ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
A. |
Directors and senior management |
8 |
B. |
Advisers |
8 |
C. |
Auditors |
8 |
|
8 |
A. |
Offer statistics |
8 |
B. |
Method and expected timetable |
8 |
|
8 |
A. |
Selected financial data |
8 |
B. |
Capitalization and indebtedness |
8 |
C. |
Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds
|
8 |
D. |
Risk factors |
8 |
|
35 |
A. |
History and development of the company
|
35 |
B. |
Business Overview |
36 |
C. |
Organizational structure |
64 |
D. |
Property, plant and equipment |
64 |
|
64 |
|
64 |
|
79 |
A. |
Directors and senior management |
79 |
B. |
Compensation |
82 |
C. |
Board practices |
83 |
D. |
Employees |
91 |
E. |
Share ownership |
91 |
|
93 |
A. |
Major shareholders |
93 |
B. |
Related party transactions |
94 |
C. |
Interests of Experts and Counsel |
102 |
|
102 |
A. |
Consolidated statements and other financial information
|
102 |
B. |
Significant changes |
103 |
|
103 |
A. |
Offering and listing details |
103 |
B. |
Plan of distribution |
103 |
C. |
Markets |
103 |
D. |
Selling shareholders |
103 |
E. |
Dilution |
103 |
F. |
Expenses of the issue |
103 |
|
103 |
A. |
Share capital |
103 |
B. |
Memorandum of association and bye-laws
|
104 |
C. |
Material contracts |
104 |
D. |
Exchange controls |
104 |
E. |
Taxation |
104 |
F. |
Dividends and paying agents |
109 |
G |
Statement by experts |
109 |
H. |
Documents on display |
109 |
I. |
Subsidiary information |
109 |
|
109 |
|
109 |
A. |
Debt securities |
109 |
B. |
Warrants and rights |
109 |
C. |
Other securities |
109 |
D. |
American Depositary Shares |
109 |
|
110 |
|
110 |
A. |
Defaults |
110 |
B. |
Arrears and delinquencies |
110 |
|
110 |
|
110 |
A. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
110 |
B. |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
110 |
C. |
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
111 |
D. |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
111 |
|
111 |
|
111 |
|
111 |
|
112 |
|
112 |
|
112 |
|
112 |
|
112 |
|
113 |
|
114 |
|
114 |
|
114 |
|
114 |
|
F-1 |
INTRODUCTION AND USE
OF CERTAIN TERMS
We have prepared this Annual Report using a number of conventions, which you should consider when reading
the information contained herein. In this Annual Report, the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”
shall refer to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., or ZIM.
The following are definitions of certain terms that are commonly used in the shipping industry and in this
Annual Report.
“alliance” |
A type of a vessel sharing agreement that involves joint operations of fleets of vessels and sharing of
vessel space in multiple trades. |
|
|
“bareboat charter” |
A form of charter where the vessel owner supplies only the vessel, while the charterer is responsible for
crewing the vessel, obtaining insurance on the vessel, the auxiliary vessel equipment, supplies, maintenance and the operation and management
of the vessel, including all costs of operation. The charterer has possession and control of the vessel during a predetermined period
and pays the vessel owner charter hire during that time. |
|
|
“bill of lading” |
A document issued by or on behalf of a carrier as evidence of a contract carriage and is usually considered
as a document of title (transferable by endorsement) and as receipt by the carrier for the goods shipped and carried. The document contains
information relating to the nature and quantity of goods, their apparent condition, the shipper, the consignee, the ports of loading and
discharge, the name of the carrying vessel and terms and conditions of carriage. A house bill of lading is a document issued by a freight
forwarder or non-vessel operating common carrier that acknowledges receipt of goods that are to be shipped and is issued once the goods
have been received. |
|
|
“blank sailing” |
A scheduled sailing that has been cancelled by a carrier or shipping line resulting in a vessel skipping
certain ports or the entire route. |
|
|
“booking” |
Prior written request of a shipper (in a specific designated form) from the carrier setting forth the requested
details of the shipment of designated goods (i.e., a space reservation). |
|
|
“bulk cargo” |
Cargo that is transported unpackaged in large quantities, such as ores, coal, grain and liquids.
|
“BWM Convention” |
The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments.
|
|
|
“capacity” |
The maximum number of containers, as measured in TEUs, that could theoretically be loaded onto a container
ship, without taking into account operational constraints. With reference to a fleet, a carrier or the container shipping industry, capacity
is the total TEUs of all vessels in the fleet, the carrier or the industry, as applicable. |
|
|
“cargo manifest” |
A shipping document listing the contents of shipments per bills of lading including their main particulars,
usually used for customs, security, port and terminal purposes. |
|
|
“carrier” |
The legal entity engaged directly or through subcontractors in the carriage of goods for a profit.
|
|
|
“CERCLA” |
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act. |
|
|
“CGU” |
Cash generating unit. |
“charter” |
The leasing of a vessel for a certain purpose at a predetermined rate for a predetermined period of time
(where the hire is an agreed daily rate) or for a designated voyage (where the hire is agreed and based on volume/ quantity of goods).
|
|
|
“classification societies” |
Organizations that establish and administer standards for the design, construction and operational maintenance
of vessels. As a practical matter, vessels cannot operate unless they meet these standards. |
|
|
“conference” |
A grouping of container shipping companies which come together to set a common structure of rates and surcharges
for a specific trade route. |
|
|
“consignee” |
The entity or person named in the bill of lading as the entity or person to whom the carrier should deliver
the goods upon surrendering of the original bill of lading when duly endorsed. |
|
|
“container” |
A steel box of various size and particulars designed for shipment of goods. |
|
|
“containerized cargo” |
Cargo that is transported using standard intermodal containers as prescribed by the International Organization
for Standardization. Containerized cargo excludes cargo that is not transported in such containers, such as automobiles or bulk cargo.
|
|
|
“customs clearance” |
The process of clearing import goods and export goods through customs. |
|
|
“demurrage” |
The fee we charge an importer for each day the importer maintains possession of a container that is beyond
the scheduled or agreed date of return. |
|
|
“depot” |
Container yards located outside terminals for stacking of containers. |
|
|
“detention” |
A penalty charge which may be imposed by the carrier, the terminal or the warehouse to customers for exceeding
agreed times for returning (merchant’s haulage) or stuffing/stripping (carrier’s haulage) container(s). |
|
|
“dominant leg” |
The direction of shipping on a particular trade with the higher transport volumes. The opposite direction
of shipping is called the “counter-dominant” leg. |
|
|
“drydocking” |
An out-of-service period during which planned repairs and maintenance are carried out, including all underwater
maintenance such as external hull painting. During the drydocking, mandatory classification society inspections are carried out and relevant
certifications issued. |
|
|
“ECAs” |
Emission Control Areas as defined by Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention. |
|
|
“end-user” |
A customer who is a producer of the goods to be shipped or an exporter or importer of such goods, in each
case, with whom we have a direct contractual relationship. In contrast, with respect to an indirect customer, we only have a contractual
relationship with a freight forwarder who acts as agent for the producer of the goods to be shipped. |
|
|
“EPA” |
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, an agency of the U.S. federal government responsible for protecting
human health and the environment. |
|
|
“FCL” |
Full Container Load, which refers to cargo shipped in a complete container. |
|
|
“feeder” |
A small tonnage vessel that provides a linkage between ports and long hull vessels or main hub ports and
smaller facility ports, which may be inaccessible to larger vessels. |
“feeder service” |
A line of service that transfers cargo between a central hub port and regional ports for a transcontinental
ocean voyage. |
|
|
“freight forwarder” |
Non-vessel operating common carriers that assemble cargo from customers for forwarding through a shipping
company. |
|
|
“GDP” |
Gross domestic product. |
|
|
“global orderbook” |
The list of newbuilding orders as provided by Alphaliner. |
“hybrid charter” |
A form of charter where the charterer’s responsibility and involvement is more in line with that
of a “bareboat” charter, but the vessel owner retains possession of the vessels and other rights as defined in the charter
party agreement. |
|
|
“IMO” |
The International Maritime Organization, the United Nations specialized agency with responsibility for
the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of marine pollution by ships. |
|
|
“IMO 2020 Regulations” |
Global regulations imposed by the IMO, effective January 1, 2020, requiring all ships to burn fuel
with a maximum sulfur content of 0.5%, among other requirements. |
|
|
“ISM Code” |
International Safety Management Code, an international code for the safe management and operation of ships
and for pollution prevention issued by the IMO applicable to international route vessels and shipping companies (ship management companies,
bareboat charters and shipowners). |
|
|
“ISPS Code” |
International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, an international code for vessel and port facility
security issued by the IMO applicable to international route vessels. |
|
|
“JWC” |
The Joint War Committee. |
|
|
“Kyoto Protocol” |
The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. |
|
|
“LCL” |
Less than a Container Load, which refers to shipments that fill less than a full shipping container and
are grouped with other cargo. |
|
|
“liner” |
A vessel sailing between specified ports on a regular basis. |
|
|
“lines” |
A line refers to a route for shipping cargo between sea ports. |
|
|
“LNG” |
Liquified natural gas. LNG is used as a vessel fuel, and is considered to emit less sulfur oxide, carbon,
and other pollutants than existing conventional vessel fuels. |
|
|
“logistics” |
A comprehensive, system-wide view of the entire supply chain as a single process, from raw materials supply
through finished goods distribution. All functions that make up the supply chain are managed as a single entity, rather than managing
individual functions separately. |
|
|
“long-term lease” |
In relation to container leasing, a lease typically for a term which exceeds five years, during which
an agreed leasing rate is payable. |
|
|
“MARPOL Convention” |
The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. |
|
|
“MEPC” |
The Marine Environment Protection Committee of the IMO. |
“MTSA” |
The US Maritime Transport Security Act of 2002. |
|
|
“newbuilding” |
A vessel under construction or on order. |
|
|
“non-dominant leg”, or “counter-dominant leg” |
The direction of shipping on a particular trade with the lower transport volumes. The opposite direction
of shipping is called the “dominant” leg. |
|
|
“non-vessel operating common carrier” |
A carrier, usually a freight forwarder, which does not own or operate vessels and is engaged in the provision
of shipping services, normally issuing a house bill of lading. |
|
|
“off hire” |
A period within a chartering term during which no charter hire is being paid, in accordance with the charter
arrangement, due to the partial or full inability of vessels, owners or crew to comply with charterer instructions resulting in the limited
availability or unavailability of the vessel for the use of the charterer. |
“OSRA” |
The U.S. Federal Ocean Shipping Reform of Act 2022. This legislation increases the authority of the Federal
Maritime Commission (FMC) in regulating the maritime shipping industry, including with respect to detention and demurrage charges, and
by prohibiting common ocean carriers, marine terminal operators, or ocean transportation intermediaries from unreasonably refusing cargo
space when available. |
|
|
“own” |
With respect to our vessels or containers, vessels or containers to which we have title (whether or not
subject to a mortgage or other lien). |
|
|
“P&I” |
Protection and indemnity. |
|
|
“port state controls” |
The inspection of foreign ships in national ports to verify that the condition of the ship and its equipment
comply with the requirements of international regulations and that the ship is manned and operated in compliance with these rules.
|
|
|
“reefer” |
A temperature-controlled shipping container. |
|
|
“regional carrier” |
A carrier who generally focuses on a number of smaller routes within a geographical region or within a
major market, and usually offers direct services to a wider range of ports within a particular market. |
|
|
“scrapping” |
The process by which, at the end of its life, a vessel is sold to a shipbreaker who strips the ship and
sells the steel as “scrap.” |
|
|
“scrubbers” |
A type of exhaust gas cleaning equipment utilized by ships to control emissions. |
|
|
“service” |
A string of vessels which makes a fixed voyage and serves a particular market. |
|
|
“Shanghai (Export) Containerized Freight Index” |
Composite index published by the Shanghai Shipping Exchange that reflects the fluctuation of spot freight
rates in the export container transport market in Shanghai. The basis period of the composite index is October 16, 2009 and the basis
index is 1,000 points. |
|
|
“shipper” |
The entity or person named in the bill of lading to whom the carrier issues the bill of lading. |
|
|
“slot” |
The space required for one TEU on board a vessel. |
|
|
“slot capacity” |
The amount of container space on a vessel. |
|
|
“slot charter/hire agreement” |
An arrangement under which one container shipping company will charter container space on the vessel of
another container shipping company. |
|
|
“slow steaming” |
The practice of operating vessels at significantly less than their maximum speed. |
|
|
“SOLAS” |
The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974. |
“SSAS” |
Ship Security Alert Systems. |
|
|
“STCW” |
The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978,
as amended. |
|
|
“stevedore” |
A terminal operator or a stevedoring company who is responsible for the loading and discharging containers
on or from vessels and various other container related operating activities. |
“swap agreement” |
An exchange of slots between two carriers, with each carrier operating its own line, while also having
access to capacity on the other shipper’s line. |
|
|
“terminal” |
An assigned area in which containers are stored pending loading into a vessel or are stacked immediately
after discharge from the vessel pending delivery. |
|
|
“TEU” |
Twenty-foot equivalent unit, a standard unit of measurement of the volume of a container with a length
of 20 feet, height of eight feet and six inches and width of eight feet. |
|
|
“time charter” |
A form of charter where the vessel owner charters a vessel’s carry capacity to the charterer for
a particular period of time for a daily hire. During such period, the charterer has the use of vessel’s carrying capacity and may
direct her sailings. The charterer is responsible for fuel costs, port dues and towage costs. The vessel owner is only responsible for
manning the vessel and paying crew salaries and other fixed costs, such as maintenance, repairs, oils, insurance and depreciation.
|
|
|
“trade” |
Trade between an origin group of countries and a destination group of countries. |
|
|
“UNCITRAL” |
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. |
|
|
“U.S. Shipping Act” |
The U.S. Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the US Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, and the Ocean Shipping
Reform Act of 2022. |
|
|
“vessel sharing agreement” (VSA) |
An operational agreement between two or more carriers to operate their vessels on a service by swapping
slots on such service and whereby at least two carriers contribute vessels to the service. |
|
|
“2M Alliance” |
A container shipping alliance comprised of Copenhagen based Maersk Lines Ltd. (Maersk) and Geneva
based Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). In January 2023 MSC and Maersk released a joint statement announcing the termination of the
2M Alliance in January 2025. |
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL
AND OTHER INFORMATION
We report under International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board, or the IASB. None of the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States. We present our financial statements in U.S. dollars. We have made rounding adjustments to some of the figures included
in this Annual Report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures
that precede them.
Items included in our financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment
in which we operate, the U.S. dollar, or the Functional Currency. Our financial statements and other financial information included in
this Annual Report are presented in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. See Note 2(d) of our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements in this Annual Report that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, results
of operations, liquidity, plans and objectives. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “believe,”
“may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,”
“plan,” “expect,” “predict,” “potential,” or the negative of these terms or other similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, such matters as:
|
• |
our expectations regarding general market conditions, including as a result of global trends and geopolitical events and developments
such as, but not limited to, the Houthi attacks against vessels in the Red Sea, which have, among other consequences, resulted in companies
re-routing vessels, the war between Israel and Hamas and the armed conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, the political and military instability
in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, rising inflation and corresponding interest rates and the aftermath effects of the COVID-19
pandemic or other pandemics; |
|
• |
our expectations regarding trends related to the global container shipping industry, including with respect to fluctuations in vessel
and container supply, industry consolidation, demand for containerized shipping services, bunker and alternative fuel prices, charter
and freights rates, container values and other factors affecting supply and demand; |
|
• |
our plans regarding our business strategy, areas of possible expansion and expected capital spending or operating expenses;
|
|
• |
our ability to adequately respond to political, economic and military instability in Israel and the Middle East (particularly as
a result of the Israel-Hamas war and the Israel-Hezbollah armed conflict), and our ability to maintain business continuity as an Israeli-incorporated
company in times of emergency. |
|
• |
our ability to effectively handle cyber-security threats and recover from cyber-security incidents, including in connection with
the Israel-Hamas war and the Israel-Hezbolla armed conflict. |
|
• |
our anticipated ability to obtain additional financing in the future to fund expenditures. |
|
• |
our expectation of modifications with respect to our and other shipping companies’ operating fleet and lines, including the
utilization of larger vessels within certain trade zones and modifications made in light of environmental regulations; |
|
• |
the expected benefits of our cooperation agreements and strategic partnerships; |
|
• |
Formation of new alliances among global carriers, changes in and disintegration of existing alliances and collaborations, including
alliances and collaborations to which we are not a party to; |
|
• |
our anticipated insurance costs; |
|
• |
our beliefs regarding the availability of crew; |
|
• |
our expectations regarding our environmental and regulatory conditions, including with respect to the drought situation around the
Panama Canal, and including changes in laws and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, and the expected effect of such
regulations; |
|
• |
our beliefs regarding potential liability from current or future litigation; |
|
• |
our plans regarding hedging activities; |
|
• |
our ability to pay dividends in accordance with our dividend policy; and |
|
• |
our expectations regarding our competition and ability to compete effectively. |
The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all of our forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of future performance, taking into account the information
currently available to us. These statements are only estimates based upon our current expectations and projections about future events.
There are important factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially
from the results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular,
you should consider the risks provided under Item 3.D “Risk factors” in this Annual Report.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity,
performance and events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Each forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly
any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this Annual Report, to conform these statements to actual results or to
changes in our expectations.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT
AND ADVISERS
A. Directors and senior management
Not applicable.
B. Advisers
Not applicable.
C. Auditors
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
A. Offer statistics
Not applicable.
B. Method and expected timetable
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected financial data
[Reserved]
B. Capitalization
and indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons
for the offer and use of proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk
factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other
information in this annual report before making an investment in our ordinary shares. Our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the market price of our ordinary
shares could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. This annual report also contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors.
Summary of Risk Factors
The following is a summary of some of the principal risks we face. The list below is not exhaustive, and
investors should read this “Risk factors” section in full.
|
• |
The container shipping industry is dynamic and volatile and has been marked in recent years by instability and uncertainties
as a result of global geopolitical and economic conditions and the many factors that affect supply and demand in the shipping industry,
including the Yemeni Houthis’ attacks on ships in the Red Sea that forced many ocean carriers to reroute some of their vessels to
alternative, longer and more expensive routes, the political and military instability in the Middle East as a result of the Israel-Hamas
war and other armed conflicts in the region (such as between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria), the Russia-Ukraine war, US-China
tensions related to trade restrictions, regulatory developments, relocation of manufacturing, logistical bottlenecks in certain location
along the cargo carriage chain, the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or other pandemics, rising inflation and climbing interest
rates and fluctuations in demand for containerized shipping services which could significantly impact freight rates. |
|
• |
We are incorporated and based in Israel. Our results may be adversely affected by political, economic, and military instability in
Israel and the Middle East. The fact that we are incorporated in Israel might limit our ability to conduct and expand our business.
|
|
• |
The military conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas and other geopolitical instabilities may cause financial markets
to plummet, reduce global trade, increase bunker prices and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and liquidity. |
|
• |
We charter-in most of our fleet, which makes us more sensitive to fluctuations in the charter market, and as a result of our dependency
on the vessel charter market, our costs associated with chartering vessels are unpredictable and could be, in certain circumstances, high
even when the freight market is in a downward trend. |
|
• |
Future imbalance between supply of global container ship capacity and demand may limit our ability to operate our vessels profitably.
|
|
• |
Limited or unavailable access to ports, canal passages and means of land transportation (mostly rail and trucking), including due
to congestion. |
|
• |
Changing trading patterns, trade flows and sharpening trade imbalances, regulatory measures, variable operational costs, such as
container storage costs, terminal costs and land transportation costs, including due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase
our container repositioning costs. If our efforts to minimize our repositioning costs are unsuccessful, it could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. |
|
• |
Our ability to participate in operational partnerships in the shipping industry remains limited, which may adversely affect our business.
In addition, we face risks related to our strategic cooperation agreement with the 2M Alliance which, following the joint statement by
its members MSC and Maersk announcing the termination of the 2M alliance, will be terminated in January 2025, and can be unilaterally
terminated even earlier by any party to the agreement after an initial period of 18 months (subject to provision of a six month prior
written notice). |
|
• |
The container shipping industry is highly competitive, and competition may intensify even further. Certain of our large competitors
may be better positioned and have greater financial resources than us and may therefore be able to offer more attractive schedules, services
and rates, which could negatively affect our market position and financial performance. |
|
• |
We may be unable to retain existing customers or may be unable to attract new customers. |
|
• |
We face various cyber-security risks both as a shipping company and as an Israeli-based company, particularly in times of war and
military conflicts. |
|
• |
Volatile bunker prices, including as a result of environmental regulation (such as the European emission trade system scheme in effect
as of January 1, 2024, or the mandatory transfer to low sulfur oil bunker pursuant to the IMO 2020 Regulations), dependency on gas suppliers
for LNG operated vessels or other geopolitical and economic events, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. |
|
• |
We are subject to environmental regulations, and in addition, ESG regulation and reporting requirements have intensified and are
expected to continue to intensify in the future, including without limitation, with respect to the use of cleaner fuel and/or imposition
of vessel speed limits, which could increase our operational costs. |
|
• |
The container shipping industry has been subject to legislative initiatives and extensive scrutiny by regulators around the world
since the temporary spike in freight rates and related charges following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, although those
have normalized since the second half of 2022. In particular, the ministry of transportation in China approached several carriers, including
the Company, with a request for information with respect to the charging of customers practices, and filing of charges and changes in
charges with the relevant regulators. In the U.S., the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA) mandates a series of rulemaking projects
by the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) such as regarding the prohibition to unreasonably refuse to carry cargo, and requires carriers
to immediately implement certain requirements in detention and demurrage invoices, which may affect our ability to effectively collect
these fees from our customers, heighten the risk of civil litigation against us and adversely affect our financial results. If we are
found to be in violation of the applicable regulation, we could be subject to various sanctions, including monetary sanctions. |
Risks related to our business and our industry
We predominately operate in the container segment of the shipping
industry, and the container shipping industry is dynamic and volatile.
Our principal operations are in the container shipping market and we are significantly dependent on conditions
in this market, which are for the most part beyond our control. For example, our results in any given period are substantially impacted
by supply and demand in the container shipping market, which impacts freight rates, bunker prices, and the prices we pay under the charters
for our vessels. Unlike some of our competitors, we do not own any ports or similar ancillary assets (except for minority ownership rights
in a company operating a terminal in Tarragona, Spain, which is currently in the process of winding down). Due to our relative lack of
diversification, an adverse development in the container shipping industry would have a significant impact on our financial condition
and results of operations.
The container shipping industry is dynamic and volatile and has been marked in recent years by instability
and uncertainties as a result of global economic crises and the many conditions and factors that affect supply and demand in the shipping
industry, which include:
|
• |
global and regional economic and geopolitical trends, including armed conflicts (such as in the Middle East and between Russia and
Ukraine), terrorist activities, embargoes, strikes, inflation rates, climbing interest rates, trade wars and the short- and long-term
impacts of the COVID-19 or other pandemics on the global economy; |
|
• |
the global supply of and demand for commodities and industrial products globally and in certain key markets, such as China;
|
|
• |
developments or disturbances in international trade, including the imposition of tariffs, the modification of trade agreements between
states and other trade protectionism (for example, in the U.S.-China trade); |
|
• |
currency exchange rates; |
|
• |
prices of energy resources, including vessel fuels
and marine LNG; |
|
• |
environmental and other regulatory developments;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns;
|
|
• |
changes in the shipping industry, including mergers and acquisitions, bankruptcies, restructurings and alliances; |
|
• |
changes in the infrastructure and capabilities of
canals, ports and terminals; |
|
• |
outbreaks of diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
and |
|
• |
development of digital platforms to manage operations and customer relations, including billing and services. |
As a result of some of these factors, including cyclical fluctuations in demand and supply, container shipping
companies have experienced volatility in freight rates. For example, the comprehensive Shanghai (Export) Containerized Freight Index (SCFI)
increased from 818 points on April 23, 2020, with the global outbreak of COVID-19, to 5,047 as of December 31, 2021, but as of December
31, 2023, was 1,760. In 2022 and 2023, freight rates have significantly declined due to reduced demand as well as the easing of both COVID-19
restrictions and congestion in ports, and this trend may change again depending on future supply and demand curves, bottlenecks around
the world and other factors. Furthermore, rates within the charter market, through which we source most of our capacity, may fluctuate
significantly based upon changes in supply and demand for shipping services. The severe shortage of vessels available for hire during
2021 and the first half of 2022 has resulted in a significant increase of charter rates and longer charter periods dictated by owners,
however, since September 2022, charter hire rates have been normalizing, with vessel availability for hire still low. Charter hire rates
in 2023 have fallen to pre-COVID-19 levels on average, as additional capacity entered the market and increased pressure on charter rates.
See below “ – We charter-in most of our fleet, which makes us more sensitive to fluctuations in the charter market,
and as a result of our dependency on the vessel charter market, the costs associated with chartering vessels are unpredictable.”
As global trends continue to change, it remains difficult to predict their impact on the container shipping
industry and on our business. If we are unable to adequately predict and respond to market changes, they could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Global economic downturns and geopolitical challenges throughout
the world could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and operating results have been, and will continue to be, affected by worldwide and regional
economic and geopolitical challenges, including global economic downturns. In particular, the outbreak of the war between Israel and Hamas
in October 2023, which has led to military, political and economic instability in the Middle East, may affect our business operations
as an Israeli-based company. Additional armed conflicts between Israel and other terror groups such as Hezbollah have flared in other
countries in the Middle East. Specifically, since October 2023, the Iranian-linked Houthis in Yemen have been launching continuous attacks
against vessels sailing in the Red Sea crossing the Bab-El-Mandeb straits, causing cargo flow disruptions, and disrupting global shipping.
In response, we have taken temporary proactive measures by re-routing some of our vessels and restructuring our services on the Indian
subcontinent to East Mediterranean trade. An escalation of this situation may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. See also “– We are incorporated and based in Israel and, therefore, our results may
be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel. Specifically, the current war between Israel and Hamas
and the additional armed conflicts in the Middle East may adversely affect our business.”
Moreover, the war between Israel and Hamas, military conflicts in the Middle East and the war between Russia
and Ukraine may adversely affect the global supply chain and the maritime shipping industry. In response to the Houthis’ attacks
in the Red Sea, several of our competitors have also re-routed their services, leading to longer voyage schedules and higher costs of
operations. Further, these military conflicts have led and may continue to lead to a decline in the financial markets and to a rise in
energy prices. The continued conflicts impede the global flow of goods, and could result in product and food shortages, could harm economic
growth and could place more pressure on already rising inflation. Furthermore, freight movement and supply chains in the Red Sea, Ukraine
and neighboring countries have been, and may continue to be, significantly disrupted. Economic sanctions levied on Russia, Iran, Hamas
and its leaders and on Russian oil and oil products may cause further global economic downturns, including additional increases in bunker
costs. A further deterioration of the current conflicts or other geopolitical instabilities may cause global markets to plummet, affect
global trade, increase bunker prices and may have a material adverse effect on our business a financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity.
Currently, global demand for container shipping is highly volatile across regions and remains subject to
downside risks stemming mainly from factors such as reduction in consumption, the geopolitical situation, increase of interest rates,
possible long term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, severe hits to the GDP growth of both advanced and developing countries, fiscal fragility
in advanced economies, high sovereign debt levels, highly accommodative macroeconomic policies and persistent difficulties accessing credit.
According to a report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as of January 2024, global growth is expected
to decrease to 3.1% in 2024 compared to 3.2% in 2023. Global inflation is expected to be 5.8% in 2024 and 4.4% in 2025. Geopolitical trends
and economic downturns may decrease global growth and increase inflation more than currently expected. The recent deterioration in the
global economy has caused, and may continue to cause, volatility or a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods shipped in containerized
form. In particular, if growth in the regions in which we conduct significant operations, including the United States, Asia and the Black
Sea, Europe and Mediterranean regions, slows for a prolonged period and/or there is significant additional deterioration in the global
economy, such conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
If these or other global conditions continue to deteriorate during 2024, global growth may take another
downturn and demand in the shipping industry may decrease. Geopolitical challenges such as rising inflation in the U.S. as well as in
other dominant countries, enhanced and other political crises and military conflicts and further escalation in the Middle East, between
the U.S. and Russia, trade wars, weather and natural disasters, embargoes and canal closures could also have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, as a result of weak economic conditions, some of our customers and suppliers have experienced
deterioration of their businesses, cash flow shortages and/or difficulty in obtaining financing due to, amongst other causes, an increase
in interest rates. As a result, our existing or potential customers and suppliers may delay or cancel plans to purchase our services or
may be unable to fulfill their obligations to us in a timely fashion.
A decrease in the level of China’s export of goods could have
a material adverse effect on our business.
According to the world shipping council (WSC), the Asia trade regions represent approximately 70% of the
total TEUs of international container trade, and the Intra-Asia trade alone accounts for at least one quarter of the global market. Although
we also operate in many other countries in Asia, a significant portion of our business originates from China and therefore depends on
the level of imports and exports to and from China. Trade tensions between the US and China have intensified in recent years, and
trade restrictions have reduced bilateral trade between the US and China and led to shifts in trade structure and reductions in container
trade. For more information on the risks related to US/China trade restrictions, see “– Our business may be adversely affected
by trade protectionism in the markets that we serve, particularly in China.” Furthermore, as China exports considerably more goods
than it imports, any reduction in or hindrance to China-based exports, whether due to decreased demand from the rest of the world, an
economic slowdown in China, seasonal decrease in manufacturing levels due to the Chinese New Year holiday, factory shutdowns due
to COVID-19 pandemic or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business. For instance, in recent years the Chinese
government has implemented economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods and national security measures
for Hong Kong which may have the effect of reducing the supply of goods available for export and may, in turn, result in decreased demand
for cargo shipping. In recent years, China has experienced an increasing level of economic autonomy and a gradual shift toward a
“market economy” and enterprise reform. However, many of the reforms implemented, particularly some price limit reforms, are
unprecedented or experimental and may be subject to revision, change or abolition. The level of imports to and exports from China could
be adversely affected by changes to these economic reforms by the Chinese government, as well as by changes in political, economic and
social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese government. Changes in laws and regulations, including with regard to tax
matters, and their implementation by local authorities could affect our vessels calling on Chinese ports and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Imbalance between supply of global container ship capacity and demand
may limit our ability to operate our vessels profitably.
According to Alphaliner, as of December 31, 2023, global container ship capacity was approximately 28 million
TEUs, spread across approximately 6,000 vessels. Furthermore, global container ship capacity is expected to increase by 9.9% in 2024,
with a vessel order book of 7.1 million TEU, while demand for shipping services is projected to increase only by 2.2%, therefore the increase
in vessel capacity is expected to be much higher than the increase in demand for container shipping.
We endeavor to adapt our vessel fleet capacity to the supply and demand trends. For example, in an attempt
to meet the sharp demand increase during 2021, we have expanded our operated vessel fleet from 87 vessels as of January 1, 2021, to 150
vessels as of December 31, 2022 (including eight purchased secondhand), as well as entered into strategic long term charter transactions.
See “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Our vessel fleet – Strategic Chartering Agreements.” As of December
31, 2023, we operated 144 vessels. Responses to changes in market conditions may be slower as a result of the time required to build new
vessels and adapt to market needs and due to shortage of vessels in the charter market, or, on the opposite, to terminate charter agreements
earlier than expected. As shipping companies purchase vessels years in advance of their actual use to address expected demand, vessels
may be delivered during times of decreased demand (or oversupply if other carriers act in kind) or unavailable during times of increased
demand, leading to a supply/demand mismatch. The container shipping industry may face oversupply in the coming years and numerous other
factors beyond our control may also contribute to increased capacity, including deliveries of new, refurbished or converted vessels, as
a response to, amongst other factors, port and canal congestion, any change in the practice of slow steaming, a reduction in the number
of void voyages and a decrease in the number of vessels that are out of service (e.g., vessels that are laid-up, drydocked, or are otherwise
not available for hire), as well as decreased scrapping levels of older vessels. In the event of overcapacity, there is no guarantee that
measures of blank sailings and redelivery of chartered vessels will prove successful, partially or at all in mitigating the gap between
excess supply and demand. Excess capacity generally depresses freight rates and can lead to lower utilization of vessels, which may adversely
affect our revenues and costs of operations, profitability and asset values. Overcapacity can cause the industry to experience downward
pressure on freight rates and such prolonged pressure could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity.
Access to ports and canals could be limited or unavailable, including
due to geopolitical events, weather and climate conditions, congestion in terminals and inland supply chains, and we may incur additional
costs as a result thereof.
Global development of new terminals continues to be outpaced by the increase in demand. In addition, the
increasing vessel size of containership newbuilding has forced adjustments to be made to existing container terminals. As such, existing
terminals are coping with high berth utilization and space limitations of stacking yards, which are at near-full capacity. This results
in longer cargo operations times for the vessels and port congestion, which could increase operational costs and have a material adverse
effect on affected shipping lines. Decisions about container terminal expansion and port access are made by national or local governments
and are outside of our control. Such decisions are based on local policies, priorities and concerns and the interests of the container
shipping industry may not be considered.
Our access to ports may also be limited or unavailable due to other reasons. As industry capacity and demand
for container shipping continue to grow, we may have difficulty in securing sufficient berthing windows to expand our operations in accordance
with our growth strategy, due to the limited availability of terminal facilities. This is especially the case for express or expedited
services that we operate, as such services depend on our ability to secure favorable berthing windows that facilitate smooth flow of the
carried cargo along the supply chain. In addition to ports, our access to canal transit may be restricted, whether because of the worsening
drought conditions in the Panama Canal or the Yemeni Houthis’ continued attacks on vessels in the Red Sea headed to the Suez Canal.
If canal transit remains restricted or inaccessible altogether, we will be required to limit the number of vessels in the canals or re-route
our vessels altogether, which is expected to increase our operating expenses and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Our status as an Israeli company has limited, and may continue to limit, our ability to call on certain
ports. For example, in December 2023, the Malaysian government announced its decision to prohibit us from docking at any Malaysian port
in response to the Israel-Hamas war. Furthermore, major ports may close for long periods of time due to maintenance, natural disasters,
strikes, pandemics, including COVID-19, or other reasons beyond our control. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruptions
to global trade and severe congestion at ports and inland supply chains. Ports and terminals may implement certain measures such as dwell
fees or similar charges applied against containers that remain in the terminal longer than the specified amount of days, as well as work
procedures intended to relieve congestion which may also limit our access to terminals and apply additional costs to us or to our customers.
Although we have taken measures to relieve congestion and to avoid additional costs as a result of dwell fees and similar charges, these
and other measures may be imposed in additional ports and terminals in other geographical areas, and we may not be able to recover or
mitigate the additional costs by applying similar charges on our customers. Although port, terminal and inland supply chain congestion
generally eased since the second half of 2022 and throughout 2023, other recent macroeconomic and geopolitical events may place pressure
on terminals to increase their services rates, thereby increasing our operational costs. We cannot ensure that our efforts to secure sufficient
port access will be successful. Any of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Changing trading patterns, trade flows and sharpening trade imbalances
may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our TEUs carried can vary depending on the balance of trade flows between different world regions. For
each service we operate, we measure the utilization of a vessel on the “strong,” or dominant, leg, as well as on the “weak,”
or counter-dominant, leg by dividing the actual number of TEUs carried on a vessel by the vessel’s effective capacity. Utilization
per voyage is generally higher when transporting cargo from net export regions to net import regions (the dominant leg). Considerable
expenses may result when empty containers must be transported on the counter-dominant leg. We seek to manage the container repositioning
costs that arise from the imbalance between the volume of cargo carried in each direction by utilizing our global network to increase
cargo on the counter-dominant leg and by triangulating our land transportation activities and services. If we are unable to successfully
match demand for container capacity with available capacity in nearby locations, we may incur significant balancing costs to reposition
our containers in other areas where there is demand for capacity. It is not guaranteed that we will always be successful in minimizing
the costs resulting from the counter-dominant leg trade, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Furthermore, sharpening imbalances in world trade patterns — rising trade deficits of net import
regions in relation to net export regions — may exacerbate imbalances between the dominant and counter-dominant legs of our
services. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to participate in operational partnerships in the shipping
industry is limited, which may adversely affect our business, and we or the 2M Alliance, which has announced its termination in January
2025, can unilaterally terminate the agreement earlier than January 2025 by providing a six-month prior written notice.
The container shipping industry has experienced a reduction in the number of major carriers, and until
recently, a continuation and increase of the trends of strategic alliances and partnerships among container carriers, which can result
in more efficient and better coverage for shipping companies participating in such arrangements. For example, in 2016 CSCL was acquired
by COSCO, APL-NOL was acquired by CMA CGM, United Arab Shipping Company merged with Hapag-Lloyd and Hanjin Shipping exited the market
as a result of a bankruptcy, during 2017, Hamburg Sud was acquired by Maersk, three large Japanese carriers, K-Line, MOL and NYK merged
into ONE and OOCL was acquired by COSCO, and in April 2020, Hyundai Merchant Marine (HMM) consummated the termination of its strategic
cooperation with 2M and joined THE Alliance. Past consolidation in the industry has affected the existing strategic alliances between
shipping companies. For example, the Ocean Three alliance, which consisted of CMA CGM Shipping, United Arab Shipping Company and China
Shipping Container Lines, was terminated in 2019 and replaced by the Ocean Alliance, consisting of COSCO Shipping Group (including China
Shipping and OOCL), CMA CGM Shipping Group (including APL) and Evergreen Marine. In January 2023, the 2M Alliance members, MSC and Maersk,
announced that the 2M Alliance will be terminated in January 2025, and in January 2024 Maersk and Hapag Lloyd announced they would establish
the new Gemini Alliance beginning in February 2025, resulting in Hapag Lloyd leaving the THE Alliance.
We are currently not party to any strategic alliances and therefore have not been able to achieve the benefits
associated with being a member of such an alliance. If, in the future, we would like to enter into a strategic alliance but are unable
to do so, we may be unable to achieve the cost and other synergies that can result from such alliances. However, we are party to operational
partnerships with other carriers in some of the trade zones in which we operate, including a strategic operational agreement with the
2M Alliance (expected to terminate in January 2025) on the Asia-US East Coast and Asia-US Gulf Coast trades. See “Item 4.B –
Business Overview – Our operational partnerships.” We may seek to enter into additional operational partnerships or similar
arrangements with other shipping companies or local operators, partners or agents. The unilateral termination of our existing operational
agreements, including with the 2M Alliance, or any future cooperation agreement we may enter into, could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
These strategic cooperation agreements and other arrangements, if we choose to enter into them with other
carriers, could also reduce our flexibility in decision making in the covered trade zones, and we are subject to the risk that the expected
benefits of the agreements may not materialize. Furthermore, in other trade zones in which other alliances operate, we are still unable
to benefit from the economies of scale that many of our competitors are able to achieve through participation in strategic arrangements
(i.e., strategic alliances or operational agreements). Our status as an Israeli company has limited, and may continue to limit, our ability
to call on certain ports and has therefore limited, and may continue to limit, our ability to enter into alliances or operational partnerships
with certain shipping companies. In addition, our existing collaboration with the 2M Alliance may limit our ability to enter into alliances
or other certain operational agreements. If we are not successful in expanding or entering into additional operational partnerships which
are beneficial to us, this could adversely affect our business.
Our business may be adversely affected by trade protectionism in
the markets that we serve, particularly in China.
Our operations are exposed to the risk of increased trade protectionism. Governments may use trade barriers
in an effort to protect their domestic industries against foreign imports, thereby further depressing demand for container shipping services.
In recent years, increased trade protectionism in the markets that we access and serve, particularly in China, where a significant
portion of our business originates, has caused, and may continue to cause, increases in the cost of goods exported and the risks associated
with exporting goods as well as a decrease in the quantity of goods shipped. In November 2020 China and additional 15 countries in
the Asia-Pacific region entered into the largest free trade pact, the RCEP Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), which is expected
to strengthen China’s position on trade protectionism related matters. China’s import and export of goods may continue to
be affected by trade protectionism, specifically the ongoing U.S.-China trade dispute, which has been characterized by escalating trade
barriers between the U.S. and China as well as trade relations among other countries. These risks may have a direct impact on demand in
the container shipping industry. In January 2020 China and the U.S. reached an agreement aimed at easing the trade war. However, tensions
between China and the U.S. continue, and there is no assurance that further escalation will be avoided.
The U.S. administration has advocated greater restrictions on trade generally and significant increases
on tariffs on certain goods imported into the United States, particularly from China and has taken steps toward restricting trade in certain
goods. China and other countries have retaliated in response to new trade policies, treaties and tariffs implemented by the United States.
China has imposed significant tariffs on U.S. imports since 2018. Such trade escalations have had, and may continue to have, an adverse
effect on manufacturing levels, trade levels and specifically, may cause an increase in the cost of goods exported from Asia Pacific and
the risks associated with exporting goods from the region. Such increases may also affect the quantity of goods to be shipped, shipping
time schedules, voyage costs and other associated costs. Further, increased tensions may adversely affect oil demand, which would have
an adverse effect on shipping rates. They could also result in an increased number of vessels sailing from China with less than their
full capacity being met. These restrictions may encourage local production over foreign trade which may, in turn, affect the demand for
maritime shipping. In addition, there is uncertainty regarding further trade agreements such as with the EU, trade barriers or restrictions
on trade in the United States. Any increased trade barriers or restrictions on trade may affect the global demand for our services and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The global COVID-19 pandemic has created significant
business disruptions and affected our business, and future outbreaks of new COVID-19 strains or other pandemics may continue to create
significant business disruptions and affect our business in the future.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of novel coronavirus COVID-19
a global pandemic. During the three years following the outbreak, COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally and caused high mortality and
morbidity rates world-wide, with some geographic regions affected more than others. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the
global economy, disrupted global supply chains, created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets and increased unemployment
levels in some of its phases. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in temporary closures of many businesses and the institution of social
distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities, as well as lockdowns and restrictions on travel.
Although we are considered an essential business and therefore enjoyed certain exemptions from the restrictions
under Israeli regulations, we have voluntary reduced our maximum permitted percentage of staffing in our offices in order to mitigate
the COVID-19 risks and have therefore relied more on remote connectivity. Similarly, our sea crews and staff located in offices worldwide
have been adversely affected as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 vaccination campaigns were launched in many countries worldwide,
including Israel. During 2022, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic gradually subsided worldwide. However, an outbreak of a new COVID-19
strain or a new pandemic may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in reduced industrial activity in various countries around the world,
with temporary closures of factories and other facilities such as port terminals, which led to a temporary decrease in supply of goods
and congestion in warehouses and terminals. For example, in January 2020, the government of China imposed a lockdown during the Chinese
New Year holiday which prevented many workers from returning to the manufacturing facilities, resulting in prolonged reduction of manufacturing
and export. Government-mandated shutdowns in various countries have also temporarily decreased consumption of goods, negatively affecting
trade volumes and the shipping industry globally during the first half of 2020. In China, many of the COVID-19 restrictions and factory
lockdowns persisted until December 2022. If new strains of COVID-19 or new pandemics erupt, we may face risks to our personnel and operations.
Such risks include delays in the loading and discharging of cargo on or from our vessels due to severe congestion at ports and inland
supply chains, difficulties in carrying out crew changes, off hire time due to quarantine regulations, delays and expenses in finding
substitute crew members if any of our vessels’ crew members become infected, delays in drydocking if insufficient shipyard personnel
are working due to quarantines or travel restrictions, difficulties in procuring new containers due to temporary factories’ shutdowns
and increased risk of cyber-security threats due to our employees working remotely. Fear of the virus and the efforts to prevent its spread
may increase pressure on the supply-demand balance, which could also put financial pressure on our customers and increase the credit risk
that we face in respect of some of them. Such events have affected our operations and may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic could have the effect of
heightening many of the other risk factors disclosed in this Annual Report.
The container shipping industry is highly competitive and competition
may intensify even further, which could negatively affect our market position and financial performance.
We compete with a large number of global, regional and niche container shipping companies, including, for
example, Mediterranean Shipping Company (“MSC”), A.P. Moller-Maersk Group (“Maersk”), COSCO Shipping, CMA CGM
S.A., Hapag-Lloyd AG, ONE and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation to provide transport services to customers worldwide. In each of
our key trades, we compete primarily with global container shipping companies. The cargo shipping industry is highly competitive, with
the top three carriers in terms of global capacity — MSC, Maersk and CMA CGM — accounting for approximately 46.7% of global
capacity, and the remaining carriers together contributing less than 53.3% of global capacity as of December 2023, according to Alphaliner.
Certain of our large competitors may be better positioned and have greater financial resources than us and may therefore be able to offer
more attractive schedules, services and rates. Some of these competitors operate larger fleets with larger vessels and with higher vessel
ownership levels than us and may be able to gain market share by supplying their services at aggressively lower freight rates for a sustained
period of time. In addition, mergers and acquisition activities within the container shipping industry in recent years have further concentrated
global capacity with certain of our competitors. See “– Our ability to participate in operational partnerships in the shipping
industry is limited, which may adversely affect our business, and we or the 2M Alliance, which recently announced its termination in January
2025, can unilaterally terminate the agreement earlier than January 2025 by providing a six month prior written notice.” If one
or more of our competitors expands its market share through an acquisition or secures a better position in an attractive niche market
in which we operate or intend to enter, we could lose market share as a result of increased competition, which in turn could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be unable to retain existing customers or may be unable to
attract new customers.
Our continued success requires us to maintain our current customers and develop new relationships. We cannot
guarantee that our customers will continue to use our services in the future or at the current level. We may be unable to maintain or
expand our relationships with existing customers or to obtain new customers on a profitable basis due to competitive dynamics, especially
in periods of market downturn. In addition, as some of our customer contracts are longer-term in nature (up to one year), if market freight
rates increase, we may not be able to adjust the contractually agreed rates to capitalize on such increased freight rates until the existing
contracts expire, while if freight rates decline below the agreed contract terms we may face pressure from our customers to adjust the
contract rates to the prevailing market rates. Upon the expiration of our existing contracts, we cannot assure you that our customers
will renew the contracts on favorable terms, or if at all, or that we will be able to attract new customers. Any adverse effect would
be exacerbated if we lose one or more of our significant customers. In 2023, our 10 largest customers represented approximately 13% of
our freight revenues and our 50 largest customers represented approximately 28% of our freight revenues. Although we believe we currently
have a diversified customer base, we may become dependent upon a few key customers in the future, especially in particular trades, such
that we would generate a significant portion of our revenue from a relatively small number of customers. Any inability to retain or replace
our existing customers may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Technological developments which affect global trade flows and supply
chains are challenging some of our largest customers and may therefore affect our business and results of operations.
By reducing the cost of labor through automation and digitization, including by means of new technologies
in artificial intelligence and machine learning, among others, and empowering consumers to demand goods whenever and wherever they choose,
technology is changing the business models and production of goods in many industries, including those of some of our largest customers.
Consequently, supply chains are being pulled closer to the end-customer and are required to be more responsive to changing demand patterns.
As a result, fewer intermediate and raw inputs are traded, which could lead to a decrease in shipping activity. If automation and digitization
become more commercially viable and/or production becomes more regional or local, total containerized trade volumes would decrease, which
would adversely affect demand for our services. Supply chain disruptions caused by geopolitical and economic events, pandemics, rising
tariff barriers and environmental concerns also accelerate these trends.
We rely on third-party contractors and suppliers, as well as our
partners and agents, to provide various products and services and unsatisfactory or faulty performance of our contractors, suppliers,
partners or agents could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We engage third-party contractors, partners and agents to provide services in connection with our business.
An important example is our chartering-in of vessels from ship owners, whereby the ship owner is obligated to provide the vessel’s
crew, insurance and maintenance along with the vessel. Another example is our carriers partners whom we rely on for their vessels and
service to deliver cargo to our customers, as well as third party agencies who serve as our local agents in specific locations. Disruptions
caused by third-party contractors, partners and agents could materially and adversely affect our operations and reputation.
Additionally, a work stoppage at any one of our suppliers, including our land transportation suppliers,
could materially and adversely affect our operations if an alternative source of supply were not readily available. Also, we outsource
part of our back-office functions to a third-party contractor. The back-office support center may shut down due to various reasons beyond
our control, which could have an adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that the products delivered and services rendered
by our third-party contractors and suppliers will be satisfactory and match the required quality levels. Furthermore, major contractors
or suppliers may experience financial or other difficulties, such as natural disasters, terror attacks, failure of information technology
systems or labor stoppages, which could affect their ability to perform their contractual obligations to us, either on time or at all.
Any delay or failure of our contractors or suppliers to perform their contractual obligations to us could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
A shortage of qualified sea and shoreside personnel could have an
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Our success depends, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified
personnel, particularly seamen and coast workers who deal directly with activities related to vessel operation and sailing. In crewing
our vessels, we require professional and technically skilled employees with specialized training who can perform physically demanding
work on board our vessels. As the worldwide container ship fleet continues to grow, the demand for skilled personnel has been increasing,
which has led to a shortfall of such personnel. An inability to attract and retain qualified personnel as needed could materially impair
our ability to operate, or increase our costs of operations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and liquidity. Furthermore, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the shipping industry as a whole experienced difficulties in carrying
out crew changes and may experience this again in the event of future pandemic outbreaks, which could impede our ability to employ qualified
personnel.
Risks related to operating our vessel fleet
We charter-in most of our fleet, which makes us more sensitive to
fluctuations in the charter market, and as a result of our dependency on the vessel charter market, the costs associated with chartering
vessels are unpredictable.
We charter-in most of our fleet. As of December 31, 2023, of the 144 vessels through which we provide transport
services globally, 135 are chartered (accounted as right-of-use assets under the accounting guidance of IFRS 16), which represents a percentage
of chartered vessels that is significantly higher than the industry average of 44% (according to Alphaliner). Any rise in charter hire
rates could adversely affect our results of operations.
While there have been fluctuations in the demand in the container shipping market, during 2021 and the
first half of 2022, charter demand was very high for all vessel sizes, leading to an imbalance in supply and demand and a shortage of
vessels available for hire, increased charter rates and longer charter periods dictated by owners, and we took steps to increase our vessel
capacity in response. See “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Our vessel fleet.” Since September 2022, charter hire
rates have been normalizing with vessel availability for hire still low (compared to pre-COVID-19 levels).
We are a party to a number of other long-term charter agreements and may enter into additional long-term
agreements based on our assessment of current and future market conditions and trends. As of December 31, 2023, 74.8% of our chartered-in
vessels (or 81.9% in terms of TEU capacity) have a remaining charter period that exceeds one year, and we may be unable to take full advantage
of short-term reductions in charter hire rates with respect to such longer-term charters. In addition, in the future we may substitute
a short-term charter of one year or less with a long-term charter exceeding one year, which could cause our costs to increase quickly
compared to competitors with longer-term charters or owned vessels. To the extent we replace vessels that are chartered-in under short-term
leases with vessels that are chartered-in under long-term leases or that are owned by us, the principal amount of our long-term contractual
obligations would increase. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such long-term leases will be favorable to us in the long
run.
We may face difficulties in chartering or owning enough vessels
in the future, including large vessels, to support our growth strategy due to the possible shortage of vessel supply in the market.
Charter rates for container and car carrier vessels are volatile. If we are unable in the future to charter
vessels of the type and size needed to serve our customers efficiently on terms that are favorable to us, if at all, this may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Furthermore, container shipping companies
have been incorporating, and are expected to continue to incorporate, larger, more economical vessels into their operating fleets. The
cost per TEU transported on large vessels is less than the cost per TEU for smaller vessels as, among other factors, larger vessels provide
increased capacity and fuel efficiency per carried TEU (assuming full vessel utilization). As a result, carriers are encouraged to deploy
large vessels, particularly within the more competitive trades. According to Alphaliner, vessels in excess of 12,500 TEUs represented
approximately 67.5% of the current global orderbook based on TEU capacity as of December 31, 2023, and approximately 38% of the global
fleet based on TEU capacity will consist of vessels in excess of 12,500 TEUs by December 31, 2024. Furthermore, a significant introduction
of large vessels, including very large vessels in excess of 18,000 TEUs, into any trade, will enable the transfer of existing, large vessels
to other shipping lines on which smaller vessels typically operate. Such transfer, which is referred to as “fleet cascading,”
may in turn generate similar effects in the smaller trades in which we operate. Other than our strategic agreement with Seaspan Corporation
for the long-term charter of ten 15,000 TEU LNG dual-fuel container vessels (see “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Our
vessel fleet - Strategic Chartering Agreements”), we do not currently have additional agreements in place to procure or charter-in
large container vessels (in excess of 12,500 TEU), and the continued deployment of larger vessels by our competitors will adversely impact
our competitiveness if we are not able to charter-in, acquire or obtain financing for such vessels on attractive terms or at all. This
risk is further exacerbated as a result of our difficulties faced in participating in certain alliances and thereby accessing larger vessels
for deployment. Even if we are able to acquire or charter-in larger vessels, we cannot assure you we will be able to achieve utilization
of our vessels necessary to operate such vessels profitably.
Rising energy and bunker prices (including LNG) may have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Fuel and energy expenses, in particular bunker expenses, represent a significant portion of our operating
expenses, accounting for 28.3%, 30.1% and 18.9% of our operating expenses and cost of services for the years ended December 31, 2023,
2022 and 2021, respectively. Bunker price moves in close interdependence with crude oil prices, which have historically exhibited significant
volatility. Crude oil prices are influenced by a host of economic and geopolitical factors that are beyond our control, particularly economic
developments in emerging markets such as China and India, the US-China trade war, the Russian-Ukraine conflict, the military conflicts
in the Middle East and sanctions enacted on seaborne imports of Russian crude oil and petroleum product, concerns related to the
global recession and financial turmoil, rising inflation, interest rates fluctuations, policies of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) and other oil producing countries and production cuts, sanctions on Iran by the US, consumption levels of other transportation
industries such as the aviation, rail and car industries, and ongoing political tensions and acts of terror in key production countries
such as Libya, Nigeria and Venezuela. Crude oil prices have decreased to an annual average of $83 per barrel in 2023, compared to $100
per barrel in 2022. Any further deterioration of geopolitical and economic factors may lead to an increase in bunker prices.
In accordance with our ESG strategy and strategic long-term charter agreements (See “Item 4.B –
Business Overview – Our vessel fleet – Strategic Chartering Agreements”), we long-term chartered 28 LNG dual fuel container
vessels, of which 15 were already delivered to us and the remaining 13 are expected to be delivered to us during the remainder of 2024.
In August 2022 we have announced the signing of a ten-year marine LNG sale and purchase agreement with Shell NA LNG, LLC, or Shell, to
supply LNG to our operated ten 15,000 TEU LNG vessels chartered from Seaspan, to be deployed on ZIM’s Container Service Pacific
(ZCP) on the Asia-USEC trade. In accordance with the agreement, Shell agreed to sell and deliver, and we agreed to purchase and accept,
LNG in quantities, quality, specifications, and prices as specified in the agreement. The agreement is for a period of ten years from
the date of the first bunkering operation executed by the parties. This agreement may be terminated with immediate effect by either party
in the event of a material breach by the other party that has not been cured within 30 days of written notice thereof. In March 2023 we
announced the successful LNG bunkering of the first LNG dual fuel vessel delivered to us, ZIM Sammy Ofer, in Kingston Freeport Terminal,
Jamaica. This sale and purchase agreement is estimated by us to be valued at more than one billion U.S dollars for its ten-year
term. If this agreement is terminated (due to a breach of either party), we may not be able to supply our 15,000 TEU long termed chartered
vessels with enough of LNG fuel required for their operation, and we will need to shift back to crude oil-based fuels, or alternatively,
we may be required to buy LNG at the then market terms, which could be on worse terms for us compared to the terms of our agreement with
Shell. Furthermore, in January 2024, U.S. President’s Biden’s administration announced a temporary pause on the approval process
for new U.S. LNG export facilities in order to consider potential climate change consequences, and this could impact the availability
of global LNG supply. Our operations may be significantly affected by the supply and demand conditions of the LNG global trade market,
and we may need to rely on other LNG suppliers to supply LNG for our other LNG container vessels.
The IMO 2020 Regulations which entered into effect on January 1, 2020, require all ships to burn fuel with
a maximum sulfur content of 0.5%, which is a significant reduction from the previous threshold of 3.5%. In addition, certain countries
around the world require ships to burn fuel with a maximum sulfur content of 0.1% upon entry to territorial waters. The IMO 2020 Regulation
led to increased demand for low sulfur fuel and higher prices compared to the price we would have paid had the IMO 2020 Regulations not
been adopted. Most of the vessels chartered by us do not have “scrubbers”, which means we are required to purchase low sulfur
fuel for our vessels. Our vessels began operating on 0.5% low sulfur fuel during the fourth quarter of 2019, and as a result, we implemented
a New Bunker Factor, or NBF, surcharge, in December 2019, intended to offset the additional costs associated with compliance with the
IMO 2020 Regulations. However, there is no assurance that this surcharge will enable us to mitigate the possible increased costs in full
or at all.
The European Union’s Emissions Trading System, or ETS, which entered into effect on January 1, 2024,
sets a limit on the total amount of greenhouse gases that we as a shipping company are permitted to emit on route to or from European
Union members’ ports. Such cap is expressed in emission allowances, where one allowance gives the right to emit one ton of carbon
dioxide equivalent. Each year, we will be required to surrender enough allowances to fully account for our emissions, otherwise we will
be subject to heavy fines. The ETS Regulations require us to purchase and surrender allowances equal to a percentage of our emissions
that gradually increases over time, from 40% of reported emissions in 2024 to 100% of reported emissions in 2026. We anticipate we will
be required to purchase allowances from the EU carbon market on an ongoing basis, which will increase our operating costs. We have implemented
a New Emission Factor, or NEF, surcharge, intended to shift the additional costs associated with compliance with the ETS Regulations to
our customers, however there is no assurance that this surcharge will enable us to mitigate the possible increase costs in full or at
all. The IMO 2020 Regulations, the ETS and any future air emissions regulations with which we must comply may cause us to incur substantial
additional operating costs.
A rise in bunker prices (including LNG) could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and liquidity. Historically and in line with industry practice, we have imposed from time to time surcharges
such as the NBF and NEF over the base freight rate we charge to customers in part to minimize our exposure to certain market-related risks,
including bunker price adjustments. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in passing on future price increases
to customers in a timely manner, either for the full amount or at all.
Our bunker consumption is affected by various factors, including the number of vessels being deployed,
vessel capacity, pro forma speed, vessel efficiency, the weight of the cargo being transported, port efficiency and sea conditions. We
have implemented various optimization strategies designed to reduce bunker consumption, including operating vessels in “super slow
steaming” mode, trim optimization, hull and propeller polishing and sailing rout optimization. Additionally, we may sometimes manage
part of our exposure to bunker price fluctuations by entering into hedging arrangements with reputable counterparties. Our optimization
strategies and hedging activities may not be successful in mitigating higher bunker costs, and any price protection provided by hedging
may be limited due to market conditions, such as choice of hedging instruments, and the fact that only a portion of our exposure is hedged.
There can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements, if taken, will be cost-effective, will provide sufficient protection, if any,
against rises in bunker prices or that our counterparties will be able to perform under our hedging arrangements.
As vessel owners we may incur additional costs and liabilities for
the operation of our vessel fleet.
Although we charter most of our fleet, we currently own and operate fourteen vessels, eight of which were
purchased during 2021 in several separate transactions in addition to one vessel already previously owned, and five of which were purchased
in February 2024 after previously being chartered to us. We may purchase additional vessels, depending on market terms and conditions
and on our operational needs. As a vessel owner we may incur additional costs due to maintenance and regulatory requirements, most of
them described in this Item 3.D and elsewhere of this Annual Report. In addition, as vessel owners we may be exposed to higher risks due
to our responsibility to the crew and operational condition of the vessel. We intend to mitigate these vessel owner liability risks by
acquiring adequate insurance policy, however our insurance policy may not cover all or part of our costs. See also below “
– Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our operations”.
There are numerous risks related to the operation of any sailing
vessel and our inability to successfully respond to such risks could have a material adverse effect on us.
There are numerous risks related to the operation of any sailing vessel, including dangers associated with
potential marine disasters, mechanical failures, collisions, lost or damaged cargo, poor weather conditions (including severe weather
events resulting from climate change), the content of the load, exceptional load (including dangerous and hazardous cargo or cargo the
transport of which could affect our reputation), meeting deadlines, risks of documentation, maintenance and the quality of fuel, terrorist
attacks and piracy. For example, we incurred expenses of $21.5 million in respect of claims and demands for lost and damaged cargo, vessels
and war risks for the year ended December 31, 2023. Such claims are typically insured and our deductibles, both individually and in the
aggregate, are typically immaterial. In addition, in the past, our vessels have been involved in collisions resulting in loss of life
and property as well as weather related events which damaged our cargo. For example, in October 2021, ZIM Kingston, one of our chartered
vessels, experienced a collapse and loss of containers due to bad weather which also resulted in a fire erupting onboard while approaching
the port of Vancouver. Both vessel and cargo suffered damages, however no personal injuries were involved.
The occurrence of any of the aforementioned risks could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity and we may not be adequately insured against any of these risks. For more information
about our insurance coverage, see the risk factor entitled “ – Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may
occur to our property or result from our operations.” For example, acts of piracy have historically affected oceangoing vessels
trading in several regions around the world. Although both the frequency and success of attacks have diminished recently, potential acts
of piracy, and more recently also acts of terrorism, continue to be a risk to the international container shipping industry that requires
vigilance. Additionally, our vessels may be subject to attempts by smugglers to hide drugs and other contraband onboard. If our vessels
are found with contraband, whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims
or penalties as well as suffer damage to our reputation, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur
to our property or result from our operations.
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, fire, contact with floating
objects, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities
and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of a marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental
mishaps. There are also liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. We procure insurance for our fleet
in relation to risks commonly insured against by operators and vessel owners, which we believe is adequate. Our current insurance includes
(i) hull and machinery insurance covering damage to our and third-party vessels’ hulls and machinery from, among other things and
collisions (ii) war risks insurance covering losses associated with the outbreak or escalation of hostilities and (iii) protection and
indemnity insurance, entered with reputable protection and indemnity, or P&I, clubs covering, among other things, third-party and
crew liabilities such as expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew members, passengers and other third parties, lost or damaged
cargo, third-party claims in excess of a vessel’s insured value arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party
property including fixed and floating objects, in excess of a vessel’s insured value and pollution arising from oil or other substances.
While all of our insurers and P&I clubs are highly reputable, we can give no assurance that we are
adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim, especially with respect to war risks, the insurance
cost for which has risen sharply recently as a result of the military tension and escalation in the Middle East. Even if our insurance
coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to obtain a timely replacement vessel or other equipment in the event of
a loss. Under the terms of our financing agreements, insurance proceeds are pledged or assigned in favor of the creditor who financed
the respective vessel. In addition, there are restrictions on the use of insurance proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance
policies. We may also be subject to supplementary calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the
claim records of all other members of the P&I clubs through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage. There is no cap on our
liability exposure for such calls or premiums payable to our P&I clubs, even though unexpected additional premiums are usually at
reasonable levels as they are distributed among a large number of ship owners. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations
and exclusions which, although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs. While we do not
operate any tanker vessels, a catastrophic oil spill or a marine disaster could, under extreme circumstances, exceed our insurance coverage,
which might have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, the insurance
may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain actions, such as vessels failing to maintain required certification. Further, we
do not carry loss of hire insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as
those that occur during an unscheduled drydocking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Any loss of a vessel or any extended period
of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers or receivers of cargo, vessel owners
and lenders and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages, including,
in some jurisdictions, for debts incurred by previous owners. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lienholder may enforce its lien by vessel
arrest proceedings. Unless such claims are settled, vessels may be subject to foreclosure under the relevant jurisdiction’s maritime
court regulations. In some jurisdictions, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel
that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled
by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating
to another of our vessels. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our business or require us to pay or
deposit large sums to have the arrest lifted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Governments, including that of Israel, could requisition our vessels
during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of earnings.
A government of the jurisdiction where one or more of our vessels are registered, as well as a government
of the jurisdiction where the beneficial owner of the vessel is registered, could requisition for title or seize our vessels. Requisition
for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes its owner. A government could also requisition our vessels for
hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a ship and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter
rates. Requisitions generally occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other
circumstances. We would expect to be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels; however, the
amount and timing of payment, if any, would be uncertain and beyond our control. For example, our chartered-in and owned vessels, including
those that do not sail under the Israeli flag, may be subject to control by Israeli authorities in order to protect the security of, or
bring essential supplies and services to, the State of Israel. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to regulation
The shipping industry is subject to extensive government regulation
and standards, international treaties and trade prohibitions and sanctions.
The shipping industry is subject to extensive regulation that changes from time to time and that applies
in the jurisdictions in which shipping companies are incorporated, the jurisdictions in which vessels are registered (flag states), the
jurisdictions governing the ports at which vessels call, as well as regulations by virtue of international treaties and membership in
international associations. As a global container shipping company, we are subject to a wide variety of international, national and local
laws, regulations and agreements. As a result, we are subject to extensive government regulation and standards, customs inspections and
security checks, international treaties and trade prohibitions and sanctions, including laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions
in which we operate, including those of the State of Israel, the United States, the International Safety Management Code, or the ISM Code,
and the European Union. Such extensive regulation could also become more and more restrictive or less permissive from time to time, such
as, for example, the OSRA enactment and the non-renewal of maritime block exemptions for operational agreements between carriers. For
additional information, see below – “We are subject to competition and antitrust regulations in the countries where we operate,
have been subject to antitrust investigations by competition authorities in the past and may be subject to antitrust investigations in
the future. Moreover, we rely on applicable competition exemptions for operational agreement with other carriers, and the revocation of
these exemptions could negatively affect our business and ability to conduct our business.”
Any violation or alleged violation of such laws, regulations, treaties and/or prohibitions could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity and may also result in the revocation
or non-renewal of our “time-limited” licenses. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control, or OFAC, administers certain laws and regulations that impose restrictions upon U.S. companies and persons and, in some
contexts, foreign entities and persons, with respect to activities or transactions with certain countries, governments, entities and individuals
that are the subject of such sanctions laws and regulations. Similar sanctions are imposed by the European Union and the United Nations.
Under economic and trading sanction laws, governments may seek to impose modifications to business practices, and modifications to compliance
programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions. For additional information,
see “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Regulatory Matters.”
We are subject to competition and antitrust regulations in the countries
where we operate, have been subject to antitrust investigations by competition authorities in the past and may be subject to antitrust
investigations in the future. Moreover, we rely on applicable competition exemptions for operational agreement with other carriers, and
the revocation of these exemptions could negatively affect our business and ability to conduct our business.
In recent years, a number of liner shipping companies, including us, have been the subject of antitrust
investigations in the U.S., the EU and other jurisdictions into possible anti-competitive behavior. Although we have taken measures to
fully comply with antitrust regulatory requirements and have adopted a comprehensive antitrust compliance plan, which includes, among
other, mandatory periodic employee trainings, we face investigations from time to time, and, if we are found to be in violation of the
applicable regulation, we could be subject to criminal, civil and monetary sanctions, as well as related legal proceedings.
We are subject to competition and antitrust regulations in each of the countries where we operate. In some
of the jurisdictions in which we operate, operational partnerships among shipping companies are generally exempt from the application
of antitrust laws, subject to the fulfillment of certain exemption requirements. We are a party to numerous operational partnerships and
view these agreements as competitive advantages in response to the market concentration in the industry as a result of mergers and global
alliances. An amendment to or a revocation of any of the exemptions for operational partnerships that we rely on could negatively affect
our business and results of operations. Specifically, Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009, or the Consortia Block Exemption Regulation,
or CBER, exempts certain cooperation agreements in the liner shipping sector (such as operational cooperation agreements), from the prohibition
on anti-competitive agreements contained at Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, or TFEU. In October 2023,
the EU competition authority, or the DG Competition, announced its intention not to renew the CBER following its expected expiry in April
2024. A similar decision was made by the United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) not to enact a UK block exemption
that would replace the CBER following Brexit. Although we currently do not believe this will have a material impact on our operations
as currently conducted, the non-renewal of the block exemption regulation in the EU and UK is expected to increase legal costs and legal
uncertainty and delay the implementation of operational cooperation agreements between carriers, thus potentially limiting our ability
to enter into cooperation arrangements with other carriers. In addition, the non-renewal of the existing CBER raises concerns of a “domino
effect” for the non-renewal or the shortening the effective period of similar block exemption regulations in other jurisdictions
(similarly to the UK). Any of the above could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The spike in freight rates and related charges during 2021 and the first half of 2022 has resulted in increased
scrutiny and enforcement actions by governments and regulators around the world, including the U.S. President Biden's administration and
the FMC, as well as the ministry of transportation in China. In the U.S., the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA) signed into law
in June 2022 mandates a series of rulemaking projects by the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) and in February 2023 the FMC published
a final rule that prohibits the collection of detention and demurrage from U.S. truckers and consignees on import, which may affect our
ability to effectively collect these fees from our customers, heighten the risk of civil litigation against us and adversely affect our
financial results. If we are found to be in violation of the applicable regulation, we could be subject to various sanctions, including
monetary sanctions.
We are also subject from time to time to civil litigation relating, directly or indirectly, to alleged
anti-competitive practices and may be subject to additional investigations by other competition authorities. Particularly, in September
2022, an FMC complaint was filed against us claiming we overcharged detention and demurrage fees in violation of the FMC’s interpretive
Rule on Detention and Demurrage of May 18, 2020, and is currently in trial proceedings on the FMC panel. These types of claims, actions
or investigations could continue to require significant management time and attention and could result in significant expenses as well
as unfavorable outcomes which could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity. For further information, see “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Legal Proceedings” and Note 27
to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
We could be adversely affected by violations
of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws outside of the United States.
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions
generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons around the
world for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement
activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the Department of Justice and the SEC,
increased enforcement activity by non-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals.
Our anti-bribery and anti-corruption compliance plan mandates compliance with these anti-bribery laws, establishes anti-bribery and anti-corruption
policies and procedures, imposes mandatory training on our employees and enhances reporting and investigation procedures. We operate in
many parts of the world that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control
policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or third party intermediaries. In the
event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws,
including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which
can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or
civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to
avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly
engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls
and new security regulations could increase costs and disrupt our business.
International container shipments are subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures
in countries of origin, destination, and certain transshipment points. These inspection procedures can result in cargo seizures, delays
in the loading, offloading, transshipment, or delivery of containers, and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against
us as well as damage our reputation. Changes to existing inspection and security procedures, including as a result of political or public
pressure, could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us or our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment
of certain types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the International Ship and
Port Facility Security Code, or the ISPS Code. The ISPS Code requires vessels to develop and maintain a ship security plan that provides
security measures to address potential threats to the security of ships or port facilities. Although each of our vessels is ISPS Code-certified,
any failure to comply with the ISPS Code or maintain such certifications may subject us to increased liability and may result in denial
of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Furthermore, compliance with the ISPS Code requires us to incur certain costs. Although
such costs have not been material to date, if new or more stringent regulations relating to the ISPS Code are adopted by the International
Maritime Organization (the IMO) and the flag states, these requirements could require significant additional capital expenditures by us
or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
We are subject to environmental regulations and failure to comply
with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) regulation
and reporting is expected to intensify in the future, which could increase our operational costs.
Our operations are subject to international conventions and treaties, national, state and local laws and
national and international regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered relating to the protection
of the environment. Such requirements are subject to ongoing developments and amendments and relate to, among other things, the storage,
handling, emission, transportation and discharge of hazardous and non-hazardous substances, such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides and
the use of low- sulfur fuel or shore power voltage, and the remediation of contamination and liability for damages to natural resources.
We are subject to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (or, MARPOL Convention, including designation
of Emission Control Areas thereunder), the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water & Sediments,
the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances
by Sea of 1996, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the
U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA), and National Invasive Species Act (NISA), among others. Compliance with such laws, regulations and standards,
where applicable, may require the installation of costly equipment, make ship modifications or operational changes and may affect the
useful lives or the resale value of our vessels.
If we fail to comply with any environmental requirements applicable to us, we could be exposed to, among
other things, significant environmental liability damages, administrative and civil penalties, criminal charges or sanctions, and could
result in the termination or suspension of, and substantial harm to, our operations and reputation. Specifically, in September 2022 we
were approached by a state regulator who indicated that we did not meet the local environmental regulation and provided an initial informal
assessment as to our scope of liability, subject to our possible counter arguments. We are currently reviewing these claims and are in
discussions with this state regulator. Additionally, environmental laws often impose strict, joint and several liability for remediation
of spills and releases of oil and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability without regard to whether we were negligent
or at fault. Under local, national and foreign laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities,
including remediation costs and natural resource damages, as well as third-party damages, personal injury and property damage claims in
the event there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous substances from our vessels, or otherwise, in connection with our operations.
We are required to satisfy insurance and financial responsibility requirements for potential petroleum (including marine fuel) spills
and other pollution incidents. Although we have arranged insurance to cover certain environmental risks, there can be no assurance that
such insurance will be sufficient to cover all such risks or that any claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental requirements can result in substantial
penalties, fines and other sanctions, including in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels and events of this nature could
have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, we are subject to limits imposed by IMO regulations on the maximum sulfur content of our fuel.
See- “Rising energy and bunker prices (including LNG) may have an adverse effect on our result of operations."
We may also incur additional compliance costs relating to existing or future ESG requirements, which have
recently intensified and are expected to intensify in the future, and which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial conditions. Such costs include, among other things: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and use of “cleaner”
fuels (including LNG), imposition of vessel speed limits, changes with respect to cargo capacity or the types of cargo that could be carried;
management of ballast and bilge waters; maintenance and inspection; elimination of tin-based paint; development and implementation of
emergency procedures and disclosure of information relating to ESG matters, including climate change. For example, on November 1, 2022,
new amendments to the MARPOL Annex IV entered into effect and introduced new energy efficiency and CO2 emissions requirements relating
to Existing Ship Energy Index (EEXI) and Operational Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) for both new and existing vessels. Compliance with
the new regulation involves additional costs and the implementation of optimization strategies such as slow steaming, which may increase
our vessels’ voyage transit times. Environmental or other incidents may result in additional regulatory initiatives, statutes or
changes to existing laws that could affect our operations, require us to incur additional compliance expenses, lead to decreased availability
of or more costly insurance coverage, and result in our denial of access to, or detention in, certain jurisdictional waters or ports.
Also, on March 6, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a rule requiring registrants to disclose certain information regarding
climate-related risk scheduled to phase in starting in 2025. For further information on the environmental regulations we are subject to
and ESG (sustainability), see “Item 4.B – Business Overview – Regulatory matters – Environmental
and other regulations in the shipping industry.”
Regulations relating to ballast water discharge may adversely affect
our results of operation and financial condition.
The IMO has imposed updated guidelines for ballast water management systems specifying the maximum amount
of viable organisms allowed to be discharged from a vessel’s ballast water. Depending on the date of the international oil pollution
prevention, or IOPP, renewal survey, existing vessels constructed before September 8, 2017, must comply with the updated D-2 standard
on or after September 8, 2019, but no later than September 9, 2024. For most vessels, compliance with the D-2 standard will
involve installing on-board systems to treat ballast water and eliminate unwanted organisms (ballast water management systems). All vessels
constructed on or after September 8, 2017, are required to comply with the D-2 standards. To date, all of our owned vessels are installed
with on-board ballast systems, however any additional requirements may subject us to additional costs of compliance and adversely affect
our results of operation and financial condition.
We are also subject to U.S. regulations with respect to ballast water discharge. Although the 2013 Vessel
General Permit (VGP) program and The National Invasive Species Act (NISA) are currently in effect to regulate ballast discharge, exchange
and installation, the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (VIDA), which was signed into law on December 4, 2018, requires that the EPA
develop national standards of performance for approximately 30 discharges, similar to those found in the VGP, by December 2020. EPA
published a notice of proposed rulemaking - Vessel Incidental Discharge National Standards of Performance for public comment on October
26, 2020. The comment period closed on November 25, 2020. A supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking was issued on October 18, 2023.
The comment period for this proposal closed on December 18, 2023. VIDA requires the U.S. Coast Guard to develop corresponding implementation,
compliance and enforcement regulations regarding ballast water within two years of the EPA’s publication of proposed rulemaking.
All provisions of the 2013 VGP will remain in force and effect until the USCG regulations under VIDA are finalized. Furthermore, we are
also subject, and may be subject in the future, to local or state ballast regulation. For example, on January 1, 2022, new ballast water
management requirements entered into effect in California. State enacted requirements may include more stringent standards than the proposed
requirements and standards set forth by the EPA and U.S. Coast Guard. New federal and state regulations could require the installation,
or further improvement of already installed ballast management systems, or place new requirements and standards which may cause us to
incur substantial costs.
Climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions may
adversely affect our operating results.
Many governmental bodies have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, international, treaties, national,
state and local laws, regulations and frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions due to the concern about climate change. These measures
in various jurisdictions include the adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards, and incentives or
mandates for renewable energy. In November 2016, the Paris Agreement, which resulted in commitments by 197 countries to reduce their
greenhouse gas emissions with firm target reduction goals, came into force and could result in additional regulation on shipping. The
IMO has been developing a comprehensive strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships. In addition, several non-governmental
organizations and institutional investors have undertaken campaigns with respect to climate change, with goals to minimize or eliminate
greenhouse gas emissions through a transition to a low- or zero-net carbon economy.
Further, on January 1, 2024, a new emissions trading system entered into effect by the European Union,
setting a cap on the total amount of greenhouse gases we are permitted to emit when sailing to or from EU ports. See – “Regulatory
Matters – European Union requirements.”
Compliance with laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change, including as a result of
such international negotiations, as well as the efforts by non-governmental organizations and investors, could increase our costs related
to operating and maintaining our vessels and require us to install new emission controls, acquire allowances or pay taxes related to our
greenhouse gas emissions, or administer and manage a greenhouse gas emissions program. Revenue generation and strategic growth opportunities
may also be adversely affected.
Compliance with safety and other requirements imposed by classification
societies may be very costly and may adversely affect our business.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society. The classification
society certifies that the vessel has been built, maintained and repaired, when necessary, in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations of the classification society. Moreover, every vessel must comply with all applicable international conventions and the regulations
of the vessel’s flag state as verified by a classification society as well as the regulations of the beneficial owner’s country
of registration. Finally, each vessel must successfully undergo periodic surveys, including annual, intermediate and special surveys,
which may result in recommendations or requirements to undertake certain repairs or upgrades. Currently, all our vessels have the required
certifications. However, maintaining class certification could require us to incur significant costs. If any of our owned and certain
of our chartered-in vessels does not maintain its class certification, it might lose its insurance coverage and be unable to trade, and
we will be in breach of relevant covenants under our financing arrangements, in relation to both failing to maintain the class certification
as well as having effective insurance. Failure to maintain the class certification of one or more of our vessels could have, under extreme
circumstances, a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Changes in tax laws, tax treaties as well as judgments and estimates
used in the determination of tax-related asset (liability) and income (expense) amounts, could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in various jurisdictions and may be subject to the tax regimes and related obligations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate or do business. Changes in tax laws, bilateral double tax treaties, regulations and interpretations
could adversely affect our financial results. The tax rules of the various jurisdictions in which we operate or conduct business often
are complex, involve bilateral double tax treaties and are subject to varying interpretations. Specifically, on December 20, 2022, the
OECD published an implementation package for Pillar Two model rules. The Pillar Two rules were introduced to ensure that large multinational
enterprises (MNEs) pay a minimum level of tax on the income arising in each jurisdiction where they operate. While Pillar Two model rules
are not intended to be applied to international shipping income, other sources of our income may be affected as a result of Pillar Two
entering into effect. Pillar Two legislation has been enacted or substantively enacted in certain jurisdictions in which ZIM operates,
and the legislation will be effective for ZIM and ZIM’s subsidiaries, or the ZIM Group, for the financial year beginning January
1, 2024. Following our assessment, the Pillar Two effective tax rates in most of the jurisdictions in which the ZIM Group (or the Group)
operates are above 15%. While we do not expect any potential exposure to Pillar Two taxes, we may be subject to additional and/or higher
tax payments as a result of this regulation, whether due to any amendment or due to the absence of applicable safe harbor exemptions to
the ZIM Group.
Tax authorities may challenge tax positions that we take or historically have taken, may assess taxes where
we have not made tax filings, or may audit the tax filings we have made and assess additional taxes. Such assessments, either individually
or in the aggregate, could be substantial and could involve the imposition of penalties and interest. For such assessments, from time
to time, we use external advisors. In addition, governments could impose new taxes on us or increase the rates at which we are taxed in
the future. The payment of substantial additional taxes, penalties or interest resulting from tax assessments, or the imposition of any
new taxes, could materially and adversely impact our results, financial condition and liquidity. Additionally, our provision for income
taxes and reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities require significant judgments and the use of estimates. Amounts of tax-related
assets and liabilities involve judgments and estimates of the timing and probability of recognition of income, deductions and tax credits.
Actual income taxes could vary significantly from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of, among other things, changes in tax laws,
regulations and interpretations, our financial condition and results of operations, as well as the resolution of any audit issues raised
by taxing authorities.
Risks related to our financial position and results
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations,
our liquidity will suffer and we may be unable to satisfy our obligations and operational needs.
Our ability to generate cash flow from operations to cover our operational costs and to make payments in
respect of our obligations, financial liabilities (mainly lease liabilities) and operational needs will depend on our future performance,
which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors. We cannot control many of these factors, including general
economic conditions and the health of the shipping industry. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy
our obligations, liabilities and operational needs, we may need to borrow funds or undertake alternative financing plans, or to reduce
or delay capital investments and other costs. It may be difficult for us to incur additional debt on commercially reasonable terms due
to, among other things, our financial position and results of operations and market conditions. Specifically, we have incurred and will
continue to incur substantial debt as part of our strategy to renew and improve our fleet by long-term chartering 46 newbuild vessels,
including 28 TEU LNG fueled vessels. Although as of December 31, 2023, our cash position was strong with liquidity of $2.7 billion, our
potential inability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or obtain additional funds or alternative financing on acceptable
terms could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Volatile market conditions could negatively affect our business,
financial position, or results of operations and could thereby result in impairment charges.
As of the end of each of our reporting periods, we examine whether there have been any events or changes
in circumstances, such as a deterioration of general economic or market conditions, which may indicate an impairment. When there are indications
of an impairment, an examination is made as to whether the carrying amount of the operating assets or cash generating units, or CGUs,
exceeds their respective recoverable amount and, if necessary, an impairment loss is recognized in our financial statements.
We recognized an impairment loss of approximately $2.1 billion in the third quarter of 2023. For each of
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we did not recognize any impairment loss in our financial statements (as of December 31, 2022
and 2021, we concluded there were no indications for impairment). With respect to the impairment analysis carried out during the year
ended December 31, 2023, see Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We cannot
assure that we will not recognize additional impairment losses in future years. If an impairment loss is recognized, our results of operations
will be negatively affected. Should freight rates decline significantly or we or the shipping industry experience adverse conditions,
this may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, which may result in us recording
an impairment charge.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations and controls could have a material
adverse effect on our earnings and the strength of our balance sheet.
Since we generate revenues in a number of geographic regions across the globe, we are exposed to operations
and transactions in other currencies. A material portion of our expenses are denominated in local currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Most of our revenues and a significant portion of our expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar, creating a partial natural hedge. To
the extent other currencies increase in value relative to the U.S. dollar, our margins may be adversely affected. Foreign exchange rates
may also impact trade between countries as fluctuations in currencies may impact the value of goods as between two trading countries.
Where possible, we endeavor to match our foreign currency revenues and costs to achieve a natural hedge against foreign exchange and transaction
risks, although there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective in the management of these risks. Consequently, short-term
or long-term exchange rate movements or controls may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity. In addition, foreign exchange controls in countries in which we operate may limit our ability to repatriate funds from
foreign affiliates or otherwise convert local currencies into U.S. dollars.
Our operating results may be subject to seasonal fluctuations.
The markets in which we operate have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result,
freight rates have also historically exhibited seasonal variations. This seasonality can have an adverse effect on our business and results
of operations. As global trends that affect the shipping industry have changed rapidly in recent years, it remains difficult to predict
these trends and the extent to which seasonality will be a factor affecting our results of operations in the future. See “Item 5
- Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Factors affecting comparability of financial position and results of operations
– Seasonality.”
Risks related to our operations in Israel
We are incorporated and based in Israel and, therefore, our results
may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel. Specifically, the current war between Israel and
Hamas and the additional armed conflicts in the Middle East may adversely affect our business.
We are incorporated and our headquarters are located in Israel and the majority of our key employees, officers
and directors are residents of Israel. Additionally, the terms of the Special State Share require us to maintain our headquarters and
to be incorporated in Israel, and to have our chairman, chief executive officer and a majority of our board members be Israeli. As an
Israeli company, we have relatively high exposure, compared to many of our competitors, to war, acts of terror, hostile activities including
cyber-attacks, security limitations imposed upon Israeli organizations overseas, possible isolation by various organizations and institutions
for political reasons and other limitations (such as restrictions against entering certain ports). Political, economic and military conditions
in Israel may directly affect our business, our service routes and port of calls and existing relationships with certain foreign corporations,
as well as affect the willingness of potential partners to enter into business arrangements with us.
Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of an event associated with the
security situation in the Middle East, and we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance if events escalate further. The Israeli government
currently provides compensation only for physical property damage caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, based on the difference
between the asset value before the attack and immediately after the attack or on any cost of repairing the damage, whichever is lower.
Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, due to the Israel-Hamas war, a special
war risk insurance premium was levied on our chartered vessels calling Israel’s territorial water and ports. We have applied a war
surcharge on our customers in an attempt to offset the cost associated with the payment of this war risk insurance premium, however, there
is no assurance that this surcharge will enable us to mitigate the possible increased costs in full or at all.
Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between
Israel, its neighboring countries and terror organizations which are today considered to be backed by Iran. On October 7, 2023, Hamas
terrorists launched a surprise attack and invaded southern Israel from Gaza under the cover of a barrage of missiles launched into southern
Israel, targeting the Israeli civilian population and local military forces. In response to this assault, Israel declared war on Hamas
and the Israeli Defense Force (“IDF”) invaded the Gaza strip.
In response to the Israel-Hamas war, other terror organizations such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis
in Yemen, both backed by Iran, have launched missile attacks against Israel as part of what they have referred to as “axis of resistance”.
Further, in Yemen, the Houthis have attacked vessels in the Red Sea suspected by them to be either linked to Israel or to call Israeli
ports. The escalation of hostilities between Israel and neighboring and regional terror organizations such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and
Hamas in the Gaza Strip follow years of terrorist activity and acts of violence perpetrated against Israel from the Northern border, Gaza,
West Bank and East Jerusalem. Political uprisings, social unrest and violence in the Middle East and North Africa, including Israel’s
neighbors Egypt and Syria, have affected and continue to affect the political stability of those countries and the Middle East as a whole.
This instability, especially the recent conflicts, has raised concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for further
escalated armed conflicts. In addition, in February 2024, the rating agency Moody’s cut Israel’s credit rating following the
war with Hamas and has lowered Israel’s outlook from stable to negative, which increases the risk of increased interest rates, currency
fluctuations, inflation, securities market volatility and uncertainty as to the scope of future investments in Israel.
In addition, Israel faces an explicit threat from Iran and more distant neighbors. Iran is also believed
to have a strong influence among parties hostile to Israel in areas that neighbor Israel, such as the Syrian government, Hamas in the
Gaza Strip, Hezbollah in Lebanon, pro-Iranian groups in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen, and is cultivating a strategy dedicated to annihilating
the State of Israel through proxy militia groups across the Middle East. The escalation of the war and armed conflicts or hostilities
in Israel or neighboring countries or a direct military war between Israel and Iran could increase the disruptions in our operations,
including significant employee absences, failure of our information technology systems and cyber-attacks, which may lead to the shutdown
of our headquarters in Israel for an unknown period of time. Although we maintain an emergency plan, such events can have material effects
on our operational activities. Any future deterioration in the security or geopolitical conditions in Israel or the Middle East could
adversely impact our business relationships and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. If our facilities, including our headquarters, become temporarily or permanently disabled by an act of terrorism
or war, it may be necessary for us to develop alternative infrastructure and we may not be able to avoid service interruptions. Additionally,
our owned and chartered-in vessels, including those vessels that do not sail under the Israeli flag, may be subject to control by the
authorities of the State of Israel in order to protect the security of, or bring essential supplies and services to, the State of Israel.
Israeli legislation also allows the State of Israel to use our vessels in times of emergency. Any of the aforementioned factors may negatively
affect us and our results of operations.
Moreover, following the terror attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, protests in support of Palestinians
and against Israel have erupted in the Middle East and western counties, including the U.S. The increased negative public opinion against
Israel across the world may cause countries, corporations and organizations to limit their business activities with Israeli-linked businesses
or deter them from expanding existing engagements. Our status as an Israeli company may limit our ability to cross the Suez Canal given
the threat of Houthi attacks, call certain ports and enter into alliances or operational partnerships with certain shipping companies,
which has historically adversely affected our operations and our ability to compete effectively within certain trades.
The Israel-Hamas war follows a period of internal civil controversy and protest in Israel over a judicial
reform proposal introduced by the Israeli government in January 2023. The judicial reform has sparked a significant backlash both inside
and outside of Israel, led to civil protest and raised economic concerns, and was challenged by an appeal made to the Israeli supreme
court. In January 2024, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the portion of the judicial reform previously legislated by the Israeli parliament,
the Knesset, in an attempt to limit judicial review of government actions, is stricken down as unconstitutional. Any attempt to relaunch
the judicial reform may reignite the internal civil protest and economic concerns.
Further, our operations could be disrupted by the obligations of personnel to perform military service.
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 860 employees based in Israel, certain of whom are currently called upon for military
service duty due to the war for an unlimited period, and more may be called in the future if the war continues or in other emergency circumstances.
Further, some of our employees are called upon to perform several weeks of annual military reserve duty until they reach the age qualifying
them for an exemption (generally 40 for men who are not officers or do not have specified military professions, although recently the
Israeli government published a possible plan to extend military reserve service duty to the age of 46). Our operations could be disrupted
by the absence of a significant number of employees related to military service, which could materially adversely affect our business
and operations.
Our risks associated with our Israeli affiliation may enhance and further increase other risk factors detailed
in this Annual Report.
Provisions of Israeli law and our articles of association may delay,
prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable
to us and our shareholders.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified
thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other
matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. For example, a tender offer for all of a company’s issued and outstanding
shares can only be completed if shares constituting less than 5% of the issued share capital are not tendered. Completion of a full tender
offer also requires acceptance by a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in the tender offer, unless less than
2% of the company’s outstanding shares are not tendered. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance
of the tender offer (unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisal
rights), may, at any time within six months following the completion of the full tender offer, petition an Israeli court to alter
the consideration for the shares. In addition, special tender offer requirements may also apply upon a purchaser becoming a holder of
25% or more of the voting rights in a company (if there is no other shareholder of the company holding 25% or more of the voting rights
in the company) or upon a purchaser becoming a holder of more than 45% of the voting rights in the company (if there is no other shareholder
of the company who holds more than 45% of the voting rights in the company).
Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders
whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax
law does not generally recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers involving an exchange
of shares, Israeli tax law may allow for tax deferral under certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment
of a number of conditions, including, in some cases, a holding period of two years from the date of the transaction during which
sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are subject to certain restrictions. Moreover, with respect to certain
share swap transactions in which the sellers receive shares in the acquiring entity that are publicly traded on a stock exchange, the
tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable even if no disposition of such shares has occurred.
In order to benefit from the tax deferral, a pre-ruling from the Israel Tax Authority might be required.
It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against
us, our officers and directors or the Israeli experts named in this Annual Report in Israel or the United States, to assert U.S. securities
laws claims in Israel or to serve process on our officers and directors and these experts.
We are incorporated in Israel. The majority of our directors and executive officers, and the Israeli experts
listed in this Annual Report reside outside of the United States, and most of our assets and most of the assets of these persons are located
outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or any of these persons, including a judgment based on the civil
liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli
court. It may also be difficult to effect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims
in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws
reasoning that Israel is not the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to
hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the
content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time consuming and costly process. Certain
matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the matters described
above. As a result of the difficulty associated with enforcing a judgment against us in Israel, you may not be able to collect any damages
awarded by either a U.S. or foreign court.
Our articles of association provide a choice of forum provision
that may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable.
Our articles of association provides that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative
forum, and other than with respect to plaintiffs or a class of plaintiffs which may be entitled to assert in the courts of the State of
Israel, with respect to any causes of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, the federal district courts of the
United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Our articles of association further provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of
an alternative forum, the Haifa District Court will be the exclusive forum for the following: (i) any derivative action or proceeding
brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or
other employees, to us or to our shareholders, or (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies
Law or the Israeli Securities Law of 1968.
This choice of forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial
forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits.
While the validity of choice of forum provisions has been upheld under the law of certain jurisdictions, uncertainty remains as to whether
our choice of forum provision will be recognized by all jurisdictions, including by courts in Israel. If a court were to find either choice
of forum provision contained in our articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional
costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are
governed by Israeli law, which differs in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.
We are incorporated in Israel. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are
governed by our articles of association and by the Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some material respects from
the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty
to act in good faith and in a customary manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations towards the company and other shareholders,
and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at a general meeting of shareholders on
matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers
and acquisitions and related party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a controlling shareholder, a shareholder
who is aware that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a
director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist
us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional
obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions
of activist shareholders and/or class action filings, which could impact the trading value of our securities.
In recent years, certain Israeli issuers listed on United States exchanges have been faced with governance-related
demands from activist shareholders, unsolicited tender offers and proxy contests. Responding to these types of actions by activist shareholders
could be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our operations and diverting the attention of management and our employees. Such activities
could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan. In addition, a proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual
meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by
management and our Board of Directors.
In recent years, we have also seen a significant rise in the filing of class actions in Israel against
public companies, as well as derivative actions against companies, their executives and board members. While the vast majority of such
claims are dismissed, companies are forced to increasingly invest resources, including monetary expenses and investment of management
attention due to these claims. This could adversely affect the willingness of our executives and board members to make decisions which
could have benefitted our business operations. Such legal actions could also be taken with respect to the validity or reasonableness of
the decisions of our Board of Directors. In addition, the rise in the number and magnitude of litigation could result in a deterioration
of the level of coverage of our D&O liability insurance.
Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control, our ability to execute on our strategy,
or changes to the composition of our Board of Directors or senior management team may arise from future proposals from shareholders and
could lead to instability which may be exploited by our competitors, result in the loss of potential business opportunities, and make
it more difficult to pursue our strategic initiatives or attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could
have an adverse effect, which may be material, on our business and operating results. In addition, actions such as those described above
could cause significant fluctuations in the trading prices of our ordinary shares based on temporary or speculative market perceptions
or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.
General risk factors
We face cyber-security risks.
Our business operations rely upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and
reporting. As a result, we maintain information security policies and procedures for managing our information technology systems. Despite
security and controls design, implementation and updates, our information technology systems may be subject to cyber-attacks, including,
network, system, application and data breaches. A number of companies around the world, including in our industry, have been the subject
of cyber-security attacks in recent years. For example, one of our peers experienced a major cyber-attack on its IT systems in 2017, which
impacted such company’s operations in its transport and logistics businesses and resulted in significant financial loss. In addition,
in August 2020, a cruise operator was a victim to ransomware attack. On September 28, 2020, another competitor confirmed a ransomware
attack that disabled its booking system, and on October 1, 2020, the IMO’s public website and intranet services were subject to
a cyberattack. In December 2020, an Israeli insurance company fell victim to a publicized ransomware attack, resulting in the filing of
civil actions against the company and significant damage to that company’s reputation. As an Israeli company, we are a potential
target for a cyber-attack, as cyber-attacks against Israeli entities have increased following the war between Israel and Hamas that erupted
in October 2023. Other Israeli companies are facing cyber-attack campaigns, and it is believed the attackers may be from hostile countries.
Cyber-attacks are becoming increasingly common and more sophisticated, and may be perpetrated by computer hackers, cyber-terrorists or
others engaged in corporate espionage.
Cyber-security attacks could include malicious software (malware), attempts to gain unauthorized access
to data, social media hacks and leaks, ransomware attacks and other electronic security breaches of our information technology systems
as well as the information technology systems of our customers and other service providers that could lead to disruptions in critical
systems, unauthorized release, misappropriation, corruption or loss of data or confidential information, and breach of protected data
belonging to third parties. In addition, following the COVID-19 pandemic, we have reduced our staffing in our offices and increased our
reliance on remote access of our employees. We have taken measures to enable us to face cyber-security threats, including backup and recovery
and backup measures, as well as cyber security awareness trainings and annual company-wide cyber preparedness drills. However, there is
no assurance that these measures will be successful in coping with cyber-security threats, as these develop rapidly, and we may be affected
by and become unable to respond to such developments. A cyber-security breach, whether as a result of malicious, political, competitive
or other motives, may result in operational disruptions, information misappropriation or breach of privacy laws, including the European
Union’s General Data Protection Regulation and other similar regulations, which could result in reputational damage and have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
We face risks relating to our information technology and communication
system.
Our information technology and communication system supports all of our businesses processes throughout
the supply chain, including our customer service and marketing teams, business intelligence analysts, logistics team and financial reporting
functions. Our two main data centers are located in Europe. Each data center can back up the other one.
Additionally, our information systems and infrastructure could be physically damaged by events such as
fires, terrorist attacks and unauthorized access to our servers and infrastructure, as well as the unauthorized entrance into our information
systems. Furthermore, we communicate with our customers through an ecommerce platform. Our ecommerce platform was developed and is run
by third-party service providers over which we have no management control. A potential failure of our computer systems or a failure of
our third-party ecommerce platform providers to satisfy their contractual service level commitments to us may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Our efforts to modernize and digitize our operations and communications
with our customers further increase our dependency on information technology systems, which exacerbates the risks we could face if these
systems malfunction.
We are subject to data privacy laws, including the European Union’s
General Data Protection Regulation, and any failure by us to comply could result in proceedings or actions against us and subject us to
significant fines, penalties, judgments and negative publicity.
We are subject to numerous data privacy laws, including Israeli privacy laws and the European Union’s
General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679), or the GDPR, which relates to the collection, use, retention, security, processing and
transfer of personally identifiable information about our customers and employees in the countries where we operate. We have also been
certified as compliant with ISO27001 in Israel (information security management standard) and ISO27701(extension to the information security
management standard).
The EU data protection regime expands the scope of the EU data protection law to all companies processing
data of EEA individuals, imposes a stringent data protection compliance regime, including administrative fines of up to the greater of
4% of worldwide turnover or €20 million (as well as the right to compensation for financial or non-financial damages claimed by
any individuals), and includes new data subject rights such as the “portability” of personal data. Although we are generally
a business that serves other businesses (B2B), we still process and obtain certain personal information relating to individuals, and any
failure by us to comply with the GDPR or other data privacy laws where applicable could result in proceedings or actions against us, which
could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments and negative publicity.
Labor shortages or disruptions could have an adverse effect on our
business and reputation.
We employ, directly and indirectly, approximately 6,460 employees around the globe (including contract
workers) as of December 31, 2023. We, our subsidiaries, and the independent agencies with which we have agreements could experience strikes,
industrial unrest or work stoppages. Several of our employees are members of unions. In recent years, we have experienced labor interruptions
as a result of disagreements between management and unionized employees and have entered into collective bargaining agreements addressing
certain of these concerns. If such disagreements arise and are not resolved in a timely and cost-effective manner, such labor conflicts
could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation. Disputes with our unionized employees may result in work stoppage,
strikes and time-consuming litigation. Our collective bargaining agreements include termination procedures which affect our managerial
flexibility with re-organization procedures and termination procedures. In addition, our collective bargaining agreements affect our financial
liabilities towards employees, including because of pension liabilities or other compensation terms.
We incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company,
and our management team, which has limited experience in managing and operating a company that is publicly traded in the U.S., will be
required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a public company whose ordinary shares have been listed in the United States since January 2021, we
incur accounting, legal and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with our reporting requirements
under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We also incur costs associated with corporate
governance requirements, including requirements under Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, and provisions of Israeli corporate laws applicable to public companies. These
rules and regulations, including enhanced ESG reporting requirements, have increased our legal and financial compliance costs, introduced
new costs such as investor relations and stock exchange listing fees, and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition,
our senior management and other personnel must divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time
to these public company requirements. Our current management team has limited experience managing and operating a company that is publicly
traded in the U.S. Failure to comply or adequately comply with any laws, rules or regulations applicable to our business may result in
fines or regulatory actions, which may adversely affect our business, results of operation or financial condition and could result in
delays in achieving or maintaining an active and liquid trading market for our ordinary shares.
Changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies could result in increased costs to us as
we respond to such changes. These laws and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance,
including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage and/or incur substantially
higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage, including increased deductibles. The impact of these requirements could also make
it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, our board committees or as executive
officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur in order to comply with such requirements.
Any of these effects could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to our ordinary shares
Our share price may be volatile, and you may lose all or part of
your investment.
The market price of our ordinary shares could be highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially as a result
of many factors, including:
|
• |
actual or anticipated variations in our or our competitors’ results of operations and financial condition; |
|
• |
variations in our financial performance or operating results from the expectations of market analysts; |
|
• |
announcements by us or our competitors of significant business developments, changes in service provider relationships, acquisitions
or strategic alliances, or expansion plans; |
|
• |
our involvement in litigation; |
|
• |
our sale of ordinary shares or other securities in the future; |
|
• |
market conditions in our industry, which traditionally have been volatile; |
|
• |
changes in key personnel; |
|
• |
the trading volume of our ordinary shares; |
|
• |
changes in government regulation; |
|
• |
changes in the estimation of the future size and growth rate of our markets; and |
|
• |
general economic and market conditions. |
The shipping and offshore industries have been highly unpredictable and volatile. The market for shares
of companies who operate in these industries may be equally volatile. In addition, the stock markets generally have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations, which have been enhanced by the volatility of the industry in which we operate.
Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our ordinary shares, regardless
of our operating performance. Consequently, you may not be able to sell the ordinary shares at prices equal to or greater than those paid
by you, or you may not be able to sell them at all. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s
securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. If we were involved in any similar litigation,
we could incur substantial costs and our management’s attention and resources could be diverted, which could affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports
about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ordinary shares depends, in part, upon the research and reports that securities
or industry analysts publish about us or our businesses. We do not have any control over analysts as to whether they will cover us, and
if they do, whether such coverage will continue. If one or more of the analysts covering us cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly
publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price or trading volume of our shares
to decline. In addition, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, the price
for our shares will likely decline.
Future sales of our ordinary shares or the anticipation of future
sales could reduce the market price of our ordinary shares.
If we or our existing shareholders sell a substantial number of our ordinary shares in the public market,
the market price of our ordinary shares could decrease significantly. The perception in the public market that our shareholders might
sell our ordinary shares could also depress the market price of our ordinary shares and could impair our future ability to obtain capital,
especially through an offering of equity securities. Substantially all of our outstanding ordinary shares are eligible for sale in the
public market, except that ordinary shares held by our affiliates are subject to restrictions on volume and manner of sale pursuant to
Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). We have also filed a registration statement
on Form S-8 with the SEC, covering all of the ordinary shares issuable under our share incentive plans and such shares are available for
resale following the expiration of any restrictions on transfer. Further, substantially all of our pre-IPO shareholders are party to a
Registration Rights Agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, the shareholders party thereto are entitled to request that we register the
resale of their ordinary shares under the Securities Act, subject to certain conditions. Certain of our shareholders have exercised their
Registration Rights in a secondary offering of our ordinary shares which closed in June 2021. See “Item 7.B - Related party transactions
— Registration rights” for additional information. In addition, a sale by us of additional ordinary shares or similar securities
in order to raise capital might have a similar negative impact on the share price of our ordinary shares. A decline in the price of our
ordinary shares might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional ordinary shares or other securities and may
cause you to lose part or all of your investment in our ordinary shares.
Interests of our principal shareholders could adversely affect our
other shareholders.
Our largest shareholder Kenon Holdings, Ltd., or Kenon, currently owns approximately 20.7% of our outstanding
ordinary shares and voting power. As a result of its voting power, Kenon has and will continue to have the ability to exert influence
over our affairs for the foreseeable future, including with respect to the election of directors, amendments to our articles of association
and all matters requiring shareholder approval. In certain circumstances, Kenon’s interests as a principal shareholder may differ
or even conflict with the interests of our other shareholders, and Kenon’s ability to exert influence over us may have the effect
of causing, delaying, or preventing changes or transactions that our other shareholders may or may not deem to be in their best interests.
In addition, we have entered into a number of transactions with related parties, which are connected to Kenon, as described in “Item
7.B - Related party transactions.” Although we have implemented procedures to ensure the terms of any related party transaction
are at arm’s length, any alleged appearance of impropriety in connection with our entry into related party transactions could have
an adverse effect on our reputation and business.
The State of Israel holds a Special State Share in us, which imposes
certain restrictions on our operations and gives Israel veto power over transfers of certain assets and shares above certain thresholds,
and may have an anti-takeover effect.
The State of Israel holds a Special State Share in us, which imposes certain limitations on our operating
and managing activities and could negatively affect our business and results of our operations. These limitations include, among other
things, transferability restrictions on our share capital, restrictions on our ability to enter into certain merger transactions or undergo
certain reorganizations and restrictions on the composition of our Board of Directors and the nationality of our chief executive officer,
among others.
Because the Special State Share restricts the ability of a shareholder to gain control of our Company,
the existence of the Special State Share may have an anti-takeover effect and therefore depress the price of our ordinary shares or otherwise
negatively affect our business and results of operations. In addition, the terms of the Special State Share dictate that we maintain a
minimum fleet of 11 wholly owned seaworthy vessels. As of March 1, 2024, we owned 14 vessels.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted, and intend, to follow
certain home country corporate governance practices instead of otherwise applicable NYSE requirements, which may result in less protection
than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, in reliance on NYSE rules that permit a foreign private issuer to follow the
corporate governance practices of its home country, we are permitted to follow certain Israeli corporate governance practices instead
of those otherwise required under the corporate governance standards for U.S. domestic issuers. We follow certain Israeli home country
corporate governance practices rather than the requirements of the NYSE including, for example, to have a nominating committee or to obtain
shareholder approval for certain issuances to related parties or the establishment or amendment of certain equity-based compensation plans.
Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a U.S. company listed on
the NYSE may provide less protection than is accorded to investors in U.S. domestic issuers. See “Item 6.C – Board practices.”
As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to the provisions
of Regulation FD or U.S. proxy rules and are exempt from filing certain Exchange Act reports, which could result in our shares being less
attractive to investors.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of requirements under U.S. securities laws that
apply to public companies that are not foreign private issuers. In particular, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the
Exchange Act related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt
from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required
under the Exchange Act to file annual and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. domestic
companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act and we are generally exempt from filing quarterly reports with the SEC
under the Exchange Act. We are also exempt from the provisions of Regulation FD, which prohibits the selective disclosure of material
nonpublic information to, among others, broker-dealers and holders of a company’s securities under circumstances in which it is
reasonably foreseeable that the holder will trade in the company’s securities on the basis of the information. Even though we have
voluntarily filed and intend to continue to voluntarily file current reports on Form 6-K that include quarterly financial statements,
and we have adopted a procedure to voluntarily comply with Regulation FD, these exemptions and leniencies reduce the frequency and scope
of information and protections to which you are entitled as an investor.
We are not required to comply with the proxy rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies, including the
requirement to disclose the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated
executive officers on an individual, rather than on an aggregate, basis. Nevertheless, regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies
Law 5759-1999 (the “Companies Law”) requires us to disclose in the notice convening an annual general meeting (unless previously
disclosed in any report by us prepared pursuant to the requirements of NYSE or any other stock exchange on which our shares are registered
for trade) the annual compensation of our five most highly compensated officers on an individual basis, rather than on an aggregate basis.
This disclosure will not be as extensive as that required of a U.S. domestic issuer. For information regarding reliefs relating to general
meetings for companies whose securities are traded outside of Israeli, see “Item 6.C – Board practices – Amendment to
Companies Regulations (Reliefs for Companies whose Securities are Traded Outside of Israel), 2000”.
We would lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of our shares became held by U.S. persons
and either a majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents or we fail to meet additional requirements
necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. Although we have elected to comply with certain U.S. regulatory provisions,
our loss of foreign private issuer status would make such provisions mandatory. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities
laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic
reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available
to a foreign private issuer. We would also be required to follow U.S. proxy disclosure requirements. We may also be required to modify
certain of our policies to comply with good governance practices associated with U.S. domestic issuers. Such conversion and modifications
will involve additional costs. In addition, we would lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements
on U.S. stock exchanges that are available to foreign private issuers.
If we are classified as a passive foreign investment company, U.S.
investors could be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
The rules governing passive foreign investment companies, or PFICs, can have adverse effects for U.S. investors
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The tests for determining PFIC status for a taxable year depend upon the relative values of certain
categories of assets and the relative amounts of certain kinds of income. As discussed in “Taxation – U.S. federal income
taxation – Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” we believe that we were
not a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2023. However, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or the
IRS, will agree with our conclusion. In addition, the determination of whether we are a PFIC depends on particular facts and circumstances
(such as the valuation of our assets, including intangible assets, which may be determined, in part, by reference to the market price
of our ordinary shares) and may also be affected by the application of the PFIC rules, which are subject to differing interpretations.
In light of the foregoing, no assurance can be provided that we were not a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2023 or that we
will not become a PFIC in any future taxable year. Furthermore, if we are treated as a PFIC, then one or more of our subsidiaries may
also be treated as PFICs.
If we are or become a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. investor holds our ordinary shares,
we generally would continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to that U.S. investor for all succeeding years during which the U.S.
investor holds our ordinary shares, even if we ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status, unless certain exceptions apply.
Such a U.S. investor may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, such as ineligibility for any preferential tax rates
on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred, and additional reporting requirements
under U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations. A “mark-to-market” election may be available that will alter the consequences
of PFIC status if our ordinary shares are regularly traded on a qualified exchange. For further discussion, see “Taxation –
U.S. federal income taxation – Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.” Investors
should consult their own tax advisors regarding all aspects of the application of the PFIC rules to our ordinary shares.
If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting in the future, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price
of our ordinary shares could be negatively affected.
As a public company, we are required to maintain internal controls over financial reporting and to report
any material weaknesses in such internal controls. We are required to furnish a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal
control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or assert that our
internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an
opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness
of our financial reports and the market price of our ordinary shares could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations
by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial
and management resources.
Our dividend policy is subject to change at the discretion of our
Board of Directors and there is no assurance that our Board of Directors will declare dividends in accordance with this policy.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a dividend policy, which was recently amended in August 2022, to distribute
a dividend to our shareholders on a quarterly basis at a rate of 30% of the net quarterly income of each of the first three fiscal quarters
of the year, while the cumulative annual dividend amount to be distributed by the Company (including the interim dividends paid during
the first three fiscal quarters of the year) will total 30-50% of the annual net income, all subject to our Board of Directors absolute
discretion at the time of any such distribution, and the satisfaction of the applicable relevant tests under the Israeli Companies law
at the time of these distributions. We paid a cash dividend of approximately $769 million, or $6.40 per ordinary share on April 4, 2023.
We have not distributed additional dividends since April 2023. During 2022, the Company paid cash dividends of approximately $3.30 billion.
During 2021 the Company paid a special cash dividend of approximately $237 million, and a cash dividend of approximately $299 million.
Any dividends must be declared by our Board of Directors, which will take into account various factors
including our profits, our investment plan, our financial position and additional factors it deems appropriate. While we initially intend
to distribute 30 - 50% of our annual net income, the actual payout ratio could be anywhere from 0% to 50% of our net income, and may fluctuate
depending on our cash flow needs and such other factors. There can be no assurance that dividends will be declared in accordance with
our Board’s policy or at all, and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason,
not to pay dividends, to reduce the amount of dividends paid, to pay dividends on an ad-hoc basis or to take other actions, which could
include share buybacks, instead of or in addition to the declaration of dividends. Accordingly, we expect that the amount of any cash
dividends we distribute will vary significantly as a result of such factors. We have not adopted a separate written dividend policy to
reflect our Board’s policy.
Our ability to pay dividends is limited by Israeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only
out of distributable profits and only if there is no reasonable concern that such distribution will prevent us from meeting our existing
and future obligations when they become due. See “Item 8.A – Consolidated statements and other financial information –
Dividends and dividend policy” and “Item 6.C – Board practices – Amendment to Companies Regulations (Reliefs for
Companies whose Securities are Traded Outside of Israel), 2000”.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. |
History and development of the company |
Founded in Israel in 1945, we purchased our first ship in 1947. In the 1950s and 1960s, we expanded our
fleet and global shipping lines. In 1969, approximately 50% of our company was acquired by Israel Corporation Ltd., which moved us away
from government ownership. In 1972, we launched our first cargo shipping service. We continued to expand globally, including establishing
a presence in China, and renovated our fleet in the late 1980s. In 2004, we were fully privatized. From 2010 through present, we have
focused on changing our strategy and adopting a comprehensive transformation strategy designed to improve our long-term commercial and
operational processes by reducing operational expenses and increasing profitability.
Our ordinary shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ZIM”
since January 28, 2021. During 2021 we have made a full early repayment of our Series 1 and Series 2 notes (Tranches C and D), in a total
amount of US$434 million, reflecting a full settlement of the outstanding indebtedness related to such notes and resulting in the removal
of the related provisions and limitations. In addition, during 2021, 2022 and 2023 we have made dividend payments of approximately US$4.61
billion in the aggregate to our shareholders.
Our legal and commercial name is ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. Our principal place of business
is located at 9 Andrei Sakharov Street, P.O. Box 15067, Matam, Haifa, 3190500. The telephone number of our principal place of business
is +972 4 8652111. Our website is www.zim.com. We have included our website address in this Annual Report solely for informational purposes.
Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated
by reference herein. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov. Our agent for service of process is
ZIM American Integrated Shipping Services Company, LLC, whose address is 5801 Lake Wright Drive, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States,
and whose telephone number is 757-228-1300.
Our company
We are a global container liner shipping company with leadership positions in niche markets where we believe
we have distinct competitive advantages that allow us to maximize our market position and profitability. Founded in Israel in 1945, we
are one of the oldest shipping liners, with nearly 80 years of experience, providing customers with innovative seaborne transportation
and logistics services with a reputation for industry leading transit times, schedule reliability and service excellence.
Our main focus is to provide best-in-class service for our customers while maximizing our profitability.
We have positioned ourselves to achieve industry-leading margins and profitability through our focused strategy, commercial excellence,
agile approach and flexibility in responding to changing market conditions and enhanced digital tools. As part of our “Innovative
Shipping” vision, we rely on careful analysis of data, including business and artificial intelligence, to better understand the
needs of our customers and digitize our products accordingly, without compromising our personal touch. We operate and innovate as a truly
customer-centric company, constantly striving to provide a best-in-class product offering.
As of December 31, 2023, we operated a fleet of 144 vessels and chartered-in 95.0% of our TEU capacity
and 93.8% of the vessels in our fleet. For comparison, according to Alphaliner, our competitors chartered-in on average approximately
44% of their fleets as of the end of 2023 (in accordance with the Alphaliner December 2023 Report). During 2021 and 2022 we have entered
into several strategic long-term charter agreements, including two strategic agreements with Seaspan for the long-term charter of ten
15,000 TEU and fifteen uniquely designed 7,700-class TEU LNG (liquified natural gas dual-fuel) container vessels to serve ZIM’s
Asia-US East Coast Trade and other global-niche trades, with 14 vessels already delivered to us. We have also entered into an eight-year
charter agreement with a shipping company that is an affiliate of our largest shareholder, Kenon Holdings Ltd., according to which we
will charter three 7,700-class TEU LNG dual fuel container vessels, with one vessel delivered to us. Furthermore, in February 2022 we
announced a new chartering agreement with Navios Maritime Partners L.P. for a total of 13 vessels (including five of which are secondhand),
ranging from 3,500 to 5,300 TEUs each, of which two newbuild vessels and all five secondhand vessels were delivered to us, and in March
2022 we announced we have entered into a seven-year charter transaction for six 5,500 TEU wide beam newbuild vessels with MPC Container
Ships ASA and MPC Capital AG, of which three vessels were already delivered to us. We expect the rest of the vessels to be delivered to
us during the remainder of 2024. See – “Our vessel fleet – Strategic Chartering Agreements”. During the second
half of 2021 we have completed the purchase of eight secondhand vessels, ranging from 1,100 to 4,250 TEU, in several separate transactions,
for an aggregated amount of $355 million. In February 2024, we completed the acquisition of an additional three secondhand 10,000 TEU
vessels and two 8,500 vessels that we already chartered by exercising an option to acquire them for approximately $129 million, so that
on March 1, 2024, we owned a total of 14 vessels of our operated fleet, including one vessel we already previously owned prior to these
acquisitions. See – “Our vessel fleet”.
As of December 31, 2023, we chartered-in most of our capacity; in addition, 74.8% of our chartered-in vessels
are under leases having a remaining charter duration of more than one year (or 81.9% in terms of TEU capacity). We continue to adjust
our operations in response to the effects of global and regional geopolitical and economic events, including the Houthi attacks on the
Red Sea, the Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine wars, long terms effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and other recent geopolitical trends. Our
fleet, mainly in terms of the size of our vessels, enables us to optimize vessel deployment to match the needs of both mainlane and regional
routes and to ensure high utilization of our vessels and specific trade advantages. Our operated vessels have capacities that range from
less than 1,000 TEUs to 15,000 TEUs. (See – “Our vessel fleet – Strategic Chartering Agreements”). Furthermore,
we operate a modern and specialized container fleet, which we significantly increased during 2021, and our current container fleet capacity
reaches approximately 885 thousand TEUs.
We operate across five geographic trade zones that provide us with a global footprint. These trade zones
include (for the year ended December 31, 2023, of carried TEUs): (1) Transpacific (38.4%), (2) Atlantic (13.1%), (3) Cross Suez (11.8%),
(4) Intra-Asia (27.9%) and (5) Latin America (8.8%). Within these trade zones, we strive to increase and sustain profitability by selectively
competing in niche trade lanes where we believe that the market is underserved and that we have a competitive advantage versus our peers.
These include both trade lanes where we have an in-depth knowledge, long-established presence and outsized market position as well as
new trade lanes into which we are often driven by demand from our customers as they are not serviced in-full by our competitors. Several
examples of niche trade lanes within our geographic trade zones include: (1) US East Coast & Gulf to Mediterranean lane (Atlantic
trade zone) where we maintain a 7.9% market share, (2) East Mediterranean & Black Sea to Far East lane (Cross Suez trade zone), 6.3%
market share and (3) Far East (not including the Indian subcontinent) to US East Coast (Pacific trade zone), 11.2% market share, in each
case according to the Port Import/Export Reporting Service (PIERS) and Container Trade Statistics (“CTS”).
During 2023 and to the date of this Annual Report, we announced the following main newly launched services
and service upgrades: (1) a new operational cooperation with MSC encompassing seven services, including three services on the southeast
Asia-Oceana trade, two services from India to the East Mediterranean and Israel (currently rerouted), and two services from the East Mediterranean
and Israel to North Europe; (2) two new independent services, ZIM Albatross (ZAT), connecting China and Southeast Asia to the west coast
South America, and ZIM Gulf Toucan (ZGT), connecting South America to the Gulf of Mexico, and replacing previous services in cooperation
with other carriers; (3) the relaunch of ZEX, ZIM eCommerce Xpress service, providing a premium, speedy China-US West Coast service; (4)
the expansion of the ZXB service calling from Port Kelang to Baltimore and Boston to include direct calls to Mexico and Colombia; (5)
the upscaling of our vessels on our independently operated ZCP service line (as part of our agreement with the 2M Alliance) to 15,000
TEU LNG dual-fuel container vessels; and (6) the launch of an independent service connecting Asia to the US via Vancouver (ZPX).
In addition to containerized cargo, in an effort to respond to increased demand for car carrier services,
and specifically to the increase in vehicle exports from China (and electric and hybrid cars in particular), we also transport vehicles
(such as cars, buses and trucks) via dedicated car carrier vessels westbound from Asia, and primarily from China, Japan, South Korea and
India. Currently, we charter 16 car carrier vessels and we have expanded the volume and our range of services to include additional calls
to ports in Europe, the Mediterranean and South America. Despite the uncertainty caused by the geopolitical situation, the outlook for
the car carrier industry remains relatively positive thanks to modest fleet growth in 2023 and slight increase in demand for light vehicles.
In 2024 car carrier fleet growth is estimated to be more robust, with an anticipated increase of approximately 6.5% capacity by year end.
As of December 31, 2023, we operated a global network of 67 weekly lines, calling at approximately 310
ports, delivering cargo to and from more than 90 countries. Our complex and sophisticated network of lines allows us to be agile as we
identify markets in which to compete. Within our global network we offer value-added and tailored services, including operating several
logistics subsidiaries to provide complimentary services to our customers. We continue to develop our network of additional logistics
companies in order to provide comprehensive services to our customers. These subsidiaries, which we operate, among others, in China, Vietnam,
Canada, Brazil, India, Singapore, Hong Kong and the U.S, are asset-light and provide services such as land transportation, custom brokerage,
LCL, project cargo and air freight services. Out of ZIM’s total volume in the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, approximately
18% of our TEUs carried utilized additional elements of land transportation.
Our network is significantly enhanced by cooperation agreements with other container liner companies and
alliances, allowing us to maintain a high degree of agility while optimizing fleet utilization by sharing capacity, expanding our service
offering and benefiting from cost savings. Such cooperation agreements include vessel sharing agreements (VSAs), slot purchase and slot
swaps. One of these cooperations is the strategic collaboration with the 2M Alliance, comprised of the two largest global carriers, Maersk
and MSC, who both announced the 2M Alliance will terminate in January 2025. Our agreement with the 2M Alliance which was launched in September
2018 and amended in February 2022, provides faster, wider and more efficient service in the Asia-US East Coast and the Asia-US Gulf Coast
with two trade lanes, seven services and approximately 15,500 weekly TEUs. Another example is our new operational cooperation with MSC
encompassing seven services on the southeast Asia-Oceana, India-East Mediterranean (currently rerouted) and East Mediterranean-North Europe
trades, that we entered into in September 2023. In addition to these collaborations, we also maintain a number of partnerships with various
global and regional liners in different trades. For example, in the Intra-Asia trade, we partner with both global and regional liners
in order to extend our services in the region (See – “Our operational partnerships”).
We have a highly diverse and global customer base with approximately 32,600 customers (which considers
each of our customer entities separately, including in instances where the entity is a subsidiary or branch of another customer, or on
a non-consolidated basis) using our services. In 2023, our 10 largest customers represented approximately 13% of our freight revenues
and our 50 largest customers represented approximately 28% of our freight revenues. One of the key principles of our business is our customer-centric
approach and we strive to offer value-added services designed to attract and retain customers. Our strong reputation, high-quality service
offering, and schedule reliability has generated a loyal customer base, with 9 of our 10 top customers in 2023 having a relationship with
the Company lasting longer than 10 years.
We have focused on developing industry-leading and best in class technologies to support our customers,
including improvements in our digital capabilities to enhance both commercial and operational excellence. We use our technology and innovation
to power new services, improve our best-in-class customer experience and enhance our productivity and portfolio management. Several recent
examples of our digital services include: (i) ZIMonitor, which is an advanced tracking device that provides 24/7 online alerts to support
high value cargo; (ii) eZIM, our easy-to-use online booking platform; (iii) eZQuote, a digital tool that allows customers the ability
to receive instant quotes with a fixed price and guaranteed terms; (iv) Draft B/L, an online tool that allows export users to view, edit
and approve their bill of lading online without speaking with a representative; and (v) ZIMGuard, an artificial intelligence-based internal
tool designed to detect possible misdeclarations of dangerous cargo in real-time. Furthermore, we have formed a number of partnerships
and collaborations with start-ups for the development of multiple engines of growth which are adjacent to our traditional container shipping
business. These technological partnerships and initiatives include: (i) “ZIMARK”, a new initiative in cooperation with Sodyo
(in which we made an additional investment in 2022), an early stage scanning technology company, aimed to provide visual identification
solutions for the entire logistics sector (inventory management, asset tracking, fleet management, shipping, access control, etc.) This
technology is extremely fast and is suitable for multiple types of media; (ii) Our investment in and partnership with WAVE, a leading
electronic bill of lading based on blockchain technology, to replace and secure original documents of title; (iii) Our investment in Hoopo
Systems Ltd. (“Hoopo”), a provider of cutting edge tracking solutions for unpowered assets, as well as our new agreement to
deploy Hoopo’s tracking devices on ZIM’s dry-van container fleet; (iv) Ship4wd, a digital freight forwarding platform offering
an online, simple and reliable self-service end to end shipping solution, that is initially targeting small and medium-sized businesses
importing and exporting from the US, Canada, the far East and Israel; (v) our investment in Data Science Consulting Group (DSG), a leading
technology company specializing in Artificial Intelligence based products, solutions and services, developer of e-volve, a holistic AI
governance and decision management system, and our co-creator of a center of excellence for the development of AI tools for the maritime
shipping industry; and (vi) 40Seas, an innovative fintech company serving as a platform for cross-border trade financing, in which we
have made an equity investment in addition to extending an approximate $100 million credit facility, with an option subject to both parties’
agreement to increase this credit facility up to $200 million. To support and enhance our commercial partnerships and investments in technology
companies, we have formed a ZIM team of professionals that specializes in the ecosystem of investing and collaborating with early-stage
technology companies, and function as a “corporate venture capital”, or CVC, dedicating a substantial part of their time to
such CVC activities. The members of this CVC team support ZIM’s portfolio companies throughout the life cycles of their businesses,
starting from identifying promising startups which are synergetic to ZIM’s business, conducting due diligence over potential investments,
negotiating investment and commercial agreements with ZIM’s portfolio companies, and supporting them in additional investment and
commercial transactions and in their operations, often by holding board membership positions in such companies.
Achieving industry leading profitability margins through both effective cost management initiatives as
well as top-line improvement strategies is one of the primary focuses of our business. Over the past three years we have taken initiatives
to reduce and avoid costs across our operating activities through various cost-control measures and equipment cost reduction (including,
but not limited to, equipment interchanges such as swapping containers in surplus locations, street turns to reduce trucking of empty
containers and domestic repositioning from inland ports). Our digital investment in our information technology systems has allowed us
to develop a highly sophisticated allocation management tool that gives us the ability to manage our vessel and cargo mix to prioritize
higher yielding bookings. The capacity management tool as well as our agility in terms of vessel deployment enables us to focus on the
most profitable routes with our customers.
In addition to effective cost management, we would not have been able to achieve our financial results
without our unique organizational culture. Our vision and values, “Z-Factor,” is fully aligned with and supports our strategy
and long-term goals. Our vision of “Innovative shipping dedicated to you!” has driven our focus on innovation and digitalization
and has led us to become a truly customer-centric company. Our can-do approach and results-driven attitude support our passion for commercial
excellence and drives our focus on optimizing our cargo and customer mix. Through our core value of sustainability, we aim to uphold and
advance a set of principles regarding Ethical, Social and Environmental concerns. Our goal is to work resolutely to eliminate corruption
risks, promote diversity among our teams and continuously reduce the environmental impact of our operations, both at sea and onshore.
Our organizational culture enables us to operate at the highest level, while also treating our oceans and communities with care and responsibility.
We are headquartered in Haifa, Israel. As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 6,460 full-time employees
worldwide (including contract workers). In 2023 and 2022, we carried 3.28 million and 3.38 million TEUs, respectively, for our customers
worldwide. During the same periods, our revenues were $5,162 million and $12,562 million, our net income (loss) was $(2,688) million and
$4,629 million and our Adjusted EBITDA was $1,049 million and $7,541 million, respectively.
Our services
With a global footprint of more than 200 offices and agencies in more than 90 countries, we offer both
door-to-door and port-to-port transportation services for all types of customers, including end-users, consolidators and freight forwarders.
Comprehensive logistics solutions
We offer our customers comprehensive logistics solutions to fit their transportation needs from door-to-door.
Our wide range of transportation services, handled by our highly trained sea and shore crews and supported with personalized customer
service and our unified information technology platform, allows us to offer our customers higher quality and tailored services and solutions
at any time around the world.
Our customers place orders either online or with a customer service member in one of our local agencies
located around the world. We issue the bill of lading detailing the terms of the shipment and, in the case of a typical door-to-door order,
we deliver an empty container to the shipper’s designated address. Once the shipper has filled the container with cargo, it is transported
to a container port, where it is loaded onto our cargo vessel. We have experience in shipping various types of cargo, such as over-sized
cargo, dangerous and hazardous cargo, cars, trucks and vehicles and reefer shipments. The container is shipped either directly to the
destination port or via one of our scheduled ports of call, where it is transferred, or “transshipped,” to another ship. When
the container arrives at the final destination port, it is off-loaded from the ship and delivered to the recipient or a designated agent
via land transportation. We partner with regional and local land transportation operators to provide a range of inland transportation
services via rail, truck and river barge, often combining multiple modes of transportation to ensure efficient and cost-effective operation
with minimum transit time. Out of ZIM’s total volume in the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, approximately 18% of our TEUs
carried utilized additional elements of land transportation. We continuously strive to find logistic solutions for land transportation
service offering under the current market conditions.
We also offer ZIMonitor, our premium reefer cargo tracking service. ZIMonitor is an advanced real-time
monitoring device that, among other things, allows our customers to monitor their shipments in real time. In 2023, ZIMonitor reached its
highest record of customer usage level since launching, reflecting a 31% growth compared to 2022. See – “Types of cargo –
Other Specialized Cargo” below.
We believe that our global-niche strategy, as well as our focus on customer-centric services, place us
in a good position to attract new customers through our reliable and competitive services.
Our services and geographic trade zones
As of December 31, 2023, we operated a global network of 67 weekly lines, calling at approximately 310
ports delivering cargo to and from more than 90 countries. Our shipping lines are linked through hubs that strategically connect main
lines and feeder lines, which provide regional transport services, creating a vast network with connections to and from smaller ports
within the vicinity of main lines. We have achieved leadership positions in specific markets by focusing on trades where we have distinct
competitive advantages and can attain and grow our overall profitability.
Our shipping lines are organized into geographic trade zones by trade. The table below illustrates our
primary geographic trade zones and the primary trades they cover, as well as the percentage of our total TEUs carried by geographic trade
zone for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
Geographic trade zone (percentage
of total TEUs carried for the period) |
|
Primary trade |
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
Pacific |
|
Transpacific |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Cross-Suez |
|
Asia-Europe |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Atlantic-Europe |
|
Atlantic |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Intra-Asia |
|
Intra-Asia |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
Latin America |
|
Intra-America |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Pacific geographic trade zone
The Pacific geographic trade zone serves the Transpacific trade, which covers trade between Asia, including
China, Korea, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and the Caribbean, Central America, the Gulf of Mexico and the east coast and west
coast of the United States and Canada. Our services within this geographic trade zone also connect to Intra-Asia and Intra-America regional
feeder lines, which provide onward connections to additional ports.
Pacific Northwest service. Based on information from Piers, Port
of Vancouver and Prince Rupert Port Authority, approximately 45% of all goods shipped to the United States are transported via ports located
in the west coast of the United States and Canada. These include local discharge as well as delivery by train or trucks to their final
destinations, mainly to the Midwestern United States and to the central and eastern parts of Canada. We hold a position within the PNW,
via the Canadian gateway Vancouver, which enable us to serve the very large Canadian and U.S. Midwest markets quickly and efficiently.
Our strategic relationships in these markets with Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”), a rail operator, have allowed
us to obtain competitive rates and provide consistent, high-quality service to our customers. Since July 2023, we have started to charter
slots from MSC to serve the Pacific Northwest, replacing our independent service line launched after the termination of the cooperation
with the 2M Alliance for this service in April 2022. In January 2024, we launched a new independent line connecting Asia and the US through
the Vancouver gateway (ZPX).
Pacific Southwest Coast service - In response to the growing trend
in eCommerce, during 2020 and 2021, we launched three eCommerce Xpress high-speed services, focusing on e-Commerce between South China
and Los Angeles, the ZEX, ZX2 and ZX3 lines. We suspended these lines because of heavy port congestion due to COVID-19. In November 2023,
we relaunched ZEX as market conditions improved.
Asia-U.S. All-Water service. With respect to the Asia-U.S. east
coast trade, “all-water” refers to trade between Asia and the U.S. east coast and Gulf Coast using marine transportation only,
via the Suez or Panama Canal. In accordance with our agreement with the 2M Alliance as amended in February 2022 effective from April 2022,
ZIM operates one out of the five joint Asia to USEC services (ZCP) as well as a vessel sharing agreement on one of two joint Asia to USGC
services (ZGX). We have deployed all 15,000 TEU LNG dual fuel vessels delivered to us so far on the independently operated ZCP service
and intend to deploy the remainder expected to be delivered to us during 2024 on this service as well (See “Our vessel fleet - Strategic
Chartering Agreements”).
As of December 31, 2023, we offered 10 services in the Pacific geographic trade zone, which had an effective
weekly capacity of 24,657 TEUs and covered all major international shipping ports in the Transpacific trade. Our services in the Pacific
geographic trade zone accounted for 45% of our freight revenues from containerized cargo for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Cross-Suez geographic trade zone
The Cross-Suez geographic trade zone serves the Asia-Europe trade, which covers trade between Asia and
Europe (including the Indian sub-continent) through the Suez Canal, primarily focusing on the Asia-Black Sea/East Mediterranean Sea sub-trade,
which is one of our key strategic zones. In previous years this trade was characterized by intense competition, and we have undertaken
several initiatives to help us remain competitive within it.
In September 2023, we entered into a cooperation agreement with MSC covering seven services, including
two services from the India subcontinent (ISC) to Israel and the East Mediterranean and two services from Israel and the East Mediterranean
to N. Europe. These services replace our previous independent service (ZMI), which was initiated following the termination of two joint
services with the 2M Alliance covering Asia to the East Mediterranean in April 2022.
In response to the Yemeni Houthis’ attacks against vessels sailing in the Red Sea, we have taken
proactive measures by rerouting some of our vessels and restructuring our services on the Indian subcontinent to East Mediterranean trade,
which also currently limits our access to the Suez Canal (See Item 3.D – Risk factors – “Global economic downturns and
geopolitical challenges throughout the world could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations,” and “We are incorporated and based in Israel and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by political,
economic and military instability in Israel. Specifically, the current war between Israel and Hamas and the additional armed conflicts
in the Middle East may adversely affect our business”).
As of December 31, 2023, we offered two services in the Cross-Suez geographic trade zone (currently rerouted),
which had an effective weekly capacity of 3,940 TEUs and covered all major international shipping ports in the East Mediterranean, the
Black Sea, China, East and Southeast Asia and India. The Cross-Suez geographic trade zone accounted for 12% of our freight revenues from
containerized cargo for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Atlantic-Europe geographic trade zone
The Atlantic-Europe geographic trade zone serves the Atlantic trade, which covers trade between North America
and the Mediterranean, along with Intra-Europe/Mediterranean trade. Our services within this geographic trade zone also connect to Intra-Mediterranean
and Intra-America regional feeder lines which provide onward connections to additional ports. Since 2014, we have had a cooperation agreement
with Hapag-Lloyd and other companies in our Atlantic services. Our new cooperation agreement with MSC also includes two joint services
from Israel and the East Mediterranean to North Europe.
As of December 31, 2023, we offered 10 services within this geographic trade zone, with an effective weekly
capacity of 8,707 TEUs, covering major international shipping ports in the East and West Mediterranean, the Black Sea, Northern Europe,
the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, and the east and west coasts of North America. The Atlantic-Europe geographic trade zone accounted
for 16% of our freight revenues from containerized cargo for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Intra-Asia geographic trade zone
The Intra-Asia and Asia-Africa geographic trade zone serves the Intra-Asia trade, which covers trades within
regional ports in Asia, including ISC (Indian sub-continent), Africa and Oceana. Our services within this geographic trade zone feed into
the global lines of the Pacific and Cross-Suez trades. This geographic trade zone is characterized by extensive structural changes that
we have made to respond to changes in trade and market conditions.
The Intra-Asia market is highly fragmented with many active carriers, all with relatively small market
shares. Local shipping companies have a significant presence within this trade, which is primarily serviced by relatively small vessels.
However, larger vessels that operate in the intercontinental trade also serve this trade and call at ports within the region. For example,
we have recently upscaled our vessels on one of our Intra-Asia services calling India subcontinent ports to 10,000 TEUs. We have operational
agreements with several other shipping companies within this trade.
Demand in this trade is impacted by, among other things, the relatively low cost of labor in the area and
its proximity to developing economies with high growth rates, which incentivizes the manufacturing of finished products for export and
trades in unfinished products passing between countries before their final passage to other trades via long-distance trade.
As of December 31, 2023, we offered 27 services within this geographic trade zone with an effective weekly
capacity of 14,712 TEUs. The Intra-Asia geographic trade zone accounted for 16% of our freight revenues from containerized cargo for the
year ended December 31, 2023. Our services within this geographic trade zone cover major regional ports, including those in China, Korea,
Thailand, Vietnam and other ports in Southeast Asia, India, Africa, Thailand, Vietnam, New Zealand and Australia, and connect to shipping
lines within our Cross-Suez and Pacific geographic trade zones.
Latin America geographic trade zone
The Latin America geographic trade zone consists of the Intra-America trade, which covers trade within
regional ports in the Americas, as well as trade between the South American east coast and Asia and trade between the South American east
coast and West Mediterranean. The regional services within this geographic trade zone are linked to our Pacific and Atlantic-Europe geographic
trade zones. We cooperate with other carriers within the regional services: We cooperate with Maersk via a vessel sharing agreement in
the Asia-East Coast South America, and we cooperate with other carriers on the Mediterranean-East Coast South America sub-trades mostly
by slots purchase. In addition, we replaced several joint services with our newly launched service, ZIM Gulf Toucan (ZGT), connecting
South America to the Gulf of Mexico. We also launched a second independent service, ZIM Albatross (ZAT), connecting China and Southeast
Asia to the west coast of South America. These new services facilitated significant growth in the scope of our activities in the Latin
America geographic trade zone during 2023.
As of December 31, 2023, we offered 18 services within this geographic trade zone as well as a complementary
feeder network with an effective weekly capacity of 8,696 TEUs and operated between major regional ports, including ports in Brazil, Argentina,
Uruguay, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, China, U.S. Gulf Coast, U.S. east coast and the West Mediterranean, and connect to our
Pacific and Atlantic-Europe services. The Latin America geographic trade zone accounted for 11% of our freight revenues from containerized
cargo for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Types of cargo
The following table sets forth details of the types of cargo we shipped during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2023, as well as the related quantities and volume of containers (owned and leased).
Type of Container |
|
Type of Cargo |
|
Quantity |
|
|
TEUs |
|
Dry van containers |
|
Most general cargo, including commodities in bundles, cartons, boxes, loose cargo,
bulk cargo and furniture |
|
|
1,824,378 |
|
|
|
3,092,964 |
|
Reefer containers |
|
Temperature controlled cargo, including pharmaceuticals, electronics and perishable
cargo |
|
|
100,510 |
|
|
|
198,907 |
|
Other specialized containers |
|
Heavy cargo and goods of excess height and/or width, such as machinery, vehicles and
building |
|
|
56,173 |
|
|
|
70,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,981,061 |
|
|
|
3,362,619 |
|
Other Specialized cargo
We offer specialized shipping solutions through a dedicated team of supply chain experts that designs tailor-made
solutions for our customers’ specific transportation needs, issues approvals and documentation, arranges for insurance and provides
other logistics services for all kinds of specialized cargo, including:
|
• |
Out-of-gauge cargo. Cargo that is over-weight, over-height, over-length and/or over-width
can present many challenges and issues relating to proper stowage, securing and handling. We maintain our containers to the highest standards
and offer premium third-party services relating to these particular challenges. |
|
• |
Dangerous and hazardous, cargo. We specialize in carrying Dangerous and hazardous shipments
safely in accordance with all applicable local and international rules and regulations. We ship a wide array of such cargos, and we employ
dedicated teams of specialists in five offices around the globe who are specially trained to guide our customers through every stage of
the supply chain challenges. We have also developed and implemented “ZIMGuard”, an innovative artificial intelligence-based,
screening software designed to detect and identify incidents of misdeclared hazardous cargo before loading to vessel. |
|
• |
Reefer cargo. Reefer cargo includes perishable goods, pharmaceuticals and electronics. Our
reefer specialists and merchant marine officers ensure the safe transport of reefer cargo with precise tracking and continuous monitoring
throughout the cold chain. During 2023 the portion of our reefer cargo carried out of our total carried TEU has grown by approximately
5% compared to 2022, demonstrating our strategy to focus on reefers as one of our growth engines. In addition, as we strive to have the
youngest reefer fleet in the industry, we have also invested in new custom-made reefer containers already equipped with our ZIMonitor
capabilities, as well as in controlled atmosphere units which are designed to ship fresh produce cargo. |
At the end of 2015, we launched ZIMonitor, our premium reefer cargo tracking service. ZIMonitor is a device
attached to the engine of the reefer, and allows customers to track, monitor and remotely control sensitive, high-value cargo, such as
pharmaceuticals, food and delicate electronics. The device monitors, among other things, GPS location, temperature, humidity and unnecessary
container door opening. Customers can opt to receive alerts regarding their shipment via text message or email. ZIMonitor is designed
to comply with the good distribution practice guidelines (GDP), which are applicable to the pharmaceutical industry, and to provide ongoing
data flow, alerts in order to prevent cargo damage and automatic reports. Customers are also able to view their cargo status online on
our designated MyZim application. In addition, we employ a 24/7 dedicated response team to promptly respond to hundreds of alerts daily.
Our vessel fleet
As of December 31, 2023, our fleet included 144 vessels (128 container vessels and 16 vehicle transport
vessels), of which nine vessels were owned by us and 135 vessels are chartered-in. As of December 31, 2023, our operating fleet (including
both owned and chartered vessels) had a capacity of 638,801 TEUs. The average size of our vessels is approximately 4,991 TEUs, compared
to an industry average of 4,689 TEUs.
During the second half of 2021 we have completed the purchase transaction of eight secondhand vessels,
ranging from 1,100 to 4,250 TEUs each, in several separate transactions, for an aggregated amount of US$ 355 million with all purchased
vessels delivered during 2021 and 2022. In February 2024, we completed the acquisition of an additional three 10,000 TEU vessels and two
8,500 TEU vessels that we already chartered by exercising an option to acquire them, so as of March 1, 2024, following these purchases,
in addition to one vessel already previously owned by us, we owned 14 vessels in our operated fleet. We may purchase additional secondhand
vessels if we evaluate that such purchase is more suited to our needs than other available alternatives.
We charter-in vessels under charter party agreements for varying periods. Our charter rates are negotiated
and predetermined at the time of entry into the charter party agreement and depend upon market conditions existing at that time. As of
December 31, 2023, all of our chartered vessel agreements consist of chartering-in the vessel capacity for a given period of time against
a daily charter fee, while the crewing and technical operation of the vessel is handled by its owner, including 3 vessels chartered-in
from related parties. Subject to any restrictions in the applicable arrangement, we determine the type and quantity of cargo to be carried
as well as the ports of loading and discharging.
Our vessels operate worldwide within the trading limits imposed by our insurance terms. As of December
31, 2023, the remaining average duration of our chartered fleet was approximately 33 months, based on the earliest date of redelivery.
As of December 31, 2023, our fleet was comprised of vessels of various sizes, ranging from less than 1,000
TEUs to 15,000 TEUs, which allows for flexible deployment in terms of port access and is optimally suited for deployment in the sub-trades
in which we operate.
The following table provides summary information, as of December 31, 2023, about our fleet:
|
|
Number |
|
|
Capacity (TEU) |
|
|
Other Vessels |
|
|
Total |
|
Vessels owned by us
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
31,842 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Vessels chartered from parties related to us
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,253 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Periods up to 1 year (from December 31, 2023)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,253 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Periods between 1 to 5 years (from December 31, 2023) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Periods over 5 years (from December 31, 2023)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Vessels chartered from third parties
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
602,706 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Periods up to 1 year (from December 31, 2023)
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
105,526 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Periods between 1 to 5 years (from December 31, 2023) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
355,584 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Periods over 5 years (from December 31, 2023)
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
141,596 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total(1)
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
638,801 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
___________________
(1) |
Under our time charters, the vessel owner is responsible for operational costs and technical management of the vessel, such as crew,
maintenance and repairs including periodic drydocking, cleaning and painting and maintenance work required by regulations, and certain
insurance costs. Transport expenses such as bunker and port canal costs are borne by us. Operational management services include the chartering-in,
sale and purchase of vessels and accounting services, while technical management services include, among others, selecting, engaging,
and training competent personnel to supervise the maintenance and general efficiency of our vessels; arranging and supervising the maintenance,
drydockings, repairs, alterations and upkeep of the vessels, the requirements and recommendations of each vessel’s classification
society, and relevant international regulations and maintaining necessary certifications and ensuring that the vessels comply with the
law of their flag state. |
As of March 1, 2024, our operated fleet included 150 vessels (134 container vessels and 16 vehicle transport
vessels), of which 14 vessels are owned by us and 136 vessels are chartered-in. Our owned and chartered container vessels had a capacity
of 703,380 TEUs. As of March 1, 2023, this operated fleet included 24 new-build vessels out of a total of 46 new-build modern vessels
long term chartered by us, with an additional 22 vessels expected to be delivered to us during 2024. Further, as of March 1, 2024, approximately
74.8% of our chartered-in vessels (84.5% in terms of TEU capacity) are under long-term leases with a remaining charter duration of more
than one year, as we continue to actively manage our asset mix.
Strategic Chartering Agreements
Long term charter agreement for LNG-Fueled Vessels from Seaspan
Corporation
In February 2021 we and Seaspan Corporation entered into a strategic agreement for the long-term charter
of ten 15,000 TEU liquified natural gas (LNG dual-fuel) container vessels. Pursuant to the agreement, we will charter the vessels for
a period of 12 years with the option to extend it by additional charter periods. We were further granted by Seaspan a right of first refusal
to purchase the chartered vessels should Seaspan choose to sell them during the charter period, and an option to purchase the vessels
at the end of the charter term. We intend to deploy these vessels on our Asia-US East Coast Trade as an enhancement to our service on
this strategic trade.
In addition, in July 2021 we announced a second strategic agreement with Seaspan for the long-term charter
for a consideration in excess of $1.5 billion, of ten uniquely designed 7,700-class TEU LNG dual fuel container vessels with an option
for additional five vessels, to serve across ZIM’s various global niche trades. In September 2021 we announced the exercise of an
option granted to us under this agreement to long term charter five additional 7,700-class TEU LNG vessels, for an additional consideration
in excess of $750 million. Following the exercise of this option, the total vessels to be chartered under this second strategic agreement
is fifteen. To date, nine 15,000 TEU and five 8,240 TEU LNG dual fuel LNG container vessels have been delivered to us with the remaining
vessels expected to be delivered during 2024.We expect to incur, in annualized charter hire costs per vessel (in addition to down payments
made on the delivery of each vessel), approximately US$17 million in respect of the abovementioned 15,000 TEU vessels, and approximately
US$13 million in respect of the abovementioned vessels, over the term of the agreements.
Long term charter agreement for LNG-Fueled vessels from a shipping
company affiliated with Kenon Holdings Ltd.
In January 2022 we entered into a new eight-year charter agreement with a shipping company that is affiliated
with Kenon Holdings Ltd., our largest shareholder, according to which we will charter three 7,700-class TEU LNG dual-fuel container vessels
to be deployed in our global niche trades for a total consideration of approximately $400 million. The vessels will be constructed at
Korean-based shipyard, Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries, with one 7,920 TEU LNG dual fuel vessel already delivered and the remaining vessels
are scheduled to be delivered during the first half of 2024.
Charter agreement with Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.
In February 2022 we and Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. entered into a charter agreement for the charter
of thirteen container vessels comprising of five secondhand vessels and eight newbuild vessels of total consideration of approximately
$870 million. The five secondhand vessels’ capacity range from 3,500 to 4,360 TEUs and were delivered during the first and second
quarter of 2022 and deployed across ZIM’s global network. Today two of the eight 5,300 TEU wide beam newbuilds have been delivered
and the rest will be delivered through the fourth quarter of 2024 and are expected to be deployed in trades between Asia and Africa. The
charter period of the vessels is approximately 5 years.
Charter agreement with MPC Container Ships ASA and MPC Capital AG
In March 2022 we and MPC Container Ships ASA and MPC Capital AG entered into a new charter agreement according
to which ZIM will charter a total of six 5,500 TEU wide beam newbuild vessels for a period of seven years and a total consideration of
approximately $600 million. The vessels are being constructed at Korean-based shipyard HJ Shipbuilding & Construction (formally known
as Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co.). Three of these vessels have been delivered, with the remaining vessels to be delivered
throughout 2024.
Our containers
In addition to the vessels that we own and charter, we own and charter a significant number of shipping
containers. As of December 31, 2023, we held 508 thousand container units with a total capacity of approximately 885 thousand TEUs, of
which 44% were owned by us and 56% were leased (including 49% accounted as right-of-use assets). In some cases, the terms of our leases
provide that we will have the option to purchase the container at the end of the lease term.
Container fleet management
We aim to reposition empty containers in the most cost-efficient way in order to minimize our overall empty
container moves and container fleet while meeting demand. Due to a natural imbalance in demand between trade areas, we seek to optimize
our container fleet by repositioning empty containers at minimum cost in order to timely and efficiently meet our customers’ demands.
Our global logistics team oversees the internal management of empty containers and equipment to support this optimization effort. In addition
to repairing and maintaining our container fleet, our logistics team continuously optimizes the flow of empty containers based on commercial
demands and operational constraints. Below is a summary of our logistics initiatives relating to container fleet management:
|
• |
Slot swap agreements. We enter into agreements with other carriers for the exchange of vessel
space, or “slots”, for repositioning of empty containers. Under these agreements, other carriers offer ZIM space on their
own operated vessels, in exchange for space on our vessels for the purpose of repositioning empty containers. ZIM has greatly developed
this type of cooperation. We have slot swap agreements with 15 carriers and exchange thousands of TEUs each year. |
|
• |
Slot sale agreements. We sell slots on board our vessels to transport empty containers.
|
|
• |
One-way container lease. We use leasing companies and other shipping liners’ empty
containers to move cargo from locations with increased demand to over-supplied locations. We are a global leader in one-way container
volumes. |
|
• |
Equipment sub-leases. We lease our equipment to other carriers and freight forwarders in
order to reduce our container repositioning and evacuation costs. |
We believe that through these initiatives, we are able to minimize costs associated with natural trade
imbalances, increase the utilization of our vessels, and reliably supply our customers with empty containers where and when they are needed.
In January 2024 we entered into an agreement with Hoopo to deploy Hoopo’s tracking device on ZIM’s
dry-van container fleet, which offers our customers comprehensive tracking information including geofence alerts and open/close door notifications
and more, while ensuring high reliability and durability combined with significant cost and energy efficiencies.
Our operational partnerships
We are party to a large number of cooperation agreements with other shipping companies and alliances, which
generally provide for the joint operation of shipping services by vessel sharing agreements, the exchange of capacity and the sale or
purchase of slots on vessels operated by us or other shipping companies. We do not participate in any alliances, which are a type of vessel
sharing agreement that involves joint operations of fleets of vessels and sharing of vessel space in multiple trades, although we do partner
with the 2M Alliance in a strategic cooperation as described below. By not participating in alliances and focusing instead on cooperation
agreements, we are able to capture many of the benefits of alliance membership while retaining a higher degree of strategic flexibility
than is typically afforded to alliance members. Our cooperation agreements provide us with access to a wider coverage of ports and specialized
lines, which enables us to improve our transit times and reduce operational expenses and repositioning costs. We continue to seek new
collaborations and joint services for the purpose of improving port coverage, quality and frequency of service and for the benefit of
our customers.
Strategic Cooperation Agreement with the 2M Alliance
In April 2022 we amended and extended our agreement with the 2M Alliance to include the extension of our
collaboration on the Asia-U.S. East Coast (USEC) and Asia-U.S. Gulf Coast (USGC) under a full slot exchange and vessel sharing agreement
originally established in September 2018 and August 2019, respectively. The strategic cooperation on the Asia-USEC currently includes
a joint network of five loops between Asia and USEC, out of which one is operated by us (ZCP) and four are operated by the 2M Alliance.
We are currently in the process of upscaling our vessels on this service to 10 15,000 TEU LNG dual-fueled container vessels. In addition,
we and the 2M Alliance agreed to swap slots on all five loops under the agreement and we could purchase additional slots in order to meet
total demand in these trades. The strategic cooperation on the Asia-USGC currently includes two services, of which one is operated through
a vessel sharing agreement, and one is operated by the 2M Alliance. We have terminated our previous cooperation with the 2M Alliance established
in March 2019 on the Asia – Mediterranean and Asia - American Pacific Northwest and are currently serving the Asia-Mediterranean
trade independently and the Asia-Pacific Northwest trade by a slot purchase from MSC and an independent service. Under our amended collaboration
agreement with the 2M Alliance, we or the 2M Alliance may terminate the agreement by providing a six-month prior written notice following
the initial 12-month period from the effective date of the agreement (April 2022), and in any event, in accordance with the announcement
made by the members of the 2M Alliance, the 2M Alliance will terminate in January 2025. This strategic cooperation with the 2M Alliance
enables us to provide our customers with improved port coverage and transit time, while generating cost efficiencies.
Operational Collaboration Agreement with MSC on Multiple Trades
In July 2023 we entered into a new slot charter agreement with MSC on the Asia-PNW trade. In September
2023, we entered into new operational agreements with MSC, encompassing several trades and seven service lines. The cooperation scope
includes services connecting the Indian Subcontinent with the East Mediterranean (currently rerouted), the East Mediterranean with Northern
Europe, and services connecting East Asia with Oceania. The joint services include a vessel sharing agreement, slots swaps and slot purchase
arrangements. The agreements are in effect for a period of two years, may be extended for additional periods and may be terminated by
providing a six-month period prior notice provided that such notice will not be given before 18 months after the effective date of the
agreements.
The table below shows our operational partners by geographic trade zone as of December 31, 2023:
|
|
Geographic trade zone |
Partner |
|
Pacific |
|
Cross-Suez |
|
Intra-Asia |
|
Atlantic-Europe |
|
Latin America |
A.P. Moller-Maersk(1)
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC)(1)
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
CMA CGM S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Evergreen Marine Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Hapag-Lloyd AG(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO) |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
ONE |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
Orient Overseas Container Line Limited (OOCL) |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
________________________
|
(1) |
Our cooperation with Maersk and MSC is under the 2M Alliance framework, except: (i) our collaboration agreements with MSC as of July
and September 2023 (as detailed above); (ii) our separate bilateral cooperation agreement with MSC in the Latin America; and (iii) our
separate bilateral cooperation agreement with Maersk in the Latin America and Intra-Asia trades. |
|
(2) |
With respect to the Atlantic-Europe trade, we have a swap agreement with THE Alliance member Hapag-Lloyd, supporting ZIM loadings
on THE Alliance service on this trade. ZIM also has a separate bilateral agreement with respect to the Atlantic-Europe trade with Hapag-Lloyd
in its standalone capacity. |
Our customers
We believe that as one of the oldest cargo shipping companies in the world, our extensive experience, our
consistent track record of stable operations and our reputation for reliability and efficiency enable us to retain our existing customers
and attract new customers.
In 2023, we had more than 32,600 customers (on a non-consolidated basis) using our services. Our customer
base is well-diversified, and we do not depend upon any single customer for a material portion of our revenue. For the year ended December
31, 2023, no single customer represented more than 2% of our revenues. Additionally, our customers have maintained a high degree of retention
and loyalty to our business. In 2023, we achieved record results for overall customer satisfaction, strong connection and customer loyalty
on the Yearly Customer Experience Survey conducted by Ipsos (one of the largest global market research companies). Eight of our 10 largest
customers by revenue have been doing business with us for more than 10 years, and five of these customers have been doing business with
us for more than 25 years. Seven of our largest 10 customers by revenue in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, have been in the top
10 in each year since 2019. Our customers include blue chip companies as well as a growing customer base of small- and medium-sized enterprises.
We intend to continue to strengthen our relationships with our key customers and to increase our direct
sales to small- and medium-sized enterprises, or SMEs, which we define as customers that ship up to 200 TEUs annually. Under this definition,
for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, SMEs represented 19% of our aggregate carried volume worldwide. We believe this large
and growing segment of the cargo shipping market represents a significant growth opportunity for us within certain of the jurisdictions
in which we operate, including China, India, South-East Asia, United States, Canada, Brazil, Israel, Turkey and Italy, wherein we have
a dedicated sales team for this growing segment. In addition, during the last three years we have increased our global deployment of services
and presence by both establishing new local agencies and strengthening our partnerships primarily in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa,
Australia and New Zealand.
Our customers are divided into “end-users,” including exporters and importers, and “freight
forwarders.” Exporters include a wide range of enterprises, from global manufacturers to small family-owned businesses that may
ship just a few TEUs each year. Importers are usually the direct purchasers of goods from exporters, but may also comprise sales or distribution
agents and may or may not receive the containerized goods at the final point of delivery. Freight forwarders are non-vessel operating
common carriers that assemble cargo from customers for forwarding through a shipping company. We believe that a diverse mix of cargo from
both end-users and freight forwarders ensures optimal vessel utilization. End-users generally have long-term commitments that facilitate
planning for future volumes, which results in high entry barriers for competing carriers due to customer loyalty. Freight forwarders have
short-term contracts at renegotiated rates. As a result, entry barriers are low for competing carriers for this customer base. Our relationships
with large end-users give us better visibility on future cargo shipping transport volumes while our relationships with large freight forwarders,
which generate cargo in many locations worldwide, help us to optimize our trade flows.
During the last five years, end-users have constituted approximately 30% of our customers in terms of TEUs
carried, and the remainder of our customers were freight forwarders. Our contracts with our main customers are typically for a fixed term
of one year on all trades. Our contracts with customers may be for a certain voyage or period of time and typically do not include exclusivity
clauses in our favor. Our customer mix varies within each of the markets in which we operate, as we tailor our sales and marketing strategies
to the unique conditions of each specific market.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, our five largest customers in the aggregate accounted
for approximately 6%, 10%, and 12% of our freight revenues and related services, respectively, and 7%, 6% and 8% of our TEUs carried for
each year.
Global Sales
Over the last 12 months, we employed 24 full-time sales professionals in our headquarters in Haifa, Israel,
and approximately 740 sales personnel worldwide in our various agency locations (including in Israel). Our sales force is generally organized
by customer or cargo type and supported by data-driven analytics to better understand our customers and better address their needs while
maintaining desired profitability levels. We currently manage over 91% of our business on our unified information technology platform
(CRM), which supports all our business processes. Operating on this unified platform enables our sales teams to quickly and consistently
deliver solutions to our customers. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, approximately 91% and 90%, respectively,
of transactions with our customers were completed via our websites, our platforms and e-commerce platforms, which reduces the error rate
and costs associated with correcting errors. We have transformed our sales processes in all key markets in which we operate, to working
by our commercial excellence methodology, to ensure alignment between all the sales initiatives and take our global sales a step forward.
Each customer is assigned to a member of our sales team to serve as a single point of contact for all the customer’s specific shipping
needs.
Our sales teams are motivated by the operational and commercial targets we set for each specific country.
We believe that our global network of services and the local presence of our offices and agencies around the world enable us to develop
direct customer relationships, maintain a positive buying experience and increase the number of repeat customers. Our internal marketing
team complements our external sales efforts by providing training and support materials, such as marketing kits and question-and-answer
documents and ensuring the consistency of our brand messaging in our direct marketing, publicity, digital media and social media channels.
We have dedicated strategic accounts teams located in our headquarters in Haifa, supported by regional
teams, working directly with our strategic accounts, such as international freight forwarders and end-users (BCOs). Our sales team in
our headquarters works directly with sales executives in either owned, partially owned or contracted local agencies which perform our
primary sales and marketing functions and manage customer relationships on a day-to-day basis. We have an ability to provide proactive
and differentiated services level to our strategic accounts in Asia and the U.S.
We also employ specially trained and experienced sales experts for each type of specialized cargo we carry,
who are available to consult our customers on the practical and regulatory requirements of shipping their cargo.
Global Customer service
As of December 31, 2023, we employed 35 full-time service professionals, of which 27 are located in our
headquarters in Haifa and eight are located worldwide. The customer service head office functions along with four regional teams, leading
and guiding our worldwide customer service teams, reaching over 1,600 customer service representative and managers, including a global
outsourced back office customer documentation center.
In the last six years, we have been focusing on implementing a new unified holistic program called SmartCS,
a unified organizational structure, working methodology and best practice processes, supported by an advanced IT infrastructure and tools
for better managing our customers’ experience across our customer service units worldwide. SmartCS’ main building blocks are:
a CRM system, a unified information technology platform providing a 360 degree view of all customer interactions; a knowledge management
system, enabling a professional and quick resolution to all customer queries; soft skills trainings; a defined set of strict ‘best
in class’ KPIs; and a variety of ongoing & periodic surveys to reflect actual customer feedback. As of December 31, 2023, implementation
coverage reached approximately 94% of our business volume.
We have also been investing significantly in a digital transformation to use technology in order to transform
the way we think, act, and perform, making it easier for our customers to do business with us. Main platforms and services introduced
in the last four years include: a new company website, which was recently re-designed and is continuously being improved with new features
which is designed for any device, supports multiple languages, and includes dynamic service maps, local news and updates, live chat, reaching
approximately 900,000 unique visitors per month; myZIM Customer Personal Area, which provides our customers with a more efficient and
convenient way to manage all of their shipments under one digital platform and easily access documentation, online draft bill of lading
as well print bill of lading, proactive personal notifications, reaching over 13,000 registered customers; eZIM, a fast and easy way to
directly submit eBooking & eShipping Instructions, supported by live chat; eZQuote, which provides instant quoting, fixed price and
guaranteed equipment and space, allowing customers to receive instant quotes with a fixed price and guaranteed terms; Lead-to-Agreement,
a system that manages all of our commercial agreements and streamlines communications between our geographic trade zones, sales force
and customers; Dynamic Pricing, an analytical engine that defines the optimal pricing for spot transactions, assisting us in increasing
profitability margins; Commercial Excellence, an advanced cloud based analytical tool that assists our geographic trade zones in focusing
on more profitable customers in specific trades; “Hive”, a yield management platform which enables instant cargo selection
and booking acceptance based on defined business rules, while providing geographic trade zones with live view and interactive control
over forecasts, booking acceptances and equipment releases, maximizing the profitability of each voyage and improving response time to
our customers; and ZIMapp, a complementary digital gateway service that allows easy access to both ZIM.com and myZIM, anywhere and anytime.
In addition, approximately 13% of our original bills of ladings are electronic (based on blockchain technology), and as a member of the
Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA), we are committed to increasing the use of electronic bills of ladings to 50% by 2027 and
100% by 2030. All platforms & services are “Powered By Our Customers”, an innovative approach supported by a working methodology
in which customers are taking an active part in designing our digital experience for customers by customers.
Suppliers
Vessel owners
As of December 31, 2023, we chartered approximately 95.0% of our TEU capacity and 93.8% of the vessels
in our fleet. Access to chartered-in vessels of varying capacities, as appropriate for each of the trades in which we operate, is necessary
for the operation of our business. See “Item 3.D – Risk factors – We charter-in most of our fleet, which makes us more
sensitive to fluctuations in the charter market, and as a result of our dependency on the vessel charter market, the costs associated
with chartering vessels are unpredictable.” Although we currently believe our current vessel capacity is adequate compared to existing
market conditions, we may face a possible shortage of vessel for hire in the future. See “Item 3.D – Risk factors –
We may face difficulties in chartering or owning enough vessels, including large vessels, to support our growth strategy due to the possible
shortage of vessel supply in the market.”
Port operators
We have Terminal Services Agreements (TSAs) with terminal operators and contractual arrangements with other
relevant vendors to conduct cargo operations in the various ports and terminals that we use around the world. Access to terminal facilities
in each port is necessary for the operation of our business. Such access is especially critical for express or expediated services such
as our ZEX service connecting China and southeast Asia to the U.S. west coast, where the speed of service and avoiding bottlenecks are
key factors for our customers. Although we believe we have been able to contract for sufficient capacity at appropriate terminal facilities
in the past five years, possible increase in demand, congestion in ports and terminals and other geopolitical and macroeconomic events
may increase our costs and dependency on berthing windows in terminals. See “Item 3.D – Risk factors – Access to ports
could be limited or unavailable, including due to congestion in terminals and inland supply chains, and we may incur additional costs
as a result thereof.”
Bunker and LNG suppliers
We have contractual agreements to purchase approximately 80% of our annual bunker estimated requirements
with suppliers at various ports around the world. We have been able to secure sufficient bunker supply under contract or on a spot basis.
For our strategic agreement with Shell and risks relating to the supply of LNG see “Item 3.D – Risk factors – Rising
energy and bunker prices (including LNG) may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.”
Land transportation providers
We have services agreements with third-party land transportation providers, including providers of rail,
truck and river barge transport. We are a party to a rail services agreement with some of the Class-1 service providers to main inland
locations in USA and Canada.
Information and communication systems
The ability to process information accurately and quickly is fundamental to our position in the cargo shipping
industry, which is characterized by constant movement of millions of individual items across a global network of sea and inland routes.
Our information and communication systems are key operational and management assets which support many of our units, including shipping
agencies, individual lines and various head office departments. With two primary data centers in Europe (each data center can back up
the other one), our information and communication systems enable us to monitor our vessels and containers, coordinate shipping schedules,
manage the loading of containers onto vessels and plan transportation schedules. We also rely on our information and communication systems
to support back-office activities, such as processing cargo bookings, generating bills of lading and cargo manifests, expediting customs
clearance, and facilitating equipment control and the planning and management of inter-modal transportation, as well as financial and
human resources activities. See Item 3.D. “Risk factors – We face risks relating to our information technology and communication
system.” In addition, as our reliance on our information and communication systems grow and as we rely more on remote connectivity
of our employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we face heightened cyber security threats. We have invested our efforts in mitigating our
cyber security risks. See Item 3.D “Risk factors – We face cyber-security risks”.
Unified platform. Our proprietary information technology platform
AgenTeam, as well as Iqship for local agencies, supports our business processes throughout the supply chain. AgenTeam or Iqship have been
installed for 89 countries, and we currently manage more than 99% of our business on these platforms.
Business intelligence. Additionally, we use our platform to respond
quickly to changes in demand in each of our shipping lines by providing information to our shipping agencies and area managers relating
to the value, volume and mix of cargo on a particular voyage or vessel. Accurate and timely information on the value, volume and mix of
cargo also helps us to analyze the efficiency of our fleet deployment, capacity utilization, demand and supply in different services and
shipping lines, based on which we refine the positioning of vessels and containers to reduce imbalances between outgoing voyages from
a point of origin and return voyages. See “Our Customers – Global Customer service.”
Data analysis. Moreover, we have a dedicated team of 30 business
intelligence, artificial intelligence analysts and data scientists who monitor and analyze an average of seven terabytes of data per month
relating to our key performance indicators, which helps, among others, our sales force target more profitable customers. We also analyze
operating expenses by calculating the standard cost of each activity that affects our operating expenses either directly or indirectly
and monitoring items such as fuel consumption, vessel charter hire rates, expenses incidental to cargo handling and port expenses for
each vessel or voyage. This, in turn, enables us to identify opportunities to implement efficiency measures and improve margins using
up-to-date operational data, including monthly financial results and expenses incurred for each voyage, routes, mileage information and
other key performance indicators. Furthermore, by using the data analysis, we are also able to build forecasting models to improve our
planning.
Customer support. Further, through our website, we enable our customers
to monitor the movement of their cargo on our vessels from the cargo’s point of origin through various ports and inter-modal transportation
to its final destination. As part of enhancing the customer experience, customer can also easily subscribe to proactive cargo-tracing
notification and get the latest container event once it is occurred. This service is open to all ZIM website visitors and provides a complementary
service to the track a shipment functionality.
In addition, we offer customers automated data interchange for shipment information and invoicing, while
also offering customers information relating to schedules, pricing, lines of service and other data to allow them to plan and book transactions
directly with us. In addition, our information and communication systems allow us to prepare and transmit bills of lading more efficiently
and enables shipping agencies to respond to individual customer needs quickly. We believe that by supporting our customers’ supply
chain management, our information and communication systems can strengthen our customer service capabilities.
Sustainability and Focus on ESG
Through our core value of sustainability, and in accordance with our Code of Ethics, we aim to uphold and
advance a set of principles regarding environmental, social and governance concerns, and with our supplier code of conduct we aim to withhold
a strong, secure and responsible supply chain. Our goal is to work resolutely to eliminate corruption risks, promote diversity among our
teams and continuously reduce the environmental impact of our operations, both at sea and onshore. In particular, our vessels are in full
compliance with materials and waste treatment regulations, including full compliance with the IMO 2020 Regulations, and our fuel consumption
and CO2 emissions are monitored, calculated and well managed, aligned with international and national regulations and standards. Furthermore,
we have elected to enter into long term charter transactions of LNG dual-fuel vessels to reduce pollutant emissions as a result of bunker
consumption, and five of these vessels are also partly ready to be powered by Ammonia in the event it will become a feasible “cleaner”
fuel. In addition to actively working to reduce accidents and security risks in our operations, we also endeavor to eliminate corruption
risks as a member of the Maritime AntiCorruption Network (“MACN”), with a vision of a maritime industry that enables fair
trade. We invest efforts in preparing for future regulations and broadly map our environmental risks. We actively promote the preservation
and protection of the marine environment and biodiversity. We also foster quality throughout the service chain, by selectively working
with qualified partners to advance our business interests. Finally, we promote diversity among our teams, with a focus on developing high-quality
training courses for all employees. We have invested efforts and resources in promoting diversity in our company, such as monitoring gender
diversity of our company on an annual basis, collaborating with nonprofit organization to increase the hiring of employees from diverse
backgrounds and with disabilities, participating in special events to raise awareness to diversity and globally communicating our efforts,
both internally and externally. Furthermore, we have published annual sustainability (ESG) reports since 2018, focusing, among others,
on our environmental efforts and initiatives, best governance practices and diversity. As we continue to grow, sustainability remains
a core value. We expect ESG regulation will intensify in the future.
Competition
We compete with a large number of global, regional and niche shipping companies to provide transport services
to customers worldwide. In each of our key trades, we compete primarily with global shipping companies. The market is significantly concentrated
with the top three carriers — A.P. Moller-Maersk Line, MSC and CMA-CGM — accounting for approximately 46.7% of global capacity,
and the remaining carriers together contributing 53.3% of global capacity as of December 2023, according to Alphaliner. As of December
2023, we controlled approximately 2.1% of the global cargo shipping capacity and ranked 10th
among shipping carriers globally in terms of TEU operated capacity, according to Alphaliner. See “Item 3.D – Risk factors
– The container shipping industry is highly competitive and competition may intensify even further, which could negatively affect
our market position and financial performance.”
In addition to the large global carriers, regional carriers generally focus on a number of smaller routes
within a regional market and typically offer services to a wider range of ports within a particular market as compared to global carriers.
Niche carriers are similar to regional carriers but tend to be even smaller in terms of capacity and the number and size of the markets
in which they operate. Niche carriers often provide an intra-regional service, focusing on ports and services that are not served by global
carriers.
We believe that the cargo shipping industry is characterized by the significant time and capital required
to develop the operating expertise and professional reputation necessary to obtain and retain customers. We believe that our development
of a large fleet with varying TEU capacities has enhanced our relationship with our principal customers by enabling them to serve the
East-West, North-South and Intra-regional shipping lines efficiently, while enabling us to operate in the different rate environments
prevailing for those routes. We also believe that our focus on customer service and reliability enhances our relationships with our customers
and improves customer loyalty. Additionally, we believe that our global deployment of services and presence through local agencies, both
in our key trades and in our niche trades, is a competitive advantage. In addition, we operate transshipment hubs in trades, allowing
us access to those zones while providing rapid and competitive services.
Seasonality
For a discussion of the impact of seasonality on our business, see “Item 5 – Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects – Factors affecting comparability of financial position and results of operations – Seasonality.”
Risk of loss and liability insurance
General
The operation of any vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, property loss or damage,
cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to a number of reasons, including political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities
and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental
mishaps, as well as other liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of
1990, or OPA 90, which imposes under certain circumstances, unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of vessels
trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance
more expensive for shipowners and operators trading in the U.S. market.
We maintain hull and machinery and war risks insurance for our fleet to cover normal risks in our operations
and in amounts that we believe to be prudent to cover such risks. In addition, we maintain protection and indemnity insurance up to the
maximum insurable limit available at any given time. While we believe that our insurance coverage will be adequate, not all risks can
be insured, and there can be no guarantee that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates or at
all, or that any specific claim we may make under our insurance coverage will be paid.
Protection and indemnity insurance
Protection and indemnity insurance is usually provided by protection and indemnity, or P&I, clubs and
covers third-party liability, crew liability and other related expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew, passengers and other
third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, third-party claims arising from collisions with other vessels (to the extent not recovered
by the hull and machinery policies), damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances and salvage,
towing and other related costs, including wreck removal.
The respective owners of the vessels that we charter-in maintain insurance on those vessels, and we maintain
charter liability insurance with a limit of $750 million per incident, as the charterer’s activity typically consists of a much
lower exposure than that of the owner. We also hold an excess policy provided by Lloyd’s underwriters of up to $100 million in excess
of $750 million per incident for our chartered-in vessels.
Our protection and indemnity insurance is provided by several P&I clubs that are members of the International
Group of P&I Clubs. The 13 P&I clubs that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial
blue-water tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. Insurance provided by a
P&I club is a form of mutual indemnity insurance.
Our maximum theoretical P&I insurance coverage for our own operated vessels is approximately $7 billion
per vessel per incident, subject to a limit of $1 billion per vessel per incident for oil pollution, an aggregate limit of $23 billion
per vessel per incident for passenger only and $2 billion per vessel per incident for passengers and seamen combined. War liabilities
are covered in excess of the “insured value” of the specific vessel.
As a member of a P&I club, which is a member of the International Group, we will be subject to calls
payable to the P&I club based on the International Group’s claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of
the P&I club of which we are a member.
Regulatory Matters
Inspections, permits and authorizations
A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections.
These entities include the local port authorities’ Port State Control (such as the U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent),
classification societies, flag state administration (country of registry), particularly terminal operators. Certain of these entities
require us to obtain certain permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates with respect to our vessels. The kinds of permits,
licenses, financial assurances and certificates required depend upon several factors, including the cargo transported, the waters in which
the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the type and age of the vessel. Failure to maintain necessary permits
or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or result in the temporary suspension of the operation of one or more of our
vessels in one or more ports. We believe we have obtained all permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates currently required
to operate our vessels. Additional laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do
business or increase the cost of doing business.
Environmental and other regulations in the shipping industry
Government regulations and laws significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. We are
subject to international conventions and treaties, national, state and local laws and national and international regulations in force
in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered relating to the protection of the environment. Such requirements are
subject to ongoing developments and amendments and relate to, among other things, the storage, handling, emission, transportation and
discharge of hazardous and non-hazardous substances, such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides and the use of low-sulfur fuel or shore power
voltage, and the remediation of contamination and liability for damages to natural resources. These laws and regulations include OPA 90,
CERCLA, the CWA, the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 (including its amendments of 1977 and 1990) (CAA), and regulations adopted by the International
Maritime Organization (IMO), including the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), and the International
Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (the SOLAS Convention), as well as regulations enacted by the European Union and other international,
national and local regulatory bodies. Compliance with such requirements, where applicable, entails significant expense, including vessel
modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures. If such costs are not covered by our insurance policies, we could be
exposed to high costs in respect of environmental liability damages, administrative and civil penalties, criminal charges or sanctions,
and could suffer substantive harm to our operations and goodwill to the extent that environmental damages are caused by our operations.
We instruct the crews of our vessels on environmental requirements and we operate in accordance with procedures that are intended to ensure
compliance with such requirements. We also insure our activities, where effective for us to do so, in order to hedge our environmental
risks.
We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters,
regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements for all vessels and may accelerate designating older
vessels for sale throughout the cargo shipping industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform
to the strictest environmental standards (such as LNG fueled vessels). We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our
vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with U.S.
and international regulations. For example, we are certified in accordance with ISO 14001-2015 (relating to environmental standards).
We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements and that our vessels
have all material permits, licenses, certificates and other authorizations necessary for the conduct of our operations. However, because
such requirements frequently change and may become increasingly more stringent, we cannot predict our ability to comply and the ultimate
cost of complying with these requirements, or the impact of these requirements on the useful lives or resale value of our vessels. In
addition, a future serious marine incident that causes significant adverse environmental impact could result in additional legislation
or regulation that could negatively affect our profitability.
Finally, we are subject, in connection with our international activities, to laws, directives, decisions
and orders in various countries around the world that prohibit or restrict trade with certain countries, individuals and entities.
International Maritime Organization
Our operated vessels are subject to standards imposed by the IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime
safety and the prevention of pollution by vessels. The IMO has adopted regulations that are designed to reduce pollution in international
waters, both from accidents and from routine operations, and has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for oil pollution
in international waters and a signatory’s territorial waters. For example, the IMO has adopted MARPOL, the SOLAS Convention, and
the International Convention on Load Lines of 1966 (the LL Convention). MARPOL establishes numerous environmental standards including
those relating to oil leakage or spilling, garbage management, sewage, air emissions, handling and disposal of noxious liquids and the
handling of harmful substances in packaged forms. MARPOL is applicable to drybulk, tanker and LNG carriers, among other vessels, and is
broken into six Annexes, each of which regulates a different source of pollution. Annex I relates to oil leakage or spilling; Annexes
II and III relate to harmful substances carried in bulk in liquid or in packaged form, respectively; Annexes IV and V relate to sewage
and garbage management, respectively; and Annex VI, lastly, relates to air emissions. Annex VI was separately adopted by the IMO in September
of 1997 and new emissions standards, titled IMO-2020, took effect on January 1, 2020. Annex IV was amended effective as of November 1,
2022 and requires vessels to improve their energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG).
In 2012, the IMO’s Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC), adopted a resolution amending
the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (IBC Code). The provisions of
the IBC Code are mandatory under MARPOL and the SOLAS Convention. These amendments, which entered into force in June 2014, pertain to
revised international certificates of fitness for the carriage of dangerous chemicals in bulk and identifying new products that fall under
the IBC Code.
In 2013, the MEPC adopted a resolution amending MARPOL Annex I Conditional Assessment Scheme (CAS). These
amendments became effective on October 1, 2014, and require compliance with the 2011 International Code of Enhanced Programme of Inspections
during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, which provides for enhanced inspection programs.
We may need to make certain financial expenditures to continue to comply with these amendments. We believe
that our vessels are currently in compliance in all material respects with these requirements.
Air Emissions
On October 27, 2016, the MEPC agreed to implement the IMO 2020 Regulations, including a global 0.5% m/m
sulfur oxide emissions limit (reduced from 3.5%) starting January 1, 2020. This limitation can be met by using low-sulfur compliant fuel
oil, alternative fuels, or certain exhaust gas cleaning systems. Ships are now required to obtain bunker delivery notes and International
Air Pollution Prevention (IAPP) Certificates from their flag states that specify sulfur content. Additionally, amendments to Annex VI
to prohibit the carriage of bunkers above 0.5% sulfur on ships were adopted and took effect March 1, 2020, with the exception of vessels
fitted with scrubbers which can carry fuel of higher sulfur content. These regulations subject ocean-going vessels to stringent emissions
controls, and may cause us to incur substantial costs, in particular those related to the purchase of compliant fuel oil. Annex VI also
provides for the establishment of special areas known as Emission Control Areas, or ECAs, where more stringent controls on sulfur and
nitrogen emissions apply. Since January 1, 2015, ships operating within an ECA have not been permitted to use fuel with sulfur content
in excess of 0.1% m/m. Currently, the IMO has designated four ECAs, including specified portions of the Baltic Sea area, North Sea area,
North American area and United States Caribbean area. In the December 2022 MEPC meeting, it was agreed that the Mediterranean will become
the fifth ECA by May 1, 2025. Furthermore, effective as of February 2023, vessels calling Israeli ports must burn marine fuels with a
0.1% low sulfur content or lower. These and similar requirements, including new ECAs that may be approved in the future by the IMO or
other new or more stringent air emission requirements adopted by the IMO or in the jurisdictions where we operate, could entail significant
additional capital expenditures, operational changes or otherwise increase the costs of our operations, which could be material.
As determined at the MEPC 70, the new Regulation 22A of MARPOL Annex VI became effective as of March 1,
2018 and requires ships above 5,000 gross tonnage to collect and report annual data on fuel oil consumption to an IMO database, with the
first year of data collection commenced on January 1, 2019. The IMO intends to use such data as the first step in its roadmap (through
2023) for developing its strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships, as discussed further below.
As of January 1, 2013, MARPOL made mandatory certain measures relating to energy efficiency for ships.
All ships are now required to develop and implement Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plans (SEEMPS), and new ships must be designed in
compliance with minimum energy efficiency levels per capacity mile as defined by the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). Under these
measures, by 2025, all new ships built will be required to be 30% more energy efficient than those built in 2014.
In addition, in June 2021, the IMO adopted extensive new CO2 regulation applicable to existing ships, which
took effect on or after January 1, 2023, and that comprises the following: (i) The Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI), which
addresses the technical efficiency of ships, will enter into effect following the first annual, intermediate or renewal of Initial Air
Pollution Prevention (IAPP) vessel survey after January 1, 2023, (ii) the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) rating scheme, which addresses
the operational efficiency of the vessel, and (iii) the enhanced Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP), which will require vessel
operators to keep an energy efficiency management plan onboard.
We may incur costs to comply with these revised standards. Additional or new conventions and international,
national or local laws and regulations may be adopted that could require the installation of expensive emission control systems and could
adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial conditions.
Safety management system requirements
The SOLAS Convention was amended to address the safe manning of vessels and emergency training drills.
The Convention of Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the LLMC) sets limitations of liability for a loss of life or personal
injury claim or a property claim against ship owners. We believe that our vessels are in full compliance with SOLAS and LLMC standards.
Additionally, the operation of our vessels is based on the requirements set forth in the ISM Code. The
ISM Code requires vessel managers to develop and maintain an extensive Safety Management System, or SMS, that includes the adoption of
a safety and environmental protection policy, sets forth instructions and procedures for safe vessel operation and describes procedures
for dealing with emergencies. The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a Safety Management Certificate for each vessel they
operate from the government of the vessel’s flag state. The certificate verifies that the vessel operates in compliance with its
approved SMS. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless the flag state has issued a document of compliance with the ISM Code to the
vessel’s manager. Failure to comply with the ISM Code may lead to withdrawal of the permit to manage or operate the vessels, subject
such party to increased liability, decrease or suspend available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and result in a denial of
access to, or detention in, certain ports. Each of our vessels are ISM Code-certified.
Ballast water discharge requirements
In 2004, the IMO adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast
Water and Sediments (the BWM Convention). The BWM Convention entered into force on September 8, 2017. The BWM Convention requires
ships to manage their ballast water to remove, render harmless, or avoid the uptake or discharge of new or invasive aquatic organisms
and pathogens within ballast water and sediments.
As of the entry into force date, all ships in international traffic are required to manage their ballast
water and sediments to a certain standard according to a ship-specific ballast water management plan, maintain a record book of the ship’s
discharge, intake and treatment of ballast water and (for ships over 400 gross tons) be issued a certificate by or on behalf of the flag
state certifying that the ship carries out ballast water management in accordance with the BWM Convention. The MEPC adopted two ballast
water management standards. The “D-1 standard” requires the exchange of ballast water in open seas and away from coastal waters.
The “D-2 standard” specifies the maximum amount of viable organisms allowed to be discharged. The D-1 standard generally applies
to all existing ships. The D-2 standard applies to all new ships, and for existing ships, becomes effective upon the ship’s first
IOPP renewal survey on or after September 8, 2019, but no later than September 9, 2024. For most existing ships, compliance
with the D-2 standard will involve installing on-board systems to treat ballast water and eliminate unwanted organisms. Ballast water
management systems, which include systems that make use of chemical, biocides, organisms or biological mechanisms, or which alter the
chemical or physical characteristics of the ballast water, must be approved in accordance with IMO Guidelines (Regulation D-3). As of
October 13, 2019, MEPC 72’s amendments to the BWM Convention took effect, making the Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management
Systems, which governs assessment of ballast water management systems, mandatory rather than permissive, and formalized an implementation
schedule for the D-2 standard. Costs of compliance with these regulations may be substantial.
Once mid-ocean ballast water treatment requirements under the D-2 standard become mandatory pursuant to
the BWM Convention, the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers and may have a material effect on our operations. However,
many countries already regulate the discharge of ballast water carried by vessels from country to country to prevent the introduction
of invasive and harmful species via such discharges. The U.S., for example, requires vessels entering its waters from another country
to conduct mid-ocean ballast exchange, or undertake some alternate measure, and to comply with certain reporting requirements. The system
specification requirements for trading in the U.S. have been formalized and we have been installing ballast water treatment systems on
our vessels as their special survey deadlines come due.
The cost of each ballast water treatment system is approximately $0.4 million, primarily dependent on the
size of the vessel.
Pollution control and liability requirements
The IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, as amended
by different Protocols in 1976, 1984 and 1992, and amended in 2000 (the CLC). Under the CLC and depending on whether the country in which
the damage results is a party to the 1992 Protocol to the CLC, a vessel’s registered owner may be strictly liable for pollution
damage caused in the territorial waters of a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to certain exceptions. The 1992
Protocol changed certain limits on liability expressed using the International Monetary Fund currency unit, the Special Drawing Rights.
The limits on liability have since been amended so that the compensation limits on liability were raised. The right to limit liability
is forfeited under the CLC where the spill is caused by the shipowner’s actual fault and under the 1992 Protocol where the spill
is caused by the shipowner’s intentional or reckless act or omission where the shipowner knew pollution damage would probably result.
The CLC requires ships over 2,000 tons covered by it to maintain insurance covering the liability of the owner in a sum equivalent to
an owner’s liability for a single incident. We have protection and indemnity insurance for environmental incidents.
The IMO International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage
of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, when it enters into force, will provide for compensation to be paid to victims of accidents
involving hazardous and noxious substances, or HNS. HNS are defined by reference to lists of substances included in various IMO conventions
and codes and include oils, other liquid substances defined as noxious or dangerous, liquefied gases, liquid substances with a flashpoint
not exceeding 60°C, dangerous, hazardous and harmful materials and substances carried in packaged form, solid bulk materials defined
as possessing chemical hazards, and certain residues left by the previous carriage of HNS. This convention will introduce strict liability
for the shipowner and a system of compulsory insurance and insurance certificates. This convention is still awaiting the requisite number
of signatories in order to enter into force.
The IMO has adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or
the Bunker Convention, to impose strict liability on vessel owners (including the registered owner, bareboat charterer, manager or operator)
for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention requires
registered owners of vessels over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability
under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the LLMC).
With respect to non-ratifying states, liability for spills or releases of petroleum carried as fuel in ship’s bunkers typically
is determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction in which the events or damages occur. Vessels are required to
maintain a certificate attesting that they maintain adequate insurance to cover an incident. P&I Clubs in the International Group
issue the required Bunker Convention’s “Blue Cards” to enable signatory states to issue certificates. All of our vessels
are in possession of a CLC State issued certificate attesting that the required insurance coverage is in force in accordance with the
Bunker Convention. In jurisdictions, such as the U.S. where the CLC or Bunker Convention has not been adopted, various legislative schemes
or common law govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or strict liability.
United States requirements
OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection of the environment from
oil spills and cleanup of oil spills. OPA 90 applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel and lubricants.
OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade or operate within in the U.S., its territories and possessions or whose vessels
operate in U.S. waters, which include the U.S.’s territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone. While we do
not carry oil as cargo, we do carry bunker fuel in our vessels, making them subject to the requirements of OPA 90. The U.S. has also enacted
CERCLA, which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances other than oil, except in limited circumstances, whether on land or at
sea. OPA and CERCLA both define “owner and operator” in the case of a vessel as any person owning, operating or chartering
by demise, the vessel. Both OPA and CERCLA impact our operations.
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and
are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the discharge of pollutants results solely from the act or omission of a third party,
an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges,
of pollutants from their vessels, including bunkers. OPA 90 defines these other damages broadly to include:
|
• |
injury to, destruction or loss of, or loss of use of, natural resources and related assessment costs; |
|
• |
injury to, or economic losses resulting from, the destruction of real and personal property; |
|
• |
loss of subsistence use of natural resources that are injured, destroyed or lost; |
|
• |
net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and or net profit revenues resulting from injury, destruction or loss of real or personal
property, or natural resources; |
|
• |
lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to injury, destruction or loss of real or personal property or natural resources;
and |
|
• |
net cost of increased or additional public services necessitated by removal activities following a discharge of pollutants, such
as protection from fire, safety or health hazards, and loss of subsistence use of natural resources. |
U.S. Coast Guard regulations limit OPA 90 liability. Effective March 23, 2023, the U.S. Coast Guard adjusted
the limits of OPA liability for a tank vessel, other than a single-hull tank vessel, over 3,000 gross tons liability to the greater of
$2,500 per gross ton or $21,521,000 (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation).These limits of liability do not apply if an incident
was proximately caused by the violation of an applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulation by a responsible party
(or its agent, employee or a person acting pursuant to a contractual relationship), or a responsible party’s gross negligence or
willful misconduct. The limitation on liability similarly does not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to (i) report
the incident as required by law where the responsible party knows or has reason to know of the incident; (ii) reasonably cooperate
and assist as requested in connection with oil removal activities; or (iii) without sufficient cause, comply with an order issued
under the Federal Water Pollution Act (Section 311 (c), (e)) or the Intervention on the High Seas Act.
CERCLA applies to spills or releases of hazardous substances other than petroleum or petroleum products
whether on land or at sea. CERCLA contains a similar liability regime to OPA and imposes joint and several liability, without regard to
fault, on the owner or operator of a vessel, vehicle or facility from which there has been a release, along with other specified parties.
Costs recoverable under CERCLA include cleanup, removal and remediation, as well as damages to injury to, or destruction or loss of, natural
resources, including the reasonable costs associated with assessing the same, health assessments or health effects studies and governmental
oversight costs. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5.0 million for vessels, other than incineration
vessels, carrying any hazardous substances, such as cargo or residue, or the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million for any other
vessel, other than an incineration vessel, per release of or incident involving hazardous substances. These limits of liability do not
apply (rendering the responsible person liable for the total cost of response and damages) if the release or threat of release of a hazardous
substance resulted is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is
unlimited.
OPA 90 and CERCLA each preserves the right to recover damages under other existing laws, including maritime
tort law. OPA 90 also contains statutory caps on liability and damages, which do not apply to direct clean-up costs. All owners and operators
of vessels over 300 gross tons are required to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient
to meet their potential liabilities under OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the U.S. Coast Guard regulations, vessel owners and operators may evidence
their financial responsibility by providing proof of insurance, surety bond, guarantee, letter of credit or self-insurance. An owner or
operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the
vessel in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the self-insurance provisions, the vessel owner
or operator must have a net worth and working capital that exceeds the applicable amount of financial responsibility, measured in assets
located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world. We have received certificates of financial responsibility
from the U.S. Coast Guard for each of the vessels in our fleet that calls U.S. waters.
OPA 90 specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil
pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, provided they accept, at a minimum, the levels of liability established under OPA,
and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. Many U.S. states that border a navigable waterway
have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge
of oil or a release of a hazardous substance. These laws may be more stringent than U.S. federal law. In some cases, states which have
enacted such legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws.
We believe we are currently in compliance with all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.
For each of our vessels, we maintain oil pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1 billion
per vessel per incident. In addition, we carry hull and machinery and P&I insurance to cover the various risks of fire and explosion.
Although our vessels only carry bunker fuel, a spill of oil from one of our vessels could be catastrophic under certain circumstances.
Losses as a result of fire or explosion could also be catastrophic under some conditions. While we believe that our present insurance
coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and if the damages from a catastrophic spill exceeded our insurance coverage, the
payment of those damages could have an adverse effect on our business or the results of our operations.
For additional information about our insurance policies, see “Risk of loss and liability insurance.”
Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004, or CGMTA, amended OPA 90 to require
the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including
bunker fuel, to prepare and submit a response plan for each vessel. These vessel response plans include detailed information on actions
to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate any discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge of oil from the vessel
due to operational activities or casualties. Each of the vessels in our fleet that calls U.S. waters has an approved response plan.
Other United States environmental initiatives
The CWA prohibits the discharge of oil, hazardous substances and ballast water in U.S. navigable waters,
unless authorized by a duly-issued permit or exemption, and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges.
The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under
the more recently enacted OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed above. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, regulates the discharge
of ballast water and other substances under the CWA. EPA regulations require vessels 79 feet in length or longer (other than commercial
fishing vessels) to obtain coverage under a Vessel General Permit, or VGP, authorizing discharges of ballast waters and other wastewaters
incidental to the operation of vessels when operating within the three-mile territorial waters or inland waters of the United States.
The VGP requires vessel owners and operators to comply with a range of best management practices and reporting and other requirements
for a number of incidental discharge types. The EPA regulates these discharges pursuant to VIDA, which was signed into law on December 4,
2018 and replaces the 2013 VGP program (which authorizes discharges incidental to operations of commercial vessels and contains numeric
ballast water discharge limits for most vessels to reduce the risk of invasive species in U.S. waters, stringent requirements for exhaust
gas scrubbers, and requirements for the use of environmentally acceptable lubricants) and current Coast Guard ballast water management
regulations adopted under NISA, such as mid-ocean ballast exchange programs and installation of approved U.S. Coast Guard technology for
all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks bound for U.S. ports or entering U.S. waters. VIDA establishes a new framework for the regulation
of vessel incidental discharges under the CWA, requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those discharges within two years
of enactment, and requires the U.S. Coast Guard to develop implementation, compliance, and enforcement regulations within two years
of EPA’s promulgation of standards. EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking - Vessel Incidental Discharge National Standards
of Performance for public comment on October 26, 2020. The comment period closed on November 25, 2020. A supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking was issued on October 18, 2023. The comment period for this proposal closed on December 18, 2023. Under VIDA,
all provisions of the 2013 VGP and U.S. Coast Guard regulations regarding ballast water treatment remain in force and effect until the
EPA and U.S. Coast Guard regulations are finalized. We have obtained coverage under the current version of the VGP for all of our vessels
that call U.S. waters. We do not believe that any material costs associated with meeting the requirements under the VGP will be material.
Furthermore, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) updated regulations requiring certain vessels to
control pollution when they run auxiliary engines and auxiliary boilers while at berth in California ports. We anticipate this regulation
will be costly, and we may be subjected to heavy fines if we fail to meet these requirements.
Since 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers have pursued multiple rulemakings under different
administrations regarding the scope of the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS), thereby establishing the scope
of federal jurisdiction under the CWA. In January 2023, the U.S. EPA issued a final rule redefining WOTUS that became effective March
1, 2023. The new WOTUS rule would have expanded the definition of what waters would be considered to be a WOTUS. However, in May 2023,
the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Sackett v. EPA that significantly narrowed the definition of WOTUS, specifically as that definition
relates to wetlands under the Clean Water Act. On August 29, 2023, the U.S. EPA re-issued its WOTUS rule, revised in accordance with the
Sackett decision, as a final rule with no public notice and comment. As a result of ongoing litigation, the current implementation of
the definition of WOTUS varies by state.
U.S. Coast Guard regulations adopted under NISA also impose mandatory ballast water management practices
for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks entering or operating in U.S. waters. Amendments to these regulations that became effective
in June 2012 established maximum acceptable discharge limits for various invasive species and/or requirements for active treatment
of ballast water. The U.S. Coast Guard ballast water standards are consistent with requirements under the BWM Convention.
The EPA has adopted standards under the CAA that pertain to emissions of volatile organic compounds and
other air contaminants. Our vessels are subject to vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading,
ballasting, cleaning and conducting other operations in regulated port areas. The CAA also requires states to draft State Implementation
Plans, or SIPs, designed to attain national health-based air quality standards in each state. Although state-specific, SIPs may include
regulations concerning emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations by requiring the installation of vapor control
equipment. If new or more stringent regulations relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by ocean-going vessels
are adopted by the EPA or states, these requirements could require significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of
our operations.
European Union requirements
The European Union has also adopted legislation that (1) requires member states to refuse access to
their ports to certain sub-standard vessels, according to vessel type, flag and number of previous detentions, (2) obliges member
states to inspect at least 25% of foreign vessels using their ports annually and provides for increased surveillance of vessels posing
a high risk to maritime safety or the marine environment, (3) provides the European Union with greater authority and control over
classification societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies and (4) requires
member states to impose criminal sanctions for certain pollution events, such as the unauthorized discharge of tank washings, and including
minor discharges, if committed with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence and the discharges individually or in the aggregate
result in deterioration of the quality of water.
Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 (amending
EU Directive 2009/16/EC) governs the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and,
subject to some exclusions, requires companies with ships over 5,000 gross tonnage to monitor and report carbon dioxide emissions annually,
which may cause us to incur additional expenses.
Furthermore, the EU has implemented regulations requiring vessels to use reduced sulfur content fuel for
their main and auxiliary engines. The EU Directive 2005/33/EC (amending Directive 1999/32/EC) introduced requirements parallel to those
in Annex VI relating to the sulfur content of marine fuels. In addition, the EU imposed a 0.1% maximum sulfur requirement for fuel used
by ships at berth in the Baltic, the North Sea and the English Channel (the so-called Sox-Emission Control Area). As of January 2020,
EU member states must also ensure that ships in all EU waters, except the Sox-Emission Control Area, use fuels with a 0.5% maximum sulfur
content.
In July 2021 the European Commission presented its ‘Fit for 55’ package, which includes, among
others, a legislative proposal to apply the EU emissions Trading System (ETS) on maritime shipping. ETS are market-based “cap and
trade” scheme in which entities trade emissions rights within an area under a cap placed on the quantity of specified pollutants.
We expect to incur additional expenses as a result if and when this proposal becomes effective, and we may not be able to recover or minimize
our additional costs by increasing our fees we collect from our customers.
The European Union’s Emissions Trading System, or ETS, which entered into effect on January 1, 2024,
sets a limit on the total amount of greenhouse gases that we as a shipping company are permitted to emit on route to or from European
Union members’ ports. Such cap is expressed in emission allowances, where one allowance gives the right to emit one ton of carbon
dioxide equivalent. Each year, we will be required to surrender enough allowances to fully account for our emissions, otherwise we will
be subject to heavy fines. The ETS Regulations require us to purchase and surrender allowances equal to a percentage of our emissions
that gradually increases over time, from 40% of reported emissions in 2024 to 100% of reported emissions in 2026. We anticipate we will
be required to purchase allowances from the EU carbon market on an ongoing basis, which will increase our operating costs. We have implemented
a New Emission Factor, or NEF, surcharge, intended to pass on to customers the additional costs associated with compliance with the ETS
Regulations, however there is no assurance that this surcharge will enable us to mitigate the possible increase costs in full or at all.
The IMO 2020 Regulations, the ETS and any future air emissions regulations with which we must comply may cause us to incur substantial
additional operating costs.
Other regional requirements
The environmental protection regimes in certain other countries, such as Canada, resemble those of the
United States. To the extent we operate in the territorial waters of such countries or enter their ports, our vessels would typically
be subject to the requirements and liabilities imposed in such countries. Other regions of the world also have the ability to adopt requirements
or regulations that may impose additional obligations on our vessels and may entail significant expenditures on our part and may increase
the costs of our operations. These requirements, however, would apply to the industry operating in those regions as a whole and would
also affect our competitors.
We are also subject to Israeli regulation regarding, among other things, national security and the mandatory
provision of our fleet, environmental and sea pollution, and the Israeli Shipping Law (Seamen) of 1973, which regulates matters concerning
seamen, and the terms of their eligibility and work procedures.
Greenhouse gas regulation
Currently, emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which entered into force in 2005 and pursuant to which adopting countries
have been required to implement national programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with targets extended through 2020. International
negotiations are continuing with respect to a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, and restrictions on shipping emissions may be included
in any new treaty. The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris resulted in the Paris Agreement, which entered into force
on November 4, 2016 and does not directly limit greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The U.S. initially entered into the agreement,
but in June 2017, the U.S. President announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris Agreement, which withdrawal became effective
on November 4, 2020. On February 19, 2021, the U.S. officially rejoined the Paris Agreement.
International or multinational bodies or individual countries or jurisdictions may adopt climate change
initiatives. For example, in June 2020 the UN's Climate Ambition Alliance (CAA) has launched a global campaign aiming for net zero greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions by 2050, rallying both governments as well as businesses. The U.S. Congress has from time to time considered adopting
legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and almost one-half of the states have already taken legal measures to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions primarily through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission inventories and/or regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade
programs. Most cap-and-trade programs require major sources of emissions, such as electric power plants, and major producers of fuels,
such as refineries and gas processing plants, to acquire or surrender emission allowances that correspond to their annual greenhouse gas
emissions. The number of allowances available for purchase is reduced each year in an effort to achieve the overall greenhouse gas
emission reduction goal. The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, if and to the extent applicable
to us, could increase our operating costs.
At MEPC 70 and MEPC 71, a draft outline of the structure of the initial strategy for developing a comprehensive
IMO strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships was approved. In accordance with this roadmap, in April 2018, nations
at the MEPC 72 adopted an initial strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The initial strategy identifies “levels
of ambition” to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including (1) decreasing the carbon intensity from ships through implementation
of further phases of the Energy Efficiency Design Index for new ships; (2) reducing carbon dioxide emissions per transport work,
as an average across international shipping, by at least 40% by 2030, pursuing efforts towards 70% by 2050, compared to 2008 emission
levels; and (3) reducing the total annual greenhouse emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 while pursuing efforts towards
phasing them out entirely. The initial strategy notes that technological innovation, alternative fuels and/or energy sources for international
shipping will be integral to achieve the overall ambition. At MEPC 80, the 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships
was adopted, which includes an enhanced common ambition to reach net-zero GHG emissions from international shipping by or around, 2050,
a commitment to ensure an uptake of alternative zero and near-zero GHG fuels by 2030 and the adoption of interim targets to reduce the
total annual GHG emissions from international shipping by at least 20% by 2030 and by at least 70% by 2040 compared to 2008. These regulations
could cause us to incur additional substantial expenses. We strive to cut greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050, and we have implemented
various optimization strategies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including long term chartering LNG dual fuel vessels, operating
vessels in “super slow steaming” mode, trim optimization, hull and propeller polishing and sailing route optimization.
The member states of the EU made a unilateral commitment to reduce by 2020 their 1990 levels of greenhouse
gas emissions by 20%. The EU also committed to reduce its emissions by 20% under the Kyoto Protocol’s second period from 2013 to
2020. Starting in January 2018, large ships over 5,000 gross tonnage calling at EU ports are required to collect and publish data
on carbon dioxide emissions and other information. In the U.S., the EPA has adopted regulations under the CAA to limit greenhouse gas
emissions from certain mobile sources, and has issued standards designed to limit greenhouse gas emissions from both new and existing
power plants and other stationary sources.
The EPA or individual U.S. states could enact environmental regulations that would affect our operations.
Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the EU, the U.S. or other countries where we operate,
or any treaty adopted at the international level to succeed the Kyoto Protocol or Paris Agreement that restricts emissions of greenhouse
gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures which we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Even in the absence
of climate control legislation and regulations, our business and operations may be materially affected to the extent that climate change
results in sea level changes and more frequent and intense weather events.
Occupational safety and health regulations
The Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, or MLC, consolidated most of the 70 existing International Labour
Organization maritime labor instruments in a single modern, globally applicable, legal instrument, and became effective on August 20,
2013. The MLC establishes comprehensive minimum requirements for working conditions of seafarers including, conditions of employment,
hours of work and rest, grievance and complaints procedures, accommodations, recreational facilities, food and catering, health protection,
medical care, welfare and social security protection. The MLC also provides a new definition of seafarer that now includes all persons
engaged in work on a vessel in addition to the vessel’s crew. Under the new definition, we may be responsible for proving that customer
and contractor personnel aboard our vessels have contracts of employment that comply with the MLC requirements. We could also be responsible
for salaries and/or benefits of third parties that board one of our vessels. The MLC requires certain vessels that engage in international
trade to maintain a valid Maritime Labour Certificate issued by their flag administration. We have developed and implemented a fleet-wide
action plan to comply with the MLC to the extent applicable to our vessels.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significant impacts on the shipping industry and on seafarers themselves. Travel
restrictions imposed by governments around the world have created significant hurdles to crew changes and repatriation of seafarers, which
has led to a growing humanitarian crisis as well as significant concerns for the safety of seafarers and shipping. IMO has urged its members
states to designate seafarers as key workers, so they can travel between the ships that constitute their workplace, and their countries
of residence. Countries and port implemented strict COVID-19 requirements which affects ships operations and crew changes.
Vessel security regulations
A number of initiatives have been introduced in recent years intended to enhance vessel security.
On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, was signed into law. To implement certain portions
of the MTSA, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations in July 2003 requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard
vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created
a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. This new chapter came into effect in July 2004 and imposes
various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the ISPS Code. Among the various
requirements are:
|
• |
on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
|
• |
on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
|
• |
the development of ship security plans; and |
|
• |
compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt
non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures; provided that such vessels have on board
a valid “International Ship Security Certificate” that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements
and the ISPS Code. We have implemented the various security measures required by the IMO, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and have approved ISPS
certificates and plans certified by the applicable flag state on board all our vessels.
Amendments to the SOLAS Convention Chapter VII apply to vessels transporting dangerous goods and require
those vessels be in compliance with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (“IMDG Code”). Effective January 1,
2018, the IMDG Code includes updates to the provisions for radioactive material, reflecting the latest provisions from the International
Atomic Energy Agency, new marking, packing and classification requirements for dangerous goods, and new mandatory training requirements.
Amendments that took effect on January 1, 2020 also reflect the latest material from the UN Recommendations
on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, including new provisions regarding IMO type 9 tank, new abbreviations for segregations groups, and
special provisions for carriage of lithium batteries and of vehicles powered by flammable liquid or gas.
In November 2001, the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol established the Customs-Trade Partnership Against
Terrorism (C-TPAT), a voluntary supply chain security program, which is focused on improving the security of private companies’
supply chains with respect to terrorism. We have been a member of C-TPAT since 2005.
Competition regulations
We have been, and continue to be, subject to investigations and party to legal proceedings relating to
competition concerns. In recent years, a number of liner shipping companies, including us, have been the subject of antitrust investigations
in the U.S., the EU and other jurisdictions into possible anti-competitive behavior. Furthermore, the spike in freight rates and related
charges during 2020 and 2021 following the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has resulted in increased scrutiny by governments and regulators
around the world, including U.S. President Biden's administration and the FMC in the U.S., and the ministry of transportation in China.
In the U.S., the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA) signed into law in June 2022 requires us and all other carriers to immediately
implement certain requirements in detention and demurrage invoices, which if not included will eliminate any obligation of the charged
party to pay the charge, including certifying that all detention and demurrage invoices are issued in compliance with the FMC’s
Interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage of May 18, 2020. These requirements in detention and demurrage invoices may affect our ability
to effectively collect these fees from our customers, heighten the risk of civil litigation and adversely affect our financial results.
OSRA further mandates a series of rule-making projects by FMC, including: (i) defining prohibited practices by common carriers and other
industry players when assessing detention and demurrage; (ii) defining what is an “unreasonable” refusal of cargo space, as
well as unfair or unjustly discriminatory methods; (iii) defining what is “unreasonable refusal” to deal or negotiate with
respect to vessel space, and (iv) authorizing the FMC to determine “essential terms” that are deemed by FMC necessary to be
included in maritime shipping service. Subsequently, the FMC published in June 2023 a proposed rule that defines when it is unreasonable
for a carrier to deny cargo space accommodations when those are available, and in February 2023 published a final rule that prohibits
the collection of detention and demurrage from U.S. truckers and consignees on import. In addition to the FMC rulemaking projects, other
new legislation initiatives have been introduced in Congress, which, if passed, could further restrict our commercial position vis-à-vis
supply chain providers and customers, create new regulatory (including environmental) requirements, as well as cancel or limit the applicable
U.S. Shipping Act antitrust exemptions. Any new rule issued by the FMC addressing these topics or other legislative-related initiatives
may have an adverse effect on our business and financial results, including on our ability to negotiate commercial terms with our customers
in our favor and our ability to collect our fees in exchange for our services. If we are found to be in violation of the applicable regulation,
we could be subject to various sanctions, including monetary sanctions. Specifically, in September 2022, an FMC complaint was filed against
us claiming we overcharged detention and demurrage fees in violation of the FMC’s interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage of
May 18, 2020, and is currently in discovery stages.
Although we have taken measures to fully comply with antitrust regulatory requirements and have adopted
a comprehensive antitrust compliance plan, which includes, among other, mandatory periodic employee trainings, we may face investigations,
and, if we are found to be in violation of the applicable regulation, we could be subject to criminal, civil and monetary sanctions, as
well as related legal proceedings. See Note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual
Report and Item 3.D “Risk Factors — We are subject to competition and antitrust regulations in the countries where
we operate, have been subject to antitrust investigations by competition authorities in the past and may be subject to antitrust investigations
in the future. Moreover, we rely on applicable competition exemptions for operational agreement with other carriers and the revocation
of these exemptions could negatively affect our business.”
United States
Our operations between the United States and non-U.S. ports are subject to the provisions of the U.S. Shipping
Act of 1984, or the Shipping Act, which is administered by the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). On October 16, 1998, the Ocean
Shipping Reform Act of 1998 was enacted, amending the Shipping Act to promote the growth and development of U.S. exports through certain
reforms in the regulation of ocean transportation. This legislation, in part, repealed the requirement that a common carrier or conference
file tariffs with the FMC, replacing it with a requirement that tariffs be open to public inspection in an electronically available, automated
tariff system. Furthermore, the legislation requires that only the essential terms of service contracts be published and made available
to the public. Our operations involving U.S. ports are subject to FMC oversight under the Shipping Act and FMC regulatory requirements
relating to carrier agreements, tariffs and service contracts, and certain “Prohibited Acts” under Section 10 of the
Shipping Act. Violations of the requirements of the Shipping Act or FMC regulations are subject to civil penalties of up to $14,608 per
non-willful violation and up to $73,045 per willful violation. Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015, these civil penalties are subject to adjustments on an annual basis to reflect inflation.
European Union and United Kingdom
Our operations involving the European Union are subject to EU competition rules, particularly Articles
101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as modified by the Treaty of Amsterdam and Lisbon. Article 101
generally prohibits and declares void any agreement or concerted actions among competitors that adversely affects competition. Article 102
prohibits the abuse of a dominant position held by one or more shipping companies. However, certain joint operation agreements in the
shipping industry such as vessel sharing agreements and slot swap agreements are block exempted from certain prohibitions of Article 101
by Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 and in effect until April 2024 (Consortia
Block Exemption Regulation, or “CBER”). This regulation permits joint operation of services among competitors under certain
conditions, with the exception of price fixing, capacity and sales limitation and allocation of markets and customers, under certain conditions.
During 2022, the European Union launched a legal review of the CBER to decide whether to renew, modify or allow the CBER to lapse. A similar
review was also initiated by the UK competition authority. In October 2023, the EU competition authority, or the DG Competition, announced
its intention not to renew the CBER following its expected expiry in April 2024. Following the expiry of the CBER, operational agreements
remain legally permitted if they fall within the conditions of Article 101 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and are
subject to a self-assessment. A similar decision was taken by the United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) not to
enact a UK block exemption that will replace the CBER following Brexit. Although we currently do not believe the non-renewal of the block
exemptions regulation in the EU and UK will have a material impact on our operations as currently conducted, the non-renewal is expected
to increase legal costs, increase legal uncertainty and delay the implementation of operational cooperation agreements between carriers,
thus potentially limiting our ability to enter into cooperation arrangements with other carriers. In addition, the non-renewal or modification
of the existing CBER may adversely affect the review and renewal processes of similar block exemptions regulations in other jurisdictions,
and may contribute to the shortening of block exemption regulation effective periods in other jurisdictions. See Item 3.D “Risk
Factors – We are subject to competition and antitrust regulations in the countries where we operate, have been subject to antitrust
investigations by competition authorities in the past and may be subject to antitrust investigations in the future. Moreover, we rely
on applicable competition exemptions for operational agreement with other carriers, and the revocation of these exemptions could negatively
affect our business.”
Israel
Our operations in Israel are subject to Israeli competition rules, primarily the Israeli Economic Competition
Law, 1988, or the Israeli Competition Law, and the regulations and guidelines thereunder. Under the Israeli Competition Law certain arrangements,
known as “restrictive arrangements”, such as non- compete and exclusivity clauses, as well as other arrangements that may
be deemed to undermine competition, such as “most-favored-nation” clauses, may create concerns under Israeli competition law
and as such may require specific exemptions or approvals, and in certain cases they may be subject to “block exemptions” which
automatically apply in the relevant circumstances. Our arrangements (agreements) and operations in Israel are reviewed on an ongoing basis
in order to address this concern. Our cooperation with competitors is subject to the Israeli industry wide block exemption with respect
to operational arrangements involving international transportation at sea, issued in 2012. Under this block exemption, sea carriers are
permitted to enter into operational agreements such as VSAs, swap agreements or slot charter agreements, subject to the completion of
a self-assessment confirming the satisfaction of the following conditions: (i) the restraints in the arrangement do not reduce competition
in a considerable share of the market, or do not result in a substantial harm to competition in such market; (ii) the object of the
arrangement is not the reduction or elimination of competition; and (iii) the arrangement does not include any restraints which are
not necessary in order to fulfill its objectives. Although originally recommended by the Israeli Competition Authority to be extended
by an additional five-year period, the block exemption was eventually extended for a shorter period of three years and until October 2025.
The explanatory notes of the Israeli block exemption include that these rules are similar in concept to the CBER. There is no assurance
that the Israeli block exemption will be further extended at all or under similar terms, particularly considering that the European Union
announced its intention not to renew the CBER and the UK CMA announced its decision not to replace the CBER with a similar UK block exemption
(see above – “Competition Regulation – European Union”).
In addition, the Israeli Competition Law sets specific limitations and restraints on entities who are defined
as “monopolies” in Israel (namely entities holding a market share that is greater than 50% or entities with a significant
market power). This matter too is reviewed by us on an ongoing basis and we do not think that our activities in Israel currently fall
within the scope of the definition of a “monopoly”.
Generally, violations of the Israeli Competition Law may result in administrative fines and in severe cases
also in criminal sanctions, all of which may apply to us or to officers and employees involved in such violations. Such violations may
also serve as a basis for class actions and tort claims. In addition, agreements which violate the Israeli Competition Law may be declared
void.
C. |
Organizational structure |
We were formed as a company in the State of Israel on June 7, 1945.
Our subsidiaries are organized under and subject to the laws of various countries. Please see Exhibit 8.1
to this Annual Report on Form 20-F for a listing of our subsidiaries.
D. |
Property, plants and equipment |
We are headquartered in Haifa, Israel and conduct business worldwide. We currently lease approximately
171,500 square feet of office space at 9 Andrei Sakharov Street, Matam, Haifa 3190500, Israel. The lease commenced in 2004 and will expire
in May 2034.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND
PROSPECTS
Overview
We are a global container liner shipping company with leadership positions in niche markets where we believe
we have distinct competitive advantages that allow us to maximize our market position and profitability. Founded in Israel in 1945, we
are one of the oldest shipping liners, with nearly 80 years of experience, providing customers with innovative seaborne transportation
and logistics services with a reputation for industry leading transit times, schedule reliability and service excellence. Moreover, we
continuously seek to maximize operational efficiencies while increasing our profitability and benefitting from a flexible cost structure.
We have also developed a variety of digital tools to better understand our customers’ needs through careful analysis of data, including
business and artificial intelligence.
As of December 31, 2023, we operated a global network of 67 weekly lines, calling at approximately
310 ports delivering cargo to and from more than 90 countries. Our network is enhanced by cooperation agreements with other leading container
liner companies and alliances, allowing us to maintain our independence while optimizing fleet utilization by sharing capacity, expanding
our service offering and benefiting from cost savings. Within our global network we offer tailored services, including land transportation
and logistical services as well as specialized shipping solutions, including the transportation of out-of-gauge cargo, refrigerated cargo
and dangerous and hazardous cargo. Our strong reputation and high-quality service offerings have drawn a loyal and diversified customer
base. We have a highly diverse and global customer base of approximately 32,600 customers (on a non-consolidated basis) using our services,
while, in 2023, our 10 largest customers represented approximately 13% of our freight revenues and our 50 largest customers represented
approximately 28% of our freight revenues.
In the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we carried 3,281 thousand, 3,380 thousand and 3,481
thousand TEUs for our customers worldwide, respectively. Additionally, in the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, our net income
(loss) was $(2,687.9) million, $4,629.0 million and $4,649.1 million, respectively, and our Adjusted EBITDA was $1,049.3 million, $7,541.3
million and $6,597.4 million, respectively.
Our ordinary shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ZIM”
since January 28, 2021.
Factors affecting our results of operations
Our results of operations are affected, among others, by the following factors:
Factors affecting our income from voyages and related services
Market Volatility. The container shipping industry continues to
be characterized in recent years by volatility in freight rates, charter rates and bunker prices, accompanied by significant uncertainties
in the global trade (including the implications of the ongoing military conflicts between Israel and Hamas and Hezbollah and Russia and
Ukraine, the rise of inflation in certain countries, or the continuing trade restrictions between the US and China). Market conditions
impact during 2021 and 2022 was positive, resulting in the Company’s improved results and strengthened capital structure, mainly
driven by increased freight rates. Following the peak levels reached during 2021 and the first quarter of 2022, freight rates have decreased
in most trades throughout the remainder of the year 2022 and during 2023 as a result of reduced demand and increased capacity as well
as the easing of both COVID-19 restrictions and congestion in ports, although some increases were demonstrated in certain trades towards
the end of 2023, related to security concerns raised in the Red Sea.
Volume of cargo carried. The volume of cargo that we carry affects
our income and profitability from voyages and related services and varies significantly between voyages that depart from, or return to,
a port of origin. The vast majority of the containers we carry are either 20- or 40-foot containers. We measure our performance in terms
of the volume of cargo we carry in a certain period in 20-foot equivalent units carried, or TEUs carried. Our management uses TEUs carried
as one of the key parameters to evaluate our performance, used in real-time and take actions, to the extent possible, to improve performance.
Additionally, our management monitors TEUs carried from a longer-term perspective, to deploy the right
capacity to meet expected market demand. Although the volume of cargo that we carry is principally a function of demand for container
shipping services in each of our trade routes, it is also affected by factors such as:
|
• |
our local shipping agencies’ effectiveness in capturing such demand; |
|
• |
our level of customer service, which affects our ability to retain and attract customers; |
|
• |
our ability to effectively deploy capacity to meet such demand; |
|
• |
our operating efficiency; and |
|
• |
our ability to establish and operate existing and new services in markets where there is growing demand. |
The volume of cargo that we carry is also impacted by our participation in strategic alliances (in which
we currently do not participate) and other cooperation agreements. In periods of increased demand and increased volume of cargo, we adjust
capacity by chartering-in additional vessels and containers and/or purchasing additional slots from partners, to the extent feasible.
During these periods, increased competition for additional vessels and containers may increase our costs. We may deploy our capacity through
additional vessels and containers in existing services, through new services that we operate independently or through the exchange of
capacity with vessels operated by other shipping companies or other cooperative agreements. In periods of decreased volumes of cargo,
we may adjust capacity to demand by electing to reduce our fleet size in order to reduce operating expenses mainly by redelivering chartered-in
vessels and not renewing their charters, or by cancelling specific voyages (which are referred to as “blank sailings”). We
may also elect to close existing services within, or exit entirely from, less attractive trades. As a substantial portion of our fleet
is chartered-in we retain a relatively high level of flexibility even though it is less so when it concerns vessels that are long term
chartered.
Freight rates. Freight rates are largely established by the freight
market and we have a limited influence over these rates. We use average freight rate per TEU as one of the key parameters of our performance.
Average freight rate per TEU is calculated as revenues from containerized cargo during a certain period, divided by total TEUs carried
during that period. Container shipping companies have generally experienced volatility in freight rates. Freight rates vary widely as
a result of, among other factors:
|
• |
cyclical demand for container shipping services relative to the supply of vessel and container capacity; |
|
• |
competition in specific trades; |
|
• |
costs of operation (including bunker, terminal and charter costs); |
|
• |
the particular dominant leg on which the cargo is transported; |
|
• |
average vessel size in specific trades; |
|
• |
the origin and destination points selected by the shipper; and |
|
• |
the type of cargo and container type. |
As a result of some of these factors, including cyclical fluctuations in demand and supply, container shipping
companies have experienced volatility in freight rates. For example, the comprehensive Shanghai (Export) Containerized Freight Index (SCFI)
increased from 818 points on April 23, 2020, with the global outbreak of COVID-19, to 5,047 as of December 31, 2021, but as of December
31, 2023, was 1,760. Freight rates have significantly declined in the second half of 2022 and 2023. Furthermore, rates within the charter
market, through which we source most of our capacity, may also fluctuate significantly based upon changes in supply and demand for shipping
services. The severe shortage of vessels available for hire during 2021 and the first half of 2022 has resulted in increased charter rates
and longer charter periods dictated by owners. Since September 2022, charter hire rates have been normalizing, with vessel availability
for hire still low. In addition, according to Alphaliner, global container ship capacity is expected to increase by 9.9% in 2024, with
a vessel order book of 7.1 million TEU, while demand for shipping services is projected to increase only by 2.2%. Therefore, the increase
in ship capacity is expected to be more than the increase in demand for container shipping.
There are certain cargo types that require more expertise; for example, we charge a premium over the base
freight rate for handling specialized cargo, such as refrigerated, liquid, over-dimensional, or hazardous cargo, which require more complex
handling and more costly equipment and are generally subject to greater risk of damage. We believe that our commercial excellence and
customer centric approach across our network of shipping agencies enable us to recognize and attract customers who seek to transport such
specialized types of cargo, which are less commoditized services and more profitable. We intend to focus on growing the specialized cargo
transportation portion of our business, and the portion of reefer cargo out of our total TEU carried grew by approximately 5% during 2023
compared to 2022. We also charge a premium over the base freight rate for global land transportation services we provide. Further, from
time to time we impose surcharges over the base freight rate, in part to minimize our exposure to certain market-related risks, such as
fuel price adjustments, increased insurance premiums in war zones, exchange rate fluctuations, terminal handling charges and extraordinary
events, although usually these surcharges are not sufficient to recover all of our costs. Amounts received related to these adjustment
surcharges are allocated to freight revenues.
Factors affecting our operating expenses and costs of services
Cargo handling expenses. Cargo handling expenses represent the
most significant portion of our operating expenses. Cargo handling expenses primarily include variable expenses relating to a single container,
such as stevedoring and other terminal expenses, feeder services, storage costs, balancing expenses arising from repositioning containers
with unutilized capacity on the counter-dominant leg, and expenses arising from inland transport of cargo.
Stevedoring expenses comprise the most significant component of cargo handling expenses. We contract stevedoring
services from third parties in every port at which we call. We generally engage these services on a port-by-port basis, although, where
possible, we seek to negotiate volume-based discounts or to enter into long-term contracts as a means of obtaining discounted rates. However,
for example, changes in labor costs at the ports where our vessels call or certain more expensive shifts during which our vessels call
may increase the cost of stevedoring services and in turn may lead to an increase in cargo handling expenses.
For each service we operate, we measure the utilization of a vessel on the dominant leg, as well as on
the counter-dominant leg by dividing the number of TEUs carried on a vessel by that vessel’s capacity. For example, some of our
major trade routes, such as the Pacific and Cross Suez routes, are marked by significant trade imbalances, as the majority of goods are
shipped from Asia for consumption in Europe and North America. We manage the container repositioning costs that arise from the imbalance
between the volume of cargo carried in each direction using various methods, such as triangulating our land transportation activities
and services. If we are unable to successfully match requirements for container capacity with available capacity in nearby locations,
we may incur balancing costs to reposition our containers in other areas where there is demand for capacity. Cargo handling accounted
for 43.0%, 41.6% and 48.1% of our operating expenses and cost of services for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Bunker expenses. Bunker expenses, mainly comprised of fuel and
marine LNG consumption, represent a significant portion of our operating expenses. As a result, changes in the price of bunker or in our
bunker consumption patterns can have a significant effect on our results of operations. Bunker price has historically been volatile, can
fluctuate significantly and is subject to many economic and political factors that are beyond our control. Bunker prices have decreased
in 2023, following their increase in 2022, partially due to the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. .In an effort to reduce
our bunker expenses, we have employed new procurement processes and tools aimed at reducing the prices at which we purchase our bunker
from our suppliers. We also seek to control our costs by imposing surcharges over the base freight rate to minimize our exposure to changes
in bunker costs, reviewing bunker prices in different markets and purchasing fuel for our vessels when such vessels are visiting bunkering
ports that offer lower bunker price. We have entered into a sale and purchase agreement with Shell to supply LNG for our 15,000 TEU LNG
dual fuel vessels, which have been delivered, and we expect to rely on Shell and other LNG suppliers for the purchase and supply of LNG
for the remaining LNG dual fuel fleet to be delivered. Additionally, we may sometimes manage, part of our exposure to fuel price fluctuations
by entering into hedging arrangements. For more information on the risks of bunker price fluctuations, see Item 3.D “Risk factors
– Risks relating to operating our vessel fleet – Rising energy and bunker prices (including LNG) may have an adverse effect
on our results of operations.” Our bunker consumption is affected by various factors, including the number of vessels being deployed,
vessel size, pro forma speed, vessel efficiency, weight of the cargo being transported and sea state. We have implemented various optimization
strategies designed to reduce bunker consumption, including operating vessels in “super slow steaming” mode, trim optimization,
hull and propeller polishing and sailing route optimization. Our bunker expenses accounted for 28.3%, 30.1% and 18.9% of our operating
expenses and cost of services for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Vessel charter portfolio. Most of our capacity is chartered in.
As of December 31, 2023, we chartered-in 135 vessels, which accounted for 95.0% of our TEU capacity and 93.8% of the vessels in our fleet.
Of such vessels, all are under a “time charter”, including three vessels chartered in from related parties, which consists
of chartering-in the vessel capacity for a given period of time against a daily charter fee with the owner handling the crewing and technical
operation of the vessel. Four of our vessels were chartered-in under a “bareboat charter”, which consists of chartering a
vessel for a given period of time against a charter fee, with us handling the operation of the vessel, but they were re-delivered to their
owners during 2023, so currently none of our vessels are chartered-in under a bareboat charter. Under these arrangements, both parties
are committed for the charter period; however, vessels temporarily unavailable for service due to technical issues will qualify for relief
from charges during such period (off hire). Further to the implementation of IFRS 16 (‘Leases’) on January 1, 2019, vessel
charters with an expected term exceeding one year, are accounted through depreciation and interest expenses. Accordingly, the composition
of our charter fleet in respect of expected term, affects the classification of our costs related to vessel charters. For strategic long
term charter agreements see “Item 4.B – Our vessel fleet – Strategic Chartering Agreements”.
We also purchase “slot charters,” which involve the purchase of slots on board of another shipping
company’s vessel. Generally, these rates are based primarily on demand for capacity as well as the available supply of container
ship capacity. As a result of macroeconomic conditions affecting trade flow between ports served by container shipping companies and economic
conditions in the industries which use container shipping services, bareboat, time and slot charter rates can, and do, fluctuate significantly
and are generally affected by similar factors that influence freight rates. Our results of operations may be affected by the composition
of our general chartered-in vessels portfolio. Slots purchase and charter hire of vessels (other than those recognized as right-of-use-assets)
accounted for 2.0%, 8.4% and 13.6%, of our operating expenses and cost of services for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021,
respectively.
Port expenses (including canal fees). We pay port expenses, which
are surcharges levied by a particular port and are applicable to a vessel and/or the cargo on board of a particular vessel, at each port
of call along our various trade routes. Increases in port expenses increase our operating expenses and, if such increases are not reflected
in the freight rate charged by us to our customers, may decrease our net income, margins and results of operations. We also pay canal
fees, which are the transit fees levied by canals, such as the Panama Canal or the Suez Canal, in connection with a vessel’s passage
and are generally correlated to the size of the vessel transporting the cargo. Larger vessels, notwithstanding their utilization in a
given voyage and capacity of cargo, generally pay higher transit fees. An increase in transit fees, if not reflected in the freight rate
charged by us to our customers, may decrease our net income, margins and results of operations. Our port (including canal) expenses accounted
for 12.9%, 7.5% and 6.5% of our operating expenses and cost of services for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Agents’ salaries and commissions. Our agents’ salaries
and commissions reflect our costs related to agents’ services in connection with certain aspects of our shipping operations. Any
increases in the salaries and commissions paid to agents for their services, would result in the corresponding increases to our operating
expenses and cost of services. Agents’ salaries and commissions totaled $209.5 million, $261.1 million and $238.8 million for the
years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounting for 5.4%, 5.5% and 6.1% of our operating expenses and cost of services
for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
General and administrative expenses. Our general and administrative
expenses include salaries and related expenses, office equipment and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, consulting and legal
fees and travel and vehicle expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $280.7 million, $338.3 million and $267.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, including $185.5 million, $238.8 million and $193.0 million of salaries
and related expenses, respectively.
Personnel expenses, which comprise salaries and related expenses (including incentives) in both operating
expenses and general and administrative expenses, totaled $428.4 million, $489.7 million and $411.3 million for the years ended December
31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Any adverse trends in volumes of trades, freight rates, charter rates and/or bunker prices, as well as
other deteriorating global economic conditions, could negatively affect the entire industry and also affect our business, financial position,
assets value, results of operations and cash flows.
Factors affecting comparability of financial position and results of operations
Seasonality
Our business has historically been seasonal in nature. As a result, our average freight rates have reflected
fluctuations in demand for container shipping services, which affect the volume of cargo carried by our fleet and the freight rates which
we charge for the transport of such cargo. Our income from voyages and related services are typically higher in the third and fourth quarters
than the first and second quarters due to increased shipping of consumer goods from manufacturing centers in Asia to North America in
anticipation of the major holiday period in Western countries. The first quarter is affected by a decrease in consumer spending in Western
countries after the holiday period and reduced manufacturing activities in China and Southeast Asia due to the Chinese New Year.
However, operating expenses such as expenses related to cargo handling, charter hire of vessels, fuel and lubricant expenses and port
expenses are generally not subject to adjustment on a seasonal basis. As a result, seasonality can have an adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Recently, as a result of the continuing volatility within the shipping industry, seasonality factors have
not been as apparent as they have been in the past. As global trends that affect the shipping industry have changed rapidly in recent years,
including trends resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and other geopolitical events, it remains difficult to predict these trends and
the extent to which seasonality will be a factor impacting our results of operations in the future.
Components of our consolidated income statements
Income from voyages and related services
Income from voyages and related services is primarily generated from the transportation of cargo and related
services, including demurrage and value-added services.
Cost of voyages and related services
Cost of voyages and related services is comprised of: (i) operating expenses and costs of services,
which mainly include expenses related to cargo handling, slots purchase and charter hire of vessels, bunker and lubricants, port expenses,
agents’ salaries and commissions, costs of related services and sundry expenses, and (ii) depreciation expenses.
Operating expenses and costs of services
Expenses related to cargo handling. Expenses related to cargo handling
primarily include the cost relating to loading and discharge of containers, transport of empty containers, land transportation and transshipment
of cargo.
Bunker and lubricants. Expenses related to the consumption of bunker
and lubricants primarily consist of the purchase costs of fuel and LNG consumed by the vessels we operate and other oil-based lubricants
required for the operation of our vessels.
Slots purchase and charter hire of vessels. Slot purchases comprise
mainly of the cost of purchases of slots from other shipping companies. Charter hire of vessels mainly consists of charges we pay to vessel
owners for hiring their vessels, excluding those accounted as right-of-use assets (in accordance with IFRS 16). In addition, we charter-in
the majority of our vessels on a time charter basis and, as a result, generally do not incur additional costs for crew provisioning, maintenance,
repair or hull insurance with respect to these vessels.
Port expenses. Port expenses consist of port costs and canal dues.
Port costs consist of charges we pay to ports, on a per-call basis, for a variety of services, including berthing, tug services, sanitary
services and utilities. Canal expenses consist of canal dues we pay to the operators of the Panama and Suez Canals.
Agents’ salaries and commissions. Agents’ salaries
and commissions comprise the cost of the services provided by the shipping agencies, in the form of salaries and commissions paid.
Costs of related services and sundry. Costs of related services
and sundry comprise mainly of expenses of subsidiaries providing shipping-agent services, logistics services, forwarding and customs clearance
services.
Depreciation
Depreciation mainly consists of depreciation of operating assets, primarily vessels and containers. We
depreciate owned vessels and leased vessels (right-of-use assets) expected to be owned by the end of the lease using a straight-line method,
on the basis of their respective estimated useful life, most often estimated at 25 years (for new build), taking into account their residual
scrap value. The remaining leased vessels are depreciated using a straight-line method along the shorter of the lease term and the useful
life of the vessel. Other assets, such as containers, are also depreciated over their estimated useful life (13-15 years for containers)
on a straight-line basis, taking into account their residual value, where applicable.
Other income (expenses), net
Other income (expenses), net ordinarily consists of capital gains and losses, net related to the disposal
of containers and handling equipment, vessels and other assets, as well as certain impairment losses (recoveries).
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist mainly of employee salaries and other employee benefits (including
incentives, pension and related payments) of our administrative personnel, as well as expenses related to office maintenance, computerized
equipment and software (including depreciation and amortization), fees paid in respect of consulting, legal and insurance services,
as well as travel and vehicle expenses.
Share of profits of associates, net of tax
Share of profits of associates, net of tax comprises our share in the net income (loss) of associate companies,
accounted for under the equity method.
Finance expenses, net
Finance income is ordinarily comprised of interest income on funds invested and net foreign currency exchange
rate differences. Finance expenses are ordinarily comprised of interest expenses on lease liabilities, borrowings and other liabilities,
net foreign currency exchange rate differences and impairment losses on trade and other receivables.
Income taxes
Income taxes comprise current and deferred tax expenses related to corporate income and other earnings.
Current tax is the expected taxes payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the
reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their amounts used for taxation purposes,
as well as in respect of carry forward losses, to the extent expected to be utilized.
How we assess the performance of our business
In addition to operational metrics such as TEUs carried and average freight rate per TEU carried and financial
measures determined in accordance with IFRS, we make use of the non-IFRS financial measures Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating
our past results and future prospects.
Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBIT is a non-IFRS financial measure that we define as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude financial
expenses (income), net and income taxes, in order to reach our results from operating activities, or EBIT, and further adjusted to exclude
impairment of assets, non-cash charter hire expenses, capital gains (losses) beyond the ordinary course of business and expenses related
to legal contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure that we define as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude financial
expenses (income), net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization in order to reach EBITDA, and further adjusted to exclude impairments
of assets, non-cash charter hire expenses, capital gains (losses) beyond the ordinary course of business and expenses related to legal
contingencies.
We present Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report because each is a key measure used by
our management and Board of Directors to evaluate our operating performance. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA
provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results and comparing our operating results
between periods on a consistent basis, in the same manner as our management and Board of Directors.
The following is a reconciliation of our net income (loss), the most directly comparable IFRS financial
measure, to Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) TO ADJUSTED EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,687.9 |
) |
|
$ |
4,629.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,649.1 |
|
Financial expenses, net |
|
|
304.5 |
|
|
|
108.5 |
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(127.6 |
) |
|
|
1,398.3 |
|
|
|
1,010.4 |
|
Operating income (EBIT)
|
|
|
(2,511.0 |
) |
|
|
6,135.8 |
|
|
|
5,816.3 |
|
Non-cash charter hire expenses(1)
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Capital loss (gain), beyond the ordinary course of business(2)
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Assets Impairment loss(3)
|
|
|
2,063.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Expenses related to legal contingencies
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
(422.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6,145.4 |
|
|
$ |
5,819.7 |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin(4)
|
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
54.2 |
% |
______________________
(1) |
Mainly related to amortization of deferred charter hire costs, recorded in connection with the 2014 restructuring. |
(2) |
Related to disposal of assets, other than container and equipment (which are disposed on a recurring basis). |
(3) |
For further details, see Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
|
(4) |
Represents Adjusted EBIT divided by Income from voyages and related services. |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) TO ADJUSTED EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,687.9 |
) |
|
$ |
4,629.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,649.1 |
|
Financial expenses, net |
|
|
304.5 |
|
|
|
108.5 |
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(127.6 |
) |
|
|
1,398.3 |
|
|
|
1,010.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,471.8 |
|
|
|
1,396.2 |
|
|
|
779.2 |
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
(1,039.2 |
) |
|
|
7,532.0 |
|
|
|
6,595.5 |
|
Non-cash charter hire expenses |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Capital loss (gain), beyond the ordinary course of business(1)
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Assets Impairment loss(2)
|
|
|
2,063.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Expenses related to legal contingencies
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,049.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,541.3 |
|
|
$ |
6,597.4 |
|
____________________________
(1) |
Related to disposal of assets, other than containers and equipment (which are disposed on a recurring basis). |
(2) |
For further details, see Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
|
Results of operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations in U.S. million dollars and as a percentage
of income from voyages and related services for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Income from voyages and related services |
|
$ |
5,162.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
12,561.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,728.7 |
|
|
|