Kuke Music Holding Ltd [KUKE] Filings

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from               to               

OR

☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number: 001-39859

Kuke Music Holding Limited

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Cayman Islands 

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Building 96 

4 San Jian Fang South Block 

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100024 

People’s Republic of China 

(Address of principal executive offices)

He Yu, Chief Executive Officer

+86-010-6561 0392 

Building 96 

4 San Jian Fang South Block 

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100024 

People’s Republic of China 

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

As of December 31, 2023, there were 24,970,625 Class A ordinary shares outstanding, par value US$0.001.  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ 

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registration has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. ☐ Yes ☐ No

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires in this annual report on Form 20-F: 

This annual report contains translations between Renminbi and U.S. dollars solely for the convenience of the reader. The translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to Renminbi in this annual report were made at a rate of RMB 7.0999 to US$1.00, the exchange rate set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board on December 29, 2023.   We make no representation that the Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of current or historical facts are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors”, that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “may,” “might,” “would,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “likely to” or other similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements include, but not limited to, statements about:

You should read this annual report and the documents that we refer to in this annual report thoroughly with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from and worse than what we expect. Important risks and factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from our expectations are generally set forth in “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” and other sections in this annual report. You should read thoroughly this annual report and the documents that we refer to with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from and worse than what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

This annual report also contains statistical data and estimates that we obtained from industry publications and reports generated by government or third-party providers of market intelligence. Although we have not independently verified the data, we believe that the publications and reports are reliable. However, the statistical data and estimates in these publications and reports are based on a number of assumptions and if any one or more of the assumptions underlying the market data are later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based on these assumptions. In addition, due to the rapidly evolving nature of the industry in which we operate, projections or estimates about our business and financial prospects involve significant risks and uncertainties.

The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this annual report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this annual report and the documents that we refer to in this annual report and exhibits to this annual report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

PART I

ITEM 1 IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS 

Not applicable.

ITEM 2 OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE 

Not applicable.

ITEM 3 KEY INFORMATION 

Our Holding Company Structure and Contractual Arrangements with The VIEs and Their Respective Shareholders

Kuke Music Holding Limited, our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company and the entity in which investors are purchasing their interest, is not a Chinese operating company and does not have any substantive operations. We carry out our value-added telecommunications business, internet audio-video program services and certain other businesses in China through our subsidiaries, the VIEs, and their subsidiaries. We do not have substantive business operations in Hong Kong. We, through our WFOEs, entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders. Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any equity interests in the VIEs. The VIE structure is used to provide investors with exposure to foreign investment in China-based companies where the PRC laws restrict direct foreign investment in the operating companies. However, our contractual arrangements with the VIEs are not equivalent of an investment in the VIEs. The VIE structure involves unique risks to investors in our securities. Investors in our securities are purchasing equity securities of our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company, rather than equity securities of the VIEs, and investors in our securities may never hold equity interests in the VIEs. Our contractual agreements may not be equivalent to, and are not as effective as, direct ownership in the VIEs. The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure, including the names, places of incorporation and the proportion of ownership interests in our subsidiaries and VIEs, as of the date of this annual report.

Contractual Arrangements with the VIEs

Current PRC laws and regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services, internet audio-video program services and certain other businesses. We are a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Kuke International and Beijing Lecheng, our PRC subsidiaries, are considered foreign-invested enterprises. To comply with the foregoing PRC laws and regulations, we currently conduct our business in the PRC mainly through the VIEs based on a series of contractual arrangements. These contractual arrangements enable us to receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs and have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests and assets in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. As a result of our direct ownership in the WFOEs and the contractual arrangements with the VIEs, we are able to receive the economic benefits of the VIEs, be the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes and consolidate the financial results of the VIEs in our consolidated financial statements, to the extent that we have satisfied the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the IFRS. The following is a summary of the currently effective contractual arrangements by and among each of our WFOEs, each of the VIEs and their respective shareholders.

Powers of Attorney. Pursuant to the power of attorney entered into among Kuke International, Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders, the shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music unconditionally and irrevocably appointed Kuke International or any person designated by Kuke International to act as their attorney-in-fact to exercise all of their rights as shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music, including, but not limited to, the right to propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings, to execute meeting minutes and resolutions, to exercise voting rights on all matters that need to be discussed and resolved in shareholders’ meetings, to dispose of the assets of Beijing Kuke Music, to resolve to dissolve and liquidate Beijing Kuke Music, to decide to transfer or otherwise dispose of the shares held by the shareholders in Beijing Kuke Music and to exercise all other shareholders’ rights stipulated by PRC laws and regulations and the articles of association of Beijing Kuke Music. The shareholders’ power of attorney will remain effective until terminated by Kuke International in writing or the equity interest in or all the assets of Beijing Kuke Music have been transferred to Kuke International or any person designated by Kuke International.

Beijing Lecheng, BMF Culture and its shareholders have also entered into a power of attorney regarding the exercise of all the shareholders’ rights of the shareholders of BMF Culture, the terms of which are substantially similar to the power of attorney described above.

Equity Interest Pledge Agreements. Pursuant to the equity interest pledge agreement entered into among Kuke International, Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders, the shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music have pledged all of their respective equity interest in Beijing Kuke Music to guarantee the performance of the obligations by, and the representations, undertakings, and warranties provided by, Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders under the exclusive consulting service agreement, exclusive intellectual property rights licensing agreement, exclusive option agreement and power of attorney (together with the equity interest pledge agreement, the “Cooperation Agreements”). In the event of a breach by Beijing Kuke Music or any of its shareholders of contractual obligations under the Cooperation Agreements, Kuke International, as pledgee, will have the right to dispose of the pledged equity interests in Beijing Kuke Music and will have priority in receiving the proceeds from such disposal. Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders also undertake that, without the prior written consent of Kuke International, the shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music will not create or allow any encumbrance on the pledged equity interests. As of the date of this annual report, the shareholders of the VIEs have completed the registration of their equity interest pledge.

Beijing Lecheng, BMF Culture and its shareholders have also entered into an equity interest pledge agreement, the terms of which are substantially similar to the equity interest pledge agreement described above, except that the relevant Cooperation Agreements do not include an exclusive intellectual property rights licensing agreement.

Exclusive Consulting Service Agreements. Pursuant to the exclusive consulting service agreement entered into between Kuke International and Beijing Kuke Music, Kuke International has the exclusive right to provide Beijing Kuke Music, its subsidiaries and investee companies with comprehensive management consulting services. Kuke International has the right to adjust the service fee at any time based on the services provided to Beijing Kuke Music. The exclusive consulting service agreement will remain irrevocable until both parties terminate the agreement in writing or Kuke International acquires all equity interests in or if all the assets of Beijing Kuke Music have been transferred to any person designated by Kuke International. Notwithstanding the above, Kuke International has the right to terminate the agreement at any time by issuing a 30 days’ notice in writing, and Kuke International shall not be liable for any defaults for unilaterally terminating the agreement.

Beijing Lecheng and BMF Culture have also entered into an exclusive consulting service agreement, the terms of which are substantially similar to the exclusive consulting service agreement described above.

Exclusive Intellectual Property Rights Licensing Agreement. Pursuant to the exclusive intellectual property rights licensing agreement entered into between Kuke International and Beijing Kuke Music, Kuke International agreed to license to Beijing Kuke Music certain intellectual property rights owned by Kuke International or being transferred to Kuke International by Beijing Kuke Music. After completion of the transfer of the relevant intellectual property rights, Kuke International shall license such intellectual property rights to Beijing Kuke Music at nil consideration. In addition, Beijing Kuke Music agreed to license all of its intellectual property rights (other than those already transferred to Kuke International) to Kuke International at nil consideration. The exclusive intellectual property rights agreement will remain effective for a term of ten years and shall be automatically renewed for successive terms of five years unless either party terminates the agreement by issuing a 30 days’ notice in writing prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement.

Exclusive Option Agreements.  Pursuant to the exclusive option agreement entered into among Kuke International, Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders, the shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music irrevocably granted Kuke International or any person designated by Kuke International an exclusive right to purchase from the shareholders of Beijing Kuke Music all or any part of their equity interest in and the assets of Beijing Kuke Music for a nominal price, or the lowest price permitted under applicable PRC laws. The exclusive option agreement will remain irrevocable until all parties terminate the agreement in writing or Kuke International acquires all equity interests in or if all the assets of Beijing Kuke Music have been transferred to any person designated by Kuke International. Notwithstanding the above, Kuke International has the right to terminate the agreement at any time by issuing a 30 days’ notice in writing, and Kuke International shall not be liable for any defaults for unilaterally terminating the agreement.

Beijing Lecheng, BMF Culture and its shareholders have also entered into an exclusive option agreement, the terms of which are substantially similar to the exclusive option agreement described above.

In addition, the spouse of certain shareholders of each of the VIEs, where applicable, has signed an undertaking (collectively, the “Spouse Undertakings”) to the effect that, among others, (1) the shares of the relevant VIE held and to be held by each of the shareholders do not fall within the scope of communal properties, and (2) he or she waives any rights or interests that may be granted to him or her under the applicable laws of any jurisdictions, and he or she undertakes not to claim such rights or interests. The spouse of certain shareholders of each of the VIEs, where applicable, has also consented to the arrangement of any equity interest held by his or her spouse under the Exclusive Option Agreement, the Exclusive Consulting Service Agreement, the Exclusive Intellectual Property Rights Agreement, where applicable, the Equity Interest Pledge Agreement and the Power of Attorney.

Our management believes:

However, our management also understand that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations and rules. Our corporate structure is subject to risks associated with our contractual arrangements with the VIEs. These contractual arrangements have not been properly tested in a court of law, and the PRC regulatory authorities could disallow our corporate structure at any time, which could result in a material change in our operations and the value of our securities could decline or become worthless. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in other jurisdictions such as the United States, and there are few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability, as a Cayman Islands holding company, to enforce these contractual arrangements and doing so may be costly. Because of our corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company, our WFOEs, the VIEs and their subsidiaries, and our investors face uncertainty with respect to the interpretation and the application of the PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to limitation on foreign ownership of value-added telecommunications businesses, internet audio-video program businesses and certain other businesses, and the validity and enforcement of the contractual agreements.

Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the management’s belief. It is uncertain whether any new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted or, if adopted, what requirements they would prescribe. If the PRC government deems that the contractual arrangements with the VIEs domiciled in China do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we and the VIEs could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish their interests in those operations. If we or any of the VIEs are found to be in violation of any future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any required permissions or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion to take action in dealing with such violations or failures

Cash Flows and Asset Transfers within Our Organization

Kuke Music Holding Limited is a holding company with no material operations of its own. We currently conduct our operations through our WFOEs, the VIEs and their respective subsidiaries. Under our corporate structure, our ability to pay dividends and to service any debt we may incur and pay our operating expenses principally depends on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China. Cash is transferred within our organization in the manner as follows: (1) we may transfer funds to our WFOEs through our British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong subsidiaries by additional capital contributions or shareholder loans, as the case may be; (2) our subsidiaries in China may provide loans to the VIEs, subject to statutory limits and restrictions; (3) the VIEs may pay service fees to our subsidiaries in China for services rendered by our subsidiaries in China; (4) our subsidiaries in China may pay service fees to the VIEs for services rendered by the VIEs; (5) our WFOEs may make dividends or other distributions to us through our British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong subsidiaries, as the case may be; and (6) our Hong Kong subsidiaries may provide loans to the VIEs, subject to statutory limits and restrictions. We do not have a written policy or procedure that specifically dictates how funds are transferred among us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs; however, we require that any loan be made and used on an ad-hoc basis and pursuant to a written loan agreement. To the extent cash or assets in the business is in mainland China or Hong Kong or in an entity domiciled in mainland China or Hong Kong, and may need to be used to fund operations outside of mainland China or Hong Kong, the funds and assets may not be available to fund operations or for other uses outside of mainland China or Hong Kong due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations by the government on our or the VIEs’ ability to transfer cash and assets. We may also encounter difficulties in our ability to transfer cash between subsidiaries in China and other subsidiaries largely due to various PRC laws and regulations imposed on foreign exchange.

Under the exclusive consulting services agreements, Kuke International and Beijing Lecheng provide consulting services to the VIEs and are entitled to receive service fees from the VIEs in exchange. The contractual arrangements provide that Kuke International and Beijing Lecheng have the right to adjust the service fee at any time based on the services provided to Beijing Kuke Music and BMF Culture. Pursuant to the exclusive intellectual property rights licensing agreement between Kuke International and Beijing Kuke Music, Kuke International agreed to license to Beijing Kuke Music certain intellectual property rights owned by Kuke International or being transferred to Kuke International by Beijing Kuke Music, both at nil consideration.

In 2021, 2022 and 2023, our WFOEs did not charge any service fees from the VIEs under the contractual arrangements, and there was no cash flows or transfers of other assets between our WFOEs and the VIEs under the contractual arrangements. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, the VIEs received debt financing from our Hong Kong subsidiaries of US$9.6 million, US$33.2 million and US$4 million, respectively, and did not receive any debt financing from our WFOEs for the same years. From January 2022 to June 2022, the VIEs paid back RMB4.78 million to our WFOEs; and from July 2022 to December 2022, the VIEs extended loans in the total amount of RMB5.2 million to our WFOEs. As of the date of this annual report, the remaining balance of the debt obligation of our WFOEs to the VIEs is approximately RMB3.6 million. 

Beijing Kuke Music and BMF Culture entered into a lease agreement in 2020 for a consideration of RMB1.1 million, and of which RMB0.6 million (US$0.1 million) remained unsettled as of December 31, 2022. Beijing Kuke Music and BMF Culture entered into another lease agreement in 2021 for a consideration of RMB1.2 million, and of which RMB0.2 million (US$30 thousand) remained unsettled as of December 31, 2022. Beijing Kuke Music and BMF Culture entered into another lease agreement in 2022 for a consideration of RMB1.2 million, and the total amount of which remained unsettled as of December 31, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, other than disclosed above, we do not have any transfers, dividends or distributions among us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs.  

Dividend Distribution to U.S. Investors and Tax Consequences

As of the date of this annual report, none of our subsidiaries has issued any dividends or made other distributions to us or their respective holding companies nor have we or any of our subsidiaries ever paid dividends or made other distributions to U.S. investors. We currently intend to retain all future earnings to finance the VIEs’ and our subsidiaries’ operations and to expand their business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. If we intend to distribute dividends through Kuke Music, Kuke International and Beijing Lecheng will transfer the dividends to Gauguin Limited and Degas Limited, which are Hong Kong entities, respectively, in accordance with the PRC laws and regulations of the PRC, and then Gauguin Limited and Degas Limited will transfer the dividends to Rococo Holding Limited and Rosenkavalier Limited, respectively, and Rococo Holding Limited and Rosenkavalier Limited will then transfer the dividends to Kuke Music, and the dividends will be distributed from Kuke Music to all shareholders respectively in proportion to the shares they hold, regardless of whether the shareholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions. The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementing rules provide that dividends paid by a PRC entity to a nonresident enterprise for income tax purposes is subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of 10%, subject to reduction by an applicable tax treaty with China. Pursuant to the Arrangement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10% if the Hong Kong enterprise directly holds at least 25% of the PRC enterprise. Pursuant to the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on the Issues concerning the Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements (“SAT Circular 81”), a Hong Kong resident enterprise must meet the following conditions, among others, in order to apply the reduced withholding tax rate: (1) it must be a company; (2) it must directly own the required percentage of the total owner’s equity and the proportion of the voting shares in the PRC resident enterprise; and (3) it must have directly owned such required percentage in the PRC resident enterprise throughout the consecutive 12 months prior to receiving the dividends. In October 2019, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Administrative Measures for Nonresident Taxpayers to Enjoy Treatment under Tax Treaties (“SAT Circular 35”), which became effective on January 1, 2020. SAT Circular 35 provides that nonresident enterprises are not required to obtain pre-approval from the relevant tax authority in order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax. Instead, nonresident enterprises and their withholding agents may, by self-assessment and on confirmation that the prescribed criteria to enjoy the tax treaty benefits are met, directly apply the reduced withholding tax rate, and file necessary forms and supporting documents when performing tax filings, which will be subject to post-tax filing examinations by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, Gauguin Limited and Degas Limited may be able to benefit from the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends it receives from its PRC subsidiaries, if it satisfies the conditions prescribed under SAT Circular 81 and other relevant tax rules and regulations. However, according to SAT Circular 81 and SAT Circular 35, if the relevant tax authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future.

Under our corporate structure, our ability to pay dividends and to service any debt we may incur and pay our operating expenses principally depends on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China. Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, our subsidiaries in China are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, our subsidiaries in China are required to allocate at least 10% of their accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund statutory reserves of up to 50% of the registered capital of the enterprise. Statutory reserves are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust the taxable income under the contractual arrangements we currently have in place in a manner that would materially and adversely affect our WFOEs’ ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us. Any limitation on the ability of our subsidiary to distribute dividends to us or on the ability of the VIEs to make payments to us may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

Restrictions on Our and the VIEs’ Ability to Transfer Cash Out of China

To the extent cash or assets in the business are in mainland China or Hong Kong or in an entity domiciled in mainland China or Hong Kong, and may need to be used to fund operations outside of mainland China or Hong Kong, the funds and assets may not be available to fund operations or for other uses outside of mainland China or Hong Kong due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations by the government on our, our subsidiaries’ or the VIEs’ ability to transfer cash and assets.

We may encounter difficulties in our ability to transfer cash between subsidiaries in China and other subsidiaries largely due to various PRC laws and regulations imposed on foreign exchange. The majority of our income is denominated in Renminbi, and shortage in foreign currencies may restrict our ability to pay dividends or other payment to satisfy our foreign currency denominated obligations, if any. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of the Foreign Exchange in the PRC as long as certain procedural requirements are met. Approval from appropriate government authorities is required if Renminbi is converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may, at its discretion, impose restrictions on access to foreign currencies for current account transactions and if this occurs in the future, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders. The PRC government has implemented a series of capital control measures, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. It may continue to strengthen its capital controls and dividends and other distributions of our subsidiaries in China may be subjected to tighter scrutiny and may limit the ability of our Cayman Islands holding company, to use capital from our subsidiaries in China, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

Permissions or Approvals Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations

We conduct our business primarily through our subsidiaries, the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China. We do not have any substantive business operations in Hong Kong. Our and the VIEs’ operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. As of the date of this annual report, we, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs have obtained or are in the process of renewing the requisite permissions and approvals from the PRC government authorities for the business operations of us, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs, including, among others, the Internet Content Provider License, the License for Production and Operation of Radio and TV Programs, Online Culture Operating Permit, the Online Publishing Service Permit (currently under renewal process), and the Online Culture Operating Permit held by Beijing Kuke Music, and the requisite commercial performance approvals and permits held by BMF culture. As of the date of this annual report, we, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs have not been denied application for any permissions or approvals required for business operations. Given the uncertainties of interpretation and implementation of relevant laws and regulations and the enforcement practice by relevant government authorities, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs may be required to obtain additional permissions or approvals for business operations in the future. If we, our subsidiaries or the VIEs are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permissions or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion to take action in dealing with such violations or failures. In addition, if we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs had inadvertently concluded that such permissions or approvals were not required, or if applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change in a way that requires us, our subsidiaries or the VIEs to obtain such permissions or approvals in the future, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs may be unable to obtain such necessary permissions or approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such permissions or approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance may subject us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs to fines and other regulatory, civil or criminal liabilities, and we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs may be ordered by the competent government authorities to suspend affected operations, which will materially and adversely affect our business operations and the value of your investment. For more detailed information, see “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Certain of our and the VIEs’ content offerings may be found objectionable by the PRC government, which may subject us and the VIEs to penalties and other regulatory or administrative actions,” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Failure to obtain or renew licenses, permits or approvals or respond to any changes in government policies, laws or regulations may affect our ability to conduct or expand our business.”

Permissions or Approvals Required from the PRC Authorities for Offering Securities to Foreign Investors

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises, or the Trial Measures, which became effective on March 31, 2023. On the same date of the issuance of the Trial Measures, the CSRC circulated No.1 to No.5 Supporting Guidance Rules, the Notes on the Trial Measures, the Notice on Administration Arrangements for the Filing of Overseas Listings by Domestic Enterprises and the relevant CSRC Answers to Reporter Questions on the official website of the CSRC, or collectively, the Guidance Rules and Notice. Under the Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, domestic companies conducting overseas securities offering and listing activities, either in direct or indirect form, shall complete filing procedures with the CSRC pursuant to the requirements of the Trial Measures within three working days following its submission of initial public offering or listing application. The companies that have already been listed on overseas stock exchanges are not required to make immediate filings for its listing yet need to make filings for subsequent offerings in accordance with the Trial Measures. In view of the fact that the Trial Measures have come into effect on March 31, 2023, we shall fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC for our future offshore offering as per requirements of the Trial Measures. According to CSRC’s Questions and Answers with respect to Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies on February 17, 2023, for the filing of overseas listing of enterprises with VIE structure, the filing procedure will adhere to the principles of market-oriented principle, rule of law, and strengthened regulatory synergy. The CSRC will consult the relevant competent authorities, and the overseas listing of VIE structured enterprises that meet the compliance requirements will be filed. We may not be able to complete the filing if the filing materials are incomplete or do not meet the requirements of the CSRC. We currently do not have over one million users’ personal information and do not anticipate that we will be collecting over one million users’ personal information in the foreseeable future. Based on such information, there is a relatively low likelihood that we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs will be subject to the cybersecurity review by the CAC for a future offering of our securities to foreign investors. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any formal notice from any PRC authorities that we shall be subject to permission or approval for the filing of this annual report. However, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government agencies, including the CSRC and the CAC, would reach the same conclusion as we do. If we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs inadvertently conclude that such permissions or approvals are not required, and the CSRC, the CAC or any other PRC regulatory body subsequently determines that we, our subsidiaries or the VIEs need to file with such government authorities or obtain their permissions or approvals to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchanges, the CAC or any other PRC government authorities promulgate any interpretation or implements rules that would require us, our subsidiaries or the VIEs to file with or obtain the permissions or approvals from the CSRC, the CAC or other governmental bodies for any such listing status, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs may face adverse actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs, and we cannot assure you that, if ever required, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs would be able to obtain any such permissions or approvals and fully comply with the relevant new rules on a timely basis, or at all.

The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 and for the years then ended contained in this annual report have been audited by Ernst & Young, an independent registered public accounting firm that is located in Hong Kong and was among the PCAOB-registered public accounting firms that are subject to the PCAOB’s determination issued on December 16, 2021 of having been unable to be inspected or investigated completely by the PCAOB. In June 2022, in connection with its implementation of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, the SEC conclusively named us as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” on its website (https://www.sec.gov/hfcaa) following the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Such identification may add uncertainty to the trading and price volatility of the ADSs. On August 26, 2022, the CSRC, the Ministry of Finance of China, and the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol (the “Protocol”), governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Protocol, the PCAOB shall have independent discretion to select any issuer audits for inspection or investigation and has the unfettered ability to transfer information to the SEC. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in 2022, and the PCAOB Board vacated its previous determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to be able to satisfactorily conduct inspections of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainty and depends on a number of factors out of our, and our auditor’s, control. The PCAOB is continuing to demand complete access in mainland China and Hong Kong moving forward and is already making plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and beyond, as well as to continue pursuing ongoing investigations and initiate new investigations as needed. The PCAOB has indicated that it will act immediately to consider the need to issue new determinations with the HFCAA if needed. Ernst & Young did not stand for re-appointment as our independent registered public accounting firm, and we appointed Yu Certified Public Accountant, P.C. (“Yu CPA”) as our independent registered public accounting firm, effective on November 17, 2022. Our current auditor, Yu CPA, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is headquartered in New York, New York and is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. As of the date of this annual report, Yu CPA is not included in the list of the PCAOB’s Determination Report issued in December 2021. For the foregoing reasons, we do not expect to be identified as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” after we file this annual report on Form 20-F. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, in the future, we have been identified by the SEC for two consecutive years as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” whose registered public accounting firm is determined by the PCAOB that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by one or more authorities in China, the SEC may prohibit our shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

Risks Related to the VIEs and China Operations

Investing in the ADSs involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described under “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors” and other information contained in this annual report, before you decide whether to purchase the ADSs. In particular, we are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to our corporate structure and doing business in China, including, but not limited to, the following:

For further details on the regulatory, liquidity and enforcement risks related to our corporate structure and the fact that we conduct substantially all of our operations in China, see “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” and “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

VIE Consolidation Schedule

The following tables set forth the summary consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023 of (i) Kuke Music and its subsidiaries and (ii) the VIEs and its subsidiaries, and the summary of the consolidated statement of income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS. The VIEs’ historical results are not necessarily indicative of results expected for future periods. You should read this information together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included elsewhere in this annual report.

Selected Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Information

Selected Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Information

Note: 

A [Reserved]

B Capitalization and Indebtedness 

Not applicable.

C Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds 

Not applicable.

D Risk Factors 

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We may not be able to maintain or expand our content offerings.

Our ability to maintain diverse and appealing content offerings hinges primarily on our relationships with content providers and our understanding of the changing tastes and preferences of existing and perspective customers. If we fail to maintain the attractiveness of our content offerings or continue to expand the breadth and diversity of our content offerings, we may lose customers and our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

We rely on Naxos and its representing labels, for the vast majority of our content offerings, over whom we have no or limited control. In particular, music tracks licensed from Naxos, our largest content provider, accounted for over 99% of our audio albums as of December 31, 2023. We have maintained a long-standing business relationship with Naxos. However, such relationship is subject to any change or uncertainty between Naxos and its representing labels, which may further affect the renewal or termination of our license agreements with Naxos. The lack of renewal, or early termination, of one or more of these license agreements, or the renewal of a license agreement on less favorable terms, could adversely affect the breadth or quality of our content offerings and may cause our content acquisition costs to increase. Any adverse changes to, or loss of, our relationships with one or more of our main content providers could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. There is no guarantee that the licenses available to us now will continue to be available in the future at rates and on terms that are favorable or commercially reasonable, or at all. The terms of our license agreements with these rights holders, including the royalty rates that we are required to pay, may change as a result of various reasons beyond our control, such as changes in our bargaining power, industry landscape, regulatory environment and overall economic conditions.

Furthermore, our ability to predict and adapt to changing consumer tastes in music, adjust our content offerings accordingly and provide our customers with customized content offerings could significantly affect our subscription revenue, licensing revenue, ticket sales and corporate sponsorship. In addition, any decline in consumers’ interest in, and spending on, classical music in general could lower the demand for our products and services, which may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may not be able to effectively execute our growth strategies and manage the increasing complexity of our business, which could negatively impact our business, financial performance and prospects.

There are significant risks associated with our ability to continue to grow and our growth rates may decline for reasons that are beyond our control, such as changing consumer needs and preferences, evolving industry standards and competitive landscape, emergence of alternative business models, the continued effects of COVID-19, actions taken by governments, businesses and individuals in response to COVID-19 or other pandemics, or adverse changes in laws, regulations, government policies and general economic conditions. Therefore, there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain our historical growth rates in future periods, and our historical operating and financial results may not be indicative of our future performance.

In addition, the complexity of our business model requires us to be highly adaptive to the changing market conditions with respect to classical music licensing and subscription, smart music learning and live classical music events. As we continue to grow rapidly, the complexity of our operations may further increase and we may encounter greater challenges in implementing our managerial, operating and financial strategies in order to keep up with our growth. The major challenges in managing our business growth include, among other things:

All efforts to address the challenges of our growth require significant managerial, financial and human resources. Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we cannot manage our growth or execute our strategies effectively, we may not continue to achieve the growth we expect and our business prospects and financial conditions may be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to control our content costs, our business, operating results and profitability will be materially and adversely affected.

Quality content is the foundation of our business. Content costs, including (i) license fees, either on a fixed amount or revenue-sharing basis, and (ii) amortization of copyrights we acquired or licensed with one-off payments, have historically accounted for a significant portion of our cost of sales, and increases in content costs may directly affect our financial condition and profitability. For example, as the competition for high-quality content intensifies and rights holders experience greater financial pressure due to COVID-19, some of our content providers may ask for higher license fees for the content they provide. In addition, our license agreement with Naxos requires us to pay Naxos a minimum license fee that increases annually over the term of the license period. In addition, as some of our content providers are located or incorporated in the United States, the increasing tension between the United States and China surrounding trade policies, as well as the potential further escalation of such tension, also create significant uncertainties on our ability to control our content costs. If any new tariffs, legislation or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated, such changes could significantly increase our content costs. Any failure to control our content costs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If our efforts to attract and retain licensees and subscribers are not successful, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to attract and retain licensees and subscribers and increase their spending is critical to the continued success and growth of our business. We compete with other classical music licensing and subscription service providers in China for customers primarily based on our content offerings, service quality and pricing. If we are unable to offer attractive content offerings, continue to expand our content offerings or provide satisfactory services to our licensees and subscribers at competitive pricing, the number of our licensees and subscribers may decrease and our music licensing and subscription revenue may suffer.

For our music licensing business, substantially all of our license agreements are nonexclusive and therefore our licensees are free to enter into similar agreements with third parties, including our competitors. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew license agreements with existing licensees or enter into license agreements with any new licensees, and failure to do so may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. For our music subscription business, public universities, music conservatories and public libraries make up most of our music subscription venue and these entities typically reply on government funding to support their discretionary spending. As such, our music subscription revenue also hinges on the level of government funding available to these entities and the amount of discretion they have in allocating such funding, both of which may have become more limited due to the continuing negative effect of COVID-19 on the Chinese economy. Any deterioration of the Chinese economy, employment levels, disposable income and consumer confidence could also have a negative impact on the demand of our licensees and individual subscribers for, and their spending on, our services.

If we fail to attract and retain customers of our smart music learning business or increase their spending, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

The smart music learning market in China is rapidly evolving and highly competitive. We compete with other smart music learning service providers for sales of our Kuke smart pianos, Kuke smart music teaching systems and Kukey courses based on a variety of factors, including user experience, the perceived effectiveness of our smart music learning solutions and our educational content offerings, technology infrastructure, data analytics capabilities, brand recognition and pricing. If we are unable to adequately and promptly address the needs of music students and educators, the sales of our smart music learning solutions may decline and we may not be able to maintain or increase the price of these products and services.

Kukey students may decide not to continue taking our courses after the subscription period, or choose to withdraw and receive full refunds within two weeks of the payment date, due to a perceived lack of improvement in their performance, general dissatisfaction with our courses, how our Kukey courses are delivered at their kindergartens or public safety concerns. Because we do not recruit instructors on our own but instead rely on employees of collaborating kindergartens, with whom we do not have any contractual relationship, to instruct students through our Kukey courses, we do not have control over these instructors. While we offer extensive training to these instructors and provide them with detailed instructions, we cannot assure you that the instructors at these kindergartens will be able to utilize our Kuke smart pianos and smart music teaching systems correctly so as to provide satisfactory instructions for our students. In addition, while we recommend kindergartens to schedule two piano lessons per week, kindergartens have full discretion with lesson scheduling. As such, students may not be able to take as many piano lessons as they wish during the subscription period and may decide not to renew their subscriptions as a result. Failure to retain students may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, any adverse changes in the financial conditions and spending power of the schools that purchase our Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems or the parents of our enrolled or perspective students may also have a material adverse effect on our revenue growth and operating results.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition have been and may continue to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. In order to contain the spread of COVID-19, the Chinese government took a number of actions, including mandatory quarantine requirements, travel restrictions, postponed school and kindergarten reopenings and resumption of business operations and prohibition of public gatherings. As a result of these measures and other precautionary actions taken by our and the VIEs’ existing and perspective customers in response, our and the VIEs’ business operations have been significantly disrupted. For example, as many government-affiliated entities, such as public schools, universities and libraries, are required to hold a public bidding process in order to purchase music subscription services, Kuke smart pianos or Kuke smart music teaching systems, they were not able to make such purchase from us, the VIEs, or our and the VIEs’ distributors during shutdowns, resulting in decreased sales of institutional music subscription services, Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems. The closure of kindergartens also made it more difficult for us and the VIEs to establish new collaboration and recruit new students to enroll in the Kukey courses, which caused the sales of Kukey courses to decline significantly. While sales of Kukey courses, Kuke smart pianos or Kuke smart music teaching systems and institutional music subscription services have recovered since September 2020 as kindergartens and schools re-opened, there are significant uncertainties as to the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on our and the VIEs’ collaborating kindergartens. In addition, due to restrictions on public gatherings, travel bans and the general population’s fears regarding contracting COVID-19, we and the VIEs had to cancel the production of many on-ground, live classical music events and were not able to organize as many live classical music performances or invite as many performing artists as we and the VIEs had been able to during the 2020 Beijing Music Festival, which led to decreased ticket sales and related sponsorship fees. In an effort to reach a broader audience and attract more sponsors, we and the VIEs have started streaming more live classical music performances, which requires additional investments in our and the VIEs’ IT infrastructure and has subjected us and the VIEs to higher content costs. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has also had a severe negative impact on many of our and the VIEs’ content providers, resulting in the cancellation of music recording activities and live classical music performances, which has created significant uncertainties for our and the VIEs’ ability to cost-effectively maintain and expand content offerings.

In 2021, our and the VIEs’ business operation substantially returned to the normal level. Many of the restrictive measures previously adopted by the PRC governments at various levels to control the spread of the COVID-19 virus have been revoked or replaced with more flexible measures since December 2022, and there has recently been and may continue to be an increase in COVID-19 cases in China, and as a result, we and the VIEs experienced temporary disruption to business operations where many employees were infected with COVID-19 in December 2022. To the extent that future waves of COVID-19 disrupt normal business operations in China, we and the VIEs may face operational challenges with our services, and we and the VIEs likely will have to adopt similar remote work arrangements and other measures to minimize such impact.

The economic disruption caused by COVID-19 has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, the level of consumer spending on discretionary items, as well as the advertising budgets of our and the VIEs’ sponsors, especially those who encounter operational or financial difficulties due to, or are located in countries and regions severely affected by, COVID-19. Students’ willingness to spend on our and the VIEs’ courses may also decline due to a worsening economic performance and outlook as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, some of our and the VIEs’ subscribers, licensees and sponsors adversely affected by COVID-19 have not renewed their agreements with us. In addition, subscribers, licensees and smart music learning service customers adversely affected by COVID-19 may require additional time to pay us and the VIEs, which could temporarily increase the amount of trade receivables and negatively affect our cash flows. Additionally, the volatilities in and damage to the global financial markets caused by COVID-19 could adversely affect our ability to access capital markets, if and when required. Substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the potential downturn brought by, and the duration of, the COVID-19 outbreak. All of the above could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ results of operations and financial condition in the near term. If the outbreak persists or escalates, our and the VIEs’ business operations and financial condition may be subject to further negative impact. There remain significant uncertainties surrounding COVID-19, including the existing and new variants of COVID-19, and its further development as a global pandemic, including the effectiveness of vaccine programs against existing and any new variants of COVID-19.

We may not be successful in introducing new products or services or adopting new technologies, or enhancing our existing products and services.

We plan to introduce new products and services and continue to enhance our existing products and services in order to attract more customers and further grow our revenue. For example, we plan to update our course offerings, introduce new versions of the Kuke smart music teaching system, offer additional value-added services to Kukey students, launch new products featuring other types of musical instruments, stream more live classical music events and offer more classical music educational programs. If these new products and services fail to gain market acceptance or meet our profitability expectations, either as a result of our lack of experience and expertise or for any other reason, we may fail to generate sufficient revenue and profit to justify our investments. If we are unable to achieve the expected results with respect to offering new products and services and optimizing our existing products and services, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Our recent or future acquisitions or strategic investments may fail, which may materially and adversely affect our business.

As part of our business growth strategy, we have in the past acquired and may in the future invest in, merge with or acquire business that we believe can expand or complement our business. For instance, we acquired BMF in February 2020, through which we operate our live classical music events business. Our ability to implement our acquisition strategy will depend on our ability to identify suitable targets, correctly value the targets, reach agreements with them on commercially reasonable terms, secure financing and obtain any required shareholder or government approvals. Our future strategic investments or mergers and acquisitions could subject us to uncertainties and risks, including:

We also face challenges regarding the integration of BMF with our existing business, including, among others, limited operating experience with respect to organizing on-ground, live classical music events, and we cannot assure you that the operations of BMF can be smoothly or successfully integrated into our existing operations in a cost-effective manner or that they will effectively generate synergies with our classical music licensing and subscription business and smart music learning business.

As a result, our recent or future acquisitions or strategic investments as well as post-acquisition management may have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operating results and financial condition.

Our business is dependent on the strengths and market perception of our brands, and any failure to maintain, protect and strengthen our brand would hurt our business and prospects.

We have developed strong brands that are essential to the success of our business. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing our brands, including but not limited to Kuke, Kukey, BMF and Beijing Music Festival, is critical to expanding our customer base and market share. Our brands may be impaired by a number of factors, including, among others, failure to maintain customer satisfaction or keep pace with technological advances, decline in the quality or quantity of our content offerings, alleged misconduct or other improper activities by our employees, customers, users, sponsors, distributors and other business partners, negative publicity about us and the industries in which we operate, rumors relating to our business, management and employees, our shareholders and affiliates, our competitors and peers, failure to protect our intellectual property rights, or any alleged rights infringement or violations of laws, regulations, public policies or contractual obligations. We have not historically been required to expend considerable resources to establish and maintain our brands. However, we may be required to expend greater resources on advertising, marketing and other brand-building efforts to preserve and enhance our brand awareness, which could adversely affect our operating results and may not be effective. If we are unable to maintain strong brands or further enhance our brand recognition, our business prospects, operational results and financial conditions may be materially and adversely affected.

We compete with other classical music licensing and subscription service providers, smart music learning service providers and live classical music event organizers for customers.

We face competition from other classical music licensing service providers for licensees, other online classical music subscription service providers for subscribers, other smart music learning service providers for student enrollment and the sale of our Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems, and other live classical music event organizers for audience and sponsorship. We compete primarily on the basis of service quality, user experience, content offerings, brand recognition and pricing. Some of our competitors may have greater financial, technical and other resources, stronger brand awareness, or more experience than we do. It is also possible that new competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. These competitors may engage in more extensive development efforts, undertake more far-reaching marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, introduce more appealing products or services and respond more quickly to market needs or new technologies. These competitors may also compete with us for key employees and relationships with key industry stakeholders. If we are unable to compete successfully against our current or future competitors, we may be required to lower our tuition fees and the price of our other products and services in order to retain or attract customers. If we lose market share or fail to effectively respond to competitive pressure, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

We may not have obtained complete licenses with respect to certain content we offer.

There is no guarantee that we have all of the licenses for the content available on our platform, as accurate and comprehensive information necessary to identify or verify the copyright ownership of the music content offered on our platform is not always available and may be difficult or even impossible for us to obtain. For example, such information may be withheld by the owners or administrators of such rights. Failure to obtain accurate and comprehensive information necessary to identify the copyright ownership of the content we offer may adversely affect our ability to identify the appropriate copyright owners from which to obtain necessary or commercially viable licenses or to whom to pay royalties. Moreover, while we only enter into license agreements with licensors who are able to provide documents evidencing their right to license the content and whose right to license the content is, to the best of our knowledge, not subject to any dispute, there is no guarantee that our licensors have the rights to license the copyright underlying all the music content covered by our license agreements. If we do not obtain necessary and commercially viable licenses from copyright owners, whether due to the inability to identify or verify the appropriate copyright owners or for any other reason, we may be found to have infringed on the copyrights of others, be subject to claims for monetary damages, government fines and penalties, or be required to remove certain content from our platform, all of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Failure to maintain, protect or enforce our intellectual property could substantially harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

The success of our business depends on our ability to maintain, protect and enforce our copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property rights. We rely upon a combination of copyright, software copyright, patent, trademark and other intellectual property laws, trade secrets, confidentiality policies, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. Despite our efforts, the measures that we take to maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, including, if necessary, litigation or proceedings before governmental authorities and administrative bodies, may not be adequate to prevent or deter the infringement or other misappropriation of our intellectual property by our customers, users, competitors, former employees or other third parties. For example, while we typically require our employees and business partners who are involved in the development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing or enforcing such agreements. In addition, the measures that we take to maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management time, which could substantially harm our operating results. Furthermore, changes in laws or their interpretation, as well as technological developments that facilitate the piracy of our music and programming, such as Internet peer-to-peer file sharing, may also adversely affect our ability to maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. Failure to maintain, protect or enforce our intellectual property rights could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Assertions by third parties of infringement or other violation by us of their intellectual property rights could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

From time to time, assertions by third parties that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their copyright or other intellectual property rights may arise. Given the volume of content available on our platform, it is nearly impossible to identify and promptly remove all alleged infringing content that may exist. In addition, location-based controls and technology we use to prevent all or a portion of our services and content from being accessed outside of the PRC may be breached, causing our content to be accessed from geographic locations beyond the scope of our license agreements with certain rights holders, regardless of whether there is any fault and/or negligence involved on our part. Moreover, while we require our licensees and subscribers to comply with the terms of our agreements with them and applicable copyright laws and regulations, there is no guarantee that our licensees, subscribers or their users will comply with the terms of these arrangements or all the applicable copyright laws and regulations.

Third parties may take action against us if they believe that certain content available on our platform violates their copyright or other intellectual property rights. As our business expands and we continue to introduce new products and services, the likelihood of intellectual property rights claims against us also increases. If we are forced to defend against any infringement or misappropriation claims, whether they are with or without merit, are settled out of court, or are determined in our favor, we may be required to expend significant time and financial resources on the defense of such claims. As a public company listed in the U.S., we and our directors and officers have also been, and may continue to be, involved in claims or lawsuits in the U.S. or other jurisdictions relating to alleged IP infringement or misappropriation. If any of these claims is successfully made against us, we may be required to (i) pay substantial statutory or other damages and fines, (ii) remove relevant content from our platform, or (iii) enter into royalty or license agreements which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We anticipate that we will continue to be subject to legal, regulatory and/or administrative proceedings in the future incidental to our ordinary course of business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevail in our defense or reverse any unfavorable judgment, ruling or decision against us. In addition, we may decide to enter into settlements that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may damage our reputation, force us to adjust our business practices, or require us to pay significant damages, government fines and penalties, cease providing content that we were previously providing, and/or take other actions that may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our license agreements are complex and impose numerous obligations on us. Any breach or perceived breach of such agreements could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Many of our license agreements with licensors are complex and impose numerous obligations on us, including obligations to, among other things, pay minimum license fees, calculate and make payments based on complex revenue sharing structures, deny user access from outside mainland China, comply with certain marketing restrictions, obtain license from relevant authorities, and defend, indemnify or hold harmless the licensors from and against certain third-party claims and actions. Some of our license agreements also grant the licensor the right to audit our compliance with the terms and conditions of such agreements. Failure to accurately pay royalties may also adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Underpayment could result in unexpected payment of additional royalties in material amounts and damage our business relationships with licensors. If we overpay royalties, we may be unable to reclaim such overpayments and our profits will suffer. If we materially breach any of the obligations set forth in any of our license agreements, or if we use content in ways that are found to exceed the scope of such agreements, we could be subject to monetary penalties and our rights under such license agreements could be terminated, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Minimum guarantees required under certain of our license agreements may limit our operating flexibility and may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Approximately 8% of our license agreements as of the date of this annual report require that we make minimum guarantee payments to the licensors. The amount of minimum guarantee payments required varies under different license agreements, ranging from nil to US$1,674,000 per year depending on the market position of the licensor and the nature of licensed content. We rely on assumptions of the competitiveness of our service offerings and the extent to which we can monetize our content to estimate whether such minimum guarantees could be recouped against the content acquisition costs we incur over the duration of the license agreement. To the extent our revenues do not meet our expectations, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected as a result of such minimum guarantees. In addition, the fixed cost nature of these minimum guarantees may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets in which we operate.

Failure to be paid sufficiently for the content we license may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We charge licensing fees either on a fixed-payment basis where we grant licensees the perpetual right to use the licensed content or a minimum guarantee plus revenue-sharing basis where we grant licensees the right to use the licensed content for a certain period. Royalties that we are entitled to receive under the minimum guarantee plus revenue-sharing model are based on complex structures that require tracking the usage of our content on the platforms of our licensees. We may not have access to accurate or complete metadata necessary for such calculation, despite our inspection rights under the license agreements and our licensees’ contractual undertaking to provide us such data. Moreover, if our licensees fail to include our music in their curated playlists or algorithm-based recommendations or give us less favorable marketing space, our royalty income could also decline, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We face risks, such as unforeseen costs and potential liability, in connection with content we produce.

We contract with third parties to develop and produce original music recordings and other original content. As we have limited control over these third parties, we may not be able to complete these projects on time and the end product may not measure up to our expectations in terms of quality and popularity.

We may also incur costs greater than what we had expected and may not be able to cover the expenses required to produce such content, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may face potential liability or suffer losses in connection with these arrangements, including, but not limited to, if such third parties breach their contractual obligations to us, violate applicable laws, engage in fraudulent behavior or become insolvent. To the extent we do not accurately anticipate such costs or mitigate such risks, our business may suffer.

Certain of our and the VIEs’ content offerings may be found objectionable by the PRC government, which may subject us to penalties and other regulatory or administrative actions.

As an internet content provider, we and the VIEs are subject to PRC laws and regulations governing internet access and the distribution of music, music videos and other forms of content over the internet. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Internet information services, Internet culture services, Internet publication services, online audio-visual products and other related value-added telecommunications services.” These laws and regulations prohibit internet content providers and internet publishers from posting on the internet any content that, among other things, violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China or public interest, or is obscene, superstitious, frightening, gruesome, offensive, fraudulent or defamatory. We and the VIEs have employed content reviewers who are licensed by relevant government agencies to review online content to ensure that the content we and the VIEs offer on our and the VIEs’ platform and license to third parties is compliant with relevant PRC laws and regulations. However, PRC government has wide discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations and may find certain content on our and the VIEs’ platform to be objectionable. In that case, the PRC regulatory authorities may require us and the VIEs to remove or limit the dissemination of such content on our platform. Failure to comply with these requirements may also result in legal and administrative liabilities, government sanctions, monetary penalties, loss of licenses and/or permits or reputational harm, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We face risks in relation to the package bidding process required by certain government-affiliated institutional subscribers.

We are occasionally required by government-affiliated institutional subscribers to include certain education-related products offered by other companies in our bids to them. After winning the bid, we will then purchase these products or services and resell them to these government-affiliated institutional subscribers. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify third-party suppliers that meet the requirements of these government-affiliated institutional subscribers or procure such products or services in a timely manner or on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to do so may cause us to lose revenue, subject us to contractual liabilities and damages and harm our customer relationships, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We rely on distributors to sell and market our institutional music subscription services, Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems and to establish collaboration with kindergartens.

We rely on third-party distributors in various aspects of our business lines. For the sale of our institutional music subscription services, Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems, we largely rely on distributors help us identify potential end customers and promote our products and services. For the offering of our Kukey courses, we do not contract with kindergartens directly but rely on distributors to establish collaboration with kindergartens, promote our Kukey courses and assist us in providing training and operational support to collaborating kindergartens. The sales performance of these distributors directly affects our business prospects, operating results and financial condition. However, we do not have day-to-day control over the activities of these distributors. If our distributors fail to identify or establish relationships with kindergartens that have a large student body or strong demand for our smart music learning solutions, or fail to maintain relationships with their end customers or collaborating kindergartens, our ability to grow our customer base and expand our kindergarten network may be materially and adversely affected.

In line with industry practice, we generally do not enter into long-term agreements with distributors. We cannot assure you that all of our distributors will renew their agreements with us on terms acceptable or favorable to us or otherwise continue their business relationships with us. Distributors with strong sales performance may request for more favorable contract terms in cooperating with us. If we fail to establish and maintain satisfactory relationships with our existing distributors or effectively expand our distributor network, or if our distributors fail to meet our sales quotas or other terms in our distribution agreements, we may not be able to find suitable replacements on a timely basis and our selling and distribution expenses may increase, which could materially and adversely affect our business prospects, operating results and financial condition.

We are dependent on a limited number of third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers for the manufacturing of Kuke smart pianos and other smart music devices

We depend on a limited number of third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers for the manufacturing of Kuke smart pianos and other smart music devices, and we have limited control over them. If any of these parties fails to perform its obligations to us, we may be unable to deliver these products to customers or place Kuke smart pianos at collaborating kindergartens in a timely manner. We are also subject to the risk of industry-wide shortages, price fluctuations and long lead times in components supply and manufacturing. Further, we do not have long-term contracts with these suppliers and manufacturers, and there can be no assurance that they will continue to take purchase orders from us on favorable terms, or at all. If one or more of our suppliers and contract manufacturers were to go out of business or discontinue their service to us, we may not be able to find a suitable replacement in time. In the event we are unable to obtain components in sufficient quantities on a timely basis and on commercially reasonable terms, or if our contract manufacturer is unable to manufacture these products in the quantities required on time or to our specifications, our reputation, business prospects and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

If we are unable to accurately anticipate the market demand for our smart music learning solutions, we may have difficulty managing our production and inventory and our operating results could be harmed.

We source the main components of Kuke smart pianos from several suppliers and engage selected contract manufacturers to manufacture Kuke smart pianos. We place orders with our suppliers and contract manufacturers based on our forecasts of the demand for our smart music learning services. Our ability to accurately forecast production and inventory needs in advance could be affected by many factors, including changes in customer demand, expansion of our distribution network, new product introductions, sales promotions and general economic conditions. If demand exceeds our forecast and we do not have sufficient inventory to meet this demand on a timely basis, we would have to rapidly increase production, which may result in reduced manufacturing quality and customer satisfaction, as well as higher supply and manufacturing costs that would lower our gross margin. We may also have to forego revenue opportunities, lose market share and damage our customer relationships if we underestimate customer demand. Conversely, if we overestimate customer demand, excess product inventory could force us to write down or write off inventory, which could cause our gross margin to suffer and impair the strength of our brand. Any of these scenarios could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.

Accidents, injuries or other harm suffered in relation to our Kuke smart pianos may adversely affect our reputation, subject us to liability and cause us to incur substantial expenses.

We could be held liable for accidents that occur in relation to our Kuke smart pianos, such as electricity leakage, fire and injuries caused by product malfunctions, defects or improper installation. In the event of personal injuries or other accidents suffered by students or instructors using our Kuke smart pianos or other people working at or visiting the premises, we could face claims alleging that we should be liable for the accidents or injuries. A material liability claim against us could adversely affect our reputation, enrollment and revenues. Even if unsuccessful, such a claim could create unfavorable publicity, cause us to incur substantial expenses and divert the time and attention of our management.

We may be subject to product liability or warranty claims that could harm our business, reputation and operating results.

We provide a one-year warranty to purchasers of Kuke smart pianos. We may face product liability or warranty claims in the event that the use of our Kuke smart pianos results in injuries, whether by product malfunctions, defects, improper installation or other causes. These claims, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs, high monetary damage payments and negative publicity. We currently do not have product liability insurance and cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain sufficient product liability insurance in the future at an acceptable cost to protect against potential product liability claims. As a result, any imposition of product liability could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There is the risk of personal injuries and accidents in connection with our live music events, which could subject us to personal injury or other claims, increase our expenses and reduce attendance at our live music events, causing a decrease in our revenue.

There are inherent risks in live music events, particularly those that involve complex staging and special effects. Injuries and accidents occurring in connection with our live music events could subject us to claims and liabilities, harm our reputation with artists and fans and make it more difficult for us to attract sponsors. News of any such incident or accident could also reduce attendance at our events, or lead to the cancellation of all or part of an event or festival, in each case leading to a decrease in our revenue. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain adequate levels of insurance to protect against lawsuits and judgments in connection with accidents or other disasters that may occur. We would be responsible for any liabilities not covered by our insurance policies, which would negatively impact our cash flows and operating results.

If we are unable to lease venues on acceptable terms, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We lease venues from third parties to host our live music events. Our long-term success in the live classical music events business will depend in part on the availability of venues at commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to lease venues on favorable terms depends on a number of factors, such as national and local business conditions and competition from other event organizers. As we have little or no control over venue operators, we may be unable to lease desirable venues from them on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Failure to obtain or renew licenses, permits or approvals or respond to any changes in government policies, laws or regulations may affect our ability to conduct or expand our business.

China’s Internet, private education and music licensing industries are highly regulated. We are required under PRC laws and regulations to obtain various government approvals, licenses and permits in connection with the provision of our services. Applicable laws and regulations may be tightened and new laws or regulations may be introduced to impose additional government approval, license and permit requirements. In particular, uncertainties exist in relation to regulatory requirements regarding private education and music licensing. For example, under certain policies, we may be required to lower the tuition of our Kukey courses in order to offer Kukey courses to the students of our collaborating kindergartens. If we fail to obtain and maintain approvals, licenses or permits required for our business or respond to changes in the regulatory environment, we could be subject to liabilities, penalties and operational disruption, which may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may not be able to achieve the benefits we expect from our strategic investment in KOLO.

In February 2022, we entered into an agreement for a strategic investment in KOLO, a classical music-focused and decentralized NFT platform driven by blockchain technology. In March 2023, we announced an agreement to acquire a 49% equity interest in KOLO. The acquisition closed on August 25, 2023, with an option to acquire the remaining 51%. We intend to utilize blockchain technology and NFT applications to drive innovation in the classical music industry, increase the monetization of classical music digital assets, build a digital economy for musicians, provide value to users, and foster mutually-beneficial partnerships among industry participants. However, such benefits we expect from the strategic investment in KOLO are subject to uncertainties.

The technology underlying blockchain technology is affected by a number of industry-wide challenges and risks relating to consumer acceptance of blockchain technology, including but not limited to government and quasi-government regulation of NFTs and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of blockchain networks or similar systems, the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of blockchain networks, changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences, the extent to which current interest in NFTs represents a speculative “bubble.” The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of blockchain networks and blockchain assets, may deter or delay the acceptance and adoption of NFTs and adversely impact the value of NFTs.

There are other risks related to our efforts on our future plan, including the risk that the execution of these efforts may not provide the expected benefits, such as the observable business growth, in our anticipated time frame. Our intentions and expectations with regard to the execution of our business plan, and the timing of any related initiatives, are subject to change at any time based on management’s subjective evaluation of our overall business needs. If we are unable to successfully execute our business plan, whether due to failure to realize the anticipated benefits from our business initiatives in the anticipated time frame or otherwise, we may be unable to achieve our financial targets.

Misconduct, non-compliance or other improper activities by our employees, customers, users, sponsors, collaborating kindergartens, distributors and other business partners could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We are exposed to various operational risks related to misconduct, non-compliance or other improper activities by our employees, customers, sponsors, collaborating kindergartens, distributors and other business partners. It is not always possible to identify and deter such misconduct, non-compliance or improper activities, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent these activities may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses. For our music licensing and subscription business, our licensees and subscribers may violate their contractual obligations to us or otherwise infringe on our intellectual property rights or the intellectual property rights of our content providers. For our smart music learning business, we enter into user agreements with the parents of enrolled students and do not contract directly with kindergartens, their employees, schools that purchased our Kuke smart pianos and/or Kuke smart music teaching systems from our distributors, or users of our Kuke smart music teaching systems at these schools. Since we have limited or, in some cases, no control over these parties, we cannot assure you that these parties will not violate our intellectual property rights or the intellectual property rights of our content providers, damage our reputation, engage in acts of deception or otherwise act in bad faith. For example, enrolled students may share their user accounts with other students who did not pay for our courses, and kindergartens may allow students who have not paid for our courses to use our Kuke smart pianos. For our live classical music events business, any misconduct or improper activities by or any regulatory investigation into our sponsors, performers, co-production partners or any other party associated with our live music events may result in negative publicity. Any of these occurrences could harm our ability to attract customers, damage our reputation and the public perception of our brand, or subject us to civil liabilities and regulatory actions and penalties. As a result, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Inability to collect our trade receivables on a timely basis, if at all, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and operating results.

We are subject to risks of not collecting our trade receivables on a timely basis, if at all. As of December 31, 2023, our trade receivables amounted to RMB22.8 million (US$3.2 million). In addition, trade receivables due from our largest customer accounted for 35% of our total trade receivables as of December 31, 2023.   There can be no assurance that we will be able to collect our trade receivables on a timely basis, and our trade receivable turnover days may increase, especially those involving customers that have been severely affected by the outbreak of COVID-19. Our liquidity and cash flows from operations may be materially and adversely affected if our receivable cycles or collection periods lengthen further or if we encounter a material increase in defaults of payment or an increase in provisions for impairment of our receivables from customers. Should these events occur, we may be required to obtain working capital from other sources, such as third-party financing, in order to maintain our daily operations, and such financing may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, or at all.

The discontinuation of any of the preferential tax treatments currently available to us could adversely affect our overall operating results.

Under PRC tax laws and regulations, Beijing Kuke Music, one of the VIEs, is qualified to enjoy a reduced enterprise income tax rate of 15% and certain other preferential tax benefits available to “high and new technology enterprises,” or HNTE. According to the relevant administrative measures, in order to qualify as an HNTE, Beijing Kuke Music must meet certain financial and non-financial criteria and complete verification procedures with the administrative authorities. Continued qualification as an HNTE is subject to a three-year review by the relevant government authorities in China, and in practice certain local tax authorities also require annual evaluation of the qualification. We cannot assure you that Beijing Kuke Music will continue to qualify for preferential tax treatments in the future. In the event the preferential tax treatments for Beijing Kuke Music are discontinued, it will become subject to the standard enterprise income tax rate of 25% and lose other preferential tax benefits it currently enjoys, which could adversely affect our overall operating results.

We may be exposed to liabilities under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and Chinese anti-corruption laws, and any determination that we have violated these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business or our reputation.

Our customers include many state-owned or state-affiliated enterprises, and we may be required to engage with Chinese officials or persons of equivalent status during the ordinary course of our business. As such, we face risks with respect to the FCPA, which generally prohibits us from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, and anti-bribery laws of China. We do not fully control over the interactions that our employees and distributors have with those officials or persons, and they may try to increase our sales through means that constitute violations of the FCPA, the PRC anti-bribery laws or other related laws. If we, due to either our own deliberate or inadvertent acts or those of others, fail to comply with applicable anti-bribery laws, our reputation could be harmed and we could incur criminal or civil penalties, other sanctions and/or significant expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may require additional capital to support business growth and objectives, which might not be available in a timely manner or on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.

Historically, we have financed our operations primarily with operating cash flows and shareholder contributions. As part of our growth strategies, we plan to continue to require substantial capital through additional debt or equity financing in the future to cover our costs and expenses. However, we may be unable to obtain additional capital in a timely manner or on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Our ability to obtain additional financing in the future is subject to a number of uncertainties, including those relating to:

In particular, recent global financial market turbulences caused by the outbreak of COVID-19 may adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets to meet our liquidity needs.

To the extent we engage in debt financing, the incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt servicing obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that may, among other things, restrict our operational flexibility or our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. If we fail to service the debt obligations or are unable to comply with such debt covenants, we could be in default under the relevant debt obligations and our liquidity and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. To the extent that we raise additional financing by issuance of additional equity or equity-linked securities, our shareholders may experience dilution. In the event that financing is not available or is not available on terms commercially acceptable to us, our business, operating results and growth prospects may be adversely affected.

We depend on our senior management and highly skilled personnel. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of them, our ability to grow our business could be harmed.

We believe that our future success depends significantly on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate our senior management and a sufficient number of experienced and skilled employees. Qualified individuals in the industries in which we operate are in high demand, and we may have to incur significant costs to attract and retain them. In particular, we cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the services of our senior management and key executive officers. The loss of any key management or executive could be highly disruptive and adversely affect our business operations and future growth. Moreover, if any of these individuals joins a competitor or forms a competing business, we may lose crucial business secrets, technological know-how and other valuable resources. Although our senior management and executive officers have non-competition agreements with us, we cannot assure you that they will comply with such agreements or that we will be able to effectively enforce such agreements.

Our principal shareholders have substantial influence over our company and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders.

Our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders together beneficially own a significant percentage of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding ordinary shares. The interests of our directors, officers and principal shareholders could differ from the interests of our other shareholders, and they may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders, even if these actions are opposed by our other shareholders. As a result of the concentration of ownership, our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders could have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our shareholders for approval, such as mergers, consolidations and election of directors, and would also have the power to discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company. This significant concentration of share ownership and voting power may also adversely affect or reduce the trading price of our ADSs because investors often perceive a disadvantage in owning shares in a company with a small number of controlling shareholders. For more information regarding our principal shareholders and their affiliated entities, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees-E. Share Ownership.”

If we are unable to improve or maintain our sales and marketing efficiency, our business and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.

We incurred RMB73.3 million, RMB32.0 million and RMB40.7 million (US$5.7 million) in selling and distribution expenses in 2021, 2022 and 2023 respectively.   We believe that we have been able to promote our products and services and strengthen our brand recognition cost-effectively. However, our sales and marketing activities may not be well received by the market and may not result in the levels of sales that we anticipate. We also may not be able to retain or recruit a sufficient number of experienced sales and marketing personnel, or to train newly hired sales and marketing personnel. Further, we must continually enhance our sales and marketing approaches and experiment with new methods to keep pace with industry developments and customer preferences. Failure to engage in sales and marketing activities in a cost-effective manner may reduce our market share, cause our profitability to decline and materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may from time to time become a party to litigation, legal disputes, claims or administrative proceedings that may materially and adversely affect us.

From time to time, we may be subject to lawsuits brought by our competitors or other individuals and entities against us or administrative proceedings. The outcomes of these actions may not be successful or favorable to us. We may need to pay damages or settle these actions with a substantial amount of cash. In addition to the related costs, such actions can significantly divert our management’s attention from operating our business and generate negative publicity that significantly harms our reputation and customer relationships. While we do not believe that there are currently any pending proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on us, if there were adverse determinations in legal proceedings against us, we could be required to pay substantial monetary damages or adjust our business practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We use open source software in our products, which could negatively affect our ability to offer our products and subject us to litigation or other actions.

We use open source software in connection with our products. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have faced claims challenging the ownership of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could be subject to lawsuits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or non-compliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute or make available open source software as part of their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software and/or make available any derivative works of the open source code on unfavorable terms or at no cost. While we monitor our use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would require us to disclose the source code or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could nevertheless occur and we may be required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our applications, discontinue sales in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts. As a result, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Any significant disruption to or failure of our information technology systems, including events beyond our control, could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

The performance and reliability of our information technology system is critical to our operations and reputation. Our operations depend on our information technology service providers’ ability to protect their and our system in their facilities against damage or interruption from events beyond our control, such as natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues, environmental conditions, computer viruses, attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events. If our arrangement with these service providers is terminated or if there is a lapse of service or damage to their facilities, we could experience interruptions in our services. Any interruptions in the accessibility of or deterioration in the quality of access to our system could reduce customer satisfaction and the attractiveness of our service offerings, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We are subject to changing laws and regulations regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of non-compliance. 

We are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and the various regulatory authorities in China and the Cayman Islands, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.

Privacy concerns or security breaches relating to our platform could result in economic loss, damage our reputation and expose us to civil liability.

As part of our operations, we collect data from our licensees, subscribers, enrolled students, their parents and our business partners, such as practice data, usage data, personally identifiable information and other confidential information. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities by, among other things, hacking into our systems or facilities or through fraud or other means of deception. In addition, hardware, software or applications we develop or obtain from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. The techniques used to gain such access to our information technology systems, our data or our customers’ data, disable or degrade our service or sabotage our systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly and often are not recognized until launched against a target. We have implemented systems and processes intended to secure our information technology systems and prevent unauthorized access to or loss of sensitive data, but these security measures may not be sufficient for all eventualities and there is no guarantee that they will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches, system compromises or misuses of data. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to maintain the security of our customer data or to comply with privacy or data security laws, regulations, policies, legal obligations or industry standards may result in governmental enforcement actions and investigations, litigation or adverse publicity. This may expose us to potential administrative inquiries, penalties and legal liability and may require us to expend significant resources in responding to and defending allegations and claims.

In addition, evolving laws and regulations concerning data privacy may result in increased regulation and different industry standards, which could increase the costs of operations or limit our activities. Regulatory requirements on cyber-security and data privacy are constantly evolving and can be subject to varying interpretations or significant changes, resulting in uncertainties about the scope of our responsibilities in that regard. For example, on June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Data Security Law (the “Data Security Law”), which took effect on September 1, 2021. The Data Security Law applies to data processing activities, including the collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, availability and disclosure of data, and security supervision of such activities within the territory of the PRC. According to the Data Security Law, whoever carries out data processing activities shall establish a sound data security management system throughout the whole process, organize data security education and training, and take corresponding technical measures and other necessary measures to ensure data security. The Data Security Law provides a national data security review system, under which data processing activities that affect or may affect national security shall be reviewed, and prohibits any individual or entity in China from providing data stored in PRC to foreign judicial or law enforcement departments without the approval of competent PRC authorities. In Addition, the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC (the “Personal Information Protection Law”), issued on August 20, 2021 by the SCNPC, further details the general rules and principles on personal information processing and further increases the potential liability of personal information processor. Even though we have already taken necessary organizational and technical measures in accordance with applicable legal requirements to protect the safety of our network facilities and the data processed by us, we may still face risks inherent in handling and protecting large volumes of data, including protecting the data temporarily hosted in our system, detecting and prohibiting unauthorized data sharing and transfers, preventing attacks on our system by outside parties, foiling any fraudulent behavior or improper use by our employees, and maintaining and updating our database. Any system failure, security breach or attempts by third parties to illegally obtain the data that results in any actual or perceived release of client data could damage our reputation and brand, deter current and potential clients from using our services, affect our business and results of operations, and expose us to potential legal liability.

Moreover, claims or allegations that we have violated laws and regulations relating to privacy and data security, or have failed to adequately protect data, may result in damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in us by our customers or business partners, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. If the third parties we work with violate applicable laws or contractual obligations or suffer a security breach, such circumstances also may put us in breach of our obligations under privacy laws and regulations and could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business.

Substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of cybersecurity related regulations and cybersecurity review as well as any impact these may have on our business operations.

The cybersecurity legal regime in China is relatively new and evolving rapidly, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainties. As a result, it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violations of applicable laws and regulations in certain circumstances.

Network operators in China are subject to numerous laws and regulations, and have the obligations to, among others, (i) establish internal security management systems that meet the requirements of the classified protection system for cybersecurity, (ii) implement technical measures to monitor and record network operation status and cybersecurity incidents, (iii) implement data security measures such as data classification, backups and encryption, and (iv) submit for cybersecurity review under certain circumstances.

On November 7, 2016, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress issued the Cyber Security Law, which imposes more stringent requirements on operators of “critical information infrastructure,” especially in data storage and cross-border data transfer.

On December 28, 2021, the CAC, the NDRC, the MIIT, and several other administrations jointly published the Measures for Cybersecurity Review, effective on February 15, 2022, which provides that certain operators of critical information infrastructure purchasing network products and services or network platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, must apply with the Cybersecurity Review Office for a cybersecurity review. However, the scope of operators of “critical information infrastructure” under the current regulatory regime remains unclear and is subject to the decisions of competent PRC regulatory authorities. The exact scope of operators of “critical information infrastructure” under the Measures for Cybersecurity Review and current PRC regulatory regime remains unclear, and is subject to the decisions of the relevant PRC government authorities that have been delegated the authority to identify operators of “critical information infrastructure” in their respective jurisdictions (including regions and industries). PRC government authorities have wide discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, including the identification of operators of “critical information infrastructure” and the interpretation and enforcement of requirements potentially applicable to such operators of “critical information infrastructure.” As a major internet platform, we are at risk of being deemed to be an operator of “critical information infrastructure” or a network platform operator meeting the above criteria under PRC cybersecurity laws. If we are identified as an operator of “critical information infrastructure,” we would be required to fulfill various obligations as required under PRC cybersecurity laws and other applicable laws for such operators of “critical information infrastructure” thus currently not applicable to us, including, among others, setting up a special security management organization, organizing regular cybersecurity education and training, formulating emergency plans for cyber security incidents and conducting regular emergency drills, and although the internet products and services we purchase are primarily bandwidth, copyright content and marketing services, we may need to follow cybersecurity review procedure and apply with Cybersecurity Review Office before making certain purchases of network products and services. During cybersecurity review, we may be required to suspend the provision of any existing or new services to our users, and we may experience other disruptions of our operations, which could cause us to lose users and customers therefore leading to adverse impacts on our business. The cybersecurity review could also lead to negative publicity and a diversion of time and attention of our management and our other resources. It could be costly and time-consuming for us to prepare application materials and make the applications. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will obtain the clearance or approval for these applications from the Cybersecurity Review Office and the relevant regulatory authorities in a timely manner, or at all. If we are found to be in violation of cybersecurity requirements in China, the relevant governmental authorities may, at their discretion, conduct investigations, levy fines, request app stores to take down our apps and cease to provide viewing and downloading services related to our apps, prohibit the registration of new users on our platform, or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business. Any of these actions may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

On November 14, 2021, the CAC published a discussion draft of the Administrative Measures for Internet Data Security, or the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security, which provides that data processors conducting the following activities shall apply for cybersecurity review: (i) merger, reorganization or division of Internet platform operators that have acquired a large number of data resources related to national security, economic development or public interests affects or may affect national security; (ii) listing abroad of data processors processing over one million users’ personal information; (iii) listing in Hong Kong which affects or may affect national security; or (iv) other data processing activities that affect or may affect national security. There have been no clarifications from the authorities as of the date of this annual report as to the standards for determining such activities that “affects or may affect national security.” The CAC has solicited comments on this draft until December 13, 2021, but there is no timetable as to when it will be enacted. As such, substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the enactment timetable, final content, interpretation and implementation. The Draft Measures for Internet Data Security, if enacted as proposed, may materially impact our capital raising activities. Any failure to obtain such approval or clearance from the regulatory authorities could materially constrain our liquidity and have a material adverse impact on our business operations and financial results, especially if we need additional capital or financing.

On July 7, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Measures for the Security Assessment of Cross-Border Transfer of Data, which took effect on September 1, 2022. These measures aim to regulate cross-border transfers of data, requiring among other things, that data processors that provide data to overseas apply to CAC for security assessments if: (1) data processors provide important data to overseas; (2) critical information infrastructure operators or data processors process personal information of more than a million people provide personal information to overseas; (3) data processors that have cumulatively provided personal information of 100,000 people or sensitive personal information of 10,000 people to overseas since January 1 of the previous year, provide personal information to overseas; or (4) other scenarios required by the CAC to apply for security assessments occur. In addition, these measures require data processors to carry out self-assessments of risks of providing data to overseas before applying to the CAC for security assessments.

The interpretation and application of these cybersecurity laws, regulations and standards are still uncertain and evolving, especially the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security. We cannot assure you that relevant governmental authorities will not interpret or implement these and other laws or regulations in ways that may negatively affect us.

We rely on certain third-party mobile app distribution channels, payment solution providers, streaming service providers, bandwidth providers and a cloud data storage service to conduct our business.

We rely on third-party mobile application distribution channels such as Apple’s App Store, various Android App Stores and other channels to distribute our Kuke Music and BMF Club mobile Apps. We expect a substantial number of downloads of our mobile Apps will continue to be derived from these distribution channels. As such, the promotion, distribution and operation of our mobile Apps are subject to such distribution platforms’ standard terms and policies for application developers, which are subject to the interpretation of, and frequent changes by, these distribution channels. If Apple’s App Store or any other major distribution channels interpret or change their standard terms and conditions in a manner that is detrimental to us, or terminate their existing relationship with us, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Our customers pay for our service through a variety of third-party payment channels. Acceptance and processing of these payment methods are subject to certain rules and regulations and require payment of interchange and other fees. To the extent there are increases in payment processing fees, material changes in the payment network, such as delays in receiving payments from processors, and/or changes in the rules or regulations concerning payment processing, our ability to provide convenient payment options to our customers may be undermined, and our revenue, operating expenses and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

We also rely upon third-party streaming services, bandwidth providers and a cloud data storage service in China to operate certain aspects of our business and to transmit or store our content and data. Any disruption of or interference with our use of these service providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We cannot assure you that these service providers and the underlying Internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China will be able to support increased demand arising from our continued business expansion.

Our operating results and cash flows may fluctuate significantly from period to period.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our operating results. We often receive orders from digital music service providers, institutional subscribers and distributors of our Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems in the second half of the year, and we usually generate ticket sales for the Beijing Music Festival every October. In addition, we expect to have higher student enrollment around the beginning of every semester and to recognize a substantial portion of our licensing revenue when we deliver the licensed content at our licensees’ request, the timing of which is not within our control. As a result, we believe that the comparison of our operating results over any interim periods in the past may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Overall, the historical seasonality of our business has been relatively mild but seasonality may increase in the future along with the expansion of our business. In addition, the seasonal trends that we have experienced in the past may not apply to, or be indicative of, our future operating results.

Recognition of share-based compensation expense may result in increased share-based compensation expenses.

We believe the granting of share-based compensation is of significant importance to our ability to attract and retain key employees, directors and consultants. In October 2020, we adopted a share incentive plan, or the 2020 Plan, to provide incentives to our employees, directors and consultants, which went into effect upon the completion of our initial public offering. The maximum aggregate number of Class A ordinary shares that may be issued under the 2020 Plan is 1,227,000. As of the date of this annual report, 1,125,334 share options and 101,666 restricted shares have been granted and outstanding.

We are required to account for share-based compensation in accordance with IFRS 2-Share-based Payment, which generally requires a company to recognize, as an expense, the fair value of share options and other equity incentives to employees based on the fair value of the equity awards on the date of the grant, with the compensation expense recognized over the period in which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the equity award. See “Note 29-Share-based payments” of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in annual report for additional information. We recognized share-based payment expense of RMB53.9 million, RMB15.2 million and RMB1.9 million (US$0.3 million) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.   If we grant additional share options or other equity incentives in the future, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may further increase, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our strategies focusing on rapid innovation and long-term goals over short-term financial results may yield results of operations that do not align with investors’ expectations.

Our business is growing and increasingly complex, and our success depends on our ability to quickly develop and launch new and innovative products and services. This business strategy could result in unintended outcomes or decisions that are poorly received by our customers or business partners. Our culture also prioritizes long-term strategic goals over short-term financial condition or operating results. We may make decisions that may reduce our short-term revenue or profitability if we believe that the decisions will improve our long-term financial performance. These decisions may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, in which case our customer base, our relationships with our business partners, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.

Our management team has limited experience managing a public company, interacting with public company investors or complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to becoming a public company that is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our senior management, particularly from our executive officers, and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

International expansion of our business could expose us to business, regulatory, political, operational, financial and economic risks associated with doing business outside of China.

We currently do not have international operations, but our long-term business strategy incorporates potential international expansion. Doing business internationally involves a number of risks, including:

Any of these factors could significantly harm our future international expansion and operations and, consequently, our revenue and operating results.

We may face risks related to natural disasters, health epidemics and other outbreaks, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

In addition to COVID-19, our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, such as snowstorms, earthquakes, fires or floods, the outbreak of other widespread health epidemics, such as swine flu, avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS, Ebola, Zika, or other events, such as wars, acts of terrorism, environmental accidents, power shortages or communication interruptions. Any of these natural disasters, health epidemics and events and their effect on the Chinese or global economy in general could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our revenue and profitability could be materially reduced due to the effect of such events on our customers, suppliers or other business partners. For example, our contract manufacturers may be required by the local or national government to shut down production under any of the aforementioned circumstances, which could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations, increase sales or expand our network of collaborating kindergartens.

We have limited insurance coverage with respect to our business and operations, which could expose us to significant costs and business disruption.

We do not maintain business interruption insurance or general third-party liability insurance, nor do we maintain property insurance, product liability insurance or key-man insurance. We consider this practice to be reasonable in light of the nature of our business and consistent with the practices of other companies of similar sizes in the same industries in China. Any uninsured risks may result in substantial costs and the diversion of our resources, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of the data, estimates and projections in this annual report that we obtained from third-party sources, and such information involves assumptions and limitations.

Certain facts, forecasts and other statistics relating to the industries in which we operate contained in this annual report have been derived from various public data sources and a commissioned third-party industry report. Industry data and projections involve a number of assumptions and limitations. Any discrepancy in the interpretation of such data could lead to measurements and projections that are different from the actual results. While we generally believe such data sources to be reliable, we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information. The report may have not been prepared on a comparable basis or may not be consistent with other sources.

If our internal control and procedures over financial reporting are not effective, we may be unable to accurately report our operating results, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.

In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified two material weaknesses in accordance with the standards established by the PCAOB, which relates to the lack of sufficient accounting and financial reporting personnel with the requisite knowledge and experience in the application of IFRS and SEC rules and the lack of sufficient controls in calculating the expected credit loss on financial assets. As defined in standards established by the PCAOB, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses, if not remediated timely, may lead to material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements in the future. To remedy our identified material weaknesses, we are in the process of adopting several measures that are expected to improve our internal control over financial reporting. See “Item 15. Disclosure Controls and Procedures-Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” However, the implementation of these measures may not fully address these deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting.

We are now a public company in the United States subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, requires that we include a management report on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F beginning with this annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. See “Item 15. Disclosure Controls and Procedures-Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” as such term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and make required remediation. In addition, as the applicable standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404.

If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our operating results and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements for prior periods.

Our ADSs may be prohibited from trading in the United States under the HFCAA in the future if it is later determined that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely our auditor. The delisting of our ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

As part of a continued regulatory focus in the United States on access to audit and other information currently protected by national law, in particular China’s, the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, has been signed into law on December 18, 2020. The HFCAA states if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspection for the PCAOB for three consecutive years beginning in 2021, the SEC shall prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the U.S.

On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted final amendments to its rules implementing the HFCAA (the “Final Amendments”). The Final Amendments include requirements to disclose information, including the auditor name and location, the percentage of shares of the issuer owned by governmental entities, whether governmental entities in the applicable foreign jurisdiction with respect to the auditor has a controlling financial interest with respect to the issuer, the name of each official of the Chinese Communist Party who is a member of the board of the issuer, and whether the articles of incorporation of the issuer contains any charter of the Chinese Communist Party. The Final Amendments also establish procedures the SEC will follow in identifying issuers and prohibiting trading by certain issuers under the HFCAA.

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC its determinations that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and identifies the registered public accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong that are subject to such determinations.

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 and for the years then ended were audited by Ernst & Young, who are located in Hong Kong and are subject to the determinations announced by the PCAOB in December 2021 (“PCAOB Determination Report”). Consequently, we were identified as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” on June 1, 2022.

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2023 and for the year ended December 31, 2023 were audited by Yu Certified Public Accountant, an independent registered public accounting firm that is headquartered in New York, the United State. Yu Certified Public Accountant is not on such list of the PCAOB Determination Report.

On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it has secured complete access to inspect and investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. The PCAOB also vacated its previous determinations issued in December 2021. Accordingly, until such time as the PCAOB issues any new determination, we are at no risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA.

On December 29, 2022, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act was signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which amended the HFCAA by reducing the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCAA from three years to two. Therefore, once an issuer is identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years, the SEC is required under the HCFAA to prohibit the trading of the issuer’s securities on a national securities exchange and in the over-the-counter market.

Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. The delisting of our ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment. If our ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our ADSs will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our businesses in China do not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations, or if these laws and regulations or their interpretations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.

PRC laws and regulations impose certain restrictions and prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in Internet and other related businesses. The Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access (2021 Version) (the “Negative List (2021 version)”) provides that foreign investors are generally not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunications service provider other than a provider for e-commerce services, domestic multi-party communications services, store-and-forward services and call center services, among others, and the Provisions on the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (2016 Revision, which was recently amended in 2022 by the State Council, and the amended version became effective on May 1, 2022) requires that the major foreign investor in a value-added telecommunications service provider in China obtain permissions and approvals from MIIT, which retain considerable discretion in granting permissions and approvals. The Negative List (2021 version) also prohibits foreign investment in internet news and information services, internet publishing services, internet audio-visual program services, internet culture operations (except for music), internet information services to the public (except for the contents allowed pursuant to China’s WTO commitments).

To ensure compliance with the PRC laws and regulations, our WFOEs, conduct business in China mainly through the VIEs based on a series of contractual arrangements by and among our WFOEs, the VIEs and the respective shareholders of the VIEs, which enable us to (i) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs, and (ii) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests and assets in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. As a result of our direct ownership in the WFOEs and the contractual arrangements with the VIEs, we are able to receive the economic benefits of the VIEs, be the primary beneficiary of the VIEs for accounting purposes and consolidate the financial results of the VIEs in our consolidated financial statements, to the extent that we have satisfied the conditions for consolidation of the VIEs under the IFRS. In the opinion of our management, each of these contractual arrangements is currently valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with its terms. However, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future PRC laws and regulations and that the PRC government may ultimately take a view contrary to ours.

If the contractual arrangements among our WFOEs, the VIEs and their respective shareholders are determined to be illegal or invalid, or if we or the VIEs fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations or failures, including:

The imposition of any of these penalties could cause us to lose our right to receive the economic benefits from the VIEs and result in a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business. In addition, it is unclear what impact these actions would have on us and on our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIEs in our consolidated financial statements, if the PRC government authorities were to find our legal structure and contractual arrangements to be in violation of PRC laws and regulations. If we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a manner satisfactory to relevant PRC regulatory authorities, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. If, due to any of the above circumstances or any other events, we become unable to exercise the contractual rights over the assets and operations of our subsidiaries or the VIEs that conduct substantially all of our operations, our securities may decline in value or become worthless.

We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders for our operations in the PRC, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders to conduct certain of our key businesses. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with substantial influence over the VIEs. If we had direct ownership of the VIEs, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of the VIEs, which in turn could implement changes at the management and operational level. Under the current contractual arrangements, however, we rely on the performance by the VIEs and their respective shareholders of their contractual obligations to exercise substantial influence over the VIEs. The VIEs and their shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct their operations in an acceptable manner, taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests or refusing to renew their existing contractual arrangements with us. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portions of our business through the contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders. Therefore, our contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their shareholders may not be as effective in ensuring our substantial influence over the relevant portion of our business operations as direct ownership would be. If the VIEs or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief and claiming damages. All the agreements we have with the VIEs and their shareholders are governed by PRC law. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in jurisdictions such as the United States and there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. In addition, under PRC law, arbitral rulings are final as parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing party fails to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time period, the prevailing party may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delay. In the event that we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert substantial influence over the VIEs, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have potential conflicts of interest with us. These shareholders may, or cause the VIEs to, breach or refuse to renew our contractual arrangements with them, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to effectively control the VIEs and receive substantially all of the economic benefits from the VIEs. For example, these shareholders may be able to cause our agreements with the VIEs to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to make payments that are due to us under the contractual arrangements on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that, when conflicts of interest arise, any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor. Currently, we do not have arrangements in place to address the potential conflicts of interest that these shareholders may have. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings to enforce our rights, which involve substantial uncertainty and may materially disrupt our business.

Failure to obtain or renew permissions or approvals or respond to any changes in government policies, laws or regulations may affect our and the VIEs’ ability to conduct or expand business.

China’s internet, private education and music licensing industries are highly regulated. We, our subsidiaries and the VIEs are required under PRC laws and regulations to obtain various government permissions or approvals in connection with the provision of our and the VIEs’ services. Applicable laws and regulations may be tightened and new laws or regulations may be introduced to impose additional government permission or approval requirements. In particular, uncertainties exist in relation to regulatory requirements regarding private education and music licensing. For example, under certain policies, we and the VIEs may be required to lower the tuition of Kukey courses in order to offer Kukey courses to the students of our collaborating kindergartens. If we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs fail to obtain and maintain permissions or approvals required for our business or respond to changes in the regulatory environment, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs could be subject to liabilities, penalties and operational disruption, which may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may lose the ability to use, or otherwise benefit from, the licenses, permits and assets held by the VIEs that are material to the operation of our business.

As part of our contractual arrangements with the VIEs, the VIEs hold certain assets, licenses and permits that are material to our business operations. The contractual arrangements contain terms that specifically obligate the VIEs’ shareholders to ensure the valid existence of the VIEs and restrict the disposal of material assets of the VIEs. However, if the VIEs’ shareholders breach the terms of these contractual arrangements, or if any of the VIEs undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding and all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors or are otherwise disposed of or encumbered without our consent, we may be unable to conduct certain of our business operations or otherwise benefit from the assets held by the VIEs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress of the PRC approved the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, i.e., the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. In December 2019, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Regulation on the Foreign Investment Law to further clarify relevant provisions of the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020. The Foreign Investment Law and its implementation regulation embody an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments.

However, since the Foreign Investment Law and its implementation regulation are relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to their interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign investment” refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in mainland China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangements would not be deemed as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition has a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. The Negative List (2021 version) stipulates that any domestic enterprise in mainland China engaging in prohibited business under the Negative List shall be subject to review by and shall obtain the consent of the relevant competent PRC authorities for overseas listing, and the foreign investors shall not participate in the operation and management of such enterprise, and the shareholding percentage of the foreign investors in such enterprise shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the relevant administrative provisions of the PRC domestic securities investment by foreign investors. The Negative List does not further elaborate whether existing overseas listed enterprises, like us, will be subject to such requirements. Further, pursuant to the press conference held by the National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC (the “NDRC”) on January 18, 2022, the foresaid requirements shall not be applicable to domestic enterprises that seek to offer and list securities in overseas markets indirectly. Although it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities in the future. According to CSRC’s Questions and Answers with respect to Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies on February 17, 2023, for the filing of overseas listing of enterprises with VIE structure, the filing procedure will adhere to the principles of market-oriented principle, rule of law, and strengthened regulatory synergy. The CSRC will consult the relevant competent authorities, and the overseas listing of VIE structured enterprises that meet the compliance requirements will be filed. For details, see “— The permission and approval from the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with an offshore offering under PRC law, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such permission or approval.”

In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under the PRC laws and regulations. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all.

In addition, the Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign-invested enterprises established before the Foreign Investment Law came into effect may maintain their structure and corporate governance within a five-year transition period, which means that we may be required to adjust the structure and corporate governance of certain of our subsidiaries in China when such transition period ends. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our subsidiaries in mainland China and Hong Kong to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. To the extent cash or assets in the business is in mainland China or Hong Kong or an entity domiciled in mainland China or Hong Kong, and may need to be used to fund operations outside of mainland China or Hong Kong, the funds and assets may not be available to fund operations or for other uses outside of mainland China or Hong Kong due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations by the government on our, our subsidiaries’ or the VIEs’ ability to transfer cash and assets, which could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct business.

Under our current corporate structure, our ability to pay dividends depends upon dividends paid by our British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong subsidiaries, which in turn depends on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China, which further depends on payments from the VIEs under the contractual arrangements. To the extent cash or assets in the business is in mainland China or Hong Kong or an entity domiciled in mainland China or Hong Kong, and may need to be used to fund operations outside of mainland China or Hong Kong, the funds and assets may not be available to fund operations or for other uses outside of mainland China or Hong Kong due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations by the government on our, our subsidiaries’ or the VIEs’ ability to transfer cash and assets.

Although we consolidate the results of the VIEs and their subsidiaries, we only have access to the assets or earnings of the VIEs and their subsidiaries through the contractual arrangements. If the PRC authorities determine that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if current regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, our ability to settle amount owed by the VIEs under the contractual arrangements may be seriously hindered. In addition, if our existing subsidiaries in China or any newly formed ones incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing their debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends to us. 

Our WFOEs are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of its retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC laws, each of our subsidiary, the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds until such reserve funds reach 50% of its registered capital. In addition, after making an allocation to the statutory reserve funds from their after-tax profits, our WFOEs, the VIEs and their subsidiaries may allocate a portion of their after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to a discretionary surplus fund at their discretion. The statutory reserve funds and the discretionary funds are not distributable as cash dividends.

There are limitations on our ability to transfer cash between us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs, and there is no assurance that the PRC government will not intervene or impose restrictions on cash transfer between us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs. We may encounter difficulties in our ability to transfer cash between subsidiaries in China and other subsidiaries largely due to various PRC laws and regulations imposed on foreign exchange. The majority of our income is denominated in Renminbi, and shortage in foreign currencies may restrict our ability to pay dividends or other payment to satisfy our foreign currency denominated obligations, if any. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of the Foreign Exchange in the PRC as long as certain procedural requirements are met. Approval from appropriate government authorities is required if Renminbi is converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may, at its discretion, impose restrictions on access to foreign currencies for current account transactions and if this occurs in the future, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders. The PRC government has implemented a series of capital control measures, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. It may continue to strengthen its capital controls and dividends and other distributions of our subsidiaries in China may be subjected to tighter scrutiny and may limit the ability of our Cayman Islands holding company, to use capital from our subsidiaries in China, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

Our Hong Kong subsidiary may be considered a non-resident enterprise for tax purposes, so that any dividends our subsidiary in China pays to our Hong Kong subsidiary may be regarded as China-sourced income and, as a result, may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10% unless a tax treaty or similar arrangement provides otherwise. If we are required under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law to pay income tax for any dividends we receive from our subsidiaries in China, or if our Hong Kong subsidiary is determined by PRC government authority as receiving benefits from reduced income tax rate due to a structure or arrangement that is primarily tax-driven, it would materially and adversely affect the amount of dividends, if any, we may pay to our shareholders.

If the PRC tax authorities determine that our Cayman Islands holding company is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes and unless a tax treaty or similar arrangement provides otherwise, we may be required to withhold a 10% tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises, including the holders of the ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders, including the ADS holders, may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 10% on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders, including the ADS holders, and any gain realized on the transfer of ADSs or ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% which in the case of dividends may be withheld at source. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs.

Cayman Islands economic substance requirements may adversely affect our business and operations.

Pursuant to the International Tax Cooperation (Economic Substance) Act (2021 Revision) of the Cayman Islands, or the ES Act, that first came into force on January 1, 2019, a “relevant entity” is required to satisfy the economic substance test set out in the ES Act. A “relevant entity” includes an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands as is our company. Based on the current interpretation of the ES Act, we have submitted filings as required under the ES Act as a pure equity holding company since it only holds equity participation in other entities and only earns dividends and capital gains. Accordingly, for so long as our company is regarded as a “pure equity holding company,” it is only subject to reduced substance requirements, which require us to (i) comply with all applicable filing requirements under the Companies Act, Cap. 22 (Act 3 of 1961, as consolidated and revised) of the Cayman Islands (the “Companies Act”); and (ii) have adequate human resources and adequate premises in the Cayman Islands for holding and managing equity participations in other entities. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to more requirements under the ES Act in the future. Uncertainties over the interpretation and implementation of the ES Act may have an adverse impact on our business and operations.

Our contractual arrangements with the VIEs may result in adverse tax consequences to us.

Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by PRC tax authorities. We could face material adverse tax consequences if PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements between us and the VIEs were not entered into on an arm’s-length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust the income of the VIEs in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the VIEs for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase their tax liabilities. In addition, PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIEs for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the VIEs’ tax liabilities increase or if any of the VIEs is required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

PRC laws and regulations over direct investment in and loans to PRC entities by offshore companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our initial public offering to make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs or make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Under PRC laws and regulations, any transfer of funds by us to our PRC subsidiaries, either as a shareholder loan or through injection of registered capital, are subject to approval by or registration or filing with relevant governmental authorities in China. Currently, there is no statutory limit to the amount of funding that we can provide to our PRC subsidiaries through capital contributions, because there is no statutory limit on the amount of registered capital for our PRC subsidiaries and we are allowed to make capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries by subscribing for their registered capital, provided that the PRC subsidiaries complete the relevant filing and registration procedures. According to relevant PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises, or FIEs, capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries are subject to filing with the PRC Ministry of Commerce, or the MOC, in its foreign investment comprehensive management information system and registration with other governmental authorities in China. Based on the current registered capital of our PRC subsidiaries and the amount of funding we have contributed, without increasing the registered capital of our PRC subsidiaries, the amount of funding we can provide to our PRC subsidiaries through injection of registered capital is US$1,840 million. In addition, under the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, and the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or SAFE Circular 16, FIEs are prohibited from using Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange capitals for expenditures beyond their business scopes or using such Renminbi fund to provide loans to persons other than their affiliates, unless that is within their business scope.

Any foreign loan procured by our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs is also required to be registered with the SAFE or its local branches or be filed with the SAFE in its information system, and each of our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs may not procure loans which exceed either (i) the amount of the difference between their respective registered total investment amount and registered capital, or the Total Investment and Registered Capital Balance, or (ii) two times, or the then-applicable statutory multiple, the amount of their respective audited net assets, calculated in accordance with PRC GAAP, or the Net Assets Limit, at our election. Increasing the Total Investment and Registered Capital Balance of our PRC subsidiaries is subject to governmental approval and may require a PRC subsidiary to increase its registered capital at the same time. If we choose to make a loan to a PRC entity based on its Net Assets Limit, the maximum amount that we would be able to loan to the relevant PRC entity would depend on the relevant entity’s net assets and the applicable statutory multiple at the time of the calculation. Any medium-or long-term loan to be provided by us to the VIEs must also be approved by the National Development and Reform Commission, or NDRC. Please see “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulations-Regulations on Foreign Exchange Registration of Offshore Investment by PRC Residents.”

These PRC laws and regulations may significantly limit our ability to use Renminbi converted from the net proceeds of our initial public offering to fund the establishment of new entities in China by our PRC subsidiaries, to invest in or acquire any other PRC companies through our PRC subsidiaries, to fund our existing VIEs or to establish and fund new variable interest entities in China. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans to our PRC subsidiaries or VIEs, or future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals or if we are found to be in violation of any applicable laws with respect to foreign currency exchange, our ability to use the proceeds we received or expect to receive from our offshore offerings may be negatively affected and we may be subject to penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

A severe or prolonged downturn in the Chinese and global economy could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our revenues are all sourced from China. Therefore, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects are affected significantly by the economic, political and legal developments in China. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, such as the level of government involvement, growth rate and control of foreign exchange. The PRC government has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of a China-based company, such as us, to conduct its business. Therefore, investors of our company and our business face potential uncertainties from the PRC government. While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth in the past 30 years, the growth has been uneven across different periods, regions and among various economic sectors of China, and the rate of growth has slowed down since 2012. In addition, economic conditions in China are also sensitive to global economic conditions. There is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies that had been adopted by the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China. There is also significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and China with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. Moreover, there have been the increasing tension between the United States and China, and concerns over unrest, terrorist threats and the potential for war in the Middle East, Europe and elsewhere, as well as over the conflicts involving Ukraine, Syria and North Korea, all creating significant uncertainty for the Chinese and global economy. For example, the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine has resulted in an escalated regional instability, amplified the existing geopolitical tension among Russia and other countries in the region and in the west, as well as adversely affected commodity and other financial markets or economic conditions. The United States, European Union, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and other countries have imposed, and may further impose, financial and economic sanctions and export controls targeting certain Russian entities and/or individuals, which could adversely affect the global economy and financial markets. The duration of such military conflict and the related sanctions, as well as their impact on the global financial markets, cannot be predicted. There have also been concerns on the relationship between China and other countries, including the surrounding Asian countries, which may potentially have economic effects. In particular, there is significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and China with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. Furthermore, there is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by central banks and financial authorities in some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China. Any prolonged slowdown in the Chinese or global economy may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system and changes in laws and regulations in China could adversely affect us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all and may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such unpredictability towards our contractual, property and procedural rights could adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations. Uncertainties also exist in relation to new legislation or proposed changes in the PRC regulatory requirements.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. Administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of management attention. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into and could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The PRC government may exert, at any time, substantial intervention and influence over the manner of our and the VIEs’ operations, and the rules and regulations to which we and the VIEs are subject, including the ways they are enforced, may change rapidly and with little advance notice to us, the VIEs or our shareholders. Any such actions by the Chinese government, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs or to exert control over any offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

The ability of our subsidiaries and the VIEs to operate in China may be impaired by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to value-added telecommunications services, internet audio-video program services, taxation, foreign investment limitations, and other matters.

The PRC government may exert, at any time, substantial intervention and influence over the manner of our and the VIEs’ operations, and the rules and regulations to which we and the VIEs are subject, including the ways they are enforced, may change rapidly and with little advance notice to us, the VIEs or our shareholders. The PRC government have recently initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over China-based companies listed overseas, and adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews and new laws and regulations relating to data security. The PRC government may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our subsidiaries in China and the VIEs’ compliance with such regulations or interpretations. As such, our subsidiaries in China and the VIEs may be subject to various government actions and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate. They could be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including various local and municipal agencies and government sub-divisions. They may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. Furthermore, it is uncertain when and whether we will be required to obtain permissions or approvals from the PRC government to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchanges in the future, and even when such permission or approval is obtained, whether it will be subsequently revoked or rescinded. According to CSRC’s Questions and Answers with respect to Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies on February 17, 2023, for  the filing of overseas listing of enterprises with VIE structure, the filing procedure will adhere to the principles of market-oriented principle, rule of law, and strengthened regulatory synergy. The CSRC will consult the relevant competent authorities, and the overseas listing of VIE structured enterprises that meet the compliance requirements will be filed. For details, see “— The permission and approval from the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with an offshore offering under PRC law, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such permission or approval.”

Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs at any time, or to exert control over an offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and/or may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. We or the VIEs have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, or sanctions regarding our corporate structure, contractual arrangements, the VIEs’ operations and the offering of securities that we may make under this annual report and the applicable annual report supplement from the CSRC, the CAC or any other PRC government authorities.

The permission and approval from the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with an offshore offering under PRC law, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such permission or approval.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises, or the Trial Measures, which became effective on March 31, 2023. On the same date of the issuance of the Trial Measures, the CSRC circulated No.1 to No.5 Supporting Guidance Rules, the Notes on the Trial Measures, the Notice on Administration Arrangements for the Filing of Overseas Listings by Domestic Enterprises and the relevant CSRC Answers to Reporter Questions on the official website of the CSRC, or collectively, the Guidance Rules and Notice. Under the Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, domestic companies conducting overseas securities offering and listing activities, either in direct or indirect form, shall complete filing procedures with the CSRC pursuant to the requirements of the Trial Measures within three working days following its submission of initial public offering or listing application. The companies that have already been listed on overseas stock exchanges are not required to make immediate filings for its listing yet need to make filings for subsequent offerings in accordance with the Trial Measures. In view of the fact that the Trial Measures have come into effect on 31 March 2023, we shall fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC for our future offshore offering as per requirements of the Trial Measures. According to CSRC’s Questions and Answers with respect to Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies on February 17, 2023, for the filing of overseas listing of enterprises with VIE structure, the filing procedure will adhere to the principles of market-oriented principle, rule of law, and strengthened regulatory synergy. The CSRC will consult the relevant competent authorities, and the overseas listing of VIE structured enterprises that meet the compliance requirements will be filed. We may not be able to complete the filing if the filing materials are incomplete or do not meet the requirements of the CSRC. Any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining the CSRC permission and approval for any of our offshore offerings, or a rescission of such permission and approval if obtained, may subject us to sanctions imposed by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. 

Our operations depend on the performance of the Internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China, which are in large part operated and maintained by state-owned operators.

The successful operation of our business depends on the performance of the Internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China. Almost all access to the Internet is maintained through state-owned telecommunications operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. We have limited access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s Internet infrastructure or the telecommunications networks provided by telecommunications service providers. Internet traffic in China has experienced significant growth during the past few years. Effective bandwidth and server storage at Internet data centers in large cities such as Beijing are scarce. With the expansion of our business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and infrastructure to keep up with our growing customer base. We had not experienced material disruptions to our business operations as a result of service capacity constraints for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023. However, we cannot assure you that the Internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China will be able to support the demands associated with the continued growth in Internet usage. If we were unable to increase our online content and service delivering capacity accordingly, we may not be able to continuously grow our Internet traffic and the adoption of our products and services may be hindered, which could adversely impact our business and our share price.

In addition, we generally have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunications service providers. If the prices we pay for telecommunications and Internet services rise significantly, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, and some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that the in-charge government authority be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC requires that the in-charge government authority be notified in advance of any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are triggered. In light of the uncertainties relating to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law, we cannot assure you that the in-charge anti-monopoly law enforcement agency will not deem our past acquisition or investments to have triggered the filing requirement for anti-trust review. If we are found to implement concentration in violation of the present Law, and the concentration has or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, the Anti-monopoly Law Enforcement Agency of the State Council shall order it to cease the implementation of concentration, dispose of the shares or assets within a time limit, transfer the business within a time limit and take other necessary measures to restore to the status before the concentration, and impose on it a fine of not more than 10% of its sales amount in the previous year; or impose on it a fine of not more than 5 million yuan if the concentration has no effect of eliminating or restricting competition. It may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, under applicable laws, mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOC, and any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement, are prohibited.

In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOC or its local counterparts, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

Any failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock incentive plans may subject our share incentive plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

In February 2012, the SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Relating to the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Listed Company, replacing earlier rules promulgated in 2007. Pursuant to these rules, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year and participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company, subject to a few exceptions, are required to register with the SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be a PRC subsidiary of the overseas listed company, and complete certain other procedures. In addition, an overseas-entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests. Failure to meet these requirements may result in fines and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries and our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us. See “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulations-Regulations on Stock Incentive Plans.”

PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident shareholders, beneficial owners and PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase their registered capital or distribute profits to us or otherwise adversely affect us.

In July 2014, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment Through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37. SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents (including PRC individuals and PRC corporate entities, as well as foreign individuals that are deemed PRC residents for foreign exchange administration purposes) to register with the SAFE or its local branches in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. SAFE Circular 37 further requires the SAFE registrations be updated in the event of any changes with respect to the basic information of the offshore special purpose vehicle, such as change in its name, operation term and PRC resident shareholder, increase or decrease of capital contribution, share transfer or exchange, or mergers or divisions.

We have requested that all of our current shareholders and beneficial owners who are known to us as being PRC residents complete the foreign exchange registrations. However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interest in our company, and we cannot provide any assurance that these PRC residents will comply with our request to make or obtain the applicable registrations or continuously comply with all the requirements under SAFE Circular 37 or other related rules. Failure by such shareholders or beneficial owners to comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiaries, could subject us to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects. In addition, if we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we cannot assure you that we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, will be able to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in share incentive plans in overseas private special purpose companies shall submit applications to the SAFE or its local branches for the foreign exchange registration. Pursuant to the Circular on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly Listed Company, or the SAFE Circular 7, promulgated by the SAFE in 2012, grantees of our incentive share awards who are PRC citizens or who are non-PRC residents continuously residing in the PRC for a continuous period of no less than a year shall, subject to limited exceptions, be required to register with the SAFE and complete certain other procedures through a domestic qualified agent and collectively retain an overseas entrusted institution to handle matters related to the exercise of stock options and the purchase and disposition of related equity interests after our company becomes an overseas listed company upon the completion of the offering. Failure to comply with these SAFE requirements may subject these individuals to fines, and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries and limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us.

The PRC State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, has also issued certain circulars concerning equity incentive awards. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise share options or are granted restricted shares will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Each of our PRC subsidiaries has obligations to file documents related to employee share options or restricted shares with relevant tax authorities and to withhold individual income taxes of those employees. If our employees fail to pay or if we fail to withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and regulations, we may face sanctions imposed by the tax authorities or other PRC governmental authorities.

If the custodians or authorized users of our corporate chops and seals fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our legal documents for corporate transactions are executed using the chops or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant branch of the PRC State Administration for Market Regulation.

In order to maintain the physical security of our chops and chops of our PRC entities, we generally store these items in secured locations accessible only by authorized personnel. Although we monitor the activities of such authorized personnel, there is no assurance that such procedures will prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. Accordingly, if any of our authorized personnel misuse or misappropriate our corporate chops or seals, we could encounter difficulties in maintaining control over the relevant entities, experience significant disruption to our operations and incur significant losses. If a designated legal representative obtains control of the chops in an effort to obtain substantial influence over any of our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs, we or our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs would need to pass a new shareholders or board resolution to designate a new legal representative and we would need to take legal action to seek the return of the chops, apply for new chops with the relevant authorities, or otherwise seek legal redress for the violation of the representative’s fiduciary duties to us, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business and operations.

We face certain risks related to the real properties that we lease and sublease.

We lease our office space from a third party in China and sublease parts of the properties to our WFOEs, VIEs and the Beijing Music Festival Arts Foundation. Our lease agreements for these properties have not been registered with the PRC governmental authorities as required by PRC law due to the property owner’s refusal to cooperate with the registration process, despite our efforts. Although the failure to do so does not in itself invalidate the leases, we may be ordered by the PRC government authorities to rectify such noncompliance and, if such non-compliance is not rectified within a given period of time, we may be subject to fines imposed by PRC government authorities ranging from RMB1,000 and RMB10,000 for each unregistered lease agreement. While we intend to continue to seek the property owner’s cooperation with the registration process, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully obtain such cooperation. If the lessor is not entitled to lease the real properties to us and the owner of such real properties declines to ratify the lease agreement between us and the respective lessor, we may not be able to enforce our rights to lease such properties under the respective lease agreement against the owner. As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware of any claim or challenge brought by any third parties concerning the use of our leased properties without proper ownership proof. If a lease agreement is claimed as null and void by third parties who is the real owner of such leased real properties, we could be required to vacate the properties, in the event of which we could only initiate the claim against the lessor under the relevant lease agreement for indemnities for their breach of the agreement. We cannot assure you that suitable alternative locations will be readily available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to relocate our office in a timely manner, our operations may be interrupted.

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.

Under the PRC EIT Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with the “de facto management body” within China is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. Under relevant implementation rules, the “de facto management body” means the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. According to a circular issued by the SAT in April 2009, or Circular 82, an enterprise incorporated offshore that is controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group may be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of its day-to-day operational management is in China; (ii) decisions relating to its financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in China; (iii) its primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions are located or maintained in China; and (iv) at least 50% of its voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in China.

We believe that we are not a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If PRC tax authorities determine that we are a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we could be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide income, which could materially reduce our net income, and we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises, including the holders of our ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders (including our ADS holders) may be subject to PRC tax on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of the ADSs or Class A ordinary shares, if such income is treated as sourced from China. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends payable to our non-PRC individual shareholders (including our ADS holders) and any gain realized on the transfer of the ADSs or Class A ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20%, unless a reduced rate is available under an applicable tax treaty between their country of tax residence and the PRC. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs or Class A ordinary shares.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

In February 2015, the SAT issued the Public Notice Regarding Certain Enterprise Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Resident Enterprises, or SAT Public Notice 7. Under SAT Public Notice 7 and amended it on December 29, 2017, pursuant to which a non-resident enterprise conducts an “indirect transfer” by transferring the taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, the non-resident enterprise or the PRC entity which directly owns the taxable assets may report to the relevant tax authority such indirect transfer. Using a “substance over form” principle, PRC tax authorities may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such an indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a tax rate of 10% for the transfer. Both the transferor and the transferee may be subject to penalties under PRC tax laws if the transferee fails to withhold the taxes and the transferor fails to pay the taxes. However, PRC tax would not be applicable to the transfer by any non-resident enterprise of our ADSs acquired and sold on public securities markets.

On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Public Notice on Issues Relating to Withholding at Source of Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises, or SAT Public Notice 37, which came into effect on December 1, 2017 and was amended on June 15,2018. According to SAT Public Notice 37, where the non-resident enterprise fails to declare its tax payable pursuant to the PRC EIT Law, the tax authority may order it to pay the tax due within a required period, and the non-resident enterprise shall declare and pay the tax within the time specified by the tax authority. If the non-resident enterprise voluntarily declares and pays tax before the tax authority orders it to do so, it shall be deemed that such enterprise has paid its tax payable in time.

We face uncertainties on the reporting and tax consequences of future private equity financing transactions, share exchanges or other transactions involving the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises. The PRC tax authorities may pursue such non-resident enterprises with respect to their filing obligations or the transferees with respect to their withholding obligations, and request our PRC subsidiaries to assist in the filing. As a result, we and the non-resident enterprises in such transactions may be subject to filing obligations or tax under SAT Public Notice 7 and SAT Public Notice 37. We may also be required to expend extensive resources to comply with these requirements or to establish that we and the non-resident enterprises should not be taxed under these regulations, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in labor costs and enforcement of stricter labor laws and regulations in China may adversely affect our business and our profitability.

The average wage in China and the average wage level for our employees have increased in recent years and are expected to grow. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will increase. Unless we are able to pass on these increased labor costs to our customers, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering into labor contracts with our employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing funds, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules, employers are subject to strict requirements in terms of signing labor contracts, paying minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employee’s probation and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. In the event that we decide to terminate some of our employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the PRC Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules may limit our ability to effect those changes in a desirable or cost-efficient manner, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, our employment practices may violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject us to labor disputes or government investigations. We cannot assure you that we have complied or will be able to comply with all labor-related laws and regulations. If we are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, we could be required to provide additional compensation to our employees, pay penalties or incur significant legal fees in connection with such disputes or investigations, and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our business may be negatively affected by the potential obligations to make additional social insurance and housing fund contributions.

We are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an employer has made adequate payments of the requisite statutory employee benefits, and employers who fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. Certain of the VIEs have historically failed to promptly make social insurance and housing fund contributions in full for their employees. With respect to the outstanding social insurance contribution, we may also be subject to a late charge at the rate of 0.05% per day from the day of default and a fine of up to three times of the outstanding contribution if we are unable to make the full payments as requested by the in-charge government authority. We have not received any inquiry from relevant government authorities in this regard but if the relevant PRC authorities determine that we shall make supplemental social insurance and housing fund contributions, we may be subject to fines and legal sanctions and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. In 2021, we made provisions of RMB34,815.6 for the outstanding social insurance and housing fund contribution. In 2022 and 2023, we did not make additional provisions.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in China against us or our management named in this annual report based on foreign laws.

We are a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We conduct substantially all of our operations in China and substantially all of our assets are located in China. In addition, all of our directors and officers are PRC nationals who reside in China for a significant portion of the year. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process upon us or those persons inside mainland China. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors as none of them currently resides in the United States or has substantial assets located in the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or the PRC would (i) recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws, or (ii) entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands or the PRC against us or our directors or officers that are predicated upon U.S. federal or state securities laws.

The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize a final and conclusive judgment in the federal or state courts of the United States under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain circumstances, an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (i) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (ii) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (iii) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (iv) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (v) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (vi) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in mainland China are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on the treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States.

Our Hong Kong subsidiaries could become subject to more influence and/or control of the PRC government if the Hong Kong legal system becomes more integrated into the PRC legal system.

Certain national laws and regulations of the PRC, including but not limited to the Measures for Cybersecurity Review and other PRC regulations, are not applicable in Hong Kong, except for those listed in the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the PRC (the “Basic Law”). However, such list of national laws and regulations that are applicable in Hong Kong can be expanded by amendment to the Basic Law. There is no assurance that (1) the Basic Law will not be further amended to apply more PRC laws and regulations in Hong Kong, or (2) the PRC and/or Hong Kong government will not take other actions to promote the integration of Hong Kong legal system into the PRC legal system. Although we do not have substantive business operations in Hong Kong, we cannot assure you that our Hong Kong subsidiaries will not be subject to more influence and/or control of the PRC government or even direct oversight or intervention from them if we expand our business in Hong Kong or the Hong Kong legal system becomes more integrated into the PRC legal system. We also cannot assure you that our Hong Kong subsidiaries will not be exposed to the similar regulatory and/or policy risks and uncertainties faced by our subsidiaries in mainland China in the future.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in the political and economic conditions in China and China’s foreign exchange policies. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, or the SDR, and decided that starting from October 1, 2016, Renminbi is determined to be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR basket. Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar. It is difficult to predict how market forces or policies by the PRC or U.S. government may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and we cannot assure you that the Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future.

Significant revaluation of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our revenues, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ADSs in U.S. dollars. The appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for capital expenditures and working capital and other business purposes. Conversely, a significant depreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar may significantly reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent of our earnings, which in turn could adversely affect the price of our ADSs and have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our Class A ordinary shares or ADSs, royalties, strategic acquisitions or investments or for other business purposes.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these transactions may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure, or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.

Foreign exchange controls may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes foreign exchange controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company primarily relies on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of the SAFE provided that certain procedural requirements are met. Specifically, under the existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of the SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China may be used to pay dividends to our company. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses, such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we need to obtain SAFE approval or registration to use cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs to pay off their respective debt in a currency other than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions in the future. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders and holders of the ADSs.

Our PRC subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on paying dividends or making other payments to us, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

We are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Payment of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries is an important source of income for us to meet our financing need, and such payment is subject to various restrictions. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated after-tax profits upon satisfaction of relevant statutory condition and procedures, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds until the total amount set aside reaches 50% of its registered capital. In addition, the EIT Law and its implementation rules provide that withholding tax at the rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises, unless otherwise exempted or reduced according to treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC-resident enterprises are incorporated. Furthermore, if our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

If we become directly subject to the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity involving U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we may have to expend significant resources to investigate and resolve the matter, which could harm our business operations, stock price and reputation.

U.S.-listed companies with substantially all of their operations in China have been the subject of intense scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity by investors, financial commentators and regulatory agencies, such as the SEC. Much of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity has centered on financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, lack of effective internal controls over financial accounting, inadequate corporate governance policies and practice, and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity, the publicly traded stock of many U.S.-listed Chinese companies sharply decreased in value and, in some cases, has become virtually worthless. Many of these companies are now subject to shareholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions and are conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations. It is not clear what effect this sector-wide scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity will have on us, our business and our stock price. If we become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, with or without merit, we will have to expend significant resources to engage in the costly and time-consuming exercise of investigating such allegations and defending our company, which could distract our management from growing our business. If we fail to prevail on these matters, our business operations could be severely affected and you could sustain a significant decline in the value of our stock.

Risks Related to Our ADSs

The trading price of our ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading price of our ADSs have been, and may be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices or the underperformance or deteriorating financial results of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility since their initial public offerings, including, in some cases, substantial decline in the trading prices of their securities. The trading performances of other PRC companies’ securities after their offerings may affect investors’ attitude toward PRC companies listed in the United States, which consequently may impact the trading performance of our ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, any negative news or perception about inadequate corporate governance practices or fraudulent accounting, corporate structure or matters of other PRC companies may also negatively affect investors’ attitude towards PRC companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have conducted any inappropriate activities. Furthermore, securities markets may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to our operating performance, resulting in a material adverse effect on the trading price of our ADSs.

In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for our ADSs may be volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the trading volume and price of the ADSs.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our dual-class voting structure will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

Our authorized and issued ordinary shares are divided into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. In respect of matters requiring the votes of shareholders, holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares vote together as a single class except as may otherwise be required by law, and holders of Class A ordinary shares will be entitled to one vote per share while holders of Class B ordinary shares will be entitled to ten votes per share. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof, while Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. Upon any transfer of Class B ordinary shares by a holder thereof to any person or entity that is not an affiliate of the holder, such Class B ordinary shares are automatically and immediately converted into an equal number of Class A ordinary shares.

As of the date of this annual report, Mr. He Yu, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Lung Yu, our Director, beneficially own all of our issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares, representing 79.1% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding ordinary shares due to the disparate voting powers associated with our dual-class voting structure. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees-E. Share Ownership.” Holders of our Class B ordinary shares have considerable influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, such as electing directors and approving material mergers, acquisitions or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of our ADSs.

Our dual-class voting structure may render the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares ineligible for inclusion in certain stock market indices, and thus adversely affect the trading price and liquidity of the ADSs.

Certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multi-class share structures in certain of their indices. For example, S&P Dow Jones and FTSE Russell have changed their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being added to such indices. As a result, our dual-class voting structure may prevent the inclusion of the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares in such indices, which could adversely affect the trading price and liquidity of the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our ADSs, the market price for our ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our ADSs will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If research analysts do not establish and maintain adequate research coverage or if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our ADSs or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the market price for our ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which, in turn, could cause the market price or trading volume for our ADSs to decline.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs are voted.

As a Cayman Islands exempted company, we are not obliged by the Companies Act to call shareholders’ annual general meetings. Our second amended and restated memorandum of association provides that we may (but are not obliged to) hold each year a general meeting as our annual general meeting. Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as our registered shareholders. As a holder of the ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or to cast any votes at such meetings. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights attached to the Class A ordinary shares underlying by your ADSs indirectly by giving voting instructions to the depositary in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you may vote only by giving voting instructions to the depositary, as the holder of the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs. Where any matter is to be put to a vote at a general meeting, then upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as is practicable, to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs in accordance with your instructions. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs, unless you withdraw the shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting. Under our second amended and restated memorandum of association, the minimum notice period required to be given by our company to our registered shareholders to convene a general meeting will be ten days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice of the meeting to withdraw the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs and become the registered holder of such shares to allow you to attend the general meeting and to vote directly with respect to any specific matter or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. In addition, under our second amended and restated memorandum of association, for the purposes of determining those shareholders who are entitled to attend and vote at any general meeting, our directors may close our register of members and/or fix in advance a record date for such meeting, and such closure of our register of members or the setting of such a record date may prevent you from withdrawing the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs and becoming the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date, so that you would not be able to attend the general meeting or to vote directly. If we ask for your instruction, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We have agreed to give the depositary at least 30 business days’ prior notice of shareholder meetings. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs are voted and you may have no legal remedy if the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of our ADSs could adversely affect their market price.

Sales of substantial amounts of our ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our ADSs and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings in the future. The ADSs sold in our initial public offering are freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and shares held by our existing shareholders may also be sold in the public market in the future subject to the restrictions in Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act. Any or all of these ordinary shares may be released prior to the expiration of the applicable lock-up period at the discretion of the designated representatives. To the extent shares are released before the expiration of the applicable lock-up period and sold into the market, the market price of our ADSs could decline significantly.

Certain major holders of our ordinary shares have the right to cause us to register the sale of their shares under the Securities Act, subject to the applicable lock-up periods in connection with our initial public offering. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in ADSs representing these shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration. Sales of these registered shares in the form of ADSs in the public market could cause the price of our ADSs to decline significantly.

We have adopted share incentive plans, under which we have the discretion to grant a broad range of equity-based awards to eligible participants. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees-B. Compensation.” We have registered all ordinary shares that we may issue under these share incentive plans and they can be freely sold in the public market in the form of ADSs upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements. If a large number of our ordinary shares or securities convertible into our ordinary shares are sold in the public market in the form of ADSs after they become eligible for sale, the sales could reduce the trading price of our ADSs and impede our ability to raise future capital. In addition, any ordinary shares that we issue under our share incentive plans would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase ADSs.

Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on price appreciation of our ADSs for return on your investment.

We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on investment in our ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.

Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain requirements of Cayman Islands law. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in our ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of our ADSs. There is no guarantee that our ADSs will appreciate in value in the future or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in our ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in our ADSs.

Your right to participate in any future rights offerings may be limited, which may cause dilution to your holdings and you may not receive cash dividends if it is impractical to make them available to you.

We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make rights available to you in the United States, unless we register both the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not make rights available to you, unless both the rights and the underlying securities to be distributed to ADS holders are either registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective and we may not be able to establish a necessary exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in your holdings.

You may be subject to limitations on the transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events such as a rights offering, during which time the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deems it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

Your rights to pursue claims against the depositary as a holder of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement.

Under the deposit agreement, any action or proceeding against or involving the depositary arising out of or based upon the deposit agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby or by virtue of owning the ADSs, including claims arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, may only be instituted in a state or federal court in New York, New York, and you, as a holder of our ADSs, will have irrevocably waived any objection which you may have to the laying of venue of any such proceeding and irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any such action or proceeding.

The depositary may, in its sole discretion, require that any dispute or difference arising from the relationship created by the deposit agreement be referred to and finally settled by an arbitration conducted under the terms described in the deposit agreement, which may include claims arising under the federal securities laws, although the arbitration provisions of the deposit agreement do not preclude you from pursuing claims under the the Securities Act or the Exchange Act in state or federal courts. Purchasers of ADSs in secondary transactions will be subject to the arbitration provision to the same extent as purchasers of the ADSs offered in our initial public offering. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs, by us or the depositary of compliance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The state and federal courts sitting in New York generally respect the contractual decision of the parties to submit their disputes to arbitration and such arbitration provisions are generally enforceable under federal law and the laws of the State of New York, subject to certain exceptions, such as corruption, fraud or undue means. Therefore, we believe that the arbitration provision in the deposit agreement is enforceable under federal law and the laws of the State of New York. As a result of these exclusive jurisdiction provisions and arbitration provisions, investors’ ability to bring claims in a judicial forum that they find favorable or convenient may be limited, and investors may have to incur increased costs in order to bring claims against the depositary, both of which could discourage claims against the depositary.

The deposit agreement may be amended or terminated without your consent.

We and the depositary may amend or terminate the deposit agreement without your consent. Such amendment or termination may be done in favor of our company. Holders of our ADSs are entitled to prior notice in the event of a materially prejudicial amendment or termination thereof. If you continue to hold your ADSs after an amendment to the deposit agreement, you agree to be bound by the deposit agreement as amended. The deposit agreement may be terminated at any time upon a prior written notice. Upon the termination of the deposit agreement, our company will be discharged from all obligations under the deposit agreement, except for our obligations to the depositary thereunder.

Holders or beneficial owners of the ADSs have limited recourse if we or the depositary fail to meet our respective obligations under the deposit agreement.

The deposit agreement expressly limits the obligations and liability of us and the depositary. For example, the depositary is not liable if any of us or our respective controlling persons or agents are prevented or forbidden from, or subjected to any civil or criminal penalty or restraint on account of, or delayed in, doing or performing any act or thing required by the terms of the deposit agreement and any ADR, by reason of any provision of any present or future law or regulation of the United States or any state thereof, the Cayman Islands or any other country, or of any other governmental authority or regulatory authority or stock exchange, or on account of the possible criminal or civil penalties or restraint, or by reason of any provision, present or future, of our memorandum and articles of association or any provision of or governing any deposited securities, or by reason of any act of God or war or other circumstances beyond its control (including, without limitation, nationalization, expropriation, currency restrictions, work stoppage, strikes, civil unrest, revolutions, rebellions, explosions and computer failure). In addition, the depositary and any of its agents also disclaim any liability for (i) any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, the manner in which any vote is cast or the effect of any vote or failure to determine that any distribution or action may be lawful or reasonably practicable or for allowing any rights to lapse in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement, (ii) the failure or timeliness of any notice from us, the content of any information submitted to it by us for distribution to you or for any inaccuracy of any translation thereof, (iii) any investment risk associated with the acquisition of an interest in the deposited securities, the validity or worth of the deposited securities or the credit-worthiness of any third party, (iv) any tax consequences that may result from ownership of ADSs, ordinary shares or deposited securities, or (v) any acts or omissions made by a successor depositary whether in connection with a previous act or omission of the depositary or in connection with any matter arising wholly after the removal or resignation of the depositary, provided that in connection with the issue out of which such potential liability arises the depositary performed its obligations without gross negligence or willful misconduct while it acted as depositary. These provisions of the deposit agreement will limit the ability of holders or beneficial owners of the ADSs to obtain recourse if we or the depositary fail to meet our respective obligations under the deposit agreement.

ADS holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares provides that, subject to the depositary’s right to require a claim to be submitted to arbitration, the federal or state courts in the City of New York have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine claims arising under the deposit agreement and in that regard, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders, including purchasers of ADSs in secondary transactions, waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our Class A ordinary shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.

If we or the depositary oppose a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver is enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable U.S. state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before investing in the ADSs.

If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under U.S. federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and/or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us and/or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action. Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not enforced, to the extent a court action proceeds, it would proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs shall relieve us or the depositary from our respective obligations to comply with the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes, which generally will result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to United States Holders of our ADSs or Class A ordinary shares.

We will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if, applying the applicable look-through rules, either (a) at least 75% of our gross income for such year is passive income or (b) at least 50% of the value of our assets (generally determined based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. A determination must be made after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year and involves extensive factual investigation, including ascertaining the fair market value of all of our assets on a quarterly basis and the character of each item of income that we earn during the relevant taxable year. The determination of whether we will be a PFIC for any taxable year may also depend in part upon the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles not reflected on our balance sheet (which may depend upon the market price of our ADSs from time to time, which may fluctuate significantly) and also may be affected by how, and how quickly, we spend our liquid assets and the cash we generate from our operations and raise in any offering. Moreover, the application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and we cannot assure you that the United States Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will not take a position contrary to any position that we take. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for our current or any future taxable year.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a United States Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”) holds our ADSs or Class A ordinary shares, certain adverse United States federal income tax consequences could apply to such United States Holder with respect to any “excess distribution” received from us and any gain from a sale or other disposition of our ADSs or Class A ordinary shares. See “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations-Passive Foreign Investment Company.”

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our second amended and restated memorandum of association, the Companies Act and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedents in the Cayman Islands, as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies have no general rights under the Companies Act Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our second amended and restated memorandum of association allows our shareholders to inspect our register of members but only for such times and on such days as our directors shall determine upon such payment as specified therein. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We conduct our operations outside the United States and all of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, all of our directors and executive officers and the experts named in this annual report reside outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against them in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands, China or other relevant jurisdiction may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

Shareholder claims, including securities law class actions and fraud claims, are common in the United States and are generally difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicability in China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other barriers to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation outside China or otherwise with respect to foreign entities. Although the local authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States have not been efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and other relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide documents and materials relating to securities business activities to overseas parties. See also “-You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.”

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE listing rules and, as a result, can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE listing rules because Mr. He Yu, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, beneficially owns more than 50% of the total voting power of our outstanding ordinary shares. For so long as we remain a controlled company under that definition, we are permitted to elect to rely, and intend to rely, on certain exemptions from corporate governance rules, including an exemption from the rule that a majority of our board of directors must be independent directors or that we have to establish a nominating committee and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. As a result, you will not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these corporate governance requirements.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information that would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.

As an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance requirements.

As a Cayman Islands exempted company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we are subject to the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. However, the New York Stock Exchange rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. For instance, we are not required to (i) have a majority of the board be independent; (ii) have a compensation committee or a nominating committee consisting entirely of independent directors; or (iii) have regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. These practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance requirements.

Our second amended and restated memorandum of association contains anti-takeover provisions that could discourage a third party from acquiring us and adversely affect the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs.

Our second amended and restated memorandum of association contains certain provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders and ADS holders of the opportunity to sell their shares or ADSs at a premium over the prevailing market price by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transactions. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders except as provided in the resolution or resolutions providing for the establishment of any class or series of preferred shares, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, relative participating, optional or special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our Class A ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of our ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we remain an emerging growth company. As a result, if we elect not to comply with such auditor attestation requirements, our investors may not have access to certain information they may deem important.

The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards. We do not plan to “opt out” of such exemptions afforded to an emerging growth company. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

We will incur increased costs and become subject to additional rules and regulations as a result of being a public company.

We are a public company and expect to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. Our executive officers have little experience in operating a U.S. public company, which makes our ability to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations uncertain. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some corporate activities more time- consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we need to increase the number of independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. After we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC.

ITEM 4 INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A History and Development of the Company

We are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands on October 2, 2019, with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands with significant subsidiaries and VIEs in China. In January 2021, we were listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

We commenced our operations in October 2002 when Mr. He Yu, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, acquired control of Beijing Cathay Orient Information Technology Company Limited, a classical music licensing and subscription service provider and the predecessor of Beijing Kuke Music.

In January 2016, Beijing Kuke Music and Naxos International established Naxos China, a PRC limited liability company. Naxos China was held by Beijing Kuke Music and Naxos International as to 51% and 49%, respectively.

In September 2017, we established Kuke Music Holding Limited as our holding company in the Cayman Islands. In the same month, Kuke Music Holding Limited established Rococo Holding Limited in the British Virgin Islands, as its wholly-owned subsidiary.

In October 2017, Rococo Holding Limited established Gauguin Limited in Hong Kong, as its wholly-owned subsidiary. In December 2017, Gauguin Limited established Kuke International, as its wholly-owned subsidiary in the PRC.

In January 2018, Beijing Kuke Music transferred its equity interest in Naxos China to Kuke International.

Due to restrictions imposed by PRC laws and regulations on foreign ownership of companies that engage in Internet and other related business, Kuke International entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Beijing Kuke Music and its shareholders in February 2018, pursuant to which Kuke International acquired substantial influence over Beijing Kuke Music.

In February 2020, through a share swap transaction, Kuke Music Holding Limited acquired 100% equity interest in Rosenkavalier Limited, a British Virgin Islands company that indirectly owns 100% equity interest in Beijing Lecheng, which has substantial influence over BMF Culture through a series of contractual arrangements with BMF Culture and its shareholders.

As a result of our direct ownership in our WFOEs and the aforementioned contractual arrangements, we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and we treat them as our consolidated affiliated entities under IFRS. We have consolidated the financial results of the VIEs in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS.

Our principal executive offices are located at Room 303, Beijing Broadcasting Tower, 14A Jianguomenwai Avenue, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. Our telephone number is (86) 10 6561 0392. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive, P.0. Box 2681, Grand Cayman KY1-1111, Cayman lslands.

B Business Overview

We are a leading provider of classical music service platform. Our business includes classical music licensing, subscription and education services in China. Leveraging our extensive content library and deep expertise in music education, we are also a leading smart music learning service provider in China. In addition, following our acquisition of BMF in February 2020, we are one of the few companies in China with the experience and scale to organize large-scale live classical music events. With more than 20 years of experience in the music industry, we have devoted ourselves to making classical music more accessible in China.

The classical music market in China has grown rapidly in recent years, driven by the rising popularity of classical music, the digitization of classical music content and favorable government policies. We identified this significant market opportunity early and we were one of the first classical music licensing and subscription service providers in China. Leveraging our long-standing relationships with world-renowned music labels and publishers, especially Naxos and years of music production and content acquisition efforts, we have built a library of classical music content, which consisted of approximately 3.06 million music tracks, including over 2.17 million tracks of traditional classical music and more than 890 thousand tracks of jazz, world, folk and other genres of music, as well as over 2,900 video titles, more than 5200 spoken content albums and more than 5,750 volumes of sheet music. These contents span across more than 410 thousand musicians, more than 2 thousand musical instruments and more than 200 countries and regions as of December 31, 2023.

We license our music content primarily to online music entertainment platforms, such as Tencent Music Entertainment Group and NetEase Cloud Music, as well as commercial enterprises, such as film and TV production companies, airlines and smart hardware companies. Our music subscription service provides users with high-quality online and offline streaming access to our content library. Users can access our platform from our website, mobile app and smart music devices. As our encyclopedic catalog is especially suitable for educational and professional use, we have attracted a large number of universities, music conservatories, public libraries and individuals to subscribe to our service over the years. As of December 31, 2023, we had over 880 institutional subscribers, including over 530 universities and music conservatories and over 340 public libraries, spread across all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China, except Tibet.

Through our licensing and subscription services, we have brought high-quality classical music into more people’s lives, enabling them to enjoy classical music in a more convenient, enriching and affordable way. However, our passion for classical music does not stop there. To us, a more fundamental way to amplify the impact of classical music is through music learning. Towards that end and in an effort to address the underserved needs in China’s music education market, we launched our smart music learning business in October 2015, offering students and schools innovative and efficient smart music learning solutions.

Our smart music learning solutions primarily comprise the offering of our proprietary Kuke smart pianos, Kuke smart music teaching systems and Kukey courses. Our Kuke smart music teaching system, which is pre-installed in our Kuke smart pianos, contains a comprehensive array of classical music content and offers real-time, individualized feedback on student performance as they practice. Kukey courses are typically small-group, beginner-level piano lessons offered through our Kuke smart pianos. Since 2022, we have started to focus more on selling smart music hardware and content to primary and secondary schools and significantly reduced the offering of Kukey courses.

Finally, as appreciation for classical music grows in China while the penetration rate of classical music learning is still very low in China comparing to developed countries, there has been a growing interest in experiencing live classical music and learning classical music for a very long time. To address this growing opportunity, we acquired BMF, which organizes the Beijing Music Festival and other influential classical music events in China. With twenty-four years of history, the Beijing Music Festival has played an indispensable role in bringing world-class classical musicians to China and offering Chinese audiences the opportunity to enjoy masterful performances in person. We believe that our live classical music events business effectively creates synergetic effects with our music content and music learning businesses, further positions us well to continuously offer differentiated value propositions to our customers through a thriving content-centric ecosystem, encompassing the entire value chain from enriching content provision to intelligent music learning services.

Our Platform

Powered by our encyclopedic classical music content offerings, we operate three music-related businesses through our platform, namely music licensing and subscription, smart music learning and live classical music events, which accounted for 40.8%, 32.4% and 26.8%, respectively, of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Our Content Offerings

Our rich and diverse content offerings are the foundation of our success. We had a library of classical music content, which consisted of approximately 2.95 million music tracks, nearly 3,000 video titles, nearly 520,000 spoken content tracks and over 5,750 volumes of sheet music as of December 31, 2023.

The vast majority of our content offerings have been licensed to us on an exclusive basis. In particular, we hold an exclusive and long-term license to the vast majority of content owned by Naxos within the territory of mainland China. Music tracks licensed from Naxos, our largest content provider, accounted for over 99% of our content offerings as of December 31, 2023. In addition to licensed content, we also help local artists to release albums and create educational content and have licensed certain classical music videos from rights holders.

Music recordings.

Our content library contains a wide range of standard and specialty repertoires of classical, jazz, world, folk and traditional Chinese music recordings, spanning from medieval to contemporary music. As of December 31, 2023, we had accumulated approximately 2.17 million tracks of traditional classical music and nearly 890,000 tracks of other genres of music recordings, covering the works of approximately over 100,000 musicians and over 2,000 musical instruments from over 200 countries and regions. Over the years, we have also created many award-wining music recordings, including the Contemporary Chinese Musicians collection, which features new, original symphony works created by Chinese composers, and the Sound of Nature collection, which records the indigenous music of China’s ethnic minorities. In addition, in order to meet the exacting standards of classical music fans and attract more customers, we licensed from Naxos approximately 10,000 albums of high-resolution classical music recordings in July 2020.

Videos.

As of December 31, 2023, our content library contained over 2,901 video titles of concerts, operas, ballets, plays, documentaries, interviews and behind-the-scenes footage, featuring works from the world’s most renowned opera houses, ballet companies and concert halls. In addition, we have been working with Countdown Media GmbH, one of our licensors, on children music videos.

Spoken content.

As of December 31, 2023, our spoken content contained audio versions of nearly 520,000 spoken content tracks, including best sellers and some of the world’s greatest novels, plays and poems, as well as various nonfiction history books and biographies.

Copyrighted SaaS-based music teaching and appreciation content.

We also offer copyrighted SaaS-based music teaching and appreciation content, which is available online to our subscribers, or embedded in our smart music hardware products. Such content and system included, among others, is self-developed by the company.

As our business grows and our collaboration with content providers and distribution channels deepens, we expect our content leadership to further strengthen.

Classical Music Licensing and Subscription

We believe that the size, diversity, quality and exclusivity of our content offerings, coupled with our classical music expertise and proprietary data analytics capability, make us a preferred choice for customers seeking to diversify their content offerings and classical music lovers with underserved needs.

Licensing

We license our music content primarily to online music entertainment platforms, such as Tencent Music Entertainment Group and NetEase Cloud Music, as well as commercial enterprises, such as film and TV production companies, airlines and smart hardware companies.

We enter into license agreements with licensees to make our content available for our licensees to access in digital formats. Our licensees may offer the licensed content on their online platforms for streaming and downloading or incorporate our licensed content into their products or service offerings. The license agreements set out the license scope, royalty arrangements, content delivery arrangements, settlement terms and the parties’ respective rights and obligations. We charge licensing fees either on a per-track basis or a minimum guarantee plus revenue-sharing basis. Under the per-track model, we typically grant licensees the perpetual right to use the licensed content in manners prescribed by the license agreement in exchange for a one-off, fixed fee. Under the minimum guarantee plus revenue-sharing model, we typically enter into nonexclusive license agreements with the licensees for a term ranging from one to two years. We typically require a minimum guarantee payment from the licensee up front and revenue-sharing fees on a quarterly basis. Under both models, the licensee shall not use the licensed content outside the license scope, revise or abridge the licensed content, or transfer the right to use the licensed content to any third party. We have the right to terminate the license agreement and seek damages from the licensee should the licensee breach its obligations under the license agreement.

In addition, we also provide certain digital music service providers with a variety of value-added services aimed at enhancing their user experience and engagement, including, among others, content recommendation and curation, playlist compilation, editorial support and content search localization.

Subscription

Our music subscription service provides users with high-quality online and offline streaming access to our content library, serving classical music lovers’ underserved needs in terms of catalog, discovery, information and audio quality. Users can access our platform anywhere and anytime through our website www.kuke.com, the Kuke Music mobile app and smart music devices, and we provide our subscribers with a wide range of ways to search, browse and discover classical music content.

As of December 31, 2023, we had over 880 institutional subscribers, including over 530 universities and music conservatories and over 340 public libraries, spread across all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China, except Tibet.

Smart Music Education

We launched our smart music learning business in October 2015, offering our proprietary Kuke smart pianos, music learning content and teaching systems to distributors for them to resell to end customers, such as primary and secondary schools. Our smart music education revenue is generated primarily from (i) sales of smart music products, which include (a) integrated Kukey smart pianos, (b) a self-developed smart teaching system installed on a network storage server, and (c) piano accessories such as professional, around ear headphones, and (ii) provision of music education classes conducted through Kukey smart pianos.

Since 2022, we have started to focus more on selling smart music hardware and content to primary and secondary schools and significantly reduced the offering of Kukey courses. In January 2022, to meet the growing demand from public schools for smart music devices, teaching systems and copyrighted music content, we entered into an equity transfer agreement to acquire a team of marketing and sales personnel experienced in promoting smart music learning solutions to primary and secondary schools.

Live Classical Music Events

In February 2020, we acquired 100% equity interest in BMF, which organizes the Beijing Music Festival and other influential classical music events in China. We are one of the few companies in China with the experience and scale to organize large-scale classical music festivals.

BMF Culture, one of the VIEs, first became involved with the organizing of the Beijing Music Festival in 2003. Since 2005, BMF Culture has been organizing the Beijing Music Festival annually together with the Beijing Music Festival Arts Foundation. In 2019, BMF Culture and the Beijing Music Festival Arts Foundation entered into a framework agreement, pursuant to which BMF Culture undertakes most of the organizing responsibilities for the Beijing Music Festival.

Leveraging our experience of hosting the Beijing Music Festival, we also organize other live classical music events throughout the year, such as the Good Afternoon themed event and several embassy events.

Additionally, as part of our effort to promote interest and education in classical music in China, we offer various online and offline opportunities for people interested in classical music to learn more about, and participate in the creation of, classical music.

Due to the impact of COVID-19 and lowering market expectations, we have not been able to organize as many live classical music performances or invite as many overseas artists to perform at our live classical music events as we had been able to. In 2023, we were not able to fully host the 2023 Beijing Music Festival and only partially resumed some live classical music events.

Our revenue from live classical music events primarily consists of sponsorship fees, performance fees, service fees, ticket sales and royalties. Over the years, BMF has built long-standing relationships with high-profile corporate sponsors, such as FAW-Volkswagen, Audi, CITIC Group, Credit Suisse, UBS, Nestle and Swire Properties. We offer various types of sponsorship programs, including naming rights, exclusive partner rights, on-site venue signage and advertisements, to sponsors across industry sectors, connecting their brands directly with a large base of well-educated, affluent and experience-oriented customers.

Strategic Investment in KOLO

In February 2022, we entered into an agreement for a strategic investment in KOLO, a classical music-focused and decentralized NFT platform driven by blockchain technology. The strategic investment in KOLO will further enable the development of a consumer-oriented, classical music-focused and global NFT application in the Metaverse. The NFT application will leverage the diversified classical music copyright resources of us and Naxos, our strategic global business partner and the largest independent classical music content provider in the world, and further enhance the transaction liquidity, platform interoperability and ease of sharing of digital music assets.

In March 2023, the Company announced an agreement to acquire a 49% equity interest of KOLO. The acquisition closed on August 25, 2023, with an option to acquire the remaining 51%.

Research and Development

We design and develop substantially all of our course materials and the functions of our Kuke smart music teaching system in-house based on our music expertise, user feedback, extensive research on market needs, content library, the requirements of various music proficiency tests, as well as input from esteemed music professionals, industry experts and content licensed from Naxos. We regularly update our Kukey courses and the functionalities of our Kuke smart music teaching system to further enhance the courses’ depth and breadth.

For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023, we recorded research and development expenses of RMB27.8 million, RMB18.7 million and RMB6.3 million (US$0.9 million), respectively.

Technology

As of December 31, 2023, we had a strong research and development team of 30 employees, which accounted for approximately 27.8% of our total headcount.

Principal components of our technology infrastructure include:

Scalable, cloud-based infrastructure.

We maintain a capital-light infrastructure. By using a cloud services provider, we are able to ensure that our systems can scale with our growth and meet fluctuating or unpredictable system demands.

Our Kuke smart music teaching system is connected to our cloud server through a local area network (“LAN”) server via wireless connection. Each LAN server can accommodate up to 60 users at the same time. Through sensors attached to the keyboard of Kuke smart pianos, we capture various aspects of students’ practice data relevant for assessing their performance, such as finger pressure, pitch and tempo. Such data and our machine-generated analysis of the data are transmitted between our Kuke smart music teaching system and cloud server in real time, enabling us to provide students with instant, individualized feedback on their performance. Through cloud computing, we generate an overall score for every student and their group automatically at the end of every piano lesson, which helps instructors stay on top of students’ progress over time and adjust the teaching pace accordingly. In addition, through Websocket technology, instructors can monitor each student’s interface at the same time, which enhances teaching efficiency without compromising the level of individualized attention.

Big data analytics.

We have invested considerably in the research and development of big data analytics and machine learning.

We have invested considerably in the research and development of big data analytics and machine learning. For our music subscription business, our musicologists conduct exhaustive analysis of metadata, the searchable, textual information embedded into each work. Users can search for content using up to 17 search criteria, including the composer, title, album, genre, period, featured instrument, duration, adaptor, lyricist, soloist, conductor, choir, ensemble, orchestra, label, year of composition and release date. We also provide listeners with a personalized music discovery experience by leveraging our proprietary content recommendation algorithms and data. For our smart music learning business, we apply proprietary algorithms to analyze various types of students’ practice data and to provide them with performance evaluations that accurately reflect their skill level, strengths and weaknesses. Based on such analysis, our data analytics engine also generates tailored practice suggestions that help students more effectively tackle areas in need of improvement.

Intellectual Property

License Agreements

We obtain licenses from and pay royalties to rights holders or their agents. Below is a summary of certain provisions of our key license agreements with Naxos, our largest content provider.

Pursuant to a license agreement between Beijing Kuke Music Co., Limited and Naxos Digital Services US, Inc., which expires on June 30, 2026 and is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods, unless either party indicates otherwise in advance, we have the exclusive right to sell a wide range of content owned or controlled by Naxos for subscription and downloading in China. We are obligated to pay Naxos the higher of (i) an annual minimum licensing fee, which increases annually over the term of the license period, with a total of approximately $9.3 million under the agreement, or (ii) 45% to 55% of the annual revenue generated from the licensed content. Naxos has the right to terminate the agreement in certain circumstances, including, for example, our failure to timely pay royalties.

Naxos has also licensed certain content it owns or controls to Naxos China, our joint venture with Naxos. Naxos China’s license agreement with Naxos International expires on December 31, 2023 and is automatically renewable for another three years, unless either party indicates otherwise in advance. Naxos China shall pay Naxos International 30% of all payments, sales proceeds or other monies directly received by or credited to Naxos China for the exploitation of the licensed content less any tax deducted (or 50% if Naxos China’s agent or affiliate is involved). Naxos China’s license agreement with Naxos of America, Inc. expires on January 1, 2021 and is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods unless either party indicates otherwise in advance. Pursuant to these license agreements, Naxos China has the exclusive right to exploit or license third parties to use the licensed content in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Naxos China shall pay Naxos of America, Inc. 65% of the income actually received by or credited to Naxos China that is derived from the exploitation of the licensed content. The licensor has audit rights and may terminate the agreement in case of any material breach of the agreement. There are no minimum guarantee payment obligations under the agreements.

Content Production Arrangement

We engage certain recording agencies to create music recordings to our specifications on a per-project basis. Under our agreements with these agencies, we are the sole owner of all the copyrights related to the recorded work.

Other Intellectual Properties

As of December 31, 2023, we owned 11 patents, 96 copyrights, 67 trademarks and 48 domain names in China. 

Data Security and Protection

We believe that data security is critical to our business operations. We have internal rules and policies to govern how we use and share personal information, as well as protocols, technologies and systems in place to ensure that such information will not be accessed or disclosed improperly.

Sales and Marketing

We primarily rely on word-of-mouth referrals and benefit from our strong brand with respect to customer acquisition and retention. We also engage in diverse marketing campaigns both online and offline to enhance our brand awareness, such as search engine optimization, social media marketing and advertisement placement through events organized by us or third-party channels. In addition, we rely on distributors to establish collaboration with kindergartens for the offering of our Kukey courses and to market and sell Kuke smart pianos, Kuke smart music teaching systems and our institutional music subscription services.

For sales made to public or government-affiliated entities, we are often required to go through a bidding process and are sometimes required to include third-party products or services in our bids. After winning the bid, we will then purchase these third-party products or services and resell them to these government-affiliated entities.

Suppliers

Our content providers include renowned music labels, publishing houses and artists. In particular, music tracks licensed from Naxos, our largest content provider, accounted for over 99% of our content offerings as of December 31, 2023. We hold an exclusive and long-term license to the vast majority of content owned by Naxos within the territory of mainland China.

Competition

We face competition from other classical music licensing service providers for licensees, other online classical music subscription service providers for subscribers, other smart music learning service providers for student enrollment and the sale of our Kuke smart pianos and Kuke smart music teaching systems, and other live classical music event organizers for audience and sponsorship.

We compete primarily on the basis of service quality, user experience, content offerings, brand recognition and pricing. Some of our competitors may have greater financial, marketing or technology resources than we do, which could enable them to respond more quickly to technological innovations or changes in market demand and build stronger relationships with rights holders.

Insurance

We provide social security insurance, including pension insurance, unemployment insurance, work-related injury insurance and medical insurance for our employees in compliance with applicable PRC laws. We do not maintain business interruption insurance.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently not involved in any material legal or administrative proceedings. We may from time to time be subject to various legal or administrative claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

Regulations

We are subject to a variety of PRC laws, rules and regulations across many aspects of our business. The following is a summary of the principal PRC laws and regulations relating to our business and operations within the territory of the PRC.

Regulations on Foreign Investment

The Foreign Investment Law of the PRC was adopted by the 2nd session of the thirteenth National People’s Congress on March 15, 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2020. The Foreign Investment Law sets out the basic regulatory framework for foreign investments and proposes to implement a system of pre-entry national treatment with a negative list for foreign investments, pursuant to which (i) foreign natural persons, enterprises or other organizations, collectively the foreign investors, shall not invest in any sector forbidden by the negative list for access of foreign investment, (ii) for any sector restricted by the negative list, foreign investors shall conform to the investment conditions provided in the negative list, and (iii) sectors not included in the negative list shall be managed under the principle that domestic investment and foreign investment shall be treated equally. The Foreign Investment Law also sets forth necessary mechanisms to facilitate, protect and manage foreign investments and proposes to establish a foreign investment information report system in which foreign investors or foreign-funded enterprises shall submit the investment information to competent departments of commerce through the enterprise registration system and the enterprise credit information publicity system.

On December 30, 2019, the Ministry of Commerce and the State Administration for Market Regulation issued the Measures for the Reporting of Foreign Investment Information, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the Provisional Measures on Administration of Filing for Establishment and Change of Foreign Investment Enterprises. Since January 1, 2020, for foreign investors carrying out investment activities directly or indirectly in China, the foreign investors or foreign-invested enterprises shall submit investment information to the commerce authorities pursuant to these measures.

Special Administrative Measures for Entrance of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2021 Version)

The Special Administrative Measures for Entrance of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2021 Version), or the Negative List, which was promulgated jointly by the Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission on December 27, 2021 and became effective on January 1, 2022, replaced and abolished the Special Administrative Measures for Entrance of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2020 Version) regulating the access of foreign investors to China. Pursuant to the Negative List, foreign investors should refrain from investing in any of prohibited sectors specified in the Negative List, and foreign investors are required to obtain the permit for access to other sectors that are listed in the Negative List but not classified as “prohibited.” The Negative List covers 12 industries. Fields not covered in the Negative List shall be administrated under the principle of equal treatment to domestic and foreign investments.

We are a Cayman Islands company and our businesses by nature in China are mainly Internet information services, Internet culture services, Internet publication services, online audio-visual products and other related value-added telecommunications services, which are restricted or prohibited for foreign investors by the Negative List. We conduct business operations that are restricted or prohibited for foreign investment through our variable interest entities, or VIEs.

Regulations on Internet information services, Internet culture services, Internet publication services, online audio-visual products and other related value-added telecommunications services

Licenses for Value-Added Telecommunications Services

The Telecommunications Regulations of the PRC (2016 Revision) (“The Telecom Regulations of the PRC”), promulgated in 2000 by the State Council and most recently amended in 2016, provides a regulatory framework for telecommunications service providers in the PRC. As required by these regulations, a commercial telecommunications service provider in the PRC shall obtain an operating license from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology or its counterparts at the provincial level prior to its commencement of operations.

The Telecom Regulations of the PRC categorize all telecommunication businesses in the PRC as either basic or value-added. The Catalog of Telecommunications Business, which was issued as an attachment to the Telecom Regulations of the PRC and most recently amended on June 6, 2019, further categorizes value-added telecommunication services into two classes: class I value-added telecommunication services and class II value-added telecommunication services. Information services provided via cable networks, mobile networks, or Internet fall within class II value-added telecommunications services.

The Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating Licenses (2017 Version) promulgated by MIIT replaced and abolished its 2009 version. According to these measures, any approved telecommunications service provider shall conduct its business in accordance with the specifications in its license for value-added telecommunications services, or VATS License. These measures further prescribe types of requisite licenses for VATS Licenses together with qualifications and procedures for obtaining such VATS Licenses. Beijing Kuke Music has obtained the VATS License.

Pursuant to the Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services, promulgated in 2000 and amended in 2011 by the State Council, commercial Internet information service providers, which mean providers of information or services to Internet users with charge, shall obtain the VATS License with the business scope of Internet information services, namely the Internet Content Provider License, from competent telecommunication authorities before providing any commercial Internet content services within the PRC. Beijing Kuke Music has obtained the Internet Content Provider License.

Restrictions on Foreign Direct Investment in Value-Added Telecommunications Services

Foreign direct investment in telecommunications companies in China is governed by the Provisions on the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises, which was promulgated in 2001 and most recently amended in 2022 by the State Council, and will become effective on May 1, 2022. The regulations require foreign-invested value-added telecommunications enterprises in China to be established as Sino-foreign equity joint ventures and, with a few exceptions, the foreign investors may acquire up to 50% of the equity interests in such joint ventures. In addition, foreign investors that meet these requirements must obtain approvals from MIIT or their authorized local counterparts, which retain considerable discretion in granting approvals.

In 2006, MIIT released the Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Investment in the Operation of Value-added Telecommunications Business, or MIIT Circular. MIIT Circular prohibits domestic telecommunications enterprises from leasing, transferring or selling telecommunications business operation licenses to foreign investors in any form, or providing any resources, sites or facilities to any foreign investor for their illegal operation of telecommunications business in China. Furthermore, under MIIT Circular, the Internet domain names and registered trademarks used by a foreign-invested value-added telecommunications services operator shall be legally owned by that operator (or its shareholders). If a license holder fails to comply with the requirements in MIIT Circular and rectify such non-compliance, MIIT or its local counterparts have the discretion to take measures against such license holders, including revoking their VATS Licenses.

Regulations on Transmitting Audio-Visual Programs through the Internet

In 2007, MIIT and the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, or SARFT, jointly issued the Administrative Provisions on the Internet Audio-Video Program Service, or the Audio-Video Program Provisions, which came into effect in 2008 and was amended in 2015 by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, or the SAPPRFT. The Audio-Video Program Provisions defines “Internet audio-video program services” as producing, editing and integrating audio-video programs, supplying audio-video programs to the public via the Internet, and providing audio-video programs uploading and transmission services to a third party. Entities providing Internet audio-video program services must obtain an Audio and Video Service Permission, or the AVSP. Applicants for the AVSP shall be state-owned or state-controlled entities unless an AVSP has been obtained prior to the effectiveness of the Audio-Video Program Provisions in accordance with the then-in-effect laws and regulations. In addition, foreign-invested enterprises are not allowed to engage in the above-mentioned services. According to the Audio-Video Program Provisions and other relevant laws and regulations, audio-video programs provided by the entities supplying Internet audio-video program services shall not contain any illegal content or other content prohibited by laws and regulations, such as any content against the basic principles in the PRC Constitution, any content that jeopardizes the sovereignty of the country or national security, and any content that disturbs social order or undermines social stability. A full copy of any audio-video program that has already been broadcasted shall be retained for at least 60 days. Movies, television programs and other media contents used as Internet audio-video programs shall comply with applicable administrative regulations on programs transmitted through radio, movie and television channels. Entities providing services related to Internet audio-video programs shall immediately remove the audio-video programs violating laws and regulations, keep relevant records, report to relevant authorities, and implement other regulatory requirements.

The Categories of the Internet Audio-Video Program Services, or the Audio-Video Program Categories, promulgated by SARFT in 2010 and amended in 2017, classifies Internet audio-video programs into four categories: (I) Category I Internet audio-video program service, which is carried out with a form of radio station or television station; (II) Category II Internet audio-video program service, including (a) re-broadcasting service of current political news audio-video programs; (b) hosting, interviewing, reporting, and commenting service of arts, entertainment, technology, finance and economics, sports, education, and other specialized audio-video programs; (c) producing (interviewing not included) and broadcasting service of arts, entertainment, technology, finance and economics, sports, education, and other specialized audio-video programs; (d) producing and broadcasting service of Internet films or dramas; (e) aggregating and broadcasting service of films, television dramas and cartoons; (f) aggregating and broadcasting service of arts, entertainment, technology, finance and economics, sports, education and other specialized audio-video programs; and (g) live audio-video broadcasting service of cultural activities of common social organizations, sport events or other organization activities; and (III) Category III Internet audio-video program service, including (a) aggregating service of online audio-video content, and (b) re-broadcasting service of audio-video programs uploaded by Internet users; and (IV) Category IV Internet audio-video program service, including (a) re-broadcasting of radio or television program channels; (b) re-broadcasting of Internet audio-video program channels; and (c) re-broadcasting of live Internet audio-video program.

In 2016, the SAPPRFT issued the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Implementing the Approval Granting for Mobile Internet Audio-Video Program Services, or the Mobile Audio-Video Program Circular. The Mobile Audio-Video Program Circular provides that mobile Internet audio-video program services shall be deemed a type of Internet audio-video program services. Entities approved to provide mobile Internet audio-video program services may use mobile WAP websites or mobile applications to provide audio-video program services, but the types of the programs operated by such entities shall be within the permitted scope as provided in their AVSPs and the said mobile applications shall be filed with the SAPPRFT.

In 2016, the State Internet Information Office issued the Administrative Regulations on Online Live Streaming Services, or the Online Live Streaming Regulations. According to the Online Live Streaming Regulations, when providing Internet news information services, both online live streaming service providers and online live streaming publishers must obtain relevant licenses for providing Internet news information services and may only carry out Internet news information services within the scope of their AVSPs. All online live streaming service providers (whether or not providing Internet news information) must take certain actions to operate their services, including establishing platforms to monitor live streaming contents.

On November 18, 2019, Cyberspace Administration of China, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the PRC and the National Radio and Television Administration, jointly issued the Administrative Provisions on Network Audio and Video Information Services, which came into effect on January 1, 2020. According to the Administrative Provisions on Network Audio and Video Information Services, network audio and video information service providers shall strengthen the management of audio and video information released by network audio and video information service users to prevent the production and transmission of illegal content.

Regulations on Production and Operation of Radio and Television Programs

In 2004, the SAPPRFT promulgated the Regulations on the Administration of Production and Operation of Radio and Television Programs, which was most recently amended in October 2020. Pursuant to these regulations, entities engaging in the production of radio and television programs must obtain the License for Production and Operation of Radio and TV Programs from the SAPPRFT or its counterparts at the provincial level. Holders of such licenses must conduct their business operations strictly in compliance with the approved scope as provided in their licenses. Beijing Kuke Music has obtained the License for Production and Operation of Radio and TV Programs.  

Regulations on Online Publication

In 2016, the SAPPRFT and MIIT jointly promulgated the Regulations on the Administration of Online Publishing Services. It defines “online publications” as digital works that are edited, produced, or processed to be published and provided to the public through the Internet, including (a) original digital works, such as pictures, maps, games and comics; (b) digital works with content that is consistent with the type of content that, prior to being released online, typically was published in offline media such as books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products and electronic publications; (c) digital works in the form of online databases compiled by selecting, arranging and compiling other types of digital works; and (d) other types of digital works identified by the SAPPRFT. In addition, foreign-invested enterprises are not allowed to engage in the foregoing services. Under the Online Publishing Regulations, Internet operators distributing online publications via the Internet are required to obtain an Online Publishing Service Permit from the SAPPRFT. Beijing Kuke Music are in the process of renewing the Online Publishing Service Permit.

Regulations on Internet Culture Activities

Pursuant to the Interim Administrative Provisions on Internet Culture promulgated by the Ministry of Culture in 2011 and amended in 2017, Internet culture activities include (i) production, reproduction, import, release or broadcasting of Internet culture products (such as online music, online game, online performance and cultural products by certain technical means and copied to the Internet for spreading); (ii) distribution or publication of cultural products on the Internet, or sending cultural products through Internet, mobile communication network and other information networks to customer premise equipment such as computers, fixed telephones, mobile phones, radios, TV sets, game players, etc. as well as Internet bar and other Internet online service operating premises available for users to browse, read, appreciate, use or download such contents; and (iii) exhibitions, competitions and other similar activities concerning Internet culture products. The Interim Administrative Provisions on Internet Culture further classifies Internet cultural activities into commercial Internet cultural activities and non-commercial Internet cultural activities. Entities engaging in commercial Internet cultural activities must apply to the relevant authorities for the Online Culture Operating Permit, while non-commercial cultural entities are only required to report to related culture administration authorities within 60 days of the establishment of such entity. If any entity engages in commercial Internet culture activities without approval, the cultural administration authorities or other relevant government may order such entity to cease to operate Internet culture activities and levy penalties including administrative warnings and fines up to RMB30,000. In addition, foreign-invested enterprises are not allowed to engage in the above-mentioned services except online music. Beijing Kuke Music has obtained the Online Culture Operating Permit.

Regulations on Online Music

In 2006, the Ministry of Culture issued the Several Opinions of the Ministry of Culture on the Development and Administration of Online Music. It provides that, among other things, an Internet music service provider must obtain an Online Culture Operating Permit. In 2015, the Ministry of Culture promulgated the Circular on Further Strengthening and Improving the Content Administration of Online Music, effective in 2016, which provides that Internet culture operating entities shall report the details of its self-monitoring activities to a nationwide administrative platform on a quarterly basis.

In 2010 and 2011, the Ministry of Culture greatly intensified its regulations on online music products by issuing a series of circulars regarding the online music industry, such as the Circular on Regulating the Market Order of Online Music Products and Renovating Illegal Conducts of Online Music Websites and the Circular on Investigating Illegal Online Music Websites in 2010. In addition, the Ministry of Culture issued the Circular on Clearing Illegal Online Music Products, which clarified that entities are subject to relevant penalties or sanctions by engaging in any of the following conducts: (i) providing online music products or relevant services without obtaining corresponding qualifications; (ii) importing online music products that have not been reviewed by the Ministry of Culture; or (iii) providing domestically developed online music products that have not been filed with the Ministry of Culture.

In 2015, the National Copyright Administration issued the Circular regarding Ceasing Transmitting Unauthorized Music Products by Online Music Service Providers, which requires that (i) all unauthorized music products on the platforms of online music service providers shall be removed prior to July 31, 2015, and (ii) the National Copyright Administration shall investigate and punish the online music service providers who continue to transmit unauthorized music products following July 31, 2015.

Regulations on Commercial Performances

The Administrative Regulations on Commercial Performances (2020 Revision) was promulgated by the State Council. According to these regulations, to legally engage in commercial performances, a culture and arts performance group shall have full-time performers and equipment in line with its performing business, and file an application with the culture administrative department of the people’s government at the county level for approval. To legally engage in commercial performances, a performance brokerage agency shall have three or more full-time performance brokers and funds for the relevant business, and file an application with the culture administrative department of the people’s government of a province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government. Such culture administrative department shall make a decision, within 20 days from the receipt of the application, on whether to approve the application; upon approval, a performance permit shall be issued to the applicant. Anyone or any entity engaging in commercial performance activities without approval may be imposed a penalty, in addition to being ordered to cease its actions. Such penalty may include confiscation of performance equipment and illegal proceeds, and a fine of eight to ten times of the illegal proceeds. Where there are no illegal proceeds or the illegal proceeds are less than RMB10,000, a fine of RMB50,000 to RMB100,000 will be imposed. BMF Culture holds the requisite commercial performance approvals and permits.

Regulations on Internet Security

In 2000, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress enacted the Decision on the Protection of Internet Security, as amended in 2009, which provides that the following activities conducted through the Internet are subject to criminal liabilities: (a) gaining improper entry into any of the computer information networks relating to state affairs, national defensive affairs, or cutting-edge science and technology; (b) spreading rumor, slander or other harmful information via the Internet for the purpose of inciting subversion of the state political power; (c) stealing or divulging state secrets, intelligence or military secrets via the Internet; (d) spreading false or inappropriate commercial information; or (e) infringing on intellectual property. The Ministry of Public Security issued the Administrative Measures on Security Protection for International Connections to Computer Information Networks in 1997 and amended it in 2011, which prohibits using the Internet to leak state secrets or to spread socially destabilizing contents.

In 2006, the Ministry of Public Security issued the Provisions on the Technical Measures for the Protection of the Security of the Internet, which requires that Internet service providers shall back up the records for at least 60 days. Also, Internet service providers shall (a) set up technical measures to record and keep the information as registered by users; (b) record and keep the corresponding relation between the Internet web addresses and intranet web addresses as applied by users; (c) record and follow up the net operation and have the functions of security auditing.

In 2010, MIIT promulgated the Administrative Measures for Communications Network Security Protection, which requires that all communication network operators including telecommunications service providers and Internet domain name service providers divide their own communication networks into units. The unit category shall be classified in accordance with the degree of damage to national security, economic operation, social order and public interest. In addition, the communication network operators must file the divisions and ratings of their communication network with MIIT or its local counterparts. If a communication network operator violates these measures, MIIT or its local counterparts may order rectifications or impose a fine up to RMB30,000 in case such violation is not duly rectified.

Regulations on Privacy Protection

In 2011, MIIT promulgated the Several Provisions on Regulation of Order of Internet Information Service Market, which prohibits Internet information service providers from collecting personal information of any user without prior consent. Internet information service providers shall explicitly inform users of the means of collecting and processing personal information, the scope of contents, and purposes. In addition, Internet information service providers shall properly keep the personal information of users. If the preserved personal information of users is divulged or may possibly be divulged, Internet information service providers shall immediately take remedial measures and report any material leak to the telecommunications regulatory authority.

In 2012, the Decision on Strengthening Network Information Protection was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. It emphasizes the need to protect electronic information that contains individual identification information and other private data. The decision requires Internet service providers to establish and publish policies regarding the collection and use of electronic personal information and to take necessary measures to ensure the security of the information and to prevent any leakage, damage or loss.

In 2013, MIIT promulgated the Regulations on Protection of Personal Information of Telecommunications and Internet Users to enhance and enforce legal protection over user information security and privacy on the Internet. It requires Internet operators to take various measures to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of users’ information.

Pursuant to the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law of the PRC issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress in 2015, any Internet service provider that fails to fulfill the obligations related to Internet information security as required by applicable laws and refuses to take corrective measures will be subject to criminal liability for (i) any large-scale dissemination of illegal information; (ii) any severe effect due to the leakage of users’ personal information; (iii) any serious loss of evidence of criminal activities; or (iv) other severe situations, and any individual or entity that (a) sells or provides personal information to others unlawfully or (b) steals or illegally obtains any personal information will be subject to criminal liability in severe situations.

In 2016, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC, which came into effect in 2017. It requires that network operators shall follow their cybersecurity obligations according to the requirements of the classified protection system for cybersecurity, including: (a) formulating internal security management systems and operating instructions, determining the persons responsible for cybersecurity, and implementing the responsibility for cybersecurity protection; (b) taking technological measures to prevent computer viruses, network attacks, network intrusions and other actions endangering cybersecurity; (c) taking technological measures to monitor and record the network operation status and cybersecurity incidents and preserving relevant web logs for at least 6 months; (d) taking measures such as data classification, back-up and encryption of important data; and (e) other obligations stipulated by laws and administrative regulations. In addition, network operators shall follow the principles of legitimacy to collect and use personal information and disclose their rules of data collection and use, clearly express the purposes, means and scope of collecting and using the information and obtain the consent of the persons whose data is gathered.

In 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, which came into effect in 2021. It further details the general rules and principles on personal information processing and increases the potential liability of personal information processor. Personal information processors shall, on the basis of the purposes and methods of processing of personal information, categories of personal information, the impacts on individuals’ rights and interests, and potential security risks, take the following measures to ensure that personal information processing activities comply with the provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and prevent unauthorized access to as well as the leakage, tampering or loss of personal information: (a) developing internal management rules and operating procedures; (b) conducting classified management of personal information; (c) taking corresponding security technical measures such as encryption and de-identification; (d) determining in a reasonable manner the operation privileges relating to personal information processing, and providing security education and trainings for employees on a regular basis; (e) developing and organizing the implementation of emergency plans for personal information security incidents; (f) other measures as provided by laws and administrative regulations.

Regulations on Infringement upon Intellectual Property Rights via the Internet

The Civil Code of the PRC, which was adopted by the National People’s Congress in 2020 and became effective in 2021, provides that (i) an online service provider should be held liable for its own tortious acts in providing online services; (ii) where an online user conducts tortious acts by utilizing online services provided by the online service provider, the infringed party has the right to request such online service provider to take necessary measures, including deleting, blocking and disconnecting the access to the infringing content promptly. Upon receiving such request, the online service provider shall promptly inform the relevant online user and take necessary measures based on the prima facie evidence and the online service provided. Failure to take necessary measures in a timely manner upon receipt of notice of such infringement, such online service provider will be held jointly liable with the relevant online users for the additional damages that would have not been incurred if the online service provider took proper actions; and (iii) where the online service provider knows or ought to have known that online users are infringing upon the civil right or interest of a third party and fails to take necessary measures, the online service provider should be jointly liable for such infringement with the online users.

Regulations on Intellectual Property Rights

Copyright

China has enacted various laws and regulations relating to the protection of copyright. China is also a signatory to some major international conventions on the protection of copyright and became a member of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the Universal Copyright Convention in 1992, and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights upon its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001.

The Copyright Law of the PRC, adopted in 1990 and revised in 2001, 2010 and further amended on October 17, 2020 and will be effective on June 1, 2021, and its implementing regulations adopted in 2002 and amended in 2011 and 2013, provide that Chinese citizens, legal persons, or other organizations will, whether published or not, enjoy copyright in their works, which include music works. Copyright will be generally conferred upon the authors, or in case of works made for hire, upon the employer of the author.

Copyright holders enjoy personal and economic rights. The personal rights of a copyright holder include rights to publish works, right to be named as the author of works, right to amend the works and right to keep the works intact; while economic rights of a copyright holder include, but not limited to, reproduction right, distribution right, performance right and information network dissemination right, etc. In addition, the rights of performers with respect to their performance, rights of publishers with respect to their design of publications, rights of organizers with respect to their video or audio productions, and rights of broadcasting or TV stations with respect to their broadcasting or TV programs are classified as copyright-related interest and protected by the Copyright Law of the PRC. For a piece of music works, it may involve the copyright of lyricists and of composers and the copyright-related interests of recording organizers and of performers.

The copyright holders may license others to exercise or assign all or part of their economic rights attaching to their works. The license can be made on an exclusive or nonexclusive basis. With a few exceptions, an exclusive license or an assignment of copyright should be evidenced in a written contract.

Pursuant to the Copyright Law of the PRC and its implementing regulations, copyright infringers are subject to various civil liabilities, such as stopping infringing activities, issuing apologies to the copyright owners and compensating the copyright owners for damages resulting from such infringement. The damages should be calculated based on the actual loss or income made by an infringer.

The Provisional Measures on Voluntary Registration of Works, promulgated by the National Copyright Administration in 1994 and effective in 1995, provides for a voluntary registration system as administered by the National Copyright Administration and its local counterparts.

The Computer Software Copyright Registration Measures, promulgated by the State Council in 2002, regulates registrations of software copyright, exclusive licensing contracts for software copyright and assignment agreements. The National Copyright Administration administers software copyright registration, and the Copyright Protection Center of China is designated as the software registration authority. The Copyright Protection Center of China shall grant registration certificates to the computer software copyright applicants which meet the requirements of both the Computer Software Copyright Registration Measures and the Computer Software Protection Regulations (2013 Revision).

The Measures for Administrative Protection of Copyright Related to Internet, which was jointly promulgated by the National Copyright Administration and MIIT in 2005, provides that upon receipt of an infringement notice from a legitimate copyright holder, an Internet content service provider must take remedial actions immediately by removing or disabling access to the infringing content. If an Internet content service provider knowingly transmits infringing content or fails to take remedial actions after receipt of a notice of infringement that harms the public interest, the Internet content service provider could be subject to administrative penalties, including an order to cease infringing activities, confiscation by the authorities of all income derived from the infringement activities, or payment of fines.

In 2006, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information, as amended in 2013. Under these regulations, an owner of the network dissemination rights with respect to written works or audio or video recordings who believes that information storage, search or link services provided by an Internet service provider infringe his or her rights may require the Internet service provider to delete or disconnect the links to such works or recordings.

National Copyright Administration

The Copyright Law of the PRC provides that holders of copyrights or copyright-related rights may authorize a collective copyright management organization to exercise their copyrights or copyright-related rights. Upon authorization, the collective copyright administration organization is entitled to exercise the copyright or copyright-related rights in its own name for the holders of copyrights or copyright-related rights, and participate as a party in court or arbitration proceedings concerning the copyright or copyright-related rights. In 2013, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on Collective Administration of Copyright (2013 Revision). This set of regulations clarified that the collective copyright management organization is allowed to (i) enter into license agreement with users of copyright or copyright-related rights, (ii) charge royalties from users, (iii) pay royalties to holders of copyright or copyright-related rights, and (iv) participate in court or arbitration proceedings concerning the copyright or copyright-related rights. It is also provides that performance right, filming right, broadcasting right, rental right, information network dissemination right, reproduction right and other rights stipulated by the Copyright Law of the PRC, which are hard to be exercised effectively by the right holders, may be collectively administrated by a collective copyright administration organization. Foreigners and stateless persons may, through an overseas collective copyright management organization having a mutual representation contract with the collective copyright management organization in China, authorize the collective copyright management organization in China to manage copyright or copyright-related rights in China. The aforesaid mutual representation contract means a contract under which the collective copyright management organization in China and its overseas peers authorize each other to conduct collective copyright administration within their respective home countries or regions. In 1992, the National Copyright Administration and Chinese Musicians Association jointly established the Music Copyright Society of China.

Trademark

According to the Trademark Law of the PRC, adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress in 1982 and subsequently amended in 1993, 2001, 2013 and 2019, as well as the Implementation Regulation of the Trademark Law of the PRC adopted by the State Council in 2002 and subsequently amended in 2014, registered trademarks are granted a term of ten years from the date of registration, which may be renewed for consecutive ten-year periods upon request by the trademark owner. Trademark license agreements must be filed with the Trademark Office for the record. Conducts that shall constitute an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark include but not limited to: using a trademark that is identical with or similar to a registered trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark registrant, and selling goods that violate the exclusive right to use a registered trademark, etc. Pursuant to the Trademark Law of the PRC, in the event of any of the foregoing acts, the infringing party will be ordered to stop the infringement immediately and may be fined, and the counterfeit goods will be confiscated. The infringing party may also be held liable for the right holder’s damages, which will be equal to gains obtained by the infringing party or the losses suffered by the right holder as a result of the infringement, including reasonable expenses incurred by the right holder for stopping the infringement.

Patent

In China, the Patent Administrative Department of the State Council is responsible for administering patents, uniformly receiving, examining and approving patent applications. In 1984, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress adopted the Patent Law of the PRC, which was subsequently amended in 1992, 2000, 2008 and last amended on October 17, 2020 and will be effective on June 1, 2021. In addition, the State Council promulgated the Implementing Rules of the Patent Law in 2001, as amended in 2002 and 2010 respectively, pursuant to which a patentable invention and utility model must meet three conditions: novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability, and designs must be obviously different from current designs or combinations thereof. Patents cannot be granted for scientific discoveries, rules and methods for intellectual activities, methods used to diagnose or treat diseases, animal and plant breeds or substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation. A patent is valid for a term of twenty years with respect to an invention and a term of ten years with respect to a utility model or design, starting from the application date. Except under certain circumstances specifically provided by law, any third party user must obtain consent or a proper license from the patent owner to use the patent, or else such use will constitute an infringement of the rights of the patent holder.

Domain Names

In China, the administration of PRC Internet domain names is mainly regulated by MIIT, under the supervision of the China Internet Network Information Center. In 2017, MIIT promulgated the Measures on Administration of Internet Domain Names, which replaced the Measures on Administration of Domain Names for the Chinese Internet issued by MIIT in 2004. These measures adopt a “first to file’ rule to allocate domain names to applicants and provide that MIIT shall supervise the domain names services nationwide and publicize the PRC domain name system. In 2012, the China Internet Network Information Center issued a circular to authorize a domain name dispute resolution institution acknowledged by the China Internet Network Information Center to decide relevant disputes. On January 1, 2018, the Circular of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Regulating the Use of Domain Names in Providing Internet-based Information Services issued by MIIT became effective. It stipulates that an Internet access service provider shall, pursuant to requirements stated in the Anti-Terrorism Law of the PRC and the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC, verify the identities of Internet-based information service providers; and the Internet access service providers shall not provide access services for those who fail to provide their real identity information.

Regulations on Taxation

Enterprise Income Tax

In 2007, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC, which was most recently amended in December 2018. In 2007, the State Council enacted the Implementation Regulations for the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC, which was amended on April 23, 2019. Under these laws and regulations, both resident enterprises and non-resident enterprises are subject to tax in the PRC. Resident enterprises are defined as enterprises that are established in China in accordance with the PRC laws, or that are established in accordance with the laws of foreign countries but are actually or in effect controlled from within the PRC. Non-resident enterprises are defined as enterprises that are organized under the laws of foreign countries and whose actual management is conducted outside the PRC, but have established institutions or premises in the PRC, or have no such established institutions or premises but have income generated from inside the PRC. Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC and relevant implementing regulations, a uniform enterprise income tax rate of 25% is applied. However, if non-resident enterprises have not formed permanent establishments or premises in the PRC, or if they have formed permanent establishment or premises in the PRC but there is no actual relationship between the relevant income derived in the PRC and the established institutions or premises set up by them, enterprise income tax is set at the rate of 10% with respect to their income sourced from inside the PRC.

Pursuant to the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC, the enterprise income tax rate of an HNTE is 15%. According to the Administrative Measures for the Recognition of HNTEs, effective in 2008 and amended in 2016, for each entity accredited as an HNTE, its HNTE status is valid for three years if it meets the qualifications for the HNTE on a continuing basis during such period. Beijing Kuke Music has been recognized as an HNTE.

Value-added Tax

The Provisional Regulations of on Value-added Tax of the PRC were promulgated by the State Council in 1993, came into effect in 1994 and were most recently amended in 2017. The Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Provisional Regulations of on Value-added Tax of the PRC were promulgated by the Ministry of Finance in 1993 and subsequently amended in 2008 and 2011. In 2017, the State Council promulgated the Order on Abolishing the Provisional Regulations of the PRC on Business Tax and Amending the Provisional Regulations of on Value-added Tax of the PRC, or Order 691. According to the above, all enterprises and individuals engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of processing, repair and replacement services, sales of services, intangible assets, real property and the importation of goods within the territory of the PRC are the taxpayers of value-added tax. The value-added tax rates generally applicable are simplified as 17%, 11%, 6% and 0%, and the value-added tax rate applicable to the small-scale taxpayers is 3%.

On April 4, 2018, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation issued the Circular on Adjustment of Value-added Tax Rates, which became effective on May 1, 2018. According to the Circular on the Adjustment of Value-added Tax Rates, relevant value-added tax rates have been reduced from May 1, 2018, such as (i) value-added tax rates of 17% and 11% applicable to the taxpayers who have value-added tax taxable sales activities or imported goods are adjusted to 16% and 10%, respectively; (ii) value-added tax rate of 11% originally applicable to the taxpayers who purchase agricultural products is adjusted to 10% and so on.

On March 20, 2019, the Ministry of Finance, the State Administration of Taxation and the General Administration of Customs issued the Announcement on Deepening Value-added Tax Reform, which became effective on April 1, 2019. According to the Announcement on Deepening Value-added Tax Reform, relevant value-added tax rates have been reduced from April 1, 2019, such as value-added tax rates of 16% and 10% applicable to the taxpayers who have value-added tax taxable sales activities or imported goods are adjusted to 13% and 9%, respectively and so on.

As of the date of this annual report, our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated affiliated entities are generally subject to value-added tax rates of 13%, 9% or 6%.

Dividend Withholding Tax

The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law provides that since 2008, an enterprise income tax rate of 10% will normally be applicable to dividends declared to non-PRC resident investors which do not have an establishment or place of business in the PRC, or which have such establishment or place of business but the relevant income is not effectively connected with the establishment or place of business, to the extent that such dividends are derived from sources within the PRC.

Pursuant to the Arrangement Between the Mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Incomes, and other applicable PRC laws, if a Hong Kong resident enterprise is determined by the competent PRC tax authority to have satisfied the relevant conditions and requirements under such arrangement and other applicable laws, the 10% withholding tax on the dividends the Hong Kong resident enterprise receives from a PRC resident enterprise may be reduced to 5%. However, based on the Circular on Certain Issues with Respect to the Enforcement of Dividend Provisions in Tax Treaties issued by the State Administration of Taxation in 2009, or SAT Circular 81, if the relevant PRC tax authorities determine, in their discretion, that a company benefits from such reduced income tax rate due to a structure or arrangement that is primarily tax-driven, such PRC tax authorities may adjust the preferential tax treatment. According to the Circular on Several Issues regarding the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties, which was issued on February 3, 2018 by the State Administration of Taxation, effective on April 1, 2018, when determining the applicant’s status of the “beneficial owner” regarding tax treatments in connection with dividends, interests or royalties in the tax treaties, several factors, including without limitation, whether the applicant is obligated to pay more than 50% of its income in twelve months to residents in a third country or region, whether the business operated by the applicant constitutes the actual business activities, and whether the counterparty country or region to the tax treaties does not levy any tax or grant tax exemption on relevant incomes or levy tax at an extremely low rate, will be taken into account, and it will be analyzed according to the actual circumstances of the specific cases. This circular further provides that applicants who intend to prove his or her status of the “beneficial owner” shall submit the relevant documents to the relevant tax bureau according to the Announcement on Issuing the Measures for the Administration of Non-Resident Taxpayers’ Enjoyment of the Treatment under Tax Agreements.

Tax on Indirect Transfer

In 2015, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Circular on Issues of Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Transfers of Assets by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Circular 7. Pursuant to SAT Circular 7, an “indirect transfer” of assets, including equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise, by non-PRC resident enterprises, may be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable assets, if such arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding payment of PRC enterprise income tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax. When determining whether there is a “reasonable commercial purpose” of the transaction arrangement, features to be taken into consideration include, inter alia, whether the main value of the equity interest of the relevant offshore enterprise derives directly or indirectly from PRC taxable assets; whether the assets of the relevant offshore enterprise mainly consist of direct or indirect investment in China or if its income is mainly derived from China; and whether the offshore enterprise and its subsidiaries directly or indirectly holding PRC taxable assets have real commercial nature which is evidenced by their actual function and risk exposure. According to SAT Circular 7, where the payer fails to withhold any or sufficient tax, the transferor shall declare and pay such tax to the tax authority by itself within the statutory time limit. Late payment of applicable tax will subject the transferor to default interest. SAT Circular 7 does not apply to transactions of sale of shares by investors through a public stock exchange where such shares were acquired on a public stock exchange. In 2017, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Circular on Issues of Tax Withholding regarding Non-PRC Resident Enterprise Income Tax, or SAT Circular 37, which further elaborates the relevant implemental rules regarding the calculation, reporting and payment obligations of the withholding tax by the non-resident enterprises. Nonetheless, there remain uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of SAT Circular 7. SAT Circular 7 may be determined by the tax authorities to be applicable to our offshore transactions or sale of our shares or those of our offshore subsidiaries where non-resident enterprises, being the transferors, were involved.

Regulations on Foreign Exchange Registration of Offshore Investment by PRC Residents

General Rules

The core regulations governing foreign currency exchange in China are the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations of the PRC, promulgated by the State Council in 1996 and most recently amended in 2008. Under the regulations, payments of current account items, such as profit distributions and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. By contrast, approval from or registration with appropriate regulatory authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital account items, such as direct investment, repayment of foreign currency-denominated loans, repatriation of investment and investment in securities outside of China.

Pursuant to the Circular of Further Improving and Adjusting Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Foreign Direct Investment, or SAFE Circular 59, promulgated by the SAFE in 2012, which was further amended in 2015, 2018 and 2019, the opening of various special purpose foreign exchange accounts, such as pre-establishment expenses accounts, foreign exchange capital accounts and guarantee accounts, the reinvestment of Renminbi proceeds by foreign investors in the PRC, and remittance of foreign exchange profits and dividends by a foreign-invested enterprise to its foreign shareholders no longer require the approval or verification of the SAFE, and multiple capital accounts for the same entity may be opened in different provinces, which was not possible previously.

In 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular of Further Simplifying and Improving the Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Applicable to Direct Investment, or SAFE Circular 13, which was further amended in 2019. SAFE Circular 13 has simplified the procedure of foreign exchange-related registration by (i) canceling the administrative approval requirements of foreign exchange registration of foreign direct investment and overseas direct investment and (ii) allowing foreign exchange registrations of foreign direct investment and overseas direct investment to be handled by the banks designated by the foreign exchange authority instead of the SAFE and its branches.

The Circular on the Reforming the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, was issued by the SAFE in 2015, and it was amended in 2019 and 2022. It allows foreign-invested enterprises, within the scope of business, to settle their foreign exchange capital on a discretionary basis according to the actual needs of their business operation and provides the procedures for foreign-invested enterprises to use Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investment.

In 2017, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Improving Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Optimizing Genuineness and Compliance Verification, or SAFE Circular 3, which stipulates several capital control measures with respect to the outbound remittance of profit from domestic entities to offshore entities, including (i) under the principle of genuine transaction, banks shall check board resolutions regarding profit distribution, the original version of tax filing records and audited financial statements; and (ii) domestic entities shall hold income to account for previous years’ losses before remitting the profits. Further, according to SAFE Circular 3, domestic entities shall make detailed explanations of the sources of capital and utilization arrangements, and provide board resolutions, contracts and other proof when completing the registration procedures in connection with an outbound investment.

Offshore Investment

The Circular of SAFE on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration over the Overseas Investment and Financing and Round-trip Investment by Domestic Residents via Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, which became effective in 2014, regulates foreign exchange matters in relation to the use of special purpose vehicles, or SPVs, by PRC residents or entities to seek offshore investment and financing or conduct round-trip investment in China. Under SAFE Circular 37, an SPV refers to offshore enterprises directly established or indirectly controlled by PRC residents for the purpose of seeking offshore equity financing or making offshore investments, using legitimate domestic or offshore assets or interests, while “round-trip investment” refers to the direct investment in China by PRC residents or entities through SPVs, namely, establishing foreign-invested enterprises to obtain the ownership, control rights and management rights. SAFE Circular 37 requires that, before making contributions to an SPV, PRC residents or entities are required to register with the local SAFE branch.

Pursuant to SAFE Circular 13, PRC residents or entities can register with qualified banks instead of the SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment of an SPV.