TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ii

INTRODUCTION

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to the terms “Relief,” “Relief Therapeutics,” “the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to RELIEF Therapeutics Holding SA together with its subsidiaries. Relief and its subsidiaries may also sometimes be referred to in this Form 20-F as the “Group.”

Our jurisdiction of incorporation is Switzerland, and our registered office is in Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. A majority of our outstanding securities that are registered in our share register are owned by non-U.S. residents. Under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we are currently eligible for treatment as a foreign private issuer. As a foreign private issuer, we will not be required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. domestic issuers whose securities are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to herein as the Exchange Act.

We own trademarks for Relief Therapeutics in Switzerland. All other trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective holders. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this prospectus are referred to without the ^® and ^™ symbols, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto. We do not intend to use or display other companies’ trademarks and trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.

Our reporting currency is the Swiss franc. In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified, all monetary amounts are in Swiss francs, all references to “CHF” and “Swiss francs” mean Swiss francs and all references to “U.S. dollars,” “$,” “US$” and “USD” mean United States dollars. Throughout this prospectus, references to ADSs mean ADSs or ordinary shares represented by such ADSs, as the case may be.

We present our consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. Readers of this prospectus should note that there may be certain differences between the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows under IFRS and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements contained in this annual report, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, projects, plans and objections of management, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend”, “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” “potential,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “continue,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. The forward-looking statements in this annual report include, among other things, statements about:

1

You should read this annual report and the documents we have filed as exhibits to the annual report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward- looking statements we make. You should refer to the sections of this annual report titled “Item 3. Key Information, D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company.” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes statistical and other industry and market data that we obtained from industry publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.

2

PART I

The following table sets forth the names, dates of birth and positions of our directors and senior management as of the date of this annual report:

Directors

Directors

Raghuram (Ram) Selvaraju, Ph.D., MBA, serves as Chairman of our Board of Directors. Dr. Selvaraju Managing Director of Equity Research at H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC whose research focuses on the healthcare sector. Dr. Selvaraju has over 16 years of experience on Wall Street and previously was a pharmaceutical researcher at Serono in Switzerland. In addition, Dr. Selvaraju has appeared numerous times on Bloomberg, CNBC, Business News Network and BTV where he discussed drug development trends, healthcare reform policy, and pharma and biotech M&A. Prior to joining Wainwright, Dr. Selvaraju held Senior Research positions at MLV & Co., Aegis Capital Corp. – Head of Healthcare Equity Research and Director of Equity Research, Hapoalim Securities U.S.A. and Rodman & Renshaw LLC. Dr. Selvaraju became the youngest-ever recipient of the Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute’s Inventorship Award for exceptional innovation and creativity in 2003. Dr. Selvaraju earned his Ph.D. in cellular immunology and molecular neuroscience and an M.S. in molecular biology from the University of Geneva in Switzerland on the basis of his drug development research. He also holds an M.B.A. from the Cornell University accelerated one-year program for scientists and engineers and a B.S. in biological sciences and technical writing from Carnegie Mellon University.

Tom Plitz serves as Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors and is chairperson of the Nomination and Compensation Committee of the Board. He most recently served as Chief Executive Officer of Chord Therapeutics SA, a privately held biopharmaceutical firm based in Geneva, Switzerland, which was acquired by Merck KGaA in January 2022, for an undisclosed amount. Prior to Chord, Dr. Plitz worked as Chief Scientific Officer of the rare disease company, Wilson Therapeutics, which was acquired for USD 855 million by Alexion Pharmaceuticals in April 2018. Dr. Plitz’s previous assignments include senior roles at Serono, Merck, and Shire Pharmaceuticals, where he worked across multiple therapeutic areas including neuroinflammatory, metabolic, and rare diseases, completing more than two decades of experience in pharmaceutical R&D. He holds a Ph.D. from Technical University of Munich, Germany

Patrice Jean is a member of our Board of Directors and is chairperson of the Audit and Finance Committee. She is the Chair of the Life Sciences Practice at Hughes Hubbard & Reed, an international law firm based in New York City. She has over a decade of experience counselling and leading startup pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology companies in all areas of intellectual property law including asserting and defending patent rights underlying core technologies and innovations. Dr. Jean serves as Vice-President of the New York Intellectual Property Law Education Foundation and is a board member of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association.. She holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology from Princeton University, a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law, and a B.A. in biochemistry from Xavier University.

3

Paolo Galfetti is a member of our Board of Directors, the chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Chief Operating Officer of Relief. He has more than thirty years of management experience in the pharmaceutical sector including in the areas of business development and licensing, operational strategic management, clinical research and pharmaceutical discovery and development. Mr. Galfetti joined APR in 1995 as head of licensing and business development and was appointed Chief Executive Officer in 2002. Prior to joining APR, he was a founding partner, Chief Executive Officer and board member of the Institute for Pharmacokinetic and Analytical Studies AG (IPAS), a Swiss contract research organization focusing on Phase I and II clinical trials, as well as Chief Executive Officer and board member of Farma Resa s.r.l., an Italian contract research organization dedicated to Phase III and IV clinical trial on a contract basis. Mr. Galfetti is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Commercial University Bocconi, Milan, Italy.

Michelle Lock is a member of our Board of Directors. She is the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Commercial Officer of Covis Pharma Group, a Switzerland-based global specialty pharmaceutical company that markets therapeutic solutions for patients with life-threatening conditions and chronic illnesses. Ms. Lock’s broad biopharmaceutical industry experience spans nearly 30 years and includes leadership roles in commercialization across various therapeutic areas including oncology, hematology, cardiovascular and metabolic disease, liver disease, immunology, virology and neuroscience. Previously, Ms. Lock served as the Senior Vice President and Head of International organization at Acceleron Pharma Inc, a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development, and commercialization of therapeutics to treat serious and rare diseases. Before that, she was a consultant to biotechnology companies, providing leadership, guidance, and strategic support to managements seeking to establish or improve their international businesses based in Switzerland. Earlier, Ms. Lock was Senior Vice President & Head of International at Sage Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing, and commercializing novel medicines to transform the lives of patients with life-altering central nervous system (CNS) disorders. During her career, Ms. Lock also spent 24 years with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) in positions of increasing responsibility in sales, commercial, general management, regional leadership and business strategy. In her most recent role at BMS, she served as Vice President and General Manager for EU Country Clusters & Global Capabilities Hub leadership, Switzerland, driving the company’s leadership efforts in immuno-oncology. She has served as Honorary Ambassador between Switzerland and the U.S. since 2018, as well is a past member of the board of directors of the Swiss American Chamber of Commerce and the Interpharma Switzerland Pharmaceutical Industry. She earned a degree in Science/Nursing at Royal Melbourne University, Australia and studied General Management and Internal General Management at CEDEP, France.

Executive Officers

Paolo Galfetti. See biographical information above.

Jack Weinstein joined us in October 2020 and since December 2022 has served as our Chief Executive Officer. From October 2020 to December 2022, Mr. Weinstein served as our U.S. based Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and as the President of Relief U.S. Mr. Weinstein has nearly 40 years of wide-ranging executive management expertise, including as a CFO, investment banker and consultant in the biopharmaceutical and life sciences industries. Prior to joining Relief, Mr. Weinstein served as Managing Director and Head of Healthcare Investment Banking at Avalon NetWorth, an independent New York-based boutique investment bank. Prior to joining Avalon, Mr. Weinstein was CFO, Treasurer and Vice President of Business Development at Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Nasdaq: CPRX), a biopharmaceutical company developing therapies to treat rare diseases, where he led the Company through its Initial Public Offering. Prior to joining Catalyst, Mr. Weinstein was the President and founder of The Sterlington Group, Inc., a consulting firm providing strategic, business development, regulatory and “CFO” consulting services. Mr. Weinstein received his MBA from the Harvard Business School.

Jeremy Meinen became our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in December 2022. Previously Mr. Meinen had served as our Vice President Finance and Administration since October 2020 and our Chief Accounting Officer since December 2021. He joined Relief as ad-interim Chief Financial Officer in April 2020. Prior to joining Relief, Jeremy provided financial consulting, controlling and auditing services to companies in various industries. He began his career in an international audit firm, where he held positions of increasing responsibility and scope over more than six years. Mr. Meinen holds a Master of Science in finance from Bocconi University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from the University of Geneva. He is a Swiss certified public accountant and former licensed audit expert.

4

Marco Marotta became our Chief Business Officer in December 2021. Mr. Marotta joined us as part of our acquisition of APR, where he served as Corporate Director, Business Development and Licensing. Mr. Marotta joined APR in January 2015, where he was initially in charge to reshape and optimize APR’s end-to-end supply chain process, and afterwards, he joined the licensing and business development department, establishing and consolidating APR’s presence in emerging markets like the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions. From 2019, Mr. Marotta led APR Business Development as a director, with responsibility of out-licensing proprietary products worldwide, divesting non-strategic assets and maximizing monetization as well as merging APR’s business with Relief. Mr. Marotta received a Master of Science in Engineering from the University Federico II in Napoli and an Executive MBA from Commercial University Bocconi in Milan.

Our principal Swiss legal advisor is VISCHER AG, located at Schuetzengasse 1, PO Box, CH-8021 Zurich, Switzerland and our principal United States (U.S.) legal adviser is Akerman LLP, located at 201 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1800, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

MAZARS SA has been our auditor since 2017. The address for MAZARS SA is Chemin de Blandonnet 2, 1214 Vernier-Geneva, Switzerland.

Not applicable.

Summary Financial Information of Relief

We derived the selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. We present our consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). All amounts below are in Swiss Francs (CHF) and are in thousands.

The summary consolidated financial data below should be read together with those consolidated financial statements as well as the Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and our interim period results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year or any other interim period.

5

The table below sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and shows our capitalization as of December 31, 2022. You should read this table in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, together with the accompanying notes and the other information appearing under the heading “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” All amounts below are in Swiss Francs (CHF) and are in thousands. Liabilities set forth below are unsecured and non-guaranteed.

As of April 30, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 11.1 million. We will need to obtain additional funding to continue our operations beyond the third quarter of 2023.

On April 28, 2023, our stockholders approved a consolidation (or reverse split) of our ordinary shares at a 400 to 1 ratio. The consolidation occurred on May 5, 2023. Assuming we meet all listing requirements, we intend to seek a listing of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ stock market. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in such listing.

Not applicable

6

Risk Factors Summary

We are providing the following summary of the risk factors contained in our Form 20-F to enhance the readability and accessibility of our risk factor disclosures. We encourage our stockholders to carefully review the full risk factors contained in this Form 20-F in their entirety for additional information regarding the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to vary materially from our recent results or from our anticipated future results.

Risks Related to Our Business

7

Risks Related to Our Relationships with Third Parties

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

8

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

9

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Annual report before making an investment. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occur, and as a result, the market price of our shares could decline. This Annual report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in these forward- looking statements as a result of certain factors.

Risks Related to Our Business

We depend heavily on the success of our product candidates. If our clinical studies are unsuccessful, if we or our collaboration partners do not obtain regulatory approval or if we or our collaboration partners are unable to commercialize our product candidates, or if we experience significant delays in doing so, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

We currently have a small number of products approved for sale, all of which were acquired in the business combination with APR, generating a limited volume of sales. We have licensed OLPRUVA^™ (ACER-001), and have added additional products to our portfolio through our acquisitions of AdVita and APR. Our ability to generate significantly higher product revenues will depend heavily on successful clinical development, obtaining regulatory approval and eventual commercialization of these product candidates. The success of our current and future product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:

If we or our collaborators do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

Our business is subject to significant regulation from governments and regulatory bodies, including marketing approval requirements, which could lengthen the development time, increase the cost of developing our drug product candidates or delay, prevent or limit the commercialization of our product candidates.

When a medicinal product candidate receives regulatory approval, the approval can nonetheless be subject to limitations, e.g., with regard to the indications for which it may be marketed. The approval may also be given subject to conditions, such as additional proof of the medicinal product’s effectiveness and safety. Even after approval is granted, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, marketing, sales and distribution of its product candidates are regulated by government agencies in countries where we intend to market our products. All these activities are subject to recurring scrutiny and regular inspections by the relevant agencies. As a consequence, if previously unknown problems are discovered in connection with an approved product, its manufacturer or the manufacturing facilities, this can result in restrictions on the product, the manufacturer or the manufacturing facilities, up to the requirement to withdraw the product from the market. In any event, changes in existing regulations or adoption of new regulations could prevent the Company and/or its commercialization partners from obtaining or maintaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory approvals.

10

These and other factors, alone or together, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects as well as the market price of our securities.

We have a limited history of commercializing pharmaceutical products, which may make it difficult to evaluate our future viability.

Our operations to date have mostly been limited to financing and staffing our company, developing our technology, and developing our product candidates. Until our acquisition of APR, we had not generated any revenue from product sales. While we began marketing commercial products with our acquisition of APR, our history of operating in the commercial market is short. Consequently, predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer history of successfully developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products. Factors that may affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates on our own include recruiting and retaining adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel, obtaining access to or persuading adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our drug candidates, and other unforeseen costs associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization. Developing a sales and marketing organization requires significant investment, is time consuming and could delay the launch of our product candidates. Consequently, we may not be able to build an effective sales and marketing organization. Additionally, successful commercialization also requires an enhanced regulatory organization, which we currently do not have. If we are unable to build our own distribution and marketing capabilities, are unable to find suitable partners for the commercialization of our product candidates or do not successfully obtain the necessary regulatory capabilities, we may not generate sufficient revenues from them and as a result may not be able to reach or sustain profitability.

Results of early clinical studies may not be predictive of future study results.

Positive or timely results from preclinical or early-stage clinical studies do not ensure positive or timely results in late-stage clinical studies or product approval by the FDA, the EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Products that show positive preclinical or early clinical results may not show sufficient safety or efficacy in later-stage clinical studies and therefore may fail to obtain regulatory approvals. In addition, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. Many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical and clinical studies have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval for the product candidates. The FDA, the EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and in determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for any of our product candidates. Even if we believe that the data collected from clinical studies of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA, the EMA or any other regulatory authority.

In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety and/or efficacy results between different studies of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in study procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, adherence to the dosing regimen and other study protocols, and the rate of dropout among clinical study participants. In the case of our later-stage clinical product candidates, results may differ in general on the basis of the larger number of clinical study sites and the additional countries and languages involved in these clinical studies.

Clinical studies may include subject-reported outcomes, some of which may be captured with electronic diaries. We have no assurance and cannot rely on past experience that the high frequency of questioning is not influencing the measured outcome. In addition, low compliance with daily reporting requirements may impact the studies’ validity or statistical power. We cannot assure that any Phase 1, phase 2, phase 3 or other clinical studies that either we or our collaboration partners may conduct will demonstrate consistent or adequate efficacy and safety to obtain regulatory approval to market our product candidates.

If we or our collaboration partners are required to conduct additional clinical studies or other testing of any of our current or future product candidates that we or our collaboration partners develop, beyond the studies and testing that we or our collaboration partners contemplate, if we or our collaboration partners are unable to successfully complete clinical studies of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these studies or tests are unfavorable or are only modestly favorable, or if there are safety concerns associated with our current or future product candidates, we may:

11

Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or receiving marketing approvals and we may be required to obtain additional funds to complete clinical studies. We cannot assure that our clinical studies will begin as planned or be completed on schedule, if at all, or that we will not need to amend our studies after they have begun. Significant clinical study delays could also shorten any periods during which we or our collaboration partners may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which may harm our business and results of operations. In addition, some of the factors that cause, or lead to, clinical study delays may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend on the extent to which governmental authorities and health insurers establish adequate coverage and reimbursement levels and pricing policies.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend, in part, on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for our products will be available from government and health administration authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors. To manage healthcare costs, many governments and third-party payors increasingly scrutinize the pricing of new technologies and require greater levels of evidence of favorable clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness before extending coverage. In light of such challenges to prices and the requirement for increasing levels of evidence of the benefits and clinical outcomes of new technologies, we cannot be sure that coverage will be available for any of our current or future product candidates that we or our collaboration partners will commercialize or, if available, that the reimbursement rates will be adequate in each respective region. If we are unable to obtain adequate levels of coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates, their marketability will be negatively and materially impacted.

Third-party payors may deny coverage and reimbursement status altogether for a given drug product or may cover the product but also establish prices at levels that are too low to enable us to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Because the rules and regulations regarding coverage and reimbursement change frequently, in some cases at short notice, even when there is favorable coverage and reimbursement, future changes may occur that adversely impact the favorable status. Further, the net reimbursement for drug products may be subject to additional reductions in the future depending on policy changes enacted by the national regulatory bodies.

The unavailability or inadequacy and variability of third-party coverage and reimbursement could have a material adverse effect on the market acceptance of our product candidates and the future revenues we may expect to receive from those products. In addition, we are unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business.

Our products may not gain market acceptance, in which case we or our collaboration partners may not be able to generate product revenues, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if the FDA, the EMA or any other regulatory authority approves the marketing of any product candidates that we develop, physicians, healthcare providers, patients or the medical community may not accept or use them. Efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may not be successful. If any of our current or future product candidates does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we or our collaboration partners may not generate significant product or royalty revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates that are approved for commercial sale will depend on a variety of factors, including:

12

If our product candidates fail to gain market acceptance, this will have a material adverse impact on our ability to generate revenues to provide a satisfactory, or any, return on our investments. Even if some products achieve market acceptance, the market may prove to not be large enough to allow us to generate significant revenues.

In addition, the potential market opportunity of our product candidates is difficult to estimate precisely. Our estimates of the potential market opportunity are predicated on several key assumptions such as industry knowledge and publications, third-party research reports and other surveys. These assumptions involve the exercise of significant judgment on the part of our management and are inherently uncertain, and the reasonableness of these assumptions could not have been assessed by an independent source in every detail. If any of the assumptions proves to be inaccurate, then the actual market for our product candidates could be smaller than our estimates of the potential market opportunity. If the actual market for our product candidates is smaller than we expect, or if any approved products fail to achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, healthcare payors and patients, our product or royalty revenue may be limited, and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical studies for our product candidates. If we are unable to enroll patients in our clinical studies, our research and development efforts could be materially adversely affected.

If our product candidates are associated with serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which such side effects are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk–benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in preclinical or early-stage testing were later found to cause side effects that restricted their use and prevented further development of the compound for larger indications.

Generally, the specific target population of patients and therapeutic time windows may make it difficult for us to enroll enough patients to complete clinical studies for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner. Delays in the completion of any clinical study of our product candidates will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process, and delay or potentially jeopardize our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commence product sales and generate revenue. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

If serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects are identified during the development of our product candidates or following approval, if any, we may need to abandon our development of such product candidates, the commercial profile of any approved label may be limited, or we may be subject to other significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if any.

If our product candidates are associated with serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which such side effects are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk–benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in preclinical or early-stage testing were later found to cause side effects that restricted their use and prevented further development of the compound for larger indications.

13

Occurrence of serious side effects could impede clinical study enrollment and receipt of marketing approval from the U.S. FDA, the EMA and comparable other national regulatory authorities. Adverse events (AEs) and/or serious adverse events (SAEs) could also adversely affect physician or patient acceptance of our product candidates.

Additionally, if one or more of our product candidates receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including the following:

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

We operate in highly competitive and rapidly changing industries, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing competing products before or more successfully than we do.

The biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to discover, develop and obtain marketing approval for new and innovative products on a cost-effective basis and to market them successfully. In doing so, we face and will continue to face intense competition from a variety of businesses, including large, fully integrated pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other private and public research institutions in Europe, the U.S. and other jurisdictions. Many of our potential competitors, alone or with their strategic partners, have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than we do and significantly greater experience in the discovery and development of product candidates, obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of treatments, and the commercialization of those treatments. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors.

The highly competitive nature of and rapid technological changes in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries could render our product candidates or our technology obsolete or noncompetitive. The commercial opportunity for our products could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors:

14

Should any of these occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business is subject to additional risks associated with international operations.

Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

The COVID-19 pandemic may impact our business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, surfaced in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. By March 2020, COVID-19 had spread to other countries, including Switzerland and the U.S., and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. Since the beginning of the pandemic, governments, public institutions, and other organizations in countries and localities where COVID-19 cases have been identified have taken certain preventative or protective measures to combat the transmission of the virus, including implementation of travel restrictions or bans, closures of non-essential businesses, limitations of public gatherings, other social distancing and shelter-in-place measures, and delays or cancellations of elective surgeries. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose the risk that the Company, our employees, contractors, suppliers, and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities for an indefinite period of time due to shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by state and federal governmental authorities.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we may experience disruptions that could materially impact our business and planned clinical trials, including:

15

Our future growth and ability to compete depends on retaining our key personnel and recruiting additional qualified personnel.

Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our key management, scientific and technical personnel, many of whom have substantial experience with or been instrumental for us and our projects. The loss of our key managers and senior scientists could delay our research and development activities. Laws and regulations on executive compensation, including legislation in Switzerland, may restrict our ability to attract, motivate and retain the required level of qualified personnel. In Switzerland, legislation affecting public companies has been passed that, among other things, imposes an annual binding shareholder “say on pay” vote with respect to the compensation of the executive management, including executive officers and the members of the board of directors. In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical field is intense, and our future success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled scientific, technical and managerial employees. We face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions and other organizations. If our recruitment and retention efforts are unsuccessful in the future, it may be difficult for us to implement our business strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims, either when testing our product candidates or at the commercial stage or as a result of claims against our directors and officers, and our liability insurance may not cover all damages from such claims.

We are exposed to potential product liability and professional indemnity risks that are inherent in the research, development, manufacturing, marketing and use of pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical products. Currently we have no products that have been approved for commercial sale; however, our current and future use of product candidates in clinical studies, and the sale of any approved products in the future, may expose us to liability claims. These claims might be made by patients that use the product, by healthcare providers, or by pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies or others selling such products. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could be difficult and costly to defend and could materially adversely affect the market for our product candidates or any prospects for commercialization of our product candidates.

Although the clinical trial process is designed to identify and assess potential side effects, it is always possible that a drug, even after regulatory approval, may exhibit unforeseen side effects. If any of our product candidates were to cause adverse side effects during clinical studies or after approval of the product candidate, we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. Physicians and patients may not comply with any warnings that identify known potential adverse effects and patients who should not use our product candidates.

We continuously seek to maintain appropriate and cost-effective liability insurance coverage in connection with our products and for purposes of indemnifying our directors and officers for claims against them. It is, however, possible that our liabilities could exceed our insurance coverage. For example, we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. However, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. If a successful liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, our assets may not be sufficient to cover such claims and our business operations could be impaired.

Should any of the events described above occur, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

16

Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs.

Our operations and those of our third-party collaborators and other contractors and consultants, could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, and other natural or man-made disasters or business interruptions, for which we are partly uninsured. In addition, we rely on our third-party research institution collaborators for conducting research and development of our product candidates, and they may be affected by government shutdowns or withdrawn funding. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our operations and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce and process our product candidates. Our ability to obtain clinical supplies of our product candidates could be disrupted if the operations of these suppliers are affected by a man-made or natural disaster or by other business interruption.

Our operations are conducted internationally with employees, consultants and strategic vendors located in the U.S. and in Europe, including Switzerland, where the Company is headquartered. Damage or extended periods of interruption to our corporate, development or research facilities due to fire, natural disaster, power loss, communications failure, unauthorized entry or other events could cause us to cease or delay development of some or all of our product candidates. Although we maintain property damage and business interruption insurance coverage on these facilities, our insurance might not cover all losses under such circumstances and our business may be seriously harmed by such delays and interruption.

Pressure on drug product third-party payor coverage, reimbursement and pricing may impair our ability to be reimbursed at prices or on terms sufficient to provide a viable financial outcome.

The commercial success of our pharmaceutical products will depend substantially on the extent to which the cost of those products will be paid or reimbursed by government health administration authorities (such as Medicare and Medicaid in the U.S.), private health coverage providers and other third party payors. If reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we may be unable to continue to successfully commercialize our products. Even if coverage is provided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be high enough to establish and maintain pricing sufficient to realize a meaningful return on our investment.

The healthcare industry is acutely focused on cost containment, both in the U.S. and elsewhere. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, which could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. These payors may not view our products as cost-effective, and coverage and reimbursement may not be available to our customers, or may not be sufficient to allow our products, if any, to be marketed on a competitive basis. Cost-control initiatives could cause us to decrease the price we might establish for products, which could result in lower than anticipated product revenues. If the prices for our products decrease or if governmental and other third-party payors do not provide adequate coverage or reimbursement, our prospects for revenue and profitability will suffer.

We cannot give any assurance that any of our product candidates in development will receive regulatory approval, which is necessary before they can be commercialized.

We cannot be certain that any of our product candidates in development will be successful in clinical studies or receive regulatory approval. Applications for our product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including but not limited to the following:

17

We generally plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the U.S., the EU, Switzerland and in additional foreign countries where we have commercial and typically IP rights. To obtain regulatory approval in other countries, we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such other countries regarding safety, efficacy, chemistry, manufacturing and controls, clinical studies, commercial sales, pricing, marketing and distribution of our product candidates. Even if we are successful in obtaining approval in one jurisdiction, we cannot ensure that we will obtain approval in any other jurisdictions. Failure to obtain marketing authorization for our product candidates will result in our being unable to market and sell such products, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to obtain approval in any jurisdiction, the geographic market for our product candidates could be limited.

Similarly, regulatory agencies may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain timelines and uncertain outcomes. If clinical studies of our product candidates are prolonged or delayed, we may be unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, and therefore be unable to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis or at all.

In order to commercialize any of our product candidates, we or our partners must obtain the necessary regulatory approvals to market and sell such product. To obtain that approval, we must demonstrate through extensive preclinical and clinical studies that our products are safe and effective in humans. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical study process. The results of preclinical and early clinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical studies. For example, the positive results generated to date in clinical studies for our product candidates do not ensure that later clinical studies will demonstrate similar results. Product candidates in later stages of clinical studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical industry, including us, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical studies due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier studies. Our future clinical study results may not be successful.

Clinical studies must be conducted in accordance with the legal requirements, regulations or guidelines of the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic and comparable regulatory authorities, and are subject to oversight by these governmental agencies and institutional review boards (IRBs) at the medical institutions where the clinical studies are conducted. In addition, clinical studies must be conducted with supplies of our product candidates produced under cGMP and other requirements. We depend on medical institutions and CROs to conduct our clinical studies in compliance with cGCP standards. To the extent the CROs fail to enroll participants for our clinical studies, fail to conduct the study to cGCP standards or are delayed for a significant time in the execution of studies, including achieving full enrollment, we may be affected by increased costs, program delays or both, which may harm our business.

The completion of clinical studies for our clinical product candidates may be delayed, suspended or terminated as a result of many factors, including but not limited to:

18

Any delays in completing our clinical studies will increase our costs, slow our product candidate development and approval process, and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate sales revenues. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of certain of our product candidates.

Even if we obtain and maintain approval for certain of our drug candidates from one jurisdiction, we may never obtain approval for our drug candidates in other jurisdictions, which would limit our market opportunities and adversely affect our business.

If marketing authorization is obtained for certain of our product candidates, the products will remain subject to continual regulatory review and therefore authorization could be subsequently withdrawn or restricted. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for certain of our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical studies, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates in development, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and oversight by regulatory authorities, including with respect to the manufacturing processes, labeling, packing, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising and marketing restrictions, and record-keeping and, potentially, other post-marketing obligations, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize such products. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and cGCP requirements for any clinical studies that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including AEs of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

19

If any of these events occurs, our ability to sell such product may be impaired, and we may incur substantial additional expense to comply with regulatory requirements, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulatory policies may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have conducted and may in the future conduct clinical studies for our drug candidates outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland, and the FDA, EMA and Swissmedic and applicable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such studies.

We, or our collaboration partners, have conducted and may in the future choose to conduct one or more of our clinical studies outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland. The acceptance of study data from clinical studies conducted outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland or another jurisdiction by the FDA, EMA and Swissmedic or applicable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from foreign clinical studies are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval, for instance in the U.S., the FDA will not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless the following are true: the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; the studies were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and the data are considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical study requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar requirements. In addition, such foreign studies would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions in which the studies are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic or any applicable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from studies conducted outside of the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic or any applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional studies, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our drugs or drug candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

Even if certain of our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expenses. Additionally, our additional product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our products.

If marketing authorization is obtained for certain of our product candidates, the products will remain subject to continual regulatory review and therefore authorization could be subsequently withdrawn or restricted. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for certain of our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including phase 4 clinical studies, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates in development, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and oversight by regulatory authorities, including with respect to the manufacturing processes, labeling, packing, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising and marketing restrictions, and record-keeping and, potentially, other post-marketing obligations, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize such products. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and cGCP requirements for any clinical studies that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including AEs of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

20

If any of these events occurs, our ability to sell such product may be impaired, and we may incur substantial additional expense to comply with regulatory requirements, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulatory policies may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and international laws and regulations regarding clinical trials reimbursement and privacy and data protection. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation and could result in claims, changes to our business practices, penalties, increased cost of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our business.

Regulatory authorities around the world have adopted laws and regulations and are continuing to consider a number of legislative and regulatory proposals, concerning privacy and data protection, including measures to ensure that encryption of users’ data does not hinder access of law enforcement agencies to that data. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe, Switzerland and elsewhere are often uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. These laws and regulations, and legislative and regulatory proposals, if adopted, and such interpretations could, in addition to the possibility of fines, result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

In the EU, new clinical trial regulations came into force on January 31, 2022. This new legislation enforces the centralization of clinical trial applications and approvals, New clinical trial sponsors must begin using the new system by January 31, 2023, and any previously approved trial sponsors must comply from January 31, 2025, but in some cases, this may extend timelines for clinical study approvals, due to potentially longer wait times enabling sponsors to apply for trial authorization in up to 30 European countries with a single online application. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which became effective in May 2018 in all EU member states, created a range of new compliance obligations for companies that process the personal data of EU residents. Although it is expected that the GDPR will provide consistency across the territory of the EU, it imposes more onerous requirements concerning consent and the obligations of sponsors of clinical trials (acting as data controllers), among other measures, which may increase the costs and extend the timelines of our product development efforts. Austerity measures in certain European nations may also affect the prices we are able to seek if our products are approved, as discussed below. Furthermore, the Brexit vote and the impact of the withdrawal of the UK may adversely affect business activity, political stability and economic conditions in the UK, the Eurozone, the EU and elsewhere. Specifically, Brexit and ongoing developments in the UK have created uncertainty with regard to data protection regulation in the UK. We may be required to comply with both the GDPR and the UK GDPR, exposing us to two parallel regimes with potentially divergent interpretations and enforcement actions for certain violations. The relationship between the UK and the EU in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains unclear, for example, how data transfers between EU member states and the UK will be treated and the role of the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office with respect to the EU following the end of the transitional period. Although we do not have material operations in the UK, we cannot rule out potential disruptions in relation to the clinical regulatory framework applicable to our clinical studies in the UK, and to data privacy and security rules with respect to personal data sharing with vendors and clinical investigators in the UK, and we cannot predict future implications.

Both in the U.S. and in the EU, legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products. We do not know whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, whether the regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be.

21

We could be subject to liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws or regulations, or fines, penalties or other sanctions, if we fail to comply with such laws or regulations or otherwise incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, and permitting requirements, including those governing laboratory procedures, decontamination activities, and the handling, transportation, use, remediation, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials, human substances and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials that produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials or wastes either at our sites or at third-party disposal sites. In the event of such contamination or injury, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties. Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses, we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, human substances or other work-related injuries, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws, regulations or permitting requirements. Such laws, regulations and requirements are becoming increasingly more stringent and may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permitting requirements also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Our relationships with clinical centers, customers and payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which, if violated, could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, it is possible that some of our future business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, recent healthcare-reform legislation has strengthened these laws. For example, the Health Care Reform Law, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. Moreover, the Health Care Reform Law provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

22

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from U.S. government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, other foreign healthcare reimbursement and procurement programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business with is found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government-funded healthcare programs.

Risks Related to Our Relationships with Third Parties

If we fail to maintain our strategic relationships with any of our current or future strategic partners, our business, commercialization prospects and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We rely, in part, on our strategic partners. Good relationships with our strategic partners are important for our business prospects. If our relationships with our current or future strategic partners were to challenge our use of their intellectual property or our calculations of the payments we are owed under our agreements, our business, financial condition, commercialization prospects and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We may seek to form additional strategic alliances in the future with respect to our product candidates, and if we do not realize the benefits of such alliances, our business, financial condition, commercialization prospects and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate, document and manage. Any delays in entering into new strategic partnership agreements related to our product candidates could delay the development and commercialization of our product candidates and reduce their competitiveness even if they reach the market. We may also be restricted under existing and future collaboration agreements from entering into strategic partnerships or collaboration agreements on certain terms with other potential collaborators. We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on acceptable terms, or at all, for any of our existing or future product candidates and programs because the potential partner may consider that our research and development pipeline is insufficiently developed to justify a collaborative effort, or that our product candidates and programs do not have the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy in the target population. If we are unsuccessful in establishing and maintaining a collaboration with respect to a particular product candidate, we may have to curtail the development of that product candidate, reduce the scope of or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of our sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense, for which we have not budgeted. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we will not be able to bring our product candidates to market and generate product revenue. Even if we are successful in establishing a new strategic partnership or entering into a collaboration agreement, we cannot be certain that, following such a strategic transaction or license, we will be able to progress the development and commercialization of the applicable product candidates as envisaged, or that we will achieve the revenues that would justify such transaction, and we could be subject to the following risks, each of which may materially harm our business, commercialization prospects and financial condition:

23

We rely on third parties to conduct our nonclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates, and our business could be substantially harmed.

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party clinical research organizations or contract research organizations (CROs), to monitor and manage data for our ongoing nonclinical and clinical programs, including the clinical studies of our product candidates. We rely on these parties for execution of our nonclinical and clinical studies and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory, and scientific standards and our reliance on the clinical CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our clinical CROs and other vendors are required to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP), current Good Clinical Practice (cGCP), and current Good Laboratory Practice (cGLP), which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the EU and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for our product candidates in nonclinical and clinical development (where applicable). Regulatory authorities enforce these regulations through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators, study sites and other contractors. If we or any of our clinical CROs or vendors fail to comply with applicable regulations, the data generated in our nonclinical and clinical studies may be deemed unreliable and the EMA, FDA, other regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional nonclinical and clinical studies before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that all of our clinical studies comply with cGCP regulations. In addition, our clinical studies must be conducted with products produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical studies, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

If any of our relationships with these third-party clinical CROs terminates, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative clinical CROs or do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, our clinical CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such clinical CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing nonclinical and clinical programs. If clinical CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to their failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements, or for other reasons, our clinical studies may be extended, delayed, or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. Clinical CROs may also generate higher costs than anticipated. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.

Switching or adding additional clinical CROs involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new clinical CROs commences work. As a result, delays occur, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our clinical CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

We currently rely on third-party suppliers and other third parties for production of our product candidates and our dependence on these third parties may impair the advancement of our research and development programs and the development of our product candidates.

We currently rely on and expect to continue to rely on third parties for the manufacturing and supply of chemical and biological compounds and formulations for the clinical studies of our current and future product candidates. For the foreseeable future, we expect to continue to rely on such third parties for the manufacture of any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale, if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval. Reliance on third-party providers may expose us to different risks than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our NDA or comparable marketing application to the FDA or other regulatory authority. We do not have control over a supplier’s or manufacturer’s compliance with these laws, regulations and applicable cGMP standards and other laws and regulations, such as those related to environmental health and safety matters. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control (QC), quality assurance (QA) and qualified personnel. If we are compelled or we wish to find alternative manufacturing facilities, this could significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates. Any failure to achieve and maintain compliance with these laws, regulations and standards could subject us to the risk that we may have to suspend the manufacturing of our product candidates or that obtained approvals could be revoked, which would adversely affect our business and reputation.

24

Third-party providers may breach agreements they have with us because of factors beyond our control. Contract manufacturers often encounter difficulties involving production yields, QC and QA, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. They may also terminate or refuse to renew their agreements because of their own financial difficulties or business priorities, potentially at a time that is costly or otherwise inconvenient for us. If we are unable to find adequate replacement or another acceptable solution in time, our clinical studies could be delayed, or our commercial activities could be harmed.

In addition, the fact that we are dependent on our suppliers and other third parties for the manufacture, storage and distribution of our product candidates means that we are subject to the risk that our product candidates and, if approved, commercial products may have manufacturing defects that we have limited ability to prevent or control. The sale of products containing such defects could result in recalls or regulatory enforcement action that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Growth in the costs and expenses of components or raw materials may also adversely influence our business, financial condition and results of operations. Supply sources could be interrupted from time to time and, if interrupted, we cannot be certain that supplies could be resumed (whether in part or in whole) within a reasonable timeframe and at an acceptable cost or at all. Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacturing of our current and future product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our, or our collaboration partners’, ability to commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

We may not have sufficient patent terms to protect our products and business effectively.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the U.S. and Europe, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. Although various extensions or adjustments may be available, such as adjustments based on certain delays caused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the USPTO) or the European Patent Office (EPO) to the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned, co-owned and licensed patent portfolios may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours or otherwise provide us with a competitive advantage. Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained and unchallenged, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from generic medications.

Although patent term extensions under the Hatch-Waxman Act in the U.S. and under supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe may be available to extend the patent exclusivity term for our products, we cannot provide any assurances that any such patent term extension will be obtained and, if so, for how long. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended, and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. However, we may not be granted any extension because of, for example, failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. It is not possible to base an SPC in Europe on a patent in a European Member State if that patent expires before the market approval of the clinical product, protected by the patent, is obtained. As the “product” (active ingredient(s)) must be “protected by a basic patent in force”, only a granted patent that is in force, and remains in force until it reaches the end of its full term, can serve as a “basic patent” upon which an SPC can be based. Therefore, expired patents and pending patent applications cannot serve as the basis for an SPC. Given the relatively long clinical development timelines of biologicals and new chemical entities for therapeutic purpose, we may not be granted any patent extensions as we might fail to apply for the extensions prior to expiration of relevant patents. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or if the term of any such extension is less than we request, such result could have a material adverse effect on our business.

25

We or our licensing or collaboration partners may become subject to intellectual property-related litigation or other proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors or licensees and collaborators, any of which could be expensive, time-consuming, and unsuccessful, and may ultimately result in our loss of ownership of intellectual property.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our licensors or collaborators. To counter such infringement, we may be required to file infringement claims against those competitors, which can be expensive and time-consuming. If we or one of our licensing or collaboration partners were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate is invalid or unenforceable or that the defendant’s products do not infringe our or our licensing collaborators’ patents or that we or our licensing collaborators infringe the defendant’s patents. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, obviousness-type double patenting, lack of written description, or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO or the EPO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. In addition, third parties may raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the U.S., in Europe or elsewhere, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, interference and derivation proceedings as well as equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, such as opposition proceedings in Europe. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. Such proceedings or patent litigations could result in the revocation or cancellation of or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates or otherwise provide any competitive advantage. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which the patent examiner and we or our licensing or collaboration partners were unaware during prosecution. A court may also refuse to stop a third party from using the technology in question on the grounds that our patents do not cover that technology. An adverse result in any proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Interference proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or declared by the USPTO or the EPO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors, licensees or collaborators. An unfavorable outcome could require us or our licensing or collaboration partners to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be materially harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us or our licensing or collaboration partners a license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we or our licensing or collaboration partners are unsuccessful in any interference proceedings, we may lose our ownership of intellectual property, or our patents may be narrowed or invalidated. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of the interference and opposition proceedings, and any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Our defense of litigation, interference proceedings or other intellectual property-related proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees from their normal responsibilities. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and could substantially reduce the funds necessary to continue our clinical studies and research programs or force us to license necessary technology from third parties or enter into development partnerships that would help us bring our product candidates to market. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensing or collaboration partners, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the U.S.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, decisions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Shares.

26

If we or our licensing or collaboration partners are unable to obtain and maintain effective patent rights for our technologies, product candidates or any future product candidates, or if the scope of the patent rights obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our, or our collaboration partners’ ability to successfully commercialize our products and technology may be adversely affected.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies and product candidates. Our success depends in large part on our and our licensing or collaboration partners’ ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the U.S., the EU and other countries with respect to our proprietary technologies and product candidates. If such license is not granted or terminated, our licensing or collaboration partners may be required to cease development and commercialization of our product candidates, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We have sought to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the U.S. and other countries related to any of our novel technologies and products that are important to our business. This process is expensive, time-consuming, and complex, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner or in all jurisdictions. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our or our licensing or collaboration partners’ research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we do not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we license to or from third parties. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.

The patent position of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions for which legal principles remain unsolved. As a result, the inventorship, issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. The pending or future patent applications that we own, co-own or in-license may fail to issue, fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our product candidates in the U.S. or in other countries, or fail to effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and product candidates. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the U.S. and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

We may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our technologies or product candidates. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the U.S. and other jurisdictions remain confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our product candidates or technologies, or whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or co-owned patents or pending patent applications, nor can we know whether those from whom we license patents were the first to make the inventions claimed or were the first to file.

There is no assurance that all potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue, and even if such patents cover our product candidates, third parties may challenge their validity, enforceability, or scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed, found unenforceable or invalidated, which could allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our or our collaboration partners’ inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property, provide exclusivity for our product candidates, prevent others from designing around our claims or provide us with a competitive advantage. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship of our patents and other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest or title in our patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. For example, we may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of consultants, CROs, contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs), academic institutions or others who are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or our ownership of our patents or other intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or the right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

27

Patent policy and rule changes could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, thereby impairing our ability to protect our technologies and products.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the U.S., EU or elsewhere could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, in the U.S. prior to March 15, 2013, the first to make the claimed invention is entitled to the patent, whereas outside the U.S., the first to file a patent application was entitled to the patent. After March 15, 2013, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the Leahy-Smith Act), which was enacted on September 16, 2011, the U.S. moved to a first-to-file system. Under a first-to-file system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the invention. The Leahy-Smith Act also includes a number of significant changes that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. These include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by the USPTO administered during post grant proceedings, including re-examination proceedings, inter partes review, post-grant review and derivation proceedings. Therefore, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation increases the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO could cause the laws and regulations governing patents to change in unpredictable ways. Any of the foregoing could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biologics and pharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceability of patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on our existing patent portfolio and our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property in the future in the U.S.

If we are unable to maintain effective proprietary rights for our technologies, product candidates or any future product candidates, we may not be able to compete effectively in our markets.

In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and any other elements of our product candidate discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect and some courts inside and outside the U.S. are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. For instance, the EU has introduced a new Directive on trade secrets increasing the standards for protection. Because we rely on our advisors, employees and third-party contractors and consultants to research and develop and to manufacture our product candidates, we must, at times, share our intellectual property with them. We seek to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and master service agreements, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, contractors, consultants, licensing and collaboration partners, and other third parties with confidentiality provisions. These agreements typically limit the rights of these third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our intellectual property and trade secrets. These agreements also typically restrict the ability of third parties to publish data potentially relating to our intellectual property, although our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. For example, any academic institution that we may collaborate with in the future may expect to be granted rights to publish data arising out of such collaboration, provided that we may have the right to be notified in advance and given the opportunity to delay publication for a limited time period in order for us to secure patent protection of intellectual property rights arising from the collaboration, in addition to the opportunity to remove confidential or trade secret information from any such publication. We also conduct joint research and development programs that may require us to share intellectual property under the terms of our research and development or similar agreements. However, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or other confidential information or proprietary technology and processes, or that such agreements will not be breached or that our trade secrets or other confidential information will not otherwise be disclosed. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with these advisors, employees and third-party contractors and consultants, the need to share intellectual property and other confidential information increases the risk that such confidential information becomes known by our competitors, is inadvertently incorporated into the product development of others or is disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Additionally, our grant agreements typically provide for dissemination of results to academic institutions and to the general public. As a result, our information may be disseminated with the loss of protection status.

28

We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining the physical security of our premises and the physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, our competitors may discover our trade secrets through breach of our agreements by third parties, for which we may not have adequate remedies for any breach, or publication of information by any of our CROs, academic partners, funding organizations or our licensing or collaboration partners. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate by law, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating such trade secrets. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, if any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent such competitor or other third party from using that technology or information to compete with us. A competitor’s or other third party’s discovery of our intellectual property would impair our competitive position and have a material adverse effect on our business.

Further, the laws of different countries protect proprietary rights to a different extent or in a different manner. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property in different countries both in the U.S. and abroad. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Despite confidentiality clauses within our employment agreements, we cannot ensure that departing employees will not breach any post-termination commitments in such agreements by allowing others to access our trade secrets.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document-submission, fee-payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for noncompliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other government fees on a patent and patent application are due to be paid to the USPTO and other national patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent and patent application. The USPTO, the EPO and various other governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee-payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We employ reputable law firms and other professionals to help us comply with these requirements and we are also dependent on our licensors or collaboration partners to take the necessary action to comply with these requirements with respect to certain of our intellectual property. Although an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Noncompliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, nonpayment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. In such an event, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

The patent protection and patent prosecution for some of our product candidates could be dependent on third parties.

Although we normally seek to obtain the right to control prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of the patents relating to our product candidates, there may be times when the filing and prosecution activities for patents relating to our product candidates are controlled by our licensors or collaboration partners. If any of our current or future licensing or collaboration partners fail to prosecute, maintain and enforce such patents and patent applications in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business, including by payment of all applicable fees for patents covering our product candidates, we could lose our rights to the intellectual property or our exclusivity with respect to those rights, our or our collaboration partners’ ability to develop and commercialize those product candidates may be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using, and selling competing products. In addition, even where we have the right to control patent prosecution of patents and patent applications we have licensed to and from third parties, we may still be adversely affected or prejudiced by actions or inactions of our licensees, our licensors and their counsel that took place prior to the date upon which we assumed control over patent prosecution.

29

Additionally, we may be adversely affected or prejudiced by actions or inactions of our external and internal patent counsels working solely on our projects or our joint patent counsels representing us and our collaboration partners.

Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may expose us to substantial liability or may prevent or delay our or our collaboration partners’ development and commercialization efforts.

Numerous EU- and foreign-issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing product candidates. For example, we are aware of third-party patents or patent applications that may be construed to cover one or more of our product candidates. If these patents are asserted against us or our licensing or collaboration partners and either we or our licensing or collaboration partners are found to infringe any of these patents, and are unsuccessful in demonstrating that such patents are invalid or unenforceable, then we and our licensing or collaboration partners could be required to pay substantial monetary damages or cease further development or commercialization of one or more of our product candidates or be compelled to enter into onerous licenses with such third parties. There may also be other third-party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods of treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates and technology. Although we generally conduct a freedom-to-operate search and review with respect to our product candidates, we cannot guarantee that our search and review is complete and thorough, nor can we be sure that we have identified each and every patent and pending application in the U.S. and abroad that is relevant or necessary to the manufacturing or commercialization of our product candidates or use of our technology. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications that may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. In addition, third parties may file and obtain additional patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or on patents that may be granted in the future, regardless of merit. Even if we believe such claims are without merit, a court of competent jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid, enforceable and infringed, which could materially and adversely affect our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize our product candidates or technologies covered by the asserted third-party patents.

Parties making claims against us may also obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our or our collaboration partners’ ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of management and employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties, redesign our infringing products or obtain one or more licenses from third parties, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, decisions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Shares.

Some of our competitors may have substantially greater resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios than we do and may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for longer periods of time than we could. In addition, patent-holding companies that focus solely on extracting royalties and settlements by enforcing patent rights may target us. As the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties. The uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

30

We employ and utilize the services of individuals who were previously employed or provided services to universities or other pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants, and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of our employees’, consultants’ or independent contractors’ former employers or of other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

In addition, although it is our policy to require our employees, consultants and independent contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries may be less extensive than those in the U.S. or Europe. In addition, the laws of different countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws in the U.S. or Europe. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the U.S. or Europe, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the U.S., Europe or other jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of prosecution and maintenance activities, we determine whether to seek patent protection outside the U.S. and Europe and in which countries. This also applies to patents we have acquired or in-licensed from third parties. In some cases, we, or our predecessors in interest or licensors of patents within our portfolio, have sought patent protection in a limited number of countries for patents covering our product candidates. Competitors may use our technologies and products in jurisdictions where we have not obtained or are unable to adequately enforce patent protection to develop their own products and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S. or Europe. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial positions.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets, and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement, misappropriation or other violations of our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

We may be unable to protect our trade secrets, know-how and technologies.

We also rely on trade secrets and non-patentable know-how and technologies it seeks to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, suppliers, licensees and other contractual parties. Trade secrets and non-patentable know-how and technologies are difficult to protect. There can be no assurance that these agreements represent effective protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets or non-patentable know-how and technologies will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors and other third parties.

31

These and other factors, alone or together, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects as well as the price of our shares.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company with a history of operating losses. Our recurring losses, negative cash flows and significant accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

We incurred a net loss (defined as net loss attributable to owners of the Company) of approximately CHF 50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and had accumulated losses at consolidation level of approximately CHF 119.6 million as of December 31, 2022. We may continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future as development expenses and other operating expenses may exceed future revenue.

Our losses have resulted principally from research and development expenses and from general business and administrative expenses. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in the future as we continue our research and development efforts for our current and future product candidates and seek to obtain regulatory approval and commercialization of such product candidates. The amount of future losses is uncertain and our ability to achieve profitability, if ever, will depend on, among other things, us or partners successfully developing drug candidates, obtaining regulatory approval to market and commercialize drug candidates, manufacturing any approved products on commercially reasonable terms, growing our sales and marketing organization for any additional approved product and raising sufficient funds to finance our activities. We cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available in the future to develop and commercialize our current or future drug candidates.

To date, we have financed our liquidity requirements primarily from equity financings and loans from our largest shareholder. Biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical product development are highly speculative undertakings and involve a substantial degree of risk.

As of April 30, 2023, we have cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 11.1 million. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund our operating expenses into the third quarter of 2023 and this raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors individually and collectively indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our future viability is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital to finance our future operations. We may seek additional funding through public or private financings, debt financing or collaboration agreements. The inability to obtain funding, as and when needed, would have a negative impact on our financial condition and ability to pursue our business strategies. If we are unable to obtain the required funding to run our operations and to develop and commercialize our candidates, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs, drug portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to continue operations. Management continues to explore options to obtain additional funding. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in raising funds, closing a collaboration agreement, obtaining sufficient funding on terms acceptable to us, or if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

If we fail to obtain additional funding, we may delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We are currently advancing our product candidates through clinical development, either together with a collaboration partner or independently. We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we and/or our collaboration partners continue our ongoing studies and initiate new studies and initiate preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates.

We will require additional capital to develop and commercialize certain of our product candidates. If we receive regulatory approval for our current and future product candidates, and if we have not already licensed such product candidate to a collaboration partner and choose to commercialize such product candidate independently, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution and establishing a regulatory structure, depending on where we choose to commercialize. Additional funds may not be available on a timely basis, on favorable terms, or at all, and such funds, if raised, may not be sufficient to enable us to continue to implement our long-term business strategy. Additionally, we may be dependent on the status of the capital markets at the time such capital is sought. If we are not able to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

32

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our shareholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our intellectual property or future revenue streams.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our liquidity needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, grants, and license and development agreements in connection with collaborations. We do not have any material committed external source of funds. In the event we need to seek additional funds, we may raise additional capital through the sale of equity, convertible debt or other securities, and through drawdowns from our Share Subscription Facility in place with GEM Global Yield LLC SCS (GEM). In such an event, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our Shares. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or proposing dividends to our shareholders.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to grant or otherwise relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property or future revenue streams.

Exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.

As our reporting currency is the Swiss franc, transactions and balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies are converted into Swiss francs at the applicable exchange rates. Our current expenses are denominated in Swiss francs, U.S. Dollars and Euros. In the future, we expect that the majority of our revenue and expenses will be in U.S. Dollars and Euros. Therefore, unfavorable developments in the value of the Swiss franc as compared to the U.S. Dollar and Euro could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The SIX Exchange Regulation AG has launched an investigation into Relief, the results of which are uncertain.

The SIX Exchange Regulation AG – the self-regulatory supervisory body for issuers listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange – has launched a formal investigation into Relief due to potential violations of the rules on ad-hoc publicity. While we do not believe that this investigation will have a material adverse effect on our business, there can be no assurance of that conclusion.

Relief was formed in 2013 and became public in 2016 following a reverse merger with THERAMETRICS holding AG. The latter was formed in 2007 under the company name i-Mondo AG, which later in 2007 was changed to mondoRPHAN AG, in 2008 to mondoBIOTECH holding AG, in 2013 to THERAMETRICS holding AG, and to RELIEF THERAPEUTICS Holding SA in 2016. RELIEF THERAPEUTICS Holding SA and its predecessors have been listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange since 2009.

Our legal seat is located in Geneva, Switzerland. Our registered office is located at Avenue de Sécheron 15, 1202 Genève, Switzerland, and our telephone number is +41 22 545 11 16. Our website address is http://www.relieftherapeutics.com. The reference to our website is for textual reference only and information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website or any other website cited in this annual report is not a part thereof.

We are a Swiss, commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to delivering innovative treatment options with the potential for transformative outcomes to benefit those suffering from rare debilitating conditions that have no or limited treatment options. Our cost-effective, capital-efficient approach to drug development and commercialization is focused on rare metabolic disorders, rare skin diseases, rare respiratory diseases and rare monogenetic diseases.

33

Our portfolio offers a balanced mix of marketed, revenue-generating products, our proprietary, globally patented drug delivery platform technologies that have utility for development in other specialty or rare disease therapeutic areas and a highly targeted clinical development pipeline consisting of risk-mitigated assets that have been engineered for improvements in efficacy, safety or convenience to benefit the lives of patients. In addition, the Company is commercializing several legacy products via licensing and distribution partners.

We are actively pursuing a strategy to diversify our portfolio through the ongoing evaluation of potential in-licensing opportunities. To bring treatments to patients as quickly as possible, we are seeking partnerships with, or acquisitions of, companies that have late-stage clinical molecules with a strong human safety profile, allowing for relatively short, capital-efficient clinical trials with clear endpoints. We are also evaluating prospective opportunities that fit within our genetic medicine initiative for devastating, as-yet-unaddressed, rare monogenetic diseases.

We are led by a proven and seasoned management team of business leaders with significant experience in discovering, developing and commercializing important new medicines, delivering them to market and maximizing shareholder value. Collectively, the members of our management team have overseen research and development of products supporting regulatory approvals as well as commercial launches of marketed products.

In March 2021, we signed a Collaboration and License Agreement with Acer Therapeutics, Inc. (Acer) for the worldwide development and commercialization of ACER-001 (now OLPRUVA^™) for the treatment of urea cycle disorders (UCDs) and maple syrup urine disease (MSUD). OLPRUVA^™ is a proprietary powder formulation of sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPB) designed to be both taste-masked and immediate release. In August 2021, Acer submitted an NDA for ACER-001 to the FDA for use as a treatment of UCD, which submission was accepted for filing in November 2021 with a PDUFA decision date of June 5, 2022. However, on or about the PDUFA decision date, Acer received a complete response letter stating that a satisfactory inspection of Acer’s third-party contract manufacturer would be required before its NDA for ACER-001 could be approved. On December 27, 2022, Relief and Acer announced that, after resubmission, the FDA had approved ACER-001, under the trade name OLPRUVA^™, for the treatment of UCDs. In addition, Acer has filed an IND to investigate OLPRUVA^™ for the treatment of MSUD.

In June 2021, we signed and closed a definitive agreement to acquire all outstanding shares of APR Applied Pharma Research SA (APR), a privately held Swiss pharmaceutical company with over 25 years’ experience in identifying, developing and globally commercializing known molecules engineered with drug delivery systems in niche and rare diseases.

In July 2021, Relief acquired AdVita Lifescience GmbH (AdVita), a Germany-based privately held pharmaceutical company developing products for the treatment and diagnosis of rare lung diseases. AdVita’s capabilities helped the Company to further progress the development of RLF-100^® for a range of lung diseases.

In July 2022, we executed a definitive agreement with Meta Healthcare Ltd. (Meta), acquiring the worldwide rights, except for the UK, for a novel dosage form of a prescription drug already approved by the FDA and intended for the treatment of patients with PKU. This improved product is expected to increase patient acceptance and compliance as well as enable easier, self or caregiver administered metered dosing and dispensing. According to the terms of the agreement, Meta shall transfer to Relief all data, know-how, as well as any intellectual property as developed or generated so far by Meta. Relief shall only be responsible for funding the remaining development work as well as for filing and prosecuting a NDA in all countries worldwide except for the UK where Relief Therapeutics shall grant a license back to Meta, enabling Meta to directly promote and commercialize the product in such country. Other than the initial acquisition payment and low double-digit royalty payments on net profit of the product in the various countries, Relief shall be under no obligation to fund or pay any other amount to Meta.

Previously, Relief partnered with NeuroRx, Inc. (NeuroRx) to seek to develop RLF-100^® as a treatment of COVID-19. In September 2020, Relief entered into a binding collaboration agreement with NeuroRx (the Collaboration Agreement). The Collaboration Agreement established the terms under which we and NeuroRx collaborate and assist each other to maximize the revenues in our respective territories from the sale of aviptadil for intravenous and inhale use primarily for the treatment of COVID-19 related conditions.

Based on numerous breaches of the Collaboration Agreement by NeuroRx, in October 2021, we filed a lawsuit against NeuroRx and its then CEO, Dr. Jonathan Javitt, for multiple breaches of the Collaboration Agreement. The complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Manhattan. On January 10, 2022, NeuroRx filed a complaint against Relief alleging that we were in breach of the Collaboration Agreement and have thus repudiated and cancelled the Collaboration Agreement. Additionally, NeuroRx’s claims included a count for defamation.

34

On November 14, 2022, Relief and NRx issued a press release announcing that the parties had entered into a definitive settlement agreement to resolve all matters relating to the pending litigation. At the closing of this settlement, held on December 19, 2022, (i) NRx transferred to Relief all of the assets that it previously used in its aviptadil development program, including its regulatory filings, patent applications, clinical data, and the formulation of the aviptadil product it was previously developing, (ii) Relief has the exclusive right and control going forward to develop and commercialize an aviptadil product, (iii) Relief has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to continue the existing Right to Try Program for aviptadil in the U.S. for at least two years, (iv) Relief will pay NRx milestone payments if it can successfully obtain commercial approval of an aviptadil product (whether for COVID-19 or any other indication), (v) Relief will pay NRx royalties based on a percentage of future sales of an aviptadil product (whether for COVID-19 or any other indication), up to a maximum of $30 million in the aggregate, (vi) NRx Pharmaceuticals has agreed not to compete in the development of an aviptadil product in the future, and (vii) at the closing, Relief and NRx Pharmaceuticals have dismissed their pending litigation. Further, the parties, as part of the settlement, the parties cancelled the collaboration agreement and exchanged mutual releases with respect to matters that were the subject of the litigation.

On November 24, 2021, we announced that we had entered into a collaboration agreement with InveniAI LLC (InveniAI), a U.S. based company that has pioneered the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning across biopharma and other industries, in order to identify promising drug candidates to treat rare and specialty diseases (the InveniAI Collaboration Agreement). Under the terms of the InveniAI Collaboration Agreement, InveniAI will use its proprietary platform for the identification of potential pharmaceutical product opportunities using its Pharma Big Innovation Data Lab, consisting of (i) its proprietary AlphaMeld platform, a cloud-based artificial intelligence platform that uses its proprietary machine learning and deep learning based neural networks to identify product opportunities in therapeutic areas, (ii) its cross-functional teams at its Integrated Center of Excellence, and (iii) domain expertise, to generate novel pharmaceutical opportunities and the related development pathway for the development of such concepts.

Under the terms of the InveniAI Collaboration Agreement, we paid InveniAI an initial up-front fee of $500,000. We will be required to pay success milestones for any products brought to us in connection with the InveniAI Collaboration Agreement ranging from $200,000 per product candidate for which we exercise our option to acquire IP rights to $50 million for any required product reaching $1 billion per year in net sales. We will also be required to pay royalties on any such commercialized product in certain countries a royalty of approximately three percent. We are not currently developing any product brought to us by InveniAI, and there can be no assurance that our collaboration with InveniAI will result in the development of new product candidates or product concepts.

Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 19.2 million. As of April 30, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 11.1 million. Based on current financial current projections, we expect that we have sufficient resources to fund operations into the third quarter of 2023.

Our Strategy

Our mission is to provide therapeutic relief to those suffering from debilitating rare diseases that have limited or no treatment options to help them live their best possible lives and achieve their full potential. We target established products with a proven history of safety and efficacy and either initial human therapeutic activity, proof-of-concept or a strong scientific rationale, allowing for relatively short, capital-efficient clinical trials with clear endpoints. Our global skills and internal research and development (R&D) resources are directed toward optimizing the therapeutic potential of these assets to deliver improvements in efficacy, safety and convenience through the application of our proprietary platform technologies, drug delivery systems or novel dosage forms.

Our risk-mitigated, cost-effective approach to drug development and commercialization is being advanced by an international team of well-established biopharma industry leaders with extensive research, development and rare disease expertise. Focusing on rare diseases with significant unmet medical need allows us to maintain a lean and capital efficient organization where all key strategic functions are internalized, combined with an optimized network of outsourced service providers for various development activities. We have a direct commercial footprint in the U.S. and in Europe, coupled with a strong network of commercial partners in the other major territories.

35

Our strategic plans are specifically centered around the therapeutic areas we know best, including:

In 2023, we completed the development of a shelf stable formulation of RLF-100^® (aviptadil acetate) for both injectable intravenous (IV) and inhaled use.

The IV RLF-100^® formulation is specifically designed and indicated for all COVID or non-COVID related acute respiratory distress syndromes (ARDSs) because (i) it allows a prompt and efficient delivery of the drug in patients with severe conditions (e.g., patients in ICUs) while (ii) keeping under control the possible side effects because administered in a hospital setting.

The Inhaled RLF-100^® formulation is specifically designed and indicated for all the rare chronic lung diseases (CLDs) we are targeting because (i) it can maximize the clinical efficacy directly in the target organs (the lungs), (ii) while reducing the side effects of the drug (vasodilator and hypotension) because not systemically absorbed.

36

We intend to leverage our strength and experience to identify, acquire and bring to market drug candidates for therapeutic areas that align with our areas of focus.

Product Portfolio and Development Timeline

Relief Therapeutics’ portfolio offers a balanced mix of marketed, revenue-generating products, our proprietary, globally patented Physiomimic^™ and TEHCLO^™ drug delivery platform technologies and a highly targeted clinical development pipeline consisting of risk-mitigated assets focused in three core therapeutic areas: rare metabolic disorders, rare skin diseases and rare respiratory diseases where the company can best leverage its internal research and development (R&D) capabilities and track record.

In addition, Relief Therapeutics is commercializing several legacy products via licensing and distribution partners.

37

DRUG DELIVERY PLATFORM TECHNOLOGIES

Our drug delivery platform technologies enable us to optimize the therapeutic potential of established products with proven efficacy, known safety profiles or where proof-of-concept exists. These platforms have utility for development in other specialty or rare disease therapeutic areas, partnerships and out-licensing.

TEHCLO NANOTECHNOLOGY^™

Our TEHCLO Nanotechnology^™ platform (TEHCLO^™) consists of our proprietary, globally patent-protected electrode with nanocoating, the method for preparing and making highly stable aqueous solutions and our device for the electrolytic treatment of a fluid. TEHCLO^™ was used to develop RLF-TD011, Nexodyn and some of our legacy products.

Our TEHCLO^™ intellectual property portfolio consists of four patent families. The first three families include 107 granted patents world-wide directed to systems and methods for generating APR’s hypochlorous acid solution, compositions comprising APR’s hypochlorous acid solution and methods for treating ocular disorders. These patents expire between October 2026 and June 2030, exclusive of any patent term adjustments or extensions, or any form of potential exclusivity. If granted, additional patents would expire no earlier than July 2040.

PHYSIOMIMIC TECHNOLOGY^™

Our Physiomimic Technology^™, used in the PKU GOLIKE^® product line, is our globally patented, proprietary method to engineer amino acids to modify their release and absorption to mimic the physiological absorption of natural dietary proteins. This technology provides extended-release, taste and odor masking and increased absorption.

Our PKU GOLIKE^® intellectual property portfolio consists of two patent families including 34 pending applications and 50 granted patents world-wide. Patents resulting from these families, if granted, will expire no earlier than 2036 and 2038, respectively, exclusive of any patent term adjustments or extensions, or any form of potential exclusivity.

RARE METABOLIC DISORDERS

Phenylketonuria (PKU)

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a rare metabolic disorder that hinders the body’s ability to break down the amino acid phenylalanine (Phe), resulting in a dangerous build-up of Phe when patients eat foods containing protein or aspartame. High levels of the Phe can lead to severe symptoms, including:

In PKU patients, the enzyme needed to convert Phe is missing or severely reduced, which can result in high build-up of Phe and severe systemic damage, mainly in the brain. Treatment guidelines for these patients require a life-long strict and very limited, low protein diet combined with a Phe-free mix of amino acid (AA) supplementation (which can represent up to 75 percent of the total daily protein intake).

A further reduction of Phe levels is important before conception: pregnant women with PKU, including those with less severe forms of the disease, may place their unborn children at risk by not following the PKU diet. Children of woman with untreated PKU may have an unusually small head (microcephaly), congenital heart disease, developmental abnormalities or facial abnormalities. There is a strong relationship between the severity of these symptoms and high Phe levels in the mother.

38

Diagnosis and Incidence

Diagnosis of PKU in Europe and the U.S. is conducted on each and every newborn through the new-born screening (NBS) programs which are mandatory in those countries. When diagnosed, newborns are to specialized referral centers/hospitals trained to deal with such rare metabolic disorders. According to a study published in August 2020 in the American Journal of Human Genetics, approximately 450,000 people suffer from PKU worldwide.

Current Treatment Options for PKU

While PKU is not curable, if diagnosed early enough, an affected newborn can grow up with normal brain development by managing and controlling Phe levels through a strict diet combined with AA supplementation or with available medications. Diet is composed by few amounts of natural food (based on severity of the disease) supplemented with AA mix with absence or low Phe content plus low protein foods. Diet is recommended for the entire life since it has been demonstrated that high Phe levels has an impact not only during growing but also in adulthood. In 2018, the FDA approved an enzyme substitute called pegvaliase, sold by BioMarin Pharmaceuticals under the brand name PALYNZIQ^® (pegvaliase-pqpz). PALYNZIQ^® is a derivative of the enzyme Phe ammonia-lyase that metabolizes Phe to reduce its blood levels (but it is not able to produce tyrosine as the natural enzyme, which still needs to be supplemented). Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor for the oxidation of Phe, when taken by mouth, is also thought to reduce blood levels of Phe in some people. Along with PALYNZIQ^®, BioMarin Pharmaceuticals also markets KUVAN^® (sapropterin dihydrochloride) for the treatment of PKU. There are also other amino acid products, sold both by prescription and over the counter, that are marketed toward PKU patients.

PKU GOLIKE^® for the Dietary Management of PKU

Patients with PKU require supplementation of amino acid (AA)-based foods for special medical purposes (FSMPs or medical formula) to prevent protein deficiency and optimize metabolic control. Many of these FSMPs can result in poor dietary compliance due to their taste and odor. Further, the unpleasant odor and aftertaste of current AA supplements can become a barrier to social interaction for PKU patients.

In addition, proteins needed for normal growth and coming from natural food sources are broken down during the digestion process and are gradually absorbed, keeping blood AA levels sufficient stable over time. However, free-AA mix administered to PKU patients in the form of FSMPs are not comparable to natural proteins because they do not need to be broken down before they are absorbed, resulting in a rapid peak of absorption and rapid decrease of their concentration into the bloodstream.

This rapid peak in blood amino acids following ingestion of FSMPs impairs the ability of the body to process them properly and incorporate them into the body’s own tissue, through a process known as anabolism, resulting in a portion of unprocessed amino acids which are then oxidated and eliminated. This rapid elimination of unprocessed AAs that is associated with traditional FSMPs represents a fundamental unmet need for PKU patients especially during any prolonged fasting period.

In order to compensate for the low levels of AAs during fasting periods, the body is forced to initiate a process called catabolism, where the body will break down lean muscle mass to obtain the AAs or energy it requires.

PKU GOLIKE^® products are Phe-free FSMPs for both children and adults. Developed with the Relief Therapeutics proprietary, patent-protected Physiomimic Technology^™ drug delivery platform, PKU GOLIKE^® products are the first prolonged-release AA FSMPs, characterized by a special coating that ensures physiological absorption of the AAs mirroring that of natural proteins. The special coating also masks the unpleasant taste, odor and aftertaste of the AAs. PKU GOLIKE^® granules are flavorless and can be mixed with many foods. PKU GOLIKE^® products contain all 19 amino acids that people with PKU need to maintain neurological and muscular health and is fortified with 27 essential vitamins and minerals, including ones normally found in protein-rich foods like iron, calcium and vitamin B12.

The PKU GOLIKE^® line of products are available in convenient packets (PKU GOLIKE Plus^® for ages 3-16 and ages 16+), medical food bars (PKU GOLIKE BAR^®) and tablets to be chewed (PKU GOLIKE KRUNCH^®). Relief Therapeutics plans to expand the PKU GOLIKE^® commercial infrastructure beyond the current countries and aims to strengthen the commercial activities to increase and accelerate future growth. PKU GOLIKE^® is currently promoted and marketed by a direct sales and marketing infrastructure in U.S., Germany, Italy, Switzerland and Austria; in addition, the product is marketed in the UK, Spain, Israel and Ecuador by local distributors under contract with APR.

39

PKU GOLIKE^® products have been commercially available in Europe since 2018. Relief Therapeutics launched the PKU GOLIKE^® family of products in the U.S. in late October 2022, with its recently assembled commercial infrastructure and team. In early 2023, the company announced the U.S. and EU availability of the new red fruit and tropical fruit flavored PKU GOLIKE BAR^®, which contain real fruit flavors, from natural ingredients. More flavors of the bars and other forms of PKU GOLIKE^® are currently in development.

On August 23, 2022, APR was issued U.S. patent number 11,419,837, which covers certain formulations of PKU GOLIKE^® and supplements the PKU GOLIKE^® intellectual property portfolio, which includes U.S. patent number 10,500,180, which was issued on December 10, 2019. The patents will expire no earlier than September 27, 2036, with the payment of all prescribed maintenance fees.

In March 2023, Relief Therapeutics presented the findings from pre-clinical research evaluating the metabolic impact of PKU GOLIKE^® on nitrogen balance, muscle strength and glucose in a poster session at the Society for Inherited Metabolic Disorders (SIMD) 44^th Annual Meeting. The poster summarized the acute and long-term metabolic effects of PKU GOLIKE^® supplementation on the utilization of AAs and glucose metabolism in a pre-clinical rat model using biomarkers for muscle metabolism, functional muscle performance and a glucose tolerance test. Due to the prolonged release of the AAs, beneficial effects were observed on AA oxidation, muscle metabolism, grip strength and glucose tolerance in healthy rats. BUN (blood urine nitrogen test) was significantly lower in the acute treatment with PKU GOLIKE^® indicating the potential to improve AA utilization in PKU patients resulting in a reduction of catabolic episodes. The results from this pre-clinical research demonstrate the important body composition benefits of the physiological absorption of our prolonged-release AA supplement PKU GOLIKE^®. Detailed results from this study are available on the Relief Therapeutics website.

Relief Therapeutics plans to expand the PKU GOLIKE^® commercial infrastructure beyond the current countries to increase and accelerate future growth. This will be supported by newer formulations of PKU GOLIKE^®.

In the U.S., PKU GOLIKE^® was granted ODD by the FDA for its development as a prescription drug. We have decided not to pursue this program and will continue to market our PKU GOLIKE^® line of products solely as FSMPs.

RLF-OD032 (formerly known as APR-OD32) for the Treatment of PKU

Through a definitive agreement with Meta Healthcare Ltd. (Meta), Relief Therapeutics has acquired the worldwide rights, title and interest, except in the UK, for a novel dosage form of a prescription drug already approved by the FDA and intended for the treatment of patients with PKU. This improved product is expected to increase patient acceptance and compliance as well as provide easy metered dosing and dispensing. Meta will provide the technology transfer package, while Relief Therapeutics will conduct clinical studies, manufacturing, regulatory submission and commercialization in the U.S. and EU.

According to the terms of the purchase agreement, Meta will transfer to Relief Therapeutics all data, know-how, as well as any intellectual property as developed or generated so far by Meta. Relief Therapeutics will only be responsible for funding the remaining development work as well as for filing and prosecuting NDA (or equivalent thereof) in all countries worldwide except for the UK, where we will grant a license back to Meta, enabling Meta to market the product in that country. Other than the initial acquisition payment and low double-digit royalty payments on net profits of the product in the various countries, we will be under no obligation to fund or pay any other amount to Meta.

Relief Therapeutics anticipates filing for registration approval in the U.S. and Europe through a 505(b)(2) NDA sometime in the second half of 2024.

ACER-001 / OLPRUVA^™ (SODIUM PHENYLBUTYRATE) FOR ORAL SUSPENSION

In March 2021, Relief Therapeutics signed a collaboration and license agreement with Acer Therapeutics Inc. (Acer) for the worldwide development and commercialization of ACER-001 (sodium phenylbutyrate) for the treatment of various inborn errors of metabolism, urea cycle disorders (UCDs) and maple syrup urine disease (MSUD).

40

ACER-001 is a proprietary, coated powder formulation of sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPB) designed to be both taste-masked and immediate release. ACER-001 was developed using a multiple coating process, and the microparticles consist of an inert core center, a coated layer of active drug and a final taste-masking coating that quickly dissolves in the stomach to avoid a bitter taste while still allowing for rapid systemic absorption. ACER-001’s taste-masked formulation is designed to improve the palatability of NaPB and could make it a compelling alternative to existing NaPB-based treatments, as the unpleasant taste associated with NaPB is cited as a major impediment to patient compliance with those treatments. Additionally, bioequivalence trials have shown ACER-001 to have similar relative bioavailability to BUPHENYL^® under both fasted and fed conditions, along with significantly lower projected pricing compared to RAVICTI^®.