REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
t | ||||
* |
* |
* |
|
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | ☒ | ||||||
Emerging growth company |
† | The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012. |
U.S. GAAP ☐ | |
Other ☐ | ||||
by the International Accounting Standards Board ☒ |
Page |
||||||
1 |
||||||
2 |
||||||
3 |
||||||
Item 1. |
3 |
|||||
Item 2. |
3 |
|||||
Item 3. |
3 |
|||||
Item 4. |
39 |
|||||
Item 4A. |
61 |
|||||
Item 5. |
61 |
|||||
Item 6. |
75 |
|||||
Item 7. |
88 |
|||||
Item 8. |
94 |
|||||
Item 9. |
96 |
|||||
Item 10. |
96 |
|||||
Item 11. |
104 |
|||||
Item 12. |
105 |
|||||
108 |
||||||
Item 13. |
108 |
|||||
Item 14. |
108 |
|||||
Item 15. |
108 |
|||||
Item 16A. |
109 |
|||||
Item 16B. |
109 |
|||||
Item 16C. |
109 |
|||||
Item 16D. |
110 |
|||||
Item 16E. |
110 |
|||||
Item 16F. |
110 |
|||||
Item 16G. |
110 |
|||||
Item 16H. |
110 |
|||||
Item 16I. |
110 |
|||||
111 |
||||||
Item 17. |
111 |
|||||
Item 18. |
111 |
|||||
Item 19. |
111 |
|||||
113 |
||||||
F-1 |
||||||
F-2 |
• | our expectations regarding our revenue, expenses, and other operating results; |
• | our ability to achieve or maintain market acceptance for our biometric technology and products; |
• | our ability to generate revenue; |
• | our ability to respond to ongoing constraints and uncertainties within the semiconductor supply chain; |
• | our ability to achieve profitability or, once doing so, sustain profitability; |
• | our estimates, and those of others, regarding our current and future capital requirements; |
• | our ability to compete effectively with existing competitors and any new market entrants; |
• | our assessment of the growth rates of the market segments and geographies in which we compete; |
• | the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our performance; |
• | our reliance on key personnel and our ability to identify, recruit, and retain skilled personnel; |
• | our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and any costs associated therewith; |
• | regulatory developments in Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and other jurisdictions; and |
• | other risks and uncertainties, including those listed in this Annual Report. |
Item 1. |
Identity of Director, Senior Management and Advisers. |
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable. |
Item 3. |
Key Information. |
• | we have a history of operating losses and may not achieve or sustain profitability; |
• | if we are unable to raise capital if and when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or terminate certain development activities or undertake other cost-reduction steps, including termination of employees, either of which could reduce our ability to execute our strategy, with potential harm to our business, operational performance, and financial position; |
• | our biometric technologies have not yet achieved, and may never achieve, widespread customer acceptance in the market segments we are targeting; |
• | if the estimates and assumptions we have used to calculate the pace of development and ultimate size of our targeted market segments are inaccurate, future revenue growth may take longer than anticipated and reaching the operational scale we believe necessary for sustained profitability may not be achieved; |
• | if we fail to innovate in response to changing customer needs, new technologies, and other evolving competitive requirements, our business, operational performance, and financial position could be harmed; |
• | we are exposed to risks associated with customer concentration and reliance on a limited number of suppliers, and the disruption to a significant customer or supplier could harm our business, operational performance, and financial position; |
• | we expect fluctuations in our quarterly financial results, making it difficult to project future results, and, if we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors with respect to our performance, the quoted prices of our equity securities could decline; |
• | because the market segments we target are highly competitive, the landscape of competitors, strategic partners, and market participants can change quickly, and because customer demand is difficult to accurately predict, our business, operational performance, and financial position could be harmed if we do not maintain our competitive advantages in response to unexpected developments in the market segments we target; |
• | we are vulnerable to adverse economic conditions, whether the result of business cycles or exogenous disruptions, and may not be able to respond quickly or effectively to unanticipated events or trends, such as a sudden or prolonged decline in business confidence and economic activities, which could harm our business, operational performance, and financial position and limit our ability to access the capital markets; |
• | because we depend on the contributions of very skilled employees across engineering and business disciplines, if these employees were to leave the Company, we may not be able to attract and hire replacements with the same skills in a timely fashion, if at all, which could harm our business, operational performance, and financial position; |
• | although we have not experienced significant delays in development activities or product deliveries to date, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could have an adverse impact on the Company and the communities in which we, our customers, our vendors, and our partners operate; |
• | because we are domiciled in Norway, we are subject to Norwegian corporate and securities laws, and, pursuant to certain exemptions under the laws and regulations in the United States, as well as the rules defining the listing requirements of Nasdaq, we are allowed to follow certain Norwegian standards for governance, which may be different from such standards in the United States and, as such, may not provide the same level of investor protections and shareholder rights; |
• | because we list our Ordinary Shares on the Oslo Børs and list our American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) on Nasdaq, we are subject to two complex sets of corporate and securities laws, which increases the costs and burdens of compliance, while increasing the risk that we may fail to comply with such laws; |
• | failure or perceived failure to comply with existing or future laws, regulations, contracts, self-regulatory schemes, standards, and other obligations related to data privacy and security (including security incidents) could harm our business, and compliance or the actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could increase the costs of our products and services, limit their use or adoption, and otherwise negatively affect our operating results and business; and |
• | the provisions of the contractual agreements associated with our ADSs are complex, and, pursuant to those agreements, holders of ADSs are afforded fewer rights and protections than holders of our Ordinary Shares, are subject to transfer and related restrictions, and are required to pay various administrative fees, all of which may reduce investor interest in our ADSs. |
• | potential issuers of biometric payment cards (e.g., banks) have required, and continue to require, extensive education regarding fingerprint authentication, addressing their uncertainties associated with costs, card deployment, user enrolment, reliability, security, and infrastructure requirements, contributing to our extended and unpredictable sales cycles; |
• | our primary customers, the manufacturers of smart cards for financial payment applications, have required, and continue to require, extensive education regarding the opportunity and our differentiated value proposition, frequently followed by an extended period of sales and engineering support necessary for the development and qualification of a biometric payment card that a manufacturer can market to its customers, contributing to our extended and unpredictable sales cycles, resource allocation challenges, and high pre-sale customer engagement costs; |
• | design, development, and qualification of a biometric payment card incorporating fingerprint authentication to a customer’s specifications has required, and may continue to require, customers, which may be resource-constrained or lack the appropriate engineering expertise, to coordinate multiple suppliers of complex components that must be integrated in a timely and cost-efficient manner, a process that has, and may continue to be, a source of delays in customer development of biometric payment cards; |
• | all financial payment cards require approvals from the global operators of payment processing platforms, notably Mastercard, VISA, and China UnionPay, certifying that a new financial payment card meets platform-specific security, reliability, performance, and interoperability requirements, and obtaining such certification has been, and may continue to be, delayed due to challenges card manufacturers have experienced with completing development of biometric payment cards and scheduling their certification with the payment processing platforms and the testing laboratories on which they rely; and |
• | because the added cost of incorporating fingerprint authentication in a financial payment card historically has been economically unjustifiable for many high-volume applications, we, since introducing the ISO ID-1 design in 2015, have aggressively addressed materials and manufacturing costs and, by 2021, with the introduction of our TrustedBio module, achieved a cost profile compelling to manufacturers of smart cards, and we continue our efforts to lower the costs of current and future solutions, although we cannot offer any assurances regarding our ability to so, or the timing thereof. |
• | the degree to which low-cost, low value-added, legacy solutions, based on minimal security requirements, continue to dominate the enterprise market, particularly within physical access control applications; |
• | the slower than expected pace at which physical access control and network user identity authentication are converging into unified, enterprise-wide security solutions; |
• | a relatively concentrated group of global and dominant regional vendors of IAM (Identity and Access Management) platforms and related access control solutions, split between those based on proprietary architectures and components and those integrating best-of-breed |
• | a highly-fragmented range of single- and multi-factor authentication solutions, including various biometric solutions, contributing to price competition and, for less demanding applications, commoditization, thereby potentially limiting opportunities for differentiating our solutions based on performance, total cost of ownership, and other elements of our value proposition. |
• | our ability to further streamline the user enrolment process for issuers, reducing costs and complexity, while enhancing the user experience; |
• | our ability to collaborate with multiple, often competing, organizations and industry bodies on the development of industry- or customer-specific software applets, modification of card operating systems for customer purposes, or obtaining necessary industry or regulatory certifications; |
• | our ability to influence the standardization and simplification of the manner in which fingerprint authentication is integrated into transaction processing systems; |
• | our ability to address public perceptions regarding privacy and the potential exposure of personal biometric information; and |
• | our ability, on a worldwide basis, to address proposed or enacted legislation related to information privacy or the collection and storage of biometric information. |
• | our ability to design, introduce, and implement compelling new technologies, products, and solutions in a timely manner; |
• | our ability to accurately predict and adapt to the evolving needs of our customers and our targeted market segments; |
• | our ability to anticipate and meet our customers’ price and performance requirements, as well as their requirements for product ease of use, reliability, and durability; |
• | our ability to provide responsive, high-quality customer service and support; and |
• | our ability to anticipate and respond to competitors’ product and pricing moves, new product and technology development, marketing initiatives, strategic partnering, and other competitive actions. |
• | the COVID-19 pandemic does not abate, or new variants of the virus are identified, causing governments to prolong current, or impose new, restrictions on activities, potentially contributing to inflationary and recessionary pressures across the global economy; |
• | supply chain constraints and related uncertainties continue indefinitely across industries, or conditions deteriorate, with the potential consequence of increasing inflationary and recessionary pressures in specific geographies or market segments or across the global economy; |
• | the relationships between China and western trading partners, notably the United States, do not improve or deteriorate further, possibly contributing to further trade restrictions, leading to inflationary and recessionary pressures in China and across the global economy; and |
• | the war between Russia and Ukraine and the risk of escalation into a broader conflict does not abate, causing prolonged trade sanctions and other economic restrictions on Russia, potentially contributing to inflationary and recessionary pressures across the global economy. 1 |
1 |
We currently do not have personnel or customers in Russia, Ukraine, or the neighboring countries. |
• | difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
• | potentially longer collection cycles, due to currency restrictions or other limitations on customer remittances; |
• | unexpected challenges within or changes to countries’ banking and credit systems; |
• | unexpected changes in government regulatory requirements; |
• | managing complex value added tax, sales, or other indirect tax requirements, regulations, and treaties, which can be burdensome, and potential changes in tax and trade regulations and treaties in and among Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and in and among countries in which we operate or conduct business; |
• | unexpected changes in international trade policies, including potential adoption and expansion of tariffs or cross- border taxation; |
• | potentially longer inventory cycles, in the event our supply chain partners, which primarily are based in China, Taiwan, and South Korea, experience operational disruptions or are negatively affected by changes in trade policies or taxation; |
• | different, complex, and evolving laws governing intellectual property rights, which in certain countries provide uncertain or reduced protection of intellectual property rights; and |
• | operating in countries with a higher incidence of corruption and fraudulent business practices. |
• | incomplete or inadequate due diligence on our part, regarding the business, operational, financial, and legal characteristics of the business and the development of associated assumptions and estimates; |
• | challenges and difficulties in the integration of acquired business operations into our operations, information systems, and control environment; |
• | challenges and difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees; |
• | challenges and difficulties in integrating technologies, intellectual property, and product development activities; |
• | challenges and difficulties in retaining existing customers of the acquired business and developing new customers after the strategic transaction; |
• | challenges and difficulties in integrating supply chains and inventories; |
• | meeting the terms of contractual liabilities assumed by us, or transferred to us, as a result of the strategic transaction; |
• | unanticipated liabilities and contingent obligations that may arise due to the strategic transaction; |
• | the breach of representations and warranties by one or more parties to the definitive agreement associated with the strategic transaction, for which remedy may be insufficient or unavailable; |
• | the failure of one or more parties to the definitive agreement associated with the strategic transaction to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the strategic transaction; and |
• | development of unfavorable economic or trading conditions in the market segments we target (or are targeted by the acquired business), which could negatively impact the accuracy of our assumptions and estimates associated with the strategic or financial value of the strategic transaction. |
• | delay, defer, or prevent a change in control; |
• | take steps to entrench our management and/or the Boards; |
• | impede or disproportionately influence a merger, change of control transaction, or other business combination involving us; |
• | discourage a potential acquirer from a tender offer or otherwise influence the outcome of any attempt to obtain control of the Company; or |
• | pursue strategies that deviate from the interests of other holders of our equity securities. |
(a) | a majority of our voting securities must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States, or |
(b) | (i) a majority of our Executive Officers or Directors 2 cannot be U.S. citizens or residents, |
(a) | the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more; |
(b) | December 31, 2026; |
(c) | the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt over the prior three years; and |
(d) | the date on which we are considered a “large accelerated filer” under SEC rules. |
2 |
For a list of our Executive Officers and Directors, see “Item 6. Section A. Directors and senior management.” |
• | our public disclosures, including our regulatory filings, press releases, and other public statements; |
• | publications or statements made by securities analysts regarding our company, our customers, our competitors, or developments in the market segments in which we are active, including revisions to investment recommendations, estimates of future financial performance for us or our competitors, estimates of growth rates for market segments, and other relevant matters, including the launch or termination of our research coverage; |
• | credible news, reported by reliable sources, directly or indirectly related to us, our customers, our competitors, or the market segments in which we are active; |
• | publication of business analyses, industry surveys, or related information authored by organizations focused on the development of market studies and related research products and services; |
• | investor reactions to rumors, speculative statements, and other unreliable information, sometimes deliberately misleading, published by unidentified authors on social media, Internet investment forums, and other unreliable outlets, with the intent of influencing or manipulating the quoted prices of our equity securities; |
• | coordinated buying and/or selling activity in our ADSs and/or Ordinary Shares, including such trading intended to manipulate quoted prices of our equity securities; |
• | large short positions in our Ordinary Shares, publicly reported from time to time; and |
• | sudden and significant news regarding economic, political, and financial market conditions. |
• | Under Norwegian corporate law, a shareholder may, at the general meeting of shareholders, require the Board and the Chief Executive Officer make available information about (i) matters that may affect the consideration of the annual financial statements and report; (ii) any matters that have been submitted to the shareholders for decision; (iii) the company’s financial condition and (iv) any other matters before the general meeting. |
• | Other than the foregoing, or in respect of a formal investigation of the company, as approved by at least 10% of the share capital represented at a general meeting, our shareholders may not ask for an inspection of our corporate records. In contrast, under Delaware corporate law, for example, any shareholder, irrespective of the size of such shareholder’s holdings, may do so. |
• | An individual shareholder of a Norwegian limited liability company is, as a starting point, also unable to initiate a derivative action, a remedy typically available to shareholders of companies domiciled in the United States, in order to enforce our right, in case we fail to enforce such right ourselves, other than in certain cases of Board and management liability under limited circumstances. |
• | Distribution of dividends from Norwegian companies to foreign companies and individuals may be subject to Norwegian non-refundable withholding tax, and not all receiving countries allow for deduction for the Norwegian withholding tax. |
• | The rights as a creditor may not be as strong under Norwegian insolvency law as under United States law or relevant state insolvency law, and, as a consequence, creditors may recover less in the event we are subject to insolvency, compared to a similar case involving an insolvent United States debtor. |
• | The use of a deferred tax asset consisting of accumulated tax losses (i.e., carryforwards) requires that we are able to generate positive taxable income, and the use of tax losses carried forward to offset against future income is subject to certain restrictions and can be restricted further by future amendments to Norwegian tax law. |
• | Norwegian corporate law may not provide appraisal rights in the case of a business combination, in a manner equivalent to those available to a shareholder of a United States company under applicable United States or state laws. |
• | The STA requires any person, entity, or consolidated group that becomes the owner of shares representing more than one-third of the voting rights of a Norwegian company whose shares are listed on a Norwegian regulated exchange to, within four weeks, make an unconditional general offer for the purchase of the remaining shares of that company. |
• | A mandatory offer obligation may be imposed by the Oslo Børs, on which our Ordinary Shares are listed for trading, when a party acquires the right to become the owner of shares that, together with the party’s own shareholding, represent more than one-third of the voting rights in the company, and the Oslo Børs determines this acquisition is regarded as an effective acquisition of the shares in question. The mandatory offer obligation ceases to apply if the person, entity, or consolidated group sells the portion of the shares that exceeds the relevant threshold within four weeks of the date on which the mandatory offer obligation was triggered. |
• | When a mandatory offer obligation is triggered, the person subject to the obligation is required to immediately notify the Oslo Børs and the targeted company. The notification shall state the person’s intentions and whether an offer will be made to acquire the remaining shares in the targeted company. An earlier notification stating an intention to acquire no additional shares or an intention to dispose of acquired shares can be altered to become a notice of an intended offer within the four-week period, while a notification stating an intention to make an offer cannot be retracted and is binding. |
• | The offer price per share associated with a mandatory offer must be at least as high as the highest price paid or agreed by the offeror for the shares in the six-month period prior to the date the ownership threshold was exceeded. If the offeror acquires or agrees to acquire additional shares at a higher price prior to the expiration of the mandatory offer period, the offeror is obligated to restate its offer at such higher price. A mandatory offer must be settled in cash or contain a cash alternative at least equivalent to any other consideration offered. |
• | In case of failure to make a mandatory offer or to sell the portion of the shares that exceeds the relevant threshold within four weeks, the Oslo Børs may force the acquiring party to sell the shares exceeding the threshold through public auction. While the mandatory offer obligation remains in force, an acquiring party failing to make such an offer may not exercise rights in the company, such as voting in a general meeting, without the consent of a majority of the remaining shareholders. The acquiring party may, however, exercise its rights to dividends and pre-emptive subscription rights in the event of a share capital increase by the targeted company. If the acquiring party neglects its duty to make a mandatory offer, Oslo Børs may impose a daily fine that is cumulative until the circumstance has been rectified. |
• | A mandatory offer obligation also is triggered when any person, entity, or consolidated group, already owning shares representing more than one-third of the votes in a Norwegian company listed on a Norwegian regulated exchange, through acquisition of additional shares, becomes the owner of shares representing 40% or more of the votes in the company. Similarly, a mandatory offer obligation is triggered when the person, entity, or consolidated group, through acquisition, becomes the owner of shares representing 50% or more of the votes in the company. The mandatory offer obligation ceases to apply if the person, entity, or consolidated group sells that portion of that shares which exceeds the relevant threshold within four weeks of the date on which the mandatory offer obligation was triggered. |
• | Any person, entity, or consolidated group that has passed any of the stated thresholds in such a way as not to trigger the mandatory bid obligation, and, therefore, has not made an offer previously for the remaining shares in the company in accordance with the mandatory offer rules is required to make a mandatory offer in the event of a subsequent acquisition of shares that increases the acquiring party’s voting rights in the company. |
Item 4. |
Information on the Company. |
3 |
The International Standards Organization (“ISO”), an independent standard-setting body, uses the term Integrated Circuit Card, or ICC, to encompass all devices in which an integrated circuit is contained within a defined form factor, the ISO ID-1 standard for the dimensions of an identification card. |
IDEX develops and markets differentiated fingerprint authentication solutions optimized for use in smart cards, based on patented and proprietary sensor technologies, integrated circuit designs, and highly-specialized firmware and software. We primarily target fingerprint authentication applications involving standardized smart cards without batteries, Our extensive intellectual property portfolio, leveraging 146 patents awarded and 66 patents pending, across applicable jurisdictions worldwide (as of December 31, 2021), is a critical enabler of our strategy and competitive positioning. From time to time, we may provide project-oriented engineering or design services to customers. We also license our intellectual property and software to third parties, although licensing currently does not contribute materially to our revenue. |
![]() A standard-format smart card, utilizing our fingerprint authentication solution, offered by Rocker AB and manufactured by our customer, IDEMIA France SAS | |
4 |
We derived these estimates from market data regarding SE shipments categorized by smart card applications, published by Eurosmart (February 2022). Subscriber identity modules, also known as SIM cards, are included in this market data, as the enabling SEs and technologies are similar, although the form factors are very different. SIM cards are much smaller devices used in mobile telephony applications for subscriber authentication. Similarly, the subscriber authentication devices used in pay-television applications also are categorized as smart cards. Our fingerprint authentication solutions are not applicable to such telephony or pay-television applications. |
5 |
Physical access control applications commonly utilize keycards, also known as proximity cards, which are wireless devices enabling a relatively low level of security for contactless identification. Applications include opening facility doors and gates, time and attendance systems, and automated toll collection. Keycards can be passive (i.e., powered by resonant inductive coupling) or active (i.e., powered by a battery). Keycard designs, functionalities, and communication protocols are proprietary to the vendor, resulting in closed systems. Our estimate of smart cards shipped for access control applications considers only those smart cards meeting the relevant ISO/IEC standards. |
In 2020, we announced the latest generation of this architecture, the TrustedBio family of modules, and, in 2021, released an enhanced version, the TrustedBio Max. |
![]() A TrustedBio module, showing the sensor surface (left) and, on the reverse side (right), our ASIC and connection circuits | |
The capacitive sensor in a TrustedBio module is made using a polymer substrate (i.e., a flex circuit) in which a capacitive sensing array (i.e., a fine-pitched wire mesh, with each wire intersection representing an electrode) is embedded. The platen is covered by a robust, protective coating, allowing for years of usage. Our flexible sensor is relatively inexpensive to manufacture and allows for an approximately 90 square millimeter sensor surface area, more than twice the size of competitive silicon sensors. The capacitive sensor in a TrustedBio module produces a larger image, yielding more data, which enables superior scanning, feature extraction, and |
6 |
According to a December 2021 issue of Nilson Report, global payment card fraud totaled $28.6 billion in 2020, representing approximately 6.8% of total purchase value. |
In 2017, we introduced a patented enrolment solution, addressing another significant barrier to adoption of fingerprint authentication, particularly within the financial payments market segment: user enrolment (i.e., the process of imaging and storing a user’s fingerprint, in the form of a template, within the memory of the smart card, thereby enabling its use). IDEX was the first to release such an innovative device, incorporating proprietary hardware and software, which we developed in partnership with Mastercard Inc. We license the design to our customers or their end-customers, for use with contactless-only, contact-based, and dual interface smart card designs. Under such a license, we provide a customized design meeting end-customer requirements and coordinate volume manufacturing for the end-customer by a third-party. |
![]() Our on-card, remote enrollment solution, a battery-powered, reusable device enabling creation of a user fingerprint template, which is stored on – and never leaves – the smart card |
7 |
We have entered into separate supply agreements with IDEMIA France SAS and Zwipe AS. IDEMIA France SAS, the second largest manufacturer of smart cards globally, utilizes our TrustedBio fingerprint authentication solution in its F.CODE platform, which it markets to issuers in banking and financial services. Zwipe AS utilizes our TrustedBio fingerprint authentication solution in its Pay ONE platform, which Zwipe markets to smart card manufacturers and issuers as a comprehensive design. |
• | with a supply chain partner, we have developed an optimized card inlay, consisting of a card antenna and connective circuits, which should reduce customer design and procurement costs; |
• | with another supply chain partner, we have developed a proprietary card operating system for the TrustedBio-SLC38 reference design which can be installed on the SLC38 prior to shipment to a smart card manufacturer, further reducing costs and process steps; and |
• | we have collaborated with a vendor of equipment used for card manufacturing to optimize tooling and process management software, thereby increasing card production throughput, while lowering yield losses. |
Market Segment |
IDEX Solutions |
Representative Applications | ||
Financial Payments |
• Smart cards • Dual-interface, NFC powered • Thermoplastic or metal • Customized COS and Applets • Enrolment sleeve or tablet-based solution |
• EMV-compliant transaction applications• Credit, debit and stored value cards • Dual- and multi-use applications• Co-branded with partners | ||
Cyber Authentication |
• Smart cards and similar devices • ID-1 form factor or customer design• RFID/NFC or battery powered • Customized COS and Applets • Enrolment sleeve or tablet-based solution |
• Secure user authorization for high value assets • Critical networks or applications • High security facilities • Easily integrated with IAM platforms • FIDO Alliance compliance |
Market Segment |
IDEX Solutions |
Representative Applications | ||
Digital Currency Storage | • Enhanced smart cards and similar devices • ID-1 form factor or customer design• RFID/NFC or battery powered • Optional displays and keypads • Optional Bluetooth connectivity • Customized COS and Applets • Enrolment sleeve or tablet-based solution |
• Secure devices for government digital currency • Example: e-CNY initiative of Chinese central bank• Card-like “wallets” issued by state-owned banks • Dual- and multi-use applications• Secure storage of health and welfare records • Highly secure cryptocurrency management devices • Authorized user access to trading platforms • Secure storage of cryptocurrencies |
• | meets end-user requirements for ease of use; |
• | addresses end-user concerns about biometric information collection and storage, as the fingerprint template never leaves the smart card; |
• | addresses end-user concerns about transaction security risks; |
• | provides a secure alternative to vulnerable mobile devices for payments and financial transactions; |
• | enables contactless transactions, while eliminating passwords, PINs, and limits on transaction value; and |
• | maintains the higher security level of MFA, while efficiently combining two authentication factors (“what you have” and “what you are”). |
• | maintaining the superior fraud protection of MFA, while improving end-user experience; |
• | given the improved end-user experience, the possibility of higher frequency card usage (i.e., the “top of wallet” effect), thereby increasing transaction-based revenue; |
• | increased differentiation for their smart card offerings and brands, potentially improving customer retention and customer acquisition rates; |
• | addition of tangible value, potentially supporting new or higher fees for a premium card offering; and |
• | minimal investment in infrastructure to support fingerprint authentication: |
• | no modification of existing protocols for encrypted communications and transactions; |
• | existing contactless point-of-sale |
• | limited modifications to back-end transaction processing. |
• | utilizing a general-purpose SE, thereby reducing component costs and increasing design flexibility; |
• | eliminating the need for separate microcontrollers for biometric processing or power management, reducing component costs, integration challenges, layout complexity, and manufacturing risks; |
• | offering a large, yet flexible, sensor surface, enabling superior image capture, processing, and matching performance, improving user experience; |
• | providing design flexibility (e.g., our matching algorithms can operate entirely on the SE, or be partitioned to also operate on the ASIC within our TrustedBio module, maximizing resource efficiency and system performance). |
• | we can provide a proprietary card operating system, which can be installed on the SLC38 prior to shipment to the customer, substantially reducing software development time and costs; |
• | with a leading inlay vendor, we have developed an optimized, cost-effective card inlay, consisting of a card antenna and connective circuits, reducing customer design and procurement costs; and |
• | with a leading production equipment vendor, we have optimized the vendor’s tooling and process management software, thereby facilitating for a customer rapid creation of manufacturing capacity delivering increased card production volume and lower yield losses. |
8 |
Since 2016, ABI Research no longer tracks the very small volume of purely contactless cards manufactured each year, tracking only dual-interface and contact-only card production. Because approximately 20% of worldwide point-of-sale end-users and issuers prefer dual-interface cards. |
9 |
Fingerprint authentication occurs within the processing capabilities of the smart card, with the matching algorithm determining if the presented fingerprint template matches the template stored in the memory of the SE. All user information, including the stored template, is encrypted within the smart card and never leaves the smart card at any time. A data element indicating the transaction originated with a smart card incorporating fingerprint authentication is the only additional information communicated to the point-of-sale |
• | Stage 1: an initial trial, consisting of several hundred smart cards, generally distributed to a controlled group within the issuer, intended as “proof of concept” and used to assess systems requirements. Our experience has been that a Stage 1 trial is generally for less than 90 days. |
• | Stage 2: an expanded pilot, consisting of several thousand smart cards, more broadly distributed to a targeted cohort of users, and intended to identify deployment risks and evaluate usage patterns. We anticipate many of the 20 announced programs of which we are aware are Stage 2 deployments. |
• | Stage 3: an initial commercial launch, consisting of multiple, phased deployments of tens of thousands of smart cards over six to 12 months, supported by consumer education and high-touch marketing initiatives. A Stage 3 deployment may be a distinct program, for example, targeting an exclusive customer cohort with a premium service level, or it may be a preparatory deployment in anticipation of a full commercial launch. |
• | Stage 4: a full commercial launch, also consisting of multiple, phased deployments, but of hundreds of thousands of smart cards, over an extended period, with broad marketing support highlighting the program as a mature element of the issuer’s product portfolio. |
• | further reduction of system costs through optimized architecture and integration; |
• | continuous solution performance improvements through enhancing sensor and ASIC designs; |
• | further refinement and enhancement of our scanning, feature extraction, and matching algorithms; |
• | development of compelling software to complement our solution strategy, including innovative software-only enrolment solutions and card-not-present |
• | developing and integrating technologies (e.g., displays) for use in next-generation smart cards. |
• | 72 were engaged in engineering functions (33 in hardware design (i.e., silicon, sensors, and packaging); 21 in systems design; and 18 in software development); |
• | 15 were engaged in marketing and sales functions; |
• | nine were engaged in administrative and financial functions; and |
• | two were engaged in production planning and supply chain management. |
Item 4A. |
Unresolved Staff Comments. |
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. |
• | Cost of materials, net of inventory change |
• | Compensation and benefits |
• | Research and development |
• | Other operating expenses |
• | Amortization and depreciation |
• | Finance income may include interest received on bank balances, the net gain associated with aggregated foreign exchange translation adjustments for the period, and upward revisions to provisions, reserves, or the recorded fair values of financial assets or liabilities. |
• | Finance cost may include interest expenses on lease liabilities, interest expenses on VAT obligations, the net loss associated with aggregated foreign exchange translation adjustments for the period, and downward revisions to provisions, reserves, or the recorded fair values of financial assets or liabilities. |
10 |
Our subsidiaries do not generate revenue from external sales of products or services. Pursuant to international tax treaties based on the definitions of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, our subsidiaries are taxed using the cost-plus transfer pricing method, by which a taxable profit is calculated based on the costs of each subsidiary incurred in providing services to our parent company and an assumed arm’s-length level of profitability on such services. |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
($000s) | 2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021-2020 Change |
2020-2019 Change |
|||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Product |
$ | 2,837 | $ | 1,013 | $ | 159 | 180 | % | 537 | % | ||||||||||
Service |
3 | 82 | 265 | (96 | %) | (69 | %) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
2,840 | 1,095 | 424 | 159 | % | 158 | % | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of materials, net of inventory change |
1,254 | 275 | 62 | 356 | % | 344 | % | |||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
21,107 | 17,672 | 21,750 | 19 | % | (19 | %) | |||||||||||||
Research and development |
2,680 | 1,895 | 4,385 | 41 | % | (57 | %) | |||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
7,347 | 5,936 | 4,641 | 24 | % | 28 | % | |||||||||||||
Amortization and depreciation |
1,802 | 1,719 | 1,633 | 5 | % | 5 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
34,190 | 27,497 | 32,471 | 24 | % | (15 | %) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(31,350 | ) | (26,402 | ) | (32,047 | ) | (19 | %) | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Finance income |
11 | 26 | 135 | (58 | %) | (81 | %) | |||||||||||||
Finance cost |
(1,123 | ) | (477 | ) | (351 | ) | (135 | %) | (36 | %) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss before tax |
(32,462 | ) | (26,853 | ) | (32,263 | ) | (21 | %) | 17 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
90 | (99 | ) | 160 | (190 | %) | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net loss for the year |
$ | (32,552 | ) | $ | (26,754 | ) | $ | (32,423 | ) | (22 | %) | 18 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Under IFRS, the gross margin and ratio figures discussed herein are alternative performance measures (“APMs”), as they are neither specified nor defined in IFRS. As we expect in the future to maintain the current level of product revenue, relative to total revenue, we believe these figures are useful indicators of our performance. We also believe these figures are consistent with IFRS, as no adjustments to other IFRS-defined figures have been made, and their use in no way represents pro forma non-IFRS figures in our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
($000s) | 2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (27,533 | ) | $ | (23,294 | ) | $ | (27,168 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(143 | ) | (232 | ) | (721 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
54,148 | 17,438 | 32,989 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 26,472 | $ | (6,088 | ) | $ | 5,100 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|