Intercorp Financial Services Inc. [IFS] Filings

20-F 1 d479784d20f.htm FORM 20-F Form 20-F

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM

20-F

(Mark One)

☐	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number

001-38965

INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

REPUBLIC OF PANAMA

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Intercorp Financial Services Inc.

Torre Interbank, Av. Carlos Villarán 140

La Victoria

Lima 13, Peru

(Address of principal executive offices)

Michela Casassa Ramat

Intercorp Financial Services Inc.

Torre Interbank, Av. Carlos Villarán 140

La Victoria

Lima 13, Peru

Telephone: (511)

219-2000

ext. 22110

E-mail:

mcasassa@intercorp.com.pe

(Name, telephone,

e-mail

and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares	IFS	NYSE and Lima

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Shares of common stock

: 115,417,631

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐

No ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes ☐

No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation

S-T

(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a

non-accelerated

filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☐

				Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to

§240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:


U.S. GAAP ☐	International Financial Reporting Standards as issued		Other ☐
	by the International Accounting Standards Board	☒

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☐ No ☐

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page
PART I		10

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS		10

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE		10

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION		10

A. [RESERVED]		10

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness		10

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds		10

D. Risk Factors		10

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY		36

A. History and Development of the Company		36

B. Business Overview		37

C. Organizational Structure		115

D. Property, Plants and Equipment		115

ITEM 4A UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS		134

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS		134

A. Operating Results		134

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources		167

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.		177

D. Trend Information		177

E. Critical Accounting Estimates		178

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES		178

A. Directors and Senior Management		178

B. Compensation		190

C. Board Practices		190

D. Employees		192

E. Share Ownership		192

F. Disclosure of a Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation		193


	Page

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		193

A. Major Shareholders		193

B. Related Party Transactions		193

C. Interests of Experts and Counsel		198

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		198

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information		198

B. Significant Changes		201

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING		201

A. Offer and Listing Details		201

B. Plan of Distribution		201

C. Markets		201

D. Selling Shareholders		202

E. Dilution		202

F. Expenses of the Issue		202

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION		202

A. Share Capital		202

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association		202

C. Material Contracts		202

D. Exchange Controls		202

E. Taxation		203

F. Dividends and Paying Agents		210

G. Statement by Experts		210

H. Documents on Display		210

I. Subsidiary Information		210

J. Annual Report to Security Holders		210

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		210

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES		227


	Page

A. Debt Securities		227

B. Warrants and Rights		227

C. Other Securities		227

D. American Depositary Shares		227

PART II		228

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES		228

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS		228

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		228

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]		229

Item 16a Audit Committee Financial Expert		229

Item 16b Code Of Ethics		229

Item 16c Principal Accountant Fees And Services		229

Item 16d Exemptions From The Listing Standards For Audit Committees		230

Item 16e Purchases Of Equity Securities By The Issuer And Affiliated Purchasers		231

Item 16f Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant		231

Item 16g Corporate Governance		231

Item 16h Mine Safety Disclosure		233

Item 16i Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections		233

PART III		234

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		234

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		234

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS		234

iii

INTRODUCTION

All references to “we”, “us”, “our company”, and “IFS” in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are to Intercorp Financial Services Inc., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of the Republic of Panama (“Panama”).

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, we refer to and the discussion of our business includes the business of our principal subsidiaries as follows: (i) in our banking segment: Banco Internacional del Perú, S.A.A.—Interbank, an open-stock corporation (sociedad anónima abierta) organized under the laws of Peru, as “Interbank”; (ii) in our insurance segment: Interseguro Compañía de Seguros, S.A., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Peru, as “Interseguro”; (iii) in our wealth management segment: Inteligo Group Corp., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Panama, as “Inteligo”; Inteligo Bank Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of The Bahamas, as “Inteligo Bank”; Inteligo Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Peru, as “Inteligo SAB”; Inteligo USA Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of New York, as “Inteligo USA”, and Interfondos S.A. Sociedad Administradora de Fondos, a corporation organized under the laws of Peru, as “Interfondos SAFM” or “Interfondos” and (iv) in our payments segment: Procesos de Medios de Pago S.A., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Peru, as “PMP” and its subsidiary Izipay S.A.C., a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Peru, as “Izipay”, both of which are IFS’s consolidated subsidiaries since April 2022.

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, we also refer to our parent company, Intercorp Perú Ltd. (“Intercorp Peru” or “Intercorp”), a holding company for a group of companies operating mainly in Peru under the name “Intercorp”. Intercorp Peru’s main subsidiaries include our company and Intercorp Retail Inc. (“Intercorp Retail”). Intercorp Retail acts as a holding company for the retail and real estate operations of Intercorp Peru in Peru. Through its subsidiary, InRetail Peru Corp., whose shares are listed on the Lima Stock Exchange under the symbol “INRETAILC1,” Intercorp Retail has controlling stakes in (i) Supermercados Peruanos S.A. (“Supermercados Peruanos”), an operating supermarket chain that consolidates other operating companies, primarily operating under the: “Plaza Vea,” “Vivanda”, “MASS” and “Makro” brands, (ii) InRetail Pharma S.A., a holding company consisting of a chain of pharmacies operating under the “Inkafarma” and “MiFarma” brands with a distribution and marketing business as well as manufacturing some pharmaceutical products and (iii) InRetail Real Estate Corp., an owner, developer and operator of shopping malls under the “Real Plaza” brand. Intercorp Retail also controls directly (a) Tiendas Peruanas S.A., a department store chain operating under the “Oechsle” brand that started operations in 2009, (b) Financiera Oh! S.A., a consumer finance company that started operations in 2010, and (c) Homecenters Peruanos S.A. (“Homecenters Peruanos”), a home improvement company operating under the “Promart” brand. Our parent company Intercorp Peru also controls the following companies involved in the private education and healthcare businesses under the following brands: “Innova Schools,” “Zegel IPAE,” “UTP” “IDAT” and “Aviva”.

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common shares is subject to a number of risks, including risks relating to the nature of our business as a holding company of banking, insurance, financial institutions, and payments institutions, our operations in Peru and our common shares. The following list summarizes some, but not all, of these risks. Please read the information in the section entitled “Risk Factors” for a more thorough description of these and other risks.

Risks Relating to Our Businesses

•

We are a holding company and all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Our ability to pay corporate expenses and to pay dividends, if any, to holders of our common shares will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and make other distributions to us.

•

As a holding company, our right to receive any distribution of assets of our subsidiaries will be effectively subordinated to the rights of our subsidiaries’ creditors, and holders of our common shares may have limited recourse against our subsidiaries’ assets in case of our liquidation.

•

Global and local health concerns, including in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic or other outbreaks of pandemics or contagious diseases, may adversely affect our and our subsidiaries’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

•

Our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision, and changes in existing regulations or the implementation of future regulations may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

The operations of our subsidiaries require the maintenance of banking, insurance and other licenses and any non-compliance with applicable license and operating obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

•

Under certain circumstances, the SBS, the SMV, the Superintendency of Banks of Panama or the Central Bank of The Bahamas, as applicable, may intervene in our subsidiaries’ operations in order to prevent, control and reduce the effects of a failure of our operations.

•

The adoption of new international banking and insurance guidelines may cause our subsidiaries to require additional capital and could cause their cost of funds to increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Our controlling shareholder, Intercorp Peru, is subject to capital requirements imposed by the SBS, and Intercorp Peru’s failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Our subsidiaries face intense competition from other banking, insurance and financial institutions, and from other players including providers of emerging financial technologies and failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Our failure to effectively anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations.

•

The banking and insurance markets are exposed to macroeconomic shocks that may negatively impact household income and, consequently, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

We could sustain losses if Interbank’s asset quality declines.

•

Reduced diversification in Interbank’s loan portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

The allowances of Interbank for impairment losses may not be adequate to cover the future losses to its loan portfolio or other assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Our financial results may be negatively affected by changes to IFRS accounting standards.

•

Our financial results may be negatively affected by investment losses.

•

Interest rate changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Interseguro is exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates on other comprehensive income.

•

Actual mortality and morbidity rates and other factors may differ from those assumed in the calculation of technical reserves and may have a material adverse effect on Interseguro’s financial condition and results of operations.

•

Interbank may not be able to obtain the funding required to support growth and implement its strategy.

•

A reduction in our subsidiaries’ credit ratings could increase their cost of borrowing funds and make their ability to raise new funds and renew maturing debt more difficult.

•

Interseguro’s failure to underwrite and price insurance premiums accurately for the products it offers would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

•

Interbank’s and Interseguro’s reliance on Peruvian sovereign and global bonds in their respective investment portfolios leaves us vulnerable to a default on such debt.

•

Interseguro may suffer losses in its investment portfolio because of risks associated with its real estate investments.

•

Tax exemptions applicable to a substantial portion of Interseguro’s investment earnings could be changed in the future.

•

We and our subsidiaries are dependent on key personnel.

•

Interruption, mismanagement or failure in our subsidiaries’ information technology systems may adversely affect their operations.

•

Cyber-security events could negatively affect our reputation or results of operations and may result in litigation.

•

Our subsidiaries are susceptible to fraud, unauthorized transactions and operational errors.

•

Our existing insurance coverage may be insufficient and future coverage may be difficult or expensive to obtain.

•

Our employees could join labor unions and we could be subject to organized labor actions, including work stoppages that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

•

Our trademarks and trade names may be misappropriated or challenged by others.

•

Any failure to comply with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing and antitrust laws and regulations could damage our reputation or expose us to penalties.

•

We and our subsidiaries are subject to litigation and other legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings.

•

Legal restrictions on our clients may reduce the demand for our services.

Risks Relating to Peru

•

Economic, social and political developments in Peru, including political instability, social unrest, persistent inflation and unemployment, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

•

Public health crises and epidemics/pandemics, such as that being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, may materially and adversely affect Peru’s economy. Additionally, the Peruvian government measures adopted in order to address these health crises and epidemic/pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may not be sufficient to address their impact.

•

Fluctuations in the value of the sol could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Potential exchange controls implemented by the Peruvian government could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

Increased inflation in Peru could have an adverse effect on the Peruvian long-term credit market as well as the Peruvian economy generally and, therefore, on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

The stability of the Peruvian financial system depends on public confidence in Peruvian banking and financial institutions.

•

The Peruvian economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in regional or global markets.

•

A decline in the prices of certain commodities in the international markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

•

The market volatility generated by distortions in the international financial markets may affect the Peruvian capital markets and the Peruvian banking system.

•

The operations of Interbank, Interseguro, Interfondos, Inteligo SAB and Izipay could be adversely affected by earthquakes, floodings or other natural disasters.

•

Corruption and ongoing high profile corruption investigations may hinder the growth of the Peruvian economy and have a negative impact on our business and operations.

•

Changes in tax laws may increase our tax liabilities and, as a result, have a material and adverse effect on us.

•

The dollarization of the Peruvian economy hampers monetary policy, which in turn may have an effect on our business.

Risks Relating to the Common Shares

•

There may be a lack of liquidity and market for our common shares.

•

The price of our common shares may be volatile.

•

We may raise additional capital in the future through the issuance of equity securities, which may result in dilution of the interests of our shareholders.

•

The significant share ownership of our controlling shareholder may conflict with the interests of the holders of our common shares and may have an adverse effect on the future market price of our shares.

•

Holders of our common shares may have fewer and less well-defined rights than shareholders of a company organized in other jurisdictions, such as the United States.

•

Holders of our common shares may have difficulty enforcing judgments against us, our officers and directors.

•

Judgments of Peruvian courts with respect to our common shares will be payable only in soles.

•

We are subject to different corporate disclosure and accounting standards than those holders of our common shares may be familiar with in the United States.

•

We could be considered a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences for U.S. investors.

•

One or more of our subsidiaries could be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

•

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our results of operations and the price of our common shares could be adversely affected.

•

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members or executive officers.

•

Our status as a foreign private issuer allows us to follow alternate standards to the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, which may limit the protections afforded to investors.

•

If securities or industry analysts do not actively follow our business, or if they publish unfavorable research about our business, the price and trading volume of our common shares could decline.

•

Future offerings of debt or preferred securities may limit our operating and financial flexibility and may materially adversely affect the market price of, and dilute the value of, the common shares.

•

Peruvian corporations, including our subsidiaries, may be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid Peruvian capital gains tax related to the transfer of the common shares.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and certain of our plans, objectives, assumptions, projections, expectations or beliefs and statements regarding other future events or prospects are forward-looking statements. These statements include, without limitation, those concerning: our strategy and our ability to achieve it; expectations regarding sales, profitability and growth; our possible or assumed future results of operations; capital expenditures and investment plans; adequacy of capital; and financing plans. In addition, this Annual Report on Form 20-F includes forward-looking statements relating to our potential exposure to various types of market risks, such as macroeconomic risk, Peru specific risks, foreign exchange rate risk, interest rate risks and other risks related to our financial performance. The words “aim,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “is expected to,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “future,” “continue,” “help,” “estimate,” “plan,” “schedule,” “intend,” “should,” “would be,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “shall,” or the negative or other variations thereof, as well as other similar expressions regarding matters that are not historical facts, are or may indicate forward–looking statements.

We have based these forward-looking statements on our management’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These views reflect the best judgment of our management but involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in our forward–looking statements and from past results, performance or achievements. Although we believe that the estimates reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, such estimates may prove to be incorrect. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things:

•

our holding company structure;

•

economic, business and political developments in Peru and globally, including corruption scandals involving the Peruvian government and related political instability;

•

economic and geopolitical developments in regional or global markets, including Russia’s continued invasion of Ukraine;

•

the financial market volatility and market turmoil generated by the recent bank failures in the United States and the emergency sale of Credit Suisse or similar developments in the financial industry;

•

health epidemics and pandemics (including the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic) and other outbreaks, government measures to contain the spread of these pandemics or outbreaks, their effects on the economy of Peru, and their impact on global and regional economic growth prospects, creditworthiness, counter-party risk, as well as any logistical, operational or labor disruptions, among others;

•

protests and social unrest in Peru against government economic policies and social inequality;

•

changes in Peruvian, Panamanian and Bahamian and other foreign laws and regulations including the adoption of new capital requirements for banks or insurance companies, as well as interest rate caps for banks;

•

the dollarization of the Peruvian economy;

•

increased competition in the Peruvian financial services and insurance markets;

•

increased inflation;

•

exchange rate instability and government measures to control foreign exchange rates;

•

developments affecting the purchasing power of middle-income consumers or consumer spending generally;

•

changes in interest rates;

•

downturns in the capital markets and changes in capital markets in general that affect policies or attitudes towards lending to Peru or Peruvian companies or securities issued by Peruvian companies;

•

our ability to keep up with technological changes and integrate new businesses into our operations;

•

the inability to obtain the capital we need for further expansion of our businesses;

•

the inability to attract and retain key personnel;

•

any future acquisitions may not bring anticipated benefits;

•

changes in tax laws;

•

severe weather, adverse climate changes and natural disasters;

•

changes and volatility in regional or global markets;

•

dependence on sovereign debt in our investment portfolios;

•

credit and other risks of lending, such as increases in defaults of borrowers;

•

increased costs of funding or our inability to obtain additional debt or equity financing on attractive terms or at all;

•

a deterioration in the quality of our assets;

•

allowances for impairment losses may be inadequate;

•

changes to accounting standards;

•

changes in actuarial assumptions upon which our annuity business is based;

•

failure to adequately price insurance premiums;

•

decreases in the spread between investment yields and implied interest rates in annuities;

•

dependence on information technology (“IT”) systems and cybersecurity risks; and

•

other risks and uncertainties described in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.”

We urge holders of our common shares to read the sections of this Annual Report on Form 20-F entitled “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors”, “Item 4. Information on the Company— Business Overview” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a more complete discussion of the factors that could affect our future performance and the industries in which we operate. Additionally, new risks and uncertainties can emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all future risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess their potential impact. Accordingly, holders of our common shares should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to cause uncertainty and disrupt the global economy, including the Peruvian economy, which may impact our business, results of operation and cash flows.

All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are based on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law. All other written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Our audited annual consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 included in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

have been prepared in

soles

and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and audited by Tanaka, Valdivia & Asociados Sociedad Civil de Responsabilidad Limitada, PCAOB ID 1315, a member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited (“EY Peru”).

For a description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

For regulatory purposes, including regulations of the

Banco Central de Reserva del Perú

(the “Central Reserve Bank of Peru”) and regulations and the reporting requirements of the

Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores

(the “SMV”), our Peruvian subsidiaries, Interbank and Interseguro, also prepare in Spanish and make available to shareholders statutory financial statements as prescribed by the Peruvian Superintendency of Banks, Insurance and Private Pension Fund Administrators (

Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros y Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones

, or “SBS”), hereinafter “SBS GAAP”.

We have included in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

certain information reported by the SBS for the Peruvian banking and insurance sectors as a whole as well as for individual financial institutions in Peru, including Interbank and Interseguro, which report to the SBS in SBS GAAP. The information under SBS GAAP has been presented for comparative market purposes. All statements in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

regarding our relative market position and financial performance

vis-à-vis

the financial services and insurance sectors in Peru are based, out of necessity, on information obtained from the SBS and the SMV. With respect to comparative banking information, we typically compare ourselves against certain peer banks or against the system as a whole. With respect to comparative insurance information, we typically compare ourselves against the industry as a whole. Statements in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

regarding our relative market position and financial performance, however, do not include information relating to Inteligo as Inteligo is not regulated by and does not report to the SBS or the SMV.

Certain comparative financial information related to our compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) included in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

has been prepared based on information reported pursuant to SBS GAAP, except for Inteligo. Compound Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) is calculated by (i) dividing the value of a variable on year X (ending value) by the value of this same variable on year Y (beginning value), then (ii) raising this to an exponent of one divided by

(X-Y)

and (iii) subtracting one from the result. In addition, our Peruvian subsidiaries pay dividends to us on the basis of the SBS GAAP financial statements as further described in this Annual Report on Form

20-F.

See “Item 8 Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and dividends policy” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—We are a holding company and all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common shares will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and make other distributions to us.”

IFRS differs in certain significant respects from SBS GAAP. Consequently, information presented in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

in accordance with SBS GAAP or based on information from the SBS or SMV may not be comparable with our financial information prepared in accordance with IFRS. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information provided in this Annual Report on Form

20-F

has been prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Change in Accounting Policies and Estimates

Generally, we have only adopted standards, interpretations or amendments that were effective in each year. Therefore, standards, interpretations or amendments that become effective in 2023 or later have not been early adopted.

On January 1, 2022, we adopted the following standards, interpretations, or amendments: (i) in connection with costs of fulfilling a contract, an amendment to IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”, (ii) amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”, (iii) in connection with proceeds before intended use of property, plant and equipment, an amendment to IFRS 16 “Leases”, (iv) in connection with a subsidiary as a first time adopter, an amendment to IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”; and (v) in connection with fees in the “10 per cent” test for derecognition of financial liabilities, an amendment to IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments have not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 3.2 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

COVID-19

related rent concessions beyond June 30, 2021, an amendment to IFRS 16 “Leases”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments have not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Since January 1, 2020, we have adopted the following standards, interpretations, or amendments: (i) Amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”, (ii) Amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” and IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors”, (iii) Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued on March 29, 2018, and (iv) Amendments to IFRS 16 “Leases”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Currency Translation

The term “sol” and the symbol “S/” refer to the legal currency of Peru, and the term “U.S. dollar” and the symbol “U.S.$” refer to the legal currency of the United States.

We have translated some of the soles amounts contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F into U.S. dollars for convenience purposes only. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the rate used to translate soles amounts to U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2022 was S/3.814 = U.S.$1.00, which was the exchange rate reported for December 31, 2022 by the SBS. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for soles. The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this Annual Report on Form 20-F is provided solely for convenience of investors and should not be construed as implying that the soles or other currency amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at such rates or at any other rate.

Effect of Rounding

Certain figures included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F and in our consolidated financial statements have been rounded for ease of presentation. Percentage figures included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F have not in all cases been calculated on the basis of such rounded figures but on the basis of such amounts prior to rounding. For this reason, percentage amounts in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may vary from those obtained by performing the same calculations using the figures in our consolidated financial statements. Certain numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them due to rounding.

Market and Industry Data

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, unless otherwise indicated, all macroeconomic data relating to Peru is based on information published by the SBS, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, the Peruvian Ministry of the Economy and Finance (Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas, or “MEF”), and the Peruvian National Institute of Statistics and Information Processing (Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática, or “INEI”). References in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to “GDP” refer to real gross domestic product, except for GDP per capita and penetration ratios of loan products.

References in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to “peer countries” in Latin America refer to Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. Certain information about peer countries in Latin America have been derived from the Economist Intelligence Unit (“EIU”), the Chilean Superintendency of Banks and Financial Institutions (Superintendencia de Bancos e Instituciones Financieras, or “SBIF”), the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), the Colombian Financial Superintendency (Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia), and the Mexican Commission for Banking and Securities (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores). References in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to the “four largest banks in Peru” or the “four largest Peruvian banks” refer to Banco de Crédito del Perú (“BCP”), BBVA Continental, Interbank and Scotiabank Perú S.A.A.

Unless otherwise indicated, statistical information in this Annual Report on Form 20-F relating to our Peruvian subsidiaries Interbank and Interseguro, regarding market share, ranking, and other measures, as well as information on other Peruvian financial institutions and the Peruvian financial system generally, has been derived from reports and information published by the SBS, the SMV, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, the Association of Peruvian Banks (Asociación de Bancos del Perú, or “ASBANC”) or from other publicly available sources and industry publications.

Socioeconomic levels are determined based on the data collected by INEI in their national annual survey Encuesta Nacional de Hogares (“ENAHO”). INEI assigns a score to each household based on their ranking on the following four factors: (i) characteristics of the household living space, (ii) level of living space overcrowding, (iii) level of education of household head and (iv) ownership of durable goods/properties; and then groups them in five socioeconomic segments (A, B, C, D, E).

Other market share information and other statistical information and quantitative statements in this Annual Report on Form 20-F regarding our market position relative to our competitors, except where otherwise indicated, is not based on published statistical data or information obtained from independent third parties. Rather, such information and statements reflect management estimates based upon our internal records and surveys, statistics published by providers of industry data, information published by our competitors, and information published by trade and business organizations and associations and other sources within the industry in which we operate. We have not independently verified any data produced by third parties or industry or general publications, although we believe such data and publications are reliable. In addition, while we believe our internal data and surveys to be reliable, such data and surveys have not been verified by any independent sources.

Loan Portfolio Data

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to performing loans refer to loans in compliance with their original contractual obligations. References to past-due loans refer to overdue loans defined as follows: commercial loans are considered past-due once amortization payments are 15 days overdue; loans to micro-businesses are considered past-due once amortization payments are 30 days overdue; and in the case of consumer, mortgage and leasing loans, the amortization portion of a coupon is considered past-due once 30 days overdue and the total amount of the loan is considered past-due once an amortization payment is 90 days overdue. For IFRS 7 and IFRS 9 disclosure purposes, the entire loan balance is considered past due when debtors have failed to make a payment when contractually due. Past-due loans do not include refinanced and restructured loans. References to total gross loans include total loans outstanding, including past-due loans, refinanced loans and restructured loans, and references to total net loans refer to gross loans plus accrued interest less allowances for loan losses and deferred interest.

In response to the COVID-19 crisis and with the support and permission of the SBS, in 2020, Interbank offered various payment rescheduling options to its clients to help them overcome the major economic shock related to the pandemic and the lockdown measures implemented by the Government. These rescheduling options refer to the following three schemes:

Unilateral: loans proactively rescheduled by Interbank on a portion of the loan balance, in consideration of the client’s debt burden.

Landing: loans rescheduled at client’s request on a portion of the loan balance.

Structural: loans proactively rescheduled by Interbank or at client’s request over the entire loan balance.

The rescheduling of loans can involve modifying payment schedules, granting grace periods, and lowering interest rates, among other measures.

In 2021 and 2022, Interbank has continued to support customers that requested additional relief for their rescheduled loans on a case-by-case basis. Finally, through a series of Resolutions and Multiple Official Letters, within the framework of emergency Decree No. 026-2021, the MEF and the SBS established measures to reschedule the loans guaranteed under the Reactiva Perú program (as defined below). These facilities included grace periods of up to 12 months and also extended the repayment period.

Certain Financial Definitions and Conventions

We present return on assets, or “ROA”, return on equity or “ROE”, net interest margin or “NIM”, risk adjusted net interest margin or “risk adjusted NIM”, cost of risk and efficiency ratio in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. We define our ROA as net profit for the period divided by average total assets; our ROE as net profit for the period divided by average total equity; NIM as (x) net interest and similar income divided (y) average interest earning assets; risk adjusted NIM as net interest margin after impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries; Cost of risk is defined as impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries divided by average gross loans. Efficiency ratio as the division of (x) salaries and employee benefits plus administrative expenses plus depreciation and amortization by (y) net interest and similar income plus other income, plus net premiums earned.

We present average balances and nominal average interest rates in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Except as otherwise indicated, average balances are based on quarterly balances. Nominal average interest rates have been calculated by dividing interest earned on assets or paid on liabilities by the corresponding average balances on such assets or liabilities.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, we present adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA, which are non-GAAP financial measures. A non-GAAP financial measure does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. A non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined as a numerical measure of an issuer’s historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that: (i) excludes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with IFRS in the statement of income, balance sheet or statement of cash flows (or equivalent statements) of the issuer; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the most directly comparable measure so calculated and presented.

We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP measures provides additional useful information to investors regarding our performance and trends related to our results of operations. Accordingly, we believe that when non-GAAP financial information is viewed with IFRS financial information, investors are provided with a more meaningful understanding of our ongoing operating performance and financial results.

ROE is calculated by dividing net profit for the year by average total equity. ROA is calculated by dividing net profit for the year by average total assets. Adjusted net profit is defined as net profit excluding non-operating and/or non-recurring gain or losses.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, we did not make adjustments to our net profit, ROE or ROA. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we made adjustments to our net profit, to ROE and to ROA, as we defined our adjusted net profit (used for the calculation of adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA) as net profit excluding the gain recognized as a result of the step acquisition of Izipay, which management believes is non-recurring in nature. See note 1(d) to our Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.

We believe that the adjustment to our net profit provided useful metrics because by excluding the fair value adjustment of the 50% ownership interest held by Interbank in Izipay before the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022, it deducted from our net profit pre-acquisition effects that our management believes to be non-operating and/or non-recurring in nature and in so doing, allows us to better assess the performance of our operating activities. Adjusted net income, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA do not have a standardized meaning and are not recognized measures under IFRS. Adjusted net income, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA should not each be considered by itself or as a substitute for net income or other measures of operating performance. Our definition of adjusted net income, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA may differ from those used by other companies.

For a discussion on the non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliation of these measures to IFRS financial measures, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results.”

There may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors. As a result, we encourage readers to consider the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F in their entirety, and not to rely on any single financial measure.

PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

A.	[RESERVED]

B.	Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not Applicable.

C.	Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not Applicable.

D.	Risk Factors

An investment in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, holders of our common shares should carefully consider the following risk factors before purchasing our common shares. If any of the possible events described below occurs, our businesses, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially and adversely affected. As a result, the market prices of our common shares could decline and holders of our common shares could lose all or part of their investment. The risks and uncertainties below are those known to us and that we currently believe may materially affect us and our common shares. We may face additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or which as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F we might not consider significant, which may also adversely affect our businesses.

Risks Relating to Our Businesses

As a holding company, all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our ability to pay corporate expenses and to pay dividends, if any, to holders of our common shares, will depend upon our receipt of dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries.

There are various regulatory restrictions in Peru and other jurisdictions that may limit our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us, such as their obligations to maintain minimum regulatory capital and minimum liquidity. See “—Global and local health concerns, including in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic or other outbreaks of pandemics or contagious diseases, may adversely affect our and our subsidiaries’ business, financial condition and results of operations”.

In addition, some of our Peruvian subsidiaries pay dividends to us on the basis of the SBS GAAP financial statements, which differ from IFRS. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro had a net profit of S/248.0 million under IFRS and of S/202.8 million under SBS GAAP, which resulted in a dividend payment to us of S/100.0 million in 2023. Therefore, there is no assurance that the differences in accounting treatment will not render the opposite result, namely that lower or no dividends would be payable to us by any of our Peruvian subsidiaries under SBS GAAP than what it would appear to be able to pay under IFRS, or that dividends will continue to be payable under SBS GAAP in the future.

Furthermore, our subsidiaries may incur indebtedness or enter into other arrangements containing terms that may restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends, the making of other distributions, or the making of loans to us. We cannot assure holders of our common shares that the agreements governing the future indebtedness of our subsidiaries will permit them to provide us with sufficient dividends, distributions or the making of loans to fund dividend payments.

To the extent our subsidiaries do not have funds available or are otherwise restricted from paying dividends to us, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders will be adversely affected.

As a holding company, our right to receive any distribution of assets of our subsidiaries upon any subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization or otherwise will be subject to the prior claims of creditors of that subsidiary, except to the extent that any claims by us as a creditor of such subsidiary may be recognized as such. Accordingly, holders of our common shares will have rights that will effectively be subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries, and, in the event of any claim against us, our shareholders may have recourse only against our assets, and not those of our subsidiaries, for payments. The only significant assets that we currently hold are our equity interests in our subsidiaries.

Global and local health concerns, including the outbreak of pandemics or contagious diseases including the COVID-19 pandemic, may disrupt economic activity. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased economic uncertainty throughout the world and resulted in a global economic recession, which may adversely affect us. Though widespread outbreaks have become less common, the business of our subsidiaries is dependent upon the willingness and ability of their customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions.

To contain the spread of COVID-19 in Peru, in 2020, 2021 and during the first semester of 2022, the Peruvian government announced and implemented several measures such as declaring a state of emergency and ordering a mandatory lockdown and the total closure of Peru’s borders, while guaranteeing access to essential goods and services, including banking and financial services, pharmacies, food stores and markets, among others. As a result of these measures, the business operations of our subsidiaries were disrupted as a significant portion of their offices and financial stores were closed temporarily. These measures and similar measures have caused significant disruption of regional and global economic activity.

While, for the most part, restrictions have been lifted in connection with the Peruvian government’s approach to re-open the economy, we can offer no assurance that they will not be re-imposed, and changes in existing regulations or implementation of future regulations in response to the COVID-19 or other pandemics may further restrict their existing operations, limit the expansion of their business and require extensive system and operating changes that may be difficult or costly for them to implement. Accordingly, as the cycle of the COVID-19 virus evolves throughout the world, the long-term ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic remain hard to predict in its duration and effects on the global and Peruvian economy and on our business.

The COVID-19 pandemic also caused significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets globally, leading to sharp fluctuations in equity levels as well as increased volatility in economic indicators, such as exchange rates, interest rates, credit spreads and commodity prices, all of which may recur or worsen in the future to the extent a new health emergency occurs. Moreover, COVID-19 generated a simultaneous shock on supply and demand – a supply shock resulting from the abrupt paralysis of production in multiple sectors and a demand shock as a result of reduced consumption – which amplified the negative effects on the economy. Further shocks or unexpected movements in these market factors could result in financial losses. The evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential long-term impact on the global economy may affect our ability to meet our financial targets.

As a result of the economic impact of the pandemic, in addition to public health measures, the Peruvian government adopted measures to generate monetary and fiscal stimulus and alleviate the financial stress on households and companies, including the allowance for partial withdrawals from compensation for service time accounts (“CTS”, by its Spanish acronym), as well as partial withdrawals from the pension fund accounts, loan rescheduling measures and an initial S/30 billion credit guarantee program (“Reactiva Perú”). Given the nature of the adopted Reactiva Perú measures, our most affected subsidiary was Interbank. In this regard, as of December 31, 2022, outstanding loans disbursed by Interbank under the Reactiva Perú program amounted to S/2.3 billion (of which S/2.0 billion were covered by a government guarantee), a reduction of 53.0.% compared to the outstanding loans under the Reactiva Perú program as of December 31, 2021 of S/4.9 billion (of which S/4.4 billion were covered by a government guarantee).

During 2020, and in response to the Covid-19 crisis, Interbank offered its clients several payment rescheduling options. As of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, the balance of total rescheduled loans amounted to S/10.5 billion, S/6.3 billion and S/5.0 billion, respectively. The loans granted under the Reactiva Perú program during the years ended December 31, 2021 2022 amounted to approximately S/133.0 million and S/2.0 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2022, the balance of rescheduled loans under the Reactiva Perú program amounted to approximately S/2.0 billion and S/1.5 billion, respectively.

If such measures fail to achieve their intended results, our customers may be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to us, as well as result in the filing and granting of insurance claims under insurance policies approved by Interseguro, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot predict whether and to what extent new or changes to laws and regulations that affect our subsidiaries’ business will be adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or other new pandemics and what effect such laws and regulations would have on our revenue sources and hence on our financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic or other outbreaks of pandemics or contagious diseases adversely affect our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors” section, such as those relating to interest rate changes, economic, social and political developments in Peru, the market volatility generated by distortions in the international financial markets, cybersecurity, etc.

Interbank and Interseguro are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the SBS. The SBS also oversees all of Interbank’s and Interseguro’s subsidiaries and their operations. Interbank is also subject to regulation and oversight by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, which, together with the SBS, have general administrative responsibilities over banks and other financial institutions, including the authority to set loan loss provisions, limits on interest rates and fees, regulatory capital requirements and other minimum capital adequacy and reserve requirements. In addition, banks are required to provide the SBS, on a periodic basis, with all information necessary to allow for its evaluation of the bank’s financial performance. Similarly, insurance companies are required to periodically provide the SBS, with all information necessary for the SBS to evaluate the company’s management, measure systems, solvency, profitability and liquidity.

Similarly, Inteligo’s subsidiaries are regulated by governmental entities and other financial services regulators in The Bahamas, Panama and Peru. Inteligo Bank is subject to the regulation and supervision of the Central Bank of The Bahamas. Additionally, Inteligo Bank’s asset management activities and securities custody and trading activities are subject to supervision by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas. Inteligo Bank holds licenses from the Securities Commission of The Bahamas for dealing in securities as agent or principal, arranging deals, managing securities and advising on securities. Inteligo Bank is licensed to undertake all securities-related activities ancillary to its banking business. Inteligo Bank and its branch are subject to regulation by the Superintendency of Banks of Panama (Superintendencia de Bancos de Panamá). Inteligo Bank is also subject to regulation by the Securities Commission of Panama (Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores de Panama) since June 18, 2021, when it obtained its investment advisory license. On January 3, 2022, Inteligo Bank began its operations under such license. Inteligo SAB and Interfondos are subject to the regulation and supervision of the SMV in Peru. Also, Interbank and Interseguro are subject to the regulations of the SMV. Izipay is subject to the regulations of the Central Bank of Peru and SMV. In addition, IFS, Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo Bank and Inteligo SAB are subject to other regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), which could increase compliance costs and, in case of non-compliance could result in liability, additional costs or sanctions imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

Changes in the regulation and supervision of Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and Izipay or the implementation of future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations by restricting our existing operations, limiting the expansion of our business and requiring extensive system and operating changes that may be difficult or costly to implement. For example, the SBS and the Central Reserve Bank of Peru regulate, and have in the past changed, capital structure and deposit reserve requirements, interest paid on deposit reserves, the amount of deposit reserves for which no interest is payable, rules regarding provisions for loan losses and legal lending limits applicable to Peruvian commercial banks. Furthermore, Interbank could be required to increase its level of provisions in response to pro-cyclical provisioning requirements that could be activated by regulators under certain favorable macroeconomic conditions. Additional changes in the regulation and supervision of our subsidiaries have been imposed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could affect our results of operations. For example, during 2020, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru took several measures, such as reducing the reference interest rate by 200 basis points from its November 2019 rate of 2.25% to 0.25% in April 2020, which low rate was maintained until July 2021, and approving a new liquidity instrument to provide funds to financial entities, consisting of repurchase operations using Peruvian government guaranteed loans as collateral. Moreover, changes in consumer protection regulation may also affect our business. For example, in March 2021, the Peruvian Congress approved a bill under which (i) the Central Reserve Bank of Peru will semi-annually establish caps on compensatory and moratorium interest rates that banks can charge to consumers and small businesses, and (ii) capitalized interest, commissions or expenses in cases of default are disallowed. Since its approval, such new regulation limiting the interest that can be charged to clients of banking entities, such as Interbank, has negatively impacted Interbank’s financial results. In addition, Interbank could be subject to limits on fees or commissions charged to clients. If legislation or governmental or regulatory action is enacted limiting the amount of ATM fees or surcharges that Interbank may receive or on its ability to charge overdraft or other fees, it could adversely impact our financial results. Furthermore, during 2022, the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law was amended by Legislative Decree No. 1531 to more closely align the Peruvian regulatory framework and its regulations applicable to the companies of the financial system to the Basel Committee’s 2011 agreement regarding the overall design of the

capital and liquidity reform package (now referred to as “Basel III”), including changes related to the composition of the effective equity (which changes to effective equity came into effect as of January 1, 2023). Interbank has already implemented most of these requirements, with no adverse effect to its operations, and it does not anticipate any adverse effect to its financial condition or operations as a result of the implementation of additional requirements imposed by Legislative Decree No. 1531. We cannot make any assurance regarding whether future regulatory changes may increase operational costs or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Since 1998, Interseguro has been subjected to strict local regulations that required significant changes in reserve requirements. For example, in March 2018, changes by the SBS to mortality tables used for calculating reserves for new annuities resulted in a higher reserve requirement, which in turn could adversely affect Interseguro’s results of operations or could result in lowered implied interest rates on Interseguro’s annuities. For further information, see Note 3.4(d) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements. New legislation or regulations applicable to the insurance industry may adversely affect Interseguro’s ability to underwrite and price risks accurately as well as affect its revenues and net income. For example, whereas retirees formerly had to choose between remaining with their pension fund or choosing an annuity, since 2016 a law has allowed retirees to withdraw 95.5% of their capital accumulated in cash upon retirement, which has resulted in a significant reduction of annuities sold by Peruvian insurance companies, including Interseguro. In addition, considering that the SBS regulates the types of and limits on eligible investments that insurance companies, such as Interseguro, are allowed to make, in case the SBS enacts new regulations that further restricts such eligible investments, Interseguro could be compelled to liquidate current investments on less favorable terms than if they were held to maturity and restrict Interseguro from making investments that its management deems to be beneficial. Likewise, at the end of 2022, in order to adjust the fair value of real estate investments, the SBS established new requirements for valuation specialists or entities requiring capacitation in specific valuation matters that are not lectured in Peru, which created hurdles to such valuations and increased operating costs. Any failure to comply with these new requirements may increase costs and result in potential sanctions by the SBS. Moreover, in the past and as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Peruvian government permitted companies to suspend employee contracts without pay in certain cases until the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused these companies to stop making the corresponding monthly contribution to the pension funds of their worker, affecting the private pension system. In addition, the Peruvian government eased pension fund regulations, including measures permitting extraordinary withdrawals of funds from the private pension system, which in turn reduced pension funds collected by Interseguro. New legislation or regulations may impact Interseguro’s ability to economically assess risk in a timely manner, which in turn may adversely affect Interseguro’s ability to underwrite and price risks accurately and thus affect our business profitability.

The Bahamas has enacted the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018 which requires substantial economic presence in The Bahamas for certain Bahamian entities that conduct relevant activities. A relevant activity includes the business of banking as conducted by Inteligo Bank. Inteligo Bank has made the appropriate registration and it is exempt from the requirements of the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018 as it currently fulfills certain disclosure and governance requirements of the applicable legislation. If The Bahamas in the future changes such regulation such that Inteligo Bank is no longer considered to be exempt from registration, it would have to enhance its economic and business presence in The Bahamas in order to comply with the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018, which increased presence may result in increased costs—financial, compliance or otherwise, which could impact Inteligo Bank’s profitability and our results of operations.

We cannot predict whether and to what extent new laws and regulations, or changes to existing laws and regulations, affecting our subsidiaries’ business will be adopted in the future, the timing of any such adoption and what effect such events would have on our financial condition and results of operations.

All banks and insurance companies established in Peru require certain authorizations issued by the SBS in order to operate in Peru. In addition, all brokerage firms operating in Peru require certain authorizations issued by the SMV in order to operate in Peru. In The Bahamas and Panama, all banks require a license to operate. Governmental authorities, such as the SBS or the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, the Central Bank of The Bahamas, or the Superintendency of Banks of Panama, have general administrative responsibilities over banks and other financial institutions, including authority to set loan loss provisions, limits on fees, regulatory capital requirements and other minimum capital adequacy and reserve requirements. In addition, banks are generally required to provide the relevant banking supervisory agency, on a periodic basis, with all information that is necessary to allow for its evaluation of a bank’s financial performance. Insurance companies are regulated and supervised by the SBS which has the ability, among other things, to set reserve requirements for insurance companies. Similarly, the SMV and the Securities Commission of The Bahamas have general administrative responsibilities over brokerage firms, including the authority to set minimum capital requirements.

Our subsidiaries currently have the required licenses in order to conduct their operations in their corresponding jurisdictions for all of their operations. Although we believe our subsidiaries are currently in compliance with their respective existing material license and reporting obligations, there is no assurance that our subsidiaries will be able to maintain the necessary licenses in the future. We can offer no assurance that future changes to existing laws and regulations, or stricter interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations, will not impair our ability to comply with such laws and regulations and thus with the terms of our licenses.

The loss of a license, a breach of the terms of a license by any of our subsidiaries or the failure to obtain any further required licenses in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of our subsidiaries loses its licenses or is required to seek additional licenses, then such subsidiary will be unable to perform its operations as it is currently authorized and as it is currently doing.

Under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law and the regulations thereunder, the SBS may intervene in Interbank’s and Interseguro’s operations upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

•

Interbank or Interseguro suspends payment of its obligations or is unable to pay its obligations as they come due;

•

Interbank or Interseguro breaches any of their respective commitments to the SBS under a surveillance regime (régimen de vigilancia) imposed by the SBS;

•

Interbank’s regulatory capital is less than 50% of the minimum regulatory capital required under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law;

•

Interbank or Interseguro experiences a deficit or reduction of more than 50% of its regulatory capital during the preceding 12-month period; or

•

Interseguro experiences a deficit or reduction of the regulatory capital of more than 50% of its solvency equity.

In the event of an intervention, the SBS has the power to institute measures, such as limiting the decisions that could be taken at a shareholders’ meeting, suspending our normal activities and segregating certain of Interbank’s or Interseguro’s assets and liabilities for transfer to third parties, among others. Furthermore, the SBS has the power under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law to declare the wind-up or liquidation of any bank or insurance company if an intervention extends for longer than 45 days, which period may be extended one time for another 45 days at the sole discretion of the SBS, and/or upon the occurrence of a wind-up or liquidation pursuant to the Peruvian General Corporations Law (Ley General de Sociedades). For further detail, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—The Peruvian Financial and Insurance Systems — Intervention by the SBS and Liquidation”.

Under Peruvian capital markets laws and the regulations thereunder, the SMV may revoke the license of Inteligo SAB and/or Interfondos, among others, upon the occurrence of (i) significant irregularities that put the companies at risk to carry out their operations as permitted by law or (ii) significant violations of the law, statutes and regulations promulgated by the SMV.

Under Bahamian banking regulations, the Central Bank of The Bahamas may intervene in Inteligo Bank’s operations upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

•

Inteligo Bank carries on its business in a manner detrimental to the public interest or the interests of its depositors or other creditors; or

•

Inteligo Bank contravenes the provisions of Bahamian banking law or any other law, order or regulation made thereunder, or any term or condition subject to which its license was issued, either in The Bahamas or elsewhere.

In addition, under Bahamian securities laws and regulations, the Securities Commission of the Bahamas may revoke Inteligo Bank’s registration and license to deal in securities, arrange deals, manage securities and/or advise on securities for noncompliance with laws and regulations.

Under Law Decree 9 of 1998, as amended, the Superintendency of Banks of Panama may seize administrative and operating control of the branch of Inteligo Bank in Panama, based on any of the following grounds:

•

upon a reasoned request of Inteligo Bank itself;

•

if Inteligo Bank cannot continue operations without endangering the interests of the depositors;

•

as a consequence of the evaluation of the report submitted by an appointed advisor;

•

non-compliance with the corrective measures ordered by the Superintendency of Banks of Panama;

•

if Inteligo Bank carries out its operations in an illegal, negligent or fraudulent manner;

•

if Inteligo Bank has suspended payment on its obligations; or

•

if the Superintendency of Banks of Panama confirms that the capital adequacy, solvency or liquidity of Inteligo Bank has deteriorated so as to require action by the Superintendency of Banks of Panama.

In December 2009, the Basel Committee announced its intention to issue a new framework related to the regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking industry. This was followed by the Basel III principles, which revises and strengthens the three pillars established by Basel II.

In July 2011, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 8425-2011 (as amended from time to time), establishing the final methodologies in the calculation and the implementation schedule of the additional capital requirements to be implemented in Peru, which, although not completely consistent with Basel III, includes requirements to cover concentration, interest rate and systemic risk, as well as certain pro-cyclical capital requirements. These additional requirements were fully implemented in July 2016. In March 2022, the Peruvian government issued Legislative Decree 1531, which revised regulatory capital definition rules in the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law. This legislative decree became effective on January 1, 2023. Changes were aimed to better comply with the standards established by Basel III.

In February 2016, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 975-2016 (as amended from time to time), which aimed to improve the quality of the total regulatory capital (patrimonio efectivo) and align Peruvian regulations towards Basel III. This resolution changed the conditions that subordinated debt must meet in order to be considered in the calculation of additional capital and the calculation methodology applicable to risk-weighted assets. In December 2022, as part of the implementation of the Basel III standards, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 03950-2022, which updates regulations applicable to subordinated debt related to its computation at the different levels and sublevels of the regulatory capital. This resolution became effective on January 1, 2023 and is applicable to subordinated debt incurred or created from the date of its effectiveness. However, as established in this new regulation, subordinated debt incurred or created prior to its effectiveness will still be considered in the calculation of regulatory capital. Although the main changes became effective January 2023, other relevant regulation were also passed by the SBS by end of 2022 to implement the aforementioned law and provided certain adequacy periods. We cannot assure whether the implementation and further supervision of the above-mentioned new regulations may result in increased costs—financial, compliance or otherwise, which could impact our profitability and our results of operations. For further details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—The Peruvian Financial and Insurance Systems”. Interbank expects to continue to be in compliance with these additional capital requirements; however, Interbank’s assumptions with respect to compliance may turn out to be incorrect, and, consequently, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

With respect to Interseguro, Solvency II, a new regulatory framework for the European insurance industry implemented in early 2016, is under consideration by international regulatory bodies, which could result in the SBS raising solvency ratio requirements for insurance companies in Peru in the future.

With respect to Inteligo Bank, The Central Bank of The Bahamas has adopted a Basel Implementation Program and has effectively implemented Pillar I and Pillar II of the Basel II framework. The Pillar I framework focuses on the capital adequacy ratio requirements and Pillar II focuses on the internal capital adequacy assessment processes (“ICAAP”) (the guidelines in relation to the ICAAP were released in August 2016). In 2016, the Central Bank of The Bahamas rolled out the capital component of the Basel III framework. In November 2020, the Central Bank of The Bahamas released a draft of The Bahamas capital regulations and reforms to the guidelines for the management of capital and the calculation of capital adequacy, which ended its consultation period in January 2021 and was shared with the Bahamian government during the third quarter of 2021 for final endorsement and release. The Central Bank of The Bahamas published its Capital Adequacy Guidelines for the Management of Capital and the Calculation of Capital Adequacy on August 24, 2022, and The Bahamas Capital Regulations 2022 came into effect on July 15, 2022. The Bahamas capital regulations include changes to the methodology for the calculation of risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital that could adversely impact Inteligo Bank’s capital adequacy ratio. The regulations and capital adequacy guidelines simplify the Bahamian Basel III framework while remaining consistent with the proportionality principles set out by the Basel Committee. The new regulations set a

new capital ratio limit and introduced changes to the credit and operational risk equivalent assets and deductions of high-risk assets from the capital base. Inteligo Bank’s capital ratio as of December 31, 2022, under the new regulations, was 16.49%, while it would amount to 20.41% under the previous regulations. In any case, Inteligo Bank’s capital ratio remains well above the regulatory limit of 12%. Additional changes to this framework could require Inteligo Bank to make revisions to its capital structure and investment which could have an adverse effect on the profitability of Inteligo Bank.

Furthermore, in 2018, the Central Bank of The Bahamas published two discussion papers focused on Minimum Disclosures (Pillar III of the Basel II framework), the net stable funding ratio and the liquidity coverage ratio (main components of Basel III). In 2021, the Central Bank of The Bahamas informed through its quarterly letter that its liquidity framework will be implemented after the completion of the capital framework. The latest update on the Basel II and III implementation was given in The Central Bank of The Bahamas’ 2022 third quarter report of the Bank Supervision Department, which stated that adoption and implementation of the Basel principles continued to progress along with related amendments to other legislation and guidelines that would be impacted by the new capital regulations. Moreover, in 2022, new credit risk guidelines were published by the Central Bank of The Bahamas. While as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, we believe such guidelines do not materially impact Inteligo Bank’s operations, we cannot make any assurances that the Central Bank of The Bahamas or other government authorities will not make further adjustments to applicable banking regulations which could materially and adversely affect Inteligo Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot predict whether and to what extent new guidelines, laws and regulations, or changes to existing guidelines, laws and regulations, affecting our subsidiaries’ business will be adopted in the future, the timing of any such adoption and what effect such events would have on our financial condition or results of operations.

The SBS has established minimum capital requirements for financial services holding companies on a fully consolidated basis, which the SBS evaluates on an annual basis. As a result of its direct and indirect equity interest in Interbank and Interseguro, our controlling shareholder, Intercorp Peru, is subject to these minimum capital requirements. Intercorp Peru owns other businesses in addition to ours, and financial information relating to both our business and those other businesses is used to determine compliance with the minimum capital requirements.

According to Peruvian regulations, the subsidiaries directly and indirectly owned by Intercorp Peru qualify as a mixed conglomerate in which three different groups are identified: (i) consolidable group of the financial system; (ii) consolidable group of the insurance system; and (iii) financial group. Pursuant to Peruvian regulations, Intercorp Peru must maintain a higher regulatory capital requirement than the regulatory capital requirements for its groups.

If Intercorp Peru fails to comply with these requirements, the SBS may request Intercorp Peru to take certain corrective actions to ensure compliance. If Intercorp Peru fails to take such actions, the SBS could suspend or revoke Interbank’s and Interseguro’s licenses to operate in Peru, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. For further details, see “—The operations of our subsidiaries require the maintenance of banking, insurance and other licenses and any non-compliance with applicable license and operating obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”

The banking market in Peru is highly competitive. Interbank has experienced strong competition from local and foreign banks, including new entrants attracted by Peru’s low banking penetration, as well as from department stores that offer credit cards, from emerging financial technology companies that offer digital banking and other services both on a regulated and unregulated basis, and from the local and international capital markets that lend to commercial customers. Competition may reduce the average interest rates that Interbank can charge its customers, increase the average rates Interbank must pay on its deposits, and may negatively affect its loan growth and place pressure on margins. Some of Interbank’s competitors may have access to greater resources and be more successful in the development of products and services that compete directly with Interbank’s products and services. If Interbank’s competitors are successful in developing products and services that are more effective or less expensive than the products and services offered by it, Interbank may be unable to compete successfully. Even if Interbank’s products and services prove to be more effective than those developed by other competitors, such other competitors may be more successful in marketing their products and services because of their greater financial resources or marketing strategies, among other factors. Interbank may not be able to grow or maintain its market share if it is not able to match its competitors’ pricing or keep pace with their development of new products, services and technological innovation and developments.

The Peruvian insurance market, particularly the annuity and life insurance sectors, is also highly competitive. Interseguro’s principal competitors are large insurance companies that may have greater resources and offer a wider range of products. These insurance companies may have better access to independent brokers who sell insurance to customers. In addition, Interseguro may also face competition from private pension funds (“AFPs”), which could in the future be allowed to offer annuities. Moreover, under the private pension system, upon retirement, retirees have the option of choosing to remain with their pension fund, choose an annuity or, since 2016, withdraw 95.5% of their capital accumulated in cash, which potentially reduces demand for Interseguro’s annuities. Any adverse impact on Interseguro resulting from increased competition, as well as a reform of the private pension system, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Similarly, if Inteligo Bank’s competitors are successful in developing products and services that are more effective or less expensive than the products and services offered by Inteligo Bank, it may be unable to compete successfully. Even if Inteligo Bank’s products and services prove to be more effective than those developed by other competitors, such other competitors may be more successful in marketing their products and services because of their greater financial resources or marketing strategies, and other factors. Competitors may also dedicate greater resources to, and be more successful in, the development of products and services that may compete directly with Inteligo Bank’s products and services. Inteligo Bank competes in a global market for wealth management services, including wealth management divisions of global banks. Such competition would adversely affect the acceptance of Inteligo Bank’s products and/or lead to adverse changes in the investing habits of Inteligo Bank’s customer base. Inteligo Bank may not be able to grow or maintain its market share if it is not able to keep pace with its competitors’ development of new products and services. Any adverse impact on Inteligo Bank resulting from increased competition could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Likewise, if Izipay’s competitors are successful in developing market share growth strategies, reduce their customer fees, or gain more customers , then Izipay could be unable to compete successfully and its net income could be threatened. Moreover, if Izipay’s competitors develop a low-cost POS technology and gain efficiency, it could negatively affect Izipay’s operating results.

Our failure to effectively anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions and results of operations.

Our failure to effectively anticipate or adapt to emerging technologies or changes in customer behavior, including among younger customers, could delay or prevent our access to new digital-based markets. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including payment systems, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we continue to grow our digital capabilities. Our customers may choose to conduct business or offer products on alternative or emerging platforms. Such new technologies could negatively impact our investments in bank premises, equipment and personnel for our branch network, or if we do not properly anticipate trends, render our existing investments in our digital platform moot. If we fail to adapt quickly, or at all, to changes in technologies or changes in customer behavior, it may have an adverse impact on Interbank resulting from increased competition, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interbank’s strategy is to focus on the retail and commercial banking sectors and to grow and gain market share profitably. As a result, Interbank’s loan portfolio will become increasingly vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks that could negatively impact the household income of Interbank’s customers and result in increased loan losses. In addition, our commercial clients could be negatively affected by global and local macroeconomic trends. As a result, in past years, our provisions for loan losses, in particular related to credit cards granted to certain vulnerable sectors of the Peruvian economy, have significantly increased during slowdowns of the Peruvian economy. Additionally, in part due to the de-dollarization policy sponsored by the Peruvian government there is a mismatch between our dollar denominated deposits and sol denominated loans. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Depreciation and Appreciation of the Sol”.

In the event of a macroeconomic shock, the value of Interseguro’s investments may also suffer losses, including in its investment property. In addition, the amount of savings available to potential annuity holders may be negatively impacted by unemployment or a decline in wages. A macroeconomic shock may also negatively impact wealth generation in Peru and, in turn, impact the demand for our wealth management services.

We could sustain losses if Interbank’s asset quality declines.

Our earnings are significantly affected by Interbank’s ability to properly originate, underwrite and service loans. We could sustain losses if Interbank incorrectly assesses the creditworthiness of its borrowers or fails to detect or respond to deterioration in asset quality in a timely manner. Problems with asset quality could cause our net interest and similar income to decrease and our provisions for loan losses to increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Reduced diversification in Interbank’s loan portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

While loan portfolio risk associated with lending to certain economic sectors or clients in certain market segments can be mitigated through adequate diversification policies, Interbank’s pursuit of opportunities in which it can charge higher interest rates may reduce diversification of the loan portfolio and expose Interbank to greater credit risk. Reduced diversification could expose Interbank to greater risks in the event of a decline in asset quality. In addition, given the relatively small size of the Peruvian economy, Interbank’s lending diversification is by necessity lower than that of banks with operations in larger economies. Moreover, certain concentrations of borrowers’ commercial sectors may be unavoidable in Peru—principally the natural resources, fishing, agriculture and mining sectors—and deteriorations in such sectors could have a material adverse effect on Interbank’s deposits, loan performance and other businesses.

Furthermore, as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, retail banking loans accounted for approximately 49.1% and 53.6% of Interbank’s loan portfolio, respectively. Higher than average exposure to retail banking could be accompanied by greater credit risk due to higher risk profiles compared, particularly, to loans to large corporate customers. Given the significant recent growth of Interbank’s loan portfolio, historical loss experience may not be indicative of future doubtful loan experience. As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves or if there are other outbreaks of pandemics or contagious diseases, Interbank’s retail and commercial clients may be impacted and our risk profile may deteriorate, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Interbank records allowances for impairment losses on loans and other assets. The amount of allowances recorded is based on Interbank’s current assessment of and expectations concerning various factors affecting the quality of its loan portfolio. These factors include, among other things, Interbank’s borrowers’ financial condition, repayment abilities and repayment intentions, the realizable value of any collateral, the prospects for support from any guarantor, Peru’s economy, government macroeconomic policies, interest rates and the legal and regulatory environment. Many of these factors are beyond Interbank’s control. In addition, as these factors evolve, the models Interbank uses to determine the appropriate level of allowance for impairment losses on loans and other assets may require recalibration, which can lead to increased allowances.

Allowances for impairment losses on loans have significantly increased as a result of the risks and uncertainties associated with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has resulted in increased monitoring of those loans that have been rescheduled. In 2020, Interbank applied several post-model adjustments for these loan exposures, such as proactive migration of certain clients from Stage 1 to Stage 2, and from Stage 2 to Stage 3, with the aim of more accurately predicting expected credit losses. Due to the political and social uncertainties in Peru during 2021 and 2022, as well as to the outbreak of the Omicron variant in 2021, Interbank decided to apply a new expert judgment to update its expected credit losses. If Interbank’s assessment of and expectations concerning the above-mentioned factors differ from actual developments, or if the quality of its loan portfolio deteriorates or the future actual losses exceed its estimates, Interbank’s allowance for impairment losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses and it may need to make additional allowances for impairment losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Selected Statistical Information—Classification of Our Loan Portfolio” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Impairment Loss on Loans, Net of Recoveries.”

Our financial results may be negatively affected by changes to IFRS accounting standards.

We report our results and financial position in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. Changes to IFRS thereof may cause our future reported results and financial position to differ from current expectations, or historical results to differ from those previously reported due to the adoption of new accounting standards on a retrospective basis. We monitor potential accounting changes and, when possible, we determine their potential impact and disclose significant future changes in our financial statements that we expect because of those changes. IFRS 17 “Insurance Contracts”, which became effective on January 1, 2023, provides a comprehensive accounting model for all types of insurance contracts that provides a more consistent framework for insurers, covering all relevant aspects as recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures. As permitted by this new standard, we decided to apply the transition methodology under fair value. On the basis of current preliminary estimates, we expect that the adoption of IFRS 17 may result in a reduction of our net equity that may fluctuate between 8% and 10% as of January 1, 2022. For further information on IFRS 17, see Note 3.5 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

Our financial results may be negatively affected by investment losses.

The investment activities of our subsidiaries are subject to factors beyond their control, and losses from their exposures could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As part of its treasury operations, Interbank trades various financial instruments and other assets, including debt, equity, fixed income, currency and related derivatives, as both agent and principal, and derives a proportion of its non-financial income from trading profits. Interbank has established position limits for sol and foreign currency-denominated securities in accordance with its overall risk management policy and with the SBS requirements. However, Interbank is exposed to numerous factors that are beyond its control, including overall market trading activity, interest rate levels, the credit risk of its counterparties and general market volatility. For example, in 2020 and in particular in March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic increased the volatility of our investment portfolio, which was also increased in 2022 due to global factors such as the Ukraine-Russia conflict and the interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve of the United States. In addition, a significant part of Interbank’s trading is related to customer transactions, and Interbank could be exposed to a number of risks related to the movement of market prices in the underlying instruments, including the risk of unfavorable market price movements relative to its long or short positions, a decline in the market liquidity of the related instruments, volatility in market prices, interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates relating to these positions, and the risk that the instruments with which Interbank chooses to hedge certain positions do not track the fair value of those positions. If Interbank incurs any further losses from these exposures, it could reduce Interbank’s trading profits or cause it to suffer losses from trading activities, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Inteligo Bank is exposed to similar investment and trading risks as Interbank.

Interseguro is exposed to the risk of a decrease in the value of its investments due to volatility in market conditions, real estate prices, equity values and interest rates, among other factors, many of which are beyond Interseguro’s control. In addition, as a holder of a large portfolio of debt investments and fixed income securities, Interseguro is exposed to the risk that the issuers of its fixed income securities may default.

Furthermore, in all of our segments, our investments may be subject to impairment, due to mark-to-market which could cause volatility in our financial condition and results of operations.

Interest rate changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interbank’s and Inteligo’s financial condition and results of operations depend to a large extent on their financial margin, which in turn depends on their ability to charge interest on interest-earning assets, such as loans to customers, that is higher than the interest they pay on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also adversely affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits. We cannot control or predict with certainty changes in interest rates since market interest rates are sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including the interest rate policies of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and the U.S. Federal Reserve. In the past year, inflation rates throughout the world have significantly increased to levels not seen in the last two decades. In response to concerns about inflation, the United States Federal Reserve has raised, and may again rise, interest rates. Although as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, during 2020, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru took several measures, such as reducing the reference interest rate by 200 basis points from 2.25% to 0.25%, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru began to increase rates in 2021 from 0.25% to 7.50% in December 2022. If Interbank or Inteligo are unable to implement commensurate and timely increases in interest rates on loans they originate, their margins would decline.

Interbank’s primary sources of funds are retail deposits with no specific or contractual maturity, and a substantial portion of the loans it originates have a longer term. The difference in maturities between deposits and loans could magnify the effect of any interest rate mismatch, as well as pose a liquidity risk if Interbank were not able to obtain funding as its liabilities mature.

Interseguro faces interest rate risk as a result of the potential variation in interest rates when it reinvests debt instruments to cover its obligations. Interseguro may reinvest when the term of its investments differs from that of its obligations. Interseguro tries to match the cash flows of its obligations with the maturities of its portfolio, but the shortage of instruments with the appropriate maturity profile may result in mismatches with its obligations and, as a result, expose it to interest rate risk.

Furthermore, on July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intended to phase out LIBOR. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings would either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative: (a) immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of the one week and two-month U.S. dollar settings; and (b) immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining U.S. dollar settings. The United States Federal Reserve also advised banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate.

Regulators and market participants in various jurisdictions have identified alternative reference rates that are compliant with the standards of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (the “ARRC”), a committee convened by the Federal Reserve that includes market participants, has recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities, as the alternative benchmark rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR. Publication of SOFR began on April 3, 2018 and it therefore has a limited history. In addition, the future performance of SOFR is impossible to predict and therefore no future performance of SOFR may be inferred from any historical simulations or its limited historical performance.

The implementation of alternative benchmark rates is still in progress, although most banks have moved from LIBOR to SOFR in the case agreements indexed to the U.S. dollar LIBOR. The replacement of LIBOR could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition if we are unable to agree on an alternative benchmark, like SOFR, with our customers and financial counterparties in advance. Furthermore, we may face a risk of litigation, disputes or other actions from clients, counterparties, customers, investors or others regarding the interpretation or enforcement of related provisions or if we fail to appropriately communicate the effect that the transition to alternative benchmark rates will have on existing and future products. Although we expect to adapt our valuation processes, IT infrastructure and pricing systems as new information arises, we can neither assure you nor calculate the impact this could have on our business and results of operations, if any.

Commercial loans, financial liabilities and derivative positions are some of the financial instruments based on LIBOR benchmarks that may affect IFS or its subsidiaries as a result of the discontinuation of LIBOR.We have analyzed such instruments to determine their respective applicable interest rates, or to determine the Bank’s course of action when fallback provisions are not in place and there is no set replacement rate. We are currently in process of amending certain instruments to replace LIBOR with alternative rates.

Interseguro is exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates on other comprehensive income.

Interseguro estimates its technical reserves under IFRS on the basis of an updated discount risk-free rate calculated using mortality data and a market discount rate, which is affected by volatility in interest rates.

See Note 3.4(d) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements. Such volatility in interest rates is reflected in Interseguro’s balance sheet, under other comprehensive income and could have a material adverse effect on our balance sheet. See Note 14(c) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

Actual mortality and morbidity rates may differ from those assumed in the initial calculation of annuity reserves at the time of the issuance of the policy and their periodic adjustments. If Interseguro’s assumptions differ materially from actual mortality and morbidity rates, Interseguro could be required to make payments under its annuities for a longer period of time than originally estimated, and existing reserves could fall short of actual payments.

However, in March 2018, the SBS approved Resolution No. 886-2018, which adopted new and updated mortality tables taking into account recent changes in Peruvian life expectancy and longer estimated lives for the calculation of the annuities’ reserves. As a result, starting in 2018, Interseguro adopted the new mortality tables approved by the SBS used to this date, which led to a negative impact of S/144.8 million in technical reserves during the second quarter of 2018. Accordingly, future changes in mortality tables could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interbank may not be able to obtain the funding required to support growth and implement its strategy.

Interbank’s strategy to grow its loan portfolio will require it to continue to have an active funding strategy. Interbank’s access to funding will depend on many factors, including factors beyond our control, such as any credit crunch, public health crises and epidemics/pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) or other conditions in global capital markets and investors’ perceptions of the risks of investing in Peru and emerging markets generally. The 2008 and 2009 global financial and economic crisis, the debt crisis in Europe and general market volatility, for example, had a negative impact on the liquidity of global financial markets. In the case of similar events, any equity or debt financing, if available at all, may be on terms that are not favorable to Interbank. If access to funding is limited, Interbank may not be able to implement its strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A reduction in our subsidiaries’ credit ratings could increase their cost of borrowing funds and make their ability to raise new funds and renew maturing debt more difficult.

Our subsidiaries’ credit ratings are an important component of their respective liquidity profile. Among other factors, Interbank’s credit ratings are based on its financial strength, the credit quality and concentrations in its loan portfolio, the level and volatility of its earnings, its capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of its balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core retail and commercial deposits and its ability to access a broad array of funding sources. In addition, our subsidiaries’ lenders may be sensitive to the risk of a ratings downgrade, which could increase the cost of refinancing their existing obligations, raising funds in the capital markets and borrowing funds from private lenders, and could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although our subsidiaries’ credit ratings have remained relatively stable over time, including throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, our creditors may be sensitive to changes in our credit ratings, and/or outlook. The risk of a future ratings downgrade could increase the cost of refinancing our existing obligations, raising funds in the capital markets and borrowing funds from private lenders, and could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interseguro’s failure to underwrite and price insurance premiums accurately for the products it offers would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Interseguro’s financial condition and results of operations depend on its ability to underwrite insurance policies and set premium rates accurately. Interseguro must generate sufficient premiums to offset claim losses and cover operating and underwriting expenses to make a profit. In order to price insurance policies accurately, Interseguro must collect and analyze a substantial volume of data, develop, test and apply appropriate rating formulae, closely monitor changes in trends in a timely fashion and project both severity and frequency of loss with reasonable accuracy. If Interseguro fails to assess accurately the risks that it assumes or does not reinsure an appropriate level of risk, it may fail to establish adequate premium rates, which could reduce income and have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Interbank’s and Interseguro’s reliance on Peruvian sovereign and global bonds in their respective investment portfolios leaves us vulnerable to a default on such debt.

A substantial portion of our investment portfolio consists of Peruvian sovereign and global bonds and Central Reserve Bank of Peru certificates of deposit, which represented 55.1% of our investment portfolio (before accrued interest) as of December 31, 2022. A default on Peruvian sovereign debt could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interseguro may suffer losses in its investment portfolio because of risks associated with its real estate investments.

Interseguro’s investment portfolio includes real estate investments located solely in Peru. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s investments in real estate projects totaled S/1,287.7 million, which represented 10.6% of Interseguro’s total investment portfolio. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and Interseguro’s ability to vary its portfolio of properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions is limited. If Interseguro wants or needs to sell a property, it may not be able to do so in the desired time period or on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, Interseguro is exposed to risk in respect of its real estate investments that are under development, including delays in receiving zoning permits, construction delays, changes in regulation or lack of demand.

Interseguro’s investment properties are carried at fair value, which could result in the value of such investment properties declining if market conditions deteriorate. As a result, we could suffer an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Tax exemptions applicable to a substantial portion of Interseguro’s investment earnings could be changed in the future.

Interseguro pays no income tax, primarily because its investment earnings in respect of its life insurance technical reserves are entirely exempt from income tax. Future changes in tax laws or regulations limiting or eliminating the current tax exemption could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We and our subsidiaries are dependent on key personnel.

Our development, operation and growth have depended significantly upon the efforts and experience of our and our subsidiaries’ board of directors, senior management and key personnel. Most of the members of our senior management have held management positions with other major financial institutions in the United States, Latin America and Europe. Although we currently expect that our and our subsidiaries’ board of directors and other senior managers will continue in their positions, the loss of their services, or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace them, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Interruption, mismanagement or failure in our subsidiaries’ information technology systems may adversely affect their operations.

As financial and insurance institutions, our success depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our subsidiaries’ computer and communications hardware systems and our applications, including systems and applications that support the operation of Interbank’s financial stores, ATMs, Interbank Agente (correspondent agents), mobile applications and website, as well as the infrastructure components that support our operations (communication devices, networking, etc.). Our subsidiaries’ computer and communications systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, sabotage, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, physical or electronic break-ins and similar events or disruptions. Any of these events could cause system interruptions, delays and losses of critical data and could prevent our subsidiaries from operating at optimal levels or at all.

Any failure, interruption or breach in security of our subsidiaries’ information systems could result in failures or interruptions in their risk management, general ledger, deposit servicing, loan organization and/or other important operations, as applicable. Although our subsidiaries have developed back-up systems and a disaster recovery center, and may continue some of their operations in case of emergency, if their information systems fail, even for a short period of time, then they may be unable to serve some or all of their customers’ needs on a timely basis. Likewise, a temporary shutdown of our subsidiaries’ information systems could result in additional costs for information retrieval and verification. In addition, failure to update and develop our subsidiaries’ existing information systems as effectively as their competitors may result in a loss of the competitive advantages that each subsidiary believes its information systems provide. Furthermore, our subsidiaries may not have adequate insurance coverage or insurance limits to be compensated for losses from a major interruption.

If our subsidiaries experience a data security breach and confidential customer information is disclosed to or accessed by third parties, their customers could be adversely affected. The collection of data and processing of transactions require our subsidiaries to receive and store a large amount of personally identifiable data. This type of data is subject to legislation and regulation in various jurisdictions, including Peru. Data security breaches suffered by well-known companies and institutions have attracted a substantial amount of media attention, prompting U.S. state and federal legislative proposals addressing data privacy and security. Our Peruvian subsidiaries are subject to requirements to protect the personally identifiable information that they process in connection with their services. Our Peruvian subsidiaries may become exposed to potential liabilities with respect to the data that they collect, manage and process, and may incur legal costs if their information security policies and procedures are not effective or if they are required to defend their methods of collection, processing and storage of personal data. Security breaches, lawsuits or adverse publicity relating to our subsidiaries’ methods of handling personal data could have a material adverse effect on their business, financial condition and results of operations due to the costs and negative market reaction relating to such developments.

In addition, our current strategy involves significant investments to expand and develop our IT, applications and systems in order to unify and simplify them, and increase the volume of transactions and operations performed online by our personnel and clients. We have also contracted with a third-party provider to ensure the stability and security of our systems and IT infrastructure and to also bear the risk of the failure of that third party. However, there can be no assurance that such strategy or its implementation will be successful, or whether it will result in failures, shutdowns or damage to our business and operations.

Moreover, additional regulations or new requirements may emerge related to cybersecurity controls and data quality, as well as contractual commitments in accordance with standards established by the Information Security and Cybersecurity Management regulation (the “Reglamento para la Gestión de la Seguridad de la Información y la Ciberseguridad”), approved by SBS Resolution No. 504-2021 (as amended). Any failure or perceived failure by financial and insurance institutions to comply with such obligations may result in governmental enforcement actions and regulatory penalties, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation. Moreover, in February 2021, the SBS approved amendments to the Plan Business Continuity regulation (the “Reglamento para la Gestión de la Continuidad del Negocio”), aimed to manage the enterprise and business unit levels, with business units identifying, measuring, monitoring, managing, and reporting these and other operational risks at a more detailed level. Failure to comply with these rules could result in a loss a material effect on results of operations and financial losses.

The occurrence of any failures or interruptions in our subsidiaries’ IT systems, or the failure of our subsidiaries to adequately address them if they do occur, as well as data security breaches incurred by our subsidiaries, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition and results of operations, including as a result of facing significant fines, customer notice obligations or costly litigation, maintaining or upgrading their IT systems, or performing other IT services on a timely basis.

Cyber-security events could negatively affect our reputation or results of operations and may result in litigation.

The information security risks have shown an incremental trend in recent years due to the proliferation of new technologies and the increasing sophistication and number of cyberattack activities as well as the growing connectivity of equipment and systems to the internet. Data security breaches suffered by numerous companies and institutions around the world have attracted a considerable amount of media attention and are leading different regulators to strengthen the legislation requirements for addressing data security and privacy issues. We depend on a variety of internet-based data processing applications, communication and information exchange platforms, and networks as part of our operations and digital strategy.

In recent years, cybersecurity risks have increased significantly mainly due to remote working arrangements and the increased use of digital channels by our clients. In this regard, we have implemented additional cybersecurity measures to prevent, detect, and respond to these risks. These measures mainly focus on strengthening the security of devices used by our employees working remotely, improving the connection and authentication methods used in remote connections, managing the risks of third parties that are part of our operation more rigorously, increasing the frequency of our cybersecurity awareness programs, and improving the capability of our cybersecurity threat detection, response, and intelligence procedures.

Although we continuously assess and strive to improve the effectiveness and security of our systems by adopting industry-recognized and suggested security standards, given the current cybersecurity dynamics we cannot guarantee to holders of our common shares that all of our systems are free from vulnerabilities or that the measures adopted will be successful in preventing all cyberattack scenarios. In the event of a cyberattack, we may suffer disruptions to our business operations, experience response costs and losses, and may be subject to litigation and reputational harm. A cyberattack could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. For more information on our cybersecurity protections and details of our information technology units, please refer to ““Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Information Technology Unit” for each of our four business segments.

Our subsidiaries are susceptible to fraud, unauthorized transactions and operational errors.

Our subsidiaries are susceptible to, among other things, fraud or bad faith by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees and other operational errors (including clerical or record keeping errors and errors resulting from faulty computer or telecommunications systems). Given a high volume of transactions that may occur at a financial institution, errors could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remedied. In addition, a number of transactions are not fully automated, which may further increase the risk that human error or employee tampering could result in losses that may be difficult to detect quickly or at all.

While our subsidiaries maintain a system of internal controls designed to monitor and control operational risk, losses from the failure of their system of internal controls to discover and rectify such risks could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our financial condition and results of operations.

Our existing insurance coverage may be insufficient and future coverage may be difficult or expensive to obtain.

Although we believe that our insurance policies provide adequate coverage for the risks inherent in our businesses, these insurance policies typically exclude certain risks and are subject to certain thresholds and limits. We cannot assure holders of our common shares that our properties, equipment, inventories and other assets will not suffer damage due to unforeseen events or that the proceeds available from our insurance policies will be sufficient to protect us from all possible loss or damage resulting from such events. Our subsidiaries renew our insurance policies on an annual basis. The cost of coverage may increase to an extent that we may choose to reduce our policy limits or agree to certain exclusions from our coverage. Among other factors, adverse political developments, security concerns and natural disasters may materially adversely affect available insurance coverage and result in increased premiums for available coverage and additional exclusions from coverage. As a result, our insurance coverage may prove to be inadequate for events that may cause significant disruption to our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our employees could join labor unions and we could be subject to organized labor actions, including work stoppages that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Even though the employees of our subsidiaries are not unionized and have not entered into any collective bargaining agreement, nothing prevents them from doing so in the future. Conflicts with our employees and organized labor actions such as work disruptions or stoppages or requirements to increase employee salaries and/or benefits as a result of future collective bargaining agreements, governmental regulations or policies or otherwise could cause us to suffer a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our trademarks and trade names may be misappropriated or challenged by others.

We own the material trademark and trade name rights used in connection with our brands and businesses and the marketing and sale of their respective products and services. We believe our brand names and related intellectual property are important to our continued success. We attempt to protect our trademarks and trade names by exercising our rights under applicable trademark and copyright laws. Any infringement of our intellectual property rights would likely result in a commitment of our time and resources to protect these rights through litigation or otherwise, which could be expensive and time-consuming. If we were to fail to protect our intellectual property rights for any reason, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Any failure to comply with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing and antitrust laws and regulations could damage our reputation or expose us to penalties.

We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing, antitrust and other international laws and regulations and are required to comply with the applicable laws and regulations of Peru, Panama, Bahamas and certain other jurisdictions. In addition, we are subject to regulatory legal frameworks that restrict our transactions with certain sanctioned countries, individuals and entities. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations may subject us to economic fines, regulatory sanctions or enforcement proceedings

Our subsidiaries are in compliance with the applicable anti-money laundering (“AML”) and anti-terrorist financing laws and regulations and have implemented policies and procedures, including a “know-your-customer” client identification program, monitoring of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) and International Sanctions List, monitoring clients’ transactions, enhanced their due diligence procedures for high-risk clients, internal controls, and quality assurance programs. Our compliance program is based upon the applicable Peruvian, Panamanian and Bahamian laws and best international practices, such as the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”). In addition, we perform due diligence on financial institutions to ensure that they have the same stand on anti-money laundering policies and procedures. Although these measures mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risks, these risks are not fully eliminated. Therefore, when subsidiaries identify suspicious activities, these are reported to the authorities and placed on an internal “black list” to block future transactions and mitigate reputational risk. However, these measures and procedures may not be completely effective in preventing third parties from using any of our subsidiaries (and our correspondent banks) as a conduit for money laundering (including illegal cash operations) or terrorist financing without our (and our correspondent banks’ and reinsurance institutions’) knowledge. If any of our subsidiaries were to be associated with money laundering or terrorist financing, our reputation as a group could suffer and/or they could become subject to fines, sanctions or legal enforcement, including being added to any “blacklists” that would prohibit certain parties from engaging in transactions with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our subsidiaries are in compliance with applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, rules and regulations, including policies regarding government officials and other high-risk stakeholders. Although we have not been subject to fines or other penalties, or suffered business or other reputational impact as a result of alleged money laundering, anti-bribery and anti-corruption activities, there can be no assurance that our internal policies and procedures will be sufficient to prevent or detect all inappropriate practices, fraud or violations of law by our affiliates, employees, directors, officers, partners, agents and service providers. We may in the future discover instances in which we have failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations or internal controls. If any of our affiliates, employees, directors, agents, officers partners, agents and service providers or other persons with whom we conduct business engage in fraudulent, corrupt or other improper or unethical business practices or otherwise violate applicable laws, regulations or our own internal compliance systems, we could become subject to one or more enforcement actions by Peruvian or foreign authorities (including the U.S. Department of Justice) or otherwise be found to be in violation of such laws, which may result in penalties, fines and sanctions and in turn adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We and our subsidiaries are subject to litigation and other legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings.

We and our subsidiaries are regularly party to litigation and other legal proceedings relating to claims resulting from operations in the normal course of business. The interpretation and enforcement of certain provisions of existing or any additional agreements we may enter into in the future may result in disputes among us and customers or third-parties. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings may occur. We cannot assure holders of our common shares that the legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings in which we and our subsidiaries are involved will not materially and adversely affect our ability to conduct our respective business in the manner that we and they expect or otherwise adversely affect our respective results of operations and financial position should an unfavorable ruling occur.

Legal restrictions on our clients may reduce the demand for our services.

We may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to us, but also by regulations and changes in enforcement practices applicable to our clients. Our business could be affected by, among other things, existing and proposed tax legislation, antitrust and competition policies, corporate governance initiatives, consumer protection laws, data use regulation and other governmental regulation and policies, and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, that affect our clients’ businesses and the financial markets. For example, a focus on tax compliance and changes in enforcement practices could lead to asset outflows from our private banking businesses, including at our subsidiary Inteligo.

Risks Relating to Peru

Economic, social and political developments in Peru, including political instability, social unrest, persistent inflation and unemployment, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Substantially all of the operations and customers of our subsidiaries are located in Peru. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations will be dependent on the level of economic activity in Peru. Our financial condition and results of operations could be affected by changes in economic conditions (both international and domestic), policies of the Peruvian government (which has exercised and continues to exercise substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector) and by other economic and political developments in Peru, including devaluation, currency exchange controls, limits on interest rates, seizure of private property, financial regulation, inflation, economic downturns, corruption scandals, social unrest and terrorism, among others.

Historically, Peru’s GDP growth rates and external surplus, reflect, in part, the strength of Peru’s economic fundamentals. However, ongoing deterioration of the global economy, rising inflation and fuel prices may adversely affect Peru’s economy. In addition, an economic contraction or weak economic growth in Peru’s trading partners may have an adverse effect on Peru’s economy. Despite Peru’s ongoing economic growth and stabilization, social and political tensions and high levels of poverty and unemployment continue. The combination of these factors may be exacerbated by political events, which may lead to intensified economic, social and/or political crises, sparking a wave of protests and social unrest.

Furthermore, Peru has experienced political instability that has included a succession of regimes with differing economic policies and programs, followed by periods of stability. While Peru has been a stable democracy having completed a peaceful transition from the administration of President Ollanta Humala to President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, who took office in July 2016, starting in 2018, Peru has suffered a series of government institutional crises due to, among other things, several corruption and political scandals involving prominent political figures, which have resulted in resignations and impeachment of various presidents since then, including most recently former President Jose Pedro Castillo in December 2022 following an attempted coup, as well as investigations of certain members of the judicial system and the public ministry who are now facing prosecution.

Peru’s most recent general presidential elections took place in April 2021. Following a run-off between the two top contenders, José Pedro Castillo Terrones (Partido Político Nacional Perú Libre), a far-left candidate, and Keiko Sofia Fujimori Higuchi (Fuerza Popular), a center-right candidate, on June 6, 2021, Pedro Castillo was elected as Peru’s president and sworn in as President on July 28, 2021.

On December 7, 2022, Mr. Castillo announced his intention to dissolve the Peruvian Congress and to intervene, among others, the Peruvian judicial branch and Superior Court. Mr. Castillo’s actions were deemed to constitute an attempted coup, which led to his impeachment and arrest. According to the Peruvian Constitution, Mr. Castillo was succeeded by his then vice-president, Dina Boluarte. Following Mr. Castillo’s impeachment, a wave of protests in support of Mr. Castillo erupted across the country, which led President Boluarte to declare a state of emergency across several regions in Peru on December 12, 2022 and call for congressional approval of a bill to permit early elections in 2024. As of the date of this annual report, the proposal to bring forward the elections in the short-term was rejected by Congress.

Moreover, the mass violent protests in several regions of the country following former President Castillo’s impeachment in December 2022, together with the political uncertainty over the past five years have raised concerns about the ability of the government to implement long-term and consistent economic and social policies required to combat social and economic issues in the future, including those designed to promote economic growth and to counteract the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The government’s failure to do address and alleviate these concerns could result in rating agencies downgrading Peru’s sovereign debt rating, which in turn could affect our rating and materially impact our business and operations.

In the past, previous governments have imposed controls on prices, exchange rates, local and foreign investment and international trade, restricted the ability of companies to dismiss employees, expropriated private sector assets and prohibited the remittance of profits to foreign investors. Former President Vizcarra was known for pursuing business-friendly and open-market economic policies, which remained in place during President Sagasti’s term, while former President Castillo was known for having proposed certain tax, fiscal, financial and economic restrictions in line with his party’s left-leaning agenda. Given President Boluarte’s recent appointment and current political conditions in Peru, there is no certainty on what kind of policies she or the next president elected will pursue, or whether those policies will be similar to the ones implemented by former President Castillo or, on the contrary, will be business-friendly and based on open-market economic guidelines that stimulate economic growth and stability. Such political uncertainty, and any future policies that might be implemented by the Peruvian government could impact interest rates and currency volatility, as well as adversely and materially affect the Peruvian economy, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “—Potential exchange controls implemented by the Peruvian government could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.”

There can be no assurance that Peru will not face continued or new economic, political or social problems in the future or that these problems will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Future government policies to pre-empt or respond to social unrest could include, among other things, declarations of state of national emergency, expropriation, nationalization, suspension of the enforcement of creditors’ rights and new taxation policies.

The Peruvian government deployed various economic and public health measures to address the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures were part of an economic stimulus plan that included tax incentives among other tools intended to address the immediate impacts of the national state of emergency invoked by the Peruvian government to attempt to contain spread of the virus and lessen the strain on the health care system and the impact on the overall economy. The MEF, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, the SBS, as well as other government entities also adopted specific measures to provide economic support to segments of the population, such as vulnerable population and small enterprises, which were most at risk in this crisis.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a material adverse impact on the Peruvian economy resulting in lower prices for primary goods, volatility in the financial markets, reduced international trade and lower activity in certain of the key drivers of the local economy. In addition, in case new sub-variants emerge, the potential return of social distancing and stay-at-home quarantine measures may affect dynamism of various productive sectors of the economy. Reduced activity in these economic sectors may result in reduced employment and less income for families and companies, which may again generate a simultaneous shock on supply and demand—a supply shock resulting from the abrupt paralysis of production in multiple sectors and on the demand side as a result of

reduced consumption, which may amplify the negative effects on the economy. Additionally, Peru has faced in 2022 and onwards a return to a high inflation and higher reference rate environment, which would also undermine Peru’s foreign competitiveness, with negative effects on the level of economic activity and employment that would increase our operating costs and adversely impacting our operating margins

Although Peru committed significant resources to strengthening the public health system and social support to the neediest families to provide a public safety net to soften the economic impact of COVID-19 on Peru’s most vulnerable citizens, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful or sufficient to address the potential effects of new variants of COVID-19 or its current or future spikes. Over the long-term, we cannot assure you that the measures adopted by the Peruvian government to counteract the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will be sufficient to restore public confidence in the economy or to restore economic growth. Global economic recession and rising inflation, among other macroeconomic factors, could adversely impact our results of operation in the long term, even despite government-relief measures to mitigate the impacts of the continued COVID-19 pandemic or new public health crises and epidemics/pandemics.

Fluctuations in the value of the sol could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As the Peruvian banking system is still partially dollarized, with 7.2% of gross loans and 40.6% of deposits denominated in U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2022, devaluation of the sol against the U.S. dollar could have a negative impact on the ability of Interbank’s clients to repay loans and make premium payments.

We are exposed to currency mismatch risks. Within our insurance segment, a similar adverse effect could occur on Interseguro’s local debt holdings denominated in foreign currency. Despite any devaluation, and absent any change in foreign exchange regulations, Interbank and Interseguro would be required to continue to repay dollar-denominated deposits in U.S. dollars. In addition, while we seek to manage the gap between Interbank’s and Interseguro’s foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities, by matching, for example, the volumes and maturities of Interbank’s sol-denominated loans against Interbank’s sol-denominated deposits, we may not be successful in doing so. Therefore, any significant devaluation of the sol against the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a devaluation of the sol against the U.S. dollar would decrease the dollar value of any dividends paid to us by our subsidiaries, and, as a result, our ability to pay dividends could be materially and adversely affected. An appreciation of the sol could also have an adverse impact on our results of operations as reported in soles, as Inteligo’s operations are denominated in U.S. dollars, but our reporting currency is in soles.

Since 1991, the Peruvian economy has undergone a major transformation from a highly protected and regulated system to a free market economy. During this period, protectionist and interventionist laws and policies have been dismantled gradually to create a liberal economy dominated by the private sector. Exchange controls and restrictions on remittances of profits, dividends and royalties have ceased. Prior to 1991, Peru exercised control over the foreign exchange markets by imposing multiple exchange rates and placing restrictions on the possession and use of foreign currencies. Currently, foreign exchange rates are determined by market conditions, with regular open-market operations by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru in the foreign exchange market to reduce volatility in the value of Peru’s currency against the U.S. dollar.

Any dividends paid to us by Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo SAB and Izipay will be paid in soles. Peruvian law does not impose any restrictions on the ability of companies having operations in Peru to transfer foreign currencies from Peru to other countries, except for restrictions applicable to companies that have been convicted or have admitted to and/or acknowledged committing crimes against the Peruvian public administration or money laundering or equivalent crimes, as set forth in Urgency Decree No. 003-2017 (Urgency Decree to Ensure Continuity of Public Utility Investment Projects and Safeguard Compensation to the State in Cases of Corruption), which restricts the transfer of both local and foreign currency abroad. Except for the restrictions set forth in such Urgency Decree, companies having operations in Peru may freely transfer foreign currency from Peru to other countries. If the Peruvian government were to implement restrictive exchange rate controls in the future, we might be obligated to seek an authorization from the Peruvian government to make dividend payments. We cannot assure holders of our common shares that such an authorization would be obtained. Any such exchange rate restrictions or the failure to obtain such an authorization could materially and adversely affect our ability to pay our shareholders.

In the past, Peru has suffered through periods of high and hyper-inflation, which has materially undermined the Peruvian economy and the government’s ability to create conditions that support economic growth. In response to increased inflation, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, which sets the Peruvian basic interest rate, may increase or decrease the basic interest rate in an attempt to control inflation or foster economic growth. Increases in the base interest rate could adversely affect our results of operations, increasing the cost of certain funding. Additionally, a return to a high inflation environment would also undermine Peru’s foreign competitiveness, with negative effects on the level of economic activity and employment, while increasing our operating costs and adversely impacting our operating margins. As of December 31, 2022, the rate of inflation was 8.46%, compared to 6.43% in the year ended December 31, 2021. In response to this spike in inflation, during 2022, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru increased the reference rate 12 times, from 2.50% to 7.50%.

The stability of the Peruvian financial system depends on public confidence in Peruvian banking and financial institutions.

Financial institutions, including Interbank and Interseguro, depend on public confidence in the Peruvian financial system. In the event of adverse developments affecting Peru’s economic, political or social conditions or if a bank faces liquidity problems, the general public may withdraw deposits and savings from the troubled bank or from banks generally, thereby precipitating a liquidity crisis, as occurred in Peru in the late 1990s.

If depositors withdraw significant holdings from banks generally, including Interbank, there will be a substantial adverse impact on the manner in which financial institutions, including Interbank and Interseguro, conduct their business, on their ability to operate as financial intermediaries and on their financial condition, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Peruvian economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in regional or global markets.

Financial and securities markets in Peru are influenced by economic and market conditions in regional or global markets. Although economic conditions vary from country to country, investors’ perceptions of the events occurring in one country may adversely affect cash flows and securities from issuers in other countries, including Peru. For example, the Peruvian economy was adversely affected by the political and economic events that occurred in several emerging economies in the 1990s, including in Mexico in 1994, which impacted the fair value of securities issued by companies from markets throughout Latin America. The crisis in the Asian markets beginning in 1997 also negatively affected markets throughout Latin America. Similar adverse consequences resulted from the economic crisis in Russia in 1998, the Brazilian devaluation in 1999 and the Argentine crisis in 2001. In addition, Peru’s economy continues to be affected by events in the economies of its major regional partners and in developed economies that are trading partners or that affect the global economy.

The 2008 and 2009 global financial and economic crisis, principally driven by the subprime mortgage market in the United States, substantially affected the international financial system, including Peru’s securities market and economy. Additionally, the debt crisis in Europe, which began with the financial crises in Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, reduced the confidence of foreign investors, which caused volatility in the securities markets and affected the ability of companies to obtain financing globally. Doubts about the pace of global growth, particularly in the United States, contributed to already weak international growth in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Moreover, Brexit and regional developments in China and other Asian countries, as well as the market turmoil generated by the recent bank failures in the United States, and the emergency sale of Credit Suisse have contributed to increased volatility and uncertainty in a number of financial markets. In addition, the announcement of rate increases by the U.S. Federal Reserve, the trade war between the United States and China, and, while our direct exposure to Russia is limited, Russia’s large-scale continued military invasion of Ukraine, among other factors, had an impact on the Peruvian economy by adding inflationary pressures, including in respect of high food and energy prices.

Any interruption to the recovery of the developed economies, the continued effects of the global crises, a worsening or resurgence of the debt crisis in Europe, impacts due to Brexit, a new geopolitical tension in Europe resulting in economic and/or financial crisis, or new bank failures in the United States, Peru or other countries, or a combination of the above, could affect the Peruvian economy, and consequently, materially adversely affect our business. Our business is particularly sensitive to economic and market conditions which affect products of various export industries, including textile, fishing, and agriculture. In addition, we are active in the real estate sector, which can also be highly sensitive to macroeconomic developments. Although we have relatively little exposure to the mining sector, a decline in commodity prices could negatively affect the Peruvian economy as a whole. Any increase in the number of delinquencies or defaults would result in higher levels of non-performing assets and provisions for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, adverse developments in regional or global markets or an increase in the perceived risks associated with investing in emerging markets in the future could adversely affect the Peruvian economy and, as a result, adversely affect our businesses.

Finally, COVID-19 has affected the economy of some of our main trade partners, such as China, the United States and the European Union, which in turn negatively impacted Peru’s revenues from trade activity in 2020 despite the related increase in commodity prices which supported growth in trade activity in 2021 and 2022. Furthermore, other adverse developments in regional or global markets or an increase in the perceived risks associated with investing in emerging markets in the future could adversely affect the Peruvian economy and, as a result, adversely affect our businesses. Moreover, the high inflation combined with the interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve of the United States have impacted our liquidity in the capital markets. The dollar volatility may adversely affect the sol.

A decline in the prices of certain commodities in the international markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In 2022, traditional exports, in particular mineral products, fishing products, agricultural products and petroleum and its derivatives, represented 71.9% of Peru’s total exports compared to 73.8% in 2021, according to the Central Reserve Bank of Peru figures. A decline in commodity prices in the international markets, especially traditional minerals which represented 57.3% and 62.8% of exports by value in 2022 and 2021, respectively, may have an adverse impact on government finances, which could affect both investor confidence and the sustainability of government expenditure and social programs. Thus, a decline in commodity prices could, ultimately, affect the political environment in Peru, especially as regional and local governments are particularly reliant on tax revenue from mining concerns. By potentially affecting private sector demand and investor confidence, lower commodity prices could also affect the banking and insurance sector, leading to, for example, lower credit demand, deteriorating asset quality and currency devaluation. A decline in commodity prices could also materially affect the finances of some of our clients that rely on revenue from natural resources.

The market volatility generated by distortions in the international financial markets may affect the Peruvian capital markets and the Peruvian banking system.

The global financial and economic crisis of 2008 and 2009 adversely affected and increased the volatility of the performance of the Lima Stock Exchange. In recent years, the Lima Stock Exchange has experienced increased participation from local and international retail investors that react rapidly to the effects from international markets. The general index of the Lima Stock Exchange increased by 1.4% in both 2020 and 2021 and increased by 1.0% in 2022. Volatility in the international markets may adversely affect the Peruvian capital markets and could therefore impact our ability to raise funds from local capital markets at a level necessary to fund our operations.

Although the Peruvian banking system has not experienced any significant liquidity problems in recent years, primarily because the major source of funds for local banks, including Interbank, is represented by the deposit base, future market volatility may affect do so. The occurrence of such volatility could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The operations of Interbank, Interseguro, Interfondos, Inteligo SAB and Izipay could be adversely affected by earthquakes, floodings or other natural disasters.

Peru is affected by El Niño, an oceanic and atmospheric phenomenon that causes a warming of temperatures in the Pacific Ocean, resulting in heavy rains off the coast of Peru and various other effects in other parts of the world. The effects of El Niño, which typically occurs every two to seven years, include flooding and the destruction of fish populations and agriculture, and it accordingly can have a negative impact on Peru’s economy. For example, in early 2017, El Niño adversely affected agricultural production, transportation services, tourism and commercial activity, caused widespread damage to infrastructure and displaced people and resulted in a 1.5% drop in GDP growth in 2017 relative to 2016 figures. The Peruvian government estimated that El Niño caused U.S.$2.8 billion in damages in affected regions in the first half of 2017. In particular, El Niño has affected and could in the future affect our loan activity and asset quality, as loan agreements typically allow borrowers to extend payments for a certain amount of time due to El Niño and it could ultimately affect their payment capacity when the extensions run out. Most recently, on March 15, 2022, heavy rainfall led to floods and landslides in the town of Retamas, La Libertad, which caused the destruction of many homes and caused several deaths.

Peru is also located in an area that experiences seismic activity and occasionally is affected by earthquakes. For example, in 2007, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.9 on the Richter scale struck the central coast of Peru, severely damaging the region south of Lima, and on May 26, 2019, an earthquake with a magnitude of 8.0 struck a remote part of the Amazon in Peru, resulting in collapsed buildings, power failures and two reported deaths. Although Interbank’s, Interseguro’s, Inteligo’s and Izipay’s headquarters and financial stores in Peru have not been materially affected by an earthquake, a major earthquake could damage the infrastructure necessary to their operations.

Although we have insured against damage caused by an earthquake and other natural disasters, accidents and other similar events (including coverage for losses due to resulting business interruption), the occurrence of an earthquake in particular and any other natural disasters in general could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and we may be subject to further requirements from the SBS in order to provide temporary measures for the victims of the natural disasters, such as re-scheduling their credit payments. Further, any natural disaster will increase the probability of Interseguro having to pay the corresponding indemnification to customers under insurance policies that Interseguro sold, which would negatively affect its operating margins.

Corruption and ongoing high profile corruption investigations may hinder the growth of the Peruvian economy and have a negative impact on our business and operations.

Starting in 2018, Peru has suffered a series of government institutional crises due to, among other things, several corruption scandals involving prominent political figures, which have resulted in resignations and impeachment of various presidents since then, including most recently former President Jose Pedro Castillo in December 2022 following an attempted coup, as well as investigations of certain members of the judicial system and the public ministry who are now facing prosecution. See “—Economic, social and political developments in Peru, including political instability, inflation and unemployment, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses”.

In addition, several corruption scandals regarding authorities at municipal, regional and national government levels are also ongoing, and former and current government officials have been detained. Relatedly, Peruvian authorities are currently conducting several high-profile corruption investigations relating to the activities of certain Brazilian companies and their Peruvian partners in the construction and infrastructure sectors, which have resulted in suspension or delay of important infrastructure projects, which were otherwise operational and permitted. Due to the cooperation agreement signed between the Peruvian government and Odebrecht S.A. in 2019, additional investigations and/or corruption scandals may arise. In recent years, similar corruption scandals have taken place in the majority of Peruvian public institutions, with the involvement of political authorities. We cannot predict how these or future corruption scandals or investigations may affect the Peruvian economy, hinder the growth of the Peruvian economy and indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in tax laws may increase our tax liabilities and, as a result, have a material and adverse effect on us.

The Peruvian government regularly implements changes to its tax regulations and interpretations. Potential changes may include modifications in the taxable events, the taxable bases or the tax rates, or the enactment of temporary taxes that, in some cases, could become permanent taxes. The Peruvian government has introduced several changes related, among others, to thin capitalization rules (which prevents companies from deducting interests for tax purposes when certain thresholds are exceeded) and to the general anti-avoidance rule or GAAR (which entitles the tax and customs national superintendency to challenge the taxation of certain transactions with a substance-over-form criteria).

On October 27, 2021, President Castillo introduced a bill (N° 583/2021-PE) to the Peruvian Congress, which proposed to delegate to the executive branch the authority to regulate for a 90-day period, certain tax, fiscal, financial and economic matters. This bill was approved and ratified into law as Law No. 31380 on December 27, 2021. During such 90-day period various subsidies and reforms to certain financial system regulations were passed. However, there is no certainty that the current President Dina Boluarte will continue to pursue similar measures or return to business-friendly and open-market economic policies that stimulate economic growth and stability during her term. The effects of any tax reform that could be proposed in the future and any other changes that could result from the enactment of additional reform or changes in interpretation have not been, and cannot be, quantified. Any changes to the Peruvian tax regime or interpretation thereof may result in an increase of our and our subsidiaries’ tax liabilities and/or overall compliance costs, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, such political uncertainty, or actual policies implemented by the Peruvian government, could also impact interest rates and currency volatility, as well as adversely and materially affect the Peruvian economy, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The dollarization of the Peruvian economy hampers monetary policy, which in turn may have an effect on our business.

Dollarization generally refers to the degree to which the U.S. dollar has displaced the sol in the economy. Despite the positive effect that it may have on reducing cross-border transaction costs and preserving purchasing power, the dollarization of the Peruvian economy has also hampered monetary policy by undermining the Central Reserve Bank of Peru’s ability to control the money supply. Despite the government’s efforts to “solarize” the economy, the high degree of dollarization of the economy affects the Peruvian financial system by forcing the Central Reserve Bank of Peru to establish high levels of reserve requirements in U.S. dollars while also adding a risk to participating banks’ balance sheets, including Interbank. An appreciation of the U.S. dollar poses a risk to us and a systemic risk to the Peruvian financial system because of the levels of U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities in the Peruvian financial system. This risk comes from the potential imbalance that a bank’s clients may experience when borrowing in U.S. dollars and earning in soles. As a result, the SBS has been enacting rules aimed to make banks capable of identifying clients with potential imbalances and establishing reserves if necessary.

Under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, all financial institutions regulated by the SBS (except for small-business development non-bank institutions) are required to maintain a legal reserve (encaje) for certain obligations. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru may require additional and marginal reserves. The exact level and method of calculation of the reserve requirement is set by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, which has issued different sets of regulations for foreign and local currency-denominated obligations of banks. We cannot assure you that the Central Reserve Bank of Peru will not increase the base rate or impose additional requirements in the future, or that such changes in the regulatory environment will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Relating to the Common Shares

There may be a lack of liquidity and market for our common shares.

An active and liquid market for our common shares may not be maintained. Active, liquid trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and respond more efficiently to orders from investors to purchase or sell securities. Liquidity of a securities’ market is often a function of the volume of the underlying shares that are publicly-held by unrelated parties. Our common shares are listed on the Lima Stock Exchange, which is generally a less liquid trading market than the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Moreover, on March 31, 2023, IFS` shareholders have approved the creation of a share repurchase program for an amount of up to US$100 million of our common shares which, if carried out, would reduce the amount of our common shares available for trading and thus their liquidity.

In addition, investing in securities traded in emerging market countries, such as Peru, frequently involves a greater degree of risk when compared to investments in securities of issuers located in international securities markets with more stable economic conditions and are generally considered being more speculative in nature.

These factors affect the ability of holders of our common to sell common shares at a desirable price and time, which could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common shares. In the event an active and liquid market for our common shares does not develop or is not maintained, the market price of our common shares that could be negatively impacted.

The price of our common shares may be volatile.

The trading price of our common shares may fluctuate substantially and may be higher or lower than the price holders of our common shares pay, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause holders of our common shares to lose part or all of their investment in our common shares. The factors that could cause fluctuations include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

overall price and volume fluctuations affecting the stock exchanges on which our common shares are listed, including financial market volatility as a result of Russia’s continued large-scale military invasion of Ukraine;

•

financial market volatility and market turmoil associated with the failure of two U.S. banks and the emergency sale of Credit Suisse or similar developments in the financial industry;

•

significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of banking or insurance company securities generally, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies;

•

actual or anticipated changes in our earnings, fluctuations in our operating results or the failure to meet the expectations of financial market analysts and investors;

•

risks relating to the global economy and the economies of the United States, Peru and the other countries in which we operate;

•

investors’ perceptions of the banking and insurance industries in general and our company in particular;

•

potential differences between our actual financial condition and results of operations and those expected by investors;

•

additions or departures of key management personnel;

•

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, divestitures, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

•

increase in interest rates in Peru and the United States;

•

reputational issues;

•

the operating and stock performance of comparable companies;

•

general economic conditions and trends;

•

catastrophic events;

•

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretation or principles;

•

regulatory changes;

•

loss of external funding sources; or

•

sales of large blocks of our stock or sales by insiders.

We may raise additional capital in the future through the issuance of equity securities, which may result in dilution of the interests of our shareholders.

We may need to raise additional capital and may opt for obtaining such capital through the public or private placement of common shares or securities convertible into our common shares. Our articles of incorporation do not provide for preemptive rights for our shareholders in the event of a public or private equity raise, or financing through the issuance of securities convertible into our common shares, such additional funds may dilute the percentage interests of investors in our common shares.

As of December 31, 2022, our controlling shareholder (Intercorp Peru) owned, directly and indirectly, 70.64% of our outstanding capital stock. Actions by Intercorp Peru with respect to the disposition of any of our common shares that it beneficially owns or the perception that such actions will occur, may negatively affect the trading price of our common shares.

In addition, Intercorp Peru has and will continue to have the ability to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors and thus determine our business strategies, as well as determine the outcome of actions that require shareholder approval, including the approval of mergers and other extraordinary transactions and the payment of dividends. The controlling shareholder of Intercorp Peru may have interests that differ from those of the holders of our common shares and may take actions that may be adverse to their interests. The concentration of ownership may also delay, prevent or deter a change in control of our company, could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common shares as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common shares.

In addition, we and our subsidiaries engage in numerous related party transactions with companies controlled by Intercorp Peru as well as other affiliated companies. Although Peruvian, Panamanian and Bahamian law regulate the amount of credit exposure our subsidiaries are permitted to have with our related parties, conflicts of interest may arise in the future. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions.”

Holders of our common shares may have fewer and less well-defined rights than shareholders of a company organized in other jurisdictions, such as the United States.

We are a sociedad anónima (corporation) organized under the laws of Panama. Our corporate affairs are governed by our organizational documents and the laws of Panama. Under such documents and laws, our shareholders, and therefore holders of our common shares, may have fewer or less well-defined rights than they might have as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in other jurisdictions, such as in the United States.

Holders of our common shares may have difficulty enforcing judgments against us, our officers and directors.

Substantially all of our directors, officers and certain of the experts named herein reside outside the United States, and all or substantial portions of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of our securities to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or upon us, including with respect to matters arising under the federal securities laws of the United States, or to enforce against such persons or against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

We have been advised by our Peruvian counsel that any final and conclusive judgment for a fixed and final sum obtained against us in any foreign court having jurisdiction in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against us for the enforcement of any obligations assumed under our outstanding securities or this Annual Report on Form 20-F would, upon request, will be deemed valid and enforceable in Peru through an exequatur judiciary proceeding (which does not involve the reopening of the case),

provided that (a) there is a treaty in effect between the country where said foreign court sits and Peru regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments or, (b) in the absence of such a treaty, the original judgment is recognized by Peruvian Courts (Cortes de la República del Perú) under such exequatur proceeding, subject to the provisions of the Peruvian Civil Code and the Peruvian Civil Procedure Code, provided further, that the following conditions and requirements are met: (i) the foreign judgment does not resolve matters under the exclusive jurisdiction of Peruvian Courts, (ii) such foreign court had jurisdiction under its own conflicts of law rules and under general principles of international law on jurisdiction, (iii) the defendant was adequately served and was guaranteed due process under the laws of the jurisdiction of the issuing court, (iv) the foreign judgment has the status of res judicata in the jurisdiction of the court rendering such judgment, (v) there is no pending litigation in Peru between the same parties for the same dispute, which shall have been initiated before the commencement of the proceeding that concluded with such foreign judgment, (vi) the foreign judgment is not incompatible with another judgment that fulfills the requirements of recognition and enforceability established by Peruvian law unless such foreign judgment was rendered first, (vii) the foreign judgment is not contrary to public order (orden público) or good morals (buenas costumbres), (viii) it has not been proven that such foreign court denies enforcement of Peruvian judgments or engages in a review of the merits thereof, (ix) the judgment has been (a) duly apostilled by the competent authority of the jurisdiction of the issuing court, in case of jurisdictions that are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention and has not opposed Peru’s accession thereto, or (b) certified by Peruvian consular authorities, in case of jurisdictions that are not parties to the Hague Apostille Convention, or then being a signatory country, opposed Peru’s accession thereto and is accompanied by a certified and officially translated copy of such judgment into Spanish, and (x) the applicable court taxes and filing fees have been paid.

We have been advised by our Panamanian counsel that there is uncertainty as to the enforceability in original actions in Panamanian courts of liabilities predicated solely on the U.S. federal securities laws and as to the enforceability in Panamanian courts of judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. There is no existing treaty between the United States and Panama for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments of courts outside Panama, including without limitation, judgments of U.S. courts. Panamanian courts, however, have enforced judgments rendered in the United States based on legal principles of reciprocity and comity. We have been advised by our Panamanian counsel that judgments rendered by foreign courts may only be recognized and enforced by the courts of Panama in the event that the Supreme Court of Panama validates such judgment by the issuance of a writ of exequatur. Subject to a writ of exequatur, any final judgment rendered by any U.S. court will be recognized, conclusive and enforceable in the courts of Panama without reconsideration of the merits, provided that: (i) such foreign court grants reciprocity to the enforcement of judgments of the courts of Panama; (ii) the party against which the judgment was rendered was personally served (service by mail not being sufficient) in such action within such foreign jurisdiction; (iii) the judgment arises out of a personal action against the defendant; (iv) the obligation in respect of which the judgment was rendered is lawful in Panama and does not contradict the public policy of Panama; (v) the judgment is properly authenticated by diplomatic or consular officers of Panama or pursuant to the 1961 Hague Convention on the Legalization of Documents; and (vi) a copy of the final judgment is translated into Spanish by a licensed translator in Panama. We have no reason to believe that any of our obligations relating to the shares would be contrary to Panamanian law.

The laws of Peru and Panama may not be as favorable to the interests of holders of our common shares as the laws of jurisdictions with which they are familiar. The application of these laws, or any conflict among them, could call into question what and how the laws of each jurisdiction should apply.

In addition, our articles of incorporation contain a general indemnification provision for our officers and directors for any loss, change or payment arising out of any claim or right of action, both individually and on our behalf, against any of them. Directors and officers and their successors and their property will be compensated for and kept safe, during the time devoted to the Company in relation to any of the affairs thereof, from any action, costs, charges, losses, damages and expenses which any of them may incur or sustain by reason of any act or omission done in the performance of their duties, and none of them will be liable for the acts, neglect or omissions of others, even if his signature or action has been provided as internal or external requirement. The indemnity provision does not cover any damage or loss resulting from malice or inexcusable negligence on the part of any of our officers or directors.

Judgments of Peruvian courts with respect to our common shares will be payable only in soles.

If proceedings are brought in the courts of Peru seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of our common shares, we will not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than soles. Under Peruvian exchange control limitations, an obligation in Peru to pay amounts denominated in a currency other than soles may be satisfied in Peruvian currency only at the exchange rate, as determined by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, in effect on the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations through the effective payment date. The then prevailing exchange rate may not afford non-Peruvian investors with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under our common shares.

We are subject to different corporate disclosure and accounting standards than those holders of our common shares may be familiar with in the United States.

As a corporation organized under the laws of Panama, our corporate affairs are governed by the laws of Panama. In addition, as our common shares are listed on the Lima Stock Exchange and the majority of our subsidiaries’ operations are in Peru, we follow Panamanian and most Peruvian practices concerning corporate governance and intend to continue to do so. Financial reporting and securities disclosure requirements in Panama and Peru differ in certain significant respects from those required in the United States. There are also material differences among IFRS, SBS GAAP and U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the information about us available to holders of our common shares will not be the same as the information available to holders of shares issued by a U.S. company.

In addition, the Peruvian Securities Market Law, which governs open or publicly listed companies, such as us, imposes disclosure requirements that are more limited than those in the U.S. in certain important respects. Although Peruvian law imposes restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, applicable Peruvian laws are different from those in the United States, and the Peruvian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets.

We could be considered a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences for U.S. investors.

Based on our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, relevant market and shareholder data and our current business plans, we believe that we will not be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2022 and current taxable years, and we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC in the future. Characterization as a PFIC could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to holders of our common shares if they are U.S. investors. Certain elections may be available to mitigate the consequences if we are treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

One or more of our subsidiaries could be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As discussed in more detail in “Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations,” U.S. investors face unique U.S. tax issues from indirectly owning interests in a PFIC that may result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to them. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our results of operations and the price of our common shares could be adversely affected.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation. We can provide no assurance that from time to time we will not identify concerns that could require remediation. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations in the future. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified opinion regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in subsequent years as required by Section 404, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our common shares.

Failure to comply with Section 404 could also potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the NYSE or other regulatory authorities.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members or executive officers.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements, such as those to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, and related rules implemented by the SEC. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing and we expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we

may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our executive officers and may divert management’s attention. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our common shares, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation which may adversely affect us.

Our status as a foreign private issuer allows us to follow alternate standards to the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, which may limit the protections afforded to investors.

We are a “foreign private issuer” within the meaning of the NYSE corporate governance standards. Under NYSE rules, a foreign private issuer may elect to comply with the practices of its home country and not comply with certain corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. companies with securities listed on the exchange. We currently follow certain Panamanian and most Peruvian practices concerning corporate governance and intend to continue to do so. Accordingly, holders of our common shares will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

For example, the NYSE listing standards provide that the board of directors of a U.S. listed company must have a majority of independent directors at the time the company ceases to be a “controlled company”. The listing standards for the NYSE also require that U.S. listed companies, at the time they cease to be “controlled companies,” have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee (in addition to an audit committee). Each of these committees must consist solely of independent directors and must have a written charter that addresses certain matters specified in the listing standards. Under both Panamanian and Peruvian law, companies may, but are not required to, form special governance committees, which may be composed partially or entirely of non-independent directors. In addition, NYSE rules require the independent non-executive directors of U.S. listed companies to meet on a regular basis without management being present. There is no similar requirement under Peruvian and Panamanian law.

The NYSE’s listing standards also require U.S. listed companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. In December 2013, the SMV published the new Code of Good Governance for Peruvian Companies. Although we have implemented most of these measures, those principles are not mandatory and therefore we are not legally required to comply with the corporate governance guidelines but are required to disclose whether or not we are in compliance. We are fully compliant with Panamanian corporate law and are part of the Index of Good Corporate Governance (Índice de Buen Gobierno Corporativo) maintained by the Lima Stock Exchange.

If securities or industry analysts do not actively follow our business, or if they publish unfavorable research about our business, the price and trading volume of our common shares could decline.

The trading market for our common shares will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our common shares or publishes unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common shares could decrease, which could cause the price and trading volume of our common shares to decline.

Future offerings of debt or preferred securities may limit our operating and financial flexibility and may materially adversely affect the market price of, and dilute the value of, the common shares.

If we decide to issue debt or preferred securities in the future or otherwise incur indebtedness, it is possible that these debt or preferred securities or indebtedness will be governed by an indenture or credit agreement or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility and limiting our ability to make distributions to holders of the common shares. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges, including with respect to distributions, more favorable than those of the common shares and may result in dilution to holders of the common shares. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering or otherwise incur indebtedness will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings or financings, any of which could materially reduce the market price of the common shares and dilute the value of the common shares.

Peruvian corporations, including our subsidiaries, may be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid Peruvian capital gains tax related to the transfer of the common shares.

Peruvian corporations, including our subsidiaries, may be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid Peruvian capital gains tax related to the transfer of shares issued by their foreign holding company.

In accordance with Peruvian income tax laws and regulations, in the case of the direct or indirect transfer by a non-Peruvian resident of shares issued by a Peruvian corporation, the Peruvian corporation whose shares were directly or indirectly transacted will be jointly liable with the non-Peruvian transferor for any unpaid capital gain tax obligations (plus accrued interest and penalties) arising from such sale/purchase, if during any of the 12 months preceding the transaction, inter alia, (i) the non-Peruvian transferor held an indirect or direct interest of more than 10% in the equity of the Peruvian corporation that issued the shares being directly or indirectly transferred, or (ii) the non-Peruvian transferor and the Peruvian corporation that issued the shares being transferred consolidate financial statements , or (iii) the non-Peruvian transferor and Peruvian corporation have had common directors / managers / or administrators that have power of decision in the financial, operational or commercial agreements, or (iv) the non-Peruvian transferor has dominant influence on the decisions of the administrative bodies of the Peruvian corporation, or vice versa. If such a transfer were to occur and the resulting Peruvian capital gains tax were not paid by the transferor, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A.	History and Development of the Company

Our legal name is Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and we are organized as a corporation (sociedad anónima) under the laws of Panama since 2006. Our principal executive offices are located at Av. Carlos Villarán 140, 5th Floor, Urbanización Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Peru. Our telephone number is +(511) 615-9011. Our website is www.ifs.com.pe.

We are the majority owner and controlling shareholder of our subsidiaries, Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and Izipay, which comprise our banking, insurance, wealth management and payments segments, respectively. We are responsible for coordinating, supervising and establishing their strategy and management policies. In 2007, we conducted an initial public offering of our common shares publicly in Peru and privately outside of Peru. Our parent company is Intercorp Peru, a holding company for a group of companies operating mainly in Peru under the name “Intercorp”. Intercorp Peru’s main subsidiaries include our company and Intercorp Retail. Intercorp Retail acts as a holding company for the retail and real estate operations of Intercorp Peru in Peru. As of December 31, 2022, Intercorp Peru owns, directly and indirectly, 70.65% of IFS’ capital stock.

Interbank is an open-stock corporation (sociedad anónima abierta). Interbank was incorporated in Lima, Peru in 1897 and formerly conducted business under the names “Banco Internacional del Perú S.A.” and “Interbank”. In August 1994, as part of the government’s privatization efforts, 91% of Interbank’s share capital was acquired by Corporación Interbank, which subsequently transferred its holdings in Interbank to the Rodríguez-Pastor family through Intercorp Peru, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas that is listed on the Lima Stock Exchange. After Interbank’s acquisition by Intercorp Peru in 1994, Interbank began conducting business under the name “Interbank” as part of a rebranding and modernization effort, and has become a leading universal bank in Peru. As of December 31, 2022, IFS holds 99.30% of the capital stock of Interbank.

Interseguro is a corporation (sociedad anónima) that was incorporated in 1998 by Intercorp Peru, pursuant to an agreement between Intercorp Peru and The Bankers Trust Company (“Bankers Trust”) (at the time the controlling shareholder of Consorcio Nacional de Seguros S.A., the largest insurer in Chile) to benefit from the expansion of the insurance business in Peru. In connection with the sale of Bankers Trust to Deutsche Bank AG in 1999, Bankers Trust’s interest in Interseguro was sold to a group of Chilean investors, and in 2000 Intercorp Peru acquired the portion of Interseguro that it did not own.

On May 31, 2017, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Sura Asset Management Company (“SUAM”) and “Grupo Wiese” to acquire 100% of the capital stock of Seguros Sura S.A. (“Seguros Sura”) and Hipotecaria Sura Empresa Administradora Hipotecaria S.A. (“Hipotecaria Sura”) (the “Sura Acquisition”) for an initial base price of U.S.$268 million. The transaction became effective on November 2, 2017 and the approval by SBS was granted on September 28, 2017. This merger consolidated Interseguro’s leadership in the annuities market, as well as strengthened its position in credit life insurance.

Inteligo was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama in 2006. Inteligo Bank is a corporation that was incorporated in 1995 in The Bahamas and formerly conducted business under the names of Interbank Overseas Ltd. and Blubank Ltd. Inteligo SAB is a corporation (sociedad anónima) that started operations in 1993. On July 18, 2014, the board of directors of IFS approved the acquisition of Inteligo, effective on August 1, 2014. This reorganization entailed the acquisition of 100% of Intercorp Peru’s shares in Inteligo by IFS in exchange for 19.5 million IFS common shares. Inteligo SAB is organized under the laws of Peru, and is licensed by the SMV to operate in Peru and conduct brokerage, custody, portfolio management and advisory services.

Interfondos S.A., Sociedad Administradora de Fondos (“Interfondos”) is a corporation (sociedad anónima) that started operations in 1994. It is organized under the laws of Peru and is licensed by the SMV to operate in Peru and conduct mutual funds and investment funds management services.

In January 2019, we announced the consolidation of our wealth management activities at Inteligo by transferring Interbank’s mutual funds subsidiary, Interfondos, to Inteligo, where asset management is the core business.

In July 2019 we, together with Interbank, Intercorp Peru and a non-related shareholder conducted a SEC-registered initial public offering as a result of which IFS sold 1,150,000 newly-issued common shares and 2,418,754 treasury common shares (including shares sold by Interbank), Intercorp Peru sold 2,531,246 common shares and the non-related shareholder sold 3,000,000 common shares. In addition, the underwriters partially exercised their option to purchase 1,350,000 additional shares, which resulted in the purchase of 1,186,841 newly-issued common shares.

While Interbank has owned 50% of PMP and its subsidiary Izipay for more than a decade, in April 2022, we acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest of PMP and its subsidiary Izipay, consolidating such subsidiaries into our corporate group and creating our payments segment.

Since 2008, we have delivered returns for our shareholders supported by a strong bottom-line generation. In 2022, we paid U.S.$202.0 million in dividends based on 2021 results. In 2021, we paid U.S.$88.9 million in dividends based on 2020 results.Furthermore, in November 2021, IFS agreed to distribute U.S.$75.0 million in extraordinary dividends, which were paid in December 2021 and based on retained earnings. In 2023, we will pay U.S.$136.2 million in dividends based on 2022 results. In addition, our market capitalization has increased from U.S.$1.2 billion in 2007 to U.S.$2.7 billion as of December 31, 2022, based on a price of U.S.$23.50 per share, as reported by the NYSE on the same date.

On March 31, 2023, IFS` shareholders have approved the creation of a share repurchase program for an amount of up to US$100 million of our common shares.

We also continue to make significant digital and physical infrastructure capital expenditure investments in our different segments. For a description of our capital expenditures, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures Program”.

The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The materials included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be downloaded at the SEC’s website: http://www.sec.gov. Any filings we make are also available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website and at our website at https://www.ifs.com.pe. (This URL and other URLs in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are intended to be inactive textual references only. None are intended to be active hyperlinks to websites. Any information which might be accessible through a hyperlink referenced from any URL referenced in this report, is not and shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

B.	Business Overview

Overview

IFS is a leading provider of banking, insurance, wealth management services and payments for retail customers and commercial clients in Peru. Our purpose is to empower all Peruvians to achieve financial well-being, and as such, we have built an integrated financial services platform in the fast-growing, underpenetrated and profitable Peruvian financial system. We have invested in building a leading and scalable digital platform (mobile and online), which is rapidly being adopted by existing and new customers. Our digital platform is complemented by one of the largest distribution networks in the country which includes financial stores, ATMs, correspondent agents, dedicated sales forces, financial advisors, call centers and POS network.

We manage our business in four segments, banking, insurance, wealth management, and payments, which complement each other and represent diversified sources of revenue. Our banking segment operates through our subsidiary Interbank, which is the second largest provider of consumer loans in Peru, according to the SBS. Interbank provides a full range of retail banking and commercial banking products, and services to individuals, large companies, and small and medium enterprises. Our insurance segment operates through our subsidiary Interseguro, which is the leading provider of annuities in Peru by premiums and one of the leading life insurance companies in the country according to the SBS. Interseguro provides a wide range of retirement, savings, life, unemployment and other insurance products mainly to retail customers. Our wealth management segment operates mainly through our subsidiaries Inteligo Bank, Inteligo SAB and Interfondos, which together provide wealth management, private banking, financing, brokerage, advisory and other investment services mainly to high-net-worth individuals. Finally, with our acquisition of the remaining 50% ownership interest of PMP and its subsidiary Izipay in April 2022, we have created our payments segment, through which we provide an end-to-end digital ecosystem of financial services and technology solutions to enable consumers, individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants, small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), in Peru, make and process payments in a safe, seamless, digital, mobile first and affordable manner.

Our key strategic priority is to achieve digital excellence for our customers by providing them with a world-class, flexible and secure digital platform. We believe our digital transformation is vital to our continued growth and profitability, and for this reason we have been investing in developing the capabilities necessary to offer digital products and services to our customers. In December 2022, more than 5,306,100 retail customers used our digital platform compared to more than 600,000 retail customers in December 2017. More than 2,175,500 retail customers no longer utilize physical channels other than ATMs or POSs as of December 2022. We are aiming to allow our customers to have a 100% digital relationship with us in an efficient and secure manner. We have also streamlined our physical presence and reduced the number of branches by approximately 43.4% since its peak in 2016, focusing on educating our customers in the use of our digital platform. To accompany this transformation, we are in the process of redesigning our physical presence in order to better serve the evolving needs of our customers. We have substantially increased migration of low-value-added transactions to more efficient digital channels, and we have increased sales of products to existing customers, as well as increased new customer acquisition of which a growing number are being acquired digitally or “born-digital.”

We aim to be the company that best knows the needs of Peruvians. Our advanced analytics and technology capabilities continue to be enriched with new sources of data and new tools that technology offers, such as cloud, real-time decision, machine learning and artificial intelligence. We believe that a deep knowledge of our current and potential customers allows us to offer them the best solutions for their financial needs across our banking, insurance, wealth management and payments segments. Through this deep knowledge we have also been able to enhance our risk models, helping us to propel growth and continue to improve our profitability.

The following table shows the evolution of our reported net profit, dividends, ROE and ROA and our adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA (if any), from 2020 through 2022:


	For the years ended December 31,
	2022		2022			2021			2020
	(U.S. $ in millions)⁽³⁾		(S/ in millions)
Net profit		438.0		1,670.7			1,800.2			383.5
Adjusted net profit⁽¹⁾		379.7		1,448.1			—			—
Dividends declared for the year⁽²⁾		136.2		511.8			751.5			332.1
ROE		—		17.7	%		19.3	%		4.5	%
Adjusted ROE⁽¹⁾		—		15.4	%		—			—
ROA		—		1.9	%		2.0	%		0.5	%
Adjusted ROA⁽¹⁾		—		1.7	%		—			—

(1)

Adjusted net profit, adjusted ROA and adjusted ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022 exclude other income of S/222.5 million from the fair value adjustment of the 50% ownership interest held by Interbank in Izipay before the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022 (See Note 1(d) to our Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements). Adjusted net profit, adjusted ROA and adjusted ROE are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net profit, ROA or ROE, or other performance measures. See “Presentation of Financial Information—Non-GAAP financial measures” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” We did not adjust net profit, ROA or ROE for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

(2)

Dividends are declared and paid in U.S. dollars. Except for declaration and payment of extraordinary dividends, dividends declared for fiscal year 2022 will be paid in 2023, dividends declared in 2021 and 2020 were paid in 2022 and 2021 and amounted to U.S.$ 202.0 million and U.S.$89 million, respectively. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and dividends policy”.

(3)	Amounts stated in U.S. dollars as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 have been translated from soles at the exchange rate of S/3.814 = U.S.$1.00.

As of December 31, 2022, we had total assets of S/87.5 billion (approximately U.S.$22.9 billion), total gross loans of S/47.0 billion (approximately U.S.$12.3 billion), total deposits and obligations of S/48.5 billion (approximately U.S.$12.7 billion) and shareholders’ equity of S/10.0 billion (approximately U.S.$2.6 billion).

For the year ended December 31, 2022, our consolidated net profit was S/1,670.7 million as compared to S/1,800.2 million in 2021. Net profit deteriorated in 2022 mainly due to (i) higher provisions at Interbank, and (ii) lower revenues across all subsidiaries. We operate the following four business segments:

•

Banking: Interbank is the second largest provider of consumer loans in Peru with a 21.8% market share in terms of total gross consumer loans outstanding as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. Interbank is the largest provider (among non-government owned banks) of payroll deduction loans to public sector employees with a 22.3% market share as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. Additionally, it is the fourth largest bank in Peru in terms of outstanding retail mortgages and the fourth largest bank in Peru in terms of commercial lending, third in total deposits and fourth in total assets. Interbank has built one of the most convenient and extensive retail banking distribution platforms in Peru including, online banking, mobile applications, a total of 164 financial stores, 1,554 ATMs and 5,672 correspondent agents (includes external network), as of December 31, 2022.

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, Interbank represented 76.6% of our total assets.

For the 2022 fiscal year, Interbank declared a dividend of S/585.8 million (or, approximately U.S.$153.6 million) of which S/581.7 million (or, approximately U.S.$152.5 million) will be paid to IFS, which represents 85.3% of total dividends to be received by IFS.

With a significant focus on the emerging middle class, Interbank has a higher percentage of retail loans, which account for 53.6% of its total loan portfolio, compared to the banking system of 36.2% as of December 31, 2022.

Interbank’s CAGR in gross loans, and deposits and obligations between 2018 and 2022 was 8.5 % and 9.3%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Interbank reported a profit of S/1,374.1 million attributed to an increase in impairment loss on loans and increases in other income and in net fee income from financial services.

•

Insurance: Interseguro is the leading provider of annuities (excluding private annuities) in Peru, with a 30.0% market share as measured by total premiums collected during 2022, according to the SBS, and is one of the leading life insurance companies in Peru. In addition, Interseguro offers private annuities, individual life insurance, disability and survivorship insurance, as well as low premium retail insurance products, including credit life, mandatory traffic accident insurance (“SOAT”), car insurance and credit card protection insurance, through a comprehensive multi-channel distribution platform which includes Interseguro’s sales force, which is a key component of Interseguro’s sales. Interseguro also distributes through Interbank, retailers and its own digital channels. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Interseguro retooled its sales force to provide customers with a 100% remote assistance and digital operation. Prior to the pandemic, sales in annuities and life insurance products were only conducted in-person, but digitalization of these sales was accelerated.

According to the SBS, in 2022, Interseguro was the largest insurance company measured by reserves, driven both by organic growth and the acquisition of Seguros Sura in November 2017, which both improved its ROE and doubled its asset size.

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro represented 16.2% of our total assets.

For the 2022 fiscal year, Interseguro declared a dividend of S/100 million (or, approximately U.S.$26.2 million), which represents 14.7% of total dividends to be received by IFS. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s net profit was S/248.0 million and its ROE was 26.6%.

•

Wealth management: Inteligo is a provider of wealth management services, which includes banking, financing, brokerage and investing activities for high-net-worth individuals through three operating subsidiaries: Inteligo Bank, Inteligo SAB (brokerage) and Interfondos (mutual funds).

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, Inteligo represented 5.8% of our total assets.

For the 2022 fiscal year, Inteligo did not declared a dividend.

Inteligo’s CAGR in assets under management was 3.9% between 2018 and 2022. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2022, Inteligo’s net loss was S/141.4 million and ROE was 13.6%.

•

Payments: Izipay is a payments company and provider of products and services related to payments acquirer, a correspondent bank and a credit cards processor. Moreover, it provides financial services and technology solutions that enable consumers, individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants, SMEs, in Peru, to make and/or process payments in a safe, seamless, digital, mobile first and affordable manner. Izipay’s technology solutions allow it to (i) be full acquirer company, with a complete set of payment solutions through Point-of-Sale (“POS”) devices and e-commerce, (ii) provide a digital platform with proprietary solutions for business management such as self check-out,split payments, product and inventory management, business reports, anti-fraud system and CRM, among others.

As of December 31, 2022, Izipay represented 1.0% of our total assets. Since April 2022, when Izipay became a consolidated subsidiary, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/595.4 million and consolidated net profit of S/41.1 million. As a reference, for the year ended December 31, 2022, including the period prior to its acquisition, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/754.3 million and consolidated net profit of S/51.2 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Izipay’s ROE was 26.1%. For the fiscal year 2022, Izipay did not declare a dividend.

The following tables provide certain financial and other information about our four business segments for the period indicated.


						As of and for the year ended December 31, 2022
	Assets					Equity					Net Profit/(Loss)						Adjusted Net Profit/ (Loss)⁽³⁾
	(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)			%			(S/ in millions)			%
Banking		66,977.3		76.6	%		7,478.8		74.4	%		1,374.1			82.3	%		1,374.1			94.9	%
Insurance		14,134.2		16.2	%		984.2		9.8	%		248.0			14.8	%		248.0			17.1	%
Wealth management		5,102.6		5.8	%		894.2		8.9	%		(141.4	)		(8.5	%)		(141.4	)		(9.8	%)
Payments⁽¹⁾		902.6		1.0	%		216.3		2.2	%		41.1			2.5	%		41.1			2.8	%
Holding and eliminations⁽²⁾		365.9		0.4	%		472.4		4.7	%		148.8			8.9	%		(73.7	)		(5.1	%)

Total		87,482.6		100.0	%		10,046.0		100.0	%		1,670.7			100.0	%		1,448.1			100	%

(1)	Reflects information for Izipay since the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022.

(2)	Holding and eliminations corresponds to expenses of IFS and elimination of intercompany transactions.

(3)

Adjusted net profit of the holding and eliminations segment, for the year ended December 31, 2022, is calculated excluding other income of S/222.5 million from the fair value adjustment of the 50% ownership interest held by Interbank in Izipay before the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022 (See Note 1(d) to our Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements). Adjusted net profit is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net profit or other performance measures. See “Presentation of Financial Information—Non-GAAP financial measures” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” See Note 1(d) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements

The following table provides relevant information about dividends declared by each of our subsidiaries:


	SBS GAAP																	IFRS
	Interbank								Interseguro									Izipay⁽¹⁾						Inteligo Bank

	For the years ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020		2022			2021			2020			2022		2021		2020		2022			2021		2020

	(S/ in millions)																	(S/ in millions)						(U.S.$ in millions)
Net profit for the period⁽²⁾		1,171.7			1,200.5			264.9		202.8			303.6			256.6			41.1		—		—		(35.4	)		71.5		71.6
Dividends declared⁽³⁾		585.8			600.2			—		100.0			201.9			200.0			—		—		—		—			52.5		38.0
Payout ratio		50	%		50	%		—		49.3	%		66.5	%		77.9	%		—		—		—		—			73.4		53.1	%

(1)	Reflects information for Izipay since the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022. Izipay did not pay dividends in 2022.

(2)

For Interbank, Interseguro and Izipay this information is calculated using SBS GAAP. This table is presented in this manner because our Peruvian subsidiaries pay dividends to us based on SBS GAAP and Inteligo pays dividends to us on the basis of IFRS. In all cases, the information is derived from stand-alone information from each entity.

(3)	Represents dividends for the fiscal year which are declared and paid in the following year.

The following tables provide certain financial and other information about our consolidated business:


	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2022		2022		2021		2020

	(U.S.$in millions)⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		(S/ in millions)⁽²⁾
Balance Sheet and Income Statement Items
Total assets		22,937.2		87,482.6		89,953.9		88,236.0
Total gross loans		12,329.7		47,025.4		44,688.2		43,081.9
Total deposits and obligations		12,724.4		48,530.7		48,897.9		47,149.3
Total equity, net		2,634.0		10,046.0		9,555.4		8,953.9


	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2022		2022		2021		2020

	(U.S.$in millions)⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		(S/ in millions)⁽²⁾
Net profit (attributable to IFS’ shareholders)		435.4		1,660.6		1,790.2		383.3
Other Information
Adjusted net profit (attributable to IFS’ shareholders)⁽³⁾		379.7		1,448.1		—		—


	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Profitability Ratios
Net interest margin⁽⁴⁾		5.0	%		4.1	%		4.5	%
Risk adjusted NIM⁽⁵⁾		4.0	%		3.7	%		1.4	%
Efficiency ratio⁽⁶⁾		36.1	%		34.7	%		32.2	%
ROA		1.9	%		2.0	%		0.5	%
Adjusted ROA⁽³⁾		1.7	%		—			—
ROE		17.7	%		19.3	%		4.5	%
Adjusted ROE⁽³⁾		15.4	%		—			—


	2022			2021			2020
Asset Quality and Capitalization
Past-due-loans as a % of total gross loans⁽⁷⁾		3.0	%		3.5	%		3.3	%
Cost of risk⁽⁸⁾		1.8	%		0.9	%		5.8	%
Core equity Tier 1 ratio of Interbank⁽⁹⁾		12.0	%		12.5	%		11.5	%


	As of and for the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Distribution Network and Customers
Financial stores		164.0			189			215
ATMs		1,554.0			1,581			1,640
Correspondent agents (includes external network)		5,672.0			5,825			5,529
Number of digital customers⁽¹⁰⁾		2,175,532.0			1,717,394.0			1,718,005
Percentage of digital users^(10)(11)		70.9	%		65.1	%		75	%

(1)	Amounts stated in U.S. dollars as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 have been translated from soles at the exchange rate of S/3.814 = U.S.$1.00.

(2)	Except for percentages and ratios and distribution and customer data.

(3)

Adjusted net profit, adjusted ROA and adjusted ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022 exclude other income of S/222.5 million from the fair value adjustment of the 50% ownership interest held by Interbank in Izipay before the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022 (See Note 1(d) to our Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements). Adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net profit, ROE or ROA, or other performance measures. See “Presentation of Financial Information—Non-GAAP financial measures” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” We did not adjust net profit, ROA or ROE for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. See Note 1(d) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

(4)	Net interest margin is defined as (x) net interest and similar income divided by (y) average interest-earning assets. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information.”

(5)	Risk adjusted net interest margin is defined as net interest margin after impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries.

(6)	Efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing (x) salaries and employee benefits plus administrative expenses plus depreciation and amortization by (y) net interest and similar income plus net fee income from financial services plus other income plus net premiums earned.

(7)	At end of period. See “Presentation of Financial Information—Loan Portfolio Data”.

(8)	Cost of risk is defined as impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries divided by average gross loans.

(9)	Calculated for Interbank only pursuant to SBS regulations.

(10)	In the month of December for each full year.

(11)	Percentage of digital users over total clients that interact with Interbank.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, we use adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA. These measures are not calculated in accordance with IFRS and we collectively refer to these as non-GAAP financial measures. For more information, see “Presentation of Financial Information—Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.

The table below presents adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA on a consolidated basis and for each of our four business segments, if any, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. We did not adjust net profit, ROA or ROE for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


	As of December 31, 2022
	Net profit			Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Adjusted Net Profit			Average total assets		ROA			Adjusted ROA			Average total equity		ROE			Adjusted average total equity		Adjusted ROE
Banking		1,374.1			—			1,374.1			67,172.4		2.0	%		2.0	%		6,937.6		19.8	%		6,937.6		19.8	%
Insurance		248.0			—			248.0			14,215.6		1.7	%		1.7	%		933.9		26.6	%		933.9		26.6	%
Wealth Management		(141.4	)		—			(141.4	)		5,275.1		(2.7	%)		(2.7	%)		1,037.5		(13.6	%)		1,037.5		(13.6	%)
Payments		41.1			—			41.1			465.6		8.8	%		8.8	%		157.3		26.1	%		157.3		26.1	%
Holding and eliminations		148.8			(222.5	)		(73.7	)		317.4		—			—			364.1		—			319.6		—

Total		1,670.7			(222.5	)		1,448.1			87,446.0		1.9	%		1.7	%		9,430.3		17.7	%		9,385.8		15.4	%

(1)

Adjusted net profit of the holding and elimination segment, for the year ended December 31, 2022, is calculated excluding other income of S/222.5 million from the fair value adjustment of the 50% ownership interest held by Interbank in Izipay before the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022 (See Note 1(d) to our Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements). Adjusted net profit is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net profit, or other performance measures. See “Presentation of Financial Information — Non-GAAP financial measures.” See Note 1(d) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

The following table reflects the reconciliation, if any, of adjusted net profit, adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA on a consolidated basis as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

	(S/ in millions)
Net profit (A)		1,670.7			1,800.2			383.5
Gain on the fair value adjustment on the previously held ownership by Interbank in Izipay prior to acquiring control⁽¹⁾ (B)		(222.5	)		—			—
Adjusted net profit (D) = (A) + (B)		1,448.1			—			—
Average total equity (E)		9,430.3			9,309.5			8.515.1
ROE (A) / (E)		17.7	%		19.3	%		4.5	%
Adjusted average total equity (F)		9,385.8			—			—
Adjusted ROE (D) / (F)		15.4	%		—			—
Average total assets (G)		87,446.0			90,231.7			79,880.4
ROA (A) / (G)		1.9	%		2.0	%		0.5	%
Adjusted ROA (D) / (G)		1.7	%		—			—

(1)	Management believes to be non-operating and/or non-recurring in nature.

Market Opportunity

We believe that the ongoing growth of the Peruvian economy, the expanding middle class, the growth of private wealth creation in Peru, the low penetration of financial services and the well-capitalized and profitable Peruvian financial system offer significant opportunities for our continued growth despite the increased political uncertainty. Moreover, the economic impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the response measures implemented by the Peruvian government opened up new opportunities to accelerate our digital transformation and growth in deposits and loans, enabling us to efficiently acquire and serve more clients, while providing distinctive and convenient customer service and greater access and inclusion to financial services to previously underserved Peruvians.

Growing economy with solid macroeconomic fundamentals

Although the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a GDP contraction of 11.0% in 2020 in Peru (compared to contractions of 6.8% in Colombia, 6.0% in Chile, 8.2% in Mexico and 4.1% in Brazil), Peru’s GDP increased to 13.3% in 2021 (compared to growth rates of 10.6% in Colombia, 12.0% in Chile, 4.8% in Mexico, and 4.6% in Brazil). In 2022, Peru’s GDP increased to 2.7% (compared to growth rates of 7.5% in Colombia, 2.4% in Chile, 3.1% in Mexico, and 2.9% in Brazil). Moreover, prior to the pandemic, Peru’s average GDP growth rate was 3.2% between 2015 and 2019, according to the World Bank, a higher rate than those of Peru’s peer countries in Latin America during the same period (Colombia at 2.4%, Chile at 2.0%, Mexico at 2.0%, and Brazil at negative 0.6%).

The Peruvian government’s prudent management of the economy, conservative fiscal policy, coupled with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru’s cautious management of inflation and international reserves have contributed to economic development, increased internal consumption and strong macroeconomic fundamentals, including low levels of public debt, low inflation, low fiscal deficit and high levels of international reserves. However, 2022 continued to characterized by global inflationary pressures that have resulted in an inflation rate above the Central Reserve Bank of Peru’s target and higher inflation expectations for 2023 and beyond. Peru’s strong track record of macroeconomic policy credibility, consistency and ability to adapt to changes has helped it to achieve investment grade ratings of Baal by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”), BBB+ by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) and BBB by Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) as of December 31, 2022. However, in December 2022 and January 2023, S&P, Fitch and Moody’s have changed Peru’s credit outlook to negative from stable due to higher political risk. In its most recent forecast, as of March 2023, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru has estimated real GDP growth for Peru of 2.6% for 2023 and 3.0% for 2024, as compared to the 2.7% increase registered in 2022 due to higher inflation and political uncertainty.

Evolution of the middle class and affluent population

The core of our customer base is Peru’s middle class and affluent population. According to INEI, the poverty rate in Peru increased to 30% in 2022, attributed to higher inflation and low economic growth, after reaching a historical low of 20.2% in 2019, reaching levels similar to 2010 (30.8%). According to the World Bank, GDP per capita in U.S. dollars has grown from U.S.$5,082 in 2010 to U.S.$7,028 in 2019 but retreated to U.S.$6,127 in 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. GDP per capita in U.S. dollars was U.S.$6,622 in 2021 and U.S.$4,454 in 2022. For 2022, Peru had a total population of 33.5 million, and according to the Asociación Peruana de Empresas de Investigación de Mercados (APEIM), Peru’s middle and upper socioeconomic segments (segments A, B and C) have significantly expanded and, as of 2022, represented 51% of the population compared to 42% in 2010. We believe that a growing middle class and affluent population creates a greater need for financial services, particularly for increasingly sophisticated banking, insurance, wealth management and payments products. These growing socioeconomic segments support growth and profitability across our business. Additionally, based on macroeconomic trends, we expect the number of high net worth individuals in Peru and the size of their investable assets to continue to grow and further increase the market for wealth management services.

Low financial services penetration

We believe that growth potential in Peru’s financial services sector continues to be significant. Despite sustained recent growth of 7.1% CAGR in total gross loans between 2018 and 2022, banking penetration in Peru, measured as the ratio of loans-to-GDP, was 38.0% as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS and the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. This represents a decline over the 39.9% registered as of December 31, 2021 and is mainly explained by the base effect resulting from (i) lower balances of Reactiva Perú loans in 2022 as compared to 2021, and (ii) the recovery in GDP growth in 2022. However, this also represents an improvement compared to the 45.4% registered as of December 31, 2020. We believe this general increase demonstrates that it is feasible to rapidly increase financial penetration in Peru through these types of programs. Moreover, within the retail banking segment, we believe that penetration potential is even more significant in mortgages given that as of December 31, 2022, there were approximately 60.3 million mortgages outstanding in Peru for a population of approximately 33.5 million, compared to approximately 1,567.5 million mortgages outstanding in Chile for a population of approximately 19.8 million. Similarly, according to industry sources, insurance penetration in Peru, measured as the ratio of premiums-to-GDP as of December 31, 2021, is estimated to be 2.0%, which is lower than the average ratio of 3.0% for the group of peer countries in Latin America, and less than the ratio of 3.4% for Chile.

Well-capitalized financial system

As a result of sound regulation and prudent management, the Peruvian financial system is well-capitalized, according to figures published by the SBS. Gross loans in Peru (measured in soles) have grown at a CAGR of 7.1% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022, while the banking system’s asset quality has remained strong with a ratio of past-due loans as a percentage of total gross loans of 4.0% and a ratio of impairment allowance for loans as a percentage of past-due loans of 148.5% as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. Capitalization of the Peruvian banking system has consistently been well above regulatory requirements with a total capital ratio of the banking system of 14.5% as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. Interbank’s capitalization ratio was 15.1% and Interseguro’s regulatory solvency ratio was 138.7%, according to the SBS as of December 31, 2022.

Development of new technologies and distribution channels

There are many technological trends currently impacting the financial services industry worldwide. For example, the penetration of cell phones, Internet and the 5G mobile network, the ability to process large quantities of data through big data, cloud and machine learning, and the opportunity to utilize robotics and artificial intelligence. As a result, many large banks have started digital transformations with large increases in their level of technological investments and are working on developing their product offerings.

Due to improved technology, banks are now able to offer a better value proposition to their customers that include better solutions with features tailored to the customer’s needs, contextual banking (whereby the customer is offered a connected banking experience, including tailored product offerings), enhanced 24-hour customer support and access and faster approval and response times, all at a lower per capita cost. Additionally, banks are now able to reach a broader base of customers both in terms of income levels and geographic locations and will be able to gradually offer them more products and services and make them a part of the banked segment of the Peruvian population, which constitutes a very important growth opportunity in the country.

Competitive Strengths

We have established a premier financial group with leading market positions in each of our primary business segments. We believe that our market share, focus on targeted and profitable segments, scale and highly recognized and trusted brands, combined with adoption of innovative technologies, a well-structured digital platform and increasing integration across our business segments, strongly position us to capitalize on the future expansion of the Peruvian economy.

Leading financial services provider focused on retail customers and highly attractive businesses

We target retail customers and growing and profitable businesses in Peru. We have highly recognized and trusted brands in each of our segments, such as Interbank in banking, Interseguro in insurance, Inteligo in wealth management and Izipay in payments. Within our banking segment, Interbank focuses primarily on retail banking, where we believe we are able to obtain higher profitability, with 53.6% of its loan portfolio constituting retail loans, compared to 36.2% for the Peruvian banking system, as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. Interbank is the second largest provider of consumer loans among banks in Peru, with a 21.8% market share as measured by gross consumer loans as of December 31, 2022, compared with 26.0% for BCP, 15.0% for Scotiabank and 14.8% for BBVA. Interbank is also the largest privately-owned bank provider of payroll deduction loans to public sector employees, with a 22.3% market share by payroll deduction loans, in each case as of December 31, 2022.

We believe that our focus on the retail market has allowed Interbank to obtain a higher ROE than the banking system on average. This higher ROE is driven by a balanced consumer loan portfolio where two of our most profitable products are credit cards and payroll deduction loans. Interbank has the highest net interest margins when compared to the three largest banks in Peru, due to its higher weighting in retail banking and consumer loans when compared to its peers. Low delinquency rates on our payroll deduction loans reduce the overall credit risk exposure of our consumer loans portfolio.

Our commercial banking business serves a range of clients spanning large corporates, mid-corporates and small-sized and medium-sized companies (“SMEs”). We continue to focus on increasing our market share in mid-corporates and SMEs while maintaining our large corporate business with a profit-oriented approach. We believe that these segments will continue to provide additional growth opportunities in the coming years. Moreover, our overall commercial loan portfolio provides us with a lower risk component that balances our total loan portfolio.

We believe that Interseguro provides us with a fast-growing and profitable business. In our insurance segment, Interseguro is the leading provider of annuities in Peru, despite the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic and political uncertainty in Peru during 2021 and 2022, with a market share of total annuities (excluding private annuities) of 30.0% as measured by premiums collected for the year ended December 31, 2022, according to the SBS. We focus on the middle class and affluent population in Peru, a segment we believe is substantially underpenetrated in insurance services. During April 2016, the Peruvian Congress enacted a law that allowed retirees to withdraw up to 95.5% of their accumulated capital in cash in their mandatory pension account upon retirement, resulting in a significant reduction of retirement annuities sold by Peruvian insurance companies, including Interseguro. In this context, in order to keep its position as a leading provider in annuities, in 2016, Interseguro launched its private annuities product which allows retirees to receive a fixed income either for life or a fixed period. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, most of the customers of private annuities and their funds originate from retirees who choose to buy a product from an insurance company rather than from a private pension fund. Interseguro is also a leading provider of life insurance and we believe this market provides an additional opportunity for growth. Finally, the company’s digital channels are taking a leading role inside the company’s structure.

Within our wealth management segment, we believe Inteligo is well positioned to capture an increasing share of the number of high-net-worth clients. Inteligo’s CAGR in assets under management was 4.9% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022. We believe that both Inteligo’s position as a provider of tailored wealth management services and its ability to provide its customers with both local and international investment products will help increase its share of wallet among high-net-worth individuals, while delivering high levels of growth and profitability.

Within our payments segment, we believe Izipay is built on a strong foundation designed to drive growth and differentiate us from our competitors. We believe that our competitive strengths include (i) our payments platform connecting merchants and consumers enables Izipay to offer unique end-to-end product experiences while gaining valuable insights into how customers use our platform as well as providing for digital and POS transactions while being both technology and platform agnostic; (ii) our national scale which helps us to drive organic growth, as shown by the increase of merchant active accounts (merchant codes) in Peru from 0.7 million in April 2022, when Izipay became our consolidated subsidiary, to 1 million as of December 31, 2022. Since April 2022, Izipay processed S/50.8 billion in monetary transactions; and (iii) the building and strengthening of the brand Izipay.

Track record of sustained growth supported by our strong and growing market share and high profitability

Our strong track record of growth is supported by our increased market share, improvements in efficiency, and high profitability across our business segments. At Interbank, we have gained significant market share over the years. Our market share in total gross loans has increased from 9.4% in 2007, 11.1% in 2015, to 12.7% in 2022, while our market share in total deposits has grown from 9.3% in 2007, 12.1% in 2015, to 13.5% in 2022. We are focused primarily on retail banking because we believe that it presents significant growth opportunities and higher profitability. In retail banking, Interbank’s outstanding retail loans, including

consumer and mortgage loans, increased 15.0% between December 2021 and December 2022, as compared to the 15.4% increase registered for the Peruvian banking system, according to the SBS. Our market share was 21.8% in consumer loans in December 2022, the second largest in the market. In the same period, Interbank has held a strong position across retail products, with market shares of 17.3% and 18.8% of total retail loans in 2016 and December 2022, respectively, according to the SBS. With respect to mortgage loans, Interbank’s market share increased from 13.1% in 2016 to 15.4% in December 2022, according to the SBS. Interbank’s increasing market shares have been accompanied by stable profitability, with ROE averaging 16.9% compared to 14.3% for the Peruvian banking system, from 2018 to 2022. The commercial banking division at Interbank has also grown faster than the Peruvian banking system, and was recently boosted by our participation in the Reactiva Perú program. However, Interbank’s outstanding commercial loans declined 4.3% between December 2022 and December 2021, as compared to the 4.5% decrease registered for the system, according to the SBS.

Interseguro’s positioning in the industry increased, with market shares in annuities by premiums (excluding private annuities) of 22.7% in 2007, 24.5% in 2015 and 30.0% in December 2022. Interseguro’s assets increased at a CAGR of 6.2% compared to 10.1% for the Peruvian insurance industry between 2018 and 2022. Between 2018 and 2022, Interseguro’s ROE averaged 23.8% compared to 13.8% for the Peruvian insurance industry, both according to the SBS. Interseguro’s ROE was 17.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022, according to the SBS.

Inteligo’s assets under management grew at a CAGR of 4.9% between 2018 and 2022. Similarly, net profit declined between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022, due to negative mark-to-market valuation of the proprietary portfolio. Inteligo’s ROAE averaged 12.5% for the three-year period ended December 31, 2022. Inteligo’s ROAE was negative 13.6% for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Izipay’s total monetary transactions reached S/39.9 billion from April 2022, when Izipay became a consolidated subsidiary, to December 31, 2022. Izipay is one of the leaders in the physical card payment business in Peru.

Digital financial services platform with rapidly increasing levels of adoption

IFS is striving to reshape the banking space in Peru, creating a new digital experience driven by convenience and simplicity. Although we believe physical channels are still necessary in an underpenetrated financial system like Peru’s, our digital platform has substantially increased our customers’ interactions with Interbank and provided us with new business opportunities to build on consumer loyalty and cross-sell services, as well as accelerate new customer acquisition and inclusion of previously underserved segments of the population, including individuals, entrepreneurs and micro-businesses. The changes in consumer behavior and the accelerated adoption of digital solutions brought in 2020 by COVID-19 continued throughout 2021 and 2022 and our agile digital solutions framework has allowed us to more effectively capture the opportunities brought by increased digitalization. We have a broad and evolving offering of digital products and services for existing and new clients, enabling them to get what they want, when they want it, and how they want it. In 2021, we launched digital payments and credit solutions such as the capability to pay with QR Codes and access credit card information for online purchases, as well as the ability to apply and obtain personal loans and credit cards directly through our app.

We believe our digital platform is one of our competitive advantages and it has driven an increase in our market share. The migration of customer interaction from physical channels like financial stores and contact centers to digital channels, continued to grow in 2022. As of December 2022, 81.9% of Interbank’s retail customers interacted digitally with the bank, up from 78.5% in December 2021, and 100% digital customers reached 70.9% in December 2022, up from 65.1% in December 2021. Our digital transformation allows our customers to interact more frequently with us and customers’ monthly interactions through our digital platform increased substantially, from 24.8 times per month in December 2021 to 30.5 times per month in December 2022, while interactions in branches decreased from 2.22 times to 2.10 times in the same period. Our penetration of digital sales increased to 64.0% from 57.4% in December 2021, while self-service transactions decreased slightly to 69.0% from 69.3% in the same period.

In January 2020, Interbank, in collaboration with BBVA and Scotiabank, launched Plin which consists of a shared directory to enable person to person (“P2P”) and person to microbusiness (“P2MB”) payments among enrolled customers of any of the participant institutions using the customers’ cellphone numbers, or individual QR codes as identifiers. These payments are offered 24/7 and commission free to all enrolled customers who can conveniently access this feature from the Interbank app. From December 2020 to December 2021, total enrolled users in Plin grew from 2.6 million to 5.7 million and participating financial institutions grew from four (Interbank, BBVA, Scotiabank and Banbif) to seven, incorporating Caja Arequipa, Caja Ica and Caja Sullana. From December 2021 to December 2022, total enrolled users in Plin grew from 5.7 million to 9.8 million which includes 1.2 million micro-businesses. As of December 2022, Interbank’s share of Plin enrolled users was of 43%, up from 41% in December 2021.

Furthermore, digital customer acquisition, or clients that were ‘born digital’, reached approximately 61,842 in December 2022, or 57% of new individual clients, compared to approximately 29,300 in December 2021, or 38% of new individual clients. In commercial banking, we developed our digital capabilities for SME and corporate clients by (a) enhancing our value-added proposition functionalities and (b) improving the performance and cybersecurity of our systems. We also believe that the upgrading of some core platforms for business banking during 2023 should enhance our performance and hence allow us to create and launch new products and features faster.

Supported by our digital platform, we have also increased the number of products held by a digital customer. The number of products held by our digital customers has increased 11% from December 2021 to December 2022. As a result of the decline digital sales, the cross-selling ratio for such clients decreased from 3.0 products per digital customer in December 2021 to 2.9 products per digital customer in December 2022. The cross-selling ratio is calculated as the sum of the number of products held by any given group of customers divided by the number of customers in such group. Similarly, the number of products held by our total customers decreased by 19%; however, the cross-selling ratio for total customers increased from 1.70 products per customer in December 2021 to 1.71 products per customer in December 2022. As part of our digital transformation, we have introduced new technologies and processes which enable us to improve time-to-market of new solutions. We have also made significant changes in the way we work. We are currently working with 73 teams using an agile framework on a number of projects, ranging from applications, digital products, new functionalities, and we are currently exploring different solutions targeting new customer segments and piloting new initiatives. For example, we have an innovation lab called “LaBentana”, which focuses on continuous innovation and development of new ideas and pilot initiatives, using design thinking methodologies developed together with the consulting firm IDEO.

In 2021, Interbank accelerated the growth of Tunki, our mobile application targeting unbanked and underbanked consumers and micro-merchants focused on P2P and P2MB transactions. Tunki is a free application that allows users to create a 100% digital mobile wallet to send and receive payments (P2P and P2MB) and that does not require them to previously have an account with Interbank. In 2021, Tunki’s functionality was expanded to enable users to send and receive payments to and/or from the Plin network which enhanced its offering, giving it access to a user base of approximately 9.8 million Plin users across seven financial institutions.

In 2022, we focused on two key aspects of the business: (i) increasing the number of clients and the onboarding of existing clients, and (ii) increasing the balance of funds in clients’ checking accounts thus building a strong financial sources and improving our revenue sources.

Pursuing its first main goal, Interbank focused on simple, faster and secure onboarding of existing clients, as well as on the growth and acquisition of new clients either through digital acquisition or through physical channels, assisting stores, service providers or other customers to accept digital payments. During 2022, Interbank has significantly reduced the cost of acquisition of new digital clients and increased the conversion rate optimization of online customers through the diversification of our digital channels. For instance, in 2021, Interbank received 95.0% of its digital leads from Google, as compared to 2022, when around 40.0% of its leads originated from Google while the remaining 60.0% was originated from other channels like Meta or TikTok. Interbank also implemented artificial intelligence-based models in order to predict the kind of merchants more likely to use its payment solutions. This assisted Interbank on approximately doubling the number of active merchants as of December 31, 2022 as compared to December 31, 2021, achieving activity ratios closer to 43% during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 21% during the year ended December 31, 2021. As a result of these efforts, Interbank had, in the year 2022, approximately 200 thousand new SME clients, and over 350 thousand new digital merchant clients.

Pursuing its second goal, Interbank focused on streamlining its tools and systems, aiming at the simple use of money by its clients. In 2022, Interbank trimmed certain functionalities of its app, emphasizing its most relevant functionalities, particularly those related to digital wallets. As a result, we noted that our merchant clients increasingly applied their money towards digital payments (Plin), instead of withdrawing it. These actions boosted the balance in our digital wallets and commercial accounts, and, as of December 31, 2022, the balance of our commercial accounts was S/60 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the number of Tunki users was 2.5 million compared to 1.6 million as of December 31, 2021.

With the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022, we expanded our growth and influence in the payments segment. Izipay is a fast-growing payments company with three business lines (acquiring, correspondent banking and credit cards processing). We believe that with the increased adoption of mobile devices by merchants and consumers as a form of payment, Izipay offers a safe, seamless, digital, mobile first and affordable solution so that individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants and SMEs can be self-sufficient at all times and offer payment options to consumers using mobile devices. As of December 31, 2022, the number of Izipay merchant active accounts (merchant codes) in Peru was 1 million compared to 0.7 million as of April 2022.

Convenient and innovative nationwide omni-channel distribution network with a distinctive customer-oriented approach

We believe that our convenient and innovative nationwide retail distribution network together with a dedicated sales force and financial advisors, allow us to better reach our customers, and this combination has differentiated us from our competitors. Interbank has one of the most convenient and extensive retail banking distribution networks in Peru and is currently present in almost

all of Peru’s regions. Our focus on digital transformation allows us to help our customers to interact with us in an easier and more efficient way and allows customers to migrate from the use of physical infrastructure to digital platforms. For instance, we have shifted monetary transactions operated through our branches to digital channels. Total monetary transactions have been increasing at a CAGR of 23.6% from 2018 to 2022 driven by monetary transactions through our mobile and internet banking which have increased at a 71.2% CAGR for the corresponding period, even though monetary transactions through our financial stores have been decreasing at a CAGR of 21.1% from 2018 to 2022. We believe this optimization of our distribution footprint has enabled us to reach our clients more efficiently, allowing them to perform transactions when and how they want to, at lower marginal costs for Interbank.

Interbank has built a convenient omni-channel distribution network in Peru, serving over 5.5 million customers. As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 164 financial stores and operated the third-largest ATM network in Peru with 1,554 ATMs, which includes one of the largest out-of-branch ATM network (under our Global Net brand). Interbank has the largest number of financial stores inside supermarkets in Peru. Moreover, with the intention of providing underserved customers with more convenient services, Interbank operates a network of correspondent agents, called Interbank Agentes. The correspondent agent concept consists of providing third-party commercial establishments with low-cost electronic terminals which allow Interbank’s customers to perform basic cash-based operations such as cash withdrawals, credit card and bill payments, and deposits at a lower marginal cost to Interbank relative to transactions performed in our financial stores. As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 5,672 correspondent agents (including its external network).

Since 2013 and in line with our strategy, we have implemented a profitability model for financial stores and ATMs which ranks them according to certain profitability metrics relevant to each distribution channel. This has allowed us to identify the less profitable units in order to close them and to prioritize new openings in more strategic locations with higher demand for value-added financial services. As a result, the number of financial stores, which peaked at 290 in 2016, has decreased by 43.4% to 164 as of December 31, 2022, while productivity of financial stores, measured as the volume of retail deposits sold per branch, has decreased. This droves retail deposits per branch to grow from approximately S/12,709.2 million per branch as of December 2017 to approximately S/23,670.0 million per branch as of December 2022. Likewise, Interbank’s market share in retail deposits under SBS GAAP grew from 12.6% as of December 31, 2017 to 14.9% as of December 31, 2022. Additionally, the number of ATMs has decreased to 1,554 in December 2022 from 2,052 in 2017. Furthermore, the number of Interbank and Interseguro sales agents has increased from 961 in 2017 to 1,077 in 2022, while call center agents increased from 321 to 466 in the same period. The COVID-19 related lockdowns accelerated customer adoption of the call center, which has become a more relevant channel to interact with our customers as well as to answer questions regarding assistance to help address the crisis. Likewise attending to queries via Whatsapp also became a common and efficient point of contact with our customers.

Interseguro offers and sells its annuities and individual life insurance products through its own dedicated sales force to ensure the delivery of high-quality service and advice to customers. Interseguro’s specialized sales force is trained to provide a differentiated service for various customer types. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro employed 94 agents exclusively dedicated to selling annuities and 436 agents to selling life insurance products. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Interseguro retooled its sales force to provide customers with a 100% remote assistance and digital operation. Prior to the pandemic, sales in annuities and life insurance products were only conducted in-person, but digitalization of these sales was accelerated.

In addition to its own sales force, Interseguro leverages on the retail distribution capabilities of Interbank and those of Intercorp and of Intercorp Retail to offer simple low-cost premium insurance products, such as credit life insurance, SOAT, card protection, loan protection, extended warranty and accident insurance.

Inteligo has developed a proprietary financial advisory model that has been a key pillar in sustaining its growth. The model considers the financial objectives of its customers and emphasizes risk analysis and continuous monitoring with portfolio rebalancing. Along with this, Inteligo has been able to successfully serve its customer base in order to deliver tailored products and advice.

Izipay has built and developed a well-recognized trusted brand. Izipay’s communication and marketing efforts play an important role in building brand visibility, usage and overall preference among customers. Also, Interbank’s and Intercorp Retail existing clients represent a sizable opportunity to cross-sell products and services with relatively low incremental marketing and advertising expenses for us. We believe that Izipay’s range of services, many of which can be used for both business and personal needs, represents an opportunity to further increase engagement with our existing clients. We plan to continually invest in product development to maintain and increase the attractiveness of our products and services.

Prudent risk management resulting in high asset quality, strong liquidity and high investment returns

Risk management has been and will continue to be a primary focus of our operations and at the center of our culture. Our experienced risk management teams focus on monitoring and managing risks across all business areas, including credit, market, liquidity and operational risks, among others. We believe our risk management expertise has allowed us to achieve strong asset quality and high investment returns. Our prudent management has allowed us to build up sufficient capital to allow us to grow strategically, invest in opportunities and pay dividends to our shareholders.

Interbank’s underwriting procedures are based on strong analytics and proprietary models. Additionally, Interbank’s investments in technology and improvements in its ability to process and apply data have enriched our risk models and enhanced their accuracy and predictiveness. Interbank’s credit risk policies are approved by its risk committee and board of directors. Despite Interbank’s concentration in retail loans, which tend to have higher levels of delinquency, Interbank’s past-due loans as a percentage of total gross loans ratio as of December 31, 2022 was 3.0%, lower than the 4.1% average of the three largest banks in Peru. As of December 31, 2022, Interbank’s past-due loans coverage ratio was 163.9%, as compared to the average for the Peruvian banking system of 148.5%, according to the SBS. In general, coverage ratios for Peruvian banks decreased during 2022 due to the reversal of provisions as improved payment behavior was observed across retail loans.

In June 2021, the SBS issued Official Document No. 27358-2021 which revised Emergency Decree No. 037-2021, and reduced the minimum regulatory capital ratio requirement from 10% to 8% from April 2021 to March 2022. As such, the minimum capitalization ratio required by Peruvian banking regulations is 8.5% as of December 31, 2022, plus an additional capital requirement which depends on certain levels of loan concentration in each institution. For Interbank, this additional capital requirement amounts to 1.3% as of December 31, 2022. Interbank’s core equity Tier 1 ratio was 12.0% as of December 31, 2022. Interbank’s capitalization ratio, which is calculated as Interbank’s regulatory capital divided by its risk-weighted assets, was the highest compared to the other three largest banks. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, Interbank’s capitalization ratio stood at 15.1% as compared to 14.5% for the Peruvian banking system, according to the SBS.

Interseguro’s investment team and its investment management approach have achieved a 7.5% investment return for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the Peruvian insurance industry’s 5.8%, according to the SBS, while maintaining prudent levels of risk and following the SBS risk guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic and rising global inflation have led to a general decline in the global economy and financial markets. Accordingly, Interseguro’s investment strategy was focused on identifying and reducing potential risks in the portfolio and looking for assets of solid companies with strong credit metrics.

Inteligo’s lending services are offered through Inteligo Bank to complement its wealth management business. The decision to make loans to wealth management customers only results in Inteligo’s loan portfolio being fully collateralized by its customers’ assets. Regarding the management of capital, Inteligo Bank’s capitalization ratio, which is calculated as Inteligo Bank’s regulatory capital divided by its risk-weighted assets, was 20.4% as of December 31, 2022, above the minimum capitalization ratio required by the Central Bank of Bahamas of 8.0%.

Izipay demands a letter of guarantee from payment facilitators, so as to partially cover payment defaults. By doing so, Izipay prevents merchants that are listed by OFAC in its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, as well as any merchants that have breached competition, fraud or brand recognition rules enforced by the Peruvian Antitrust Authority (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual – “Indecopi”) from signing up to its services.

Diversified funding base with strength in retail deposits

IFS has a competitive funding structure. We have access to diverse sources of funding, including deposits and debt securities placed in local and international capital markets. The majority of our funding comes from low-cost customer deposits, which demonstrate our customers’ trust in our franchise and enables us to achieve attractive lending spreads. At Interbank, as of December 31, 2022, 75.6% of its total funding base was comprised of deposits. Interbank’s deposit base is broad and fragmented, such that it is not dependent on a certain type of customer, which provided Interbank with an average cost of funding of 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Interbank has been a significant player in the Peruvian banking industry with a market share of demand, savings, and term deposits of 10.7%, 17.5%, and 11.7%, respectively, as of December 31, 2022, according to SBS. Moreover, our strategic focus on retail has allowed Interbank to gain market share in retail deposits over the years reaching 14.9% as of December 31, 2022 as compared to 12.8% as of December 31, 2016, providing us with a healthy funding base.

Given our competitive advantage in the retail segment, over the last two years, increased growth in deposits was attributable to an increase in our clients’ liquidity as the result of (i) partial cash withdrawals from CTS accounts systemwide and the private pension system, (ii) commercial deposits related to unused funds from the Reactiva Perú program, and (iii) the widespread adoption of a “savings” mindset, all as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Interbank’s strong asset quality and capital and liquidity position have resulted in two of the highest local ratings levels possible, which have allowed it to secure local funding through local short-term and long-term debt market issuances.

Experienced management team with proven ability to foster a merit-based culture and a highly motivated work force

We believe that the strength of our senior and middle management team has enhanced and will continue to be a key driver of our successful business model. We benefit from an experienced, diverse and talented management team. Most of the members of our senior management have held management positions with other major financial institutions in the United States, Latin America and Europe.

We are focused on attracting, developing and retaining highly qualified personnel and believe that a merit-based culture that emphasizes teamwork enables us to maintain a motivated workforce that delivers high-quality service. Interbank is the only Peruvian company that has been chosen by the Peruvian Great Place to Work Institute as one of the 20 best places to work in Peru for the past 20 consecutive years and one of the top 20 places to work in Latin America in the past nine years. In the most recently available rankings, Interbank was selected number one best company to work for in Peru in the large size category (2022), number one in Latin America (2021), number eleven for women in Peru (2021), number one for work from home in Peru (2021), number seven for diversity and inclusion in Peru in 2021, and number two for millennials in Peru (2021). Similarly, Interseguro was selected as the third best company to work for Peru in the medium-size category (2022) and is the only Peruvian insurance company that has been chosen as one of the top 10 best places to work in Peru (medium-size category) by the Peruvian Great Place to Work Institute. In 2022, Inteligo’s three subsidiaries located in Peru (Inteligo SAB, Inteligo Peru Holdings and Interfondos) participated together under the name “Inteligo Group Peru” and Inteligo Group Peru was selected as the third best company to work for in Peru in the medium-size category. Inteligo Bank’s branch in Panama began participating in the Great Place to Work Institute survey in 2014 and since 2015 has been ranked among the top 10 companies in its category (companies with 30 to 250 employees) in Panama. Similarly, Izipay, as a financial services and payments technology platform that enables digital payments and simplifies commerce experiences, competes for top talent in Peru and the region. We believe that a strong culture focused on employee experiences that enables advancement, learning, and individual career insights is essential to the successful acquisition, development, and retention of diverse talent. To that end, since its acquisition, we have implemented programs at Izipay focused on inclusive hiring practices, enriched virtual new hire experiences, individual coaching and mentorship programs, and ongoing learning opportunities.

Developing strategic alliances to challenge us continuously to offer high quality digital services to our customers

In September 2020, Interbank announced a strategic alliance with Rappi, a leading super app in Peru and in Latin America, to deliver 100% digital products in Peru under the RappiBank brand, exclusively available through the Rappi App. Under this alliance, we leverage Rappi’s exponential growth, high level of customer engagement and digital and analytical capabilities, together with Interbank’s solid risk management and financial services proven expertise to allow Peruvians to access financial products and services in an agile, contextual and 100% digital manner, while at the same time enabling us to interact with customers wherever they are and expand the scope of our business.

The alliance’s product offerings include a savings account with payments capabilities (bills, mobile top-ups, cardless ATM withdrawal, interbank in/out transfers, among others), and the first-to-market (and only) PAN-less and name-less debit and credit cards that are delivered as fast as within the hour in locations under Rappi coverage. As of December 2022, RappiBank had 240,191 customers.

Increasingly integrated business platform with synergy potential supported by a strong parent group

Since the introduction of our insurance, wealth management and payments operations alongside our banking operations, we have strived to share and leverage key resources and capabilities across all four segments, which has resulted in enhanced revenues.

Our banking operations remain our core competency that binds together all our operations, while our insurance and wealth management operations are expected to continue supporting our growth. We believe that our continuous efforts to better integrate our four segments, combined with our focus on digital transformation, our existing distribution channels, experience and knowledge of our customer base and the Peruvian market, is a significant competitive advantage.

Furthermore, our parent company, Intercorp Peru, is one of Peru’s largest economic conglomerates, with activities spanning financial services, retail, education and real estate, among others. In 2022 and 2021, Intercorp Peru’s businesses represented approximately 4.0% and 3.5% of Peru’s GDP, respectively, while generating U.S.$9,846 million and U.S.$7,625 million in revenue, respectively. We believe that being part of this group gives us a competitive edge, because of the group’s deep knowledge of the Peruvian consumer, extensive focus and know-how in the Peruvian retail market, highly visible in-country presence and rapid decision-making capabilities. Intercorp provides significant synergy and cross-selling opportunities for IFS. For example, starting in 2018, we, jointly with Intercorp Peru, launched an effort to strengthen our presence and commercial efforts in seven of Peru’s main regions: Arequipa, Cusco, Trujillo, Chiclayo, Ica, Huancayo and Piura, by leveraging on Intercorp’s already established network.

Also, with the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022, we expanded our capacity to cross-sell products and services and benefit from synergies across all our segments, providing a unique value proposition to our customers.

Analytical excellence as a tool to become the company with the deepest knowledge of Peruvians

Our advanced analytics capabilities are being enriched with new data sources and technology tools, such as cloud, real-time decision, machine learning, artificial intelligence and big data. We aim to have the deepest understanding of Peruvians, both individuals and companies, as we believe that a deep knowledge of our current and potential customers’ characteristics and adapting to their behavior is important to better serve them, and to offer them the best solutions according to their needs and risk profile.

Investments in technology represent the pillar of this strategic initiative, and we are working in a variety of areas to achieve this goal, including data and infrastructure, advanced marketing analytics, and risk profiling and pricing models, as well as improving our customer management system (“CRM”) capabilities, including contextual marketing. With the support of our team of data scientists, we centrally design and distribute most of our sales campaigns, have substantially improved our campaign effectiveness and are currently employing real-time decision making on certain campaigns. This combination of investments has helped make us more dynamic and able to approach customers in real time, by offering easy-to-understand information and agile and transparent processes that generate trust in us. Additionally, we have bolstered our investments in cybersecurity as we believe it is fundamental to provide a secure platform to be able to continue with our digital transformation.

These efforts also include different actions undertaken to have a better understanding of the self-employed segment of the population, which constitute a significant opportunity for financial services given the current low penetration levels. We are working on alternative risk profile models for new customer acquisition using new sources and non-traditional sources of data.

Our analytics vision is to have a fully deployed online CRM which relies on real-time data, cloud processing, automated and reusable variables, real-time decision and actions, and an integrated infrastructure to support these new processes.

Retain top talent with a unique culture, fostering a strong sense of achievement

We believe that a motivated workforce leads to high-quality customer service, which leads to satisfied customers and better results. To foster a motivated workforce and performance-based culture, we have developed multiple drivers aligned to what matters most to our people. This is demonstrated by our first place ranking among Peruvian and Latin American companies in all our core segments by the Great Place to Work Institute and recently also in the specific rankings for women, millennials and remote work arrangements.

In past years, we had focused on changing the way we work to agile methodologies. During 2022, certain teams have defined their objectives and key results and we are focusing on deploying the methodology to the whole organization. Moreover, we believe we are extremely focused on developing digital, analytical and technological capabilities and changing the mindset of our people to align with these objectives. Furthermore, we continue to attract and retain some of the best talent in the region, as well as continuing to focus on diversity, inclusion, innovation and our values.

Therefore, we have introduced a series of initiatives such as LearnIn Day, Expo Analytics and SALTO. We have also created tailor-made training programs including the Law, Risk and Finance Academies, Learning Plus, Interbank Aprende and Tech University. We have also partnered with top institutions such as Udemy to strengthen a continuous learning culture in our organization.

Additionally, as we strongly believe that career opportunities are one of the best ways to develop our people, we have designed Career Paths for our digital, analytical and technological talent and we continue to rotate our employees throughout the organization. We also maintain our programs focused on young talent. In 2022, we launched the sixth class of our Digital Trainee Program (Tribk) and the twenty-seventh class of our Commercial Trainee Program.

Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and Izipay will continue their efforts to attract, develop and retain highly qualified personnel and to maintain a performance-based culture that emphasizes teamwork to keep employees motivated and deliver high-quality service and strong results. In this context, the COVID-19 pandemic has given us the opportunity to attract talented people from all around the world as we do not require them to be physically located in Peru and through our flexible work policy called “Interbank Eres” which allows our employees to work from wherever they prefer.

Strategy

Our purpose is to empower all Peruvians to achieve financial well-being. By doing so in our four business segments, we believe that we can help our clients to access the same opportunities to build and assure their futures. We strive to (i) increase our customer base by leveraging data and analytics with sound risk management skills, (ii) provide the best digital experience based on operational excellence and (iii) become the leading digital financial platform to provide profitable solutions with a clear strategic focus on key businesses such as payments, consumer financing, wealth management and life insurance.

To achieve these goals, we continue working on four main pillars:

•

Developing a simple, resilient and scalable technology platform for current and future growth;

•

Becoming a data driven organization with deep understanding of Peruvians and consumer preferences;

•

Attracting and developing the best talent within our remote-fist framework;

•

Becoming a leader in sustainable operations within our segments in Peru.

Growth with strategic focus on key businesses

We have built a financial platform that is very focused on areas in which we believe we can find a unique combination of our own key capabilities, coupled with potential for growth and profitability: Interbank is a universal bank with strategic focus on retail banking; Interseguro is an insurance company focused on life and annuities; Inteligo is an advisory firm for the emerging wealthy; and Izipay is the pillar for building our payments ecosystem.

Interbank is a universal bank with strong market share in retail and a strong focus in consumer finance, which represents 61% of our loans portfolio, compared to 54% of the total loans outstanding within the Peruvian Banking system as of December 2022, according to data from SBS. We are continuously improving our value proposition for different customer segments including improvements to products such as accounts, payments and financing. We have developed several digital features and products to serve different customer needs, such as: the loyalty program Interbank Benefit, the digital wallet Tunki, the budget tool Mis Finanzas, the digital savings account Piggybank. In order to ensure we deliver customer-oriented products, these solutions have been designed together with our innovation lab LaBentana. We have a goal to grow our retail deposits at a faster rate than that of the Peruvian banking system while optimizing our physical distribution channels. As part of this optimization, we have reduced the number of Interbank financial stores by over 40% as of December 31, 2022 from its peak in 2016. Moreover, our expertise and digital strategy in retail banking has allowed to improve our relationship with our customer, while increasing profitability, growing customer, raising cross-selling and boosting operating leverage.

Within commercial banking, our priority is to be the preferred bank for Peruvian businesses with a strong focus on profitability. More than half of our commercial loan portfolio outstanding as of December 31, 2022 was allocated in what we consider to be very low risk corporate clients while the remaining of the portfolio was placed to SMEs, a segment that is riskier but more profitable due to our special knowledge and expertise on key products and industries. In this context, our value proposition for commercial clients is based on (i) delivering customer oriented digital solutions, (ii) building long lasting relationships, (iii) developing strong expertise in relevant sectors, and (iv) having a fast decision-making process. We want to create value for our customers by becoming their transactional bank, connecting and collaborating with their suppliers, customers, employees and communities, co-creating products and services, all focused on their own ecosystem. We aim to provide the best self-service and automated credit experience for commercial clients by offering them with a 100% digital journey focused on cash management solutions such as Cuenta Negocios, sales financing such as CIMA, sustainable loans, and easy and transparent ways of managing payments, such as Cobro Simple, Cuenta Sueldo and through Izipay.

In our insurance segment, Interseguro is strategically focused on life insurance and its life insurance portfolio has had a fast growth rate in recent years. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the premiums earned from life insurance customers represented 89% of Interseguro’s total premiums earned, compared to the average of 52% of life insurance premiums earned over total premiums earned in the industry as of December 2022, according to data from SBS. Within our life insurance practice, we focus on annuities, individual life and retail insurance, directing our efforts towards an end-to-end experience in our customers’ journey, from the issuance of an insurance policy to the after-sale services we offer to clients. In this context, our digital offering is gaining relevance. As an example, digital mandatory auto insurance (Seguro Obligatorio de Accidentes de Tránsito, or “SOAT”) policies accounted for 78% of total SOAT sales in the month of December 2022. Additionally, our after-sale offerings are expected to become a virtual self-service experience, with the aim of ensuring customers have a simple and positive interaction with us and positive development in digital indicators.

In our wealth management segment, Inteligo’s primary focus is to preserve and enhance the wealth created through people’s careers and lifetime. The approach is focused on its value proposition, offering digital onboarding and products and services by segment, with a 360-degree view of its customers. To acquire depth knowledge of the needs of its customers, Inteligo cultivates a culture of closeness with them, while also leveraging the wide array of financial products that can be offered through its subsidiaries, as well as through IFS’ platform. In this context, we have been able to achieve good financial results through a low-intensity capital business model uniting cost efficiencies and diversified sources of revenues over the years, as we complement our products and services across all IFS’ business segments.

Finally, in our payments section, Izipay is a key player to our goal of creating the largest payments ecosystem in Peru. Izipay is a payments company and provider of products and services related to payments acquirer, a correspondent bank and a credit cards processor. Izipay is one of the leaders in the physical card payment business in Peru. At Izipay, we are growing our core business by increasing adoption of our digital payment methods, while increasing synergies with our other segments.

We believe Izipay will strengthen our strategic and competitive positioning in the payments landscape in Peru and will allow us to explore new sources of growth and monetization opportunities. Moreover, it represents additional potential for merchant financing and additional services for merchants, complementing its value proposition with Interbank’s product suite, together with some existing synergies with our banking business. We are currently building and testing the use of Izipay solutions to Interbank’s merchant clients and their micro-loans, providing significant cross-selling opportunities and enhancing customer loyalty.

We aim to become the preferred option for our individual and commercial customers and to help them achieve financial well-being and growth by understanding and anticipating their needs, as well as by offering financial solutions that can be deployed at every contact point with the clients in real time, including in-person and digitally, and in real time. We believe that maintaining a trustworthy and transparent relationship with our customers, together with the superior, simple, mobile, agile and personalized experience that we offer, brings us closer to this goal. Our highly recognized and trusted brands in each of our segments (Interbank in banking, Interseguro in insurance. Inteligo in wealth management and Izipay in payments) are a testament to our focus on this objective. Our subsidiaries are leaders in their respective industries and, by focusing on our strengths, values and solid relationships, we plan to continue evolving and growing.

Create the largest payments ecosystem in Peru

We strive to provide solutions to address the payment needs of people and companies by creating a payment ecosystem that seeks to build a strong bond with our customers, focusing on five pillars: (i) growing number of customers and transactional volumes by extending merchant coverage, improving customer experience and banking the unbanked, (ii) replacing cash by banking unbanked accounts, through pre-paid cards and through our open APIs that allow partners to access our account opening and basic financial-transaction services, (iii) scaling up e-commerce initiatives such as those related to marketplace and our Buy Now Pay Later solution, (iv) creating new consumer finance product offerings based on the information provided by people using our payment initiatives, and (v) offering financing and aggregated services to merchants.

Moreover, our payments ecosystem benefits from having strong solutions on both ends of the market. On the retail customer side, Izipay has a strong market share, as well as knowledge of the traditional and digital card payments. On the merchant side, Izipay complements the role of Interbank’s digital wallet Tunki of interacting with Peru’s unbanked population. It also complements Interbank’s sales financing tool CIMA, while our shared directory Plin allows us to interact with customers from other banks and serves as a bridge between retail customers and micro-merchants. This wholesome ecosystem also allows us to scale up our other initiatives such as our e-commerce solutions, our marketplace Shopstar and the Buy Now, Pay Later solution Divídelo.

Tunki is our digital wallet and is mainly focused on the unbanked population and was built based on a 100% digital experience from onboarding to the customer care experience. It is a free application that allows users to create a digital mobile wallet to send and receive payments, P2P and P2MB, without previously having an account with Interbank. As of December 31, 2022, the number of Tunki users was 2.5 million compared to 1.6 million as of December 31, 2021. While the user base is constantly growing, in numbers and in activity, we plan to strength our value proposition with new financial products to become an “entry-level” bank to unbanked people.

Plin is a P2P and QR code payment solution which interacts with multiple financial institutions and serves as a bridge between the banked and the unbanked through cell phones, as services may be conveniently accessed through the Interbank app. These payments are offered around-the-clock and are commission-free to all enrolled customers. Interbank is currently one of seven financial institutions that are Plin’s partners. As of December 31, 2022, Plin reached 9.8 million users.

CIMA is a 100% digital financing solution with immediate disbursement that allow small merchants to access working capital loans they need to grow their businesses quickly and easily.

Divídelo is the name of our Buy Now, Pay Later solution which is already connected to over 40 e-commerce businesses in Peru and growing.

Shopstar is an online marketplace aiming to become the preferred e-commerce option for IFS customers and a sandbox to evaluate some of our initiatives such as Divídelo. It was created from the insight that many of our customers were not comfortable buying on e-commerce but would be willing to try it in a platform that was supported by Interbank. As of December 31, 2022, Shopstar had approximately 130 thousand users.

Interbank is continuously searching for alliances and opportunities in the digital market as well as in the payment ecosystem.

The best digital experience based on operational excellence

We want to deliver a seamless and superior experience to our customers, while becoming more relevant to them. We believe that acting on these goals will allow us to more effectively serve our customers, enabling them to get what they want, when they want it, and how they want it. We believe that the key to ensure that our customers will have the best experience when interacting with us is to create unique experiences throughout their customer journey, including during new client acquisition, on-boarding, customer development to earn loyalty, and during retention stages. We have been implementing various initiatives to improve the customer relationship cycle.

We seek to build entirely digital solutions for the customer journey and accelerate the growth of our customer base by creating innovative and distinctive tools that deliver financial solutions to people, micro-merchants and all types of business in an accessible and efficient way, throughout all our business segments.

With the Izipay acquisition, we have further expanded our digital ecosystem by becoming a provider of financial services and technology solutions that enable consumers, individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants, SMEs, in Peru, to make and/or process payments in a safe, seamless, digital, mobile first and affordable manner. Izipay operates a national, two-sided network at scale that helps merchants and consumers connect, transact, and complete payments, whether they are online or in-person. As of December 31, 2022, the number of Izipay merchant active accounts (merchant codes) in Peru was 1 million compared to 0.7 million as of April 2022.

Izipay is one of our accelerated growth initiatives focused on creating the largest payments ecosystem in Peru and is being integrated with Interbank to create a seamless digital journey for customers. Izipay’s approach is focused on providing a best in-class customer experience and expanding our value proposition for merchants and consumers by partnering with merchants to grow and expand their business online and in-store, and providing consumers with simple, secure, and flexible ways to manage and move money across different markets, merchants, and platforms and simplifying their shopping experiences. Our aim is to anticipate user’s needs and make relevant suggestions to support business management and growth.

At Interbank, we have built a seamless digital customer journey with teams dedicated to improving each step of the customer experience. We believe that a strong on-boarding leads to higher engagement from customers while an increase in engagement will create a tangible higher NPS and lower churn. In digital, we are focusing our efforts on expanding the products and self-service interactions, continuing to foster the adoption of digital channels by our customers, adding new features according to their needs, and ensuring that interactions with our customers are safe and secure.

Within commercial banking, we are working on a radical simplification of our products and processes together with digitalizing each point of contact with us. Moreover, one of the most important points of contact for our clients is the post sales division, where we solve inquiries, claims and any operational issues that our customers have, using channels like the WhatsApp for businesses or the virtual chatbot.

Regarding our cash management platform, it has three types of client groups based on sales volume, which allows us to employ different strategies accordingly. For large corporations, we focus our efforts on generation of fees from cash management and corporate finance; for medium-sized companies we focus on growth, productivity and cash management; and for small companies we focus on sustainable growth and productivity with strong support from analytics and collection. For small businesses, since its introduction in August 2018, our Cuenta Negocios, an account that can be opened 100% digitally, has grown to 186,000 accounts as of December 31, 2022.

Within retail banking, we have developed several high impact digital solutions based on customer preferences and needs. These solutions have been designed together with our innovation lab LaBentana based on deep understanding and research, as well as through certain co-creation with our customers. We have decided to make all our solutions available in our Interbank App, which we strongly believe to be our most valuable channel going forward in our relationship with our customers, considering the decrease of in-person interaction. Over the year 2022, the percentage of financial transactions performed on Interbank’s branches over the number of total transactions has continued to decrease, declining 11% compared with the percentage of transactions performed in-person during the year 2021. In contrast, digital sales have increased during the year ended December 31, 2022, reaching 64% of Interbank’s total sales from 57.8% during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Through our physical channels, we continue to focus on providing a superior customer experience and are improving productivity and efficiency through digital processes, tools and more advanced analytics. Additionally, we continue to invest in educating our customers to encourage the use of digital and other channels. Deposits, withdrawals, bills and credit cards payments are being redirected to other more convenient and cost-efficient channels.

At Interseguro, we want to be the preferred and most convenient digital insurance company, using active listening mechanisms to improve customer experience and be characterized as a data driven organization to gain a competitive advantage against our peers. In this sense, the digital journey started with the launch of the online sale of SOAT in 2016 and continued with the sale of new digital products such as travel insurance, car insurance and individual life insurance. In addition, Interseguro accelerated the digitalization of its sales of annuities and life insurance products. For example, Vida cash, a 100% digital life insurance, has been gaining relevance in the life insurance business from being inexistent years ago to represent more than 39% of premiums of the individual life policies outstanding in Peru as of December 31, 2022.

At Inteligo, we focus on offshore wealth management services and have launched a digital platform that allows on-boarding, financial planning, and advisory and execution services to be part of our digital customer journey. Moreover, our value proposition is centered on giving what we consider to be the best investment advice possible and to be able to do so, we maintain relationships with our customers to acquire in depth knowledge of their needs. Apart from being knowledgeable about our customers’ needs, we believe we can be more responsive as a result of a horizontal organizational structure and entrepreneurial mindset. Additionally, our competitive edge is adapting to the changing needs of our customers to give them agile solutions. As an example, since 2021, Inteligo Bank has been developing new digital products and services for its clients, complementing the previously existing services provided by their relationship officer under a “phygital” model.

We will continue to focus on our digital transformation to enhance efficiency through the automation of internal processes and use of technology. Our goal is to be more efficient while utilizing fewer resources in our customer interaction.

Resilient, simple and scalable technology

To achieve all of the above, we believe that building a scalable, flexible, trustworthy, stable and secure technological platform is essential. We believe that we have deployed the key initial investments necessary to scale our platform and are committed to continue to improve it by maintaining and updating our current levels of investment in technology.

Our IT strategy is focused on working in collaboration with open technological platforms to transform our operations supporting the digital-only approach. Our focus is based on three main areas of work: (i) resilience, (ii) journey to cloud, and (iii) world-class security. What we refer to ‘resilience’ is maintaining up-to-date critical core applications and high performance and stability of our technological platforms. Our ‘journey to cloud’ refers to the modernization of the main applications towards cloud native versions and the evolution of the cloud operation governance model. Finally, our ‘world-class security’ goal is to have the adequate equipment, processes and tools that allow us to operate in a safe environment on a daily basis.

In this context, Interbank continuously invests in the update of core applications while additional effort and resources are invested in the digitalization and transformation of processes and channels in order to provide an entirely digital experience to all customers.

Moreover, we have moved from working with 17 teams within our agile digital solutions framework in 2017 to more than 110 teams in such framework as of December 31, 2022, allowing us to substantially decrease time-to-market and to develop more innovative ideas.

Additionally, during the year 2022, we have bolstered our investments in cybersecurity as we believe security is essential for our platform to continue to enable our digital transformation. General-purpose technologies have also been implemented to our operations to mitigate cybersecurity risks and these controls are constantly evolving and being aligned with industry trends.

We strongly believe that our IT strategy will allows us to deliver high standards of cybersecurity and compete with high performing players in the region, including financial incumbents and digital disruptors.

Strengthen a data driven organization

Our advanced analytics capabilities are being enriched with new sources of data and new tools that technology offers, such as cloud, real-time decision, machine learning, deep learning, artificial and continuous intelligence and big data. We aim to have a deep understanding of the habits of Peruvians, both individuals and companies, as we believe that a deep knowledge of our current and potential customers’ characteristics and adapting to their behavior is important to better serve them, and to offer them the best solutions according to their needs and risk profile.

In this context, at Interbank, our goal of deepening our understanding of Peruvians focuses on three strategic areas: (i) marketing analytics, (ii) risk, and (iii) collections.

In marketing analytics, we aim to anticipate the needs of our customers with personalized and timely solutions. We are evolving from advanced analytics to artificial intelligence to deliver personalized, real-time experiences to all our customers. At the end of 2022 we had over 300 retail and risk models that use over 2,500 variables, most of which are in the cloud. We are focused on improving time-to-market, as well as increase the number of personalized offers. In this way, we connect with our customers with higher impact in engagement at a more efficient cost.

Secondly, our ability to assess our customers risk profile in the correct manner, together with our balanced portfolio approach, has allowed us to grow in healthy manner. We focus on improving our assessment, through more and better models and using as much information as possible. Furthermore, we have been able to deliver contextual credit offers digitally in real and near real time which allows us to maximize the relationship with strong credit customers, while generating a sense of togetherness and loyalty.

Finally, we also apply advanced analytics to improve our debt collection process, creating an efficient, digital and empathetic experience. As for example, machine learning models have allowed us to improve contestability and response, as well as the contact with customers. This has been important to develop a self-service environment that gives our customers flexibility in an easy and empathetic manner.

Investments in technology represent the pillar of this strategic initiative, and we are working in a variety of areas to achieve this goal, including data and infrastructure, advanced marketing analytics, and risk profiling and pricing models, as well as improving our CRM capabilities, including contextual marketing. With the support of our team of data scientists, we centrally design and distribute most of our sales campaigns, have substantially improved our campaign effectiveness and are currently employing real-time decision making on certain campaigns. This combination of investments has helped make us more dynamic and able to approach customers in real time, by offering easy-to-understand information and agile and transparent processes that generate trust in us.

Our analytics vision is to have a fully deployed online customer management system which relies on real-time data, cloud processing, automated and reusable variables, real-time decision and actions, and an integrated infrastructure to support these new processes.

Through analytics, we are working to become the digital ally in hearts and minds of Peruvians.

Unique working environment to capture and retain the best talent worldwide

We believe that a motivated workforce leads to high-quality customer service, which leads to satisfied customers and better results. Our commitment to fostering a motivated workforce and performance-based culture is demonstrated by being ranked among the top Peruvian and Latin American companies in all our core segments by the Great Place to Work Institute and recently also in the specific rankings for women and millennials.

We also believe that diversity makes us stronger and enhances our innovation. For this purpose, we have introduced a series of initiatives such as Expo Analytics, Interbank Hackathon, Innovaton, Interbank Datathon, as well as Innovation Day at the Intercorp Peru level. We have also created training programs including the Agile Academy, Tribk, and the Interbank Tek program.

As talent is considered by us as one of our main pillars, we seek to capture and retain the best talent worldwide. This is possible because our flexible remote work framework ERES, launched as a response of the pandemic, is a competitive advantage in the context of digital financial services and allows us to stay connected while achieving our goals wherever we are. Our ERES framework has allowed us to attract regional talent on key positions.

We continue building on the pillars of our corporate culture: leadership, horizontality and growth. They help us promote an environment of transparency, openness, and personal and professional development, especially in such areas as data, digital and soft skills. Additionally, we are searching the balance between organizational agility and culture to generate more value in the business and engagement in our teams.

An ESG framework embedded in our management

At IFS, we are positively impacting our stakeholders and building an organization focused on sustainability. In this context, our culture is centered on respect for the environment; responsible social practices; encouraging inclusion, equality and diversity; and having world class corporate governance standards.

Moreover, we are adopting stronger and more widespread ESG practices to drive value creation not only for shareholders, but for all stakeholders over the long term. Our ESG initiatives include actions in three areas:

•

Environment:

•

Measuring our carbon footprint, developing sustainable office infrastructure, and implementing recycling, and energy efficiency strategies;

•

Following the guidelines of the Science Based Targets initiative, we are currently defining science-based targets to contribute to Net-Zero by 2030;

•

Following the guidelines of the Science Based Targets initiative, we are currently defining science-based targets to contribute to Net-Zero by 2050;

•

Identification of financial risks on infrastructure derived from climate change.

•

Social:

•

Focus on creating an environment of a great place to work in order to attract, select, retain and develop the best talent;

•

Focus on our zero tolerance policy on sexual harassment, women in leadership and workplace inclusive practices;

•

The creation of a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Policy approved by the Board;

•

The creation of a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee;

•

Corporate volunteer community program;

•

Digital payments, digital savings accounts, micro-credit, micro lines of credit, financial protection and wellbeing, contributing to financial and sustainable inclusion;

•

Initiatives that support financial education and digital literacy;

•

Governance:

•

Best corporate governance practices in terms of board composition, diversity and transparency of social and environmental indicators;

•

International standards, alignment with PCI DSS/NIST CSF and SBS compliance;

•

Reinforced security protocols for enabling remote work and strong CyberSOC capabilities to prevent, detect, react timely for cyber threats.

Through ESG Finance, IFS offers new financial instruments that will facilitate the transition to a low carbon economy and stimulate sustainable development. As of December 2022, we have disbursed 167 million dollars in sustainability-linked transactions. Moreover, we are currently working with IDB Invest to set in place a scalable ESG Finance Framework.

In 2022, IFS has participated in the S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment and reached a score of 62 points, 9 points above the registered for the first time in 2021 and 16 points above the 2022 industry’s average.

Banking Segment

Overview

Interbank provides retail and commercial banking services to more than 5.5 million total customers as of December 31, 2022, which includes more than 5.3 million retail customers and approximately 152,232 commercial clients. It is the fourth largest bank in Peru in terms of total assets and total loans, and third largest in terms of total deposits, with market shares of 13.3%, 12.7% and 13.5%, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 according to the SBS. Interbank is focused on fast-growing and highly profitable retail banking businesses, such as credit card financing, payroll deduction loans to public employees and mortgages, as well as Peruvian corporates and medium-size companies within commercial banking.

Given this focus, 53.6% of Interbank’s gross loans as of December 31, 2022 correspond to retail banking, compared to 36.2% for the Peruvian banking system, according to the SBS. Interbank is the second largest provider of consumer loans, the leading player among private banks in payroll deduction loans to public sector employees and the third largest bank in retail deposits in Peru. As part of its strategy to serve retail banking customers, Interbank has one of the most convenient and extensive retail banking distribution networks in Peru and is currently present in 23 of Peru’s 25 regions. Interbank serves its customers through 164 financial stores, 1,554 ATMs throughout Peru, which is the third-largest ATM network nationwide and one of the largest out of branch ATM networks, and 5,672 correspondent agents (includes external network), and a digital platform including a mobile app with 70.9% of 100%-digital customers as of December 31, 2022.

In the commercial banking line of business, which represents 46.4% of Interbank’s gross loans as of December 31, 2022 according to the SBS, Interbank focuses on high margin and fee generating products such as leasing, structured finance, cash management, trade finance and factoring in its commercial lending business. These products and services are attractive not only for the financial margins they offer, but also for the fee income they generate. In addition, these products and services enhance customer loyalty and provide significant cross-selling opportunities.

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Interbank’s net results were a net profit of S/1,374.1 million (U.S.$360.3 million), net profit of S/1,360 million (U.S.$341.2 million), and net loss of S/5.7 million (U.S.$1.6 million), respectively. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Interbank had shareholders’ equity of S/7,478.8 million (U.S.$1,960.9 million), S/7,002.0 million (U.S.$1,756.2 million) and S/6,224.5 million (U.S.$1,719.0 million), respectively. Interbank’s ROE and ROA for the year ended December 31, 2022 were 19.8% and 2.0%, respectively. Interbank’s ROE for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 21.0% and negative 0.1%, respectively, and ROA for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 2.0% and 0.0%, respectively. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of the adjustments made in 2020.

COVID-19 Measures

During 2020 and 2021, the Peruvian government implemented extraordinary measures to secure the continuity of the economy’s payment chain. The main measures implemented in the financial system were related to facilities for loans rescheduling (payment deferrals), suspension of counting of past due days, partial or total withdrawal of deposits for CTS, Repo operations with the BCRP and the launch of credit programs guaranteed by the Peruvian Government, such as Reactiva Perú.

Business Lines

Interbank has three business lines: (1) retail banking, (2) commercial banking and (3) treasury and institutional.

LOGO

Retail Banking

Interbank’s retail banking business line provides a variety of financial products and services to individuals including retail loans and retail deposits. Interbank’s retail banking strategy consists of providing the best customer experience through convenient, agile and friendly service. Interbank’s key objectives include increasing its market share in its core products through

acquiring new clients, increasing its share of wallet and cross-selling products to its existing customers. Interbank seeks to meet the financial service needs of Peru’s growing middle class. Interbank believes the retail banking sector presents significant opportunities to continue to grow and sustain high margins, while taking on reasonable risk.

As of December 31, 2022, retail loans represented 53.6% of Interbank’s total loan portfolio outstanding as compared to 36.2% for the Peruvian banking system under SBS GAAP. Furthermore, Interbank’s strategy also seeks to continue capturing low-cost funding through a stable and diversified deposit base. The following charts show Interbank’s and the Peruvian banking system’s retail gross loans breakdown according to the SBS as of December 31, 2022.

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Retail Loans

Retail loans consist of consumer and mortgage loans. Interbank classifies its consumer loans into three categories: (1) credit cards and (2) payroll deduction and (3) personal loans.

Consumer Loans

(1) Credit cards. Credit cards represent the largest portion of Interbank’s consumer loan portfolio in terms of outstanding loans. Interbank offers its retail customers two major credit cards: VISA and American Express. Interbank has an exclusivity agreement with American Express for its Centurion line of credit cards in Peru. Interbank also offers credit cards with different value propositions catering to each customer segment.

In November 2019, the SBS issued Resolution No. 5570-2019 which became effective in January 2021. This resolution establishes that the non-revolving financing portion of credit card loans must be presented for regulatory considerations as loans instead of credit card loans. Under SBS GAAP figures, this resulted in a significant reduction to Interbank’s credit card loan balances, market share and a change in its retail loans portfolio mix.

(2) Payroll deduction loans. Payroll deduction loans to public sector employees such as police officers, teachers and army employees, Interbank ranks first among private banks in Peru in terms of payroll deduction loans to public sector employees, with a market share of 22.3% as of December 31, 2022 as compared to 25.2% as of December 31, 2021.

The risk of default under payroll deduction loans is low, because the employer deducts the loan payments from the employee’s salary and makes payments directly to Interbank. Additionally, these payroll deduction loans are legally required to be insured by an insurance company against the death and disability of the borrower. Interseguro provides substantially all of the insurance policies for these loans although customers are free to purchase insurance from other providers.

(3) Personal loans. Personal loans include cash loans, student loans, and collateralized cash loans. Cash loans have a term of up to 60 months and a grace period of up to two months. In addition, collateralized cash loans allow customers to include savings accounts or real estate as collateral, have a term of up to 60 months and a grace period of up to two months.

Mortgage Loans

Interbank offers fixed rate mortgage loans with a typical term of 20 years and a typical down payment of 20% denominated in either U.S. dollars or soles.

Interbank’s mortgage loans outstanding grew at a CAGR of 9.7% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022 compared to a CAGR of 7.4% for the Peruvian banking system in the same period. Between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, Interbank’s growth in mortgage loans outstanding was 8.6%, compared to 7.6% for the Peruvian banking system over the same period. For 2021, Interbank’s growth in mortgage loans outstanding was 10.5% with respect to 2020, as compared to 8.9% for the Peruvian banking system over the same period. For 2022, Interbank’s mortgage loan balances amounted to S/9,306.2 million, of which 93.1% were denominated in soles and the remaining 6.9% in U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Interbank’s mortgage loan balances amounted to S/8,572.8 million, of which 90.9% were denominated in soles and the remaining 9.1% in U.S. dollars.

Interbank also provides residential construction loans to real estate developers. Although these loans are reported within the commercial banking portfolio, they are managed together with retail banking mortgages because of the synergies between the businesses. Financing real estate projects provides Interbank with an opportunity to market mortgage loans to home buyers.

In 2001, the Peruvian government launched the Nuevo Crédito Mivivienda program, a social initiative to promote the construction of low-income housing, of which Interbank is an active participant. As of November 2022, the Mivivienda program had successfully disbursed 12,353 loans, mainly to develop multi-family buildings. The Nuevo Crédito Mivivienda program provides direct funding to match each loan underwritten by banks, as well as credit risk coverage for up to two-thirds of any realized loss. Furthermore, the program subsidizes interest rates by rewarding the end customer with direct financial incentives if payments are kept current.

Retail Deposits

Interbank offers a wide range of sol and U.S. dollar denominated transactional, savings and investment accounts through one of the largest distribution networks, as measured by total financial stores, ATMs and correspondent agents. These products satisfy key consumer needs and position Interbank as an attractive financial institution for retail customers.

Transactional accounts

Within retail deposits, Interbank offers transactional accounts with different interest rates, maintenance fees and options for accessing funds.

Cuenta Sueldo is a payroll account into which an employer may deposit an accountholder’s salary on a regular basis. These payroll accounts provide debit cards for employees and discounts at restaurants and retailers, among other benefits. Interbank offers these payroll account services to employers in conjunction with other commercial banking products, and also markets directly to employees.

Cuenta Simple is used by customers for their everyday banking needs and does not have a maintenance fee. Transactions are free of charge for up to a certain number of monthly transactions through physical channels. In addition, all transactions and transfers performed through online banking and other electronic devices are free of charge. This transactional account is of low cost for Interbank as most of the transactions are conducted through electronic channels. Customers are also able to receive incoming wire transfers in this account. This account type was used to make available the funds that were permitted to be withdrawn from the private pension funds as a result of the Government’s COVID-19 relief measure to provide liquidity to individuals.

Savings accounts

Interbank offers savings accounts with a variety of interest rates, maintenance charges and options for alternative access channels, such as ATM cards, and free Internet access and mobile access.

Cuenta Millonaria is Interbank’s fastest growing savings account, which may be denominated in soles or U.S. dollars. The Cuenta Millonaria account allows accountholders to participate in sweepstakes to win prizes such as apartments, cars, courses of studies, among other prizes.

Cuenta Super Tasa offers special interest rates based on clients’ account balances and free unlimited transactions through electronic channels.

Alcancía Virtual is a digitally-enabled feature of a transactional or payroll account in either soles or U.S. Dollars, which encourages our customers to save. This virtual piggy bank allows customers to easily transfer or “swipe” certain amounts from other accounts to their piggy bank. The funds allocated to the piggy bank are not subject to maintenance fees and benefit from higher rates than those applied to the associated transactional account. Amounts in customers’ piggy bank do not show as funds available for ATM withdrawals or for debit card purchases. As such, money deposited in piggy bank accounts improve Interbank’s funding base. Customers retain full flexibility to transfer any funds in their piggy bank account to their transactional accounts through mobile banking or online banking and can also personalize the piggy bank account according to their goals or saving purpose.

Investment accounts

Interbank offers time deposits, certificates of deposit (“CDs”) and CTS accounts denominated in soles, U.S. dollars, and Euros (only for time deposits), to customers who may or may not have a checking or savings account with Interbank.

Interbank offers time deposits and CDs, with maturities ranging from 31 days to one year. Time deposits with maturities of 31 days or more may be opened with a minimum initial balance of S/2,000, U.S.$1,000, or EUR 1,000. Time deposits with maturities ranging from five years to 10 years are only offered in soles and can be opened with a minimum initial balance of S/50,000.

CTS accounts are severance accounts that employers must open for the benefit of their employees pursuant to Peruvian law. Employers must deposit into these accounts twice a year (in May and November) an amount equal to one half of an employee’s month salary. Employees may withdraw from their CTS account any amount exceeding the sum of such employee’s four months’ salary calculated based on the most recent monthly salary.

Commercial Banking

Interbank’s commercial banking is organized in three business units: (1) corporate; (2) medium-size businesses and (3) small businesses.

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank was the fourth largest bank in terms of commercial loans outstanding, with a total commercial loan portfolio amounting to S/20.9 billion, representing a 9.2% market share, while its past-due loan ratio stood at 3.1%, the second lowest among the largest four banks in Peru.

The following charts show Interbank’s and the Peruvian banking system’s commercial gross loans breakdown according to the SBS as of December 31, 2022:

LOGO

Source: SBS.

According to the SBS, in general terms, corporate loans are loans offered to companies with annual sales exceeding S/200.0 million in the previous two years; large loans are offered to companies with annual sales between S/20.0 million and S/200.0 million in the previous two years, medium loans are offered to companies with a total debt in the Peruvian financial system above S/300,000 in the last six months that cannot be classified as corporate or large companies; small size loans are offered to companies with a total debt in the Peruvian financial system between S/20,000 and S/300,000 in the last six months; micro-company loans are offered to companies with total debt in the Peruvian financial system no higher than S/20,000 in the last six months.

Corporate Banking

Interbank’s corporate banking unit is primarily responsible for providing services to companies with annual sales exceeding S/100.0 million or are part of a large economic group. Interbank’s corporate banking unit provides investment banking, structured finance and other sophisticated banking products to meet the needs of its target clients. Furthermore, Interbank focuses on developing a relationship with each client and promoting fee-related and low-risk products, such as supply chain financing, collections, transfers and foreign exchange services, all tailored to meet the particular requirements of each client.

Medium-Size Business Banking

Interbank’s medium-size business banking unit offers many of the same products as those of the corporate banking unit mainly to medium-size enterprises with annual sales between S/3.0 million and S/100.0 million. The unit primarily provides Interbank’s clients with working capital loans secured by accounts receivable and other products, including financing for medium and long-term investment programs. Medium-size businesses also constitute an important source of deposits.

Medium-size enterprises in Peru generally do not have access to financing through local or international capital markets or to term loans from foreign banks. Interbank expects to capitalize on the significant growth opportunities in this sector and to profit from the margins that it offers when taking into account the reasonable degree of risk involved. We believe that this sector will continue to grow along with the Peruvian economy.

Small Business Banking

Interbank’s small business banking unit serves companies with annual sales between S/500,000 and S/3.0 million. Interbank offers working capital loans, fixed asset financing, revolving lines of credit and transactional accounts to small businesses. Interbank has invested in building an experienced team and developing a strong IT platform, with online and automated processes to better serve these customers.

Main Commercial Banking Products

Medium-Term Loans. Interbank offers Term Loans, which are loans with tenors over 1 year and with average duration of 3.2 years. These loans are usually collateralized with mortgages and/or other assets in order to secure the credit facility. Furthermore, Interbank earns structuring fees from these transactions.

Leasing. Interbank provides financial leasing including commercial real estate, vehicles, machinery and other goods. At the end of the term of a leasing agreement, the customer has the option to purchase the leased assets.

In recent years, the growth in Interbank’s leasing business has been driven by economic growth and related private sector investments. We expect this trend to continue in the future. Furthermore, Interbank is actively pursuing leasing and financing opportunities for machinery and equipment to grow its leasing business.

Cuenta Negocios. The only 100% digital current-account for businesses in the Peruvian market. This account can be opened by customers following a very simple process, with no physical documentation required. Cuenta Negocios is the principal client acquisition tool in ourcommercial banking business. It also supports many other of our products, such as factoring.

Cash management. Interbank offers products and services that strengthen its relationship with clients, build loyalty and reduce costs by using electronic channels and by increasing fee income. Services managed by this unit include collection services (automated trade bill collection), automated payments (payroll and payments to suppliers) and digital banking and cash management. Interbank earns fees from cash management services by charging its clients a fixed fee and a variable fee based on the volume and frequency of the transactions.

Trade finance. Interbank provides short-term loans for trade, funded with internal resources or with credit lines from foreign banks. In addition, the trade finance unit offers medium-term credit lines using funds granted by international commercial banks and foreign governmental institutions. The trade finance unit also earns fees by providing customers with letters of credit, international collection and foreign exchange services.

Interbank intends to take advantage of the growing importance of China in Peru’s foreign trade by facilitating trade and investment with both countries. In 2007, Interbank established a Commercial Representative Office in China in order to provide financial services to Peruvian and Chinese companies wishing to trade in either market.

Supply Chain Financing. Interbank’s electronic factoring products enable our clients to pay in advance and at a discount to their suppliers. We have a 100% digital-platform for the onboarding of new providers. New customers can also open a Cuenta Negocios during that same process.

Treasury and Institutional

The main activities of Interbank’s treasury and institutional business line include treasury and institutional banking, as well as securitization services through Internacional de Titulos Sociedad Titulizadora S.A. (“Intertítulos”).

Treasury

Interbank is an active participant in the money and foreign exchange trading markets in Peru. Its money market desk plays an active role in the sol and foreign currency short-term money markets. In addition, the money market desk participates in the auction of certificates of deposit issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. Interbank’s proprietary trading activities focus on foreign exchange trading and short-term investments in securities, which primarily include certificates of deposit of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Peruvian global bonds and sovereign debt instruments.

Institutional Banking

Interbank’s institutional banking unit serves primarily non-profit public and private organizations, international entities, educational institutions and nongovernmental organizations. As of December 31, 2022, the institutional banking unit had more than 760 clients and S/7.3 billion in current account deposits and S/4.4 billion in time deposits, accounting for 26.2% of Interbank’s total deposits.

The institutional banking unit is strategically important to Interbank as it provides Interbank with a stable and low-cost deposit base, as well as opportunities for fee income generation. The clients for the institutional banking unit require mainly transactional products, such as remote office banking, collection services, automated payroll payment services and investment management. Interbank’s strategy is focused on building customer loyalty with these clients by offering customized services at competitive rates and by providing high-quality customer service.

Securitization Services

In addition, Interbank provides securitization services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Intertítulos, which is regulated by the SMV. Intertítulos, acting as a trustee, enables its clients to issue securities in order to obtain funds directly from financial markets.

Distribution Channels

Interbank has built and developed one of the best omni-channel platforms that combine physical and digital presence, serving over 5.3 million customers as well as non-customers across Peru.

In terms of physical presence, Interbank has developed a highly convenient network. As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 164 financial stores and operated 1,554 ATMs, the third-largest ATM network in Peru and the largest out-of-branch ATM network. Interbank has the largest number of financial stores within retail locations in Peru. We have 58 financial stores in the aggregate across Plaza Vea, Vivanda and shopping malls. Moreover, with the intention of offering greater convenience as well as providing underserved customers with greater access to financial services, Interbank operates a network of over 5,672 correspondent agents (includes external network) as of December 31, 2022, known as Interbank Agente.

In terms of online channels, Interbank provides any customer or non-customer with the option to have a completely digital experience with the bank, from acquisition and onboarding to the use of its financial products. Its website has a strong commercial focus and manages the bank’s digital acquisition of new customers. Its online banking and mobile application give customers immediate access to its day-to-day transactions and after-sales services and uses those interactions to capture cross-sell opportunities. Furthermore, Interbank has developed other channels that serve specific segments or customer needs. For example, a separate website that serves customers under the Interbank Benefit loyalty program, and “Cuenta Sueldo” is a mobile application for payroll account customers that gives access to discounts and benefits.

The following table shows the number of monetary transactions of each distribution channel:


Number of transactions in December, in millions of soles	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		CAGR 2018-2022
Financial stores		2.6		2.7		1.5		1.2		1.0		(21.1	)%
Off-branch		11.3		14.4		18.4		25.3		31.4		29.1	%
ATMs		6.7		6.5		5.5		5.9		6.9		0.7	%
Correspondent agents		2.0		2.8		3.4		4.0		3.6		15.7	%
Mobile banking		2.4		4.9		9.4		15.3		20.8		71.2	%
Other		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		(6.3	)%

Total		13.9		17.0		19.9		26.5		32.4		23.6	%

The following table shows the percentage of use of each distribution channel, reflecting a transition from the use of traditional channels (branches, ATMs and correspondent agents) to mobile banking:


As of December, Percentage of total	2018			2019			2020			2021			2022
Financial stores		18.7	%		15.7	%		7.5	%		4.5	%		3.1	%
Off-branch		81.3	%		84.3	%		92.5	%		95.5	%		96.9	%
ATMs		48.4	%		38.4	%		27.6	%		22.3	%		21.3	%
Correspondent agents		14.5	%		16.5	%		17.0	%		14.9	%		11.1	%
Mobile banking		17.4	%		28.6	%		47.4	%		57.8	%		64.1	%
Other		1.0	%		0.8	%		0.5	%		0.4	%		0.3	%

Total general		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Financial Stores

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 164 financial stores in Peru. After peaking at 290 financial stores in 2016, the number of financial stores decreased mainly due to the success in transferring basic transactions from the stores to more efficient channels, the use of online banking and mobile applications, and process improvements. However, Interbank maintains the fifth largest network of financial stores among Peruvian banks, covering 23 of Peru’s 25 regions. A large number of the financial stores are located in convenient, high traffic areas, such as supermarkets and shopping malls, to maximize client coverage.

In May 2013, Interbank introduced “Imagine” financial stores, a concept jointly developed with IDEO, a design and innovation consulting firm. “Imagine” fosters a more pleasant and inviting environment to Interbank’s customers and is designed to educate customers on the use of electronic channels in order to migrate low value transactions to more efficient channels, while continuing to capture new customers and exploit cross-selling opportunities. Imagine has set new service standards in the industry and many of its elements have been adopted by Interbank’s main competitors.

In July 2020, Interbank introduced an evolution of the “Imagine” concept, “Xperience”. “Xperience” enables customer to perform digital transaction in stores and also reinforces the role of digital education. This concept was developed into two store models, “Express” and “Universal”. “Express” stores are located inside retailers and they are the first cashless stores, focused on education and new customer acquisition. “Universal” stores transform Interbank financial stores by creating a physical-digital area at the entrance of the store that is specifically dedicated to offer digital solutions to our customers and non-customer. These new stores have offered new and existing customers an assisted onboarding process onto its digital channels. In 2022, 36.9% of new digital users utilized the onboarding process offered at Interbank’s financial stores, which resulted in increased customer satisfaction level by 3pp compared to the traditional model and increased assisted digital sales to represent to 29% of sales per store.

The following chart illustrates Interbank’s financial stores evolution according to the SBS.

LOGO

ATMs

Interbank’s strategy is to offer its customers increased convenience and as of December 31, 2022, had the third-largest ATM network in Peru with more than 1,554 ATMs located across Peru. Although this number represents a reduction from the 2,159 ATMs in 2016, the streamlining of the network has allowed Interbank to relocate ATMs to higher convenience locations as well as invest in renewing and upgrading its equipment, while monetary transactions kept growing year-over-year in this channel. The reduction of the network in 2019, responds to Interbank’s decision to discontinue the operation of 359 coin-dispensing ATMs, migrating those transactions to more efficient channels like regular ATMs or correspondent agents.

As of December 31, 2022, approximately 67.4% of Interbank’s ATMs are located out-of-branch in high foot traffic areas like shopping malls, supermarket and airports. These 1,048 ATMs make up one of the largest out-of-branch networks in Peru, as reported by ASBANC. The ATM channel is one of the largest channels in Peru in terms of monetary transactions, with a 21% share and has advanced features, including cardless withdrawals, and the ability to receive cash deposits, bill and credit card payments in cash or via debit card, as well as disburse payroll advances. To offer this increased convenience in an efficient way, Interbank operates under the Global Net brand which is also a business line that provides ATM services to other financial institutions in Peru and acquires ATM transactions for all major global brands, including Visa, MasterCard, American Express, JCB, Union Pay, Diners and Discovery.

The following chart illustrates the evolution in number of Interbank’s ATMs according to ASBANC.

LOGO

Correspondent Agents

This channel operates under the Interbank Agente brand and consists of providing traditional merchants, for example, warehouses, pharmacies, low-cost electronic terminals that allow customers to carry out basic cash transactions, such as withdrawals, deposits and utility bill payments. In order to accelerate and broaden geographic coverage, Interbank incorporated external Correspondent Agents, which currently represent 46% of the total Correspondent Agents, expanding its network from more than 5,713 as of December 31, 2020 to 5,672 as of December 31 2022. We believe that Interbank’s focus on migrating low-value cash transactions from stores to more efficient channels contributed to an increase in transactions in this channel, from 3.4 million to 3.6 million.

The following chart illustrates the evolution of Interbank’s Correspondent Agents according to Interbank’s information.

LOGO

Mobile Banking

Interbank has developed a robust digital ecosystem that allows its customers to fulfil their financial needs and goals with a 100% digital experience. Its objective is to provide a journey which does not require physical contact so that its clients do not need to physically visit a branch or contact the call center, unless the customer chooses to do so. Interbank offers digital banking to its new and existing customers through its website and its mobile application. In December 2022, Interbank had more than 3.1 million monthly active users and registered over 20.8 million monetary transactions as well as 220.9 million non-monetary transactions. Its mobile application was the highest rated in the Google Play Store among the four largest banks in Peru. In addition to its website and mobile banking channels, Interbank has also developed other digital solutions that address specific customer segments or needs such as Interbank Benefit, a loyalty program, and Cuenta Sueldo APP, where our payroll account customers can access special discounts and benefits. Furthermore, in 2019, Interbank launched Crédito por Convenio APP, which services our public sector payroll deduction loan customers.

Interbank’s website provides general information about the bank and its products and services and has a commercial orientation, allowing non-customers to acquire credit cards and loans or open a savings or transactional account.

Interbank’s mobile banking is available to existing customers and its services include: (i) transactions: account balance and transaction inquiries, transfers between accounts to Interbank and other local and international banks, credit card, bills and loan payments, mutual funds investments and cardless ATM withdrawal requests; (ii) after-sales services: lock your card, enable or disable card usage online or abroad, turn on notifications for card usage, mobile transactions and/or ATM withdrawals and divide card transactions into installments; (iii) product cross-sell: credit cards, credit card line extension, pre-approved loans, savings accounts and insurance products; and (iv) personal financial management tools: view your credit score and tips to improve it, spending, creating a budget. As of December 31, 2022, more than 82.8% of Interbank’s transactions, 67.1% of the after-sales services and 95.5% of Interbank’s products were available online. Furthermore, as part of its strategy to enhance the digital experience and incentivize its customers to migrate to digital channels, Interbank has digital-only services, such as access to the loyalty program “Interbank Benefit”, the digital savings account “Piggy Bank”, the personal financial management tool Mis Finanzas and a personalized credit score based on customers’ financial behavior.

Increased monthly usage of digital solutions among customers is key to Interbank’s strategy as mobile banking customers interact monthly more than eight times the amount that branch customers do, have lower transactional costs and have a better net promoter score and churn indicators as of December 31, 2022.

Furthermore, in December 2022, 70.9% of our retail customers that interacted with the bank through any channel were digital customers, that is, customers that also access Interbank’s services though internet and mobile banking, while monetary transactions in this channel grew by 35.6% from December 2021 to December 2022.

Contact Center

Interbank seeks to prioritize the self-service of our clients, offering the help of service advisors 24/7 who can meet the needs of customers. Our strategy focuses on delivering first contact solutions, generating value in each contact.

Additionally, we seek to generate value in each touch point, with products and benefits to improve customers’ experience and thus their relationship with the bank. In May 2020, Interbank launched their service bot “AVI” offered through the WhatsApp platform. During 2022, Interbank focused on continuing to grow this channel, reaching 250,000 average monthly interactions, approximately 131,000 of which were self-assisted in December 2022, compared to 93,000 self-assisted interactions in January 2022.

Interbank has a state-of-the-art contact center, which managed an average of over 543,000 assisted interactions per month in 2022, answering inquiries from clients, offering assistance and information, and selling new products to customers.

Interbank has a dedicated telephone sales force of 290 employees as of December 31, 2022, which sells credit cards and short loans. The dedicated sales force is a key resource for customer acquisition and for our up-selling and cross-selling campaigns.

Information Technology Unit

Interbank continuously invests in new technology and the maintenance of its existing equipment and infrastructure in order to improve its value proposition to its customers, increase its efficiency and support business growth. The Information Technology Unit focuses on assuring 24-hour channel availability, enhancing the timeliness of data processing, guaranteeing data protection and anti-fraud security, updating and maintaining hardware platforms and software systems, developing contingency plans and implementing technology projects. Interbank’s IT system also processes credit card, personal and commercial loans, and electronic transactions.

In order to comply with business and regulatory requirements, Interbank has strengthened its IT governance model incorporating best practices for IT quality assurance, risk evaluation, project management and dividing responsibilities within the teams that operate the technology and the teams that develop new solutions. It has also fortified its business continuity program through increased redundancy programs and upgraded hardware and software components. This model includes establishing operating partnerships with various leading word-class IT vendors.

Interbank has also made significant investments to upgrade its data centers and central technology platforms. These platforms provide a stable and secure environment for Interbank’s operations, a better understanding of cost drivers, and improve its processes.

As part of its cybersecurity strategy, Interbank continued to evolve the maturity level of its cybersecurity capabilities, processes and tools, based on security standards such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST), cybersecurity framework, CSF), ISO 27001 and PCI DSS, new industry trends and definitions established by the bank. In 20212022, Interbank focused its cybersecurity strategy on defining and beginning four points:

•

Strengthening the cybersecurity department, evolving the roles and responsibilities of the team and doubling its headcount

•

Continue to implement and develop the Zero Trust approach to address emerging risks through a stronger and more adaptable posture. Along this path, SASE (Security Access Service Edge) architecture capabilities such as CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker), CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) and NGSWG (Next Generation Web Gateway) have been implemented. Interbank also advanced its DevSecOps approach through continuous testing in the software development cycle and security automations in the integration and continuous deployment pipelines. During 2022, ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access) has been implemented for all remote connections, including third-party connections.

•

Implementing new endpoint cybersecurity model through Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) technologies

•

Evolving detection and response capabilities with new intelligence driven SOC (Security Operations Center) services, mainly supported by artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies.

In the coming years, Interbank will continue to move towards a Zero Trust approach, the implementation of new local regulatory requirements in terms of cybersecurity and the generation of digital trust in the services offered to the customers.

Interbank’s IT strategy is focused on dedicating more resources to projects that add more value to the customer and help to accelerate digital transformation. Interbank invests in back-end applications with the aim of keeping applications current while more effort and resources are dedicated to customer facing applications in order to provide a seamless digital experience to internal and external customers through all our channels.

A high percentage of IT investment is aimed at deepening the understanding of the customer to achieve service that exceed their expectations, providing solutions to their problems and enabling a selling platform with contextual and real time offerings. To provide this, Interbank IT

Unit fully utilizes the new technologies that allow the flexibility, scalability and availability required to fulfill customer demands. APIs, micro services and multicloud environments have been implemented since 2018 to reach these objectives. A close relationship with fintechs also helps Interbank to leverage some capabilities and creates opportunities to learn about the way to approach different solutions. An important fact to consider is the transformation of the working model from a waterfall scheme to an agile framework, based on new processes, tools and cultural changes since 2019. In 2020, the development model evolved to allow remote work, redesigning processes and adopting new tools to achieve an optimal work experience for technology teams while taking care of their communication needs, security and productivity. During 2021, our technology teams continued to work remotely, and in 2022, we adopted a hybrid model where technology teams can decide whether they prefer to work remotely or on bank’s premises achieving optimal levels of effectiveness and efficiency.

Insurance Segment

Overview

Interseguro is an insurance company that caters to Peru’s growing middle class. Interseguro is focused on annuities and life insurance, two of the fastest growing insurance market segments in Peru, which are driven by the sale of annuities mostly to individuals that reached retirement or became disabled or died and individuals seeking life protection with savings options. Interseguro has been the leader in the Peruvian annuities (excluding private annuities) segment since 2010, with market shares in terms of premiums of 30% and 32.0% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

For the four-year period ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s ROE averaged 23.8% compared to 13.8% for the Peruvian insurance industry. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s premiums (excluding disability and survivorship gross premiums) decreased 4.9% as compared to 2021, according to the SBS, related to lower sales as a result of worse annuities market conditions. During 2022, the survivorship annuities market decreased 9.7% compared to 2021 due to the lower mortality rates from the COVID-19 outbreak, which continued to decrease during 2022 as a result of stability in waves and emergence of variants. This led to Interseguro annuities sales, with survivorship premiums going from S/ 470.6 million in 2021 to S/ 411.2 million in 2022, a decrease of 12.6%. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Interseguro’s premiums (excluding disability and survivorship gross premiums) increased 71.9% as compared to 2020, according to the SBS, related to lower sales as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Interseguro intends to leverage its leading position in annuities, as well as Intercorp Peru’s and Interbank’s retail distribution capacity to continue capturing growth opportunities in the insurance industry. In addition, Interseguro expects to continue developing new products to satisfy increasing demand for insurance products by middle class families in Peru.

The growth of annuities is expected to accelerate as the number of Peruvian private pension system affiliates and the Peruvian salaries average increases. From 2010 to 2022, the growth of Peruvian private pension system affiliates was 90%, according to the SBS, and the annual average growth of Peruvian salaries from 2010 to 2022 was 3%, according to INEI. In Peru, employees may choose to accumulate their mandatory retirement contribution in the public or the private pension system. Under the mandatory private pension system, a retiree has the option of converting the capital accumulated in a personal account maintained with an AFP into an annuity offered by a life insurance company, such as Interseguro. In addition to retirement annuities, Interseguro also offers disability annuities to members of the Peruvian private pension system who have been declared permanently or partially disabled. Moreover, Interseguro offers survivorship annuities to beneficiaries of deceased members of the system. Once an annuity client chooses an insurance company, the decision is irrevocable. Besides private pension system annuities, Interseguro offers private annuities, a product that was launched in 2016 and that is sold to any owner of private funds and is not restricted to members of the system and their accumulated capital. This product is aimed at retirees that choose to withdraw the 95.5% of their pension funds and are looking for an option to capitalize such funds.

Interseguro also offers traditional life insurance products, as well as low-cost premium retail insurance products, including credit life, SOAT, credit card protection insurance, among others, mainly sold through Interbank and Intercorp Peru’s complementary channels, as well as digital channels. Interseguro’s life and retail insurance business lines have grown significantly over the last five years. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro was the fifth largest consolidated insurance company and the fourth largest life insurance company in Peru in terms of premiums. In addition, in terms of the size of its portfolio, Interseguro was the largest insurance company in Peru as of December 31, 2022.

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Interseguro’s net results were net profit of S/248.0 million (U.S.$65.0 million), net profit of S/272.7 million (U.S.$68.4 million) and net profit of S/141.1million (U.S.$39.0 million), respectively. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Interseguro had shareholders’ equity of S/984.2 million (U.S.$258.0 million), S/873.6 million (U.S.$219.1 million) and S/935.3 million (U.S.$258.3 million), respectively. Interseguro’s ROE for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 26.6%, 28.2% and 18.9%, respectively, while ROA was 1.7%, 1.8% and 1.0%, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interseguro’s net profit under SBS GAAP were S/202.8 million and S/303.6 million, respectively. The decrease in Interseguro’s net profit under SBS GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021 was primarily a result of a S/141.1 million decrease in net gain of financial investments. According to SBS, as of December 31, 2022, Interseguro had shareholders’ equity of S/1,186 million as compared to S/1,486 million for 2021. Interseguro’s ROE under SBS GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 16.9%, as compared to 19.9% for the year ended December 31, 2021. According to the SBS, for the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro was the third most profitable insurance company by ROE, when compared to the five other largest insurance companies in Peru.

COVID-19 Measures

Interseguro had what we consider to be a rapid and effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, deploying response measures targeting its operations, financial profile and investments, and customers and employees.

The main measures implemented by Interseguro were related to the improvements of facilities to work remotely as well as the improvement of digital channels. Interseguro also took a more conservative investment strategy, which resulted in the sale of positions involving higher risk and the purchase of assets we believe have a safer risk-return profile.

These measures allowed Interseguro to continue its operations during 2020 and the following years, without major impacts. Finally, Interseguro is closely monitoring the collection of life insurance premiums and offering rescheduling of payments to life insurance policyholders, while advancing pension payments to annuity clients within the same month during which they were originally due, in order to ensure that the liquidity and security needs of its clients are met.

Interseguro’s Business Lines

Interseguro has three business lines: (1) annuities, (2) retail insurance and (3) individual life.

LOGO

The following chart shows Interseguro’s and the Peruvian insurance system’s breakdown by life insurance premiums plus collections according to the SBS as of December 31, 2022:

Interseguro

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Insurance system

LOGO

Source: SBS.

The following chart shows Interseguro’s gross premiums and collections, according to SBS for the periods indicated.

Gross Premiums and collections (S/ in Millions)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

(1)	Excluding gross premiums from disability and survivorship.

Annuities

An annuity is a type of insurance policy that, in exchange for an initial lump sum payment, provides regular monthly payments. Interseguro offers three types of annuities: Soles, U.S. dollars and soles indexed to CPI, adjusted by 2% per year.

There are two groups of annuities: (i) Regular Retirement Annuities are the annuities sold under the Peruvian private pension system, and (ii) Private Annuities which include the Renta Privada product. In Peru, employees may choose to deposit their cumulative contributions in the public or the private pension system. Under the private pension system, upon retirement, a retiree has the option of converting the capital accumulated into a personal account maintained with an AFP, collecting 95.5% of their accumulated capital or converting the capital into an annuity offered by an insurance company, such as Interseguro.

In 2016, following the enactment of law No. 30425, retirees are allowed to withdraw up to 95.5% of their accumulated capital in cash upon retirement. As a result, there was a significant reduction of annuities sold by Peruvian insurance companies, including Interseguro. In order to maintain the leadership in annuities, Interseguro launched Private Annuities. This product allows retirees to receive a fixed income either for life or temporarily. Interseguro was the first insurance company to introduce this type of product to the market in response to the new law. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, most of the clients of Private Annuities and their funds originate from retirees that choose to withdraw the 95.5% of their pension funds.

In addition to Regular Retirement Annuities and Private Annuities, Interseguro also offers disability annuities to members of the Peruvian private pension system who have been declared permanently or partially disabled before reaching retirement age and thus unable to access a sufficient pension and survivorship annuities for beneficiaries of deceased members of the system.

The following table shows Interseguro’s Annuity Gross Premiums by type from 2018 to 2022.

Annuities Gross Premiums (S/ in Millions)

LOGO

Source: Company information.

Interseguro’s annuities products include:

Regular Retirement Annuities

Retirement. The retirement annuity product is directed to members of the Peruvian private pension system who are 65 years of age or older and retiring. This product represented 0.3% of annuities sold by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 0.4% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Early Retirement. The early retirement product was offered to members of the Peruvian private pension system who are not yet 65 years of age, but who are permitted to have access to their Peruvian private pension system accounts if the savings in such accounts allow for a pension of at least 40% of the average last 120 months’ compensation. The early retirement annuity products represented 0.0% of annuities sold by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 0.1% for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Peruvian law was modified and since May 2019, in order to access this product, men must be at least 55 years old and women 50 years old. This change is intended to fill a loophole in the law that allowed affiliates to deliberately increase their funds with additional deposits, in order to access early retirement and withdraw 95.5% of their total pension funds, regardless of age. This modification closing the loophole should positively impact the annuities market slightly, as it helps in retaining affiliates in the private pension system for longer

Special Early Retirement. The special early retirement product was offered until December 2018 to members of the Peruvian private pension system who are 55 years of age or older and male, or 50 years of age or older and female, and are retiring and have not been contributing to the Peruvian private pension system for at least 12 months. Since May 2019, Peruvian law established that this regime is permanent and in order to access this product, if a retiree receives income during the period in which they have not been contributing, total income must be less than or equal to seven UIT (Unidad Impositiva Tributaria).

This product is more flexible than the standard early retirement annuity product. The special early retirement annuity product represented 0.0% of annuities sold by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 0.0% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Private Annuities. The Private Annuities product was launched in 2016 allowing the recovery of Interseguro’s premiums and collections from the effects of the law No. 30,425, enacted in 2016. This product can be sold to any owner of private funds and is not restricted to members of the system and their accumulated capital. The annuity can have any duration and the lump sum invested can be partially or totally repaid at the end of the annuity, if it has one. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, most of the clients and their funds come from retirees that chose to withdraw 95.5% of their accumulated capital. Private Annuities represented 26.9% of annuities sold by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 32.9% and 39.4% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Disability and Survivorship Annuities

Disability and Survivorship. Under Peruvian law there is a mandatory insurance coverage for all members of the pension system paid monthly in addition to their contribution. In case a member has been declared permanently or partially disabled, or deceased while having legal beneficiaries, this insurance completes the accumulated capital as if the individual had worked until retirement age, allowing a better pension when applying for the retirement. While this insurance is not an annuity, it is closely related to the one we describe next. Disability and survivorship represented 1.3% of annuities sold by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 1.0% and 2.5% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The SBS conducts a Dutch auction every two years inviting insurance companies to bid to determine which insurance company will be the provider for this insurance in a two-year period. Interseguro was successful in the 2015 auction, and as a result of the merger with Seguros Sura, they were also a provider for 2017. Interseguro participated in the auction for the 2021-2022 years but were not successful; they expect to bid again at the next auction. Although this will represent a decrease in gross premiums in the following years, Interseguro ceded almost 100% of disability and survivorship gross premiums; therefore, the effect on net profit is minimal.

Disability and Survivorship Annuities. The disability and survivorship product is offered to members of the Peruvian private pension system who have been declared permanently or partially disabled and to beneficiaries of deceased members of the Peruvian private pension system. This annuity is offered in conjunction with the disability and survivorship mandatory insurance. Disability and survivorship annuity products accounted for 71.5% annuities sold by Interseguro for the year period ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 65.7% and 57.6% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

All retirement annuities sold under the Peruvian private pension system offer monthly payments for the life of the policyholder and thus the initial lump sum is never recovered. A retiree’s joint choice of an insurance company, currency denomination and retirement modality is irrevocable.

Product differentiation is limited in the Peruvian annuities sector, as product features are regulated by the SBS. The market position of each insurance company is driven instead by its sales strategy and quality of service. Interseguro’s sales strategy, consisting of providing ongoing sales force training, and implementing innovative control and management mechanisms, has permitted Interseguro to be the market leader in the annuities sector over the past four years, with an increasing advantage over the second largest market participant.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s market share by annuity premiums (including Private Annuities and excluding Previsional Insurance) was 24.2%, nearly 3.4 basis points higher than its next competitor’s market share.

Retail Insurance

Interseguro offers simple, low-cost premium products targeted to middle class families and sold mainly through Interbank financial stores, as well as channels owned by Intercorp Peru, including Intercorp Retail points of sale (Plaza Vea and Oechsle) and digital channels. In 2016, Interseguro expanded its retail insurance portfolio with an online sale for the launch of the digital SOAT and in 2018, with travel insurance and vehicle insurance.

Interseguro offers the following retail insurance products:

Credit Life Insurance. The credit life insurance product protects against death or disability of the insured and is designed to pay the debt owed by a customer to the financial institution. This product is available for mortgages, credit cards and personal loans. Credit life insurance represented 57.8% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 55.4% and 59.7% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Debit and Credit Card Protection Insurance. The debit and credit card protection insurance product protects the insured against financial loss, medical expenses for hospitalization or accidental death as a result of theft, assault and abduction. Debit and credit card protection insurance represented 6.7% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 8.2% and 10.4% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

SOAT (Seguro Obligatorio de Accidentes de Tránsito). The SOAT product protects against the risk of death or injury to occupants and third parties involved in an automobile accident. The SOAT product is mandatory, and coverage is limited to cover personal injury, excluding any physical damage to the vehicle. The SOAT product accounted for 19.8% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 20.8% and 19.7% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Vehicle Insurance. The vehicle insurance coverage includes damage to vehicles due to traffic accidents, total loss, theft, fire, nature risks, strikes or vandalism and civil liability for occupants and third parties. Occupants’ damages such as permanent disability, healing expenses, funeral expenses and death are also covered. In addition, this insurance includes replacement drivers, cranes and mechanical assistance, among others. Vehicle Insurance represented 5.3% and 4.4% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Loan Protection Insurance. The loan protection insurance covers a specific number of payments of a loan in case the insured loses his job. Loan protection insurance accounted for 4.9% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 5.3% and 3.8% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Extended Warranty. The extended warranty product extends the product’s original warranty period by about 12–24 months. Extended warranty product accounted for 0.4% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 0.6% and 0.5% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Others. The other products category protects against personal accidents. Other products accounted for 5.6% of total retail insurance premiums assumed by Interseguro for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 5.8% and 2.8% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Individual Life

Although the individual life insurance market remains relatively small in Peru, the market has grown at a CAGR of 5.5% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the individual life insurance market decreased 6.5% as compared to 2021, primarily due to an economic recovery following less restrictive government mandates by the end of 2021, as well as increased concerns relating to the different waves of COVID-19 which resulted in increased purchases of life insurance. The recovery of the Peruvian economy and digitalization of the sales processes are expected to boost sales of individual life products.

Interseguro offers a variety of individual life insurance products, providing a wide range of coverage for the length of a policyholder’s life. Most of Interseguro’s products also provide savings features.

Interseguro’s strategy in individual life insurance consists in adapting its products to the emerging Peruvian middle class, developing a highly trained sales force, achieving high standards of sales efficiency and leveraging digitalization to increase sales of life insurance. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Interseguro positioned itself as the third largest participant in the individual life insurance market, with a 15.8% market share by individual life premiums.

Sales Force

Interseguro markets its annuities and individual life insurance products through its own dedicated sales force both in Lima and across Peru’s provinces, without a third-party intermediary. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Interseguro retooled its sales force to provide customers with a 100% remote assistance and digital operation. Prior to the pandemic, sales in annuities and life insurance products were only conducted in-person, but digitalization of these sales was accelerated.

In annuities, Interseguro employed 120 agents, 71 in Lima and 49 outside of Lima as of December 31, 2022. Each salesperson receives continuous training through a multiple-level program, which includes training in macroeconomic background, financial statement analysis, investment policy, marketing techniques and time management. In addition, Interseguro’s annuity sales agents specialize in the sale of different types of annuity products. As a result, Interseguro’s sales force is trained to satisfy each customer’s needs.

In life insurance, Interseguro employed 507 agents, 336 agents in Lima and 171 agents outside of Lima, as of December 31, 2022. In addition, Interseguro employs servicing agents with the aim of servicing existing life insurance policies. We believe that constant training develops effective sales techniques and the skills to assess customer needs, which we believe is one of Interseguro’s critical competitive advantages. Interseguro has a specialized team focused on setting a training curriculum for each salesperson in the first three years with the company as well as in assigning a mentor to each new recruit.

As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro works with six brokers nationwide to offer SOAT. Interseguro also works with insurance brokers to sell SOAT to increase coverage in Peru with limited capital investment. As of December 31, 2022, the brokerage channel accounts for approximately 13.9% of Interseguro’s total SOAT sales.

Strategic Partners

Interseguro offers its retail insurance, such as credit life insurance, debit and credit card protection insurance, loan protection insurance, SOAT and extended warranty through non-traditional channels, including partnerships with Interbank and Intercorp Retail.

Through its partner companies, Interseguro reaches a large number of customers, offering a convenient and reliable payment mechanism. This distribution network represents one of Interseguro’s strongest competitive advantages, as it allows for a broad insurance product offering through several points of sales.

Interseguro’s retail insurance division used the following distribution channels to sell its products as of December 31, 2022:


Strategic Partners		Points of Sale
Interbank		Financial Stores: 164
		Plaza Vea: +100 stores
Intercorp Retail		Oechsle: 25 stores

Interseguro’s retail insurance premiums breakdown by distribution channel as of December 31, 2022 is the following:


Strategic Partners		Retail insurance premiums breakdown
Interbank		66.3%
Intercorp Retail (Plaza Vea and Oeschle)		3.9%

Investments and Investment Management

Investment Portfolio

Interseguro invests the insurance premiums yet to be paid out in claims in its investment portfolio, based on a policy of capital conservation and adequate diversification.

The main objective of Interseguro’s investment portfolio is to cover its future payment obligations, associated mainly with its annuities business. Interseguro maintains a conservative asset liability management approach, matching its obligations by currency and maturity. Interseguro’s portfolio focuses on investment grade fixed-income instruments in U.S. dollars, soles and inflation linked notes, mitigating interest rate, inflation, and currency risks. Interseguro’s obligations consist of technical obligations related to annuities that are sold at a fixed interest rate, thus Interseguro prioritizes the investments on fixed income securities that hedge such obligations. Based on Interseguro’s investment strategy, its portfolio shows asset sufficiency to cover insurance liabilities at a currency, duration, inflation and interest rate levels that hedge against volatility in these factors.

Given that the Peruvian market offers a limited range of long-term investment instruments, Interseguro has sought to increase its investments outside of Peru and explore alternative investments in the local market, such as real estate projects.

Interseguro is required to comply with the following investment management principles according to the SBS:

•

Security Principle. Based on the protection and preservation of the economic value of assets over time.

•

Liquidity Principle. Consist of the availability of an asset to be converted into cash at the required time and without significantly affecting its value.

•

Diversification Principle. Based on the set of assets that contribute to the diversification of the risk factors of the portfolio and reduction of the potential impact of adverse effects.

•

Parity Principle. Parity between the characteristics of the asset and the obligations that it supports. These features include the term or horizon, the degree of liquidity or enforceability, currency, volatility in valuation, predictability and timing of flows, among others.

•

Profitability Principle. Based on generation of returns that would cover at least the commitments offered to policyholders.

Additionally, as established by the investment regulation of insurance companies, Interseguro must meet its technical obligations. As part of the coverage of the technical obligation proceeds, Interseguro must follow the investment management principles established in the regulation and comply with the eligibility requirements of its investments by type of assets.

Regarding the investment eligibility, to consider an asset as eligible, it must not be affected or be subject to any precautionary measure. The custody agreements of the eligible investment must not contain any clause that allows use of such assets as collateral to back other company obligations and that there are no other measures that limit the free transfer of the assets. Furthermore, eligible investments must comply with certain investment limits, by issuer, economic group, asset and foreign issuers. In addition, assets rated in categories below the investment grade cannot be considered as an eligible investment.

Interseguro’s investment management complies with the limits and requirements indicated in the regulation in order to minimize non-eligible investments and comply with the coverage of its technical reserves, minimum solvency capital required and guaranty fund.

As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s investments amounted to S/ 12,582.8 million, of which S/ 10,544.5 million and S/ 750.5 million were fixed income securities, and equity securities and fund investments, respectively, as compared to S/13,175.9 million, of which S/10.905.6 million and S/1,045.9 million were fixed income securities, and equity securities and fund investments, respectively, for 2021. As of December 31, 2022, investments in real estate projects were S/ 1,287.7 million (approximately U.S.$337.6 million) as compared to S/1,224.4 million (approximately U.S.$307.8 million) for 2021.

The following tables present a breakdown of Interseguro’s investment portfolio by type of investment as of the dates indicated.

Investments by Type


	Book Value as of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%
Fixed Income		10,544.5		83.8	%		10,905.6		82.8	%		11,645.1		83.5	%
Corporate Bonds		4,837.3		38.4	%		4,367.0		33.1	%		5,519.6		39.6	%
Peruvian Sovereign Bonds		3,126.2		24.8	%		3,169.6		24.1	%		2,923.8		21.0	%
Foreign Bonds		2,581.0		20.5	%		3,369.0		25.6	%		3,201.7		23.0	%
Equity and Funds		750.5		6.0	%		1,045.9		7.9	%		1,249.9		9.0	%
Equity		599.5		4.8	%		963.2		7.3	%		1,119.0		8.0	%
Funds		151.2		1.2	%		82.6		0.6	%		130.9		0.9	%
Real Estate		1,287.74		10.0	%		1,224.4		9.3	%		1,044.0		7.5	%

Total		12,582.8		100.0	%		13,175.9		100.0	%		13,939.0		100.0	%

The following tables present a breakdown of Interseguro’s investment portfolio by currency as of the dates indicated.

Investments by Currency


	Book Value as of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
Portfolio	S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%
Sol(1)		8,542.6		67.9	%		8,180.3		62.1	%		8,620.1		61.8	%
U.S. dollar		4,040.2		32.1	%		4,995.6		37.9	%		5,318.9		38.2	%

Total		12,582.8		100.0	%		13,175.9		100.0	%		13,939.0		100.0	%

(1)	Real estate investments are measured in soles.

The following tables present a breakdown of Interseguro’s investment portfolio by rating as of the dates indicated.

Investments by Rating⁽¹⁾


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%
AAA		836.9		27.1	%		662.2		21.8	%		862.3		22.6	%
AA+ to AA-		2,221.0		72.0	%		2,351.2		77.3	%		2,920.2		76.6	%
A+ to A-		25.7		0.8	%		27.2		0.9	%		31.1		0.8	%

Total Local Ratings		3,040.6		100.0			3,040.6		100.0	%		3,813.6		100.0	%

AAA		0.0		0.0	%		0.0		0.0	%		0.0		0.0	%
AA+ to AA-		26.4		0.4	%		29.2		0.4	%		35.6		0.5	%
A+ to A-		477.3		6.4	%		211.4		2.7	%		1,311.6		16.7	%
BBB+		2,383.4		31.9	%		2,655.3		33.8	%		2,440.1		31.2	%
BBB		2,710.0		36.3	%		3,356.3		42.7	%		1,738.9		22.2	%
BBB-		1,252.4		16.8	%		1,161.6		14.8	%		1,918.9		24.5	%
BB+		262.0		3.5	%		143.8		1.8	%		0.0		0.0	%
BB		0.0		0.0	%		0.0		0.0	%		206.2		2.6	%
BB-		349.5		4.7	%		102.7		1.3	%		0.0		0.0	%
B		0.0		0.0	%		204.8		2.6	%		0.0		0.0	%
CCC+		0.0		0.0	%		0.0		0.0	%		180.2		2.3	%

Total Foreign Rating		7,461.0		100.0			7,865.0		100.0	%		7,831.4		100.0	%

(1)	Includes only credit rated fixed-income investments.

In regards to fixed income, Interseguro prioritizes the investment in local bonds and foreign bonds with a higher risk rating of AA- and BBB-, respectively.

The following table presents a breakdown of Interseguro’s investment portfolio by maturity as of the dates indicated.

Investments by Maturity


	Book Value as of December 31,
	2022		2021		2020
	S/in millions		S/in millions		S/in millions
Maturity
0-5 years		467.5		121.6		137.4
6-10 years		1,726.1		1,287.6		1,688.1
11-20 years		5,350.3		4,461.3		4,982.6
21+ years		3,000.6		5,035.1		4,837.1
No maturity(1)		2,038.2		2,270.3		2,293.9

Total		12,582.8		13,175.9		13,939.0

(1)	Real-estate and equity investments.

Fixed-Income

The fixed-income securities portfolio is mainly composed of long-term fixed rate debt that are eligible instruments to cover reserves, in compliance with the requirements established by the SBS.

As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s fixed-income investments represented 83.8% of its total portfolio, of which 38.4% were corporate bonds, 24.8% were Peruvian sovereign bonds, 20.5% were foreign bonds as compared. As of December 31, 2021 Interseguro’s fixed-income investments represented 82.8% of its total portfolio, of which 40.0% were corporate bonds, 29.1% were Peruvian sovereign bonds and 30.9% were foreign bonds. As of December 31, 2020, Interseguro’s fixed-income investments represented 83.5% of its total portfolio and of which 47.4% were corporate bonds, 25.1% were Peruvian sovereign bonds and 27.5% were foreign bonds.

As of December 31, 2022, 100.0% of bonds with local ratings and 91.8% of bonds with international ratings had investment grade status.

Equity and Funds

Substantially all of Interseguro’s equity and funds portfolio is invested in companies with low beta and relatively stable and predictable cash flows. Interseguro’s equity and funds portfolio is invested across Latin America and the United States. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s equity and funds portfolio represented 6.0% and of its total portfolio, of which 63.3% was invested in foreign securities and 36.7% in local securities. As of December 31, 2021, Interseguro’s equity and funds portfolio represented 7.9% of its total portfolio, of which 74.2% was invested in foreign securities and 25.8% in local securities. As December 31, 2020, Interseguro’s equity and funds portfolio represented 9.0% of its total portfolio, of which 67.6% was invested in foreign securities and 32.4% in local securities.

Real Estate

Interseguro’s investments in real estate are made across the different types of properties: office, industrial, retail and land for development. Interseguro leverages advice from its affiliates, InRetail Shopping Malls and Real Plaza, in order to maximize its real estate portfolio. InRetail Properties Management is specialized in securing new locations and developing shopping malls based on its proprietary consumer demand analytics and projected yield targets. Real Plaza is focused on operating shopping malls in Peru.

Real estate income derives from the appreciation of real estate property and from rental income from its tenants. Interseguro’s rental income comes primarily from Orquídeas (offices building) and Tabacalera (industrial asset). Tabacalera is an industrial property leased to Teleatento Peru S.A.C, which is a company dedicated to call centers. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro’s investments in real estate projects represented 10.2% of its total portfolio, as compared to 9.3% and 7.5% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Reinsurance

Interseguro transfers risks to reinsurers in order to limit its maximum aggregate potential loss and minimize exposures on large particular individual risks. Reinsurance is placed with reinsurance companies based on its reinsurance policy, which is annually approved by Interseguro’s board of directors and its risk committee. Interseguro’s main reinsurers are six international reinsurance companies: Scor Global Life, Munich Re, Gen Re and Hannover.

Premiums ceded to reinsurers represented 1.3%, 1.0% and 1.6% of Interseguro’s premiums assumed for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively (these percentages do not include the reinsurance for the pension-related insurance (disability and survivorship)).

Interseguro also has catastrophe reinsurance that covers individual and group life insurance products, except annuities. These contracts are intended to limit Interseguro’s risk exposure in the event of low-probability but high-cost events, such as natural or man-made disasters.

Information Technology Unit

Interseguro’s IT unit is responsible for managing its technology infrastructure, telecommunications network and computer systems. The unit is also responsible for designing and implementing in-house solutions or third-party technological developments to support Interseguro’s operation.

Interseguro has undertaken investments in technology with the aim of providing a stable and secure platform to support its rapidly expanding business. In 2012, Interseguro’s insurance company decided to invest in the implementation of an operations system in order to support Interseguro’s planned growth in life and retail insurance, a CRM platform, and business intelligence capabilities, among others. Interseguro invested approximately S/ 1.5 million in projects for the year ended December 31, 2022 and approximately S/1.5 million and S/1.7 million, in projects for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Interseguro plans to invest approximately S/10.5 million over the next three years in technology.

Recently, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, cyber-security risks have increased primarily due to implementation of remote work policies. In response, Interseguro has implemented additional cyber-security measures to prevent, detect, and respond to these enhanced cyber-security risks. These measures focus primarily on the improvement of access management processes within the company, implementation of processes to supervise access to the company’s systems, implementation and updates of the company’s information security policies and procedures, and continuous evaluation of new threats in cyber-security.

Wealth Management Segment

Overview

Inteligo is a provider of wealth management services through Inteligo Bank, brokerage services through Inteligo SAB and mutual funds management services through Interfondos. Inteligo Bank primarily focuses on individuals with investable assets in the range of U.S.$500,000 and U.S.$10.0 million, where Inteligo believes there is higher growth potential. Inteligo SAB and Interfondos focus on providing brokerage and mutual funds services to individuals with investable assets under U.S.$500,000. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo had assets under management of S/21,317.4 million (U.S.$5,589.3 million) as compared to S/22,980.7 million (U.S.$5,763.9 million) in 2021. Inteligo’s assets under management grew at a CAGR of 4.9% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022. Inteligo conducts various types of banking, trust, financing, brokerage and investing activities for high net worth individuals.

Inteligo SAB also provides sales and trading operations for individual and institutional customers primarily in the Peruvian capital markets. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo SAB was the seventh largest broker by market share in equities trading, according to the SMV. Interfondos is the fourth largest mutual fund manager in Peru with a 15.6% market share based on assets under management, according to the SMV.

Inteligo’s result for the year ended December 31, 2022 was a loss S/141.4 million as compared to net profit S/283.5 million in 2021. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo had shareholders’ equity of S/894.2 million as compared to S/1,295.1 million in 2021. Inteligo’s ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 13.6% loss as compared to 23.0% in 2021.

COVID-19 Measures

Inteligo had what we consider to be a rapid and effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, deploying response measures targeting its operations, financial profile and investments and customers and employees.

The main measures implemented in Inteligo were related to facilities for remote work, using technology to maintain frequent communication and to ensure agile execution and improve investment strategy. The measures allowed Inteligo to continue its operations during 2020 and the following years, without major impacts.

Business Lines

Inteligo has three business lines: (1) financial advisory; (2) lending; and (3) portfolio investments.

LOGO

Financial Advisory

Inteligo provides financial advisory services to high net worth individuals regarding investments, including equities, fixed income, structured products, alternative investments and managed accounts. Through its team of investment analysts, Inteligo designs financial strategies to satisfy the investment objectives of each client in the Peruvian and international financial markets. Furthermore, Inteligo provides regular updates to its clients on market conditions through reports from its in-house research team.

The strength of Inteligo’s financial advisory services has contributed to the growth of its fee income as a percentage of its revenues. Inteligo’s fee income from financial services, net decreased from S/197.0 million for 2021 to S/ 163.3 million for 2022.

Lending

Inteligo offers lending services through Inteligo Bank to complement its wealth management business only to its existing clients. Most of the loans are categorized as consumer financing.

Inteligo Bank’s loan portfolio was fully collateralized by its clients’ assets as of December 31, 2022. Inteligo’s net loan portfolio totaled S/ 1,784.3 million as of December 31, 2022, increasing 5.1%, from S/1,698.4 million, as of December 31, 2021. Inteligo’s net loan portfolio represented 35.0% of its total assets as of December 31, 2022 as compared to 29.7% for 2021.

Portfolio Investments

Inteligo manages a proprietary portfolio primarily composed of medium-term investments in fixed-income securities and private equity. Inteligo’s investment team uses third-party funds as well as individual fixed income and equity securities.

Inteligo’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022, totaled S/ 1,698.2 million, a decrease of 26.6%, from S/2,314.3 million as of December 31, 2021, mainly explained by a depreciation of equity investments. In addition, Inteligo’s investment portfolio represented 33.3% of total assets as of December 31, 2022 as compared to 40.4% for 2021. Inteligo’s investment portfolio represented 40.4% of total assets as of December 31, 2021 as compared to 43.7% for 2020.

The following tables show the composition of Inteligo’s portfolio by asset class as of the dates indicated.

Investments by Asset Class


	As of December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

Asset Class	(S/ in millions)
Fixed income		210.6		260.2		424.9
Equity		217.7		429.9		367.3
Managed accounts (Fixed income)		263.4		286.0		291.2
Managed accounts (Long-Short)		108.1		115.9		103.1
Mutual funds & investment funds		898.4		1,222.3		694.6

Total		1,698.2		2,314.3		1,881.0

Investments by Maturity


	As of December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

Maturity	(S/ in millions)
0-5 years		149.5		211.0		260.1
6-10 years		203.9		236.7		370.1
11+ years		118.7		86.8		70.1
No maturity⁽¹⁾		1,226.1		1,779.8		1,180.8

Total		1,698.2		2,314.3		1,881.0

(1)	Mutual Funds, equity and private equity investments.

Inteligo’s successful strategy is reflected by the strong growth of its assets under management which had a CAGR of 4.9% between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Inteligo’s assets under management decrease 7.2%, as compared to 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Inteligo’s growth in assets under management was 9.5% as compared to 2020.

The following table shows the composition of Inteligo’s assets under management by asset class as of the dates indicated.

Assets under Management by Asset Class


	As of December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

Asset Class	(S/ in millions)
Fixed income		10,286		13,908		11,082
Equity		9,416		7,600		8,993
Alternative investments		1,615		1,472		915

Total		21,317		22,981		20,989

Inteligo’s net profit declined 149.9% between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, supported by strong fees on assets under management, which remained at 0.7% in 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Inteligo’s net profit increased 16.6% as compared to 2020.

Market Segmentation

Inteligo Bank primarily focuses on individuals with investable assets in the range of U.S.$500,000 and U.S.$10 million, where Inteligo believes there is higher growth potential. Inteligo SAB and Interfondos also focus on providing brokerage and mutual funds services to individuals with investable assets under U.S.$500,000. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo Bank, Inteligo SAB and Interfondos had approximately 4,192, 1,772 and 62,259 clients, respectively, as compared to approximately 4,280, 1,544 and 59,201 clients, respectively, in 2021.

Inteligo’s strategy consists of establishing long-term relationships with its broad and profitable client base, segmenting its customers effectively and proactively providing financial advisory services. Inteligo’s committed advisory service, supported by a local investment team that possess extensive knowledge of its Peruvian clients’ preferences for financial products, and delivered through an experienced group of relationship managers is a key pillar of Inteligo’s success. Inteligo’s position further benefits from its leading brokerage operation in Peru through Inteligo SAB, an important mutual fund manager in Peru, Interfondos, and from being a part of one of Peru’s leading economic groups.

Financial Advisory Team

Inteligo serves its customers through its advisory team of approximately 69 people. Through its relationship managers, Inteligo establishes strong client relationships which result in a loyal and growing customer base. Inteligo’s experienced relationship managers team has acquired specialized product knowledge and deep understanding of its customers’ needs.

Information Technology Unit

Inteligo Bank implemented a new core system in 2020 to support its rapidly expanding operations. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Inteligo Bank had invested S/2.6 million and S/2.7 million, respectively, in the development of its technology platform, which will allow it to leverage its existing CRM platform and develop stronger business intelligence capabilities.

As a part of its cybersecurity strategy, Inteligo continued to strengthen its identification, protection, detection and action cybersecurity plans, which reduced the occurrence of attacks and mitigated the risk of cyber threats. This strategy is based on the cybersecurity framework of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and other standards such as ISO 27000 and 27032. Inteligo’s cybersecurity strategy includes improvements to security on different fronts, including mobile devices, workstations, in the cloud and on premises. Inteligo uses updated technology such as behavior analysis and artificial intelligence, which allow its human resources to reduce time spent on threat detection and analysis.

Payments Segment

Overview

In April 2022, we acquired the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay, a provider of products and services related to payments acquirer, a correspondent bank and credit cards processor. Moreover, Izipay provides financial services and technology solutions that enable consumers, individual entrepreneurs, micro-merchants, SMEs, in Peru, to make and/or process payments in a safe, seamless, digital, mobile first and affordable manner. Izipay’s technology solutions allow it to (i) be full acquirer company, with a complete set of payment solutions through POS devices and e-commerce, (ii) provide a digital platform with proprietary solutions for business management such as self check-out,split payments, product and inventory management, business reports, anti-fraud system and CRM, among others. Izipay operates a national, two-sided network at scale that helps merchants and consumers connect, transact, and complete payments, whether they are online or in person. As of December 31, 2022, the number of Izipay merchant active accounts (merchant codes) in Peru was 1 million compared to 0.7 million as of April 2022. Izipay is one of the leaders in the physical card payment business in Peru.

Since becoming a consolidated subsidiary in April 2022, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/595.4 million and consolidated net profit of S/41.1 million. As a reference, for the year ended December 31, 2022, including the period prior to its acquisition, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/754.3 million and consolidated net profit of S/51.2 million. As of December 31, 2022, Izipay had shareholders’ equity of S/ 216.3 million and ROE for the year ended December 31, 2022 of 26.1%.

COVID-19 Measures

Izipay deployed several strategies across the organization to mitigate the remaining impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on both its operations and on its employees.

Business Lines

Izipay has three main business lines: (i) payments acquirer, (ii) correspondent banking and (iii) credit card processing.

LOGO

Payments acquirer

Izipay offers merchants an end-to-end payments solution that provides authorization and settlement capabilities, helping merchants connect with their customers, process exchanges and returns, and manage risk. This is Izipay’s main activities, accounting for most of its revenues.

For its payments acquirer activities, Izipay generates revenue from credit, debit and prepaid card transactions by charging a merchant discount rate, or MDR, a commission withheld by Izipay from the transaction value paid to the merchant. The transaction amount, less the MDR, is credited to the merchant’s account. Izipay’s MDR pricing model is standardized, easy to understand and transparent. It also offers customized MDR pricing for certain merchants who process large payment volumes.

Correspondent Banking

Izipay offers correspondent services at merchants throughout Peru like pharmacies, libraries and mom-and-pop stores, with exclusive POS terminals leased to banks that allow customers to perform basic cash-based transactions, such as withdrawals, deposits and payment of utility bills.

For its correspondent banking activities, Izipay earns revenues primarily from fees of financial and administrative transactions and fees for each exclusive POS terminal installed.

Credit Card Processing

Izipay uses world-class software (Credit Management Systems) to provide its services. Through this system, we can manage the credit and prepaid card accounts of our clients, who are mainly financial institutions, which allows them to control credit card balances, issue account statements, calculate payment schedules, among other functions.

For its credit card processing activities, Izipay generates revenue mainly from fees by number of total accounts.

Information Technology Unit

During the year 2022, Izipay invested S/104.3 million, in the development of its technology platform (including POSs, Software and Hardware), which will allow it to leverage its existing platform and develop stronger business intelligence capabilities.

As part of its cybersecurity strategy, Izipay has strengthened its preventive, detective, and recovery cybersecurity controls to reduce the occurrence of attacks and mitigate the risk of cyberthreats. This strategy takes as a framework the security requirements of PCI DSS, and other standards such as NIST, ISO 27000 and ISO 27032. Izipay’s cybersecurity strategy includes security improvements on different fronts, included in our e-commerce applications, workstations, cloud or on-premises architectures. Izipay has tools and services based on behavioral analysis and artificial intelligence, that allow detecting and carrying out an exhaustive analysis of known or “0 day” threats that are exposed, allowing your human resources to reduce the time spent on detection and analysis of threats.

COMPETITION

We face intense competition in all of our segments, which can affect our margins, growth and profitability.

Peruvian Banking System and Competition

During the 1990s, the Peruvian economy underwent a major transformation, from being a highly protected and regulated system prevailing in the 1980s to a free-market economy. During this period, protectionist and interventionist laws and policies were gradually dismantled to create a liberal economy dominated by the private sector. Similarly, the Peruvian financial industry underwent deep structural changes that resulted in a significant expansion of credit. From 1993 to 1998, performing loans in the Peruvian financial system grew at a five-year CAGR of 45.9%, and banking penetration in Peru, measured as the ratio of loans-to-GDP, rose from 10.2% to 26.4% according to the SBS.

In 1998, the rise in international interest rates that followed the Russian default led to large outflows of capital from Peru, resulting in a 15.8% depreciation of the Sol. The strong depreciation of the Sol, coupled with the strong dollarization of the Peruvian Banking system prevalent at that time (81% of the loans were denominated in U.S. dollars) led to a sharp deterioration of the Peruvian banking system’s loan portfolio quality and to a contraction in total loans. Past-due loans in the system peaked at 9.4% of total gross loans as of January 31, 2000, resulting in increased provisions and large capital losses for financial institutions.

However, from 2001 onwards, as macroeconomic conditions improved, the general banking industry indicators in Peru began also to improve. Past-due loans dropped from 9.0% of total gross loans as of December 31, 2001 to 3.7% as of December 31, 2004, and loan reserves over past-due loans increased from 118.9% as of December 31, 2001 to 176.5% as of December 31, 2004 according to the SBS.

From 2005 to 2008, fostered by a steady and sustained improvement in Peru’s macroeconomic indicators, credit expanded again, with performing loans growing 25.2% in 2005, 18.0% in 2006, 34.7% in 2007 and 38.2% in 2008. The global financial crisis that started in late 2008 temporarily reduced credit growth as performing loans remained flat in 2009. Growth returned following the crisis, with the banking system in Peru experiencing a significant expansion of credit from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2013. During this period, gross loans in the Peruvian banking system grew at a five-year CAGR of 13.0% and banking penetration in Peru, measured as the ratio of loans-to-GDP, rose from 24.8% to 30.4%, according to the SBS and the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

From December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2022, the banking system in Peru continued to grow steadily, with gross loans expanding at a four-year CAGR of 7.1%, according to the SBS. A significant part of the growth experienced by the Peruvian financial system since 2017 has been generated by the retail banking sector. Retail loans (including consumer loans and mortgages) grew at a four-year CAGR of 7.9% for the period ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 36.2% of the Peruvian banking sector’s total loans were retail loans, down from 35.1% as of December 31, 2018.

According to the SBS, the total number of credit cards issued by the Peruvian Banking system as of December 31, 2022 was approximately 6.7 million.

Although mortgage loans in the Peruvian banking system grew at a four-year CAGR of 7.4% for the period ended December 31, 2022 and 7.6% between December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022, there is still substantial room for growth, with only approximately 294.7 million mortgages outstanding in Peru among a population of approximately 33.5 million, compared to approximately 1.6 million mortgages outstanding in Chile for a population of 19.8 million, each as of December 31, 2022. A responsible macroeconomic approach, high housing demand and the promotion of housing programs over the past five years have been the main drivers of mortgage loan growth in Peru and are expected to continue fueling mortgage lending.

The Peruvian banking system is highly concentrated in a small number of relatively large participants. The four largest banks accounted for 83.8% of total gross loans and 82.8% of total deposits in the system as of December 31, 2022. Furthermore, foreign banks play a significant role in the Peruvian financial system. As of December 31, 2022, BBVA and Scotiabank, two of the four largest banks in the system, which accounted for a combined 36.6% of total gross loans and 33.0% of total deposits, according to the SBS, were under foreign control. Although other major global banks such as BNP Paribas, Standard Chartered, Intesa, BankBoston, HSBC and Deutsche Bank have ceased operations in Peru over the past 15 years, other foreign banks have entered or have shown interest in entering or increasing their exposure in the Peruvian market.

Interbank is currently the fourth largest bank in Peru, as measured by commercial lending and total assets and third largest bank, as measured by retail lending and total deposits, as of December 31, 2022, and has faced strong competition, including increased pressure on margins, primarily as a result of the presence of commercial banks in the Peruvian market with substantial capital, technology and marketing resources, as well as from Peruvian pension funds that lend to Interbank’s current and potential commercial customers. This increased competition has affected the average interest rates that the Peruvian banking system has been able to charge its customers. Despite being the fourth largest bank in Peru, Interbank continues to be strongly positioned in the consumer sector, being the second largest bank in gross consumer loans as of December 31, 2022, according to the SBS.

The following tables show Interbank, the rest of the Peruvian banking system and their respective market shares as of December 31, 2022.


	Assets							As of December 31, 2022 Total Gross Loans							Deposits
	Balance		Market Share (%)			Rank		Balance		Market Share (%)			Rank		Balance		Market Share (%)			Rank

	(S/ in millions)							(S/ in millions)							(S/ in millions)
BCP		178,505		35.5	%		1		122,863		34.5	%		1		118,340		36.3	%		1
BBVA		98,156		19.5	%		2		73,120		20.5	%		2		66,148		20.3	%		2
Scotiabank		73,855		14.7	%		3		57,435		16.1	%		3		41,313		12.7	%		4
Interbank		66,825		13.3	%		4		45,270		12.7	%		4		44,020		13.5	%		3
BanBif		19,246		3.8	%		5		13,671		3.8	%		6		12,721		3.9	%		5
Mibanco		16,944		3.4	%		6		13,966		3.9	%		5		9,145		2.8	%		6
Pichincha		11,201		2.2	%		7		9,339		2.6	%		7		7,654		2.3	%		7
Santander		8,555		1.7	%		8		5,892		1.7	%		8		5,308		1.6	%		9
Citibank		7,191		1.4	%		9		1,940		0.5	%		11		5,470		1.7	%		8
GNB		5,465		1.1	%		10		3,440		1.0	%		10		4,259		1.3	%		10
ICBC		3,576		0.7	%		11		1,170		0.3	%		14		3,048		0.9	%		12
Falabella		5,517		1.1	%		12		3,941		1.1	%		9		3,897		1.2	%		11
Comercio		2,341		0.5	%		13		1,915		0.5	%		12		1,519		0.5	%		14
Ripley		2,578		0.5	%		14		1,718		0.5	%		13		1,748		0.5	%		13
Alfin Banco		1,032		0.2	%		15		575		0.2	%		15		834		0.3	%		15
Bank of China		595		0.1	%		16		117		0.0	%		17		334		0.1	%		16
BCI		552		0.1	%		17		213		0.1	%		16		234		0.1	%		17

Total		502,134		100	%				356,585		100.0	%				325,990		100.0	%

Source: SBS.

(1)	Gross consumer loans do not include mortgage loans.

The following table shows key industry metrics for the four largest banks by assets and the Peruvian banking system.


	As of December 31, 2022
	Gross Consumer Loans⁽¹⁾
	Balance		Market Share (%)			Rank

	(S/ in millions)
BCP		17,814		26.0	%		1
Interbank		14,978		21.8	%		2
Scotiabank		10,304		15.0	%		3
BBVA		10,154		14.8	%		4
Pichincha		3,623		5.3	%		5
Falabella		3,940		5.7	%		6
BanBif		1,850		2.7	%		7
Ripley		1,718		2.5	%		8
Comercio		1,556		2.3	%		9
GNB		1,533		2.2	%		10
Mibanco		529		0.8	%		11
Alfin Banco		571		0.8	%		12
Santander		4		0.0	%		13
Citibank		0		0.0	%		14
ICBC		0		0.0	%		15

Bank of China		0		0.0	%		16
BCI		0		0.0	%		17

Total		68,574		100.0	%


	2022			2021			2020			2019			2018
ROE
Interbank		17.6	%		19.1	%		4.3	%		22.0	%		21.3	%
BCP		21.6	%		15.9	%		4.5	%		20.6	%		21.4	%
BBVA		18.3	%		16.3	%		7.0	%		18.9	%		19.0	%
Scotiabank		13.7	%		10.1	%		2.6	%		15.9	%		15.3	%
Peruvian banking system		17.3	%		13.3	%		4.0	%		18.5	%		18.5	%
ROA
Interbank		1.7	%		1.7	%		0.4	%		2.4	%		2.3	%
BCP		2.5	%		1.6	%		0.5	%		2.7	%		2.6	%
BBVA		1.9	%		1.5	%		0.7	%		2.0	%		2.0	%
Scotiabank		1.9	%		1.3	%		0.3	%		2.1	%		2.1	%
Peruvian banking system		2.0	%		1.4	%		0.4	%		2.3	%		2.2	%
Efficiency Ratio⁽¹⁾
Interbank		42.7	%		45.1	%		39.4	%		38.4	%		40.4	%
BCP		40.4	%		44.7	%		40.9	%		39.0	%		40.1	%
BBVA		39.1	%		39.3	%		40.4	%		37.7	%		37.5	%
Scotiabank		38.7	%		42.7	%		41.0	%		36.1	%		37.0	%
Peruvian banking system		42.5	%		46.6	%		43.4	%		41.1	%		42.2	%
Past-Due-Loan Ratio
Interbank		3.0	%		3.6	%		3.4	%		2.6	%		2.6	%
BCP		4.0	%		3.7	%		3.2	%		2.7	%		2.7	%
BBVA		4.4	%		3.7	%		3.2	%		3.0	%		2.9	%
Scotiabank		4.1	%		3.9	%		5.4	%		3.5	%		3.5	%
Peruvian banking system		4.0	%		3.8	%		3.8	%		3.0	%		3.0	%
Coverage Ratio
Interbank		163.9	%		132.8	%		202.3	%		176.5	%		175.0	%
BCP		142.2	%		152.5	%		192.7	%		137.7	%		143.0	%
BBVA		144.6	%		167.2	%		192.9	%		161.8	%		163.4	%
Scotiabank		147.4	%		154.0	%		136.1	%		134.7	%		128.9	%
Peruvian banking system		148.5	%		155.5	%		177.7	%		152.1	%		153.6	%
Total Capital Ratio
Interbank		15.1	%		15.9	%		17.0	%		15.2	%		15.8	%
BCP		14.4	%		14.9	%		14.9	%		14.5	%		14.2	%
BBVA		14.0	%		14.1	%		13.7	%		14.1	%		15.0	%
Scotiabank		14.0	%		14.7	%		16.5	%		14.5	%		14.6	%
Peruvian banking system		14.5	%		14.9	%		15.5	%		14.6	%		14.7	%

Source: SBS.

(1)	Under SBS criteria.

Note: ROE calculated as net income for the period divided by the average of total equity at the end of the last five quarters. ROA calculated as net income for the period divided by the average of total assets at the end of the last five quarters.

The Peruvian banking system’s net profit was S/10,119.2 million in 2022, an increase of 40.2% compared to 2021 due to higher revenues and lower provisions as a result of the activity recovery and base effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The following chart shows the evolution of the banking system’s net profit between 2018 and 2022.

Banking system’s Net Profit 2018 — 2022 (S/ in millions)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

The following chart sets forth, for the metrics indicated below, the year-over-year performance as of December 31, 2022 for the four largest banks in Peru under SBS GAAP.

Total Net Profit CAGR (2018 – 2022) and

Year-Over-Year Performance by Net Profit (As of December 31, 2022 vs. As of December 31, 2021)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

The banking system’s total loans have shown high growth in the past years, reaching a 7.1% four-year CAGR from 2018 to 2022. In 2022, according to the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, loans to the private sector grew 4.5% mainly due to disbursements under the Reactiva Perú program. Excluding the effect of the Reactiva Perú program, loans to the private sector would have increased 11.2% in 2022. The following chart shows the evolution of the Peruvian banking system’s retail and commercial loans between 2018 and 2022 under SBS GAAP.

Banking system’s total loan 2018-2022 (S/ in billion)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

The following chart sets forth the four-year CAGR from 2018 to 2022 and the year-over-year growth as of December 31, 2022 of total loans under SBS GAAP for the four largest banks in Peru.

Total Loans CAGR (2018 - 2022) and

Year-Over-Year Growth (As of December 31, 2022 vs. As of December 31, 2021)

LOGO

Source: SBS

Note: Banks include international branches.

The following chart sets forth the CAGR from 2018 to 2022 and the year-over-year growth as of December 31, 2022 of total deposits for the four largest banks in Peru. In 2022, increased in deposits was primarily due to an increase in our clients’ liquidity as the result of (i) partial cash withdrawals from CTS accounts systemwide and the private pension system, (ii) commercial deposits related to unused funds from the Reactiva Perú program, and (iii) the widespread adoption of a “savings” mindset, all as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Total Deposits CAGR (2018 - 2022) and

Year-Over-Year Growth (As of December 31, 2022 vs. As of December 31, 2021)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

Interbank’s past-due-loan ratio was the fourth lowest among the four largest Peruvian banks, and higher/lower than the banking system’s average of 4.0%. The following chart sets forth the past-due-loan and coverage ratios under Peruvian SBS GAAP for the four largest banks in Peru as of December 31, 2022.

Past-Due-Loan and Coverage Ratios (As of December 31, 2022)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank’s past-due-loan ratio in retail and consumer loans was the first and third highest, respectively among the four largest Peruvian banks, due to our clients’ profile and the importance of credit cards in our portfolio. The following charts set forth the past-due-loan ratios in retail and consumer loans for the four largest banks in Peru as of December 31, 2022.

Retail Loans Past-Due-Loan Ratio (As of December 31, 2022)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

Consumer Loans Past-Due-Loan Ratio (As of December 31, 2022)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

Interbank had the lowest commercial past-due-loan ratio among the four largest Peruvian banks as of December 31, 2022. The following chart sets forth the commercial past-due-loan ratio for the four largest banks as of December 31, 2022.

Commercial Loans Past-Due-Loan Ratio (As of December 31, 2022)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Banks include international branches.

Fintech Landscape

In recent years, fintech entities have gained global relevance in financial services, with a focus on financial inclusion, payments solutions for individuals and companies, lending activities, insurance and investment needs. According to industry sources, investments in fintechs on a global basis decreased more than 31.3% between 2021 and 2022, while fintech-related investments in Latin America decreased 37.0% over the same period. In this region, investments in fintech entities have mostly targeted companies in countries like Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, which have critical mass populations. However, in Peru, partnerships between traditional financial institutions and fintech entities have started to occur, which we expect will expand opportunities to share competitive advantages and result in mutually beneficial opportunities to better serve current markets or access new ones. In 2021, Interbank scaled its open banking initiative and integrated with several new partners to offer its financial services through new channels. For example, Interbank announced a partnership with Kambista, a Peruvian fintech which allows users to exchange U.S. dollars to soles through an online currency exchange platform.

Peruvian Insurance Industry and Competition

The Peruvian insurance industry is well-capitalized, with a solvency ratio (patrimonio efectivo / requerimientos patrimoniales) of 132% under Peruvian SBS GAAP as of December 31, 2022, and operates under a well-established regulatory framework. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the industry had experienced strong decrease. Insurance premiums grew at a four-year CAGR of 9.9% for the period ended December 31, 2022. Insurance premiums in Peru reached S/ 18.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, representing a 5.9% year-over-year increase.

Life insurance premiums represented approximately 52.0% of total insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2022. In April 2016, a new regulation was approved in Peru, allowing pensioners to withdraw up to 95.5% of their retirement funds. While this measure had a negative impact on market size, life insurance annuities have increased at a CAGR of 16.2% from 2018 to 2022.

Growth of the annuities’ segment is expected to resume as the number of Peruvian private pension system’s retirees and their respective average pension balances increase. Currently, Peru’s private pension system covers eight million citizens, 96.3% of whom are under 65 years (legal retirement age).

According to the SBS, in 2022, approximately 74,286 people retired under the Peruvian private pension system with more than 4.8 million people expected to retire between the next 10 and 30 years.

The table below sets forth the number of members in the Peruvian private pension system as of December 31, 2022.


As of December 31, 2022
Age (years)	Number of Members (in thousands)	Percentage of Total
Less than 25	1,146,544	13.0%
26-35	2,540,612	28.8%
36-45	2,210,051	25.1%
46-55	1,708,022	19.4%
56-65	881,167	10.0%
More than 65	329,908	3.7%

Total	8,816,304	100.0%

Source: SBS

The chart below sets forth Peruvian insurance premiums for the periods indicated.

Insurance Premiums (S/ in Millions)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

The chart below shows market share by annuities premiums from 2018 to 2022.

Market Share by Annuities (Excluding Private Annuities) Premiums

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Interseguro’s figures incorporate Seguros Sura starting November 2018.

As of December 31, 2022, a total of 17 companies comprised the Peruvian insurance industry. As of December 31, 2022, in terms of assets on a consolidated basis, the four largest insurance companies had an 78.9% market share, and the leading two insurance companies had a combined market share of 49.7%. The Peruvian insurance industry is largely represented by Peruvian companies with three of the six largest companies controlled by Peruvian economic groups.

The following table presents market shares by assets and premiums of the six largest insurance companies in Peru as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.


			Total Assets as of December 31, 2022					Total Net Premiums for the year ended December 31, 2022
Company	Life	Non-Life	(S/ in million)		Market Share (%)			(S/ in million)		Market Share (%)
Rimac	✓	✓		19,030		26.5	%		5,556		30.5	%
Pacífico Seguros	✓	✓		16,737		23.3	%		4,445		24.4	%
Interseguro	✓	✓		15,020		20.9	%		1,209		6.6	%
La Positiva(1)	✓	✓		8,171		11.4	%		2,282		12.5	%
Mapfre(1)	✓	✓		5,947		8.3	%		2,023		11.1	%
Protecta Security	✓	✓		3,311		4.6	%		594		3.3	%

Source: SBS

(1)	La Positiva consolidates La Positiva and La Positiva Vida. Mapfre consolidates Mapfre Peru and Mapfre Peru Vida.

The following chart sets forth the ROEs for Interseguro, its main competitors and the Peruvian insurance industry, from 2018 to 2022.

ROE

LOGO

Source: SBS.

The following chart shows investment portfolio returns for Interseguro and the Peruvian insurance industry from 2018 to 2022.

Investment Portfolio Returns (2018-2022)

LOGO

Source: SBS.

Note: Annual Investment portfolio returns calculated as return from investments for the period divided by the average of total investments at the last five quarters.

The following chart shows total investments under Peruvian SBS GAAP of the four largest life insurance companies in Peru as of December 31, 2022:

Investment portfolio (S/ in millions)

LOGO

Source: SBS

Note: La Positiva consolidates La Positiva and La Positiva Vida.

Insurtech Landscape

In the last 10 years, advances in technology and data analytics have been accelerating the potential development of insurtechs in different parts of the value chain of the insurance industry. At a global level, insurtechs have captured almost U.S.$29.1 million in investments from venture capital firms, angel funding and corporate venture capital firms financed by digital-based technology companies and large incumbents during the month of December 2022. There were 49 deals involving insurtech funding in the United States during the year 2022, in the combined amount of U.S.$0.5 billion, while there were 30 deals in Europe, in the combined amount of U.S.$0.2 billion, and 19 deals in Asia, in the combined amount of U.S.$0.2 billion. Other regions such as Latin America & the Caribbean have had one deal in 2022, in the amount of U.S.$10.0 million, Africa had two deals in the combined amount of U.S.$2.0 million, Australia had two deals in the combined amount of U.S.$71.0 million, and Canada had two deals in the combined amount of U.S.$5.0 million. In Peru, investments in the insurtech segment are in the early stages. Nonetheless, many incumbents, including Interseguro, are betting on digital product developments and strategic partnerships that could eventually leverage insurtech capabilities.

Wealth Management Industry and Competition

Inteligo Bank operates in the highly-competitive and regulated wealth management industry, competing with independent advisors, global banks and Peruvian firms, such as its main competitor Credicorp Ltd. through its subsidiary Atlantic Security Bank (“ASB”). The Peruvian wealth management industry has also recently attracted several new participants, including representative offices of global banks such as JP Morgan, UBS, RBC, Credit Suisse, and Julius Baer, among others.

The following chart sets forth fee income for Inteligo Bank and ASB from 2019 to 2022.

Fee Income (S/ millions)

LOGO

The following chart sets forth net income in for Inteligo Bank and ASB from 2019 to 2022.

Net Income (S/. millions)

LOGO

Source: Company information and Credicorp Ltd.’s quarterly reports.

Interfondos provides mutual fund management services in Peru. Interfondos has been the fourth largest mutual fund manager in Peru in each of the last five years according to the SMV. As of December 31, 2022, Interfondos had a 15.6% market share based on assets under management.

Inteligo SAB provides brokerage services, including sales and trading operations, in Peru’s domestic capital markets. As of December 31, 2022, the Peruvian brokerage industry consisted of 20 brokerage firms. Inteligo SAB has ranked among the largest equity trading platforms in the last five years in terms of trading volumes on the Lima Stock Exchange.

Payments

Izipay operates in the highly-competitive and regulated payments industry, competing with a wide range of businesses, even smaller or younger companies and from all form of physical and electronic payments. This is due to the fact that the payments industry is continuously innovating, changing technologies and adapting to fast paced preference and needs of merchants and consumers.

Izipay’s payments acquirer line primarily competes with merchant acquirers, payment gateways, payment facilitators and other financial technology companies who provide businesses with merchant acquiring services and related services. In this segment, Izipay’s main competitors are: Niubiz and Culqi

Izipay’s correspondent banking business line is primarily comprised by three group of players: Izipay, banks and other providers. Izipay offers correspondent services at merchants throughout Peru like pharmacies, libraries and mom-and-pop stores, with exclusive POS terminals leased to banks. Banks partner with merchants to have the POS terminals advertised in stores. Banks provide those services at their own branches and other providers that don’t offer the service for a single customer. In this segment, Izipay’s main competitors are: Full carga, Kasnet, Cyrus, Niubiz and the proprietary solutions of the banks themselves.

Our credit card and prepaid processing business line primarily competes with other third-party payment card processors, the card brands, core banking platform providers, independent software vendors and various other firms that provide products and services to payment card issuers in Peru. Banks do not delegate debit card processing, they do it with their internal core system. Our primary competitors in this space include: Unibanca and Niubiz.

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

The Peruvian Financial and Insurance Systems

A substantial part of our activities are conducted through Interbank and Interseguro, our banking and insurance subsidiaries, respectively, operating in Peru. A summary of the Peruvian financial and insurance regulatory framework is set forth below.

General Overview of the Peruvian Financial Regulatory Framework

Peruvian banking regulation follows the standards set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Peruvian banks and other Peruvian financial institutions are primarily governed by two banking regulatory authorities: the SBS and the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. The Peruvian Constitution establishes that the SBS’s main function and responsibility is to protect depositors of the Peruvian financial system, while the main function of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru is to preserve monetary stability. In addition, Peruvian banks are subject to certain regulations of the SMV.

The regulatory framework for the operation of the Peruvian financial and insurance sector is set in the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law (Ley General del Sistema Financiero y del Sistema de Seguros y Orgánica de la Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros) approved by Law No. 26702, which was enacted in December 1996. The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law regulates Peruvian financial and insurance companies and private pension funds administrators. In accordance with the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the SBS is responsible for issuing banking regulations and for monitoring the Peruvian banking financial and insurance sector. The SBS supervises and regulates financial institutions such as commercial banks, financial companies, financial leasing companies, small business financial companies, savings and loan corporations, financial services companies such as trust companies and investment banks, insurance companies, private pension fund administrators and savings and loans cooperatives (other financial institutions such as stock brokerage houses and mutual fund managers are subject to different legal frameworks and to the supervision of the SMV). The SBS became operational in 1931.

Financial and insurance institutions must seek the authorization of the SBS before initiating operations. The SBS has administrative and financial autonomy, and its head office is located in Lima. The current chairman of the SBS, María del Socorro Heysen Zegarra, was appointed by former President Kuczynski in August 2016.

In June 2008, as a way to facilitate the adoption process to the Basel II standards, the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law was amended by Legislative Decree No. 1028 and Legislative Decree No. 1052, to comply with the international standards. In June 2011, the Basel Committee announced the issuance of the Basel III principles. The changes introduced have been designed to be implemented progressively. The SBS, by use of its regulatory attributes, has issued several regulations that seek to adapt the Peruvian financial system to the new Basel Capital Accords. This new capital framework revises and strengthens the three pillars established by Basel II. The accord is also extended with new capital buffers (including a capital conservation buffer, a countercyclical capital buffer, and a global systemically important banks buffer), a leverage ratio and liquidity requirements.

In March 2022, the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law was amended by Legislative Decree No. 1531 to adapt the regulations applicable to the companies of the financial system, related to the composition of the effective equity to the Basel III principles. In December 2022 the SBS approved six resolutions aimed at adapting the regulatory framework of the financial system more generally to the Basel III principles. Such legislative decree became effective on January 1, 2023.

As noted, Peruvian banks, financial institutions and insurance companies are mainly regulated and supervised by the following administrative institutions:

The SBS

The SBS is the regulatory authority charged with the implementation and enforcement of the requirements contained in the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, and, more generally, with the regulation and supervision of all financial and insurance companies in Peru and, since July 2005, the private pension funds administrators.

Its objectives include: (i) protecting the public interest; (ii) safeguarding the financial stability of the institutions over which it has authority; and (iii) punishing violators of its regulations.

Its main responsibilities include: (i) reviewing and approving, with the assistance of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, the establishment, organization and operations of the institutions it regulates and their subsidiaries; (ii) overseeing mergers, dissolutions and reorganizations of banks, financial institutions and insurance companies; (iii) supervising financial, insurance and related companies from which information on an individual or consolidated basis is required, through changes in ownership and management control (this supervision also applies to non-bank holding companies, such as us and Intercorp Peru); (iv) reviewing the by-laws and amendments thereto of these companies; (v) setting forth criteria governing the transfer of bank shares, when permitted by law, for valuation of assets and liabilities and for minimum capital requirements; (vi) controlling the Central de Riesgos (Bank Risk Assessment Center), to which all banks are legally required to provide information regarding all businesses and individuals with whom they deal without regard to the amount of credit risk (the information provided is made available to all banks to allow them to monitor individual borrowers’ overall exposure to Peru’s financial system); and (vii) supervising the anti-money laundering system through the financial intelligence unit.

The SBS enforces the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law on an ongoing basis through periodic resolutions. The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law provides for stringent loan loss reserve standards, brings asset risk weighing in line with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision guidelines and includes the supervision of holding companies of financial institutions by the SBS.

For the foregoing purpose, the SBS requires banks, financial and insurance companies to report, on a periodic basis, all relevant information necessary for off-site evaluation of its financial performance. The relevant information for off-site evaluation includes audited financial statements on a consolidated basis, board of directors’ reports, auditor’s reports and any other reports which reflect the operation of a bank’s business. Under current practice, such reporting is required on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and semi-annual basis, depending on the nature of the reported information.

The SBS is also responsible for conducting on-site examinations of banks on an annual basis, implementing the provisions of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law and other related legislation, examining all banking and insurance operations, and analyzing the relationship between assets, liabilities, net worth, profit and loss accounts and all other factors affecting a bank’s financial structure.

The SBS has the power to impose administrative sanctions on financial institutions and their directors and employees as a result of any violation of the Peruvian financial and insurance system rules. Sanctions vary from monetary fines to license cancellation. The SBS may also sanction directors and other officers of financial institutions for breach of regulations under the supervision of the SBS.

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru was incorporated in 1922. Pursuant to the Peruvian Constitution, its primary role is to ensure the stability of the Peruvian monetary system and perform the functions common to a central or reserve bank, such as issuing bank notes, implementing governmental monetary policies, regulating the money supply, managing official gold and foreign exchange reserves and managing the interbank cash clearance system. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru exercises its power and authority independently and is responsible for its affairs in accordance with the government’s policies. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru is empowered to determine the inflation target and to adopt a monetary policy in accordance thereof and is also responsible for establishing mandatory minimum liquidity reserves. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru manages Peruvian international reserves and gathers and publishes data on its finances and is also the sole issuer of Peruvian currency.

The highest decision-making authority within the Central Reserve Bank of Peru is its seven-member Board of Directors. Each Director serves a five-year term. Of the seven Directors, four are selected by the executive branch and three are selected by Congress. The Chairman of the BCRP is one of the executive branch nominees but must be approved by Congress.

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru Board of Directors develops and oversees monetary policy, establishes reserve requirements for entities within the financial system, and approves guidelines for the management of international reserves. All entities within the financial system are required to comply with the decisions of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

The SMV

The SMV is the Peruvian securities market regulatory authority, attached to the Ministry of Economy and Finance (Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas). The main purpose of the SMV is promoting, overseeing and regulating the securities market, supervising and controlling all individuals and entities that intervene in such market, and enforcing compliance with the provisions of the Peruvian Securities Market Law and its regulations.

Pursuant to Article 29 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the issued and outstanding shares of Peruvian banks must be registered with the SMV and listed with the BVL. Therefore, according to the Peruvian Securities Market Law and its regulations, listed companies such as banks and insurance companies are required to file with the SMV and the BVL, in Spanish and on a going forward basis, quarterly and annual financial reports.

In addition, these companies are required to disclose to the market in a timely manner (on the same day when the event occurs) all information that investors are reasonably likely to consider material. Specific regulations provide for specific parameters to determine what is considered material information (hechos de importancia).

In March 2014, regulations related to disclosure of material information were amended. By virtue of such regulations, issuers under supervision of the SMV are required to disclose all material information in connection with the issuer of registered securities (such as our common shares) and its activities or securities issued or secured by such issuer which may influence the liquidity or price of such securities.

Also, issuers whose securities are also traded in foreign markets must file with the SMV all information that is required to be disclosed to investors on such foreign market as soon as such information is delivered to foreign regulators.

COVID-19 Response

The Peruvian government implemented a number of measures aimed at strengthening the financial sector in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, but not limited to:

•

Modifying the limit for swap and forward operations for the sale of foreign currency in exchange for local currency from U.S.$575 million per week to U.S.$675 million per week per financial institution, without requiring additional reserves, in order to support foreign exchange hedges.

•

Reducing the reserve requirement from 50% to 9% for obligations in foreign currency with average terms equal to or less than two years entered into with foreign financial entities.

•

Establishing the National Government Guarantee Program for Financial Institutions (Programa de Garantía del Gobierno Nacional a las Empresas del Sistema Financiero) for an amount of S/7,000 million, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 1508 enacted on May 11, 2020. Financial institutions may apply to this program in order to enter into repurchase agreements with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru in connection with their loan portfolios. The objective of this measure is to provide Peruvian financial institutions with extraordinary liquidity, but only up to 80% of the loan portfolio’s value may be paid by the Peruvian government under the program as per the repurchase agreement. In addition, eligible loan portfolios must have been qualified as “Normal”–as per the SBS categorization–. The term for financial institutions to apply and enter into repurchase agreements with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru within the framework of the program expired on December 31, 2022, and the maximum term to repurchase the corresponding transferred loan portfolio expires on December 31, 2024.

•

Authorizing financial institutions to modify contractual loan obligations, including rescheduling of maturities, without characterizing such modifications as refinanced loans, provided that the term of any loan is not extended for more than six months from the original term, and for no more than twelve months in case of retail loans and loans granted to mid-sized corporations, respectively, so that debtors can meet payment obligations. See “Presentation of Financial Information—Loan Portfolio Data.”

•

Increasing monetary limits per operation (wire transfers, electronic money exchange, among others) to be carried out through electronic money accounts.

•

Establishing procedures for extraordinary withdrawals from pension fund accounts as set forth in the Urgency Decree No. 034-2020 and Law No. 31017. In addition, Urgency Decree 056-2020 was enacted to permit banks to open individual or retail bank accounts (such that no consent or signed documentation is required from individuals) to enable receipt of government subsidies as well as of pension payments in connection with withdrawals from pension fund accounts.

•

Establishing that the allowance rate for loan loss reserves applicable to loans guaranteed pursuant to the Reactiva Perú program would be 0%, such that any allowance for loan loss is undertaken by the counterparty granting the guarantee rather than the banks granting the loan, pursuant to SBS Resolution No. 1314-2020 enacted on April 27, 2020. The program, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 1455 enacted on April 6, 2020, aims to promote the financing of working capital in order to ensure continuity in the chain of payments in the Peruvian economy. The granted guarantee covers an amount that is equal to three months of average monthly sales in 2019 (according to SUNAT’s information), and is channeled through two mechanisms: (i) guarantees to credit portfolios implemented through a trust, and (ii) individual guarantees implemented through a trust commission (comisión de confianza) or other instrument of similar nature. The debtor companies must not pre-pay financial obligations in force before paying off the loans covered by the guarantee, and must not distribute dividends or approve and/or split profits during the term of the loans, except for the amount and/or percentage corresponding to the workers’ profit share.

The term for loans must not exceed thirty-six months, including a twelve-month grace period. The program has a duration of four years counted from the execution of the agreement between COFIDE and the financial institution. Companies will be able to apply for extensions on the term of their loans under this program until June 30, 2023. Any loans which have their terms extended under this program have their principal amount guaranteed by the Peruvian National Government.

•

Establishing the Fondo de Apoyo Empresarial a las MYPE del Sector Turismo (FAE-TURISMO), pursuant to Urgency Decree No. 076-2020, enacted on June 30, 2020. The objective of this fund is to guarantee credits for working capital of SMEs that carry out hospitality activities and accommodation, transport of passengers, tourist transport, travel and tourism agencies, restaurants, leisure activities, organization of conferences, conventions and events, tourist guiding, and production and marketing of handicrafts. The operations guaranteed by FAE-TURISMO are carried out in the form of a loan portfolio. Guarantees granted through FAE-TURISMO covers a maximum amount equivalent to three times the average monthly working capital debt registered by the MYPE in the year 2019 before financial institutions. The loans term must not exceed sixty months, including a 24-month grace period. The term for SMEs to obtain a loan within the framework of the FAE-TURISMO was extended and will expire on June 30, 2023, and the duration of the program is six years from the execution of the respective trust agreement. Because of the emergence of new variants of COVID-19, the government modified the operating rules of the FAE-TURISMO for MYPEs to facilitate working capital loans to these entities.

•

Establishing debt freeze and rescheduling, under the Guarantee Program COVID-19 pursuant Law No. 31050, enacted on October 8, 2020. The law establishes extraordinary measures for rescheduling credit payments of certain debtors affected by the state of national emergency subject to the granting of guarantees by the Peruvian National Government. These guarantees will only be applicable if the financial institutions reduce the cost of the loan as to the percentages established by the law, reduce interest rates, or condones one or more debt installments, or a combination of such measures. The measure is applicable to consumer, personal, housing mortgage, vehicle and SMEs (MYPEs) loans. The minimum term for rescheduled loans must be six months (except for mortgage loans, in which case, will be nine months) and the maximum term for the credits shall be thirty-six months, including the grace period. The duration of the program is four years from the execution of the respective agreement. Because of the emergence of new variants of COVID-19, the government extended until December 31, 2021 the period during which debtors were able enroll in the Guarantee Program COVID-19 in order to maintain the soundness and solvency of the national financial system and to protect financial clients.

Banking Regulation and Supervision

Banking regulations and capital adequacy in Peru take into account the recommendations of the Basel Committee. The SBS has adopted the principles and guidelines of Basel II and Basel III. Also, the SBS has mandated a minimum regulatory capital requirement for Peruvian banks and, in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 1531’s amendments to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, issued certain resolutions in 2022, completing the three objectives for Basel III (i.e., increased capital, establishment of liquidity standards and improvement in the quality of capital). However, the implementation of other Basel III principles, such as the net stable funding ratio, have yet to be implemented by Peruvian legislation. We cannot provide any assurances regarding whether or as to the extent the SBS may adopt the pending standards.

Implementation of Basel II Principles

To carry out the implementation of Basel II, the SBS has approved a schedule of two (2) phases: a first mandatory phase and a second voluntary phase. During the first phase, which started in 2008 and ended in June 2009, the SBS performed quantitative impact studies and drafted the most important regulations. On June 22, 2008, Legislative Decree No. 1028 was issued, which contains certain amendments to the current Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, most of which were aimed to adapt it to Basel II standards.

In order to conform to Basel II standards, the methodology for measuring credit, market and operational risks has been amended to allow both standardized and internal model-based methods for measuring market and credit risks. All Peruvian financial institutions and insurance companies were to have implemented the standardized approach methodology by June 2009. Financial institutions and insurance companies will have the opportunity to request the validation and approval to implement the internal rating-based (“IRB”) methodology. Only those financial institutions and insurance companies that apply to use the IRB methodology will follow the second phase of implementation of Basel II standards.

The second phase consists of a validation process of the IRB methodology by the SBS and its subsequent approval. Once the IRB methodology has been validated and approved by the SBS, the pertinent financial institution will use regulatory capital floors to calculate their capital requirements. The amount of required capital may not be less than the percentage of capital requirements obtained under the previous methodology.

100


	First Year	Second Year	Third Year
Basic IRB and Internal Models of Credit Risk	95%	90%	80%
Advanced Models of Credit Risk and/or Operational Risk	90%	90%⁽¹⁾	—

(1)	80% for operational risk.

Capital Adequacy Requirements—Basel II

Under the amended provisions of Article 199 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, and on an unconsolidated basis, the regulatory capital (patrimonio efectivo) may not be lower than 10% of its total weighted assets, the latter being defined as the sum of: (i) the regulatory capital allocated to cover market risks multiplied by the inverse of the overall limit (límite global), (ii) the regulatory capital allocated to cover operational risks multiplied by the inverse of the overall limit (límite global); and (iii) the total amount of credit risk-weighted assets. Notwithstanding, according to SBS Resolution No. 03952-2022, published on December 27, 2022, the SBS established a gradual implementation schedule (from 8.5% for January—March 2023 to 10% for March 2024 and onward).

According to the amended provisions of Articles 184 and 185 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law (as amended by Legislative Decree No. 1531), regulatory capital is defined as the sum of: (i) Tier 1 Regulatory Capital or Basic Capital; and Tier 2 Regulatory Capital.

Tier 1 Regulatory Capital or Basic Capital is comprised of (i) the ordinary capital (which includes common stock and other paid-in capital instruments), capital premiums, dividends, unrealized gains, legal and voluntary reserves, donations and other elements as defined by the SBS and (ii) supplementary Tier 1 Regulatory Capital, which includes capital instruments, capital premiums and certain subordinated debt, premiums, of the above indicated instruments and other elements as defined by the SBS. Basic Capital is subject to, among others, the following deductions: losses of prior years and of the current year, unrealized losses, any provisions deficit, and goodwill resulting from corporate reorganizations and acquisitions; and supplementary Tier 1 Regulatory Capital is subject to, among others, the following deductions: holdings, directly or indirectly, of equity and/or subordinated debt instruments eligible for additional Tier 1 Regulatory Capital, which have been issued by the company itself and which are held in treasury and investments in equity and/or subordinated debt instruments eligible for additional Tier 1 Regulatory Capital, issued by companies of the financial system or the insurance system, domestic or foreign.

Tier 2 Regulatory Capital consists of (i) equity and subordinated debt instruments, not included in Tier 1 Regulatory Capital, that meet the conditions set forth by the SBS, (ii) premiums of the above mentioned instruments, (iii) generic provisions up to 1.25% of the assets and contingencies weighted by credit risk when the standard method is used to determine the regulatory capital requirement for credit risk, and (iv) other elements as defined by the SBS. Tier 2 Regulatory Capital is subject to certain deductions under the law, such as: holdings, directly or indirectly, of equity and/or subordinated debt instruments eligible for additional Tier 2 Regulatory Capital, which have been issued by the company itself and which are held in treasury and investments in equity and/or subordinated debt instruments eligible for additional Tier 2 Regulatory Capital, issued by companies of the financial system or the insurance system, domestic or foreign, etc.

Banks are required to prepare and submit to the SBS, within the first 15 days of each month, a report analyzing the bank’s assets for the previous month and the total amount of the bank’s regulatory capital. Foreign currency denominated assets are valued in soles at an average exchange rate published by the SBS in effect as of the date of such report.

In February 2016, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 975-2016, which changed the conditions that subordinated debt must meet in order to be considered in the calculation of additional capital and the calculation methodology applicable to risk-weighted assets. As part of the implementation of the Basel III standards, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 03950-2022 in December 2022 regulating new dispositions applicable for subordinated debt, in order to update the form of computation in the different levels and sublevels of the regulatory capital, in accordance with the characteristics of each element. This resolution became effective on January 1, 2023 and is applicable to subordinated debt incurred or created as from such date. However, subordinated debt incurred or created prior to its enactment will still be considered in the calculation of regulatory capital.

In addition, SBS Resolution No. 03950-2022 was enacted mainly to reflect the new composition of the regulatory capital. As a result, non-redeemable subordinated debt is taken into account for the computation of Supplementary Tier 1 Regulatory Capital, as opposed to the previous treatment, which allowed its computation as either Tier 1 or Tier 2 Regulatory Capital. Similarly, redeemable subordinated debt becomes part of the computation of Tier 2 Regulatory Capital only.

101

In accordance with SBS Resolution No. 03952-2022 (which amended the SBS Resolution No. 14354-2009), the 1,000% factor for risk-weighted assets for intangibles (excluding goodwill), deferred tax assets that originate from operating losses and deferred tax assets that exceed the threshold of 10% of “adjusted total capital” has been removed from the computation of regulatory capital. To replicate the deductions established by Basel III, deferred income tax assets net of deferred income tax liabilities arising from temporary differences that do not exceed the threshold of 10% of Tier 1 Regulatory Capital will receive a weighting factor of 250%.

Implementation of Basel III Principles

In July 2011, the SBS approved SBS Resolution No. 8425-2011 (as amended from time to time), which required additional regulatory capital based on the risk profile of each financial institution in accordance with the guidelines approved by the SBS, to cover risks not contemplated in Pillar I of Basel II. Consistent with certain aspects of Basel III, the SBS Resolution No. 8425-2011 was replaced by SBS Resolution No. 03953-2022 and SBS Resolution No. 03954-2022 in order to update the methodologies for calculating the individual and sector concentration risk buffers (including regional and economic sector concentration) eliminating the capital buffer requirement for risk appetite and maintaining the requirement for measuring the interest rate risk of the banking book. Legislative Decree No. 1531 and SBS Resolution No. 03954-2022 aligned the capital conservation buffer in the Peruvian regulation, to the Basel III principles.

Companies shall complete the regulatory capital requirement for concentration risk by December 2023. This transition applies only to the excess of the required capital over the additional regulatory capital requirement for concentration risk calculated as of December 2022. In addition, the conservation buffer requirement shall be implemented following a specific schedule:


Compliance Date		Conservation Buffer Requirement (% of the total APR)
December 2023		0.625%
December 2024		1.250%
December 2025		1.875%
December 2026		2.500%

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interbank is in compliance with the additional regulatory capital requirements approved by the SBS.

Liquidity Requirements of Basel III Principles

In December 2012, the SBS approved SBS Resolution No. 9075-2012, requiring a new calculation of the liquidity ratio coverage. The liquidity ratio coverage is a ratio for financial institutions to ensure the maintenance of adequate levels of high-quality liquidity assets (ALAC) that could easily be converted into cash to meet liquidity needs, for a 30-calendar day period, under a stress liquidity scenario. High-quality liquidity assets are defined as assets that are easily and immediately convertible into cash, with minimum or no loss of value during the stress period. In October 2022, the SBS approved SBS Resolution No. 03296-2022 which incorporated, among others, the operational criteria that the high-quality liquidity assets must meet, as well as the categories of such assets.

Pursuant to SBS Resolution No. 6694-2015, the SBS defined a plan for the implementation of this ratio. Since January 2019 and moving forward, companies have been required to implement 100% of the Liquidity Ratio Coverage Ratio. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interbank is in full compliance with all regulatory limits required by the SBS. In addition, Interbank’s alert system monitors any deviations so Interbank may take any preventive measures.

Classification of the Loan Portfolio

According to SBS regulations, the provision for loan losses is calculated and recorded following SBS Resolution No. 11356-2008, which sets parameters to determine the calculation of provisions which is based on formulas and the use of specific percentages over the balances of loans and collateral received. For example, banks must consider certain criteria with respect to the borrower, including securities; credit category; borrower’s liquidity, borrower’s equity and outstanding debt, among others. Also, it requires constitution of generic provisions based on total loan portfolio, including generic provisions on not-impaired loans. The loan portfolio provisions which result from such classification differ materially from the loan portfolio provisions which result from our application of IFRS. For a discussion of our loan portfolio classification policies and the resulting allowances, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Classification of our Loan Portfolio and—Impairment Allowance for Loans” and “Note 30.1 Credit Risk” to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

102

Beginning on January 1, 2021, the SBS introduced a reporting rule under the SBS GAAP whereby non-revolving credit card loans must be reported as other non-revolving consumer loans. This change resulted in a reduction in Interbank’s credit card loan balances and an increase in consumer loans in the same proportion as the credit card balances were reduced.

Risk of Over-Indebtedness by Consumer Banking Customers

According to SBS Resolution No. 6941-2008, as amended, banks and other financial entities must adopt a system to manage the risk of over-indebtedness that (a) allows the mitigation of such risk before and after making the loan, (b) permits the performance of a permanent monitoring of the portfolio to identify over-indebted borrowers and (c) includes the periodic evaluation of the control mechanisms being used and of the corrective actions or required improvements, as the case may be. The board of directors of such banks and other financial entities are responsible for (i) establishing and reviewing the policies and proceedings for the identification, measuring, treatment, control, reporting and monitoring of the risk from the level of indebtedness of its consumer banking customers and (ii) causing the management to adopt the necessary measures to monitor and control such risks. In addition, the board of directors must cause the bank and/or financial entity to have an organizational structure that guarantees total independence between the risk and the commercial divisions and that the incentive schemes for employees’ performance does not cause a conflict of interest with risk management policies.

Banks and financial entities that are not able to monitor, control and identify the risk of over-indebtedness are obliged to maintain a special loan loss reserve. Banks and financial entities that comply with the requirements described above are not required to maintain any such specific allowance.

Legal Reserve Requirements

Pursuant to Article 67 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, all banks must create a legal reserve.

Each year a bank must allocate 10% of its net profit to its legal reserve until its legal reserve is equal to 35% of its paid-in capital. Any subsequent increases in paid-in capital will imply a corresponding increase in the required level of the legal reserves to be funded as described above.

Lending Limits

Under Article 206 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the total amount of direct and indirect credits and financings granted in favor of a person shall not exceed 10% of the bank’s regulatory capital. A person is defined for the purposes therein as a person or group of persons or entities representing a common or single risk.

The SBS has issued special regulations establishing the guidelines that must be followed by banks when determining legal reserves for legal proceedings for past-due loans and foreclosures.

For purposes of Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, a single borrower includes an individual or an economic group. An economic group constituting a single or common risk, according to Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, includes a person, such person’s close relatives and companies in which such person or close relatives have significant share ownership or decision-making capability. According to current regulations, shareholders who own or control directly or indirectly at least 4% of a company’s shares are considered to share common risk with such company. Significant decision-making capability is deemed to be present when, among others, a person or group can exercise material and continuous influence upon the decisions of a company, when a person or company holds seats on the board of directors or has principal officers in another company, or when it can be assumed that one company or person is the beneficial recipient of credit facilities granted to another company.

The 10% limit indicated above may be raised to 15%, 20% and 30%, depending on the type of collateral securing the excess over each limit. For instance, the limit can be extended to 15% when the excess is secured by a mortgage; it may be raised to 20% when the excess is collateralized with securities listed in the Selective Index of the BVL (ISBVL); and it may be raised to 30% when the excess is secured with deposits that are maintained and pledged with the bank.

Other special lending limits must also be taken into account, such as lending to related parties or affiliates (30% of regulatory capital), to local banks (30%), and to foreign banks (from 5% for non-regulated banks to 30% for first category international banks, which may also be raised to 50% when backed by letters of credit). There are other limits that require banks to diversify their portfolio through different types of assets, benefiting liquid and low-risk assets.

Lending to Related Parties

The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law regulates and limits transactions with related parties and affiliates of financial institutions, on an unconsolidated basis. In 2015, the SBS and the SMV enacted new regulations containing definitions of indirect ownership, related parties and economic groups, which serve as the basis for determining limits on transactions with related parties and affiliates. These regulations also provide the basis for the subsequent development of specific supervision standards of financial institutions and conglomerates formed by financial institutions.

103

Additionally, pursuant to Article 202 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the aggregate amount of loans to related party borrowers may not exceed 30% of a bank’s regulatory capital (exceptionally, according to Circular B-2148-2005, as amended, the amount of loans to related parties may not exceed 50% of a bank’s regulatory capital if the excess of 30% is secured by credit letters from foreign financial institutions). For purposes of this test and in accordance with regulations of economic group, related party borrower includes any person or an affiliate of that person holding, directly or indirectly, 4% or more of a bank’s capital stock, directors, certain of the bank’s principal executive officers or other persons in more junior positions affiliated with the bank’s management.

All loans to related parties must be made on an arm’s-length basis with terms no more favorable than the best terms that Interbank would offer to the public.

In addition, under Article 201 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the total amount of loans extended to directors, officers, employees or close relatives of any such persons may not exceed 7% of a bank’s regulatory capital. All loans made to any single such related party borrower may not exceed 0.35% of a bank’s regulatory capital (i.e., 5% of the overall 7% limit) per each person, including such person’s spouse and relatives. In addition, the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law generally provides that banks may not extend credit to or guarantee the obligations of employees or members of the board of directors, except for home mortgage loans to employees and directors.

Country Risk Reserve Requirements

SBS Resolution No. 7932-2015, enacted in December 2015, requires the funding of reserves to cover exposure to country risk, which is defined to include sovereign risk, transfer risk and expropriation or nationalization risk, all of which may affect operations with companies or individuals in foreign countries. The SBS has also established guidelines indicating the procedures and responsibilities necessary for coping with country risk.

Integral Risk Management

Integral risk management is a process intended to identify potential events that can affect banks and to manage those events according to their nature and risk level. In January 2017, the SBS enacted the SBS Resolution No. 272-2017, which replaced SBS Resolution No. 037-2008. SBS Resolution No. 272-2017 (as amended from time to time) contains guidelines for integral risk management of financial institutions and covers all kinds of risks that could affect a banking operation, such as operational, market, credit, anti-money laundering (“AML”), liquidity and reputational risks. Furthermore, it introduced various changes, focusing on corporate governance practices including the following: (i) two or more independent directors must be appointed when boards are integrated by six or more members, (ii) a remunerations committee must be formed and (iii) concepts such as ‘risk appetite’, ‘risk capacity’ and ‘risk limits’ have been modeled after the Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework of the Financial Stability Board.

In addition, on January 2023, the SBS approved the SBS Resolution No. 00053-2023 (the Model Risk Management Regulation), which establishes minimum guidelines to mitigate the risks derived from the use of models used in the management of credit, market, liquidity, operational, and money laundering and terrorist financing risks of companies in the financial and insurance system. This regulation establishes the definition of model and model risks, the corporate governance framework for model risk management and the minimum guidelines for the development, validation, implementation, use and monitoring of models. Its application will be phased-in commencing in December 2023 through January 2026, given the need to properly implement at the operational level adequate tools to assess the risks that are intended to be managed with the models and the categorization of the models used.

Credit Risk

According to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, as of July 1, 2009, financial institutions would have been allowed to use the IRB methodology instead of the standardized methodology for calculating their regulatory capital requirement for credit risk, after receiving prior approval from the SBS. However, regulations required for the full implementation of both standardized and IRB methodologies by Peruvian financial institutions were not enacted until November 4, 2009, with SBS Resolution No. 14354-2009.

Under SBS Resolution No. 14354-2009, enacted in November 2009, financial institutions are allowed to use the standardized methodology and, with the prior approval of the SBS, IRB methodologies for calculating their regulatory capital requirement for credit risk. Interbank has not decided if it will request approval from the SBS to adopt the IRB methodology.

104

In addition, according to SBS Resolution No. 3780-2011, financial institutions are required to implement an organizational structure and certain procedures in connection with control on interest management and strategic needs procedures in order to adequately manage credit risk. SBS Resolution No. 8548-2012, enacted in November 2012, establishes new guidelines for calculation of risk weighted assets for personnel (planilla), credit card and mortgage exposure resulting in more capital requirements for credit risk.

Market Risk

Regulations for the supervision of market risks, enacted in May 1998, require banks to establish internal policies and procedures to monitor these risks, as well as market risk exposure limits. Regulations define market risk as the probability of loss derived from exposure to various classes of commodities, securities, foreign exchange, derivative operations or commercial assets that banks may hold in their portfolio, which may, or may not, be accounted for in their statements of financial position. In June 2009, the SBS enacted SBS Resolution No. 6328-2009, which defines the methodology to be applied, and the requirements to be satisfied, to calculate the regulatory capital requirement for market risks under the standard methodology and the IRB methodology.

Operational Risk

SBS Resolution No. 2115-2009, enacted in April 2009, defined the methodology to be applied, and the requirements to be satisfied, by financial institutions in calculating their regulatory capital requirement for operational risk under the IRB methodology, the alternative standardized methodology and the advanced methodologies. However, as the advanced methodologies approach was part of the Basel II principles, this alternative was eliminated as part of SBS Resolution No. 03955-2022’s updates in alignment with the Basel III principles because internal operational risk models had failed to adequately reflect the risks. The IRB methodology uses a bank’s gross operational margin as an “exposure indicator,” and its application does not require the prior approval by the SBS. Application of the alternative standardized methodology requires compliance with certain provisions included in SBS Resolution No. 2115-2009 (as amended from time to time) and prior approval from the SBS.

SBS Resolution No. 2116-2009, enacted in April 2009, which approves the guidelines for managing operational risk, defines “operational risk” as the possibility of suffering losses due to inadequate procedures, failures of personnel, IT or external events, including, without limitation, legal risks (but excluding strategic and reputational risk). It also establishes that a bank’s board of directors is responsible for designing the general policies to manage operational risk and that a bank’s management is in charge of implementing such policies. Finally, it provides that each bank is obligated to create a database of all of such bank’s losses due to operational risk, classifying such losses by event.

Investments in Financial Instruments

Investment in financial instruments by Peruvian banks is restricted to those financial instruments listed in the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, such as equity instruments traded on a stock exchange, debt instruments (to the extent that certain requirements are satisfied), sovereign debt instruments and quotas in mutual and investment funds, among others.

Pursuant to SBS Resolution No. 7033-2012, investments in financial instruments by Peruvian banks shall be classified into any of the following categories: (a) investments at fair value with changes in results (short-term), (b) investments available-for-sale, (c) investments until maturity (long-term) and (d) investments in subsidiaries and affiliates.

On July 2018, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 2610-2018, which entered into force as of October 1, 2018, and amended the regulation on classification and valuation of investments approved by SBS Resolution No. 7033-2012 and its amendments. The main amendment contained in this resolution is the introduction of standard methodology for the identification of impairment of financial instruments classified as available-for-sale investments and held-to-maturity investments. The annex to this resolution has been amended by SBS Resolution No. 4034-2022 effective as of December 31, 2022.

Reserve Requirements from the Central Reserve Bank of Peru

Under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, all financial institutions regulated by the SBS (except for small-business development non-bank institutions) are required to maintain a legal reserve (encaje) for certain obligations. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru may require additional marginal reserves. The exact level and method of calculation of these reserve requirements is set by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, which has issued different sets of regulations for foreign and local currency-denominated obligations of banks. The following liabilities are subject to the reserve requirement: demand and time deposits, savings accounts, certain obligations, securities, certain bonds and funds administered by the bank. Subject to certain requirements, the regulation excludes mid-term and long-term funding (i.e., more than two years) from foreign financial institutions, other central banks, governments or multilateral lending agencies.

105

In April 2004, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru began requiring reserves on amounts due to foreign banks and other foreign financial institutions, which were not previously considered obligations.

As of December 31, 2022, the minimum legal reserve requirement for local and foreign currency deposits was 6.0% and 9.0%, respectively. Foreign currency deposits collected from the general public are subject to a marginal rate of 35%.for funds that exceed a certain level set by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. Local and foreign currency borrowings from certain foreign sources with an original maturity of two years or less are subject to a 9% special rate. Financial institutions may satisfy the minimum reserve requirements with funds that they hold in vaults or that they have deposited in their accounts at the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

Subject to certain requirements, the regulation excludes from the reserve requirement mid-term and long-term funding (i.e., liabilities with a minimum average maturity of more than two years, subject to other conditions) through the issuance of securities.

They must also keep at least 1.0% and 3.0% of their local and foreign currency deposited in the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, respectively. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru oversees compliance with the reserve requirements.

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru also establishes the interest rate payable on reserves that exceed the minimum legal reserve requirement applicable to both local and foreign currency deposits. The current applicable interest rate: (a) for local currency reserves, different from those described below, is the higher of 0.0% or the overnight deposits interest rate, minus 1.95%; and, (b) for foreign currency deposits, is the higher of (i) 25.0% of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate at one-month minus 10 basic points and (ii) the CME Term SOFR rate at one-month minus 50 basic points. Currently, no interest rate is payable in respect of local currency deposits to certain foreign sources, such as financial institutions, hedge funds, brokerage firms, pension funds and others with a foreign parent company, except for those authorized by the SBS to collect deposits from the general public in Peru. The applicable interest rate is expected to be periodically revised by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru in accordance with monetary policy objectives. In the past, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru has on numerous occasions changed the deposit reserve requirements applicable to Peruvian commercial banks and both the rate of interest paid on deposit reserves and the amount of deposit reserves on which no interest is payable by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

Deposit Insurance Fund

Bank deposits are protected by the Fondo de Seguros de Depósito (Deposit Insurance Fund), against bank failure. Specifically, savings deposit by natural persons, savings deposit accounts maintained by non-profit entities and checking accounts are covered in full up to an amount that is revised quarterly by the SBS. For the period between December 2022 and February 2023, the maximum coverage amount is S/125,603 per person per bank.

The Deposit Insurance Fund was established in 1991 and was organized as a private corporation in 1996. The Deposit Insurance Fund’s governing body is led by a representative of the SBS. The additional members are appointed by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru (one member), the MEF (one member) and by the banks (three members). SBS provides the necessary administrative members and operational resources for the Deposit Insurance Fund.

The financial resources available to the Deposit Insurance Fund pursuant to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law include, among others, the original contribution from the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, insurance premiums paid by banks, unclaimed bank deposits (after 10 years) and fines imposed by the SBS for violations of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law.

In addition, the Deposit Insurance Fund may, in extraordinary situations, borrow funds with authorization from the Peruvian treasury, or it may borrow long-term government securities from the Peruvian treasury.

Anti-Money Laundering Rules

Money laundering is considered a criminal act in Peru. A special legal framework was established in April 2002, which follows the 40 recommendations of FATF, established by the G-7. Since then, this legal framework has been amended in order to improve and increase the efficiency of the Peruvian anti-money laundering system.

Money laundering includes a wide range of serious offenses such as tax evasion, terrorism, drug trafficking, corruption and other criminal activities. A special set of anti-money laundering rules applies specifically to banks, which includes specific rules for customer and employee due diligence and recordkeeping. In March 2008, the SBS enacted additional anti-money laundering provisions, pursuant to which, among other things, banks must establish a set of policies and procedures specifically aimed to prevent asset laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. In November 2008, the SBS modified the anti-money laundering provisions to include, among other changes, the obligations of Peruvian banks to verify that their branches and foreign subsidiaries comply with the anti-money laundering and terrorism financing provisions enacted by the SBS and with the recommendations of the FATF.

106

On February 17, 2011, the SBS modified current anti-money laundering provisions through SBS Resolution No. 2108-2011, as amended, in order to adapt these provisions to international standards established by the Financial Action Task Force of South America (Grupo de Acción Financiera de Sudamerica, or “GAFISUD”), in relation to due diligence in the identification of clients according to their risk and profile level, among other considerations. On May 14, 2015 and December 6, 2017, the SBS further amended and supplemented the aforementioned provisions through SBS Resolution No. 2660-2015 and SBS Resolution No. 4705-2017 (each as amended). SBS Resolution No. 2018-2011 was replaced by SBS Resolution No. 2891-2018, which came into force on October 1, 2018.

The government agency responsible for supervising the anti-money laundering system is the Financial Intelligence Unit (Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Perú, or “UIF”), which was made part of the SBS in July 2007. The chairman of this agency is appointed by the chairman of the SBS. Additionally, Law No. 30424, enacted in April 2016 and which took effect on January 1, 2018, as amended, attributes criminal liability to legal entities when money laundering, terrorist financing and/or bribery (including multinational bribery) crimes are committed on its behalf or for its benefit by any legal representative or de facto or de iure executive. Such regulation establishes that criminal liability will be exempted or mitigated if the legal entity has adopted an adequate and suitable prevention model following the criteria and minimum guidelines outlined in Law No. 30424. On January 9, 2019, Supreme Decree 002-2019-JUS (Reglamento de la Ley N° 30424) was enacted and took effect, setting forth further regulations and guidelines related to, among other things, the suitable prevention model to be implemented in accordance with Law No. 30424.

Disclosure of Material Information

All banks that are organized as corporations (the only exception being the Peruvian branches of foreign banks) are listed on the BVL. As a result, they are subject to the disclosure and reporting rules contained in the Peruvian Securities Market Law and the internal regulations of the SMV and the BVL. Banks are also subject to full disclosure and reporting obligations under the banking regulatory framework. See “Regulation and Supervision—The Peruvian Financial and Insurance Systems—The SMV”.

Intervention by the SBS and Liquidation

Pursuant to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the SBS has the power to interrupt the operations of a bank in order to prevent, or to control and reduce the effects of, a bank failure. Accordingly, the SBS may intervene in a bank’s business by adopting either a temporary surveillance regime or a definitive intervention regime (“Intervention”) depending on how critical the situation is deemed to be by the SBS. Intervention will be taken upon the occurrence of certain events, including (a) suspension of payments, (b) failure to comply with the restructuring plan during the surveillance regime, (c) regulatory capital is less than 50% of the minimum regulatory capital required or (d) deficit or reduction of more than 50% of its regulatory capital in a 12-month period. Less drastic measures, such as (1) placing additional requirements, (2) ordering a capital increase or an asset divesture or (3) imposing a financial restructuring plan, may be also adopted by the SBS when the situation allows for them.

An Intervention may halt a bank’s operations for up to 45 days, and may be extended for a second period of up to 45 additional days, during which time the SBS may institute measures such as: (a) canceling losses by reducing reserves, capital and subordinated debt, (b) segregating certain assets and liabilities for transfer to another financial institution and (c) merging the intervened bank with another acquiring institution. After an Intervention, the SBS will proceed to dissolve and liquidate the bank unless the preceding option (c) was applied.

Beginning on the date on which a resolution of the SBS subjecting a bank to an Intervention regime is issued, and continuing until such Intervention is concluded (which period ends when the liquidation process begins), the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law prevents any creditor of the bank from (a) initiating any judicial or administrative procedure for the collection of any amount owed by the bank, (b) enforcing any judicial decision rendered against the bank to secure payment of any of its obligations, (c) constituting a lien or attachment over any of the assets of the bank to secure payment of any of its obligations or (d) making any payment, advance or compensation or assuming any obligation on behalf of the bank, with the funds or assets that may belong to it and are held by third parties, except for (i) set-off compensation payments that are made between regulated entities of the Peruvian banking and financial sector and insurance industry and (ii) set-off of reciprocal obligations arising from repurchase agreements and operations with financial derivatives entered into with local or foreign financial and insurance institutions.

During liquidation, claims of bank creditors rank as follows:

First order—Labor claims:

•

1^st Employee remunerations.

107

•

2^nd Social benefits, contributions to the private and public pension system and other labor claims against the bank accrued until the date when the dissolution is declared, retirement pensions or the capital required to redeem those pensions or to secure them by purchasing annuities.

Second order—Claims for bank deposits and other types of saving instruments provided under the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, in the portion not covered by the Deposit Insurance Fund and the contributions and resources used by such Deposit Insurance Fund to cover the above described claims for bank deposits and other types of saving instruments.

Third order—Taxes:

•

1^st Claims by the Peruvian social security administration (Seguro Social de Salud del Perú EsSalud) related to health care benefits for which the bank is responsible as employer.

•

2^nd Taxes.

Fourth order—Unsecured and non-privileged credits:

•

1^st All unsecured and non-privileged credits against the bank, ranked on the basis of (i) the date they were assumed or incurred by the bank whereby obligations assumed or incurred on an earlier date shall rank senior in right of payment to obligations assumed or incurred by the bank at a later date, and (ii) obligations assumed or incurred by the bank on a date that cannot be determined shall rank junior in right of payment to all the obligations comprised in (i) above and pari passu among themselves.

•

2^nd The legal interest on the bank’s obligations that may accrue during the liquidation.

•

3^rd Subordinated debt.

Except for the first and second categories under unsecured and non-privileged credits, all claims within an order will be ranked pari passu among themselves. Each category of creditors will collect in the order indicated above, whereby distributions in one order will be subject to completing full distribution in the prior order. Any security interest created before the issuance of the resolution declaring the bank’s dissolution and the initiation of the liquidation process shall survive in order to guarantee the obligation it secures. The secured creditors shall retain the right to collect from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, on a preferred basis (except with respect to labor claims, savings and deposits, which are privileged claims), subject to certain rules established under Article 119 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law.

Peruvian banks are not subject to the regime of insolvency and bankruptcy otherwise applicable to Peruvian corporations in general.

Insurance Regulation and Supervision

Solvency Requirements and Regulatory Capital

Pursuant to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the SBS regulates the solvency margin of Peruvian insurance companies. The solvency margin is based upon calculations that take into account the annual amount of premiums and the medium burden of claims during a specified period (three latest annual periods) prior to the date on which calculation is made.

Insurance companies must also maintain a “solvency equity” (patrimonio de solvencia) which must be higher than (a) the solvency margin, or (b) the minimum capital required by law, or S/8,475,907 in accordance with Circular G-218-2023 for the period between January and March 2023. The required amount of solvency equity is recalculated at least monthly and is adjusted for inflation. If the insurance company has operations subject to credit risk, part of the solvency equity should be segregated for their coverage.

The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law provides that insurance companies should have at all times a regulatory capital that should not be lower than the solvency equity detailed above.

The regulatory capital of Peruvian insurance companies used to cover its operations may be conformed by: (a) the insurance company’s paid-in-capital, voluntary and legal reserves and premium for the issue of shares; and (b) the computable portion of the subordinate debt meeting SBS requirements that such entity establishes for such purpose. The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law provides the following procedure for the determination of the regulatory capital eligible to cover insurance risks: (a) sum of the paid-in-capital, supplementary capital premium and the legal and voluntary reserves, as applicable; (b) sum of the profit of previous fiscal years and of the fiscal year in course, including the commitment to capitalization of the fiscal year profits;

108

(c) sum of the subordinated bonds issued by the insurance companies; (d) subtraction of the amount of all the investment in subordinate bonds and shares of diverse nature made by insurance companies in other insurance companies engaged in different lines of business; (e) subtraction of the losses of the previous fiscal years and the fiscal year in course; and (f) subtraction of the goodwill of the company, as well as losses of reserves that come from assets valuation.

Furthermore, insurance companies shall maintain a guarantee reserve from its equity as a guarantee fund, in order to cover risks such as (a) insurance technical risks, and (b) credit risks of certain financial transactions specifically set forth in the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law.

Reserves

The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law provides that insurance companies shall constitute, on a monthly basis, the following technical reserves: (a) for claims, including those that took place and were not reported, past-due capital and income or benefits of the insured parties, with pending liquidation or payment; (b) mathematical, over life or income insurance; (c) for risks in course or non-accrued premiums; (d) for catastrophes and uncertain casualty risks; and (e) for risks of medical health or medical assistance insurance.

Article 67 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law also requires that all insurance companies establish a legal reserve by setting aside 10% of adjusted income before taxes, until the reserve reaches at least 35% of their capital stock.

Under SBS GAAP following the adoption of new mortality tables in 2018 the SBS allowed the adjustment of technical reserves to be spread over 10 years. In contrast, our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, under IFRS, recorded a negative impact of S/144.8 million in our technical reserves due to the aggregate effect recorded in technical reserves on insurance policies issued prior to the date of adoption of the new mortality tables.

In addition, SBS Resolution No. 1143-2021 establishes the guidelines regarding the valuation and accounting record of the mathematical reserves for the insurance policies that grant long-term coverage (more than 1 year). As a result of the application of this regulation, Interseguro has recognized an impact for income/private insurance of S/35 million.

Limit of Indebtedness

Insurance companies may only take credits, in the country or abroad, for a sum not exceeding an amount equivalent to its regulatory capital. In case such limit of indebtedness is surpassed, the insurance company shall submit to the SBS a program approved by its board of directors establishing the measures adopted to eliminate the excess within a term not exceeding three (3) months.

Investment Requirements

Pursuant to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the total amount of investments of a Peruvian insurance company shall cover the total amount of technical reserves at all times. For such purposes, technical reserves are defined as the sum of all obligations that an insurance company has vis-à-vis its insured clients plus the solvency equity, the guarantee fund and the regulatory capital for the economic cycle. The assets covering the technical reserves cannot be subject to any pledge, encumbrance or precautionary measure, which limits its free availability.

Peruvian insurance companies are allowed to invest in certain eligible assets such as instruments issued by the Peruvian Central Government, classified corporate bonds and shares, among others. However, in order to balance levels of risk, applicable regulations have imposed a number of limitations to insurance companies with respect to their investments (by issuer, economic group, type of instrument and nationality, among others). In general terms, no more than 15% of the total amount of an insurance company’s technical reserves may be invested in certain instruments (including, among others, stocks and bonds) issued by the same economic group, which may be reduced to 7% if certain additional conditions are met. The investment regulations further specify that investment policies of Peruvian insurance companies shall consider maximum limits by issuer (calculated over the regulatory capital of each company) depending on the type of investment and the insurance industry in which the company operates.

Pursuant to the Investment of Insurance Companies Regulation approved by SBS Resolution No. 1041-2016 (as amended), Interseguro has implemented a plan to reduce its exposure to related parties and comply with the limits established by Article 13 of the Reglamento de Supervisión Consolidada, approved by Resolution No. 11823-2010 (as amended). In addition, Interseguro limits the amount of exposure to the credit risk in any of the issuers of the financial instruments, which it believes enable it to maintain adequate diversification of its financial investment portfolio.

109

Disclosure of Relevant Information

All insurance companies that are organized as corporations (the only exception being the Peruvian branches of foreign insurance companies) have their shares listed on the BVL. As a result, they are subject to the disclosure and reporting rules contained in the Peruvian Securities Market Law and the internal regulations of the BVL. Insurance companies are also subject to full disclosure and reporting obligations under the insurance regulatory framework. See “Regulation and Supervision—The Peruvian Financial and Insurance Systems—The SMV”.

Ownership Restrictions

The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law establishes certain restrictions on the ownership of a bank and insurance company’s capital stock. Banks must have at least two unrelated shareholders at all times. Restrictions are placed on the ownership of shares of any bank or insurance company by persons that have committed certain crimes, as well as by public officials who have supervisory powers over banks or who are majority shareholders of an enterprise of a similar nature. All transfers of shares in a bank or insurance company must be reported to the SBS by the bank or insurance company.

Transfers involving the acquisition by any individual or corporation, whether directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of a bank or insurance company’s capital stock must receive prior authorization from the SBS. The SBS may deny authorization to such transfer of shares if the purchasers (or their shareholders in the case of legal persons) are legally disabled, have engaged in illegal activity in the areas of banking, finance, insurance or reinsurance, or if objections are raised on the basis of the purchaser’s moral fitness or financial solvency. The decision of the SBS on this matter is final and cannot be overturned in the courts. If a transfer is made without obtaining the prior approval of the SBS, the purchaser may be fined an amount equivalent to the value of the securities transferred. In addition, the purchaser will be required to sell the securities within 30 days, or the fine will double, and the purchaser is disqualified from exercising its voting rights at any shareholders’ meetings and to participate in the distribution of dividends. Foreign investors receive the same treatment as Peruvian nationals and are subject to the same limitations described above.

Risk Rating

The Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law and SBS Resolution No. 18400-2010, enacted in January 2011, require that all financial and insurance institutions be rated by at least two rating agencies (registered with the SBS) on a semiannual basis (updated in March and September, with information as of December 31 and June 30 of each year, respectively), in addition to the SBS’s own assessment. Criteria to be considered in the rating include risk management and control procedures, loan quality, financial strength, profitability, liquidity and financial efficiency. Five risk categories are assigned, from “A,” lowest risk, to “E,” highest risk, allowing for subcategories within each letter.

Intervention by the SBS

Pursuant to the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, the SBS has the power to interrupt the operations of an insurance company to prevent, or to control and reduce, the effects of its failure. Accordingly, SBS intervention may be of two levels, depending on how critical the situation is: a temporary supervision regime or a definitive intervention regime prior to liquidating the bank or insurance company. Intervention will be taken upon the occurrence of certain events including: (1) suspension of payments; (2) failure to comply with the restructuring plan during the surveillance regime; (3) deficit or reduction of more than 50% of its regulatory capital in a 12-month period; or (4) deficit or reduction of its regulatory capital in excess of 50% of its solvency capital.

The intervention regime and the liquidation is the same as the one described above for banking entities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—The Peruvian Financial and Insurance System—Intervention by the SBS and Liquidation”. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—Investment Requirements” for a discussion of investment requirements and technical obligations.

The Peruvian Payment’s System

The payments segment of our group has been conducted through PMP (in which Interbank holds 50%) even prior to the direct acquisition, on April 13, 2022, by IFS of the remaining 50% in such company. As a consequence of such acquisition, IFS now holds all interest in PMP’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Izipay, which is currently our payments processor and the payments facilitator for our subsidiaries operating in Peru. A summary of the Peruvian payment’s system regulatory framework is set forth below.

Payment processors provide technological services to merchants such as by: (a) capturing transactions through a physical network of terminals or payment platforms; and (ii) routing the transaction to the bank or card networks (such as VISA, or Mastercard) for validation (e-commerce). On the other hand, payment facilitators affiliate merchants to accept payment cards on behalf of an acquirer, specializing in the affiliation of merchants with low sales volume, offering them value-added services. PMP acts as payments processor, but it also provides the acquiring services (i.e. the acquirer is the agent in charge of affiliating merchants so that they accept card payments from consumers through a point of sale (physical or virtual), such as POS or website payment buttons).

110

General Overview

The regulatory authorities for the payment industry include the Central Reserve Bank of Peru; the Peruvian Antitrust Authority (Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual – “Indecopi”), the SBS and Data Privacy Authority (Autoridad Nacional de Datos Personales). The Central Reserve Bank of Peru is the governing body of the payment systems. The SBS regulates and oversees financial system companies and their financial transactions, including the issuance of cards. The Peruvian Antitrust Authority is the competition authority, which, among other duties, has the power to develop market research to identify potential opportunities for improvement related to the development of conditions of competition for a specific sector and issue recommendations. Finally, the Data Privacy Authority is responsible for the overview of compliance with the law on the processing of personal information.

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru is empowered to supervise and regulate payment systems and to determine when a payment agreement should be recognized as a payment system, and as such should be subject to the supervision and regulation of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

Law No. 29440 (as amended) (the “Payments and Settlement Law”) regulates the legal regime applicable to payment systems and securities settlement that have a systemic relevance, as well as to payment agreements (Acuerdos de Pago). If a payment system is recognized as such under the Payments and Settlement Law, the operator of the system will have to comply with applicable regulations, be supervised by the Peruvian Central Reserve Bank and subject to sanctions imposed by it.

The Central Reserve Bank of Peru has approved Circular No. 012-2010-BCRP (as amended) (the “Regulations for the Payment Systems”) which sets the criteria for a payment system to be considered subject to the provisions of the Payments and Settlement Law. Section 5 of the Regulations for the Payment Systems establishes that, in order for a payment agreement (Acuerdo de Pago) to be considered a payment system, the following characteristics shall be considered: (a) the value and number of funds transfer orders and (b) the interrelation of the payment agreement with other systems of importance for the transactions of the Peruvian financial system. As described, the criteria included in the Regulations for the Payment Systems is not quantifiable, but it includes general concepts to provide the Central Reserve Bank of Peru broad faculties to determine whether a payment system could have a systematic relevance. Systemic relevance encompasses institutions whose stress or bankruptcy situation could have a significant negative impact on the financial system and cause a deep and prolonged economic recession.

The payment card system in Peru is regulated by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, since it is recognized as a payment agreement. Currently, the only obligation of acquirers, as part of the payment card system in Peru, is to submit certain information about the nature and volume of their transactions, their functionality and risk control measures. Nonetheless, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru may, in the future, issue new rules, regulations, principles and standards within the payment card system. On the other hand, the participants in the issuing activity are regulated by the SBS in aspects related to security, the handling of fraudulent transactions and the minimum content of contracts between cardholders and card issuers.

As part of its operations, PMP has entered into license agreements with MasterCard and Visa, for which PMP is subject to specific rules and procedures for clearing and settlement of transactions.

Licensing

Service providers (including Izipay), collecting agents or processing agents in the payment industry are not required to obtain prior licenses such as pasarelas de pagos. However, recent regulations imposed certain obligations to such persons (including AML obligations) and required that they register with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

Regulation of Payment Services offered by Providers, Payment Agreements and Payment Systems

A special legal framework for the payment’s ecosystem was established in 2022 by the issuance of two key regulations passed by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru: Circular No. 024-2022-BCRP and Circular No. 027-2022-BCRP.

On October 2022, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru issued the Circular No. 024-2022-BCRP, approving the Interoperability Regulation of Payment Services offered by providers, payment agreements and payment systems. This regulation will allow transactions to be made between all digital wallets that operate in Peru. Specifically, interoperability will allow a user to perform a transfer or digital payment to any person or business, regardless of who operates the digital wallet, functionality or mobile application that is being used, or in which financial institution the user maintains its account.

111

Such regulation establishes the following deadlines for entities to start interoperating and meeting the regulation requirements: (a) March 31, 2023, for digital wallets, and (b) June 30, 2023, for entities that offer immediate payment functionalities, immediate transfers and payments by QR code.

Regulation of Payment Agreements with Cards

In addition, on November 2022, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru issued the Circular No. 027-2022-BCRP, approving the Regulation of Payment Agreements with Cards, which includes the recommendations made by the Indecopi, in order to strengthen competition and provide greater transparency of card payment services, which in turn shall benefit the final users. This regulation establishes the principles and standards that govern payment agreements with cards, the responsibilities and obligations of the administrator, the acquirers and payment facilitators, related to the disclosure on their web pages of exchange rates and discount rates. Likewise, such circular establishes that the entities involved in a payment agreement with cards must register with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. The regulation became effective on January 1, 2023 and contemplated certain adequacy periods for entities already operating within the Peruvian payment’s ecosystem. As of the date, PMP is duly registered as acquiror and issuing entity, while Izipay is duly registered as payments facilitator, in both cases, before the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

Anti-Money Laundering Rules

On June 2007, Law No. 29038 set a list of the entities required to comply with anti-money laundering rules, which include debit and/or credit cards processors (such as PMP). On February 2008, the SBS issued SBS Resolution No. 369-2018 establishing a simplified AML system (sistema acotado) which these entities are required to implement, including certain obligations such as the appointment of a compliance officer, the reporting of certain operations, and the implementation of a prevention system, among others.

The government agency responsible for supervising the anti-money laundering system is the UIF, which was made part of the SBS in July 2007. The chairman of this agency is appointed by the chairman of the SBS.

General Overview of the Bahamian Financial Regulatory Framework

The regulatory framework for the operation of the Bahamian bank and trust industry is set forth in the Central Bank of The Bahamas Act, 2020, as amended, and the Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act, 2020, as amended, and their related rules and regulations and any related guidance or notices issued by The Central Bank of The Bahamas. The Central Bank of The Bahamas licenses and supervises all of the banks and trust companies in The Bahamas. Its objectives include promoting and maintaining monetary stability and ensuring a sound financial system through the effective application of international regulatory and supervisory standards. All banks must adhere to the Central Bank of The Bahamas’ licensing and prudential requirements, ongoing supervisory programs and regulatory reporting requirements, and are subject to periodic onsite inspections. The regulatory framework for the securities industry in The Bahamas is set forth in the Securities Industry Act, 2011, as amended, and the Securities Industry Regulations, 2012. The relevant regulator for the securities industry is the Securities Commission of The Bahamas.

Licensing

Inteligo Bank has been granted a banking license by the Central Bank of The Bahamas and an International Banking License by the Superintendency of Banks of Panama. Under the BTCRA, the Central Bank of The Bahamas may revoke the license of a licensee if: in the opinion of the Central Bank of The Bahamas, the licensee (i) is carrying on its business in a manner detrimental to the public interest or the interests of its depositors or other creditors or (ii) contravening the provisions of Bahamian banking law or any other law, order or regulations made thereunder, or any term or condition subject to which the license was issued, either in The Bahamas or elsewhere; (iii) if Inteligo Bank has ceased to carry on its banking business; or (iv) if Inteligo Bank becomes bankrupt or goes into liquidation or is wound up or otherwise dissolved.

Inteligo Bank’s asset management activities and securities custody and trading activities are subject to supervision by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas. Inteligo Bank holds the following licenses from the Securities Commission of The Bahamas: Dealing as Agent or Principal; Arranging Securities; Managing Securities; and Advising on Securities. Inteligo Bank is licensed to undertake all securities related activities that are ancillary to its banking business.

Banking Regulation and Supervision

Banking regulations on capital adequacy and regulatory framework in The Bahamas take into account the recommendations of the Basel Committee. The Central Bank of The Bahamas has adopted a Basel Implementation Program (the “Program”) and has effectively implemented Pillar I, Pillar II and Pillar III of the Basel II framework. The Pillar I framework focuses on the capital adequacy ratio requirements. Pillar II focuses on the ICAAP (the guidelines in relation to the ICAAP were released in August of 2016), and Pillar III relates to Minimum Disclosures. The Central Bank of The Bahamas has rolled out the capital

112

component of the Basel III framework and in 2017, began to implement other elements namely, the capital buffers, the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio and the liquidity coverage ratio. In November 2020, the Central Bank of The Bahamas released a draft of The Bahamas capital regulations and reforms to the guidelines for the management of capital and the calculation of capital adequacy, which ended its consultation period in January 2021 and was shared with the Bahamian government during the third quarter of 2021 for final endorsement and release. The Bahamas capital regulations include changes to the methodology for the calculation of risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital that could adversely impact Inteligo Bank’s capital adequacy ratio. Currently, a date has not been defined for the implementation of these regulations. In 2018, the Central Bank of The Bahamas published two discussion papers focused on minimum disclosures (Pillar III of the Basel II framework) and the net stable funding ratio and the liquidity coverage ratio (main components of Basel III), but its liquidity framework will be implemented after the completion of the capital framework.

Corporate Governance

The Guidelines for the Corporate Governance of Banks and Trust Companies Licensed to Do Business Within and From Within The Bahamas, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, list the minimum standards that banks must adopt in respect of their corporate governance framework. Generally, the guidelines require the board of directors to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (i) the competence and independence of board members, (ii) proper management of strategic, business and process-level risks, (iii) compliance with applicable laws, regulations and guidelines, and (iv) ongoing reporting to the Central Bank of The Bahamas.

Limits on Large Exposures

Pursuant to the Banks and Trust Companies (Large Exposures) (Amendment) Regulations, 2012, no bank shall (i) incur exposures to any individual counterparty or group of connected parties which in the aggregate exceed 25% of the bank’s capital base, (ii) hold non-capital investments in securities of a single issuer which exceed 10% of the bank’s capital base, (iii) incur exposures to its related parties which in the aggregate exceed 15% of the bank’s capital base, (iv) incur exposures to related parties unless approved by the bank’s board of directors and negotiated on an arm’s length basis, or, (v) incur non-exempt large exposures which in the aggregate exceed 800% of its capital base. There are certain exemptions listed in the regulations, and the Central Bank of The Bahamas may also exempt a bank from the exposure limits outlined in the regulations in certain circumstances.

Classification of Impaired Assets

The Guidelines for the Measurement, Monitoring and Control of Impaired Assets, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, provide the Central Bank of The Bahamas’ minimum requirements for the recognition, measurement and classification of impaired assets. An impaired asset is defined as an asset where there is no longer a reasonable assurance of timely collection of the full amount of principal and interest due to a deterioration of credit quality of the counterparty. Banks are required to follow the requirements of the International Financial Reporting Standards relating to impaired assets, in particular International Accounting Standards 36 and IFRS 9.

Credit Risk

The Guidelines for the Management of Credit Risk, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, require banks to have a written statement of their credit risk strategy and policies and procedures to implement the strategy. The strategy and policies should be approved by the board of directors and should be consistent with the bank’s degree of risk tolerance, the level of capital available for credit activities and credit management expertise. The Central Bank of The Bahamas endorses the Basel Committee’s Principles for the Management of Credit Risk (September 2000).

Market Risk

The Guidelines on the Management of Market Risk, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, require banks that meet the stated threshold tests to establish sound policies and procedures for the management of market risk, to be supervised and controlled by the board of directors and senior management. Market risk is defined as the risk of losses in on and off-balance sheet positions arising from movements in market prices.

Operational Risk

The Guidelines for the Management of Operational Risk, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, require senior management of a bank, under the approval of the board of directors, to develop and implement an operational risk management framework that explicitly recognizes operational risk as a distinct risk to the institution and aims to effectively manage it. Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems from external events. The guidelines are based upon the Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk, issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2011.

113

Country Risk

The Guidelines for the Management of Country Risk, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, require banks to have a risk management process that focuses on the broadly defined concept of country risk and addresses certain minimum requirements listed therein. The guidelines reference the Basel Committee’s Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.

Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulations

Money laundering is a criminal act in The Bahamas. The laws of The Bahamas concerning money laundering and combatting the financing of terrorism are contained in the following legislation, as amended: (i) the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2018; (ii) the Anti-Terrorism Act, 2004; (iii) the Financial Transactions Reporting Act, 2018; (iv) the Financial Transaction Reporting Regulations, 2018; (v) the Financial Transactions Reporting (Wire Transfers) Regulations, 2018; (vi) the Financial Intelligence Unit Act, 2000; and (vii) the Financial Intelligence (Transactions Reporting) Regulations, 2001. The Guidelines for Licensees on the Prevention of Money Laundering & Countering the Financing of Terrorism, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, apply specifically to banks and other licensees of the Central Bank of The Bahamas. The guidelines require banks to establish clear responsibilities and accountabilities to ensure that policies, procedures and controls which deter criminals from using their facilities for money laundering or the financing of terrorism, are implemented and maintained, thus ensuring that they comply with their obligations under the law. Banks must have in place sufficient controls and monitoring systems for timely detection and reporting of suspicious activities, proper verification of their customers’ identities, record keeping in accordance with applicable laws, and ongoing education and training for its employees.

The Bahamas has enacted the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018 which requires substantial economic presence in The Bahamas for certain Bahamian entities that conduct relevant activities. A relevant activity includes the business of banking as conducted by Inteligo Bank. Inteligo Bank has made the appropriate registration in order to seek exemption from this legislation as it considers itself to be tax resident in another jurisdiction, Panama, despite being a licensed bank in The Bahamas. As a tax resident in Panama, Inteligo Bank would be exempt from the requirements of the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018 if it fulfills certain disclosure and governance requirements of the applicable legislation. If Inteligo Bank is not considered to be tax resident in Panama, or does not fulfill the requirements of the applicable legislation, it will have to enhance its economic and business presence in The Bahamas in order to comply with the Commercial Entities (Substance Requirements) Act, 2018.

External Auditors

The Guidelines on the Relationship between External Auditors of Licensees and the Central Bank of The Bahamas, issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas, require banks to inform the Central Bank of The Bahamas of the appointment of their external auditors. In addition to listing certain criteria to be used when appointing external auditors, the guidelines also provide examples of facts and matters of material significance that must be reported by an external auditor to the Central Bank of The Bahamas, such as material misstatements in financial statements or evidence of fraudulent activities. The guidelines take into account the aspects of the Basel Committee’s paper, The Relationship Between Banking Supervisors and Banks’ External Auditors (2002).

114

C.	Organizational Structure

The following chart presents our corporate structure, indicating our principal subsidiaries and respective ownership interests.

LOGO

D.	Property, Plants and Equipment

We are based in Peru and our principal executive offices are located at Av. Carlos Villarán 140, Urbanización, Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Peru, which is owned by Interbank.

Our principal subsidiaries own or lease the following properties:

Interbank

Interbank owns its headquarters, the Interbank Tower, located at Av. Carlos Villarán 140, Urbanización, Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Peru (approximately 46,585 square meters). Although most of its financial store facilities are leased, Interbank owned 43 financial store facilities as of December 31, 2022.

Interseguro

Interseguro owns its administrative office, located at Av. Javier Prado 492, San Isidro, Lima, Peru (approximately 2,482 square meters), as well as its main commercial office, located at Av. Paseo de la República 3071, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru (approximately 1,650 square meters). Additionally, Interseguro leases 24 facilities in different provinces of Peru. Most of Interseguro’s facilities outside of Lima are subleased to Interbank.

Inteligo

Inteligo had six offices as of December 31, 2022. Inteligo owns its branch in Panama and leases the rest of the facilities where it operates. Inteligo Bank’s registered headquarters are located at Inteligo Bank—Seventeen Shop Building, First Floor, Collins Avenue & Fourth Terrace, Centreville, Nassau, The Bahamas. Inteligo SAB’s registered headquarters are located at Inteligo SAB—Av. Rivera Navarrete 501, San Isidro, Lima, Peru. Interfondos’ registered headquarters are located at Interfondos—Av. Carlos Villaran 140, Sixth Floor, La Victoria, Lima, Peru.

Izipay

Izipay had 19 offices as of December 31, 2022. Izipay owns one administrative office, located at Calle Porta 111 Piso 7, Miraflores, Lima, Peru, and leases the rest of the facilities where it operates including its main offices at Av. Jorge Chávez 275 Piso 7, Miraflores, Lima, Peru.

115

SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION

The following tables present certain selected statistical information and ratios for IFS for the periods indicated. The following information is included for analytical purposes and should be read in conjunction with the information included in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our audited annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. The statistical information and discussion and analysis presented below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 reflect our consolidated financial position with our subsidiaries, Inteligo, Interbank, Interseguro and Izipay (since the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in PMP and Izipay in April 2022), for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 and their results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Average annual balances are based on five quarterly balances. Nominal average interest rates have been calculated by dividing interest earned on assets or paid on liabilities by the corresponding average annual balances on such assets or liabilities.

On January 1, 2021, we adopted the following standards, interpretations, or amendments: (i) in connection with the interest rate benchmark reform, amendments to IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”, IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”, and IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”, IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts”, and IFRS 16 “Leases”,– Phase 2; and (ii) in connection with COVID-19 related rent concessions beyond June 30, 2021, an amendment to IFRS 16 “Leases”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments have not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Since January 1, 2020, we adopted the following standards, interpretations, or amendments: (i) Amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”, (ii) Amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” and IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors”, (iii) Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued on March 29,2018 and (iv) Amendments to IFRS 16 “Leases”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Average Balance Sheets, Income Earned from Interest-Earning Assets, Interest Paid on Interest-Bearing Liabilities

The tables below set forth, by currency of denomination, average balances for IFS prepared on a consolidated basis, and, where applicable, interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Except as otherwise indicated, average balances, when used, have been classified by currency (soles or foreign currency (primarily U.S. dollars)), regardless of the domestic or international origin of the relevant balances. In addition, unless otherwise set forth in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, such average balances are based on quarterly balances. Nominal average interest rates have been calculated by dividing interest earned on assets or paid on liabilities by the corresponding average balances on such assets or liabilities.

116


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022⁽¹⁾								2021⁽¹⁾								2020⁽¹⁾

	(S/ in millions, except for percentages)
	Average Balance		Interest Earned			Nominal Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest Earned			Nominal Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest Earned			Nominal Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks
Soles		3,539.6		55.9			1.6	%		8,752.7		38.4			0.4	%		5,150.5		10.3			0.2	%
Foreign Currency		10,412.5		119.5			1.1	%		10,231.2		7.9			0.1	%		9,741.6		25.6			0.3	%

Total		13,952.1		175.4			1.3	%		18,983.9		46.3			0.2	%		14,892.0		35.9			0.2	%

Investments
Soles		16,373.9		1,121.4			6.8	%		14,993.1		795.4			5.3	%		13,464.4		625.7			4.6	%
Foreign Currency		7,653.1		326.0			4.3	%		9,394.1		369.4			3.9	%		7,729.9		368.0			4.8	%

Total		24,027.1		1,447.4			6.0	%		24,387.2		1,164.8			4.8	%		21,194.3		993.7			4.7	%

Loans
Soles		33,385.0		3,587.3			10.7	%		32,502.9		2,878.1			8.9	%		30,444.9		3,062.9			10.1	%
Foreign Currency		12,630.0		661.2			5.2	%		11,492.8		516.5			4.5	%		10,878.5		572.4			5.3	%

Total		46,015.1		4,248.5			9.2	%		43,995.7		3,394.6			7.7	%		41,323.4		3,635.3			8.8	%

Total interest-earning assets
Soles		53,298.6		4,764.6			8.9	%		56,248.7		3,711.8			6.6	%		49,059.8		3,699.0			7.5	%
Foreign Currency		30,695.7		1,106.7			3.6	%		31,118.2		893.8			2.9	%		28,350.0		966.0			3.4	%

Total		83,994.2		5,871.3			7.0	%		87,366.9		4,605.6			5.3	%		77,409.7		4,665.0			6.0	%

Taxable interest income		—		4,261.2			—			—		3,353.0			—			—		3,591.0			—
Non-taxable interest income		—		1,610.1			—			—		1,252.6			—			—		1,074.0			—
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits and obligations
Soles		28,143.4		(782.9	)		(2.8	%)		29,976.5		(311.7	)		(1.0	%)		26,945.7		(462.3	)		(1.7	)%
Foreign Currency		19,954.4		(158.4	)		(0.8	%)		19,191.5		(93.1	)		(0.5	%)		15,487.2		(116.2	)		(0.8	)%

Total		48,097.7		(941.3	)		(2.0	%)		49,168.0		(404.9	)		(0.8	%)		42,433.0		(578.5	)		(1.4	)%

Due to banks and correspondents⁽²⁾
Soles		7,231.3		(214.4	)		(3.0	%)		8,078.3		(136.1	)		(1.7	%)		6,508.8		(146.7	)		(2.3	)%
Foreign Currency		717.2		(20.5	)		(2.9	%)		865.1		(20.4	)		(2.4	%)		1,058.7		(35.0	)		(3.3	)%

Total		7,948.5		(234.8	)		(3.0	%)		8,943.5		(156.5	)		(1.7	%)		7,567.5		(181.7	)		(2.4	)%

Bonds, notes and other obligations
Soles		2,400.3		(169.2	)		(7.0	%)		2,552.0		(207.7	)		(8.1	%)		2,459.5		(162.6	)		(6.6	)%
Foreign Currency		5,643.0		(316.8	)		(5.6	%)		5,664.0		(288.9	)		(5.1	%)		4,907.3		(269.5	)		(5.5	)%

Total		8,043.2		(486.0	)		(6.0	%)		8,216.0		(496.6	)		(6.0	%)		7,366.8		(432.1	)		(5.9	)%

Total Interest-bearing liabilities:
Soles		37,775.0		(1,166.4	)		(3.1	%)		40,606.8		(655.5	)		(1.6	%)		35,914.0		(771.6	)		(2.1	)%
Foreign Currency		26,314.5		(495.7	)		(1.9	%)		25,720.6		(402.4	)		(1.6	%)		21,453.2		(420.7	)		(2.0	)%

Total		64,089.5		(1,662.1	)		(2.6	%)		66,327.4		(1,057.9	)		(1.6	%)		57,367.3		(1,192.3	)		(2.1	)%

(1)

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, IFS did not maintain any of the following categories on its balance sheets: (i) federal funds sold, (ii) securities purchased with agreements to resell, (iii) federal funds purchased, (iv) securities sold under agreements to repurchase, or (v) commercial paper.

(2)	Includes inter-bank funds

117

The following tables set forth, by currency of denomination, average balances for our non-interest earning assets and non-interest bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity for the periods indicated.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

	(S/ in millions)
	Average Balance			Average Balance			Average Balance
Impairment allowance for loans
Soles		(1,958.6	)		(2,279.4	)		(2,035.2	)
Foreign Currency		(83.6	)		(214.6	)		(309.2	)

Total		(2,042.3	)		(2,494.0	)		(2,344.4	)

Investment Property
Soles		1,255.5			1,188.2			1,015.5
Foreign Currency		—			—			—

Total		1,255.5			1,188.2			1,015.5

Property, furniture and equipment, net
Soles		809.1			811.6			901.0
Foreign Currency		—			—			—

Total		809.1			811.6			901.0

Accounts receivable and other assets, net
Soles		1,562.4			1,676.1			1,040.8
Foreign Currency		287.8			295.5			591.6

Total		1,850.2			1,971.6			1,632.4

Intangibles and goodwill, net
Soles		1,322.7			1,034.8			1,019.0
Foreign Currency		—			—			—

Total		1,322.7			1,034.8			1,019.0

Due from customers on acceptances
Soles		—			—			—
Foreign Currency		65.1			94.0			44.1

Total		65.1			94.0			44.1

Deferred Income Tax asset, net
Soles		191.5			258.6			203.0
Foreign Currency		—			—			—

Total		191.5			258.6			203.0

Total non-interest-earning assets:
Soles		3,182.5			2,689.9			2,144.2
Foreign Currency		269.3			174.9			326.5

Total		3,451.8			2,864.8			2,470.7

118


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

	(S/ in millions, except for percentages)
	Average Balance		Average Balance		Average Balance
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Due from customers on acceptances
Soles		—		—		—
Foreign Currency		65.1		94.0		44.1

Total		65.1		94.0		44.1

Accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities
Soles		1,804.7		1,945.7		1,579.3
Foreign Currency		1,225.7		713.0		616.9

Total		3,030.4		2,658.7		2,196.2

Insurance contract liabilities
Soles		6,696.0		6,876.3		7,346.4
Foreign Currency		4,100.2		4,965.3		4,410.7

Total		10,796.2		11,841.6		11,757.1

Deferred Income Tax Liability, net
Soles		34.6		0.6		0.7
Foreign Currency		—		—		—

Total		34.6		0.6		0.7

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Soles		8,535.2		8,822.6		8,926.3
Foreign Currency		5,391.0		5,772.3		5,071.7

Total		13,926.2		14,594.8		13,998.0

Changes in Net Interest and Similar Income and Net Interest and Similar Expense: Volume and Rate Analysis

The following table sets forth, by currency of denomination, changes in our interest revenue and expenses between changes in the average volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in their respective nominal interest rates from the year ended December 31, 2022 to the year ended December 31, 2021 and from the year ended December 31, 2021 to the year ended December 31, 2020. Volume and rate variances have been calculated based on movements in average quarterly balances and changes in nominal interest rates, average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. The net change attributable to changes in both volume and rate has been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.


	December 31, 2022/2021⁽¹⁾								December 31, 2021/2020⁽¹⁾
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in:								Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in:
	Rate		Volume			Net Change			Rate			Volume		Net Change

	(S/ in millions)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks⁽²⁾
Soles		99.8		(82.3	)		17.5			12.3			15.8		28.1
Foreign Currency		109.6		2.1			111.6			(18.1	)		0.4		(17.7	)

Total		209.4		(80.2	)		129.1			(5.8	)		16.2		10.4

Investments
Soles		231.4		94.6			326.0			88.6			81.1		169.7
Foreign Currency		30.8		(74.2	)		(43.4	)		(64.1	)		65.4		1.4

Total		262.2		20.4			282.6			24.5			146.5		171.0

119


	December 31, 2022/2021⁽¹⁾									December 31, 2021/2020⁽¹⁾
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in:									Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in:
	Rate			Volume			Net Change			Rate			Volume			Net Change

	(S/ in millions)
Loans
Soles		614.5			94.8			709.3			(367.1	)		182.2			(184.	)
Foreign Currency		85.1			59.5			144.7			(83.5	)		27.6			(55.9	)

Total		699.6			154.3			853.9			(450.6	)		209.8			(240.7	)

Total interest-earning assets:
Soles		945.7			107.0			1,052.7			(266.3	)		279.1			12.9
Foreign Currency		225.5			(12.5	)		212.9			(165.6	)		93.4			(72.2	)

Total		1,171.2			94.5			1,265.7			(431.9	)		372.6			(59.3	)

Interest-bearing liabilities: Deposits and obligations
Soles		(522.1	)		51.0			(471.2	)		182.1			(31.5	)		150.6
Foreign Currency		(59.2	)		(6.1	)		(65.2	)		41.1			(18.0	)		23.1

Total		(581.3	)		44.9			(536.4	)		223.1			(49.5	)		173.7

Due to banks and correspondents
Soles		(103.4	)		25.1			(78.3	)		37.1			(26.4	)		10.6
Foreign Currency		(4.3	)		4.2			(0.1	)		10.0			4.6			14.6

Total		(107.7	)		29.3			(78.4	)		47.1			(21.9	)		25.2

Bonds, notes and other obligations
Soles		27.9			10.7			38.6			(37.6	)		(7.5	)		(45.1	)
Foreign Currency		(29.2	)		1.2			(28.0	)		19.2			(38.6	)		(19.4	)

Total		(1.3	)		11.9			10.6			(18.4	)		(46.1	)		(64.5	)

Total Interest-bearing liabilities:
Soles		(597.7	)		86.8			(510.9	)		181.6			(65.5	)		116.1
Foreign Currency		(92.6	)		(0.7	)		(93.3	)		70.3			(52.0	)		18.3

Total		(690.3	)		86.1			(604.2	)		251.8			(117.5	)		134.3

(1)

(2)	Includes inter-bank funds.

Interest-Earning Assets: Net Interest Margin and Yield Spread

The following table set forth for each of the periods indicated, by currency of denomination, our levels of average interest-earning assets, net interest income, gross yield, net interest margin and yield spread, all on a nominal basis.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022		2021		2020
Average interest-earning assets
Soles		53,298.6		56,248.7		49,059.8
Foreign Currency		30,695.7		31,118.2		28,350.0

Total		83,994.3		87,366.9		77,409.8

Net interest income⁽¹⁾
Soles		3,598.2		3,056.3		2,927.4
Foreign Currency		611.0		491.4		545.3

Total		4,209.2		3,547.7		3,472.8

120


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Gross yield⁽²⁾
Soles		8.9	%		6.6	%		7.5	%
Foreign Currency		3.6	%		2.9	%		3.4	%

Total		7.0	%		5.3	%		6.0	%

Net interest margin⁽³⁾
Soles		6.8	%		5.4	%		6.0	%
Foreign Currency		2.0	%		1.6	%		1.9	%

Total		5.0	%		4.1	%		4.5	%

Yield spread⁽⁴⁾
Soles		5.9	%		5.0	%		5.4	%
Foreign Currency		1.7	%		1.3	%		1.4	%

Total		4.4	%		3.7	%		3.9	%

(1)	“Net interest income” is defined as interest and similar income less interest and similar expense.

(2)	“Gross yield” is defined as interest and similar income divided by average interest-earning assets.

(3)	“Net interest margin” is defined as net interest and similar income divided by average interest-earning assets.

(4)	“Yield spread”, on a nominal basis, represents the difference between gross yield on average interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Investment Portfolio

The following table sets forth our financial investment portfolio by type on the dates indicated. For more information on our financial investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, see Note 5 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		16,716.5		74.6	%		17,629.8		72.9	%		17,902.4		74.7	%
Investments at amortized cost		3,231.1		14.4	%		3,225.2		13.3	%		2,650.9		11.1	%
Investments at fair value through profit or loss		1,933.0		8.6	%		2,706.2		11.2	%		2,042.8		8.5	%
Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		512.9		2.3	%		623.7		2.6	%		1,373.5		5.7	%

Total		22,393.5		100.0	%		24,184.9		100.0	%		23,969.6		100.0	%

Plus: Accrued interest		394.1					362.3					307.5

Total investments, net		22,787.6					24,547.3					24,277.1

121

The following tables set forth the maturities of our financial investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022, before accrued interest.

Maturities of Investment Portfolio - Yields


	1 year or less			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			1-5 years			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			5-10 years			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			Over 10 years			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			Total
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income:
Bonds		278.6			135.6	%		1,268.2			7.7	%		1,848.5			6.8	%		5,233.8			6.7	%		8,629.0
Peruvian sovereign and global Bonds		5.9			0.0	%		2,220.9			6.4	%		1,278.7			8.1	%		3,103.3			7.3	%		6,608.8
Negotiable bank certificates issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru		1,478.7			25.8	%		—			—			—			—			—			—			1,478.7

Total Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		1,763.2			161.5	%		3,489.1			14.1	%		3,127.2			15.0	%		8,337.0			14.0	%		16,716.5

Investments at amortized cost:
Peruvian sovereign Bonds		494.9			0.0	%		1,084.1			4.6	%		741.4			7.8	%		910.7			8.6	%		3,231.1

Total Investments at amortized cost		494.9			0.0	%		1,084.1			4.6	%		741.4			7.8	%		910.7			8.6	%		3,231.1

Total investments		2,258.1			161.5	%		4,573.2			18.7	%		3,868.6			22.8	%		9,247.7			22.5	%		19,947.7

%		10.1	%		—			20.4	%		—			17.3	%		—			41.3	%		—			89.1	%

(1)	The weighted average yield for each range of maturity is calculated by dividing the annual interest income by the book value of the debt securities.

Loan Portfolio

The following table sets forth our loans by type of loan, at the dates indicated.


	As of December 31,
	2022						2021						2020
	S/ in millions			%			S/ in millions			%			S/ in millions			%
Loan Portfolio
Loans		35,977.7			76.5	%		35,490.2			79.4	%		34,718.3			80.6	%
Credit cards		6,239.3			13.3	%		4,814.8			10.8	%		4,379.9			10.2	%
Leasing		1,174.5			2.5	%		1,111.0			2.5	%		1,211.3			2.8	%
Discounted notes		894.6			1.9	%		572.3			1.3	%		468.7			1.1	%
Factoring receivables		1,011.5			2.2	%		867.8			1.9	%		572.0			1.3	%
Advances and overdrafts		38.8			0.1	%		41.0			0.1	%		39.4			0.1	%
Refinanced loans		322.9			0.7	%		236.5			0.5	%		287.1			0.7	%
Past-due and under legal collection loans		1,366.0			2.9	%		1,554.7			3.5	%		1,405.2			3.3	%

Total gross loans		47,025.4			100.0	%		44,688.2			100.0	%		43,081.9			100.0	%

Accrued interest from performing loans		527.6			—			404.9			—			445.1			—
Impairment allowance for loans		(2,027.9	)		—			(2,064.9	)		—			(2,984.9	)		—
Unearned interest and interest collected in advance		(22.1	)		—			(22.6	)		—			(22.8	)		—

Total direct loans, net		45,503.0			—			43,005.6			—			40,519.4			—

122

Loans by Classification

The following table shows the composition of our loan portfolio by classification for the periods indicated.


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%
Commercial loans		21,412.1		45.5	%		22,118.9		49.5	%		22,001.6		51.1	%
Consumer loans		14,967.8		31.8	%		12,514.5		28.0	%		11,416.2		26.5	%
Mortgage loans		9,286.9		19.7	%		8,552.3		19.1	%		7,721.3		17.9	%
Small and micro-business loans		1,358.5		2.9	%		1,502.5		3.4	%		1,942.9		4.5	%

Total direct gross loans⁽¹⁾		47,025.4		100.0	%		44,688.2		100.0	%		43,081.9		100.0	%

(1)	Includes refinanced loans and past due and under legal collection loans for all periods reported.

Loans by Currency

The following table presents our loan portfolio divided by currency at the dates indicated.


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%			S/ in millions		%
Foreign currency denominated		13,481.9		28.7	%		12,088.9		27.1	%		10,755.1		25.0	%
Sol denominated		33,543.5		71.3	%		32,599.4		72.9	%		32,326.8		75.0	%

Total gross loans		47,025.4		100.0	%		44,688.2		100.0	%		43,081.9		100.0	%

As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we did not have foreign loans that exceeded 1% of our total consolidated assets.

Maturity Composition of Our Portfolio of Loans

The following tables set forth an analysis of our portfolio of loans as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 by type and by the time remaining to maturity. Loan amounts are presented before deduction of allowances for loan losses.


	As of December 31, 2022⁽¹⁾
	1 month		1-3 months		3 months -1 year		1-5 years		More than 5 years but less than 15 years		More than 15 years		Past-due loans		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Loans		2,979.8		3,432.0		7,688.4		16,061.5		5,522.5		293.5		1,366.0		37,343.7
Credit cards		1,206.4		1,223.6		1,711.9		2,097.4		—		—		—		6,239.3
Leasing		73.4		60.2		475.6		554.7		10.7		—		—		1,174.5
Discounted notes		399.0		412.0		83.6		—		—		—		—		894.6
Factoring receivables		240.0		565.3		206.2		—		—		—		—		1,011.5
Advances and overdrafts		38.8		—		—		—		—		—		—		38.8
Refinanced loans		8.5		15.2		54.4		203.1		37.4		4.3		—		322.9

Total gross loans		4,945.9		5,708.3		10,220.2		18,916.6		5,570.6		297.9		1,366.0		47,025.4

123


	As of December 31, 2021⁽¹⁾
	1 month		1-3 months		3 months -1 year		1-5 years		More than 5 years but less than 15 years		More than 15 years		Past-due loans		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Loans		2,049.3		4,114.6		8,069.1		15,818.4		5,240.4		198.4		1,554.7		37,044.9
Credit cards		893.4		915.6		1,379.3		1,622.7		3.7		—		—		4,814.8
Leasing		39.3		113.9		390.1		548.4		19.2		—		—		1,111.0
Discounted notes		196.5		328.6		47.2		—		—		—		—		572.3
Factoring receivables		121.7		454.3		291.8		—		—		—		—		867.8
Advances and overdrafts		41.0		—		—		—		—		—		—		41.0
Refinanced loans		4.2		8.9		44.7		141.8		30.7		6.1		—		236.5

Total gross loans		3,345.5		5,935.9		10,222.3		18,131.4		5,294.0		204.5		1,554.7		44,688.2


	As of December 31, 2020⁽¹⁾
	1 month		1-3 months		3 months -1 year		1-5 years		More than 5 years but less than 15 years		More than 15 years		Past-due loans		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Loans		2,016.0		2,804.7		7,712.0		17,259.9		4,778.6		147.0		1,405.2		36,123.5
Credit cards		586.2		730.9		1,360.6		1,654.8		47.4		—		—		4,379.9
Leasing		80.5		109.8		369.5		618.7		32.8		—		—		1,211.3
Discounted notes		189.0		237.3		42.4		—		—		—		—		468.7
Factoring receivables		167.0		318.7		86.3		—		—		—		—		572.0
Advances and overdrafts		39.4		—		—		—		—		—		—		39.4
Refinanced loans		5.0		12.1		56.7		186.3		22.7		4.2		—		287.1

Total gross loans		3,083.1		4,213.5		9,627.6		19,719.7		4,881.5		151.2		1,405.2		43,081.9

(1)	Includes the balance of disbursements made by Interbank within the “Reactiva Perú” program. The balance of these loans as of December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 amounted to S/2,299.9 million, S/4,896.1 million and S/6,615.8, respectively.

Classification of Our Loan Portfolio - Analysis of Substandard and Past Due Loans

The following tables provide the classification of our loans as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, calculated under the requirements of IFRS 9:


	As of December 31, 2022
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total

Direct and indirect Loans	(S/ in millions)
Not impaired
High grade		39,559.3		1,513.8		—		41,073.1
Standard grade		4,295.0		874.8		—		5,169.7
Sub-standard grade		778.7		1,000.3		—		1,779.0
Past due but not impaired		1,124.6		1,150.1		—		2,274.7
Impaired
Individually impaired		—		—		55.2		55.2
Collectively impaired		—		—		1,161.0		1,161.0

Total gross loans		45,757.5		4,539.0		1,216.2		51,512.7

124


	As of December 31, 2022
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total

Direct and indirect Loans	(S/ in millions)
Direct loan portfolio		41,798.1		4,037.2		1,190.1		47,025.4
Indirect loan portfolio		3,959.4		501.8		26.1		4,487.3

Total gross loans		45,757.5		4,539.0		1,216.2		51,512.7


	As of December 31, 2021
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total

Direct and indirect Loans	(S/ in millions)
Not impaired
High grade		37,337.4		775.7		—		38,113.1
Standard grade		4,487.6		371.8		—		4,859.4
Sub-standard grade		1,952.2		1,274.7		—		3,226.9
Past due but not impaired		729.7		862.4		—		1,592.0
Impaired
Individually impaired		—		—		54.0		54.0
Collectively impaired		—		—		1,283.3		1,283.3

Total gross loans		44,506.8		3,284.6		1,337.2		49,128.7

Direct loan portfolio		40,522.5		2,853.6		1,312.2		44,688.2
Indirect loan portfolio		3,984.4		431.0		25.1		4,440.5

Total gross loans		44,506.8		3,284.6		1,337.2		49,128.7

125


	As of December 31, 2020
Direct and indirect Loans	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Not impaired
High grade		32,994.4		1,728.9		—		34,723.3
Standard grade		4,458.7		1,603.3		—		6,062.0
Sub-standard grade		692.7		1,169.7		—		1,862.5
Past due but not impaired		790.3		1,781.9		—		2,572.1
Impaired
Individually impaired		—		—		30.3		30.3
Collectively impaired		—		—		2,443.7		2,443.7

Total gross loans		38,936.0		6,283.8		2,474.0		47,693.8

Direct loan portfolio		34,893.3		5,744.7		2,443.9		43,081.9
Indirect loan portfolio		4,042.8		539.1		30.1		4,611.9

Total gross loans		38,936.0		6,283.8		2,474.0		47,693.8

Impairment Allowance for Loans

The following tables show the allocation for our impairment allowance for loans as of December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020:


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%
Commercial loans		282.4		13.7	%		383.2		18.2	%		294.7		9.7	%
Consumer loans		1,622.4		78.6	%		1,401.7		66.6	%		2,413.4		79.3	%
Mortgage loans		61.6		3.0	%		155.2		7.4	%		188.0		6.2	%
Small and micro-business loans		96.9		4.7	%		165.1		7.8	%		146.5		4.8	%

Total⁽¹⁾		2,063.4		100.0	%		2,105.2		100.0	%		3,042.6		100.0	%

(1)	Includes impairment allowance for indirect loans amounting to S/35.5 million as of December 31, 2022, S/40.3 million as of December 31, 2021 and S/57.7 million as of December 31, 2020. See Note 6(d.2) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

The following table shows the changes in our impairment allowance for loans for the periods indicated.

126


	For the years ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

	(S/ in millions)
Balance as of January 1		2,105.2			3,042.6			1,434.5
Provision		830.6			381.6			2,393.9
Recoveries of written-off loans		155.1			182.0			106.4
Written-off loans and sales		(1,021.5	)		(1,525.1	)		(926.0	)
Translation result and others		(6.0	)		24.2			33.7
Balance as of December 31,		2,063.4			2,105.2			3,042.6

Allowances for indirect loans		35.5			40.3			57.7
Allowances for direct loans		2,027.9			2,064.9			2,984.9

Total allowances for loan losses		2,063.4			2,105.2			3,042.6

Allowances for Loan Losses at end of Period as a Percentage of Total Loans		4.4	%		4.7	%		7.1	%
Ratios of Charge-Offs to Average Balance
Commercial loans		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Consumer loans		1.8	%		3.0	%		2.1	%
Mortgage loans		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Small and micro business loans		0.2	%		0.2	%		0.1	%

The ratio of allowances for loan losses to average loans was 4.4% in 2022 compared to 4.7% in 2021. The lower ratio was mainly explained by lower allowances for direct loans in addition to growth in the average balance of loans.

Lower allowances for direct loans were explained by increase in provision requirements in consumer loans and mortgages. These effects were partially offset by higher allowances for loans in commercial and small and micro-business loans.

The following tables show the changes in our impairment allowance for loans (direct and indirect) by line of business for the period indicated.


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
	Commercial loans			Mortgage loans			Consumer loans			Small and micro-business loans			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Balance as of January 1		383.2			155.2			1,401.7			165.1			2,105.2

Provision		(34.1	)		(90.1	)		966.9			(12.1	)		830.6
Recovery of written-off loans		5.9			—			140.4			8.7			155.1
Written-off loans and sales		(68.4	)		(2.3	)		(886.2	)		(64.7	)		(1,021.5	)
Translation result and others		(4.4	)		(1.2	)		(0.4	)		—			(6.0	)

Balance as of		282.4			61.6			1,622.4			96.9			2,063.4

127


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
	Commercial loans			Mortgage loans			Consumer loans			Small and micro-business loans			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Balance as of January 1		294.7			188.0			2,413.4			146.5			3,042.6

Provision		98.6			(36.1	)		225.6			93.5			381.6
Recovery of written-off loans		1.4			—			175.3			5.3			182.0
Written-off loans and sales		(27.4	)		(2.4	)		(1,414.9	)		(80.3	)		(1,525.1	)
Translation result and others		15.9			5.7			2.3			0.2			24.2

Balance as of		383.2			155.2			1,401.7			165.1			2,105.2


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
	Commercial loans			Mortgage loans			Consumer loans			Small and micro-business loans			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Balance as of January 1		185.6			121.7			1,058.6			68.6			1,434.5

Provision		118.0			63.7			2,112.9			99.4			2,393.9
Recovery of written-off loans		1.8			—			100.8			3.9			106.4
Written-off loans and sales		(27.8	)		(4.4	)		(868.1	)		(25.7	)		(926.0	)
Translation result and others		17.2			6.9			9.3			0.3			33.7

Balance as of		294.7			188.0			2,413.4			146.5			3,042.6

128

Composition of Deposits and Obligations

The following tables provide information on the composition of our deposits obligations for the periods indicated.


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%			(S/ in millions)		%
Demand deposits
Soles		7,467.3		15.4	%		7,943.1		16.2	%		8,836.1		18.7	%
Foreign currency		6,357.6		13.1	%		6,490.1		13.3	%		4,996.1		10.6	%

Total		13,824.8		28.5	%		14,433.2		29.5	%		13,832.3		29.3	%

Savings deposits
Soles		12,395.3		25.5	%		13,665.4		27.9	%		12,212.6		25.9	%
Foreign currency		8,516.4		17.5	%		8,876.4		18.2	%		5,639.7		12.0	%

Total		20,911.7		43.1	%		22,541.8		46.1	%		17,852.3		37.9	%

Time deposits
Soles		8,285.3		17.1	%		6,060.4		12.4	%		7,977.8		16.9	%
Foreign currency		4,581.4		9.4	%		4,893.8		10.0	%		5,557.2		11.8	%

Total		12,866.7		26.5	%		10,954.2		22.4	%		13,535.0		28.7	%

Others
Soles		695.6		1.4	%		713.8		1.5	%		1,492.6		3.2	%
Foreign currency		231.9		0.5	%		254.9		0.5	%		437.1		0.9	%

Total		927.5		1.9	%		968.7		2.0	%		1,929.7		4.1	%

Total deposits
Soles		28,843.5		59.4	%		28,382.7		58.0	%		30,519.2		64.7	%
Foreign currency		19,687.2		40.6	%		20,515.2		42.0	%		16,630.1		35.3	%

Total		48,530.7		100.0	%		48,897.9		100.0	%		47,149.3		100.0	%

As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we did not have individual material deposits by foreign depositors that exceeded 10% of our total Deposits and Obligations.

The following table provides information on the composition of our domestic and foreign deposits, by average balances and average nominal rate, for the periods indicated.

129


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

	(S/ in millions)
Deposits in Domestic Offices
Demand deposits
Average balance
Soles		8,127.6			8,966.5			8,069.7
Foreign currency		4,552.9			4,348.0			3,858.5

Total		12,680.5			13,314.5			11,928.2

Average nominal rate
Soles		3.2	%		0.4	%		0.8	%
Foreign currency		0.5	%		0.1	%		0.3	%

Total		2.2	%		0.3	%		0.6	%

Savings deposits
Average balance
Soles		12,832.2			13,025.1			9,570.5
Foreign currency		8,562.4			7,156.7			5,053.0

Total		21,394.6			20,181.9			14,623.5

Average nominal rate
Soles		1.0	%		0.7	%		1.0	%
Foreign currency		0.4	%		0.2	%		0.2	%

Total		0.7	%		0.5	%		0.7	%

Time deposits
Average balance
Soles		6,469.5			6,876.7			7,892.6
Foreign currency		2,758.7			3,653.5			3,275.1

Total		9,228.2			10,530.2			11,167.8

Average nominal rate
Soles		4.6	%		1.1	%		2.5	%
Foreign currency		1.1	%		0.3	%		0.8	%

Total		3.6	%		0.8	%		2.0	%

Others
Average balance
Soles		714.1			1,108.2			1,413.0
Foreign currency		243.1			358.6			430.4

Total		957.1			1,466.8			1,843.4

Average nominal rate
Soles		6.6	%		5.0	%		4.9	%
Foreign currency		4.1	%		1.8	%		1.7	%

Total		6.0	%		4.2	%		4.1	%

Deposits in Foreign Offices
Demand deposits
Average balance
Soles		—			—			—
Foreign currency		2,004.8			1,990.8			1,194.6

Total		2,004.8			1,990.8			1,194.6

Average nominal rate
Soles		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Foreign currency		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%

Total		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%

Time deposits
Average balance

130


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Soles		—			—			—
Foreign currency		1,832.5			1,683.7			1,675.6

Total		1,832.5			1,683.7			1,675.6

Average nominal rate
Soles		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Foreign currency		3.1	%		1.9	%		1.9	%

Total		3.1	%		1.9	%		1.9	%

Uninsured Deposits

Uninsured deposits are deposits that are in excess of local deposit insurance fund, see “Regulation and Supervision— Banking regulations and supervision - Deposit Insurance Fund”, calculated based on the respective local regulations, as well as deposits in uninsured accounts. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 total estimated uninsured deposits were S/30,520.7 million, S/31,717.8 million and S/33,128.7 million, respectively.

The table below, shows the maturity of estimated uninsured time deposits as of December 31, 2022.


	For the year ended December 31, 2022
	(S/ in millions)
Uninsured time deposits
Within 3 months		5,034.7
From 3 to 6 months		2,145.1
From 6 to 12 months		2,621.2
Over 12 months		1,091.8

Total uninsured time deposits		10,892.7


	As of December 31, 2022
	1 month			1-3 months			3 months-1 year			1-5 years			More than 5 years			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Maturity of Deposits
Demand deposits		13,824.8			—			—			—			—			13,824.8
Saving deposits		20,911.7			—			—			—			—			20,911.7
Time deposits		2,797.7			1,973.3			6,788.7			1,023.5			283.5			12,866.6

Total		37,534.3			1,973.3			6,778.7			1,023.5			283.5			47,603.2

Percentage of Total		78.8	%		4.1	%		14.3	%		2.2	%		0.6	%		100.0	%

131


	As of December 31, 2021
	1 month			1-3 months			3 months-1 year			1-5 years			More than 5 years			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Maturity of Deposits
Demand deposits		14,433.2			—			—			—			—			14,433.2
Saving deposits		22,541.8			—			—			—			—			22,541.8
Time deposits		4,679.0			2,205.2			3,430.8			377.9			261.3			10,954.2

Total		41,654.0			2,205.2			3,430.8			377.9			261.3			47,929.2

Percentage of Total		86.9	%		4.6	%		7.2	%		0.8	%		0.5	%		100.0	%


	As of December 31, 2020
	1 month			1-3 months			3 months-1 year			1-5 years			More than 5 years			Total

	(S/ in millions)
Maturity of Deposits
Demand deposits		13,832.3			—			—			—			—			13,832.3
Saving deposits		17,852.3			—			—			—			—			17,852.3
Time deposits		6,983.1			2,208.2			3,531.5			539.6			272.6			13,535.0

Total		38,667.6			2,208.2			3.531.5			539.6			272.6			45,219.5

Percentage of Total		85.5	%		4.9	%		7.8	%		1.2	%		0.6	%		100.0	%

Short-Term Borrowings

The following tables provide information on the composition of our short-term borrowings for the periods indicated.


	As of December 31,
	2022					2021					2020
	(S/in millions)		Average rate			(S/in millions)		Average rate			(S/ in millions)		Average rate
Inter-bank funds		30.0		7.5	%		—		0.0	%		29.0		0.3	%
Due to banks and correspondents		2,107.8		5.0	%		822.1		2.5	%		1,794.5		1.6	%
Bonds, notes and other obligations		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%

Total		2,137.8		5.0	%		822.1		2.5	%		1,823.4		1.6	%


	As of December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

	(S/in millions except for percentages)
Average balance		1,445.1			1,335.0			2,967.2
Maximum quarter-end balance		2,137.8			1,916.2			4,228.2
Weighted-average nominal interest rate		4.7	%		1.6	%		2.3	%

132

ETHICS AND CORPORATE COMPLIANCE

IFS is firmly committed to promoting a world-class ethics and compliance program (the “Compliance Program”), ensuring a compliance culture within its subsidiaries, to maintain an ethical culture throughout its organizations. Thus, IFS has a corporate compliance policy (the “IFS Corporate Compliance Policy”) based on local and US regulations, international best practices, and our principles and values.

The Compliance Program aims to promote corporate policies and procedures of effective internal controls to prevent, detect and report inappropriate conducts, comply with laws and regulations, and mitigate reputational risk to maintain a sustainable business. In addition, this program is enhanced and strengthened by a sanction program and continuous mandatory training for all employees, including tailored training for the board of directors, front office, and compliance team members to prevent misconduct and reinforce compliance policies.

The Compliance Program is led by the Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), who reports directly to the board of directors and indirectly to the CEO and is responsible for overseeing the Compliance Program within the organization. Moreover, each subsidiary has a Compliance Officer who reports to the CCO and to their respective board of directors.

The Compliance Program has a risk-based approach, which focuses on mitigating the risk of misconduct that could negatively impact our reputation. This program includes the following policies:

Anti-Money Laundering / Anti-Terrorist Financing (“AML/ATF”)

IFS has implemented a risk-based AML/ATF program according to regulations pursuant to which each subsidiary operates, as well as international standards, and best practices, including the FATF.

In the context of the digital era, we are continuously working on incorporating knowledge-based systems and tools to help us prevent and detect money laundering and financing of terrorism by using customized algorithms.

The subsidiaries have implemented their policies and procedures in accordance with the IFS Corporate Compliance Policy and local regulation, approved by their respective boards of directors and reviewed on an annual basis, which includes but is not limited to:

•

AML/AFT policy and procedures based on risk assessment.

•

Customer Identification Program (“CIP”), Know Your Customer, and due diligence procedures including monitoring of the OFAC and International Sanctions List.

•

Know your employee and vendor policy.

•

Annual review of high-risk customers.

Anti-Corruption Program

IFS is committed to conducting its business in accordance with world-class ethics and compliance standards. As part of that commitment, IFS prohibits its directors, officers and employees from making any political contribution on its behalf or its subsidiaries. Our anti-corruption program contains policies and procedures that comply with the local and international anti-corruption laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”).

Our program has been designed by understanding IFS’s business model and its risk profile. This program includes, but is not limited to, roles and responsibilities, guidelines, a zero-tolerance policy for any act of bribery or corruption, policies regarding gifts, conflicts of interest, donations, and hiring and appointing employees, officers, and directors, as well as violations reports, and sanctions.

The subsidiaries have implemented their respective anti-corruption programs based on the IFS Corporate Compliance Policy and local anti-bribery regulations.

Insider Trading

The IFS insider trading program prohibits any of its directors, officers, or employees who possess material, non-public information concerning IFS or its subsidiaries from buying or selling its securities or passing on such information to others who may be induced to buy or sell securities.

133

Consumer Data Privacy Program

In accordance with local regulations and best international practices, IFS is committed to ensuring that the processing of personal data is carried out in accordance with the purpose for which it has been provided, with the expressed consent of the clients.

This program includes compliance with the legal framework of Law No. 29733 Personal Data Protection Law and Supreme Decree No. 003-2013-JUS. In addition, the subsidiaries that are subject to this law, have implemented internal controls in accordance with the IFS Corporate Compliance Program.

IFS and its subsidiaries have a sanction program for non-compliance with data protection laws.

Fiscal Transparency

O.C.D.E. Common Report Standard (“CRS”)

IFS and its subsidiaries are CRS compliant, reporting to their respective Tax Authorities on an annual basis.

U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”)

IFS and its subsidiaries are FATCA compliant and are all classified as Reporting Model 1. Intercorp is the lead of the Expanded Affiliated Group.

Dodd Frank

IFS, as a counterparty of U.S. banks for operations with derivatives, must adhere to the Dodd Frank Protocol. Such requirements include the settlement of certain operations through a clearinghouse and adherence to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) standards to comply, where applicable, with Dodd Frank regulations.

Whistleblower Hotline

IFS and its subsidiaries have implemented a whistleblower hotline that helps stakeholders report improper conduct, fraudulent practices, violations of internal policies, and unlawful and unethical conducts. These conducts can be reported through the website, e-mail, or phone call, and may be reported anonymously. Moreover, this hotline is managed by a third party to reinforce the confidentiality of the complaint.

ITEM 4A

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A.	Operating Results

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Substantially all of our subsidiaries’ operations are conducted in Peru. Accordingly, our results of operations and financial condition are dependent on economic conditions, consumer spending and investment levels in Peru. During the 1980s, Peru experienced a severe economic crisis and high levels of inflation. Beginning in the 1990s, however, the Peruvian government implemented a series of structural reforms, which helped stabilize the Peruvian economy and foster continued GDP growth, lower inflation and interest rates, more stable currency and significantly improved public finances. Moreover, and as a result of the financial instability in 2008 and 2009, which was accompanied by a global economic downturn in many decades, and the worst crisis caused by the pandemic COVID-19, the Peruvian economy, while affected, was one of the few economies in Latin America to experience growth in 2009. Peru’s real GDP grew at a rate of 1.0% in 2009, supported by the Peruvian government’s fiscal stimulus programs.

Nonetheless, the country has experienced a slowdown in recent years, mainly explained by lower domestic demand, as a result of a lower growth in private investment. This slowdown was intensified due to several factors, such as (i) a strong El Niño phenomenon, which adversely affected agricultural production, transportation services, tourism and commercial activity, and resulted in a 1.5% drop in GDP growth in 2017; (ii) corruption scandals related to the activities of certain Brazilian and Peruvian companies in the construction sector, which resulted in suspension or delay of important infrastructure projects during 2018; and (iii) political

134

instability, as Peru has suffered a series of government institutional crises starting in 2018 due to, among other things, several corruption scandals involving prominent political figures, which have resulted in resignations and impeachment of various presidents since then, including most recently former President Jose Pedro Castillo in December 2022 following an attempted coup, as well as investigations of certain members of the judicial system and the public ministry who are now facing prosecution. Despite these factors and continued political corruption scandals, the Peruvian economy continued to outperform its peer countries in 2019, supported by solid macroeconomic fundamentals and strong fiscal and monetary policies.

In 2020, Peru experienced an 11.0% GDP contraction as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in particular the impact of the lockdown and mobility restrictions implemented by the Peruvian government to contain the spread of the pandemic, which in turn resulted in (i) lower employment, (ii) postponement of investment projects, and (iii) restricted access to goods and services. As a result of the reductions in private consumption and gross fixed investment, domestic demand decreased 9.8% during the year.

At the beginning of 2021, Peru continued to struggle from the effects of the pandemic but started to recover over time as targeted lockdowns decreased and were eventually lifted and the vaccination program accelerated. The recovery was mainly driven by domestic demand-oriented sectors, improved trade terms, higher private consumption, and the base effect of such improvements as compared to 2020. Nevertheless, such improved economic landscape was negatively affected by the uncertainty that arose in the run up to the April 2021 presidential and congressional elections. These political events contributed to a slowdown in GDP growth, volatility of the exchange rate and weakening of the local currency, which in turn also affected inflation. As a result of these factors, the Peruvian GDP grew 13.3% in 2021.

In 2022, political uncertainty and social unrest caused an economic deceleration that drove GDP growth to 2.7%. Sectors such as mining, tourism and agriculture were the most affected ones. As a result, inflation increased up to 8.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022. To curb inflation, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru tightened its monetary policy by elevating the reference policy rate to 7.50% as of December 2022.

The table below sets forth additional details regarding Peru’s recent economic performance.


	2022			2021			2020			2019			2018
Peruvian real GDP growth rate		2.7	%		13.3	%		(11.0	)%		2.2	%		4.0	%
Domestic demand growth		2.3	%		14.4	%		(9.5	)%		2.2	%		4.2	%
Private consumption growth		3.6	%		11.7	%		(9.8	)%		3.2	%		3.8	%
Fixed private investment (real growth)		-0.5	%		37.6	%		(16.5	)%		4.5	%		4.1	%
Reference interest rate		7.5	%		2.5	%		0.3	%		2.3	%		2.8	%
Fiscal (deficit) (% of GDP)		-1.6	%		(2.6	)%		(8.9	)%		(1.6	)%		(2.3	)%
Variation in Consumer Price Index (“CPI”)		8.5	%		6.4	%		2.0	%		1.9	%		2.2	%
Unemployment rate (Metropolitan Lima)		7.8	%		10.7	%		13.0	%		6.6	%		6.7	%
Disposable income growth		0.6	%		10.3	%		(7.5	)%		2.8	%		3.9	%
Public external debt as a percentage of Peruvian GDP		17.5	%		19.5	%		14.9	%		8.5	%		8.8	%
Net international reserves (U.S.$ in millions)		71,883			78,495			74,707			68,316			60,121

Sources: Central Reserve Bank of Peru and INEI.

In this context, Peru continues to have its sovereign debt rated investment grade by S&P, Fitch and Moody’s. The Peruvian government’s conservative fiscal policy, coupled with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru’s responsible management of inflation and international reserves has helped Peru to maintain its investment grade ratings by Moody’s (Baal), S&P (BBB+) and Fitch (BBB). Peru’s credit ratings are subject to periodic review and may be revised or lowered in the future.

Furthermore, in its most recent forecast as of December, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru has estimated real GDP growth of 2.9% for 2023 and 3.0% for 2024, as compared to a 2.7% increase registered in 2022 and a 13.3% increase registered in 2021. Based on Peru’s strong macroeconomic base, during 2021, the government began to phase out its various expansionary fiscal and monetary policies initially deployed to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the Peruvian economy and population. Moreover, during 2022, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru deployed contractive monetary policies to offset inflation.

Interest Rates

In general, increases in prevailing interest rates result in more interest revenue from loans. An increase of prevailing interest rates may, however, adversely affect Interbank as a result of reduced overall demand for loans and greater risk of default by its clients. In addition, relatively high interest rates affect Interbank’s funding costs, and can adversely affect spreads on its loan portfolio if Interbank is unable to pass on the increased funding costs to its clients. On the other hand, a decrease in interest rates can

135

reduce Interbank’s revenue from its loan portfolio. This revenue decrease may be offset by an increase in the volume of loans resulting from higher demand and/or a decrease in Interbank’s funding costs. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, on April 9, 2020, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru took several measures, such as reducing the reference interest rate by 200 basis points from 2.25% to 0.25%. This measure has affected both interest income and interest expense. Moreover, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, similar to other monetary authorities around the world, started to increase its reference rate to mitigate the impacts of inflation in Peru. As of December 31, 2022, the reference interest rate was 7.50%.

In May 2021, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru set the methodology to determine maximum interest rates applicable to three types of loans: (i) ordinary consumer credit; (ii) consumer loans equivalent to two UIT (Unidad Impositiva Tributaria”) or less; and, (iii) credit for small and micro businesses, as ruled by Law 31143. Maximum interest rates are to be set at two times the average rate of consumer loans during the period between two and seven months prior to becoming effective. The interest rate cap was first effective for the period between May and October 2021 at a level of 83.4% for loans denominated in soles and 68.4% for loans denominated in U.S. dollars. For the period between November 2022 and April 2023, the interest rate cap was 87.9% for loans denominated in soles and 68.3% for loans denominated in U.S. dollars. The interest rate cap does not represent a major disruption to Interbank’s results.

Increases in interest rates negatively affect the value of Interseguro’s fixed income portfolio. However, higher rates allow Interseguro to reinvest new annuities at a higher yield. At the same time, increases in interest rates result in an increase in the discount rate Interseguro uses to calculate its reserve requirements, which has the effect of reducing Interseguro’s required technical reserves. Conversely, if interest rates fall, Interseguro’s portfolio will have a lower average interest rate, resulting in Interseguro having to record higher technical reserves.

Similar to Interbank, an increase in prevailing interest rates may adversely affect Inteligo as a result of reduced overall demand for loans, as well as lower interest margins if Inteligo is unable to pass on higher funding costs to its clients. On the other hand, a decrease in interest rates may reduce Inteligo’s revenue from its loan portfolio. Furthermore, a portion of Inteligo’s revenues corresponds to earnings from its investment portfolio and is therefore exposed to interest rates fluctuations that may affect revenue from fixed-income instruments.

Increases in interest rates result in additional interest income from Inteligo’s variable-rate investments, but may also result in capital losses on its fixed-rate investments.

Likewise, increases in interest rates in Izipay result in lower transactional volumes because of higher cost of debt for the customers. Also, in this context, Izipay’s funding strategy may be affected because of higher financial cost.

Inflation

Our performance may be impacted by inflation, because substantially all of our assets are not adjusted for the effects of inflation. During the 1980s, Peru experienced hyperinflation, negative economic growth and substantial currency devaluation. Inflation rates in Peru began to decrease in the 1990s and in the last 14 years Peru had one of the lowest average inflation rates in the region, partly due to the monetary policy implemented by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and partly due to the conservative fiscal policy of the Peruvian government. In 2002, in order to maintain low inflation rates, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru established an annual inflation target of 2.5% within a range of one percentage point. In 2007, the target was lowered to 2%, within a range of one percentage point. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru has maintained its target inflation range ever since. The inflation rate in Peru, as measured by changes in the Metropolitan Lima consumer price index published by the INEI, was 12.2% in 2018, 1.9% in 2019, 2.0% in 2020, 6.4% in 2021 and 8.5% in 2022. In its most recent forecast as of December 2022, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru has estimated Peru’s inflation to be 3.0% in 2023 and 2.4% in 2024.

Depreciation and Appreciation of the Sol

The sol floats freely against other currencies. Nevertheless, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru participates in the market (buying or selling soles) in order to avoid any large fluctuations in the exchange rate because of the effects that it could have on the Peruvian economy, which remains partly dollarized. Because a significant portion of our subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars and our consolidated financial statements are prepared in soles, the results reflected in our consolidated financial statements are affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates between the sol and the U.S. dollar.

In 2015, the sol depreciated significantly against the U.S. dollar and remained relatively stable until the beginning of 2020. However, during 2020, the sol rapidly depreciated against the U.S. dollar as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which in 2021 and 2022 continued to depreciate due to political uncertainty in Peru, global market volatility and the rising inflation. In this context, any future changes in the value of the sol against the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations to the extent that our subsidiaries maintain a gap between foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

136

The Peruvian government adopted a policy to encourage the de-dollarization of the Peruvian economy. This policy included promoting the development of a sol capital market and local currency yield curves. The proportion of outstanding loans in the banking system denominated in U.S. dollars has fallen from 51.0% as of December 31, 2011 to 27.4% as of December 31, 2022, according to figures published by the SBS. The percentage of deposits in the banking system denominated in U.S. dollars was approximately 47.3% as of December 31, 2011 compared to 40.6% as of December 31, 2022. Interbank’s proportion of loans in soles increased from 53.2% as of December 31, 2011 to 74.1% as of December 31, 2022, while deposits in soles increased from 56.8% as of December 31, 2011 to 64.8% as of December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, 67.9% of Interseguro’s investment portfolio was invested in soles and 32.1% was invested in U.S. dollars. According to Interseguro’s investment policy, it allocates the currency of its investment portfolio to mitigate potential currency volatility between its investment assets and its insurance liabilities as observed since the commencement of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Substantially all of Inteligo’s financial assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Moreover, Izipay’s transactions may be affected by the exchange rate volatility.

Monetary Policy

In April 2010, as a result of significant economic growth, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru began tightening its monetary policy, raising the reference rate. This tightening policy had the goal of mitigating speculative capital inflows and cooling the expansion of credit.

However, since the beginning of 2017, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru started loosening its monetary policy. From January 2017 to December 2020, the reference rate decreased from 4.25% to 0.25%. On March 19, 2020, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru reduced its reference rate by 100 basis points to 1.25%. Furthermore, on April 9, 2020, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru took several measures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, including reducing the reference interest rate by another 100 basis points from 1.25% to 0.25%. In response to rising inflationary concerns, in August 2021, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru started tightening its monetary policy, similar to other monetary authorities around the world. As of December 31, 2022, the reference interest rate was 7.50%.

Regulatory Changes

In April 2016, a new law entered in force which allows retirees to withdraw 95.5% of their pension funds as a one-time transaction. As a second stage of this law, in October 2016, retirees were allowed to withdraw their pension fund in several transactions whenever desired. This regulatory change resulted in a 36% yearly contraction for the Peruvian insurance system in purchases of regular and private annuities from 2015 to 2016, according to the SBS. Interseguro was negatively affected by the law, with annuities collected of S/337.8 million in 2016, a 38% reduction compared to 2015.

However, as of December 2022, the annuities market has continued to stabilize as a result of the introduction of private annuities, a type of annuity created to fill the vacuum left by the law. This product, pioneered by Interseguro in October 2016 and soon followed by other providers, helped the industry recover a portion of the lost market. In 2022, private annuities accounted for 6.0% of the premiums collected in 2022 for the insurance industry. For Interseguro, private annuities represented 27.2% of its S/659.4 million in collections in annuities as of December 31, 2022.

COVID-19 and Subsequent Adjustments to the Expected Loss Model

Due to the risks and uncertainties originated by the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020, as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on April 26, 2021 and in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2022, and which continued throughout 2021, as well as the economic and political uncertainty in Peru, rising inflation and global financial market volatility, Interbank assessed whether to include a series of expert judgments with the purpose of calculating the expected loss pursuant to the requirement established by IFRS 9.

We made adjustments to the expected loss model to include in the calculation the effects of the uncertainty and risks generated by current events as of December 31, 2022. In connection with those adjustments, two expert judgments were established to stress test the possibility of default from customers due to the political situation in Peru, as follows:

(a)

Stress of the probability of default (PD) for loans in Stage 1 and Stage 2; and

(b)

Stress for clients in Stage 3

137

Adoption of New Standards and Disclosures

Since January 1, 2020, we adopted the following standards, interpretations, or amendments: (i) Amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”, (ii) Amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” and IAS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors”, (iii) Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued on March 29, 2018 and (iv) Amendments to IFRS 16 “Leases”. Such standards, interpretations or amendments did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical accounting estimates and judgments

In preparing our audited annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), we apply judgment and make estimates and assumptions that may involve significant uncertainty at the time they are made. We regularly reassess those estimates and assumptions, which encompass historical experience, expectations of the future and other pertinent factors, to determine their continuing relevance based on current conditions, and we update them as necessary. Changes in estimates and assumptions may have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, our actual results may differ significantly from our estimates, which could result in significant losses to us or our subsidiaries, beyond what we anticipated or provided for.

Key areas involving a high degree of judgment and areas where estimates and assumptions are significant to the consolidated financial statements include:

•

the calculation of the impairment of the portfolio of loans and financial investments;

•

the measurement of the fair value of the financial investments and investment properties;

•

the assessment of the impairment of the goodwill;

•

determination of terms and estimation of the applicable interest rate for lease agreements;

•

the liabilities for insurance contracts;

•

the measurement of the fair value of derivative financial instruments;

•

the estimated useful life of intangible assets, property, furniture and equipment;

•

the estimation of assets and liabilities for deferred income tax; and

•

the estimation of provisions for litigation.

138

We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions we have made are appropriate under the circumstances and that our audited annual consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the financial positions of IFS as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the results of our operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 in accordance with IFRS.

For more information about our critical accounting estimates and judgments, see:

•

“Note 3 Significant accounting policies” to our audited annual consolidated financial statements for more information;

•

“Note 3.6 Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions” to our audited annual consolidated financial statements for more information on estimations and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of significant events in the notes to the audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

“Note 30.1 Credit Risk” and “Note 30.2 Market Risk management” for a discussion of risk and sensitivity of certain items;

•

“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 20-F for more information.

Principal Line Items in Consolidated Income Statements

Below is a description of certain significant line items:

•

interest and similar income includes interest from our loan portfolio plus interest and dividends from our investment portfolio and is composed of the following line items: (i) interest on loan portfolio, (ii) interest on financial investments, (iii) interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds, (iv) dividends on financial investments, and (v) other interest and similar income. See Note 19(a) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

interest and similar expenses includes all financial expenses incurred to fund our operations and is composed of the following line items: (i) interest and fees on deposits and obligations, (ii) interest on bonds, notes and other obligations, (iii) interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions, (iv) deposit insurance fund fees, (v) interest on lease payments, and (vi) other interest and similar expenses. See Note 19(a) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries includes provisions recognized as expense, net of recoveries. See Note 6(d.1) and (d.2) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments includes impairment loss recognized as expense, net of recoveries. See Note 5(c) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

fee income from financial services, net includes primarily commissions and other fees we charge to our customers, net from related expenses, and is composed of the following line items: (i) accounts maintenance, carriage, transfers, and debit and credit card fees, (ii) income from services (“acquirer and card issuer roles for Izipay”), (iii) funds management, (iv) banking services fees, (v) contingent loan fees, (vi) collection services, (vii) commission for loans rescheduling “Reactiva Perú” program, and (viii) brokerage and custody services. See Note 20(a) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

other income includes: (i) gain from sale of written-off loans, (ii) other technical income from insurance operations, (iii) income from investments in associates, (iv) services rendered to third parties; (v) income from ATM rentals, and (vi) other income. See Note 21(a) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements;

•

total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits includes: (i) net premiums earned, adjustment of technical reserves included, and (iii) net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others. See Notes 22 and 23 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements; and

139

•

other expenses include: (i) salaries and employee benefits, (ii) administrative expenses, (iii) depreciation and amortization, (iv) sundry technical insurance expenses and commission from insurance activities and (v) expenses related to rental income. See Notes 8(a), 9(a), 21(a) cost of sale of POS equipment, 24, and 25 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

Financial Condition as of December 31, 2022 Compared to December 31, 2021

The following table sets forth the principal components of our consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021.


	As of December 31, 2022			As of December 31, 2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/in millions)			%
Assets
Cash, due from banks and inter-banks funds		13,489.5			17,134.5			(3,644.9	)		(21.3	%)
Financial investments		22,787.6			24,547.3			(1,759.7	)		(7.2	%)
Loans, net of unearned interest		47,530.9			45,070.5			2,460.4			5.5	%
Impairment allowance for loans		(2,207.9	)		(2,064.9	)		37.1			(1.8	%)
Investment property		1,287.7			1,224.5			63.3			5.2	%
Property, furniture and equipment, net		791.4			815.1			(23.7	)		(2.9	%)
Intangibles and goodwill, net		1,633.2			1,044.7			588.5			56.3	%
Other assets		1,990.2			2,182.2			(192.1	)		(8.8	%)

Total assets		87,482.6			89,953.9			(2,471.3	)		(2.7	%)

Liabilities and equity
Deposits and obligations		48,530.7			48,897.9			(367.2	)		(0.8	%)
Due to banks and correspondents and inter-bank funds		7,130.7			8,522.8			(1,392.2	)		(16.3	%)
Bonds, notes and other obligations		7,906.3			8,389.7			(483.4	)		(5.8	%)
Insurance contract liabilities		10,602.4			11,958.1			(1,355.7	)		(11.3	%)
Other liabilities		3,266.6			2,630.0			636.6			24.2	%

Total liabilities		77,436.7			80,398.5			(2,961.9	)		(3.7	%)

Equity, net
Equity attributable to IFS’s shareholders		9,991.2			9,504.0			487.1			5.1	%
Non-controlling interest		54.8			51.3			3.5			6.7	%

Total equity, net		10,046.0			9,555.4			490.6			5.1	%

Total liabilities and equity net		87,482.6			89,953.9			(2,471.3	)		(2.7	%)

Our assets were S/87,482.6 million as of December 31, 2022, a 2.7% decrease from S/89,953.9 million as of December 31, 2021. This was mainly driven by a decrease of 21.3% in cash, due to from banks and inter-banks funds, 7.2% in financial investments and 1.8% in impairment allowance for loans. These factors were partially offset by growth of 5.5% in loans, net of unearned interest.

The decrease in cash, due to from banks and inter-banks funds resulted mainly from lower deposits at the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. The decrease in financial investments resulted from lower volumes of sovereign bonds, Central Reserve Bank of Peru Certificates of Deposits (“CDBCR”) and corporate bonds. The decrease in impairment allowance for loans occurred mainly at Interbank. The increase in loans, net of unearned interest was mainly the result of higher retail loans balances at Interbank, which was primarily due to increases in consumer loans and mortgages. This increase was partially offset by lower commercial loan balances due to decreases in short and medium-term lending, as well as lower leasing operations, in both cases across all business segments.

Our liabilities reached S/77,436.7 million as of December 31, 2022, a 3.7% decrease from S/80,398.5 million as of December 31, 2021. This was mainly driven by a 16.3% decrease in due to banks and correspondents and inter-banks funds, 11.3% decrease in insurance contract liabilities, and 5.8% decrease in bonds, notes and other obligations.

140

Our net equity was S/10,046.0 million as of December 31, 2022, a 5.1% increase from S/9,555.4 million as of December 31, 2021, mainly as a result of higher retained earnings.

For more information of our liquidity, capital resources and commitments and obligations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2021

The following table sets forth the principal components of our consolidated profit for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income		5,871.3			4,605.6			1,265.7			27.5	%
Interest and similar expenses		(1,662.1	)		(1,057.9	)		(604.2	)		57.1	%

Net interest and similar income		4,209.2			3,547.7			661.5			18.6	%

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(830.6	)		(381.6	)		(449.0	)		117.7	%
Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments		(12.8	)		30.9			(43.6	)		(141.3	%)

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss		3,365.9			3,197			168.9			5.3	%

Fee income from financial services, net		1,137.4			823.8			313.6			38.1	%
Other income		542.4			905.6			(363.2	)		(40.1	%)

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		(191.8	)		(272.1	)		80.3			(29.5	%)

Total other expenses		(2,683.9	)		(2,262.8	)		(421.1	)		18.6	%

Income before translation result and income tax		2,170.0			2,391.6			(221.6	)		(9.3	%)
Translation result		(36.8	)		(89.3	)		52.5			(58.8	%)
Income Tax		(462.5	)		(502.1	)		39.6			(7.9	%)

Net profit for the year		1,670.6			1,800.2			(129.5	)		(7.2	%)

Attributable profit to:
IFS’ shareholders		1,660.6			1,790.2			(129.6	)		(7.2	%)
Non-controlling interest		10.1			10.0			0.1			0.5	%

Our net profit was S/1,670.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, a 7.2% decrease as compared to 2021. The deterioration in net profit was mainly driven by a significant increase of S/449.0 million in impairment loss on loans and decrease of S/363.2 million in other income, an increase of S/421.1 million in other expenses, and a decrease of S/43.6 million in loss due to impairment of financial investments. These factors were partially offset by a S/661.5 million increase in net interest and similar income, an increase of S/313.6 in net fee income from financial services, and lower income tax.

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries increased from S/381.6 million as of December 31, 2021 to S/830.6 million as of December 31, 2022 mainly due to more than two-fold, compared to the previous year, in which there was a reversion of provisions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in provision expenses was mainly related to higher requirements in the retail and loan book, partially offset by lower requirements in the commercial loan book, associated with a deterioration of the macroeconomic outlook in Peru. The decrease in other income was mainly due to negative performance in our wealth management segment mainly supported by net gain of foreign exchange transactions and on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at Interbank.

The increase in other expenses is mainly due to the extraordinary income of S/222.5 million due to Izipay’s acquisition at fair value adjustment of the participation held by Interbank in Izipay, in addition to higher personnel and administrative expenses, as well as higher salaries and employee benefits across all four subsidiaries. The increase in administrative expenses was mainly related to marketing and credit card expenses, and IT services at Interbank.

The increase in net interest and similar income was mainly due to a slightly higher return of the fixed income portfolio at Interseguro and higher interest and similar expenses at Inteligo. This increase was partially offset by an increase in net interest and similar income at Interbank.

141

The decrease in net fee income from financial services was mainly due to lower fees at Inteligo, partially offset by higher commissions across most products and services at Interbank.

Our ROE was 17.7% in 2022, lower than the 19.3% reported in 2021, mainly due to an increase in impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries and a decrease in other income and net fee income from financial services, partially offset by an increase in net interest and similar income.

Results of Operations by Segment

The following table presents an overview of certain consolidated income statement data for each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	Banking						Insurance						Wealth Management						Payments (1)					Holding and eliminations						Consolidated
	2022			2021			2022			2021			2022			2021			2022			2021		2022			2021			2022			2021
Interest and similar income		4,774.4			3,636.8			940.9			803.0			155.1			154.3			1.6			—		(0.7	)		11.5			5,871.3			4,605.6
Interest and similar expenses		(1,476.9	)		(893.1	)		(130.5	)		(117.5	)		(50.3	)		(39.8	)		(1.3	)		—		(3.1	)		(7.5	)		(1,662.1	)		(1,057.9	)
Net interest and similar income		3,297.4			2,743.7			810.4			685.4			104.8			114.5			0.3			—		(3.8	)		4.0			4,209.2			3,547.7
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(832.9	)		(379.0	)		—			—			2.4			(2.5	)		—			—		—			—			(830.6	)		(381.6	)
Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments		(0.7	)		(0.5	)		—			33.2			(12.0	)		(1.6	)		—			—		—			(0.2	)		(12.8	)		30.9
Net interest and similar income after impairment loss		2,463.8			2,364.2			810.4			718.6			95.2			110.3			0.3			—		(3.8	)		3.9			3,365.9			3,197.0
Fee income from financial services, net		797.7			677.5			(7.2	)		(6.8	)		163.3			197.0			258.7			—		(75.2	)		(43.8	)		1,137.4			823.8

Other income		475.4			552.5			45.9			234.7			(244.5	)		136.1			36.0			—		229.5			(17.6	)		542.4			905.6

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		—			—			(191.8	)		(272.0	)		—			—			—			—		—			—			(191.8	)		(272.1	)

Total other expenses		(1,930.8	)		(1,787.9	)		(399.0	)		(350.3	)		(145.5	)		(143.4	)		(232.8	)		—		24.1			18.8			(2,683.9	)		(2,262.8	)

Income (loss) before translation result and income tax		1,806.1			1,806.2			258.4			324.2			(131.5	)		299.9			62.3			—		174.6			(38.8	)		2,170.0			2,391.6
Translation result		(22.8	)		7.2			(10.4	)		(51.5	)		(7.1	)		(7.6	)		2.3			—		1.2			(37.5	)		(36.8	)		(89.3	)
Income tax		(409.2	)		(453.2	)		—			—			(2.8	)		(8.8	)		(23.6	)		—		(27.0	)		(40.1	)		(462.5	)		(502.1	)

142


	Banking				Insurance				Wealth Management					Payments (1)				Holding and eliminations					Consolidated
	2022		2021		2022		2021		2022			2021		2022		2021		2022		2021			2022		2021
Net profit (loss) for the year		1,374.1		1,360.3		248.0		272.7		(141.4	)		283.5		41.1		—		148.8		(116.4	)		1,670.7		1,800.2
Attributable to:
IFS’ shareholders		1,374.1		1,360.3		248.0		272.7		(141.4	)		283.5		41.1		—		138.8		(126.4	)		1,660.6		1,790.2
Non-controlling interest		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		10.1		10.0			10.1		10.0

(1)	Reflects information for Izipay since the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in Izipay in April 2022.

The discussion below covers each of our reported segments and corresponds to information before adjustments and eliminations for consolidation, as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, in accordance with IFRS.

Banking

Interbank’s net results were profit of S/1,374.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to net profit of S/1,360.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The main factors that contributed to this result were the lower income tax due to the deterioration in profitability, in addition to a 20.2% increase in net interest and similar income, a 17.8% increase in net fee income from financial services and a 14.0% increase in other income. These factors were partially offset by the 119.7% increase in impairment loss on loans and an 8.0% increase in other expenses.

Interbank’s ROE was 19.8% for the year ended December 31, 2022, representing a slight decline in profitability compared to the 21.0% recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of interest and similar income for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)		%
Interest and similar income
Interest on loan portfolio		4,171.6			3,330.2			841.4		25.3	%
Interest on financial investments		447.5			266.8			180.8		67.8	%
Interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds		155.3			39.9			115.4		289.5	%

Total		4,774.4			3,636.8			1,137.6		31.3	%

Nominal average rate		7.2	%		5.3	%		—		—

Interest and similar income increased 31.3% due to a 25.3% increase in interest on loan portfolio, a 67.8% increase in interest on financial investment and a 289.5% increase in interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds.

143

The increase in interest on loan portfolio was mainly due to a 150 basis point increase in the average rate, as well as a 4.7% increase in average volume. The higher average rate on loans, from 7.9% in 2021 to 9.4% in 2022, was due to yield increases in both retail and commercial segments. In retail loans rates increased on other consumer loans and mortgages. In the commercial portfolio, rates increased on all types of loans. The higher average volume of loans was attributable to a 14.4% increase in retail loans, partially offset by a 4.1% decrease in commercial loans. In the retail portfolio, average volumes grew due to a 8.6% increase in mortgages, partially offset by a 18.4% increase in the average balance of consumer loans. In the commercial portfolio, the lower average volume was mainly due to a 12.1% decrease in short and medium-term loans, as well as 4.9% in leasing operations, partially offset by a 26.4% increase in trade finance loans.

Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds increased by S/115.4 million, or 289.5%, primarily as a result of 29.8% decline in the average volume and a 110 basis point increase in the nominal average rate. The decrease in the average volume was explained by lower deposits at the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

The increase in interest on financial investments was primarily the result of an increase in average volumes, and by a 140 basis point increase in the average yield. The increase in the average volume was mainly the result of higher average balances of CDBCR and corporate bonds from non-financial institutions and sovereign bonds, partially offset by lower positions in global bonds and corporate bonds from financial institutions. The increase in the nominal average rate, from 2.8% in 2021 to 4.2% in 2022, was mainly explained by higher returns on all types of securities, especially CDBCR and corporate bonds from financial institutions.

As a result of the above, the nominal average yield on interest-earning assets increased 190 basis points, from 5.3% for the year ended December 31, 2021 to 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Interest and Similar Expenses

The following table presents the components of interest and similar expenses for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and Similar Expenses
Interest and fees on deposits and obligations		(901.2	)		(369.8	)		(531.4	)		143.7	%
Interests on bonds, notes and other obligations		(358.3	)		(374.6	)		16.2			(4.3	%)
Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others		(217.4	)		(148.7	)		(68.7	)		46.2	%

Total		(1,476.9	)		(893.1	)		(583.9	)		65.4	%

Nominal average rate		2.5	%		1.5	%		—			—

Interest and similar expense increased 65.4% mainly due to a 143.7% increase in interest on deposits and obligations, and a 46.2% increase in interest on due to banks and correspondents, partially offset by a 4.3% decrease in interest on bonds, notes and other obligations.

Interest and fees on deposits and obligations increased mainly due to a 120 basis point increase in the average cost, from 0.8% in 2021 to 2.0% in 2022 due to higher interest rate environment which resulted in a increase in rates payable on institutional, retail and commercial deposits, partially offset by 2.8% decrease in average volumes across all client segments. By currency, average balances of soles-denominated deposits increased 24.7% while average dollar-denominated deposits increased 29.1%.

Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others increased from 46.2% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021, mainly due to a 120 basis points decrease in the average cost mainly due to higher rates payable on all types of funding, especially that provided by correspondent banks abroad and inter-bank funds, partially offset by 12.6% decrease in the average volume. The decrease in the average volume was due to lower funding provided by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and COFIDE.

144

Interest on bonds, notes and other obligations decreased mainly due to 2.3% decrease in the average volume, mainly attributable to a 10 basis point decrease in the nominal average cost. These effects were mostly attributable to the maturity of local subordinated bonds for S/ 137.9 million in June 2022.

The average cost of funds decreased 100 basis points, from 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2021 to 2.5% for the year ended December 31, 2022, in line with the higher implicit cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Impairment Loss on Loans, Net of Recoveries

The following table presents the components of impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(832.9	)		(379.0	)		(453.9	)		119.7	%
Past-due loan ratio (at period end)		3.0	%		3.6	%		—			—
Provision expense as a percentage of average total loans		1.9	%		0.9	%		—			—
Coverage ratio⁽¹⁾		173.5	%		159.4	%		—			—
Impairment allowance for loans		2,027.5			2,062.1			—			—

(1)	Coverage ratio is calculated by dividing allowances for loan losses as a percentage of past due loans.

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries increased from S/379.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, in which there was a reversion of provisions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, to S/832.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 mainly reflecting the increase in provision expenses was mainly related to higher requirements in the retail and loan book, partially offset by lower requirements in the commercial loan book, associated with a deterioration of the macroeconomic outlook in Peru.

Interbank’s coverage ratio increased from 159.4% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 173.5 % for the year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of the aforementioned factors.

Fee Income from Financial Services, Net

The following table presents the components of fee income from financial services, net for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Income
Maintenance and mailing of accounts, transfer fees and commissions on credit and debit card		707.3			561.0			146.3			26.1	%
Commissions for banking services		322.8			299.8			23.0			7.7	%
Fees from indirect loans		70.0			65.0			5.1			7.8	%
Collection services fees		61.0			53.2			7.8			14.7	%
Others		48.3			60.4			(12.1	)		(20.1	%)

Total		1,209.4			1,039.3			170.1			16.4	%

Expenses
Credit cards		(164.7	)		(128.6	)		(36.2	)		28.1	%
Debtor’s life insurance premiums		(97.4	)		(102.8	)		5.5			(5.3	%)
Fees paid to foreign banks		(24.9	)		(31.8	)		6.8			(21.6	%)
Others		(124.7	)		(98.7	)		(26.0	)		(26.4	%)

Total		(411.7	)		(361.9	)		(49.9	)		13.8	%

Net		797.7			677.5			120.2			17.8	%

145

The S/120.2 million, or 17.8 %, increase in net fee income from financial services for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was mainly due to increases in commissions received across most products and services primarily attributable to the base effect of lower commissions from products and services in 2021 due to decreased business activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Other Income

The following table presents the components of other income for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain on foreign exchange transactions		380.2			423.0			(42.9	)		(10.1	%)
Net gain on sale of financial investments		(12.3	)		100.9			(113.2	)		(112.2	%)
Net gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		(5.9	)		(56.4	)		50.5			(89.5	%)
Other		113.5			85.0			28.5			33.5	%

Other income		475.4			552.5			(77.1	)		(14.0	%)

Other income decreased by 14% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to an decrease in net gain on foreign exchange transactions, as well as lower net results on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, both effects associated with higher currency volatility.

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(656.6	)		(618.5	)		(38.1	)		6.2	%
Administrative expenses		(931.0	)		(832.8	)		(98.2	)		11.8	%
Depreciation and amortization		(257.2	)		(245.4	)		(11.8	)		4.8	%
Other		(86.0	)		(91.2	)		5.2			(5.7	%)

Total other expenses		(1,930.8	)		(1,787.9	)		(142.9	)		8.0	%

146

Other expenses increased 8.0% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly as a result of higher administrative expenses. The increase in administrative expenses was mainly due to higher marketing and credit card expenses and IT services.

Our efficiency ratio was 40.4% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 42.7% recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Income Before Translation Result and Income Tax

Results before translation result and income tax were S/1,806.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, representing an decline compared to the S/1,806.2 million gain recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021, for the reasons discussed above. This result was partially offset by lower effective tax rate in our banking segment.

Insurance

Interseguro’s profit attributable to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2022 was S/248.0 million compared to a S/272.7 million profit for the year ended December 31, 2021 mainly due to a S/91.8 million increase in net interest and similar income, primarily due to a S/188.8 million decrease in other income, as well as a S/48.7 million increase in other expenses and for a S/33.2 million lower impairment recovery. These effects were partially offset by a S/80.2 million increase in total premiums earned minus claims and benefits, as well as a S/41.1 million increase in translation result.

Net Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of net interest and similar income for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income		940.9			803.0			137.9			17.2	%
Interest and similar expense		(130.5	)		(117.5	)		(12.9	)		11.0	%

Net interest and similar income		810.4			685.4			125.0			18.2	%

Net interest and similar income increased 18.2% mainly due to a S/125.0 million increase in interest and similar income primarily attributable to S/137.9 million higher interest and similar income, partially offset by a S/12.9 million higher interest and similar expense.

Other Income, Net

The following table presents the components of other income for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021		Change

	(S/ in millions)					(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain (loss) on sale of financial investments		(6.4	)		145.7		(152.1	)		n.m
Net gain (loss) on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		(82.3	)		0.2		(82.5	)		n.m
Rental income		65.5			57.4		8.1			14.1	%
Net gain on investment property valuation		19.1			22.0		(2.8	)		(12.8	%)
Other		49.9			9.4		40.6			n.m

Other income, net		45.9			234.7		(188.8	)		(80.4	%)

n.m. means not meaningful.

147

Other income decreased S/188.8 million, mainly due to S/152.1 million decrease in net gain on sale of financial investments, S/82.5 million decrease in net gain (loss) of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss in rental income and S/2.8 million decrease in net gain on valuation of real estate investments. These factors were partially offset by S/40.6 million increase in other income and S/8.1 million increase in rental income.

Recovery (Loss) due to Impairment of Financial Investments

Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments was negligible for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a gain of S/33 million in the previous year, attributable to the greater volatility in the financial markets compared to 2021.

Total Net Premiums Earned Minus Claims and Benefits

The following table presents the components of total premiums earned minus claims and benefits for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Premiums assumed		1,027.3			1,051.4			(24.2	)		(2.3	%)
Premiums ceded to reinsurers		(13.9	)		(10.9	)		(3.1	)		28.3	%
Adjustment of technical reserves		(345.1	)		(395.3	)		50.1			(12.7	%)
Net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others		(860.0	)		(917.3	)		57.4			(6.3	%)

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		(191.8	)		(272.0	)		80.3			(29.5	%)

n.m. means not meaningful.

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits were S/191.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to S/272.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. These results were primarily due to a S/57.4 million decrease in net claims and benefits incurred and a S/50.1 million decrease in adjustment of technical reserves, partially offset by S/27.3 million decrease in net premiums.

Net Premiums

Net premiums represent the difference between premiums assumed and premiums ceded to reinsurers. The following table presents net premiums by business line for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022		2021		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities⁽¹⁾		486.3		622.8		(136.3	)		(21.9	%)
Individual Life		218.2		176.5		41.7			23.6	%
Retail Insurance		308.7		241.3		67.5			28.0	%
Credit Life Insurance		175.7		131.5		44.2			33.6	%
Mandatory Traffic Accident (SOAT)		62.1		51.0		11.1			21.8	%
Card Protection		36.3		33.1		3.2			9.7	%
Others		34.6		25.7		8.9			34.6	%

Net Premiums⁽²⁾		1,013.4		1,040.6		(27.2	)		(2.6	%)

(1)	Annuities include premiums from pension-related insurance (disability and survivorship).

(2)	Temporary Private Annuities are not included as premiums assumed. Net premiums are premiums assumed net of premiums ceded.

148

Net premiums decreased 2.6% mainly due to decreases of (i) S/136.3 million in annuities primarily attributable to a market reduction of survivorship annuities, as a result of lower mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic, (ii) increase S/41.7 million in individual life primarily explained by a 35% increase in the sales force headcount and continued growth in online sales, and (iii) S/67.5 million in retail insurance premiums primarily due to SOAT recovery and increases in sales from digital products such as car insurance and travel insurance.

Adjustment of Technical Reserves

The following table presents adjustment of technical reserves by business line for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities		(256.5	)		(301.3	)		44.8			(14.8	%)
Individual Life		(58.2	)		(76.3	)		18.1			(23.8	%)
Retail Insurance		(30.5	)		(17.7	)		(12.8	)		72.3	%

Adjustment of technical reserves		(345.1	)		(395.3	)		50.2			(12.7	%)

n.m. means not meaningful.

Adjustment of technical reserves decreased 12.7% mainly due to a S/44.8 million decrease in annuities, S/18.1 million decrease in individual life, partially offset by S/12.8 million increase in retail insurance. The decrease in technical reserves was mostly related to lower premiums, partially offset by higher technical reserves for inflation indexed annuities due to an increase in the Peruvian inflation rate.

Net Claims and Benefits Incurred for Life Insurance Contracts and Others

The following table presents net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others by business line for our insurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities⁽¹⁾		(748.4	)		(733.8	)		(17.0	)		2.3	%
Individual Life		(10.9	)		(28.2	)		17.3			(61.4	%)
Retail Insurance		(100.1	)		(155.3	)		55.2			(35.5	%)
Credit Life Insurance		(39.8	)		(112.4	)		44.2			(52.6	%)
Mandatory Traffic Accident (SOAT)		(25.9	)		(17.9	)		17.3			(40.0	%)
Card Protection		(4.7	)		(3.0	)		1.4			(23.2	%)
Others		(29.7	)		(22.0	)		(7.7	)		34.9	%

Net claims and benefits incurred⁽²⁾		(860.0	)		(917.3	)		57.3			(6.3	%)

(1)	Annuities include claims from pension-related insurance (disability and survivorship).

(2)	Temporary Private Annuities are not included as benefits incurred.

The reduction in net claims and benefits incurred was mainly explained by decreases of S/ 55.2 million in retail insurance claims and S/ 17.3 million in individual life, both associated with higher claims in credit life insurance due to the COVID-19 mortality in Peru in 2021. These factors were partially offset by an increase of S/ 17.0 million in annuity benefits during the year ended December 31, 2022.

149

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our insurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(53.1	)		(100.4	)		47.4			(47.2	%)
Administrative expenses		(61.0	)		(64.4	)		3.4			(5.3	%)
Depreciation and amortization		(23.7	)		(25.0	)		1.4			(5.4	%)
Expenses related to rental income		(7.8	)		(4.4	)		(3.5	)		79.2	%
Other		(253.4	)		(156.1	)		(97.3	)		62.4	%

Total other expenses		(399.0	)		(350.3	)		(48.7	)		13.9	%

Other expenses increased S/48.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to increases of S/ 97.3 million third-party commissions, as well as S/ 3.5 million in expenses related to rental income. These factors were partially offset by a decrease of S/47.4 million in salaries and employee’s benefits.

Wealth Management

Inteligo’s net loss was S/141.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, a reversal from net profit of S/283.5 for the year ended December 31, 2021. This result was mainly attributable to decrease in other income due to weak investment results for the year, and 17.1% decrease in fee income from financial services, in part supported by the effect of a lower foreign exchange results in these two revenue lines.

Inteligo’s ROE was 13.6% for the year ended December 31, 2022, lower than the 23.0% registered for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was mainly attributable to a decrease in shareholders’ equity which in turn was mainly attributed to decreases in accumulated results and the effect on equity of a lower foreign exchange rate due to the appreciation of the sol against the U.S. dollar in 2022 as compared to 2021.

Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of interest and similar income for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income
Interest on loan portfolios		77.4			64.4			12.9			20.1	%
Interest on financial investments		61.8			84.1			(22.2	)		(26.4	%)
Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds		15.9			5.8			10.1			n.m

Total		155.1			154.3			0.8			0.5	%

Nominal average rate		3.0	%		2.9	%		—			—

n.m. means not meaningful.

Interest and similar income increased 0.5% mainly due to a 26.4% decrease in interest on financial investments, partially offset by a 20.1% increase in interest on loan portfolios and increase in interest due from banks and inter-bank funds.

Interest on loan portfolios increased S/12.9 million mainly due to increase in the average rate despite an decrease in average loans outstanding. Interest on financial investments decreased S/22.2 million mainly due to lower dividends received from equity investments during 2022. Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds increased S/10.1 million, mainly attributable to an increase in the average rate of term deposits.

150

Interest and Similar Expenses

The following table presents the components of interest and similar expenses for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar expenses
Interest and fees on deposits and obligations		(43.9	)		(35.6	)		(8.2	)		23.1	%
Interests on bonds, notes and other obligations		(3.1	)		(2.4	)		(0.6	)		25.8	%
Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others		(3.4	)		(1.8	)		(1.6	)		90.1	%

Total		(50.3	)		(39.8	)		(10.5	)		26.3	%

Nominal average rate		1.2	%		1.0	%		—			—

Interest and similar expenses increased S/10.5 million mainly due to increases of 25.8% in interest and fees on deposits and obligations and 90.1% in interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others.

Interest and fees on deposits and obligations increased S/8.2 million due to a increase in the average rate as a consequence of an increase in average non-interest-bearing deposits. Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others increased S/1.6 million due to loan amortizations during the second half of 2022. Interest on bonds, notes and other obligations increased S/0.6 million primarily as a result of the effect of a lower foreign exchange rate on Inteligo’s financial expenses related to leases as they are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Impairment Loss on Loans, Net of Recoveries

Inteligo’s loan portfolio had no delinquencies for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Inteligo’s impairment gain on loans was S/2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Recovery (Loss) due to Impairment of Financial Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2022, Inteligo’s impairment loss on financial investments was S/12.0 million, as compared to a S/1.6 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021.

151

Fee Income from Financial Services, Net

The following table presents the components of fee income from financial services, net for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Income
Maintenance and mailing of accounts, transfer fees and commissions on credit and debit card		2.9			1.6			1.3			78.9	%
Funds management fees		154.1			186.9			(32.7	)		(17.5	%)
Brokerage and custody services fees		6.8			9.7			(2.8	)		(29.3	%)
Others		1.2			0.6			0.6			94.8	%

Total		165.1			198.8			(33.7	)		(17.0	%)

Expenses
Brokerage and custody services		(0.8	)		(0.9	)		0.1			(11.5	%)
Others		(0.9	)		(0.9	)		(0.0	)		4.2	%

Total		(1.7	)		(1.8	)		0.1			(3.9	%)

Net		163.3			197.0			(33.6	)		(17.1	%)

Fee income from financial services, net for the year ended December 31, 2022 was S/163.3 million, a S/33.6 million, or 17.1%, decrease compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. This decrease was mainly attributable to lower fund management fees and lower brokerage fees due to decreased trading volumes, triggered by higher price volatility.

Other Income

The following table presents the components of other income for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain on sale of financial investments		(41.7	)		42.1			(83.8	)		n.m
Net gain on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		(201.1	)		96.7			(297.8	)		n.m
Other		(1.6	)		(2.7	)		1.1			(40.2	%)

Other Income		(244.5	)		136.1			(380.5	)		n.m

n.m. means not meaningful.

Other income decreased S/380.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, mainly attributable to negative mark-to-market valuations on investments.

152

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2022			2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(84.0	)		(84.1	)		0.1			(0.1	%)
Administrative expenses		(45.1	)		(41.5	)		(3.6	)		8.7	%
Depreciation and amortization		(15.0	)		(15.0	)		(0.1	)		0.5	%
Other		(1.3	)		(2.8	)		1.5			(53.3	%)

Total Other Expenses		(145.5	)		(143.4	)		(2.1	)		1.4	%

Total other expenses increased S/2.1 million, or 1.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 mainly due to a higher number of employees and higher administrative expenses.

Inteligo’s efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing salaries and employee benefits plus administrative expenses plus depreciation and amortization by net interest and similar income plus net fee income from financial services plus other income. Our wealth management segment’s efficiency ratio deteriorated from 31.6% for the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to lower revenues, despite the slight increase in expenses.

Payments

Since the date of its acquisition in April 2022, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/595.4 million and consolidated net profit of S/41.1 million. As a reference, for the year ended December 31, 2022, including the period prior to its acquisition, Izipay had consolidated revenues of S/754.3 million and consolidated net profit of S/51.2 million.

The positive performance from Izipay during the year 2022 is mainly explained by growth in its net fee income from financial services, as a result of higher income from payments due to the increase of the number of merchants served and monetary transactions recorded, which grew 14% and 10%, respectively, during the last quarter of 2022. The positive results were partly impacted by higher administrative expenses attributed to an increase in customer acquisition, as well as higher salaries and benefits to employees, and depreciation and amortization charges given the sharp rise in business activity. Izipay’s ROE was 26.7% for the period starting in April 2022, when it became a consolidated subsidiary, until December 31, 2022.

153

Financial Condition as of December 31, 2021 Compared to December 31, 2020

The following table sets forth the principal components of our consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.


	As of December 31, 2021			As of December 31, 2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Assets
Cash, due from banks and inter-banks funds		17,134.5			18,783.6			(1,649.1	)		(8.8	)%
Financial investments		24,547.3			24,277.1			270.2			1.1	%
Loans, net of unearned interest		45,070.5			43,504.3			1,566.2			3.6	%
Impairment allowance for loans		(2,064.9	)		(2,984.9	)		919.9			(30.8	)%
Investment property		1,224.5			1,044.0			180.5			17.3	%
Property, furniture and equipment, net		815.1			844.4			(29.3	)		(3.5	)%
Intangibles and goodwill, net		1,044.7			1,042.6			2.2			0.2	%
Other assets		2,182.2			1,724.9			457.3			26.5	%

Total assets		89,953.9			88,236.0			1,717.9			1.9	%

Liabilities and equity
Deposits and obligations		48,897.9			47,149.3			1,748.7			3.7	%
Due to banks and correspondents and inter-bank funds		8,522.8			9,689.8			(1,167.0	)		(12.0	)%
Bonds, notes and other obligations		8,389.7			7,778.8			610.9			7.9	%
Insurance contract liabilities		11,958.1			12,501.7			(543.7	)		(4.3	)%
Other liabilities		2,630.0			2,162.5			467.5			21.6	%

Total liabilities		80,398.5			79,282.1			1,116.5			1.4	%

Equity, net
Equity attributable to IFS’s shareholders		9,504.0			8,908.1			595.9			6.7	%
Non-controlling interest		51.3			45.8			5.5			12.0	%

Total equity, net		9,555.4			8,953.9			601.4			6.7	%

Total liabilities and equity net		89,953.9			88,236.0			1,717.9			1.9	%

Our assets were S/89.9 billion as of December 31, 2021, a 1.9% increase from S/88.2 billion as of December 31, 2020. This was mainly driven by growth of 3.6% in loans, net of unearned interest, 1.1% in financial investments, and a 30.8% decrease in impairment allowance for loans. These factors were partially offset by 8.8% reduction in cash, due from banks and inter-banks funds.

The increase in loans, net of unearned interest was mainly the result of higher retail loans balances at Interbank, which was primarily due to increases in consumer loans and mortgages. This increase was partially offset by lower commercial loan balances due to decreases in short and medium-term lending, as well as lower leasing operations, in both cases across all business segments. The increase in financial investments resulted from higher volumes of sovereign bonds, Central Reserve Bank of Peru Certificates of Deposits (“CDBCR”) and corporate bonds, while the decrease in cash and due from banks and inter-bank funds resulted mainly from lower deposits at the Central Reserve Bank of Peru. The decrease in impairment allowance for loans occurred mainly at Interbank.

Our liabilities reached S/80.4 billion as of December 31, 2021, a 1.4% increase from S/79.3 billion as of December 31, 2020. This was mainly driven by a 7.9% increase in bonds, notes and obligations and 3.7% in deposits and obligations, partially offset by a decrease of 12.0% in due to banks and correspondents and inter-banks funds and a 4.3% decrease in insurance contract liabilities. The increase in bonds, notes and other obligations was mainly attributable to a 10.1% depreciation in the foreign exchange rate as compared to 2020, partially offset by the execution of the optional redemption with respect to the S/110.0 million local subordinated bonds in September 2021. The annual growth in deposits and obligations was mainly explained by an increase in retail deposits, partially offset by decreases in institutional deposits and commercial deposits. The annual decrease in due to banks and correspondents and inter-bank funds was mainly the result of a decrease in long-term funding provided by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and COFIDE, associated with a decrease in funds being distributed under the Reactiva Perú Program, in addition to lower long-term funds from correspondent banks abroad. These effects were partially offset by higher short-term funding provided by correspondent banks abroad and COFIDE.

154

Our net equity was S/9.6 billion as of December 31, 2021, a 6.7% increase from S/9.0 billion as of December 31, 2020, mainly as a result of higher retained earnings.

For more information of our liquidity, capital resources and commitments and obligations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2020

The following table sets forth the principal components of our consolidated profit for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%

Interest and similar income		4,605.6			4,665.0			(59.3	)		(1.3	)%
Interest and similar expenses		(1,057.9	)		(1,192.3	)		134.3			(11.3	)%

Net interest and similar income		3,547.7			3,472.7			75.0			2.2	%

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(381.6	)		(2,393.9	)		2,012.4			(84.1	)%
Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments		30.9			(32.9	)		63.8			n.m.

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss		3,197			1,045.8			2,151.2			n.m.

Fee income from financial services, net		823.8			723.5			100.3			13.9	%
Other income		905.6			776.7			128.9			16.6	%

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		(272.1	)		(279.1	)		7.0			(2.5	)%

Total other expenses		(2,262.8	)		(1,910.7	)		(352.1	)		18.4	%

Income before translation result and income tax		2,391.6			356.3			2,035.3			n.m.
Translation result		(89.3	)		(45.7	)		(43.6	)		95.3	%
Income Tax		(502.1	)		72.9			(575.0	)		n.m.

Net profit for the year		1,800.2			383.5			1,416.7			n.m.

Attributable profit to:
IFS’ shareholders		1,790.2			383.2			1,406.9			n.m.
Non-controlling interest		10.0			0.3			9.7			n.m.

n.m. means not meaningful.

Our net profit was S/1,800.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, a more than four-fold increase as compared to 2020. The recovery in net profit was mainly driven by a significant decrease of S/2,012.4 million in impairment loss on loans and growth of S/128.9 million in other income, S/100.3 million in net fee income from financial services, and S/75.0 million in net interest and similar income. These factors were partially offset by a S/352.1 million increase in other expenses, and higher income tax.

The increase in net interest and similar income was mainly due to a higher return of the fixed income portfolio at Interseguro and lower interest and similar expenses at Inteligo. This increase was partially offset by a slight decrease in net interest and similar income at Interbank.

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries decreased from S/2,393.9 million as of December 31, 2020 to S/381.6 million as of December 31, 2021 mainly due to the fact that those provisions recorded as of December 31, 2020 were determined considering certain post-model adjustments to capture the high uncertainty in the retail loan portfolio caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, while those provisions recorded as of December 31, 2021 were determined in light of improved credit and payment behavior during 2021. The increase in net fee income from financial services was mainly due to higher commissions across most products and services at Interbank and higher fees at Inteligo. The increase in other income was mainly due to positive performance across all three subsidiaries mainly supported by net gain of foreign exchange transactions and on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at Interbank.

155

The increase in other expenses is mainly due to higher administrative expenses, as well as higher salaries and employee benefits across all three subsidiaries. the increase in administrative expenses was mainly related to marketing and credit card expenses, and IT services at Interbank and the increase in salaries and employee benefits was associated with higher employee profit sharing at Interbank, in addition to promotions and recruitment of new employees, together with the effect of a higher foreign exchange rate in the cost base at Inteligo.

Our ROE was 19.3% in 2021, higher than the 4.5% reported in 2020, mainly due to a decrease in impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries and an increase in other income and net fee income from financial services, as well as in net interest and similar income.

Results of Operations by Segment

The following table presents an overview of certain consolidated income statement data for each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	Banking						Insurance						Wealth Management						Holding and eliminations						Consolidated
	2021			2020			2021			2020			2021			2020			2021			2020			2021			2020

	(S/ in millions)
Interest and similar income		3,636.8			3,836.4			803.0			655.0			154.3			163.4			11.5			10.2			4,605.6			4,665.0
Interest and similar expenses		(893.1	)		(1,053.4	)		(117.5	)		(84.0	)		(39.8	)		(51.7	)		(7.5	)		(3.3	)		(1,057.9	)		(1,192.3	)
Net interest and similar income		2,743.7			2,783.1			685.4			571.0			114.5			111.8			4.0			6.9			3,547.7			3,472.7
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(379.0	)		(2,393.9	)		—			—			(2.5	)		(0.0	)		—			—			(381.6	)		(2,393.9	)
Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments		(0.5	)		0.2			33.2			(33.8	)		(1.6	)		0.7			(0.2	)		—			30.9			(32.9	)
Net interest and similar income after impairment loss		2,364.2			389.3			718.6			537.2			110.3			112.5			3.9			6.9			3,197.0			1,045.8
Fee income from financial services, net		677.5			619.8			(6.8	)		(6.1	)		197.0			164.0			(43.8	)		(54.3	)		823.8			723.5
Other income(1)		552.5			444.1			234.7			201.7			136.1			106.6			(17.6	)		24.4			905.6			776.7

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		—			—			(272.0	)		(279.1	)		—			—			—			—			(272.1	)		(279.1	)

Total other expenses		(1,787.9	)		(1,533.5	)		(350.3	)		(286.0	)		(143.4	)		(128.0	)		18.8			36.9			(2,262.8	)		(1,910.7	)

Income (loss) before translation result and income tax		1,806.2			(80.2	)		324.2			167.7			299.9			255.0			(38.8	)		13.9			2,391.6			356.3
Translation result		7.2			(6.0	)		(51.5	)		(26.6	)		(7.6	)		(3.8	)		(37.5	)		(9.3	)		(89.3	)		(45.7	)
Income tax		(453.2	)		80.5			—			—			(8.8	)		(8.0	)		(40.1	)		0.4			(502.1	)		72.9
Net profit (loss) for the year		1,360.3			(5.7	)		272.7			141.1			283.5			243.1			(116.4	)		5.0			1,800.2			383.5
Attributable to:
IFS’ shareholders		1,360.3			(5.7	)		272.7			141.1			283.5			243.1			(126.4	)		4.7			1,790.2			383.3
Non-controlling interest		—			—			—			—			—			—			10.0			0.3			10.0			0.3

156

Banking

Interbank’s net results were profit of S/1,360.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to net loss of S/5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The main factors that contributed to this result were the 84.2% decrease in impairment loss on loans, the 24.4% increase in other income and the 9.3% increase in net fee income from financial services. These factors were partially offset by higher income tax due to the recovery in profitability and a 16.6% increase in other expenses, in addition to a 1.4% decrease in net interest and similar income.

Interbank’s ROE was 21.0% for the year ended December 31, 2021, representing a strong recovery in profitability compared to the 2.0% recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of interest and similar income for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income
Interest on loan portfolio		3,330.2			3,570.0			(239.9	)		(6.7	)%
Interest on financial investments		266.8			239.0			27.8			11.6	%
Interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds		39.9			27.4			12.5			45.5	%

Total		3,636.8			3,836.4			(199.6	)		(5.2	)%

Nominal average rate		5.3	%		6.3	%		—			—

Interest and similar income decreased 5.2% due to a 6.7% decrease in interest on loan portfolio, partially offset by a 45.5% increase in interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds, and 11.6% increase in interest on financial investments.

The decrease in interest on loan portfolio was mainly due to a 110 basis point decrease in the average rate, partially offset by a 6.5% increase in average volume. The lower average rate on loans, from 9.0% in 2020 to 7.9% in 2021, was due to yield reductions in all client segments partly reflecting the effects of low-return loans offered to several commercial clients as part of the Reactiva Perú Program. In retail loans rates decreased on other consumer loans and mortgages. In the commercial portfolio, rates decreased on all types of loans. The higher average volume of loans was attributable to a 12.3% increase in commercial loans and an 0.8% increase in retail loans. In the commercial portfolio, the higher average volume was mainly due to a 14.3% increase in short and medium-term loans, attributable to disbursement of loans under the Reactiva Perú Program, as well as a 10.4% increase in trade finance loans. In the retail portfolio, average volumes grew due to a 10.9% increase in mortgages, partially offset by a 5.2% decrease in the average balance of consumer loans.

Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds increased by S/12.5 million, or 45.5%, primarily as a result of 23.8% growth in the average volume and a relatively stable nominal average rate. The increase in the average volume was explained by higher deposits at the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, partially offset by a lower average balance of inter-bank funding and reserve funds.

The increase in interest on financial investments was primarily the result of an increase in average volumes, partially offset by a 50 basis point decrease in the average yield. The increase in the average volume was mainly the result of higher average balances of sovereign bonds, CDBCR and global bonds. The decrease in the nominal average rate, from 3.3% in 2020 to 2.8% in 2021, was mainly explained by lower returns on all types of securities, especially CDBCR and corporate bonds from financial institutions.

As a result of the above, the nominal average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 100 basis points, from 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 5.3% for the year ended December 31, 2021.

157

Interest and Similar Expenses

The following table presents the components of interest and similar expenses for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and Similar Expenses
Interest and fees on deposits and obligations		(369.8	)		(536.0	)		166.2			(31.0	)%
Interests on bonds, notes and other obligations		(374.6	)		(344.7	)		(29.8	)		8.7	%
Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others		(148.7	)		(172.6	)		23.9			(13.9	)%

Total		(893.1	)		(1,053.4	)		160.3			(15.2	)%

Nominal average rate		1.5	%		2.0	%		—			—

Interest and similar expense decreased 15.2% mainly due to a 31.0% decrease in interest on deposits and obligations, and a 13.9% decrease in interest on due to banks and correspondents, partially offset by an 8.7% increase in interest on bonds, notes and other obligations.

Interest and fees on deposits and obligations decreased mainly due to a 50 basis point reduction in the average cost, from 1.3% in 2020 to 0.8% in 2021 due to lower interest rate environment which resulted in a decrease in rates payable on institutional, retail and commercial deposits, partially offset by 14.4% increase in average volumes across all client segments. By currency, average balances of soles-denominated deposits increased 11.1% while average dollar-denominated deposits increased 21.4%.

Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others decreased from 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 1.7% for the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to a 70 basis point decrease in the average cost mainly due to lower rates payable on all types of funding, especially that provided by correspondent banks abroad and inter-bank funds, partially offset by 18.5% increase in the average volume. The increase in the average volume was due to higher funding provided by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and COFIDE.

Interest on bonds, notes and other obligations increased mainly due to 10.5% increase in the average volume, mainly attributable to a 10.6% decrease in the average foreign exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The average cost of funds decreased 50 basis points, from 2.0% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2021, in line with the lower cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Impairment Loss on Loans, Net of Recoveries

The following table presents the components of impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)		%
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(379.0	)		(2,393.9	)		2,014.9		(84.2	)%
Past-due loan ratio (at period end)		3.6	%		3.4	%		—		—
Provision expense as a percentage of average total loans		0.9	%		6.1	%		—		—
Coverage ratio⁽¹⁾		131.1	%		181.5	%		—		—
Impairment allowance for loans		2,062.1			2,984.7			—		—

(1)	Coverage ratio is calculated by dividing allowances for loan losses as a percentage of past due loans.

158

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries decreased from S/2,393.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to S/379.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 mainly reflecting the fact that those provisions recorded as of December 31, 2020 were determined considering certain post-model adjustments to capture the high uncertainty in the retail loan portfolio caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, while those provisions recorded as of December 31, 2021 were determined in light of improved credit and payment behavior during 2021. This decrease in impairment loss on loans was partially offset by higher provision requirements in the commercial portfolio, mainly related to loan exposures to SMEs.

Interbank’s coverage ratio decreased from 181.5% for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to 131.1% for the year ended December 31, 2021, as a result of the aforementioned factors.

Fee Income from Financial Services, Net

The following table presents the components of fee income from financial services, net for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Income
Maintenance and mailing of accounts, transfer fees and commissions on credit and debit card		561.0			473.8			87.2			18.4	%
Commissions for banking services		299.8			293.4			6.4			2.2	%
Fees from indirect loans		65.0			52.5			12.5			23.7	%
Collection services fees		53.2			41.3			11.9			28.8	%
Others		60.4			38.3			22.2			57.9	%

Total		1,039.3			899.3			140.1			15.6	%

Expenses
Credit cards		(128.6	)		(105.8	)		(22.8	)		21.6	%
Debtor’s life insurance premiums		(102.8	)		(101.8	)		(1.1	)		1.0	%
Fees paid to foreign banks		(31.8	)		(15.1	)		(16.7	)		110.3	%
Others		(98.7	)		(56.8	)		(41.9	)		73.9	%

Total		(361.9	)		(279.4	)		(82.4	)		29.5	%

Net		677.5			619.8			57.6			9.3	%

The S/57.6 million, or 9.3%, increase in net fee income from financial services for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, was mainly due to increases in commissions received across most products and services primarily attributable to the base effect of lower commissions from products and services in 2020 due to decreased business activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Other Income

The following table presents the components of other income for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

159


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain on foreign exchange transactions		423.0			318.4			104.6			32.8	%
Net gain on sale of financial investments		100.9			103.8			(2.9	)		(2.8	)%
Net gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		(56.4	)		(38.1	)		(18.3	)		48.1	%
Other		85.0			60.0			25.0			41.6	%

Other income		552.5			444.1			108.4			24.4	%

Other income increased by 24.4% for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly due to an increase in net gain on foreign exchange transactions, partially offset by lower net results on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, both effects associated with higher currency volatility.

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our banking segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(618.5	)		(594.4	)		(24.2	)		4.1	%
Administrative expenses		(832.8	)		(656.6	)		(176.2	)		26.8	%
Depreciation and amortization		(245.4	)		(234.5	)		(11.0	)		4.7	%
Other		(91.2	)		(48.1	)		(43.1	)		89.5	%

Total other expenses		(1,787.9	)		(1,533.5	)		(254.4	)		16.6	%

Other expenses increased 16.6% for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly as a result of higher administrative expenses and salaries and employee benefits. The increase in administrative expenses was mainly due to higher marketing and credit card expenses and IT services. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was due to higher employee profit sharing, which in turn was due to the increase in net profit. Investments in digital ventures also played a significant role in the increase in our other expenses.

Our efficiency ratio was 42.7% for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 38.6% recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Income Before Translation Result and Income Tax

Results before translation result and income tax were S/1,806.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, representing an improvement compared to the S/80.2 million loss recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020, for the reasons discussed above. This result was partially offset by higher income tax in our banking segment.

Insurance

Interseguro’s profit attributable to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2021 was S/272.7 million compared to a S/141.1 million profit for the year ended December 31, 2020 mainly due to a S/114.4 million increase in net interest and similar income, primarily due to higher returns on the fixed income portfolio, a S/67.0 million recovery from prior impairment of financial investments and S/33.0 million increase in other income. These effects were partially offset by a S/64.3 million increase in other expenses, as well as a S/24.9 million decrease in translation result.

160

Net Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of net interest and similar income for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income		803.0			655.0			148.0			22.6	%
Interest and similar expense		(117.5	)		(84.0	)		(33.5	)		39.9	%

Net interest and similar income		685.4			571.0			114.4			20.0	%

Net interest and similar income increased 22.6% mainly due to a S/148.0 million increase in interest and similar income primarily attributable to higher return of the fixed income portfolio, which was partially offset by a S/33.5 million decrease in interest and similar expenses.

Other Income, Net

The following table presents the components of other income for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021		2020		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain (loss) on sale of financial investments		145.7		105.0		40.7			38.7	%
Net gain (loss) on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		0.2		39.2		(39.0	)		(99.4	)%
Rental income		57.4		39.5		17.9			45.4	%
Net gain on investment property valuation		22.0		5.4		16.5			n.m.
Other		9.4		12.5		(3.1	)		(25.0	)%

Other income, net		234.7		201.7		33.0			16.4	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Other income increased S/33.0 million, mainly due to a S/40.7 million increase in net gain on sale of financial investments, a S/17.9 million increase in rental income and a S/16.5 million increase in net gain on valuation of real estate investments. These factors were partially offset by a S/39.0 million decrease in net gain on financial assets at fair value.

Recovery (Loss) due to Impairment of Financial Investments

Recovery due to impairment of financial investments was S/33.2 million as compared to a S/33.8 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2020, a S/67.0 million reversal of provisions for impairment on a fixed income investment that was downgraded in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was upgraded to B in the first quarter of 2021 from CCC+.

Total Net Premiums Earned Minus Claims and Benefits

The following table presents the components of total premiums earned minus claims and benefits for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

161


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Premiums assumed		1,051.4			625.9			425.5			68.0	%
Premiums ceded to reinsurers		(10.9	)		(10.2	)		(0.7	)		6.9	%
Adjustment of technical reserves		(395.3	)		(100.8	)		(294.5	)		n.m.
Net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others		(917.3	)		(794.1	)		(123.3	)		15.5	%

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		(272.0	)		(279.1	)		7.0			(2.5	)%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits were S/272.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to S/279.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. These results were primarily due to a S/424.8 million increase in net premiums, partially offset by increases of S/294.5 million in adjustment of technical reserves and S/123.3 million in net claims and benefits incurred.

Net Premiums


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021		2020		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities⁽¹⁾		622.8		256.9		366.0			142	%
Individual Life		176.5		134.5		42.0			31	%
Retail Insurance		241.3		224.4		16.8			8	%
Credit Life Insurance		131.5		132.9		(1.4	)		(1	)%
Mandatory Traffic Accident (SOAT)		51.0		45.2		5.8			13	%
Card Protection		33.1		32.7		0.4			1	%
Others		25.7		13.6		12.1			89	%

Net Premiums⁽²⁾		1,040.6		615.8		424.8			69	%

(1)	Annuities include premiums from pension-related insurance (disability and survivorship).

(2)	Temporary Private Annuities are not included as premiums assumed. Net premiums are premiums assumed net of premiums ceded.

Net premiums increased 69.0% mainly due to increases of (i) S/366.0 million in annuities primarily attributable to a market expansion of survivorship annuities, as a result of higher mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic, (ii) S/42.0 million in individual life primarily explained by a 28% increase in the sales force headcount and continued growth in online sales, and (iii) S/16.8 million in retail insurance premiums primarily due to SOAT recovery and increases in sales from digital products such as car insurance and travel insurance.

Adjustment of Technical Reserves

The following table presents adjustment of technical reserves by business line for our insurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

162


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change
	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities		(301.3	)		(43.3	)		(257.9	)		596	%
Individual Life		(76.3	)		(62.0	)		(14.4	)		23	%
Retail Insurance		(17.7	)		4.5			(22.2	)		(493	%)

Adjustment of technical reserves		(395.3	)		(100.8	)		(294.5	)		292	%

Adjustment of technical reserves increased more than three-fold mainly due to a S/257.9 million increases in annuities, S/22.2 million increase in retail insurance and S/14.4 million increase in individual life. The increase in technical reserves was mostly related to (i) increased sales, particularly for annuities, and (ii) higher technical reserves for inflation-indexed annuities due to an increase in the inflation rate.

Net Claims and Benefits Incurred for Life Insurance Contracts and Others

The following table presents net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others by business line for our insurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Annuities⁽¹⁾		(733.8	)		(668.0	)		(65.8	)		10	%
Individual Life		(28.2	)		(15.1	)		(13.1	)		87	%
Retail Insurance		(155.3	)		(111.0	)		(44.3	)		40	%
Credit Life Insurance		(112.4	)		(78.2	)		(34.2	)		44	%
Mandatory Traffic Accident (SOAT)		(17.9	)		(13.0	)		(4.9	)		38	%
Card Protection		(3.0	)		(0.9	)		(2.1	)		232	%
Others		(22.0	)		(18.9	)		(3.1	)		17	%

Net claims and benefits incurred⁽²⁾		(917.3	)		(794.1	)		(123.2	)		16	%

(1)	Annuities include claims from pension-related insurance (disability and survivorship).

(2)	Temporary Private Annuities are not included as benefits incurred.

Net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others increased S/123.2 million, mostly explained by higher claims in credit life insurance related to the COVID-19 mortality in Peru, as well as by increases of S/65.8 million in annuity benefits and S/13.1 million in individual life claims.

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our insurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

163


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(100.4	)		(75.5	)		(24.9	)		33.0	%
Administrative expenses		(64.4	)		(39.5	)		(24.9	)		63.0	%
Depreciation and amortization		(25.0	)		(25.6	)		0.6			(2.2	)%
Expenses related to rental income		(4.4	)		(2.0	)		(2.4	)		n.m.
Other		(156.1	)		(143.4	)		(12.6	)		8.8	%

Total other expenses		(350.3	)		(286.0	)		(64.3	)		22.5	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Other expenses increased S/64.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly due to a S/24.9 million increase in administrative expenses and S/24.9 million increase in salaries and employee benefits.

Wealth Management

Inteligo’s net profit was S/283.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, a 16.6% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. This result was mainly attributable to 27.7% increase in other income due to strong investment results for the year, and 20.1% increase in fee income from financial services, in part supported by the effect of a higher foreign exchange results in these two revenue lines.

Inteligo’s ROE was 23.0% for the year ended December 31, 2021, lower than the 28.0% registered for the year ended December 31, 2020. This was mainly attributable to an increase in shareholders’ equity which in turn was mainly attributed to increases in accumulated results and the effect on equity of a higher foreign exchange rate due to the depreciation of the sol against the U.S. dollar in 2021 as compared to 2020.

Interest and Similar Income

The following table presents the components of interest and similar income for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change
	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar income
Interest on loan portfolios		64.4			65.3			(0.9	)		(1.3	)%
Interest on financial investments		84.1			91.2			(7.2	)		(7.9	)%
Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds		5.8			6.9			(1.0	)		(15.1	)%

Total		154.3			163.4			(9.1	)		(5.6	)%

Nominal average rate		2.9	%		4.1	%

Interest and similar income decreased 5.6% mainly due to a 7.9% decrease in interest on financial investments, a 1.3% decrease in interest on loan portfolios, and a 15.1% decrease in interest due from banks and inter-bank funds.

Interest on loan portfolios decreased S/0.9 million mainly due to a decrease in the average rate despite an increase in average loans outstanding. Interest on financial investments decreased S/7.2 million mainly due to lower dividends received from equity investments during 2021. Interest due from banks and inter-bank funds decreased S/1.0 million, mainly attributable to a decrease in the average rate of term deposits.

164

Interest and Similar Expenses

The following table presents the components of interest and similar expenses for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change
	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Interest and similar expenses
Interest and fees on deposits and obligations		(35.6	)		(46.0	)		10.3			(22.5	)%
Interests on bonds, notes and other obligations		(2.4	)		(2.1	)		(0.4	)		17.1	%
Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others		(1.8	)		(3.6	)		1.8			(51.0	)%

Total		(39.8	)		(51.7	)		11.8			(22.9	)%

Nominal average rate		1.0	%		1.6	%

Interest and similar expenses decreased 22.9% mainly due to decreases of 22.5% in interest and fees on deposits and obligations and 51.0% in interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others.

Interest and fees on deposits and obligations decreased S/10.3 million due to a decrease in the average rate as a consequence of an increase in average non-interest-bearing deposits. Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions and others decreased S/1.8 million due to loan amortizations during the second half of 2021. Interest on bonds, notes and other obligations increased S/0.4 million primarily as a result of the effect of a higher foreign exchange rate on Inteligo’s financial expenses related to leases as they are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Impairment Loss on Loans, Net of Recoveries

Inteligo’s loan portfolio had no delinquencies for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Inteligo’s impairment loss on loans was S/2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Recovery (Loss) due to Impairment of Financial Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2021, Inteligo’s impairment loss on financial investments was S/1.6 million, as compared to a S/0.7 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2020

Fee Income from Financial Services, Net

The following table presents the components of fee income from financial services, net for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

165


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Income
Maintenance and mailing of accounts, transfer fees and commissions on credit and debit card		1.6			1.1			0.6			50.7	%
Funds management fees		186.9			152.5			34.4			22.6	%
Brokerage and custody services fees		9.7			7.9			1.8			22.1	%
Others		0.6			4.0			(3.4	)		(84.8	)%

Total		198.8			165.4			33.3			20.2	%

Expenses
Brokerage and custody services		(0.9	)		(0.6	)		(0.4	)		61.2	%
Others		(0.9	)		(0.9	)		—			(0.5	)%

Total		(1.8	)		(1.5	)		(0.4	)		23.9	%

Net		197.0			164.0			33.0			20.1	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Fee income from financial services, net for the year ended December 31, 2021 was S/197.0 million, a S/33.0 million, or 20.1%, increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was mainly attributable to higher fund management fees and higher brokerage fees due to increased trading volumes, triggered by higher price volatility and client appetite for investing or rebalancing portfolios.

Other Income

The following table presents the components of other income for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Net gain on sale of financial investments		42.1			(23.4	)		65.5			n.m.
Net gain on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		96.7			134.9			(38.2	)		(28.3	)%
Other		(2.7	)		(5.0	)		2.2			(44.9	)%

Other Income		136.1			106.6			29.5			27.7	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Other income increased S/29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly attributable to positive mark-to-market valuations on investments.

Other Expenses

The following table presents the components of other expenses for our wealth management segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

166


	For the year ended December 31,
	2021			2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Salaries and employee benefits		(84.1	)		(75.0	)		(9.0	)		12.1	%
Administrative expenses		(41.5	)		(37.9	)		(3.6	)		9.6	%
Depreciation and amortization		(15.0	)		(14.5	)		(0.5	)		3.4	%
Other		(2.8	)		(0.6	)		(2.2	)		n.m.

Total Other Expenses		(143.4	)		(128.0	)		(15.4	)		12.0	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Total other expenses increased S/15.4 million, or 12.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly due to increased salaries and employee benefits, associated with promotions and recruitment of new employees, in addition to the effect of a higher foreign exchange rate in the cost base due to the depreciation of the sol against the U.S. dollar in 2021 as compared to 2020.

Inteligo’s efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing salaries and employee benefits plus administrative expenses plus depreciation and amortization by net interest and similar income plus net fee income from financial services plus other income. Our wealth management segment’s efficiency ratio improved from 33.3% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 31.6% for the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to higher revenues, despite the slight increase in expenses.

B.	Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of liquidity is dividends received from our subsidiaries and an issuance of senior debt and our primary use of funds is the payment of dividends to our shareholders and interest payments associated with the indebtedness described below.

As of December 31, 2022, our outstanding indebtedness included the following:

•

U.S.$300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2027 issued pursuant to the indenture, dated October 19, 2017 among the Registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Luxembourg Branch, as Luxembourg transfer and paying agent.

The following discussion of liquidity and capital resources is on a segment basis. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and dividends policy”.

Interbank

The following table presents Interbank’s primary sources of funds as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	As of December 31, 2022		As of December 31, 2021		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Total deposits and obligations		44,597.9		44,966.3		(368.5	)		(0.8	%)
Due to banks and correspondents and inter-bank funds		6,756.6		8,112.7		(1,356.1	)		(16.7	%)
Bonds, notes and other obligations		6,571.5		6,939.0		(367.4	)		(5.3	%)

Total		57,926.0		60,018.0		(2,092.0	)		(3.5	%)

In our banking segment, our primary sources of funds have traditionally consisted of deposits and obligations, which amounted to S/44,597.9 million as of December 31, 2022. Interbank’s deposits include retail and commercial deposits, generated mainly through its digital channels, financial stores distribution network, and its relationships with commercial clients.

167

Interbank is required to maintain deposits with the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, as legal reserve, in an amount determined by the percentage of deposits and other liabilities owed to its clients. For a description of the legal reserve (encaje) regulations, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—Banking Regulation and Supervision—Reserve Requirements from the Central Reserve Bank of Peru”.

At times, Interbank has utilized Peru’s short-term interbank loans market to satisfy liquidity needs. The Central Reserve Bank of Peru’s discount window, which makes short-term loans to banks at premium rates, is another potential short-term funding source; although, Interbank has used it infrequently. As part of Interbank’s liquidity management, it sometimes enters into repos on Central Reserve Bank of Peru certificates of deposit, which are a cost and tax efficient source of funds in Peruvian currency.

Amounts due to banks and correspondents of Interbank (including both short and long-term amounts) decreased S/1,356.1 million, or 16.7%, to S/6,756.6 million as of December 31, 2022 from S/8,112.7 million as of December 31, 2021, as a result of a reduction in the long-term funding provided by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru and COFIDE, associated with a decrease in funds available for the Reactiva Perú Program, in addition to an increase in long-term funds from correspondent banks abroad.

Interbank has issued senior, senior-subordinated, junior-subordinated, mortgage and leasing bonds in the Peruvian and international capital markets.

Outstanding Indebtedness of Interbank

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank’s outstanding indebtedness included the following:

•

U.S.$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.625% subordinated notes due 2029 issued by Interbank on March 18, 2014, and an early redemption date (Call Date) on March 19, 2024.

•

U.S.$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.375% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 notes”) issued by Interbank on January 18, 2018. Interbank executed an exchange offer that resulted in a further issuance of U.S.$284.9 million of its 2023 notes. The total aggregate amount is U.S.$484.9 million as of December 31, 2022. Furthermore, the exchange did not generate a substantial change in the terms and conditions of the financial liability; therefore, no new financial obligation was recognized. The transactional costs associated with these exchanged bonds will continue to be amortized based on the new issuance schedule.

•

U.S.$400.0 million principal amount of 3.250% senior notes due 2026 issued by Interbank on October 4, 2019, in connection with a tender offer for its 5.750% senior notes due 2020. Following the tender offer, Interbank redeemed the remaining 5.750% senior notes due 2020.

•

S/312.0 million principal amount of 5.000% senior notes due 2026 issued by Interbank on October 1, 2019.

•

U.S.$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% subordinated notes due 2030 issued by Interbank on July 8, 2020, and an early redemption date (Reset Date or Call Date) on July 8, 2025.

•

U.S.$30.0 million loan under a credit facility agreement between Interbank and Caixabank dated as of August 2024. The credit facility agreement does not include clauses regarding the compliance of financial ratios.

•

U.S.$30.0 million loan under a credit facility agreement between Interbank and JP Morgan Chase dated as of October 2024. The credit facility agreement does not include clauses regarding the compliance of financial ratios.

•

U.S.$15.0 million loan under a credit facility agreement between Interbank and Banco Estado from Chile dated as of January 2025. The credit facility agreement does not include clauses regarding the compliance of financial ratios.

•

U.S.$10.0 million loan under a credit facility agreement between Interbank and Bank of China Peru dated as of November 2024. The credit facility agreement includes standards clauses regarding the compliance of administrative matters.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the following represents individual amounts of local debt from a total amount of U.S.$128.7 million, which includes local subordinated bonds of S/340.7 million (U.S.$89.3 million) which qualify as second tier equity (“Tier 2”) in the determination of the regulatory capital, according to SBS, S/150 million (U.S.$39.3 million) of local corporate inflation-linked bonds at the nominal exchange rate of S/3.814 as of December 31, 2022.

168

These bonds do not have specific guarantees:

•

S/150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.81% fixed rate subordinated notes due 2023 issued by Interbank on January 11, 2013. The issuance does not have specific guarantees and, according to SBS regulation, qualify as Tier 2 in the determination of the regulatory capital, as described in our audited financial statements and related notes.

•

U.S.$50.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% fixed rate subordinated notes due 2023 issued by Interbank on December 13, 2013. The issuance does not have specific guarantees and, according to SBS regulation, qualify as Tier 2 in the determination of the regulatory capital, as described in our audited financial statements and related notes.

•

S/150.0 million aggregate principal amount of VAC + 3.41% corporate inflation-linked bonds due 2029 issued by Interbank on March 26, 2019, as described in our audited financial statements and related notes.

Additionally, on June 25, 2022, Interbank redeemed a subordinated bond for a nominal outstanding amount of S/137.9 million and an annual fixed rate of 6.91%. Interbank issued those bonds on June 25, 2012, for 10 years.

Additional outstanding indebtedness is mainly related to short term bank facilities for working capital and general purposes.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, Interbank complies with all the covenants described above and not subject to any other such obligations.

Interseguro

Interseguro’s primary source of funds is premiums collected, carry from fixed income investments, dividends on equity investments and real estate leases.

Interseguro has issued subordinated bonds in the Peruvian market. As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro had S/247.9 million in bonds outstanding compared to S/259.2 million for 2021. Additionally, Interseguro works with credit lines for promissory notes and letters of guarantee. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance for lines with three major banks in Peru was U.S.$61.0 million.

Inteligo

The following table presents Inteligo’s primary sources of funds as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	As of December 31, 2022		As of December 31, 2021		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Total deposits and obligations		4,098.8		4,171.8		(73.0	)		(1.7	%)
Due to banks and correspondents and inter-bank funds		53.9		183.4		(129.5	)		(70.6	%)

Total		4,152.8		4,355.3		(202.5	)		(4.6	%)

In our wealth management segment, the primary source of funds has consisted of deposits and obligations, which amounted to S/4,098.8 million as of December 31, 2022. Inteligo Bank’s deposits are retail deposits, from its private wealth clients. Retail deposits provide Inteligo with a low-cost, diverse and stable source of funding. Amounts due to banks and correspondents consist of the credit facilities provided to Inteligo Bank.

Deposits and obligations decreased S/73.0 million or 1.7% from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022, mainly attributable to migrations from cash positions to investments. Funds due to banks and correspondents decreased S/ 129.5 million or 70.6% from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022, mainly explained by the termination of Inteligo Bank’s credit line with Credit Suisse.

169

Outstanding Indebtedness of Inteligo

As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo’s outstanding indebtedness included the following:

•

U.S.$14 million loan under a credit facility between Inteligo Bank and Banque J. Safra Sarasin SA. The credit agreement includes standard clauses regarding eligible collateral.

Izipay

The following table presents Izipay’s primary sources of funds as of December 31, 2022:


	As of December 31, 2022

	(S/ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents		111.1
Net cash provided by operating activities		97.4
Net cash used in investing activities		(109.6	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(18.8	)

Total		80.1

In our payments segment, the primary source our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents.

As of December 31, 2022, we had S/111.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, customer funds cash and cash equivalents. Customer funds cash and cash equivalents are used to meet the obligations set aside for customers.

Outstanding Indebtedness of Izipay

As of December 31, 2022, Izipay’s outstanding indebtedness included the following:

•

U.S.$ 18.6 million loan under a credit facility between Izipay and Scotiabank Perú SAA, Banco Internacional del Perú and Banco de Crédito del Perú. The framework agreement for the facility includes standard clauses regarding eligible collateral, compliance with covenants and other administrative matters.

•

S/0.4 million financial leasing.

•

S/31.0 million loans with local banks.

Regulatory Capital

We are not required to establish a regulatory capital for statutory purposes. However, Interbank and Interseguro are required to maintain minimum regulatory capital pursuant to guidelines issued by the SBS, and Inteligo Bank is required to maintain minimum regulatory capital pursuant to guidelines issued by the Central Bank of The Bahamas. Izipay does not have mandatory capital requirements.

170

Interbank

As of December 31, 2022, the minimum regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for Interbank was 9.8% and its ratio of regulatory capital to total risk weighted assets was 15.1%, the highest among the four largest banks in Peru, according to the SBS. As of December 31, 2021, the minimum regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for Interbank was 9.0% and its ratio of regulatory capital to total risk weighted assets was 15.9%, the highest among the four largest banks in Peru, according to the SBS. As of December 31, 2020, the minimum regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for Interbank was 10.7% and its ratio of regulatory capital to total risk weighted assets was 17.0%, the highest among the four largest banks in Peru, according to the SBS. See Note 16(f) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision” section in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for a discussion of regulatory capital requirements applicable to Interbank.

The following tables present Interbank’s regulatory capital as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, in accordance with SBS GAAP, as required by the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law.


	As of December 31, 2022			As of December 31, 2021			Change

	(S/ in (millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Paid-in-capital		5,441.9			4,961.8			480.2			9.7	%
Legal and special reserves		1,166.0			1,045.9			120.0			11.5	%
Treasury stock		(33.9	)		(33.9	)		—			—
Earnings pending capitalization⁽¹⁾		458.1			299.9			158.2			52.7	%
Shares of IFS⁽²⁾		(1.4	)		(1.5	)		0.1			(4.3	%)
Others		(14.3	)		(10.1	)		(4.2	)		41.4	%

Total Tier 1		7,016.4			6,262.1			754.3			12.0	%

Subordinated bonds		2,288.4			2,462.1			(173.7	)		(7.1	%)
Generic allowances for loan losses		465.7			423.1			42.7			10.1	%
Shares of IFS⁽²⁾		(1.4	)		(1.5	)		0.1			(4.3	%)
Others		(14.3	)		(10.1	)		(4.2	)		41.4	%

Total Tier 2		2,738.4			2,873.5			(135.1	)		(4.7	%)

Total Regulatory Capital		9,754.8			9,135.6			619.2			6.8	%

Risk-weighted assets		64,690.1			57,570.3			7,119.8			12.4	%
Regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets		15.1	%		15.9	%

(1)	Corresponds to retained earnings to be capitalized as directed by the board of directors.

(2)	Corresponds to 24,324 IFS shares held by Interbank as of December 31, 2022.


	As of December 31, 2021			As of December 31, 2020			Change

	(S/ in (millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Paid-in-capital		4,961.8			4,723.4			238.4			5.0	%
Legal and special reserves		1,045.9			1,019.5			26.5			2.6	%
Treasury stock		(33.9	)		(33.9	)		—			n.m.
Earnings pending capitalization⁽¹⁾		299.9			231.9			68.0			29.3	%
Unrealized gains in investments available-for-sale		—			—			—			n.m.
Subordinated bonds		—			—			—			n.m.
Shares of IFS⁽²⁾		(1.5	)		(1.1	)		(0.4	)		38.7	%
Others		(10.1	)		(9.0	)		(1.1	)		11.8	%

Total Tier 1		6,262.1			5,930.7			331.4			5.6	%

Subordinated bonds		2,462.1			2,393.5			68.5			2.9	%
Generic allowances for loan losses		423.1			428.1			(5.0	)		(1.2	)%
Shares of IFS⁽²⁾		(1.5	)		(1.1	)		(0.4	)		38.7	%
Others		(10.1	)		(9.0	)		(1.1	)		11.8	%

Total Tier 2		2,873.5			2,811.5			62.0			2.2	%

Total Regulatory Capital		9,135.6			8,742.1			393.5			4.5	%

Risk-weighted assets		57,570.3			51,451.8			6,118.5			11.9	%
Regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets		15.9	%		17.0	%

(1)	Corresponds to retained earnings to be capitalized as directed by the board of directors.

(2)	Corresponds to 24,324 IFS shares held by Interbank as of December 31, 2021.

n.m. means not meaningful.

171

Interseguro

Interseguro is required to maintain a minimum regulatory capital, also known as solvency equity, pursuant to guidelines issued by the SBS. The capital requirement is the sum of solvency equity and the guarantee fund. Solvency equity is determined by the level of risk and the risk profile assumed by an insurance company in Peru in accordance with SBS regulations. The guarantee fund is equivalent to 35% of solvency equity. See Note 16(f) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision” in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for a discussion of regulatory capital requirements applicable to Interseguro.

The following tables present Interseguro’s solvency ratio as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 in accordance with SBS GAAP as required by the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law.


	As of December 31, 2022			As of December 31, 2021			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Regulatory capital		1,338.2			1,387.7			(49.5	)		(3.6	%)
Less:
Solvency equity (solvency margin)⁽¹⁾		714.9			672.6			42.3			6.3	%
Guarantee fund⁽²⁾		250.2			235.4			14.8			6.3	%
Required capital		965.1			907.9			57.1			6.3	%

Surplus		373.2			479.8			(106.6	)		(22.2	%)
Solvency Ratio⁽³⁾		138.7	%		152.8	%


	As of December 31, 2021			As of December 31, 2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Regulatory capital		1,387.7			1,359.4			28.3			2.1	%
Less:
Solvency equity (solvency margin)⁽¹⁾		672.6			607.8			64.7			10.6	%
Guarantee fund⁽²⁾		235.4			212.7			22.6			10.6	%
Required capital		907.9			820.6			87.3			10.6	%

Surplus		479.8			538.8			(59.1	)		(11.0	)%
Solvency Ratio⁽³⁾		152.8	%		165.7	%

(1)	Corresponds to an amount determined by the level of risk and the risk profile assumed by an insurance company in Peru in accordance with SBS regulations.

(2)	Equal to 35% of solvency margin.

(3)	Solvency ratio for Interseguro is calculated in accordance with SBS guidelines. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision—Insurance Regulation and Supervision—Solvency Requirements and Regulatory Capital”.

Inteligo Bank

The following tables present Inteligo Bank’s risk-weighted assets under the prior standard and regulatory capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

172


	As of December 31, 2022			As of December 31, 2021			Change

	(U.S. $/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)			%
Total eligible capital		195.8			287.2			(85.9	)		(31.8	%)
Total risk-weighted assets		959.2			1,177.3			(218.1	)		(18.5	%)

Capital ratio		20.4	%		24.4	%


	As of December 31, 2021			As of December 31, 2020			Change

	(U.S. $/ in millions)						(S/ in millions)		%
Total eligible capital		287.2			270.7			16.5		6.1	%
Total risk-weighted assets		1,177.3			953.0			224.3		23.5	%

Capital ratio		24.4	%		28.4	%

In August 2022, the Central Bank of Bahamas released the Bahamas Capital Regulations 2022. The new regulation set a new capital ratio limit and introduced changes to the credit and operational risk equivalent assets and deductions of high-risk assets from the capital base. According to the new regulation, the Central Bank of Bahamas requires the Inteligo Bank to maintain a capital ratio of not less than 12%. Under this new regulation, Inteligo Bank’s capital ratio at December 31, 2022 was 16.5%.This ratio is not displayed on the tables above because it is not comparable with the ratio of the prior standard. In 2018, the Central Bank of The Bahamas published two discussion papers focused on minimum disclosures (Pillar III of the Basel II framework) and the net stable funding ratio and the liquidity coverage ratio (main components of Basel III), but its liquidity framework will be implemented after the completion of the capital framework.

Risk-weighted assets are the sum of (i) the total amount of credit risk weighted assets and indirect loans, (ii) 10 times the regulatory capital allocated to cover market risk, only if the bank’s market risk position is higher than (a) 5% of the total on- and off-balance sheet assets, or (b) U.S.$100 million, and (iii) 12.5 times the regulatory capital allocated to cover operational risk. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo Bank’s ratio of regulatory capital to total risk-weighted assets was 20.4%.

In Peru, Inteligo SAB is regulated by the SMV, which is responsible for determining the minimum capital requirement for the companies under its supervision. As of December 31, 2022, the capital requirement for brokerage houses is the sum of (i) the minimum regulatory capital required of S/2.3 million; and (ii) the regulatory capital allocated to cover operational risks. As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo SAB held capital exceeding S/21.7 million.

Izipay

In Peru, Izipay is regulated by Central Bank of Perú.

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

We enter into various commitments and contractual obligations that may require future cash payments, respectively.

173

The following tables summarize our commitments and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively:


As of December 31, 2022	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Deposits and obligations		47,223.8		956.0		67.5		283.5		48,530.7
Inter-bank funds		30.0		—		—		—		30.0
Due to banks and correspondents		2,433.5		3,220.1		288.8		1,158.3		7,100.6
Bonds, notes and other obligations		2,296.5		—		2,903.4		2,706.4		7,906.3
Due from customers on acceptances		45.8		—		—		—		45.8
Accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		3,026.4		—		—		—		3,026.4
Lease liabilities		36.6		47.5		22.0		6.5		112.6

Total⁽¹⁾		55,092.5		4,223.7		3,281.7		4,154.6		66,752.4


As of December 31, 2021	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Total

	(S/ in millions)
Deposits and obligations		48,258.8		335.2		42.7		261.3		48,897.9
Inter-bank funds		—		—		—		—		n.m.
Due to banks and correspondents		1,068.8		5,324.3		1,163.7		966.0		8,522.9
Bonds, notes and other obligations		249.6		2,261.4		1,895.7		3,982.9		8,389.7
Due from customers on acceptances		152.4		—		—		—		152.4
Accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		2,242.7		—		—		—		2,242.7
Lease liabilities		46.4		61.4		29.5		97.6		234.9

Total⁽¹⁾		52,018.7		7,982.4		3,131.6		5,307.8		68,440.5

(1)	For insurance contract liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, see Note 14 of our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

n.m. means not meaningful.

All contractual obligations included in these tables are recognized as liabilities on our consolidated statement of financial position and represent principal payments on an undiscounted basis without including payment of future interest.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our subsidiaries Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and Izipay have various contractual arrangements, such as contingent operations, that are not recognized as liabilities in our audited annual consolidated financial statements but are required to be recorded as off-balance sheet items. See Note 18 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

We enter into contingent operations to generate fees from guarantees, stand-by letters of credit, import and export letters of credit, due from bank acceptances and foreign currency forward obligations.

174

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021

The following table presents our consolidated off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.


	As of December 31,
	2022		2021		Change
	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Contingent credits—Indirect loans
Guarantees and standby letters		4,001.8		4,150.1		(148.3	)		(3.6	%)
Import and export letters of credit		485.5		290.4		195.2			67.2	%

		4,487.3		4,440.5		46.9			1.1	%
Derivatives—Notional amounts Held for trading
Forward currency contracts—buy		1,977.3		3,925.5		(1,948.1	)		(49.6	%)
Forward currency contracts—sell		4,057.8		4,390.3		(332.5	)		(7.6	%)
Foreign currency forward contracts on currencies other than sol		292.9		316.0		(23.1	)		(7.3	%)
Interest rate swaps		2,424.6		2,969.0		(544.5	)		(18.3	%)
Currency swaps		2,672.5		4,162.3		(1,489.8	)		(35.8	%)
Cross currency swap		224.5		234.7		(10.2	)		(4.3	%)
Foreign currency options		80.2		1.8		78.3			n.m
Held as hedges Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps		—		—		—			—
Cross currency swap		2,579.2		2,358.0		221.2			9.4	%

		14,309.0		18,357.6		(4,048.7	)		(22.1	%)

Responsibilities under credit lines agreements		14,758.7		12,182.2		2,576.5			21.1	%

Total		33,555.0		34,980.3		(1,425.3	)		(4.1	%)

n.m. means not meaningful.

Guarantees and standby letters decreased by S/148.3 million, or 3.6%, from S/4,150.1 million as of December 31, 2021 to S/4,001.8 million as of December 31, 2022. Import and export letters of credit increased S/195.2 million.

Foreign currency forwards, including purchase and sale agreements decreased S/23.1 million from S/316.0 million as of December 31, 2021 to S/292.9 million as of December 31, 2022. We also use derivative financial instruments as hedges. See Note 10(b) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements for derivative financial instruments valuation.

Responsibilities under credit line agreements increased S/2,576.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the amount registered as of December 31, 2021. These credit line agreements are cancellable at any time by Interbank.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements as of December 31, 2021 and 2020

The following table presents our consolidated off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

175


	As of December 31,
	2021		2020		Change

	(S/ in millions)				(S/ in millions)			%
Contingent credits—Indirect loans
Guarantees and standby letters		4,150.1		4,445.1		(295.0	)		(6.6	)%
Import and export letters of credit		290.4		166.9		123.5			74.0	%

		4,440.5		4,611.9		(171.5	)		(3.7	)%
Derivatives—Notional amounts Held for trading
Forward currency contracts—buy		3,925.5		2,317.1		1,608.3			69.4	%
Forward currency contracts—sell		4,390.3		947.3		3,443.1			n.m.
Foreign currency forward contracts on currencies other than sol		316.0		396.7		(80.6	)		(20.3	)%
Interest rate swaps		2,969.0		4,382.5		(1,413.5	)		(32.3	)%
Currency swaps		4,162.3		2,520.8		1,641.6			65.1	%
Cross currency swap		234.7		213.1		21.5			10.1	%
Foreign currency options		1.8		22.7		(20.9	)		(92.0	)%
Held as hedges Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps		—		—		—			n.m.
Cross currency swap		2,358.0		2,140.0		218.0			10.2	%

		18,357.6		12,940.2		5,417.5			41.9	%

Responsibilities under credit lines agreements		12,182.2		9,953.6		2,228.7			22.4	%

Total		34,980.3		27,505.7		7,474.6			27.2	%

n.m. means not meaningful.

Guarantees and standby letters decreased by S/295.0 million, or 6.6%, from S/4,445.1 million as of December 31, 2020 to S/4,150.1 million as of December 31, 2021. Import and export letters of credit increased S/123.5 million.

Foreign currency forwards, including purchase and sale agreements decreased S/80.6 million from S/396.7 million as of December 31, 2020 to S/316.0 million as of December 31, 2021. We also use derivative financial instruments as hedges. See Note 10(b) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements for derivative financial instruments valuation.

Responsibilities under credit line agreements increased S/2,228.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the amount registered as of December 31, 2020. These credit line agreements are cancellable at any time by Interbank.

Capital Expenditures Program

We have made significant investments and, in particular, in our banking segment. In fact, Interbank has made substantial investments in recent years targeting both digital and physical infrastructure.

Interbank believes that it is building the foundations to capture current and future market opportunities and continue to grow. It has a capital expenditure plan to ensure the accomplishment of its medium-term strategic plan, as it believes that not only operating efficiency and proximity to its customers, but also digital transformation and innovation, are key competitive advantages. We are investing intensely in our transformation and our technology capital expenditures are double that the one in made in 2015.

While we budget for investments across our subsidiaries, Interbank accounts for the substantial majority or our capital expenditures budget. We budget for year long periods. Interbank’s budget for capital expenditures for the next three years is approximately S/900 million. Of this budget, approximately 84% is related to technology expenditures including investments in our digital platform, aligned with technology as a main pillar at IFS. Some of the key technological expenditures include:

•

significant improvements in our digital platform, including new functionalities aimed to enhance User Experience (UX), in both retail and commercial segments;

•

further improvement in advanced analytical capabilities and personalization approach to better understand our customers through data and analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, among others, to enrich our understanding of Peruvian clients and strengthen our data driven organization approach;

176

•

research and development of digital solutions, including products, services, and processes in a fast-changing and competitive environment; and

•

strengthen cybersecurity standards to protect our customers.

Interseguro has invested in technology and projects to support its rapidly expanding operations. It has implemented an operations system in order to support Interseguro’s planned growth in individual life and retail insurance products, a CRM platform, robotic process automation (RPA) to automate processes and look for operational efficiency, in addition to improving such processes and freeing up resources. Interseguro also has introduced its new 100% digital products and solutions such as Rumbo, car insurance, travel insurance, Vida Free and Vida Cash. Interseguro has also implemented and digitized the process of analysis of needs for life insurance products, which allows the company to issue insurance policies without a physical application form.

Additionally, Interseguro continues improving business intelligence capabilities such as Datalake which allows the consolidation of information from different Interseguro systems to generate a unique customer base for the creation of predictive models.

In our wealth management segment, Inteligo SAB and Inteligo Peru Holdings implemented a new core system “SAP Business One” to automate back-office activities like accounting, budgeting and purchasing. Inteligo Bank has continued working on complementing its IT infrastructure and further developing of its technology platform, which will allow it to leverage its existing CRM platform and develop stronger business intelligence capabilities.

In our payments segment, Izipay constantly invests in technology in order to reinforce its network, including POS with Android operative system as well as hardware to increase its capacities and developing software in order to deliver new services to different types of clients. The capital expenditure investment from Izipay for the period 2022 was S/104.3 million.

C.	Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

Not Applicable.

D.	Trend Information

As of December 31, 2022, we had total assets of S/87.5 billion (approximately U.S.$22.9 billion), total gross loans of S/47.5 billion (approximately U.S.$12.5 billion), total deposits and obligations of S/7.1 billion (approximately U.S.$1.9 billion) and shareholders’ equity of S/10.0 billion (approximately U.S.$2.6 billion).

The economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic were compounded by the slowdown that the Peruvian economy has experienced in recent years, which had already intensified due to several factors, including (i) a strong El Niño phenomenon, which adversely affected agricultural production, transportation services, tourism and commercial activity, and resulted in a 1.5% drop in GDP growth in 2017; (ii) corruption scandals related to the activities of certain Brazilian and Peruvian companies in the construction sector, which resulted in suspension or delay of important infrastructure projects during 2018; and (iii) political instability, as Peru has suffered a series of government institutional crises starting in 2018 due to, among other things, several corruption scandals involving prominent political figures, which have resulted in resignations and impeachment of various presidents since then, including most recently former President Jose Pedro Castillo in December 2022 following an attempted coup, as well as investigations of certain members of the judicial system and the public ministry who are now facing prosecution. Despite these factors and continued political corruption scandals, the Peruvian economy continued to outperform its peer countries in 2019, supported by solid macroeconomic fundamentals and strong fiscal and monetary policies.

At the beginning of 2021, Peru continued to struggle from the effects of the pandemic but started to recover over time as targeted lockdowns decreased and were eventually lifted and the vaccination program accelerated. The recovery was mainly driven by domestic demand-oriented sectors, improved trade terms, higher private consumption, and the base effect of such improvements as compared to 2020. Nevertheless, such improved economic landscape was negatively affected by the uncertainty that arose in the run up to the presidential and congressional elections that took place in April 2021. These political events contributed to a slowdown in GDP growth, volatility of the exchange rate and weakening of the local currency, which in turn also affected inflation. As a result of these factors, the Peruvian GDP grew 13.3% in 2021.

177

In 2022, Peru had an economic deceleration due political uncertainty and social unrest. This outlook affected directly the mining, tourism and agricultural sectors. As a consequence, inflation remained at 8.5% as of December 2022. To curb inflation, the Central Bank tightened its monetary policy by elevating the reference policy rate to 7.50% as of December 2022. As a result of these factors, the Peruvian GDP grew 2.7% in 2022. For more information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Trend Information” in our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2022 and in our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on April 24, 2023.

In the beginning of 2023, certain bank failures in the United States and the emergency sale of Credit Suisse significantly increased market volatility and caused turmoil in global capital markets. To date, we have not experienced any negative impact from such events, which we believe is due to the quality of our assets, and our strong capital and liquidity position. Nonetheless, similar developments in the financial industry in the future could potentially affect the Peruvian economy, and consequently, materially adversely affect our business.

The following are the most important trends, uncertainties and events that are reasonably likely to affect us or that would cause the financial information disclosed herein not to be indicative of or have a material adverse effect on our future operating results or financial condition:

•

Our businesses and prospects rely on a market-oriented economy, and potential political changes following the upcoming elections may alter the current economic model and business environment.

•

Our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision, and changes in existing regulations or the implementation of future regulations.

•

The adoption of new international banking and insurance guidelines may cause our subsidiaries to require additional capital and could cause their cost of funds to increase.

•

Intense competition from other banking, insurance and financial institutions, and from other players including providers of emerging financial technologies.

•

Financial market volatility and market turmoil associated with the failure of two U.S. banks and the emergency sale of Credit Suisse or similar developments in the financial industry.

•

Our loans, deposits, asset quality and our profits have all experienced substantial growth, benefitting from growth in the Peruvian economy. However, economic, social and political developments in Peru, including political instability, high profile corruption investigations, inflation and unemployment may cease to support our historically strong growth.

•

Our capital and funding requirements as well as our client activity and our clients’ ability to repay loans could be affected by continued adverse developments and market uncertainties relating to the COVID-19 outbreak, which has resulted in significant and unexpected volatility in equity and credit markets.

•

Cybersecurity events, earthquakes, other natural disasters, health epidemics (including the current COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks could negatively affect our reputation and the operations of Interbank, Interseguro, Interfondos, Inteligo SAB and Izipay.

•

The oceanic and atmospheric phenomenon El Niño may have a negative impact on the economy of Peru and on our results. Among other potential impacts, this phenomenon could affect Interbank’s loan activity and asset quality in the future, considering that (i) it may affect the overall payment capacity of Interbank borrowers, and (ii) Interbank loan agreements typically grant borrowers a grace period due to El Niño.

For more information regarding potential economic or regulatory factors that could affect our result of operations or financial condition, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors”, “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Strategy”, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.

E.	Critical Accounting Estimates

For a summary regarding critical accounting estimates and judgments, please refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Operating Results—Critical accounting estimates and judgments”.

ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A.	Directors and Senior Management

General

Our business and affairs are managed by our board of directors in accordance with our articles of incorporation and Panamanian corporate law. Our articles of incorporation provide for a board of directors of no less than three members. Our current board of directors is comprised of seven directors and no alternates. The two-year term of our current board of directors appointed on March 31, 2022 will expire in March 2025.

178

If a director resigns or otherwise becomes unable to continue with its duties, a majority of our directors may appoint any other person to serve as director for the remaining term of the board.

The board of directors may establish one or more committees, to which it may delegate any or all of its responsibilities. Each committee shall be composed by two or more directors.

The board of directors typically meets in regularly scheduled quarterly meetings and when called by any dignitary (dignatario) or our Chief Executive Officer. Resolutions must be adopted by a majority of the directors present at the meeting.

Board of Directors

Our board of directors consists of seven members, three of whom are independent. The business address of our board of directors is Av. Carlos Villarán 140, 5th floor Urbanización Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Perú. The following table sets forth certain information about our current directors.


Name	Position		Year of Birth		Year Appointed
Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale		Chairman		1959		2007
Fernando Martín Zavala Lombardi		Secretary		1971		2019
Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni⁽¹⁾		Treasurer		1953		2007
José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante⁽¹⁾		Director		1941		2007
Lucía Cayetana Aljovín Gazzani		Director		1966		2019
Hugo Antonio Santa María Guzmán		Director		1963		2019
Guillermo Martinez Barros⁽¹⁾		Director		1958		2019

(1)	Independent director pursuant to Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

The following sets forth selected biographical information for each of the members of IFS’s board of directors.

Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale has served as IFS’ chairman since 2007. He also serves as Interbank’s chairman since 1995 and was Interbank’s interim Chief Executive Officer during 2010. In addition, Mr. Rodríguez-Pastor serves as Chairman of Intercorp Peru, Supermercados Peruanos, Tiendas Peruanas, Colegios Peruanos, InRetail Peru Corp. and Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, and as director of Inteligo Group Corp., Interseguro, Homecenters Peruanos and Financiera OH! S.A., among others. Mr. Rodríguez-Pastor received a bachelor’s degree in social science from the University of California at Berkeley and a master’s degree in business administration from the Amos Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.

Fernando Martin Zavala Lombardi has served as an IFS director since his appointment on April 2019, and has been serving Interbank as director since March 2019. Mr. Zavala also serves as CEO and director of Intercorp Peru Ltd. and Chairman of InRetail Pharma and Homecenters Peruanos, and director of InRetail Peru Corp., Inteligo Group Corp., Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Colegios Peruanos, Interseguro, Tiendas Peruanas, Supermercados Peruanos, Financiera OH! S.A., Intertítulos, and Inteligo Bank. He previously served as CEO in Peru and Panama of the multinational company SABmiller, as General Manager of Indecopi and has been director of several companies in Peru, and several business guilds and NGOs as well. In the public sector, he has been Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance, the latest twice. Mr. Zavala received a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidad del Pacífico in Lima, a master’s degree in business management from Universidad de Piura, and a master’s in business administration from University of Birmingham in England.

Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni has served as one of IFS’ directors since 2007. Mr. Morris also serves as Chairman of Interseguro and Financiera OH!, as Vice-Chairman of Interbank and as Director of Intercorp Peru and Inteligo Bank. Mr. Morris received a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad del Pacífico in Lima, a master’s degree in economics from the University of Pittsburgh and a master’s degree in finance from American University.

José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante has served as one of IFS’ and Interbank’s directors since March 2007. Mr. Bustamante is the President of the Board of CFI Holdings S.A. and also serves as a director of Agrícola Cerro Prieto S.A., Irrigadora Cerro Prieto S.A.C., Huaura Power Group S.A. and San Miguel Industrias Pet S.A. Mr. Bustamante was President of the Board of Telefónica del Perú and Banco Santander Central Hispano, formerly known as Bancosur, and of the Asociación de Bancos del Peru – ASBANC. In the public sector, Mr. Bustamante was the Prime Minister of Peru and Minister of Industry, Tourism, Integration and International Trade Negotiations (1993-1994) and was president of COPRI and Prom Perú during the same period. Mr. Bustamante received a bachelor’s degree in agricultural engineering from the Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina in Lima and pursued his graduate studies at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

179

Lucía Cayetana Aljovin Gazzani has served as one of IFS’ directors since her appointment in April 2019 and has been serving as Interbank’s director since July 2018. She has also served as Foreign Affairs Minister, Minister of Energy and Mines and Minister of Social Inclusion. Mrs. Aljovin is the President of the National Fishing Society, Vice President of CONFIEP and Vice President of the Arbitral Tribunal of AMCHAM Perú. Previously, she was a partner at Miranda & Amado law firm, a member of the board of directors of the Lima Stock Exchange and served as director of other Peruvian companies and nonprofit organizations. Mrs. Aljovin received a degree in Law from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and a master’s degree in business administration from Universidad Adolfo Ibanez of Chile. She has also been a journalist and a professor at several Peruvian universities.

Hugo Antonio Santa María Guzmán has served as one of IFS’ directors since his appointment in April 2019, and has been serving as Interbank director since November 2016. Mr. Santa María is partner, manager of economic studies, and chief economist of APOYO Consultoría, where he runs the Business Advisory Service (SAE, for its acronym in Spanish). SAE is the leading economic and business (analysis) service in Peru. He is currently a member of the board of directors of Virú S.A., InRetail Perú Corp. and Colegios Peruanos. Previously, he was a member of the boards of Banco Santander Peru, Grupo ACP, Compañía Minera Atacocha and the Consolidated Reserve Fund (investment fund of the Peruvian public pension system) and independent director and President of the board of Mibanco. Mr. Santa María has been a professor in graduate programs at Universidad del Pacífico, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas and Universidad de Piura. Mr. Santa María holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidad del Pacífico and Ph.D. from Washington University in St. Louis.

Guillermo Martínez Barros has served as one of IFS’s directors since 2019. He has also served as a director of Interseguro since 2008. Mr. Martínez serves as director of Financiera OH! S.A., PrimAmérica S.A. in Chile and is a member of the Direction Committee of Centros de Salud Peruanos S.A.C. Mr. Martínez is also the chairman and owner of Inmobiliaria e Inversiones Siete Mares S.A. and the chairman of Scan S.A. and Ebench S.A. in Chile. Mr. Martínez received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Universidad Católica de Chile, a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Chicago and a master’s degree in economics from the London School of Economics.

Executive Officers

The business address of our executive officers is Av. Carlos Villarán 140, Urbanización Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Perú. The following table sets forth certain information about our executive officers. Each member of our management team serves for open-ended terms.


Name	Position	Year of Birth	Year Appointed
Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres	Chief Executive Officer	1970	2013
Gonzalo José Basadre Brazzini	Deputy Chief Executive Officer	1970	2013
Michela Casassa Ramat	Chief Financial Officer	1973	2012
Liliana Elcira Vera Villacorta	Chief Accounting Officer	1974	2006
Juan Antonio Castro Molina	General Counsel	1971	2006
Carlos Tori Grande	Executive Vice President of Payments	1976	2022
Ernesto Giancarlo Ferrero Merino	Investor Relations Officer	1973	2014
Katia Mercedes Lung Won	Chief Compliance Officer	1968	2016
Peter Roekaert Embrechts	Internal Auditor	1967	2020
Zelma Acosta-Rubio Rodríguez	Chief Sustainability Officer	1965	2022

Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres, Mr. Castellanos has served as IFS’ Chief Executive Officer since April 2013 and as Interbank’s Chief Executive Officer since January 2011. Mr. Castellanos is also one of Interseguro’s directors since his appointment in April 2019. Mr. Castellanos joined Interbank in 2006 as the Chief Executive Officer of Interfondos. He has served as Interbank’s Vice President for Retail Banking and Manager of the Mortgage and Real Estate Division. Previously, he was a Director in the investment banking division at Citigroup Global Markets in New York. Before joining Citigroup, Mr. Castellanos was responsible for the treasury department at Minera Yanacocha S.A. Mr. Castellanos received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Universidad del Pacífico and a master’s degree in business administration from the Amos Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.

Gonzalo José Basadre Brazznini has served as IFS’ Deputy Chief Executive Officer since April 2013. Mr. Basadre is also the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Interseguro since 2012. Previously, he was the Vice President of Investments (Chief Investment Officer) of Interseguro. He received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Universidad del Pacífico in Lima and a master’s degree of business administration from Harvard University.

180

Michela Casassa Ramat has served as IFS’ Chief Financial Officer and as Interbank’s Chief Financial Officer since September 2012. Mrs. Casassa joined Interbank in September 2011 as Head of Strategic Planning. Prior to joining Interbank, she served as Head of Strategy for Corporate and Investment Banking at Banco de Crédito del Perú in Lima and Unicredit in Munich, and Head of Strategy for the International Division of Unicredit in Milan and Istanbul. She has also worked at The Boston Consulting Group in Milan and Citibank in Lima. Mrs. Casassa holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Universidad de Lima and a master’s degree in business administration with a specialization in finance from the SDA Bocconi in Milan.

Liliana Elcira Vera Villacorta has served as IFS’ Chief Accounting Officer since our formation. Ms. Vera served as Accounting Manager of Interbank from 2003 to 2011. From 1998 to 2002, Ms. Vera was a senior analyst at EY Peru. Ms. Vera received a degree in accounting from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and a master’s degree in business administration from INCAE Business School.

Juan Antonio Castro Molina. Mr. Castro is Corporate Legal Vice President for Intercorp Group, and General Counsel for IFS since its incorporation. Mr. Castro also serves as member of the board of Universidad Tecnológica del Peru and other companies of the Intercorp Group. Mr. Castro was previously employed at Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr in Washington D.C. and has also served as chief of staff to the Prime Minister of Peru (2001). Mr. Castro received a degree in law from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, a master’s of laws degree from the University of Virginia where he attended as a Fulbright scholar, a master’s degree in business administration from Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, and he has attended senior management programs at Harvard Business School and the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

Carlos Tori Grande has served as IFS´s Executive Vice President of Payments since June 2022, and as Interbank’s Executive Vice President of Payments Ecosystem since August 2022. At Interbank, he has previously served as Vice President of Retail Banking and Channels since March 2021, as Vice President of Retail Banking since December 2016 and as Vice President for Distribution Channels since February 2014. In addition, Mr. Tori serves as a director of Servitebca and PMP. Mr. Tori joined Interbank in 2009 as Head of the Corporate Finance team. Previously, Mr. Tori had served as a director of Interfondos, Compañía de Servicios Conexos Expressnet and Pagos Digitales Peruanos. Prior to joining Interbank, Mr. Tori worked for Citigroup and BankBoston. Prior to 2009, he served as an Investment Banking Associate at Merrill Lynch’s Financial Institutions Group. Mr. Tori received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Texas A&M University and a master’s degree in business administration from the Amos Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. In addition, he attended the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School.

Ernesto Giancarlo Ferrero Merino, was appointed IFS’ Investor Relations Officer in July 2014. Previously he served as Interbank’s Head of Financial Management since February 2012. Mr. Ferrero joined Interbank in November 2010 as Deputy Head of Corporate Finance. Prior to joining Interbank, he served as Corporate and Investment Banking Vice President at BBVA Banco Continental and General Manager at BBVA Continental Bolsa. Mr. Ferrero holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad del Pacífico, as well as a master’s degree in business administration from the Rotterdam School of Management at Erasmus University, The Netherlands.

Katia Mercedes Lung Won was appointed as IFS’ Chief Compliance Officer in March 2016. She also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of Interbank since 2012. Prior to joining Interbank, Ms. Lung served as Vice President Project Manager for Suntrust Bank in Miami, Florida in the International Wealth Management Division and as Vice President BSA/AML Compliance Officer for BNP Paribas Agency and the General Security Principal (Broker Dealer) for BNP Paribas Investment Services. Ms. Lung holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Florida International University (Cum Laude), and a master’s degree in business administration from Nova Southeastern University, as well as a CP/AML FIBA and a Six Sigma Certification—Green Belt.

Peter Roekaert Embrechts was appointed as IFS’ Internal Auditor in June 2020. Since September 2019 Mr. Roekaert has been in charge of SOX and internal control implementation at IFS and subsidiaries. Previously he served as Interbank’s Head of Credit Risk Monitoring and Recovery – Commercial Banking since December 2006. Prior to that he was Deputy Head of Recovery – Commercial Banking since January 2004 and worked at Interbank’s Corporate Banking Division since July 1996. Mr. Roekaert holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad del Pacífico, as well as a master’s degree in business administration from the Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University.

Zelma Acosta-Rubio Rodríguez has served as IFS´ Chief Sustainability Officer since March 2022, as Interbank’s General Counsel and Secretary of the Board of Directors since April 2007, and as Executive Vice President of Corporate and Legal Affairs since 2018. Mrs. Acosta-Rubio also serves as Chief Diversity Officer for Intercorp since 2018, as well as a director of several related companies of Interbank, including, La Fiduciaria S.A. (related under SBS rules) and Intertítulos. Previously, she served as Director at Compañía de Servicios Conexos Expressnet. Before joining Interbank, Mrs. Acosta-Rubio worked at Clifford Chance in London and Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy in New York. Mrs. Acosta-Rubio received a law degree from the Universidad Católica

181

Andres Bello in Caracas, a master’s degree in comparative jurisprudence from New York University, a master’s degree in international banking law from Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University and a master’s degree in business administration from the Management School at Universidad de Piura. In addition, she attended courses on governance and corporate social responsibility at Harvard Business School.Mrs. Acosta-Rubio is admitted to the New York State Bar.

Interbank

Board of Directors

Interbank’s board of directors consists of ten members, six of whom are independent. The business address of Interbank’s board of directors is Av. Carlos Villarán, Urbanización Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Peru. The following table sets forth certain information about our directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


Name	Position	Year of Birth	Year Appointed
Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale	Chairman	1959	1995
Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora	Director	1946	1994
José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante⁽¹⁾	Director	1941	2007
David Fischman Kalincausky⁽¹⁾	Director	1958	2003
Carlos Miguel Heeren Ramos⁽¹⁾	Lead Director	1968	2015
Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni	Director	1953	2000
Lucía Cayetana Aljovín Gazzani⁽¹⁾	Director	1966	2018
Hugo Antonio Santa María Guzmán⁽¹⁾	Director	1963	2016
Fernando Martín Zavala Lombardi	Director	1971	2019
Marcia Nogueira de Mello	Director	1965	2022

(1)	Independent director pursuant to Peruvian regulations.

The following sets forth selected biographical information for each of the members of Interbank’s board of directors.

Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora has served as one of Interbank’s directors since 1994. In addition, Mr. Barúa serves as a director of InRetail Pharma, Supermercados Peruanos, Real Plaza, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Financiera OH! S.A., Inteligo Group and Interseguro. He has also served as director of Intercorp Perú, IFS, Inretail Peru Corp., Tiendas Peruanas and Homecenters Peruanos and until 2019, he was the Chief Executive Officer of Intercorp Perú. Mr. Barúa received a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería in Lima and a degree in economics from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium.

José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and senior management—General—Board of Directors”.

David Fischman Kalincausky has served as one of Interbank’s directors since 2003. Mr. Fischman also serves as a director of Supermercados Peruanos. He has served for 17 years as Vice Chancellor of Administration of the Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) in Lima, of which he is also a funding member. Mr. Fischman is an international consultant on leadership and organizational culture issues. He holds a degree in civil engineering from Georgia Tech University and a master’s degree in business administration from Boston University.

Carlos Heeren Ramos has served as one of Interbank’s directors since 2015, appointed as Lead Director in 2020 and, as required by the SBS regulation, designated as the Director responsible to supervise the efficiency of the information security and cybersecurity system. In addition, he is CEO of UTEC (Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología) and TECSUP (Instituto Superior de Tecnología). He currently serves on the board of a number of companies as well as non-profit organizations. Prior to his current role, he was a partner in the largest consulting firm in Peru, Apoyo Consultoría, where he served as the head of management consulting. Additionally, he spent 12 years as a faculty member in the Graduate School of the Universidad del Pacífico. He obtained his bachelor’s degree in economics at the Universidad del Pacífico, and obtained his master’s degree in economics from the University of Texas at Austin.

Felipe Morris Guerinoni, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

182

Lucía Cayetana Aljovin Gazzani, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Hugo Antonio Santa María Guzmán, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Fernando Martin Zavala Lombardi, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Marcia Nogueira de Mello has served as one of Interbank’s directors since October 2022. She is co-founder and board member of Revolution Investimentos Ltda. and Volt Partners Investimentos Ltd., independent board member of PagSeguro Digital Ltd. and Leo Meios de Pagamentos Ltd., and member of the advisory board of Banco Letsbank S.A. (formerly Banco Smartbank S.A.). Previously, she served as CEO of Global Payments South America Brasil Serviços de Pagamentos, was member of the advisory board of DMCard Administradora de Cartões de Crédit, commercial director of Elavon do Brasil Soluçoes de Pagamento S.A., country manager and sales director of Verifone do Brasil Ltda., director of channels, strategy and payment solutions at Companhia Brasileira de Meios de Pagamento S.A. (Cielo), and business development manager of EDS Electronic Data Systems do Brasil Ltda. (subsidiary of Hewlett-Packard—HP). Mrs. Nogueira received a degree in Computer Science from the Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie in Brazil

Executive Officers

The business address of Interbank’s executive officers is Av. Carlos Villarán 140, Urbanización Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima 13, Perú. The following table sets forth certain information about Interbank’s executive officers as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


Name	Position	Year of Birth	Year Appointed
Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres	Chief Executive Officer	1970	2011
Michela Casassa Ramat	Chief Financial Officer	1973	2012
Gabriela Prado Bustamante	Vice President of Risk Management	1970	2008
Carlos Tori Grande	Vice President Payments Ecosystem	1976	2022
César Augusto Andrade Nicoli	Vice President of Retail Banking and Channels	1971	2022
Víctor Cárcamo Palacios	Vice President of Commercial Banking	1972	2016
Alfonso Díaz Tordoya	President of Operations and Technology	1979	2022
Giorgio Bernasconi Carozzi	Vice President of Capital Markets	1961	2009
Zelma Acosta-Rubio Rodríguez	Vice President of Corporate and Legal Affairs	1965	2007
Julio Del Valle Montero	Manager of Human Resources	1977	2019

Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers.”

Michela Casassa Ramat, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers.”

Gabriela Prado Bustamante has served as Interbank’s Executive Vice President of Risk Management since July 2008. Previously, Ms. Prado was responsible for Interbank’s Special Asset Management Division and from 2000 to 2004, Ms. Prado served as Manager of Interbank’s Risk Management Division, and responsible for monitoring customer performance. Prior to joining Interbank, Ms. Prado also worked for Santander’s Risk Management Division. Ms. Prado received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Universidad de Lima, and a graduate degree in business administration from the INCAE Business School. In addition, she attended the Management Development Program at the Universidad de Piura

Carlos Tori Grande, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers.”

César Augusto Andrade Nicoli has served as Interbank’s Executive Vice President of Retail Banking and Channels since August, 2022. He also served as Vice President of Operations and Technology since May 2015. Before joining Interbank, he served as Director of Sales Strategy at LAN Peru and LATAM Airlines Peru, Commercial Director at Telefonica Colombia and Commercial Vice President at Telefónica Peru. Mr. Andrade holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad del Pacífico in Lima and a master’s degree in business administration from the Kellogg School of Management.

183

Víctor Cárcamo Palacios has served as Interbank’s Executive Vice President for Commercial Banking since January 2016. Previously, he served as Head of Corporate Finance and Head of Medium Enterprises Banking at Interbank. He also serves as Director of Intertítulos, Procesos de Medios de Pago and La Fiduciaria S.A.. Before joining Interbank, Mr. Cárcamo was the Executive Director of Capital Markets at Banco Santander in Mexico and Deputy Manager of Retail Products at Banco Santander in Argentina. Mr. Cárcamo holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad de Lima and a master’s degree in business administration from the Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez in Chile. Mr. Cárcamo also completed the General Management Program at Harvard Business School.

Alfonso Díaz Tordoya has served as Interbank’s Vice President of Operations and Technology since August, 2022. Mr. Diaz also serves as a Director of Procesos de Medios de Pago and Cámara de Compensación Electrónica – CCE. He also served as Vice President of Digital Delivery & Partnerships, Head of Digital Alliances, Vice President of Distribution Channels and as Manager for the Digital Channels Division. Previously, he served as director at Interfondos, Servitebca and Compañía de Servicios Conexos Expressnet. Prior to joining Interbank, Mr. Diaz worked in management consulting at A.T. Kearney and in commercial banking at Citigroup Peru. Mr. Diaz is a Licensed Industrial Engineer from Universidad de Lima and holds a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.

Giorgio Bernasconi Carozzi has served as Interbank’s Executive Vice President for Capital Markets since March 2009. Prior to joining Interbank, Mr. Bernasconi served as Director in Strategy and Marketing, Global Markets and Distribution for Latin America and was responsible for Latin American capital markets at BBVA Bancomer in México. From 1997 to 2006, he was the Deputy General Manager for BBVA Banco Continental in Peru. He previously served as Treasury Vice President for Citibank Lima. Mr. Bernasconi has a bachelor’s degree in administration from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. In addition, he attended the Management Development Program at the Universidad de Piura, the Corporate Leadership and Management Program at the IESE Business School of the Universidad de Navarra, and the Senior Leaders Group Program at the Harvard Business School.

Zelma Acosta-Rubio Rodríguez, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers.”

Julio Del Valle Montero has served as Interbank’s Human Resources Manager since January 2019. Mr. Del Valle joined Interbank in 2007 and since then has led teams related to Process Transformation, Procurement and Facility Management. Previously, he worked as Senior Manager at BNSF Railway in Texas, United States. Mr. Del Valle holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from St. Mary’s University and a master’s degree in business administration from SMU Cox School of Business.

Interseguro

Board of Directors

Interseguro’s board of directors consists of eight principal members and one alternate member, three of whom are independent. The business address of Interseguro’s board of directors is Avenida Javier Prado Este No. 492, office No. 2601, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru. The following table sets forth certain information about Interseguro’s directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


Name	Position	Year of Birth	Year Appointed
Felipe Morris Guerinoni	Chairman	1953	1998
Juan Carlos Vallejo Blanco	Director	1964	2012
Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale	Director	1959	1998
Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora	Director	1946	2000
Raúl Alberto Francisco Musso Vento⁽¹⁾	Director	1954	2000
Fernando Martín Zavala Lombardi	Director	1971	2019
Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres	Director	1970	2019
Guillermo Martínez Barros⁽¹⁾	Director	1958	2008
Carlos Octavio Saco Vértiz Tudela⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Alternate Director for Mr. Guillermo Martínez Barros	1961	2013

(1)	Independent director pursuant to Peruvian regulations.

(2)	Carlos Octavio Saco Vértiz is an alternate director.

The following sets forth selected biographical information for each of the members of Interseguro’s board of directors.

Felipe Morris Guerinoni, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

184

Juan Carlos Vallejo Blanco has served as one of Interseguro’s directors since 2012. In addition, Mr. Vallejo is Chief Executive Officer of InRetail Peru Corp., and serves as director of Supermercados Peruanos, Makro Supermayorista, InRetail Pharma, Tiendas Peruanas, Homecenters Peruanos, Quicorp, Colegios Peruanos S.A., Financiera OH! S.A. and Inmobiliaria Milenia S.A. Mr. Vallejo served as Chief Executive Officer of Interseguro from 1998 until 2012. Mr. Vallejo received a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the Universidad de Chile and a master’s degree in business administration from INCAE Business School in Costa Rica.

Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors.”

Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Interbank–Board of Directors.”

Raul Alberto Francisco Musso Vento has served as one of Interseguro’s directors since 2000 and is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Industrias Electro Químicas S.A. Mr. Musso served as a director of Urbi Mercados S.A. from 1999 to 2000, as the General Manager of LP Holding S.A. from 1998-1999 and as the Vice-President of Bankers Trust Company. Mr. Musso received a bachelor’s degree in Economics from the Universidad del Pacífico and a master’s degree in economics from the University of Pittsburgh.

Fernando Martín Zavala Lombardi, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers”

Guillermo Martínez Barros, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Carlos Octavio Saco Vértiz Tudela has served as an alternate director of Interseguro’s since 2004. Mr. Saco-Vértiz has also served as a director of Financiera OH! S.A., Tiendas Peruanas S.A., Supermercados Peruanos S.A. and Homecenters Peruanos S.A. In addition, Mr. Saco-Vértiz is a Senior Partner at BBGS Saco-Vértiz & Landerer law firm. Mr. Saco-Vértiz received a law degree from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and graduated from the Senior Management Program (PAD) of the Universidad de Piura.

Executive Officers

The business address of Interseguro’s executive officers is Av. Javier Prado Este No. 492. office No. 2601, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru. The following table sets forth certain information about Interseguro’s executive officers.


Name	Position	Year of Birth	Year Appointed
Gonzalo José Basadre Brazzini	Chief Executive Officer	1970	2012
Juan Carlos Motta Flores	Vice President, Operations	1963	2011
Juan Pablo Segura Vegas	Vice President, Legal, Administration and Finance	1972	2019
Luciana Camila Olaechea Cadenillas	Vice President, Human Development	1977	2020
Percy Rolando Chávez Castillo	Vice President, Commercial	1971	2020
Ian Scofield Rodriguez- Arnaiz	Vice President, Mass Insurance, Digital and Analytics	1985	2022
Armando Vidal Gastañaga	Vice President, Investment	1983	2022
Sergio Jhasmany Soliz Bilbao	Vice President, Information Technology	1985	2022

Gonzalo José Basadre Brazzini, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers”.

Juan Carlos Motta Flores has served as Interseguro’s Vice President of Operations and Actuarial Studies since 2011. Before joining Interseguro, he was the Chief Executive Officer at Penta Seguros de Vida-Penta Hipotecario in Chile for 10 years, and previously he worked as Technical Manager at Consorcio Nacional de Seguros S.A., also in Chile. Mr. Motta holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and a master’s degree in economics from Universidad Católica de Chile.

185

Juan Pablo Segura Vegas has served as Interseguro’s Vice President of Legal, Administration and Finance since 2019. Previously, Mr. Segura served as Interseguro’s Vice President of Administration and Finance from 2016 to 2017. Prior to joining Interseguro, he was the Executive Director of Corporate Planning at Estee Lauder Companies in New York. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business management from the Florida International University and a master’s degree in business management from The University of North Carolina.

Luciana Camila Olaechea Cadenillas has served as Interseguro’s Human Development Vice President since March 2020. Previously, Mrs. Olaechea served as Interseguro’s Human Development Manager from April 2019 to February 2020. Before joining Interseguro, she served as Manager of Consulting in Management and Human Development, Human Development Manager of Digital Transformation, and Human Development Manager for Retail Banking at Banco de Crédito del Perú, where she remained for 11 years. Mrs. Olaechea holds a bachelor’s degree in psychology from the Universidad de Lima, and a master’s degree in human behavior from the Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas.

Percy Rolando Chávez Castillo has served as Interseguro’s Commercial Vice President since November 2020. Before his appointment as Vice President, Mr. Chávez worked as an Annuities Division Manager of Interseguro. He previously served as Territorial Manager of the Commercial Banking Division at Banbif and Regional Manager for the provincial stores division at Interbank. Mr. Chávez holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidad Nacional de la Plata in Argentina and a master’s degree in marketing intelligence from Escuela Superior de Gestión Comercial y Marketing in Spain.

Ian Scofield Rodriguez- Arnaiz has served as Interseguro’s Vice President, Mass Insurance, Digital and Analytics since August 2022. Before his appointment as Vice President, Mr. Scofield worked as Commercial Manager of Rímac Seguros. He had previously served as Insurance Manager at Banco Ripley and Commercial Division Manager at BNP Paribas Cardif. Mr. Scofield holds a bachelor’s degree in Economics from Florida International University and a master’s degree in business administration from IE Business School.

Armando Vidal Gastañaga has served as Interseguro’s Vice President of Investments since August 2022. Before joining Interseguro, he held the position of Regional Head of Credit at SURA Investment Management. He also held the position of General Manager at Fondos Sura, and Investment Manager at AFP Integra. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidad del Pacífico, and a master’s degree in business administration from IE Business School.

Sergio Jhasmany Soliz Bilbao has served as Interseguro’s Vice President of Technology and Information since August 2022. Before joining Interseguro, Mr. Soliz served as Data & Digital Manager at Hipermercados Tottus Perú & Chile. He also served as Digital Manager at Belcorp Corporation and Head of Information Technology at Belcorp Chile. Mr. Soliz holds a bachelor’s degree in Systems Engineering from Universidad Catolica Boliviana and a master’s degree in Software Engineering from Universidad Autónoma Gabriel Rene Moreno.

Inteligo

Board of Directors

Inteligo’s board of directors consists of five members, none of whom are independent. The business address of Inteligo’s board of directors is Calle 50 con Elvira Méndez, Piso 48 (P.H. Tower Financial Center), Panama City, Panama. The following table sets forth certain information about Inteligo’s directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


Name	Position	Year of Birth		Year Appointed
Roberto Hoyle McCallum	Chairman		1949		2014
Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale	Director		1959		2007
Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora	Secretary		1946		2006
Fernando Zavala Lombardi	Vice President		1971		2019
Luis Felipe Castellanos	Director		1970		2019
Reynaldo Roisenvit Grancelli	Treasurer		1969		2020

The following sets forth selected biographical information for each of the members of Inteligo’s board of directors.

186

Roberto Hoyle McCallum has served as Chairman of Inteligo Group since February 2014. He also serves as Chairman of Inteligo Bank Ltd., Chairman of Instituto Cultural Peruano Norteamericano (ICPNA), Director of Inteligo Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A., Director of inPeru, Director of Vida Peru, former director and member of the executive committee of Cámara de Comercio de Lima, former Chairman of the Bolsa de Valores de Lima, former Chairman of inPeru and former member of the Executive Committee of FIAB (Federación Iberoamericana de Bolsas). Mr. Hoyle has over 45 years of experience in international banking. He received a bachelor’s degree in business administration and completed the Management Executive Program and the executive master’s degree in business administration of the Universidad de Piura.

Carlos Tomás Rodríguez-Pastor Persivale, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Ramón José Vicente Barúa Alzamora, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Interbank–Board of Directors”.

Fernando Zavala Lombardi, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Board of Directors”.

Luis Felipe Castellanos, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—General–Executive Officers.”

Reynaldo Roisenvit Grancelli has served as Inteligo Group’s Treasurer since 2020 and as Chief Executive Officer since February 2014. He also serves as Inteligo USA’s sole Director and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Inteligo Bank since 2005. Mr. Roisenvit is also director of the Lima Stock Exchange, member of the Investment Committee of Interseguro and member of various committees, including Corporate Governance Committees, of Inteligo Bank. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Inteligo SAB, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Inteligo SAB, Chief of Research of Interfip Bolsa, Chief Executive Officer of Interfip Bolsa, Products Manager of Private Banking at Interbank and Portfolio Manager of Global Investment Advisory Group at the Compass Group, in New York. Mr. Roisenvit received a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Universidad de Lima and a master’s degree in business administration from Columbia Business School.

Executive Officers

The business address of Inteligo’s executive officers is Calle 50 con Elvira Méndez, Piso 48 (P.H. Tower Financial Center), Panama City, Panama. The following table sets forth certain information about Inteligo’s executive officers.


Name	Position	Date of Birth		Year Appointed
Reynaldo Roisenvit Grancelli	Chief Executive Officer		1969		2014
Bruno Ferreccio Del Río	Deputy CEO		1976		2017
Victor Vinatea Cámere	Chief Operations Officer		1962		2017
Gianina Gotuzzo Oliva	General Counsel		1975		2017
Daniel Yagui Yoshimoto	Chief Financial Officer		1980		2020

Reynaldo Roisenvit Grancelli, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Inteligo—Board of Directors.”

Bruno Ferreccio Del Río has served as Inteligo Bank’s Chief Executive Officer since May 2019. Previously, he served as Inteligo SAB´s Chief Executive Officer since July 2019 until September 2021 and as Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Inteligo SAB since April 2017, and before that as Chief Commercial Officer since December 2015. In addition, he served as Inteligo’s Chief Financial Officer and as Inteligo SAB’s Financial Vice President since April 2014. Before joining Inteligo in June 2010 as Inteligo SAB’s Financial Manager and Chief of Products, Mr. Ferreccio was the Vice President of Futures and Derivates in Commodities at AAKOP LLC in New York, and Resident Engineer of HV S.A. CONTRATISTAS in Peru. He received a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the University of Texas, Austin, a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Michigan and completed the General Management Program at Harvard Business School.

Victor Vinatea Cámere has served as Inteligo’s Chief Operations Officer since 2017. Mr. Vinatea has more than 30 years of banking experience. Before joining Inteligo, Mr. Vinatea held management positions in commercial and retail banking as well as in operations at different banking institutions in Peru. He has been director of La Fiduciaria and Intertítulos. Mr. Vinatea received a degree in business administration from ESAN and holds a master’s degree in business administration in Direction from INCAE and Universidad Adolfo Ibañez and has participated in international seminars related to banking at Harvard Business School.

Gianina Gotuzzo Oliva has served as Inteligo SAB’s General Counsel since 2016 and Inteligo’s General Counsel since 2017. She has also served as General Counsel of InRetail Perú Corp. and Legal Counsel of Intercorp Peru from 2010 to 2016. Mrs. Gotuzzo was previously a Senior Associate of Hernández & Cía. Mrs. Gotuzzo was a professor of corporate law at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru for seven years, where she received her law degree in 1999. Mrs. Gotuzzo holds an LL.M. from Cornell University and was admitted to the New York Bar in 2002.

187

Daniel Yagui Yoshimoto has served as Chief Executive Officer of Inteligo SAB and Inteligo Peru Holdings S.A.C. since September 2021. He also serves as Chief Financial Officer of Inteligo since August 17, 2020. He has over sixteen years of professional experience in multinational companies, including 10 years of experience in financial departments within several industries such as financial services, retail and consumer products, and over five years of experience leading business consulting projects performed in top companies in Peru, Argentina and Colombia. Mr. Yagui holds a master’s degree in finance from Universidad Torcuato Di Tella in Argentina and a master’s degree in business administration from Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez in Chile.

Procesos de Medios de Pago

Board of Directors

PMP’s board of directors consists of seven members, one of whom is independent. The business address of PMP’s board of directors is Calle Jorge Chavez 275, 7^th Floor, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru. The following table sets forth certain information about PMP’s directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


Name	Position	Year of Birth		Year Appointed
Carlos Tori Grande	Chairman		1976		2015
Michela Casassa Ramat	Director		1973		2022
Ivana Osores Balestra	Director		1970		2022
Víctor Carcamo Palacios	Director		1972		2022
Cesar Andrade Nicoli	Director		1971		2022
Juan Carlos Vallejo Blanco	Director		1964		2022
Bruno Alberto Funcke Ciriani⁽¹⁾	Director		1967		2020

(1)	Independent director pursuant to Peruvian regulations.

Carlos Tori Grande, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Interbank—Executive Officers”.

Michela Casassa Ramat, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General—Executive Officers.”

Ivana Osores Balestra, has served as one of PMP’s directors since 2022. She also serves as Director of Compañía de Servicios Conexos Expressnet since February 2019. In addition, since 2019, she has been the Central Chief of Strategy and Technological Transformation of Interbank, in which she previously had other positions such as Central Chief of Strategy and Retail Transformation (2018) and Division Chief of Architecture and Technological Transformation. Prior to joining Interbank, she was the Chief of Architecture and IT Standards, Operations Chief, Chief of Engineering and IT Development and Chief of Information Management at Banco de Crédito del Peru S.A. – BCP. Mrs. Osores holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from Universidad de Lima, a master’s degree in business administration from ESAN and a master’s degree in IT Project Management from the George Washington University.

Víctor Cárcamo Palacios, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Interbank—Executive Officers.”

Cesar Andrade Nicoli, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Interbank—Executive Officers.”

Juan Carlos Vallejo Blanco, See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Intereguro—Board of Directors.”

Bruno Alberto Funcke Ciriani, has served as one of PMP’s directors since 2020. He is also currently the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Grupo Dresden. Previously, he has served as director of Capia Renta Fija S.A.C. (2016 – 2022), independent director of Hipermercados Tottus (2016 – 2021), Tiendas del Mejoramiento del Hogar S.A. (2016 – 2021) and Avla Perú Compañía de Seguros S.A. (2017 – 2018), and Chief Executive Officer of Banco Falabella Perú (2011 – 2016). Mr Funcke holds a bachelor’s degree in administration from Universidad del Pacífico, and a master’s degree in business administration from ESAN.

188

Executive Officers

The business address of PMP’s executive officers is Calle Jorge Chavez 275, 7^th Floor, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru. The following table sets forth certain information about PMP’s executive officers.


Name	Position	Year of Birth		Year Appointed
Luis Felipe Venturo Denegri	Chief Executive Officer		1970		2015
Jorge Luis Malaga Bekich	Chief Financial Officer		1982		2022
Demian Arturo Ballon Espinoza	Chief Operations Officer		1974		2021
Christian Ramon Alvarado Perez	Chief Marketing, Sales & Product Officer		1975		2016
Jorge Luis Valdivia Chavez	Chief Technology Officer		1962		2015
Paola Rosa Maria Rodriguez Rodriguez	Chief Executive Risks & Compliance Officer		1971		2016
Arnaldo Rivera Velez	Chief Human Resources Officer		1971		2015

Luis Felipe Venturo Denegri has been PMP’s Chief Executive Officer since April 2015. Before joining PMP, he had occupied the position of Retail Banking Vice President at Banco Falabella from 2008 to 2014. He received a bachelor’s degree in Science from Babson College, and a master’s degree in Business Administration, Finance and Marketing from Kellogg Graduate School.

Jorge Luis Malaga Bekich has been PMP’s Chief Financial Officer since April 2022. Before joining PMP, he had been the Strategy Manager in Financiera Oh! from 2017 until 2022, and Financial Planning and Treasury Manager in Banco Falabella Peru from 2011 to 2017. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business and Finance from Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas and a master’s degree in Business Administration from Universidad de Piura.

Demian Arturo Ballon Espinoza has been PMP’s Chief Operations Officer since October 2021, having previously been PMP`s Manager of POS Network Operations since September 2020. From 2014 to 2019, Mr. Espinoza was the Controller and Chief Technology Officer at Pesquera Exalmar S.A.A. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Management from Universidad Ricardo Palma, and a master’s degree in Corporate Finance from Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas.

Christian Ramon Alvarado Perez has been PMP’s Chief Marketing, Sales & Product Officer since November 2016. Previously, he had been the Chief of Markets and Marketing of Entel from 2012 to 2016. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Universidad del Pacífico, and a master’s degree in Medex Executive MBA from Universidad de Piura

Jorge Luis Valdivia Chavez has been PMP’s Chief Technology Officer since August 2015. Before joining PMP, he was the Chief Technology and Innovation Officer of Unibanca (2012-2014), where he had previously held positions of Chief Systems and Operation Officer (2004-2012), Chief Systems Officer (2002-2003), Systems Deputy (2000- 2002) Support Chief Engineer (1996-2000) and Communication Support Engineer (1994-1995). He received a bachelor’s degree in science with a major in Electronic Engineering from Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería and a master´s degree in Business Administration with a major in Finance from Universidad ESAN.

Paola Rosa Maria Rodriguez Rodriguez has been PMP’s Chief Executive Risks & Compliance Officer since April 2016. She had previously held a position of Accountant and Internal Auditor on Banco de Crédito del Perú S.A. – BCP and in other companies of the Credicorp Group for nineteen years. She received a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Universidad Ricardo Palma, and a master’s degree in Business Administration from Universidad Adolfo Ibañez.

Arnaldo Rivera Velez has been PMP’s Chief Human Resources Officer since June 2015; having previously been a Non-Monetary Compensation Manager from 2010 to 2015. He received a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Universidad de Lima, a Master in Business Administration from Centrum PUCP Business School and an International Master in Leadership from EADA Business School.

Izipay

Izipay does not have a Board of Directors.

The business address of Izipay’s executive officers is Calle Jorge Chavez 275, 7^th Floor, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru.

Izipay’s Executive Officers are the same as the PMP’s Executive Officers and they hold the same roles and positions.

189

B.	Compensation

Our articles of incorporation provide that our shareholders are responsible for determining the compensation to be paid to members of our board. Some of our executive officers are also executive officers in our subsidiaries, and receive compensation for their services from such subsidiaries. Consistent with applicable law, we do not disclose to our shareholders, or otherwise make public, information regarding the individual compensation of our board members or executive officers, or of the board members or executive officers of our subsidiaries. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the aggregate annual compensation to our board members and to board members of our subsidiaries totaled S/2.9 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the aggregate annual compensation to our executive officers and executive officers of our subsidiaries totaled S/27.0 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, no amounts were set aside or accrued by us to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for our directors and officers. None of our directors or any of the directors of our subsidiaries have entered into any service contracts with our company or our subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of their employment. As of the year ended December 31, 2022, neither we nor our subsidiaries have adopted any executive long-term incentive plan, while Interbank has a retention bonus program for some of its executive officers.

C.	Board Practices

Our board of directors and the board of directors at each of our subsidiaries (Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and PMP) is responsible for establishing an appropriate and integrated risk management system and for promoting an internal environment that facilitates the board of directors’ supervision and risk management control. The board of directors is continuously informed about the degree of exposure of the diverse risks managed by each subsidiary and inherent to their businesses.

The boards of directors of Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo Bank and PMP have created several specialized committees to which they have delegated specific tasks in order to enhance risk management and internal control. We list below the main committees established by the boards of directors of our subsidiaries.

For more information on board practices, see “Item 6.A. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—General.”

Audit Committee

Our audit committee is fully independent and complies with the criteria set forth under our “Audit Committee Charter” (as amended from time to time) the rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, each as applicable to foreign private issuers. Our audit committee consists of three directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom is a financial expert. The current members of our audit committee are Guillermo Martínez Barros, Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni and José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante.

Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni, Guillermo Martínez Barros and José Alfonso Bustamante y Bustamante are independent under Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni is a financial expert in accordance with NYSE rules. Our audit committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. The audit committee is responsible for:

•

reviewing our financial statements;

•

evaluating our internal controls and procedures, and identifying deficiencies;

•

the appointment of our external auditors, determining their compensation, retention and oversight, and resolving any disagreement that may arise between management and our external auditors;

•

evaluating the Company’s compliance with the Board of Director’s internal regulation, as well as with general principles of corporate governance;

•

informing our board of directors regarding any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of the external auditors, or the performance of the internal audit function;

•

establishing procedures for the reception, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls or other auditing matters, including the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•

independently engaging its own counsel and any other advisers it deems necessary to fulfill its functions; and

190

•

establishing policies and procedures to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services.

Other Committees

Comprehensive Risk Management Committee and Risk Committee

At Interbank, the Integral Risk Management Committee is a corporate body created by resolution of the board of directors. It is responsible for approving the policies and organization of the comprehensive risk management system, as well as any amendments to said policies. The Integral Risk Management Committee defines the risk appetite and level of tolerance that each subsidiary is willing to take in its business and the actions needed to implement the required corrective measures necessary to maintain adequate levels of risk tolerance. The Integral Risk Management Committee is comprised of (i) five members of the board of directors (three of whom are independent directors), out of which three are titular directors and two are alternate directors; and, (ii) the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice-Presidents. The committee reports monthly to the board of directors the main issues it has discussed and the agreements adopted in the previous meeting.

In the case of Inteligo Bank, the Integral Risk Management Committee is comprised of at least two members of the board of directors, one of which must be independent (as defined pursuant to the Bahamian regulation), who will oversee the Committee. Other members are the Chief Executive Officer of the Panamanian Branch, the Finance Manager, the Legal Manager and the Corporate Risk Officer. The Committee reports quarterly to the board of directors the main issues it has discussed and the agreements adopted in the previous meeting.

Instead of an Integral Risk Management Committee, Interseguro has a Risk Committee, which is a corporate body created by resolution of the board of directors, and is responsible for defining risk limits for Interseguro’s business, approving risk policies and approving required corrective measures necessary to maintain adequate levels of risk tolerance. The Risk Committee is comprised of four board members, the Chief Executive Officer and the Risk Manager.

Finally, PMP has a Risk Management Committee comprised by three Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Executive Risks & Compliance Officer. This Risk Management Committee is responsible for the design, implementation and approval of policies and procedures for risk management, and the definition of PMP’s risk appetite, tolerance and exposure.

Assets and Liabilities Committee

The Assets and Liabilities Committee (the “ALCO”) is a corporate body created by resolution of the board of directors of Interbank and Inteligo. In the case of Interbank, the ALCO is comprised exclusively of officers.

At Interbank, the ALCO’s main purpose is to manage the structure of Interbank’s financial position considering its profitability and risk targets. The ALCO is also responsible for the proposition of new products or operations that contain components of market risk. Additionally, it serves as the communication channel with units that generate market risks. The ALCO meets monthly and is comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, the Vice Presidents of Risks, Retail Banking and Channels, Payments Ecosystem, Commercial, Finance and Capital Markets and the Manager of Treasury/Position Desk.

Inteligo Bank holds positions that are not actively traded, but are part of its assets and liabilities. These positions include a loan portfolio, customer deposits and bank loans. These positions are also exposed to interest rate risk, exchange rate risk and liquidity risk. The main purpose of the ALCO at Inteligo Bank is to manage its financial position, considering its profitability and risk targets. The ALCO meets quarterly and is comprised of at least two board members, one of whom must be independent (as defined pursuant to Bahamian regulations), the Chief Executive Officer of the Panamanian Branch, Finance Manager, Legal Manager and the Corporate Risk Officer.

At Interseguro, the functions of the ALCO committee are assumed by the Investment Committee.

Investment Committee

The Investment Committee is responsible for approving the limits of each security or real estate which could be included in Interseguro’s investment portfolio. This Committee is comprised of several members of the board, the Chief Executive Officer and the Investment-Vice President. The Risk Manager also participates as an advisor.

191

Inteligo Bank created an Investment Committee in 2017. The Investment Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the strategy of Inteligo Bank’s investment portfolio and approving new investment products. The Investment Committee meets quarterly and is comprised of one board member, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Panamanian Branch, the Chief Financial Officer and the Corporate Risk Officer.

Internal Audit

At our segments level, the Internal Audit Division reports to the board of directors at each subsidiary. It supports the Company in meeting its objectives through the application of a systemic and disciplined approach to assess and enhance the efficiency of its governance processes, risk management and control processes.

Employees

IFS

As of December 31, 2022, IFS had no employees. However, its operations are carried out by employees from its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Interbank

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 6,162 employees, 1,985 work in financial stores and 4,177 work at the headquarters and in operational centers of Interbank. Of the total employees, 3,110 are dedicated to sales force. We have been optimizing our distributional channels and have reduced full time employees at financial stores. Interbank’s employees are not unionized, are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement and since Interbank’s privatization in 1994, have never been involved in a strike or work stoppage.

Interseguro

As of December 31, 2022, Interseguro had a total of 921 employees, which included officers and administrative staff, as well as sales agents and representatives. Interseguro’s employees are not unionized, are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement and have never been involved in a strike or work stoppage.

Interseguro provides its employees with benefits that exceed the requirements of Peruvian labor laws, including school allowance, specialized training programs, general health base plan and oncology plan, each covered at 100%. Interseguro also provides wellness programs for its employees, as well as a full portfolio of development, family inclusion, and social programs.

Inteligo

As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo and its subsidiaries had 337 employees, which included officers and administrative staff, as well as commercial representatives. Inteligo’s senior management is located in Peru and Panama. Inteligo’s and its subsidiaries’ employees are not unionized, are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement and have never been involved in a strike or work stoppage.

PMP and Izipay

As of December 31, 2022, PMP had 667 employees, which included officers and administrative staff, as well as commercial representatives. PMP’s employees are not unionized, are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement and have never been involved in a strike or work stoppage.

While Izipay does not have any employees, it is provided with managerial services by PMP through an intercompany management services agreement entered into by PMP and Izipay. PMP´s and Izipay’s senior management are located in Peru.

E.	Share Ownership

Except as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major shareholders”, none of our directors or senior management beneficially owns our common shares other than two directors and two senior executives of IFS, who own a 0.05% interest in IFS.

We do not have any arrangements for involving employees in our capital, including any arrangements that involve the issue or grant of options of our shares or securities.

192

F.	Disclosure of a Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A.	Major Shareholders

Our only outstanding equity securities are our common shares. As of December 31, 2022, IFS had issued 115,447,705 common shares, of which 68,290,827 were registered in CAVALI and 47,156,878 were registered in DTC. As of December 31, 2022, 56,903 common shares registered in CAVALI were held by 16 U.S. citizens and/or residents in the United States.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of outstanding shares as of April 5, 2023 for the following:

•

each person or entity who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding shares capital or voting rights;

•

our directors and members of our executive management group, as a group.


	Common Shares Owned
Shareholders	Number of Shares		Percentage owned
Intercorp Perú Ltd.⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		81,532,547		70.6	%
Other Directors and Officers⁽³⁾		54,210		0.0	%
Float		33,860,948		29.3	%

Total		115,447,705		100.0	%

(1)

International Financial Holdings Group Inc. (“IFH”), representing 77.3% of the voting rights to appoint the majority of the members of the board of directors of Intercorp Peru, has entered into an irrevocable proxy agreement (the “Irrevocable Proxy Agreement”) appointing Carlos Tomás Rodriguez-Pastor Persivale and two members of his family (the “Agents”) as IFH’s agents, acting by majority vote, with respect to any matters relating to IFH’s ownership interest in Intercorp Peru. The initial period of the Irrevocable Proxy Agreement was two years commencing in June 2019 automatically renewable for six-month periods unless otherwise terminated upon 90 days’ notice. On May 20, 2021, the Irrevocable Proxy was renewed and ratified with effectiveness as of June 12, 2021 under the same terms originally agreed, including automatic renewals for six-month periods unless otherwise terminated upon 90 days’ notice. The renewed Irrevocable Proxy is valid for a two-year period counted from June 12, 2021. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, the Irrevocable Proxy Agreement had not been terminated.

(2)	IFH Capital Corp. and Intercorp Capital Investments Inc. are the record holders of 9,747,706 and 9,747,707, respectively, of our common shares, or 8.44% each, and are both wholly-owned subsidiaries of Intercorp Peru and therefore Intercorp Peru beneficially owns their shares.

(3)	Excluding Carlos Tomás Rodriguez-Pastor Persivale.

There have been no significant changes in the percentage ownership held by our major shareholders over the past three years.

As of December 31, 2022, IFS and its subsidiaries held 30,074 common shares in treasury stock. For more details regarding these shares, see “Item 16E – Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers” and Note 16(b) to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

B.	Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries, Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo and Izipay, engage in a variety of transactions among ourselves and with certain of our affiliates and related parties. All material transactions between us or our subsidiaries and our other affiliates or related parties are evaluated by our senior management and our board in accordance with specific regulations and internal rules applicable to all third-party transactions. These transactions are subject to prevailing market conditions and transfer pricing regulations.

Interbank extends loans to related parties, including its executive officers and directors and executive officers and directors of our affiliates, in accordance with Peruvian law and regulations established by the SBS. According to the SBS, loans to related parties cannot be made on more favorable terms than those offered to the public, with the exception of mortgage loans granted to workers for housing purposes. As a result, all related-party loans have been made in the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s-length basis and on substantially the same terms, including with respect to interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions offered to the public. In addition, related-party loans do not involve greater collection risk nor present

193

other features unfavorable to Interbank as compared to loans offered to the public. Peruvian law and SBS regulations also set forth limitations on the amount of credit loans that may be extended to related parties based on Article 201 and Article 202 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law. The law establishes that the total amount of loans to be extended to directors, employees and close relatives of any such persons may not exceed 7.0% of the bank’s regulatory capital. All loans extended to any director or employee of the company (including close relatives of such person) may not exceed 0.35% of the regulatory capital (i.e., 5.0% of the overall 7.0% limit discussed above).

In addition, under Article 202 of the Peruvian Banking and Insurance Law, no loans extended to related parties or affiliates may exceed 30.0% of a bank’s regulatory capital. Under these laws, related-party borrowers include any corporation holding, directly or indirectly, 4.0% or more of a bank’s shares, such bank’s directors, certain of its principal executive officers or other persons affiliated with such bank’s management or any individual or entity that is deemed to have a significant influence in its operations.

Peruvian regulations also set forth limits on the investments of insurance companies. Pursuant to SBS regulations, the aggregate amount of investments that Interseguro may have with any member of its economic group cannot exceed 7.0% of its technical obligations, being that any excess will be considered as non-eligible investment.

Furthermore, under Peruvian law, board members and executive officers of Interbank and Interseguro, may not (i) receive loans (in money or goods) from the company unless approved by the board of directors, (ii) use for their own benefit, the company’s assets, services or credits unless approved by the board of directors, (iii) disclose or use, inappropriately, for their own benefit, privileged information, and (iv) participate in any corporate decision that presents a conflict of interest with the company. In all cases, the execution of agreements that involve at least 5.0% of the assets of the company with persons or entities related to directors, managers or shareholders that own, directly or indirectly, more than 10.0% of the share capital requires the prior authorization of the board of directors (with no participation of the director(s) involved in the transaction, if any). In addition, the execution of agreements with a party controlled by the company’s controlling shareholder requires the prior authorization of the board of directors and an evaluation of the terms of the transaction by an external independent company (audit companies or other evaluator to be determined by the SMV).

During 2020, 2021 and 2022, IFS’s directors, officers and key management had been involved, directly and indirectly, in credit transactions with certain subsidiaries of IFS, as permitted by applicable Peruvian laws and regulations that regulate and limit certain transactions with employees, directors and officers of financial entities. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, direct loans by IFS or its subsidiaries to employees, directors, officers, and key management of IFS and its subsidiaries amounted to S/211.7 million, S/213.0 million and S/222.1 million, respectively. These loans are current and accrue interest at market rates. Payment dates vary, and may be monthly, quarterly, or at maturity. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation and Supervision” for information on the regulation of IFS and its subsidiaries and on the protection of deposits.

Inteligo Bank is operating pursuant to its original license, which commencing in 2020 permits a related party exposure of up to 15% of its capital, a decrease from the prior 25% maximum. As of December 31, 2022, the exposure was 10.82%.

For additional information about loans, including tabular disclosure, to, and certain other transactions with, related parties and affiliates including directors and officers, see Note 27 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

In the normal course of our operations, related party transactions are evaluated in accordance with Peruvian banking and securities regulations, as described in this section. These transactions are subject to prevailing market conditions and transfer pricing regulations. We and our subsidiaries have a number of such transactions with our parent company, subsidiaries of our parent company, affiliates pursuant to the criteria of the SBS and other related parties. See “Presentation of Financial Information” for a brief description of a number of these parties. For additional information including tabular disclosure, about loans, to, and certain other transactions with, related parties and affiliates including directors and officers, see Note 27 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements.

IFS

Bonds in InRetail Shopping Malls.

Since September 20, 2019, IFS holds S/39.0 million in bonds of InRetail Shopping Malls. The annual interest rate for these bonds is 7.88% and they mature on July 25, 2034.

194

Interbank

Lease Agreements between Interbank and Supermercados Peruanos, S.A. (“Supermercados Peruanos”)

During 2020, Interbank and Supermercados Peruanos entered into a lease agreement under which Supermercados Peruanos granted Interbank the right to use supermarket space for the operation of their stores (Money Markets format) and ATMs for a term of five years. Under the terms of such agreement, Supermercados Peruanos agreed to grant an area of 2,000 square meters of floor space for the first three years of the agreement and 1,800 square meters of floor space for the following two years.

In December 2021, an amendment to the agreement was entered into between the parties to reduce the rented area to 1,913.40 square meters of floor space during the period of January 2021 to September 2022, and to 1,713.40 square meters of floor space from October 2022 until the end of the agreement, which will take place on October 1, 2024.

The agreed monthly rent is as follows: (i) for stores located inside the premises (Money Markets format) the rent is S/288.38 per square meter plus taxes, (ii) for stores located outside the premises, the rent is S/191.87 per square meter plus taxes, (iii) for ATMs located inside the premises, the rent is S/2,091.11 plus taxes and, (iv) for ATMs located outside the premises, the rent is S/1,511.69 plus taxes.

In addition, Interbank has made a security deposit of US$0.9 million (approximately S/3.4 million), which shall be applied as a guarantee of payment of the monthly rent. Finally, Supermercados Peruanos has granted an exclusivity right to Interbank for the operation of stores (Money Market format) and for ATMs located inside the supermarket premises. As of December 31, 2022, Interbank was operating in 29 stores (Money Market format) and had 89 ATMs located inside the supermarket premises.

Loan Agreement between Interbank and GTP Inversionistas S.A.C.

In May 2017, Interbank and GTP Inversionistas S.A.C. an affiliate, pursuant to the criteria of the SBS, entered into a loan agreement under which Interbank disbursed to the latter U.S.$32.6 million for the indirect acquisition of 24.95% of the capital stock of Universidad Tecnológica del Perú S.A.C. (“UTP”). The loan was granted for a term of five years to be repaid in five annual payments with an effective annual interest rate of 7.875%. The collateral granted consisted on a pledge agreement of 24.95% of the capital stock of UTP. In May 2020, the loan agreement was amended, increasing the remaining term to seven years. As of December 31, 2022, the total outstanding debt under such loan agreements amounts to U.S.$19.1 million.

Lease Agreements with Supermercados Peruanos

Interbank and Supermercados Peruanos, a subsidiary of Intercorp, have entered into several lease agreements whereby Interbank leased real estate property, machinery and equipment to Supermercados Peruanos. These lease agreements are amended from time to time, most recently in March 2021. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding debt under such lease agreements amounts to S/85.1 million.

Loan Agreement with Supermercados Peruanos

On September 27, 2018, Interbank and Supermercados Peruanos entered into a medium-term loan agreement under which Interbank granted a loan for up to S/95 million to be paid in 28 installments at a monthly interest rate of 5.85%. In October 2019, the loan agreement was amended increasing its amount to S/198 million. In March 2021, the interest rate was reduced to 3.99% to be paid on a quarterly basis and the due date was extended to February 2026.

In September 2022, Interbank entered into a new medium-term loan agreement with Supermercados Peruanos under which Interbank granted a loan for up to S/ 100 million to be paid in 18 installments at an annual interest rate of 7.99%.

As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding debt under such loan agreements amounts to S/298.0 million.

In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the outstanding short-term debt of Supermercados Peruanos to Interbank amounts to S/38.2 million, including factoring and credit cards.

Lease Agreements with Homecenters Peruanos (“HPSA”)

Interbank and HPSA, a subsidiary of Intercorp, have entered into several lease agreements whereby Interbank leased machinery and equipment to HPSA. As of December 31, 2022, the total outstanding debt under such lease agreements amounts to S/46.9 million.

195

Loan Agreements with HPSA

In November 2019, Interbank and HPSA, a subsidiary of Intercorp, entered into a term loan agreement for S/25 million at annual interest rate of 5.30%. In September 2022, Interbank and HPSA entered into a new medium – term loan agreement for S/ 80 million at an annual interest rate of 8.55%. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding debt of HPSA under such loans amounts to S/92.1 million

In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the outstanding short-term debt of HPSA amounts to S/7.3 million, including factoring and credit cards.

Loan Agreement with InRetail Pharma

Interbank and InRetail Pharma, a subsidiary of Intercorp, have entered into a syndicated secured loan agreement for up to S/161.9 million due on April 2025. The collateral granted consisted of mortgage over real estate properties and guarantees (fianzas solidarias) granted by several of its subsidiaries. In May 2021, the loan agreement was refinanced by a new syndicated secured loan agreement for up to S/220 million due on March 2026. As of December 31, 2022, the total outstanding debt under such loan agreement amounts to S/220 million at an interest rate of 3.75%.

In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the outstanding short-term debt of InRetail Pharma amounts to S/52.7 million, including factoring, credit cards and working capital.

Loan Agreement with UTP

In September 2018, Interbank and UTP, a subsidiary of Intercorp, entered into a loan agreement under which Interbank disbursed to the latter S/80.0 million at an interest rate of 6.9%. The loan was granted for a term of seven years, which included a two year grace period. The collateral consisted of a mortgage over real estate properties and assignment of surface rights. In September 2020, as a result of the spin-off of UTP and IDAT, the loan was split and assigned as follows: S/62.0 million to UTP and S/18.0 million to IDAT. In April 2021, UTP’s loan agreement was amended in order to reduce the interest rate to 4.15% and to extend the term to six years, including one year of grace period, as of April 2021. As of December 31, 2022, the aggregate amount outstanding under the loan agreement with UTP amounted to S/51.0 million, excluding interest. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding amount under the loan agreement with IDAT amounted to S/14.8 million. The last installment of such loans will fall due in March 2027.

Loan Agreement with La Tinka

In December 2021, Interbank and La Tinka, a subsidiary of Intercorp, entered into a term loan agreement for up to S/66.5 million due on November 2023 to be paid in eight quarterly installments at a monthly interest rate of 4.88%. The proceeds of the loan were disbursed to repay La Tinka’s parent company’s, NG Entertainment, debt to Interbank. The collateral granted consisted of a mortgage over one real estate property. As of December 31, 2022, the aggregate amount outstanding under such loan agreement amounted to S/33.3 million, excluding interest.

Lease Agreement with Centros de Salud Peruanos

On December 2022 Interbank entered into several lease agreements with Centros de Salud Peruanos, a subsidiary of Intercorp Peru, by means of which Interbank leased machinery and equipment for the construction of a new clinic located in Cercado de Lima. As of December 31, 2022, the aggregated amount outstanding under such lease agreements amounted to S/58.1 million.

Interseguro

Agreements with Colegios Peruanos S.A. (“CPSA”)

In September 2016, Interseguro and CPSA, a subsidiary of Intercorp, signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 20 years, according to which Interseguro granted in usufruct the property located in Trujillo, Peru in favor of CPSA, in order for CPSA to operate a school under the commercial name of “Innova School”. Interseguro constructed the building in four stages all of which were completed in 2019. Currently, CPSA pays Interseguro a monthly rent which amounts to S/104,171 before taxes, adjusted annually by 3% plus 9.1% on the total investment accumulated on the date incurred by Interseguro on the property. Due to COVID-19, payment of the monthly rent for the period between March 2020 and June 2021 was renegotiated such that CPSA paid a percentage of the monthly amount, with the remaining balance for each such month to be paid in a period of 18 months.

196

In April 2022, as a consequence of the increased number of students registered in 2022, an addendum establishing that the amount of the rent would depend on the number of students was signed. The increase of students registered was 11.25% resulting in S/247,539 plus IGV. Considering that the amount of the rent is variable; the amount to be paid will be reviewed annually.

In October 2017, Interseguro and CPSA signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 25 years, according to which Interseguro leased the property located in Cusco, Peru, in order to operate a school under the commercial name of “Innova School”. Interseguro constructed the building, which was completed in January 2018. In April 2018, CPSA began paying Interseguro a monthly rent. The current rent amounts to S/180,690 before taxes, adjusted annually by 3% plus 9.3% on the total investment accumulated on the date incurred by Interseguro on the property. Due to COVID-19, in the period between March 2020 and June 2021, the payment of the monthly rent was renegotiated such that CPSA paid a percentage of the monthly amount, with the remaining balance for each such month in 2020 to be paid in a period of 18 months.

In April 2022 an addendum was signed through which it was established that the rent would depend on the number of students registered in 2022. The number of students increase 11.25%, resulting in S/429,381 plus IGV. It should be that the amount of the rent is variable; therefore, the amount to be paid will be reviewed annually.

In June 2008, Interseguro bought a certificate of participation in the trust Patrimonio en Fideicomiso D.S 093-2002-EF Interproperties Perú (“Interproperties”), which is managed by Internacional de Titulos Sociedad Titulizadora S.A. (“Intertitulos”), corresponding to a real estate project that was developed in a property located in Ate, Lima, Peru. Also, in October 2012, Interproperties and CPSA signed a surface right agreement, according to which Interproperties granted this property in surface right, in order to operate a school under the commercial name of “Innova Schools”. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding amount to be collected by Interseguro from CPSA increased to S/6.7 million.

Agreements with HPSA

In November 2012, HPSA, a subsidiary of Intercorp, and Hebraica Asociación Cultural Deportiva y Social (“Hebraica”) signed a surface right agreement according to which Hebraica granted a surface right in favor of HPSA over the commercial space with an area of 13,401.99 m², located in Ate, Lima. In October 2015, HPSA assigned its contractual position to Interseguro. In April 2016, Interseguro and HPSA entered into a 30-year usufruct agreement, according to which HPSA was granted in usufruct the property, in order to operate a home improvement store under the commercial name of “Promart”. The monthly lease payment under agreement since January 2017, is comprised of a payment of S/164,744 before taxes, adjusted annually by 3%, and the payment made by Interseguro to Hebraica for the surface right agreement that both parties signed in October 2015. The current monthly rent amounts to S/233,393 before taxes. In July 2022, Interseguro assigned its contractual rights in the surface right agreement to HPSA.

In July 2017, HPSA and Interseguro signed a surface right agreement and an usufruct agreement granting surface and usufruct rights to Interseguro over certain commercial space located in Ica, Perú. In July 2022, HPSA and Interseguro terminated the surface right agreement and the usufruct agreement.

In October 2015, Interseguro contributed in trust the property located in Talara, Piura, Peru in favor of Interproperties, which is managed by Intertitulos. Accordingly, Intertitulos issued in favor of Interseguro a certificate of participation representing 100% of the property ownership. In addition, in October 2015, Interproperties Perú and HPSA signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 30 years, according to which Interproperties granted in usufruct this property, in order to operate a home improvement store under the commercial name of “Promart”. As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of the property amounts to S/46.1 million. In February 2021, Interproperties returned the property in favor of Interseguro, cancelling the certificate of participation for the amount of S/40.2 million, which represented Interseguro’s contribution to the trust assets. The current monthly rent amounts to S/108.577 before taxes.

Agreements with UTP

In June 2018, Interseguro and UTP signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 30 years, according to which Interseguro granted in usufruct to UTP the property located in Ate, Lima, Peru, for it to operate a university campus under the commercial name of “UTP”. The annual rent is equivalent to 8.5% of the total investment before taxes which is adjusted annually according to CPI variation. This annual rent will be paid to Interseguro in four quarterly installments. Due to COVID-19, in 2020, payment of the monthly rent was renegotiated such that UTP will pay a percentage of the monthly amount, with the remaining balance for each such month in 2020 to be paid in a period of 12 months. In 2021, the outstanding balance of unpaid rent during 2020 was fully paid by UTP.

197

In November 2019, Interseguro and UTP signed an usufruct agreement for a period of 30 years, according to which Interseguro granted in usufruct to UTP the property located in Nuevo Chimbote, Ancash, Peru, for it to operate a university campus under the commercial name of “UTP”. Interseguro finished constructing the building in the last quarter of 2020, and commencing in 2021, UTP will pay an annual rent to Interseguro in four quarterly installments, ascending to S/1,019.626 before taxes, adjusted annually according to CPI variation.

In April 2020, Interseguro and UTP signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 30 years, pursuant to which Interseguro granted in usufruct to UTP the property located in Piura, Peru, for it to operate a university campus under the commercial name of “UTP”. Since March 2021, the UTP building in Piura (which is about 97% finished) has been operating. UTP agreed to pay to Interseguro a quarterly rent ascending to S/1,886.356 before taxes, adjusted annually according to CPI variation.

Agreements with Supermercados Peruanos

In October 2015, Interseguro contributed in trust the property located in Talara, Piura, Peru in favor of Interproperties, which is managed by Intertitulos. Accordingly, Intertitulos issued in favor of Interseguro a certificate of participation representing 100% of the property ownership. In addition, in January 2016, Interproperties and Supermercados Peruanos signed a usufruct agreement for a period of 30 years, according to which Interproperties granted in usufruct to Supermercados Peruanos this property of 5,573 m2, for it to operate a supermarket under the commercial name of “Plaza Vea”. As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of the property amounts to S/46.1 million. In February 2021, Interproperties returned the property in favor of Interseguro, cancelling the certificate of participation for the amount of S/40.2 million, which represented Interseguro’s contribution to the trust assets. The current monthly rent amounts to S/137,019 before taxes.

In July 2022, Supermercados Peruanos assigned its contractual position in the usufruct agreement in favor of its affiliated Compañia Food Retail S.A.C.

C.	Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A.	Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See “Item 17. Financial Statements.”

Legal Proceedings

IFS is not involved in any legal or arbitration proceedings which could have a material adverse effect on its financial position.

Interbank is involved in a number of legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its banking activities. Interbank is also a party to a number of legal proceedings related to labor disputes with former employees and tax disputes with the tax authority. For more information on the tax disputes, see Note 17 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Interseguro is routinely involved in legal or arbitration proceedings with respect to liabilities that are the subject of policy claims. These liabilities are taken into account in setting Interseguro’s technical reserves.

PMP and Izipay are involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of their business, however none of those are material.

Inteligo Bank is involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its banking operations.

The two main lawsuits that Inteligo Bank is a party to jointly seek the return of approximately U.S.$11 million in redemption payments received by Inteligo Bank in connection with investments in Fairfield, a Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) feeder fund, are the following:

•

A lawsuit filed on September 2, 2010 by the liquidators of Fairfield Sentry Limited (“Fairfield”), which has since been dismissed by the Bankruptcy Court. The Southern District Court of New York upheld the Bankruptcy Court’s dismissal of the liquidator’s complaint against Inteligo Bank and several other defendants. The liquidator appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and submitted its briefs on January 6, 2023. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has not ruled on the appeal.

198

•

A lawsuit filed on October 6, 2011 by Irving Picard, the Trustee for BLMIS. On December 9, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied Inteligo Bank’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On December 15, 2022, an amended version of its memorandum decision was issued rejecting the motion, consistent with the court’s prior rejections of similar motions made by other defendants. On February 10, 2023, Inteligo Bank filed its answer to the complaint, and expects to meet with the Trustee to address the discovery.

Dividends and Dividends Policy

We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us.

Our annual dividend is proposed by our board of directors and approved at our annual ordinary meeting of shareholders, in accordance with our dividend policy which for year 2022 consists of distributing to shareholders at least 20% of any profit earned for the relevant year, subject to regulatory capitalization requirements and our financial condition. Dividends are paid to shareholders who held common shares as of the record date preceding the date set for payment of the dividend. The shares go ex-dividend two business days prior to the record date. Dividends are declared and paid in U.S. dollars.

IFS’s ordinary dividends for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were U.S.$136.2 million (S/511.8 million), U.S.$202.0 million (S/751.5 million), and U.S.$88.9 million (S/332.1 million). Furthermore, in November 2021, IFS agreed to distribute U.S.$75.0 million in extraordinary dividends, which were paid in December 2021 and based on retained earnings. Dividends corresponding to fiscal year 2022 will be paid in May of 2023; while dividends for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 were paid in May of each of 2022 and 2021, respectively. Dividend per share amounted to U.S.$1.18, U.S.$1.75, and U.S.$0.77 for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Interbank

Interbank’s dividends are proposed annually by its board of directors and are subject to approval by the general shareholders’ meeting. On November 10, 2020, the shareholder’s meeting amended the dividend policy as follows: At least 20% of the distributable profits of Interbank recorded in the fiscal year will be distributed among the shareholders, provided that the following rules are observed: (a) the profit capitalization commitment agreements adopted by the general shareholders’ meeting or by the board of directors (as delegated by the shareholders’ meeting), are not affected, (b) both the legal requirements applicable to Interbank and its appetite for equity growth are satisfied, in accordance with the board of directors’ proposal, and (c) the board of directors deems such distribution to be advisable based on the economic and financial conditions of Interbank and the business environment. In accordance with the foregoing, if during any year any of the aforementioned rules is not satisfied, the general shareholders’ meeting may agree to distribute a lower percentage of dividends than indicated or decide not to distribute dividends for such year. Any dividends would be distributed within sixty calendar days following their declaration and approval at the general shareholders’ meeting. For the fiscal year ended 2022, Interbank declared as dividends approximately 56% of its distributable income (net income minus the required legal reserves which may be up to 10% of net profit). For the fiscal year ended 2021, Interbank declared and distributed as dividends approximately 56% of its distributable income (net income minus the required legal reserves which may be up to 10% of net profit). For the fiscal year ended 2020, Interbank did not distribute dividends as the general shareholders’ meeting agreed to capitalize all distributable income (net income minus the required legal reserves which may be up to 10% of net profit

Dividends are declared based on Interbank’s financial statements prepared under SBS GAAP. The following table shows Interbank’s distribution of net profit for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 under SBS GAAP.


	For the fiscal years ended December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

	(S/ in millions)
Net profit		1,171.7		1,200.5		264.9
Reserves		117.2		120.0		26.5
Capitalized earnings		468.7		480.2		238.4
Dividends		585.8		600.2		—

Interseguro

Interseguro’s dividends are proposed annually by its board of directors and are subject to approval by the general shareholders’ meeting. Current dividend policy establishes that Interseguro will pay as dividends at least 30% of its net profits attained in any given year. Dividend distributions depend on several factors, including (1) approval by Interseguro’s shareholders of the proposal to distribute dividends, (2) Interseguro’s earnings, (3) protection of Interseguro’s equity growth, (4) capital and legal reserve requirements, and (5) prevailing market conditions.

199

The following table shows Interseguro’s distribution of net profit for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 under SBS GAAP.


	For the fiscal years ended December 31,
	2022		2021		2020

	(S/ in millions)
Net profit		202.8		303.6		256.6
Reserves		—		17.5		22.0
Capitalized earnings⁽¹⁾		—		84.2		63.0
Dividends		100.0		201.9		200.0

(1)	Includes capitalization of earnings net of accumulated losses.

Inteligo

Inteligo Bank’s dividends are proposed annually by its board of directors and are subject to approval by the general shareholders’ meeting. Dividend distributions depend on several factors, including (1) approval by Inteligo’s shareholders of the proposal to distribute dividends, (2) Inteligo Bank’s earnings, (3) Inteligo Bank’s capital expenditure program, and (4) prevailing market conditions.

The following table shows Inteligo Bank’s distribution of net profit and dividends for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 under IFRS.


	For the fiscal years ended December 31,
	2022			2021		2020

	(S/ in millions)
Net profit		(135.8	)		277.6		250.2
Dividends		—			209.3		137.6

For additional information regarding risks that could materially adversely affect our ability to pay dividends, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—We are a holding company, and all of our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries. Our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common shares will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us”.

For additional information regarding taxation of dividends, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Peruvian Tax Considerations” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Distributions”.

PMP and Izipay

PMP’s and Izipay’s dividends are proposed annually by its board of directors and their management, respectively, and are subject to approval by their general shareholders’ meetings. Dividend distributions depend on several factors, including (1) approval of the proposal to distribute dividends by the shareholders of PMP and Izipay, respectively; (2) earnings; and (3) prevailing market conditions and equity growth. Neither PMP nor Izipay paid dividends in 2022.

200

B.	Significant Changes

No significant changes in our financial condition have occurred since the date of the most recent audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

A.	Offer and Listing Details

Our Shares

Our common shares are registered in the Public Registry of Securities held with the SMV and are listed on the Lima Stock Exchange and on the NYSE under the symbol “IFS”.

B.	Plan of Distribution

Not Applicable.

Markets

Trading in the Peruvian Securities Market

Lima Stock Exchange

As of December 31, 2022, there were 259 companies listed on the Lima Stock Exchange. Established in 1970, the Lima Stock Exchange is Peru’s only securities exchange.

Trading on the Lima Stock Exchange is primarily done on an electronic trading system that became operational in August 1995. From the first Sunday of November through the second Sunday of March of each year, trading hours are Monday through Friday (except holidays) as follows: 9:00 a.m.–9:30 a.m. (pre-market ordering); 9:30 a.m.–3:52 p.m. (trading); 3:52 p.m.–4:00 p.m. (after-market sales); and 4:02 p.m.–4:10 p.m. (after-market trading). At all other times, trading hours are from Monday to Friday (except holidays) as follows: 8:20 a.m.-8:30 a.m. (pre-market ordering); 8:30 a.m.–2:52 p.m. (trading); 2:52 p.m.–3:00 p.m. (after-market sales); and 3:02 p.m.–3:10 p.m. (after-market trading).

Substantially all of the transactions on the Lima Stock Exchange are traded on the electronic system. Transactions during the electronic sessions are executed through brokerage firms and stockbrokers on behalf of their clients. The orders must specify the type of security as well as the amount and price of the proposed sale or purchase. The exchange is authorized to halt the trading of certain securities or the whole market, under certain circumstances, for example, when a significant fluctuation occurs with the price of a security, without apparent justification. In this case, the exchange may impose a 15 minutes halt, which may be extended depending on the nature of the event.

Moreover, under the exchange’s market margin rule, when the market price for a particular security reaches a 15% variation (vis a vis the last closing price or proposal, whichever is higher), trading on that particular security is halted for the rest of the session. The exchange may exceptionally authorize further negotiation. The market margin rule is not applicable for securities cross-listed in certain markets, including the United States.

Certain information regarding trading on the Lima Stock Exchange is set forth in the table below:


	(S/ in millions)
	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022
Market capitalization⁽¹⁾		479,301		537,308		599,007		591,734		451,515
Volume		20,208		18,127		20,107		21,803		14,243
Average daily trading volume		81		72		79		87		56

Source: Bolsa de Valores de Lima Annual Reports

End-of-period figures for trading on the Lima Stock Exchange.

201

D.	Selling Shareholders

Not Applicable.

Dilution

Not Applicable.

F.	Expenses of the Issue

Not Applicable.

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.	Share Capital

As of December 31, 2022, our authorized capital consists of 150,000,000 common shares, and our issued capital stock consists of 115,447,705 outstanding common shares, with no par value. All of our common shares are fully paid and non-assessable. Non-residents of Panama may hold and vote shares.

B.	Memorandum and Articles of Association

The information under the heading “Description of Common Shares” except for the information under the subheading “—General;” in Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (333-232554) filed on July 15, 2019 is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no changes to the Company’s Articles, as reflected in the Company’s financial statements.

C.	Material Contracts

The following is a brief summary of our current material contracts. A copy of each of these contracts has been included as exhibit hereto. See “Item 19. Exhibits.”

Irrevocable Proxy Agreement

IFH, representing 77.3% of the voting rights to appoint the majority of the members of the board of directors of Intercorp Peru, has entered into an irrevocable proxy agreement on June 12, 2019 (the “Irrevocable Proxy Agreement”) appointing Carlos Tomás Rodriguez-Pastor Persivale and two members of his family (the “Agents”) as IFH’s agents, acting by majority vote, with respect to any matters relating to IFH’s ownership interest in Intercorp Peru. The initial period of the Irrevocable Proxy Agreement was two years commencing in June 2019 automatically renewable for six-month periods unless otherwise terminated upon 90 days’ notice. On May 20, 2021, the Irrevocable Proxy was renewed and ratified with effectiveness as of June 12, 2021 under the same terms originally agreed, including automatic renewals for six-month periods unless otherwise terminated upon 90 days’ notice. The renewed Irrevocable Proxy is valid for a two-year period counted from June 12, 2021. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, the Irrevocable Proxy Agreement had not been terminated. “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”

IFS Indenture

On October 19, 2017 we entered into an indenture among us, The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Luxembourg Branch, as Luxembourg transfer and paying agent in connection with the issuance of U.S.$300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2027. The use of proceeds was to fund the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Seguros Sura S.A. and Hipotecaria Sura Empresa Administradora Hipotecaria S.A. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

D.	Exchange Controls

The Peruvian sol is freely traded in the exchange market. Current Peruvian regulations on foreign investment allow foreign equity holders of Peruvian companies to receive and repatriate 100% of the cash dividends distributed by these companies, except for restrictions applicable to companies that have been convicted or have admitted to and/or acknowledged committing crimes against the Peruvian public administration or money laundering or committing equivalent crimes, as set forth in Law No. 30737 (A law that ensures the immediate payment of the compensation to the State in cases of corruption and other crimes), which restricts the transfer of both local and foreign currency abroad. Non-Peruvian equity holders are allowed to purchase foreign currency at free market currency rates through any member of the Peruvian banking system and transfer such foreign currency outside Peru without restriction. Peruvian law in the past, however, has imposed restrictions on the conversion of Peruvian currency and the transfer of funds abroad, and we cannot assure holders of our common shares that Peruvian law will continue to permit such payments, transfers, conversions

202

or remittances without restrictions. In addition, under Panamanian law, there are currently no exchange control restrictions imposed on payments made in U.S. dollars. There can be no assurance, however, that Peruvian and Panamanian laws will continue to permit such payments, transfers, conversions or remittances without restrictions.

Taxation

The following discussion summarizes the material Peruvian, U.S. federal and Panamanian income tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of our shares.

This discussion is not a comprehensive discussion of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase our shares and is not applicable to all categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules, and does not specifically address all of the Peruvian, U.S. federal and Panamanian income tax considerations applicable to any particular holder. It is based upon the tax laws of Peru, the United States and Panama as in effect on the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and to differing interpretations. Holders of our common shares are urged to consult its independent tax advisor about the particular Peruvian, U.S. federal and Panamanian income tax consequences to it of an investment in our shares.

Peruvian Tax Considerations

The following summary of certain Peruvian tax matters as in force on the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F describes the principal tax consequences of an investment in our common shares or the beneficial interest therein by non-Peruvian shareholders. This summary is not intended to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to make an investment in our common shares or the beneficial interest therein. In addition, it does not describe any tax consequences: (a) arising under the laws of any taxing jurisdiction other than Peru or (b) applicable to anyone different from a non-Peruvian shareholder.

For purposes of this section, “non-Peruvian shareholder” means either: (i) a legal entity which has neither been incorporated nor established in Peru, provided that it does not conduct any trade or business through a permanent establishment in Peru or holds our shares or the beneficial interest therein through a Peruvian branch or (ii) an individual who is not a Peruvian tax resident. For Peruvian tax purposes, an individual is deemed to be a Peruvian tax resident if such individual is (a) a Peruvian citizen who has a regular residence in Peru, or (b) a non-Peruvian citizen who has resided or remained in Peru for more than 183 calendar days during any 12-month period. Any change in the residency condition will be effective as of January 1 of the following calendar year in which such conditions are met.

The discussion in this summary is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used or relied upon by any person, for the purpose of avoiding Peruvian taxation, and was written to support the promotion or marketing of this offering. Holders of our common shares should consult an independent tax advisor with respect to the Peruvian tax consequences of participating.

Peruvian Income Tax

Payment of Dividends

Dividends paid by legal entities incorporated in Peru are subject to a Peruvian withholding tax at a 5% rate. Our Peruvian subsidiaries are required to act as withholding agents for any income tax due with respect to dividends on their shares. We have not agreed to assume the withholding payments nor pay additional amounts so that the non-Peruvian shareholder of our common shares or the beneficial interest therein receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions or withholdings been made.

We are a company incorporated under the laws of Panama, accordingly, dividends paid on our common shares will not be subject to a Peruvian withholding.

Sale of our common shares

As a general rule, under the current Peruvian income tax laws and regulations, proceeds received by a non-Peruvian shareholder on the sale, exchange or disposition of our common shares will not be subject to any Peruvian withholding or capital gains tax, since our common shares are deemed to be issued by a legal entity not incorporated in Peru.

203

However, capital gains accrued and received by a non-Peruvian shareholder on the sale, exchange or disposition of our common shares will be subject to Peruvian income tax at a 30% rate if such transaction consists of an indirect transfer of shares issued by a Peruvian entity (“Peruvian shares”). An indirect transfer of Peruvian shares takes place in the transfer of the shares of a non-Peruvian entity that owns, directly or indirectly, shares of a Peruvian company provided that the following conditions are met:

(i)

the fair market value of the Peruvian shares, whether owned directly or indirectly by the foreign parent company, is equal to 50% or more of the fair market value of the capital stock issued by the foreign parent entity at any time during the 12-month period prior to the transfer; and,

(ii)

in any 12-month period, 10% or more of the shares issued by the foreign parent company are transferred.

Applicable regulations provide specific rules to determine the fair market value and cost of the shares and the capital stock issued by the foreign parent entity.

There is a rebuttable presumption that both conditions are met if the foreign parent company whose shares are transferred resides in a low-tax, zero-tax or un-cooperative jurisdiction pursuant to Peruvian legislation.

An indirect transfer of Peruvian shares also takes place in the transfer of the shares of a non-Peruvian entity that owns, directly or indirectly, shares of a Peruvian company provided the aggregate amount of the Peruvian shares being indirectly transferred by the transferor and its related parties in any 12-month period reaches or exceeds 40,000 Tax Units (for fiscal year 2022, one Tax Unit equals S/4,600, and for fiscal year 2023, it is equal to S/4,950). This rule applies irrespective if conditions (i) and (ii) abovementioned are not met.

A 5% preferential rate would be applicable on capital gains if (i) such shares are registered with the SMV; and (ii) such sale is performed through trading sessions (rueda de bolsa) of the Lima Stock Exchange.

A further tax exemption would be applicable on capital gains obtained by individuals, either Peruvian or non Peruvian, during 2023 provided (i) such shares are registered with the SMV; (ii) such sale is performed through trading sessions (rueda de bolsa) of the Lima Stock Exchange, (iii) such shares have a stock market presence as of the transfer date (ensuring share liquidity and continuous price quotations); and (iv) the transferor and its related parties have not transferred 10% or more of the aggregate shares issued by the foreign parent company in any 12-month period. This tax exemption applies to all capital gains accrued and received during the year meeting conditions (i) to (iv) abovementioned, regardless of their connection to the transaction, but it is limited to an annual aggregate amount of 100 Tax Units (for fiscal year 2023, one Tax Unit equals S/4,950). Therefore, once the capital gains accrued and received during the year meeting conditions (i) to (iv) abovementioned exceed 100 Tax Units, the excess will be subject to the 5% preferential rate. Applicable regulations set forth how the 100 Tax Units available to the transferor are applied when having multiple sales during the year, either involving the same shares, other shares or even other securities. This tax exemption is set to expire on December 31, 2023.

Value added tax

Dividends resulting from the shares issued by our Peruvian subsidiaries are not subject to Peruvian Value Added Tax (Impuesto General a las Ventas, or “VAT”).

The sale, exchange or disposition of shares issued by our Peruvian subsidiaries is not subject to VAT.

Financial Transaction Tax

Deposits in and withdrawals from accounts held in Peruvian banks or other financial institutions, whether in soles or foreign currency, are levied with a financial transactions tax (“FTT”) at a 0.005% rate. Therefore, FTT will be levied on the price paid for and the dividends resulting from the shares issued by our Peruvian subsidiaries if deposited in or withdrawn from a Peruvian bank or other financial institution, as the case may be.

United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common shares. Except where otherwise noted, this discussion applies only to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of our common shares that hold such shares as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment). This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “U.S. Code”), its legislative history, existing final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and judicial decisions, all as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) and to different interpretations.

204

This discussion does not purport to address all U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular holder and holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their specific tax situations. The discussion does not address the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders subject to special tax rules, including, for example:

•

insurance companies;

•

tax-exempt organizations;

•

dealers in securities or currencies;

•

traders in securities that elect the mark to market method of accounting with respect to their securities holdings;

•

banks or other financial institutions;

•

partnerships or other pass-through entities or arrangements for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

•

U.S. Holders whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

•

real estate investment trusts or regulated investment companies;

•

persons that, directly or indirectly, hold 10% or more of our stock by vote or value;

•

U.S. expatriates; or

•

persons for whom the common shares may form part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction.

Further, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or alternative minimum tax consequences, or the Medicare tax on net investment income, or any state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of the common shares.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of the common shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

•

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

•

a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

•

an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

•

a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has a valid election in effect under current U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds the common shares, the tax treatment of the partnership and a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such partner or partnership should consult its own tax advisor as to its consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of the common shares.

Except where specifically described below, this discussion assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Please see the discussion under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies” below.

Distributions

Subject to the discussion below under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” distributions of cash or property (other than our common shares, if any, distributed pro rata to all of our shareholders) paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) with respect to our common shares, including the net amount of any tax withheld on the distribution, will be includible in gross income as ordinary dividend income on the date on which the U.S. Holder receives the distributions. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S.

205

federal income tax purposes, such excess amounts will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in our common shares and, thereafter, as capital gain. We do not intend to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Unless and until these calculations are made, distributions should be presumed to be taxable dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As used below, the term “dividend” means a distribution that constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A dividend paid in a non-U.S. currency will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day the dividend is received by the U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted to U.S. dollars. If a dividend paid in a non-U.S. currency is converted into U.S. dollars on the day the dividend is received by the U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder generally will not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. Any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend payment is included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder through the date such non-U.S. currency is converted into U.S. dollars (or otherwise disposed of) generally will be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of foreign currency exchange gain or loss, if any, with respect to non-U.S. currency received by the U.S. Holder which is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt.

Dividends paid to corporate U.S. Holders with respect to our common shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the U.S. Code. Dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. Holders with respect to the common shares will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at preferential rates if the dividends constitute “qualified dividend income” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Dividends paid on the common shares will be treated as qualified dividend income if (i) the common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, (ii) the U.S. Holder satisfies certain holding period and other requirements and (iii) we were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC.

Our common shares are listed on the NYSE, and therefore we expect that the common shares should qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.

Moreover, as discussed below under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” we believe that we will not be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2022 and current taxable years, and we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC in the future. However, there can be no assurance in this regard because the PFIC determination is made annually and is based on the portion of our assets (including goodwill) and income that is characterized as passive under the PFIC rules and our continued qualification for an exception to the PFIC rules for certain foreign banks and insurance companies.

Subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions under the U.S. Code (including a minimum holding period requirement), any non-U.S. income tax withheld from dividends may be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. Dividends paid on our common shares generally will constitute foreign source income, and for purposes of calculating the foreign tax

credit, as “passive category income,” for most U.S. Holders. Alternatively, a U.S. Holder may be able to deduct foreign income taxes paid with respect to dividends on our common shares against its taxable income, assuming such U.S. Holder does not take a credit for any foreign income taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year and certain other conditions are met. U.S. Holders should consult their own advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of our Common Shares

Subject to the discussion below under “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares generally will be capital gain or loss and generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if our common shares have been held for more than one year. The amount of gain or loss realized will be the difference between (i) the amount realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares over (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such common shares, in each case determined in U.S. dollars. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a common share generally will equal the cost of the common share to the U.S. Holder. Long-term capital gain realized by certain U.S. Holders (including individuals) generally is eligible for favorable rates of U.S. federal income tax. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations under the U.S. Code.

Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on such a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. If any non-U.S. income tax is withheld on such sale, exchange or other taxable disposition, a U.S. Holder may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit for such non-U.S. tax. However, pursuant to U.S. Treasury regulations that apply to taxes paid or accrued in taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021, any such Peruvian, Panamanian or other foreign income tax would generally not be eligible for a foreign tax

206

credit unless the U.S. Holder elects benefits under an applicable income tax treaty between the United States and the foreign country imposing the tax. Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may take a deduction for any otherwise creditable tax in computing taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, provided that the U.S. Holder elects to deduct all foreign taxes paid or accrued for the taxable year. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foreign tax credit limitation rules to their investment in, and disposition of, our common shares.

Passive Foreign Investment Companies

U.S. Holders should carefully consider the discussion below regarding our potential treatment as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

In general, if, during any taxable year of a non-U.S. corporation, 75% or more of the corporation’s gross income consists of certain types of “passive income,” or the average value during the taxable year of the “passive assets” of the corporation (generally, assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income) is 50% or more of the average value of all of its assets, the corporation will be classified as a PFIC under U.S. federal income tax law. Passive income for this purpose generally, among other things, includes interest, dividends, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. Certain exceptions are provided, however, for passive income derived in the conduct of an active business.

The PFIC provisions also contain a look-through rule under which a non-U.S. corporation shall be treated as if it received directly its proportionate share of the income and as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of any other corporation in which it owns at least 25% of the value of the stock. Under the look-through rule, we should be deemed to own a proportionate share of the assets and to have received a proportionate share of the income of our principal subsidiaries, including Interbank, Interseguro and Inteligo Bank, for purposes of the PFIC determination. As noted below, the assets and income of Interbank, Interseguro and Inteligo Bank are subject to special rules under the PFIC regime. Further, the PFIC test is performed on an annual basis and it is therefore possible that our PFIC status may change from year to year due to changes in income or asset composition.

Assets and Income of Interbank and Inteligo Bank under the PFIC Rules

The application of the PFIC rules to banks is unclear under present U.S. federal income tax law. Banks generally derive a substantial part of their income from assets that are interest-bearing or that otherwise could be considered passive assets under the PFIC rules. The IRS has issued a notice and has proposed U.S. Treasury regulations that exclude from passive income any income derived in the active conduct of a banking business by a qualifying foreign bank (the “active bank exception”). The IRS notice and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations have different requirements for qualifying as a foreign bank, and for determining the banking income that may be excluded from passive income under the active bank exception. Moreover, the proposed U.S. Treasury regulations have been outstanding since 1995 and may not be finalized in their current form. Our PFIC status may be impacted if and when these U.S. Treasury regulations are finalized.

Because final U.S. Treasury regulations have not been issued and because the notice and the proposed U.S. Treasury regulations are inconsistent in certain respects, Interbank’s, Inteligo Bank’s and (as a result) our status under the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty. While Interbank and Inteligo Bank conduct, and intend to continue to conduct, a significant banking business, there can be no assurance that they will satisfy the specific requirements for the active bank exception under either the IRS notice or the proposed U.S. Treasury regulations. It is therefore possible that a significant portion of the assets and income of Interbank or Inteligo Bank may be treated as passive.

Assets and Income of Interseguro under the PFIC Rules

While passive income generally includes interest, dividends, annuities and other investment income, the PFIC rules provide that income “derived in the active conduct of an insurance business by a qualifying insurance corporation” is not treated as passive income. A qualifying insurance corporation is a foreign corporation (i) which would be taxable as an insurance company if it were a U.S. corporation and (ii) the applicable insurance liabilities of which constitute more than 25% of its total assets, as determined for financial reporting purposes. Additionally, if a corporation meets the first prong of this test, but not the second, a U.S. Holder can still elect to treat the corporation as a qualifying insurance company if at least 10% of its assets are applicable insurance liabilities and it meets certain alternative facts and circumstances tests. Under these tests, the corporation must be predominantly engaged in an insurance business and the failure to meet the 25% test described above must be due solely to run-off related or rating-related circumstances involving such insurance business. Proposed U.S. Treasury regulations were issued in 2019 that provide guidance about the definitions of “active conduct” and “insurance business.” The proposed regulations were withdrawn in part and subsequent U.S. Treasury regulations were proposed in 2020 that provide explanation of the active insurance income exception as modified under changes to the U.S. Code as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. We expect, for purposes of the PFIC rules, that Interseguro will meet the requirements to be considered a qualifying insurance corporation. No assurance can be provided, however, that changes in Interseguro’s business operations or in the application of U.S. federal income tax law, including the finalization of the proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, will not affect the ability of Interseguro to qualify for the active insurance income exception.

207

Consequences of PFIC Status

Although the matter is not free from doubt, based on our current expectations regarding our subsidiaries meeting the PFIC exceptions discussed above, the value and nature of the assets of our subsidiaries, the sources and nature of the income of our subsidiaries, relevant market and shareholder data and our current business plans, we believe that we will not be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2022 and current taxable years and we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC in the future. If we are classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our common shares, such a U.S. Holder would be subject to special rules (and may be subject to increased tax liability) with respect to (a) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of our common shares, and (b) any “excess distribution” made by us to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distribution during a taxable year in which distributions to the U.S. Holder on our common shares exceed 125% of the average annual distributions the U.S. Holder received on the shares during the preceding three taxable years or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares). Under those rules, (a) the gain or excess distribution would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common shares, (b) the amount allocated to the taxable year in which the gain or excess distribution is realized and to taxable years before the first year in which we became a PFIC would be taxable as ordinary income, (c) the amount allocated to each prior year in which we were a PFIC would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and (d) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of U.S. federal income tax would be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each prior year in which we were a PFIC. In addition, in the event that we are classified as a PFIC, similar rules would apply to “excess distributions” or gains with respect to subsidiary PFICs held directly or indirectly by us (“Lower-tier PFICs”), even if the proceeds are not distributed to our shareholders. A U.S. Holder generally will be required to file IRS Form 8621 if it holds our common shares in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC.

A U.S. Holder may be able to mitigate these tax consequences by electing mark to market treatment for its common shares, provided the relevant shares constitute “marketable stock” as defined in U.S. Treasury regulations. Our shares will be “marketable stock” if they are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange or other market” within the meaning of the U.S. Treasury regulations. Our common shares are listed on the NYSE, and therefore we expect that our common shares should qualify as regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market. No assurance can be given, however, that our common shares will be considered regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market. A U.S. Holder electing the mark to market regime generally would, during any year in which we are treated as a PFIC, compute gain or loss at the end of such year as if the shares had been sold at fair value. Any gain recognized by the U.S. Holder under the mark to market election, including on an actual sale, would be treated as ordinary income, and the U.S. Holder would be allowed an ordinary deduction for any decrease in the value of shares as of the end of any taxable year and for any loss recognized on an actual sale, but only to the extent, in each case, of previously included mark to market income not offset by previously deducted decreases in value. Any loss on an actual sale of shares would be a capital loss to the extent in excess of previously included mark to market income not offset by previously deducted decreases in value. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in shares would increase or decrease by gain or loss taken into account under the mark to market regime.

A mark to market election under the PFIC rules applies to all future years of an electing U.S. Holder during which the shares are regularly traded on a qualifying exchange or other market, unless revoked with the IRS’s consent. A mark to market election under the PFIC rules with respect to shares would not apply to a Lower-tier PFIC, and a U.S. Holder would not be able to make such a mark to market election in respect of its indirect ownership interest in that Lower-tier PFIC. Consequently, U.S. Holders of shares could be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to income of the Lower-Tier PFIC the value of which already had been taken into account indirectly via mark to market adjustments.

A U.S. Holder may in certain circumstances mitigate the adverse tax consequences of the PFIC rules by filing an election to treat the PFIC as a qualified electing fund (“QEF”). However, in the event that we are or become a PFIC, we do not intend to comply with the reporting requirements necessary to permit U.S. Holders to elect to treat us as a QEF.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, our common shares that are paid to a U.S. Holder generally will be subject to the information reporting requirements of the U.S. Code and may be subject to backup withholding unless the U.S. Holder provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and makes any other required certification or otherwise establishes an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

208

In addition, U.S. Holders may be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including filing an IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with respect to the holding of certain foreign financial assets, including stock of foreign issuers, either directly or through certain foreign financial institutions, if the aggregate value of all such assets exceeds U.S.$50,000. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting rules to our common shares and the application of these reporting requirements to their particular situations.

FATCA Withholding Taxes

Pursuant to sections 1471 through 1474 of the U.S. Code (provisions commonly known as “FATCA”), a “foreign financial institution” may be required to withhold U.S. tax on certain “passthru payments” made on or after the date that is two years after the date of publication in the Federal Register of applicable final regulations defining foreign passthru payments to the extent such payments are treated as attributable to certain U.S. source payments. Holders should consult their own tax advisors on how these rules may apply to their investment in the common shares. In the event any withholding under FATCA is imposed with respect to any payments on the common shares, there will be no additional amounts payable to compensate for the withheld amount.

HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON SHARES SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON SHARES, INCLUDING, IN PARTICULAR, THE EFFECT OF ANY NON-U.S. STATE OR LOCAL TAX LAWS.

Panamanian Taxation

The following is a summary of the principal Panamanian income tax consequences resulting from the beneficial ownership and disposition of our common shares by certain persons. This summary is based on the Panamanian Tax Code of 1956, as amended, other applicable tax laws, decrees and regulations issued thereunder, and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof, and is subject to any changes in these or other laws, decrees, regulations and interpretations occurring after such date, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary is intended as a descriptive summary only and is not a complete analysis or listing of all potential Panamanian income tax consequences to purchasers of our common shares. The summary does not address the tax treatment of potential purchasers that may be subject to special income tax and withholding rules. The summary is not intended as tax advice to any particular person, nor does it purport to furnish information on the level of detail or with attention to a purchaser’s specific tax circumstances that would be provided by a purchaser’s own tax advisor. Holders of our common shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the precise Panamanian and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common shares.

Panamanian Income Tax Structure

Panama’s income tax regime is essentially territorial. Consequently, income tax is levied only upon income or gains derived from income deemed to arise from Panamanian sources, while income not deemed to be Panamanian source income is not subject to Panamanian income taxes.

Taxation of Dividends

In light of the above, dividend income is not subject to income tax in Panama if the profits to which the dividends relate are not Panamanian source income. Moreover, further distributions of dividend income received by the direct shareholders of a Panamanian company to such direct shareholders’ own shareholders are not subject to income tax in Panama. Accordingly, because we are a holding company that does not perform income generating activities in Panama and our income is generated exclusively from activities outside of Panama, dividend payments made with respect to our common shares would not be subject to income tax or withholding requirements in Panama.

The offering and sale of our common shares and the use of proceeds therefrom herein described will all take place outside of Panama, and we do not intend to place, invest or economically utilize in Panama the proceeds that we will receive upon the issuance and sale of our common shares, or to conduct business activities in Panama.

Taxation of Capital Gains

Under the tax principles set forth above, because we generate income only from foreign or non-Panamanian sources, any capital gains realized by a holder of our common shares on the sale or other disposition thereof will be exempt from income or capital gains tax in Panama.

Stamp and Other Taxes

Because we are a holding company that does not perform income generating activities in Panama and our income is generated exclusively from activities outside of Panama, our common shares, and any document containing an agreement providing for the sale or disposition thereof, are not subject to stamp, registration or similar taxes, unless the respective documents shall be used before the courts or administrative authorities of Panama, in which case the stamp tax shall be paid at that time at a rate of U.S.$0.10 for each U.S.$100.00 or fraction of U.S.$100.00 of the face value of the obligations stated therein.

209

In light of the above, there are no sales, transfer or inheritance taxes in Panama applicable to the sale or disposition of our common shares.

Foreign Investors

Because the gains realized on the sale and disposition of our common shares are not subject to income tax in Panama as indicated above, a person domiciled outside of Panama is not required to file an income tax return in Panama solely by reason of his or her purchase or ownership of our common shares.

F.	Dividends and Paying Agents

Not Applicable.

G.	Statement by Experts

Not Applicable.

H.	Documents on Display

The materials included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be downloaded at the SEC’s website: http://www.sec.gov. Additional reports and information about us can be downloaded at the SEC’s website.

I.	Subsidiary Information

Not Applicable.

J.	Annual Report to Security Holders

Not Applicable.

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For quantitative and qualitative information related to market risk, in addition to the information presented below, see Note 30.2 to our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

210

RISK MANAGEMENT

Our goal is to attain sustainable long-term growth, through a balance between risk policies and profitability. As a result, our senior management places great emphasis on risk management.

To manage the risks described below, we have a specialized risk management structure, measurement systems and mitigation and remediation processes in place for each of our business segments. We incorporate analytics into our decision-making process and make use of tools and methodologies that allow us to identify and manage risk efficiently.

Banking Segment

Main Types of Risks

The main types of risk inherent in Interbank’s businesses are credit, market, liquidity and operational risk.

•

Credit risk: probability of loss due to inability or lack of willingness to pay by debtors, counterparts or third parties bound by contractual obligations.

•

Market risk: probability of loss in positions on and off-balance sheets derived from variations in market conditions. It generally includes the following risk types: exchange rates, interest rates and prices.

•

Liquidity risk: potential inability to meet contractual and contingent obligations, both on- or off-balance sheet, as they come due.

•

Operational risk: probability of loss due to inadequate processes, personnel and information technology failures, or external events.

To manage the above risks, Interbank has a specialized risk management structure, measurement systems and mitigation and remediation processes. It uses different models and rating tools at the client or product level to manage risks. These tools measure and value the risk with a prospective vision, thus allowing the organization to make better risk decisions in the different stages or life cycle of each loan.

The risk management indicators are continuously reviewed and assessed to identify possible deviations in risk profile with respect to the established risk appetite and apply timely corrective actions as needed. This information is submitted to the Risk Management Committee monthly and to the board of directors periodically.

Credit Risk

The main risk Interbank must manage is credit risk. To mitigate exposure to credit risk and provide adequate risk coverage, Interbank has established the following measures, among others:

•

policies, procedures, methodologies, models, parameters and expert judgement to identify, measure, control and report credit risk;

•

review and assessment of credit risk through specialized units of risk screening, which are independent from Interbank’s Commercial Division, and which assess credit risk prior to loan approvals or prior to the acquisition of specific investments;

•

timely monitoring and tracking of credit risk and maintenance of pre-defined tolerance levels;

•

compliance with regulatory limits and establishment of internal limits to minimize exposure to debtors and counterparties, such as those related to sector concentration (for loans), by issuer, credit rating and liquidity;

•

procedures for the management of loan guarantees.

Interbank also uses different models and rating tools for each type of client and/or product. Interbank constantly monitors and reviews these tools to ensure that adequate levels of prediction and performance are maintained and if necessary, to adjust or take corrective measures.

211

Through its policies and procedures, Interbank establishes the patterns and mechanisms needed to prevent excessive risk concentration and maintain a diversified portfolio.

Interbank manages its credit risk by means of three main processes: underwriting, monitoring and recovery. These processes are applied accordingly in different business lines.

The underwriting process is fundamentally based on comprehensive knowledge of the client and their economic activity and evaluating their repayment capacity, solvency and credit history. This process uses risk management methodologies and tools, which measures and assesses the quality of the risk to be granted, based on models and automatic rating systems for the admission of credits.

The monitoring process is used for early detection of credit risk to identify clients with potential risks that would affect their ability to pay which can possibly impact the debtor’s credit development. This process uses an integrated system of alerts, which is used to determine whether immediate actions need to be taken.

Actions include preventative, corrective or follow-up measures. This process utilizes systems, models and guidelines to assess the evolution of the debtor’s detected risks and determine their management for standardization or collection.

The recovery process is carried out through a set of coordinated actions for the appropriate and timely recovery of the loans, which aim to minimize losses in exposures with a high credit risk.

Commercial Banking

The following table presents the approval levels required for commercial loan applications at Interbank.


Approval requirement	Amount	Executive required to be present at committee meeting	Minimum quorum
Interbank related companies credit committee	Any transaction with related companies	Two Directors	2

Director credit committee	According to business segment and statistical rating situation Corporate Banking	Two Directors	2

	-With updated statistical rating AAA-A greater than U.S.$50,000,000 BBB-B greater than U.S.$40,000,000 CCC-C greater than U.S.$30,000,000

	-Without statistical rating updated Greater than U.S.$30,000,000 Medium-sized Banking, Institutional Banking and Real Estate Business Greater than U.S.$30,000,000

Central credit committee	According to business segment and statistical rating situation Corporate Banking	CEO or VP of Payments, VP of Risk Management, and Other VP.	3

	-With statistical rating updated AAA-A up to

	U.S.$50,000,000 BBB-B up to U.S.$40,000,000 CCC-C up to U.S.$30,000,000

	-Without statistical rating updated Up to

	U.S.$30,000,000

212


Approval requirement	Amount	Executive required to be present at committee meeting	Minimum quorum

	Medium-sized Banking, Institutional Banking and Real Estate Business Up to U.S.$30,000,000

Executive credit committee	According to business segment and statistical rating situation Corporate Banking	VP of Risk Management, VP Business and Other VP	3

	-With statistical rating updated AAA-A: up to U.S.$25,000,000 BBB-B up to U.S.$20,000,000

	CCC-C up to U.S.$15,000,000

	-Without statistical rating updated Up to U.S.$15,000,000

	Medium-sized Banking, Institutional Banking and Real Estate Business Up to U.S.$15,000,000

Credit approval is determined by the applicant’s repayment ability, which is defined primarily by their cash flow and credit history. The decision whether or not to approve an extension of credit takes into account the applicant’s economic environment, its ability to meet its obligations, collateral, management and the credit ratings assigned to the applicant by other companies of the financial system.

To rate credit risk within the commercial portfolio, Interbank uses a credit risk management system, the Statistical Rating System. This system measures credit risk by classifying companies based on their expected default probability, without considering the facility’s amount, loan conditions or collateral. The Statistical Rating System is supported by a statistical model that predicts default probability from historical default data, based on the company’s qualitative information, financial performance and internal and external credit behavior. Currently, the system is designed to rate companies from our commercial banking business line with at least S/3.0 million in annual sales.

For government entities or project finance, Interbank uses the Weighted Rating System. This methodology considers six different areas: (1) product, demand and industry; (2) shareholders and management; (3) access to credit; (4) profitability; (5) generation of resources; and (6) solvency. The final rating is the weighted sum of these areas.

In the case of financial institutions, Interbank uses an Expert Judgment Analysis Methodology. This methodology considers aspects such as shareholders, management, profitability, solvency, risk rating information, etc.

The Watchlist System monitors clients that have risk potential that needs to be addressed. Based on internal and external alerts, historical financial data and client behavior and market conditions, clients are classified into one of four categories: (1) surveillance; (2) guarantee (increase collateral), (3) reduce exposure and (4) exit or collect.

The Non-Performing Assets Monitoring System monitors the status of non-performing loans and defines categories and related strategies. This system allows Interbank to evaluate which companies are overdue and are struggling to pay their loans and focus recovery efforts on those loans. The recovery portfolio is divided into rescheduled and refinanced credit, judicial recoveries and restructured credit.

Credit risk management includes strategies related to proper recovery of defaulted loans. Depending on whether the recovery strategy is based upon the client’s cash flow or collateral foreclosure, loans are assigned to the recovery division. This division has two units, special credit and judicial recovery. Judicial recovery may include the sale of recovered or foreclosed assets, which are managed by the asset sales unit that oversees selling these assets.

213

Small Business Banking

The following table presents the approval levels required for small business banking loan applications by principal amount in U.S. dollars.


Approval levels	Amount⁽¹⁾
Vice President of Risk Management	Over U.S.$	268,500
Risk Manager	Up to U.S.$	268,500
Risk Assistant Manager	Up to U.S.$	157,400
Zonal Risk Officer	Up to U.S.$	91,800
Master Risk Analyst	Up to U.S.$	52,500
Senior Risk Analyst	Up to U.S.$	39,400
Risk Analyst	Up to U.S.$	12,600

(1)	Amounts stated in U.S. dollars as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 have been translated from soles at the exchange rate of S/3.814 = U.S. $1.00.

In small business banking, credit approval is determined by the applicant’s credit history and repayment ability, which is in turn determined primarily by the applicant’s cash flow and credit history. Approvals of loans depend on the applicant’s economic conditions, its ability to meet its obligations, collateral, management and the credit ratings assigned by a scoring system applied to new and current clients.

An independent unit is responsible for ensuring proper compliance with risk policies, the methodologies applied in the evaluation of creditors and the performance of scoring models and ensuring that the quality of the portfolio does not exceed risk limits.

Interbank has developed specific risk management tools to respond efficiently to new schemes and constraints that arise in the market for small business banking. Interbank refers to these tools as the Small Business Banking Management and Monitoring Process, which consist of:

•

Scoring Small Banking Enterprises: is an analysis tool in the credit evaluation process aimed at reducing risk rates and process times and assigning a score to the credit proposal evaluated.

•

Indebted Customers Methodology Small Business Banking: identifies customers who have high leverage exposure.

•

Field Audit and Monitoring: is used to assess quality by selecting samples of credit loans granted and poor performing portfolios and reviewing supporting documentation, with a final risk report presentation.

During collection of early stage (1-90 days), Interbank uses collection scores that allow Interbank to define the collection strategy: phone collection, text message collection, mail or personal collection.

Recovery in small business banking occurs in two phases. Early collection is based on and supported by admission risk officers for the first 90 days. During this time, a customer in default is contacted and recovery efforts are made in the form of letters, telephone calls and direct negotiations. After the first 90 days, the defaulted loan is transferred to the Recovery Unit.

Retail Banking

The following table presents the approval levels required for retail loan applications by principal amount in U.S. dollars. Approval levels also vary according to product.

214


	Credit Card		Cash Credit		Pay-roll Loans		Loans for Diplomats		With Collateral		Automobile		Mortgage

	Amount
Approval Levels⁽¹⁾		Greater than		Greater than		Greater than		Greater than		Greater than		Greater than		Greater than
Vice President Risk Management		34,100		78,700		78,700		—		393,300		70,000		800,000
Central Manager		34,100		78,700		78,700		—		393,300		70,000		800,000
Risk Manager		26,200		65,500		65,500		39,300		262,200		60,000		700,000
Risk Assistant Manager		19,700		52,400		52,400		23,600		196,600		50,000		550,000
Risk Officer		15,700		47,200		47,200		23,600		131,100		40,000		350,000
Senior Risk Analyst		11,800		31,500		31,500		15,700		104,900		30,000		250,000
Risk Analyst		6,800		21,000		21,000		7,900		52,400		25,000		150,000
Junior Risk Analyst		3,100		13,100		13,100		5,200		26,200		16,000		100,000

(1)	Amounts stated in U.S. dollars as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 have been translated from soles at the exchange rate of S/3.814= U.S.$1.00.

The approval process in retail banking is supported by world class tools, a workflow that includes a parameterized decision-making system, including risk policies and limits, as well as statistical models for all main retail banking products: credit cards, payroll deduction loans, mortgages and consumer loans.

In retail banking, credit approval is determined by the applicant’s repayment ability, credit history and risk profile. An independent unit is responsible for monitoring the performance of the customer’s portfolio, identifying and controlling risk across the customer’s life cycle, keeping track of the performance of credit policies at origination and monitoring behavior in customer management and collections. For this purpose, Interbank uses data mining and cluster analysis, stress testing for likelihood of defaults, vintage and roll rate analysis and credit risk scoring.

During collection of early stage (1-90 days) due loans in retail banking, Interbank uses collection scores that allow it to choose the appropriate collection strategy: phone collection, text message collection, chatbot, mail or personal collection.

Unpaid debts with a 90 day stay are deemed defaulted loans. Depending on whether the recovery strategy is based on the client’s cash flow or collateral foreclosure, loans are assigned to Interbank’s recovery division. The recovery division has two units, pre-judicial and judicial stage of recovery. During the judicial stage of recovery, accounts are assigned to recovery attorneys. Recovery may include the sale of foreclosed assets.

Defaulted loans that are 100% accounted for under loan loss reserves are written-off and managed through external judicial recovery.

Collections and recoveries are undertaken through advanced collection systems from world class suppliers and predictive dialers. The recovery portfolio is segmented into various groups that are divided according to the specific phase of the recovery process. Collections and recovery efforts are made by letters, SMS text messages, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), telephone and personal contact with the customer.

Market Risk

Market risk is the probability of loss due to variations in financial market conditions. The main variations to which Interbank is exposed are: (i) exchange rates, (ii) interest rates and, (iii) prices. Said variations can affect the value of financial assets and liabilities. As part of the risk management system, in certain circumstances Interbank uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate the risk exposure which arises from the variations in interest rates and exchange rates.

Exchange Rate

Management sets limits on exposure levels by currency and monitors them on a daily basis. Transactions in foreign currency are accounted for by using exchange rates prevailing on the market.

215

Interbank manages exchange rates by matching its assets and liabilities, overseeing the global exchange position daily. Interbank’s global foreign exchange position is equivalent to the result of long positions minus short positions in currencies different from the sol. The global foreign exchange position includes spot positions and derivative positions.

Interest Rate

Interest rates continuously fluctuate on the market. These fluctuations affect Interbank in two ways: first, through the change in the valuation of assets and liabilities; and second, though cash flows at repricing. The variation in the valuation of assets and liabilities is increasingly sensitive as the term at which the asset or liability repricing increases. This process consists of the assessment of the repricing periods. On the other side, cash flows are affected when the instruments reach maturity, given that they are invested or placed at the new market interest rates.

The interest rate risk tracking is reported to the Integral Risk Management Committee, as well as the ALCO. The Integral Risk Management Committee approves the various limits applicable to the management of financial instruments. The tracking process is performed by the Division of Market Risk.

Repricing Gap


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2022
	1 - Month			1 - 3 Months			3 Months - 1 Year			1 Year - 3 Years			3 Years - 5 Years		Over 5 Years		Past-due loans / Equities		Banking

	(S/ in millions)
Assets
Cash due from banks		7,393.3			—			—			—			—		—		—		7,393.3
Inter-bank funds		296.1			—			—			—			—		—		—		296.1
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		614.2			1,112.5			106.8			1,020.8			1,956.4		1,445.2		4.2		6,260.1
Investments at amortized cost		—			71.6			494.49			640.3			443.8		1,652.2		—		3,302.8
Loans, net of unearned income		4,473.4			5,415.6			9,150.7			12,110.5			6,681.7		6,434.6		1,486.5		45,752.9
Other assets		237.3			4.3			16.7			22.1			—		—		—		280.4

Total		13,014.3			6,604.1			9,769.1			13,793.6			9,081.9		9,532.0		1,490.7		63,285.6

Deposits and obligations		30,550.8			1,379.2			4,494.6			899.0			70.1		323.5		—		37,717.3
Inter-bank funds		30.0			—			—			—			—		—		—		30.0
Due to banks and correspondents		303.7			1,237.9			1,011.5			2,725.7			289.6		1,158.3		—		6,726.6
Bonds, notes and other obligations		2,532.6			—			224.9			2,288.4			1,525.6		—		—		6,571.5
Other liabilities		15.1			12.5			56.9			63.8			22.2		5.8		—		176.2

Total		33,432.2			2,629.6			5,787.9			5,976.9			1,907.5		1,487.5		—		51,221.6

Marginal gap		(20,417.9	)		3,974.5			3,981.1			7,816.7			7,174.4		8,044.5		1,490.7		12,064.0
Accumulated gap		(20,417.9	)		(16,443.4	)		(12,462.3	)		(4,645.6	)		2,528.9		10,573.3		12,064.0		—

An analysis of repricing gaps is performed to determine the impact of interest rate movements on the valuation of assets and liabilities into different time gaps.

The following tables summarize Interbank’s exposure to interest rate risks. Financial instruments are presented at book value, classified by the period of the contract’s interest rate repricing or maturity date, whichever occurs first:

216


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2021
	1 - Month			1 - 3 Months			3 Months - 1 Year			1 Year - 3 Years			3 Years - 5 Years		Over 5 Years		Past-due loans / Equities		Banking

	(S/ in millions)
Assets
Cash due from banks		10,626.4			419.4			13.2			—			—		—		—		11,059.0
Inter-bank funds		30.0			—			—			—			—		—		—		30.0
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		689.1			1,011.6			214.2			966.7			2,349.0		1,497.5		4.7		6,732.8
Investments at amortized cost		—			70.9			—			1,143.4			456.8		1,625.0		—		3,296.0
Loans, net of unearned income		2,927.0			5,706.3			9,354.0			11,688.1			6,351.6		5,739.1		1,603.3		43,369.5
Other assets		52.0			68.5			24.7			347.5			—		—		—		492.7

Total		14,324.5			7,276.7			9,606.2			14,145.7			9,157.3		8,861,6		1,608.0		64,980.0

Deposits and obligations		33,088.1			1,822.0			2,380.8			223.7			42.7		261.3		—		37,818.6
Inter-bank funds		—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—
Due to banks and correspondents		177.6			685.2			1,795.3			4,009.6			479.0		966.0		—		8,112.7
Bonds, notes and other obligations		213.4			23.9			155.3			3,455.0			3,091.5		—		—		6,939.0
Other liabilities		59.5			77.9			63.4			70.4			31.9		14.2		—		317.2

Total		33,538.6			2,609.0			4,394.7			7,758.7			3,645.1		1,241.4		—		53,187.5

Marginal gap		(19,214.0	)		4,667.7			5,211.4			6,387.1			5,512.3		7,620.1		1,608.0		11,792.5
Accumulated gap		(19,214.0	)		(14,546.4	)		(9,334.9	)		(2,947.9	)		2,564.4		10,184.5		11,792.5		—

Interbank separates exposures to market risk into two blocks: (i) trading book, which comprises positions in liquid investments, and (ii) banking book, which comprises banking assets and liabilities inherent to the intermediation business whose market risk exposure stems from the changes in the portfolio’s structural positions.

Trading Book

To control and monitor the risks arising from the volatility of risk factors, Interbank has established maximum exposure limits by currency, investment type, Value-at-Risk (VaR) and tolerance to expected maximum loss (Stop Loss), which are monitored on a daily basis. Likewise, reports from the Integral Risk Management Committee and the ALCO are submitted regularly to Interbank’s board of directors.

The validity of VaR calculation is proven through a back-testing proof, which uses historical data to ensure that the model adequately estimates potential losses. Additionally, it calculates risk factor sensitivity, which shows potential portfolio losses resulting from interest rate shocks, exchange rate shocks and price shocks, among others.

As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Interbank’s VaR calculated for its trading book, classified by type of risk, was as follows:


	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)									Dec 22 / Dec 21			Dec 21 / Dec 20
By type of risk
Exchange rate		1.2			1.5			3.3			(0.3	)		(1.8	)
Interest rate		1.7			9.9			0.4			(8.2	)		9.6
Price		—			—			—			—			—
Diversification effect		(0.9	)		(0.8	)		(0.2	)		(0.0	)		(0.6	)

Total		2.0			10.6			3.4			(8.6	)		7.2

Interbank’s VaR decreased from S/10.6 million as of December 31, 2021 to S/2.0 million as of December 31, 2022, mainly due to a reduction in volumes of derivatives along with the change from the LIBOR reference rate to the SOFR reference rate.

217

Interbank’s VaR increased from S/3.4 million as of December 31, 2020 to S/10.6 million as of December 31, 2021, mainly due to higher interest rate volatility due to the continued political instability in the country.

For the periods presented Interbank did not have back-testing exceptions.

Banking Book

Interbank also holds positions that are not actively traded. These positions include all loan placements and funds raised through Interbank’s intermediation business, as well as certain investments that are not deemed trading.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Foreign exchange rate risk is the risk due to exchange rates movements. Management sets limits on exposure levels by currency and monitors them on a daily basis. Transactions in foreign currency are accounted for by using exchange rates prevailing on the market.

Interbank manages exchange rate risk by matching its assets and liabilities, overseeing the global exchange position on a daily basis. Interbank’s global foreign exchange position is equivalent to the result of long positions minus short positions in currencies different from the sol. The global foreign exchange position includes spot positions and derivative positions.

Liquidity Risk

Interbank’s liquidity risk arises from the potential inability to comply with financial obligations. This risk may arise as a result of diverse events such as the unexpected loss of funding sources or the inability to rapidly settle assets, among others.

Interbank takes short-term deposits and transforms them into longer-term loans, which also increases its exposure to liquidity risk. Interbank keeps a set of deposits that historically represent a stable funding source.

Interbank’s liquidity is managed by the Vice President of Capital Markets, which leads the ALCO. Liquidity risk is overseen by the Integral Risk Management Committee, which defines the risk level that Interbank is willing to take and reviews the corresponding indicators, limits and controls.

Interbank has a set of indicators that establish minimum short-term liquidity and reflect several risk aspects, such as concentration, stability, position by currency, main depositors, etc. The Market Risk Division is responsible for tracking such indicators.

Interbank also assesses medium-term and long-term liquidity through a structural analysis of its funds inflows and outflows on diverse maturity terms. This process allows it to identify, for each currency, the funding sources, how liquidity needs increase and which terms are mismatched. For both assets and liabilities, Interbank makes assumptions for operations without specific maturity dates, including revolving loans and savings. These assumptions also include the estimated obligations arising from contingent liabilities such as guarantee letters or non-used credit lines. Based on this information, necessary actions are taken to maintain the target liquidity levels.

Operational Risk

•

1st line: comprises the business and support units, which perform operations directly and are responsible for the operational risks.

•

2nd line: comprises the units of risks, Fraud Prevention, Cybersecurity, the Portal for Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention (“PLAFT” by its Spanish acronym), among others, which provide for the methodological support for risk management.

•

3rd line: comprises the Internal Audit unit, which conducts an independent review on the operational risk management.

The management of operational risk by Interbank has the following objectives:

•

to manage risk according to the defined levels of appetite and tolerance;

218

•

to reduce the level of operational losses;

•

to monitor, measure and report the main risks identified to their respective units;

•

to promote the development and innovation of new products and processes in accordance with the aforementioned objectives; and

•

to maintain an optimal level of readiness in case of any interrupting event that may weaken Interbank’s operations, as well as improve its recovery abilities.

The management of operational risk by Interbank uses the Basel standards as base, and it is constantly being transformed to support Interbank in its process of digital transformation in a manner that is sustainable, streamlined, and straightforward.

Insurance Segment

Interseguro has the following risk management objectives:

•

protect shareholder value by monitoring that exposure to probable losses does not exceed approved limits;

•

protect policyholders so that their rights will not be affected by losses that exceed the value of Interseguro’s equity;

•

support the decision making processes in Interseguro, by providing consistent, reliable and timely risk information; and

•

promote a successful company culture of risk awareness and informed risk-taking.

To this end, Interseguro uses tools and methodologies to identify and manage risk efficiently, incorporating analytics into its decision-making process.

Main Types of Risks

The main risks faced by Interseguro are insurance risk, credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, real estate risk and operational risk. Other risks include interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.

Insurance Risk

As an insurance company, Interseguro is exposed to the risk that the assumptions it employs to price a particular insurance policy, such as the frequency of losses or the severity of losses may be incorrect. Flaws in these assumptions may lead to premium mispricing and the miscalculation of the amount of funds necessary to cover such insurance policy. Particularly, upon the sale of an annuity, Interseguro records a reserve that is calculated on the basis of a market discount rate and mortality data.

Credit Risk

Interseguro holds a large portfolio of debt investments and fixed income securities and is therefore exposed to the risk that the issuer may default on its interest or principal payments. This risk is mitigated through a three step process. Initially, regulations established by the SBS (1) limit the types of investments Interseguro can make, (2) set minimum credit ratings that securities must have, and (3) limit Interseguro’s investments with respect to a single issuer. Secondly, Interseguro performs a careful analysis on the securities it purchases. Finally, Interseguro’s investment committee, which is comprised of both internal and independent members of its board of directors, is responsible for approving any new investment and periodically reviews Interseguro’s investment portfolio.

Market Risk

Interseguro is exposed to the risk that the value of its investments decreases due to changing market conditions. Market risk drivers include equity prices, interest rates and real estate prices. Interseguro manages this risk by setting limits on individual issuer concentration, on type and liquidity of assets and on deviations from the terms of the technical liabilities they should cover. The risk management unit regularly assesses market risk to verify its alignment to Interseguro’s risk appetite. This assessment includes VaR analysis, contribution and sensitivity analysis of each risk driver and stress tests in different extreme scenarios.

219

The VaR analysis is a statistical measurement that quantifies the maximum loss expected for the investment portfolio for a period of time and a determined significance level under normal market conditions. For VaR calculation Interseguro uses a historical simulation model, with a 10-day period of time and a 99% significance level. The VaR is calculated for the entire market portfolio, and for market risk factors, such as interest rate, equity price and foreign exchange.

The validity of the VaR calculation is proven through back-testing, which uses historical data to ensure that the model adequately estimates the potential losses. Additionally, Interseguro employs sensitivity analysis to show potential portfolio losses derived from price, foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations.

As of December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Interseguro’s VaR calculated for its investment portfolio, classified by type of risk, was as follows:


	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020			Change

	(S/ in millions)									Dec 22 / Dec 21			Dec 21 / Dec 20
By type of risk
Exchange rate		6.2			11.3			14.0			(5.1	)		(2.7	)
Interest rate		534.4			633.7			1,123.0			(99.3	)		(489.3	)
Price		28.9			56.2			32.6			(27.4	)		23.7
Diversification effect		(29.1	)		(48.3	)		(456.9	)		19.1			408.6

Total		540.3			652.9			712.7			(112.7	)		(59.7	)

Between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the value of Interseguro’s investment portfolio in financial instruments decreased by more than S/656.3 million, which also led to a decrease in exposure to market risk represented by the VaR, principally in interest rate risk and price risk.

Between December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021, the value of Interseguro’s investment portfolio in financial instruments decreased by more than S/943.6 million, which also led to a decrease in exposure to market risk represented by the VaR, principally in interest rate risk.

For the periods presented Interseguro did not have back-testing exceptions.

Interest Rate Risk

The following tables set forth all the assets and liabilities that are sensitive to interest rate movements.

In addition to fixed income investments, Interseguro has almost no interest-bearing assets or liabilities. Consequently, the interest rate risk of Interseguro is already incorporated into the market risk of the portfolio.

220


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2022
	1 - Month		1-3 Months			3 Months - 1 Year			1 Year– 3 Years			3 Years – 5 Years			Over 5 Years		Past-due loans / Equities		Insurance
	(S/ in millions)
Interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		488.0		—			—			—			—			22.1		—		510.1
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.		24.7		17.2			167.2			463.6			591.4			9,279.1		492.4		11,035.6
Other assets		34.6		90.7			44.6			14.3			37.2			28.7		—		250.0

Total interest earning assets		547.4		107.8			211.8			477.9			628.6			9,329.9		492.4		11,795.7

Interest bearing liabilities
Due to banks and correspondents		308.2		—			—			—			—			—		—		308.2
Bonds, notes and other obligations		—		3.6			—			—			—			—		—		251.5
Insurance contract liabilities		106.3		208.3			932.9			—			4,417.1			4,798.9		—		10,463.6
Other liabilities		67.9		40.3			19.4			3.5			—			—		—		131.2

Total interest bearing liabilities		482.4		252.2			952.4			3.5			4,417.1			5,046.8		—		11,154.5

Marginal gap		64.9		(144.4	)		(740.6	)		474.4			(3,788.5	)		4,283.0		492.4		641.2
Accumulated gap		64.9		(79.5	)		(820.0	)		(345.7	)		(4,134.2	)		148.8		641.2		—


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2021
	1 - Month			1-3 Months		3 Months - 1 Year			1 Year – 3 Years			3 Years – 5 Years			Over 5 Years			Past-due loans / Equities			Insurance
	(S/ in millions)
Interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		—			574.7		—			—			—			—			—			574.7
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.		23.9			25.1		118.6			427.4			465.5			9,843.3			604			11,507.8
Other assets		17.4			69.7		35.4			7.2			10.9			0.2			—			140.9

Total interest earning assets		41.3			669.5		154.0			434.6			476.4			9,843.5			604.0			12,223.4

Interest bearing liabilities
Due to banks and correspondents		226.7			—		—			—			—			—			—			226.7
Bonds, notes and other obligations		—			3.8		—			—			—			259.2			—			262.9
Insurance contract liabilities		93.4			183.2		810.7			1,888.5			1,863.6			6,979.9			—			11,819.3
Other liabilities		58.7			36.0		4.8			3.3			—			—			—			102.7

Total interest bearing liabilities		378.9			222.9		815.6			1,891.7			1,863.6			7,239.0			—			12,411.7

Marginal gap		(337.5	)		446.6		(661.6	)		(1,457.1	)		(1,387.2	)		2,604.5			604.0			(188.3	)
Accumulated gap		(337.5	)		109.1		(552.5	)		(2,009.6	)		(3,396.9	)		(792.3	)		(188.3	)		—

221

Foreign Exchange Risk

Interseguro has mainly assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars. Interseguro manages its foreign exchange rate exposure by matching assets and liabilities by currency.

Liquidity Risk

Interseguro controls its liquidity needs in the short, medium and long term with the application of Asset Adequacy Tests. In simple terms, these are exercises in which the projected flows of the contracted annuities and insurance policies, are compared with the cash flows of the assets allocated for their coverage, and the present value of the surpluses, dynamically calculated, represents the level of liquidity adequacy of Interseguro.

Real Estate Risk

There are two sources of real estate risk. The first is related to the real estate market, which includes property values and lease demand. The second is the possibility of default on leases.

Interseguro manages the risk associated with its real estate market by adapting its current offer and future projects to the new conditions that arises. Interseguro periodically evaluates the financial position of prospective and current tenants to reduce the risk of losing rental income.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is defined as the possibility of losses due to inadequate processes, faulty personnel, information technology, or external events. To manage these risks, Interseguro uses tools for identification, evaluation and treatment of risks similar to the tools used by banks to comply with Basel II. The goals of these risk management tools may be summarized as follows:

•

reduce operational losses by identifying potential process risks;

•

identify operational risk in the development of new products;

•

manage control risk and self-assessment of critical processes; and

•

monitor and measure operational risk.

Wealth Management Segment

Inteligo’s risk management policies are guided by an emphasis on maintaining growth that is both sustainable, profitable and aligned to adequate levels of risk. In order to accomplish this, Inteligo has developed analytic tools and methodologies aiming to identify and manage risk efficiently. Inteligo monitors and reviews these tools to ensure that adequate levels of prediction and performance are maintained and, if necessary, to make adjustments or take corrective measures.

In order to manage the above risks, Inteligo has a specialized risk management structure, measurement systems and mitigation and coverage processes.

Inteligo uses different key risk indicators (“KRI”) to measure its exposure to risk factors. These KRI are continuously monitored and reviewed monthly by senior management and quarterly by the Integral Risk Management Committee and the board of directors to identify possible deviations from the stipulated risk appetite and apply timely corrective actions if needed.

Both credit and market risk are the main risks to be managed by Inteligo and, in order to mitigate its exposure and provide adequate risk coverage, it has established the following measures, among others:

•

policies, procedures, methodologies, and parameters aimed to identify, measure, control and report market and credit risk;

•

review and assessment of credit risk through a specialized risk department which is independent from the commercial unit and which assesses all credit risks prior to loan approvals;

•

compliance with regulatory limits and establishment of internal limits for concentration exposure to counterparties and financial instruments, such as concentration to industry, issuer, credit rating and type of investment; and

222

•

procedures for the management of loan guarantees.

Through these measures, Inteligo establishes the patterns and mechanisms needed to maintain a diversified portfolio and prevent excessive risk concentration.

Main Types of Risks

The main risks faced by Inteligo are credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.

Credit Risk

In our wealth management segment, only Inteligo Bank is exposed to credit risk. The substantial majority of loans we make are fully collateralized by time deposits or investment securities. Nevertheless, we have implemented strict credit risk management policies, which have contributed to a minimum level of non-performing loans. As of December 31, 2022, only 0.01% of its loan portfolio was classified as non-performing loans.

The following table presents the approval levels required for loan applications by total exposure amount in U.S. dollars.


Approval levels	Amount
Board of Directors		Over U.S.$20,000,000
Executive Committee		Up to U.S.$20,000,000
Credit Committee		Up to U.S.$15,000,000
Chief Executive Officer		Up to U.S.$5,000,000
Chief Operating Officer		Up to U.S.$1,500,000
Operations Manager		Up to U.S.$500,000

Credit approval is determined by the applicant’s repayment ability, which is determined primarily by the applicant’s credit history and cash flow generation for commercial loans or monthly net profit for retail loans.

The decision whether or not to approve an extension of credit takes into account the applicant’s economic environment, its ability to meet its obligations, collateral, management and character. We developed a credit risk scorecard system, which classifies applicants based on several variables such as leverage ratio, debt service as a percentage of monthly income and collateral quality, among others.

The Risk Unit is responsible for periodical monitoring of our credit portfolio and early detection of possible deviations in the credit performance and financial condition of clients in order to maintain a healthy loan portfolio and take timely and necessary actions to reduce or avoid losses. To this end, the Risk Unit reviews Inteligo Bank’s loan portfolio on a monthly basis and calculates an expected credit loss according to internal models. Additionally, it is responsible for the regulatory classification of all bank customers and appropriate allocation of reserves.

Although Inteligo Bank has a recovery process for the collection of unpaid loans, there have been very few cases of non-performing or defaulted loans.

Market Risk

Market risk is the probability of loss due to variations in financial market conditions. The main variations to which Inteligo is exposed to are: interest rates and market pricing of financial instruments. Said variations can affect the value of Inteligo’s financial assets and liabilities. Exchange rate risk is minimal because of the small exposure to other currencies.

Inteligo Investment Portfolio

In order to monitor the risks within each instrument of its investment portfolio, Inteligo has established maximum exposure limits by individual issuer, investment type and currency that are calculated on a monthly basis.

The main technique used to measure and control market risk is VaR, which is a statistical measurement that quantifies the maximum loss expected for the investment portfolio for a period of time and a determined significance level under normal market conditions. Inteligo uses the historic VaR model for a period of one month with a 99% confidence level. The VaR is calculated for each risk factor (price, interest rate and exchange rate) and investment type (fixed income, equity and alternative investments).

223

Additionally, Inteligo calculates the marginal contribution to VaR of each instrument in the portfolio. The validity of the VaR calculation is verified through a back-testing methodology, which uses historical data to ensure that the model adequately estimates potential losses. Inteligo has also developed a sensitivity analysis to show potential portfolio losses from price variations in its investment portfolio or interest rates fluctuations.

The primary source of Inteligo’s market risk is Inteligo Bank’s investment portfolio, as it represents over 95% of Inteligo’s VaR results. As of December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 Inteligo’s VaR, classified by type of risk was as follows:


	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020			Change

By type of risk	(S/ in millions)									Dec 22 / Dec 21			Dec 21 / Dec 20
Exchange rate		2.7			1.0			5.4			1.8			(4.4	)
Interest rate		21.4			4.0			1.3			17.4			2.7
Price		137.9			156.9			213.3			(19.0	)		(56.4	)
Diversification effect		(2.6	)		(3.4	)		(8.4	)		0.8			5.0

Total		159.4			158.5			211.5			1.0			(53.0	)

Inteligo’s VaR increased S/1 million as of December 31, 2022, mainly due to higher levels of interest rates due to inflationary pressures in the relevant market that affect Inteligo’s fixed income portfolio, when compared to December 31, 2021.

Inteligo’s VaR decreased S/53.0 million as of December 31, 2021, mainly due to lower levels of volatility in the financial markets as a result of the development and implementation of vaccine programs in many countries to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, when compared to December 31, 2020.

For the periods presented Inteligo did not have back-testing exceptions.

Assets and Liabilities Management

Inteligo holds positions that are not actively traded, including its loan portfolio, customer deposits, and bank loans. These positions are also exposed to interest rate risk, exchange rate risk and liquidity risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rates continuously fluctuate on the market. These fluctuations affect Inteligo in two ways: firstly, through the change in the valuation of assets and liabilities; and secondly, affecting the cash flows at repricing dates. The variation in the valuation of assets and liabilities is increasingly sensitive as the term at which the asset or liability repricing increases.

An analysis of the repricing gaps is performed in order to determine the impact of interest rates movements. Said analysis consists of classifying all the interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities in several time ranges according of their repricing date. The impact of the variation in the valuation of assets and liabilities on each range (the repricing gap) is calculated in function of this analysis.

224

The following tables summarize Inteligo’s exposure to interest rate risks. Inteligo’s financial instruments are presented at book value, classified by the period of the contract’s interest rate repricing or maturity date, whichever occurs first:


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2022
	Up to 1 month		From 1 to 3 months		From 3 Months - 1 Year			From 1 Year - 3 Years		From 3 Years - 5 Years		Over 5 Years		Past-due loan/ Equities		Wealth Management

	(S/ in millions)
Interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		971.6		23.8		303.8			6.8		—		—		—		1,306.0
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		0.1		0.2		1.1			69.6		58.2		80.5		18.5		228.1
Loans, net of unearned interest		130.3		335.0		1,215.3			92.7		1.7		9.2		0.1		1,784.3
Other assets		897.5		0.2		3.1			—		—		—		—		900.9

Total interest earning assets		1,999.5		359.2		1,523.4			169.1		59.9		89.7		18.6		4,219.3

Interest bearing liabilities
Deposits and obligations and deposits from financial entities		162.4		309.3		1,603.7			63.8		—		—		—		2,139.3
Due to banks and correspondents		0.9		1.7		61.2			8.7		—		—		—		72.5

		163.3		311.1		1,664.9			72.5		—		—		—		2,211.8

Marginal gap		1,836.2		48.1		(141.5	)		96.6		59.9		89.7		18.6		2,007.6
Accumulated gap		1,836.2		1,884.3		1,742.9			1,839.4		1,899.3		1,989.0		2,007.6		—


	Repricing Gap at December 31, 2021
	Up to 1 month		From 1 to 3 months			From 3 Months - 1 Year		From 1 Year - 3 Years		From 3 Years - 5 Years		Over 5 Years		Past-due loan/ Equities		Wealth Management

	(S/ in millions)
Interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		1,125.7		31.5			175.0		—		60.5		—		—		1,392.7
Instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		0.1		0.4			1.3		75.9		55.0		123.4		17.6		273.7
Loans, net of unearned interest		129.5		327.7			1,144.9		81.7		0.8		12.6		1.3		1,698.4
Other assets		3.6		—			3.1		—		—		—		—		6.7

Total interest earning assets		1,259.0		359.5			1,324.3		157.6		116.2		136.0		18.9		3,371.5

Interest bearing liabilities
Deposits and obligations and deposits from financial entities		162.8		383.6			1,160.0		102.8		—		—		—		1,809.1
Due to banks and correspondents		183.4		—			—		—		—		—		—		183.4

		346.2		383.6			1,160.0		102.8		—		—		—		1,992.6

Marginal gap		912.7		(24.0	)		164.3		54.8		116.2		136.0		18.9		1,379
Accumulated gap		912.7		888.7			1,053.0		1,107.8		1,224.1		1,360.1		1,379		—

225

Foreign Exchange Risk

Exchange rate risk is related to the variation of the positions both on- and off-balance sheet that may be negatively affected by exchange rates movements. Inteligo Bank’s main business is performed in U.S. dollars, its functional currency. Management sets a limit to exposure levels in other currencies and monitors it monthly.

Inteligo SAB uses both soles and U.S. dollars in its trading operations and maintains positions in both currencies. Interfondos manages mutual funds in both soles and U.S. dollars.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk consists of Inteligo’s inability to comply with the maturity of its obligations, thus incurring losses that affect its equity position. This risk may arise as result of diverse events such as the unexpected decrease of funding sources or the inability to rapidly settle assets, among others.

Although Inteligo takes short-term deposits, most of the deposits have historically been renewed or maintained, and consequently they represent a stable funding source. Additionally, the average loan term is less than a year and more than a half of the investment portfolio can be easily liquidated, so liquidity risk is low.

Nevertheless, Inteligo assesses medium-term and long-term liquidity through a structural analysis of its funds inflows and outflows on diverse maturity terms. This process allows it to know the diverse funding sources, how liquidity needs to be increased, and which terms are mismatched. On the basis of this information, the necessary decisions to maintain adequate liquidity levels are taken.

Inteligo Bank’s financial assets include unlisted equity investments, which generally are illiquid. In addition, Inteligo Bank holds investments in closed (unlisted) and open-ended investment funds, which may be subject to redemption restrictions such as “side pockets” and redemption limits. As a result, Inteligo Bank may not be able to settle some of its investments in these instruments in due time in order to meet its liquidity requirements.

Operational Risk

Inteligo manages operational risk through its risk unit, guided by banking best-practices, including Basel II policies. The objectives of the operational risk management are to:

•

reduce operational losses by identifying potential process risks;

•

identify operational risk in the development of new products; and

•

manage control risk and self-assess critical processes;

•

monitor and measure operational risk.

Inteligo’s methodology is based on two tools for identifying and measuring risks that calculate the exposure level and facilitates decision-making to mitigate exposures within certain limits of risk tolerance. These tools are risks and controls self-assessment, and collection of loss event.

Inteligo Bank uses the Standarized Approach for operational risk management under Basel II, according to the Central Bank of The Bahamas’ regulation. In recent years, Inteligo launched several initiatives to strengthen the risk culture among the employees.

Payments Segment

Main Types of Risks

The main types of risk inherent in Izipay’s businesses are fraud and operational risk.

To manage the risks mentioned above, Izipay has a specialized risk management structure, measurement systems and mitigation and remediation processes. This structure is used to manage the risks of the organization, establish preventive control mechanisms and mitigate risks constantly. Izipay’s risk management team proposes and implements action plans to mitigate any identified risks.

226

These tools are continuously monitored and periodically validated to ensure that appropriate levels of prediction and performance are being maintained and to take corrective action or adjust the models when needed. The risk management indicators are continuously reviewed and assessed to identify possible deviations in risk profile with respect to the established risk appetite and apply timely corrective actions as needed. This information is submitted to the Risk Committee periodically.

Fraud Risk

In our payments segment, Izipay is exposed to fraud risk due to the sales transactions carried out through its systems are susceptible to potentially fraudulent or improper sales, which may be charged back to Izipay. In order to mitigate this risk, Izipay has around-the-clock transactional monitoring for all transactions made in its acquisition network. Izipay has monitoring tools in real time or close to real time, for the pre-clearing of transactions and for the merchants’ settlement.

Additionally, we work in coordination with the Association of Banks (ASBANC) that notifies us about cases of fraud reported by local issuers in order to take swift action in the mitigation of any damage.

Merchants with irregular activity, bad practices, with cases of fraud reported by issuers, among others, are disaffiliated from our system and included in our blocked list so that they cannot affiliate again to our system.

Our efforts to efficiently prevent fraud aim to protect Izipay from financial loss due to claims or disputes and from reputational damage. In addition, it ensures the proper functioning of the ecosystem of payment industry in Peru.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is the probability of loss due to inadequate processes, personnel and information technology failures, or external events. For Izipay, operational risk also includes risks related to information security, cybersecurity and compliance risks.

Izipay has an operational risk team which, jointly with the personnel responsible for a certain task, unit or department (experts), identifies, measures and treats the risks affecting such unit or department, and carries out adequate risk management to mitigate those risks.

Izipay employs a methodology for the evaluation of operational risks, with a series of activities for risk identification, followed by controls, impact measurement and evaluation of probability so as to calculate the residual risks Izipay is exposed to. It identifies the risks as “moderate,” “high,” “extreme,” and “not acceptable,” determining a different set of actions for each type of risk. The method also assigns a person responsible for the proposed mitigation plan and to monitor its execution.

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

A.	Debt Securities

Not Applicable.

B.	Warrants and Rights

Not Applicable.

C.	Other Securities

None.

D.	American Depositary Shares

None.

227

PART II

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We have evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management, under the supervision and with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS as adopted by IASB and includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS as adopted by IASB, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, effective control over financial reporting cannot and does not provide absolute assurance of achieving our control objectives. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13(a)-13(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, it used the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

As permitted by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2022 did not include the internal controls of PMP or its subsidiary Izipay, which became consolidated subsidiaries in April 2022. The combined results of PMP and Izipay amounted to 1.0% and 2.2% of our consolidated total assets and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2022, and 3.7% and 2.5% of our consolidated interest and similar income and net profit, respectively, for the year then ended. EY Peru’s audit of internal control over financial reporting of IFS also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of PMP and Izipay.

228

EY Peru, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F under “Item 18. Financial Statements—Report of independent registered public accounting firm.”

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16.

[RESERVED]

ITEM 16 A

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that Felipe Federico Roy Morris Guerinoni, a member of our audit committee, meets the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the SEC, and is an independent member of the audit committee under applicable SEC and NYSE rules.

See Item 6: “Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—Audit Committee.”

ITEM 16 B

Code of Ethics

In May 2020, we updated our code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act which applies to all directors, officers, employees, consultants and contractors without exception. The code is publicly available on the corporate governance section of our website at https://www.ifs.com.pe/. The information on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

The Code of Ethics is available to the general public on our web page at www.ifs.com.pe. This URL is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. It is not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL, is not and shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

ITEM 16 C

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by our independent auditors, EY Peru, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022:


	Year ended December 31,
	2022		2021⁽¹⁾
	(S/ in millions)
Audit fees		10.0		9.7
Audit-related fees		0.1		0.1
Tax fees		0.5		0.3
Other fees		—		0.2

Total fees		10.6		10.3

(1)	Including taxes.

“Audit fees” in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by EY Peru in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements. This line item includes: the audit of our and our subsidiaries’ statutory accounts, the audit of the consolidated financial statements required by Item 18 of Form 20-F, the limited reviews of financial statements of our subsidiaries and procedures related to the issuance of comfort letters.

229

“Audit related fees” in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by EY Peru for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of IFS financial statements and are not reported under “audit fees”. This line item includes services such as attestation reports for our subsidiaries as required by statute or regulations.

“Tax fees” related to tax services which include all services performed by IFS’s independent auditor´s tax personnel, except those services specifically related to the review and preparation of IFS´s financial statements, and which principally consist of tax compliance and advisory service.

“All Other fees” includes other advisory services to our subsidiaries.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee is responsible for the appointment of our external auditors, determining their compensation, retention and oversight, and resolving any disagreement that may arise between management and our external auditors. Our audit committee annually pre-approves the services that may be retained with our external auditor, considering the independence rules for the external auditor described in section I of Annex A of the Audit Committee Policy. These previously approved services are ratified and/or adjusted once a year by the audit committee. In addition, our audit committee may, at any time, add or eliminate services from the pre-approval list. We may engage our external auditors for all services contained in the pre-approval list without additional audit committee approval, provided that they do not exceed the amount of U.S.$50,000. Any services not included in such pre-approval list or which, having been previously approved, exceed the amount indicated above, need to be specifically reviewed and approved by our audit committee before any such engagement.

All proposed services carried out by our external auditors as well as corresponding fees related to audit and non-audit services, have been presented to our audit committee, which has determined they are reasonable and consistent with our policies.

In accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, our board of directors delegated the approval of the engagement and compensation of the external auditors independent external for 2022 to our audit committee, which delegation was approved by our shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on March 31, 2022. Furthermore, in connection with such delegation, our audit committee reviewed proposals from various prominent global audit firms with operations in the countries where our subsidiaries operate to act as our external auditors for 2022 or a longer period as may be recommended. After analyzing such proposals received, the audit committee recommended EY Peru to serve as our and our subsidiaries’ independent external auditor for a period of five auditable years (2022-2026). Our board of directors’ agreed with the audit committee’s recommendation to appoint EY Peru for such term, subject to the audit committee’s continued evaluation of EY Peru’s performance and continued compliance with the SEC’s independence requirements.

Our audit committee’s main duties are disclosed in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices.” Furthermore, the authorization to hire external auditors is subject to approval by our shareholders at the ordinary annual shareholders’ meeting although our audit committee is responsible for their appointment and oversight.

ITEM 16 D

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

230

ITEM 16 E

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table sets out certain information concerning purchases of our previously issued shares by us or any affiliated purchaser during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

Period

Total number
of shares
purchased⁽¹⁾

Average
price paid
per share
(S/)⁽²⁾

Total number of
shares
purchased as
part of publicly
announced
plans or
programs

Maximum number of shares
that may yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs

January 2022

—

February 2022

—

March 2022

—

April 2022

—

May 2022

—

June 2022

—

July 2022

—

August 2022

—

September 2022

—

October 2022

—

November 2022

—

December 2022

—

Total⁽³⁾

—

(1)	As of December 31, 2022, there were not shares purchased by any affiliate.

(2)

For convenience purposes only, amounts in soles in this column have been converted from U.S. dollars using a rate of S/3.814 to US$1.00, which was the exchange rate reported for December 31, 2022 by the SBS. These translations should not be construed as representations that the U.S. dollar amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into soles at that or at any other exchange rate.

(3)	As of December 31, 2022, the Company and certain subsidiaries hold an aggregate of 30,074 shares issued by IFS.

On March 31, 2023, IFS` shareholders have approved the creation of a share repurchase program for an amount of up to US$100 million of our common shares, which is expected to continue until terminated by the Board of Directors. The repurchase may take place simultaneously in both the Lima Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, and may be carried out in one or several dates at market prices.

ITEM 16 F

Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 and through the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, EY Peru, has not resigned, has not indicated that it will decline to stand for re-election after the completion of its current audit nor has it been dismissed.

ITEM 16 G

Corporate Governance

As a foreign private issuer, we are subject to different corporate governance requirements than those followed by a U.S. company with shares listed on the NYSE that follow NYSE listing standards. With certain exceptions, foreign private issuers are permitted to follow their home country corporate governance standards.

We are registered with the SMV and although there is no legal obligation to comply with Peruvian corporate governance practices, we are required to report our degree of compliance with Peruvian corporate governance practices for Peruvian publicly-held companies to the SMV. Because we are not subject to Panamanian securities laws as we have not offered any securities in Panama and because general corporate law in Panama does not impose any meaningful restrictions on our corporate governance, a comparison to Panamanian corporate governance practices is not applicable. Additionally, we have adopted a set of additional corporate governance guidelines as contemplated by the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and our articles of incorporation, which include the establishment of:

•

principles and duties relating to the conduct of our management, including as with respect to confidentiality and conflicts of interest;

•

internal accounting controls systems;

231

•

corporate governance guidelines;

•

amendments to the audit committee charter;

•

a code of business conduct and ethics;

•

corporate anti-corruption policies and guidelines, including compliance with the FCPA; and

•

amendments to corporate compliance policies.

Pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE, we are required to provide a summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. The following is a comparison between our corporate governance policies under Peruvian law and those of the NYSE listing standards.


NYSE Standards		Our Corporate Governance Practices

Director Independence. A majority of the board of directors must be independent, except in the case of a “controlled” issuer. §303A.01 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		Our articles of incorporation provide for a minimum of three members for our board of directors. Currently, our board of directors is composed of seven members.

		The criteria for determining independence under our corporate governance standards has been defined in accordance with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

Executive Sessions. Non-management directors must meet regularly in executive sessions without management. Independent directors should meet alone in an executive session at least once a year. §303A.03 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		Under our articles of incorporation and applicable laws non-management directors are not required to meet in executive sessions without management.

NYSE Standards		Our Corporate Governance Practices

Audit committee. An audit committee satisfying the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. §303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		Our audit committee complies with the criteria set forth under our “Audit Committee Charter,” the rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, each as applicable to foreign private issuers. Our audit committee consists of three directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom is a financial expert. Our audit committee is fully independent in compliance with NYSE rules and Rule 10A-3(b) of the Exchange Act.

Audit committee additional requirements. §303A.07 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual requires that an audit committee must consist of at least three members, each of whom are financially literate and at least one of whom is a financial expert, and that the audit committee have a written charter outlining the committee’s responsibilities.		Our audit committee complies with the criteria set forth under our “Audit Committee Charter,” the rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, each as applicable to foreign private issuers. Our audit committee consists of three directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom is a financial expert. The three members of the audit committee are independent.

Nominating/corporate governance committee. A nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors is required. The committee must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. §303A.04 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		We do not have a nominating/corporate governance committee. Our board of directors has the power to establish such a committee in the future on the terms it deems appropriate.

Compensation committee. A compensation committee of independent directors is required. The committee must approve executive officer compensation and must have a charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. §303A.05 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		We do not have a compensation committee. Our Board of Directors may establish a compensation committee in the future on the terms it deems appropriate.

232



Code of Ethics. A code of business conduct and ethics are required, as is disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers. §303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual		We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, as contemplated by the NYSE. Our board of directors has the obligation to verify compliance with the provisions of such code.

ITEM 16 H

Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

ITEM 16 I

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

233

PART III

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our audited consolidated financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F beginning at page F-1. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

1.1*		Legalized Translation of the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as currently in effect (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 of Form F-1 (File No. 333-232554) as filed with the SEC on July 3, 2019, and incorporated by reference herein).

2.1*		IFS Indenture, dated October 19, 2017, among the Registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Luxembourg, as Luxembourg transfer and paying agent (relating to our U.S.$300,000,000 4.125% Senior Notes due 2027) (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 of Form F-1 (File No. 333-232554) as filed with the SEC on July 3, 2019, and incorporated by reference herein).

2.2*		Description of Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2021).

3.1**		Irrevocable Proxy Agreement as of May 20, 2021, by and among International Financial Holdings Group Inc., in favor of George Pastor, Carlos Rodriguez-Pastor, and Anne Marie See.

8.1**		List of Subsidiaries.

12.1**		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

12.2**		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

13.1**		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS**		Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104**		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

(*)	Previously filed.

(**)	Filed herewith.

Omitted from the exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 20-F are certain instruments and agreements with respect to our long-term debt, none of which authorizes securities in a total amount that exceeds 10% of our total assets and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC copies of any such omitted instruments or agreements as the SEC requests.

234

SIGNATURE

The registrant, INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on Form 20-F on its behalf.

Date: April 24, 2023


INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

By		/s/ Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres
Name:		Luis Felipe Castellanos López Torres
Title:		Chief Executive Officer

235

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Content


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-3

Consolidated financial statements

Consolidated statement of financial position			F-5
Consolidated statement of income			F-6
Consolidated statement of other comprehensive income			F-7
Consolidated statement of changes in equity			F-8
Consolidated statement of cash flows			F-9
Notes to the consolidated financial statements			F-11

F-2

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Intercorp Financial Services Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report date on April 21, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Expected credit loss on loan portfolio

Description of the matter

At December 31, 2022, the balance of impairment allowance for loans is S/2,027,855. As disclosed in Notes 3.4(i)(ii), 6 and 30.1(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the impairment allowance for loans is calculated using an expected credit loss (ECL) model. The determination of the ECL is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset as a result of a significant increase in credit risk— since origination or when there is objective evidence of impairment. ECL allowances are measured at amounts equal to either

(i) 12-month

ECL; or (ii) lifetime ECL. The ECL calculation is based on key elements as the probability of default, the exposure to the default and the loss given default, which are determined based on macroeconomic variables as forward-looking information inputs. When estimating the ECLs, the Company considers three scenarios (optimistic, base and pessimistic), which are associated with different probability of default. Also, the Company has evaluated the specific effects of the current Peruvian political and economic environment as a post-model adjustment.

Auditing the impairment allowance for loans was complex and required the application of significant judgment and involvement of specialists due to the inherent complexity of the models, assumptions, judgments, the forward-looking nature of key assumptions and the interrelationship of the critical variables in measuring the ECL. Significant assumptions and judgments with respect to the estimation of the allowance for credit losses include (i) the determination of when a loan has experienced a significant increase in credit risk; (ii) the forecast of forward looking information for multiple economic scenarios and the probability weighting of those scenarios; (iii) the calculation of both

12-month

and lifetime credit losses; and (iv) the application of expert credit judgment as post-model adjustment, specifically due to the current Peruvian political and economic situation. The allowance for credit losses is a significant estimate for which variations in model methodology, assumptions and judgments can have a material effect on the measurement of expected credit losses.

How we addressed the matter in our audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of management’s controls over the calculation of the ECL and the significant assumptions described above, including the allowance related to the post-model adjustment due to the current Peruvian political and economic situation. The controls we tested included, amongst others, controls over the identification of indicators of impairment, the determination of significant changes in credit risk, and management’s review and approval of models used to calculate the ECL, including the data inputs and outputs of those models; testing controls over the risk-rating process, and the governance and oversight controls over the review of the overall ECL.

To test the ECL, our audit procedures included, amongst others, involving our credit risk specialist to assess whether methodology and assumptions used to estimate ECL were consistent with the requirements of IFRS. We assessed significant changes in credit risk triggers, management’s forecasting methodology and compared management’s forward-looking information to publicly available information from independent sources. Also, we assessed management post-model adjustment included due to uncertainty surrounding the current Peruvian political and economic situation performed independent recalculations, and we tested the completeness and accuracy of data used in the measurement of the ECL. We also assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures.

Valuation of technical reserves for annuities

Description of the matter

As described in Note 14(b) to the consolidated financial statements, the balance of technical reserves for annuities was S/8,603,763 as of December 31, 2022. Technical reserves for annuities is determined as the sum of the discounted value of expected future pensions to be paid during a defined or

non-defined

period, computed on the basis of current mortality tables and current discount interest rates and using key actuarial economic assumptions.

Auditing the Company’s technical reserves for annuities was complex and required the application of significant auditor judgment and involvement of specialists due to the actuarial models and highly judgmental nature of the actuarial assumptions used by management to estimate the liabilities. Changes in these assumptions could have significant effects on the valuation of the technical reserves for annuities.

How we addressed the matter in our audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the management’s controls, related to the valuation of technical reserves for annuities. This included testing the governance and oversight controls over the review of the actuarial models, the actuarial assumptions, and the data inputs used.

To test the balance of the technical reserves for annuities, our audit procedures included, amongst others, comparing the methodology, actuarial models and actuarial assumptions used by the Company to recognized actuarial practices and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying insurance policy data used in the valuation. We involved our actuarial specialists to assist us in assessing the reasonableness of the assumptions and the appropriateness of the methodologies and models. Our actuarial specialists also performed an independent calculation of the technical reserves for annuities. In addition, our actuarial specialists assessed the reasonableness of the movement of technical reserves for annuities considering changes in the actuarial assumptions in the reporting period. We also assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures.

/s/ Tanaka, Valdivia, & Asociados S. Civil de R.L.

A member practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited

We have served as the Company‘s auditor since 2006

Lima, Peru

April 24, 2023

F-3

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Intercorp Financial Services Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Procesos de Medios de Pago S.A. and Subsidiary, which is included in the 2022 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 1% and 2% of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 4% and 2% of interest and similar income and net profit for the year, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Procesos de Medios de Pago S.A. and Subsidiary.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and our report dated on April 24, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Tanaka, Valdivia, & Asociados S. Civil de R.L.

A member practice of Ernst & Young Global Limited

Lima, Peru

April 24, 2023

F-4

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated statement of financial position

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021


	Note		2022			2021
			S/(000)			S/(000)
Assets
Cash and due from banks		4(a)
Non-interest bearing				4,012,293			3,931,419
Interest bearing				8,712,874			12,488,242
Restricted funds				468,244			684,804

				13,193,411			17,104,465
Inter-bank funds		4(e)		296,119			30,002
Financial investments		5		22,787,598			24,547,294
Loans, net:		6
Loans, net of unearned interest				47,530,853			45,070,500
Impairment allowance for loans				(2,027,855	)		(2,064,917	)

				45,502,998			43,005,583
Investment property		7		1,287,717			1,224,454
Property, furniture and equipment, net		8		791,432			815,118
Due from customers on acceptances				45,809			152,423
Intangibles and goodwill, net		9		1,633,202			1,044,749
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		10		1,778,559			1,887,454
Deferred Income Tax asset, net		15		165,787			142,367

Total assets				87,482,632			89,953,909


	Note		2022			2021
			S/(000)			S/(000)
Liabilities and equity
Deposits and obligations		11
Non-interest bearing				8,684,678			9,270,255
Interest bearing				39,846,030			39,627,689

				48,530,708			48,897,944
Inter-bank funds		4(e)		30,012			—
Due to banks and correspondents		12		7,100,646			8,522,849
Bonds, notes and other obligations		13		7,906,303			8,389,672
Due from customers on acceptances				45,809			152,423
Insurance contract liabilities		14		10,602,372			11,958,058
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		10		3,138,932			2,477,601
Deferred Income Tax liability, net		15		81,899			—

Total liabilities				77,436,681			80,398,547

Equity, net		16
Equity attributable to IFS’s shareholders:
Capital stock				1,038,017			1,038,017
Treasury stock				(3,363	)		(3,363	)
Capital surplus				532,771			532,771
Reserves				6,000,000			5,200,000
Unrealized results, net				(613,280	)		(168,300	)
Retained earnings				3,037,030			2,904,912

				9,991,175			9,504,037
Non-controlling interest				54,776			51,325

Total equity, net				10,045,951			9,555,362

Total liabilities and equity, net				87,482,632			89,953,909

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated statement of income

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020


	Note	2022			2021			2020
		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Interest and similar income	19		5,871,302			4,605,625			4,664,967
Interest and similar expenses	19		(1,662,098	)		(1,057,937	)		(1,192,284	)

Net interest and similar income			4,209,204			3,547,688			3,472,683
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries	6(d.1) and (d.2)		(830,551	)		(381,577	)		(2,393,944	)
(Loss) recovery due to impairment of financial investments	5(c)		(12,752	)		30,898			(32,904	)

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss			3,365,901			3,197,009			1,045,835
Fee income from financial services, net	20		1,137,386			823,808			723,500
Net gain on foreign exchange transactions			380,154			423,022			318,422
Net (loss) gain on sale of financial investments			(60,448	)		288,923			185,383
Net (loss) gain on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss	5(e) and 10(b)		(262,093	)		24,800			165,883
Net gain on investment property	7(b)		84,631			79,399			44,929
Other income	21		400,202			89,498			62,117

			1,679,832			1,729,450			1,500,234

Insurance premiums and claims
Net premiums earned	22		668,197			645,267			514,981
Net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others	23		(859,991	)		(917,346	)		(794,051	)

			(191,794	)		(272,079	)		(279,070	)

Other expenses
Salaries and employee benefits	24		(852,050	)		(807,382	)		(749,246	)
Administrative expenses	25		(1,179,788	)		(965,505	)		(748,617	)
Depreciation and amortization	8(a) and 9(a)		(336,226	)		(279,690	)		(268,750	)
Other expenses	21		(315,845	)		(210,192	)		(144,047	)

			(2,683,909	)		(2,262,769	)		(1,910,660	)

Income before translation result and Income Tax			2,170,030			2,391,611			356,339
Exchange difference			(36,836	)		(89,320	)		(45,723	)
Income Tax	15(c)		(462,537	)		(502,112	)		72,933

Net profit for the year			1,670,657			1,800,179			383,549

Attributable to:
IFS’s shareholders			1,660,581			1,790,155			383,259
Non-controlling interest			10,076			10,024			290

			1,670,657			1,800,179			383,549

Earnings per share attributable to IFS’s shareholders, basic and diluted (stated in Soles)	26		14.388			15.510			3.320

Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands)	26		115,418			115,419			115,447

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated statement of other comprehensive income

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020


	Note	2022			2021			2020
		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Net profit for the year			1,670,657			1,800,179			383,549
Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in subsequent periods:
(Losses) gains on valuation of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income	16(e)		(21,924	)		146,161			8,176
Income Tax	16(e)		218			(31	)		(36	)

Total unrealized (loss) gain that will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income			(21,706	)		146,130			8,140

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in subsequent periods:
Net movement of debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income	16(e)		(1,833,856	)		(2,282,111	)		635,669
Income Tax	16(e)		8,250			8,404			(2,643	)

			(1,825,606	)		(2,273,707	)		633,026
Insurance premiums reserve	16(e)		1,520,980			1,392,280			(332,536	)

Net movement of cash flow hedges	16(e)		(62,954	)		97,943			(17,968	)
Income Tax	16(e)		8,670			(15,696	)		3,559

			(54,284	)		82,247			(14,409	)
Translation of foreign operations	16(e)		(50,165	)		95,674			76,935

Total unrealized (loss) gain to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in subsequent periods			(409,075	)		(703,506	)		363,016

Other comprehensive income for the year			(430,781	)		(557,376	)		371,156

Total comprehensive income for the year, net of Income Tax			1,239,876			1,242,803			754,705

Attributable to:
IFS’s shareholders			1,231,914			1,236,980			752,973
Non-controlling interest			7,962			5,823			1,732

			1,239,876			1,242,803			754,705

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020


						Attributable to IFS’s shareholders
															Unrealized results, net
	Number of shares														Instruments that will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income			Instruments that will be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income
	Issued		In treasury			Capital stock		Treasury stock			Capital surplus		Reserves		Equity instruments at fair value			Debt instruments at fair value			Insurance premiums reserves			Cash flow hedges reserve			Translation of foreign operations			Retained earnings			Total			Non- controlling interest			Total equity, net
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)

Balances as of January 1, 2020		115,447		(1	)		1,038,017		(196	)		530,456		4,700,000		264,883			1,036,159			(923,855	)		(22,758	)		88,476			2,145,688			8,856,870			46,578			8,903,448
Net profit for the year		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			383,259			383,259			290			383,549
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		8,175			630,944			(331,990	)		(14,350	)		76,935			—			369,714			1,442			371,156

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		8,175			630,944			(331,990	)		(14,350	)		76,935			383,259			752,973			1,732			754,705
Declared and paid dividends, Note 16(a)		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(698,228	)		(698,228	)		—			(698,228	)
Purchase of treasury stock, Note 16(b)		—		(23	)		—		(2,573	)		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,573	)		—			(2,573	)
Transfer of retained earnings to reserves, Note 16(g)		—		—			—		—			—		500,000		—			—			—			—			—			(500,000	)		—			—			—
Dividends paid to non-controlling interest of Subsidiaries		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,432	)		(2,432	)
Sale of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, Note 5(g)		—		—			—		—			—		—		24,154			—			—			—			—			(24,154	)		—			(40	)		(40	)
Others		—		—			—		—			2,315		—		—			—			—			—			—			(3,248	)		(933	)		2			(931	)

Balance as of December 31, 2020		115,447		(24	)		1,038,017		(2,769	)		532,771		5,200,000		297,212			1,667,103			(1,255,845	)		(37,108	)		165,411			1,303,317			8,908,109			45,840			8,953,949
Net profit for the year		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			1,790,155			1,790,155			10,024			1,800,179
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		145,899			(2,266,729	)		1,389,995			81,986			95,674			—			(553,175	)		(4,201	)		(557,376	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		145,899			(2,266,729	)		1,389,995			81,986			95,674			1,790,155			1,236,980			5,823			1,242,803
Declared and paid dividends, Note 16(a)		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(633,853	)		(633,853	)		—			(633,853	)
Purchase of treasury stock, Note 16(b)		—		(5	)		—		(594	)		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			(594	)		—			(594	)
Dividends paid to non-controlling interest of Subsidiaries		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(328	)		(328	)
Sale of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, Note 5(g)		—		—			—		—			—		—		(451,898	)		—			—			—			—			451,898			—			—			—
Others		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(6,605	)		(6,605	)		(10	)		(6,615	)

Balance as of December 31, 2021		115,447		(29	)		1,038,017		(3,363	)		532,771		5,200,000		(8,787	)		(599,626	)		134,150			44,878			261,085			2,904,912			9,504,037			51,325			9,555,362
Net profit for the year		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			1,660,581			1,660,581			10,076			1,670,657
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		(21,663	)		(1,821,183	)		1,518,484			(54,140	)		(50,165	)		—			(428,667	)		(2,114	)		(430,781	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—		—			—		—		(21,663	)		(1,821,183	)		1,518,484			(54,140	)		(50,165	)		1,660,581			1,231,914			7,962			1,239,876
Declared and paid dividends, Note 16(a)		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(751,532	)		(751,532	)		—			(751,532	)
Transfer of retained earnings to reserves, Note 16(g)		—		—			—		—			—		800,000		—			—			—			—			—			(800,000	)		—			—			—
Dividends paid to non-controlling interest of Subsidiaries		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(4,511	)		(4,511	)
Sale of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, Note 5(g)		—		—			—		—			—		—		(16,313	)		—			—			—			—			16,313			—			—			—
Others		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—			—			6,756			6,756			—			6,756

Balance as of December 31, 2022		115,447		(29	)		1,038,017		(3,363	)		532,771		6,000,000		(46,763	)		(2,420,809	)		1,652,634			(9,262	)		210,920			3,037,030			9,991,175			54,776			10,045,951

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated statement of cash flows

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net profit for the year		1,670,657			1,800,179			383,549
Plus (minus) adjustments to net profit
Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		830,551			381,577			2,393,944
Loss (recovery) due to impairment of financial investments		12,752			(30,898	)		32,904
Depreciation and amortization		336,226			279,690			268,750
Provision for sundry risks		12,661			14,872			4,918
Deffered Income Tax		(442	)		205,752			(308,067	)
Net loss (gain) on sale of financial investments		60,448			(288,923	)		(185,383	)
Net loss (gain) of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		262,093			(24,800	)		(165,883	)
Net gain for valuation of investment property		(19,146	)		(21,969	)		(5,438	)
Disposal of fixed assets		(11,780	)		—			—
Fair value adjustment on the participation held by Interbank in Izipay, Note 1(d)		(222,513	)		—			—
Exchange difference		36,836			89,320			45,723
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(168,454	)		(16,108	)		(207,474	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		121,324			(63,839	)		(13,692	)
Net changes in assets and liabilities
Net increase in loan portfolio		(3,204,130	)		(2,949,964	)		(5,663,256	)
Net decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable and other assets		331,287			(199,227	)		(129,457	)
Net decrease (increase) in restricted funds		225,659			(75,308	)		620,292
(Decrease) increase in deposits and obligations		(467,213	)		1,893,763			9,138,664
(Decrease) increase in due to banks and correspondents		(1,460,227	)		(1,138,320	)		5,672,189
Increase in other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		494,420			2,430,391			1,724,913
Income Tax paid		(334,173	)		(280,412	)		(379,963	)
Decrease (increase) of investments at fair value through profit or loss		481,087			(659,972	)		(233,680	)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(1,012,077	)		1,345,804			12,993,553

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Consolidated statement of cash flows (continued)


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income and at amortized cost		(857,589	)		(1,911,799	)		(3,737,749	)
Purchase of property, furniture and equipment		(135,036	)		(87,282	)		(52,371	)
Purchase of intangible assets		(227,270	)		(170,528	)		(196,056	)
Purchase of investment property		(34,760	)		(156,892	)		(61,243	)
Sale of property, furniture and equipment		54,313			—			—
Purchase of subsidiaries, net of cash received		(193,215	)		—			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,393,557	)		(2,326,501	)		(4,047,419	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid		(751,532	)		(633,853	)		(698,228	)
Issuance of bonds, notes and other obligations		—			—			1,150,000
Payments of bonds, notes and other obligations		(137,900	)		(91,000	)		(837,400	)
Net (increase) decrease in receivable inter-bank funds		(266,117	)		(11,897	)		66,901
Net increase (decrease) in payable inter-bank funds		30,482			(30,945	)		(140,167	)
Purchase of treasury stock, net		—			(594	)		(2,573	)
Dividend payments to non-controlling interest		(4,174	)		(30	)		(2,202	)
Lease payments		(146,982	)		(93,379	)		(89,162	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,276,223	)		(861,698	)		(552,831	)

(Net decrease) net increase in cash and cash equivalents		(3,681,857	)		(1,842,395	)		8,393,303
Translation (loss) gain on cash and cash equivalents		(26,678	)		112,787			(99,113	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year		16,416,311			18,145,919			9,851,729

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year, Note 3.4(ag)		12,707,776			16,416,311			18,145,919

Supplementary cash flow information:
Cash paid by -
Interest		1,395,673			988,315			1,108,310
Dividends		755,706			634,181			700,660
Income Tax		334,173			280,412			379,963
Cash received from -
Interest		5,620,231			4,483,746			4,349,828
Dividends received		88,236			108,931			111,097
Operations that do not generate cash flow -
Recognition of right-of-use assets		33,178			31,692			29,070
Effect on the participation in Izipay prior to its acquisition, Note 1(d)		(222,513	)		—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021

1.	Business activity, current context and acquisition of Subsidiaries

(a)

Business activity -

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Subsidiaries (henceforth “IFS”, “the Company” or “the Group”), is a limited liability holding company incorporated in the Republic of Panama on September 19, 2006, and is a Subsidiary of Intercorp Peru Ltd. (henceforth “Intercorp Peru”), a holding Company incorporated in 1997 in the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Intercorp Peru holds directly and indirectly 70.65 percent of the issued capital stock of IFS, equivalent to 70.64 percent of the outstanding capital stock of IFS

IFS’s legal domicile is located at Av. Carlos Villarán 140 Urb. Santa Catalina, La Victoria, Lima, Peru.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, IFS holds 99.30 percent of the capital stock of Banco Internacional del Peru S.A.A. – Interbank (henceforth “Interbank”), 99.84 percent of the capital stock of Interseguro Compañía de Seguros S.A. (henceforth “Interseguro”), 100 percent of the capital stock of Inteligo Group Corp. (henceforth “Inteligo”) and 100

percent of Procesos de Medios de Pago and its subsidiary Izipay S.A.C (henceforth “Izipay”), acquired in April 2022, see (d).

The operations of Interbank, Interseguro and Izipay are concentrated in Peru, while the operations of Inteligo and its Subsidiaries (Interfondos S.A. Sociedad Administradora de Fondos, Inteligo Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. and Inteligo Bank Ltd.) are mainly concentrated in Peru and Panama.

The main activities of IFS’s Subsidiaries and their assets, liabilities, equity, operating income, net income, balances and other relevant information are presented in Note 2.

The consolidated financial statements of IFS and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2021, and for the year then ended, were approved by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2022. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022, and for the year then ended, have been approved and authorized for issuance by Management and the Board of Directors on April 24, 2023.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

Political and social context in Peru –

On December 7, 2022, Pedro Castillo, President of Peru, announced the dissolution of Peruvian Congress and the establishment of an emergency government which, as he assured, would rule through decree until a new Parliament with constitutive powers would write a new Constitution. Due to this announcement, the Congress debated and voted in favor of a presidential vacancy motion that ended up in his destitution. He was immediately succeeded by the vice-president, Dina Boluarte, who was designated President of the Republic of Peru.

Since said date, a series of demonstrations and protests have erupted in the country, claiming the resignation of president Boluarte and calling for a new presidential election, among other demands.

In this situation, and with the purpose of maintaining peace and safety in different parts of the country, the Executive Branch declared the state of emergency in certain regions through Supreme Decree No.

009-2023-PCM,

dated January 14, 2023. Similarly, through Supreme Decree No.

010-2023-PCM,

issued on February 18, 2023, the State of Emergency was extended for 60 more days in some provinces of the country.

The Group constantly monitors the implications of this situation and the measures adopted by the government.

(c)

Pandemic

Covid-19

(c.1)State

of National and Sanitary Emergency

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared

“Covid-19”

as a global pandemic, with a significant impact on the world economy. In Peru, the Government declared a State of National and Sanitary Emergency with a series of measures that affected both businesses and the population at large. The reopening of economic activities began since

mid-2020,

through the establishment of targeted measures by region and new rules of social coexistence.

During 2022, the Peruvian government derogated the National State of Emergency, while extending the National State of Health Emergency until the end of May 2023. It is worth mentioning that, since the first quarter of 2022, economic activities in the country are being carried out with normality and at the same level as before the Covid-19 pandemic.

(c.2)

Economic measures adopted by the Peruvian Government

During 2020 and 2021, the Peruvian government implemented extraordinary measures to secure the continuity of the economy’s payment chain. The main measures implemented in the financial system were related to facilities for loans rescheduling (payment deferrals), suspension of counting of past due days, partial or total withdrawal of deposits for severance indemnity (“CTS” by its Spanish acronym), Repo operations with the Banco Central de Reserva del Peru (henceforth “BCRP” by its Spanish acronym) and the launching of credit programs guaranteed by the Peruvian Government, such as “Reactiva Peru”.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Given the nature of the adopted measures, they had effects mainly of the Subsidiary Interbank. During 2020, and in response to the

Covid-19

crisis, Interbank offered its clients several payment rescheduling options. As of December 31, 2020, the balance of rescheduled loans amounted to S/10,489,296,000. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of rescheduled loans amounted to S/5,048,978,000 and S/6,266,601,000, respectively.

On the other hand, under the program “Reactiva Peru”, Interbank granted loans for S/6,617,142,000. As of December 31, 2022, the balance of loans granted under this program amounts to S/2,357,201,000, including accrued interest for S/57,254,000. As of this date, the amount covered by the guarantee of the Peruvian Government was S/2,040,379,000 (as of December 31, 2021, the balance was S/4,976,073,000, including accrued interest for S/79,936,000); while the amount covered by the guarantee of the Peruvian Government was S/4,421,999,000. It should be noted that during 2022 and 2021, Interbank made rescheduling for the “Reactiva Perú” program for an amount of approximately S/133,046,000 and S/2,012,855,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of rescheduled loans under the “Reactiva Peru” program amounts to approximately S/1,473,770,000 and S/1,974,180,000, respectively.

Additionally, during 2022 and 2021, the government authorized the

one-off

withdrawal of the entirety of the CTS, with the purpose of covering the workers’ economic needs caused by the

Covid-19

pandemic. As part of this benefit, approximately 261,000 clients withdrew the approximate sum of S/767,470,000 during the year 2022 (242,000 clients withdrew the approximate sum of S/1,630,000,000 during the year 2021).

(d)

Acquisition of Procesos de Medios de Pago S.A. and Subsidiary Izipay S.A.C. (“Izipay”)

Until March 2022, the Group (through its subsidiary Interbank) held 50 percent of Izipay. In April 2022, IFS acquired the remaining 50 percent of Izipay’s capital stock, thus completing the 100 percent of its capital stock. The amount paid by IFS amounted to US$83,775,000 (equivalent to approximately S/312,647,000). The economic activity of the acquired companies is explained in greater detail in Note 2(g).

The acquisition made by IFS was recorded using the “Step acquisition” accounting method, pursuant to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”. According to this method, the acquirer company must readjust to fair value the previously held equity interest in the acquiree entities. Additionally, assets and liabilities must be recorded at their fair values estimated at the acquisition date, including the identified intangible assets and the resulting goodwill that were not recorded in the statements of financial position of each acquired entity.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

As a result of the acquisition and pursuant to the accounting regulation in force, the previous held equity interest was adjusted to its fair value resulting in a gain

of S/222,513,000, recorded in September 2022 and presented in the caption “Other income and (expenses)” of the consolidated statement of income, see note 21. The expenses associated with the acquisition of approximately S/381,000 were presented in the caption “Administrative expenses” of the consolidated statement of income. The fair values of the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities, are presented below:


	Fair value of the acquired entities
	S/(000)
Assets -
Cash		119,432
Trade accounts receivable and other receivables		178,982
Inventory		13,600
Deferred assets		102,687
Property, furniture and equipment, Note 8(a)		83,486
Right-of-use assets, Note 8(a)		6,593
Intangibles, Note 9(a)		331,421
Deferred income tax asset		11,014
Other assets		3,903
Liabilities -
Financial obligations		26,251
Trade accounts payable and other payables		319,456
Deferred income		25,190
Lease liability		6,593
Other liabilities		223
Deferred income tax liability, Note 15(a)		86,541

Total identifiable net assets at fair value		386,864

Goodwill, Note 9(a)		238,429
Fair value of acquired entities		625,293

The net cash flow incurred as a result of the acquisition is presented below:


	S/(000)
Total price paid		312,647
Cash of acquired companies		(119,432	)

		193,215

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Since the date of its acquisition, Izipay has contributed to the Group with consolidated revenues of S/595,360,000 and consolidated net income of S/41,075,000. If the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the year, they would have contributed with consolidated revenues of S/754,284,000 and consolidated net income of S/51,182,000.

2.	Subsidiaries

IFS’s Subsidiaries are the following:

(a)

Banco Internacional del Peru S.A.A. - Interbank and Subsidiaries -

Interbank is incorporated in Peru and is authorized by the Superintendence of Banking, Insurance and Private Pension Funds (henceforth “SBS”, by its Spanish acronym) to operate as a universal bank in accordance with Peruvian legislation. The Bank’s operations are governed by the General Act of the Banking and Insurance System and Organic Act of the SBS – Act No. 26702 (henceforth “the Banking and Insurance Act”), that establishes the requirements, rights, obligations, restrictions and other operating conditions that financial and insurance entities must comply with in Peru.

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank had 164 offices (189 offices as of December 31, 2021). Additionally, it holds approximately 100 percent of the shares of the following Subsidiaries:


Entity		Activity
Internacional de Títulos Sociedad Titulizadora S.A. - Intertítulos S.T.		Manages securitization funds.
Compañía de Servicios Conexos Expressnet S.A.C.		Services related to credit card transactions or products related to the brand “American Express”.

(b)

Interseguro Compañía de Seguros S.A. and Subsidiary -

Interseguro is incorporated in Peru and its operations are governed by the Banking and Insurance Act. It is authorized by the SBS to issue life and general risk insurance contracts.

Interseguro holds participations in Patrimonio Fideicometido

D.S.093-2002-EF,

Interproperties Peru (henceforth “Patrimonio Fideicometido – Interproperties Peru”), that is a structured entity, incorporated in April 2008, and in which several investors (related parties to the Group) contributed investment properties. Each investor or investors have ownership of and specific control over the contributed investment property. The fair values of the properties contributed by Interseguro that were included in this structured entity as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, amounted to S/93,994,000 and S/71,302,000, respectively; see Note 7. For accounting purposes and under IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements” the assets included in said structure are considered “silos”, because they are ring-fenced parts of the wider structured entity (the Patrimonio Fideicometido - Interproperties Peru). IFS has ownership and decision-making power over these properties and the Group has the exposure or rights to their returns; therefore, IFS consolidates the silos containing the investment properties that it controls.

(c)

Inteligo Group Corp. and Subsidiaries -

Inteligo is an entity incorporated in the Republic of Panama. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, it holds 100 percent of the shares of the following Subsidiaries:

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


Entity		Activity
Inteligo Bank Ltd.		It is incorporated in The Commonwealth of the Bahamas and has a branch established in the Republic of Panama that operates under an international license issued by the Superintendence of Banks of the Republic of Panama. Its main activity is to provide private and institutional banking services, mainly to Peruvian citizens.

Inteligo Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A.		Brokerage firm incorporated in Peru.

Inteligo Peru Holding S.A.C.		Financial holding company incorporated in Peru in December 2018. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, it holds 99.99 percent interest in Interfondos S.A. Sociedad Administradora de Fondos, company that manages mutual funds and investment funds.

Inteligo USA, Inc.		Incorporated in the United States of America in January 2019, provides investment consultancy and related services.

(d)

Negocios e Inmuebles S.A. and Holding Retail Peru S.A. -

These entities were acquired by IFS as part of the purchase of Seguros Sura and Hipotecaria Sura in the year 2017; Note 9(b). In April 2021, Negocios e Inmuebles S.A. (absorbing company) merged with Holding Retail Peru S.A. (absorbed company), the latter being extinguished without liquidation. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Negocios e Inmuebles S.A., holds

8.50 percent of Interseguro’s capital stock .

(e)

San Borja Global Opportunities S.A.C. -

Its corporate purpose is the marketing of products and services through Internet, telephony or related and it operates under the name of Shopstar (online marketplace) dedicated to the sale of products from different stores locally.

(f)

IFS Digital S.A.C. –

Entity incorporated in August 2020, which its corporate purpose is to perform any type of investments and related services.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(g)

Procesos de Medios de Pago and Izipay (Izipay) –

Both companies were acquired in April 2022, as detailed in Note 1(d). Procesos de Medios de Pago is dedicated to the development, management and operation of the shared service of transaction processing of credit and debit cards, through the acquirer role for the brands MasterCard, Visa and other private brands; also, it renders processing services, through the issuer role, to entities of the financial system. Izipay is dedicated to the facilitation of payments and services, offering its services of technological, operating and safety infrastructure through the affiliation of commercial stores, as well as installation and maintenance of infrastructure for transactions through the electronic commerce modality, interconnected with the networks of payment methods processors.

As indicated in Note 1(d), in April 2022, IFS acquired control of Izipay, and it became a consolidated subsidiary. Therefore, starting in April 2022, Izipay consolidates its financial information together with IFS. The investment that Interbank held in Izipay until March 31, 2022, is presented as investments in associates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The table below presents a summary of the consolidated financial statements of the main Subsidiaries, before adjustments and eliminations for consolidation, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, in accordance with the IFRS. Additionally, for information on business segments, see Note 28:


	Interbank and Subsidiaries						Interseguro						Inteligo and Subsidiaries						Izipay
	2022			2021			2022			2021			2022			2021			2022		2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Consolidated statement of financial position -
Cash and due from banks		11,052,299			14,390,759			631,156			1,055,105			1,457,445			1,533,043			111,087		—
Financial Investments		9,586,343			10,062,243			11,295,068			11,951,454			1,698,229			2,314,331			—		—
Loans, net		43,725,346			41,307,369			—			—			1,784,343			1,698,397			—		—
Investment property		—			—			1,287,717			1,224,454			—			—			—		—
Total assets		66,977,277			68,584,019			13,636,925			14,743,405			5,102,598			5,722,539			902,610		—
Deposits and obligations		44,597,855			44,966,330			—			—			4,098,842			4,171,832			—		—
Due to banks and correspondents		6,726,595			8,112,667			308,164			226,742			53,937			183,441			18,584		—
Bonds, notes and other obligations		6,571,539			6,938,988			251,524			262,933			—			—			—		—
Insurance contract liabilities		—			—			10,463,577			11,819,263			—			—			—		—
Total liabilities		59,498,433			61,581,982			12,046,352			13,233,420			4,208,369			4,427,452			686,292		—
Equity attributable to IFS’s shareholders		7,478,844			7,002,037			1,590,573			1,509,985			894,229			1,295,087			216,318		—
Consolidated statement of income -
Net interest and similar income		3,297,436			2,743,750			861,555			736,912			104,810			114,488			300		—
(Loss) recovery due to impairment on loans, net of recoveries		(832,919	)		(379,034	)		—			—			2,368			(2,543	)		—		—
(Loss) recovery due to impairment of financial investments		(732	)		(527	)		(26	)		33,198			(11,981	)		(1,615	)		—		—
Net gain of investment property		—			—			19,146			21,969			—			—			—		—
Fee income from financial services, net		797,711			677,461			(7,160	)		(6,802	)		163,325			196,959			258,728		—
Insurance premiums and claims		—			—			(191,772	)		(272,037	)		—			—			—		—
Net profit (loss) for the year attributable to IFS’s shareholders		1,374,121			1,360,278			313,000			339,233			(141,395	)		283,545			41,074		—

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

3.	Significant accounting policies

3.1

Basis of presentation -

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (henceforth “IFRS”) as issued by International Accounting Standards Board (henceforth “IASB”) and are presented in Soles, which is the functional currency of the Group. All values are rounded to the nearest thousand (S/(000)), except when otherwise indicated.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with the IFRS requires Management to make estimations and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of significant events in the notes to the consolidated financial statements; see Note 3.6.

3.2

Adoption of new standards and disclosures -

In these consolidated financial statements, the Group has not early adopted any standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is not yet effective.

The following standards, interpretations or amendments have been adopted for the first time in 2022, but they have not had a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements:

•

Amendments to IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”: Onerous Contracts – Costs of Fulfilling a Contract

An onerous contract is a contract under which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.

The amendments to the aforementioned IAS specify that when assessing whether a contract is onerous or loss-making, an entity needs to include costs that relate directly to a contract to provide goods or services including both incremental costs and an allocation of costs directly related to contract activities. General and administrative costs do not relate directly to a contract and are excluded unless they are explicitly chargeable to the counterparty under the contract.

The Group amended onerous contracts in which the entities had not fulfilled all of its obligations at the beginning of the reporting period without significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

•

Amendments to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”: Reference to the Conceptual Framework

The amendments replace the reference to a previous version of the IASB’s Conceptual Framework with a reference to the current version issued in March 2018 without significantly changing its requirements.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Likewise, the amendments add an exception to the recognition principle of IFRS 3 Business Combinations to avoid the issue of potential ‘day 2’ gains or losses arising from liabilities and contingent liabilities that would be within the scope of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets or IFRIC 21 Levies, if incurred separately. The exception requires entities to apply the criteria in IAS 37 or IFRIC 21, respectively, instead of the Conceptual Framework, to determine whether a current obligation exists at the acquisition date.

The amendments also add a clarification on IFRS 3 regarding the contingent assets that do not qualify for recognition at the acquisition date.

In accordance with the transitional provisions, the Group applies the amendments prospectively, i.e., to business combinations occurring after the beginning of the annual reporting period in which it first applies the amendments (the date of initial application).

These amendments had no impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements as there were no contingent assets, liabilities, or contingent liabilities within the scope of these amendments that arose during the period.

•

Amendments to IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment” - Proceeds before Intended Use

The amendment prohibits entities from deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, any proceeds of the sale of items produced while bringing that asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Instead, an entity recognizes the proceeds from selling such items, and the costs of producing those items, in profit or loss.

These amendments had no impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements as there were no sales of such items produced by property, plant and equipment made available for use on or after the beginning of the earliest period presented.

•

IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” - Subsidiary as a first-time adopter

The amendment permits a subsidiary that elects to apply paragraph D16(a) of IFRS 1 to measure cumulative translation differences using the amounts reported in the parent’s consolidated financial statements, based on the parent’s date of transition to IFRS, if no adjustments were made for consolidation procedures and for the effects of the business combination in which the parent acquired the subsidiary. This amendment is also applied to an associate or joint venture that elects to apply paragraph D16(a) of IFRS 1.

These amendments had no impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements as it is not a first-time adopter of IFRSs.

•

IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”: Fees in the ’10 per cent’ test for derecognition of financial liabilities

The amendment clarifies the fees that an entity includes when assessing whether the terms of a new or modified financial liability are substantially different from the terms of the original financial liability. These fees include only those paid or received between the borrower and the lender, including fees paid or received by either the borrower or lender on the other’s behalf. There is no similar amendment proposed for IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In accordance with the transitional provisions, the Group applies the amendment to financial liabilities that are modified or exchanged on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period in which the entity first applies the amendment (the date of initial application).

These amendments had no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group as there were no modifications of the Group’s financial instruments during the period.

3.3

Basis of consolidation -

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statement of IFS and its Subsidiaries (see Note 2).

For consolidation accounting purposes, control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns. Specifically, the Group controls an investee if and only if the Group has:

•

Power over the investee (i.e., existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee);

•

Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and

•

The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.

Generally, it is presumed that a majority of voting rights entitles to control. To support this presumption and when the Group has less than the majority of votes or similar rights in the investee, the Group considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee, including:

•

The contractual arrangement with the other vote holders of the investee;

•

Rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and

•

The Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation with a Subsidiary begins when the Group obtains control over the Subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses control of the Subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of an acquired or disposed subsidiary during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date the Group acquired the control of the subsidiary until the date the Group ceases to have control of the subsidiary.

Profit and loss and each component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are attributed to the equity holders of the Group’s parent Company and to the

non-controlling

interests, even if this results in the

non-controlling

interests having a deficit balance. When necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statement of Subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies into line with the Group’s accounting policies.

All intra-group assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between members of the Group are totally eliminated on consolidation.

If the Group ceases to have control over a subsidiary, it derecognizes the related assets (including goodwill), liabilities,

non-controlling

interest and other components of equity, while any resultant gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. Any investment retained is recognized at fair value.

Assets in custody or managed by the Group, such as investment funds and others, are not part of the Group’s consolidated financial statements; see Note 3.4(ac).

3.4

Summary of significant accounting policies -

(a)

Foreign currency translation -

Functional and presentation currency:

The Group has determined that its functional and presentation currency is the Sol, because it reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to most of the Group’s entities, insofar as its main operations and/or transactions, such as loans granted, financing obtained, sale of insurance premiums, interest and similar income, interest and similar expenses and an important percentage of purchases are established and settled in Soles; in addition, it corresponds to the functional currency to most of the Subsidiaries; except for Inteligo Bank, whose functional currency is the US Dollar.

Because Inteligo Bank has a functional currency different from the Sol, its balances were translated for consolidation purposes using the methodology established by IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”, as follows:

•

Assets and liabilities at the closing rate at the date of each consolidated statement of financial position.

•

Income and expenses, at the average exchange rate for each month.

As a result of the translation, the Group has recorded the difference in the caption “Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations” in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Foreign currency balances and transactions:

Foreign currency transactions and balances are those performed in currencies different from the functional currency. Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate in effect on the reporting date. The differences between the closing rate at the date of each consolidated statement of financial position presented and the exchange rate initially used to record the transactions in foreign currency are recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the period in which they arise, in the caption “Translation result”.

Non-monetary

assets and liabilities acquired in a foreign currency are recorded at the exchange rate at the date of the initial transaction.

(b)

Interest income -

(b.1)

Effective interest rate method -

Under IFRS 9, interest income is recorded using the effective interest rate (“EIR”) method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost, interest rate derivatives for which hedge accounting is applied and the related amortization/recycling effect of hedge accounting. The interest income of financial assets that accrue interests measured at fair value through other comprehensive income according to IFRS 9 is also recorded using the EIR method. Interest expenses are also calculated using the EIR method for all financial liabilities held at amortized cost. EIR is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period at the net carrying amount of the financial asset.

The EIR (and therefore, the amortized cost of the financial asset) is calculated by taking into account transaction costs and any discount or premium on the acquisition of the financial asset, as well as fees and costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The Group recognizes interest income using the best estimate of a constant rate of return over the expected life of the financial asset. Therefore, the EIR calculation also considers the effect of potentially different interest rates that may be charged at various stages of the financial asset’s expected life, and other characteristics of the product’s life cycle (including prepayments, penalty interest and charges).

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

If expectations of fixed rate financial assets’ or liabilities’ cash flows are revised for reasons other than credit risk, then changes to future contractual cash flows are discounted at the original EIR, and the adjustment is recorded as a positive or negative adjustment of the carrying amount of the financial asset in the consolidated statement of financial position with an increase or decrease in Interest revenue.

For floating-rate financial instruments, periodic

re-estimation

of cash flows to reflect the movements in the market rates of interest also alters the effective interest rate, but when instruments were initially recognized at an amount equal to the principal,

re-estimating

the future interest payments does not significantly affect the carrying amount of the asset or the liability.

(b.2)

Interest income and similar -

The Group calculates the interest income by applying the EIR to the gross carrying amount of

non-impaired

financial assets.

When a financial asset becomes impaired, and, therefore, it is classified as Stage 3 (as established in Note 3.4(h)), the Group calculates the interest income by applying the EIR at the amortized cost of the asset. If the financial assets “recover”, as detailed in Note 30.1(d), and is no longer impaired, the Group recalculates the interest income in gross figures.

For purchased or originated credit-impaired (POCI) assets, as established in Note 30.1(d), the Group calculates the interest income by determining the credit-adjusted EIR at the amortized cost of the asset. The credit-adjusted EIR is the interest rate that, in the initial recognition, discounts the estimated future cash flows (including credit losses) at the amortized cost of POCI assets.

The interest income for all trading assets, that is, for those that are measured at fair value through profit or loss, are presented under the caption “Net gain of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” of the consolidated statement of income.

(c)

Banking services commissions -

The Group earns fee and commission income from a diverse range of financial services it provides to its customers. Fee and commission income are recognized at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for providing the services.

The performance obligations, as well as the timing of their satisfaction, are identified and determined at the inception of the contract. The Group’s income from contracts do not typically include multiple performance obligations.

When the Group provides a service to its clients, the consideration is invoiced and generally due immediately upon satisfaction of a service provided at a point in time or at the end of the contract period for a service provided over time.

The Group has generally concluded that it is the principal in its revenue arrangements because it typically controls the services before transferring them to the customer.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The fees included in the caption “Fees for banking services, net” that make up part of the consolidated statement of income include fee income where performance obligations are satisfied at a specific time or over a period of time.

Fee income where performance obligations are satisfied over a period of time include, among others, collection services, funds management, memberships, fees for contingent loans and credit card insurance. Likewise, fee income where performance obligations are satisfied at a specific time include, among others, banking service fees, brokerage and custody services, and credit card fees.

Below is the main income from contracts with customers that are recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position:

•

Fees receivable for credit cards and certain fees receivable for letters of guarantee included in the caption “Other accounts receivable and other assets, net”, represent the Group’s right to an unconditional consideration (i.e., it only requires the passing of time for the consideration payment). This income is measured at amortized cost and is subject to impairment specifications under IFRS 9.

•

Deferred income from commissions for letters of guarantee included in the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities”, represent the Group’s obligation to render services to a customer, from whom the Group has received a consideration (or a due amount). A liability for unearned fees and commissions is recognized when the payment is made or when the payment is due (whichever happens first). Unearned fees and commissions are recognized as income when the Group renders the service.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

Insurance contracts –

Accounting policies for insurance activities:

The Group applies to insurance contracts the existing accounting policies prior to the adoption of IFRS (i.e., accounting standards established by the SBS for financial and insurance entities in Peru) with certain modifications as described below:

•

Incurred but not reported claims reserves (IBNR): These reserves are calculated and applied at each recording period using the Chain Ladder methodology, which considers past experience based on cumulative claims losses to estimate future claims developments.

•

Technical reserves for life annuities and retirement, disability and survival pensions: The Group uses the Peruvian mortality tables

SPP-S-2017

and

SPP-I-2017

(men and women), published by the SBS through Resolution

No. 886-2018

dated March 7, 2018, and set the discount interest rate through the Matching Adjustment method plus an illiquidity premium to discount all the pension cash flows; see Note 14(e).

Product classification:

Insurance contracts are those contracts where the Group (the insurer) has accepted significant insurance risk from another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder for a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) that adversely affects the policyholder. As a general guideline, the Group determines whether it has significant insurance risk by comparing benefits paid with benefits payable if the insured event did not occur. Insurance contracts may also transfer a financial risk. When the contract has a financial component and transfers no relevant insurance risk as established by IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts”, the contract is recorded based on IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”. These contracts are presented in the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities” as “Contract liability with investment component” of the consolidated statement of financial position; see Note 10(a).

Once a contract has been classified as an insurance contract, it remains as an insurance contract for the remainder of its life, even if the insurance risk is reduced significantly during this period, unless all rights and obligations are extinguished or expire.

Life insurance contracts offered by the Group include retirement, disability and survival insurance, annuities and group and individual life.

Non-life

insurance contracts mainly include SOAT (mandatory individual car accident insurance) and credit card insurance, among others.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Insurance receivables:

Insurance receivables are initially recognized when due and are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Consequently, in its initial recognition, insurance receivables are measured at amortized cost. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the carrying value of the insurance receivables is similar to their fair value due to their short-term maturity. The carrying value of insurance receivables is reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, with the impairment loss recorded in the consolidated statement of income.

Reinsurance:

The Group cedes the insurance risk in the normal course of its operations mainly due to pension fund risks and life insurance risks (individual and group). The reinsurance assets represent balances due and payable by reinsurance companies. Reinsurance is ceded on a proportional basis.

The amounts recoverable from the contracts with reinsurers are estimated consistently with the loss reserve pending settlement or losses settled and with the premiums ceded, associated with policies ceded, in accordance with the clauses established in the related reinsurance contracts.

Reinsurance assets are reviewed for impairment at each date of the consolidated statement of financial position or more frequently when necessary. Impairment arises when there is objective evidence the Group cannot receive all the outstanding amounts receivable under the contract terms and the event has a reliably measurable impact on the amounts that the Group will obtain from the reinsurer. Impairment loss is registered in the consolidated statement of income.

Reinsurance contracts ceded do not release the Group from its obligations to the insured.

The liabilities from reinsurance contracts represent balances due and payable to reinsurance companies. The amounts payable are estimated consistently with the related reinsurance contract.

Premiums and claims are presented as gross amounts for the reinsurance ceded. Reinsurance assets or liabilities are written off when the contractual rights are extinguished, expire, or when the contract is transferred to a third party.

Reinsurance commissions:

The commissions from the reinsurance contracts for premiums ceded are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related insurance contract.

F-27

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Insurance contract liabilities:

Life insurance contract liabilities are recognized when contracts are entered into.

The technical reserves for retirement, disability and survival insurance and annuities are determined as the sum of the discounted value of expected future pensions to be paid during a defined or

non-defined

period, computed on the basis of current mortality and morbidity tables and current discount interest rates described in Note 14(e).

Individual life technical reserves are determined as the sum of the discounted value of expected future benefits, administration expenses, policyholder options and guarantees and investment income, less the discounted value of the expected premiums that would be required to meet the future cash outflows. Furthermore, the technical reserves for group life insurance contracts comprise the provision for unearned premiums and unexpired risks.

Insurance claims reserves include reserves for reported claims and an estimate of the IBNR. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, IBNR reserves were determined on the basis of the Chain Ladder methodology, whereby the weighted average of past claims’ development is projected into the future. Adjustments to the liabilities at each reporting date are recorded in the consolidated statement of income. The liability is derecognized when the contract expires, is discharged or cancelled.

At each reporting date an assessment is made on whether the recognized life insurance liabilities are sufficient, by using an existing liability adequacy test as established by IFRS 4. In the case of annuities and retirement, disability and survival insurance, this test was conducted by using current assumptions for mortality and morbidity tables and interest rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Management determined that liabilities were sufficient and therefore, it has not recorded any additional life insurance contract liability.

The accounts payable to reinsurers and coinsurers arise from the ceded premiums issued based on the evaluation of the risk assumed and the losses coming from the reinsurance contracts accepted as well as from the clauses executed for the coinsurance received, and are registered in the item “Accounts payable to reinsurers and coinsurers” that is part of the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities” of the consolidated statement of financial position.

Income recognition:

Life insurance contracts:

Gross premiums on life insurance are recognized as revenue when due from the policyholder. For single premium products, revenue is recognized on the date when the policy is effective. The net premiums earned include the annual variation of technical reserves.

F-28

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Property, casualty and group life insurance contracts:

Unearned premiums are those proportions of premiums written in a year that relate to periods of risk afterwards the reporting date. Unearned premiums are calculated on a daily pro rata basis. The proportion attributable to subsequent periods is deferred as a provision for unearned premiums.

Recognition of benefits, claims and expenses:

(i)

Gross benefits and claims

Gross benefits and claims for life insurance contracts include the cost of all claims arising during the year, including internal and external claims handling costs that are directly related to the processing and settlement of claims.

Death, survival and disability claims are recorded on the basis of notifications received. Annuities payments are recorded when due.

(ii)

Reinsurance premiums

Reinsurance premiums comprise the total premiums payable for the whole coverage provided by contracts entered into in the period and are recognized at the date at which the policy is effective. Unearned ceded premiums are deferred during the period of the related insurance contract.

(iii)

Reinsurance claims

Reinsurance claims are recognized when the related gross insurance claim is recognized according to the terms of the relevant contract.

(iv)

Acquisition costs

Acquisition costs related to the sale of new policies are recognized when incurred.

(e)

Financial instruments: Initial recognition -

(e.1)

Date of recognition

Financial assets and liabilities, with the exception of loans, are initially recognized at the trading date. This includes regular transactions of purchases or sales of financial assets that require the delivery of assets within the time frame generally established by regulation or convention on the marketplace. Loans are recognized when the funds are transferred to the customers while deposits and obligations are recognized when the funds are received by the Group.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e.2)

Initial measurement of financial instruments

The classification of financial instruments at initial recognition depends on the characteristics of the business model and contractual flows for managing the instruments, as described in Notes 3.4(f.1.1) and 3.4(f.1.2). Financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value (as defined in Note 3.4(e.4)), except in the case of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs are added to, or subtracted from, this amount. Accounts receivables are measured at the transaction price. When the fair value of financial instruments at initial recognition differs from the transaction price, the Group accounts for the Day 1 profit or loss, as described below.

(e.3)

Day 1 profit or loss

When the transaction price of the instrument differs from the fair value at origination and the fair value is based on a valuation technique that only uses inputs observable in market transactions, the Group recognizes the difference between the transaction price and fair value in the net trading income. In those cases where fair value is based on models for which some of the inputs are not observable, the difference between the transaction price and the fair value is deferred and is only recognized in profit or loss when the inputs become observable, or when the instrument is derecognized.

(e.4)

Measurement categories of financial assets and liabilities

The Group classifies all of its financial assets based on the business model and the contractual terms, measured at either:

•

Amortized cost, as explained in Note 3.4(f.1).

•

Fair value through other comprehensive income, as explained in Notes 3.4(f.4) and (f.5).

•

Fair value through profit or loss, as explained in Note 3.4(f.7).

The Group classifies and measures its derivative and trading portfolio at fair value through profit or loss as explained in Notes 3.4(f.2) and (f.3). The Group may designate financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss, if so doing eliminates or significantly reduces measurement or recognition inconsistencies, as explained in Note 3.4(f.7).

Financial liabilities, other than financial guarantees, are measured at amortized cost or at fair value through profit or loss when they are held for trading, are derivative instruments or the fair value designation is applied, as explained in Note 3.4(f.6). It should be noted that during 2022 and 2021, the Group only presents derivative financial instruments measured in this way.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f)

Financial assets and liabilities -

Following is the description of the assets and liabilities held by the Group, as well as the criteria for their classification:

(f.1)

Assets measured at amortized cost -

As required by IFRS 9, the Group measure cash and due from banks inter-bank funds, financial investments in debt instruments, loans and other financial assets at amortized cost if the following two conditions are met:

•

The financial asset is held within a business model with the objective to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows, and

•

The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding.

The details of these conditions are presented below:

(f.1.1)

Business model assessment -

The Group’s business model is assessed at a higher level of aggregated portfolios, and not instrument by instrument, and is based on observable factors such as:

•

How the performance of the business model and the financial assets held within that business model are assessed and reported to the entity’s key management personnel.

•

The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within that business model) and, in particular, the way those risks are managed.

The expected frequency, value and timing of sales are also important aspects of the Group’s assessment. The business model assessment is based on reasonably expected scenarios without taking “worst case” or “stress case”. If cash flows after initial recognition are realized in a way that is different from the Group’s original expectations, the classification of the remaining financial assets that remain in that business model will not be changed, but incorporates such information when assessing newly purchased financial assets going forward.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f.1.2)

The SPPI test (Solely payments of principal and interest) -

As a second step of its classification process, the Group assesses the contractual terms to identify whether they meet the SPPI test.

“Principal”, for the purpose of this test, is defined as the fair value of the financial asset at initial recognition and may change over the life of the financial asset (for example, if there are repayments of principal or amortization of the premium/discount).

The most significant elements within a lending arrangement are the time value of money and credit risk. To perform the SPPI assessment, the Group applies judgement and considers relevant factors such as the currency in which the financial asset is denominated, and the period for which the interest rate is set. In contrast, contractual terms that introduce volatility in the contractual cash flows that are unrelated to a basic lending arrangement do not give rise to contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the amount outstanding. In such cases, the financial asset is required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss.

(f.2)

Derivatives recorded at fair value through profit or loss -

A derivative is a financial instrument or other contract with the following three characteristics:

•

Its value changes in response to the change in a specified interest rate, financial instrument price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index, or other variable; provided that, in the case of a

non-financial

variable, it is not specific to part of the contract (i.e., the “underlying”).

•

It requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than the required for other types of contracts expected to have a similar response to changes in market factors.

•

It is settled at a future date.

The Group enters into derivative transactions with various counterparties, such as: interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency options and foreign currency forward contracts. Derivatives are recorded at fair value and carried as assets when their fair value is positive and as liabilities when their fair value is negative. The notional amount and fair value of such derivatives are presented separately in Note 10(b). Changes in the fair value of derivatives are included in net trading income unless hedge accounting is applied. Hedge accounting disclosures are presented in Note 3.4(j).

F-3

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f.2.1)

Embedded derivatives -

An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid instrument that also includes a

non-derivative

host contract with the effect that some of the cash flows of the combined instrument vary in a way similar to a stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative causes some or all of the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the contract to be modified according to a specified interest rate, financial instrument price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index, or other variable, provided that, in the case of a

non-financial

variable, it is not specific to a party to the contract. A derivative that is attached to a financial instrument, but is contractually transferable independently of that instrument, or has a different counterparty from that instrument, is not an embedded derivative, but a separate financial instrument.

Embedded derivatives in financial assets, liabilities and

non-financial

host contacts, were treated as separate derivatives and recorded at fair value if they met the definition of a derivative (as defined above), their economic characteristics and risks were not closely related to those of the host contract, and the host contract was not itself held for trading or designated at fair value through profit or loss. The embedded derivatives separated from the host contract are carried at fair value in the trading portfolio with changes in the fair value recognized in the consolidated statement of income.

In the case of embedded derivatives in financial assets, they are not separated from the financial asset and, therefore, the classification rules are applied to the hybrid instrument in its entirety, as described in Note 3.4(e.4).

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group does not present embedded derivatives in its financial liabilities, which are needed to be separated from the host contract.

(f.3)

Financial assets or financial liabilities held for trading -

The Group classifies financial assets or financial liabilities as held for trading when they have been purchased or issued primarily for short-term profit making through trading activities or form part of a portfolio of financial instruments that are managed together, for which there is evidence of a recent pattern of short-term profit taking.

Held-for-trading

assets and liabilities are recorded and measured in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of income. Interest income or expense and dividend are recorded in the statement of income according to the terms of the contract, or when the right to payment has been established. Included in this classification are debt securities, equities and short positions that have been acquired mainly for the purpose of selling them in the short term.

F-33

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f.4)

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income -

The Group applies the category of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income when both of the following conditions are met:

•

The instrument is held within a business model, the objective of which is achieved by collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.

•

The contractual terms of the financial asset meet the SPPI test.

Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income are subsequently measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. Interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss in the same manner as for financial assets measured at amortized cost, as explained in Note 3.4(f.1). The expected credit loss calculation for debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income is explained in Note 3.4(h)(iii). When the Group holds more than one investment in the same security, they are deemed to be disposed of on a

“first-in

first-out”

basis. On derecognition, cumulative gains or losses previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.

(f.5)

Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income -

Upon initial recognition , the Group occasionally elects to classify irrevocably some of its equity investments as equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income when not held for trading. Such classification is determined on an

instrument-by-

instrument basis.

Gains and losses on these equity instruments are never recycled to profit even when the asset is sold. Dividends are recognized in the consolidated statement of income as income when the right of the payment has been established, except when the Group benefits from such proceeds as a recovery of part of the cost of the instrument, in which case, such gains are recorded in other comprehensive income. Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income are not subject to an impairment assessment.

(f.6)

Financial liabilities -

After initial measurement, financial liabilities, except those measured at fair value through profit or loss; see (f.7), are measured at amortized cost. Amortized cost includes commissions and interest, transaction lost and any other premium or discount. A compound financial instrument which contains both a liability and an equity component is separated at the issue date.

F-34

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group first establishes whether the instrument is a compound instrument and classifies such instrument’s components separately as financial liabilities, financial assets, or equity instruments in accordance with IAS 32. Classification of the liability and equity components of a convertible instrument is not revised as a result of a change in the likelihood that a conversion option will be exercised, even when exercising the option may appear to have become economically advantageous to some holders. When allocating the initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument to the equity and liability components, the equity component is assigned as the residual amount after deducting from the entire fair value of the instrument, the amount separately determined for the liability component. The value of any derivative features (such as call options) embedded in the compound financial instrument, other than the equity component (such as an equity conversion option), is included in the liability component. Once the Group has determined the split between equity and liability, it further assesses whether the liability component has embedded derivatives that must be accounted for separately.

(f.7)

Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss -

Financial assets and financial liabilities in this category are those that are not held for trading and have been either designated by Management upon initial recognition or are mandatorily required to be measured at fair value under IFRS 9. Management designates an instrument at fair value through profit or loss upon initial recognition when one of the following criteria is met:

•

The designation eliminates, or significantly reduces, the inconsistent treatment that would otherwise arise from measuring the assets or liabilities or recognizing gains or losses on them on a different basis, or

•

The liabilities are part of a group of financial liabilities which are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy, or

•

The liabilities contain one or more embedded derivatives, unless they do not significantly modify the cash flows that would otherwise be required by the contract.

Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded in profit and loss with the exception of movements in fair value of liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss due to changes in the Group’s own credit risk. Such changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income and do not get reclassified to profit or loss. Interest accrued on assets that must be measured at fair value through profit or loss is recorded using the contractual interest rate. Dividend income from equity instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss is recorded in profit or loss as “Interest and similar income”; see Note 19, when the right to the collection has been established.

F-35

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f.8)

Financial guarantees and letters of credit -

The Group issues financial guarantees, and letters of credit.

Financial guarantees are initially recognized in the consolidated financial statements (within provisions) at fair value, which is equivalent to the commission received. Subsequent to initial recognition, the recognized liability is measured at the higher amount between: a) amount initially recognized less its cumulative amortization; and b) an Expected Credit Loss (“ECL”) provision determined as set out in Note 3.4(h)(ii).

The commission received is recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the caption “Fee income from financial services, net” on a straight-line basis over the life of the guarantee.

Letters of credit are commitments under which, over the duration of the commitment, the Group is required to provide a loan with

pre-specified

terms to the customer. Similar to financial guarantee contracts, these contracts are within the scope of the ECL requirements.

The nominal contractual value of financial guarantees and letters of credit, where the loan agreed to be provided is on market terms, is not recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position. The nominal values of these instruments together with the corresponding ECLs are disclosed in Note 6(d).

(f.9)

Reclassification of financial assets and liabilities -

The reclassification of financial assets will take place as long as the business model that manages the financial assets is changed. It is expected that this change is very rare. These changes are determined by Management because of external or internal changes and must be significant for the Group’s operations and demonstrable to third parties. Consequently, a change in the Group’s business model will take place only when it begins or ceases to carry out an activity that is significant for its operations. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group has not reclassified its financial assets after their initial recognition. Financial liabilities are never reclassified.

F-36

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f.10)

Repurchase agreements -

Securities sold under repurchase agreements on a specified future date are not derecognized from the consolidated statement of financial position since the Group retains substantially all of the risks and rewards inherent to its ownership. Cash received is recognized as an asset with the corresponding obligation to return it, including accrued interest, as a liability, reflecting the transaction’s economic substance as a loan to the Group. The difference between the sale and repurchase price is recorded as interest expense and is accrued over the life of the agreement using the effective interest rate and is recognized in the caption “Interest and similar expenses” of the consolidated statement of income.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group did not keep any repurchase agreements.

(g)

Modification of financial assets and liabilities -

(g.1)

Modification of financial assets -

When the contractual cash flows of a financial asset are renegotiated or otherwise modified as a result of commercial restructuring activity rather than due to credit risk and impairment considerations, the Group performs an assessment to determine whether the modifications result in the derecognition of that financial asset. For financial assets, this assessment is based on qualitative factors.

When assessing whether or not to derecognize a loan to a customer, among others, the Group considers the following factors:

•

Change in the loan’s currency.

•

Introduction of an equity feature.

•

Change in customer’s credit risk.

•

If the modification is such that the instrument would no longer meet the SPPI criterion.

If the modification does not result in cash flows that are substantially different, the modification does not result in derecognition. Based on the change in cash flows discounted at the original EIR, the Group records a modification gain or loss, to the extent that an impairment loss has not already been recorded.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(g.2)

Modification of financial liabilities -

When the modification of the terms of an existing financial liability is not judged to be substantial and, consequently, does not result in derecognition, the amortized cost of the financial liability is recalculated by computing the present value of estimated future contractual cash flows that are discounted at the financial liability’s original EIR. Any resulting difference is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

Regarding the financial liabilities, the Group considers a substantial amendment based on qualitative factors and provided it exists a difference between the present value of the discounted cash flows under the new conditions and the original book value of the financial liability is larger than ten percent.

(h)

Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities -

(h.1)

Derecognition due to substantial change in terms and conditions -

The Group derecognizes a financial asset, such as a loan to a customer, when the terms and conditions have been renegotiated to the extent that, substantially, it becomes a new loan, with the difference recognized as a derecognition gain or loss, to the extent that an impairment loss has not already been recorded.

(h.2)

Derecognition other than for substantial modification -

(h.2.1)

Financial assets

A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset have expired.

The Group has transferred the financial asset if, and only if, either:

•

Has transferred its contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset, or

•

It retains the rights to the cash flows, but has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a “pass-through” arrangement.

F-3

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Pass-through arrangements are transactions whereby the Group retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of a financial asset (the ‘original asset’), but assumes a contractual obligation to pay those cash flows to one or more entities (the ‘eventual recipients’), when all of the following conditions are met:

•

The Group has no obligation to pay amounts to the eventual recipients unless it has collected equivalent amounts from the original asset.

•

The Group cannot sell or pledge the original asset other than as security to the eventual recipients.

•

The Group has to remit any cash flows it collects on behalf of the eventual recipients without material delay. In addition, the Group is not entitled to reinvest such cash flows, except for investments in cash or cash equivalents including interests earned, during the period between the collection date and the date of agreed revision with the eventual recipients.

A transfer only qualifies for derecognition if either:

•

The Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or

•

The Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.

The Group considers that control is transferred if, and only if, the transferee has the ability to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party and is able to exercise that ability unilaterally.

When the Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards and has retained control of the asset, the asset continues to be recognized only to the extent of the Group’s continuing involvement, in which case, the Group also recognizes an associated liability. The transferred asset and the associated liability are measured on a basis that reflects the rights and obligations that the Group retains.

When the continuing involvement takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset, the amount of the Group’s continuing involvement will be the lowest between the asset amount and the maximum amount of consideration the Group may be required to pay.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

When the continuing involvement takes the form of a written or purchased option (or both) over the transferred asset, the amount of the Group’s continuing involvement will be the amount of the transferred asset that the Group could repurchase. In the case of a written put option on an asset that is measured at fair value, the amount of the Group’s continuing involvement will be limited to the lowest between the fair value of the transferred asset and the option exercising price.

The net loss originated as consequence of the derecognition of financial asset accounts measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between the book value (impairment included) and the amount received.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group did not recognize net losses as consequence of derecognition of financial assets accounts.

(h.2.2)

Financial liabilities

A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability has been discharged, cancelled or has expired. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference between the carrying value of the original financial liability and the consideration paid is recognized in profit or loss of the period .

(i)

Impairment of financial assets -

(i)

Overview of the expected credit loss principles -

The Group records an allowance for expected credit losses for all loans and other debt financial assets not held at fair value through profit or loss, together with financial guaranteed contracts. Equity instruments are not subject to impairment under IFRS 9.

The determination of the expected credit loss is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset, unless there has been no significant increase in credit risk since origination, in which case, the allowance is based on the

12-month

expected credit loss as described in (ii) below. The policies for determining whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk are set out in Note 30.1(d).

Both lifetime expected credit loss and

12-month

expected credit loss are calculated on either an individual basis or a collective basis, depending on the nature of the portfolio. The Group’s policy for grouping financial assets measured on a collective basis is explained in Note 30.1(d).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group has established a policy to perform an assessment, at the end of each reporting period, of whether a financial instrument’s credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition. This is further explained in Note 30.1(d).

Based on the above mentioned process, IFS groups its loans into “Stage 1”, “Stage 2”, “Stage 3” and purchased or originated credit impaired financial assets (“POCI”), as described below:

Stage 1: When loans are first recognized, the Group recognizes an allowance based on the

12-month

expected credit loss. Stage 1 also includes loans whose credit risk has improved and the loan has been reclassified from Stage 2.

Stage 2: When a loan has shown a significant increase in credit risk since inception, the Group records an allowance based on the expected credit loss for the entire lifetime of the financial asset. Stage 2 also includes loans whose credit risk has improved and the loan has been reclassified from Stage 3.

Stage 3: Loans considered credit impaired (as outlined in Note 30.1(d)). The Group records an allowance for the entire lifetime of the financial asset.

POCI: Purchased or originated credit impaired assets are financial assets that are impaired on initial recognition. POCI assets are recorded at fair value at original recognition and interest income is subsequently recognized based on a credit-adjusted EIR. ECLs are only recognized or released to the extent that there is a subsequent change in the expected credit losses. It should be noted that during the years 2022 and 2021, the Group has not purchased or originated POCI financial assets.

For financial assets for which the Group has no reasonable expectations of recovering either the entire outstanding amount, or a proportion thereof, the gross carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced. This is considered a (partial) derecognition of the financial asset.

The Group recognizes a value correction for expected credit losses on the following financial assets:

•

Financial assets that are measured at amortized cost.

•

Financial assets that are measured at fair value with changes in other comprehensive income if the following two conditions are met:

(i)

The financial asset is maintained within a business model whose objective is achieved by obtaining contractual cash flows and selling financial assets; and

F-41

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(ii)

The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise, on specified dates, to cash flows that are only payments of the principal and interest on the outstanding principal amount.

•

Accounts receivable from leases.

•

Assets from contracts.

•

Financial guarantee contracts.

In this regard, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group’s financial assets subject to a correction for expected credit loss are the following:

•

Cash and due from banks.

•

Inter-bank funds.

•

Financial investments; see Notes 3.4(f), 5 and 30.1(e).

•

Loans; see Notes 3.4(f.1), 6 and 30.1(d).

•

Due from customers on acceptances.

•

Other accounts receivable and other assets.

The Group assesses periodically impairment alerts derived from factors such as

Covid-19,

the political and economic context of the country, and the effects of the international conflicts that may affect Peru, with the purpose of timely identifying an increase in the credit loss risk. Thus, for those financial assets other than financial investments and the loan portfolio, Management has estimated the expected credit loss, concluding that it is neither significant nor relevant, given that the maximum period considered for measuring expected credit losses is very small or, even if it implies a longer term, because the main debtor is the Central Reserve Bank (“BCRP”, by its Spanish acronym) or corresponds to cash in vaults of the Group.

(ii)

Calculation of ECL -

The Group calculates ECL based on three probability-weighted scenarios to measure the expected cash shortfalls, discounted at an approximation to the EIR. A cash shortfall is the difference between the cash flows that are due to an entity in accordance with the contract and the cash flows that the entity expects to receive.

The mechanics of the ECL calculations are described below, and the key elements are the following:

•

PD (“Probability of default”) is an estimate of the likelihood of default over a given time horizon. A default may only happen at a certain time over the assessed period, if the financial asset has not been previously derecognized and is still in the portfolio. The definition of PD is further explained in Note 30.1(d).

F-42

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

EAD (“Exposure at default”) is an estimate of the exposure at a future default date, taking into account expected changes in the exposure after the reporting date, including repayments of principal and interest, whether scheduled by contract or otherwise, expected drawdowns on committed facilities, and accrued interest from missed payments. The definition of EAD is further explained in Note 30.1(d).

•

LGD (“Loss Given Default”) is an estimate of the loss arising in the case where a default occurs at a given time. It is based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due and those that the lender would expect to receive, including from the realization of any collateral. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the EAD. The definition of LGD is further explained in Note 30.1(d).

When estimating the ECLs, the Group considers three scenarios (optimistic, base and pessimistic). Each of these is associated with different PDs, as presented in Note 30.1(d). When is relevant, the assessment of multiple scenarios also incorporates how defaulted loans are expected to be recovered, including the probability that the loans will “cure” and the value of collateral or the amount that might be received for selling the asset.

With the exception of credit cards, for which the treatment is separately set out in (iv) below, the maximum period for which the credit losses are determined is the contractual life of a financial instrument (considering the prepayments) unless the Group has the legal right to call it earlier.

Impairment losses and reversals are accounted for and disclosed separately from modification losses or gains that are accounted for as an adjustment of the financial asset’s gross carrying value.

The criteria followed for calculating the ECL based on each stage are described below:

•

Stage 1: The provision for credit losses of those financial instruments that do not show a significant increase in risk since the initial recognition, will be calculated as the expected credit losses in the following 12 months. The group calculates the expectation that there is a probability of default (PD) in the 12 months after the reporting date. To this probability of default is multiplied and expected loss in case of default (LGD) and exposure on the date of default (EAD) and discounting the original effective interest rate. This calculation is made for each of the three scenarios (optimistic, base and pessimistic) defined by the Group.

F-43

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

Stage 2: When the financial instrument shows a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, the provision of credit losses of this financial instrument will be calculated as the expected credit loss throughout the life of this asset. The calculation method is similar to that for Stage 1, including the use of multiple scenarios, but expected credit loss is estimated over the lifetime of the instrument.

•

Stage 3: When there is objective evidence that the financial instrument is impaired, the provision of credit losses will be calculated as the expected credit loss over the life of the asset. The method is similar to that for Stage 2, with the PD set at 100 percent.

It is possible that the inputs and models used to calculate the expected loss do not reflect all the characteristics of the market as of the date of the financial statements. This is why, occasionally, subsequent qualitative adjustments to the model are performed when there are significant differences. See Note 30.1(d.7).

Financial guarantee contracts

The Group measures each financial guarantee as the highest of the amount initially recognized minus cumulative amortization recognized in the consolidated statement of income, and the ECL provision. For this purpose, the Group estimates ECL based on the present value of the expected payments to reimburse the holder for a credit loss that it incurs. The deficits are discounted by the risk-adjusted interest rate relevant to the exposure. The ECLs related to financial guarantee contracts are recognized in provisions.

(iii)

Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income -

The ECLs for debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income do not reduce the carrying amount of these financial assets in the consolidated statement of financial position, which remains at fair value. However, the expected losses that arise at each measurement date must be reclassified from other comprehensive income to results of the period.

(iv)

Credit cards -

The Group calculates the expected losses in a period that reflects the Group’s expectations regarding the client’s behavior, probability of default and the Group’s future risk mitigation procedures that could include the reduction or cancellation of lines of credit. Based on past experience and the Group’s expectations, until October 2021, the period during which the Group calculates the expected lifetime losses of this product was 17 months. From November 2021 onwards, that period was adjusted to 16 months, period that was maintained for 2022.

F-44

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The assessment of whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk for revolving products is similar to other credit products. This is based on changes in the customer’s credit rating, as explained in Note 30.1(d).

The interest rate used to discount the ECL for credit cards is based on the average effective interest rate that is expected to be charged over the expected period of exposure to the facilities. This estimation takes into account that many facilities are repaid in full each month and are consequently not charged interest.

(v)

Forward-looking information -

In its expected credit loss models, the Group relies on the following macroeconomic variables as forward-looking information inputs as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022		2021
GDP growth		X		X
Unemployment rate		X
Gross capital formation				X
Consumer				X
Domestic demand		X		X
Formal labor salary		X
Informal labor salary		X

The inputs and models used, see Note 30.1, for calculating ECLs may not always capture all characteristics of the market at the date of the consolidated financial statements. To reflect this, qualitative adjustments or overlays are occasionally made as temporary adjustments when such differences are significantly material. Detailed information about these inputs are provided in Note 30.1(d).

(vi)

Valuation of guarantees -

To mitigate the credit risks on financial assets, the Group generally uses three types of guarantees: physical guarantee, personal guarantees and title guarantees.

The guarantee, unless recovered, is not recorded in the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position. However, the fair value of the guarantee affects the calculation of the expected losses, and because of that, it is assessed periodically.

The nominal contract value of the guarantees and the letters of credit not used where the loan was agreed to be granted is in market terms, is not recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position. The nominal values of these instruments together with the corresponding expected losses are disclosed in Note 30.1(d).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

To the extent possible, the Group uses active market data for valuing financial assets held as guarantees.

Non-financial

guarantees, such as real estate, is valued based on data provided by third parties such as appraisers.

(vii)

Write-offs -

Financial assets are written off only when the Group has stopped pursuing the recovery, at which time the cumulative provision recorded coincides with the total amount of the asset.

(viii)

Refinanced and modified loans -

The Group may make concessions or modifications to the original terms of loans as a response to the borrower’s financial difficulties, rather than taking possession or to otherwise enforce collection of guarantees. Once the terms have been renegotiated, any impairment is measured using the original EIR (as calculated before the modification of terms). It is the Group’s policy to monitor refinanced loans to help ensure that future payments continue to be likely to occur.

A refinanced asset is initially classified into Stage 2 and there will be no

clean-up

period. However, if the financial asset presents a default mark, it will be reclassified from Stage 2 to Stage 3.

(j)

Hedge derivatives -

Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. All derivatives are recognized as assets when the fair value is positive and they are recorded as “Accounts receivables related to derivative financial instruments” under “Other accounts receivable and other assets, net” and as liabilities when they are negative and they are recorded as “Accounts payable related to derivative financial instruments” under “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities” in the consolidated statement of financial position.

Derivatives can be designated as hedging instruments under hedge accounting and in the event they qualify, depending upon the nature of the hedged item, the method for recognizing gains or losses from changes in fair value will be different. These derivatives, which are used to hedge exposures to risk or modify the characteristics of financial assets and liabilities and that meet IFRS 9 criteria, are recognized as hedging accounting.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments or that do not qualify for hedging accounting are initially recognized at fair value and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value, which is estimated based on the market exchange rate and interest rate. Gains or losses due to changes in their fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of income, see Note 3.4(f.2).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In accordance with IFRS 9, to qualify for hedge accounting, all of the following conditions must be met:

(i)

The hedging relationship consists of only hedging instruments and eligible hedged items.

(ii)

At the inception of the hedge, there is formal designation and documentation of the hedging relationship and the entity’s risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. This documentation will include the identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and the way the entity will assess if the hedging relationship meets the hedge effectiveness requirements.

(iii)

The hedging relationship meets all the following hedge effectiveness requirements:

•

There is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument.

•

The effect of the credit risk does not dominate the value changes that result from that economic relationship.

•

The hedge ratio of the hedging relationship is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the hedged item that the entity actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that the entity actually uses to hedge that quantity of the hedged item.

IFRS 9 presents three hedge accounting categories: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, and hedge of net investments in a foreign operation. The Group uses derivatives as hedging instruments under cash flow hedges, as detailed in Note 10(b).

For derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedge, the effective portion of derivative gains or losses is recognized in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedge, and reclassified to income in the same period or periods in which the hedge transaction affects income. The portion of gain or loss on derivatives that represents the ineffective portion or the hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness is recognized immediately in income. Amounts originally recorded in other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to income are recorded in the corresponding income or expenses lines in which the related hedged item is reported.

When a hedging instrument expires, is sold, when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting or when the Group

re-designates

a hedge, the cumulative gain or loss existing in other comprehensive income is kept and recognized in income when the hedged item is ultimately recognized in the consolidated statement of income. When a projected transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income is immediately transferred to the consolidated statement of income.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(k)

Leases -

The determination of whether an arrangement is a lease, or contains a lease, is based on the substance of the arrangement at contract inception: whether the fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or whether the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset., even if it is not explicitly specified in the contract in exchange for consideration.

(i)

The Group as a lessee -

The Group, as a lessee, applies a single recognition and measurement approach for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of

low-value

assets.

•

Right-of-use

assets -

The Group recognizes

right-of-use

assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e., the date the underlying asset is available for use).

Right-of-use

assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, and adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of

right-of-use

assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognized, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received. The Group holds as

right-of-use

assets: land lots, buildings and facilities and furniture and equipment. Land lots do not depreciate; buildings and facilities and furniture and equipment depreciate based on the straight-line method during the lease term and are presented in Note 8 “Property, furniture and equipment, net”, and are subject to impairment.

•

Lease liabilities -

The Group recognizes lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease payments to be made over the lease term. Given that this interest rate implicit in the lease agreement is not easily determinable, in the calculation of the present value of the lease payments, the Group uses the rate it applies to its loans. The lease payments include fixed payments (less any lease incentives receivable), variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees. The lease payments also include the exercise price of a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised by the Group and payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects exercising the option to terminate. Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate are recognized as expenses in the period in which the event or condition that triggers the payment occurs. Lease liabilities are presented in Note 10 as “Lease liabilities” in the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities”.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group performs accounting estimates related to the determination of terms and rates of the lease agreements, as detailed below:

•

Determination of the lease term for lease contracts with renewal and termination options The Group as a lessee determines the lease term as the

non-cancellable

term of the lease, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if it is reasonably certain to be exercised, or any periods covered by an option to terminate the lease, if it is reasonably certain not to be exercised. The Group applies judgement in evaluating whether it is reasonably certain whether or not to exercise the option to renew or terminate the lease. That is, it considers all relevant factors that create an economic incentive for it to exercise either the renewal or termination. After the commencement date, the Group reassesses the lease term if there is a significant event or change in circumstances that is within its control that affects its ability to exercise or not to exercise the option to renew or to terminate (e.g., construction of significant leasehold improvements or significant customisation of the leased asset).

•

Estimating the incremental borrowing rate To determine the interest rate implicit in the lease, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate - “IBR” to measure lease liabilities. The IBR is the rate of interest that the Group would have to pay to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the

right-of-use

asset in a similar economic environment. The IBR therefore reflects what the Group ‘would have to pay’, which requires estimation when no observable rates are available or when they need to be adjusted to reflect the terms and conditions of the lease (for example, when leases are not in the subsidiary’s functional currency).The Group estimates the IBR using observable inputs such as the free-risk interest rates, Peruvian government yield curves of global bonds (in Dollars) and sovereign bonds (in Soles), and a credit risk differential, using a spread on the most recent debt issuance.

The Group used the exemption proposed by the standard for short term and low value assets; thus, short term and low value lease agreements are kept classified as operating leases, and the disbursements incurred due to these leases are recorded in the caption “Administrative expenses” of the consolidated statement of income.

F-4

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(ii)

The Group as a lessor -

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group holds the following types of leases:

•

Financial leases -

Leases in which the Group substantially transfers all risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset are classified as financial leases.

Financial leases are recognized as loans at the present value of the installments. The difference between the total value receivable and the present value of the loan is recognized as accrued interest. This income is recognized during the term of the lease using the effective interest rate method, which reflects a constant rate of return.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, leasing receivables are subject to the financial asset impairment policy; see Notes 3.4(f.1) and (g).

•

Operating leases -

Leases in which the Group does not substantially transfers all risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases.

Lease revenues obtained from investment properties are recorded using the straight-line method for the contract terms, and they are recorded as a revenue in the consolidated statement of income due to their operative nature, except for contingent lease revenues, which are recorded when realized.

The lease term is the

non-cancelable

period, together with any other additional period for which a lessee has the option of continuing with the lease, where, at the start date of the lease, Management is reasonably confident that a lessee will exercise such option.

Amounts received from tenants to terminate leases or to compensate impairment of leased facilities are recognized as revenues in the consolidated statement of income when the right to receive them arises.

Service charges, administration expenses and other recoverable expenses paid by the lessees and the revenues resulting from expenses charged to the lessees are recognized in the period in which the compensation becomes an account receivable. Service charges and administration expenses and other receipts are included in the gross revenues from rentals of the related costs, given that Management considers that the Group acts as principal party.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(l)

Customer Loyalty Program -

The Group has a customer loyalty program, which allows customers to accumulate points that can be exchanged for products. Loyalty points give rise to a separate performance obligation, since they provide a material right to the customer. A part of the transaction price is allocated to the loyalty points granted to customers on the basis of the relative independent selling price and is recognized as a contractual liability until the points are redeemed and presented as “Other accounts payable” in the item “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities” of the consolidated statement of financial position. Expenses are provisioned monthly regardless of the customer’s redemption of products.

By estimating the selling price independent of the loyalty points, the Group considers the probability of a client will use the cumulated points. The Group updates the estimates of points to be monthly redeemed and any adjustment to the liability balance will be recognized in the caption “Administrative expenses” of the consolidated statement of income.

(m)

Services of purchase-sale of financial investments “principal versus agent”-

The Group has contracts with customers to buy and sell, on their behalf, financial investments in the stock market and

over-the-counter

market. The Group acts as an agent in these agreements.

When another party participates in the supply of services to their client, the Group determines whether it is a principal or an agent in these transactions when evaluating the nature of its agreement with the client. The Group is a principal and records the revenue by gross amounts if it controls the committed services before transferring to the customer. However, if the Group’s role is only to arrange for another entity to provide the services, then the Group is an agent and records the revenues for the net amount it retains for its services as an agent.

(n)

Investments in associates -

An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the entity, but without having control over those policies. The considerations taken for determining significant influence are similar to those needed to determine control over Subsidiaries.

The Group’s investments in its associates are recognized initially at cost and then are accounted for using the equity method. The Group’s investments in associates are included in the caption “Other accounts receivable and other assets, net” of the consolidated statement of financial position, see note 10. Gains resulting from the use of the equity method of accounting are included in the caption “Other income” of the consolidated statement of income.

(o)

Investment property -

Investment property comprises land and buildings (mainly shopping malls, educational institutions and offices) that are not occupied substantially for use in the operations of the Group, nor for sale in the ordinary course of business, but are held primarily to earn rental income and capital appreciation. These buildings are substantially rented and not intended to be sold in the ordinary course of business. Investment property comprises completed property and property under construction or

re-development.

The Group measures its investment property at fair value according to the requirements of IAS 40 “Investment Property”, as it has chosen to use the fair value model as its accounting policy.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Investment property is measured initially at cost, including transaction costs, that include transfer taxes, professional fees for legal services and initial leasing commissions to bring the property to the condition necessary to start operating. The carrying amount also includes the cost of replacing part of an existing investment property at the time that cost is incurred if the recognition criteria are met.

Properties under construction are measured based on estimates prepared by independent real estate valuation experts, except where such values (e.g.

work-in-progress

incurred on properties under construction) cannot be readily determined. Accordingly, the

work-in-progress

incurred on properties under construction is measured at cost until either its fair value becomes reliably measurable or construction is completed (whichever is earlier). Investment property under construction includes the value of land, which is determined by appraisals performed by an accredited appraiser using the price per square meter as a market comparable method.

Subsequent to initial recognition, investment property is recorded at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in fair values are included in the caption “Net gain on investment property” of the consolidated statement of income in the year in which they arise.

Fair values are assessed periodically by Management, based on the discounted cash flows that are expected to be obtained from these investments. Fair values of investment properties under construction or investment properties held to operate in the future are assessed by an independent external appraiser, through the application of a recognized valuation model. See Note 7 for details of fair value and related assumptions.

F-5

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Transfers to or from Investment property are made only when there is a change in the use of the asset. In case of assets transferred from Investment property to Property, furniture and equipment, the reclassified amount corresponds to the asset’s fair value at the date when the asset’s use was changed. If an item of Property, furniture and equipment moves to Investment property, the Group transfers the fixed asset’s net cost to Investment property and the asset is subsequently measured at fair value according to the policies established by the Group.

During 2022, the Group transferred part of the “Orquideas and Andres Reyes” buildings, located in San Isidro, Lima, from caption “Property, furniture and equipment” to caption “Investment property”, for S/9,357,000 (during 2021, the Group transferred part of the “Pardo y Aliaga” building, located in San Isidro, Lima, from caption “Property, furniture and equipment” to caption “Investment property”, for S/1,615,000); see Note 7(c).

Investment property is derecognized when it has been disposed or withdrawn from use and no future economic benefit is expected from its disposal. The difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset would result in either gains or losses at the retirement or disposal of investment property. Any gains or losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of income of the year of retirement or disposal.

(p)

Property, furniture and equipment, net -

Property, furniture and equipment are stated at historical acquisition cost less residual value, cumulative depreciation and impairment losses, if applicable. The historical acquisition cost includes the expenses that are directly attributable to the acquired property, furniture or equipment. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to the consolidated statement of income; significant renewals and improvements are capitalized when it is probable that future economic benefits, in excess of the originally assessed standard of performance, will result from the use of the acquired property, furniture or equipment.

Land does not depreciate. Depreciation of property, furniture and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which are as follows:


		Years
Buildings and facilities		40 - 75
Leasehold improvements		5
Furniture and equipment		10
Vehicles		5

An item of property, furniture and equipment and any significant part initially recognized, is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising from the derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the consolidated statement of income.

F-5

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The residual value of each asset, its useful life and the selected depreciation method are periodically reviewed to ensure that they are consistent with current economic benefits and useful life expectations.

(q)

Assets seized through legal actions -

Assets seized through legal actions are recorded in the item “Others” of the caption “Other accounts receivable and other assets, net” of the consolidated statement of financial position, see note 10; and are recognized at the lower value between the cost or the estimated market value (minus cost to sell), determined from valuations made by independent appraisers. Reductions in book value are recorded in the consolidated statement of income.

(r)

Intangible assets with finite or indefinite useful lives -

Intangible assets with finite or indefinite useful lives are included in the caption “Intangibles and goodwill, net” of the consolidated statement of financial position. Intangibles assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition.

Intangibles assets with finite useful lives include costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of computer software used in operations and other minor intangible assets. The amortization expense is calculated following the straight-line method over the useful life estimated between 4 and 5 years; see Note 9.

Intangibles assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be sustainable. If not, the charge in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis.

On the other hand, when an insurance contract portfolio is acquired, whether directly from another insurance company, as described in Note 14(b), regarding the purchase of the portfolio of Complementary Accident Insurance for High-risk Activities (“SCTR” by its Spanish acronym) from Mapfre Peru Vida made in 2020, or as part of a business combination (the acquisition of Seguros Sura, see Note 9(b)), the difference between the fair value of the insurance contracts liability and the value of the insurance contract liability, as measured with the acquirer’s accounting policies, is recognized as an intangible asset named “Present Value of

In-Force

Business” (henceforth “PVIF”).

F-5

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The PVIFs resulting from the acquisition of Seguros Sura are recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at their estimated market value at the acquisition date. After the initial recognition, the PVIF is recorded at cost, minus the cumulative amortization and cumulative impairment loss, if any. The PVIF is amortized on a linear basis over the useful life of the acquired policies, which has been estimated in ten years.

The recoverability of PVIF is considered as part of the liability adequacy test performed at each reporting period. PVIF is derecognized when the related contracts are settled or disposed of.

Changes in the estimated useful life or in the pattern of consumption of the expected future economic benefits embedded in the PVIF are recorded by changing the amortization period or method and are treated as a change in an accounting estimate.

Gains or losses arising from the derecognition of an intangible asset are measured as the difference between the net amount of the disposal of the asset and the book value of said asset and they are recognized in the consolidated statement of income at the derecognition date.

(s)

Goodwill -

Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognized for

non-controlling

interests, and any previous interest held, if any, over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the fair value of net assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate consideration transferred, the Group

re-assesses

whether it has correctly identified all of the assets acquired and all the liabilities assumed and reviews the procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognized at the acquisition date. If from the reassessment still results in an excess of fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, then the gain is recognized in the consolidated statement of income.

After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any cumulative impairment loss, if any. A goodwill impairment testing is performed on a yearly basis. To perform an impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated, since the acquisition date, to one of the Group’s cash-generating units (henceforth “CGU”) that are expected to benefit from the business combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquirer are assigned to those units.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Goodwill impairment is determined by assessing the recoverable amount of each CGU (or group of CGUs) to which the goodwill relates. When the recoverable amount of the CGU is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.

Where the goodwill has been allocated to the CGU and part of the operation within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated to the disposed operation is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss of disposal. Goodwill disposed in these circumstances is measured based on the relative values of the disposed operation and the withheld portion of the CGU retained.

Goodwill, recorded by the Group; see Note 9(b), arises from the acquisition of Izipay, allocated to the CGU of Payments business unit and, Seguros Sura, allocated to the CGU of the insurance business unit.

(t)

Business combinations -

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method established by IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, which is measured at the acquisition date’s fair value, and the amount of any

non-controlling

interests in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Group chooses whether to measure the

non-controlling

interests in the acquiree at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in the caption “Administrative expenses” of the consolidated statement of income, see Note 1(d).

The Group determines that it has acquired a business when the acquired set of activities and assets include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The acquired process is considered substantive if it is critical for the capacity to the ability to continue producing outputs , and the inputs acquired include an organized workforce with the necessary skills, knowledge or experience to perform that process or it significantly contributes to the ability to continue producing outputs and is considered unique or scarce or cannot be replaced without incurring in significant costs, effort or delay in the ability of continue producing outputs.

When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer shall be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability that is a financial instrument and within the scope of IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”, is measured at fair value with the changes in the consolidated statement of income or in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is not within the scope of IFRS 9, this shall be measured according to the applicable IFRS. The contingent consideration that is classified as equity must not be measured again and its subsequent settlement shall be recorded in equity. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there have been no contingencies arising from business combinations.

A business combination between entities or businesses under common control is beyond the scope of IFRS 3, because it corresponds to a business combination in which all entities or businesses that are combined are ultimately controlled by the same part or parts, both before and after the business combination. In these transactions, the Group recognizes the assets acquired under the method of unification of interest, whereby the assets and liabilities of the combined companies are reflected in their book values and no commercial credit is recognized as a result of the combination.

(u)

Impairment of

non-financial

assets -

Property, furniture and

equipment,right-of-use

assets and intangible assets with a finite life are assessed to determine whether there are any indications of impairment as of the closing of each period. If any indication exists, the Group estimates the asset’s recoverable value. The recoverable amount of the assets is the highest between the value of an asset or a CGU less the costs of sale and its use value, and it is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash revenues that are largely independent from those of other assets or groups of assets.

When the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a

pre-tax

discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value minus costs to sell, an appropriate valuation model is used.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, including goodwill, are tested for impairment annually to determine if circumstances indicate that the value of the recoverable amount of the asset or a CGU (or group of CGUs) is greater than its carrying amount or recognize an impairment loss. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(v)

Due from customers on acceptances -

Due from customers on acceptances corresponds to accounts receivable from customers for import and export transactions, whose obligations have been accepted by the Group. The obligations that must be assumed by the Group for such transactions are recorded as liabilities.

(w)

Defined contribution pension plan -

The Group only operates a defined contribution pension plan. The defined contribution payable in the pension plan is in proportion to the services rendered to the Group by the employees and it is recorded as an expense in the caption “Salaries and employee benefits” of the consolidated statement of income. Unpaid contributions are recorded as liabilities.

(x)

Provisions -

Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or implicit) as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the consolidated statement of income, net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a

pre-tax

rate that reflects, where appropriate, the specific risks of the liability. When discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a financial expense.

(y)

Contingencies -

Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements, but are disclosed in notes to the consolidated financial statements, unless the probability of an outflow of resources is remote. Contingent assets are not recorded in the consolidated financial statements, but they are disclosed if it is probable that an inflow of economic benefits will emerge.

(z)

Fair value measurement -

Fair value is the price that would be received for the sale of an asset or paid for the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:

•

On the principal market for the asset or liability; or

•

In the absence of a principal market, on the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Group. Also, the fair value of a liability reflects its

non-performance

risk.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.

When possible, the Group measures the fair value of a financial instrument using the quoted price in an active market for that instrument. A market is regarded as active if transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

If there is no quoted price on an active market, then the Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure the fair value, maximizing the use of relevant and observable data and variables, and minimizing the use of unobservable data and variables. The chosen valuation technique incorporates all of the factors that market participants would take into account in pricing a transaction.

In the case of investment property, the Group has considered the specific requirements relating to highest and best use, valuation of premises and principal (or most advantageous) market. The determination of investment property fair value requires the use of estimations such as the future cash flows of the assets (e.g., leases, sales, fixed rents for the different lessees, variable rents based on the sales percentage, operating costs, construction costs, maintenance costs, and the use of discount rates).

Additionally, real estate development risks (such as construction and abandonment) are also taken into account when determining the fair value of the land related to the investment property under construction.

The fair value of investment property in the consolidated statement of financial position must reflect the volatile nature of real estate markets; therefore, Management and its appraisers use their market knowledge and professional criteria and do not depend solely on historical comparable transactions. In this sense, there is a higher degree of uncertainty than when a more active market exists for the estimation of fair value. Significant methods and assumptions used in the estimation of fair value of investment property are detailed in Note 7.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

All assets and liabilities for which the fair value is measured or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements are categorized within the fair value hierarchy described below:

•

Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 - Valuation techniques for input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable.

•

Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which data and variables of the lowest significant level to measure fair value are unobservable.

For assets and liabilities that are recognized at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis, the Group determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by

re-assessing

categorization at the end of each reporting period.

For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Group has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of hierarchy of the fair value, as explained above.

Fair values of financial instruments measured at amortized cost are disclosed in Note 31(b).

(aa)

Income Tax -

Income Tax is computed based on the separate financial statement of each Subsidiary.

Deferred Income Tax is accounted for in accordance with IAS 12 “Income Taxes”. In this sense, the deferred Income Tax reflects the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and the amounts determined for tax purposes. Deferred assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates that are expected to be in force in the years in which such temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Consequently, the deferred Income Tax has been calculated by applying the rates that are in force; see Note 17(c). The measurement of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities reflects the tax consequences that arise from the manner in which each individual entity of the Group expects, at the consolidated statement of financial position dates, to recover or settle the carrying amount of their assets and liabilities.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized regardless of when the temporary differences are likely to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized when it is probable that sufficient taxable income will be generated against which the deferred tax assets can be offset. At each consolidated statement of financial position date, unrecognized deferred assets and the carrying amount of deferred tax assets registered are assessed. A previously unrecognized deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it has now become probable that future taxable income will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. Likewise, the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset is reduced when it is no longer probable the generation of a sufficient taxable income that allow the application of the tax deferred asset.

According to IAS 12, the deferred Income Tax is determined by applying the Income Tax rate applicable to the retained earnings, recognizing any additional tax on distribution of dividends that may arise on the date when the liability is recognized.

(ab)

Segment information -

IFRS 8 “Operating Segments” requires that the information of operating segments be disclosed consistently with information provided by the chief operating decision maker, who allocates resources to the segments and assesses their performance. Segment information is presented in Note 28.

(ac)

Fiduciary activities and management of funds -

The Group provides trust management, investment management, advisory and custody services to third parties that result in the holding of assets on their behalf. These assets and the income arising thereon are excluded from these consolidated financial statements, as they are not assets of the Group; see Note 32.

Commissions generated from these activities are included in the caption “Fee income from financial services, net” of the consolidated statement of income.

(ad)

Earnings per share -

The amount of basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit for the year attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group does not have financial instruments with dilutive effect, therefore, basic and diluted earnings per share are identical for the years reported.

(ae)

Capital surplus -

It is the difference between the nominal value of shares issued and their public offering price made in 2007 and 2019. Capital surplus is presented net of expenses incurred in the issuance of shares.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(af)

Treasury stock -

Shares repurchased are recorded in the shareholders’ equity under treasury stock caption at their purchase price. No loss or gain is recorded in the consolidated statement of income arising from the purchase, sale, issuance or amortization of these instruments. Shares that are subsequently sold are recorded as a reduction in treasury stock, measured at the average price of treasury stock held at such date; and the resulting gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statement of changes in net equity in the caption “Retained earnings”.

(ag)

Cash and cash equivalents -

Cash presented in the consolidated statement of cash flows includes cash and due from banks balances with original maturities lower than three months, excludes the restricted funds, which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. The cash and cash equivalent item does not include accrued interest.

On the other hand, the cash collateral committed as part of a repurchase agreement is included in the “Cash and due from banks” caption of the consolidated statement of financial position; see Note 4(d).

(ah)

Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16: “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform” - Phase 1 -

Since the year 2019, the Group applies the exceptions of the Interest Rate Benchmark reform to all affected hedging relationships. A hedging relationship will be affected if the reform generates uncertainty about the moment or the amount of the cash flows related to the hedged account of the hedging instrument in the period prior to the replacement of the rate benchmark with the alternate rate benchmark, given that this rate can be almost risk free. With exceptions applied, the Group has the intention of avoiding any disruption in the existing relationships in the hedge accounting of cash flows and the fair value of interest rate risk which, in the absence of these amendments, would result in the ineffectiveness of the hedge and potential inconsistencies in the hedge accounting as result of the interest rate benchmark reform.

The exceptions provided by the amendments are:

•

“Highly probable” requirement for cash flow hedges: If the hedged item is a forecast transaction, it will be determined that the forecast transaction is highly probable by assuming that the interest rate benchmark on which the hedged cash flows are based is not altered as result of the interest rate benchmark reform.

•

Reclassification of the cash flow hedge reserve to statement of income: To determine if it is not expected that the hedged cash flows occur, it is assumed that the interest rate benchmark on which the hedged cash flows are based is not altered as result of the interest rate benchmark reform.

•

Economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedge instrument: It is assumed that the interest rate benchmark on which the hedged cash flows are based, and/or the interest rate benchmark on which the cash flows of the hedge instrument are based, is not altered as result of the interest rate benchmark reform.

At the end of the period 2022, the Group has exposure to mainly

USD-LIBOR

rates; thus, the impact was the change to the SOFR reference rate.

The main affected items within the Group are the derivative positions (interest rate swaps – IRS, and cross currency swaps – CCS, outstanding as of the transition date which accrue

USD-LIBOR

interest) as well as USD LIBOR interest-bearing loans.

F-6

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Additionally, the Group holds some financial instruments with exposure to the inter-bank EURIBOR rate (Euro Interbank Offered Rate). However, said exposure will continue at the indicated rate, since EURIBOR is considered a benchmark based in real transactions. The rate is defined by the European Money Markets Institute (EEMI).

According to the explained above, these amendments, did not have a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

(ai)

Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16: “Interest Rate Benchmark Reform” - Phase 2 -

Phase 2 of the Reference Interest Rate Reform provides temporary exceptions that address the effects on financial instruments when a benchmark interest rate offered is replaced by an alternative interest rate (virtually risk-free rates).

The amendments include the following practical exceptions:

•

A practical expedient to require contractual changes, or changes to cash flows that are directly required by the reform, to be treated as changes to a floating interest rate, equivalent to a movement in a market rate of interest.

•

Permit changes required by Interbank Offered Rates (henceforth “IBOR”) reform to be made to hedge designations and hedge documentation without the hedging relationship being discontinued.

•

Provide temporary relief to entities from having to meet the separately identifiable requirement when the risk-free interest rate instrument is designated as a hedge of a risk component.

F-63

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In March 2021, the FCA informed that all LIBOR rates would stop being published or no longer be representative, defining two dates: the first one, immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of Sterling Pound, Euro, Swiss Franc, Yen and US dollar, references to one week and two months; and the second one, immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the rest of US dollar rates, references to overnight, one, three, six and twelve months. In addition, in July 2021, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (henceforth the “ARRC”) announced that it was formally recommending the CME Group’s forward-looking Secured Overnight Financing Rate term rates (henceforth the “SOFR Term Rates”) as the benchmark rate.

As of December 31, 2022, Interbank maintains exposure to mainly

USD-LIBOR

rates; thus, the impact has been the change to another rate benchmark. In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (henceforth the “FCA”) is responsible of the regulation of the LIBOR rates. In the United States, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is leading the transition of the

USD-LIBOR

into the robust rate benchmark Secured Overnight Financial Rate (henceforth “SOFR”).

Regarding the exposures, among the items potentially affecting the Group are commercial loans, financing liabilities and derivative positions. The positions within the balance sheet that accrue interest at the

USD-LIBOR

rate are not significant and represents less than 3 percent of the asset or liability, respectively. In the case of commercial loans, the agreements have been reviewed and they are being changed to SOFR or replacement clauses (fallbacks) are being incorporated that imply changing to the SOFR rate before June 30, 2023. In the case of liabilities, there were exposures in loans and bonds. In the case of loans, the last date of interest calculation will be before June 30, 2023. All new loans are already based on SOFR. In the case of issued bonds, there is one issuance that could pay interest based on LIBOR in the future, but this issuance has a fallback clause, which determines the conditions governing contracts when indexes are not available. In derivative products, the Group adhered to the “ISDA Protocol”, to be aligned to the global market standard. Considering the local contracts, progress is being made in the negotiation process with clients and it is expected to finish before the stipulated period.

Note 10(b)(vi) details the nominal value and the average term in years of derivative financial instruments that are subject to the interest rate benchmark reform.

F-64

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

3.5

Standards issued but not yet effective -

Following is the description of the new and amended standards and interpretations issued, but which are not yet in force at the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. The Group intends to adopt these new and amended standards and interpretations, if applicable, when they become effective:

•

IFRS 17 “Insurance contracts”

In May 2017, the IASB issued IFRS 17 “Insurance Contracts”, a comprehensive new accounting standard for insurance contracts, covering recognition and measurement, reporting and disclosure. Once effective, this new accounting standard will replace IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts”, issued in 2005. IFRS 17 applies to all types of insurance contracts (i.e., life,

non-life,

direct insurance and

re-insurance),

regardless of the type of entities that issue them, as well as to certain guarantees and financial instruments with discretionary participation features. A few scope exceptions will apply. On the other hand, IFRS 17 introduces new accounting requirements for baking products with insurance features that may affect the determination of which instruments or which components thereof will be in the scope of IFRS 9 or IFRS 17.

IFRS 17 is effective for comparative reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Early application is permitted, provided the entity also applies IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 on or before the date that it first applies IFRS 17. The Group is applying these two standards since 2018.

Following is the description of the main impacts from the adoption of IFRS 17:

(a)

Classification and measurement -

The adoption of IFRS 17 has not changed the classification of the Group’s insurance contracts. However, it establishes specific principles for the recognition and measurement of insurance contracts held by the Group.

The key principles of IFRS 17 consider that the Group:

•

Identifies insurance contracts as those under which the entity accepts significant insurance risk from another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder.

•

Recognizes and separates in insurance contracts investment components and goods or services components from insurance services and records them according to other standards.

•

Divides insurance contracts into groups that it recognizes and measures:

•

A risk-adjusted present value of the future cash flows (fulfillment cash flow, or “FCF”) that incorporates all available information about the fulfilment cash flows in a way that is consistent with observable market information.

•

Plus:

•

An amount representing the unearned profit in the group of contracts (the contractual service margin, or “CSM”).

•

Recognizes profit from a group of insurance contracts over each period the Group provides insurance contract services, as the Group is released from risk. If a group of contracts is expected to be onerous (i.e., loss-making) over the remaining coverage period, the Group recognizes the loss immediately.

(b)

Transition

(b.1)

Transition methodology -

F-65

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group decided to apply the transition methodology under Fair Value, which consists of obtaining the amount under which a liability portfolio could be transferred to a third party. This amount was compared with the balance of the estimate of technical provisions (Best Estimate Liability – “BEL”) and Risk Adjustment existing at the transition date, and the result was the CSM as of said date. Also, it was determined the future benefit provided by the insurance contracts (Contractual Service Margin – CSM), and will be decommitted to the statement of income to the extent that the Group renders its services to the insured. The CSM balance at the date of transition into IFRS 17 was applied retrospectively for the policies in force at said date.

(b.1.1)

Calculation methodology

The calculation methodology that the Group has applied to determine the Fair Value amount of its portfolios in force as of the date of transition into IFRS 17 is the valuation technique of present value. In this sense, the following calculation components are taken into account:

•

An estimation of the future cash flows for the asset or liability subject to valuation.

•

The expectations of possible variations in the amount and the cash flows calendar that represent the uncertainty inherent to cash flows.

•

The time value of money, represented by the interest rate on risk-free monetary assets that present maturity dates or lives that coincide with the periods covered by the cash flows and do not involve neither uncertainty regarding the calendar nor risk of default for the holder (i.e., risk-free interest rate).

•

The price to bear the uncertainty inherent to cash flows (i.e., a risk premium).

•

Other factors that market participants may take into account considering the circumstances.

•

For a liability, the risk of default related to said liability, including the credit risk of the entity (i.e., the debtor).

(b.2)

Impact on the financial statements -

On the basis on current preliminary estimations, it is expected that the adoption of IFRS 17 may result in a reduction of the Group’s net equity that would oscillate between 8 and 10 percent, to be recorded in retained earnings as of January 1, 2022.

•

Amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements: Classification of Liabilities as Current or

Non-Current”

In January 2020, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 with the purpose of specifying the requisites for the classification of liabilities as current or

non-current.

The amendments clarify:

•

What is meant by a right to defer a settlement arrangement.

•

That a right to defer must exist at the end of the reporting period.

•

That liability classification unaffected by the likelihood that an entity will exercise its deferral right.

•

That only if an embedded derivative in a convertible liability is itself an equity instrument would the terms of a liability not impact its classification.

F-66

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on January 1, 2023 and must be applied in a retrospectively manner. These amendments are not applicable to the Group because given the nature of its operations (mainly banking and insurance), it does not perform the classification of current and

non-current

in its financial statements.

•

Amendments to IAS 8 “Accounting policies, changes in estimates and errors”: Definition of accounting estimates

In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 8, in which it introduces a definition of accounting estimates. The amendments clarify the distinction between changes in accounting estimates and changes in accounting policies and the correction of errors. Also, they clarify how entities use measurement techniques and inputs to develop accounting estimates.

The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and apply to changes in accounting policies and changes in accounting estimates that occur on or after the start of that period. Earlier application is allowed as long as this fact is disclosed.

It is not expected that the amendment will have a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2: Disclosure of Accounting Policies

In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 “Making Materiality Judgements”, in which it provides guidance and examples to help entities apply materiality judgments to accounting policy disclosures. The amendments aim to help entities provide accounting policy disclosures that are more useful by replacing the requirement for entities to disclose their “significant” accounting policies with a requirement to disclose their material accounting policies and adding guidance on how entities apply the concept of materiality in making decisions about accounting policy disclosures.

The amendments to IAS 1 are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023, with earlier application permitted. Since the amendments to the IFRS Practice Statement 2 provide

non-mandatory

guidance on the application of the definition of material to accounting policy information, an effective date for these amendments is not necessary.

As of the date of this report, the Group’s Management is assessing these amendments to determine their impact on their accounting policy information.

•

Amendments to IAS 12 “Income Taxes”: Deferred Tax related to assets and Liabilities arising from a single transaction

In May 2021, the Board issued amendments to IAS 12, which narrow the scope of the initial recognition exception under IAS 12, so that it no longer applies to transactions that give rise to equal taxable and deductible temporary differences.

The amendments should be applied to transactions that occur on or after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. In addition, at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented, a deferred tax asset (provided that sufficient taxable profit is available) and a deferred tax liability should also be recognized for all deductible and taxable temporary differences associated with leases and decommissioning obligations.

The Group is currently assessing these amendments to determine their impact on the consolidated financial statements.

3.6

Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions -

The preparation of the consolidated financial statement of the Group requires Management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of income, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the accompanying disclosures, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities. In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, Management has used judgments and assumptions about the future and other key sources to make its estimates at the reporting date, which have a significant risk that may cause a material adjustment to the value in books of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. The estimates and existing assumptions may change due to circumstances beyond the control of the Group and are reflected in assumptions if they occur. The items with the most impact recognized in the consolidated financial statements with judgements and/or considerable estimates are the following: the calculation of the impairment of the portfolio of loans and financial investments, the measurement of the fair value of the financial investments and investment properties, the assessment of the impairment of the goodwill, the liabilities for insurance contracts and the measurement of the fair value of derivative financial instruments; also, there are other estimates such as provisions for litigation, the estimated useful life of intangible assets, and property, furniture and equipment, and the estimation of assets and liabilities for deferred Income Tax, and the determination of terms and estimation of the interest rate of lease agreements. The accounting criteria used for each of these items are described in Note 3.4.

F-6

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

4.	Cash and due from banks and inter-bank funds

(a)

The detail of cash and due from banks is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Cash and clearing (b)		2,865,251		2,363,326
Deposits in the BCRP (b)		6,918,526		10,445,851
Deposits in banks (c)		2,923,999		3,607,134
Accrued interest		17,391		3,350

		12,725,167		16,419,661
Restricted funds (d)		468,244		684,804

Total		13,193,411		17,104,465

Cash and cash equivalents presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows exclude the restricted funds and accrued interest; see Note 3.4(ag).

(b)

In accordance with rules in force, Interbank is required to maintain a legal reserve to honor its obligations with the public. This reserve is comprised of funds kept in Interbank and in the BCRP and is made up as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Legal reserve (*)
Deposits in the BCRP		6,055,726		6,366,151
Cash in vaults		2,719,277		2,171,601

Subtotal legal reserve		8,775,003		8,537,752
Non-mandatory reserve
Overnight deposit in BCRP (**)		762,800		—

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Cash and clearing		145,903		191,673
Term deposits in BCRP (***)		100,000		4,079,700

Subtotal non-mandatory reserve		1,008,703		4,271,373

Cash balances not subject to legal reserve		71		52

Total		9,783,777		12,809,177

(*)

The legal reserve funds maintained in the BCRP are

non-interest

bearing, except for the part that exceeds the minimum reserve required that accrued interest at a nominal annual rate. According to the information note “Interest rate of the reserve funds in the Central Reserve Bank of Peru”, starting in February 2022, the rate used for the calculation of interest was the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) (in the year 2021, the rate used was the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)). As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the excess in foreign currency accrued interest in US Dollars at an annual average rate of 3.79 and 0.01 percent. During 2022 and 2021, Interbank did not maintain excess reserves in national currency.

In Group Management’s opinion, Interbank has complied with the requirements established by the rules in force related to the computation of the legal reserve.

(**)	As of December 31, 2022, corresponds to an overnight deposit in foreign currency for US$200,000,000 (approximately equivalent to S/762,800,000) in the BCRP, with maturity in the first days of January 2023 and accrued interest an annual interest rate of 4.39 percent.

(***)

As of December 31, 2022, corresponds to a term deposit in local currency that Interbank maintained in the BCRP, mature in the first days of January 2023, and accrues interest at an annual interest rate of 7.50 percent (five term deposits in local currency that Interbank maintained in the BCRP, matured in the first days of January 2022, and accrued interest at an annual interest rate of 2.50 percent, as of December 31, 2021).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c)

Deposits in domestic banks and abroad are mainly in Soles and US Dollars, they are freely available and accrue interest at market rates.

(d)

The Group maintains restricted funds related to:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Inter-bank transfers (*)		431,052		141,681
Derivative financial instruments, Note 10(b)(i)		34,784		121,613
Repurchase agreements with BCRP (**)		—		419,410
Others		2,408		2,100

Total		468,244		684,804

(*)	Funds held at BC RP to guarantee transfers made through the Electronic Clearing House (“CCE”, by its Spanish acronym).

(**)	As of December 31, 2021, correspond to deposits maintained in the BCRP which guarantee agreements with said entity; see Note 12(b).

(e)

Inter-bank funds

These are loans made between financial institutions with maturity, in general, minor than 30 days. As of December 31, 2022, Inter-bank funds assets and liabilities accrue interest at an annual rate of 7.50 percent in local currency (annual rate of 2.50 percent in local currency for Inter-bank funds assets, as of December 31, 2021); and do not have specific guarantees.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

5.	Financial investments

(a)

This caption is made up as follows, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (b) and (c)		16,716,517		17,629,787
Investments at amortized cost (d)		3,231,139		3,225,174
Investments at fair value through profit or loss (e)		1,932,993		2,706,271
Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (f)		512,884		623,718

Total financial investments		22,393,533		24,184,950

Accrued income
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (b)		322,425		291,488
Investments at amortized cost (d)		71,640		70,856

Total		22,787,598		24,547,294

In the determination of the expected loss for the financial investments’ portfolio, the Group has not needed to apply any subsequent adjustment to the model through the expert judgment, as it has been in the case of the loan portfolio, see Note 30.1, because the most significant investments held as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are permanently evaluated by local and international credit-rating agencies, in an individual manner. Said agencies periodically modify the ratings of the issuers in accordance with the risk variation of each of the financial instrument, based on the particular situation of issuers.

F-7

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

Following is the detail of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income:


			Unrealized gross amount									Annual effective interest rates
	Amortized cost		Gains		Losses (c)			Estimated fair value		Maturity		S/				US$
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)				Min		Max		Min		Max
												%		%		%		%
2022
Corporate, leasing and subordinated bonds (*)		8,707,969		9,477		(1,143,244	)		7,574,202		Jan-23 / Feb-97		1.60		13.26		5.10		13.14
Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru (**)		7,878,445		590		(1,270,254	)		6,608,781		Sep-23 / Feb-55		1.89		8.14		—		—
Variable interest Certificates of Deposit issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru		1,434,752		89		(5	)		1,434,836		Jan-23 / Mar-23		7.29		7.46		—		—
Bonds guaranteed by the Peruvian Government		512,316		1,698		(26,286	)		487,728		Oct-24 / Oct-33		3.48		6.01		6.86		8.25
Global Bonds of the Republic of Peru		508,813		—		(55,527	)		453,286		Jul-25 / Dec-32		—		—		5.18		5.60
Global Bonds of the Republic of Colombia		82,836		—		(2,026	)		80,810		Mar-23 / Feb-24		—		—		6.07		6.23
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru		44,234		—		(366	)		43,868		Mar-23		2.28		2.28		—		—
Other		39,627		—		(6,621	)		33,006		Nov-31 / Feb-34		—		—		3.85		6.06

Total		19,208,992		11,854		(2,504,329	)		16,716,517

Accrued interest									322,425

Total									17,038,942


			Unrealized gross amount									Annual effective interest rates
	Amortized cost		Gains		Losses (c)			Estimated fair value		Maturity		S/				US$
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)				Min		Max		Min		Max
												%		%		%		%
2021
Corporate, leasing and subordinated bonds (*)		8,125,394		326,929		(300,143	)		8,152,180		Jan-22 / Feb-97		0.31		12.48		0.74		23.15
Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru (**)		7,374,357		44		(655,048	)		6,719,353		Aug-24 / Feb-55		3.03		6.91		—		—
Variable interest Certificates of Deposit issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru		1,440,926		131		(113	)		1,440,944		Jan-22 / Mar-22		0.04		0.04		—		—
Global Bonds of the Republic of Peru		537,871		—		(11,148	)		526,723		Jul-25 / Dec-32		—		—		1.81		2.83
Bonds guaranteed by the Peruvian Government		529,142		7,973		(12,710	)		524,405		Oct-24 / Oct-33		3.35		5.51		3.53		7.62
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit issued by the Central Reserve Bank of Peru		179,815		—		(608	)		179,207		Jan-22 / Mar-23		0.31		2.28		—		—
Global Bonds of the Republic of Colombia		88,180		—		(1,205	)		86,975		Mar-23 / Feb-24		—		—		1.93		2.48

Total		18,275,685		335,077		(980,975	)		17,629,787

Accrued interest									291,488

Total									17,921,275

(*)

As of December 31, 2022, Inteligo holds corporate bonds from several entities for approximately S/

116,603

,000, which guarantee loans with Bank J. Safra Sarasin, see Note 12(h). As of December 31, 2021, Inteligo held corporate bonds and mutual funds from several entities for approximately S/

391,616

,000, which guarantee loans with Credit Suisse First Boston and Bank J. Safra Sarasin; see Note 12(h) and (i).

(**)	As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interbank holds Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru for approximately S/ 1,047,815 ,000 and S/ 335,529 ,000, respectively, which guarantee loans with the BCRP, see Note 12(b).

The following table shows the credit quality and maximum exposure to credit risk based on the Group’s internal credit rating of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The amounts presented do not consider impairment.

F-7

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022								2021
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		2,271,038		—		—		2,271,038		1,917,827		—		—		1,917,827
Standard grade		13,499,740		945,321		—		14,445,061		14,815,454		896,506		—		15,711,960
Sub-standard grade		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Impaired
Individual		—		—		418		418		—		—		—		—

Total		15,770,778		945,321		418		16,716,517		16,733,281		896,506		—		17,629,787

(c)

The Group, according to the business model applied to these debt instruments, has the capacity to hold these investments for a sufficient period that allows the early recovery of the fair value, up to the maximum period for the early recovery or the due date.

F-7

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The following table shows the analysis of changes in fair value and the corresponding expected credit loss:


	2022
Gross carrying amount of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		16,733,281			896,506			—			17,629,787
New originated or purchased assets		3,211,041			—			—			3,211,041
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(1,939,686	)		(10,531	)		—			(1,950,217	)
Change in fair value		(1,906,272	)		(14,416	)		(9,210	)		(1,929,898	)
Transfers to Stage 1		—			—			—			—
Transfers to Stage 2		(88,095	)		88,095			—			—
Transfers to Stage 3		(2,162	)		(7,805	)		9,967			—
Write-offs		—			—			—			—
Foreign exchange effect		(237,329	)		(6,528	)		(339	)		(244,196	)

End of year balances		15,770,778			945,321			418			16,716,517


	2022
Movement of the allowance for expected credit losses for debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at the beginning of the period		9,456			31,652			—			41,108
New originated or purchased assets		3,132			—			—			3,132
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(416	)		(46	)		—			(462	)
Transfers to Stage 1		—			—			—			—
Transfers to Stage 2		(105	)		105			—			—
Transfers to Stage 3		(305	)		(993	)		1,298			—
Effect on the expected credit loss due to the change of the stage during the year		—			3,237			12,311			15,548
Others (*)		(1,186	)		(4,282	)		—			(5,468	)
Write-offs		—			—			—			—
Recoveries		—			—			—			—
Foreign exchange effect		246			(73	)		(57	)		116

Expected credit loss at the end of the period		10,822			29,600			13,552			53,974

(*)	Corresponds mainly to the effects on the expected loss because of changes in investment ratings and that not necessarily have resulted in stage transfers during the year.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2021
Gross carrying amount of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		17,690,212			212,140			—		17,902,352
New originated or purchased assets		4,515,849			—			—		4,515,849
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(3,104,080	)		(149,785	)		—		(3,253,865	)
Change in fair value		(2,845,868	)		608,321			—		(2,237,547	)
Transfers to Stage 1		3,979			(3,979	)		—		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(217,915	)		217,915			—		—
Transfers to Stage 3		—			—			—		—
Write-offs		—			—			—		—
Foreign exchange effect		691,104			11,894			—		702,998

End of year balances		16,733,281			896,506			—		17,629,787


	2021
Movement of the allowance for expected credit losses for debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Expected credit loss at the beginning of the period		9,417			62,143			—		71,560
New originated or purchased assets		2,723			246			—		2,969
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(3,360	)		(27	)		—		(3,387	)
Transfers to Stage 1		1,058			(1,058	)		—		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(857	)		857			—		—
Transfers to Stage 3		—			—			—		—
Effect on the expected credit loss due to the change of the stage during the year		—			15,696			—		15,696
Others (*)		80			(46,256	)		—		(46,176	)
Write-offs		—			—			—		—
Recoveries		—			—			—		—
Foreign exchange effect		395			51			—		446

Expected credit loss at the end of the period		9,456			31,652			—		41,108

(*)	Corresponds mainly to the effects on the expected loss because of changes in investment ratings and that not necessarily have resulted in stage transfers during the year.

In the determination of the expected loss for the portfolio of financial investments, for the years 2022 and 2021; it has not been necessary to perform a subsequent adjustment to the model because it captures the expected loss in a satisfactory manner considering the Group portfolio investments.

As a result of the assessment of the impairment of its debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, the Group recorded a loss of S/12,752,000 during the year 2022, a reversal of impairment of S/30,898,000 during the year 2021, and an expense of S/32,904,000 during the year 2020, which are presented in the caption “(Loss) recovery to impairment of financial investments” in the consolidated statement of income. The movement of unrealized results of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of Income Tax and

non-controlling

interest, is presented in Notes 16(d) and (e).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, investments at amortized cost corresponds to Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru issued in Soles, for an amount of S/3,302,779,000 and S/3,296,030,000, respectively, including accrued interest. Said investments present low credit risk and the expected credit loss is not significant.

As of December 31, 2022, these investments have maturity dates that range from September 2023 to August 2037, have accrued interest at effective annual rates ranging from 4.29 percent and 6.64 percent, and estimated fair value amounting to approximately S/2,949,507,000 (as of December 31, 2021, their maturity dates ranged from September 2023 to August 2037, accrued interest at effective annual rates between 4.29 percent and 6.58 percent, and its estimated fair value amounted to approximately S/3,181,392,000).

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interbank keeps loans with the BCRP that are guaranteed with these sovereign bonds, classified as restricted, for approximately S/2,310,536,000 and S/1,643,293,000, respectively; see Note 12(b).

(e)

The composition of financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Equity instruments
Local and foreign mutual funds and investment funds participations		1,517,075		1,830,098
Listed shares		315,820		651,813
Non-listed shares		74,430		184,973
Debt instruments
Corporate, leasing and subordinated bonds		25,668		39,387

Total		1,932,993		2,706,271

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, investments at fair value through profit or loss include investments held for trading for approximately S/209,549,000 and S/282,781,000, respectively; and those assets that are necessarily measured at fair value through profit or loss for approximately S/1,723,444,000 and S/2,423,490,000, respectively.

During the year 2022, the Group recognized losses from valuation of instruments at fair value through profit or loss for approximately S/257,570,000 (during the year 2021 and 2020, recognized gains for S/85,075,000, S/205,090,000, respectively), which are part of caption “Net (loss) gain from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” of the consolidated statement of income.

During the years 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Group has received dividends from these investments for approximately S/33,897,000, S/2,536,000 and S/2,887,000, respectively, which are presented in the caption “Interest and similar income” of the consolidated statement

of income.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the composition of equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is as follow:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Listed shares (g)		474,588		583,684
Non-listed shares		38,296		40,034

Total		512,884		623,718

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, it corresponds to investments in shares in the biological sciences, distribution of machinery, energy, telecommunications, financial and massive consumption sectors that are listed on the domestic and foreign markets.

During the years 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Group received dividends from these investments for approximately S/45,031,000, S/99,200,000 and S/100,407,000, respectively, which are included in the caption “Interest and similar income” in the consolidated statement of income.

(g)

During

the year 2022, the Group sold shares of several entities, which were irrevocably designated at fair value through other comprehensive income. The total amount of the sales amounted to S/345,791,000 generating total gains for approximately S/16,313,000 (in 2021, the sales amounted to S/1,240,052,000, generating total losses for approximately S/180,905,000; in 2020, the sales amounted to S/158,083,000, generating total losses for approximately S/24,154,000). Said gains were reclassified to caption “Retained Earnings” of the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

In October 2021, the Group sold the 2,396,920 shares it held in InRetail Peru Corp. (a related entity), that represented 2.33 percent of its capital stock, which were irrevocably designated at fair value through other comprehensive income. The sale was trade through Lima Stock Exchange, at market value for a total amount of US$84,108,000, equivalent to S/341,646,000. Since the acquisition date, the Group had recorded a cumulative gain on valuation for approximately S/270,993,000. In accordance with the provisions of IFRS 9 and considering the classification of this investment; said gain was recorded as a decrease in the caption “Unrealized results, net” and an increase in the caption “Retained earnings” of the consolidated statements of changes in equity.

F-7

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(h)

The following is the balance of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (debt and equity instruments) and investments at amortized cost as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 classified by contractual maturity (without including accrued interest):


	2022				2021
	Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income		Investments at amortized cost		Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income		Investments at amortized cost
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Up to 3 months		1,610,691		—		1,597,490		—
From 3 months to 1 year		152,533		494,872		185,274		—
From 1 to 3 years		1,160,014		640,314		1,126,012		1,143,436
From 3 to 5 years		2,329,056		443,799		2,418,557		456,784
From 5 years onwards		11,464,223		1,652,154		12,302,454		1,624,954
Equity instruments (without maturity)		512,884		—		623,718		—

Total		17,229,401		3,231,139		18,253,505		3,225,174

(i)

Below are the debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and at amortized cost according to the stages indicated by IFRS 9 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and at amortized cost	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru		9,839,920		—		—		9,839,920
Corporate, leasing and subordinated bonds		6,709,273		864,511		418		7,574,202
Variable interest Certificates of Deposit issued by the BCRP		1,434,836		—		—		1,434,836
Bonds guaranteed by the Peruvian government		487,728		—		—		487,728
Global Bonds of the Republic of Peru		453,286		—		—		453,286
Global Bonds of the Republic of Colombia		—		80,810		—		80,810
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit issued by the BCRP		43,868		—		—		43,868
Others		33,006		—		—		33,006

Total		19,001,917		945,321		418		19,947,656

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2021
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and at amortized cost	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Sovereign Bonds of the Republic of Peru		9,944,527		—		—		9,944,527
Corporate, leasing and subordinated bonds		7,342,649		809,531		—		8,152,180
Variable interest Certificates of Deposit issued by the BCRP		1,440,944		—		—		1,440,944
Global Bonds of the Republic of Peru		526,723		—		—		526,723
Bonds guaranteed by the Peruvian Government		524,405		—		—		524,405
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit issued by the BCRP		179,207		—		—		179,207
Global Bonds of the Republic of Colombia		—		86,975		—		86,975

Total		19,958,455		896,506		—		20,854,961

Loan, net

(a)

This caption is made up as follows:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Direct loans
Loans (*)		35,977,734			35,490,230
Credit cards and other loans (**)		6,239,314			4,814,758
Leasing		1,174,542			1,110,958
Factoring		1,011,496			867,765
Discounted notes		894,588			572,334
Advances and overdrafts		38,763			40,978
Refinanced loans		322,941			236,520
Past due and under legal collection loans		1,365,972			1,554,679

		47,025,350			44,688,222

Plus (minus)
Accrued interest from performing loans		527,615			404,923
Unearned interest and interest collected in advance		(22,112	)		(22,645	)
Impairment allowance for loans (d)		(2,027,855	)		(2,064,917	)

Total direct loans, net		45,502,998			43,005,583

Indirect loans, Note 18(a)		4,487,347			4,440,458

(*)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interbank maintains repo operations of loans represented in securities according to the BCRP’s definition. In consequence, loans provided as guarantee amounts to S/1,909,375,000 and S/4,389,903,000, respectively, and is presented in the caption “Loan, net”, and the related liability is presented in the caption “Due to banks and correspondents” of the consolidated statement of financial position; see Note 12(b).

(**)	As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, it includes non-revolving consumer loans related to credit card lines for approximately S/3,225,874,000 and S/2,536,448,000, respectively.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

The classification of the direct loan portfolio is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Commercial loans (c.1)		21,412,126		22,118,918
Consumer loans (c.1)		14,967,799		12,514,499
Mortgage loans (c.1)		9,286,944		8,552,304
Small and micro-business loans (c.1)		1,358,481		1,502,501

Total		47,025,350		44,688,222

Following is the balance of loans under the “Reactiva Peru” program as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Commercial loans		1,704,203		3,848,904
Small and micro-business loans		595,744		1,047,233

Total		2,299,947		4,896,137

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of rescheduled loans as a consequence of the

Covid-19

explained in Note 1(c.2) amounted to S/5,048,978,000 and S/6,266,601,000, respectively.

For purposes of estimating the impairment loss in accordance with IFRS 9, the Group’s loans are segmented into homogeneous groups that share similar risk characteristics; the Group determined these 3 types of portfolios: Retail Banking (consumer and mortgage loans), Commercial Banking (commercial loans) and Small Business Banking (loans to small and micro-business).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c)

The following table shows the credit quality and maximum exposure to credit risk based on the Group’s internal credit rating as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The amounts presented do not consider impairment.


	2022								2021
Direct loans, (c.1)	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		35,613,991		1,111,421		—		36,725,412		33,465,863		428,269		—		33,894,132
Standard grade		4,282,904		835,217		—		5,118,121		4,408,249		371,023		—		4,779,272
Sub-standard grade		776,603		940,391		—		1,716,994		1,918,709		1,191,914		—		3,110,623
Past due but not impaired		1,124,557		1,150,139		—		2,274,696		729,660		862,359		—		1,592,019
Impaired
Individually		—		—		45,907		45,907		—		—		41,069		41,069
Collectively		—		—		1,144,220		1,144,220		—		—		1,271,107		1,271,107

Total direct loans		41,798,055		4,037,168		1,190,127		47,025,350		40,522,481		2,853,565		1,312,176		44,688,222


	2022								2021
Contingent Credits: Guarantees and stand-by letters, import and export letters of credit (substantially, all indirect loans correspond to commercial loans)	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		3,945,307		402,336		—		4,347,643		3,871,575		347,420		—		4,218,995
Standard grade		12,083		39,541		—		51,624		79,334		798		—		80,132
Sub-standard grade		2,051		59,953		—		62,004		33,453		82,821		—		116,274
Past due but not impaired		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Impaired
Individually		—		—		9,330		9,330		—		—		12,909		12,909
Collectively		—		—		16,746		16,746		—		—		12,148		12,148

Total indirect loans		3,959,441		501,830		26,076		4,487,347		3,984,362		431,039		25,057		4,440,458

F-8

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c.1)

The following tables show the credit quality and maximum exposure to credit risk for each classification of the direct loans:


	2022								2021
Commercial loans	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		16,213,146		914,480		—		17,127,626		16,535,489		372,946		—		16,908,435
Standard grade		1,991,637		230,180		—		2,221,817		2,229,068		163,143		—		2,392,211
Sub-standard grade		380,679		171,648		—		552,327		1,094,980		509,141		—		1,604,121
Past due but not impaired		704,067		398,185		—		1,102,252		376,301		324,017		—		700,318
Impaired
Individually		—		—		45,907		45,907		—		—		41,069		41,069
Collectively		—		—		362,197		362,197		—		—		472,764		472,764

Total direct loans		19,289,529		1,714,493		408,104		21,412,126		20,235,838		1,369,247		513,833		22,118,918


	2022								2021
Consumer loans	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		11,331,807		181,066		—		11,512,873		9,365,186		53,219		—		9,418,405
Standard grade		1,139,837		579,625		—		1,719,462		1,386,872		75,474		—		1,462,346
Sub-standard grade		60,415		542,841		—		603,256		527,381		391,980		—		919,361
Past due but not impaired		153,865		526,042		—		679,907		89,186		270,241		—		359,427
Impaired
Individually		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collectively		—		—		452,301		452,301		—		—		354,960		354,960

Total direct loans		12,685,924		1,829,574		452,301		14,967,799		11,368,625		790,914		354,960		12,514,499

F-8

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022								2021
Mortgage loans	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		7,490,495		1,033		—		7,491,528		6,749,848		1,838		—		6,751,686
Standard grade		667,599		15,411		—		683,010		715,652		43,702		—		759,354
Sub-standard grade		334,967		200,226		—		535,193		287,750		159,549		—		447,299
Past due but not impaired		205,728		132,958		—		338,686		231,610		93,827		—		325,437
Impaired
Individually		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collectively		—		—		238,527		238,527		—		—		268,528		268,528

Total direct loans		8,698,789		349,628		238,527		9,286,944		7,984,860		298,916		268,528		8,552,304


	2022								2021
Small and micro-business loans	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Not impaired
High grade		578,543		14,842		—		593,385		815,340		266		—		815,606
Standard grade		483,831		10,001		—		493,832		76,657		88,704		—		165,361
Sub-standard grade		542		25,676		—		26,218		8,598		131,244		—		139,842
Past due but not impaired		60,897		92,954		—		153,851		32,563		174,274		—		206,837
Impaired
Individually		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collectively		—		—		91,195		91,195		—		—		174,855		174,855

Total direct loans		1,123,813		143,473		91,195		1,358,481		933,158		394,488		174,855		1,502,501

F-8

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

The balances of the direct and indirect loan portfolio and the movement of the respective allowance for expected credit loss, calculated according to IFRS 9, is as follows:

(d.1)

Direct loans


	2022												2021
Gross carrying amount of direct loans	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		40,522,481			2,853,565			1,312,176			44,688,222			34,893,278			5,744,690			2,443,936			43,081,904
New originated or purchased assets		22,393,323			—			—			22,393,323			21,545,125			—			—			21,545,125
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(14,636,477	)		(1,194,405	)		(429,348	)		(16,260,230	)		(14,791,609	)		(760,419	)		(126,811	)		(15,678,839	)
Transfers to Stage 1		1,019,478			(1,014,657	)		(4,821	)		—			4,351,705			(3,843,213	)		(508,492	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(3,131,710	)		3,161,335			(29,625	)		—			(2,064,223	)		2,730,130			(665,907	)		—
Transfers to Stage 3		(401,017	)		(317,282	)		718,299			—			(810,812	)		(775,058	)		1,585,870			—
Write-offs		—			—			(960,918	)		(960,918	)		—			—			(1,444,538	)		(1,444,538	)
Others (*)		(3,383,889	)		575,338			590,017			(2,218,534	)		(3,593,568	)		(316,605	)		(16,412	)		(3,926,585	)
Foreign exchange effect		(584,134	)		(26,726	)		(5,653	)		(616,513	)		992,585			74,040			44,530			1,111,155

End of year balances		41,798,055			4,037,168			1,190,127			47,025,350			40,522,481			2,853,565			1,312,176			44,688,222


	2022												2021
Changes in the allowance for expected credit losses for direct loans, see (d.1.1)	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at the beginning of year balances		956,456			404,881			703,580			2,064,917			180,241			1,145,207			1,659,403			2,984,851

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		503,454			—			—			503,454			397,989			—			—			397,989
Assets matured or derecognized (excluding write-offs)		(173,872	)		(237,110	)		(302,861	)		(713,843	)		(114,680	)		(65,927	)		(43,917	)		(224,524	)
Transfers to Stage 1		166,755			(163,090	)		(3,665	)		—			439,400			(438,283	)		(1,117	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(259,226	)		268,700			(9,474	)		—			(208,937	)		428,732			(219,795	)		—
Transfers to Stage 3		(74,178	)		(88,551	)		162,729			—			(116,057	)		(271,149	)		387,206			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year (***)		(129,388	)		176,416			340,244			387,272			(107,177	)		(238,805	)		239,241			(106,741	)
Others (**)		(382,355	)		375,448			666,581			659,674			479,443			(159,658	)		13,495			333,280

Total		(348,810	)		331,813			853,554			836,557			769,981			(745,090	)		375,113			400,004
Write-offs		—			—			(1,021,539	)		(1,021,539	)		—			—			(1,525,094	)		(1,525,094	)
Recovery of written–off loans		—			—			155,070			155,070			—			—			181,969			181,969
Foreign exchange effect		912			592			(8,654	)		(7,150	)		6,234			4,764			12,189			23,187

Expected credit loss at the end of year balances		608,558			737,286			682,011			2,027,855			956,456			404,881			703,580			2,064,917

(*)

Corresponds mainly to: (i) the variation between the amortized cost of the loan at the beginning of the year and its amortized cost at the end of the year (partial amortizations that did not represent a reduction or derecognized of the loan), and (ii) the execution of contingent loans (conversion of indirect debt into direct debt).

(**)

Corresponds mainly to: (i) the variation between the amortized cost of the loan at the beginning of the year and its amortized cost at the end of the year (variation in the provision recorded for partial amortizations that did not represent a reduction or derecognized of the loan), (ii) variations in credit risk that did not generate transfers to other stages; and (iii) the execution of contingent loans (conversion of indirect debt into direct debt).

(***)

During 2022 and 2021, the Group applied its expert judgement with the purpose of reflecting the effects of the political and economic uncertainty that were not considered in the forward-looking model, which led to incur in a higher provision for expected loss, see Note 30.1(d.7).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d.1.1)

The following tables show the movement of the allowance for expected credit losses for each classification of the direct loan portfolio:


	2022												2021
Commercial loans	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at beginning of year		100,874			60,100			182,467			343,441			71,272			98,040			68,448			237,760

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		33,506			—			—			33,506			30,045			—			—			30,045
Assets derecognized or matured (excluding write-offs)		(18,984	)		(37,865	)		(92,529	)		(149,378	)		(33,005	)		(12,728	)		(2,726	)		(48,459	)
Transfers to Stage 1		41,140			(40,152	)		(988	)		—			26,456			(26,456	)		—			—
Transfers to Stage 2		(15,952	)		16,311			(359	)		—			(19,847	)		19,847			—			—
Transfers to Stage 3		(6,603	)		(48,516	)		55,119			—			(22,205	)		(16,355	)		38,560			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year (**)		(31,403	)		4,752			16,864			(9,787	)		(16,399	)		44,934			143,162			171,697
Others (*)		(57,822	)		91,880			63,218			97,276			58,996			(50,913	)		(44,625	)		(36,542	)

Total		(56,118	)		(13,590	)		41,325			(28,383	)		24,041			(41,671	)		134,371			116,741
Write-offs		—			—			(68,362	)		(68,362	)		—			—			(27,392	)		(27,392	)
Recovery of written–off loans		—			—			5,942			5,942			—			—			1,404			1,404
Foreign exchange effect		718			801			(7,073	)		(5,554	)		5,561			3,731			5,636			14,928

Expected credit loss at end of year		45,474			47,311			154,299			247,084			100,874			60,100			182,467			343,441


	2022												2021
Consumer loans	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at beginning of year		802,421			263,219			336,041			1,401,681			85,321			901,602			1,426,470			2,413,393

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		438,109			—			—			438,109			348,647			—			—			348,647
Assets derecognized or matured (excluding write-offs)		(141,201	)		(144,553	)		(100,740	)		(386,494	)		(77,181	)		(49,433	)		(25,906	)		(152,520	)
Transfers to Stage 1		44,453			(43,487	)		(966	)		—			382,412			(381,300	)		(1,112	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(229,316	)		234,062			(4,746	)		—			(149,863	)		362,940			(213,077	)		—
Transfers to Stage 3		(59,129	)		(13,433	)		72,562			—			(77,865	)		(223,051	)		300,916			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year (**)		(35,112	)		163,681			293,678			422,247			(74,056	)		(332,709	)		(22,895	)		(429,660	)
Others (*)		(286,212	)		198,393			580,849			493,030			364,973			(15,296	)		109,462			459,139

Total		(268,408	)		394,663			840,637			966,892			717,067			(638,849	)		147,388			225,606
Write-offs		—			—			(886,200	)		(886,200	)		—			—			(1,414,948	)		(1,414,948	)
Recovery of written–off loans		—			—			140,438			140,438			—			—			175,287			175,287
Foreign exchange effect		(8	)		(408	)		(14	)		(430	)		33			466			1,844			2,343

Expected credit loss at end of year		534,005			657,474			430,902			1,622,381			802,421			263,219			336,041			1,401,681

(*)

(**)	During 2022 and 2021, the Group applied its expert judgement with the purpose of reflecting the effects of the political and economic uncertainty that were not considered in the forward-looking model, which led to incur in a higher provision for expected loss, see Note 30.1(d.7).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022												2021
Mortgage loans	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at beginning of year		12,669			42,681			99,850			155,200			11,123			62,782			114,079			187,984

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		1,473			—			—			1,473			2,357			—			—			2,357
Assets derecognized or matured (excluding write-offs)		(435	)		(763	)		(10,957	)		(12,155	)		(1,787	)		(1,038	)		(12,929	)		(15,754	)
Transfers to Stage 1		6,103			(6,103	)		—			—			9,458			(9,458	)		—			—
Transfers to Stage 2		(778	)		4,871			(4,093	)		—			(2,896	)		9,457			(6,561	)		—
Transfers to Stage 3		(467	)		(1,254	)		1,721			—			(1,106	)		(1,753	)		2,859			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year (**)		(5,871	)		4,342			11,518			9,989			(4,155	)		(20,041	)		(11,576	)		(35,772	)
Others (*)		(8,663	)		(31,688	)		(49,097	)		(89,448	)		(915	)		2,170			11,800			13,055

Total		(8,638	)		(30,595	)		(50,908	)		(90,141	)		956			(20,663	)		(16,407	)		(36,114	)
Write-offs		—			—			(2,267	)		(2,267	)		—			—			(2,419	)		(2,419	)
Recovery of written–off loans		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Foreign exchange effect		205			199			(1,574	)		(1,170	)		590			562			4,597			5,749

Expected credit loss at end of year		4,236			12,285			45,101			61,622			12,669			42,681			99,850			155,200


	2022												2021
Small and micro-business loans	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Expected credit loss at beginning of year		40,492			38,881			85,222			164,595			12,525			82,783			50,406			145,714

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		30,366			—			—			30,366			16,940			—			—			16,940
Assets derecognized or matured (excluding write-offs)		(13,252	)		(53,929	)		(98,635	)		(165,816	)		(2,707	)		(2,728	)		(2,356	)		(7,791	)
Transfers to Stage 1		75,059			(73,348	)		(1,711	)		—			21,074			(21,069	)		(5	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(13,180	)		13,456			(276	)		—			(36,331	)		36,488			(157	)		—
Transfers to Stage 3		(7,979	)		(25,348	)		33,327			—			(14,881	)		(29,990	)		44,871			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year (**)		(57,002	)		3,641			18,184			(35,177	)		(12,567	)		69,011			130,550			186,994
Others (*)		(29,658	)		116,863			71,611			158,816			56,389			(95,619	)		(63,142	)		(102,372	)

Total		(15,646	)		(18,665	)		22,500			(11,811	)		27,917			(43,907	)		109,761			93,771
Write-offs		—			—			(64,710	)		(64,710	)		—			—			(80,335	)		(80,335	)
Recovery of written–off loans		—			—			8,690			8,690			—			—			5,278			5,278
Foreign exchange effect		(3	)		—			7			4			50			5			112			167

Expected credit loss at end of year		24,843			20,216			51,709			96,768			40,492			38,881			85,222			164,595

(*)

(**)	During 2022 and 2021, the Group applied its expert judgement with the purpose of reflecting the effects of the political and economic uncertainty that were not considered in the forward-looking model, which led to incur in a higher provision for expected loss, see Note 30.1(d.7).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d.2)

Indirect loans (substantially, all indirect loans correspond to commercial loans)


	2022												2021
Gross carrying amount of contingent credits, guarantees and stand-by letters, import and export letters of credit	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		3,984,362			431,039			25,057			4,440,458			4,042,757			539,112			30,062			4,611,931
New originated or purchased assets		1,829,985			—			—			1,829,985			1,667,947			—			—			1,667,947
Assets derecognized or matured		(1,470,891	)		(168,603	)		(9,627	)		(1,649,121	)		(1,887,316	)		(139,391	)		(13,564	)		(2,040,271	)
Transfers to Stage 1		25,315			(25,315	)		—			—			114,321			(114,261	)		(60	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(258,992	)		258,992			—			—			(136,230	)		136,230			—			—
Transfers to Stage 3		(633	)		(10,035	)		10,668			—			(3,065	)		(5,325	)		8,390			—
Others (*)		(58,323	)		25,454			(22	)		(32,891	)		(14,239	)		(15,369	)		—			(29,608	)
Foreign exchange effect		(91,382	)		(9,702	)		—			(101,084	)		200,187			30,043			229			230,459

End of year balances		3,959,441			501,830			26,076			4,487,347			3,984,362			431,039			25,057			4,440,458


	2022												2021
Changes in the allowance for expected credit losses for contingent credits, guarantees and stand-by letters, import and export letters of credit	Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total			Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S(000)			S(000)			S(000)			S(000)			S(000)			S(000)			S(000)			S(000)
Expected credit loss at beginning of year balances		8,594			18,492			13,243			40,329			15,741			18,945			23,037			57,723

Impact of the expected credit loss in the consolidated statement of income -
New originated or purchased assets		5,615			—			—			5,615			4,016			—			—			4,016
Assets derecognized or matured		(4,838	)		(2,016	)		(6,241	)		(13,095	)		(8,737	)		(1,222	)		(9,991	)		(19,950	)
Transfers to Stage 1		109			(109	)		—			—			485			(474	)		(11	)		—
Transfers to Stage 2		(854	)		854			—			—			(1,464	)		1,464			—			—
Transfers to Stage 3		(57	)		(171	)		228			—			(754	)		(294	)		1,048			—
Impact on the expected credit loss for credits that change stage in the year		(47	)		585			623			1,161			(138	)		542			681			1,085
Others (**)		(274	)		(467	)		1,054			313			(1,198	)		(815	)		(1,565	)		(3,578	)

Total		(346	)		(1,324	)		(4,336	)		(6,006	)		(7,790	)		(799	)		(9,838	)		(18,427	)
Foreign exchange effect		106			1,037			29			1,172			643			346			44			1,033

Expected credit loss at the end of year balances, Note 10(a)		8,354			18,205			8,936			35,495			8,594			18,492			13,243			40,329

(*)

(**)

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e)

In Management’s opinion, the allowance for loan losses recorded as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, has been established in accordance with IFRS 9; and it is sufficient to cover incurred losses on the loan portfolio.

(f)

The interest that the loan portfolio generates is freely agreed considering the interest rates prevailing on the market. In March 2021, the government published Act No. 31143, “Act Protecting Consumers of Financial Services from Usury”, through which the Congress of the Republic of Peru established that the BCRP is the entity responsible for setting the maximum and minimum interest rates that the Peruvian financial system can charge. In April 2021, the BCRP established the methodology for the calculation of the maximum interest rate for consumer, small and micro-business loans, which shall be updated semi-annually in May and November. The maximum interest rate for the period November 2022 - April 2023 is

87.91 percent in national currency and 68.27 percent in foreign currency (the maximum interest rate for the period November 2021 - April 2022 was 83.64 percent in national currency and 66.08 percent in foreign currency, as of December 31, 2021).

(g)

Interest income from loans classified in Stage 3 is calculated through the effective interest rate adjusted for credit quality at amortized cost.

(h)

The refinanced loans during the 2022 period amounted to approximately S/192,045,000 (S/114,747,000, during 2021) which had no significant impact on the consolidated statement of income.

During 2020, the Group modified the contractual conditions of a determined number of loans as relief for its clients’ liquidity as consequence of the

Covid-19

pandemic, for a total of approximately S/12,663,960,000. Said loans are not considered as refinanced loans. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balances of the rescheduled loans amount to approximately S/5,048,978,000 and S/6,266,601,000; see further detail in Note 30.1 (d.6).

Additionally, during 2022 and 2021, the Group modified the contractual conditions of a determined number of loans that were granted under the “Reactiva Peru” program, for a total amount of approximately S/133,046,000 and S/2,012,855,000, respectively. Said loans were not deemed as refinanced loans. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of rescheduled loans amounts of approximately S/1,473,770,000 and S/1,974,180,000, respectively, see further detail in Note 30.1 (d.6).

(i)

The table below presents the maturity of direct loan portfolio without including accrued interest, interest to be accrued and interest collected in advance as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Outstanding
Up to 1 month		4,945,881		3,345,496
From 1 to 3 months		5,708,262		5,935,876

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
From 3 months to 1 year		10,220,204		10,222,266
From 1 to 5 years		18,916,603		18,131,367
Over 5 years		5,868,428		5,498,538

		45,659,378		43,133,543
Past due and under legal collection loans, see (i.1) -
Up to 4 months		423,906		512,669
Over 4 months		401,508		515,237
Under legal collection		540,558		526,773

		47,025,350		44,688,222

(i.1)

The tables below present past due and under legal collection loans for each classification of the direct loan portfolio:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Commercial loans
Up to 4 months		150,607		226,342
Over 4 months		106,081		187,670
Under legal collection		245,786		224,948

		502,474		638,960

Consumer loans
Up to 4 months		143,867		77,144
Over 4 months		220,226		205,038
Under legal collection		108,162		83,747

		472,255		365,929

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Mortgage loans
Up to 4 months		30,484		32,230
Over 4 months		48,316		65,878
Under legal collection		155,587		177,418

		234,387		275,526

Small and micro-business loans
Up to 4 months		98,948		176,953
Over 4 months		26,885		56,651
Under legal collection		31,023		40,660

		156,856		274,264

See credit risk analysis in Note 30.1

(j)

Part of the loan portfolio is collateralized with guarantees received from clients, which mainly consist of mortgages, trust assignments, financial instruments as well as industrial commercial pledges.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(k)

The following tables present the maturities of direct and indirect loans of Stages 2 and 3 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as follows:

•

Stage 2: Loans with maturity longer or shorter than 30 days, regardless the criteria that caused their classification into Stage 2.

•

Stage 3: Loans with maturity longer or shorter than 90 days, regardless the criteria that caused their classification into Stage 3.


	2022												2021
	Stage 2				Stage 3				Total				Stage 2				Stage 3				Total
	Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Maturity shorter than:
30 days		3,934,328		595,372		—		—		3,934,328		595,372		2,825,245		318,953		—		—		2,825,245		318,953
90 days		—		—		1,816		1,583		1,816		1,583		—		—		1,505		709		1,505		709
Maturity longer than:
30 days		604,670		160,119		—		—		604,670		160,119		459,359		104,420		—		—		459,359		104,420
90 days		—		—		1,214,387		689,364		1,214,387		689,364		—		—		1,335,728		716,114		1,335,728		716,114

Total		4,538,998		755,491		1,216,203		690,947		5,755,201		1,446,438		3,284,604		423,373		1,337,233		716,823		4,621,837		1,140,196

(k.1)

The following tables present the maturities of direct and indirect loans of Stages 2 and 3 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, for each classification:


	2022												2021
	Stage 2				Stage 3				Total				Stage 2				Stage 3				Total
Commercial loans	Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Maturity shorter than:
30 days		2,089,059		60,403		—		—		2,089,059		60,403		1,663,448		60,842		—		—		1,663,448		60,842
90 days		—		—		250		214		250		214		—		—		134		20		134		20
Maturity longer than:
30 days		127,264		5,113		—		—		127,264		5,113		136,838		17,750		—		—		136,838		17,750
90 days		—		—		433,930		163,021		433,930		163,021		—		—		538,756		195,690		538,756		195,690

Total		2,216,323		65,516		434,180		163,235		2,650,503		228,751		1,800,286		78,592		538,890		195,710		2,339,176		274,302

F-9

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022												2021
	Stage 2				Stage 3				Total				Stage 2				Stage 3				Total
Consumer loans	Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Maturity shorter than:
30 days		1,500,325		511,105		—		—		1,500,325		511,105		620,485		195,221		—		—		620,485		195,221
90 days		—		—		1,356		1,194		1,356		1,194		—		—		578		509		578		509
Maturity longer than:
30 days		329,249		146,369		—		—		329,249		146,369		170,429		67,998		—		—		170,429		67,998
90 days		—		—		450,945		429,708		450,945		429,708		—		—		354,382		335,532		354,382		335,532

Total		1,829,574		657,474		452,301		430,902		2,281,875		1,088,376		790,914		263,219		354,960		336,041		1,145,874		599,260


	2022												2021
	Stage 2				Stage 3				Total				Stage 2				Stage 3				Total
Mortgage loans	Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Maturity shorter than:
30 days		271,622		9,266		—		—		271,622		9,266		246,833		33,713		—		—		246,833		33,713
90 days		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		232		83		232		83
Maturity longer than:
30 days		78,006		3,019		—		—		78,006		3,019		52,083		8,968		—		—		52,083		8,968
90 days		—		—		238,527		45,101		238,527		45,101		—		—		268,296		99,767		268,296		99,767

Total		349,628		12,285		238,527		45,101		588,155		57,386		298,916		42,681		268,528		99,850		567,444		142,531


	2022												2021
	Stage 2				Stage 3				Total				Stage 2				Stage 3				Total
Small and micro-business loans	Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss		Gross amount		Expected loss
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Maturity shorter than:
30 days		73,322		14,598		—		—		73,322		14,598		294,479		29,177		—		—		294,479		29,177
90 days		—		—		210		175		210		175		—		—		561		97		561		97
Maturity longer than:
30 days		70,151		5,618		—		—		70,151		5,618		100,009		9,704		—		—		100,009		9,704
90 days		—		—		90,985		51,534		90,985		51,534		—		—		174,294		85,125		174,294		85,125

Total		143,473		20,216		91,195		51,709		234,668		71,925		394,488		38,881		174,855		85,222		569,343		124,103

F-9

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(l)

The following tables present the exposure and the expected credit losses by economic sector for direct loans as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


2022
	Carrying amount								Expected credit loss								Percentage expected credit loss
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Direct loans
Consumer loans		12,685,924		1,829,574		452,301		14,967,799		534,005		657,474		430,902		1,622,381		4.2	%		35.9	%		95.3	%		10.8	%
Mortgage loans		8,698,789		349,628		238,527		9,286,944		4,236		12,285		45,101		61,622		0.0	%		3.5	%		18.9	%		0.7	%
Commerce		3,837,304		402,454		173,236		4,412,994		31,844		29,009		78,028		138,881		0.8	%		7.2	%		45.0	%		3.1	%
Manufacturing		4,346,251		451,393		63,397		4,861,041		8,403		12,389		21,611		42,403		0.2	%		2.7	%		34.1	%		0.9	%
Professional, scientific and technical activities		3,529,961		298,534		64,078		3,892,573		12,056		10,186		26,497		48,739		0.3	%		3.4	%		41.4	%		1.3	%
Communications, storage and transportation		1,102,988		194,840		75,427		1,373,255		7,047		7,035		23,645		37,727		0.6	%		3.6	%		31.3	%		2.7	%
Agriculture		1,747,159		134,545		10,863		1,892,567		1,391		967		1,381		3,739		0.1	%		0.7	%		12.7	%		0.2	%
Electricity, gas, water and oil		867,431		55,187		1,652		924,270		886		462		220		1,568		0.1	%		0.8	%		13.3	%		0.2	%
Leaseholds and real estate activities		499,385		84,056		23,441		606,882		1,595		1,825		14,518		17,938		0.3	%		2.2	%		61.9	%		3.0	%
Construction and infrastructure		415,827		91,910		49,736		557,473		1,667		1,654		32,569		35,890		0.4	%		1.8	%		65.5	%		6.4	%
Others		4,067,036		145,047		37,469		4,249,552		5,428		4,000		7,539		16,967		0.1	%		2.8	%		20.1	%		0.4	%

Total direct loans		41,798,055		4,037,168		1,190,127		47,025,350		608,558		737,286		682,011		2,027,855		1.5	%		18.3	%		57.3	%		4.3	%


2021
	Carrying amount								Expected credit loss								Percentage expected credit loss
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Direct loans
Consumer loans		11,368,625		790,914		354,960		12,514,499		802,421		263,219		336,041		1,401,681		7.1	%		33.3	%		94.7	%		11.2	%
Mortgage loans		7,984,860		298,916		268,528		8,552,304		12,669		42,681		99,850		155,200		0.2	%		14.3	%		37.2	%		1.8	%
Commerce		4,312,851		587,020		288,015		5,187,886		66,774		56,404		128,780		251,958		1.5	%		9.6	%		44.7	%		4.9	%
Manufacturing		4,302,980		357,496		90,736		4,751,212		15,944		8,059		29,627		53,630		0.4	%		2.3	%		32.7	%		1.1	%
Professional, scientific and technical activities		3,730,237		183,600		95,722		4,009,559		22,647		9,045		31,143		62,835		0.6	%		4.9	%		32.5	%		1.6	%
Communications, storage and transportation		1,212,288		201,274		96,227		1,509,789		13,393		8,637		28,837		50,867		1.1	%		4.3	%		30.0	%		3.4	%
Agriculture		1,726,488		39,153		11,722		1,777,363		2,547		342		1,672		4,561		0.1	%		0.9	%		14.3	%		0.3	%
Electricity, gas, water and oil		863,358		55,895		260		919,513		2,856		439		161		3,456		0.3	%		0.8	%		61.9	%		0.4	%
Leaseholds and real estate activities		487,331		172,016		35,160		694,507		3,701		1,789		12,451		17,941		0.8	%		1.0	%		35.4	%		2.6	%
Construction and infrastructure		651,956		69,781		50,175		771,912		4,747		9,451		24,781		38,979		0.7	%		13.5	%		49.4	%		5.0	%
Others		3,881,507		97,500		20,671		3,999,678		8,757		4,815		10,237		23,809		0.2	%		4.9	%		49.5	%		0.6	%

Total direct loans		40,522,481		2,853,565		1,312,176		44,688,222		956,456		404,881		703,580		2,064,917		2.4	%		14.2	%		53.6	%		4.6	%

F-9

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(m)

The following tables present the exposure and the expected credit losses by economic sector for indirect loans as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


2022
	Carrying amount								Expected credit loss								Percentage expected credit loss
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Indirect loans
Commerce		264,926		40,527		76		305,529		309		424		49		782		0.1	%		1.0	%		64.5	%		0.3	%
Manufacturing		518,115		134,469		—		652,584		487		153		—		640		0.1	%		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Professional, scientific and technical activities		1,183,657		75,946		485		1,260,088		1,486		700		52		2,238		0.1	%		0.9	%		10.7	%		0.2	%
Communications, storage and transportation		467,018		19,117		—		486,135		489		91		—		580		0.1	%		0.5	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Agriculture		4,487		—		—		4,487		7		—		—		7		0.2	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.2	%
Electricity, gas, water and oil		155,621		—		—		155,621		135		—		—		135		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Leaseholds and real estate activities		45,037		19,150		—		64,187		193		97		—		290		0.4	%		0.5	%		0.0	%		0.5	%
Construction and infrastructure		412,388		130,886		24,956		568,230		4,470		4,463		8,775		17,708		1.1	%		3.4	%		35.2	%		3.1	%
Others		908,192		81,735		559		990,486		778		12,277		60		13,115		0.1	%		15.0	%		10.7	%		1.3	%

Total indirect loans		3,959,441		501,830		26,076		4,487,347		8,354		18,205		8,936		35,495		0.2	%		3.6	%		34.3	%		0.8	%


2021
	Carrying amount								Expected credit loss								Percentage expected credit loss
	Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1		Stage 2		Stage 3		Total		Stage 1			Stage 2			Stage 3			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Indirect loans
Commerce		238,699		1,726		80		240,505		382		78		51		511		0.2	%		4.5	%		63.8	%		0.2	%
Manufacturing		409,193		357		—		409,550		288		4		—		292		0.1	%		1.1	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Professional, scientific and technical activities		1,200,833		50,564		402		1,251,799		1,651		992		48		2,691		0.1	%		2.0	%		11.9	%		0.2	%
Communications, storage and transportation		565,359		110,311		—		675,670		416		174		—		590		0.1	%		0.2	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Agriculture		3,190		4		16		3,210		2		—		2		4		0.1	%		0.0	%		12.5	%		0.1	%
Electricity, gas, water and oil		143,789		—		—		143,789		89		—		—		89		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.1	%
Leaseholds and real estate activities		72,809		16,187		—		88,996		412		250		—		662		0.6	%		1.5	%		0.0	%		0.7	%
Construction and infrastructure		501,712		168,980		24,559		695,251		4,785		4,721		13,142		22,648		1.0	%		2.8	%		53.5	%		3.3	%
Others		848,778		82,910		—		931,688		569		12,273		—		12,842		0.1	%		14.8	%		0.0	%		1.4	%

Total indirect loans		3,984,362		431,039		25,057		4,440,458		8,594		18,492		13,243		40,329		0.2	%		4.3	%		52.9	%		0.9	%

During the years 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Group decided to apply the expert judgment, which led to incur in a higher provision for expected losses, see Note 30.1(d.7).

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

7.	Investment property

(a)

This caption is made up as follows:


	2022		2021		Acquisition or construction year		Hierarchy level (i)		Valuation methodology (e) 2022 / 2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Land
San Isidro – Lima		264,868		281,535		2009		Level 3		Appraisal
San Martín de Porres – Lima		88,182		66,408		2015		Level 3		Appraisal
Nuevo Chimbote		33,747		33,863		2021		Level 3		Appraisal
Santa Clara – Lima		26,352		17,906		2017		Level 3		Appraisal
Sullana		22,689		19,818		2012		Level 3		Appraisal
Others		8,716		9,680		—		Level 3		Appraisal / Cost

		444,554		429,210

Completed investment property - “Real Plaza” shopping malls
Talara		43,728		32,554		2015		Level 3		DCF

		43,728		32,554

Buildings
Ate Vitarte – Lima		149,720		116,432		2006		Level 3		DCF/Appraisal
Orquídeas - San Isidro – Lima		138,643		153,452		2017		Level 3		DCF
Piura (d)		123,508		116,595		2008/2020		Level 3		DCF/Appraisal
Paseo del Bosque (d)		96,194		105,398		2021		Level 3		DCF
Chorrillos – Lima (d)		81,516		67,043		2017		Level 3		DCF
Chimbote		45,069		44,212		2015		Level 3		DCF
Maestro-Huancayo		32,342		31,965		2017		Level 3		DCF
Cusco		27,513		30,852		2017		Level 3		DCF
Panorama – Lima		20,669		20,509		2016		Level 3		DCF
Pardo y Aliaga – Lima, Note 3.4(o)		16,755		19,569		2008		Level 3		DCF
Trujillo		15,815		17,681		2016		Level 3		DCF
Cercado de Lima – Lima		14,543		16,025		2017		Level 3		DCF
Others		37,148		22,957		—		Level 3		DCF

		799,435		762,690

Total		1,287,717		1,224,454

DCF: Discounted cash flow

(i)	During 2022 and 2021, there were no transfers between levels of hierarchy, see Note 3.4(z)

(ii)	As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there are no liens on investment property.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

The net gain on investment properties as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, consists of the following:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Income from rental of investment property		65,485		57,430		39,491
Gain on valuation of investment property		19,146		21,969		5,438

Total		84,631		79,399		44,929

(c)

The movement of investment property for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		1,224,454		1,043,978		972,096
Additions (d)		34,760		156,892		61,243
Valuation gain		19,146		21,969		5,438
Net transfers, Note 3.4(o)		9,357		1,615		5,201

End of year balances		1,287,717		1,224,454		1,043,978

(d)

During 2022, the main additions correspond to contributions in the participation of a property called “Rex” and disbursements related to the expansion of the educational center called “Chorrillos”.

During 2021, it mainly corresponds to the purchase of the “Paseo del Bosque” building, which was purchased from a third party.

During 2020, it mainly corresponds to outlays related to the purchase of the “Piura” building, which was purchased from a related entity.

(e)

Fair value measurement – Investment property and investment property under construction

Valuation techniques -

The discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method is used for completed shopping malls, buildings and investment property built on land leases and own lands.

This method involves the projection of a series of periodic cash flows at present value through a discount rate. The periodic calculation of the cash flows is normally determined as rental income net of operating expenses. The series of periodic net operating income, together with an estimation of the terminal value (which uses the traditional valuation method) at the end of the projection period, is discounted at present value. The sum of the net current values is equal to the investment property’s fair value.

The fair value of land is determined based on the value assigned by an external appraiser. The external appraiser uses the market comparable method, under this method a property’s fair value is estimated based on comparable transactions. The unit of comparison applied by the Group is the price per square meter. Following are the minimum ranges, maximum ranges and the average price for the land, before any adjustment:

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	Minimum range		Maximum range		Average
	US$ per m2		US$ per m2		US$ per m2
San Isidro – Lima		5,000		8,800		6,761
San Martin de Porres – Lima		1,050		1,425		1,268
Piura		615		1,000		791
Ate Vitarte - Lima		1,188		1,800		1,619
Others		170		335		222

Main assumptions

Below is a brief description of the assumptions considered in the determination of cash flows as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:

•

ERV (Estimated Rental Value) -

Corresponds to the Estimated Rental Value, that is, the rent under to which the space could be rented under the market conditions prevailing at the valuation date.

•

Long-term inflation -

It is the increase of the general level of prices expected in Peru for the long term.

•

Long-term occupancy rate -

It is the expected occupancy level of lessees in the leased properties.

•

Average growth rate of rental income -

It is the rate that expresses the rental income growth and includes growth factors of the industry, inflation rates, stable exchange rate, per capita income and increasing expenses.

•

Average Net Operating Income (NOI) margin -

It is projected from the rental income from leasable areas, by property and marketing income, minus costs related to administration fees, other administrative expenses, insurance, taxes and other expenses.

•

Discount rate -

It reflects the current market risk and the uncertainty associated to obtaining cash flows.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The main assumptions used in the valuation and estimation of the market value of investment property are detailed below:


	US$ / Percentage
	2022			2021
Average ERV	US$	125.9		US$	99.0
Long-term inflation		3.1	%		2.6	%
Long-term occupancy rate		97.1	%		98.4	%
Average growth rate of rental income		2.9	%		2.6	%
Average NOI margin		93.7	%		93.4	%
Discount rate		10.3	%		9.3	%

Sensitivity analysis -

The sensitivity analysis on the valuation of investment property, against changes in factors deemed relevant by Management, is presented below:


			2022			2021
			S/(000)			S/(000)
Average growth rate of rental income (basis) -
Increase	+0.25	%		10,474			15,291
Decrease	-0.25	%		(10,107	)		(14,733	)
Long-term inflation (basis) -
Increase	+0.25	%		16,133			17,592
Decrease	-0.25	%		(15,017	)		(16,308	)
Discount rate (basis) -
Increase	+0.5	%		(47,957	)		(48,381	)
Decrease	-0.5	%		55,135			55,881

Likewise, a significant increase (decrease) in the price per square meter of the land lots could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

(f)

Below are the nominal amounts of the future minimum fixed rental income of the Group’s investment property (operating leases) are as follows:


Year	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Within 1 year		61,557		62,880
After 1 year but not more than 5 years		241,546		231,768
Over 5 years		865,407		834,997

Total		1,168,510		1,129,645

The minimum rental income is computed considering a period between 20 and 28 years.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

8.	Property, fur nit ure and equipment, net

(a)

The movement of p

rop

erty, furniture and equipment and depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


																Right-of-use assets
Description	Land			Buildings, facilities and leasehold improvements			Furniture and equipment			Vehicles			Assets and work-in-progress			Land			Buildings and facilities			Furniture and equipment			Total 2022			Total 2021			Total 2020
	S/ (000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/ (000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)

Cost
Balance as of January 1		185,217			571,210			641,688			1,523			57,890			69,281			296,950			2,292			1,826,051			1,781,765			1,800,466
Acquisition of Izipay, Note 1 (d)		347			2,867			76,781			6			3,485			—			6,593			—			90,079			—			—
Additions		—			16,130			97,446			124			21,336			—			33,178			—			168,214			118,974			75,441
Transfers		—			36,526			8,272			—			(44,798	)		—			—			—			—			—			—
Transfer (to) from investment property, Note 3.4 (o)		(4,623	)		(5,757	)		(263	)		—			—			—			—			—			(10,643	)		(2,029	)		(4,182	)
Disposals, write-offs and others (d)		(39,735	)		(20,808	)		(17,858	)		(420	)		(3,899	)		(69,281	)		(56,723	)		—			(208,724	)		(72,659	)		(89,960	)

Balance as of December 31		141,206			600,168			806,066			1,233			34,014			—			279,998			2,292			1,864,977			1,826,051			1,781,765

Depreciation
Balance as of January 1		—			(309,543	)		(538,038	)		(824	)		—			(6,751	)		(154,154	)		(1,623	)		(1,010,933	)		(937,338	)		(849,523	)
Depreciation of the year		—			(20,739	)		(59,661	)		(291	)		—			(1,119	)		(51,442	)		(573	)		(133,825	)		(121,932	)		(137,551	)
Transfer to (from) investment property, Note 3.4(o)		—			1,253			33			—			—			—			—			—			1,286			1,038			360
Disposals, write-offs and others (d)		—			16,879			15,379			164			—			7,870			29,635			—			69,927			47,299			49,376

Balance as of December 31		—			(312,150	)		(582,287	)		(951	)		—			—			(175,961	)		(2,196	)		(1,073,545	)		(1,010,933	)		(937,338	)

Net book value		141,206			288,018			223,779			282			34,014			—			104,037			96			791,432			815,118			844,427

(b)

Financial entities in Peru are prohibited from pledging their fixed assets.

(c)

Management periodically reviews the residual values, useful life and the depreciation method to ensure they are consistent with the economic benefits and life expectation of property, furniture and equipment. In Management’s opinion, there is no evidence of impairment in property, furniture and equipment as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

(d)

During 2022, includes the sale of a land lot, perf

orm

ed by Interbank to a related entity, for US$14,100,000 (equivalent to approximately S/54,313,000), with a net disposal cost of S/44,374,000. The gain generated from the sale amounted to S/9,939,000, and was recorded as “Gain on sale of Property, furniture and equipment” in the caption “Other income and (expenses)” in the consolidated statement of income; see Note 21. Additionally, includes the sale of two land lots from Interseguro to a related entity, recorded as financial lease according to IFRS 16. This sale implied the derecognition of a

right-of-use

asset, net of depreciation, for S/59,051,000, alongside a derecognition of a

right-of-use

liability for S/77,305,000 (see Note 8(e)), generating a net disposal cost of S/18,253,000 and a gain amounted to S/1,841,000, presented as “Gain on sale of Property, furniture and equipment” in the caption “Other income and (expenses)” in the consolidated statement of income.

During the years 2021 and 2020, correspond mainly to assets fully depreciated and

written-off,

except for right-of-use assets.

Right-of-use

write-offs are related to the early termination of lease agreements due to the closing of offices and less ATMs (which were located inside facilities whose operations were interrupted by the

Covid-19

pandemic, see Note 1(c)). In that sense, the Group has derecognized the cost for

right-of-use

and the cumulative depreciation of the assets related to early terminated agreements. In the same way, the Group has derecognized the future installments of said obligations, which were recorded as financial lease liabilities; see (e) below. The early termination of these agreements has not had impacts on the Group’s results.

F-

100

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e)

The following table shows the book values of lease liabilities (included in the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities”); see Note 10(a) and the movement of the year:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
As of January 1		234,946			269,755
Additions		40,610			34,052
Interest expenses, Note 19(a)		9,283			14,004
Disposals (*)		(106,990	)		(23,657	)
Exchange differences		(2,948	)		7,438
Payments		(62,320	)		(66,646	)

As of December 31		112,581			234,946

(*) These disposals are related to the early termination of lease agreements; see (d) above.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the amortization schedule of these obligations is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
2022		-		46,142
2023		38,095		38,406
2024		27,497		23,972
2025		18,571		15,877
2026 onwards		28,418		110,549

Total		112,581		234,946

The following table shows the amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of income:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Depreciation expenses of right-of-use assets		53,134		58,698		65,815
Interest expenses of lease liabilities, Note 19(a)		9,283		14,004		15,288
Expenses related to short term and low value assets leases (included in administrative expenses, see Note 25(c))		10,958		11,841		6,781

Total amount recognized in the consolidated statement of income		73,375		84,543		87,884

During the year 202

2, t

he Group pa

id i

ts leases for approximately S/146,982,000, out of which S/62,320,000 correspond to financial lease installments recorded according to IFRS 16 “Leases”, see letter (e) above, and S/84,662,000 correspond to financial lease installments recorded according to IAS 17 “Leases” (as of December 31, 2021, payments for S/93,379,000, related to leases according to IFRS 16 for S/66,646,000 and financial leases according to IAS 17 for S/26,733,000).

F-

101

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

9.	Intangible assets and goodwill, net

(a)

Intangible assets

The movement of intangible assets and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


	2022																									2021			2020
Description	Software			Software development			Present value of acquired in-force business (PVIF)			Relationship with clients			Brand		Database			Other intangible assets			Goodwill (b)		Total			Total			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Cost
Balance as of January 1		1,041,398			215,863			137,900			—			—		—			82,337			430,646		1,908,144			1,748,222			1,553,949
Acquisition of Izipay, Note 1(d)		41,817			—			—			110,042			82,546		97,016			—			238,429		569,850			—			—
Additions and transfers		222,890			(3,177	)		—			—			—		—			7,557			—		227,270			170,528			196,056
Disposals and write-offs, Note 21(a)		(298	)		(6,266	)		—			—			—		—			(214	)		—		(6,778	)		(10,606	)		(1,783	)

Balance as of December 31		1,305,807			206,420			137,900			110,042			82,546		97,016			89,680			669,075		2,698,486			1,908,144			1,748,222

Amortization
Balance as of January 1		(776,149	)		—			(57,458	)		—			—		—			(29,788	)		—		(863,395	)		(705,637	)		(574,687	)
Amortization of the year		(166,291	)		—			(13,790	)		(8,253	)		—		(7,276	)		(6,791	)		—		(202,401	)		(157,758	)		(131,199	)
Disposals and write-offs		298			—			—			—			—		—			214			—		512			—			249

Balance as of December 31		(942,142	)		—			(71,248	)		(8,253	)		—		(7,276	)		(36,365	)		—		(1,065,284	)		(863,395	)		(705,637	)

Net book value		363,665			206,420			66,652			101,789			82,546		89,740			53,315			669,075		1,633,202			1,044,749			1,042,585

Management

asse

sses periodically the amortization method used with the purpose of ensuring that it is consistent with the economic benefit of the intangible assets. In Management’s opinion, there is no evidence of impairment in the Group’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

F-10

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

Goodwill

Seguros Sura:

In 2017, IFS acquired 99.39 percent of Seguros Sura’s capital stock and 99.42 percent of Hipotecaria Sura’s capital stock. In March 2018, Interseguro merged with Seguro Sura, using the method of absorption, originating the transfer of all the assets and liabilities of Seguros Sura to the absorbing company and extinguishing without having to liquidate.

The goodwill resulting from the purchase of Seguros Sura and Hipotecaria Sura equivalent to S/430,646,000 represents the future synergies that are expected to arise from the combination of operations, distribution channels, workforce and other efficiencies not included in the intangible assets of the present value of acquired

in-force

business.

The goodwill recorded by the Group has been allocated to the CGU (cash generated unit) comprised of the merged entity.

The recoverable amount for the CGU was determined based on the income approach, specifically the dividend discount model.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the key assumptions used for the calculation of fair value are:

•

Perpetuity growth rate: 4.5%.

•

Discount rate: 12.5% (2022 and 2021)

10-year

cash flows and a perpetuity estimates were included in the dividend discount model. The estimated growth rates are based on the historical performance and the expectations of Management over the development of the market. Long-term perpetuity growth rate was determined based on reports from the sector.

The discount rate represents the assessment of the CGU specific risks. The discount rate was established considering the Company’s capital structure, the cost of capital coming from the benefits that the Group’s investors expect to obtain, from the specific risk incorporated by applying comparable individual beta factors adapted to the CGU’s debt structure and from the country and market specific risk premiums for the CGU. Beta factors are assessed on an annual basis using available market information.

The key assumptions described above can change if the market conditions and the economy change. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group estimates that the reasonableness of possible changes in these assumptions would not make the recoverable amount of the CGU decrease to an amount lower than its book value.

F-10

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Izipay:

In April 2022, IFS acquired 50 percent of Izipay, through the method of step acquisitions, adjusting at fair value the previous participation held by IFS in Izipay through its Subsidiary Interbank (50 percent).

The goodwill resulting from the acquisition of Izipay, equivalent to S/ 238,429,000, represents the future synergies that are expected to arise from the combination of operations and other efficiencies not included in the intangibles of the current value of the ongoing business.

The goodwill recorded by the Group has been assigned to the CGU (cash-generating unit) consisting of the acquired entities, Izipay.

The recoverable amount for the CGU has been determined based on the method of discounted cash flows.

As of December 31, 2022, the key assumptions used for the calculation of the fair value are the following:

•

Perpetual growth rate: 3%

•

Discount rate: 13.65%

5-year

cash flows plus an estimation of the value at perpetuity were included in the model of discounted cash flows. The estimated growth rates are based on the historical performance and the expectations of Management over the market development. The long-term perpetual growth rate has been determined considering the upper target range of inflation established by the BCRP.

The discount rate represents the assessment of the CGU’s specific risks. The discount rate was originated considering the data obtained from market information sources.

The key assumptions described before can change if market conditions and the economy change. As of December 31, 2022, the Group estimates that the reasonableness of these possible changes in these assumptions would not originate that the recoverable amount of the CGU decreases below its book value.

F-10

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

10.	Other accounts receivable and other assets, net, and other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities

(a)

These captions are comprised of the following:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Other accounts receivable and other assets
Financial instruments
Other accounts receivable, net		633,926		455,060
Accounts receivable related to derivative financial instruments (b)		515,800		793,361
Operations in process (d)		112,195		86,193
POS Commission accounts receivable		110,906		—
Accounts receivable from sale of investments (c)		37,987		12,366
Assets for technical reserves for claims and premiums by reinsurers		34,596		53,104
Others		24,753		22,749

		1,470,163		1,422,833

Non-financial instruments
Deffered cost of POS affiliation and registration		95,265		—
Deferred charges		92,865		75,316
Realizable assets, received as payment and seized through legal actions		27,266		26,871
Payments in advance of Income Tax		26,759		255,437
Investments in associates		22,728		99,767
POS equipment supplies (*)		18,698		—
Tax credit for General Sales Tax - IGV		17,623		—
Prepaid rights to related entity		3,399		3,399
Others		3,793		3,831

		308,396		464,621

Total		1,778,559		1,887,454

(*) Comprises the Points of Sale (“POS”) required for the rendering of the service. Their supplies are recorded at cost, which is determined by applying the weighted average method.

F-10

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities
Financial instruments
Contract liability with investment component, Note 3.4(d)		883,268		736,637
Other accounts payable		726,983		547,747
Third party compensation (**)		386,136		—
Accounts payable related to derivative financial instruments (b)		297,038		413,797
Operations in process (d)		184,584		169,515
Workers’ profit sharing and salaries payable		154,460		113,874
Lease liabilities, Note 8(e)		112,581		234,946
Accounts payable for acquisitions of investments (c)		53,905		17,817
Allowance for indirect loan losses, Note 6(d.2)		35,495		40,329
Accounts payable to reinsurers and coinsurers		5,648		4,215

		2,840,098		2,278,877

Non-financial instruments
Taxes payable		138,819		76,823
Provision for other contingencies		79,304		64,935
Deferred income (***)		57,001		46,145
Registration for use of POS		17,029		—
Others		6,681		10,821

		298,834		198,724

Total		3,138,932		2,477,601

(**)

Accounts payable for compensations correspond mainly to outstanding balances payable to affiliated businesses, for the consumptions made by the cards users, net of the respective fee charged by Izipay, which are mainly settled the day after the transaction was made.

(***)

Corresponds mainly to deferred fees for indirect loans (mainly guarantee letters) and the transactions registered in Izipay related to installments pending of accrual within the contract’s term (36 months) with affiliated businesses.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the fair value of derivative financial instruments recorded as assets or liabilities, including their notional amounts. The notional gross amount is the nominal amount of the derivative’s underlying asset and it is the base over which changes in the fair value of derivatives are measured; see Note 18(a):


	Note			Assets		Liabilities		Notional amount		Effective part recognized in other comprehensive income during the year			Maturity	Hedged instruments		Caption of the consolidated statement of financial position where the hedged item has been recognized
				S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
2022
Derivatives held for trading (*) -
Forward exchange contracts					58,201		27,556		6,328,060		—		Between January 2023 and December 2023		—	—
Currency swaps					77,045		141,823		2,672,533		—		Between January 2023 and March 2029		—	—
Interest rate swaps					67,737		38,551		2,424,566		—		Between January 2023 and June 2036		—	—
Cross currency swaps					—		75,489		224,485		—		January 2023		—	—
Options					99		463		80,151		—		Between January 2023 and December 2023		—	—

					203,082		283,882		11,729,795		—
Derivatives held as hedges -
Cash flow hedges:
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		13	(g)		237,438		—		1,681,974		(20,199	)	January 2023		Corporate bonds	Bonds, notes and obligations outstanding
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		13	(i)		75,280		—		573,000		(33,565	)	October 2027		Senior bond	Bonds, notes and obligations outstanding
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		12	(e)		—		3,916		114,420		360		August 2024		Due to banks	Due to banks and correspondents
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		12	(f)				6,295		114,420		(355	)	October 2024		Due to banks	Due to banks and correspondents
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		12	(g)				931		57,210		(225	)	January 2025		Due to banks	Due to banks and correspondents
Cross currency swaps (CCS)		12	(k)				2,014		38,140		(156	)	November 2024		Due to banks	Due to banks and correspondents

					312,718		13,156		2,579,164		(54,140	)

					515,800		297,038		14,308,959		(54,140	)

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	Note	Assets		Liabilities		Notional amount		Effective part recognized in other comprehensive income during the year		Maturity	Hedged instruments	Caption of the consolidated statement of financial position where the hedged item has been recognized
		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
2021
Derivatives held for trading (*) -
Forward exchange contracts			53,421		128,250		8,631,830		—	Between January 2022 and December 2022	—	—
Interest rate swaps			40,139		30,325		2,969,027		—	Between January 2022 and June 2036	—	—
Currency swaps			220,979		162,917		4,162,325		—	Between January 2022 and April 2028	—	—
Cross currency swaps			—		92,299		234,667		—	January 2023	—	—
Options			—		6		1,816		—	Between January 2022 and June 2022	—	—

			314,539		413,797		15,999,665		—
Derivatives held as hedges -
Cash flow hedges:
Cross currency swaps (CCS)	13(g)		343,535		—		1,758,267		37,251	January 2023	Corporate bonds	Bonds, notes and obligations outstanding
Cross currency swaps (CCS)	13(i)		135,287		—		599,700		44,735	October 2027	Senior bond	Bonds, notes and obligations outstanding

			478,822		—		2,357,967		81,986

			793,361		413,797		18,357,632		81,986

(*)

During the years 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Group recognized losses for S/4,523,000, S/60,275,000 and S/39,207,000, respectively, for valuation of derivative financial instruments held for trading, which were recorded in the caption “Net (loss) gain from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” in the consolidated statement of income.

(i)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, certain derivative financial instruments hold collateral deposits; see Note 4(d).

(ii)

For the designated hedging derivatives mentioned in the table above, changes in fair values of hedging instruments completely offset the changes in fair values of hedged items; therefore, there has been no hedge ineffectiveness in 2022 and 2021. During 2022 and 2021, there were no discontinued hedges accounting.

(iii)

Derivatives held for trading are traded mainly to satisfy clients’ needs. The Group may also take positions with the expectation of profiting from favorable movements in prices or rates. Also, this caption includes any derivatives which do not comply with IFRS 9 hedging accounting requirements.

(iv)

The future effect of current cash flow hedges on the consolidated statement of income, net of the deferred Income Tax, which will be included in the caption “Net (loss) gain of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” when realized, is presented below:

As of December 31, 2022

As of December 31, 2021

Up to 1

year

From 1 to 3

years

Over 3

years

Expected

effect

Up to 1

year

From 1 to 3

years

Over 3

years

Expected

effect

S/(000)

Consolidated statement of income – Income (expense)

429

(731

)

(8,960

)

(9,262

)

1,507

20,871

22,500

44,878

The transfer of net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges to the consolidated statement of income is presented in Note 16(d) and (e).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(v)

The gain (loss) for cash flow hedges reclassified to the consolidated statement of income for the year ended as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, is as follows:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Interest expenses from cash flow hedges		(78,300	)		(71,009	)
Interest income from cash flow hedges		62,158			57,550
Expenses for exchange differences from cash flow hedges		(337,907	)		(128,820	)
Income for exchange differences from cash flow hedges		225,399			346,326

		(128,650	)		204,047

These amounts offset the effects of interest rate risk and exchange rate risk of the hedged item.

The following table shows hedging instruments that the Group uses in its cash flow hedges due to maturities:


December 31, 2022	Up to 1 month			3 to 12 months		1 to 5 years			Over 5 years		Total
Cross currency swaps (CCS)
Notional		1,681,974			—		897,190			—		2,579,164
Average interest rate in US Dollars		3.38	%		—		3.80	%		—		—
Average interest rate in Soles		4.87	%		—		5.03	%		—		—
Average exchange rate Soles / US Dollar		3.26			—		3.58			—		—


December 31, 2021	Up to 1 month		3 to 12 months		1 to 5 years			Over 5 years			Total
Cross currency swaps (CCS)
Notional		—		—		1,758,267			599,700			2,357,967
Average interest rate in US Dollars		—		—		3.38	%		—			—
Average interest rate in Soles		—		—		4.87	%		1.88	%		—
Average exchange rate Soles / US Dollar		—		—		3.26			3.24			—

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(vi)

The following table shows the nominal value and the weighted average maturity of derivative and

non-derivative

financial instruments that are subject to the reform of the reference interest rate; see Note 3.4(ah):


Derivative financial instruments	2022				2021
Derivative financial instruments	Derivative nominal value (*) S/(000)		Average term in years (*)		Derivative nominal value (*) S/(000)		Average term in years (*)
Position purchased (LIBOR is paid)
Interest rate swaps 3-month LIBOR		208,002		5.8		315,555		5.9
6-month LIBOR		278,060		8.2		301,871		9.4

		486,062				617,426

Cross currency swaps
6-month LIBOR		114,420		1.5		119,610		2.5

Total		600,482				737,036

Position sold (LIBOR is received)
Interest rate swaps 3-month LIBOR		251,873		5.3		473,042		5.0
6-month LIBOR		346,712		7.1		373,637		8.3

		598,585				846,679

Cross currency swaps
6-month LIBOR		202,142		1.8		231,246		2.7

Total		800,727				1,077,925

(*)

Balances as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, that will change no later than June 30, 2023 to the new benchmark rate.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group does not present derivative financial instruments classified as hedge accounting that are subject to the interest rate benchmark reform; see Note 3.4(ah).


	2022				2021
Non-derivative financial instruments	Nominal value		Average term in years		Nominal value		Average term in years
	S/(000)				S/(000)
Assets
Loans 1-month LIBOR		—		—		3,220		6.5
3-month LIBOR		465,494		3.8		573,727		4.1
6-month LIBOR		197,891		11.8		517,590		7.4

Total		663,385				1,094,537

Liabilities
Issuances 3-month LIBOR		1,144,200		5.0		1,196,100		5.0

Total		1,144,200				1,196,100

(c)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, corresponds to accounts receivable and payable for the sale and purchase of financial investments negotiated during the last days of the month, which were settled at the beginning of the following month. As of said dates, the balance corresponds mainly to the purchase and sale of Sovereign Bonds issued by the Peruvian Government and Global Bonds issued by the Treasury of the United States of America.

(d)

Operations in process include transactions made during the last days of the month and other types of similar transactions that are reclassified to their corresponding accounting accounts in the following month. These transactions do not affect the consolidated statement of income.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

11.	Deposits and obligations

(a)

This caption is made up as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Saving deposits		20,911,746		22,541,822
Demand deposits		13,824,824		14,433,164
Time deposits (e)		12,866,602		10,954,233
Compensation for service time (c)		921,288		962,596
Other obligations		6,248		6,129

Total		48,530,708		48,897,944

(b)

Interest rates applied to deposits and obligations are determined based on the market interest rates.

(c)

In May 2022, through Act No. 31480 “Act Authorizing the Withdrawal of Severance Indemnities to Cover Economic Needs Caused by the Covid-19 Pandemic”, the Peruvian government authorized clients, until December 31, 2023, to withdraw one hundred percent of these deposits. As part of this benefit, as of December 31, 2022; approximately

261,000

clients withdrew approximately

767,470,000.

In April 2021, through Act No. 31171, the Peruvian government authorized clients to withdraw the 100 percent of these deposits accumulated until December 31, 2021. As part of this benefit, as of December 31, 2021, approximately 242,000 customers withdrew approximately S/1,630,000,000.

(d)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, approximately S/18,368,816,000 and S/17,180,174,000, respectively, of deposits and obligations are covered by the Peruvian Deposit Insurance Fund. Likewise, at those dates, the coverage of the Deposit Insurance Fund by each client is up to S/125,603 and S/115,637, respectively.

(e)

The table below presents the balance of time deposits classified by maturity as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Up to 1 month		2,797,703		4,679,045
From 1 to 3 months		1,973,288		2,205,213
From 3 months to 1 year		6,788,680		3,430,805
From 1 to 5 years		1,023,473		377,889
Over 5 years		283,458		261,281

Total		12,866,602		10,954,233

F-11

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

12.	Due to banks and correspondents

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
By type -
Banco Central de Reserva del Peru (b)		4,481,138		6,332,527
Promotional credit lines (c)		1,863,482		1,595,405
Loans received from foreign entities (d)		339,446		322,947
Loans received from Peruvian entities (k)		357,770		226,713

		7,041,836		8,477,592
Interest and commissions payable		58,810		45,257

		7,100,646		8,522,849


By term -
Short term	2,433,459	1,068,838
Long term	4,667,187	7,454,011

Total	7,100,646	8,522,849

(b)

As part of the exceptional measures implemented to mitigate the financial and economic impact generated by the

Covid-19

pandemic, see Note 1(c.2), the BCRP issued a series of regulations related to the loans repurchase agreements. In this sense, during 2022, Interbank took in repurchase agreements of loan portfolio for an amount of S/42,461,000 (S/4,183,571,000 during 2021, which was aimed to the “Reactiva Peru” program; Note 1(c.2)).

As of December 31, 2022, includes repurchase operations on loans represented by securities according to which Interbank received a debit in local currency for approximately S/1,909,375,000 (S/4,389,903,000 as of December 31, 2021), and gives to commercial and micro and small business loans as guarantee; see Note 6(a). As of December 31, 2022, these obligations have maturities between May 2023 and November 2025, and accrue interest at effective rates 0.50 percent; these operations accrued interest payable for approximately S/4,049,000 (as of December 31, 2021, these obligations have maturities between May 2023 and November 2025, and accrue interest at effective rates between 0.50 percent; these operations accrued interest payable for S/11,218,000).

F-11

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, it includes repurchase agreements whereby Interbank receives Soles for approximately S/2,571,763,000 and delivers securities of its investment portfolio as guarantees. In relation to said operations, Interbank delivered Peruvian Sovereign Bonds as guarantee, which are recorded as investments at fair value through other comprehensive income and investments at amortized cost; see Note 5(b) and (d), respectively. These operations have a maturity between January 2023 and October 2024 and bear interest at effective interest rates between 0.50 percent and 8.64 percent. These operations bear interest payable for approximately S/45,150,000 (as of December 31, 2021, Interbank received a loan in Soles for approximately S/1,572,624,000, and gave as guarantee Peruvian Sovereign Bonds, which are recorded as investments at fair value through other comprehensive income and at amortized cost, see Note 5(b) and (d), with maturities between April 2023 and October 2024, and bear interest at effective interest rates between 0.50 percent and 2.04 percent, and bear interest payable for approximately S/9,746,000).

Likewise, as of December 31, 2021, corresponded to currency repurchase operations according to which Interbank receives Soles for approximately S/370,000,000, and delivers US Dollars to the BCRP (for an amount equivalent to the one received). The US Dollars delivered are recorded as restricted funds; see Note 4(d). These obligations matured in March 2022 and bore an effective interest rate between 2.74 and 3.29 percent; these operations generated interest payable for approximately S/19,925,000.

(c)

Promotional credit lines are loans in Soles and US Dollars from the Corporación Financiera de Desarrollo (“COFIDE”) and Fondo Mivivienda (“FMV”) whose purpose is to promote development in Peru. These liabilities are guaranteed by a loan portfolio up to the amount of the line and include specific agreements on the use of funds, the financial conditions to be met and other management issues. In Management’s opinion, Interbank is meeting these requirements.

As of December 31, 2022, COFIDE’s loans accrued, in local currency, an effective annual interest rate that fluctuated between 7.55 percent and 7.67 percent, and maturities in January 2027 and in foreign currency fluctuated between 5.81 and 8.05 percent, and maturities between December 2029 and October 2034 (as of December 31, 2021, they accrued, in local currency, an effective annual interest rate that fluctuated between 7.55 percent and 7.67 percent, and maturities in January 2027, and in foreign currency fluctuated between 5.86 percent and 8.05 percent, and maturities between December 2029 and October 2034).

As of December 31, 2022, FMV’s loans accrued, in local currency, an effective annual interest rate that fluctuated between 5.00 percent and 8.30 percent, and maturities between January 2023 and December 2047 and in foreign currency of 7.75 percent and maturities between January 2023 and November 2028 (as of December 31, 2021, accrued in local currency, an effective annual interest rate between 5.00 and 8.30 percent, and maturities between January 2022 and December 2046, and in foreign currency, 7.75 percent and maturities between February 2022 and November 2028).

F-11

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, corresponds to the following funding in foreign currency:


Entity	Country		Final maturity		2022		2021
					S/(000)		S/(000)
Caixabank S.A. Barcelona (e)		Spain		2024		114,420		—
JP Morgan Chase Bank NY (f)		United States of America		2024		114,420		—
Banco del Estado de Chile (g)		Chile		2025		57,210		—
Bank J. Safra Sarasin (h)		Switzerland		2023/2022		53,396		23,922
Credit Suisse First Boston (i)		Switzerland		2022		—		159,480
Development Bank of Latin America (j)		Supranational		2022		—		139,545

						339,446		322,947

As of December 31, 2022, the operations with foreign entities accrue interest at effective annual rates between 0.66 and 6.92 percent (effective annual rates between 0.43 percent and 1.62 percent, as of December 31, 2021).

(e)

Corresponds to a loan received in July 2022 for US$30,000,000 that accrues interest at a

6-month

Term SOFR rate plus 1.35 percent. In July 2022, Interbank entered into a currency swap that was designated as cash flow hedge; see Note 10(b), through this operation, the loan was economically converted into a fixed rate of 7.74 percent.

(f)

Corresponds to a loan received in September 2022 for US$30,000,000 thar accrues interest at

6-month

Term SOFR rate plus 1.75 percent. In September 2022, Interbank entered into a currency swap that was designated as cash flow hedge; see Note 10(b). Through this operation, the loan was economically converted into a fixed rate of 8.4 percent.

(g)

Corresponds to a loan received in December 2022 for US$15,000,000 that accrues interest at

6-month

Term SOFR rate plus 1.99 percent. In December 2022, Interbank entered a currency swap that was designated as cash flow hedge; see Note 10(b). Through this operation, the loan was economically converted into a fixed rate of 8.59 percent.

(h)

Corresponds to a loan received by Inteligo Bank in December 2022 for US$14,000,000, which accrues interest at an effective annual rate of 5.61 percent, guaranteed by corporate bonds. As of December 31, 2021, corresponded to a loan received by Inteligo Bank in December 2021 for US$6,000,000, which accrued interest at an effective annual rate of 0.84 percent, and it was guaranteed by corporate bonds. See Note 5(b).

(i)

Corresponded to a loan received by Inteligo Bank in December 2021 for US$40,000,000, which accrues interest at an effective annual rate of 0.65 percent, guaranteed by corporate bonds and was totally canceled IN 2022. See Note 5(b).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(j)

Corresponded to a financing from the Development Bank of Latin America in foreign currency for US$35,000,000, equivalent to S/139,545,000, which accrues interest at a

6-month

LIBOR rate plus 0.57 percent and matured in April 2022.

(k)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, corresponds to the following funding in local and foreign currency:

2022

Entity

Maturity

Currency

Book value

S/(000)

Scotiabank

Jan-23 / Oct-25

PEN

120,718

Banco de Credito del Peru

Jan-23 / Oct-23

PEN

81,644

GNB

Jan-23

PEN

71,500

Bank of China Peru (i)

Nov-24

PEN

38,140

BBVA Continental

Jan-23

USD

45,768

357,770

2021

Entity

Maturity

Currency

Book value

S/(000)

Scotiabank

Jan-22

USD

99,675

GNB

Jan-22

USD

63,194

BBVA Continental

Jan-22

USD

47,844

Banco de Credito del Peru

Jan-22

PEN

16,000

226,713

(l)

As of December 31, 2022, includes a loan received from Bank of China Peru in October 2022 for US$10,000,000, which accrues interest at a

6-month

Term SOFR rate plus 1.50 percent. In October 2022, Interbank entered into a currency swap, which was designated as cash flow hedge; see Note 10(b). Through this operation, the loan was economically converted to a fixed rate of 8.18 percent.

(m)

As of December

31,

2022 and 2021, maturities are the following:

F-11

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


Year	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
2022		—		1,068,838
2023		2,433,459		3,685,027
2024		1,888,657		1,639,319
2025 onwards		2,778,530		2,129,665

Total		7,100,646		8,522,849

13.	Bonds, notes and other obligations

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


Issuance	Issuer		Annual interest rate	Interest payment		Maturity		Amount issued		2022		2021
								(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Local issuances
Subordinated bonds – first program (b)
Eighth (A series)		Interbank	6.91%		Semi-annually		2022		S/137,900		—		137,900

											—		137,900

Subordinated bonds – second program (b)
Second (A series)		Interbank	5.81%		Semi-annually		2023		S/150,000		149,998		149,938
Third (A series)		Interbank	7.50%		Semi-annually		2023		US$50,000		190,616		199,175

											340,614		349,113

Subordinated bonds – third program (b)
Third - single series (c)		Interseguro	4.84%		Semi-annually		2030		US$25,000		95,350		99,675
First - single series		Interseguro	6.00%		Semi-annually		2029		US$20,000		76,213		79,663
Second - single series		Interseguro	4.34%		Semi-annually		2029		US$20,000		76,280		79,740

											247,843		259,078

Corporate bonds – second program
Fifth (A series)		Interbank	3.41% + VAC (*)		Semi-annually		2029		S/150,000		150,000		150,000

Total local issuances											738,457		896,091

International issuances
Subordinated bonds (d)		Interbank	4.000%		Semi-annually		2030		US$300,000		1,137,691		1,188,394
Corporate bonds (e)		Interbank	5.000%		Semi-annually		2026		S/312,000		311,522		311,401
Corporate bonds (f)		Interbank	3.250%		Semi-annually		2026		US$400,000		1,517,661		1,584,288
Corporate bonds (g)		Interbank	3.375%		Semi-annually		2023		US$484,895		1,849,133		1,912,330
Subordinated bonds (h)		Interbank	6.625%		Semi-annually		2029		US$300,000		1,142,764		1,193,461
Senior bonds (i)		IFS	4.125%		Semi-annually		2027		US$300,000		1,074,396		1,178,000

Total international issuances											7,033,167		7,367,874

Total local and international issuances											7,771,624		8,263,965

Interest payable											134,679		125,707

Total											7,906,303		8,389,672

(*)

The Spanish term “Valor de actualización constante“ is referred to amounts in Soles indexed by inflation.

F- 1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

Subordinated bonds do not have specific guarantees and in accordance with SBS rules, qualify as second level equity (Tier 2) in the determination of the effective equity; see Note 16(f).

(c)

On September 29, 2020, Interseguro issued subordinated bonds denominated “Third Issuance of the Third Program of Subordinated Bonds Interseguro (Single Series)” for the amount of US$25,000,000, recorded in Section “Transferable Securities and Issuance Programs” of the Public Registry of the Stock Market, under the Third Program of Subordinated Bonds of Interseguro.

(d)

On June 30, 2020, Interbank placed subordinated bonds called “4.00% Subordinated Notes due 2030” for an amount of US$300,000,000, under Rule 144A and Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 of the United States of America. The issuance date of these bonds was July 8, 2020.

Starting on July 8, 2025, prior authorization by the SBS, Interbank will be able to redeem the entirety of the bonds, having to pay a redemption price of 100 percent of the issued subordinated bonds. From that date onwards, in case Interbank does not perform the early redemption, the interest rate will increase by 371.1 basis points. After July 8, 2025, prior authorization by the SBS, Interbank will be able to redeem the entirety of the bonds, having to pay a redemption price of 100 percent of the issued subordinated bonds plus the present value of each scheduled coupon payment, discounted at the redemption date.

(e)

On September 24, 2019, Interbank placed corporate bonds denominated “5.00% Senior Notes due 2026” for S/312,000,000, under Rule 144A and Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1993 of the United States of America. These bonds were issued on October 1, 2019.

(f)

On September 25, 2019, Interbank placed corporate bonds denominated “3.25% Senior Notes due 2026” for US$400,000,000, under Rule 144A and Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1993 of the United States of America. These bonds were issued on October 4, 2019.

(g)

In January 2018, Interbank issued corporate bonds called “

3.375

Senior Unsecured Notes” for US$

200,000,000

, under Rule 144A and Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1993 of the United States of America.

Considering the issuance of bonds in January 2018 and the exchange of bonds previously issued carried out on said date, the total balance of the “3.375 Senior Unsecured Notes” amounted to US$484,895,000.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interbank maintains fourteen cross-currency swaps for a total of US$441,000,000 (equivalent to approximately S/1,681,974,000 and S/1,758,267,000, respectively), see Note 10(b). Through these operations, part of the issued amount by these bonds was economically converted into Soles at a fixed rate of 4.88 percent.

As of December 31, 2022, Management does not intend to redeem these bonds before their maturity date; said situation may change in the future, depending on market conditions.

(h)

Starting in March 2024, the interest rate changes to 8.625%. Starting on that date and on any interest payment date, Interbank can redeem all the notes without penalties.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In accordance with SBS regulation, this issuance qualifies as second level equity (Tier 2) in the determination of the effective equity; see Note 16(f).

As of December 31, 2022, Management does not intend to redeem these bonds before their maturity date; said situation may change in the future, depending on market conditions.

(i)

From 2018 until July 2027, IFS, on any time, can redeem these bonds, paying a penalty equal to the United States of America Treasury rate plus 30 basis points. The payment of principal will take place on the maturity date of the bonds or when IFS redeems them.

In October 2017, IFS entered a cross currency swap for US$150,000,000 (equivalents to approximately S/573,000,000 and S/599,700,000, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively), which was designated as a cash flow hedge, see Note 10(b); through this operation part of the issued amount of these bonds was economically converted to Soles at a fix rate of 5.06 percent.

As of December 31, 2022, Management does not intend to redeem these bonds before their maturity date; said situation may change in the future, depending on market conditions.

(j)

International issuances are listed at the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. On the other hand, the local and international issuances include standard clauses of compliance with financial ratios, the use of funds and other administrative matters.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the international issuances maintain mainly this common clause: submit audited financial statements on an annual basis and unaudited financial statements on a quarterly basis (both in Spanish and English). In the opinion of Group Management and its legal advisers, this clause has been met by the Group as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In addition, Interbank maintains the following additional clauses: (i) limits regarding related party transactions that are not under market conditions and (ii) limits regarding consolidation, merger or transfer of Interbank assets. In the opinion of Interbank Management and its legal advisers, these clauses has been met by Interbank as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(k)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the repayment schedule of these obligations is as follows:


Year	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
2022		—		249,609
2023		2,296,506		2,261,443
2024		—		—
2025		—		—
2026 onwards		5,609,797		5,878,620

Total		7,906,303		8,389,672

14.	Insurance contract liabilities

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Technical reserves for insurance premiums (b)		10,400,667		11,735,995
Technical reserves for claims (c)		201,705		222,063

		10,602,372		11,958,058

By term -
Short term		1,023,856		949,512
Long term		9,578,516		11,008,546

Total		10,602,372		11,958,058

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

The movement of technical reserves for insurance premiums (disclosed by type of insurance) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


	2022																		2021																		2020
	Annuities			Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total			Annuities			Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total			Annuities		Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		9,923,679			618,452			892,992			40,762			260,110			11,735,995			10,448,455			745,292			746,171			38,015			320,142			12,298,075			9,741,241		779,455			630,801			41,073			30,886			11,223,456
Insurance subscriptions		319,876			—			2,882			40,220			—			362,978			482,508			115			11,770			30,411			2,562			527,366			249,380		—			2,259			31,808			—			283,447
Acquisition of Mapfre portfolio (*)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			292,499			292,499
Time passage adjustments (**)		(1,482,660	)		(34,745	)		122,237			(27,962	)		(16,933	)		(1,440,063	)		(1,347,987	)		(126,955	)		131,533			(28,112	)		(62,674	)		(1,434,195	)		162,654		(34,163	)		110,102			(35,167	)		(3,326	)		200,100
Maturities and recoveries		—			—			(66,517	)		—			—			(66,517	)		—			—			(65,587	)		—			—			(65,587	)		—		—			(50,654	)		—			—			(50,654	)
Exchange differencies		(157,132	)		—			(34,286	)		(283	)		(25	)		(191,726	)		340,703			—			69,105			448			80			410,336			295,180		—			53,663			301			83			349,227

End of year balances		8,603,763			583,707			917,308			52,737			243,152			10,400,667			9,923,679			618,452			892,992			40,762			260,110			11,735,995			10,448,455		745,292			746,171			38,015			320,142			12,298,075

(*)

In December 2019, SBS authorized the transfer of risk insurance contracts from Complementary Insurance for High-risk Activities (“SCTR”, by its Spanish acronym), of Mapfre Peru Vida Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros S.A. (henceforth “Mapfre”, an unrelated entity), which entered into force on January 2, 2020. The assets received by said contracts were cash and financial debt instruments of a value equivalent to S/246,101,000; also recognized a liability for technical reserves of premiums for S/292,499,000, the difference amounting to S/46,398,000, was recorded in the caption “Intangibles and goodwill, net”, as part of the “Other Intangibles”, see Note 9(a).

(**)

The table below presents the composition of the adjustments due to time passage as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:


	2022															2021															2020
	Annuities (***)			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total			Annuities (***)			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total			Annuities (***)			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total
		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)		S/(000	)
Interest rate effect (****), Note 3.4(d)		(1,484,394	)		—			—			(36,586	)		(1,520,980	)		(1,318,573	)		—			—			(73,707	)		(1,392,280	)		333,761			—			—			(1,225	)		332,536
Aging insured population effect		(270,339	)		122,237			(27,962	)		(8,271	)		(184,335	)		(325,914	)		131,533			(28,112	)		(6,705	)		(229,198	)		(257,549	)		110,102			(35,167	)		(7,495	)		(190,109	)
Inflation and other effects		237,328			—			—			27,924			265,252			169,545			—			—			17,738			187,283			52,279			—			—			5,394			57,673

Time passage adjustments		(1,517,405	)		122,237			(27,962	)		(16,933	)		(1,440,063	)		(1,474,942	)		131,533			(28,112	)		(62,674	)		(1,434,195	)		128,491			110,102			(35,167	)		(3,326	)		200,100

(***)

It includes retirement (disability and survival annuities) and “Renta Particular Plus – Vitalicio”.

(****)

Comprises the variations of the market interest rate for each period. The Company uses market rates. In 2022, 2021 and 2020, the rates for annuities, retirement, disability and survival annuities and SCTR in US Dollars presented an increase, fluctuating around 6.10 percent, 3.70 percent and 3.53 percent, respectively; whereas for annuities, retirement, disability and survival annuities and SCTR in adjustable S/ presented an increase, fluctuating around 8.14 percent, 6.84 percent and 5.07 percent, respectively; and for of annuities, retirement, disability and survival annuities and SCTR in S/ VAC presented an increase, fluctuating around 4.78 percent, 3.77 percent and 2.05 percent, respectively.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c)

Below is the balance of technical reserves for outstanding claims (according to the type of insurance) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	2022												2021
	Annuities		Retirement, disability and survival annuities		Life insurance		General insurance		SCTR		Total		Annuities		Retirement, disability and survival annuities		Life insurance		General insurance		SCTR		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Reported claims		15,673		56,816		42,449		19,399		5,731		140,068		12,233		61,700		46,411		12,514		5,762		138,620
IBNR		—		5,855		50,201		4,984		597		61,637		—		18,352		58,911		5,383		797		83,443

		15,673		62,671		92,650		24,383		6,328		201,705		12,233		80,052		105,322		17,897		6,559		222,063

The movement of technical reserves for claims for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is as follows:


	2022
	Annuities			Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		12,233			80,052			105,322			17,897			6,559			222,063
Claims of the period		699,977			55,272			57,104			43,343			16,189			871,885
Adjustments to prior years claims		4,027			(16,117	)		—			—			(165	)		(12,255	)
Payments		(700,538	)		(56,532	)		(68,909	)		(36,657	)		(16,255	)		(878,891	)
Exchange difference		(26	)		(4	)		(867	)		(200	)		—			(1,097	)

End of year balances		15,673			62,671			92,650			24,383			6,328			201,705


	2021
	Annuities			Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		8,201			89,676			83,712			14,189			7,870			203,648
Claims of the period		713,226			75,185			134,615			27,622			15,329			965,977
Adjustments to prior years claims		4,135			(22,096	)		26,629			183			(790	)		8,061
Payments		(713,309	)		(62,713	)		(142,013	)		(23,877	)		(15,850	)		(957,762	)
Exchange difference		(20	)		—			2,379			(220	)		—			2,139

End of year balances		12,233			80,052			105,322			17,897			6,559			222,063

F-12

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2020
	Annuities			Retirement, disability and survival annuities			Life insurance			General insurance			SCTR			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Beginning of year balances		3,691			116,130			60,032			13,250			10,072			203,175
Claims of the period		626,106			58,841			64,133			22,278			14,269			785,627
Adjustments to prior years claims		5,011			(17,764	)		36,973			(3,064	)		(1,482	)		19,674
Payments		(626,632	)		(67,531	)		(78,393	)		(18,394	)		(14,989	)		(805,939	)
Exchange difference		25			—			967			119			—			1,111

End of year balances		8,201			89,676			83,712			14,189			7,870			203,648

(d)	In Management’s opinion, these balances reflect the exposure of life and general insurance contracts as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, in accordance with IFRS 4.

(e)	The main assumptions used in the estimation of retirement, disability and survival annuities and individual life reserves as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, are the following:


Type	Mortality table		Interest rate
	2022	2021	2022	2021
Annuities and Lifetime RPP	SPP-S-2017, SPP-I-2017 with improvement factor for mortality		6.10% in US$ 4.78% in S/ VAC 8.14% adjustable in S/	3.70% in US$ 3.77% in S/ VAC 6.84% adjustable in S/
Retirement, disability and survival	SPP-S-2017, SPP-I-2017 with improvement factor for mortality		4.78% in S/ VAC	3.77% in S/ VAC
SCTR insurance	SPP-S-2017, SPP-I-2017 with improvement factor for mortality		4.78% in S/ VAC	3.77% in S/ VAC
Individual life insurance contracts (included linked insurance contracts)	CSO 80 adjustable		4.00 - 5.00%	4.00 - 5.00%

F-12

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The sensitivity of the estimates used by the Group to measure its insurance risks is represented primarily by life insurance risks; the main variables as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, are the interest rates and the mortality tables. The Group has assessed the changes of the reserves related to its most significant life insurance contracts included in the reserves of annuities, retirement, disability and survival of +/- 100 basis points (bps) in the interest rates and of +/- 500 basis points (bps) of the mortality factors, being the results as follows:


	2022								2021
			Variation in reserves								Variation in reserves
Variables	Reserves		Amount			Percentage			Reserves		Amount			Percentage
	S/(000)		S/(000)			%			S/(000)		S/(000)			%
Annuities -
Portfolio in S/ and US Dollars - basis amount
Changes in interest rate: + 100 bps		7,890,881		(712,882	)		(8.29	)		8,995,287		(928,392	)		(9.37	)
Changes in interest rate: - 100 bps		9,447,412		843,649			9.81			11,041,604		1,117,925			11.27
Changes in mortality table at 105%		8,531,246		(72,517	)		(0.84	)		9,823,769		(99,910	)		(1.01	)
Changes in mortality table at 95%		8,679,442		75,678			0.88			10,028,431		104,752			1.06
Retirements, disability and survival -
Portfolio in S/ – basis amount
Changes in interest rate: + 100 bps		531,597		(52,110	)		(8.93	)		557,818		(60,634	)		(9.80	)
Changes in interest rate: - 100 bps		645,981		62,274			10.67			691,971		73,519			11.89
Changes in mortality table at 105%		577,279		(6,428	)		(1.10	)		611,223		(7,229	)		(1.17	)
Changes in mortality table at 95%		590,423		6,716			1.15			626,020		7,568			1.22
SCTR insurance -
Portfolio in S/ - basis amount
Changes in interest rate: + 100 bps		217,035		(26,117	)		(10.74	)		228,990		(31,120	)		(11.96	)
Changes in interest rate: - 100 bps		275,699		32,548			13.39			299,710		39,600			15.22
Changes in mortality table at 105%		241,489		(1,663	)		(0.68	)		258,161		(1,949	)		(0.75	)
Changes in mortality table at 95%		244,880		1,728			0.71			262,143		2,033			0.78

F-12

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

15.	Deferred Income Tax asset and liability

(a)

As indicated in Note 3.4(aa), the net tax position has been met based on the separate financial statement of each Subsidiary domiciled in Peru. The following table presents a summary of the items comprising the Subsidiaries’ deferred Income Tax:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Deferred asset
Provision for loan portfolio and other provisions		291,634			316,208
Modification of rescheduled loan cash flows		(7,943	)		4,184
Deferred income from indirect credits (stand-by letters)		2,319			3,958
Right-of-use assets		3,405			3,281
Net unrealized losses from fluctuation in investments through other comprehensive income		11,688			3,151
Unrealized (loss) gain from derivatives		245			(7,453	)
Leveling of assets and liabilities		16,357			(27,773	)
Recording of past-due and refinanced loans (Stages 1, 2, 3)		(74,401	)		(47,746	)
Tax loss		28,054			408
Deferred service income		7,485			—
Others		40,593			29,621
Deferred liability
Deemed cost of fixed assets		(61,403	)		(62,125	)
Amortization of intangible assets, net		(62,213	)		(69,465	)
Deferred cost of POS affiliation and registration		(26,980	)		—
Others		(3,053	)		(3,882	)

Total deferred Income Tax asset, net		165,787			142,367

Deferred liability (*)
Higher value of intangibles generated by business combination, Note 1(d)		80,852			—
Higher value of IME and right-of-use generated by business combination, Note 1(d)		1,047			—

Total deferred Income Tax liability, net		81,899			—

(*)

Includes S/4,642,000 in results for the period.

(b)

In Management’s opinion, the deferred Income Tax assets will be recovered from the taxable income that will be generated by each company of the Group over the coming years, including the portion that is recorded in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c)

The table below presents the amounts reported in the consolidated statement of income for the years 2022, 2021 and 2020:


	2022			2021		2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Current – Expense		432,392			257,252		236,652
Current – Dividend expense, Note 17(b)		30,587			39,108		(1,518	)
Deferred – (Income) expense		(442	)		205,752		(308,067	)

		462,537			502,112		(72,933	)

(d)

The table below presents the reconciliation of the effective Income Tax rate to the statutory tax rate for the Group:


	2022						2021						2020
	S/(000)			%			S/(000)			%			S/(000)			%
Income before Income Tax		2,133,194			100.0			2,302,291			100.0			310,616			100.0

Theoretical tax		629,292			29.5			679,176			29.5			91,632			29.5
Increase (decrease) in income of Subsidiaries not domiciled in Peru		11,412			0.5			(39,498	)		(1.7	)		(54,020	)		(17.4	)
Non-taxable income, net		(244,154	)		(11.4	)		(224,780	)		(9.8	)		(131,595	)		(42.4	)
Permanent non-deductible expenses		61,833			2.9			69,367			3.0			28,452			9.2
Non-taxable translation results		4,154			0.2			17,847			0.8			(7,402	)		(2.4	)

Income Tax		462,537			21.7			502,112			21.8			(72,933	)		(23.5	)

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

16.

Equity

(a)

Capital stock and distribution of dividends -

IFS’s shares are listed on the Lima Stock Exchange and, since July 2019, they are listed also on the New York Stock Exchange. IFS’s shares have no nominal value and their issuance value was US$9.72 per share.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, IFS’s capital stock is represented by 115,447,705 subscribed and

paid-in

common shares.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on March 31, 2023, agreed to distribute dividends charged to profits for the year 2022 for approximately US$136,222,000 (equivalent to approximately S/511,788,000); equivalent to US$1.18 per share, which will be paid on May 8, 2023.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on March 31, 2022, agreed to distribute dividends charged to profits for the year 2021 for approximately US$202,025,000 (equivalent to approximately S/751,532,000); equivalent to US$1.75 per share, which were paid on May 6, 2022.

The General Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on November 24, 2021, agreed to distribute extraordinary dividends for approximately US$75,038,000 (equivalent to approximately S/301,757,000), equivalent to US$0.65 per share, which was paid on December 20, 2021.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on March 31, 2021, agreed to distribute dividends for the year 2020 for approximately US$88,891,000 (equivalent to approximately S/332,096,000), equivalent to US$0.77 per share, which were paid on May 6, 2021.

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on April 7, 2020, agreed to distribute dividends for the year 2019 for approximately US$202,033,000 (equivalent to approximately S/698,228,000), US$1.75 per share, which were paid on May 6, 2020.

(b)

Treasury stock -

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company and some Subsidiaries hold, 30,074 shares issued by IFS, with an acquisition cost equivalent to S/3,363,000.

(c)

Capital surplus -

Corresponds to the difference between the nominal value of the shares issued and their public offerings price, which were performed in 2007 and 2019. Capital surplus is presented net of the expenses incurred and related to the issuance of such shares.

F-12

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

Unrealized results, net —

This item is made up as follows:


	Unrealized gain (loss)

	Instruments that will not be reclassified to consolidated statement of income			Instruments to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income
	Equity instruments at fair value			Debt instruments at fair value			Insurance premiums reserve			Cash flow hedge reserve			Translation of foreign operations		Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Balances as of January 1, 2020		264,883			1,036,159			(923,855	)		(22,758	)		88,476		442,905
Effect of changes in the discount rates of pension reserves, Note 3.4(d)		—			—			(331,990	)		—			—		(331,990	)
Unrealized gain from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		8,175			—			—			—			—		8,175
Transfer to retained earnings from realized loss from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		24,154			—			—			—			—		24,154
Unrealized gain from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		—			791,762			—			—			—		791,762
Transfer to realized gain from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		—			(193,683	)		—			—			—		(193,683	)
Transfer of impairment loss on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		—			32,865			—			—			—		32,865
Variation for net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges		—			—			—			(38,924	)		—		(38,924	)
Transfer of realized loss on cash flow hedges to consolidated statement of income, net of realized gain		—			—			—			24,574			—		24,574
Translation of foreign operations		—			—			—			—			76,935		76,935

Balances as of December 31, 2020		297,212			1,667,103			(1,255,845	)		(37,108	)		165,411		836,773

Effect of changes in the discount rates of pension reserves, Note 3.4(d)		—			—			1,389,995			—			—		1,389,995
Unrealized gain from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		145,899			—			—			—			—		145,899
Transfer to retained earnings from realized loss from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		(451,898	)		—			—			—			—		(451,898	)
Unrealized loss from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		—			(1,986,046	)		—			—			—		(1,986,046	)
Transfer to realized gain from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized loss		—			(249,689	)		—			—			—		(249,689	)
Transfer of impairment recovery on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		—			(30,994	)		—			—			—		(30,994	)
Variation for net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges		—			—			—			68,615			—		68,615
Transfer of realized loss on cash flow hedges to consolidated statement of income, net of realized gain		—			—			—			13,371			—		13,371
Translation of foreign operations		—			—			—			—			95,674		95,674

Balances as of December 31, 2021		(8,787	)		(599,626	)		134,150			44,878			261,085		(168,300	)

Effect of changes in the discount rates of pension reserves, Note 3.4(d)		—			—			1,518,484			—			—		1,518,484

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	Unrealized gain (loss)

	Instruments that will not be reclassified to consolidated statement of income			Instruments to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income
	Equity instruments at fair value			Debt instruments at fair value			Insurance premiums reserve		Cash flow hedge reserve			Translation of foreign operations			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Unrealized loss from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized gains		(21,663	)		—			—		—			—			(21,663	)
Transfer to retained earnings from realized gain from equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		(16,313	)		—			—		—			—			(16,313	)
Unrealized loss from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized gain		—			(1,848,192	)		—		—			—			(1,848,192	)
Transfer to realized loss from debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net of unrealized gain		—			14,263			—		—			—			14,263
Transfer of impairment recovery on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		—			12,746			—		—			—			12,746
Variation for net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges		—			—			—		(70,170	)		—			(70,170	)
Transfer of realized loss on cash flow hedges to consolidated statement of income, net of realized gain		—			—			—		16,030			—			16,030
Translation of foreign operations		—			—			—		—			(50,165	)		(50,165	)

Balances as of December 31, 2022		(46,763	)		(2,420,809	)		1,652,634		(9,262	)		210,920			(613,280	)

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e)

Components of other comprehensive income -

The consolidated statement of comprehensive income include: (i) Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in future periods, such as the revaluation of gain (loss) in equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income; which will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income at the time of its disposal, but will be reclassified to retained earnings; and (ii) Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in future periods, such as the comprehensive income of financial instruments derivatives used as cash flow hedges, debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income and translation for foreign operations. Below is the movement of the caption:


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in future periods:
Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
(Losses) gains on equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income, net		(21,663	)		145,899			8,175

Subtotal		(21,663	)		145,899			8,175

Non-controlling interest		(43	)		231			(35	)
Income Tax		(218	)		31			36

Total		(21,924	)		146,161			8,176

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to the consolidated statement of income in future periods:
Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
Unrealized net (loss) gain on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		(1,848,192	)		(1,986,046	)		791,762
Transfer to income of unrealized net loss (gain) on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		14,263			(249,689	)		(193,683	)
Transfer to income of loss (recovery) for impairment on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		12,746			(30,994	)		32,865

Subtotal		(1,821,183	)		(2,266,729	)		630,944

Non-controlling interest		(4,423	)		(6,978	)		2,082
Income Tax		(8,250	)		(8,404	)		2,643

Total		(1,833,856	)		(2,282,111	)		635,669


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Insurance premiums reserve, Note 14(b)		1,518,484		1,389,995		(331,990	)

Non-controlling interest		2,496		2,285		(546	)

Total		1,520,980		1,392,280		(332,536	)

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022			2021		2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)
Cash flow hedges:
Net (loss) gain from cash flow hedges		(70,170	)		68,615		(38,924	)
Transfer of net realized loss from cash flow hedge to consolidated statement of income		16,030			13,371		24,574

Subtotal		(54,140	)		81,986		(14,350	)

Non-controlling interest		(144	)		261		(59	)
Income Tax		(8,670	)		15,696		(3,559	)

Total		(62,954	)		97,943		(17,968	)

Foreign currency translation		(50,165	)		95,674		76,935

(f)

Shareholders’ equity for legal purposes (regulatory capital) -

IFS is not required to establish a regulatory capital for statutory purposes. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the regulatory capital required for Interbank, Interseguro and Inteligo Bank (a Subsidiary of Inteligo Group Corp.), is calculated based on the separate financial statement of each Subsidiary and prepared following the accounting principles and practices of their respective regulators (the SBS or the Central Bank of the Bahamas, in the case of Inteligo Bank).

The regulatory capital required for Interbank, Interseguro and Inteligo Bank is detailed below:

Interbank’s regulatory capital -

According to Legislative Decree No. 1028 and amendments, Interbank’s regulatory capital must be equal to or higher than 10 percent of the assets and contingent credits weighted by total risk represented by the sum of: the regulatory capital requirement for market risk multiplied by 10, the regulatory capital requirement for operational risk multiplied by 10 and the assets and contingent credits weighted by credit risk. However, through Multiple Official Letter No. 27358-2021 and Emergency Decree

003-2022,

the SBS established that in the period between April 2021 and August 2022, the regulatory capital for financial companies shall be equal or higher than 8 percent of total risk-weighted assets and contingencies and for the period between September 2022 and March 2023, it will be of 8.5 percent. Once this period ends, the regulatory capital shall go back to the percentage initially defined (10 percent of the assets and contingent loans weighted by total risks).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 1028 and amendments, Interbank maintains the following amounts related to the risk weighted assets and contingent and regulatory capital (basic and supplementary):


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Total risk weighted assets and credits		64,690,083			57,570,306
Total regulatory capital		9,754,806			9,135,614
Basic regulatory capital (Level 1)		7,016,417			6,262,096
Supplementary regulatory capital (Level 2)		2,738,389			2,873,518
Global capital to regulatory capital ratio		15.08	%		15.87	%

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interbank has complied with SBS Resolutions No.2115-2009, No.6328-2009, No.14354-2009, No.4128-2014, “Regulations for the Regulatory Capital Requirement for Operational Risk”, “Market Risk” and “Credit Risk”, respectively, as amended. These resolutions establish, mainly, the methodologies to be applied by financial entities to calculate the assets and credits weighted per type of risk.

In July 2011, the SBS issued Resolution No. 8425-2011, modified by Resolution SBS

No. 603-2016

and SBS

No. 975-2016,

through these resolutions establish that, to determine an additional regulatory capital level and develop a process to assess the adequacy of their regulatory capital in relation with their risk profile, which must follow the methodology described in said resolution. The additional regulatory capital requirement shall be equivalent to the amount of regulatory capital requirements calculated for each of the following components: economic cycle, concentration risk, market concentration risk and interest rate risk in the bank book, among others. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the additional regulatory capital estimated by Interbank amounts to approximately S/840,914,000 and S/587,350,000, respectively.

In December 2021, the SBS issued Resolution No. 3921-2021, through which it establishes the modification to the calculation of the additional regulatory capital requirement for market concentration, considering the criteria of size, interconnection, substitutability, and complexity. Likewise, it establishes an adaptation period of two years starting in December 2022.

On March 26, 2020, the SBS issued Resolution No. 1264-2020, establishing that, for the calculation of capital requirements in relation to the weighting factor for mortgage loans and

non-revolving

consumer loans that have been subject to rescheduling where its expiration term has been extended, will not be increased. Likewise, such Resolution authorizes to the financial entities to use the additional regulatory capital accumulated for the economic cycle component, see Note 1(c).

In that sense, Interbank has granted loan reschedulings to its clients, which consisted of modifications to the payment schedules and/or grace periods so that the original term of loans was postponed; however, according to the SBS’s indications, this term postponement has not generated that Interbank needs higher regulatory capital requirements, by the weighting factor.

In Group Management’s opinion, Interbank has complied with the requirements established by the aforementioned Resolution.

F-13

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Interseguro’s regulatory capital -

In accordance with SBS Resolution No. 1124-2006, and its amendments, Interseguro is required to maintain a level of regulatory capital to maintain a minimum equity to support technical risks and other risks that could affect it. The regulatory capital must be higher than the amount resulting from the sum of the solvency net equity, the guarantee fund and the regulatory capital intended to cover credit risks.

The solvency net equity is represented by the higher amount between the solvency margin and the minimal capital. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the solvency net equity is represented by the solvency margin. The solvency margin is the complementary support that insurance entities must maintain to deal with possible situations of excess claims not foreseen in the establishment of technical reserves. The total solvency margin corresponds to the sum of the solvency margins of each branch in which Interseguro operates.

Also, the guarantee fund represents the additional equity support that insurance companies must maintain to deal with the other risks that can affect them and that are not covered by the solvency net equity, such as investment risks and other risks. The monthly amount of said fund must be equivalent to 35 percent of the solvency net equity, calculated in accordance with SBS Resolution No. 1124-2006.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Interseguro’s surplus equity is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Regulatory capital		1,338,237		1,387,713
Less
Solvency equity (solvency margin)		714,875		672,551
Guarantee fund		250,207		235,393

Surplus		373,155		479,769

Inteligo Bank’s regulatory capital -

The Central Bank of the Bahamas requires Inteligo Bank to maintain a regulatory capital of not less than 8 percent of its risk weighted assets. Inteligo Bank’s capital ratio as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 is the following:


	2022		2021
	US$(000)		US$(000)
Total eligible capital		195,806		287,196

Total risk weighted assets		959,241		1,177,296

Capital adequacy ratio (in percentage)		20.41		24.39

F-13

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In Management’s opinion, its Subsidiaries have complied with the requirements set forth by the regulatory entities.

(g)

Reserves -

The General Shareholders’ Meeting of IFS held on March 31, 2022, agreed to constitute reserves for S/800,000,000 charged to retained earnings.

The Board of Directors of IFS session held on April 22, 2020, agreed to constitute reserves for S/500,000,000 charged to retained earnings.

(h)

Subsidiaries’ legal and special reserves –

The Subsidiaries domiciled in Peru are required to establish a reserve equivalent to a certain percentage of their

paid-in

capital (20 or 35 percent, depending on their economic activity) through annual transfers of not less than 10 percent of their net income. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the reserves constituted by the Peruvian subsidiaries amounted to S/1,545,471,000 and S/1,397,030,000, respectively.

17.	Tax situation

(a)

IFS and its Subsidiaries are incorporated and domiciled in the Republic of Panama and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas (see Note 2), and are not subject to any Income Tax, or any other taxes on capital gains, equity or property. The Subsidiaries incorporated and domiciled in Peru (see Note 2) are subject to the Peruvian Tax legislation; see paragraph (c).

Peruvian life insurance companies are exempt from Income Tax regarding the income derived from assets linked to technical reserves for pension insurance and annuities from the Private Pension Fund Administration System; as well as income generated through assets related to life insurance contracts with savings component.

In Peru, all income from Peruvian sources obtained from the direct or indirect sale of shares of stock capital representing participation of legal persons domiciled in the country are subject to income tax. For that purpose, an indirect sale shall be considered to have occurred when shares of stock or ownership interests of a legal entity are sold and this legal entity is not domiciled in the country and, in turn, is the holder — whether directly or through other legal entity or entities — of shares of stock or ownership interests of one or more legal entities domiciled in the country, provided that certain conditions established by law occur.

In this sense, the Act states that an assumption of indirect transfer of shares arises when in any of the 12 months prior to disposal, the market value of shares or participations of the legal person domiciled is equivalent to 50 percent or more of the market value of shares or participations of the legal person

non-domiciled.

Additionally, as a concurrent condition, it is established that in any period of 12 months shares or participations representing 10 percent or more of the capital of legal persons

non-domiciled

be disposal.

Also, an indirect disposal assumption arises when the total amount of the shares of the domiciled legal person whose indirect disposal is performed, is equal or greater than 40,000 Taxation Units (henceforth “UIT”, by its Spanish acronym).

F-13

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

Legal entities or individuals not domiciled in Peru are subject to an additional tax (equivalent to 5 percent) on dividends received from entities domiciled in Peru. The corresponding tax is withheld by the entity that distributes the dividends. In this regard, since IFS controls the entities that distribute the dividends, it records the amount of the Income Tax on dividends as expense of the financial year of the dividends received. In this sense, during 2022 and 2021, the Company has recorded a provision for S/30,587,000 and S/39,108,000, respectively, in the caption “Income Tax” of the consolidated statement of income. The recovery recognized in the year 2020 for S/1,518,000

was consequence of: (i) the decrease in the percentage of dividends distribution by Interbank in April 2020, as part of the measures adopted to alleviate the financial impact of Covid-19, which generated that IFS recorded in the year 2020 a reversal of the provision recorded as of December 31, 2019, and; (ii) lower recognition of expenses for Income Tax provision over dividends due to a lower income in Interbank for the year 2020.

(c)

IFS’s Subsidiaries incorporated in Peru are subject to the payment of Peruvian taxes; hence, they must calculate their tax expenses on the basis of their separate financial statements. The Income Tax rate as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, was 29.5 percent, over the taxable income.

(d)

The Tax Authority (henceforth “SUNAT”, by its Spanish acronym) is legally entitled to perform tax audit procedures for up to four years subsequent to the date at which the tax return regarding a taxable period must be filed.

Below are the taxable periods subject to inspection by the Tax Authority as of December 31, 2022:

•

Interbank: Income Tax returns for the years 2018 to 2022, and

Value-Added-Tax

returns for the years 2018 to 2022.

•

Interseguro: Income Tax returns for the years 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2022, and

Value-Added-Tax

returns for the years 2018 to 2022.

•

Seguros Sura: Income Tax returns for the year 2018, and

Value-Added-Tax

returns for the year 2018.

•

Procesos de Medios de Pago: Income Tax returns for the years 2018 to 2022, and

Value-Added-Tax

returns for the years 2018 to 2022.

•

Izipay: Income Tax returns for the years 2018 to 2022, and

Value-Added-Tax

returns for the years 2018 to 2022.

Given the possible interpretations that SUNAT may give to the legislation in effect, up to date it is not possible to determine whether or not any review to be conducted would result in liabilities for the Subsidiaries; any increased tax or surcharge that could arise from possible tax audits would be applied to the results of the period in which such tax increase or surcharge may be determined.

Following is the description of the main ongoing tax procedures for the Subsidiaries:

Interbank:

•

Between 2004 and 2010, Interbank received several Tax Determination and Tax Penalty notices corresponding mainly to the Income Tax determination for the fiscal years 2000 to 2006. As a result, claims and appeals were filed and subsequent contentious administrative proceedings were started.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Regarding the tax litigations followed by Interbank related to the annual Income Tax returns for the years 2000 to 2006, the most relevant matter subject to discrepancy with SUNAT corresponds to whether the “interest in suspense” are subject to Income Tax or not. In this sense, Interbank considers that the interest in suspense does not constitute accrued income, in accordance with the SBS’s regulations and International Financial Reporting Standards, which is also supported by a ruling by the Permanent Constitutional and Social Law Chamber of the Supreme Court issued in August 2009 and a pronouncement in June 2019.

As of December 31, 2022 the tax liability requested for this concept and other minor contingencies, amounts to approximately S/290,000,000 w

ich includes the tax, fines and interest arrears, of which S/198,000,000 corresponded to interest in suspense and S/92,000,000 corresponded to other minor repairs. As of December 31, 2021, the tax liability amounted to S/425,000,000 and includes taxes, fines and interest arrears; however, during the year 2022, Interbank was notified with some rulings in its favor reaffirming its position that interest in suspense does not constitute taxable income.

From the tax and legal analysis performed, Interbank´s Management and its external legal advisers consider that there exists sufficient technical support for the prevailing of the Interbank’s position; as consequence, no provision has been recorded for this contingency as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

•

In 2017, SUNAT closed the audit process corresponding to the Income Tax for the year 2010. Interbank paid the debt under protest and filed a claim procedure. Currently, the process has been appealed and it is pending resolution by the Tax Administration.

•

In 2019, Interbank was notified of the Determination and Penalty Resolutions corresponding to the audit of the Income Tax for the fiscal year 2013., the main concept observed corresponded to the deduction of loan write-offs without proof by the SBS.

During 2021, Interbank filed a claim against the Resolution of the Tax Court (“RTF” by its Spanish acronym) that confirmed, revoked and ordered to resettle the aforementioned concepts. At the end of 2022, the Tax Court reconfirmed its ruling in the aforementioned Resolution.

In December 2022, through Resolution of Coactive Collection No. 0110060065138, SUNAT notified Interbank a deadline of 7 working days to pay the third-category income tax debt corresponding to the period 2013, for approximately S/

62,000,000.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the tax debt requested for this concept and other minor contingencies amounts to approximately S/62,000,000 and S/41,000,000, respectively, which comprises the tax, penalties and moratorium interest. On February 2, 2023, the required payment was made; however, the process continues in the

judiciary.

In the opinion of Interbank´s Management and its legal advisors, any additional tax settlement would not be significant for the financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

In April 2019, SUNAT notified about the commencement of the definitive audit process on Income Tax withholdings of

non-domiciled

entities corresponding to the year 2018. To date, said audit is under process and no resolutions have been issued by the Tax Administration.

•

In September and December, 2019, SUNAT notified Interbank about the beginning of the definitive audit process on Income Tax corresponding to the year 2014 and 2015, respectively, which are in the appeal stage.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the tax debt requested in relation to the Income Tax advance payments for the period 2015 and to the application of the additional Income Tax rate of 4.1 percent, amounted to S/14,000,000 and S/13,000,000, respectively.

•

In May 2020, Interbank was notified with the Resolution of Compliance related to the Income Tax and advance payments of the Income Tax for the year 2005 (linked to the interest in suspense). Through said notification, SUNAT increased the requested tax debt from S/1,000,000 to S/35,000,000 because as a result of the Resolution of Compliance, certain previously accepted deductions by SUNAT. In June 2020, Interbank filed an Appeal against the Resolution of Compliance, which is pending of pronouncement by the Tax Court.

In December 2022, the Tax Court notified of Resolution

No. 09431-9-2022,

through which it revoked interest in suspense, financial

pro-rata,

advance payments and fines. Interbank is awaiting the Resolution of Compliance.

•

In July 2020, Interbank was notified of the Determination and Penalty Resolutions corresponding to the audit of the Income Tax for the fiscal year 2012. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the tax debt claimed by SUNAT amounted to S/14,000,000 and S/13,000,000, respectively. As of the date of this report, the process is on appeal, pending resolution.

•

In February 2021, Interbank was notified with the Resolution of Compliance related to the Income Tax and prepaid income tax of the year 2006 (related to litigations about interest in suspense). Through said notification, SUNAT rejected an excess payment of S/3,500,000 and determined a tax debt of S/23,000,000.

In December 2022, the Tax Court notified of Resolution

No. 09451-1-2022,

through which it revoked interest in suspense, advance payments coefficient and fines. Interbank is awaiting the Resolution of Compliance.

•

In December 2021, by letter No.

210011740110-01-SUNAT,

SUNAT notified Interbank about the beginning of the definitive audit process on Income Tax corresponding to the year 2017. On October 28, 2022, SUNAT notified of Resolutions of Determination No. 0120030127896 and No. 0120030127908, issued regarding the third-category Income Tax corresponding to the period 2017, without additional amounts to pay.

In November 2022, Interbank filed an appeal recourse against the aforementioned resolutions of determination. The claim appeal is pending resolution by SUNAT.

•

In June and September 2022, the Permanent Constitutional and Social Law Chamber of the Supreme Court notified Interbank of its ruling regarding the Income Tax 2004, which declared unfounded the appeals by SUNAT and the Ministry of Economy and Finance, thus reaffirming the position held by Interbank in the sense that interest in suspense does not constitute taxable income. The same criterion has been adopted by the aforementioned Chamber regarding the 2001 Income Tax, according to the ruling that has been notified to Interbank in December 2022.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In the opinion of Interbank´s Management and its legal advisors, any eventual additional tax settlement would not be significant for the financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Interseguro:

On January 4, 2019, Interseguro was notified through a Tax Determination notice about the partial audit of the Income Tax for

non-domiciled

entities for Sura corresponding to January 2015. The tax debt requested by SUNAT amounts to approximately S/19,000,000. Considering that this debt corresponds to a period prior to the acquisition of Sura by the Group, if confirmed, would be assumed by the sellers. On November 12, 2020, the Tax Court issued a favorable opinion to Interseguro, revoking the Determination Resolution issued by SUNAT.

On May 03, 2021, SUNAT notified Interseguro about the beginning of the partial audit process of the Income Tax corresponding to the year 2017. On December 24, 2021, Interseguro was notified about the Resolution of Determination regarding the conclusion of the tax audit, which readjusted the loss without additional amounts or penalties payable.

In December 2022, SUNAT notified Interseguro the beginning of the fiscalization process regarding the Income Tax corresponding to the year 2020. As of the date of this report, said inspection is in process.

In the opinion of Management and its legal advisers, any eventual additional tax would not be significant for the financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Izipay:

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Izipay maintains carryforward tax losses amounting to S/82,931,174 and S/99,640,144, respectively. In application of current tax regulations, Management opted for system “B” to offset its tax losses. Through this system, the tax loss may be offset against the net income obtained in the following years, up to 50 percent of said income until they are extinguished; therefore, they do not have an expiration date.

In the opinion of Management and its legal advisers, any eventual additional tax would not be significant for the financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

(e)

Peruvian life insurance companies are exempted from the Income Tax on income from assets related to technical reserves for the payment of annuities and retirement, disability and survival annuities of the Private Pension Fund Administration System.

(f)

For the purpose of determining the Income Tax, the transfer prices of transactions with related companies and with companies domiciled in countries or territories that are

non-cooperating

or low or zero tax countries or territories, or with entities or permanent establishments whose income, revenues or gains from said contracts are subject to a preferential tax regime, must be supported by documented information on the valuation methods used and the criteria considered for their determination. On the basis of the analysis of the operations of the Group, Management and its internal legal advisors believe that, as a consequence of the application of these standards, contingencies of importance will not arise as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

F-13

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Through Legislative Decree No. 1312, published on December 31, 2016, the formal obligations for entities included within the scope of application of transfer pricing were modified, thus incorporating three new information requirements: the first is a Local Report; the second is a Master Report; and the third is a Country Report. The first entered into effect since 2017 for the operations that occurred during the year 2016 and the last two since 2018 for the operations that have occurred since the fiscal year 2017.

(g)

Through Legislative Decree No.1381, published on August 24, 2018, it was incorporated in the Income Tax Act the concept of

“non-cooperating”

countries or territories and preferential tax regimes to which defensive measures already existing for countries and territories with low or zero taxation are imposed.

(h)

In July 2018, Act No. 30823 was published, whereby the Congress delegated power to the Executive Branch to legislate on various issues, including tax and financial matters. In this sense, the main tax regulations issued are the following:

(i)

Beginning on January 1, 2019, the treatment applicable to royalties and remuneration for services rendered by

non-domiciled

persons was modified, eliminating the obligation to pay the amount equivalent to the withholding due to the accounting record of the cost or expense. Now the Income Tax is withheld at the payment of the compensation. For said cost or expense to be deductible for the local company, the remuneration must have been paid to the filing date of the annual tax return for the Income Tax (Legislative Decree No. 1369).

F-139

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(ii)

The rules that regulate the obligation of legal persons and/or legal entities to inform the identification of their final beneficiaries (Legislative Decree No. 1372) were established. These rules are applicable to legal entities domiciled in the country, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the Income Tax Act, and legal entities established in the country. The obligation covers

non-domiciled

legal entities and legal entities established abroad, provided that: a) they have a branch, agency or other permanent establishment in the country; b) the natural or juridical person who manages the autonomous patrimony or the investment funds from abroad, or the natural or legal person who has the status of trustee or administrator, is domiciled in the country; c) any of the members of a consortium is domiciled in the country. This obligation will be fulfilled through the presentation to SUNAT of an informative Sworn Statement, which must contain the information of the final beneficiary and be submitted, in accordance with the regulations and within the deadlines established by SUNAT.

(iii)

The Tax Code was amended with the purpose of offering taxpayers more assurance regarding the application of the general anti-avoidance rule (Rule XVI of the Preliminary Title of the Tax Code); as well as to provide SUNAT with tools for its effective implementation (Legislative Decree No.1422).

As part of this amendment, a new assumption of joint and several liability is envisaged, when the tax debtor is subject to the application of the measures provided by Rule XVI in the event that presumed tax avoidance cases are detected; in such case, the joint and several liability shall be attributed to the legal representatives provided that they have collaborated with the design or approval or execution of actions or situations or economic relations viewed as tax avoidance in Rule XVI. In the case of companies that have a Board of Directors, it is up to this corporate body to define the tax strategy of the entity, having to decide on the approval or not of actions, situations or economic relations to be carried out within the framework of tax planning, this power being

non-delegable.

The actions, situations and economic relations carried out within the framework of tax planning and implemented on the date of entry into force of Legislative Decree No. 1422 (September 14, 2018) and which continue to have effect, must be evaluated by the Board of Directors of the entity for the purpose of ratification or modification until March 29, 2019, without prejudice to the fact that the management or other managers of the company have approved the aforementioned actions, situations and economic relations.

Likewise, it has been established that the application of Rule XVI, regarding the

re-characterization

of tax avoidance assumptions, will take place in the final inspection procedures in which acts, events or situations produced since July 19, 2012.

F-140

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(iv)

Amendments to the Income Tax Act were included, effective as of January 1, 2019, to improve the tax treatment applicable to the following (Legislative Decree No. 1424):

•

Income obtained from the indirect transfer of shares of stock or capital representing participations of legal persons domiciled in the country. Among the most significant changes is the inclusion of a new indirect sale assumption, which is triggered when the total amount of the shares of the domiciled legal entity whose indirect disposal is made is equal to or higher than 40,000 UITs.

•

Permanent establishments of sole proprietorships, companies and entities of any nature incorporated abroad. For this purpose, new cases of permanent establishment have been included, among them, when the rendering of services in the country occurs, with respect to the same project, service or related one, for a period that exceeds 183 calendar days in total within any period of twelve months.

•

The system of credits against Income Tax for taxes paid abroad, to be included in the indirect tax credit (corporate tax paid by foreign subsidiaries) as credit applicable against the Income Tax of domiciled legal persons, to avoid double economic taxation.

•

The deduction of interest expenses for the determination of corporate Income Tax. In the years 2019 and 2020, it shall be applicable the debt limit set at up to three times the net equity as of December 31 of the previous year will be applicable, both to loans with related parties, and to loans with third parties contracted since September 14, 2018. Beginning in 2021, the limit for the deduction of financial expenses shall be equivalent to 30 percent of the entity’s tax EBITDA. There are some exceptions to this limitation, such as in the case of banks, taxpayers with income lower than 2,500 UITs, infrastructure, public services, among others.

(v)

Regulations have been established for the accrual of income and expenses for tax purposes beginning on January 1, 2019 (Legislative Decree No. 1425). Until the year 2018, there was no rule definition of this concept, so in many cases accounting rules were used for its interpretation. In general terms, with the new criterion, for the purpose of determining the Income Tax, it shall be considered whether the substantial events for the generation of income or expense agreed upon by the parties have occurred, provided they are not subject to a subsequent condition, in which case the recognition shall take place when it is fulfilled and when collection or payment is to take place will not be taken into account; and, if the determination of the consideration depends on a future action or event, the total or part of the corresponding income or expense will be deferred until that action or event occurs.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(i)

Supreme Decree No.

430-2020-EF,

published on December 31, 2020, approved the Regulation that establishes the financial information that companies of the financial system must provide to SUNAT in the fight against tax evasion and avoidance pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 1434. Such Regulation entered into force on January 1, 2021.

Considering that, said Regulation stablished the concepts that the financial entities must report to SUNAT, which are, among others, cumulative balances and/or amounts, averages or highest amounts and the returns generated in the accounts during the reporting period and are equal or higher than S/30,800 in said period. The information shall be provided to SUNAT semi-annually through informative declarations containing monthly information.

(j)

Law No. 31106 extends until December 31, 2023, the validity of all exemptions in force to date contained in Article 19 of the Income Tax Act.

On this matter, among the extended exemptions that are applicable or related to Interbank’s operations, are the following:

•

Subparagraph i) of Article 19 which indicates that shall be exempted any type of fixed or variable interest rate, in local or foreign currency, that is paid for any deposit or levy pursuant to the General Act of the Banking and Insurance System and Organic Act of the Superintendence of Banking, Insurance and Private Pension Funds, Law No. 26702, as well as the capital increases of said deposits and levies, in local or foreign currency, except when said income constitute third category income.

(k)

Legislative Decree No. 1529 was published on March 3, 2022, amending the Bankarization Act in order to promote the use of means of payment and reduce the minimum amount for the use of means of payment means, according to the following:

•

The minimum amount for the use of means of payment is two thousand Soles (S/

2,000) or five hundred American Dollars (US$500).

•

With the purpose of improving the coverage of means of payment and thus broaden the range of traceable operations, Article 3 of

the Bankarization Act was amended in order to point out that the payment of sums of money in operations included in said

article, for amounts equivalent or higher than

UIT, even when the payment is performed partially, can only be performed by

using means of payment contemplated by said Act.

F-14

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

The payment of obligations to

non-domiciled

natural and/or legal persons that must be performed through the means of payment contemplated by said Act, must be performed through either the Financial System Entities (“FSE”), or

non-domiciled

banking or finance companies, in the cases that the subject performs foreign trade operations, including the obligations derived from the acquisition of property and rights related to the holding of shares and other transferable securities.

•

The use of means of payment is deemed complied with only if the payment is performed directly to the lender, supplier and/or service provider, or when said payment is made to a third party designated by the former, provided that such designation is informed to SUNAT prior to the Payment.

•

In no case the obligation to use the means of payment pursuant to the Act is deemed complied with when the payments are performed through banking or finance companies domiciled in either

non-cooperating

countries or territories, with low or zero taxation, or permanent establishments (PE) in said countries or territories.

The legislation entered into effect on April 1, 2022, with the exception of the amendment referred to the payment of

non-domiciled

FSEs located in low or zero taxation territories, which was set to enter into effect on January 1, 2023.

(l)

On March 26, 2022, Legislative Decree No. 1539 was published. It amends the Income Tax Act in order to incorporate new methods to establish the market value of transferable securities in operations between

non-related

third parties. Said legislation was set to enter into effect on January 1, 2023.

18.	Off-balance sheet accounts

(a)

The table below presents the components of this caption:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Contingent credits - indirect loans (b), Note 6(a)
Guarantees and stand-by letters		4,001,806		4,150,093
Import and export letters of credit		485,541		290,365

		4,487,347		4,440,458

Derivatives
Held for trading: Note 10(b)
Forward foreign currency agreements, see Note 30.2(b)(i):
Forward currency agreements – purchase		1,977,324		3,925,457
Forward currency agreements – sale		4,057,830		4,390,342
Forward foreign currency agreements in other currencies		292,906		316,031
Foreign currency options		80,151		1,816
Swap agreements, see Note 30.2(b)(ii):
Currency swaps: Foreign currency delivery / receipt in Soles		644,019		995,650
Currency swaps: Soles delivery / receipt in foreign currency		2,028,514		3,166,675
Cross currency swaps		224,485		234,667
Interest rate swaps		2,424,566		2,969,027

F-14

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Designated as hedges: Note 10(b)
Cash flows:
Cross currency swaps		2,579,164		2,357,967

		14,308,959		18,357,632

Responsibilities for credit lines granted (cancellable) (c)		13,213,024		11,213,104
Responsibilities for credit lines – commercial and others (d)		1,545,698		969,113

Total		33,555,028		34,980,307

(b)

In the normal course of its operations, the Group performs contingent operations (indirect loans). These transactions expose the Group to additional credit risks to the amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position.

The Group applies the same credit policies for granting and evaluating the provisions required for direct loans when performing contingent operations (see Note 6(a)), including obtaining guarantees when deemed necessary. Guarantees vary and include deposits in financial institutions or other assets.

Taking into account that most of the contingent operations are expected to expire without the Group having to disburse cash, the total committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

(c)

Responsibilities under credit lines agreements include consumer credit lines and other consumer loans that are cancellable by the Bank.

(d)

Corresponds to commitments of disbursement of future loans that Interbank has committed to carry out; provided that the borrower complies with the obligations under the corresponding loan agreements, however, they may be cancelled by Interbank.

19.	Interest income and expenses, and similar accounts

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Interest and similar income
Interest on loan portfolio		4,207,420		3,274,402		3,769,716
Impact from the modification of contractual cash flows due to the loan rescheduling schemes (*)		41,110		120,193		(134,376	)
Interest on investments at fair value through other comprehensive income		1,202,788		928,660		769,718
Interest on due from banks and inter-bank funds		175,401		46,273		35,906
Interest on investments at amortized cost		161,966		130,326		116,338

F-14

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Dividends on financial instruments, Note 5(e) and (f)		78,928			101,736			103,294
Others		3,689			4,035			4,371

Total		5,871,302			4,605,625			4,664,967

Interest and similar expenses
Interest and fees on deposits and obligations		(863,335	)		(334,212	)		(522,357	)
Interest on bonds, notes and other obligations		(418,821	)		(433,774	)		(390,586	)
Interest and fees on obligations with financial institutions		(234,842	)		(156,490	)		(181,675	)
Deposit insurance fund fees		(77,920	)		(70,670	)		(56,177	)
Interest on lease payments, Note 8(e)		(9,283	)		(14,004	)		(15,288	)
Others		(57,897	)		(48,787	)		(26,201	)

Total		(1,662,098	)		(1,057,937	)		(1,192,284	)

(*)

For rescheduled loans, during 2020, Interbank recalculated the carrying amount of these financial assets as the present value of the modified contractual cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. The impact of the recalculation amounted approximately to S/134,376,000 of lower interest income for the year 2020.

During 2022 and 2021, the recognition of this interest was recorded in function of the rescheduled term for approximately S/22,930,000 and S/96,627,000, respectively. Likewise, as result of the rescheduling of loans under “Reactiva Peru” program, income for approximately S/18,180,000 and S/23,566,000, respectively; was recorded. Both amounts are presented as an increase in interest income and similar income.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

The amounts shown in literal (a) above, include interest income and expenses calculated using the effective interest rate (EIR), which are related to the following items:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Financial assets measured at amortized cost		4,585,897		3,571,194		3,787,584
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		1,202,788		928,660		769,718

Total interest from financial assets calculated at EIR		5,788,685		4,499,854		4,557,302

Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost		1,526,281		938,480		1,109,906

20.	Fee income from financial services, net

(a)

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, this caption is comprised of the following:


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Income
Performance obligations at a point in time:
Accounts maintenance, carriage, transfers, and debit and credit card fees		705,188			562,542			474,822
Income from services (acquirer and issuer role) (b)		523,313			—			—
Banking services fees		205,333			207,230			192,588
Brokerage and custody services (c)		5,836			8,457			6,858
Others		34,438			—			—
Performance obligations over time:
Funds management		153,948			184,703			151,356
Contingent loans fees		70,038			64,964			52,156
Collection services		60,931			52,955			41,124
Commission for loans rescheduling “Reactiva Peru” program		16,909			23,722			—
Others		23,259			37,293			42,207

Total (d)		1,799,193			1,141,866			961,111

Expenses
Expenses for services (acquirer and issuer role) (b)		(238,997	)		—			—
Credit cards		(164,722	)		(128,580	)		(105,772	)
Commissions Mastercard - Visa		(56,845	)		—			—
Credit life insurance premiums		(54,536	)		(60,231	)		(59,520	)
Local banks fees		(50,192	)		(36,836	)		(15,828	)
Foreign banks fees		(24,920	)		(31,767	)		(15,105	)

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Commission for loans rescheduling “Reactiva Peru” program		(22,373	)		(26,215	)		—
Registry expenses		(2,046	)		(3,009	)		(8,151	)
Brokerage and custody services (c)		(961	)		(824	)		(630	)
Others		(46,215	)		(30,596	)		(32,605	)

Total		(661,807	)		(318,058	)		(237,611	)

Net		1,137,386			823,808			723,500

(b)

Corresponds to the management and operation of the shared service of transaction processing of credit and debit cards, for clients of Izipay since April 2022, month in which Izipay became a consolidated subsidiary of IFS.

(c)

As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Group has recognized net income for transactions carried out on behalf of its clients amounting to S/4,875,000, S/7,633,000 and S/6,228,000, respectively.

(d)

Fee income by geographic distribution for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 is presented below:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Geographic information
Peru		1,678,023		1,003,858		854,082
Panama		121,170		138,008		107,029

Total		1,799,193		1,141,866		961,111

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

21.	Other income and (expenses)

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Other income
Fair value adjustment of the participation held by Interbank in Izipay, note 1(d)		222,513			—			—
Maintenance, installation and sale of POS equipment		22,000			—			—
Gain from sale of written-off-loans (c)		19,177			11,848			12,962
Gain from refunds and penalties		18,783			—			—
Income from investments in associates (b)		18,713			33,378			9,068
Profit from sale of property, furniture and equipment, Note 8(d)		11,780			—			—
Services rendered to third parties		7,611			6,836			7,843
Other technical income from insurance operations		6,489			8,115			11,547
Income from ATM rentals		6,459			4,944			3,971
Others		66,677			24,377			16,726

Total other income		400,202			89,498			62,117

Other expenses
Commissions from insurance activities		(108,597	)		(37,920	)		(28,390	)
Sundry technical insurance expenses		(67,820	)		(65,757	)		(47,285	)
Cost of sale of POS equipment		(27,366	)		—			—
Provision for sundry risk		(12,661	)		(14,872	)		(4,918	)
Expenses related to rental income		(7,521	)		(4,026	)		(1,993	)
Administrative and tax penalties		(7,317	)		(2,672	)		(543	)
Write-off of intangibles, Note 9(a)		(6,266	)		(10,371	)		(824	)
Provision for accounts receivable		(5,684	)		(1,123	)		(7,310	)
Donations		(4,712	)		(4,991	)		(5,509	)
Others (*)		(67,901	)		(68,460	)		(47,275	)

Total other expenses		(315,845	)		(210,192	)		(144,047	)

(*)

During the year 2022, corresponds mainly to expenses for operational write-offs and technological failures, among other minor expenses. During 2022 and 2021, correspond mainly to

non-recurring

expenses derived from the

Covid-19

pandemic (implementation of safety protocols and remote working, among others).

(b)

As of December 31, 2022, includes S/5,033,000 corresponding to the participation that Interbank held in Izipay until the date of its acquisition, see Note 1(d).

(c)

During the years 2022, 2021

and 2020, Interbank sold

written-off

loan portfolios, in cash and to

non-related

third parties. The nominal value of the credits sold amounted to S/973,966,000, S/501,540,000 and S/625,406,000, respectively.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

22.	Net premiums earned

This caption is comprised of the following:


	Premiums assumed						Adjustment of technical reserves									Gross premiums (*)								Premiums ceded to reinsurers									Net premiums earned
	2022		2021		2020		2022			2021			2020			2022			2021			2020		2022			2021			2020			2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Life insurance
Annuities (**)		478,159		614,899		248,025		(254,567	)		(291,076	)		(56,021	)		223,592			323,823			192,004		—			—			—			223,592			323,823			192,004
Group life		182,944		136,743		138,360		(364	)		(2,189	)		281			182,580			134,554			138,641		(6,861	)		(4,779	)		(4,890	)		175,719			129,775			133,751
Individual life		224,862		182,032		139,105		(58,204	)		(76,339	)		(61,978	)		166,658			105,693			77,127		(6,614	)		(5,494	)		(4,592	)		160,044			100,199			72,535
Retirement (disability and survival) (***)		8,650		8,418		9,347		(19,734	)		(9,661	)		11,912			(11,084	)		(1,243	)		21,259		(422	)		(534	)		(527	)		(11,506	)		(1,777	)		20,732
Others		2		2		3		(22	)		(13,595	)		2,085			(20	)		(13,593	)		2,088		—			—			—			(20	)		(13,593	)		2,088

Total life insurance		894,617		942,094		534,840		(332,891	)		(392,860	)		(103,721	)		561,726			549,234			431,119		(13,897	)		(10,807	)		(10,009	)		547,829			538,427			421,110
Total general insurance		132,649		109,303		91,092		(12,239	)		(2,405	)		2,930			120,410			106,898			94,022		(42	)		(58	)		(151	)		120,368			106,840			93,871

Total general		1,027,266		1,051,397		625,932		(345,130	)		(395,265	)		(100,791	)		682,136			656,132			525,141		(13,939	)		(10,865	)		(10,160	)		668,197			645,267			514,981

(*)	It includes the annual variation of technical reserves and unearned premiums.

(**)	The variation of the adjustment of technical reserves is due mainly to aging over time; see Note 14(b).

(***)

In April 2016, the Congress of the Republic of Peru approved the amendment of the Private Pension System Act, through which the affiliates of the Pension Fund Administrators (AFPs) who turn 65 and retire, can choose, among other existing retirement modalities, the return of 95.5

percent of the total fund available from their Individual Capitalization Account (“CIC”, by its Spanish acronym). During 2017, to offset the contraction of retirement income because of the aforementioned amendment to the SPP Act, Interseguro launched the products “Renta Particular Plus” and “Renta Particular Plus – Vitalicio”. During the years 2022 and 2021, premiums collected for “Renta Particular Plus – Vitalicio” amounted to

S/19,123,000 and S/57,479,000, respectively, and for “Renta Particular Plus” amounted to S/160,439,000 and S/219,347,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, retirement premiums amounted to S/2,220,000 (in 2021 and 2020 retirement premiums amounted to S/3,713,000 and S/1,750,000, respectively). The liability related to “Renta Particular Plus – Vitalicio“ is presented in the caption “Insurance contracts liabilities” of the consolidated statement of financial position considering that it contains an important component of insurance; and the liability of the “Renta Particular Plus” is presented in the caption “Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities” of the consolidated statement of financial position considering that it does not contain an important insurance component.

F-149

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

23.	Net claims and benefits incurred for life insurance contracts and others

This caption is comprised of the following:


	Gross claims and benefits									Ceded claims and benefits								Net insurance claims and benefits
	2022			2021			2020			2022			2021		2020			2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Life insurance
Annuities		(703,511	)		(687,208	)		(631,117	)		—			—		—			(703,511	)		(687,208	)		(631,117	)
Group life		(43,360	)		(124,308	)		(83,605	)		2,649			11,222		4,868			(40,711	)		(113,086	)		(78,737	)
Individual life		(13,743	)		(37,049	)		(17,495	)		2,949			8,789		2,393			(10,794	)		(28,260	)		(15,102	)
Retirement (disability and survival)		(39,393	)		(53,089	)		(41,076	)		(5,808	)		6,505		4,206			(45,201	)		(46,584	)		(36,870	)
Others		(16,279	)		(14,539	)		(12,794	)		(151	)		11		(216	)		(16,430	)		(14,528	)		(13,010	)
General insurance		(43,344	)		(27,691	)		(19,214	)		—			11		(1	)		(43,344	)		(27,680	)		(19,215	)

		(859,630	)		(943,884	)		(805,301	)		(361	)		26,538		11,250			(859,991	)		(917,346	)		(794,051	)

24.	Salaries and employee benefits

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Salaries		571,343		567,938		526,909
Workers’ profit sharing		92,042		59,441		52,829
Vacations, health insurance and others		81,581		74,924		72,405
Social security		62,637		60,802		55,408
Severance indemnities		44,447		44,277		41,695

Total		852,050		807,382		749,246

average number of employees for the years 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 8,076, 7,378 and 7,610 respectively.

25.	Administrative expenses

(a)

This caption is comprised of the following:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Services received from third parties (b)		1,104,822		909,212		704,255
Taxes and contributions		64,008		44,452		37,581
Rental expenses (c) and Note 8(e)		10,958		11,841		6,781

Total		1,179,788		965,505		748,617

(b)

Servi

ces

received from third parties correspond mainly to computer equipment maintenance services, credit cards associated expenses, securities transportation services, advertising, customer loyalty programs, marketing on digital media, among others.

(c)

During the years 2022, 2021 and 2020 corresponds to disbursements made by the Group for of short-term and low value assets, see Note 3.4(k).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

26.	Earnings per share

The following table presents the calculation of the weighted average number of shares and the basic and diluted earnings per share, determined and calculated based on the earnings attributable to the Group, as described in Note 3.4(ad):


	Outstanding shares			Shares considered in computation			Effective days in the year		Weighted average number of shares
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Year 2020
Balance as of January 1, 2020		115,446			115,446			365		115,446
Sale of treasury stock		4			4			266		3
Purchase of treasury stock		(27	)		(27	)		30		(2	)

Balance as of December 31, 2020		115,423			115,423					115,447

Net earnings attributable to IFS’s shareholders S/(000)										383,259

Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to IFS’s shareholders (Soles)										3.320

Year 2021
Balance as of January 1, 2021		115,423			115,423			365		115,423
Sale of treasury stock		1			1			267		1
Purchase of treasury stock		(6	)		(6	)		274		(5	)

Balance as of December 31, 2021		115,418			115,418					115,419

Net earnings attributable to IFS’s shareholders S/(000)										1,790,155

Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to IFS’s shareholders (Soles)										15.510

Year 2022
Balance as of January 1, 2022		115,418			115,418			365		115,418

Balance as of December 31, 2022		115,418			115,418					115,418

Net earnings attributable to IFS’s shareholders S/(000)										1,660,581

Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to IFS’s shareholders (Soles)										14.388

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

27.	Transactions with shareholders, related parties and affiliated entities

(a)

The table below presents the main transactions with shareholders, related parties and affiliated companies as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Assets
Instruments at fair value through profit or loss		99		112,096
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income		58,378		65,357
Loans, net (b)		1,317,453		1,323,580
Accounts receivable		117,273		131,541
Other assets		32,043		8,694
Liabilities
Deposits and obligations		1,040,975		999,754
Other liabilities		3,215		12,809
Off-balance sheet accounts
Indirect loans (b)		89,707		105,604


	2022			2021			2020
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Income (expenses)
Interest and similar income		72,334			68,166			70,261
Rental income		31,428			30,873			18,609
Valuation of financial derivative instruments		149			180			164
Administrative expenses		(33,758	)		(44,249	)		(42,768	)
Interest and similar expenses		(16,821	)		(3,065	)		(7,264	)
Others, net		51,241			31,392			6,853

F-15

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(b)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the detail of loans is the following:


	2022						2021
	Direct Loans		Indirect Loans		Total		Direct Loans		Indirect Loans		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Affiliated		1,108,276		18,832		1,127,108		1,076,393		45,522		1,121,915
Associates		209,177		70,875		280,052		247,187		60,082		307,269

		1,317,453		89,707		1,407,160		1,323,580		105,604		1,429,184

(c)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the directors, executives and employees of the Group have been involved in credit transactions with certain subsidiaries of the Group, as permitted by Peruvian law, which regulates and limits on certain transactions with employees, directors and executives of financial entities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, direct loans to employees, directors and executives amounted to S/211,715,000 and S/212,967,000, respectively; said loans are repaid monthly and bear interest at market rates.

There are no loans to the Group’s directors and key personnel guaranteed with shares of any Subsidiary.

F-15

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

The Group’s key personnel basic remuneration for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is presented below:


	2022		2021		2020
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Salaries		26,964		24,768		21,859
Board of Directors’ compensations		3,923		2,861		3,719

Total		30,887		27,629		25,578

(e)

In Management’s opinion, transactions with related companies have been performed under market conditions and within the limits permitted by the SBS.

28.	Business segments

The Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) of IFS is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Group presents four operating segments based on products and services, as follows:

Banking -

Mainly loans, credit facilities, deposits and current accounts.

Insurance -

It provides life annuity products with single-premium payment and conventional life insurance products, as well as other retail insurance products.

Wealth management -

It provides brokerage and investment management services. Inteligo serves mainly Peruvian citizens.

Payments -

It provides mainly administration services, operation and processing of credit and debit cards. Taking into account that Izipay became a subsidiary of IFS since April 2022, the results shown for this segment correspond to the nine-month period ended December 31, 2022.

The operating segments monitor the operating results of their business units separately for the purpose of making decisions on the distribution of resources and performance assessment. Segment performance is evaluated based on operating profit or loss and it is measured consistently with operating profit or loss in the consolidated financial statements.

Transfer prices between operating segments are on an arm’s length basis in a manner similar to transactions with third parties.

No revenue from transactions with a single external customer or counterparty exceeded 10 percent of the Group’s total revenues in the years 2022, 2021 and 2020.

F-15

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The following table presents the Group’s financial information by business segments for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:


	2022
	Banking (*)			Insurance			Wealth management			Payments (**)			Holding and consolidation adjustments			Total consolidated
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Total income (***)
Third party		6,459,232			1,655,036			75,706			595,360			95,802			8,881,136
Inter-segment		(137,253	)		(37	)		—			—			137,290			—

Total income		6,321,979			1,654,999			75,706			595,360			233,092			8,881,136

Consolidated statement of income data
Interest and similar income		4,774,378			940,894			155,116			1,569			(655	)		5,871,302
Interest and similar expenses		(1,476,942	)		(130,458	)		(50,306	)		(1,269	)		(3,123	)		(1,662,098	)

Net interest and similar income		3,297,436			810,436			104,810			300			(3,778	)		4,209,204

(Loss) reversal on loans, net of recoveries		(832,919	)		—			2,368			—			—			(830,551	)
Loss due to impairment of financial investments		(732	)		(26	)		(11,981	)		—			(13	)		(12,752	)

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss on loans		2,463,785			810,410			95,197			300			(3,791	)		3,365,901

Fee income from financial services, net		797,711			(7,160	)		163,325			258,728			(75,218	)		1,137,386
Net gain on sale of financial investments		(12,341	)		(6,360	)		(41,747	)		—			—			(60,448	)
Other income		487,758			52,283			(202,736	)		36,040			229,549			602,894
Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		—			(191,772	)		—			—			(22	)		(191,794	)
Depreciation and amortization		(257,210	)		(23,682	)		(15,044	)		(30,185	)		(10,105	)		(336,226	)
Other expenses		(1,673,581	)		(375,301	)		(130,453	)		(202,565	)		34,217			(2,347,683	)

Income (loss) before translation result and Income Tax		1,806,122			258,418			(131,458	)		62,318			174,630			2,170,030
Exchange difference		(22,800	)		(10,408	)		(7,146	)		2,316			1,202			(36,836	)
Income Tax		(409,201	)		—			(2,791	)		(23,560	)		(26,985	)		(462,537	)

Net profit (loss) for the year		1,374,121			248,010			(141,395	)		41,074			148,847			1,670,657

Attributable to:
IFS’s shareholders		1,374,121			248,010			(141,395	)		41,074			138,771			1,660,581
Non-controlling interest		—			—			—			—			10,076			10,076

		1,374,121			248,010			(141,395	)		41,074			148,847			1,670,657

(*)	Includes 50 percent of Interbank’s participation in Izipay until March 2022, considering that in April 2022, Izipay became a consolidated subsidiary of the Group, see Note 1(d).

(**)	As of December 31, 2022, the payments segment corresponds to the profit generated by Izipay during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2022.

(***)

Corresponds to interest and similar income, other income and net premiums earned.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2021
	Banking (*)			Insurance			Wealth management			Holding and consolidation adjustments			Total consolidated
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Total income (**)
Third party		4,866,775			1,676,185			487,339			(49,914	)		6,980,385
Inter-segment		(45,904	)		—			(18,813	)		64,717			—

Total income		4,820,871			1,676,185			468,526			14,803			6,980,385

Consolidated statement of income data
Interest and similar income		3,636,810			802,961			154,328			11,526			4,605,625
Interest and similar expenses		(893,060	)		(117,531	)		(39,840	)		(7,506	)		(1,057,937	)

Net interest and similar income		2,743,750			685,430			114,488			4,020			3,547,688

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(379,034	)		—			(2,543	)		—			(381,577	)
(Loss) recovery due to impairment of financial investments		(527	)		33,198			(1,615	)		(158	)		30,898

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss on loans		2,364,189			718,628			110,330			3,862			3,197,009

Fee income from financial services, net		677,461			(6,802	)		196,959			(43,810	)		823,808
Net gain on sale of financial investments		100,867			145,714			42,074			268			288,923
Other income		451,637			89,002			93,978			(17,898	)		616,719
Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		—			(272,037	)		—			(42	)		(272,079	)
Depreciation and amortization		(245,432	)		(25,035	)		(14,977	)		5,754			(279,690	)
Other expenses		(1,542,487	)		(325,242	)		(128,444	)		13,094			(1,983,079	)

Income (loss) before translation result and Income Tax		1,806,235			324,228			299,920			(38,772	)		2,391,611
Exchange difference		7,241			(51,493	)		(7,570	)		(37,498	)		(89,320	)
Income Tax		(453,198	)		—			(8,805	)		(40,109	)		(502,112	)

Net profit (loss) for the year		1,360,278			272,735			283,545			(116,379	)		1,800,179

Attributable to:
IFS’s shareholders		1,360,278			272,735			283,545			(126,403	)		1,790,155
Non-controlling interest		—			—			—			10,024			10,024

		1,360,278			272,735			283,545			(116,379	)		1,800,179

(*)	Includes 50 percent of Interbank’s profit from Izipay, which were recorded in the caption “Other income”.

(**)	Corresponds to interest and similar income, other income and net premiums earned.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2020
	Banking (*)			Insurance			Wealth management			Holding and consolidation adjustments			Total consolidated
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Total income (**)
Third party		4,900,400			1,365,579			433,941			(19,738	)		6,680,182
Inter-segment		(59,267	)		—			(3,273	)		62,540			—

Total income		4,841,133			1,365,579			430,668			42,802			6,680,182

Consolidated statement of income data
Interest and similar income		3,836,413			654,975			163,414			10,165			4,664,967
Interest and similar expenses		(1,053,356	)		(83,992	)		(51,652	)		(3,284	)		(1,192,284	)

Net interest and similar income		2,783,057			570,983			111,762			6,881			3,472,683

Impairment loss on loans, net of recoveries		(2,393,923	)		—			(21	)		—			(2,393,944	)
Recovery (loss) due to impairment of financial investments		170			(33,819	)		745			—			(32,904	)

Net interest and similar income after impairment loss on loans		389,304			537,164			112,486			6,881			1,045,835

Fee income from financial services, net		619,842			(6,056	)		163,968			(54,254	)		723,500
Net gain (loss) on sale of financial investments		103,773			105,038			(23,428	)		—			185,383
Other income		340,372			96,641			129,987			24,351			591,351
Total net premiums earned minus claims and benefits		—			(279,070	)		—			—			(279,070	)
Depreciation and amortization		(234,479	)		(25,590	)		(14,478	)		5,797			(268,750	)
Other expenses		(1,299,027	)		(260,405	)		(113,564	)		31,086			(1,641,910	)

Income (loss) before translation result and Income Tax		(80,215	)		167,722			254,971			13,861			356,339
Exchange difference		(5,966	)		(26,591	)		(3,846	)		(9,320	)		(45,723	)
Income Tax		80,509			—			(8,000	)		424			72,933

Net profit (loss) for the year		(5,672	)		141,131			243,125			4,965			383,549

Attributable to:
IFS’s shareholders		(5,672	)		141,131			243,125			4,675			383,259
Non-controlling interest		—			—			—			290			290

		(5,672	)		141,131			243,125			4,965			383,549

(*)	Includes 50 percent of Interbank’s profit from Izipay, which were recorded in the caption “Other income”.

(**)	Corresponds to interest and similar income, other income and net premiums earned.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022
	Banking		Insurance		Wealth management		Payments		Holding and consolidation adjustments			Total consolidated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Capital investments (*)		258,887		41,599		3,443		92,133		1,004			397,066
Total assets		66,977,277		14,134,224		5,102,598		902,610		365,923			87,482,632
Total liabilities		59,498,433		13,150,041		4,208,369		686,292		(106,454	)		77,436,681


	2021
	Banking		Insurance		Wealth management		Holding and Consolidation adjustments		Total consolidated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Capital investments (*)		216,786		157,186		40,114		616		414,702
Total assets		68,584,019		15,254,493		5,722,539		392,858		89,953,909
Total liabilities		61,581,982		14,380,847		4,427,452		8,266		80,398,547

(*)	It includes the purchase of property, furniture and equipment, intangible assets and investment properties.

The distribution of the Group’s total income based on the location of the customer and its assets, for the year ended December 31, 2022, is S/8,851,175,000 in Peru and S/29,961,000 in Panama (for the year ended December 31, 2021, was S/6,568,484,000 in Peru and S/411,901,000 in Panama). The distribution of the Group’s total assets based on the location of the customer and its assets as of December 31, 2022 is S/82,508,015,000 in Peru and S/4,974,617,000 in Panama (for the year ended December 31, 2021, was S/84,391,264,000 in Peru and S/5,562,645,000 in Panama).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

29.	Financial instruments classification

The financial assets and liabilities of the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, are presented below.


	As of December 31, 2022
	At fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Amortized cost		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		—		—		—		13,193,411		13,193,411
Inter-bank funds		—		—		—		296,119		296,119
Financial investments		1,932,993		17,038,942		512,884		3,302,779		22,787,598
Loans, net		—		—		—		45,502,998		45,502,998
Due from customers on acceptances		—		—		—		45,809		45,809
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		515,800		—		—		954,363		1,470,163

		2,448,793		17,038,942		512,884		63,295,479		83,296,098

Financial liabilities
Deposits and obligations		—		—		—		48,530,708		48,530,708
Inter-bank funds		—		—		—		30,012		30,012
Due to banks and correspondents		—		—		—		7,100,646		7,100,646
Bonds, notes and other obligations		—		—		—		7,906,303		7,906,303
Due from customers on acceptances		—		—		—		45,809		45,809
Insurance contract liabilities		—		—		—		10,602,372		10,602,372
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		297,038		—		—		2,543,060		2,840,098

		297,038		—		—		76,758,910		77,055,948

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	At fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Amortized cost		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		—		—		—		17,104,465		17,104,465
Inter-bank funds		—		—		—		30,002		30,002
Financial investments		2,706,271		17,921,275		623,718		3,296,030		24,547,294
Loans, net		—		—		—		43,005,583		43,005,583
Due from customers on acceptances		—		—		—		152,423		152,423
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		793,361		—		—		629,472		1,422,833

		3,499,632		17,921,275		623,718		64,217,975		86,262,600

Financial liabilities
Deposits and obligations		—		—		—		48,897,944		48,897,944
Due to banks and correspondents		—		—		—		8,522,849		8,522,849
Bonds, notes and other obligations		—		—		—		8,389,672		8,389,672
Due from customers on acceptances		—		—		—		152,423		152,423
Insurance contract liabilities		—		—		—		11,958,058		11,958,058
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		413,797		—		—		1,865,080		2,278,877

		413,797		—		—		79,786,026		80,199,823

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

30.	Financial risk management

It comprises the management of the main risks, that due to the nature of their operations, IFS and its Subsidiaries are exposed to; and correspond to: credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, insurance risk and real estate risk.

•

Credit risk: possibility of loss due to inability or lack to pay of willingness to pay debtors, counterparts or third parties bound to comply with their contractual obligations.

•

Market risk: probability of loss in positions on and off the consolidated statement of financial position derived from variations in market conditions; it generally includes the following types of risk: exchange rate; fair value by interest rate, price, among others.

•

Liquidity risk: possibility of loss due to noncompliance with the requirements of financing and fund application that arise from mismatches of cash flows.

•

Insurance risk: possibility that the actual cost of claims and payments will differ from the estimates.

•

Real estate risk: possibility of significant loss in rental income due to the insolvency of the lessee or, a decrease in the market value of real estate investments.

To manage the risks detailed above, every Subsidiary of the Group has a specialized structure and organization in their management, measurement systems, as well as mitigation and coverage processes, according to specific regulatory needs and requirements for the development of its business. The Group and its Subsidiaries, mainly Interbank, Interseguro, Inteligo Bank and Izipay, operate independently but in coordination with the general provisions issued by the Board of Directors and Management of IFS. The Board of Directors and Management of IFS are ultimately responsible for identifying and controlling risks. The Company has an Audit Committee comprised of three independent directors, pursuant to Rule

10A-3

of the Securities Exchange Act of the United States; and one of them is a financial expert according to the regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and its main purpose is to monitor and supervise the preparation processes of financial and accounting information, as well as the audits over the financial statements of IFS and its Subsidiaries.

Also, the Audit Committee is responsible of assisting the Board of Directors in the monitoring and supervising, thus helping to ensure:

•

The quality and comprehensiveness of IFS’s financial statements, including its disclosures.

•

The existence of adequate procedures to assess, objectively and periodically, the effectiveness of the internal control system over the financial report.

•

The compliance of the legal and regulatory framework.

•

The qualification and independence of external auditors.

•

The performance of external auditors.

•

The implementation by Management of an adequate internal control system, in particular the internal control system over the financial report.

The Company has an Internal Audit Division which is responsible for monitoring the key processes and controls to ensure an adequate low risk control according to the standards defined in the Sarbanes Oxley Act.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Management is responsible of the preparation, presentation and comprehensiveness of the Group’s consolidated financial statements, the suitability of the principles and accounting policies it uses, the establishment and upkeeping of the internal control over the financial information, as well as the facilitation of communications among external auditors, IFS’s managers, Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.

(a)

Structure and organization of risk management -

The Group’s risk management structure and organization for each of its Subsidiaries is as follows:

(i)

Interbank -

Board of Directors

Interbank’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing an appropriate and integral risk management and promoting an internal environment that facilitates its development. The Board is continuously informed about the exposure degree of the various risks managed by Interbank.

The Board has created several specialized committees to which it has delegated specific tasks to strengthen risk management and internal control.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee’s main purpose is to monitor that the accounting financial reporting processes are appropriate, as well as to evaluate the activities performed by the auditors, both internal and external. The Committee is comprised of three members of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, the Internal Auditor, the Vice-President of Corporate and Legal Affairs and other executives may also participate therein, when required. The Committee meets at least six times a year in ordinary sessions and informs the Board about the most relevant issues discussed.

F-16

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Comprehensive Risk Management Committee

The Comprehensive Risk Management Committee (“GIR”, by its Spanish acronym) is responsible for approving the policies and organization for comprehensive risk management, as well as the amendments to said policies. This Committee defines the level of tolerance and the exposure degree to risk that Interbank is willing to assume in its business and also decides on the necessary actions aimed at implementing the required corrective measures in case of deviations from the levels of tolerance to risk. The Committee is comprised of two Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice-Presidents. The Committee reports monthly to the Board of Directors the main issues it has discussed and the resolutions taken in the previous meeting.

Assets and Liabilities Committee

The main purpose of the Assets and Liabilities Committee (“ALCO”) is to manage the financial structure of the statement of financial position of Interbank, based on profitability and risk targets. The ALCO is also responsible for the proposal of new products or operations that contain components of market risk. Likewise, it is the communication channel with the units that generate market risk. The ALCO meets monthly and it is comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, the Vice-Presidents of Risks, Commercial, Finance, Operations, Distribution Channels, Capital Market and the Manager of Treasury / Position Desk.

Internal Audit Division -

Risk management processes of Interbank are monitored by the Internal Audit Division, which examines both the adequacy of the procedures and the compliance with them. The Internal Audit Division discusses the results of all assessments with Management and reports its findings and recommendations to the Audit Committee and Board of Directors.

(ii)

Interseguro -

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is responsible for the overall approach to risk management and it is responsible for the approval of the policies and strategies currently used. The Board of Directors provides the principles for overall risk management, as well as the policies prepared for specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and the use of derivative and

non-derivative

financial instruments.

Audit Committee

The main purpose of the Audit Committee is to monitor that the accounting and financial reporting process are appropriate, as well as to assess the activities performed by External and Internal Auditors. The Audit Committee is comprised of three Board members who do not fulfil any executive position within Interseguro, being at least one of them an Independent Director, who leads the Committee and cannot lead any other Committee within Interseguro. The Committee sessions can be attended by the Chief Executive Officer, the Audit Manager, the External Auditors and other executives when required. The Committee meets at least six times a year in ordinary sessions and informs the Board on the most relevant issues it has addressed.

F-163

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee is a corporate body created by the Board. It is responsible of defining the business risk limits of Interseguro through the approval of risk policies and the corrective measures needed to maintain adequate levels of risk tolerance. The Risk Committee is comprised of four Board members, the Risk Manager and the Chief Executive Officer.

Investment Committee

The Investment Committee is responsible of approving the limits of each security or real estate that may be included in Interseguro’s investment portfolio. This Committee is comprised of several Board Members, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice-President of Investments.

Internal Audit Division

Risk management processes throughout Interseguro are monitored by the Internal Audit Division, which reviews and assesses the design, scope and functioning of the internal control system and verifies the compliance of the legal requirements, policies, standards and procedures. The Internal Audit Division discusses the results of all assessments with Management and reports its findings and recommendations to the Audit Committee and Board of Directors.

(iii)

Inteligo Bank -

Inteligo Bank’s Board of Directors is responsible for the establishment and monitoring of the risk administration policies. To manage and monitor the various risks Inteligo Bank is exposed to, the Board of Directors has created the Credit and Investment Committee, the Assets and Liabilities Committee, the Credit Risk Committee and the Audit Committee.

(iv)

Izipay -

The Board of Izipay is responsible for the approval of risk management policies. Likewise, in order to monitor the risks to which Izipay is exposed, the Board has created the Risks and Compliance Committee and the Audit Committee.

The Group, through its different risk management bodies, has been monitoring and implementing in its subsidiaries, diverse measures to address and counter the negative effects caused by the political and social context in the country and the pandemic, which began in March 2020.

(b)

Risk measurement and reporting systems -

The Group uses different models and rating tools. These tools measure and value the risk with a prospective vision, thus allowing the making of better risk decisions in the different stages or life cycle of client or product.

F-164

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Said models and tools are permanently monitored and periodically validated to assure that the levels of prediction and performance are being maintained and to make the corrective actions or adjustments, when needed.

(c)

Risk mitigation and risk coverage -

To mitigate its exposure to the various financial risks and provide adequate coverage, the Group has established a series of measures, among which the following stand out:

•

Policies, procedures, methodologies, models and parameters aimed to allow for the identification, measurement, control and reporting of diverse financial risks;

•

Review and assessment of diverse financial risks, through specialized units of risk screening;

•

Timely monitoring and tracking of diverse financial risks and their maintenance within a defined tolerance level;

•

Compliance with regulatory limits and establishment of internal limits for exposure concentration; and

•

Procedures for the management of guarantees.

Likewise, as part of its comprehensive risk management, in certain circumstances the Group uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate its risk exposure, which arises from the variations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.

(d)

Risk concentration -

Through its policies and procedures, the Group has established the guidelines and mechanisms needed to prevent excessive risk concentration. In case any concentration risk is identified, the Group works with specialized units that enable it to control and manage said risks.

30.1

Credit risk

(a)

The Group opts for a credit risk policy that ensures sustained and profitable growth in all its products and business segments it operates. In doing so, it applies assessment procedures for the adequate decision-making, and uses tools and methodologies that allow the identification, measurement, mitigation and control of the different risks in the most efficient manner. Likewise, the Group incorporates, develops and reviews regularly management models that allow an adequate measurement, quantification and monitoring of the loans granted by each business unit and also encouraging the continuous improvement of its policies, tools, methodologies and processes. Additionally, as consequence of the political, economic and social context that arose during 2022 and 2021, see Note 1(b), and the

Covid-19

pandemic during 2020 and 2021, see Note 1(c), the behavior and performance of the expected credit losses of the retail and commercial clients has been affected, thus requiring a greater monitoring of results, which has also implied to perform certain subsequent adjustments to the expected loss model to be able to capture the effects of the current situation, which has generated a high level of uncertainty in the estimation of the loans expected loss.

F-165

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In compliance with the policy of monitoring the Group’s credit risk, during 2022 and 2021 Interbank performed the recalibration process of its risk parameters for the calculation of the expected credit losses.

(b)

The Group is exposed to credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty causes a financial loss by failing to comply with an obligation. Credit risk is the most important risk for the Group’s business; therefore, Management carefully manages its exposure to credit risk, which arise mainly in lending activities that lead to loans and investment activities that contribute with securities and other financial instruments to the Group’s asset portfolio. There is also credit risk in the financial instruments out of the consolidated statement of financial position, such as contingent credits (indirect loans), which expose the Group to risks similar to those of direct loans, being mitigated with the same control processes and policies. Likewise, credit risk arising from derivative financial instruments is, at any time, limited to those with positive fair values, as recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position.

As of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position and under IFRS 9, impairment allowances are established for expected credit losses. Significant changes in the economy or in the particular situation of an economic sector that represents a concentration in the Group’s portfolio could result in losses that are different from those provisioned for as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position.

The Group structures the levels of credit risk it undertakes by placing limits on the amount of risk accepted in relation to one borrower or groups of borrowers, geographical and industry segments. Said risks are monitored on a revolving basis and subject to continuous review.

The Group’s exposure to credit risk is managed through the regular assessment of debtors and their potential capability to pay the principal and interest of their obligations, and through the change in exposure limits, when appropriate.

The exposure to credit risk is also mitigated, in part, through the obtaining of personal and corporate collateral. Nevertheless, there is a significant part of the financial instruments where said collateral cannot be obtained. Following is a description of the procedures and policies related to collateral management and valuation of collaterals.

Policies and procedures for management and valuation of guarantees -

Collateral required for financial assets other than the loan portfolio are determined according to the nature of the instrument. However, debt instruments, treasury papers and other financial assets are in general not guaranteed, except for securities guaranteed with similar assets and instruments.

The Group has policies and guidelines established for the management of collateral received to back loans granted. The assets that guarantee loan operations bear a certain value prior to the loan approval and the procedures for their updating are described in the internal rules. To manage guarantees, the Group operates specialized divisions for the establishment, management and release of guarantees.

Collateral that back loan operations include different goods, property and financial instruments (including cash and securities). Their preferential status depends on the following conditions:

•

Easy convertibility into cash.

F-166

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

Proper legal documentation, duly registered with the corresponding public registry.

•

Do not have previous obligations that could reduce their value.

•

Their fair value must be updated.

Long-term loans and fundings granted to corporate entities are generally guaranteed. Consumer loans granted to small companies are not generally guaranteed.

Management monitors the fair value of collateral, and with the purpose of mitigating credit losses, requests additional collateral to the counterparty as soon as impairment evidence exists. The proceeds from the settlement of the collateral obtained are used to reduce or repay the outstanding claim.

In the case of derivative financial instruments, the Group maintains strict control limits on net open derivative positions (the difference between purchase and sale contracts), both in amount and term. The amount subject to credit risk is limited to the current fair value of instruments that are favorable to the Group (for example, an asset when its fair value is positive), which in relation to derivatives is only a small fraction of the contract, or notional amount used to express the volume of instruments outstanding. This credit risk exposure is managed as part of the overall lending limits with customers, together with potential exposures from market movements. Collateral or other securities are not usually obtained for credit risk exposures on these instruments.

Settlement risk arises in any situation where a payment in cash, securities or equity is made in the expectation of a corresponding receipt in cash. Daily settlement limits are established for each counterparty to cover the aggregate of all settlement risk arising from the Group’s market transactions on any single day.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(c)

Maximum exposure to credit risk -

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Management estimates that the maximum credit risk to which the Group is exposed is represented by the book value of the financial assets which show a potential credit risk and consist mostly of deposits in banks, inter-bank funds, investments, loans (direct and indirect), without considering the fair value of the collateral or guarantees, derivative financial instruments transactions, receivables from insurance transactions and other monetary assets. In this sense, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the main captions were formed as follows:

•

74.2 percent and 77.3 percent, respectively, of cash corresponds to amounts deposited in the Group’s vaults or in the BCRP;

•

89.8 percent and 87.5 percent, respectively, of the loan portfolio is classified into the two lower credit risk categories defined by the Group under IFRS 9 (high and standard grade);

•

92.6 percent and 93.5 percent, respectively, of loans is deemed

non-past-due

and

non-impaired.

It is worth mentioning that, because of the effects of the

Covid-19

pandemic, the Group has rescheduled loans that met certain requirements. The balance of rescheduled loans related to

Covid-19

as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 amounts approximately to S/5,049,000,000 and S/6,267,000,000, respectively. Additionally, as a consequence of “Reactiva Peru” program, the Group has rescheduled loans that meet certain requirements, therefore, the balance of credits rescheduled under this program as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, amounts approximately to S/1,473,770,000 and S/1,974,180,000, respectively.

•

88.0 percent and 91.8 percent, respectively, of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income and investments at amortized cost have at least an investment grade

(BBB-

or higher) or are debt instruments issued by the BCRP or the Peruvian Government; and

•

97.7 percent and 98.1 percent of accounts receivable from insurance premiums and leases of the investment properties is deemed

non-past

due and

non-impaired.

•

In addition, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group holds loans (direct and indirect) and investments in fixed income instruments issued by entities related to the infrastructure sector that, in recent years, have been exposed to local and international events, for an amount of approximately of S/712,662,000 (S/163,534,000 in direct loans and S/549,128,000 in indirect loans) and S/1,036,763,000, respectively (S/1,055,904,000 (S/334,375,000 in direct loans and S/721,529,000 in indirect loans) and S/911,756,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2021).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d)

Impairment assessment for loan portfolios -

The main objective of the impairment requirements is to recognize expected credit losses during the average life of financial instruments when there has been a significant increase in credit risk after the initial recognition — as evaluated on a collective or individual basis — considering all reasonable and sustainable information, including that which refers to the future. If the financial instrument does not show a significant increase in credit risk after the initial recognition, the provision for credit losses shall be calculated as

12-month

expected credit losses (Stage 1), as defined in Note 3.4(i).

Under some circumstances, entities may not have reasonable and sustainable information available without disproportionate effort or cost to measure the expected credit losses during the lifetime of the asset on an individual instrument basis. In that case, expected credit losses during the asset’s lifetime shall be recognized on a collective basis considering information about the overall credit risk. The financial assets for which the Group calculates the expected loss under a collective assessment include:

•

All direct and indirect (contingent) loans related to

stand-by

letters, guarantees, bank guarantees and letters of credit. Except for short-term reasons, certain clients that belong to the infrastructure sector.

•

Debt instruments measured at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income.

The expected credit loss is estimated collectively for each loan portfolio with shared similar risk characteristics. Not only default indicators, but all information such as: macroeconomic projections, type of instrument, credit risk ratings, types of guarantees, date of initial recognition, remaining time to maturity, among other indicators.

For the collective impairment assessment, the financial assets are grouped based on the Group’s internal credit rating system, which considers credit risk characteristics, such as: type of asset, economic sector, geographical location, type of guarantee, among other relevant factors.

Expected losses are calculated under the identification and multiplication of the following risk parameters:

•

Probability of Default (PD): It is the likelihood of a default over a particular time horizon that the counterpart will be unable to meet its debt obligations in a certain term and with it is cataloged as default.

•

Loss Given Default (LGD): Measures the loss in percentage terms on total exposure at default (see Exposure at default).

•

Exposure at Default (EAD): Represents the total value that the Group can lose upon default of a counterpart.

(d.1)

Definition of default:

In accordance with IFRS 9, the Group determines that there is default on a financial asset when:

•

The borrower is unlikely to pay their credit obligations to the Group in full, without recourse by the Group to actions such as realizing guarantee (if applicable); or

•

The borrower is past due by more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Group.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

In assessing whether a borrower presents default, the Group considers the following indicators:

•

Qualitative: contracts in judicial and prejudicial proceedings.

•

Quantitative: contracts in default for more than 90 days; and

•

Based on data prepared internally and obtained from external sources such as:

•

Significant changes in indicators of credit risk

•

Significant changes in external market indicators

•

Real or expected significant change in the external and/or internal credit rating

•

Existing or forecast adverse changes in the business, economic or financial conditions that are expected to cause a significant change in the borrower’s ability to meet their debt obligations.

•

Real or expected significant change in the operating results of the borrower

•

Existing or future adverse changes in the regulatory, economic or technological environment of the borrower that results in a significant change in their ability to meet their debt obligations.

Likewise, losses recognized in the period are affected by several factors, such as:

•

Financial assets moving from Stage 1 to Stage 2 or Stage 3 because there has been a significant increase in their risk since initial recognition or they present impairment at the analysis date, respectively. As a result, lifetime expected losses are calculated.

•

Impact on the measurement of expected losses due to changes in PD, EAD and LGD resulting from the update of the inputs used.

•

Impact on the measurement of expected losses due to changes in the models and assumptions used.

•

Additional provisions for new financial instruments reported during the period.

•

Periodic reversals of the discount of expected losses due to the passage of time, as they are measured based on the present value.

•

Financial assets written off during the period.

•

Exchange difference arising from financial assets denominated in foreign currency.

(d.1.1)

Internal rating and PD:

The Group’s loans are segmented into homogeneous groups with shared similar credit risk characteristics as detailed below:

•

Personal Banking (credit cards, mortgages, payroll loans, consumer loans and vehicular loans)

•

Small Business Banking (segments S1, S2 and S3)

•

Commercial Banking (Corporate, Institutional, Companies and Real estate)

In the case of Interbank, its Credit Risk Department determines its risk level according to the following classification, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	2022
Banking	Segment	High grade PD less than or equal (*)	Standard grade PD range (*)	Grade lower than standard PD equal to or higher (*)
	Credit card	7.36%	7.37% - 17.52%	17.53%
	Mortgage	1.15%	1.16% - 3.76%	3.77%
	Payroll loans	3.94%	3.95% - 16.89%	16.90%
Personal Banking	Consumer	7.94%	7.95% - 18.15%	18.16%
	Vehicular	3.24%	3.25% - 9.09%	9.10%
Small Business Banking		15.05%	15.06% - 24.59%	24.60%
	Corporate	0.28%	0.28%	0.28%
Commercial Banking	Institutional	0.28%	0.28%	0.28%
	Companies	3.72%	3.73% - 6.84%	6.85%
	Real estate	1.66%	1.66%	1.66%

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)



	2021
Banking	Segment	High grade PD less than or equal	Standard grade PD range	Grade lower than standard PD equal to or higher
	Credit card	7.35%	7.36% - 19.30%	19.31%
	Mortgage	2.57%	2.58% - 7.44%	7.45%
	Payroll loans	2.34%	2.35% - 5.48%	5.49%
Personal Banking	Consumer	10.35%	10.36% - 24.39%	24.40%
	Vehicular	7.51%	7.52% - 17.84%	17.85%
Small Business Banking		20.60%	20.61% - 39.94%	39.95%
	Corporate	0.29%	0.29%	0.29%
Commercial Banking	Institutional	0.29%	0.29%	0.29%
	Companies	1.28%	1.29% - 3.48%	3.49%
	Real estate	3.53%	3.53%	3.53%

(*)

It is worth mentioning that the probability of default is exclusively those determined by the statistical model and, therefore, do not include the subsequent adjustments to the model, detailed in Note 30.1 (d.7)

The main objective of the scoring or rating is to generate statistical models that allow forecasting the applicant’s level of credit risk. The development of these models incorporates both qualitative and quantitative information, as well as client specific information that may affect their performance.

These rating models are monitored on a regular basis because with, the passage of time, some factors may have a negative impact on the model’s discriminating power, and stability due to changes in the population or its characteristics.

Each rating has an associated PD, which is adjusted to incorporate prospective information. This is replicated for each macroeconomic scenario, as appropriate.

To calculate the PD, two differentiated methodologies have been developed, which are described below:

•

Transition matrixes

Its objective is to determine the probability of default over a

12-month

horizon based on the maturity of the operation, by analyzing the conditional probability of transition from one credit rating state to another. This method is suitable for loans with high exposure and wide data availability. The intention is to calculate the PD based on the maturity of the operation.

•

Default ratio

Its objective is to determine the probability of default over a

12-month

horizon based on the level of risk with which the operation begins, based on a counting analysis and the percentage of cases that report a default mark. This method is suitable for loans with poor data availability by type of maturity.

F-17

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Given the nature of the portfolios and the availability of historical information, the method to estimate the PD for each portfolio is presented below:


Banking / Segments	Transition matrix		Default ratio
Personal banking:
Credit cards		X
Mortgage		X
Payroll loans				X
Consumer				X
Vehicular				X
Small business banking				X
Commercial banking
Corporate				X
Institutional				X
Companies		X
Real estate				X

Likewise, for commercial sector clients, Interbank has implemented a system that allows it to monitor clients in a

more personalized way, based on warnings, changes in rating, reputation problems, among others.

On the other hand, at each reporting date, for indirect loans (contingent), as happens for direct loans, the expected loss is calculated depending on the stage in which each operation is located; that is, if it is in Stage 1, the expected loss is calculated with a

12-month

view. If it is in Stage 2 (if the operation shows a significant risk increase since the initial recognition) or Stage 3 (if the operation has a default), the expected loss is calculated for the remaining life of the asset.

The Group considers the changes in credit risk based on the probability that the borrower will fail to comply with the loan agreement.

F-17

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Group holds

stand-by

letters and guarantees with entities related to the infrastructure sector that, in recent years, for circumstantial reasons; have been exposed to national and international events. To determine the expected losses of these entities, the Group, in a complementary manner, has performed an individual assessment to determine if the operation is in Stage 1, Stage 2 or Stage 3.

The criteria established to assign the risk to each one of the operations that are evaluated under an individual evaluation use the following combination of factors: quantitative, qualitative and financial.

To estimate the PD for the lifetime of a financial asset, a transformation to a

12-month

PD is made according to the year of remaining life. That is, the PD is determined for a lifetime by an exponentiation of the

12-month

PD.

At Inteligo Bank, both for Personal Banking and Commercial Banking, the internal model developed (scorecard) assigns 5 levels of credit risk: low, medium low, medium, medium high, and high. This methodology evaluates the scoring, increase or decrease of risks, taking into consideration the loan structure and the type of client; therefore, there is one scorecard for Personal Banking and another for Commercial Banking.

(d.2)

Loss Given Default (LGD):

It is an estimated loss in case of default. It is the difference between contractual cash flows due and those expected to be received, including guarantees. Generally, it is expressed as an EAD percentage.

In the case of Interbank, the calculation of the LGD has been developed under three differentiated methods, which are described below:

•

Closed recoveries

Those in which a client entered and left default (due to debt settlement, application of penalty or refinancing) over a course of up to 88 months and 74 months, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

•

Open recoveries

Those in which a client entered and did not manage to exit default over a course of up to 88 months and 74 months, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This method identifies the adjustment factor that allows to simulate the effect of a closed recovery process. Thus, a recovery curve is built from the information of closed recovery processes and a recovery rate curve is estimated based on the number of months of each process.

This methodology is applied to the Mortgage and Commercial Banking loan portfolios.

In the case of Inteligo Bank, for those credits that are classified in Stage 1 or Stage 2 at the reporting date, the regulatory recoveries of the Central Bank of the Bahamas and the Superintendence of Banks of Panama are used, using stressed scenarios for each type of guarantee.

F-17

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d.3)

Exposure at default (EAD):

Exposure at default represents the gross carrying amount of financial instruments subject to impairment, which involves both the client’s ability to increase exposure as default approaches and possible early repayments. To calculate the EAD of a loan in Stage 1, potential default events are evaluated over a

12-

month horizon. For financial assets in Stage 2 and Stage 3, exposure at default is determined over the life of the instrument.

A calculation methodology has been developed for those portfolios that present a defined schedule, differentiating those transactions that consider prepayment and those that do not consider prepayment; and another methodology that is based on building the credit risk factor for those portfolios that allows the client the ability to use a line of credit (revolving products) and, therefore, the percentage of additional use of the credit line that the client could use in the event of a default must be calculated.

(d.4)

Significant increase in credit risk:

The Group has established a framework that incorporates quantitative and qualitative information to determine whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has significantly increased since initial recognition, both for loans and investments. The framework is aligned with the Group’s internal credit risk management process.

In certain cases, using its expert credit judgment and, where possible, with relevant historical experience, the Group may determine that an exposure has experienced a significant increase in credit risk when certain qualitative indicators that may not be captured by a timely quantitative analysis.

At each reporting date, expected losses are calculated depending on the stage of each loan, as each one is evaluated with a different life period.

•

Stage 1 -

12-month

expected losses are calculated. For this, the following risk parameters are multiplied: the

12-month

forward-looking PD for year 1 of the remaining life, the client’s LGD, and the EAD for year 1 of the remaining life for operations with payment schedule or the balance as of the reporting date for operations without payment schedule.

•

Stage 2 -

Lifetime expected losses are calculated for the entire remaining life of the asset. For operations with payment schedule, they are calculated in each year of remaining life by multiplying the following risk parameters:

12-month

forward-looking PD, the client’s LGD, and the EAD of the corresponding year of remaining life, and then the summation is done. For operations without payment schedule, they are calculated by multiplying the lifetime forward-looking PD, the client’s LGD, and the balance as of the reporting date.

•

Stage 3 -

Expected losses are calculated by multiplying the PD (equal to 100 percent) by the client’s LGD and the balance as of the reporting date.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group classifies the operations with a significant increase in the risk of each portfolio such as marked refinanced operations, operations with arrears longer than 30 days (for all portfolios except Mortgages that considers arrears longer than 60 days), or operations marked “Leave” or “Reduce” in the surveillance system for the Commercial Banking portfolio.

Likewise, the evaluation of the significant risk increase is made by comparing the

12-month

PD to the date of origin and the

12-month

PD to the date of the report adjusted by the forward-looking factor, according to the quantitative criteria of absolute variation and relative variation. The Group has established a range of simple average absolute variation of 7% and a simple average relative variation of 588%.

The Group periodically evaluates the following warning signs and criteria to assess whether the placement presents a significant increase in credit risk (Stage 2):

•

Rescheduled loans.

•

Infraction to the covenants.

•

Forced interventions by governments in the primary and secondary markets of obligors.

•

Involvement of the borrower in illicit, political and fraud business.

•

Impairment of guarantees (underlying assets).

•

Arrears or short and frequent failures to pay installments.

•

Significantly adverse macroeconomic, regulatory, social, technological and environmental changes.

•

Other assessments and/or warnings (financial statements, EBIT evaluation, financial indicators by industry, regulatory criteria, others).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

On the other hand, the Group monitors the effectiveness of the criteria used to identify significant increases in credit risk through periodic reviews to confirm that:

•

The criteria used is able to identify significant increases in credit risk before an exposure is in default;

•

The average time between the identification of a significant increase in credit risk and default is reasonable;

•

Exposures usually do not transfer directly from the measurement of

12-month

expected losses to impaired loans; and

•

There is no unjustified volatility in the allocation of expected credit losses between the measurement of

12-month

expected credit losses and lifetime expected credit losses.

Subsequently, the expected loss of each scenario (optimistic, base and pessimistic) is calculated as the sum of the expected loss of each Stage. Finally, the expected loss of the portfolio is calculated by assigning weights to each scenario based on their respective probability of occurrence.

An operation shall migrate from Stage 1 to Stage 2 due to significant risk increase, if comparing the current PD with the PD at the moment it was generated it is observed an increase (relative and absolute variation) in the PD that exceeds the established thresholds.

On the other hand, the methodology introduces the concept of cure for the Mortgage, Corporate and Business portfolios. According to this concept, a loan in Stage 3 that has been recovered through the payment of the debt, does not migrate directly to Stage 1, instead of continuing in Stage 2 during an observation window of 12 months, to secure a consistent behavior in the transaction’s risk, as well as to mitigate the migration volatility between risk stages.

(d.5)

Reactiva Peru

The National Government Guarantees Program “Reactiva Peru”, created by Legislative Decree 1455, and amended by Legislative Decree 1457, aimed to provide a quick and effective response to the liquidity needs faced by companies due to the impact of the Covid

-19

pandemic.

During the year 2020, Interbank granted loans under this modality for S/6,617,142,000. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of loans under this program amounted to S/2,414,455,000 and S/5,056,009,000 respectively, including accrued interest.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Also, during the years 2022 and 2021, the Peruvian government established measures for the rescheduling of these loans setting new grace periods additional to the grace periods of the original loan. Also, certain requirements were established that the client had to comply with to access to the rescheduling.

(d.6)

Rescheduled loans:

(d.6.1)

Reschedules due to

Covid-19

Because of the pandemic scenario as consequence of the

Covid-19

pandemic explained in Note 1(c), the SBS authorized financial entities to grant credit facilities (rescheduling) to clients that meet certain requirements specified by the regulations issued by this regulatory entity. In that sense, Interbank granted repayment facilities to its customers that included: modification of repayment schedules, granting of grace periods, reduction of interest rates, fractioning and downsizing of installments, among others. The effects of such rescheduling have been recorded in the caption “Interest and similar income” of the consolidated income statement, see Note 19.

(d.6.2)

Reschedules “Reactiva Peru”

During 2022 and 2021, the MEF and the SBS establish measures to reschedule the loans guaranteed under the “Reactiva Peru” program. See Note 30.1 (d.5).

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance of rescheduled credits of the “Reactiva Peru” program amounts to approximately S/1,473,770,000 and S/1,974,180,000,

respectively. As a result of such rescheduling, during 2022 and 2021, revenues of approximately S/

18,180,000 and S/23,566,000 were recorded, respectively. Both amounts are presented as an increase in interest and similar income. See Note 19.

Interbank performed an assessment to define whether these rescheduled contracts represented, or not, a substantial modification under IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments. From that assessment, the new cash flows of the rescheduled loans did not generate substantial nor significant changes in the conditions initially contracted by the client; therefore, the adjustments in the conditions did not generate any substantial modification and, thus, neither a derecognition of the asset.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d.7)

Subsequent adjustments to the model

The risks and uncertainties originated by the

Covid-19

pandemic during 2020 and 2021, and the political and economic context of Peru in the year 2021 and 2022, have not been adequately reflected by the existing statistical models which are parameterized to determine the expected loss of the Group, considering that those events are of extraordinary nature and have not had precedents that would have been used as basis to model them in the calculation of the expected loss. For this reason, Interbank incorporated a series of expert judgments with the purpose of calculating the expected loss pursuant to the requirement established by IFRS 9.

Following is the detail of the subsequent adjustments to the expected loss model performed to include in the calculation the effects of the uncertainty and risks as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:

(i)

Subsequent adjustments to the model included in 2022:

Two expert judgments were set up to stress the possibility of default from customers due to the political and economic situation in Peru, as described in Note 1(b).

•

Stress of the probability of default (PD) for loans in Stage 1 and Stage 2

This judgment includes an additional stress scenario for Stages 1 and 2 based on the uncertainty of the political and economic context, which could not be included in those expected loss models due to the extraordinary nature of events in this context. In this sense, it can be incorporated a stress to the forward-looking factors used in the macroeconomic forecasts, thus increasing the provision for expected loss requirement in Stages 1 and 2, considering the historical behavior of the forward-looking factors during a concrete period and excluding any factor that could skew the results of this period by showing an atypical trend as result of the presented environment.

•

Stress for clients in stage 3

The expert judgement applied to these clients considers the relative participation of the exposure of clients in Stage 3 in function of the total portfolio exposure (Stage 3 exposure divided by the total exposure) during a concrete period and excluding any factors that may bias the results of this period, showing an atypical trend due to the presented environment.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Once this period of analysis is excluded, the series average is calculated, and a standard deviation is added with the purpose of determining the level of additional provisions for clients in Stage 3.

Following is the amount of the expected loss as of December 31, 2022, as determined by the model, and the subsequent adjustments to the model explained in previous paragraphs:


	Expected loss (according to Model)		Subsequent adjustments to the model		Expected loss (Total)
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Commercial loans		261,187		21,231		282,418
Consumer loans		1,296,560		325,822		1,622,382
Mortgage loans (*)		61,618		—		61,618
Small and micro-business loans		90,685		6,247		96,932

Total		1,710,050		353,300		2,063,350

(*)	Considering the nature of these loans, it has not been necessary to determine a subsequent adjustment to the model.

(ii)

Subsequent adjustments to the model included in 2021

Two expert judgments were set up that seek to stress the possibility of default from customers due to the political situation in Peru.

•

Stress of the probability of default (PD) for loans in Stage 1 and Stage 2

This judgment is related to the evaluation of the forward-looking factors used in the model, which are built from the macro-economic models and forecasts made by an external supplier; and is based on a more stressed forward-looking scenario for the economy’s performance compared against the weighted factors of the expected loss model and the difference between both of them, it represents, for each loan, the additional provision requirement. In this way, the expected loss can be stressed by applying more severe macro-economic forecasts to the probability of default.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

•

Stress for clients in Stage 3

The methodology applied, according to this judgment, is analogous to the one described above for clients in Stage 3, as of December 31, 2022; that is, the expert judgment applied for these clients considers the participation relative to the exposure of Stage 3 clients with respect to the whole portfolio exposure.

Additionally, given the uncertainty context due to the outbreak of the Omicron variant, new expert criteria was applied for the new wave of infections, which could cause another cycle of loan rescheduling, although to a lesser extent than the year 2020. This criterion has been applied only to the Credit Cards portfolio.

On the other hand, it was considered to apply an expert judgment in relation to the “Reactiva Peru” program, to the Small Business Banking portfolio, because this portfolio presents a greater participation in the Program, higher number of rescheduling and higher provision.

Following is the amount of the expected loss as of December 31, 2021, as determined by the model and the subsequent adjustments to it, explained in the previous paragraphs:


	Expected loss (according to Model)		Subsequent adjustments to the model		Expected loss (Total)
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Commercial loans		283,243		100,527		383,770
Consumer loans		983,592		418,089		1,401,681
Mortgage loans		145,947		9,253		155,200
Small and micro-business loans		96,821		67,774		164,595

Total		1,509,603		595,643		2,105,246

(iii)

Subsequent adjustments to the model included in 2020

With the purpose of reflecting the impact of the uncertainty due to the

Covid-19

pandemic, Interbank decided to apply the expert judgment to perform migrations of clients with higher risk from Stage 1 to Stage 2 and Stage 3, and from Stage 2 to Stage 3. These migrations into higher risk Stages led to incur in a higher provision for expected loss for S/1,441,981,000.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(d.8)

Prospective information

Expected credit losses consider information about the overall credit risk. Information about the overall credit risk must incorporate not only information on delinquency, but also all relevant credit information, including forward-looking macroeconomic information.

To comply with the regulatory requirement, it has been determined that the methodology includes the aforementioned effects within the expected loss.

The estimation of expected credit losses will always reflect the possibility of a credit loss, even if the most likely result is not credit loss. Therefore, estimates of expected credit losses are required to reflect a weighted, unbiased amount that is determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes.

To capture these effects, the Group uses internally developed stress models that seek to stress the probability of default based on different macroeconomic variable projection scenarios.

The Group has defined three possible scenarios for each portfolio: optimistic, base and pessimistic.

Within the analysis carried out for the projection of probability of default, the projection period determined is 36 months (3 years). For projections after that period, the same information of that last year is considered, because it is deemed that projections beyond this period lose statistical significance, as evidenced by observing thresholds of confidence levels.

Macroeconomic variables used as of December 31, 2022


	Scenario	2023			2024			2025
Gross domestic product (annual % var.)	Optimistic		2.6	%		3.1	%		3.2	%
	Base		2.3	%		2.5	%		2.8	%
	Pessimistic		1.3	%		2.0	%		2.4	%
Unemployment rate (annual % var.)	Optimistic		(13.8	%)		(3.9	%)		(3.6	%)
	Base		(10.1	%)		(3.7	%)		(3.5	%)
	Pessimistic		(5.5	%)		(3.5	%)		(3.3	%)
Domestic demand (annual % var.)	Optimistic		1.7	%		2.5	%		2.8	%
	Base		1.1	%		1.7	%		2.3	%
	Pessimistic		(0.1	%)		1.0	%		1.9	%
Formal average salary (annual % var.)	Optimistic		(0.7	%)		1.3	%		1.4	%
	Base		(1.4	%)		1.0	%		1.2	%
	Pessimistic		(3.6	%)		(0.7	%)		0.5	%
Informal average salary (annual % var.)	Optimistic		1.8	%		3.4	%		3.5	%
	Base		1.0	%		2.9	%		3.0	%
	Pessimistic		(1.1	%)		1.3	%		2.3	%

F-18

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Macroeconomic variables used as of December 31, 2021


	Scenario	2022			2023			2024
Gross domestic product (annual % var.)	Optimistic		10.9	%		2.2	%		2.2	%
	Base		5.4	%		2.8	%		3.7	%
	Pessimistic		(15.2	%)		5.8	%		7.8	%
Consumption (annual % var.)	Optimistic		10.8	%		2.2	%		2.1	%
	Base		5.4	%		2.8	%		3.6	%
	Pessimistic		(13.9	%)		2.9	%		12.2	%
Domestic demand (annual % var.)	Optimistic		9.4	%		1.5	%		2.1	%
	Base		4.1	%		2.2	%		3.6	%
	Pessimistic		(15.6	%)		5.8	%		7.3	%
Gross Capital Formation	Optimistic		11.1	%		(0.1	%)		1.6	%
	Base		4.1	%		1.7	%		4.0	%
	Pessimistic		(25.1	%)		21.8	%		(4.6	%)

For the determination of these macroeconomic variables, different external sources of recognized prestige have been considered. The impact of these macroeconomic variables on the expected loss differs for each portfolio depending on the sensitivity in each of them.

The following tables summarize the impact of multiple scenarios on the expected credit loss of direct and indirect loans (optimistic, base and pessimistic):


	%		Total
			S/(000)
December 31, 2022
Optimistic		10		198,113
Base		52		1,050,333
Pessimistic		38		814,904

Total				2,063,350


	%		Total
			S/(000)
December 31, 2021
Optimistic		30		827,138
Base		40		601,358
Pessimistic		30		676,750

Total				2,105,246

F-18

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Guarantees:

The fair value of the loan guarantees as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, is presented below:


	Fair value of the credit guarantee under the base scenario
As of December 31, 2022	Maximum exposure to credit risk		Cash		Investments		Properties		Others		Total guarantee (*)		Net exposure			Expected loss associated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Subject to impairment
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		13,193,411		—		—		—		—		—		13,193,411			—
Commercial loans		21,412,126		815,190		1,380,441		11,327,344		4,361,481		17,884,456		3,527,670			247,084
Small and micro-business loans		1,358,481		—		—		—		—		—		1,358,481			96,768
Consumer loans		14,967,799		—		—		—		—		—		14,967,799			1,622,381
Mortgage loans		9,286,944		—		—		16,578,513		—		16,578,513		(7,291,569	)		61,622

Direct loans		47,025,350		815,190		1,380,441		27,905,857		4,361,481		34,462,969		12,562,381			2,027,855
Debt instruments at amortized cost		3,302,779		—		—		—		—		—		3,302,779			—

Total financial assets at amortized cost		63,521,540		815,190		1,380,441		27,905,857		4,361,481		34,462,969		29,058,571			2,027,855
Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		17,038,942		—		—		—		—		—		17,038,942			53,974

Total debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		17,038,942		—		—		—		—		—		17,038,942			53,974
Not subject to impairment
Derivative financial instruments - Trading		203,082		235,133		—		—		—		235,133		(32,051	)		—
Derivative financial instruments - Hedges		312,718		—		—		—		—		—		312,718			—
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		1,932,993		—		—		—		—		—		1,932,993			—

Total financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss		2,448,793		235,133		—		—		—		235,133		2,213,660			—

		83,009,275		1,050,323		1,380,441		27,905,857		4,361,481		34,698,102		48,311,173			2,081,829

Financial guarantees (guarantees and stand-by letters)		4,001,806		17,363		46,810		1,404,684		1,165,573		2,634,430		1,367,376			35,124
Letters of credit for customers		485,541		—		29,588		—		3,814		33,402		452,139			371

Indirect loans		4,487,347		17,363		76,398		1,404,684		1,169,387		2,667,832		1,819,515			35,495

		87,496,622		1,067,686		1,456,839		29,310,541		5,530,868		37,365,934		50,130,688			2,117,324

F-18

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	Fair value of the credit guarantee under the base scenario
As of December 31, 2021	Maximum exposure to credit risk		Cash		Investments		Properties		Others		Total guarantee (*)		Net exposure			Expected loss associated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Subject to impairment
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		17,104,465		—		—		—		—		—		17,104,465			—
Commercial loans		22,118,918		614,039		1,446,894		11,453,465		6,587,461		20,101,859		2,017,059			343,441
Small and micro-business loans		1,502,501		—		—		—		—		—		1,502,501			164,595
Consumer loans		12,514,499		—		—		—		—		—		12,514,499			1,401,681
Mortgage loans		8,552,304		—		—		16,327,398		—		16,327,398		(7,775,094	)		155,200

Direct loans		44,688,222		614,039		1,446,894		27,780,863		6,587,461		36,429,257		8,258,965			2,064,917
Debt instruments at amortized cost		3,296,030		—		—		—		—		—		3,296,030			—

Total financial assets at amortized cost		65,088,717		614,039		1,446,894		27,780,863		6,587,461		36,429,257		28,659,460			2,064,917
Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		17,921,275		—		—		—		—		—		17,921,275			41,108

Total debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income		17,921,275		—		—		—		—		—		17,921,275			41,108
Not subject to impairment
Derivative financial instruments - Trading		314,539		174,790		—		—		—		174,790		139,749			—
Derivative financial instruments - Hedges		478,822		—		—		—		—		—		478,822			—
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		2,706,271		—		—		—		—		—		2,706,271			—

Total financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss		3,499,632		174,790		—		—		—		174,790		3,324,842			—

		86,509,624		788,829		1,446,894		27,780,863		6,587,461		36,604,047		49,905,577			2,106,025

Financial guarantees (guarantees and stand-by letters)		4,150,093		13,128		62,576		1,750,607		572,428		2,398,739		1,751,354			38,514
Letters of credit for customers		290,365		—		48,591		90,610		100		139,301		151,064			1,815

Indirect loans		4,440,458		13,128		111,167		1,841,217		572,528		2,538,040		1,902,418			40,329

		90,950,082		801,957		1,558,061		29,622,080		7,159,989		39,142,087		51,807,995			2,146,354

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The following table shows the analysis of the fair values of the guarantees classified in Stage 3:


	Fair value of the credit guarantee under the base scenario
As of December 31, 2022	Maximum exposure to credit risk		Cash		Investments		Guarantees from third parties or governments		Properties		Others		Total guarantee (*)		Net exposure			Expected loss associated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Commercial loans		408,104		10		2,818		—		495,872		66,074		564,774		(156,670	)		154,299
Small and micro-business loans		91,195		—		—		—		—		—		—		91,195			51,709
Consumer loans		452,301		—		—		—		—		—		—		452,301			430,902
Mortgage loans		238,527		—		—		—		624,486		—		624,486		(385,959	)		45,101

Total		1,190,127		10		2,818		—		1,120,358		66,074		1,189,260		867			682,011

Indirect loans		26,076		—		—		—		—		—		—		26,076			8,936

		1,216,203		10		2,818		—		1,120,358		66,074		1,189,260		26,943			690,947


	Fair value of the credit guarantee under the base scenario
As of December 31, 2021	Maximum exposure to credit risk		Cash		Investments		Guarantees from third parties or governments		Properties		Others		Total guarantee (*)		Net exposure			Expected loss associated
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Commercial loans		513,833		4		2,123		—		456,732		143,020		601,879		(88,046	)		182,467
Small and micro-business loans		174,855		—		—		—		—		—		—		174,855			85,222
Consumer loans		354,960		—		—		—		—		—		—		354,960			336,041
Mortgage loans		268,528		—		—		—		728,333		—		728,333		(459,805	)		99,850

Total		1,312,176		4		2,123		—		1,185,065		143,020		1,330,212		(18,036	)		703,580

Indirect loans		25,057		—		—		—		—		—		—		25,057			13,243

		1,337,233		4		2,123		—		1,185,065		143,020		1,330,212		7,021			716,823

(*)	Includes the total fair value of the guarantees held by the Group as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, regardless the balance of the loan it guarantees.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e)

Credit risk management for investments

(e.1)

Scoring or internal rating and PD:

For this type of financial instruments, the Group analyzes the public information available from international risk rating agencies such as: Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, and assigns a rating to each instrument.

For each rating agency, the ratings associated with higher to lower credit quality are shown:


Fitch	Moody’s	Standard & Poor’s
AAA	Aaa	AAA
AA+	Aa1	AA+
AA	Aa2	AA
AA-	Aa3	AA-
A+	A1	A+
A	A2	A
A-	A3	A-
BBB+	Baa1	BBB+
BBB	Baa2	BBB
BBB-	Baa3	BBB-
BB+	Ba1	BB+
BB	Ba2	BB
BB-	Ba3	BB-
B+	B1	B+
B	B2	B
B-	B3	B-
CCC	Caa1	CCC+

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The Group determines its risk level according to the following classification as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:


	High grade	Standard grade	Grade lower than standard
2022	Rating: from AAA to A	Rating: from BBB to B	Rating: from CCC to C
	PD less than or equal to:	PD range	PD equal or higher to:
Global	0.05% - 0.11%	0.12% - 2.09%	23.34%
Latin America	0.00%	0.09% - 3.02%	24.64%
Sovereigns	0.00%	0.00% - 1.55%	27.08%


	High grade	Standard grade	Grade lower than standard
2021	Rating: from AAA to A	Rating: from BBB to B	Rating: from CCC to C
	PD less than or equal to:	PD range	PD equal or higher to:
Global	0.05% - 0.12%	0.12% - 2.11%	23.55%
Latin America	0.00%	0.11% - 3.06%	25.21%
Sovereigns	0.00%	0.00% - 1.64%	30.77%

Finally, each instrument is assigned a PD according to the transition matrices published by Fitch.

(e.2)

Loss given default (LGD):

For those issuers that are classified in Stage 1 or Stage 2 at the reporting date, the Group uses the recovery matrix published by Moody’s.

For those investments in Stage 3, an evaluation must be made to determine the severity of the expected loss according to the progress of the recovery process initiated.

(e.3)

Exposure at default (EAD):

EAD represents the gross book value of the financial instruments subject to impairment. To calculate the EAD of an investment in Stage 1, possible

non-compliance

events are evaluated within 12 months. For financial assets in Stage 2 and Stage 3, exposure at default is determined for events throughout the life of the instrument.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(e.4)

Significant increase in credit risk:

The Group has assumed that the credit risk of a financial instrument has not increased significantly since the initial recognition if it is determined that the investment has a low credit risk at the reporting date, which occurs when the issuer has a strong ability to meet its contractual cash flow obligations in the near term and adverse changes in economic and business conditions in the long term may reduce, but not necessarily, the ability of the issuer to meet its cash flow obligations contractual cash.

In accordance with the assignment of ratings to each debt instrument, the Group determines whether there is a significant increase in credit risk by comparing the rating at the date of acquisition with the rating at the reporting date, and designates the Stage in which each debt instrument is classified according to the quantitative and qualitative criteria, defined as follows:

(i)

Quantitative criteria -

The Group holds an investment that does not present a significant increase in risk if there is a movement of its credit risk rating within the investment grade. In case there is a movement of its credit risk rating outside the investment grade, it is deemed that the instrument presents a significant increase in risk.

(ii)

Qualitative criteria -

The Group periodically evaluates the following warning signs and criteria to assess whether the financial instrument presents a significant risk increase (stage 2) at the reporting date:

•

Significant decrease (30 percent of its original value) and prolonged (12 months) of the market value of the investment.

•

Infringements of covenants without a waiver from the bondholders committee.

•

Forced interventions by governments in the primary and secondary markets of the issuers.

•

Linkage of the issuer in illicit, political and fraud activities.

•

Impairment of collateral (underlying assets) in the case of securitized instruments.

•

Delays or short and frequent breaches in the payment of coupons.

•

Macroeconomic, regulatory, social, technological and environmental changes are significantly adverse.

•

Other evaluations and/or alerts made by each Subsidiary (financial statements, evaluation of EBIT, financial indicators by industry, regulatory criteria, others).

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The table below presents the credit risk ratings issued by risk rating agencies of recognized prestige local and international financial investments:


	As of December 31, 2022				As of December 31, 2021
	S/(000)		%		S/(000)		%
Instruments issued and rated in Peru:
AAA		19,125		0.1		14,189		0.1
AA-/ AA+		2,944		0.0		3,016		0.0
A- / A+		—		0.0		3,325		0.0
BBB- / BBB+		2,368,251		10.4		2,410,077		9.8
BB- / BB+		685,424		3.0		601,978		2.5

		3,075,744		13.5		3,032,585		12.4

Instruments issued in Peru and rated abroad:
BBB- / BBB+		11,710,437		51.4		12,224,488		49.8
BB- / BB+		545,868		2.4		141,841		0.6
B- / B+		—		0.0		204,762		0.8

		12,256,305		53.8		12,571,091		51.2

Instruments issued and rated abroad:
AAA		41,198		0.2		23,619		0.1
AA- / AA+		26,077		0.1		28,803		0.1
A- / A+		489,765		2.2		248,343		1.0
BBB- / BBB+		2,247,646		9.9		2,907,882		11.8
BB- / BB+		295,812		1.3		380,192		1.5
B- / B+		61,089		0.3		81,638		0.3
Less than B-		983		0.0		—		0.0

		3,162,570		13.9		3,670,477		14.8

Unrated
Certificates of deposits with variable interest rates issued by the BCRP		1,434,836		6.3		1,440,944		5.9
Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by the BCRP		43,868		0.2		179,207		0.7
Mutual funds and investment funds participations (*)		1,402,848		6.2		1,780,519		7.3
Others		1		0.0		45		0.0
Listed shares		790,408		3.5		1,235,496		5.0
Non-listed shares and participations		226,953		1.0		274,586		1.1

Total		22,393,533		98.3		24,184,950		98.5

Accrued interest		394,065		1.7		362,344		1.5

Total		22,787,598		100.0		24,547,294		100.0

(*)

It includes mutual and investment funds which do not have risk rating.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(f)

Concentration of financial instruments exposed to credit risk -

Financial instruments exposed to credit risk were distributed according to the following economic sectors:


	As of December 31, 2022
	Designated at fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Amortized cost			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
BCRP		—		1,478,704		—		7,362,737			8,841,441
Consumer loans		—		—		—		15,005,146			15,005,146
Financial services		2,083,648		1,694,266		170,250		7,347,135	(*)		11,295,299
Mortgage loans		22,314		—		—		9,293,900			9,316,214
Manufacturing		74,303		559,581		111,069		4,873,701			5,618,654
Commerce		4,062		170,540		—		4,412,994			4,587,596
Construction and infrastructure		5,915		2,544,815		36,759		557,474			3,144,963
Government of Peru		—		7,062,066		—		3,231,139			10,293,205
Electricity, gas, water and oil		33,518		1,324,234		95,572		924,270			2,377,594
Agriculture		3,085		24,768		3,054		1,892,566			1,923,473
Leaseholds and real estate activities		24,162		156,539		5,246		606,883			792,830
Communications, storage and transportation		143,394		294,171		86,224		1,375,071			1,898,860
Mining		3,917		899,083		—		1,228,508			2,131,508
Community services		9,027		—		—		582,263			591,290
Insurance		6,345		—		—		1,427			7,772
Fishing		—		—		4,710		448,166			452,876
Commercial and micro-business loans		—		—		—		1,065,159			1,065,159
Foreign governments		—		113,816		—		—			113,816
Education, health and other services		885		91,518		—		293,872			386,275
Medicine and biotechnology		3,482		—		—		190,302			193,784
Public administration and defense		23,472		106,068		—		81,371			210,911
Professional, scientific and technical activities		3,482		196,348		—		3,930,939			4,130,769
Others		3,782		—		—		41,168			44,950

Total		2,448,793		16,716,517		512,884		64,746,191			84,424,385

Impairment allowance for loans											(2,027,855	)
Accrued interest											899,568

Total											83,296,098

(*)	It includes mainly the available funds deposited in the vaults of Interbank and in foreign banks; see Note 4.

F-1

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	Designated at fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Amortized cost			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
BCRP		—		1,620,151		—		10,866,021			12,486,172
Consumer loans		—		—		—		12,578,669			12,578,669
Financial services		2,718,146		1,798,502		267,611		7,610,629	(*)		12,394,888
Mortgage loans		35,818		—		—		8,558,105			8,593,923
Manufacturing		196,910		736,926		100,697		4,907,086			5,941,619
Commerce		11,754		129,666		—		5,187,887			5,329,307
Construction and infrastructure		10,785		2,799,391		43,180		771,911			3,625,267
Government of Peru		—		7,246,077		—		3,225,174			10,471,251
Electricity, gas, water and oil		57,231		1,240,807		91,915		919,511			2,309,464
Agriculture		7,824		26,198		1,857		1,777,362			1,813,241
Leaseholds and real estate activities		37,608		94,320		4,580		694,506			831,014
Communications, storage and transportation		173,460		355,501		110,608		1,513,062			2,152,631
Mining		6,353		1,030,543		—		681,864			1,718,760
Community services		10,396		—		—		271,464			281,860
Insurance		2,395		—		—		17,416			19,811
Fishing		—		—		3,270		440,009			443,279
Commercial and micro-business loans		—		—		—		1,170,563			1,170,563
Foreign governments		—		86,974		—		—			86,974
Education, health and other services		3,968		104,545		—		285,101			393,614
Medicine and biotechnology		117,396		—		—		189,496			306,892
Public administration and defense		28,847		136,345		—		119,317			284,509
Professional, scientific and technical activities		15,637		223,841		—		4,009,561			4,249,039
Others		65,104		—		—		35,044			100,148

Total		3,499,632		17,629,787		623,718		65,829,758			87,582,895

Impairment allowance for loans											(2,064,917	)
Accrued interest											744,622

Total											86,262,600

(*)	It includes mainly the available funds deposited in the vaults of Interbank and in foreign banks; see Note 4.

F-19

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The table below presents the financial instruments with exposure to credit risk, by geographic area:


	As of December 31, 2022
	Designated at fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Investments at amortized cost			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Peru		152,424		13,579,422		270,166		61,849,912			75,851,924
United States of America		1,734,175		360,279		86,224		1,479,634			3,660,312
Mexico		11,410		1,049,305		—		13,178			1,073,893
Cayman Islands		141,149		—		—		—			141,149
Canada		5,560		—		—		499,111			504,671
Luxembourg		68,553		12,510		—		47,500			128,563
Colombia		95		322,840		—		55,230			378,165
Chile		1		668,122		—		28,100			696,223
Panama		—		206,216		—		333,084	(*)		539,300
Brazil		—		153,977		—		21,258			175,235
United Kingdom		192,112		306,888		154,476		27,577			681,053
Germany		24,947		—		—		175,061			200,008
Ireland		—		—		—		455			455
Ecuador		—		—		—		4,990			4,990
Belgium		—		—		157		3			160
Others		118,367		56,958		1,861		211,098			388,284

Total		2,448,793		16,716,517		512,884		64,746,191			84,424,385

Impairment allowance for loans											(2,027,855	)
Accrued interest											899,568

Total											83,296,098

(*)	It corresponds mainly to the loan portfolio maintained by Inteligo Bank (domiciled in Panama) with Peruvian citizens.

F-19

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	Designated at fair value through profit or loss		Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		Amortized cost			Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Peru		379,059		13,988,582		259,810		61,482,338			76,109,789
United States of America		1,966,994		243,396		110,608		1,477,418			3,798,416
Mexico		95,933		1,485,744		—		10,384			1,592,061
Cayman Islands		315,925		—		—		125,989			441,914
Canada		7,774		—		—		934,208			941,982
Luxembourg		272,931		15,270		—		23,121			311,322
Colombia		3,459		318,054		—		85,149			406,662
Chile		30,736		673,805		—		62,221			766,762
Panama		—		281,889		—		519,082	(*)		800,971
Brazil		23,617		173,824		—		142,276			339,717
United Kingdom		231,045		383,668		251,188		38,283			904,184
Germany		28,367		—		—		263,223			291,590
Ireland		—		—		—		474			474
Ecuador		—		—		—		57,477			57,477
Belgium		—		—		164		2			166
Others		143,792		65,555		1,948		608,113			819,408

Total		3,499,632		17,629,787		623,718		65,829,758			87,582,895

Impairment allowance for loans											(2,064,917	)
Accrued interest											744,622

Total											86,262,600

(*)	It corresponds mainly to the loan portfolio maintained by Inteligo Bank (domiciled in Panama) with Peruvian citizens.

F-19

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(g)

Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

The information contained in the tables below includes financial assets and liabilities that:

•

Are offset in the statement of financial position of the Group; or

•

Are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that covers similar financial instruments, regardless of whether they are offset in the consolidated statement of financial position or not.

Similar arrangements of the Group include derivatives clearing agreements. Financial instruments such as loans and deposits are not disclosed in the following tables since they are not offset in the consolidated statement of financial position.

The offsetting framework agreement issued by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc. (“ISDA”) and similar master netting arrangements do not meet the criteria for offsetting in the statement of financial position, because of such agreements were created in order for both parties to have an enforceable offsetting right in cases of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the Group or the counterparties or following other predetermined events. In addition, the Group and its counterparties do not intend to settle such instruments on a net basis or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.

The Group receives and delivers guarantees in the form of cash with respect to transactions with derivatives; see Note 4.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(g.1)

Financial assets subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, are presented below:


	Gross amounts of recognized financial assets		Gross amounts of recognized financial liabilities and offset in the consolidated statement of financial position		Net amounts of financial assets presented in the consolidated statement of financial position		Related amounts not offset in the consolidated statement of financial position						Net amount
	Gross amounts of recognized financial assets						Financial instruments (including non-cash guarantees)			Cash guarantees received			Net amount
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
2022
Derivatives, Note 10(b)		515,800		—		515,800		(169,050	)		(235,133	)		111,617

Total		515,800		—		515,800		(169,050	)		(235,133	)		111,617

2021
Derivatives, Note 10(b)		793,361		—		793,361		(279,024	)		(174,790	)		339,547

Total		793,361		—		793,361		(279,024	)		(174,790	)		339,547

(g.2)

Financial liabilities subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, are presented below:


	Gross amounts of recognized financial liabilities		Gross amounts of recognized financial assets and offset in the consolidated statement of financial position		Net amounts of financial liabilities presented in the consolidated statement of financial position		Related amounts not offset in the consolidated statement of financial position						Net amount
	Gross amounts of recognized financial liabilities						Financial instruments (including non-cash guarantees)			Cash guarantees pledged (Note 4(d))			Net amount
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
2022
Derivatives, Note 10(b)		297,038		—		297,038		(169,050	)		(34,784	)		93,204

Total		297,038		—		297,038		(169,050	)		(34,784	)		93,204

2021
Derivatives, Note 10(b)		413,797		—		413,797		(279,024	)		(121,613	)		13,160

Total		413,797		—		413,797		(279,024	)		(121,613	)		13,160

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

30.2

Market risk management

Market risk is the possibility of loss due to variations in the financial market conditions. The main variations to which the Group is exposed to are exchange rates, interest rates and prices. Said variations can affect the value of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities.

During 2022, the volatility of interest rates in Soles remained high, but with downward tendency. Also, during the year 2022, interest rates in Soles increased significantly as result of the rise of both the benchmark rate of the BCRP and inflation. This affected the bond prices of the Trading Book, reaching minimum valuations during the third quarter and then recovering by the end of the year.

On the other side, the Banking Book was also affected by the changes in interest rates, especially by the increase of shorter-term rates, which boosted the growth of financial income to a larger extent than expenses, thus resulting in higher margins.

The Group separates its exposure to market risk into two blocks: (i) the one that arises from the fluctuation of the value of the trading investment portfolios, due to movements of market rates or prices (“Trading Book”) and; (ii) the one that arises from the changes in the structural positions (“Banking Book”) due to movements in interest rates, prices and exchange rates.

(a)

Trading Book -

To control and monitor the risks arising from the volatility of risk factors involved within each instrument, maximum exposure limits by currency, by type of investment and

Value-at-Risk

(“VaR”), which are controlled on a daily basis, have been established.

The main measurement technique used to measure and control market risk is VaR, which is a statistical measurement that quantifies the maximum loss expected for a period of time and a determined significance level under normal market conditions. The Group uses the VaR model for a period of one day, and a

99-percent

confidence level. VaR is calculated by risk factor: interest rate, price or exchange rate and by type of investment: derivatives, fixed income and variable income.

VaR models are designed to measure the market risk within a normal market environment. Since VaR is based mainly on historical data to provide information and does not clearly predict future changes and modifications in risk factors, the probability of big market movements may be underestimated. VaR can also be under or overestimated due to the hypotheses made on the risk factors and the relation among these factors with the specific instruments. To determine the reliability of VaR models, the actual results are regularly monitored to prove the validity of the assumptions and parameters used in the calculation of VaR.

The Group includes within the VaR calculation the potential loss that may arise from the exposure to exchange rate risk. This risk is included in the VaR calculation because the exchange position is the result of the spot position plus the position in derivative products. Likewise, the total VaR includes the diversification effect that arises as a result of the interaction of the various market risk factors to which the Group is exposed.

The validity of the VaR calculation is proven through back-testing, which uses historical data to ensure that the model adequately estimates the potential losses. Additionally, the sensitivity of risk factors is calculated, which shows the potential portfolio losses in the event of certain fluctuations in factors. Said fluctuations include: interest rate shocks, exchange rate shocks and price shocks.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The VaR results of the Group’s portfolio by type of asset are presented below:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Equity investments		41,083			54,769
Debt investments		5,088			1,704
Derivatives and/or exchange position		2,925			10,790
Diversification effect		(4,390	)		(1,876	)

Consolidated VaR by type of asset (*)		44,706			65,387

The Group’s VaR results by type of risk are the following:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Exchange rate risk		4,859			7,473
Interest rate risk		4,827			10,712
Price risk		39,359			55,381
Diversification effect		(4,339	)		(8,179	)

Consolidated VaR by type of risk (*)		44,706			65,387

(*)

The total VaR is lower than the sum of its components due to the benefits of risk diversification.

(b)

Banking Book -

The portfolios which are not for trading are exposed to different financial risks, since they are sensitive to movements of the market rates, which can result in a negative effect on the value of the assets compared to its liabilities and; therefore, on its net value.

(i)

Interest rate risk

Interest rates fluctuate permanently on the market. These fluctuations affect the Group in two ways: first, through the change in the valuation of assets and liabilities; and secondly, affecting the cash flows at repricing. The variation in the valuation of assets and liabilities is increasingly sensitive as the term at which the asset or liability is repriced is extended. This process consists in the assessment of repricing periods. On the other hand, cash flows are affected when the instruments reach maturity, when they are invested or placed at new interest rates effective in the market.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Repricing gap

An analysis of the repricing gaps is performed to determine the impact of the interest rates movements. Said analysis consists of assigning the balances of the operations that will change the interest rate into different time gaps. Based on this analysis, the impact of the variation in the valuation of assets and liabilities on each gap is calculated.

F-

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(i.1)

The following table summarizes the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk. The Group’s financial instruments are presented at book value (including interest accrued), classified by the repricing period of the contract’s interest rate or maturity date, whichever occurs first:


	As of December 31, 2022
	Up to 1 month			From 1 to 3 months			From 3 to 12 months			From 1 to 5 years			More than 5 years		Non-interest bearing			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		8,824,601			23,810			303,812			6,815			22,080		4,012,293			13,193,411
Inter-bank funds		296,119			—			—			—			—		—			296,119
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (debt and equity)		640,301			1,129,911			275,048			4,159,999			10,833,683		512,884			17,551,826
Investments at amortized cost		—			71,640			494,872			1,084,113			1,652,154		—			3,302,779
Loans, net (*)		4,596,996			5,750,591			10,366,009			18,886,533			6,443,838		(540,969	)		45,502,998
Other assets (**)		1,054,346			99,405			69,828			73,523			28,652		4,173,670			5,499,424

Total assets		15,412,363			7,075,357			11,509,569			24,210,983			18,980,407		8,157,878			85,346,557

Financial liabilities
Deposits and obligations		30,713,163			1,688,546			6,098,329			1,022,471			323,521		8,684,678			48,530,708
Due to banks and correspondents		606,091			1,239,640			1,072,666			3,023,988			1,158,261		—			7,100,646
Inter-bank funds		30,012			—			—			—			—		—			30,012
Bonds, notes and other obligations		2,532,625			3,614			233,891			4,895,031			241,142		—			7,906,303
Insurance contract liabilities		106,335			208,257			932,909			4,417,141			4,937,730		—			10,602,372
Other liabilities (***)		464,731			131,845			120,143			90,410			5,762		2,169,867			2,982,758
Equity		—			—			—			—			—		10,045,951			10,045,951

Total liabilities and equity		34,452,957			3,271,902			8,457,938			13,449,041			6,666,416		20,900,496			87,198,750

Off- balance sheet accounts
Derivatives held as assets		1,681,974			—			—			897,190			—		—			2,579,164
Derivatives held as liabilities		1,681,974			—			—			897,190			—		—			2,579,164

		—			—			—			—			—		—			—

Marginal gap		(19,040,594	)		3,803,455			3,051,631			10,761,942			12,313,991		(12,742,618	)		(1,852,193	)

Cumulative gap		(19,040,594	)		(15,237,139	)		(12,185,508	)		(1,423,566	)		10,890,425		(1,852,193	)		—

(*)	The balance presented in column “Non-interest bearing” corresponds mainly to accrued income from loans, past-due loans, loans under judicial collection and the provision for loan losses.

(**)	Includes investment property, property, furniture and equipment, net, banker’s acceptances, intangibles and goodwill, net, Other accounts receivable and other assets, net (except accounts receivable from derivative financial instruments held for trading), and deferred income tax assets, net.

(***)

Includes banks acceptances and other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities (except accounts payable for derivative financial instruments held for trading) and income tax liability.

Investments at fair value through profit or loss and derivatives held for trading are not considered because these instruments are part of the trading book and the methodology used for the measurement of their market risk is VaR.

F-

200

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	Up to 1 month			From 1 to 3 months			From 3 to 12 months			From 1 to 5 years		More than 5 years			Non-interest bearing			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks		11,898,425			1,025,641			188,458			60,522		—			3,931,419			17,104,465
Inter-bank funds		30,002			—			—			—		—			—			30,002
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (debt and equity)		714,470			1,037,091			334,042			4,339,422		11,496,250			623,718			18,544,993
Investments at amortized cost		—			70,856			—			1,600,220		1,624,954			—			3,296,030
Loans, net (*)		3,056,324			6,033,992			10,498,942			18,122,112		5,751,670			(457,457	)		43,005,583
Other assets (**)		202,455			138,208			67,572			497,774		245			4,045,772			4,952,026

Total assets		15,901,676			8,305,788			11,089,014			24,620,050		18,873,119			8,143,452			86,933,099

Financial liabilities
Deposits and obligations		33,250,863			2,205,564			3,540,717			369,270		261,275			9,270,255			48,897,944
Due to banks and correspondents		587,776			685,191			1,795,332			4,488,578		965,972			—			8,522,849
Bonds, notes and other obligations		213,362			27,690			165,171			6,546,370		1,437,079			—			8,389,672
Insurance contract liabilities		93,427			183,175			810,746			3,752,061		7,118,649			—			11,958,058
Other liabilities (***)		114,629			131,645			92,945			108,032		14,159			1,754,817			2,216,227
Equity		—			—			—			—		—			9,555,362			9,555,362

Total liabilities and equity, net		34,260,057			3,233,265			6,404,911			15,264,311		9,797,134			20,580,434			89,540,112

Off- balance sheet accounts
Derivatives held as assets		—			—			—			1,758,267		—			599,700			2,357,967
Derivatives held as liabilities		—			—			—			1,758,267		599,700			—			2,357,967

		—			—			—			—		(599,700	)		599,700			—

Marginal gap		(18,358,381	)		5,072,523			4,684,103			9,355,739		8,476,285			(11,837,282	)		(2,607,013	)

Cumulative gap		(18,358,381	)		(13,285,858	)		(8,601,755	)		753,984		9,230,269			(2,607,013	)		—

(*)	The balance presented in column “Non-interest bearing” corresponds mainly to accrued income from loans, past-due loans, loans under judicial collection and the provision for loan losses.

(**)	Includes investment property, property, furniture and equipment, net, banker’s acceptances, intangibles and goodwill, net, Other accounts receivable and other assets, net (except accounts receivable from derivative financial instruments held for trading), and deferred income tax assets, net.

(***)

Includes banks acceptances and other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities (except accounts payable for derivative financial instruments held for trading).

F-

201

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(i.2)

Sensitivity to changes in interest rates -

The exposure to the interest rate is supervised by the GIR Committee and the ALCO Committee. The GIR Committee approves the various limits applicable to the financial instruments’ management. The ALCO Committee analyzes and monitors the results of the asset and liability management strategies and decisions implemented. Likewise, it defines the strategies and analyzes the sources of financing, as well as the coverage of the balance executed by the Bank. In particular, the latter could be considered to cover the exposure due to the variation in cash flows attributed to changes in variable market rates, to fix the cost of funds considering the global context of future movement of rates in the currencies under evaluation, to transform the cost of funds from foreign currency to the functional currency, among other casuistic as reviewed and approved by the Committee, considering the risk limits.

In this regard, the effect of movements in interest rates is analyzed based on the Regulatory Model and takes into account: (i) the financial margin for the next 12 months or Earning at Risk (EaR) and (ii) the Equity Value at Risk (EVaR), as detailed below:

•

Earning at Risk indicator, calculated as a percentage of the Regulatory Capital, the legal limit of 5 percent and an early warning of 4 percent are set.

•

Value at Risk indicator, calculated as a percentage of the effective equity, establishes the internal limit of 15 percent and an early warning of 13 percent.

Thus, interest rate risk is managed and supervised by monitoring the aforementioned indicators, which allows Management to assess the potential effect of interest rates movements on the Group’s financial margin and thus manage the terms and the fixed and/or variable yields generated by the financial instruments held by the Group, including strategies on the derivative financial instruments designated as hedge accounting.

For its part, the GIR Committee oversees the approval levels of structural interest-rate risk capacity and appetite, which are detailed in the Bank’s Risk Appetite Framework.

In the case of Interseguro and Inteligo Bank, their Boards establish limits, which are controlled by their respective Investment Risk Unit. Izipay’s Management considers that the risk is not significant because its interest rates do not differ significantly from the market.

F-20

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The table below presents the sensitivity to a possible change in interest rates, with all other variables kept constant, in the consolidated statement of income and in the consolidated statement of changes in equity, before Income Tax and

non-controlling

interest.

As of December 31, 2022

Currency

Changes in basis
points

Sensitivity

of net income

Sensitivity of other net
comprehensive income

S/(000)

US Dollar

+/-25

+/-

9,381

+/-

108,457

US Dollar

+/-50

+/-

18,762

+/-

217,095

US Dollar

+/-75

+/-

28,143

+/-

326,095

US Dollar

+/-100

+/-

37,524

+/-

435,640

Sol

+/-50

-/+

40,539

-/+

388,047

Sol

+/-75

-/+

60,809

-/+

582,844

Sol

+/-100

-/+

81,079

-/+

778,196

Sol

+/-150

-/+

121,618

-/+

1,171,915

As of December 31, 2021

Currency

Changes in basis
points

Sensitivity

of net income

Sensitivity of other net
comprehensive income

S/(000)

US Dollar

+/-25

+/-

10,091

+/-

149,172

US Dollar

+/-50

+/-

20,182

+/-

298,698

US Dollar

+/-75

+/-

30,274

+/-

448,883

US Dollar

+/-100

+/-

40,365

+/-

600,165

Sol

+/-50

-/+

20,858

-/+

363,643

Sol

+/-75

-/+

31,287

-/+

546,431

Sol

+/-100

-/+

41,716

-/+

729,860

Sol

+/-150

-/+

62,574

-/+

1,100,408

The interest rate sensitivities shown in the tables above are only illustrative and are based on simplified scenarios. The figures represent the effect of the

pro-forma

movements in the net interest income based on the projected scenarios yield curve and the Group’s current interest rate risk profile. However, this effect, does not include actions that would be taken by Management to mitigate the impact of this interest rate risk. In addition, the Group seeks proactively to change the interest rate risk profile to minimize losses and optimize net revenues. The above projections also assume that interest rate of all maturities move by the same amount and, therefore, do not reflect the potential impact on net interest income of some rates changing while others remain unchanged. The projections also include assumptions to facilitate calculations, such as that all positions are held to maturity.

F-20

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(i.3)

Sensitivity to price variation -

Shares classified as investments at fair value through other comprehensive income, for the years 2022 and 2021, are not considered as part of the investments for interest rate sensitivity calculation purposes. However, a calculation of sensitivity in market prices and the effect on expected unrealized gain or loss in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income, before Income Tax and

non-controlling

interest, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, is presented below:


	Changes in market price		2022		2021
	%		S/(000)		S/(000)
Sensitivity to market price
Shares		+/-10		51,288		62,372
Shares		+/-25		128,221		155,930
Shares		+/-30		153,865		187,115

F-20

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

(ii)

Foreign exchange risk

The Group is exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates of the foreign currency prevailing in its financial position and cash flows. Management sets limits on the levels of exposure by currency and total daily and overnight positions, which are monitored daily. Most of the assets and liabilities in foreign currency are stated in US Dollars. Transactions in foreign currency are made at the exchange rates of free market.

As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average exchange rate of free market published by the SBS for transactions in US Dollars was S/3.808 per US$1 bid and S/3.820 per US$1 ask (S/3.975 and S/3.998 as of December 31, 2021, respectively). As of December 31, 2022, the exchange rate for the accounting of asset and liability accounts in foreign currency set by the SBS was S/3.814 per US$1 (S/3.987 as of December 31, 2021).

The table below presents the detail of the Group’s position:


	As of December 31, 2022
	US Dollars			Soles			Other currencies			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Assets
Cash and due from banks		10,205,093			2,404,942			583,376			13,193,411
Inter-bank funds		—			296,119			—			296,119
Financial investments		6,860,558			15,884,533			42,507			22,787,598
Loans, net		13,507,125			31,995,873			—			45,502,998
Due from customers on acceptances		45,809			—			—			45,809
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		306,949			1,162,826			388			1,470,163

		30,925,534			51,744,293			626,271			83,296,098

Liabilities
Deposits and obligations		19,187,300			28,843,457			499,951			48,530,708
Inter-bank funds		—			30,012			—			30,012
Due to banks and correspondents		645,706			6,454,940			—			7,100,646
Bonds, notes and other obligations		7,257,098			649,205			—			7,906,303
Due from customers on acceptances		45,809			—			—			45,809
Insurance contract liabilities		3,666,074			6,936,298			—			10,602,372
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		1,231,698			1,607,541			859			2,840,098

		32,033,685			44,521,453			500,810			77,055,948

Forwards position, net		(1,993,217	)		2,074,784			(81,567	)		—
Currency swaps position, net		1,384,495			(1,384,495	)		—			—
Cross currency swaps position, net		2,354,679			(2,354,679	)		—			—
Options position, net		(172	)		172			—			—

Monetary position, net		637,634			5,558,622			43,894			6,240,150

F-20

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	US Dollars			Soles			Other currencies			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Assets
Cash and due from banks		10,415,166			6,062,879			626,420			17,104,465
Inter-bank funds		—			30,002			—			30,002
Financial investments		8,709,754			15,708,023			129,517			24,547,294
Loans, net		12,086,570			30,919,013			—			43,005,583
Due from customers on acceptances		152,423			—			—			152,423
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		222,795			1,199,349			689			1,422,833

		31,586,708			53,919,266			756,626			86,262,600

Liabilities
Deposits and obligations		20,003,314			28,382,727			511,903			48,897,944
Due to banks and correspondents		757,039			7,765,810			—			8,522,849
Bonds, notes and other obligations		7,616,634			773,038			—			8,389,672
Due from customers on acceptances		152,423			—			—			152,423
Insurance contract liabilities		5,241,284			6,716,774			—			11,958,058
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		523,281			1,753,975			1,621			2,278,877

		34,293,975			45,392,324			513,524			80,199,823

Forwards position, net		(378,778	)		464,885			(86,107	)		—
Currency swaps position, net		2,171,025			(2,171,025	)		—			—
Cross currency swaps position, net		2,123,300			(2,123,300	)		—			—
Options position, net		(3	)		3			—			—

Monetary position, net		1,208,277			4,697,505			156,995			6,062,777

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

As of December 31, 2022, the Group granted indirect loans (contingent operations) in foreign currency for approximately US$614,405,000, equivalent to S/2,343,341,000 (US$651,240,000, equivalent to S/2,596,494,000 as of December 31, 2021); see Note 18.

The Group manages the exchange rate risk through the matching of its active and passive operations, supervising its global exchange position daily. The global exchange position of the Group is equivalent to long positions minus short positions in currencies other than the Sol. The global exchange position includes balance positions (spot) and the positions in derivatives, including the positions of derivatives that have been designated as accounting hedges with the purpose of covering the exposure due to the variation of the exchange rate; see Note10(b). Any depreciation/appreciation of the foreign currency would affect the consolidated statement of income. An imbalance in the monetary position would make the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position vulnerable to the fluctuation of the foreign currency (exchange rate “shock”).

The table be

ow shows the analysis of variations of the US Dollar, the main foreign currency to which the Group has exposure as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The analysis determines the effect of a reasonably possible variation of the exchange rate US Dollar to the Sol, considering all the other variables constant in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income before Income Tax. A negative amount shows a potential net reduction in the consolidated statement of income, while a positive amount reflects a net potential increase:


Sensitivity analysis	Changes in currency rates	2022			2021
	%	S/(000)			S/(000)
Devaluation
US Dollar	5		(19,746	)		(42,218	)
US Dollar	10		(39,492	)		(84,437	)
US Dollar	15		(59,237	)		(126,655	)
Revaluation
US Dollar	5		19,746			42,218
US Dollar	10		39,492			84,437
US Dollar	15		59,237			126,655

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

30.3

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk consists in the Group’s inability to comply with the maturity of its obligations, thus incurring in losses that significantly affect its equity position. This risk may arise as a result of various events such as: the unexpected decrease of funding sources, the inability to rapidly settle assets, among others.

The Group has a set of indicators that are controlled and reported daily, which establish the minimum liquidity levels allowed for the short-term and reflect several risk aspects such as: concentration, stability, position by currency, main depositors, etc.

Likewise, the Group assesses medium-term and long-term liquidity through a structural analysis of its funds inflows and outflows in different maturity terms. This process allows to know, for each currency, the various funding sources, how liquidity needs increase and which terms are mismatched. Both for assets and liabilities, assumptions are considered for the operations that do not have determined maturity dates, such as revolving loans, savings and similar ones, as well as contingent liabilities, such as

non-used

letters of credit or lines of credit. Based on this information, the necessary decisions to maintain target liquidity levels are made.

In the case of Interbank, liquidity is managed by the Vice-Presidency of Capital Markets, which chairs the ALCO Committee, in which positions, movements, indicators and limits on liquidity management are presented. Liquidity risk is supervised by the GIR Committee, defining the risk level that Interbank is willing to take and the corresponding indicators, limits and controls are reviewed. The Market Risk Division is in charge of tracking said indicators. Interbank takes short-term deposits and transforms them into longer-term loans. Therefore, its exposure to liquidity risk increases. Interbank maintains a set of deposits that are historically renewed or maintained, and represent a stable funding source.

In the case of Interseguro, it is exposed to requirements other than their cash resources, mainly claims resulting from their short-term insurance contracts. The Board of Directors of the company establishes limits on the minimum proportion of the maturity funds available to meet these requirements and in a minimum level of lines of credit that must be available to cover claims at unexpected claim levels.

Regarding

long-term insurance contracts, considering the types of products offered and the long-term contractual relationship with clients (the liquidity risk is not material) the emphasis is on sufficient availability of flow of assets, and the term matching of the latter with the liability obligations (mathematical technical reserves), for which there are sufficiency and adequacy indicators.

In the case of Inteligo Bank, the Board of Directors has established liquidity levels as to the minimum amount of available funds required to meet such requirements and the minimum level of inter-banking facilities and other loan mechanisms that should exist to cover unexpected withdrawals. Inteligo Bank holds a short-term asset portfolio comprised of loans and investments to ensure sufficient liquidity.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The following table presents the Group’s undiscounted cash flows payable according to contractual terms agreed (including the payment of future interest):


	As of December 31, 2022
	Up to 1 month			From 1 to 3 months			From 3 to 12 months			From 1 to 5 years			Over 5 years			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Financial liabilities by type -
Deposits and obligations		36,674,487			1,842,392			6,642,702			1,523,454			2,392,309			49,075,344
Inter-bank funds		30,012			—			—			—			—			30,012
Due to banks and correspondents		693,550			785,085			2,040,127			2,983,773			1,591,843			8,094,378
Bonds, notes and other obligations		2,059,807			1,155			380,495			5,726,366			435,141			8,602,964
Due from customers on acceptances		18,909			4,854			22,046			—			—			45,809
Insurance contract liabilities		106,399			208,257			932,909			4,417,141			18,196,813			23,861,519
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		1,356,478			204,843			46,535			1,976			933,228			2,543,060

Total non-derivative liabilities		40,939,642			3,046,586			10,064,814			14,652,710			23,549,334			92,253,086

Derivatives held for trading (*) -
Contractual amounts receivable (inflow)		583,440			711,292			2,059,478			841,875			344,267			4,540,352
Contractual amounts payable (outflow)		604,526			568,112			2,051,065			1,041,851			354,758			4,620,312

Total		(21,086	)		143,180			8,413			(199,976	)		(10,491	)		(79,960	)

Derivatives held as hedge (**) -
Contractual amounts receivable (inflow)		1,712,865			3,289			13,772			432,103			—			2,162,029
Contractual amounts payable (outflow)		1,479,047			5,038			28,784			406,806			—			1,919,675

Total		233,818			(1,749	)		(15,012	)		25,297			—			242,354

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2021
	Up to 1 month			From 1 to 3 months			From 3 to 12 months			From 1 to 5 years			Over 5 years			Total
	S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Financial liabilities by type -
Deposits and obligations		39,298,408			2,286,838			3,555,643			1,251,449			2,723,645			49,115,983
Inter-bank funds		—			—			—			—			—			—
Due to banks and correspondents		732,010			431,352			2,649,853			4,373,597			1,233,202			9,420,014
Bonds, notes and other obligations		72,423			43,626			378,421			7,322,864			1,678,191			9,495,525
Due from customers on acceptances		56,903			68,083			27,437			—			—			152,423
Insurance contract liabilities		96,757			189,835			840,717			3,752,862			16,407,482			21,287,653
Other accounts payable, provisions and other liabilities		543,673			244,249			104,420			96,525			876,213			1,865,080

Total non-derivative liabilities		40,800,174			3,263,983			7,556,491			16,797,297			22,918,733			91,336,678

Derivatives held for trading (*) -
Contractual amounts receivable (inflow)		938,973			926,361			1,782,384			1,874,161			289,991			5,811,870
Contractual amounts payable (outflow)		848,334			999,058			1,727,425			2,093,959			302,650			5,971,426

Total		90,639			(72,697	)		54,959			(219,798	)		(12,659	)		(159,556	)

Derivatives held as hedge (**) -
Contractual amounts receivable (inflow)		29,634			—			29,670			1,787,938			113,850			1,961,092
Contractual amounts payable (outflow)		35,742			—			46,619			1,520,104			11,407			1,613,872

Total		(6,108	)		—			(16,949	)		267,834			102,443			347,220

(*)	It includes contracts whose future flows agreed to be exchanged are settled on a net basis (non-delivery) and a gross basis (full-delivery).

(**)	It only includes contracts whose future flows agreed to be exchanged are settled on a net basis (non-delivery)

The table below shows maturity, by contractual term, of the contingent credits (indirect loans) granted by the Group as of the dates of the consolidated statement of financial position:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Contingent credits (indirect loans)
Up to 1 month		686,403		974,601
From 1 to 3 months		1,358,990		1,242,858
From 3 to 12 months		2,054,523		2,056,381
From 1 to 5 years		387,431		166,618
Over 5 years		—		—

Total		4,487,347		4,440,458

The Group estimates that not all of the contingent loans (indirect) or commitments will be used before the maturity date of the commitments.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The following table shows the changes in liabilities arising from financing activities according to IAS 7:


	2022
	Balance as of January 1		Dividends payable		Cash flow			Effect of variation in exchange rate			Others			Balance as of December 31
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)			S/(000)
Inter-bank funds		—		—		30,482			(470	)		—			30,012
Bonds, notes and other obligations		8,389,672		—		(137,900	)		(385,850	)		40,381			7,906,303
Lease liability related to right-of-use assets		234,946		—		(62,320	)		(2,948	)		(57,097	)		112,581
Dividends payable		1,219		756,041		(755,706	)		—			(93	)		1,461

Total liabilities for financing activities		8,625,837		756,041		(925,444	)		(389,268	)		(16,809	)		8,050,357


	2021
	Balance as of January 1		Dividends payable		Cash flow			Effect of movement in exchange rate		Others			Balance as of December 31
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)		S/(000)			S/(000)
Inter-bank funds		28,971		—		(30,945	)		1,974		—			—
Bonds, notes and other obligations		7,778,751		—		(91,000	)		713,744		(11,823	)		8,389,672
Lease liability related to right-of-use assets		269,755		—		(66,646	)		7,438		24,399			234,946
Dividends payable		921		634,181		(633,883	)		—		—			1,219

Total liabilities for financing activities		8,078,398		634,181		(822,474	)		723,156		12,576			8,625,837

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

30.4

Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from systems failure, human error, fraud or external events. When internal controls fail, operational risks can cause damage to reputation, have legal or regulatory implications, or lead to financial loss. The Group cannot expect to eliminate all operational risks, but through a control framework and by monitoring and responding to potential risks, the Group is able to manage these risks. Controls include mainly the segregation of duties, accesses, authorization and reconciliation procedures, staff training and assessment processes, including the review by Internal Audit.

Management has focused its attention on the implementation of a series of measures aimed to ensure the Group’s workers an optimal environment of information technology systems and cybersecurity systems for the execution of their operations within a mixed labor environment (home or office).

30.5

Insurance risk management

The risk under an insurance contract, in any of its various forms, is the possibility that the insured event occurs and; therefore, uncertainty is realized in the amount of the resulting claim. Given the nature of the insurance contract, this risk is aleatory and; therefore, unpredictable.

Regarding a portfolio of insurance contracts where the theory of large numbers and probabilities for pricing and provisions is applied, the main risk faced by the insurance business of the Group, managed by Interseguro, is that claims and/or payments of benefits covered by the policies exceed the book value of insurance liabilities. This could happen to the extent that the frequency and/or severity of claims and benefits are higher than estimated. The factors that are considered to perform the assessment of insurance risks are the following:

•

Frequency and severity of claims;

•

Sources of uncertainty in the calculation of payment of future claims;

•

Mortality tables for different coverage plans in the life insurance segment;

•

Changes in market rates of investments that directly affect the discount rates to calculate mathematical reserves; and

•

Specific requirements established by the SBS according to insurance plans.

On the other hand, Interseguro has signed contracts of automatic reinsurance coverage mainly in credit life, retirement and life insurances that protect it from losses due to frequency and severity. The objective of this reinsurance negotiation is that the total net insurance losses do not affect the equity and liquidity of Interseguro. Interseguro’s policy is to sign contracts with companies with international rating determined by SBS rules. Annuities contracts do not have reinsurance coverage.

(a)

Life insurance contracts -

Interseguro has developed its insurance underwriting strategy to diversify the type of insurance risks accepted. Factors that aggravate the insurance risk include lack of risk diversification in terms of type and amount of risk and geographic location. The underwriting strategy aims to ensure that underwriting risks are well diversified in terms of type and amount of risk. Underwriting limits serve to implement the selection criteria for appropriate risk. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, most of the insurance contracts entered into by Interseguro are located in the city of Lima.

F-21

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

The sufficiency of reserves is a principle of insurance management. Technical reserves for claims and premiums are estimated by Interseguro’s actuaries and reviewed by independent experts when deemed necessary.

Interseguro’s Management constantly monitors trends in claims, which allows it to perform estimates of claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) that are supported by recent information.

On the other hand, Interseguro is exposed to the risk that mortality and morbidity rates associated with customers do not reflect the actual mortality and morbidity and may cause the premium calculated for the coverage offered to be insufficient to cover claims. For this reason, Interseguro performs a careful risk selection or underwriting when issuing policies, because by doing so it can classify the degree of risk presented by a proposed insured, analyzing characteristics such as gender, smoking condition, health condition, among others.

In the particular case of annuities, the risk assumed by Interseguro is that the real life expectancy of the insured population is greater than that estimated when determining income, which would mean a deficit of reserves to comply with the payment of pensions.

On the other hand, insurance products do not have particularly relevant terms or clauses that could have a significant impact or represent significant uncertainties over Interseguro’s cash flows.

(b)

Real estate risk management -

Real estate risk is defined as the possibility of losses due to changes or volatility of market prices of properties; see Note 7. Investment properties are held by Interseguro to manage its long term inflows and match its technical reserves. SBS Resolution No. 2840-2012, dated May 11, 2012, “Regulations on Real Estate Risk Management in Insurance Companies”, requires that insurance companies adequately identify, measure, control and report the real estate risk level they are exposed to.

Additionally, Interseguro has identified the following risks associated with its real estate portfolios:

•

The cost to develop a project may increase if there are delays in the planning process; however, Interseguro receives services from advisors to reduce the risks that may arise in the planning process.

•

A major lessee may become insolvent thus causing a significant loss in rental income and a reduction in the value of the associated property. To reduce this risk, Interseguro reviews the financial position of all prospective lessees and decides on the appropriate level of safety required, such as lease deposits or guarantees.

•

The fair values of the investment property could be affected by the cash flows generated by the tenants and/or lessees, as well as by the economic conditions of Peru and future expectations.

F-21

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial s

tate

ments (continued)

30.6

Capital management

The Group manages in an active manner a capital base to cover the risks inherent to its activities. Capital adequacy of the Group is monitored by using regulations and ratios established by the different regulators. See Note 16(f).

F-21

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

31.	Fair value

(a)

Financial instruments measured at their fair value and fair value hierarchy

The following table presents an analysis of the financial instruments that are measured at their fair value, including the level of hierarchy of fair value. The amounts are based on the balances presented in the consolidated statement of financial position:


	As of December 31, 2022
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Financial assets
Financial investments
At fair value through profit or loss (*)		428,739		564,559		939,695		1,932,993
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		9,946,427		6,770,090		—		16,716,517
Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		464,556		10,188		38,140		512,884
Derivatives receivable		—		515,800		—		515,800

		10,839,722		7,860,637		977,835		19,678,194

Accrued interest								322,425

Total financial assets								20,000,619

Financial liabilities
Derivatives payable		—		297,038		—		297,038

(*)	As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, correspond mainly to participations in mutual funds and investment funds.


	As of December 31, 2021
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Financial assets
Financial investments
At fair value through profit or loss (*)		978,978		633,400		1,093,893		2,706,271
Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		11,194,459		6,435,328		—		17,629,787
Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income		556,162		27,686		39,870		623,718
Derivatives receivable		—		793,361		—		793,361

		12,729,599		7,889,775		1,133,763		21,753,137

Accrued interest								291,488

Total financial assets								22,044,625

Financial liabilities
Derivatives payable		—		413,797		—		413,797

(*)	As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, correspond mainly to participations in mutual funds and investment funds.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

Financial assets included in Level 1 are those measured on the basis of information that is available on the market, to the extent that their quoted prices reflect an active and liquid market and that are available in some centralized trading mechanism, trading agent, price supplier or regulatory entity.

Financial instruments included in Level 2 are valued based on the market prices of other instruments with similar characteristics or with financial valuation models based on information of variables observable in the market (interest rate curves, price vectors, etc.).

Financial assets included in Level 3 are valued by using assumptions and data that do not correspond to prices of operations traded on the market. The valuation requires Management to make certain assumptions about the model variables and data, including the forecast of cash flow, discount rate, credit risk and volatility.

During the

years

2022 and 2021, there were no transfers of financial instruments to or from level 3 to level 1 or level 2.

The table below presents a description of significant unobservable data used in valuation:


	Valuation technique	Significant unobservable inputs	Valuation		Sensitivity of inputs to fair value
			2022	2021
Listed shares	Net asset value	NAV	—	203.53	10 percent increase (decrease) in the NAVs would result in increase (decrease) in fair value by S/11,199,000 as of December 31, 2021.

Private Equity Stocks	Net asset value	NAV	Depends on each investment	Depends on each investment	10 percent increase (decrease) in the NAVs would result in increase (decrease) in fair value by S/7,022,000 as of December 31, 2022 and S/7,300,000 as of December 31, 2021.

Private equity funds	Net asset value	NAV	Depends on each investment	Depends on each investment	10 percent increase (decrease) in the NAVs would result in increase (decrease) in fair value by S/86,944,000 as of December 31, 2022 and S/90,633,000 as of December 31, 2021.

Listed shares	Equity method	—	According to price risk	According to price risk	5 percent increase (decrease) of the price would result in increase in fair value of S/1,907,000 as of December 31, 2022 and S/1,994,000 as of December 31, 2021.

The table below includes a reconciliation of fair value measurement of financial instruments classified by the Group within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:


	2022			2021
	S/(000)			S/(000)
Initial balance as of January 1		1,133,763			514,922
Purchases		180,344			629,543
Sales		(280,297	)		(237,870	)
(Loss) gain recognized on the consolidated statement of income		(55,975	)		227,168

Balance as of December 31		977,835			1,133,763

(b)

Financial instruments not measured at their fair value -

The table below presents the disclosure of the comparison between the carrying amounts and fair values of the Group’s financial instruments that are not measured at their fair value, presented by level of fair value hierarchy:

F-21

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)


	As of December 31, 2022										As of December 31, 2021
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value		Book value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value		Book value
	S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)		S/(000)
Assets
Cash and due from banks		—		13,193,411		—		13,193,411		13,193,411		—		17,104,465		—		17,104,465		17,104,465
Inter-bank funds		—		296,119		—		296,119		296,119		—		30,002		—		30,002		30,002
Investments at amortized cost		2,949,507		—		—		2,949,507		3,302,779		3,181,392		—		—		3,181,392		3,296,030
Loans, net		—		42,932,260		—		42,932,260		45,502,998		—		42,892,599		—		42,892,599		43,005,583
Due from customers on acceptances		—		45,809		—		45,809		45,809		—		152,423		—		152,423		152,423
Other accounts receivable and other assets, net		—		954,363		—		954,363		954,363		—		629,472		—		629,472		629,472
Total		2,949,507		57,421,962		—		60,371,469		63,295,479		3,181,392		60,808,961		—		63,990,353		64,217,975
Liabilities
Deposits and obligations		—		48,464,095		—		48,464,095		48,530,708		—		48,914,408		—		48,914,408		48,897,944
Inter-bank funds				30,012		—		30,012		30,012		—		—		—		—		—
Due to banks and correspondents		—		6,859,664		—		6,859,664		7,100,646		—		8,274,484		—		8,274,484		8,522,849
Bonds, notes and other obligations		6,447,282		990,545		—		7,437,827		7,906,303		7,286,082		1,202,219		—		8,488,301		8,389,672
Due from customers on acceptances		—		45,809		—		45,809		45,809		—		152,423		—		152,423		152,423
Insurance contract liabilities		—		10,602,372		—		10,602,372		10,602,372		—		11,958,058		—		11,958,058		11,958,058
Other accounts payable and other liabilities		—		2,543,060		—		2,543,060		2,543,060		—		1,865,080		—		1,865,080		1,865,080

Total		6,447,282		69,535,557		—		75,982,839		76,758,910		7,286,082		72,366,672		—		79,652,754		79,786,026

The methodologies and assumptions used to determine fair values depend on the terms and risk characteristics of each financial instrument and they include the following:

(i)

Long-term fixed-rate and variable-rate loans are assessed by the Group based on parameters such as interest rates, specific country risk factors, individual creditworthiness of the customer and the risk characteristics of the financed project. Based on this evaluation, allowances are taken into account for the estimated losses of these loans. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the book value of loans, net of allowances, was not significantly different from the calculated fair values.

(ii)

Instruments whose fair value approximates their book value: For financial assets and financial liabilities that are liquid or have short-term maturity (less than 3 months) it is assumed that the carrying amounts approximate to their fair values. This assumption is also applied to demand deposits, savings accounts without a specific maturity and variable-rate financial instruments.

(iii)

Fixed-rate financial instruments: The fair value of fixed-rate financial assets and financial liabilities at amortized cost is determined by comparing market interest rates when they were first recognized with current market rates related to similar financial instruments for their remaining term to maturity. The fair value of fixed interest rate deposits is based on discounted cash flows using market interest rates for financial instruments with similar credit risk and maturity. For quoted debt issued, the fair value is determined based on quoted market prices. When quotations are not available, a discounted cash flow model is used based on the yield curve of the appropriate interest rate for the remaining term to maturity.

F-2

Table of Contents

Notes to the consolidated financial statements (continued)

32.	Fiduciary activities and management of funds

The Group provides custody, trustee, investment management and advisory services to third parties; therefore, the Group makes purchase and sale decisions in relation to a wide range of financial instruments. Assets that are held as trust are not included in the consolidated financial statements. These services give rise to the risk that the Group could eventually be held responsible of poor yielding of the assets under its management.

As of December 31, 2022 an

d 20

21, the value of the managed

off-balance

sheet financial assets is as follows:


	2022		2021
	S/(000)		S/(000)
Investment funds		16,821,566		18,669,786
Mutual funds		4,495,832		4,310,914

Total		21,317,398		22,980,700

33.	Events after th e r eporting period

On March 31, 2023, IFS’s shareholders have approved the creation of a Share Repurchase Program for an amount of up to US$100,000,000 of

IFS’ common shares, which is expected to continue until terminated by the Board of Directors. The share repurchase program may be carried out simultaneously in the Lima Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in one or several dates, at market prices.

F-2