TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC. [TENX] Filings

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C., 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

OR

For the transition period from ____ to _____

Commission File No. 001-34600

101 Glen Lennox Drive, Suite 300, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (919) 855-2100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $7,031,280.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s class of $0.0001 par value common stock as of March 20, 2024 was 1,958,245.

On January 2, 2024, the registrant effected a 1-for-80 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Reverse Stock Split did not change the number of authorized shares of the registrant’s capital stock or cause an adjustment to the par value of the registrant’s capital stock. However, all other share amounts and references to stock prices in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retrospectively restated to reflect the reverse split. Pursuant to their terms, a proportionate adjustment also was made to the per share exercise price and number of shares issuable under the registrant’s outstanding stock options and warrants and to the number of shares authorized for issuance pursuant to the registrant’s equity incentive plans to reflect the Reverse Stock Split. The Company also has adjusted the financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days following the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, and/or which include words such as “believes,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “will” or similar expressions. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance, ongoing strategies or prospects, and possible future actions, including any potential strategic transaction involving us, which may be provided by our management, are also forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events, actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed in under the heading “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, could affect our stock price or future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:

The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K represent our views as of the date such statements are made. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date such statements are made.

NOTES

All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the “Company,” “Tenax”, “we”, “our” and “us” means Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains references to our trademarks and to trademarks belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including logos, artwork and other visual displays, may appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other company.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Our business is subject to significant risks and uncertainties that make an investment in us speculative and risky. Below we summarize what we believe are the principal risk factors, but these are not the only risks we face, and you should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors”, together with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the following risks materializes (or if any of those listed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K materialize), our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects could be seriously harmed. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

Risks Related to Our Business Strategy and Operations

  Risks Related to Drug Development and Commercialization

Risks Relating to Our Industry

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock

ITEM 1—BUSINESS

Overview

The Company was originally formed as a New Jersey corporation in 1967 under the name Rudmer, David & Associates, Inc., and subsequently changed its name to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. Effective June 30, 2008, we changed the domiciliary state of the corporation to Delaware and changed the Company name to Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. On September 19, 2014, we changed the Company name to Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

On November 13, 2013, we acquired a license granting Life Newco, our wholly-owned subsidiary, an exclusive, sublicensable right to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan, 2.5 mg/ml concentrate for solution for infusion / 5ml vial in the United States and Canada. In October 2020 and January 2022, we entered into an amendment to the license agreement between the Company and Orion to include in the scope of the license two new oral product formulations containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form (TNX-103), and a subcutaneously administered dosage form (TNX-102), subject to specified limitations. In February 2024, we entered into an additional amendment to the license, providing global rights to oral and subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan used in the treatment of PH-HFpEF, revising the royalty structure, lowering the royalty rates, modifying milestones associated with certain regulatory and commercial achievements, and excluding from our right of first negotiation the right to commercialize new applications of levosimendan for neurological diseases and disorders developed by Orion.

On January 15, 2021, we acquired 100% of the equity of PHPrecisionMed Inc., a Delaware corporation(“PHPM”), with PHPM surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. As a result of the merger, pending the outcome of our strategic process, we plan to commercialize pharmaceutical products containing imatinib for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (“PAH”).

Business Strategy

Having carefully considered alternatives within the ongoing strategic process announced in September 2022, and having raised capital expected to fund the Company through 2024, the Company has elected to prioritize its LEVEL trial (Phase 3 testing of oral levosimendan), ahead of imatinib. Activity to initiate the LEVEL trial continued in the fourth quarter of 2023, and site qualification, selection, and initiation processes are ongoing, the Company having received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) input into the oral levosimendan protocol and clinical development program in the third quarter of 2023. The Company began initiating sites in the fourth quarter of 2023 and commenced enrolling patients early in 2024. Additional funding will be needed to complete the LEVEL trial, which includes an open label extension phase following the completion of the randomized phase. The Company will complete efficacy and safety analyses of levosimendan versus placebo at the end of the randomized treatment phase, but many patients will continue to be treated under the protocol on open label levosimendan, beyond the completion of these analyses. Supporting this strategic decision to prioritize levosimendan development and commence Phase 3 trial work were two U.S. Patents issued in March and July 2023, covering the use of IV and oral levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF. These patents are the second and third levosimendan patents granted to us since the start of 2022. An additional new patent to be issued in early 2024 provides protections covering all therapeutic doses of all three formulations of the product in patients with PH-HFpEF.  Given our prioritization of the Phase 3 testing of levosimendan, we have suspended plans to launch an imatinib Phase 3 trial.

The Company took steps to reduce its monthly operating expenses and conserve cash, as it commenced exploring strategic alternatives in late 2022. The Company at that time cancelled many non-essential operating expenses such as consulting, its office lease, and dues and subscriptions and office supplies associated with that leased office. During the third quarter of 2023, the Company and its contracted CRO increased outreach to North American clinical trial sites, Institutional Review Boards, and other partners who will support the LEVEL trial, and in the fourth quarter of 2023 commenced site initiations.

Pending the outcome of our ongoing strategic process, the key elements of our business strategy are outlined below.

Efficiently conduct clinical development to establish clinical proof of principle in new indications, refine formulation, and commence Phase 3 testing of our current product candidates.

Levosimendan and imatinib have been approved and prescribed in countries around the world for more than 20 years, but we believe their mechanisms of action have not been fully exploited, despite promising evidence they may significantly improve the lives of patients with pulmonary hypertension. We are conducting clinical development with the intent to establish proof of beneficial activity in cardiopulmonary diseases in which these therapeutics would be expected to have benefit for patients with diseases for which either no pharmaceutical therapies are approved at all, or in the case of pulmonary arterial hypertension (“PAH”), where numerous, expensive therapies generally offer a modest reduction of symptoms. Our focus is primarily on designing and executing formulation improvements, protecting these innovations with patents and other forms of exclusivity, and employing innovative clinical trial science to establish a robust foundation for subsequent development, product approval, and commercialization. We intend to submit marketing authorization applications following two Phase 3 trials of levosimendan and, when appropriate, a single Phase 3 trial of imatinib. Our trials are designed to incorporate and reflect advanced clinical trial design science and the regulatory and advisory experience of our team. We intend to continue partnering with innovative companies, renowned biostatisticians and trialists, medical leaders, formulation and regulatory experts, and premier clinical testing organizations to help expedite development, and continue expanding into complementary areas when opportunities arise through our development, research, and discoveries. We also intend to continue outsourcing to CROs, and seeking and acting upon the advice of preeminent scientists focused on cardiovascular and pulmonary drug development, when designing and executing our research.

Efficiently explore new high-potential therapeutic applications, in particular where expedited regulatory pathways are available, leveraging third-party research collaborations and our results from related areas.

Levosimendan has shown promise in multiple disease areas in the more than two decades following its approval. Our own Phase 2 study and open-label extension has demonstrated that its property of relaxing the venous circulation, a formerly under-appreciated mechanism of action of levosimendan, , brings durable improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life, as well as other clinical assessments, in patients with PH-HFpEF. We believe this patient population today has no pharmaceutical therapies available and we are committed to exploring potential clinical indications where our therapies may achieve best-in-class profile, and where we can address significant unmet medical needs.

We believe these factors will support approval by the FDA of these product candidates based on positive Phase 3 data. Through our agreement with our licensor, Orion, the originator of levosimendan for acute decompensated heart failure, we have access to a library of ongoing and completed trials and research projects, including certain documentation, which we believe, in combination with positive Phase 3 data we hope to generate in at least one indication, will support FDA approval of levosimendan. Likewise, the regulatory pathway for approval of imatinib for the treatment of PAH, as formulated by us at the dose shown to be effective in a prior Phase 3 trial conducted by Novartis, allows us to build on the dossier of research results already reviewed by the FDA. In order to achieve our objective of developing these medicines for new groups of patients, we have established collaborative research relationships with investigators from leading research and clinical institutions, and our strategic partners. These collaborative relationships have enabled us to explore where our product candidates may have therapeutic relevance, gain the advice and support of key opinion leaders in medicine and clinical trial science, and invest in development efforts to exploit opportunities to advance beyond current clinical care.

Continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio.

Our intellectual property and the confidentiality of all our Company information is important to our business and we take significant steps to help protect its value. Our research and development efforts, both through internal activities and through collaborative research activities with others, aim to develop new intellectual property and enable us to file patent applications that cover new uses of our existing technologies, alone or in combination with existing therapies, as well as other product candidates.

Notice of Allowance and Patents.

On February 1, 2023, the Company announced it was granted a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for its patent application with claims covering the use of IV levosimendan (TNX-101) in the treatment of PH-HFpEF. This patent (U.S. Patent No. 11,607,412) was issued on March 21, 2023. On July 19, 2023, the Company announced USPTO issuance of another patent, this one including claims covering the use of oral levosimendan (TNX-103) in patients with PH-HFpEF. This issued patent (U.S. Patent No. 11,701,355) provides exclusivity through December 2040. On February 6, 2024, the Company announced it was granted a Notice of Allowance from USPTO for its patent application broadening IP protection for oral, I.V., and subcutaneous use of levosimendan and its active metabolites in PH-HFpEF, at all therapeutic doses and in combination with various cardiovascular drugs. At present, the Company has other patent applications pending, with additional decisions expected in the future.  Patents pending in Europe may lead to intellectual property protections on the use of levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF in 2024.

Enter into licensing or product co-development arrangements.

In addition to our internal development efforts, an important part of our product development strategy is to work with collaborators and partners to accelerate product development, maintain our low development and business operations costs, and broaden our commercialization capabilities globally. We believe this strategy will help us develop a portfolio of high-quality product development opportunities, enhance our clinical development and commercialization capabilities, and increase our ability to generate value from our proprietary technologies.

As we focus on our strategic process, we also continue to position ourselves to execute upon licensing and other partnering opportunities. To do so, we need to continue to maintain our strategic direction, manage and deploy our available cash efficiently, and strengthen our collaborative research development and partner relationships.

Historically, we have financed our operations principally through equity and debt offerings, including private placements and loans from our stockholders. Based on our current operating plan, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management has implemented certain cost-cutting measures as described above and is actively exploring a diverse range of strategic options to help drive stockholder value including, among other things, capital raises, a sale of our Company, merger, one or more license agreements, a co-development agreement, a combination of these, or other strategic transactions; however, there is no assurance that these efforts will result in a transaction or other alternative or that any additional funding will be available. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to raise additional capital, through the sale of equity or debt securities and through collaboration and licensing agreements, to support our future operations. If we are unable to complete a strategic transaction or secure additional capital, we may be required to curtail our research and development initiatives and take additional measures to reduce costs.

Our Current Programs

TNX-101 (IV), TNX-102 (subcutaneous) and TNX-103 (oral) levosimendan Background

Levosimendan was discovered and developed by Orion. Levosimendan, as marketed around the world today, is a calcium sensitizer/K-ATP activator developed for intravenous use in hospitalized patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. It is currently approved in 58 countries for this indication but is not available in the United States or Canada. It is estimated that to date over 1.9 million patients have been treated worldwide with levosimendan. 

Levosimendan is a novel, first in class calcium sensitizer/K-ATP activator. The therapeutic effects of levosimendan are mediated through:

Several studies have demonstrated that levosimendan protects the heart and improves tissue perfusion while minimizing tissue damage during cardiac surgery.

In 2013, we acquired certain assets of Phyxius Pharma, Inc. (“Phyxius”), including its North American rights to a license agreement with Orion to develop and commercialize intravenous levosimendan for any indication in the United States and Canada. On October 9, 2020 and January 25, 2022, we entered into an amendment to the license agreement to include in the scope of the license two new oral product formulations containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form (TNX-103), and a subcutaneously administered dosage form (TNX-102), subject to specified limitations. In February 2024, we entered into an additional amendment to the license, providing global rights to oral and subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan used in the treatment of PH-HFpEF, revising the royalty structure, lowering the royalty rates, modifying milestones associated with certain regulatory and commercial achievements, and excluding from our right of first negotiation the right to commercialize new applications of levosimendan for neurological diseases and disorders developed by Orion.

In the countries where it is marketed, intravenous levosimendan is indicated for the short-term treatment of acutely decompensated heart failure in situations where conventional therapy is not sufficient, and in cases where inotropic support is considered appropriate. In acute decompensated heart failure patients, levosimendan has been shown to significantly improve patient symptoms as well as acute hemodynamic measurements such as increased cardiac output, reduced preload and reduced afterload.

TNX-101 (IV), TNX-102 (subcutaneous) and TNX-103 (oral) (levosimendan) Development for Pulmonary Hypertension Patients

In 2020, we completed a Phase 2 clinical trial of intravenous levosimendan in North America for the treatment of patients with PH-HFpEF, a disease defined hemodynamically by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (“mPAP”) of ≥25 mmHg, and a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (“PCWP”) of >15 mmHg. Pulmonary hypertension in these patients is believed to arise from a passive backward transmission of elevated filling pressures from left-sided heart failure. These mechanical components of pulmonary venous congestion can trigger pulmonary vasoconstriction, decreased nitric oxide availability, increased endothelin expression, desensitization to natriuretic peptide induced vasodilation, and vascular remodeling. Over time, these changes often lead to advanced pulmonary arterial and venous disease, increased right ventricle afterload, and right ventricle failure.

Per the World Health Organization, PH-HFpEF is the most common of five forms of pulmonary hypertension, with an estimated U.S. prevalence exceeding 1.5 million patients. Currently, no pharmacologic therapies are approved for treatment of PH-HFpEF. Despite the fact that many therapies have been studied in PH-HFpEF patients, including therapies approved to treat PAH patients, no therapies have been shown to be effective in treating PH-HFpEF patients.

Several published studies provide evidence that levosimendan may improve right ventricular dysfunction which is a common comorbidity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. While none of these studies has focused specifically on PH-HFpEF patients, the general hemodynamic improvements in these published studies of various types of pulmonary hypertension provide a basis for further research into the potential beneficial impact of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients. 

In March 2018, we met with the FDA to discuss development of levosimendan in these patients. The FDA agreed with our planned Phase 2 design, patient entry criteria, and endpoints. It was agreed the study could be conducted under the existing investigational new drug application with no additional nonclinical studies required to support full development. The FDA recognized there were no approved drug therapies to treat PH-HFpEF patients and acknowledged this provided an opportunity for a limited Phase 3 clinical program. This topic was discussed further at the End-of-Phase 2 Meeting following completion of the Phase 2 study in PH-HFpEF patients, which is known as the HELP Study - Hemodynamic Evaluation of Levosimendan in PH-HFpEF.

We initiated the first of our HELP Study clinical sites in November 2018 and the first of 37 patients was enrolled in the HELP Study in March 2019. Enrollment in the HELP Study was completed in March 2020. The primary endpoint of the HELP Study was based on the change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (“PCWP”) during exercise versus baseline compared to placebo. The HELP Study utilized a double-blind randomized design following five weekly outpatient infusions of levosimendan.

On June 2, 2020, we announced preliminary, top-line data from the study. The primary efficacy analysis, PCWP during exercise, did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction from baseline. Levosimendan did demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in PCWP compared to baseline (p=<0.0017) and placebo (p=<0.0475) when the measurements at rest, with legs up, and on exercise were combined. Levosimendan also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance as compared to placebo (p=0.0329). These findings from the HELP Study represent important discoveries related to the use of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients since this is the first study to evaluate levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients and this is the first study ever conducted of any therapy in PH-HFpEF patients to show such positive improvements in hemodynamics and 6-minute walk distance.

Hemodynamic Results

Hemodynamic measurements were made at rest (supine), after leg raise on a supine bicycle (a test of rapid increase in ventricular filling) and during exercise (25 watts for three minutes or until the patient tired). In the initial open-label phase, 84% of the patients had a significant reduction in right atrial pressure (“RAP”), pulmonary artery pressure (“PAP”), and PCWP at rest and during exercise. In the randomized double-blinded 6-week trial, levosimendan demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PCWP compared to baseline (p=<0.0017) and placebo (p=<0.0475) when these three measurements were combined: at rest, with legs up, and during exercise. While there was no significant change in PCWP during exercise, patients receiving levosimendan had reductions from baseline at Week 6 in PCWP and PAP that were statistically significant when patients were “at rest” and/or with their “legs raised” (p<0.05).

Clinical Results (6-Minute Walk Distance)

The clinical efficacy was confirmed by a statistically significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance of 29 meters (p=0.0329). The 6-minute walk distance was a secondary endpoint in the trial and is a validated and accepted endpoint used in many pulmonary hypertension registration trials.

Safety

The incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events between the control and treated groups was similar. In addition, there were no arrhythmias observed, atrial or ventricular, when comparing baseline electrocardiographic monitoring with 72-hour monitoring after five weeks of treatment.

The detailed results from the Phase 2 HELP Study of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF were presented at the Heart Failure Society of America Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting on October 3, 2020 and at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2020 on November 13, 2020. Additionally, the full manuscript was published in the peer-reviewed journal JACC: Heart Failure. Burkhoff D, Borlaug BA, Shah SJ, …Rich S. Levosimendan Improves Hemodynamics and Exercise Tolerance in PH-HFpEF: Results of the Randomized Placebo-Controlled HELP Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 May;9(5):360-370.

Next Steps

On October 9, 2020 and January 25, 2022, we entered into amendments to the license agreement between the Company and Orion to include in the scope of the license two new oral product formulations containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form (TNX-103), and a subcutaneously administered dosage form (TNX-102), subject to specified limitations. On January 4, 2022, we were issued US Pat. No. 11,213,524, entitled PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF LEVOSIMENDAN. In February 2024, we entered into an additional amendment to the license, providing global rights to oral and subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan used in the treatment of PH-HFpEF, revising the royalty structure, lowering the royalty rates, modifying milestones associated with certain regulatory and commercial achievements, and excluding from our right of first negotiation the right to commercialize new applications of levosimendan for neurological diseases and disorders developed by Orion.

The 2022 and 2024 amendments to the license, which adjusted the timeframe for Phase 3 development and regulatory efforts and broaden the North American rights to be worldwide, as well as the additional patents issued by USPTO, furthered the Company’s justification for continuing and prioritizing the development of levosimendan.

Following patient completion of the randomized treatment phase of the HELP Study, patients were able to enter a study extension. For over two years, the Company and our HELP investigators continued studying the safety and efficacy of TNX-103 in all patients participating in the open-label extension of the HELP Study, all of whom previously received weekly infusions of intravenous levosimendan. These patients were safely transitioned from the intravenous to the oral formulation in late 2021, with positive signs of efficacy observed across all measured parameters during the transition study phase of the open-label extension study (“OLE”). The OLE concluded in the first half of 2023.

In October 2020, we met with the FDA for an End-of-Phase 2 Meeting to discuss the Phase 2 clinical data and further development of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF patients. The FDA agreed that one or two Phase 3 clinical studies (depending on the size) with a primary endpoint of change in 6-minute walk distance over 12 weeks or a single Phase 3 trial with clinical worsening (e.g., death, hospitalization for heart failure, or decline in exercise capacity) over 24 weeks would be sufficient to demonstrate the effectiveness of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF. The FDA also agreed to a plan to replace weekly intravenous levosimendan dosing with daily TNX-103 doses in a Phase 3 clinical study. The FDA expressed that a safety database could be necessary and indicated that the need for a larger safety database could depend on the final design of the Phase 3 study. A proposed Phase 3 study design was provided in late 2021 for FDA review and comment on the safety database requirements at filing. In February 2022, the FDA advised in a written response that the safety database at NDA filing only need meet the minimum International Clinical Harmonization (ICH) standards for a chronic medication.

The HELP Study design was novel in several respects. To date, no other multi-center study has evaluated levosimendan in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (“HFpEF”) patients or PH-HFpEF patients. Instead, all previous levosimendan heart failure studies have enrolled heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (“HFrEF”), therefore specifically excluding HFpEF patients. Also, the HELP Study utilized a unique 24-hour weekly infusion regimen of 0.075- 0.1µm/kg/min. Finally, the HELP Study employed a unique home-based intravenous infusion administration via an ambulatory infusion pump. This home-based weekly intravenous administration is unlike all other chronic dosing studies of levosimendan that have typically employed a shorter duration and less frequent infusion regimen administered in a hospital setting. The transition of patients in the OLE from intravenous to oral therapy was encouraging. PH-HFpEF has an approximate 50% rate of survival of five years. The patients who enrolled in the HELP Study had very advanced disease, with 87% Functional Class III at enrollment. At the time of the transition, these patients had already been on levosimendan for two years or longer. The fact that there was an improvement in all measures of efficacy on oral therapy beyond what had been achieved on intravenous therapy speaks to the remarkable durability of the treatment effect.

We believe that the combination of the unique HELP Study patient population, innovative weekly 24-hour dosing, unique home-based site of administration, the transition from intravenous to oral therapy in a subset of these patients who continued in the OLE until the commencement of this transition sub study, and the novel findings of efficacy and safety in PH-HFpEF patients represent important discoveries and significant intellectual property. We received two U.S. Patents issued in March and July 2023, covering the use of IV and oral levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF.

On November 13, 2023, the Company announced that the FDA had reviewed and cleared the Company’s Investigational New Drug (IND) Application for TNX-103 (oral levosimendan) for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF), enabling Tenax to proceed with the first of two Phase 3 studies. The LEVEL Study (LEVosimendan to Improve Exercise Limitation in PH-HFpEF Patients) launched with site initiations in the fourth quarter of 2023.

TNX-201 (imatinib) Background

Imatinib (marketed in the U.S. as Gleevec®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which changed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (“CML”) following its approval over 20 years ago, as the first curative treatment of chronic leukemia. The first clinical trial of imatinib took place in 1998 and the drug received FDA approval in May 2001. Encouraged by the success of imatinib in treating CML patients, scientists explored its effect in other cancers, and it was found to produce a similar positive effect in malignancies where tyrosine kinases were overexpressed.

Previous Imatinib Development for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients

In PAH, a rare disease, patients who remain symptomatic despite available therapies have a high morbidity and mortality. Though several therapies are now available, there is no cure for the disease, and there is no data supporting that the existing approved therapies, all of which are pulmonary vasodilators, halt progression or induce regression of the disease. Imatinib has been shown in animal models of pulmonary hypertension to induce disease reversal by an effect on platelet derived growth factor (“PDGF”), which appears to be causal in the disease. After that discovery was made, several case reports and small case series of patients with advanced PAH failing combination pulmonary vasodilator therapy were published showing a dramatic effect of imatinib on stabilizing and improving these patients. This led Novartis to develop imatinib as a treatment of PAH.

Novartis sponsored a Phase 2 proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of imatinib as an adjunct to PAH-specific therapy in patients with PAH. Novartis then sponsored a Phase 3 trial (IMPRES) which met its primary endpoint of significant increase in 6-minute walk (32 meters, p=0.002), an effect maintained in the extension study in patients remaining on imatinib. However, the data were confounded by a high rate of dropouts in the patients randomized to imatinib attributed largely to gastric intolerance during the first eight weeks. Consequently, Novartis chose to withdraw the Investigational New Drug application as the drug went off patent.

Current TNX-201 Development for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients

On May 30, 2019, PHPrecisionMed Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PHPM”), which we acquired in January 2021, met with the FDA to discuss a proposal for a Phase 3 trial of imatinib for PAH. At that meeting, PHPM discussed a single Phase 3 trial using change in 6-minute walk distance as the primary endpoint (p<0.05). PHPM received agreement for submission under the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway, and thereafter received orphan designation. In July 2020, PHPM received agreement from the FDA for the development of a modified release formulation that would require only a small comparative PK/bioavailability study. A Phase 3 study of TNX-201, this optimized modified release formulation of imatinib, would be the next clinical trial to commence in our development planning, pending the outcome of our strategic process and funding of the trial costs.

Manufacturing and Supply

We contract with third parties for the manufacturing of all of our product candidates and for pre-clinical and clinical studies and intend to continue to do so in the future. We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities and we have no plans to build any owned clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We believe that the use of third-party manufacturers and contract drug manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) eliminates the need to directly invest in manufacturing facilities, equipment and additional staff.

Pursuant to the terms of our license for levosimendan, Orion is contractually our sole manufacturing source for TNX-103. We may engage other third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of TNX-102, or other formulations we may develop.

We have engaged various third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of imatinib for potential future clinical trials, and relied on such contractors for material contributing to TNX-201, for testing in our two completed Phase 1 trials.

As we further develop our product pipeline, we expect to consider secondary or back-up manufacturers for both active pharmaceutical ingredient and drug product manufacturing. To date, our third-party manufacturers have met the manufacturing requirements for our product candidates. We expect third-party manufacturers to be capable of providing sufficient quantities of our product candidates to meet anticipated full-scale commercial demands, but we have not assessed these capabilities beyond the supply of clinical materials to date.

We believe alternate sources of manufacturing will be available to satisfy our clinical and future commercial requirements; however, we cannot guarantee that identifying and establishing alternative relationships with such sources will be successful, cost effective, or completed on a timely basis without significant delay in the development or commercialization of our product candidates. All of the vendors we use are required to conduct their operations under current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”), a regulatory standard for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent applications, patents, trade secrets, proprietary know-how, trademarks, and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We believe that to have a competitive advantage, we must develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of our technologies. Currently, we require our officers, employees, consultants, contractors, manufacturers, outside scientific collaborators and sponsored researchers, and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment, consulting, or advisory relationships with us, where appropriate. We also require employees, consultants, and advisors whom we expect to work on our products to agree to disclose and assign to us all inventions conceived during the workday, developed using our property, or which relate to our business.

As of the date of this filing, the Company has been granted three patents and has one U.S. patent application pending, for which the Company has received a Notice of Allowance, all related to product candidates and proprietary process, method and technology. Our issued levosimendan patents expire in 2039 and late 2040.

On January 4, 2022, we received a patent for the subcutaneous administration of levosimendan, whether through the formulation we have developed in collaboration with a formulation development partner, or other subcutaneous formulations meeting certain broad characteristics defined in the patent. In addition, we received on March 21, 2023 a patent for the use of IV levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF patients, based on several discoveries that have emerged from the HELP Study and the OLE.

The U.S. trademark registration for Simdax® is owned by Orion and is licensed to us for sales and marketing purposes for any intravenous pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan that are commercialized in the United States and Canada.

Our success will in part depend on the ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary rights in commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business, the validity and enforceability of our patents, the continued confidentiality of our trade secrets and our ability to operate without infringing the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. We also rely on continuing technological innovation and in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position.

We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications we may own or license in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents we may own or license in the future will be useful in protecting our technology and products. Comprehensive risks related to our intellectual property are described under the heading “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Simdax License Agreement

On November 13, 2013, we acquired, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, a license agreement between Phyxius and Orion, which was later amended on October 9, 2020, January 25, 2022, and February 19, 2024 (as amended, the “License”). The License grants us an exclusive, sublicenseable right to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan worldwide (the “Territory”) and, pursuant to the October 9, 2020 amendment to the License, also includes two product dose forms containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form, and a subcutaneously administered product containing levosimendan, subject to specified limitations (together, the “Product”). Pursuant to the License, Tenax and Orion will agree to a new trademark when commercializing levosimendan in either of these forms.

Pursuant to the License, we have a right of first negotiation to commercialize new developments of levosimendan, including developments as to the formulation, presentation, means of delivery, route of administration, dosage or indication (i.e., line extension products).  Neurological diseases and disorders are excluded from this right of first negotiation.

Orion’s ongoing role under the License includes sublicense approval, serving as the sole source of manufacture of oral formulations of levosimendan, holding a first right to enforce intellectual property rights in the United States and Canada, and certain regulatory participation rights. Orion must notify the Company before the end of 2024 if it chooses not to exercise its right to supply oral formulations of levosimendan to the Company for commercialization in the Territory. Additionally, the Company must grant back to Orion a broad non-exclusive license to any patents or clinical trial data related to levosimendan developed by the Company under the License. The term of the License extends until 10 years after the launch of a levosimendan product in the United States and Canada, provided that the License will continue after the end of the term in each country in the Territory until the expiration of Orion’s patent rights in levosimendan in such country. In the event that no regulatory approval for levosimendan has been granted in the United States on or before September 20, 2030, however, either party will have the right to terminate the License with immediate effect.

As consideration for the License, we agreed to pay Orion (i) a one-time up-front payment in the amount of $1.0 million, (ii) development milestones consisting of (a) $10.0 million upon the grant of FDA approval and (b) $1.0 million upon the grant of regulatory approval for the Product in Canada, (c) $5.0 million due upon the grant of regulatory approval for a levosimendan-based product in Japan, (iii) commercialization milestones aggregating to up to $45.0 million, upon achievement of certain cumulative net sales amounts in the United States and Canada, and (iv) royalties based on net sales of the Product in the Territory. After the end of the License term, the Company must pay Orion a royalty based on net sales of the Product in the Territory for as long as the Company sells the Product in the Territory.

Competition

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive. Many companies, including biotechnology, chemical, and pharmaceutical companies, are actively engaged in activities similar to ours, including research and development of drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and related medical conditions, both rare and common. Many of these companies have substantially greater financial and other resources, larger research and development staffs, and more extensive marketing and manufacturing organizations than we do. In addition, some of them have considerable experience in preclinical testing, clinical trials and other regulatory approval procedures. There are also academic institutions, governmental agencies and other research organizations that are conducting research in areas in which we are working. Our success will be based in part on our ability to identify, develop and manage a portfolio of product candidates that are safer and more effective than any competing products.

We believe the concept of using TNX-101/102/103 (levosimendan) to treat patients with PH-HFpEF is novel, and the patent granted for this use in March 2023 demonstrates USPTO’s concurrence. Because no therapies are approved to treat PH-HFpEF, we believe our ability to succeed in the market is primarily dependent on our ability to change the established practice paradigm, which could be difficult. Key factors on which we will compete with regards to the development and marketing of levosimendan for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in these patients include, among others, the ability to obtain adequate efficacy data, safety data, cost effectiveness data and hospital formulary approval, marketing exclusivity, as well as sufficient distribution and handling. Furthermore, while we believe the mechanism of action of levosimendan is novel, other low-priced, generically available products possess some similar qualities, which could present competition in the form of therapeutic substitution.

TNX-201 (imatinib) has the potential to be the first disease-modifying treatment of PAH, a fatal orphan disease. Pulmonary vasodilators, the only approved medications for PAH, do not have disease modifying properties. We do not expect these products, other than one which is not widely used today, to be contraindicated in patients taking TNX-201, and our intended protocol design tests TNX-201 as an additional therapy to one or more of these vasodilators.

Several other companies are developing new therapies to treat PAH, including some that may also be disease-modifying. Novartis developed imatinib for PAH and conducted a Phase 3 trial that in 2013 succeeded in meeting its primary endpoint. However, the high number of dropouts of patients randomized to imatinib led the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) to request another trial before they would approve the product in PAH. To address this, we are developing a modified-release oral formulation designed to reduce the stomach’s exposure to imatinib, thereby lessening the nausea and vomiting commonly observed in patients receiving imatinib. Other companies are developing an inhaled route of administration as their strategy to mitigate gastric intolerance. We believe that our development plan has advantages in that we already know the effective dose of imatinib administered orally, and the systemic exposure from an inhaled route remains uncertain and costly to determine. Since only the first FDA approved formulation of imatinib to treat PAH will qualify for the seven years of Orphan Drug exclusivity in the U.S., these alternative formulations of imatinib represent potential competitive threats.

In order to compete successfully, we must develop proprietary positions in patented drugs for therapeutic markets that have not been satisfactorily addressed by conventional research strategies. Our product candidates, even if successfully tested and developed, may not be adopted by physicians over other products and may not offer economically feasible alternatives to other therapies.

Government Regulation

The manufacture and distribution of levosimendan will require the approval of United States government authorities as well as those of foreign countries. In the United States, the FDA regulates medical products. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act govern the testing, manufacture, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion of our medical products. In addition to FDA regulations, we are also subject to other federal and state regulations, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Environmental Protection Act. Product development and approval within this regulatory framework requires a number of years and involves the expenditure of substantial funds.

Preclinical tests include evaluation of product chemistry and studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product and its formulation. The results of the preclinical tests are submitted to the FDA as part of the application. The goal of clinical testing is the demonstration in adequate and well-controlled studies of substantial evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the product in the setting of its intended use. The results of preclinical and clinical testing are submitted to the FDA from time to time throughout the trial process. In addition, before approval for the commercial sale of a product can be obtained, results of the preclinical and clinical studies must be submitted to the FDA. The testing and approval process requires substantial time and effort and there can be no assurance that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. The approval process is affected by a number of factors, including the severity of the condition being treated, the availability of alternative treatments and the risks and benefits demonstrated in clinical trials. Additional preclinical studies or clinical trials may be requested during the FDA review process and may delay product approval. After FDA approval for its initial indications, further clinical trials may be necessary to gain approval for the use of a product for additional indications. The FDA may also require post-marketing testing to monitor for adverse effects, which can involve significant expense.

The effects of government regulations on our business are discussed under the heading “Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees and Human Capital

We have assembled a high-quality team of clinical development managers and executives with significant experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.

As of December 31, 2023, we had five full-time employees and one part-time employee. In addition to our employees, we also rely on the service and support of outside consultants and advisors. None of our employees is represented by a union, and we believe relationships with our employees are good.

Available Information

Our website address is www.tenaxthera.com, and our investor relations website is located at http://investors.tenaxthera.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference herein. Copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and our proxy statements for our meetings of stockholders, and any amendments to those reports, as well as Section 13 and 16 reports filed by our insiders, are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file the reports with, or furnish the reports to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also publicly available on the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A—RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition and operating results may be affected by a number of factors, including but not limited to those described below. Any one or more of such factors could directly or indirectly cause our actual results of operations and financial condition to vary materially from our past or anticipated future results of operations and financial condition. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the accompanying financial statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As a result of our historical operating losses and expected future negative cash flows from operations, we have concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Similarly, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, includes an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may materially and adversely affect the price per share of our common stock and make it more difficult to obtain financing. Our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We will require substantial additional funding to further develop our product candidates, including to complete the LEVEL trial, which includes an open label extension phase, to complete a subsequent Phase 3 trial of TNX-103, and to initiate or complete the imatinib Phase 3 trial. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed on acceptable terms, or at all, or execute on alternative strategic paths, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our clinical trials, product development efforts and business operations.

Developing biopharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials and establishing manufacturing and sales and marketing capabilities, is expensive. We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase in connection with our ongoing activities. In addition, our expenses could increase beyond expectations if applicable regulatory authorities, including the FDA, require that we perform studies additional to those we currently anticipate, in which case the timing of any potential product approval may be delayed.

As of December 31, 2023, we had $9.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. We will need substantial additional capital in order to develop our product candidates, including to complete the LEVEL trial and its associated open label extension, a Phase 3 trial of TNX-103, and to complete the regulatory approval process and commercialization of levosimendan, and, potentially, imatinib, or any future product candidates. As a result, we continue to evaluate strategic alternatives, including pursuing additional public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. Such funding may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

In addition, to the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience additional significant dilution; debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We may seek to access the public or private capital markets whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at that time.

Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

We also expect to continue our evaluation of additional strategic alternatives, including a sale of our Company, merger, other business combination, or recapitalization. In the event we are unable to obtain additional capital as needed or execute on other strategic alternatives, we may further delay, limit, reduce or terminate our current development efforts and business operations.

Our ongoing exploration of alternative strategic paths may not result in entering into or completing transactions, when necessary, and the process of reviewing alternative strategic paths or their conclusion could adversely affect our stock price.

We continue to evaluate strategic paths to provide the resources necessary to complete our product development and maximize stockholder value. Potential strategic paths may include additional capital raises, a sale of our Company, merger, one or more license agreements, a co-development agreement, a combination of these, or other strategic transactions. There can be no assurance, however, that our evaluation will result in transactions or other alternatives, even when deemed necessary. There is no set timetable for our strategic process and we do not intend to provide updates unless or until the Board of Directors approves a specific action or otherwise determines that disclosure is appropriate or necessary. We have suspended plans to launch the imatinib Phase 3 trial in PAH, and the initiation of that trial and continued development of our product candidates, including completion of the LEVEL Study, our Phase 3 trial of levosimendan in PH-HFpEF, depend on the outcome of our ongoing strategic process.

There can be no assurance any transaction will result from the Company’s ongoing evaluation of strategic paths. Any potential transaction would be dependent on a number of factors that may be beyond our control, including, among other things, market conditions, industry trends, the interest of third parties in a potential transaction with us, obtaining stockholder approval and the availability of financing to third parties in a potential transaction with us on reasonable terms. The process of reviewing alternative strategic paths may be time consuming and may involve the dedication of significant resources and may require us to incur significant costs and expenses. It could negatively impact our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees, and expose us to potential litigation in connection with this process or any resulting transaction. If we are unable to effectively manage the process, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, speculation regarding any developments related to the review of strategic alternatives and perceived uncertainties related to the future of our Company could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly. Further, any alternative strategic paths that may be pursued and completed ultimately may not deliver the anticipated benefits or enhance stockholder value. There can be no guarantee that the process of evaluating alternative strategic paths will result in our Company entering into or completing potential transactions within the anticipated timing or at all.

In the event we do not successfully complete strategic transactions, should this be deemed necessary, our Board of Directors may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation of our Company. In such an event, the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders will depend heavily on the timing of such liquidation as well as the amount of cash that will need to be reserved for commitments and contingent liabilities.

There can be no guarantee that the process to identify strategic transactions will result in successfully completed transactions when necessary. If additional transactions are not completed that enable us to continue the development of our product candidates and sustain our business operations, our Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interest of our stockholders to dissolve our Company and liquidate our assets. In that event, the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders will depend heavily on the timing of such decision and, ultimately, such liquidation since the amount of cash available for distribution continues to decrease as we fund our operations and evaluate our strategic alternatives. In addition, if our Board were to approve and recommend, and our stockholders were to approve, a dissolution of our Company, we would be required under Delaware corporate law to pay our outstanding obligations, as well as to make reasonable provision for contingent and unknown obligations, prior to making any distributions in liquidation to our stockholders. As a result of this requirement, a portion of our assets may need to be reserved pending the resolution of such obligations. In addition, we may be subject to litigation or other claims related to a dissolution and liquidation of our Company. If a dissolution and liquidation were pursued, our Board, in consultation with its advisors, would need to evaluate these matters and make a determination about a reasonable amount to reserve. Accordingly, holders of our common stock could lose all or a significant portion of their investment in the event of a dissolution, liquidation or winding up of our Company.

Our failure to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements could result in the delisting of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In order to maintain this listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On March 29, 2023, we received a notification letter from the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) indicating that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Bid Price Rule”) because the minimum bid price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days.  In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company had a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until September 25, 2023, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule.  This timeline was extended by Nasdaq until March 25, 2024, and following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company regained compliance. On January 18, 2024, Nasdaq provided the Company with a written confirmation of compliance with the Bid Price Rule.

On January 11, 2024, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq indicating that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(4) (the “Public Float Rule”), which requires the Company to have a minimum of 500,000 publicly held shares.  On February 22, 2024, Nasdaq provided the Company with a written confirmation of compliance with the Public Float Rule.

While we intend to engage in efforts to maintain compliance, and thus maintain our listing, there can be no assurance that we will be successful or continue to meet all applicable Nasdaq Capital Market requirements in the future. If our common stock were to be removed from listing with the Nasdaq Capital Market, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange, which is the exception on which we currently rely. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market.

If our common stock is delisted and there is no longer an active trading market for our shares, it may, among other things:

A delisting would also reduce the value of our equity compensation plans, which could negatively impact our ability to retain employees.

We expect a number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance.

Our financial condition and operating results have varied significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include the following factors, among others:

Due to the various factors mentioned above, and others, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of our future operating performance.

We have incurred losses since our inception, expect to continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future, and may never become profitable.

We have incurred losses since inception. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we incurred net operating losses of $8.2 million and $11.0 million, respectively. We have funded our operations since September 1990 principally through the issuance of debt and equity securities and loans from stockholders. We will continue to incur losses until we generate sufficient revenue to offset our expenses, and we anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for at least the next several years. We expect to incur additional expenses related to our development and potential commercialization of levosimendan for pulmonary hypertension and other potential indications, imatinib for PAH, as well as identifying and developing other potential product candidates, and as a result, we will need to generate significant net product sales, royalty and other revenues to achieve profitability.

Risks Related to Our Business Strategy and Operations

We are limited in the number of products we can simultaneously pursue and therefore our survival depends on our success with a small number of product opportunities.

We have limited financial resources, so at present we are primarily focusing our resources on developing levosimendan for the treatment of PH-HFpEF, while imatinib for the treatment of PAH remains part of our portfolio. We intend to commit most of our resources to advancing levosimendan to the point it receives regulatory approval for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with associated HFpEF. Depending on the funds raised and timing of the funding, as well as on decisions made by USPTO, clinical trial results and other information revealed by competitors, and other factors, we will prioritize our funding and other resources. Pending the outcome of our strategic process, if as a consequence of the results of our planned Phase 3 trials, or the results of prior clinical trials performed using levosimendan or imatinib, we are unable to receive regulatory approval of one or both of our existing product candidates, then we may not have resources to pursue development of any other products and our business could terminate.

A pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease, such as COVID-19, or another coronavirus or similar disrupting illness, may materially and adversely affect our business and our financial results.

The spread of COVID-19, including variant strains, has affected segments of the global economy and healthcare systems and has previously had an adverse impact on our business operations. COVID-19 or a similar global pandemic could in the future, directly or indirectly, materially and adversely affect our operations, including the potential interruption of our clinical trial activities and our supply chain. There could be continuing or new effects of COVID-19 or similar disrupting illnesses to the processes, timelines, resourcing, and other aspects of operations at FDA or other health authorities, which could result in delays of reviews and approvals, including with respect to our product candidates.

Additionally, the continued spread of COVID-19 or similar disrupting illnesses could adversely affect our future clinical trial operations in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere, including our ability to recruit, retain, and rely on the active participation of patients and principal investigators and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to respiratory illnesses if an outbreak occurs in their geography. The spread of COVID-19, or another infectious disease, could also negatively affect the operations at our third-party manufacturers, which could result in delays or disruptions in the supply of our product candidates.

We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any potential business shutdowns or disruptions. If we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, however, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively affected, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and our results of operation and financial condition.

If we fail to attract and retain senior management and key scientific personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates.

We have historically operated with a limited number of employees. As of December 31, 2023, we had five full-time employees and one part-time employee. Therefore, institutional knowledge is concentrated within a small number of employees. Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel to continue the development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates. We will need to hire or contract with additional qualified personnel with expertise in preclinical testing, clinical research and testing, government regulation, formulation and manufacturing, and sales and marketing. Additionally, our future success is highly dependent upon the contributions of our senior management team. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our product pipeline, completion of our planned clinical trials or the commercialization of our product candidates.

We face competition from other companies and organizations for qualified personnel. Other companies and organizations with which we compete for personnel may have greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles than we do, and a history of successful development and commercialization of their product candidates. Replacing employees and attracting sufficiently skilled new employees may be difficult and costly, and we may not have other personnel with the capacity to assume all the responsibilities of an existing employee upon his or her departure or to take on the duties necessary to continue growing our company and pursuing our business strategy. If we cannot attract and retain skilled personnel, as needed, we may not achieve our development and other goals.

In addition, the success of our business will depend on our ability to develop and maintain relationships with respected service providers and industry-leading consultants and advisors. If we cannot develop and maintain such relationships, as needed, the rate and success at which we can develop and commercialize product candidates may be limited. In addition, our insourcing and outsourcing strategies, which have included engaging consultants to manage core administrative and operational functions, may subject us to scrutiny under labor laws and regulations, which may divert management time and attention and have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Risks Related to Drug Development and Commercialization

We currently have no approved drug products for sale, and we cannot guarantee that we will ever have marketable drug products.

We currently have no approved drug products for sale. The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, selling, marketing, and distribution of drug products are extensively regulated by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, with regulations differing from country to country. We are not permitted to market our product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) from the FDA for each product candidate. We have not submitted an NDA or received marketing approval for any of our product candidates, and obtaining approval of an NDA is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. In addition, markets outside of the United States also have requirements for approval of drug candidates which we must comply with prior to marketing. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will ever have marketable drug products.

Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a product candidate in the United States or abroad, we or our collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA, that such product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses. Results from preclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the preclinical or clinical data for our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Additionally, the FDA may require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials for our product candidates either prior to or post-approval, or it may object to elements of our clinical development program.

We are required to conduct additional clinical trials, including the LEVEL trial for oral levosimendan, which are expensive and time consuming, and the outcome of the clinical trials is uncertain.

We expect to commit a substantial portion of our financial and business resources in the short-term to completing the LEVEL trial, a Phase 3 trial of levosimendan, and advancing this product through a subsequent Phase 3 trial and on to regulatory approval for use in PH-HFpEF, and potentially other indications. We may in the future commit resources to clinical trials for our other product candidates, including imatinib. All of these clinical trials and testing will be expensive and time consuming and the timing of the regulatory review process is uncertain. The applicable regulatory agencies may suspend clinical trials at any time if they believe that the subjects participating in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete our clinical trials successfully or obtain FDA or other governmental or regulatory approval of our product candidates, or that such approval, if obtained, will not include limitations on the indicated uses for which our product candidates may be marketed. Our business, financial condition and results of operations are critically dependent on obtaining capital to advance our testing program and receiving FDA and other governmental and regulatory approvals of our products. A significant delay in or failure of our planned clinical trials or a failure to achieve these approvals would have a material adverse effect on us and could result in major business and financial setbacks.

The market may not accept our products.

If any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If our product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant revenue and we may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

Nonfinal results from our clinical trials announced or published from time to time on an interim, preliminary, or “top-line” basis, and conclusions that may be drawn from such results, may change as more patient data become available, and these results are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publish interim, top-line, or preliminary results from our clinical trials. Interim or top-line results from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcome measurements may materially change as patient enrollment and treatment extends and more patient experience is observed. Preliminary or top-line results also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final and complete data are available. Differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects and may cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

Any collaboration we enter with third parties to develop and commercialize any future product candidates may place the development of our product candidates outside our control, may require us to relinquish important rights or may otherwise be on terms unfavorable to us.

We may enter into collaborations with third parties to develop and commercialize future product candidates. Our dependence on future partners for development and commercialization of our product candidates would subject us to a number of risks, including the following:

Delays in the enrollment and completion of clinical testing could result in increased costs to us and delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Delays in the commencement, enrollment and completion of clinical testing could significantly affect our ability to gain FDA approval of current product candidates, to gain this approval in the timeline planned, and could significantly increase our future product development costs. The completion of clinical trials requires us to identify and maintain a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which might already be engaged in other clinical trial programs for the same indication as our product candidates, might be required to withdraw from our clinical trial as a result of changing standards of care, might suffer from staff shortages at the institutional or clinic level that impact their ability to enroll and treat patients under our protocols, or might become ineligible to participate in clinical studies. The enrollment and completion of clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of other reasons, including delays related to:

In addition, a clinical trial may be suspended or terminated by us, the FDA or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including:

Changes in regulatory requirements and guidance may occur and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes with appropriate regulatory authorities. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs for re-examination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or if we terminate, our clinical trials, the commercial prospects for our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues will be delayed. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate. Even if we are ultimately able to commercialize our product candidates, other therapies for the same or similar indications may have been introduced to the market and established a competitive advantage.

Risks Relating to Our Industry

Intense competition might render our cardiovascular and pulmonary product candidates noncompetitive or obsolete.

Competition in the pharmaceutical industry in general and in our therapeutic areas is intense and characterized by extensive research efforts and rapid technological progress. Technological developments by competitors, regulatory approval for marketing competitive products, including potential generic or over-the-counter products, or superior marketing resources possessed by competitors could adversely affect the commercial potential of our cardiovascular and pulmonary disease product candidates and could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and results of operations. We believe that there are numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as academic research groups throughout the world, engaged in research and development efforts with respect to pharmaceutical products targeted at cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and conditions addressed by our product pipeline. Developments by others might render our product pipeline obsolete or noncompetitive. Competitors might be able to complete the development and regulatory approval process sooner and, therefore, market their cardiovascular and pulmonary disease products earlier than we can.

Many of our current competitors have significant financial, marketing and personnel resources and development capabilities. For example, many large, well-capitalized companies already offer cardiovascular and pulmonary products and services in the United States and Europe that target the indications for which our product candidates are being developed, or related indications. Currently, as an example, twelve vasodilators are marketed in the U.S. for use in patients with PAH, and sales teams from Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and other large companies with marketing and sales capabilities represent these products in the specialized care centers where the disease is treated.  While there are no products currently marketed to treat PH-HFpEF, some products are under development to treat this prevalent disease.

Our activities are and will continue to be subject to extensive government regulation, which is expensive and time-consuming, and we will not be able to sell our products without regulatory approval.

Our development, marketing, and distribution of levosimendan and, potentially in the future, imatinib, are, and will continue to be, subject to extensive regulation, monitoring and approval by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. There are significant risks at each stage of regulation.

Product approval stage

During the product approval stage, we study and attempt to prove the safety and efficacy of our product candidate for its indicated uses. There are numerous problems that could arise during this stage, including:

Post-commercialization stage

Discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, or unanticipated problems with our manufacturing arrangements, even after FDA and other regulatory approvals of our products for commercial sale, may result in the imposition of significant restrictions, including withdrawal of the product from the market.

Additional laws and regulations may also be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products, including laws or regulations relating to the price or cost-effectiveness of medical products. Any delay or failure to achieve regulatory approval of commercial sales of our products is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies continue to review products even after they receive agency approval. If and when the FDA or another regulatory agency outside the United States approves one of our products, its manufacture and marketing will be subject to ongoing regulation, which could include compliance with current good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting requirements and general prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses. We are also subject to inspection and market surveillance by the FDA for compliance with these and other requirements. Any enforcement action resulting from failure, even by inadvertence, to comply with these requirements could affect the manufacture and marketing of levosimendan, imatinib or our other products. In addition, the FDA or other regulatory agencies could withdraw a previously approved product from the market upon receipt of newly discovered information. The FDA or another regulatory agency could also require us to conduct additional, and potentially expensive, studies in areas outside our approved indicated uses.

We may not receive all of the anticipated market exclusivity benefits of imatinib’s orphan drug designation, if we prioritize imatinib development in the future.

TNX-201, our proprietary formulation of imatinib mesylate, a kinase inhibitor, received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA in the second quarter of 2020. Orphan Drug Designation may provide market exclusivity in the United States for seven years if (i) imatinib receives market approval before a competitor using a similar mechanism for the same indication, (ii) we are able to produce sufficient supply to meet demand in the marketplace, and (iii) another product with the same active ingredient is not subsequently deemed clinically superior.

Obtaining an Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA may not effectively protect our product candidates from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition, and orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving the same or a different drug in another indication. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve a later application for the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer in a substantial portion of the target populations, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. In addition, a designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. Moreover, orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Orphan Drug Designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

Even after products are commercialized, we would expect to spend considerable time and money complying with federal and state laws and regulations governing their sale, and, if we are unable to fully comply with such laws and regulations, we could face substantial penalties.

Health care providers, physicians and others would play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of our clinical products. Our arrangements with third-party payers and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other health care laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we will market, sell and distribute our products. Applicable federal and state health care laws and regulations are expected to include, but not be limited to, the following:

Our failure to comply with any of these federal and state health care laws and regulations, or health care laws in foreign jurisdictions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, result of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to uncertainty relating to healthcare reform measures and reimbursement policies that, if not favorable to our products, could hinder or prevent our products’ commercial success, if any of our product candidates are approved.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities, such as Medicare, private health insurers and other organizations establish what we believe to be appropriate coverage and reimbursement for our approved products. The unavailability or inadequacy of third-party payer coverage and reimbursement could negatively affect the market acceptance of our product candidates and the future revenues we may expect to receive from any approved products. The commercial success of our product candidates, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which the costs of such products will be covered by third-party payers, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and other organizations. Third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. If these third-party payers do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other therapies, we may not obtain coverage for our products after approval as a benefit under the third-party payers’ plans or, even if we do, the level of coverage or payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.

Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status for newly approved drug products, including coding, coverage and payment. There is no uniform policy requirement for coverage and reimbursement for drug products among third-party payers in the United States; therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly by payer. The coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payer separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate payment will be applied consistently or obtained. The process for determining whether a payer will cover and how much it will reimburse a product may be separate from the process of seeking approval of the product or for setting the price of the product. Even if reimbursement is provided, market acceptance of our products may be adversely affected if the amount of payment for our products proves to be unprofitable for healthcare providers or less profitable than alternative treatments or if administrative burdens make our products less desirable to use. Third-party payer reimbursement to providers of our products, if approved, may be subject to a bundled payment that also includes the procedure of administering our products or third-party payers may require providers to perform additional patient testing to justify the use of our products. To the extent there is no separate payment for our products, there may be further uncertainty as to the adequacy of reimbursement amounts.

The containment of healthcare costs is a priority of federal, state and foreign governments and the prices of drug products have been a focus in this effort. The continuing efforts of government, private insurance companies and other organizations to contain or reduce costs of healthcare may adversely affect our ability to set as high a price for our products as we might otherwise and the rate and scope of adoption of our products by healthcare providers. We expect that federal, state and local governments in the United States, as well as governments in other countries, will continue to consider legislation directed at lowering the total cost of healthcare. In addition, in certain foreign markets, the pricing of drug products is subject to government control and reimbursement may in some cases be unavailable or insufficient. It is uncertain whether and how future legislation, whether domestic or abroad, could affect prospects for our product candidates or what actions governmental or private payers for healthcare treatment and services may take in response to any such healthcare reform proposals or legislation. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, may prevent or limit our ability to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates.

These potential courses of action are unpredictable and the potential impact of new legislation on our operations and financial position is uncertain, but may result in more rigorous coverage criteria, lower reimbursement and additional downward pressure on the price we may receive for an approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payers. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products, if approved.

Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls and reimbursement approval policies, which may adversely affect our prospects for generating revenue outside the United States.

We have worldwide distribution rights for levosimendan and our formulation of imatinib, and in some countries, particularly European Union countries and Canada, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. To obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries with respect to any product candidate that achieves regulatory approval, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available therapies. If reimbursement of our products upon approval, if at all, is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our prospects for generating revenue, if any, could be adversely affected, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, if we achieve regulatory approval of any product, we must successfully negotiate product pricing for such product in individual countries. As a result, if our products are approved, the pricing of our products in different countries may vary widely, thus creating the potential for third-party trade in our products in an attempt to exploit price differences between countries. This third-party trade of our products could undermine our sales in markets with higher prices.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities, limit sales of our existing products and limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

Our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, distribution, and sale of biotechnology products. We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and an even greater risk when we commercially sell any products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

We currently maintain limited product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials in the total amount of $5 million. However, our profitability will be adversely affected by a successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage. There can be no assurance that product liability insurance will be available in the future or be available on reasonable terms.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, malware, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber-terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our product development programs. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing or planned clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach was to result in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur material legal claims and liability, and damage to our reputation, and the further development of our product candidates could be delayed.

Our disclosure controls and procedures address cybersecurity and include elements intended to ensure that there is an analysis of potential disclosure obligations arising from security breaches. We also maintain compliance programs to address the potential applicability of restrictions against trading while in possession of material, nonpublic information generally and in connection with a cybersecurity breach. However, a breakdown in existing controls and procedures around our cybersecurity environment may prevent us from detecting, reporting or responding to cyber-incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and value of our stock. For more information, see Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We have historically and we will continue to rely significantly on third parties to conduct our nonclinical testing and clinical studies and other aspects of our development programs. If those third parties do not satisfactorily perform their contractual obligations or meet anticipated deadlines, the development of our product candidates could be adversely affected.

We do not currently employ personnel or possess the facilities necessary to conduct many of the activities associated with our development programs. We have historically and we will continue to engage consultants, advisors, CROs and others to assist in the design and conduct of nonclinical and clinical studies of our product candidates, with interpretation of the results of those studies and with regulatory activities and expect to continue to outsource all or a significant amount of such activities. As a result, many important aspects of our development programs are and will continue to be outside our direct control and our third-party service providers may not perform their activities as required or expected, including the maintenance of Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”) or Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) compliance, which are ultimately our responsibility to ensure. Further, such third parties may not be as committed to the success of our programs as our own employees and, therefore, may not devote the same time, thoughtfulness, or creativity to completing projects or problem-solving as our own employees would. To the extent we are unable to successfully manage the performance of third-party service providers, our business may be adversely affected.

The CROs we engage or may engage to execute our clinical studies play a significant role in the conduct of the studies, including the collection and analysis of study data, and we likely will depend on CROs and clinical investigators to conduct future clinical studies and to assist in analyzing data from completed studies and developing regulatory strategies for our product candidates. Individuals working at the CROs with which we contract, as well as investigators at the sites at which our studies are conducted, are not our employees, and we have limited control over the amount or timing of resources that they devote to their programs. If our CROs, study investigators, and/or third-party sponsors fail to devote sufficient time and resources to studies of our product candidates, if we and/or our CROs do not comply with all GLP and GCP regulatory and contractual requirements, or if their performance is substandard, it could adversely affect the development of our product candidates.

In addition, the third parties we engage may have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. Through intentional or unintentional means, our competitors may benefit from lessons learned on the project that could ultimately harm our competitive position. Moreover, if a CRO fails to properly, or at all, perform our activities during a clinical study, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs on acceptable terms or in a timely manner, or at all. Switching CROs may increase costs and divert management time and attention. In addition, there likely would be a transition period before a new CRO commences work. These challenges could result in delays in the commencement or completion of our clinical studies, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired and/or announced development timelines and have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

We depend on third parties to formulate and manufacture our products.

We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities for the clinical- or commercial-scale production of our products.

Pursuant to the terms of our license for levosimendan, Orion is at present our sole manufacturing source for TNX-103; should they opt not to provide us the product, our license agreement provides for 24 months’ notice to the Company of same, to allow an alternative manufacturer to be brought onboard. We might engage other third-party suppliers and CMOs for the supply and manufacture of TNX-102, or other formulations we might develop. Accordingly, our business is susceptible to disruption, and our results of operations can be adversely affected, by any disruption in supply or other adverse developments in our relationship with Orion. If supply from Orion is delayed or terminated, or if its facilities suffer any damage or disruption, we may need to successfully qualify an alternative supplier in a timely manner in order to avoid disruption of our business. If we cannot obtain an alternate manufacturer in a timely manner, we would experience a significant interruption in supply of levosimendan, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

To potentially manufacture imatinib in the future, we have contracted with various third-party suppliers and CMOs making us highly dependent on these CMOs. We do not at present have alternative CMOs planned or contracted to back up our primary vendors of clinical trial material or, if approved, commercial supply material. Identification of and discussions with other CMOs may be protracted and/or unsuccessful, or these new CMOs may be unsuccessful in producing the same results as the current primary CMOs producing the material. Therefore, if our primary CMOs become unable or unwilling to perform their required activities, we could experience protracted delays or interruptions in the supply of clinical trial material and, ultimately, product for commercial sale, which would materially and adversely affect our development programs, commercial activities, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the FDA or regulatory authorities outside of the United States may require us to have an alternate manufacturer of a drug product before approving any product candidate for marketing and sale in the United States or abroad. Securing such alternate manufacturer, if possible, could result in considerable additional time and cost prior to approval.

We currently have no marketing capabilities and no sales organization. Pending the outcome of our ongoing strategic process, if we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities on our own or through third parties, we will be unable to successfully commercialize our products, if approved, or generate product revenue.

Pending the outcome of our strategic process, to commercialize our products, if approved, in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we may seek approvals, we must build our marketing, sales, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. We have not decided upon a commercialization strategy in these areas. We have no experience in the sale and marketing of approved medical products and marketing the licensing of such products before FDA or other regulatory approval. We do not know of any third party that is prepared to distribute our products should they be approved. If we decide to establish our own commercialization capability, we will need to recruit, train and retain a marketing staff and sales force with sufficient technical expertise. We do not know whether we can establish a commercialization program at a cost that is acceptable in relation to revenue or whether we can be successful in commercializing our product. Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products directly and without strategic partners include:

Further, we may pursue arrangements regarding the sales and marketing and distribution of one or more of our product candidates and our future revenues may depend, in part, on our ability to enter into and maintain arrangements with other companies having sales, marketing and distribution capabilities and the ability of such companies to successfully market and sell any such products. Any failure to enter into such arrangements and marketing alliances on favorable terms, if at all, could delay or impair our ability to commercialize our product candidates and could increase our costs of commercialization. Any use of distribution arrangements and marketing alliances to commercialize our product candidates will subject us to a number of risks, including the following:

If we are unable to implement our own sales and marketing capability or are unable to contract with one or more third parties for such services on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products in certain markets. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal or external sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of our products. If we are not successful in commercializing our products, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we would incur significant additional losses.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Our success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining effective patent and other intellectual property protection for our product candidates and proprietary technology.

Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining effective patent protection and other intellectual property protection of our product candidates and the methods used to manufacture them, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our products, if any, will be dependent upon the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities.

We are pursuing a multi-faceted IP strategy for levosimendan that includes filing patent applications in the U.S. and Canada that, if granted, could protect various uses and formulations of levosimendan In January 2022, the USPTO granted us a patent protecting claims for different uses of various cyclodextrin-based subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan, including a claim for its use in the treatment of PH-HFpEF patients. In addition, we received in March 2023 another patent protecting the use of levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF.  Two subsequent patents expanded these protections on the use of levosimendan in the treatment of PH-HFpEF.

Our strategy to maximize market exclusivity for imatinib relies on two forms of exclusivity. First, we have been granted Orphan Drug Designation for the treatment of PAH by the FDA which would provide seven years of regulatory exclusivity in the U.S. if our imatinib formulation is the first to receive FDA approval for PAH. In addition, we expect to file one or more patent applications to cover patentable subject matter that may result from our imatinib development. If granted, a patent would provide protection for 20 years from its filing date.

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biopharmaceutical patents has emerged to date in the United States. The biopharmaceutical patent situation outside the United States is less certain still. Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in the patents we own. Further, if any of our patents are deemed invalid and unenforceable, it could impact our ability to commercialize or license our technology.

The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:

We also may rely on trade secrets to protect our technology, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. Although we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our employees, consultants, contractors, outside scientific collaborators and other advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using any of our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.

We rely on confidentiality agreements that, if breached, may be difficult to enforce and could have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position.

Our policy is to enter into agreements relating to the non-disclosure and non-use of confidential information with third parties, including our contractors, consultants, advisors and research collaborators, as well as agreements that purport to require the disclosure and assignment to us of the rights to the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions of our employees and consultants while we employ them. However, these agreements can be difficult and costly to enforce. Moreover, to the extent that our contractors, consultants, advisors and research collaborators apply or independently develop intellectual property in connection with any of our projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to the intellectual property. If a dispute arises, a court may determine that the right belongs to a third party, and enforcement of our rights can be costly and unpredictable. In addition, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how that we seek to protect in part by confidentiality agreements with our employees, contractors, consultants, advisors or others. Despite the protective measures we employ, we still face the risk that:

Any breach of our confidentiality agreements or our failure to effectively enforce such agreements would have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position.

We may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights and we may be unable to protect our rights to, or use, our technology.

If we or our partners choose to go to court to stop someone else from using the inventions claimed in our patents, that individual or company has the right to ask the court to rule that these patents are invalid and/or should not be enforced against that third party. These lawsuits are expensive and would consume time and other resources even if we were successful in stopping the infringement of these patents. In addition, there is a risk that the court will decide that these patents are not valid and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of these patents is upheld, the court will refuse to stop the other party on the ground that such other party’s activities do not infringe our rights to these patents.

Furthermore, a third party may claim that we or our manufacturing or commercialization partners are using inventions covered by the third party’s patent rights and may go to court to stop us from engaging in our normal operations and activities, including making or selling our product candidates. These lawsuits are costly and could affect our results of operations and divert the attention of managerial and technical personnel. There is a risk that a court would decide that we or our commercialization partners are infringing the third party’s patents and would order us or our partners to stop the activities covered by the patents. In addition, there is a risk that a court will order us or our partners to pay the other party damages for having violated the other party’s patents. We have agreed to indemnify certain of our commercial partners against certain patent infringement claims brought by third parties. The biotechnology industry has produced a proliferation of patents, and it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform. If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our products or methods of use either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent and/or that the patent claims are invalid, and we may not be able to do this. Proving invalidity, in particular, is difficult since it requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents.

Because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, because patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing and because publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our issued patents or our pending applications, or that we were the first to invent the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering technology similar to ours. Any such patent application may have priority over our patent applications or patents, which could further require us to obtain rights to issued patents by others covering such technologies. If another party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventions similar to ours, we may have to participate in an interference proceeding declared by the USPTO to determine priority of invention in the United States. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that such efforts would be unsuccessful if, unbeknownst to us, the other party had independently arrived at the same or similar invention prior to our own invention, resulting in a loss of our U.S. patent position with respect to such inventions.

Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations.

Under current law, we may not be able to enforce all employees’ covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees.

We have entered into non-competition agreements with certain of our employees. These agreements prohibit our employees, if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors for a limited period. Under current law, we may be unable to enforce these agreements against certain of our employees and it may be difficult for us to restrict our competitors from gaining the expertise our former employees gained while working for us. If we cannot enforce our employees’ non-compete agreements, we may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees.

We may infringe or be alleged to infringe intellectual property rights of third parties.

Our products or product candidates may infringe on, or be accused of infringing on, one or more claims of an issued patent or may fall within the scope of one or more claims in a published patent application that may be subsequently issued and to which we do not hold a license or other rights. Third parties may own or control these patents or patent applications in the United States and abroad. These third parties could bring claims against us or our collaborators that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successful against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement suit were brought against us or our collaborators, we or they could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the product or product candidate that is the subject of the suit.

If we are found to infringe the patent rights of a third party, or in order to avoid potential claims, we or our collaborators may choose or be required to seek a license from a third party and be required to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we or our collaborators were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product, or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we or our collaborators are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms.

There have been substantial litigation and other proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a party to other patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference proceedings declared by the USPTO and opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office, regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products. Our products, after commercial launch, may become subject to Paragraph IV certification under the Hatch-Waxman Act, thus forcing us to initiate infringement proceedings against such third-party filers. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time.

Some of our employees were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us. We may, however, be subject to claims that we or these employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, trade secrets or other proprietary information of any such employee’s former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims and, even if we are successful in defending ourselves, could result in substantial costs to us or be distracting to our management. If we fail to defend any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.

Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock

Our share price has been volatile, and may continue to be volatile, which may subject us to securities class action litigation in the future.

Our stock price has in the past been, and is likely to be in the future, volatile. The stock market in general, and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, our existing stockholders may not be able to sell their stock at a favorable price. The market price for our Common Stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities class action lawsuits filed against them. Such lawsuits, should they be filed against us in the future, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Anti-takeover provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, which could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.

Certain provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”), and our Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), may make it difficult for a third party to acquire, or attempt to acquire, control of the Company, even if a change in control was considered favorable by the stockholders. For example, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control transaction. As a result, the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of our stockholders may be adversely affected. An issuance of shares of preferred stock may result in the loss of voting control to other stockholders.

Our organizational documents also contain other provisions that could have an anti-takeover effect, including provisions that:

In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limit the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock, including transactions that may be in stockholder best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that certain investors are willing to pay for our stock.

Our Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees, or agents.

Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, any North Carolina state court that has jurisdiction, or the Delaware Court of Chancery shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any internal corporate claims, including without limitation (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of us, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of us to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to said court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants in such action. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any other claim for which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

This exclusive forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees or could result in increased costs for our stockholders to bring a claim in the chosen forum. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision in our Bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could harm our results of operations. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

We have U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”), which expire in various years if not utilized. In addition, we have federal research and development credit carryforwards. The federal research and development credit carryforwards expire in various years if not utilized. Under Sections 382 and 383 of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its future post-change income and taxes may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5% shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. We have not performed a formal study to determine whether any of our NOLs are subject to these limitations. We have recorded deferred tax assets for our NOLs and research and development credits and have recorded a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. In the event that it is determined that we have in the past experienced additional ownership changes, or if we experience one or more ownership changes as a result of future transactions in our stock, then we may be further limited in our ability to use our NOLs and other tax assets to reduce taxes owed on the net taxable income that we earn in the event that we attain profitability. Any such limitations on the ability to use our NOLs and other tax assets could adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results in the event that we attain profitability.

ITEM 1B—UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 1C—CYBERSECURITY

The Company has a cybersecurity strategy designed to protect our information systems and data from an evolving cyber-threat landscape.  Our cybersecurity program, administered by the Company’s Senior Network Administrator and overseen by the Audit and Compliance Committee, has the support of executive leadership and the Board of Directors, and the Company continues to invest in cybersecurity to protect the Company’s systems.

Our cybersecurity program focuses on all areas of our business, including cloud-based environments, devices used by employees and contractors, facilities, networks, applications, vendors, disaster recovery, business continuity and controls and safeguards enabled through business processes and tools. We continuously monitor for threats and unauthorized access. We learn of security threats through automated detection solutions as well as reports from users and business partners. We draw on the knowledge and insight of external cybersecurity experts and vendors and employ an array of third-party tools to secure our information infrastructure and protect systems and information from unauthorized access.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have not encountered any risks from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, including its business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. For more information on our cybersecurity related risks, see “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Industry” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 2—PROPERTIES

We own no real property. Beginning November 1, 2022, we maintain a membership providing dedicated office space, as well as shared services and shared space for meetings, catering, and other business activities, at our principal executive office relocated to 101 Glen Lennox Drive, Suite 300, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517. The current rent is approximately $800 per month.

On February 7, 2023, we entered into a Lease Termination Agreement with CCP Concourse, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (the “Landlord”) with respect to the Company’s prior principal executive office lease (the “Prior Lease). The Prior Lease, as amended, was originally entered into on January 27, 2011 and would have terminated on June 30, 2024. As consideration for the Landlord’s entry into the Lease Termination Agreement, including a release of any claims the Landlord may have had against the Company under the Prior Lease, the Company has paid the Landlord $169,867.41. Pursuant to the Lease Termination Agreement, effective February 8, 2023, the Company has no remaining rent or further obligations to the Landlord pursuant to the Prior Lease.

ITEM 3—LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to litigation in the normal course of business, none of which management believes will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4— MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5—MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Number of Stockholders

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “TENX”.

Based upon information furnished by our transfer agent, as of March 22, 2024, there were approximately 1,337 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared dividends on our equity securities, and currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Subject to the foregoing, the payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our overall financial condition and any other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

Repurchases of Common Stock

None.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities not previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

ITEM 6—RESERVED

ITEM 7—MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in Part II, Item 8 – “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company was originally formed as a New Jersey corporation in 1967 under the name Rudmer, David & Associates, Inc., and subsequently changed its name to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. Effective June 30, 2008, we changed the domiciliary state of the corporation to Delaware and changed the Company name to Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. On September 19, 2014, we changed the Company name to Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.

On November 13, 2013, we acquired a license granting Life Newco, our wholly-owned subsidiary, an exclusive, sublicensable right to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan, 2.5 mg/ml concentrate for solution for infusion / 5ml vial in the United States and Canada. On October 9, 2020 and January 25, 2022, we entered into amendments to the license agreement between the Company and Orion to include in the scope of the license two new oral product formulations containing levosimendan, in capsule and solid dosage form (TNX-103), and a subcutaneously administered dosage form (TNX-102), subject to specified limitations.  In February 2024, we entered into an additional amendment to the license, providing global rights to oral and subcutaneous formulations of levosimendan used in the treatment of PH-HFpEF, revising the royalty structure, lowering the royalty rates, modifying milestones associated with certain regulatory and commercial achievements, and excluding from our right of first negotiation the right to commercialize new applications of levosimendan for neurological diseases and disorders developed by Orion.

On January 15, 2021, we acquired 100% of the equity of PHPM, with PHPM surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. As a result of the merger, pending the outcome of our strategic process, we plan to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products containing imatinib for the treatment of PAH.

Reverse Stock Splits

The Company has adjusted all share amounts and references to stock prices in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our financial statements, to reflect that on January 2, 2024, we effected a 1-for-80 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and on January 4, 2023, we effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split (the “Prior Reverse Stock Split”, together with the Reverse Stock Split, the “Reverse Stock Splits”). The Reverse Stock Splits did not change the number of authorized shares of capital stock or cause an adjustment to the par value of our capital stock. Pursuant to their terms, a proportionate adjustment was made to the per share exercise price and number of shares issuable under our outstanding stock options and warrants. The number of shares authorized for issuance pursuant to our equity incentive plans have also been adjusted proportionately to reflect the Reverse Stock Splits.

Business Strategy

Having carefully considered alternatives within the ongoing strategic process announced in September 2022, and having raised capital expected to fund the Company through 2024, the Company has elected to prioritize its LEVEL trial (Phase 3 testing of oral levosimendan), ahead of imatinib. Activity to initiate the LEVEL trial continued in the fourth quarter of 2023, and site qualification, selection, and initiation processes are ongoing, the Company having received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) input into the oral levosimendan protocol and clinical development program in the third quarter of 2023. The Company began initiating sites in the fourth quarter of 2023, and commenced enrolling patients early in 2024. Additional funding will be needed to complete the LEVEL trial, which includes an open label extension phase following the completion of the randomized phase. The Company will complete efficacy and safety analyses of levosimendan versus placebo at the end of the randomized treatment phase, but many patients will continue to be treated under the protocol on open label levosimendan, beyond the completion of these analyses. Supporting this strategic decision to prioritize levosimendan development and commence Phase 3 trial work were two U.S. Patents issued in March and July 2023, covering the use of IV and oral levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF. These patents are the second and third levosimendan patents granted to us since the start of 2022. An additional new patent to be issued in early 2024 provides protections covering all therapeutic doses of all three formulations of the product in patients with PH-HFpEF.  Given our prioritization of the Phase 3 testing of levosimendan, we have suspended plans to launch an imatinib Phase 3 trial.

The Company took steps to reduce its monthly operating expenses and conserve cash, as it commenced exploring strategic alternatives in late 2022. The Company at that time cancelled many non-essential operating expenses such as consulting, its office lease, and dues and subscriptions and office supplies associated with that leased office. During the third quarter of 2023, the Company and its contracted CRO increased outreach to North American clinical trial sites, Institutional Review Boards, and other partners who will support the LEVEL trial, and in the fourth quarter of 2023 commenced site initiations.

Pending the outcome of our ongoing strategic process, the key elements of our business strategy are outlined below.

Efficiently conduct clinical development to establish clinical proof of principle in new indications, refine formulation, and commence Phase 3 testing of our current product candidates.

Levosimendan and imatinib have been approved and prescribed in countries around the world for more than 20 years, but we believe their mechanisms of action have not been fully exploited, despite promising evidence they may significantly improve the lives of patients with pulmonary hypertension. We are conducting clinical development with the intent to establish proof of beneficial activity in cardiopulmonary diseases in which these therapeutics would be expected to have benefit for patients with diseases for which either no pharmaceutical therapies are approved at all, or in the case of PAH, where numerous expensive therapies generally offer a modest reduction of symptoms. Our focus is primarily on designing and executing formulation improvements, protecting these innovations with patents and other forms of exclusivity, and employing innovative clinical trial science to establish a robust foundation for subsequent development, product approval, and commercialization. We intend to submit marketing authorization applications following two Phase 3 trials of levosimendan and, when appropriate, a single Phase 3 trial of imatinib. Our trials are designed to incorporate and reflect advanced clinical trial design science and the regulatory and advisory experience of our team. We intend to continue partnering with innovative companies, renowned biostatisticians and trialists, medical leaders, formulation and regulatory experts, and premier clinical testing organizations to help expedite development, and continue expanding into complementary areas when opportunities arise through our development, research, and discoveries. We also intend to continue outsourcing to CROs, and seeking and acting upon the advice of preeminent scientists focused on cardiovascular and pulmonary drug development, when designing and executing our research.

Efficiently explore new high-potential therapeutic applications, in particular where expedited regulatory pathways are available, leveraging third-party research collaborations and our results from related areas.

Levosimendan has shown promise in multiple disease areas in the more than two decades following its approval. Our own Phase 2 study and open-label extension has demonstrated that a formerly under-appreciated mechanism of action of levosimendan, its property of relaxing the venous circulation, brings about durable improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life, as well as other clinical assessments, in patients with PH-HFpEF. We believe this patient population today has no pharmaceutical therapies available and we are committed to exploring potential clinical indications where our therapies may achieve best-in-class profile, and where we can address significant unmet medical needs.

We believe these factors will support approval by the FDA of these product candidates based on positive Phase 3 data. Through our agreement with our licensor, Orion, the originator of levosimendan for acute decompensated heart failure, we have access to a library of ongoing and completed trials and research projects, including certain documentation, which we believe, in combination with positive Phase 3 data we hope to generate in at least one indication, will support FDA approval of levosimendan. Likewise, the regulatory pathway for approval of imatinib for the treatment of PAH, as formulated by us at the dose shown to be effective in a prior Phase 3 trial conducted by Novartis, allows us to build on the dossier of research results already reviewed by the FDA. In order to achieve our objective of developing these medicines for new groups of patients, we have established collaborative research relationships with investigators from leading research and clinical institutions, and our strategic partners. These collaborative relationships have enabled us to explore where our product candidates may have therapeutic relevance, gain the advice and support of key opinion leaders in medicine and clinical trial science, and invest in development efforts to exploit opportunities to advance beyond current clinical care.

Continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio.

Our intellectual property and the confidentiality of all our Company information is important to our business and we take significant steps to help protect its value. Our research and development efforts, both through internal activities and through collaborative research activities with others, aim to develop new intellectual property and enable us to file patent applications that cover new uses of our existing technologies, alone or in combination with existing therapies, as well as other product candidates.

Notice of Allowance and Patents

On February 1, 2023, the Company announced it was granted a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for its patent application with claims covering the use of IV levosimendan (TNX-101) in the treatment of PH-HFpEF. This patent (U.S. Patent No. 11,607,412) was issued on March 21, 2023. On July 19, 2023, the Company announced USPTO issuance of another patent, this one including claims covering the use of oral levosimendan (TNX-103) in patients with PH-HFpEF. This issued patent (U.S. Patent No. 11,701,355) provides exclusivity through December 2040. On February 6, 2024, the Company announced it was granted a Notice of Allowance from USPTO for its patent application broadening IP protection for oral, I.V., and subcutaneous use of levosimendan and its active metabolites in PH-HFpEF, at all therapeutic doses and in combination with various cardiovascular drugs.  At present, we have other patent applications pending, with additional decisions expected in the future.  Patents pending in Europe may lead to intellectual property protections on the use of levosimendan in patients with PH-HFpEF in 2024.

Enter into licensing or product co-development arrangements.

In addition to our internal development efforts, an important part of our product development strategy is to work with collaborators and partners to accelerate product development, maintain our low development and business operations costs, and broaden our commercialization capabilities globally. We believe this strategy will help us develop a portfolio of high-quality product development opportunities, enhance our clinical development and commercialization capabilities, and increase our ability to generate value from our proprietary technologies.

As we focus on our strategic process, we also continue to position ourselves to execute upon licensing and other partnering opportunities. To do so, we need to continue to maintain our strategic direction, manage and deploy our available cash efficiently, and strengthen our collaborative research development and partner relationships.

Historically, we have financed our operations principally through equity and debt offerings, including private placements and loans from our stockholders. Based on our current operating plan, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management has implemented certain cost-cutting measures as described above and is actively exploring a diverse range of strategic options to help drive stockholder value including, among other things, capital raises, a sale of our Company, merger, one or more license agreements, a co-development agreement, a combination of these, or other strategic transactions; however, there is no assurance that these efforts will result in a transaction or other alternative or that any additional funding will be available. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to raise additional capital, through the sale of equity or debt securities and through collaboration and licensing agreements, to support our future operations. If we are unable to complete a strategic transaction or secure additional capital, we may be required to curtail our research and development initiatives and take additional measures to reduce costs.

Comparison of Our Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $5.7 million for the same period in 2022. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for executive, finance, legal and administrative personnel, including stock-based compensation. Other general and administrative expenses include facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, legal and accounting services, and other professional and consulting services. General and administrative expenses and percentage changes for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, are as follows:

Personnel costs decreased approximately $194,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was due to reductions in head count and stock compensation expenses.

Stock Compensation expense was approximately $191,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, and decreased approximately $174,000 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The decrease in expense was due to the decrease in head count and option awards during the year.   

Legal and professional fees decreased approximately $402,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. Professional fees consist of the costs incurred for accounting fees, capital market expenses, consulting fees and investor relations services, as well as fees paid to the members of our Board of Directors.

Legal fees decreased approximately $264,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to lower capital market activities and IP-related costs.

Professional fees decreased approximately $138,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreased consulting fees and a decrease in accounting, capital markets, and investor relations costs.

Other costs increased approximately $50,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. Other costs include expenses incurred for franchise and other taxes, travel, supplies, insurance, depreciation and other miscellaneous charges. The increase was primarily attributable to increased costs for insurance offset by decreases in franchise and other taxes.

Facilities costs decreased approximately $124,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower costs paid for rent and utilities at our corporate headquarters in North Carolina.

Research and Development Expenses 

Research and development expenses were $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $5.4 million for the same period in the prior year. Research and development expenses include, but are not limited to, (i) expenses incurred under agreements with CROs and investigative sites, which conduct our clinical trials and a substantial portion of our pre-clinical studies; (ii) the cost of supplying clinical trial materials; (iii) payments to contract service organizations, as well as consultants; (iv) employee-related expenses, which include salaries and benefits; and (v) facilities, depreciation and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and equipment, depreciation of leasehold improvements, equipment, and other supplies. All research and development expenses are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses and percentage changes for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, are as follows:

Clinical and preclinical development costs decreased approximately $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Clinical and preclinical development costs consist of expenses associated with the ongoing open label extension phase of our Phase 2 HELP Study for levosimendan, costs associated with our intravenous-to-oral levosimendan transition study, and development costs associated with the formulation for imatinib. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower Phase 1 and Phase 3 costs for imatinib, since the Company suspended clinical development activities for this product candidate in 2022, offset by increased LEVEL trial costs in 2023.

Personnel costs increased approximately $145,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to increased incentive compensation costs.

Other costs increased approximately $55,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to higher regulatory costs over the prior year.

Other Income and Expense, Net

Other income and expense include non-operating income and expense items not otherwise recorded in our consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. These items include, but are not limited to, interest income earned and fixed asset disposals. Other income increased approximately $538,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase is due primarily to the interest earned from the Company’s money market accounts.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Plan of Operation

We have incurred losses since our inception and, as of December 31, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $297 million. We will continue to incur losses until we generate sufficient revenue to offset our expenses, and we anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for at least the next several years. We expect to incur additional expenses related to our development and potential commercialization of levosimendan in the LEVEL trial and, pending the outcome of our strategic process, imatinib for pulmonary hypertension and other potential indications, as well as identifying and developing other potential product candidates, and as a result, we will need to generate significant net product sales, royalty and other revenues to achieve profitability.

The process of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials necessary to obtain approval from the FDA is costly and time consuming. The probability of success for each product candidate and clinical trial may be affected by a variety of factors, including, among other things, the quality of the product candidate’s early clinical data, investment in the program, competition, manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, uncertainty associated with clinical trial enrollment and risks inherent in the development process, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of current or future clinical stages of our product candidates or when, or to what extent, we will generate revenues from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates. Development timelines, probability of success and development costs vary widely. We are currently focused on developing our two product candidates, levosimendan and imatinib, and have prioritized levosimendan in the short-term; however, we will need substantial additional capital in the future in order to complete the development and potential commercialization of levosimendan and imatinib, and to continue with the development of other potential product candidates.

Liquidity

We have financed our operations since September 1990 through the issuance of debt and equity securities and loans from stockholders. We had total current assets of approximately $11.7 million and $3.2 million and working capital of approximately $8.1 million and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Our practice is to invest excess cash, where available, in short-term money market investment instruments and high quality corporate and government bonds.

Clinical and Preclinical Product Development

We are currently conducting a Phase 3 trial of oral levosimendan (LEVEL), and intend to recruit patients throughout 2024 and into at least the first half of 2025. Our ability to continue to pursue development of our products, including completing the LEVEL trial, beyond 2024 will depend on obtaining license income or outside financial resources. There is no assurance that we will obtain any license agreement or outside financing or that we will otherwise succeed in obtaining any necessary resources.

Financings

On February 8, 2024, we sold in a registered public offering (i) an aggregate of 421,260 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,178,740 shares of our common stock and (ii) accompanying warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,200,000 shares of our common stock at a combined offering price of $5.65 per share of common stock and associated warrant, or $5.649 per pre-funded warrant and associated warrant, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $9.0 million. Net proceeds of the offering were approximately $8.0 million, after deducting the placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.

As retrospectively adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split, on February 3, 2023, we sold in a registered public offering (i) an aggregate of 86,994 shares of our common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 21,341 shares of our common stock and (ii) accompanying warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 216,667 shares of our common stock at a combined offering price of $144.00 per share of common stock and associated warrant, or $143.92 per pre-funded warrant and associated warrant, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $15.6 million. Net proceeds of the offering were approximately $14.1 million, after deducting the placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by the Company.

As retrospectively adjusted for the Reverse Stock Splits, on May 17, 2022, we sold 6,623 units in a private placement at a purchase price of $1,240.00 per unit for net proceeds of approximately $7.9 million. Each unit consisted of one unregistered pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of our common stock and one unregistered warrant to purchase one share of common stock.

Cash Flows

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Net cash (used in) operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to approximately $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in cash used for operating activities was primarily due to lower expense activity in the current period as compared to the prior year. 

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

Net cash used in or provided by investing activities was approximately $2,843 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately $(2,323) in the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the sale of office furniture related to the relocation of the Company’s headquarters.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to approximately $7.9 million in the prior year. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was due to the net proceeds from the February 3, 2023 sale of common stock and warrants and the exercise of warrants.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors that include, but are not limited to the following:

Based on our working capital on December 31, 2023, and the financing completed on February 8, 2024, we believe we have sufficient capital on hand to continue to fund operations through 2024.

We will need substantial additional capital beyond 2024, assuming ongoing activities with the LEVEL trial continue at the expected pace. In addition, we will need additional funding in the future in order to complete the regulatory approval and commercialization of levosimendan, as well as to fund the development and commercialization of other future product candidates. Until we can generate a sufficient amount of product revenue, if ever, we expect to finance future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. Such funding, if needed, may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. In the event we are unable to obtain additional capital, we may delay or reduce the scope of our current research and development programs and other expenses. As a result of our historical operating losses and expected future negative cash flows from operations, we have concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Similarly, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our December 31, 2023 consolidated financial statements include an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may materially and adversely affect the price per share of our common stock and make it more difficult to obtain financing.

If adequate funds are not available, we may also be required to eliminate one or more of our clinical trials, delaying approval of levosimendan or our commercialization efforts. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience additional significant dilution, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We may seek to access the public or private capital markets whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at that time. We may also consider strategic alternatives, including a sale of our company, merger, other business combination or recapitalization.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates—The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Preclinical Study and Clinical Accruals—We estimate our preclinical study and clinical trial expenses based on the services received pursuant to contracts with several research institutions and CROs that conduct and manage preclinical and clinical trials on our behalf. The financial terms of the agreements vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven expenses and payment flows. Preclinical study and clinical trial expenses include the following:

Stock-Based Compensation—We account for stock-based awards to employees in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC 718: Compensation — Stock Compensation, which provides for the use of the fair value-based method to determine compensation for all arrangements where shares of stock or equity instruments are issued for compensation. Fair values of equity securities are determined by management based predominantly on the trading price of our common stock. The values of these awards are based upon their grant-date fair value. That cost is recognized over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the reward.

We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. We record equity instruments issued to non- at their fair value on the measurement date and periodically adjust them as the underlying equity instruments vest.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard that amends how credit losses are measured and reported for certain financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. This standard requires that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down for available-for-sale debt securities and will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2023, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2023. Our adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. 

ITEM 7A—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 8—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the financial statements included at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9—CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A—CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on their evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2023, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in that they provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We routinely review our internal controls over financial reporting and from time to time make changes intended to enhance the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and will take action as appropriate.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, management reviewed all work generated in support of the financial statements and corresponding footnotes to determine areas which may be susceptible to human error. The review focused on limiting manual inputs into work papers wherever possible and tying inputs to external source documents. In addition, management also enhanced its work paper review to compare figures to prior year amounts or source documents and increased the number of calculations in the work papers that are reviewed and re-performed.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer and affected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. In making its assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023.

Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our independent registered public accounting firm has not assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and, under SEC rules, will not be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting so long as we qualify as a “non-accelerated filer”.

ITEM 9B—OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C—DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10— DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

Information about our directors, their ages as of March 28, 2024, and the expiration dates of their current terms of Board service are provided in the table below. Additional biographical descriptions are set forth in the text below the tables and include the primary individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director that led to the conclusion that such director should serve as a member of our Board at this time.

June Almenoff, MD, PhD has served as a director since February 2021. Dr. Almenoff is currently the Chief Medical Officer at RedHill Biopharma Inc. (NASDAQ: RDHL), a specialty biopharmaceutical company, primarily focused on gastrointestinal and infectious diseases, where she serves on the commercial executive team. From March 2010 to October 2014, Dr. Almenoff served as President and Chief Medical Officer and a member of the board of directors of Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (previously NASDAQ: FURX) (“Furiex”), a drug development collaboration company that was acquired by Actavis plc (now AbbVie, Inc.) for $1.2 billion in July 2014. Prior to joining Furiex, Dr. Almenoff was at GlaxoSmithKline plc (NYSE: GSK) for twelve years, where she held various positions of increasing responsibility, most recently Vice President in the Clinical Safety organization. Dr. Almenoff is on the investment advisory board of the Harrington Discovery Institute, a private venture philanthropy. She serves on the board of directors of Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVTX) and is a director-advisor of inSoma Bio, Inc. She previously served as a member of the board of directors of Brainstorm Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: BCLI), Tigenix NV (formerly NASDAQ: TIG), OHR Pharmaceutical Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: OHRP), Kurome Therapeutics, Inc., and as executive chair of the board of directors of RDD Pharma, Ltd. Dr. Almenoff received her B.A. cum laude from Smith College and graduated with AOA honors from the M.D.-Ph.D. program at the Icahn (Mt. Sinai) School of Medicine. She completed post-graduate medical training at Stanford University Medical Center and served on the faculty of Duke University School of Medicine. She is an adjunct Professor at Duke, a Fellow of the American College of Physicians and has authored over 60 publications.

Our Board of Directors believes that Dr. Almenoff’s close to 25 years of leadership experience as a biopharma executive, her expertise in research and development, as well as her experience with public and private biotech boards, venture philanthropy investment, and product commercialization qualify her to serve on our Board.

Michael Davidson, MD has served as a director since February 2021. Since August 2020, Dr. Davidson has served as the Chief Executive Officer of New Amsterdam Pharma B.V., a clinical stage company focused on the treatment of cardio-metabolic diseases. Since April 2007, Dr. Davidson has also served as Clinical Professor and Director of the Lipid Clinic at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. From January 2016 to July 2020, Dr. Davidson was the Founder and Chief Scientific Officer and a director of Corvidia Therapeutics, a company focused on the development of transformational therapies for cardio-renal diseases, which was acquired by Novo-Nordisk for up to $2.1 billion in June 2020. Prior to that, from November 2009 to January 2016, Dr. Davidson was the co-founding Chief Medical Officer of Omthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceuticals company focusing its efforts on the clinical development of new therapies for dyslipidemia, which was acquired by AstraZeneca plc in 2013 for $443 million. Earlier in his career, he founded the Chicago Center for Clinical Research, which became the largest investigator site in the United States and was acquired by PPD, Inc. in 1996. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLBS), Silence Therapeutics PLC (NASDAQ: SLN), Sonogene LLC, Jocasta Neuroscience, Inc. and Trofi Nutritionals, Inc. His research background encompasses both pharmaceutical and nutritional clinical trials including extensive research on statins, novel lipid-lowering drugs, and omega-3 fatty acids. Dr. Davidson is board-certified in internal medicine, cardiology, and clinical lipidology and served as President of the National Lipid Association from 2010 to 2011. He received his B.A./M.S. from Northwestern University and M.D. from The Ohio State University School of Medicine.

Our Board of Directors believes that Dr. Davidson’s medical background and extensive experience in clinical development, as well as his extensive experience as an executive of several biotechnology companies, qualify him to serve on our Board.

Declan Doogan, MD has served as a director since February 2021. Since November 2019, Dr. Doogan has served as co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of Juvenescence Ltd., a life sciences company developing therapies to modify aging and increase healthy human lifespan. From June 2013 to May 2019, Dr. Doogan served as Chief Executive Officer of Portage Biotech, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRTG), a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company, where he currently remains a director. From 2007 to 2012, Dr. Doogan held various executive roles at Amarin Corporation (NASDAQ: AMRN), a pharmaceutical company focused on cardiovascular disease management, including Head of Research and Development, Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Medical Officer. Prior to that, from 1982 to 2007, he held a number of executive positions in the U.S., the U.K. and Japan at Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE: PFE), a multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporation, and was most recently the Senior Vice President and Head of Worldwide Development. Beyond his executive career, Dr. Doogan is an investor in emerging biotechnology companies, and is a partner at Mediqventures Ltd., a biotech merchant bank and investment firm. In addition to Portage Biotech, Inc., Dr. Doogan currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Apterna Ltd. and Causeway Therapeutics Ltd. Dr. Doogan previously served as chairman of the board of directors of Biohaven Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: BHVN) and a member of the boards of directors of Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: INTS), Sosei Group Corporation (TSE: 4565), Kleo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Celleron Therapeutics Ltd. Dr. Doogan has also held professorships at Harvard School of Public Health, Glasgow University Medical School and Kitasato University (Tokyo). He received his medical degree from Glasgow University. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and the Faculty Pharmaceutical Medicine and holds a Doctorate of Science at the University of Kent in the U.K.

Our Board of Directors believes that Dr. Doogan’s 30 years of experience in the global pharmaceutical industry in both major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, in addition to his medical background, experience in clinical development and extensive board experience on both public and privately held life sciences companies, qualify him to serve on our Board.

Christopher T. Giordano joined the Company as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors in July 2021 and became President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2021. From March 2018 to July 2021, he served as President of IQVIA Biotech LLC and IQVIA MedTech Inc., a provider of integrated clinical and commercial solutions to medical device and small biotech companies, where he led an executive team that managed a clinical trial portfolio that grew from 250 to 400 active projects during his three years of leadership. Prior to that role, from August 2008 to March 2018, Mr. Giordano held roles of increasing responsibility at Quintiles Transnational Holdings Inc., a provider of pharmaceutical outsourcing services (acquired by IMS Health Holdings, Inc. in October 2016 to become IQVIA Holdings Inc.), and was most recently Global Vice President of the cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic group. From January 2001 to July 2008, Mr. Giordano served in various sales and operational roles at PPD, Inc., a global clinical research organization. Mr. Giordano holds a B.A. (summa cum laude) in English from the University of San Diego and a M.A. in English from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Giordano’s 20 years of experience in the clinical research industry and extensive experience with bringing pharmaceutical products to market qualify him to serve on our Board.

Robyn M. Hunter has served as a director since January 2022. Since August 2022, she has served as global Chief Financial Officer of Sotio Biotech Inc., a clinical stage immuno-oncology company. Previously, she served as the Chief Financial Officer of Fortress Biotech, Inc. (NASDAQ: FBIO) ("Fortress Biotech") from June 2017 to August 2022, and from August 2011 to June 2017, she served as the Vice President and Corporate Controller of Fortress Biotech. From January 2006 to May 2011, Ms. Hunter served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Schochet Associates, Inc. From August 2004 to January 2006, Ms. Hunter served as the Corporate Controller for Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. From 1990 to 2004, Ms. Hunter held several positions from Accounting Manager to Vice President and Treasurer of The Stackpole Corporation. Ms. Hunter holds a B.A. in Economics from Union College in Schenectady, New York.

Our Board of Directors believes that Ms. Hunter’s general business experience and finance expertise and practice in the pharmaceutical industry, developed through her leadership at other companies, qualifies her to serve on our Board.

Gerald T. Proehl has served as a director since April 2014. Since June 2015, Mr. Proehl has served as Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the board of directors of Dermata Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company (NASDAQ: DRMA). In January 1999, Mr. Proehl co-founded Santarus, Inc., a specialty biopharmaceutical company, and through January 2014, until its sale to Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. for $2.6 billion, he held various leadership roles, including as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director. Prior to joining Santarus, Mr. Proehl was with Hoechst Marion Roussel (HMR) for 14 years where he served in various capacities, including Vice President of Global Marketing. During his career at HMR he worked across numerous therapeutic areas, including central nervous system, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal. In addition to Dermata Therapeutics, Mr. Proehl serves on the board of directors of Kinetek Sports, Inc. Mr. Proehl previously served on the boards of Sophiris Bio Inc. (formerly OTCQB: SPHS), Ritter Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: RTTR), and Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: ASPX). Mr. Proehl holds a B.S. in education from the State University of New York at Cortland, an M.A. in exercise physiology from Wake Forest University and an M.B.A. from Rockhurst University.

Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Proehl’s general business and commercial experience in the pharmaceutical industry, as well as his strong background in business operations developed through his leadership at other companies, qualify him to serve on our Board.

Stuart Rich, MD has served as our Chief Medical Officer since January 2021 and a director since February 2021. Dr. Rich joined the Company from PHPrecisionMed Inc. (PHPM), where he was a co-founder and held the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Director from October 2018 until PHPM’s merger with the Company in January 2021. Beginning July 2015, Dr. Rich has served as Professor of Medicine (and since 2021, Professor Emeritus) at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He was co-founder and a Trustee of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute from 2006 until 2023, a U.K. based charity. From July 2015 until January 2021, he also served as the Director of the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Program at the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute of Northwestern University, and since January 2006 he has served as a Director of the Cardiovascular Medical and Research Foundation, a U.S. based charity. He was a standing member of the Cardiovascular and Renal Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from 2002 through 2013. Prior to Northwestern University, Dr. Rich was Professor of Medicine at the Section of Cardiology of the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine from September 2004 to July 2015. Dr. Rich also served as the Chief Medical Officer (part-time) of United Therapeutics from October 2003 until December 2004. He was Professor of Medicine at the Rush Heart Institute of the Rush University School of Medicine from July 1996 to September 2004 and Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Section of Cardiology at the University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago from July 1980 to July 1996. Dr. Rich received his B.S. in Biology at the University of Illinois and his M.D. at Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, and he completed his residency in medicine at the Washington University of St. Louis and his fellowship in cardiology at the University of Chicago.

Our Board of Directors believes that Dr. Rich’s extensive medical background in the field of pulmonary hypertension and experience as a consultant and standing member of the Cardiovascular and Renal Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration qualify him to serve on our Board.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers as of March 28, 2024:

The biographies of Mr. Giordano and Dr. Rich appear above, under the heading “Directors”.

Lawrence R. Hoffman has served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer since January 2024. Since November 2021, Mr. Hoffman has served as a consultant to several companies through Danforth, including as Interim Chief Financial Officer for SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Nasdaq: SCYX) from November 2021 until October 2022. Prior to joining Danforth, from February 2018 to October 2021, Mr. Hoffman was Chief Financial Officer of Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Hoffman has held executive management positions at multiple public and private companies in the United States. Mr. Hoffman holds a B.S. in Business Administration from La Salle University, a J.D. from Temple University School of Law, an LL.M. (taxation) from Villanova University School of Law, and is a Certified Public Accountant in Pennsylvania.

Director Independence

In accordance with the applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules, our Board of Directors must consist of a majority of “independent directors”, which is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of our Board would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

The Board has determined that directors Drs. Almenoff, Davidson, and Doogan, Mr. Proehl and Ms. Hunter are independent directors in accordance with applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed the information provided by the director nominees with regard to each individual’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management.

The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of each of the Audit and Compliance, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees are independent as defined under applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules. In addition, the Board has determined that Ms. Hunter, and Drs. Almenoff and Davidson meet the additional test for independence for audit committee members and Ms. Hunter, Mr. Proehl and Dr. Davidson meet the additional test for independence for compensation committee members imposed by SEC regulations and the Nasdaq Listing Rules.

Standing Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit and Compliance Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters of the Audit and Compliance, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, as they may be amended from time to time, are available on our website at http://www.tenaxthera.com.

The following table provides membership information of our directors on each committee of our Board of Directors as of January 30, 2024.

 = Committee Chair

 = Member

Audit and Compliance Committee

The members of the Audit and Compliance Committee are currently Drs. Almenoff and Davidson and Ms. Hunter. Ms. Hunter serves as chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Hunter qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules. The Audit and Compliance Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Legal Proceedings with Directors or Executive Officers

There are no legal proceedings related to any of our directors or executive officers that require disclosure pursuant to Items 103 or 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Family Relationships

There is no family relationship between any director, executive officer, or person nominated to become a director or executive officer of our Company.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code of Ethics”) applicable to all of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this Code of Ethics is available free of charge and is posted on our website at http://investors.tenaxthera.com/corporate-governance. In the event the Code of Ethics is revised, or any waiver is granted under the Code of Ethics with respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions, notice of such revision or waiver will be posted on our website or disclosed on a current report on Form 8-K as required.

 Compliance with Section 16(a) Reports

The information required by this Item, if any, concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act will be incorporated by reference from the section of the proxy statement captioned “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports”.

ITEM 11— EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables and narrative discussion describe the material elements of our executive compensation program during 2023. We also provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, including our principal compensation policies and practices.

Our “named executive officers” for fiscal year 2023 includes the individual who served as our principal executive officer during 2023, the only other person serving as an executive officer as of December 31, 2023, and the individual who formerly served as our principal financial officer during 2023 (who died in December 2023). Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for 2023 were:

2023 Summary Compensation Table

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table

Elements of Compensation

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we compensated our Named Executive Officers generally through a mix of (i) base salary and (ii) annual cash bonus based on achievement of predetermined operational goals. We did not issue long-term equity compensation because the Board determined there were insufficient shares reserved under our 2022 Stock Incentive Plan.

Mr. Lurier was our Interim Chief Financial Officer employed by Danforth and was compensated on an hourly basis in accordance with his consulting agreement (the “Danforth Consulting Agreement”). See “Employment and Other Contracts - Eliot M. Lurier” for further discussion of Mr. Lurier's consulting agreement.

Annual Base Salaries

Mr. Giordano and Dr. Rich received a base salary to compensate them for services rendered to us during the year ended December 31, 2023. The base salary is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive’s skill set, experience, role and responsibilities. In the year ended December 31, 2023, we paid an annual base salary of $405,300 to Mr. Giordano and $318,000 to Dr. Rich.

Cash Bonuses

Under each of their employment agreements, Mr. Giordano and Dr. Rich are eligible to receive annual cash bonuses based on the achievement of annual goals. During the year ended December 31, 2023, Mr. Giordano and Dr. Rich were eligible to receive a target cash bonus consisting of 50% and 40%, respectively, of their base salaries, based on 100% achievement of the predetermined operational goals. There is no cap on the bonuses for greater than 100% achievement of goals, and there is no pre-identified threshold amount that must be achieved to receive any cash bonus payment. Our Compensation Committee evaluated performance for the year ended December 31, 2023, and consistent with the determinations made in prior years, did so in March 2024.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

Provided we have sufficient shares reserved under our 2022 Stock Incentive Plan, we typically award stock options to our key employees, including to our non-executive employees, on an annual basis and subject to approval by (i) the Board of Directors upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation with respect to executive officers and (ii) the Compensation Committee with respect to all other employees.

Other Elements of Compensation

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

We maintain broad based benefits that are provided to all employees, including health and dental insurance. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, in each case, on the same basis as other employees.

No Tax Gross-Ups

We do not make gross-up payments to cover our NEOs’ personal income taxes that may pertain to any of the compensation or perquisites paid or provided by us.

Severance and Change-of-Control Benefits

Pursuant to employment agreements we have entered into with certain NEOs, each such officer is entitled to specified benefits in the event of the termination of his employment under specified circumstances, including termination following a change in control of the Company. We have provided more detailed information about these benefits under the caption “-Employment and Other Contracts” below.

Employment and Other Contracts

Christopher T. Giordano

We entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Giordano, effective July 6, 2021 (the “Giordano Employment Agreement”). Under the Giordano Employment Agreement, Mr. Giordano initially received an annual base salary of $375,000, which has been subsequently increased to $469,000, effective January 1, 2024. Mr. Giordano also will receive participation in medical insurance, dental insurance, and other benefit plans on the same basis as our other officers. Under the Giordano Employment Agreement, Mr. Giordano will receive an annual cash bonus consisting of 50% of his base salary, based on 100% achievement of annual goals (with no cap on the bonus for greater than 100% achievement of goals). The Giordano Employment Agreement also provides for the grant of the following employment inducement stock options (as retrospectively adjusted for the Reverse Stock Splits): (i) a one-time stock option grant of 160 shares of Common Stock with four-year straight-line vesting; and (ii) a one-time stock option grant of 63 shares of Common Stock with 50% vesting upon the achievement of certain performance metrics related to our clinical trials. As of December 31, 2023, none of the vesting milestones had been achieved and the options were subsequently cancelled. We also reimbursed Mr. Giordano for up to $10,000 of legal expenses related to the Giordano Employment Agreement.

The Giordano Employment Agreement is effective for a one-year term, and automatically renews for additional one-year terms, unless the Giordano Employment Agreement is terminated in advance of renewal or either party gives notice at least 90 days prior to the end of the then-current term of an intention not to renew. If Mr. Giordano is terminated without “cause”, if he terminates his employment for “good reason”, or if the Company elects not to renew the Giordano Employment Agreement, Mr. Giordano would be entitled to receive (i) one-year of base salary, (ii) a pro-rated amount of the annual bonus that he would have received had 100% of goals been achieved, and (iii) one-year of COBRA reimbursements or benefits payments, as applicable. Mr. Giordano’s entitlement to these payments is conditioned upon execution of a release of claims.

For purposes of the Giordano Employment Agreement: (i) “cause” includes (1) a willful material breach of the Giordano Employment Agreement by Mr. Giordano, (2) material misappropriation of Company property, (3) material failure to comply with our policies, (4) abuse of illegal drugs or abuse of alcohol in a manner that interferes with the performance of his duties, (5) dishonest or illegal action that is materially detrimental to the Company, (6) failure to cooperate with internal investigations or law enforcement and regulatory investigations, and (7) failure to disclose material conflicts of interest and (ii) “good reason” includes (1) a material reduction in base salary, (2) a material reduction of Mr. Giordano’s authority, duties or responsibility, (3) certain changes in geographic location of Mr. Giordano’s employment, or (4) a material breach of the Giordano Employment Agreement or other written agreement with Mr. Giordano by the Company.

Stuart Rich

We entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Rich, effective January 15, 2021 (the “Rich Employment Agreement”). Under the Rich Employment Agreement, Dr. Rich initially received an annual base salary of $300,000, which has been subsequently increased to $318,000. Dr. Rich will also receive participation in medical insurance, dental insurance, and other benefit plans on the same basis as our other officers. Under the Rich Employment Agreement, Dr. Rich is eligible for an annual target cash bonus of 40% of his base salary, based on 100% achievement of annual goals (with no cap on the bonus for greater than 100% achievement of goals). Pursuant to the Rich Employment Agreement, Dr. Rich received as an inducement award a one-time non-statutory stock option grant of 160 shares of Common Stock (as retrospectively adjusted for the Reverse Stock Splits). The option award will vest as follows: 25% upon initiation of a Phase 3 trial (the “Trial”); 25% upon database lock of the Trial; 25% upon acceptance for review of an Investigational New Drug Application; and 25% upon approval from the FDA. The option grant has a 10-year term and an exercise price of $2,848 per share.

The Rich Employment Agreement is effective for a one-year term, and automatically renews for additional one-year terms, unless terminated in advance of renewal or either party gives notice at least 90 days prior to the end of the then-current term of an intention not to renew. If Dr. Rich is terminated without “cause”, if he terminates his employment for “good reason, or if we elect not to renew the Rich Employment Agreement, Dr. Rich would be entitled to receive (i) one-year of his then current base salary, (ii) a pro-rated amount of the annual bonus that he would have received had 100% of goals been achieved, (iii) acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity-based compensation awards held by Dr. Rich, and (iv) one-year of COBRA reimbursements or benefits payments, as applicable. Dr. Rich’s entitlement to these payments is conditioned upon execution of a release of claims.

For purposes of the Rich Employment Agreement: (i) “cause” includes (1) a willful material breach of the Rich Employment Agreement by Dr. Rich, (2) material misappropriation of Company property, (3) material failure to comply with our policies, (4) abuse of illegal drugs or abuse of alcohol in a manner that materially interferes with the performance of his duties, (5) dishonest or illegal action that is materially detrimental to the Company, and (6) failure to disclose material conflicts of interest; and (ii) “good reason” includes (1) a material reduction in base salary, (2) a material reduction of his authority, duties or responsibility, or (3) a material breach of the Rich Employment Agreement by the Company.

Eliot M. Lurier

We entered into a consulting agreement with Danforth, dated October 14, 2021, providing for the engagement of Mr. Lurier, a consultant with Danforth, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company (the “Danforth Consulting Agreement”). Pursuant to the Danforth Consulting Agreement, Mr. Lurier was responsible for the Company’s accounting and finance functions and served as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Mr. Lurier provided services to the Company under the Danforth Consulting Agreement as an independent contractor. The Danforth Consulting Agreement may be terminated by us or Danforth (i) with “Cause”, immediately upon written notice to the other party or (ii) without Cause upon 30 days prior written notice to the other party. Pursuant to the Danforth Consulting Agreement, Danforth received cash compensation at a rate of $416 per hour for Mr. Lurier’s services.

As of January 2024, our new Interim Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Hoffman will provide services to the Company as an independent contractor pursuant to the Company’s existing Danforth Consulting Agreement. Pursuant to the Danforth Consulting Agreement, Danforth will receive cash compensation at a rate of $416 per hour for Mr. Hoffman’s services, which rate may be increased by up to 4% annually.

For purposes of the Danforth Consulting Agreement, “Cause” is a material breach of the terms of the Danforth Consulting Agreement which, if curable, is not cured within 10 days of written notice of such default, or the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or deliberate disregard of a rule or policy of the Company.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of December 31, 2023, as retrospectively adjusted for the Reverse Stock Splits.

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2023

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, our non-employee directors were paid the following compensation for service on the Board of Directors and committees according to the policies established for director compensation by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to non-employee directors for fiscal year ended December 31, 2023:

ITEM 12— SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2023.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2024, the number and percentage of the outstanding shares of common stock that, according to the information supplied to us, were beneficially owned by (i) each person who is currently a director or a director nominee, (ii) our Named Executive Officers, (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group and (iv) each person who, to our knowledge, is the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.