||||
Total financing margin and other revenue | 3,495 | 4,067 | 4,585 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,274 | 1,295 | 1,429 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses (Note 6) | 547 | 588 | 532 | ||||||||
Insurance expenses (Note 14) | 125 | 124 | 77 | ||||||||
Total expenses | 1,946 | 2,007 | 2,038 | ||||||||
Other income, net (Note 15) | 330 | 250 | 80 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,879 | 2,310 | 2,627 | ||||||||
Provision for / (Benefit from) income taxes (Note 12) | 506 | (697 | ) | 403 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 1,373 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 2,224 | |||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,373 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 2,224 | |||||
Other comprehensive income / (loss), net of tax (Note 13) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | (283 | ) | 471 | (410 | ) | ||||||
Total other comprehensive income / (loss), net of tax | (283 | ) | 471 | (410 | ) | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,090 | $ | 3,478 | $ | 1,814 | |||||
The accompanying notes are part of the financial statements.
FC-3
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions)
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3) | $ | 9,558 | $ | 9,607 | |||
Marketable securities (Note 3) | 2,881 | 1,308 | |||||
Finance receivables, net (Note 4) | 116,003 | 118,814 | |||||
Net investment in operating leases (Note 5) | 26,661 | 27,449 | |||||
Notes and accounts receivable from affiliated companies | 1,076 | 905 | |||||
Derivative financial instruments (Note 9) | 935 | 670 | |||||
Other assets (Note 10) | 3,329 | 3,456 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 160,443 | $ | 162,209 | |||
LIABILITIES | |||||||
Accounts payable | |||||||
Customer deposits, dealer reserves, and other | $ | 1,171 | $ | 1,097 | |||
Affiliated companies | 592 | 426 | |||||
Total accounts payable | 1,763 | 1,523 | |||||
Debt (Note 11) | 137,828 | 140,146 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 2,386 | 2,595 | |||||
Derivative financial instruments (Note 9) | 310 | 663 | |||||
Other liabilities and deferred income (Note 10) | 2,272 | 2,307 | |||||
Total liabilities | 144,559 | 147,234 | |||||
SHAREHOLDER’S INTEREST | |||||||
Shareholder’s interest | 5,227 | 5,227 | |||||