Hide

Hide

Copy

SD 2019-06-30

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 6. Exhibits

EX-31.1	sd10q63019-ex311ceocer.htm
EX-31.2	sd10q63019-ex312cfocer.htm
EX-32.1	sd10q63019-ex321sectio.htm

---

---

---

PART I. Financial Information

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

---

---

---

---

Nature of Business. SandRidge Energy, Inc. is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma with a principal focus on the acquisition, exploration and development of hydrocarbon resources in the United States.

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned or majority owned subsidiaries, including its proportionate share of the Royalty Trusts. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Interim Financial Statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes contained in the Company’s 2018 Form 10-K. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted, although the Company believes that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, the financial statements include all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary to fairly state the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  

Significant Accounting Policies. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the accounting policies stated in the 2018 Form 10-K as well as the items noted below.

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the Company’s previously reported results of operations.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The more significant areas requiring the use of assumptions, judgments and estimates include: oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) reserves; impairment tests of long-lived assets; asset retirement obligations; depreciation, depletion and amortization; income taxes; valuation of derivative instruments; contingencies; and accrued revenue and related receivables. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company revised estimated retirement dates for certain Mid-Continent properties. These revisions resulted in the reclassification of $9.7 million in asset retirement obligations from current liabilities to long-term obligations on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019. Although management believes the estimates used in the areas noted above are reasonable, actual results could differ significantly.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and subsequently issued other associated ASU's related to Topic 842 which supersede Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 840 and require lessees to recognize right of use ("ROU") lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for long-term leases formerly classified as operating leases under ASC 840, and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach for all ROU leases that existed at the period of adoption and did not restate its comparative periods. See Note 4 for additional discussion of the new leasing standard.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. The FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments —Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace the currently required incurred loss approach with an expected loss model for instruments measured at amortized cost. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2018, and will be applied using a modified retrospective approach resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The Company does not plan to early adopt and is currently evaluating the effect the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements; however, the impact is not expected to be material.

---

The Company measures and reports certain assets and liabilities on a fair value basis and has classified and disclosed its fair value measurements using the levels of the fair value hierarchy noted below. The carrying values of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, certain other current assets and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other current liabilities and other long-term obligations included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets approximated fair value at June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. Additionally, the carrying amount of debt associated with borrowings outstanding under the credit facility approximates fair value as borrowings bear interest at variable rates. As a result, these financial assets and liabilities are not discussed below. The fair values of property, plant and equipment classified as assets held for sale and related impairments, which are calculated using Level 3 inputs, are discussed in Note 5.

Level 1			Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2			Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3			Measurement based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The determination of the fair values, stated below, considers the market for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, the associated credit risk and other factors. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. The Company had no financial assets or liabilities where fair value differed from carrying value classified in the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2019. The Company had assets classified in Level 2 of the hierarchy as of December 31, 2018, as described below.

Level 2 Fair Value Measurements

Commodity Derivative Contracts. The fair values of the Company’s oil and natural gas fixed price swaps are based upon inputs that are either readily available in the public market, such as oil and natural gas futures prices, volatility factors and discount rates, or can be corroborated from active markets. Fair value is determined through the use of a discounted cash flow model or option pricing model using the applicable inputs discussed above. The Company applies a weighted average credit default risk rating factor for its counterparties or gives effect to its credit default risk rating, as applicable, in determining the fair value of these derivative contracts. Credit default risk ratings are based on current published credit default swap rates.

Fair Value - Recurring Measurement Basis

The Company had no commodity derivative contracts in place at June 30, 2019. The following table summarizes the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

December 31, 2018

Copy Copy+ History

			Fair Value Measurements																														Netting(1)						Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
			Level 1						Level 2						Level 3
Assets
Commodity derivative contracts			$	—					$	5,286					$	—					$	—					$	5,286
			$	—					$	5,286					$	—					$	—					$	5,286

____________________

1.Represents the effect of netting assets and liabilities for counterparties with which the right of offset exists.

---

Commodity Derivatives 

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk, which impacts the predictability of its cash flows from the sale of oil and natural gas. The Company, on occasion, has sought to manage this risk through the use of commodity derivative contracts, which allow the Company to limit its exposure to commodity price volatility on a portion of its forecasted oil and natural gas sales. The Company has not designated any of its derivative contracts as hedges for accounting purposes and records all derivative contracts at fair value with changes in derivative contract fair values recognized as gain or loss on derivative contracts in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. At June 30, 2019, the Company had no commodity derivative contracts in place. Historically, none of the Company’s commodity derivative contracts could be terminated prior to contractual maturity solely as a result of a downgrade in the credit rating of a party to the contract. Commodity derivative contracts are settled on a monthly basis, and the commodity derivative contract valuations are adjusted to the mark-to-market valuation on a quarterly basis. The Board and management of the Company are continuing to evaluate the futures market for oil and natural gas to mitigate exposure to adverse oil and natural gas price changes.

The following table summarizes derivative activity for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, and 2018 (in thousands):

Copy Copy+ History

			Three Months Ended June 30,																		Six Months Ended June 30,
			2019						2018						2019						2018
Loss on commodity derivative contracts			$	—					$	30,104					$	209					$	48,434
Cash paid (received) on settlements			$	—					$	11,274					$	(5,078)					$	17,393

Master Netting Agreements and the Right of Offset. Historically, the Company has had master netting agreements with all of its commodity derivative counterparties and has presented its derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty on a net basis in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the netting provisions, the Company's maximum amount of loss under commodity derivative transactions due to credit risk was limited to the net amounts due from its counterparties. The Company is not required to post additional collateral under its commodity derivative contracts as all of the counterparties to the Company’s commodity derivative contracts shared in the collateral supporting the Company’s credit facility.

The following table summarizes (i) the Company's commodity derivative contracts on a gross basis, (ii) the effects of netting assets and liabilities for which the right of offset exists based on master netting arrangements and (iii) for the Company’s net derivative liability positions, the applicable portion of shared collateral under the credit facility as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

December 31, 2018

Copy Copy+ History

						Gross Amounts						Gross Amounts Offset						Amounts Net of Offset						Financial Collateral						Net Amount
Assets
Derivative contracts - current						$	5,286					$	—					$	5,286					$	—					$	5,286
Total						$	5,286					$	—					$	5,286					$	—					$	5,286

---

Fair Value of Derivatives 

The following table presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts as of December 31, 2018, on a gross basis without regard to same-counterparty netting (in thousands):

Type of Contract

Balance Sheet Classification

December 31, 2018

Derivative assets

Natural gas price swaps

Derivative contracts-current

$

5,286

Total net derivative contracts

$

5,286

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and subsequently issued other associated ASU's related to Topic 842 which supersede ASC 840 and require lessees to recognize ROU lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for long-term leases formerly classified as operating leases under ASC 840, and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Leases to explore for or produce oil and natural gas were not impacted by this guidance. This ASU became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach for all ROU leases that existed at the period of adoption and did not restate its comparative periods.

Topic 842 provides a number of practical expedients to assist with the transition to the new standard. The Company elected the 'package of practical expedients,' and therefore did not have to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial indirect costs. The Company also utilized the land easement practical expedient and short-term lease recognition exemption, under which leases with initial terms less than 12 months are not required to be presented on the balance sheet. Certain leases contain both lease and non-lease components. The Company elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components for asset classes including drilling rigs, compressors and various office equipment.

The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. A lease is defined as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the lease payments not yet paid over the lease term at January 1, 2019 for existing leases and at the commencement date for any new leases entered into subsequent to January 1, 2019. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company's incremental borrowing rate was used as the discount rate when determining the present value of future payments. The ROU assets are recognized based on the lease liability plus any prepaid lease payments and excluding lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred for the same periods. The Company's lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that option will be exercised. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Adoption of this standard resulted in additional ROU lease assets and lease liabilities of approximately $2.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019, which did not materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements. The difference between the net lease assets and liabilities was recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Operating leases are included in other assets, other current liabilities and other long-term obligations, and finance leases are included in other property, plant and equipment, other current liabilities and other long-term obligations on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019. The Company had no significant capital or operating leases with terms longer than 12 months at December 31, 2018.

The Company has operating and financing leases for vehicles, drilling rigs and equipment, which are not significant to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019.

---

The components of lease costs recognized for the Company's ROU leases are shown below:

Copy Copy+ History

						Three Months Ended June 30, 2019						Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Short-term lease cost (1)						$	3,174					$	8,083
Financing lease cost						348						645
Operating lease cost						43						101
Total lease cost						$	3,565					$	8,829

___________________

1.$1.9 million and $5.1 million of short-term lease cost was capitalized as part of oil and natural gas properties during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Portions of these costs were reimbursed to the Company by other working interest owners.

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (in thousands): 

Copy Copy+ History

			June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
Oil and natural gas properties
Proved			$	1,390,054					$	1,269,091
Unproved			46,274						60,152
Total oil and natural gas properties			1,436,328						1,329,243
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and impairment			(652,709)						(580,132)
Net oil and natural gas properties			783,619						749,111
Land			4,400						4,400
Electrical infrastructure			131,176						131,176
Other non-oil and natural gas equipment			13,327						13,458
Buildings and structures			77,148						77,148
Financing leases			2,083						—
Total			228,134						226,182
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			(30,428)						(25,344)
Other property, plant and equipment, net			197,706						200,838
Total property, plant and equipment, net			$	981,325					$	949,949

During the first quarter of 2018, the Company classified its remaining midstream generator assets as held for sale. These assets had a carrying value of $5.7 million which exceeded the estimated net realizable value of $1.6 million based on expected sales prices obtained from third parties. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment of $4.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018. The midstream generator assets were sold during the second quarter of 2018 with no gain or loss recognized on the sale. No significant assets were classified as held for sale at June 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018.

---

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

Copy Copy+ History

			June 30, 2019									December 31, 2018
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses			$	65,267								$	78,219
Payroll and benefits			10,943									12,891
Production payable			11,881									12,767
Taxes payable			6,709									5,350
Drilling advances			811									2,031
Accrued interest			123									539
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses			$	95,734								$	111,797

Credit Facility. On June 21, 2019, the Company amended and restated its existing $600.0 million reserve-based revolving credit facility. The initial borrowing base of the restated credit facility is $300.0 million, which was reduced from $350.0 million under the previous credit facility. The next borrowing base redetermination is scheduled for October 1, 2019 with semiannual redeterminations thereafter. The facility is also subject to an initial aggregate elected commitment of $270.0 million, which the Company may reduce or seek to increase in future periods in accordance with the terms of the restated credit facility. The restatement extended the credit facility maturity date to April 1, 2021 from March 31, 2020.

The interest rate on outstanding borrowings was reduced from a pricing grid tied to the borrowing base utilization rate of (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin that varies from 3.00% to 4.00% per annum, or (b) the base rate plus an applicable margin that varies from 2.00% to 3.00% per annum under the previous credit facility to a pricing grid tied to borrowing base utilization of (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin that varies from 2.00% to 3.00% per annum, or (b) the base rate plus an applicable margin that varies from 1.00% to 2.00% per annum under the restated credit facility. Interest on base rate borrowings is payable quarterly in arrears and interest on LIBOR borrowings is payable every one, two, three or six months, at the election of the Company. Quarterly, the Company pays commitment fees assessed at annual rates of 0.50% on any available portion of the credit facility. The Company has the right to prepay loans under the credit facility at any time without a prepayment penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.

The restated credit facility is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages on at least 85% of the PV-9 valuation of all proved reserves included in the most recently delivered reserve report of the Company, (ii) a first-priority perfected pledge of substantially all of the capital stock owned by each credit party and equity interests in the Royalty Trusts that are owned by a credit party and (iii) a first-priority perfected security interest in substantially all the cash, cash equivalents, deposits, securities and other similar accounts, and other tangible and intangible assets of the credit parties (including but not limited to as-extracted collateral, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, general intangibles, investment property, intellectual property, real property and the proceeds of the foregoing). Other than reducing the proportion of the Company’s proved reserves required to be subject to first-priority mortgages to 85% from 95%, these terms are materially similar to those contained in the previously existing credit facility.

The restated facility includes events of default and certain customary affirmative and negative covenants which are materially similar to those under the previous credit facility. The Company must also continue to maintain certain financial covenants including (i) a maximum consolidated total net leverage ratio, measured as of the end of any fiscal quarter, of no greater than 3.50 to 1.00 and (ii) a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio, measured as of the end of any fiscal quarter, of no less than 2.25 to 1.00. As of June 30, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants and had a consolidated total net leverage ratio of 0.25 and consolidated interest coverage ratio of 63.13.

The Company had $52.0 million outstanding under the credit facility at June 30, 2019, and $7.6 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduce availability under the restated credit facility on a dollar-for-dollar basis.

Building Note. In February 2018, the Company fully repaid a note secured by a mortgage on the Company's downtown Oklahoma City real estate (the "Building Note") in the amount of $36.3 million, which was comprised of an initial principal amount of $35.0 million and $1.3 million in in-kind interest costs that were previously added to the principal. An unamortized

---

Legal Proceedings. As previously disclosed, on May 16, 2016, the Company and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the "Debtors") filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the joint plan of organization (the "Plan") of the Debtors on September 9, 2016, and the Debtors subsequently emerged from bankruptcy on October 4, 2016.

Pursuant to the Plan, claims against the Company were discharged without recovery in each of the following consolidated cases (the “Cases”):

•In re SandRidge Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 5:12-cv-01341-LRW, USDC, Western District of Oklahoma; and

•Ivan Nibur, Lawrence Ross, Jase Luna, Matthew Willenbucher, and the Duane & Virginia Lanier Trust v. SandRidge Mississippian Trust I, et al., Case No. 5:15-cv-00634-SLP, USDC, Western District of Oklahoma

The lead plaintiffs in both In re SandRidge Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation and Lanier Trust assert claims on behalf of themselves and a putative class of (i) in In re SandRidge Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation all purchasers of SandRidge common stock from February 24, 2011 and November 8, 2012 under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and (ii) in Lanier Trust purchasers of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II common units between April 7, 2011 and November 8, 2012 under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, both based on allegations that defendants, which include certain former officers of the Company and the SandRidge Mississippian Trust I, made misrepresentations or omissions concerning various topics including the performance of wells operated by the Company in the Mississippian region.

Discovery in each of the Cases closed on June 19, 2019. A hearing on class certification in each of the Cases has been scheduled for September 6, 2019.

In each of the Cases, lead plaintiffs seek to recover unspecified damages, interest, costs and expenses incurred in the litigation on behalf of themselves and class members. Although the claims against the Company in each Case have been discharged pursuant to the Plan, the Company remains a nominal defendant in each of the Cases solely to the extent necessary to allow recovery from applicable insurance policies or proceeds. In addition, the Company owes indemnity obligations and/or the obligation to advance legal fees, to certain former officers who remain as defendants in each action. The Company may also be contractually obligated to indemnify the SandRidge Mississippian Trust I against losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable costs of investigation and attorney’s fees and expenses, arising out of the Cases, and such indemnification is not covered by insurance.

In light of the status of the Cases, and the facts, circumstances and legal theories relating thereto, the Company is not able to determine the likelihood of an outcome in either case or provide an estimate of any reasonably possible loss or range of possible loss related thereto. However, considering the erosion of insurance coverage available to the Company, such losses, if incurred, could be material. The Company has not established any liabilities relating to the Cases and believes that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend against the Cases in its capacity as a nominal defendant.

In addition to the matters described above, the Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and proceedings which are being handled and defended by the Company in the ordinary course of business.

---

For each interim reporting period, the Company estimates the effective tax rate expected for the full fiscal year and uses that estimated rate in providing for income taxes on a current year-to-date basis.

Deferred income taxes are provided to reflect the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The Company’s deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance due to a determination that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred assets will not be realized based on the weight of all available evidence. The Company continues to closely monitor and weigh all available evidence, including both positive and negative, in making its determination whether to maintain a valuation allowance. As a result of the significant weight placed on the Company's cumulative negative earnings position, the Company continued to maintain a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2019. Thus, the Company had no federal income tax expense or benefit for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and an insignificant amount of state income tax benefit for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018.

Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382 addresses company ownership changes and specifically limits the utilization of certain deductions and other tax attributes on an annual basis following an ownership change. As a result of the Chapter 11 reorganization and related transactions, the Company experienced an ownership change within the meaning of IRC Section 382 during 2016 that subjected certain of the Company’s tax attributes, including net operating losses ("NOLs"), to an IRC Section 382 limitation. This limitation has not resulted in cash taxes for any period subsequent to the ownership change. Since the 2016 ownership change, the Company has generated additional NOLs and other tax attributes that are not currently subject to an IRC Section 382 limitation. The Company's ability to use NOLs and other tax attributes to reduce taxable income and income taxes could be materially impacted by a future IRC 382 ownership change. Future transactions involving the Company's stock including those outside of the Company's control could cause an IRC 382 ownership change resulting in a limitation on tax attributes currently not limited and a more restrictive limitation on tax attributes currently subject to the previous IRC 382 limitation.

The Company’s only taxing jurisdiction is the United States (federal and state). The Company’s tax years 2015 to present remain open for federal examination. Additionally, tax years 2005 through 2014 remain subject to examination for determining the amount of remaining federal net operating loss and other carryforwards. The number of years open for state tax audits varies, depending on the state, but are generally from three to five years.

---

The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by source for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

Copy Copy+ History

			Three Months Ended June 30,																		Six Months Ended June 30,
			2019						2018						2019						2018
			(In thousands)
Oil			$	55,615					$	49,219					$	98,774					$	102,554
NGL			9,413						16,946						22,524						33,335
Natural gas			10,168						13,139						26,946						30,381
Other			192						158						380						320
Total revenues			$	75,388					$	79,462					148,624						$	166,590

Oil, natural gas and NGL revenues. A majority of the Company’s revenues come from sales of oil, natural gas and NGLs and are recorded at a point in time when control of the oil, natural gas and NGL production passes to the customer at the inlet of the processing plant or pipeline, or the delivery point for onloading to a delivery truck. As the Company’s customers obtain control of the production prior to selling it to other end customers, the Company presents its revenues on a net basis, rather than on a gross basis.

Pricing for the Company’s oil, natural gas and NGL contracts is variable and is based on volumes sold multiplied by either an index price, net of deductions, or a percentage of the sales price obtained by the customer, which is also based on index prices. The transaction price is allocated on a pro-rata basis to each unit of oil, natural gas or NGL sold based on the terms of the contract. Oil, natural gas and NGL revenues are also recorded net of royalties, discounts and allowances, and transportation costs, as applicable. Taxes assessed by governmental authorities on oil, natural gas and NGL sales are presented separately from revenues and are included in production tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Payment terms are typically within 30 days of control being transferred. The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, and (ii) contracts for which revenue is recognized at the amount to which the Company has the right to invoice for services performed.

Revenues Receivable. The Company records an asset in accounts receivable, net on its consolidated balance sheet for revenues receivable from contracts with customers at the end of each period. Pricing for revenues receivable is estimated using current month crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices, net of deductions. Revenues receivable are typically collected the month after the Company delivers the related production to its customers. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had revenues receivable of $23.3 million and $31.8 million, respectively, and did not record any bad debt expense on revenues receivable during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019.

---

Share-Based Compensation

Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Company's Omnibus Incentive Plan became effective in October 2016. The Omnibus Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 4.6 million shares of SandRidge common stock to eligible persons including non-employee directors of the Company, employees of the Company or any of its affiliates, and certain consultants and advisers to the Company or any of its affiliates. At June 30, 2019, the Company had restricted stock awards and an immaterial amount of performance share units and stock options outstanding under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Vesting for certain restricted stock awards and performance share units was accelerated in connection with the departure of certain executives and reductions in force which occurred during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and the six-month period ended June 30, 2018. Vesting for certain restricted stock awards, performance share units and performance units was accelerated in the second quarter of 2018 in connection with the change in the composition of the Board after the 2018 annual meeting.

Restricted Stock Awards. The Company’s restricted stock awards are equity-classified awards and are valued based upon the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Outstanding restricted shares will generally vest over either a one-year period or three-year period. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had approximately 0.3 million unvested restricted shares outstanding at a weighted average grant date fair value of $13.56 per share, and unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards totaled $3.1 million. The remaining weighted average contractual period over which this compensation cost may be recognized is 1.7 years.

The following tables summarize share and incentive-based compensation for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, and 2018 (in thousands):

Copy Copy+ History

						Recurring Compensation Expense(1)						Executive Terminations(2)(3)						Reduction in Force(2)(3)						Accelerated Vesting(4)						Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
Equity-classified awards:
Restricted stock awards						$	829					$	197					$	501					$	—					$	1,527
Performance share units						189						281						—						—						470
Stock options						193						—						—						—						193
Total share-based compensation expense						1,211						478						501						—						2,190
Less: Capitalized compensation expense						(62)						—						—						—						(62)
Share-based compensation expense, net						$	1,149					$	478					$	501					$	—					$	2,128
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Equity-classified awards:
Restricted stock awards						$	603					$